More likely because there were a bunch of insiders in their with her, who got it, made a fortune and got out, with full knowledge. So ping her and likely that ping will flush out a bunch of others, protected insiders.
Capitalism does the same, it just demands to make a profit in every single step.
Facebook probably will kerb hate speech in five to ten years time, as growing unpopularity forces it to shut down servers. Do you know "I hate you", is in fact not hate speech, now how fucked up is that.
I turned on the privacy setting as soon as I figured out that publisher PR stooges were playing fan bois and attacking people with their history for negative reviews or comments. It was getting pretty annoying back they backed off when they could not force positive reviews and comments and people where often ragging on games more as a result of the negative interactions with publisher trolls, than the game itself. Gamers are becoming a lot more forward critiquing game developers and publishers, especially with regard to sticking it to their products. The negative reviews on steam are often the most informative.
Proof reading would Indicate I give a fuck, rather than just having fun, except for the Puerto Rico bit, which I will repeat https://www.youtube.com/watch?..., Australia Puerto Rico volume 2, just more profitable, fuck off.
Lets not pretend anything is going to happen. The corporations will continue to lie and pay propagandist to serve this quarters profits margins and their bonuses, ie their funding, funding, funding. They don't care how many die, in fact they get a thrill from causing mass deaths, turns them on.
Right now the climate models are hugely underestimating the outcomes, why, because they were climate models and not weather models. The problem is climate models tend to reflect stable change and not the reality of likely extreme weather outcomes. Hence reality is proving far more reactionary than models.
The naysayers, who gives a fuck what you say, too late already, in fact the rich liars who peddle the lies are selling underwater front all over the place, they know the truth, want that beach side penthouse, well, they are getting cheaper and cheaper and harder to sell, the rich know but hey, they still don't give a fuck only the poor will die but now the insurance scams, make the poor pay premiums to underwrite under waterfront to save the rich billions, greed knows no limits.
As long as the walled garden surrounds me I don't give a crap. The current system is corrupt shite. So instead of Tim Cook just saying stuff, how about doing stuff. Like a massively multiplayer online social media web site using avatars with attached varied game zones. A place for people to play, not attack each other. Lets see actions not words, lets see some concrete plans, not empty statements. Want better Tim Cook, do better, you have the tools and you have the knowledge, so put it together.
So where are the sanctions against the UK for criminally interfering in US elections. So accuse Russia, sanction Russia, evidence proves just thirteen Russian trolls, no apologise, no reversal of sanctions and oh look, the UK are the culprits and there are UK government and MI6 fingerprints all over it, so how about sanctions against the UK. Doesn't make any difference, they are going backward fast, the other people's money scam is failing as other people's money is now leaving. Would the US have invaded Iraq with the UK, hmmm, pushing in the background, did the UK suck the USA into a war in Iraq, who led whom there.
Probably needs to be more high tech. You are not trying to 'stop' radiation. You are trying to convert high frequency photons into lower frequency photons ie gamma down to infra red. Likely method involving crystalline structures and electron flows, fancy molecular engineering to force that change, rather than simply intervening mass. Even better if you can convert it into electron energy flows, as high frequency photovoltaic panel ie converting a negative into a positive, heh heh.
Stupid petty irritations like delays in allowing diplomatic staff entry to create difficulties in processing Visas from the US to Russia prior to the world cup for the combinant affect of lax vetting allow insertion of espionage agents and to reduce ticket sales. Russia hacking down to thirteen trolls that the US publicly announced with not extradition treaty instead of the normal gambit of tricking them to a county with extradition treaties and if they is not enough to keep them out and away from a trial, actually ban them from entering the US (those 17 intelligence agencies look like real shite now, oh and by the way, no apology for the sanctions against Russia, oh look, based upon a lie). Be honest Aussies have done more to fuck with the US than Russia, try this on https://www.youtube.com/watch?... (and no, Australia will never become Puerto Rico volume 2, fuck off).
Nobody hacks more than the US, nobody, that's government, corporate and individuals, USA number 1 in all categories. In fact they publicly declared that was their intention, the US will dominate in cyberspace and that includes all the stupid asinine petty shit. This crap, when it is pretty clear geek and nerdsville is not buying into this shit. You brag about criminals now, why not, that is the nature of you Government and you Government agencies, career criminals (public cheating in the Primaries, none of you give a crap, people should be in prison for subverting democracy).
How many of your allies did you murder in Iraq based upon a lie about WMDs, forget the Iraqi's how many of you allies were murdered (by law all deaths associated with a crime are homicide), no apologies, no recompense to the affected families, just a whoops, tee hee, giggle giggle. Why would anyone believe anything coming out of the US, your establishment are inveterate liars (you make the Russian Government look like Angels in comparison. By the way Russia is not an autocracy it is a technocracy, it changed during Putin's reign and as such will become much more popular with technocrats from the West, their kind of 'er' democracy and much preferable to a kakatocracy the US system at the moment, claims of a house cleaning being in force).
Bullshit. They could simply do the ads tied to content with zero invasion of privacy. Why mine you digital identity, to manipulate your choices subconsciously, an extremely corrupt method of advertising. Everyone should not how shite Facebook are by now continue to use them and you deserve to be lied to and maniplute. Use Facebook as a company and well, for me, that's a black mark against you, liars deal with liars, use Facebook to promote products and it is a solid sign you can not be trusted. Shun companies that use Facebook and shun them publicly.
'ER' not datamining like FBI datamining. Why seize Backpage, not so much what they did but their collection of data about what other people did. Even if they can not get the conviction to stick, they can still go on a fishing expedition through Backpage servers and find who did what with whom for direct prosecutions or FBI level extortions or to add to other investigations.
Put simply, Facebook will only accept recognised establishment propagandists, all others will be banned. So the reason for going to Facebook, to escape the recognised establishment propagandists, now an excercise in futility. Not that I am a member, gave it a miss a long time ago, could never understand why people got hooked when it was so visibly manipulative. I guess sheeple will be sheeple. There is a counter, any commercial entity who uses Facebook, avoid them and tell them you avoid them because they serve and promote a propaganda network, Facebook.
Yeah chill out I came across the ad for the FCC what ever that stands for, https://www.youtube.com/watch?..., have fun. Don't laugh too much, that resulted in this https://www.youtube.com/watch?... because some government got a little peeved and sought changes in another country and that was without much exposure. The Aussie viewpoint, always better to try to nip things in the bud even if it is beyond our shores.
Looks like Facebook is to be the whipping boy, that terrorist memo was extremely damaging and really problematic when it comes to laws regarding aiding and abetting terrorism, especially when Facebook generates far more views and ad impression during major terrorism incidents. Looks like a joint multi-nation investigation, where privacy as a wedge into the door for a much deeper investigation.
Reality is social media should be avatar based to take the sting out of it, much too damaging with real personality and ego up to being a punching bag. Sure you can data mine it when real, to manipulate people and society but it is really a bad idea because many can not handle that well. Avatars dealing with real world events is a lot safer, only people's avatars get attacked, rather than the people themselves being attacked.
Back to the terrorism aspect, if it is found that Facebook was purposefully promoting terrorism to drive views, than they should face the real penalties for that, no just a slap on the wrist because they were not actually involved in terror just promoting terror for profit. Under law, the means do not justify the ends, you pay penalties for the means and that means custodial sentences.
You do not understand business at all, nothing about a countries ego, just whether a company in China could benefit as a company, with that partnership. Grow up.
You might think it is a joke, but private person to person messages should never be censored, not in the least, there is no message person to person that should be censored, even public censoring is extremely questionable unless it has been through the courts ie gas the Jews, feed them backed beans, https://www.youtube.com/watch?..., whilst questionable, clearly a joke but would be automatically censored, but would it in any way reasonable (excluding of course killing the new sheriff in town).
It is a valid personal choice that you have zero right to contest in any way. Upon a life balance basis, contributing more to life than you consume from it. Contributing to engineering specifically designed to kill, to rapaciously consume life, just killing it to kill it and diminish your life's worth to induce a completely undesirable negative balance. Your engineering potentially killing millions and placing that negative burden upon your spirit, is a self destructive obscenity and any living being as a inherent right to avoid. It is extremely offensive that you would challenge that. That you would expect others to condemn themselves, to feed their greed by engineering the mass murder of others, to diminish themselves, to one could say, nothing but a silent scream in the dark.
Just stop fucking killing (lets no lie about the war on terror, the US is not fighting it, it is creating it to feed the military industrial complex and facilitate resource theft from all over the world). Certainly do not tempt others into, to damage their spirits, to diminish their existence just because you are going to a dark place, do not try to take others there with you. Your negative burden is your own, the silent scream you already try to drown out with empty and often dark entertainments, noise to hide out your own fears, is your future burden. There is zero guilt in not participating in the murder of others, I would not do engineering to kill, not have a burden that could last well beyond my time to continue to condemn me, nor would I ever in the most ugly fashion imaginable tempt others to.
Do not participate in death industries, nothing good comes of it, don't lie to yourselves. At least some Google employees are good people, I wish them the best in their endeavours for a better humanity.
'ER', no, you panic with patient number 1 if the disease is sufficiently dangerous and virulent. Every dangerous contagion kicks off with patient zero, and that is where you want to get to it and prevent it from spreading. Fortunately with less complex life forms, there is only so much DNA to get around, sure it can resist some or anti-biotics but not all, not enough DNA in any particular bacterial cell to resist them all. It just requires a more complex anti-biotic made up of several anti-biotics. Each with specific attack vectors in relationship to bacterial DNA biases and of course differing side affects for the patient so as to reduce patient impact, whilst creating a more complex attack upon the bacteria, one which can not be effectively selectively resisted. Sure resist one or two or maybe even three at the same time but the fourth gets them, and whilst the dose would be high as long as the antibiotic side affects do not compound, to exacerbate those side affects, everything should work out fine. So less filler and more different antibiotics combined in the one dose, at one time, to exceed limited resistance capabilities of any one cell (not the entire bacterial strain, which could well have resistance too all those anti-biotics but no single bacteria has resistance to all those anti-biotics and so in conjuction the entire strain is eliminated via one vector or another, all delivered at the same time)
You have confused the term record of financial transactions with data collection. A required record of financial transactions to keep the tax people happy and to allow those transaction and keep you happy is sufficient. Once used and no longer necessary deleted. This versus data collection, with no limitations. One acceptable and the other, pretty much looking like it should be banned.
There are two types of gamers, one good and one bad. If you do not make that distinction you are fooling yourself. Gamers who cheat and gamers who do not cheat, guess which gamers you should put in security roles and which you should avoid like the plague. So sure games who don't cheat, who don't play games where you can buy power ups to beat people who do not buy them and gamers who prefer coop to pvp and of course gamers who play I don't know maybe strategy games instead of shooters, or any game that use strategy over shooting everything. That I can agree with, just gamers 'er' absolutely not.
More likely a cynical excercise in marketing, in every other way, they are a pack of corrupt propagandistic deceitful manipulators, oh but they buy a surplus of renewabale energy, it all begins to fell like this https://www.youtube.com/watch?.... Google screaming, love me, love me, whilst perversely trapping you in an abuse relationship. My response https://duckduckgo.com/?q=fuck.... It's not you Google it's me, I just feel the kind of relationship you want, is not one that I can provide, https://www.youtube.com/watch?...;D.
I was just thinking there are a whole bunch of humans I have very little or no desire to talk to. So a chatbot, is it one I want to talk to or is it just empty pointless conversation, talking to talk, hell, I can do that already by talking to myself.
Perhaps M$ are desperate to create a chatbot because pretty much everyone hates them now and they would prefer to never have to talk to their pissed off customers any more and the expected torrent of abuse for invading the customers privacy and force install shit software and crashing people's computers, and well, you get the idea.
Yeah If I ran M$ I would create a chatbot to avoid having to pay people to suffer through all the angry calls. Probably deliver the same levels of service, none.
Slashdot Mirror
More likely because there were a bunch of insiders in their with her, who got it, made a fortune and got out, with full knowledge. So ping her and likely that ping will flush out a bunch of others, protected insiders.
Capitalism does the same, it just demands to make a profit in every single step.
Facebook probably will kerb hate speech in five to ten years time, as growing unpopularity forces it to shut down servers. Do you know "I hate you", is in fact not hate speech, now how fucked up is that.
Facebook absolutely do not listen in via the microphone, they contract that out and then feed in the meta data ;D.
I turned on the privacy setting as soon as I figured out that publisher PR stooges were playing fan bois and attacking people with their history for negative reviews or comments. It was getting pretty annoying back they backed off when they could not force positive reviews and comments and people where often ragging on games more as a result of the negative interactions with publisher trolls, than the game itself. Gamers are becoming a lot more forward critiquing game developers and publishers, especially with regard to sticking it to their products. The negative reviews on steam are often the most informative.
Proof reading would Indicate I give a fuck, rather than just having fun, except for the Puerto Rico bit, which I will repeat https://www.youtube.com/watch?..., Australia Puerto Rico volume 2, just more profitable, fuck off.
Lets not pretend anything is going to happen. The corporations will continue to lie and pay propagandist to serve this quarters profits margins and their bonuses, ie their funding, funding, funding. They don't care how many die, in fact they get a thrill from causing mass deaths, turns them on.
Right now the climate models are hugely underestimating the outcomes, why, because they were climate models and not weather models. The problem is climate models tend to reflect stable change and not the reality of likely extreme weather outcomes. Hence reality is proving far more reactionary than models.
The naysayers, who gives a fuck what you say, too late already, in fact the rich liars who peddle the lies are selling underwater front all over the place, they know the truth, want that beach side penthouse, well, they are getting cheaper and cheaper and harder to sell, the rich know but hey, they still don't give a fuck only the poor will die but now the insurance scams, make the poor pay premiums to underwrite under waterfront to save the rich billions, greed knows no limits.
As long as the walled garden surrounds me I don't give a crap. The current system is corrupt shite. So instead of Tim Cook just saying stuff, how about doing stuff. Like a massively multiplayer online social media web site using avatars with attached varied game zones. A place for people to play, not attack each other. Lets see actions not words, lets see some concrete plans, not empty statements. Want better Tim Cook, do better, you have the tools and you have the knowledge, so put it together.
So where are the sanctions against the UK for criminally interfering in US elections. So accuse Russia, sanction Russia, evidence proves just thirteen Russian trolls, no apologise, no reversal of sanctions and oh look, the UK are the culprits and there are UK government and MI6 fingerprints all over it, so how about sanctions against the UK. Doesn't make any difference, they are going backward fast, the other people's money scam is failing as other people's money is now leaving. Would the US have invaded Iraq with the UK, hmmm, pushing in the background, did the UK suck the USA into a war in Iraq, who led whom there.
Probably needs to be more high tech. You are not trying to 'stop' radiation. You are trying to convert high frequency photons into lower frequency photons ie gamma down to infra red. Likely method involving crystalline structures and electron flows, fancy molecular engineering to force that change, rather than simply intervening mass. Even better if you can convert it into electron energy flows, as high frequency photovoltaic panel ie converting a negative into a positive, heh heh.
Stupid petty irritations like delays in allowing diplomatic staff entry to create difficulties in processing Visas from the US to Russia prior to the world cup for the combinant affect of lax vetting allow insertion of espionage agents and to reduce ticket sales. Russia hacking down to thirteen trolls that the US publicly announced with not extradition treaty instead of the normal gambit of tricking them to a county with extradition treaties and if they is not enough to keep them out and away from a trial, actually ban them from entering the US (those 17 intelligence agencies look like real shite now, oh and by the way, no apology for the sanctions against Russia, oh look, based upon a lie). Be honest Aussies have done more to fuck with the US than Russia, try this on https://www.youtube.com/watch?... (and no, Australia will never become Puerto Rico volume 2, fuck off).
Nobody hacks more than the US, nobody, that's government, corporate and individuals, USA number 1 in all categories. In fact they publicly declared that was their intention, the US will dominate in cyberspace and that includes all the stupid asinine petty shit. This crap, when it is pretty clear geek and nerdsville is not buying into this shit. You brag about criminals now, why not, that is the nature of you Government and you Government agencies, career criminals (public cheating in the Primaries, none of you give a crap, people should be in prison for subverting democracy).
How many of your allies did you murder in Iraq based upon a lie about WMDs, forget the Iraqi's how many of you allies were murdered (by law all deaths associated with a crime are homicide), no apologies, no recompense to the affected families, just a whoops, tee hee, giggle giggle. Why would anyone believe anything coming out of the US, your establishment are inveterate liars (you make the Russian Government look like Angels in comparison. By the way Russia is not an autocracy it is a technocracy, it changed during Putin's reign and as such will become much more popular with technocrats from the West, their kind of 'er' democracy and much preferable to a kakatocracy the US system at the moment, claims of a house cleaning being in force).
Bullshit. They could simply do the ads tied to content with zero invasion of privacy. Why mine you digital identity, to manipulate your choices subconsciously, an extremely corrupt method of advertising. Everyone should not how shite Facebook are by now continue to use them and you deserve to be lied to and maniplute. Use Facebook as a company and well, for me, that's a black mark against you, liars deal with liars, use Facebook to promote products and it is a solid sign you can not be trusted. Shun companies that use Facebook and shun them publicly.
'ER' not datamining like FBI datamining. Why seize Backpage, not so much what they did but their collection of data about what other people did. Even if they can not get the conviction to stick, they can still go on a fishing expedition through Backpage servers and find who did what with whom for direct prosecutions or FBI level extortions or to add to other investigations.
Put simply, Facebook will only accept recognised establishment propagandists, all others will be banned. So the reason for going to Facebook, to escape the recognised establishment propagandists, now an excercise in futility. Not that I am a member, gave it a miss a long time ago, could never understand why people got hooked when it was so visibly manipulative. I guess sheeple will be sheeple. There is a counter, any commercial entity who uses Facebook, avoid them and tell them you avoid them because they serve and promote a propaganda network, Facebook.
Banned from twitter, why would anyone care?!?
Yeah chill out I came across the ad for the FCC what ever that stands for, https://www.youtube.com/watch?..., have fun. Don't laugh too much, that resulted in this https://www.youtube.com/watch?... because some government got a little peeved and sought changes in another country and that was without much exposure. The Aussie viewpoint, always better to try to nip things in the bud even if it is beyond our shores.
Looks like Facebook is to be the whipping boy, that terrorist memo was extremely damaging and really problematic when it comes to laws regarding aiding and abetting terrorism, especially when Facebook generates far more views and ad impression during major terrorism incidents. Looks like a joint multi-nation investigation, where privacy as a wedge into the door for a much deeper investigation.
Reality is social media should be avatar based to take the sting out of it, much too damaging with real personality and ego up to being a punching bag. Sure you can data mine it when real, to manipulate people and society but it is really a bad idea because many can not handle that well. Avatars dealing with real world events is a lot safer, only people's avatars get attacked, rather than the people themselves being attacked.
Back to the terrorism aspect, if it is found that Facebook was purposefully promoting terrorism to drive views, than they should face the real penalties for that, no just a slap on the wrist because they were not actually involved in terror just promoting terror for profit. Under law, the means do not justify the ends, you pay penalties for the means and that means custodial sentences.
You do not understand business at all, nothing about a countries ego, just whether a company in China could benefit as a company, with that partnership. Grow up.
You might think it is a joke, but private person to person messages should never be censored, not in the least, there is no message person to person that should be censored, even public censoring is extremely questionable unless it has been through the courts ie gas the Jews, feed them backed beans, https://www.youtube.com/watch?..., whilst questionable, clearly a joke but would be automatically censored, but would it in any way reasonable (excluding of course killing the new sheriff in town).
It is a valid personal choice that you have zero right to contest in any way. Upon a life balance basis, contributing more to life than you consume from it. Contributing to engineering specifically designed to kill, to rapaciously consume life, just killing it to kill it and diminish your life's worth to induce a completely undesirable negative balance. Your engineering potentially killing millions and placing that negative burden upon your spirit, is a self destructive obscenity and any living being as a inherent right to avoid. It is extremely offensive that you would challenge that. That you would expect others to condemn themselves, to feed their greed by engineering the mass murder of others, to diminish themselves, to one could say, nothing but a silent scream in the dark.
Just stop fucking killing (lets no lie about the war on terror, the US is not fighting it, it is creating it to feed the military industrial complex and facilitate resource theft from all over the world). Certainly do not tempt others into, to damage their spirits, to diminish their existence just because you are going to a dark place, do not try to take others there with you. Your negative burden is your own, the silent scream you already try to drown out with empty and often dark entertainments, noise to hide out your own fears, is your future burden. There is zero guilt in not participating in the murder of others, I would not do engineering to kill, not have a burden that could last well beyond my time to continue to condemn me, nor would I ever in the most ugly fashion imaginable tempt others to.
Do not participate in death industries, nothing good comes of it, don't lie to yourselves. At least some Google employees are good people, I wish them the best in their endeavours for a better humanity.
'ER', no, you panic with patient number 1 if the disease is sufficiently dangerous and virulent. Every dangerous contagion kicks off with patient zero, and that is where you want to get to it and prevent it from spreading. Fortunately with less complex life forms, there is only so much DNA to get around, sure it can resist some or anti-biotics but not all, not enough DNA in any particular bacterial cell to resist them all. It just requires a more complex anti-biotic made up of several anti-biotics. Each with specific attack vectors in relationship to bacterial DNA biases and of course differing side affects for the patient so as to reduce patient impact, whilst creating a more complex attack upon the bacteria, one which can not be effectively selectively resisted. Sure resist one or two or maybe even three at the same time but the fourth gets them, and whilst the dose would be high as long as the antibiotic side affects do not compound, to exacerbate those side affects, everything should work out fine. So less filler and more different antibiotics combined in the one dose, at one time, to exceed limited resistance capabilities of any one cell (not the entire bacterial strain, which could well have resistance too all those anti-biotics but no single bacteria has resistance to all those anti-biotics and so in conjuction the entire strain is eliminated via one vector or another, all delivered at the same time)
You have confused the term record of financial transactions with data collection. A required record of financial transactions to keep the tax people happy and to allow those transaction and keep you happy is sufficient. Once used and no longer necessary deleted. This versus data collection, with no limitations. One acceptable and the other, pretty much looking like it should be banned.
There are two types of gamers, one good and one bad. If you do not make that distinction you are fooling yourself. Gamers who cheat and gamers who do not cheat, guess which gamers you should put in security roles and which you should avoid like the plague. So sure games who don't cheat, who don't play games where you can buy power ups to beat people who do not buy them and gamers who prefer coop to pvp and of course gamers who play I don't know maybe strategy games instead of shooters, or any game that use strategy over shooting everything. That I can agree with, just gamers 'er' absolutely not.
More likely a cynical excercise in marketing, in every other way, they are a pack of corrupt propagandistic deceitful manipulators, oh but they buy a surplus of renewabale energy, it all begins to fell like this https://www.youtube.com/watch?.... Google screaming, love me, love me, whilst perversely trapping you in an abuse relationship. My response https://duckduckgo.com/?q=fuck.... It's not you Google it's me, I just feel the kind of relationship you want, is not one that I can provide, https://www.youtube.com/watch?... ;D.
I was just thinking there are a whole bunch of humans I have very little or no desire to talk to. So a chatbot, is it one I want to talk to or is it just empty pointless conversation, talking to talk, hell, I can do that already by talking to myself.
Perhaps M$ are desperate to create a chatbot because pretty much everyone hates them now and they would prefer to never have to talk to their pissed off customers any more and the expected torrent of abuse for invading the customers privacy and force install shit software and crashing people's computers, and well, you get the idea.
Yeah If I ran M$ I would create a chatbot to avoid having to pay people to suffer through all the angry calls. Probably deliver the same levels of service, none.
So, how much will you be losing when the crypto fantasy dies, hmm?