And if they dont believe? I personally ( as a Christian ) dont think they should be going to Church unless/until they believe.
Note, I make a distinction between accepting assistance from the/a Church and "going" to Church ( I.E. going to church => believing )
I agree with you in the main, but you make no allowance for learning or making mistakes. Once they have decided to decriminalize themselves, what options will they have?
I am sure that there are some churches that act as you describe.
Not all do that. One example, fits right in with your example above, My church had about 20 or so people go down to Tijuana ( we are in San Diego ) to build homes for them. Also, when the hurricanes hit last year, we had people go into the affected areas to provide daycare for the children of the affected families, so they could do what they needed to do. We also take up collections above and beyond what the church needs internally to give to others. We had special collections when the tsunami hit in the pacific, and for a couple of other large scale disasters.
None of this was predicated on being a member of the church.
I am with you on wishing more would practice "do unto others".
Is there a bigger potential for fraud with an electronic machine?
Since you cannot audit the process, the answer seems to be "yes".
There has always been bvote fraud...
True. That does not excuse rectifiable problems with successor systems. From my reading the vendors of these systems there is no effort to close the holes, only "trust us".
With a punch card I get no reciept...
And I dont think you will get a receipt with any new systems either. Only purpose that I know of for printing the vote is so that meaningfull recounts are possible.
I am sorry that you are tired of Diebold getting whipped. Maybe you can convince them not to deserve it.
Any system will have it's problems. That does not mean we should not have a best effort to have as correct and demonstrably correct a system as human minds can put together.
Slashdot Mirror
Unless the actuall eyeball is missing, she can still reach out and touch it.
Just what does "trying to roger the patient" mean?
I think the news part of this is that they
are not annoucing this during one of their
own conferences, but during Novell's.
Kinda like peeing in someone's water hole.
Our most abject apologies, but handbaskets are in short supply,
Please provide $10.00 for your handbasket or proceed without*
* Hell accomodations require us to put you in the next lower
level of hell, if you are unaccompanied by a handbasket.
I just *knew* someone would come along and point that out :-)
just as I clicked submit. I just *knew* it.
Thats "wewease".
And if they dont believe? I personally
( as a Christian ) dont think they should be
going to Church unless/until they believe.
Note, I make a distinction between accepting
assistance from the/a Church and "going" to
Church ( I.E. going to church => believing )
I agree with you in the main, but you make no
allowance for learning or making mistakes. Once
they have decided to decriminalize themselves,
what options will they have?
I am sure that there are some churches that act as you describe.
Not all do that. One example, fits right in with your example above,
My church had about 20 or so people go down to Tijuana ( we are in
San Diego ) to build homes for them. Also, when the hurricanes hit
last year, we had people go into the affected areas to provide
daycare for the children of the affected families, so they could do
what they needed to do. We also take up collections above and beyond
what the church needs internally to give to others. We had special
collections when the tsunami hit in the pacific, and for a couple of
other large scale disasters.
None of this was predicated on being a member of the church.
I am with you on wishing more would practice "do unto others".
One argument for supporting a former criminal that decides to come clean.
If you dont support him/her/it/them, they will have few appealing
choices other than reverting back to criminal behaviours.
And federal/state/prison. What does it matter exactly at which
level it comes from, at least with respect to the taxation situation?
Better get that in Wikipedia quick!
That was no secret.
Yes, the windows boot loader was able to load windows.
Then it was replaced. By GRUB. For whatever reason,
GRUB had a problem.
There is nothing remaining for it to fall back on.
Same as the windows boot loader.
What would that be?
Since you cannot audit the process, the answer seems to be "yes".
True. That does not excuse rectifiable problems with successor systems.
From my reading the vendors of these systems there is no effort to
close the holes, only "trust us".
Well, she is.
She is not so Quik now.
One two many quikies, I guess.
( now if only I had that sig about how school administrators
dont know what causes student pregnancies.... )
I'll be here all week, tip your server.
No, you are a nonymous coward, and you are not his mother.
He had a mother!
But imagine the license fees to Microsoft!
Could this be the exception that proves the rule?
Forgive my ignorance....
How does guidance help analysts manipulate the stock?
Pentium V (r), Fusion Ready (tm)!
I had a compiler for that around here somewhere.
Calculator Performance Unit (CPU)
The only advertising campaign without larceny at it's heart: :-)
"Word of mouth".
No, see, google will now move the US records to China,
safe from the US administration.
Depends on where the parenthesis go, I guess.
I always thought that restrain of trade was
bad, whether it was brought about by a monopoly
or not.
...They prohibit a variety of practices that restrain trade.
And this practice restrains trade.
I dont think the guy you responded to is
completely on base, but he is not completely
off base either.