Slashdot Mirror


Cubicles a Giant Mistake

J to the D writes "Apparently even the designer of the cubicle believes now that they are a bad idea." From the article: "After years of prototyping and studying how people work, and vowing to improve on the open-bullpen office that dominated much of the 20th century, Propst designed a system he thought would increase productivity (hence the name Action Office). The young designer, who also worked on projects as varied as heart pumps and tree harvesters, theorized that productivity would rise if people could see more of their work spread out in front of them, not just stacked in an in-box."

374 comments

  1. Cubicles a Giant Mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Ha-ha, you fool. You fell victim to one of the classic blunders, the most famous of which is "Never get involved in a land war in Asia", but only slightly less well known is this: "Never go in against a nerd, when *first post* is on the line.".
    Hahahahahah.

    [Vizzini falls over dead]

    1. Re:Cubicles a Giant Mistake by 'nother+poster · · Score: 1, Redundant

      That puts vizzini in good company since Propst, the guy who invented cubicles, died in 2000. I guess that make it hard for him to believe anything "now".

  2. Stuff that Matters... by Slipgrid · · Score: 5, Funny

    My cubicles walls help give me more free time to spend on Slashdot... And, that's Stuff that Matters...

    1. Re:Stuff that Matters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      According to your employer's http proxy logs, not for long.

    2. Re:Stuff that Matters... by Slipgrid · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Now, I'm a bit smarter than that. All my surfing is logged on my home computer. My home computer is my proxy. Easy enough to do, though I did study CS for many years. Funny, though, because the system admin wanted me to run a spyware remover on my desktop at work, that I've used for two years now. It came back with only one cookie that it thought was set to last to long. He was stunned. Not bad for all that time here.

    3. Re:Stuff that Matters... by speed_of_light · · Score: 0

      What are you talking about? Slashdotters spend more time on pr0n than /.

    4. Re:Stuff that Matters... by sgt_doom · · Score: 5, Funny

      It still beats being shackled to those damn oars...I hated those Roman overseers....

    5. Re:Stuff that Matters... by know1 · · Score: 1

      hope you passwordprotectde that proxy...

    6. Re:Stuff that Matters... by LilGuy · · Score: 1

      My company runs ethereal servers... and I dont encrypt any traffic or try to circumvent any monitoring. I talk shit about them all the time and chat about nasty things with my friends. I have yet to be scolded. Thought I'm pretty sure they're watching because my boss acts pretty shady around me :D

      Fuck employment anyway, I'm lookin at a real nice bridge with electric heat...

      --

      You're nothing; like me.
    7. Re:Stuff that Matters... by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

      True, and it would probably help if they installed reverse cubicles in movie theaters too.

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    8. Re:Stuff that Matters... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "It still beats being shackled to those damn oars...I hated those Roman overseers...."

      Bloody Romans!!!

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  3. Just Another Tool by tverbeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Like any tool, the fault isn't the tool but the people using it. I've worked in (and helped design) some "cubicles" that were closer to Propst's vision... less a cubicle farm than a garden. They beat working in a doored, fully-walled office, and definitely were better than what used to come before them (rows and columns of desks, one-room-schoolhouse style).

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    1. Re:Just Another Tool by mordors9 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But there is also human nature. Someone hidden behind any sort of wall MAY take the opportunity to goof off. Having said that, the fault then really lies with management. They have to recruit good people, train the people properly, motivate them and reward them for good performance. It doesn't matter if there are cubicles, offices or an open area. We are all adults working together to reach the obejctive.

    2. Re:Just Another Tool by Abcd1234 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They beat working in a doored, fully-walled office

      You must be on crack to believe that. Anyone who works in a job that requires any kind of concentration (software development being the most obvious example) will, given the opportunity, enter a state of "flow" where they are wholly committed to the work they're doing. Many people have likely experienced this: ever start working and then suddenly realize it's already lunch time? Have you had periods where you spend a couple hours deeply focused while getting enormous amounts of work done? That's flow.

      The thing is, getting into this state requires at least 20 minutes to a half an hour, and it can be very easily disturbed by outside distractions, such as noise, conversations, etc. And any break in ones concentration just requires another 20 minutes of recovery time. Consequently, open, cubicle-style workspaces are exactly the *worst* kind of work environment for these kinds of professions. All they do is increase the amount of distraction and make it more difficult for employees to enter a proper state of flow, when they are most productive.

      This would be why I greatly favour offices over any other kind of open concept design, at least for these types of jobs. Does that mean slackers can slack off more easily? Sure. But you'll see greatly increased productivity from the quality employees, as they'll be able to get more work done due to less distraction. And for those slackers, well, the more they slack off, the more obvious it is that they're doing it, giving you the opportunity to cut out the chaff from the wheat.

    3. Re:Just Another Tool by RevMike · · Score: 5, Funny

      Anyone who works in a job that requires any kind of concentration (software development being the most obvious example) will, given the opportunity, enter a state of "flow" where they are wholly committed to the work they're doing. Many people have likely experienced this: ever start working and then suddenly realize it's already lunch time? Have you had periods where you spend a couple hours deeply focused while getting enormous amounts of work done? That's flow.

      The thing is, getting into this state requires at least 20 minutes to a half an hour, and it can be very easily disturbed by outside distractions, such as noise, conversations, etc. And any break in ones concentration just requires another 20 minutes of recovery time. Consequently, open, cubicle-style workspaces are exactly the *worst* kind of work environment for these kinds of professions. All they do is increase the amount of distraction and make it more difficult for employees to enter a proper state of flow, when they are most productive.

      Even in a typical private office, however, there are still distractions. The telephone ringing or your neighbor speaking too loud or any of a million other things can be disturbing.

      A good compromise is to provide flexible space, cubicles for handling the normal day-to-day stuff, team rooms for collaborative work, and small private spaces with no distractions for deep solo concentration.

      Actually, lots of companies provide the third. The room is generally tiled and has a row of tiny offices equipped with porceline chairs.

    4. Re:Just Another Tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When my company moved from an old cube-farm style building to a newer building, they did not change the cube arrangement. In fact they lowered the height of cubes by about 1 1/2 feet. To compensate they implemented a sort of white noise system that's constantly around you giving you a 5-10 yard conversation radius. Its been working pretty well, as you can focus easier on your work while maintaining the sociable aspect management likes. Cubes are not the end of the world, but they can still be greatly improved.

    5. Re:Just Another Tool by jadavis · · Score: 1

      It's interesting that you can use those same ideas to promote the idea of outsourcing computer programming to another country.

      The reasoning behind having a job like that here in the U.S. is so that your collegues can interact more directly with you and more promptly. The theory is that it's easy for requirements to change, or not be specified very well in the first place (often not the fault of management, but just the reality of projects is that it's difficult to specify exactly). So, it turns out that it's often more efficient to constantly change direction slightly to stay on course and meet the needs as they come. If that weren't true, all programming jobs would probably go to other countries.

      That being said, there's a difference between a manager intervening to give you an important update on the big project, and some guy trying to get you to bet on some sport you don't care about, or endlessly rambling with other people 4 feet away from where you're trying to work.

      --
      Social scientists are inspired by theories; scientists are humbled by facts.
    6. Re:Just Another Tool by kov · · Score: 5, Interesting

      At the risk of drawing derision on financial software development, we couldn't possibly do what we do with offices. When the trading desk has a problem with your software system and you're bleeding money, it's battle stations. Much easier to have a big wide open room with everyone right there madly working on the solution. More sources of input, less redundant communication. The benefits of that are too good compared to the benefits of an office -- you just have to learn how to concentrate in the middle of a battlefield, sort of like that guy in the Seven Samurai who makes himself sleep when the time's available (and only when it's available!).

      Course, we don't use cubes either, just a wide open floor with desks.

    7. Re:Just Another Tool by CentraSpike · · Score: 1

      I keep telling my boss I should have my own office - but it aint gonna happen. For now I have some big ass headphones that isolate me pretty well when i'm focusing. Plus there is the added bonus of not being able to hear the phone :)

    8. Re:Just Another Tool by Tim · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Anyone who works in a job that requires any kind of concentration (software development being the most obvious example) will, given the opportunity, enter a state of "flow" where they are wholly committed to the work they're doing.

      Yeah, that's nice in theory. In practice, the people most dedicated to The Flow (tm), are the antisocial, uncooperative nitwits who hole themselves up in their offices for 8+ hours each day, only to turn out piles of un-reviewed, un-documented, poorly-specified crap (whether code or otherwise).

      With no exceptions, the best tech workers I know are balanced, social people who prefer not to hole up in their offices. The best coding environment I ever worked in was a room of 6 developers, separated by bookshelves, with small break-out rooms available for truly private conversations. Of course, you do actually have to like your coworkers for a setup like that to work, but I digress....

      --
      Let's try not to let fact interfere with our speculation here, OK?
    9. Re:Just Another Tool by TrappedByMyself · · Score: 1

      It's interesting that you can use those same ideas to promote the idea of outsourcing computer programming to another country...The reasoning behind having a job like that here in the U.S. is so that your collegues can interact more directly with you and more promptly.

      What on earth does this have to do with oursourcing?
      I have an office. If I need privacy, I can shut the door. Even with the door open, I have enough privacy to get into "the zone". If someone needs to interact with me directly, they can come out of their office and take the 10 steps to my door. Does walking for a few seconds not fall under the category of "promptly"?

      --

      Help me take back Slashdot. When did 'News for Nerds' become 'FUD and Conspiracy Theories for Extremist Nutjobs'?
    10. Re:Just Another Tool by fm6 · · Score: 5, Informative
      That's funny. I work at a company where almost everybody has a private office. And yet lots of people go home to work to get away from the distractions!

      The way to eliminate distractions is not to build walls, but to build awareness of people's needs. People need to be aware of how the noise they make affects others. That's not just important in cube land — somebody with a nasty case of "cell phone shout" can reach through walls!

    11. Re:Just Another Tool by Total_Wimp · · Score: 1

      Like any tool, the fault isn't the tool but the people using it. I've worked in (and helped design) some "cubicles" that were closer to Propst's vision... less a cubicle farm than a garden.

      Actually my employer has both a cubicle farm, and a garden. The cubes aren't so bad most of the time. Concentration was an issue when I was a cube dweller, but it's not much better now that they've moved me to an office. People often forget that offices have phones and doors and coworkers know how to use both. That's not even counting email and IM.

      But the cubes were bearable mostly because of good coworkers. Jokes could be shared as well as knowledge and people generally liked giving each other a hand.

      It isn't always peachy though, and that's where the garden/park comes into play. My workplace is in an office center with about four nice sized buildings surounding a large, well groomed park with two ponds, a stream and lots of benches. When I get frustrated I can slip out for a walk. It's amazingly thereputic, even on a winter day.

      I've worked at a lot of different places and had plenty of time in my own office at most of them. I'd always work in a cube with a garden near the building over having my own office if I had a choice.

      TW

    12. Re:Just Another Tool by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually, lots of companies provide the third. The room is generally tiled and has a row of tiny offices equipped with porceline chairs.

      True. To coin the grandparent poster, I often experience "the flow" when in these private sanctuaries.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    13. Re:Just Another Tool by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's nice in theory. In practice, the people most dedicated to The Flow (tm), are the antisocial, uncooperative nitwits who hole themselves up in their offices for 8+ hours each day, only to turn out piles of un-reviewed, un-documented, poorly-specified crap (whether code or otherwise).

      Well, good to see you aren't prejudiced...

      With no exceptions, the best tech workers I know are balanced, social people who prefer not to hole up in their offices.

      Who said anything about being "[holed] up"? Believe it or not, there are those of us who like socializing with co-workers while still having the opportunity to drop into the zone and get things done (which is, IMHO, the most pleasurable part of my job). In my case, I work in a tech company where we all have offices (actually, they're double-occupancy offices, which is still far better than cubicles), and we socialize a great deal. None of us close our doors unless we're deeply into things, and of course we have other methods of communication, such as IRC. It works great. If you need to concentrate, you can, if you need to have a quick discussion, you have IRC, and if you need to hash things out more thoroughly, you can have face-to-face convos without distracting other people.

    14. Re:Just Another Tool by Usquebaugh · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm just starting to experiment with sensory deprivation at work. I'm using a set of the monitors in glasses and also a set of ear defenders with an old set of mini headphones embedded.

      It's going pretty well and I can pretty much stay in the flow no matter what. Although I do worry about the fire alarms. Next I'm going to try a recliner.

      Ideally I'd like to dump the keyboard and mouse, but I can't think how.

      I'm much better at getting through work, although my wierdness factor is just gone up an order of magnitude.

    15. Re:Just Another Tool by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      My boss said to me earlier today that he has some of his best ideas in the shower. I replied that I have my best ideas in a different spot in the same room.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    16. Re:Just Another Tool by onepoint · · Score: 1

      >>that guy in the Seven Samurai who makes himself sleep when the time's available.

      How true your statement is. The issue is that the character could do that, most people can not. it took me 3 years to learn how to sleep on a moments notice.

      Now do you think anyone could do that? No, now try to focus on your conversation, it's very hard in a rough environment. it's all in the training.

      onepoint

      --
      if you see me, smile and say hello.
    17. Re:Just Another Tool by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I liked cubicles. I really don't care for the jobs that keep me isolated, and cubicles can be designed/chosen with very good sound absorbing properties such that they can be better than a square office that reflects or transmits sound. The system is very flexible such that the problem is usually the design specifications and not the system itself is the problem. The system is modular, with varying heights and varying accoustical treatments. Blaming poor cubicle design on the cubicle system is like blaming poor housing design on the lumber, when it is the idiot that designed or built it that should be blamed.

      I should say that I did work for a couple companies that made office furniture for about three years each, one of them was a small, irrelevant one, the other was Herman Miller.

      My home desk is assembled from a lot of cubicle components, with accoustical paneling, lots of shelves and so on.

    18. Re:Just Another Tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      People that don't understand "The Flow" are nitwits who prefer to spend their time gossiping around the water cooler and talking about their golf handicap. Some of us lock ourselves down and produce very high quality work rather than treating the office like some sort of nightclub. Spend more time working and less time chatting up the girls in HR you jock.

    19. Re:Just Another Tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF? The grandparent didn't mention anything about holing up in his office for 8+ hours...he indicated that sometimes you need a few hours of uninterrupted time to work on a challenging problem

      I've never known a developer who doesn't need this occasionally.

    20. Re:Just Another Tool by karnal · · Score: 5, Funny

      You should move a little to the left. No one likes it when you crap in the sink, fyi.

      --
      Karnal
    21. Re:Just Another Tool by teece · · Score: 1

      If you think any company can afford to give private offices to anybody but it's most important employees, you're deluding yourself.

      There is a lot of griping about cubicles, but they are considerably better than open bull pens, and it's important to realize that *that* is your alternative. Nobody is going to give their code monkeys private offices -- they can't afford to. In that light, cubicles are a good thing.

      --
      -- Hello_World.c: 17 Errors, 31 Warnings
    22. Re:Just Another Tool by TClevenger · · Score: 1
      If someone needs to interact with me directly, they can come out of their office and take the 10 steps to my door. Does walking for a few seconds not fall under the category of "promptly"?

      Especially since the cubicle alternative usually involves said parties having a very loud conversation across the top of my cubicle situated between them.

    23. Re:Just Another Tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I'm using a set of the monitors in glasses and also a set of ear defenders

      What products, exactly? Some of us might be interested in trying this out.

    24. Re:Just Another Tool by Abcd1234 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you think any company can afford to give private offices to anybody but it's most important employees, you're deluding yourself.

      When did I say they could? My point is that offices are better. Period. Whether a company can afford them is a completely different issue. I happen to work for a tech company on a site in a smaller Canadian city where office space is relatively cheap. Consequently, we all have two-person offices (with windows, no less). Is this unusual? Probably. Is it incredibly awesome? Definitely! 'course, it helps that there are management-types in the company who have actually coded, and thus understand the value of a quiet, distraction-free environment.

    25. Re:Just Another Tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      You must be on crack to believe that.

      Funny you should put it that way, because it sounds like your job is your crack. Lock the door, draw the shades, get out the works, and make the world go away for several hours.

      When I need to work without distractions, I don't work at my desk where everyone knows where to find me. I've got another place in the building where I can do that (and no, it's not on the toilet). If that's what your job requires all the time, you don't need an office; you need a box in the basement.

    26. Re:Just Another Tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Many people have likely experienced this: ever start working and then suddenly realize it's already lunch time?

      Only on days I don't show up to the office until around 10:30-10:45. So, yes, lots. Sometimes that half hour passes verrrrry slowly, though.

    27. Re:Just Another Tool by KarateExplosions · · Score: 1

      If you think any company can afford to give private offices to anybody but it's most important employees, you're deluding yourself.

      If you think that the people who occupy those offices are the most important employees, YOU are deluding YOURSELF.

    28. Re:Just Another Tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The latest trend is half height cubicles. My company (an engineering r & d organization) brags to visitors about increased communication due to our "progressive" half height cubicles. I honestly don't see the difference between these and just putting a desk out in the open like a 50's secretary pool. There is Zero privacy, noise carries horribly, and the walls aren't high enough to pin up a calendar, whiteboard, or decorative poster.

      The poor engineers here suffer through any phone call or conversation within 15 yards. This coupled with an anti-music/headphone policy makes concentration nearly impossible. The only people who benefit from this are the "communicators" i.e. managers. Obviously nobody in management here has read any of the prevailing books on intellectual workers vs. production workers, and the theory of flow.

      Executives patting themselves on the back for "increased communication" and money saved by using half height vs. full height cubes don't seem to get the irony. The only reason to have cubical is to provide noise reduction and privacy, something their brilliant idea sacrifices. Hello, nose, face. Not that I'm advocating a return to the 50's / 60's but think about it.

      I miss my 90's full height cubical. But hey the benefits here are good. I suppose in the modern economy its not about loving your job or what you do, but just loving that you have a job period.

    29. Re:Just Another Tool by ltbarcly · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, that isn't 'flow'. It's Attention Deficit Disorder. It's very, very common among computer programmers, as intelligent people with ADD will self select CS because the instant feedback gives an immediate reward for concentration, and therefore they feel more successful at computer work than other endeavors.

      See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperfocus

    30. Re:Just Another Tool by eric76 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I now have two offices. Both are in the same building about 30 feet from each other.

      The larger office is my public office. It used to be a conference room but is now packed with book shelves, a several tables and desks, and a number of computers. Any more, I spend about three fourths of my workday in it.

      The smaller, private office is very quiet. It is well insulated and has no telephone. It has a large comfortable easy chair pushed up to a desk with a couple of computers and a monitor. It also has a CD player and small speakers, but I hardly turn it on. Everyone knows to bother me there only if it is really important.

      I can usually accomplish more software development work in two uninterrupted hours in the private office than I can in 8 hours in the public office.

      All it takes is one or two interruptions in that two hours and my productivity drops to about the same as in the public office.

    31. Re:Just Another Tool by Darby · · Score: 1

      Like any tool, the fault isn't the tool but the people using it.

      But when the people using it are all tools, then you have a real problem.

    32. Re:Just Another Tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      On heavy flow days, I stay home and eat things with lots of salt or chocolate.

    33. Re:Just Another Tool by xiewadu · · Score: 1

      Not everyone who gets into that state of hyperfocus has ADD, though. That is a prognosis that is bandied around quite a bit in the past decade. Hyperfocus is merely one possible symptom of ADD - that in and of itself is nowhere close to being a substitute for an actual diagnosis. Some jobs, especially as detail-oriented and complex as programming and development require a large amount of focus.

    34. Re:Just Another Tool by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Someone hidden behind any sort of wall MAY take the opportunity to goof off.

      It's pretty easy to goof off and look like your're working. You can't actually sleep at your desk, but just about anything else goes.

    35. Re:Just Another Tool by RocketRainbow · · Score: 3, Interesting

      SNAP!!!

      Yes, if you are easily distracted, have trouble getting into a mental/emotional state where you can work and think clearly, and once in "the zone" you are hyperfocused on your goal, then you may have ADD. It might be associated with hyperactivity, or with inattention/phasing out. In my case, it's associated with an astonishingly small amount of mental RAM and extreme sluggishness in the morning before my first dose of (no I don't believe in Xenu) drugs.

      If you're a coffee addict or smoker, and you feel large amounts of these stimulants help you to function normally (and when you try to come off them you just CAN'T), that's more evidence that ADD may be responsible. Ask your doctor for a referral to a (good) psychiatrist!

      By the way, ADD can be successfully managed with a lot less drugs and a lot more yoga, and it has been associated with people like Einstein who clearly had a "nerd personality" but definitely not ASD. So it's not a delinquency/criminal illness and it's not mental retardation and it's DEFINITELY not an excuse for lazy people to get high! (I am a Buddhist and I hate drugs - I won't even take strong herbs without a doctor's orders.) Actually, there's often a genetic cause and usually related to the ASD gene (but with a different expression in brain function).

      Bring on the pink Hello Kitty labcoat for use in all those laser labs where my sparkly things are banned!

      xx
      Rocket

      --
      *#*#*#*#*#******* I love peanut butter sandwiches!
    36. Re:Just Another Tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use a "handicap" stall. It's probably bigger than your cube: their size is governed by law, but your cube is as small as they can make it. If the state puts a prisoner in a cell as small as today's office cube, the ACLU lawyers start talking about "cruel and unusual punishment."

    37. Re:Just Another Tool by RocketRainbow · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Even if a company can't afford pretty offices, there's no reason to put everyone to work in septic flourescent batteries. A few colour-corrected flouros mimics the feel of working next to the window! You could put in a few well-placed indoor plants, and with careful choice of colour (ie NOT prison turquoise) it feels perfectly delightful being at work. The advantage of windows is natural light and fresh air - if you can keep those coming in, it doesn't matter whether you're adjacent to the exterior wall. Colours and foliage simply enhance the feeling of calm/peace.

      --
      *#*#*#*#*#******* I love peanut butter sandwiches!
    38. Re:Just Another Tool by MyIS · · Score: 1

      small private spaces with no distractions for deep solo concentration
      The room is generally tiled and has a row of tiny offices equipped with porceline chairs.

      Er, there definitely are distractions in the washroom; in fact, I'd prefer regular office noises to the bathroom kind.

      --
      http://zero-to-enterprise.blogspot.com/
    39. Re:Just Another Tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No solution is perfect. But REAL offices are better than cubes as the parent poster describes them. I finally quit my job and started my own company. My kitchen table allows me to be left alone and work. The IM being my only distraction is a blessing.

      And for those calling the flow ADD I don't buy it. I meditate as well. Meditation and the flow are very similar - a fugue state. If ADD is fugue state - I want to "suffer" from it.

    40. Re:Just Another Tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn straight. There's a book published by MS press called Rapid Development that gets into this idea in quite a bit of detail, including case studies. Good readin'.

    41. Re:Just Another Tool by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      If I move a little to the left in my bathroom, that would put me in the hallway.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    42. Re:Just Another Tool by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Interesting
      You must be on crack to believe that. Anyone who works in a job that requires any kind of concentration (software development being the most obvious example) will, given the opportunity, enter a state of "flow" where they are wholly committed to the work they're doing.

      The thing is, getting into this state [flow] requires at least 20 minutes to a half an hour, and it can be very easily disturbed by outside distractions, such as noise, conversations, etc. And any break in ones concentration just requires another 20 minutes of recovery time.

      Nope. When I was in the Navy, I could (and still can) enter flow by a simple act of will - and exit and reenter it equally as easily. But then, I worked very hard to gain that ability - because at Battle Stations you really had no other options. (Or even during refit when faced with a thorny troubleshooting problem.) It's a matter of discipline.

      Many young Jedi wannabees claim that absolute privacy and silence is needed because they grew up without being forced to obtain an attention span, preferring instant gratification at need - they grow up to be adults lacking a vital skill.

    43. Re:Just Another Tool by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      Which might very well be worse than crapping in your sink.

        And to think that before I read your post I was pretty sure that wasn't going to be possible.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    44. Re:Just Another Tool by klept · · Score: 1

      You are right.

    45. Re:Just Another Tool by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      So dude, you got me thinking, and I did this test http://www.mental-health-matters.com/articles/arti cle.php?artID=463 and got 13 of the points down. Any more information you could provide me? And yes, I am a computer programmer.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    46. Re:Just Another Tool by aeoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ah, you should open up your mind more.

      I've had from about 1000 friends (not kidding) to almost none. I'm not this or that. I'm not social or anti-social. Sometimes I chat up almost anyone, and other times I want my space. Sometimes I am a party/clown type fool and others times I'm serious. Don't stick me with your idiotic labels just because you didn't have the priviledge to know me for more than 3 years, please.

      Right now I work in a cube. I love talking to others. Right now. I am not obligated to keep loving it. I am not obligated to hate it. And here's the kicker, I still enter the zone! Even in a social situation I can be as focused as anyone in a completely isolated and sound-proof office. AND it doesn't stop me from being able to chat with my cube buddies once in a while, or maybe a lot on some days. Or maybe not at all on others.

      For Pete's sake, just stop stereotyping. The zone, social, anti-social, good, bad, asshole, nice, it's not how you imagine. It's really not. It only seems you got it nailed down. But once you start asking yourself tough questions and start being really observant, you'll see that people are individuals and that many qualities you previously thought to be exclusive are not necessarily exclusive.

      Someone in an office can be very friendly and social. Someone in a cube farm or in a completely open environment can be able to enter the zone. Someone who can enter the zone can be very considerate of others. Someone who is a socialite could be an inconsiderate and narcisistic asshole. And so on. Just because you talk to others a lot and get your code reviewed doesn't mean you write good code. You might be stupid and resistant to change, no matter how much your code gets reviewed. The reviewers might be idiots. It's really, really hard to say. It's very context/situation dependent. And please, I am not trying to know code reviews -- I love open source and I constantly solicit reviews of my own code, even though code review is not even a policy in my workplace.

      In a word, just try to grow an open mind. Please. For all of us! Not just for your own sake.

    47. Re:Just Another Tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The company I used to work for did. We had most people in individual offices and a few shared offices with at most two people in them. All offices had doors that could be closed. It was amazing the productivity that we had and the money we made (as evidenced by the profit share). The company was still very profitable when the VCs pulled the plug because of disagreement between the founders.

    48. Re:Just Another Tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Headphones! IM and Email are still there to bug you even in a nice office. oh yeah and a phone....

    49. Re:Just Another Tool by karmatic · · Score: 1

      Wow - I nailed 19 of them. Ouch.

      What do you get on This One?

      As a sort of "control", I had a couple of my friends take it. They all got "Your results indicate that it is unlikely that you have adult ADD." - it's not like those horoscopes that apply to 99% of people out there.

    50. Re:Just Another Tool by spot35 · · Score: 1

      And at the risk of stating the obvious, that's even more annoying because you can't even understand what's being said because it's more muffled and you get more distracted trying to decipher it.

    51. Re:Just Another Tool by JabrTheHut · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When the trading desk has a problem with your software system and you're bleeding money, it's battle stations.

      There is, unfotunately, no desk system that can compensate for coders who skip the test and UAT stages and move code directly from dev to live, then wonder why it doesn't work...

      --
      Work like no one is watching. Dance like you've never been hurt. Make love like you don't need the money.
    52. Re:Just Another Tool by ltbarcly · · Score: 1

      Find a good psychiatrist who isn't afraid to proscribe ritalin on a trial basis. Then try it for a few weeks and watch your world change. Make an effort do discover the lowest dose which is therapeutic. Try to avoid gradually increasing the dose by taking 'medicine holidays' where you skip it for a week or two.

      According to the psyc I used to go to, if you respond to ritalin with increased focus and no sensation of being 'high' then you are much more likely to have ADD than someone who can get 'high' off of it.

      When I took too much ritalin it turned me into a zombie, things seemed distant and weird, but I never had a pleasurable sensation. Elvis used to use ritalin like cocaine, to get high. It has different effects on different people.

      Adderall also works well, but it isn't for everybody.

      Finally, don't let ritalin turn into Sleep 2.0. When you are taking it you should force yourself to eat and sleep on a normal schedule, since it is a stimulant it will effect your sleep patterns just like coffee.

      Finally, make sure the first proscription you fill is for brand name ritalin, not generic. For some reason people sometimes have a more pronounced effect with the brand name stuff (yes, I know it shouldn't matter).

      Good luck.

    53. Re:Just Another Tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's right everyone. Get on drugs ! They cure everything. Oh, and go to a psychiatrist because there are 1000's graduating with that loser degree every week looking for work. Got to feed the circle.

    54. Re:Just Another Tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone who is a socialite could be an inconsiderate and narcisistic asshole.

      I see that you've met my sister. My sympanthies.

    55. Re:Just Another Tool by bit01 · · Score: 1

      Actually, that isn't 'Attention Deficit Disorder'. It's 'flow', otherwise known as 'concentration' or being 'in the zone' .

      The symptoms of ADD (in adults difficulty with time management, organization, risk-taking, careless behavior, and distractible and impulsive behavior) have absolutely nothing to do with 'flow'. Any job which requires the manipulation of complex abstract mental models over hours of time while performing a task causes 'flow', particularly abstract models with little relationship to the day-to-day.

      Some programmers compensate for their limited ability to create and manipulate a sophisticated mental model of the program by being better at things like documentation and user interface however if you want the code itself to be good you need somebody who can abstract, not just talk. i.e. can juggle complex mental models for hours at a time.

      Incidentally, many psychiatrists suffer from the "when all you've got is a hammer, everything looks like a nail" syndrome. Most human behaviour is ambiguous enough to be considered as mental illness if looked at the right way and ADD and other psychiatric disorders are often mis-applied because of this.

      ---

      Open source software is everything that closed source software is. Plus the source is available.

    56. Re:Just Another Tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you joking? The most common reason I see for people not liking computer programming is that they don't have the patience to stay on one single, unrewarding task before finally "getting it to work" hours later. Computer programming is about the most anti-ADD occupation I can think of.

    57. Re:Just Another Tool by moro_666 · · Score: 1

      i agree, i don't want to see 1 moving thing behind the screen when i write my code. distractions like "seeing the work flow" will only upset you. maybe some people like to see the secretary leaning over the table to get the pencil that she dropped, but this hardly makes your code better.

        ps. lunch is always too soon, also the time to go home.

      --

      I'd tell you the chances of this story being a dupe, but you wouldn't like it.
    58. Re:Just Another Tool by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      somebody with a nasty case of "cell phone shout" can reach through walls!

      You really have to wonder why these people need a phone at all...

    59. Re:Just Another Tool by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      it's more muffled and you get more distracted trying to decipher it.

      But if the guy they're talking too has also a case of "cellphone shout", you get to hear both sides of the conversation ;-)

    60. Re:Just Another Tool by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      So, here there are lots of people who are stuck within a tiny cube because their employer's are too poor or too tight-assed to afford them a full-size office, and you, mister Privileged have the luxury of having two offices! Shame on you!

    61. Re:Just Another Tool by justaguy516 · · Score: 1

      I fixed ADD by signing up for a course in advanced mathematics, which involved 1.5 hour long lectures. When I started out, I couldn't focus on one thing for more than 20 minutes - had to check my email. Now I can study uninterruptedly for 5-6 hours sitting in a cubicle.

    62. Re:Just Another Tool by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

      Right- Concentration is a skill that can be learned by anyone at any age. It is just a muscle to be exercised (or to put it more accurately, a neural pathway that must be reinforced). Daily meditation practice can work wonders with regard to increasing one's attention span. A lot of people get put off by the idea because they think it has to involve religious ideas that conflict with their religion of choice (or lack thereof), but it doesn't. Buddhism practiced by many as more of an exercise than a religion- Buddhist temples are just set up to give people a place to practice and learn, and to pay homage to the Buddha who came up with the practice.

      All you do is spend 20-30+ minutes being absolutely still (although walking meditation is also doable) and focusing on your breath. You don't try to control your breath, just let your body do its own thing. A quiet place helps, but waiting for absolute silence will keep you waiting forever, and any sounds or other distractions are just obstacles to be overcome. Whenever your mind starts to wander, you don't quit, freak out or beat yourself up about it, you just gently guide it back to your breath. After practicing this for a while, your mind will start to wander less and less, and likewise you get distracted less in your normal activities as well.

    63. Re:Just Another Tool by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "ven in a typical private office, however, there are still distractions. The telephone ringing or your neighbor speaking too loud or any of a million other things can be disturbing."

      That's when I just turn the tunes up LOUDER to drown them out....

      Hehehe...pretty much everyone in the office near me wears headphones...because I don't.

      :-)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    64. Re:Just Another Tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me guess -- you're self-diagnosed Asperger's?

    65. Re:Just Another Tool by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Damn...I hit 20 of them head on!! And hell, there were a couple of them I could have 'maybe' chosen...

      Interesting. However, I guess I'll live with it...I could not stand to be on anti-depressants....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    66. Re:Just Another Tool by ltbarcly · · Score: 1

      Yes, your mockery is well placed. Since you are an expert, what should everyone do instead of go to a psychiatrist? I personally know people who's life was changed once they were put on medication. Instead of being frustrated failures who never 'live up to their potential' they are able to concentrate and achieve.

      Psychiatrists aren't a bunch of idiots. There are some bad ones, as well as some good ones, but as a field they are merely trying to do what they think will get people the best outcome. There aren't any crazy conspiracies, because doctors do not see a cut for the medicine they proscribe. If they really wanted to bilk you out of money they would require you to come again and again instead of just occasionally to check progress and get a proscription.

      Besides, fuck you. The fact that you feel the need to insult others and mock people you don't know is a symptom of your disease. Get some friends, it may be hard if you just go ballistic and in their face for every fact about their life you mildly disagree with but which doesn't effect you at all, and you won't feel the need to get crazy and scream for attention.

    67. Re:Just Another Tool by ltbarcly · · Score: 1
      'Flow' is bullshit.

      One way to detect 'bullshit' is when someone is talking about something, and they keep referring to the name of the idea they are talking about. Remember that book that came out recently, called 'the earth is flat' or something to that effect? I picked it up in the bookstore. It was just a bunch of ramblings and facts, but everything in it was supposed to be evidence of the 'flattening of the earth'. The author never tells you what this means, although it seems to be supported by every change the world is going through. 'The earth is flat' in the book is exactly the same as saying 'the Earth is different and it is changing in some ways'.

      'Flow' is a similar concept. I'm not sure what stupid ass thought it up, but you most certainly got it from some book. 'Flow' is just another way of saying 'being smart'. You seem to think that you can get in 'a zone' and that this 'zone' is a state of mind where you can think better. This is just crap. Either you can do it or not, there isn't some magic mojo hocus-pocus which will let you be a better programmer.

      The reason it is bullshit when people refer to the name of an idea over and over while describing it is that they are not really describing it. They are selling it.

      If I told you that 'blue' is the color of the sky, the ocean from the correct distance, and has a wavelength of x meters, you now know a lot about how to decide if something is blue.

      If I told you that 'a pound' is equal to X kilograms on earth, is equal to Y atoms of carbon, is equal to some object which you have access to, that a pound is a measure of weight, etc, you can go out and use this knowledge.

      If I tell you that "the manipulation of complex abstract mental models over hours of time while performing a task causes 'flow'", you still have no idea what it is.

      This is like saying "riding the hood of a car for hours at a time" causes 'smerka". What is smerka? Nobody knows, but we know as much about it as we know about 'flow'.

      Some programmers compensate for their limited ability to create and manipulate a sophisticated mental model of the program by being better at things like documentation and user interface however if you want the code itself to be good you need somebody who can abstract, not just talk. i.e. can juggle complex mental models for hours at a time.


      I've never seen a more ADD ridden sentence in my life. It is almost without punctuation. It should probably be 3 - 5 sentences.

      Most human behaviour is ambiguous enough to be considered as mental illness if looked at the right way and ADD and other psychiatric disorders are often mis-applied because of this.


      Again, super non-punctuation. 'Illness' is not well defined. However, I can tell you this:

      If I am having difficulty concentrating due to the makeup of my brain, and taking medicine allows me to complete tasks I could not otherwise complete, I believe that taking medicine is worthwhile. If you disagree that is fine, but you shouldn't act as though you are some sort of expert when you are not. You have not made a systematic study of psychiatry nor have you made one of ADD, and so your opinion on either of those subjects has as much worth as your opinions on which rare earth metal makes the best coating for nuclear reactor parts, specifically, you are talking out your ass.

      Thanks for sharing.
    68. Re:Just Another Tool by ltbarcly · · Score: 1

      False. Studies have shown what I said to be correct. It is widely accepted.

    69. Re:Just Another Tool by msuzio · · Score: 1

      Amen.

      Yes, I know what "the flow" is. I get into it quite often. I also realize just as often that, guess what? I'm part of a team of people. We regularly shout over the cubicle walls, or prarie-dog to look over into each others cubes to discuss something quickly. When we need to all have a quick discussion, we pop up, walk over to the nearest intersection of cubicle quadrants, and have a "standing meeting".

      I find putting on headphones and listening to music (even low-volume music) is just enough to shut out the world. Others in the team also (duh) respect when I want to be left alone to hack. In a pinch, we do have enclaves I can retreat to and shut the door of, and in that environment I will not be disturbed.

      So... gosh, like most of life, it takes a mix of solutions to get the job done. Imagine that...

    70. Re:Just Another Tool by shambalagoon · · Score: 1

      You arent trying hard enough!

      Just sit slanty in your chair, one hand on the mouse and rest your head on the other, facing the screen. Put some indecipherable code on the screen and drift of into blissful sleep.

      That is, if when people approach, they do so from behind.

    71. Re:Just Another Tool by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      Same result there too. I find this all rather interesting. Frankly, I find it to be cool.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    72. Re:Just Another Tool by aeoo · · Score: 1

      Nah. I don't believe in this kind of stuff. What's a disease and what's not a disease is just a convention. But I don't want to have a long philosophical discussion about it now. Suffice it to say that, no, I don't diagnose myself in that way at all. And I have no plans to turn into a hypochondriac when I'm old either -- but who knows how it will be?

    73. Re:Just Another Tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MSN contacts don't count as friends.

    74. Re:Just Another Tool by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      it took me 3 years to learn how to sleep on a moments notice.

      Self-taught or a particular school's technique?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    75. Re:Just Another Tool by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Nicely done. Software maturity levels (and the maturity of those writing most software) needs to come up about ten-fold.

      Of course, this also assumes that the management can create a viable business model that allows this, both money and time-wise.

      It's coming... someday... well-engineered software...

      Meh.

      Again, well-said: It's a move in the right (attitude) direction.

      Just remember: QA is not a department, it's an attitude.

      --
      +++OK ATH
    76. Re:Just Another Tool by onepoint · · Score: 1

      self taught, but the best thing I can tell you is to learn to focus, like what happens right before you crash, where everything is slow motion. once you can get close to that, then you should be able to take a nap within 10 minutes of thinking of it. it still takes me about 5 minutes to zero out completely.

      --
      if you see me, smile and say hello.
    77. Re:Just Another Tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      False. Studies have shown what I said to be correct. It is widely accepted.

      Yeah? What studies?

      It is widely accepted.

      The hell it is. I've never met an ADD computer geek, and computer geeks have been who I've hung out with all my life. I know it's fashionable on Slashdot to ascribe all kinds of labelled social disorders to nerds, like it makes them feel special or something — Asperger's, ADD, or whatnot — but it's not the reality. If anything, computer geeks are painstakingly obsessed with detail, not easily distracted. So tell me, who "widely accepts" this ridiculous claim of yours? And don't say "the psychological community" without hard proof.
    78. Re:Just Another Tool by ltbarcly · · Score: 1

      Awfully angry there.

      However, just because you don't think your friends have add, it doesn't mean that it is true. Additionally, do you go through all of your friends medicine cabinets, and do they log their doctors appointments with you?

      I would actually go and find the studies, but you can do that as well as I can, I suspect. I'm not going to, because you are not in a position to know what you claim to be true, specifically, you don't know what your friends don't tell you, and people don't brag about their psychiatrist appointments, so you saying that you've never met an ADD computer geek is about as crazy of a claim as you could make.

      And now you've met me, so chalk one up.

    79. Re:Just Another Tool by RocketRainbow · · Score: 1

      That's pretty funny. Many people have their ADD picked up when they start struggling in their undergrad studies after getting all As in high school.

      You must have found a way to "reroute" around your ADD. I've read about a woman who couldn't "understand" her courses but could easily "memorise" them. My method is to sit in the front and output everything that goes in. I take notes like the kids in Brave New World and then I go home and almost write a new textbook on the subject, by the time the semester is finished!

      I worked the helldesk for a while and had no problem at all with the cubicle environment from hell. They were basically semi-cubes arranged by putting the desks in a rectangle, with mini-dividers between so we could work without staring at the other person, and shared by about 4 people. I got to be right next to the aisle, with no divider in front and people wandering up and down all the time, and I was in the cube with the IT support computers which had people coming and going all day. And we were right next to the kitchenette, which had an automatic espresso machine in it. Plus, it was a public service office, so all the badly dressed blokes were always flirting with me by shouting across the room or by email. I used to just sit there and do my work while another member of the team would stick up "please close the door when you're making coffee" signs and grouch at everyone who made any noise. But I NEED stimulation, and I guess my grouchy friend was the opposite.

      But I've had HUGE problems studying!

      --
      *#*#*#*#*#******* I love peanut butter sandwiches!
  4. Now wait just a minute... by PenguinBoyDave · · Score: 5, Funny

    Without cubes, we never would have been given Dilbert, Office Space or User Friendly. Cubes aint all that bad!

    --
    I'm not a troll, but I play one on Slashdot.
    1. Re:Now wait just a minute... by susano_otter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Without cubes, we never would have been given Dilbert, Office Space or User Friendly. Cubes aint all that bad!

      The creators of these works are essentially profiting from helping us to relieve the stress and pain caused by bad work environments and policies.

      Imagine what rewarding and fulfilling work they could do, if society had no need for them to expend their creative energies helping us to relieve the stress of working in cubicles.

      Imagine what more we could all do, if we didn't have to relieve that stress in the first place!

      Dilbert, Office Space, and User Friendly all make the best of a bad situation. I'd rather their creators never had a bad situation to make the best of, in the first place.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    2. Re:Now wait just a minute... by dusik · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Some of the best jokes I know came out of the Soviet Union. Although, most of them aren't even that funny to someone who hasn't had a chance to live in the USSR.

      As Heisenberg said, "There are things that are so serious that you can only joke about them."

      The question is, is the suffering worth it to you?

    3. Re:Now wait just a minute... by Vandilizer · · Score: 1

      "Without cubes, we never would have been given Dilbert, Office Space or User Friendly. Cubes aint all that bad!"

      Yes but is that better then the possibility that we would never had a need for these vent in the first place. For we would have been in a better place...

      Anyway we sill have our bosses and co-workers to complain about. That alone is enough for those cartoons and then some.

    4. Re:Now wait just a minute... by kadathseeker · · Score: 1

      Off topic, but your sig is wrong. It should read "any sufficiently DIS-organized". Just FYI.

      --
      The 'Net is a waste of time, and that's exactly what's right about it. - William Gibson
    5. Re:Now wait just a minute... by AchilleTalon · · Score: 1
      Propst designed a system he thought would increase productivity

      He partly succeeded. Our paper-plane fights are getting a very high participation rate.

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
    6. Re:Now wait just a minute... by G-funk · · Score: 1

      Dilbert, Office Space is good.... but uf? Man I vote time-travel, kill the cube-guy. We won't miss Dilber that much.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    7. Re:Now wait just a minute... by susano_otter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem with bumper-sticker philosophy is that the idea expressed is usually too complex to be clearly communicated by a witty one-liner.

      My sig is actually a dig at libertarianism, which, in a general way, holds that individuals can organize themselves in a community, without the need for "government".

      My take is that the moment you start organizing a community, you end up with a system that performs essentially the same functions, in essentially the same way, as "government".

      I also think that governments are actually incredible examples of organization on a large scale. Perhaps your perception of governments as disorganized comes from mistaking the bureaucratic overhead imposed on a huge, complex organization for disorganization. Or maybe it's that you perceive individual instances of human error (incompetence, corruption, etc.) and mistake them for evidence of system-wide, institutional disorganization. I honestly think that what you perceive as disorganized government is really just the annoying 10% of government that doesn't submit well to any attempt to organize it. The other 90% ends up running pretty smoothly.

      Besides, my sig isn't comparing government to some ideal standard of organization, but rather (by implication) to some ideal standard of disorganization: an anarchic mob, ruled by the strongest, with no attempt made at stability.

      And, finally, just because our government doesn't appear to be particularly well organized (a misperception on our part, I'm sure), that doesn't mean that a well-organized community would be functionally different from a well-organized government.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    8. Re:Now wait just a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd hate that world. Diversity is what everything good and useful in the world has ever come from. The stuff you don't like is part of that diversity, whether you like it or not. Individuals think for themselves, whether you like it or not.

      I just don't understand the logic of thinking about how the people whose actions or words you don't like could do better for "society" (which isn't actually a living, thinking being, but a collection of unique individuals with unique thoughts and values)? How would it make sense to spend time thinking about such a thing, unless individuals do not actually own themselves and their own thoughts, including what is best for themselves? After all, if individuals do own themselves, then there is no answer to the question "how could this person better benefit society". This is because you don't get to decide how that person should live, one inch further than where your body and mind reaches. Nobody has that right by nature, not even governement.

    9. Re:Now wait just a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      Governments, including democratic ones, have caused more death and destruction than all private individuals and groups combined, in the history of the world. Just thought you might like to know that.

    10. Re:Now wait just a minute... by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      That's because once you become powerful enough to cause death and destruction, you stop being "private".

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    11. Re:Now wait just a minute... by kadathseeker · · Score: 1

      Well, I was making a joke along the lines of Firefly's "a government is a body of people, usually notably ungoverned".

      I'm sorry, but in wake of the foul-ups of 9/11 and the handling of Katrina my level of cynicism is a little higher, and jibes are neccessary to keep the govt. more accountable. Also, when was the last time you visited the DMV? THAT is the standard level of govt. efficiency. As bad as corporations are, govts. are worse. But that's just human nature. After all, the only activities that efficiency is critical are the military, police, and schools. Two out of three isn't great (schools suck pretty bad), but about expected.

      You aren't criticizing libertarians. Saying that libertarians are anarchists is a slippery slope argument that is unfounded. They are no more anarchists than a liberal is a communist. They occupy certain ranges of the political spectrum that extends far longer than it is usually used. A conservative isn't a fascist. Extremes of any political ideology approach the next one, and that is when one should be worried.

      You are most likely criticizing anarcho-communalists, or some other very radical group.

      I want a government that does fewer things (less programs, less laws, less control, fewer branches, etc.) but does a better job in those areas by focusing on fewer things. I think taxes should be simplified, but instead of cutting them or spending, I'd rather not waste that money by throwing schools instead of managing the money right (how about paying the teachers more and getting more, getting more books, and not building new football fields and gymnasiums?) and instead put it to NASA or something else that has many side and long-term effects. Fewer laws, better enforcement, stronger punishments.

      What you are saying is simple sociology: people are social creatures. Anyone who thinks that becoming a hermit is returning to the way man was meant to live is wrong, we had tribes for a purpose (and they may have been a superior social organization to civilization in terms of happiness on the memebers and the environment, read Ishmael and Beyond Civilization by Daniel Quinn).

      --
      The 'Net is a waste of time, and that's exactly what's right about it. - William Gibson
    12. Re:Now wait just a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any common street criminal has the ability to murder and destroy property. Is a common street criminal not private? It takes a special "right" to employ coercion as your means to an end, however, to achieve mass murder of innocents on the scale of war. (An offensive army can't be funded voluntarily -- the average individual just isn't violent enough.)

      Criminals don't have that "right". That's why they are criminals. Government, on the other hand, is purely founded on the presumption of that "right". It is, in fact, what fuels everything government does and could possibly do. (If government didn't posess the ability to employ coercion, where would they get their funding, for starters?)

    13. Re:Now wait just a minute... by susano_otter · · Score: 1

      As I thought, you're mistaking bureaucratic overhead for disorganization.

      The DMV is actually pretty well-organized, considering the scope and nature of its responsibilities, and the less-than-perfect quality of human beings, which are the primary components of the DMV system.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    14. Re:Now wait just a minute... by kadathseeker · · Score: 1

      9/11, Katrina, the WMD fiasco, and the failure to capture bin Laden even when the Pakistanis handed him on a silver platter to Clinton are NOT bureaucratic overhead. Schools are not run well either. Some perts of government run pretty smoothly, like the Marines.

      --
      The 'Net is a waste of time, and that's exactly what's right about it. - William Gibson
    15. Re:Now wait just a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, the Soviet Union comes out of JOKES!

    16. Re:Now wait just a minute... by titzandkunt · · Score: 1


      "... Government, on the other hand, is purely founded on the presumption of that "right" [to use force]. It is, in fact, what fuels everything government does and could possibly do. (If government didn't posess the ability to employ coercion, where would they get their funding, for starters?)..."

      IIRC, some wit or other once described taxation as a civilised form of armed robbery.

      I don't mind shelling out my hard-earned for roads, schools, hospitals, defence etc. When it comes to illegal wars and ID cards I start to feel a bit robbed.

      T&K.

      --
      Political language ... is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable...
    17. Re:Now wait just a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like I always say, take away their guns, and I'll agree to everything government wants to do.

    18. Re:Now wait just a minute... by susano_otter · · Score: 1

      That's all irrelevant (and, to be honest, I disagree with your claim that these three events are examples of poor organization; that's a different debate, though).

      I never said government was perfectly organized.

      The gist of my sig is that government is an example of an organized system, and that any community that attempts to organize itself (rather than wallowing in a state of anarchy) will promptly discover that it has created a government.

      Neither the government nor the organized community has to be perfectly organized, in order for this claim to be true.

      I'm talking about relative organization; comparing an organized community to that organized system we refer to as government.

      You're talking about absolute organization; comparing the organized system of government to some ideal organization, and cataloguing it's failures to achieve that ideal. I think that's neat. But it's not really relevant to my point.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    19. Re:Now wait just a minute... by kadathseeker · · Score: 1

      Well, I am agreeing in that for most things, it is pretty well organized, but the failures have been pretty spectacular. To be fair, the successes have been as well. In a relative sense, our government is not any less organized than most other national governments, but we can do with some of improvements. Even though we will never achieve a truly efficient government there is room for improvement and without any pressure to improve, it will not.

      --
      The 'Net is a waste of time, and that's exactly what's right about it. - William Gibson
  5. Cubicles are Cubs Fans ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Cubicles are Cubs Fans who sit in their ice-cold stadium

    1. Re:Cubicles are Cubs Fans ... by absinthminded64 · · Score: 1

      Giant cubicles were a mistake? I want one!

    2. Re:Cubicles are Cubs Fans ... by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      I had a giant cubicle. it was like almost as big as four cubicles. But eventually I had to *share* my cubicle. Isn't that the point of cubicles? you don't have to share them.

      But normally I don't have to share cubicles at places I work. but everytime I've gotten my own office by the time the company started growing I just ended up sharing the office.

      I even worked in a "bullpen" situation. It wasn't too bad, everyone just tried to face the walls so they didn't have to stare at one another all day. (I'm a software/firmware developer)

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    3. Re:Cubicles are Cubs Fans ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No - naturally, that would be "cubsicles"

  6. In other words ... by tomhudson · · Score: 1, Funny

    ... now that he's made as much money as he can off getting people into the box, he's going to try to make more getting them back out of the box.

    Considering his track record, HE should be put in a box.

    1. Re:In other words ... by timster · · Score: 5, Funny

      He IS in a box. RTFA.

      --
      I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
    2. Re:In other words ... by HardCase · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Considering his track record, HE should be put in a box.

      Yeah, and buried so deep...oh...wait...

    3. Re:In other words ... by Vandilizer · · Score: 1

      Don't scare us like that for a second there I miss read it and thought you wanted to RFID tag him.

    4. Re:In other words ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well someone should get him out! oh wait, i get it

    5. Re:In other words ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do we know he's not in an urn ?

    6. Re:In other words ... by iamlucky13 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Dogbert: I plan to enslave the world. I will put everyone in small boxes and make them work there all day.
      Dilbert: That's ridiculous. People would never stand for that. Now get out of my cubicle, I'm trying to get stuff done.
      Dogbert: You mean your box.

  7. How?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How could a solid so platonic be a "giant mistake?"

    1. Re:How?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see what you did there.

  8. cubicles are great for raising livestock by swschrad · · Score: 5, Funny

    tell me you all aren't pumped full of donuts, chained to the desk, allowed to get big and fat, and then sold for slaughter right before the holidays....

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
    1. Re:cubicles are great for raising livestock by anothy · · Score: 1

      dude, you get donuts?

      --

      i speak for myself and those who like what i say.
    2. Re:cubicles are great for raising livestock by Burgundy+Advocate · · Score: 1
      You get doughnuts in your cube? Dude, send me an app!

      --
      Dragging people kicking and screaming into reality since 1996.
    3. Re:cubicles are great for raising livestock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Donuts - Check
      Chained to Desk - Check
      Allowed to get big and fat - Check

      I haven't been sold to slaughter yet, should I be worried about the coming holidays?

  9. I agree completely! by rob_squared · · Score: 4, Funny

    To remedy this, I suggest corner window offices for all office employees.

    --
    I don't get it.
    1. Re:I agree completely! by jtorkbob · · Score: 1

      But please put IT in the middle of the building where there are no windows to burn our eyes. Thank you.

      --
      AC: Only on slashdot... could the sentence "My hovercraft is full of eels." be moderated "+4, Insightful
    2. Re:I agree completely! by infinite9 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      To remedy this, I suggest corner window offices for all office employees.

      I would be far happier in my cube if the walls went floor to ceiling, and there were real sound dampening materials in the walls. I can hold a conversation with the guy on the other side of the wall while speaking in a low voice. And I'm sick and tired of impromptu speaker-phone conference calls in the cube next to me.

      I feel exactly the same way about bathroom stalls.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    3. Re:I agree completely! by Scarletdown · · Score: 1
      To remedy this, I suggest corner window offices for all office employees.


      But how expensive would it be to design and build a skyscraper in the shape of a 20 point star?

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    4. Re:I agree completely! by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      I suggest corner window offices for all office employees.

      Sure. Who says buildings have to be quadrilateral? I'd love to work in a dodecagonal prism.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    5. Re:I agree completely! by StarfishOne · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Please insert your favourite Windows/Microsoft joke here, thank you. :D

    6. Re:I agree completely! by hey! · · Score: 1

      To remedy this, I suggest corner window offices for all office employees.

      Dude -- you've just described MIT's Strata Center.

      I've read the architect envisioned the people in their behaving like baboons -- I guess nerds didn't impress them with their social habits. But baboons even though baboons do spend most of their time in the favorite tree, they still need to come down to the forest floor to socialize.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    7. Re:I agree completely! by StikyPad · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yep.. nothing worse than impromptu conference calls in the bathroom.

      For the love of God, pipe down! I'm tryina take a crap over here..

    8. Re:I agree completely! by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      Just cut vertical shafts through. Put a garden in the hole in the middle. You've doubled your 'window space' (Well, not doubled, but you get the idea).

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    9. Re:I agree completely! by teklob · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't know why nobody pointed this out before, but having Windows in offices definately does not improve productivity. *Ducks*

    10. Re:I agree completely! by bckrispi · · Score: 1

      ^Just keep in mind that if you're loud enough, the entire conference call can know exactly where their "industrious attendee" is. Just wait until he's talking (so you know he's not muted) then:
      *grunt* *fart* *plop* *flush*

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
    11. Re:I agree completely! by Kenshin · · Score: 1

      I hate it when people insist on dialing *every time* using their speakerphone. At full volume, especially.

      --

      Does it make you happy you're so strange?

    12. Re:I agree completely! by karnal · · Score: 1

      Actually, when I started work at %big_co%, I worked for two years in the center of a building that had no windows.

      Annoying after the first year. Downright depressing at the 2nd. After that stint I moved up north a bit and got a cubicle right by the windows.

      Let me tell you, your eyes will adjust, and it is really nice to have something to stare off at when you're frustrated with whatever you're doing.

      I never thought I'd like windows either... turns out, they rock.

      --
      Karnal
    13. Re:I agree completely! by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      That causes a lot of extra ductwork/sprinkler system work.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    14. Re:I agree completely! by Bad-JuJu-Man · · Score: 1

      I work in a cubicle right next to a guy with Tourette's... Sporadically cursing and banging on his keyboard. While it is mildly entertaining (though somewhat frightening) i would give up a lot for an office with a door. Even if i had to share it, just not with him. I hope he doesn't read slashdot... I hope he doesn't own any weapons...

      --
      ""I don't see an obvious biosynthetic pathway from allicin (CH2=CHCH2SS(=O)CH2CH=CH2)to isothiocyanates (R-N=C=S) ""
    15. Re:I agree completely! by zen-theorist · · Score: 1
      I would be far happier in my cube if the walls went floor to ceiling, and there were real sound dampening materials in the walls. I can hold a conversation with the guy on the other side of the wall while speaking in a low voice. And I'm sick and tired of impromptu speaker-phone conference calls in the cube next to me. I feel exactly the same way about bathroom stalls.
      but that would hinder the possible sharing/reuse of TP squares.
    16. Re:I agree completely! by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      Actually, building number 10 at the Microsoft campus in Redmond, Washington has an angular external layout which produces lots of "corner" type offices. There are several other buildings close by with the same type of layout. All of these buildings were collectively occupied, or at least they were the last time I was there, by the Windows OS groups.

    17. Re:I agree completely! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear ya buddy.. right now I'm the next cube across from a coworker who EACH and EVERY work day for the last SIX months has a routine of hacking up phlegm (loudly), sneezing (very loudly) then blowing his running nose (REALLY &@)#*!)@$*ING LOUDLY) that repeats endlessly, every minute or so.. there it goes AGAIN. INCONSIDERATE WEAK IMMUNE SYSTEMED PRICK. I want him dead.

    18. Re:I agree completely! by kevingolding2001 · · Score: 1
      I can hold a conversation with the guy on the other side of the wall while speaking in a low voice

      You're lucky. I used to have to email the guy at the next desk to mine because he couldn't hear me over the general hubbub of the "open plan cubicle hell" that we worked in.

    19. Re:I agree completely! by Nurgled · · Score: 1

      I agree. Is there some good reason why cubicles don't go right to the ceiling?

  10. Easy fix... by Bob+Cat+-+NYMPHS · · Score: 4, Funny

    We just move to icosahedronicles.

  11. What the dead believe by liveinthewire · · Score: 5, Informative
    "even the designer of the cubicle believes now that they are a bad idea."

    Unlikely, since he's been dead for several years.

    1. Re:What the dead believe by mopslik · · Score: 5, Funny

      he's been dead for several years.

      You heard it here first: even brain-eating zombies hate cubicles.

    2. Re:What the dead believe by _xeno_ · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah, he died in 2000, according to this FORTUNE article which was posted in this Slashdot story. From the first paragraph of the article:

      Robert Propst invented nothing so destructive. Yet before he died in 2000, he lamented his unwitting contribution to what he called "monolithic insanity."

      You should read the article. It mentions that he's dead, and it explains (based on accounts by his still-living peers) how his original Action Office devolved into the cubicle.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    3. Re:What the dead believe by wbean · · Score: 1

      Not only that but he didn't invent the cubicle in 1968. I went to work for Honeywell in 1965 and we sure had cubicles. I still have the bakalite nameplate that slid into the slot on the outside. So I guess the article had it wrong at both ends.

    4. Re:What the dead believe by sehryan · · Score: 1

      So the questoin is, why is that statement only now making news, 6 years later? I guess it is a slow news day.

      --
      The world moves for love. It kneels before it in awe.
    5. Re:What the dead believe by AJWM · · Score: 1

      it explains (based on accounts by his still-living peers) how his original Action Office devolved into the cubicle.

      No, I'm pretty sure we can pin that one on Unintelligent Design.

      --
      -- Alastair
    6. Re:What the dead believe by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      I took some time to read the article and take a look at the fancy photo gallery of the cubicles of the last decades. What a sad view, they looked uncomfortable, unorganized and packed even when still empty in the try-to-make-it-nice-looking brochure photos! I never worked in such an environment and hope I never will.

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    7. Re:What the dead believe by _xeno_ · · Score: 1

      It's not news, the stuff at the end of the article explaining how companies are moving away from traditional cubicles is news.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
  12. Oh dear god no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Open plan is even worse, jesus christ I can't bear open plan, oh dear god please don't make me go back to open plan, please!

    1. Re:Oh dear god no by djdavetrouble · · Score: 1

      Open plan is even worse, jesus christ I can't bear open plan, oh dear god please don't make me go back to open plan, please!

      it was all so fake too, at (flashy dead dot.com) it was all open, EXCEPT for the two top guys and the managing director. It was
      all a strategy to spend less money on renovations and more money on cocaine and boat parties anyway. and aerons.

      .
      .

      --
      music lover since 1969
    2. Re:Oh dear god no by Snap+E+Tom · · Score: 1

      I went to an interview last summer at a dot com. I walk in and see two huge dining room tables with workstations setup all around it. Each table had about 8-10 people. The place was eerie stale quiet except for people working.

      About 13 of the first 15 minutes was the guy spouting off about what he's done and the graduate program he just got into. At minute 16, he gets a cell phone call. He scheduled another meeting at the same time. He apologized and said he wanted to schedule a second.

      When the secretary called, I told her no thanks. Between the crappy space and the pompous asshole interviewer, it wasn't a hard decision.

    3. Re:Oh dear god no by mykdavies · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I find open plan by far the best working environment for concentrating: being part of the environment means that I can let it all pass me by without breaking my concentration. If you hear a thud, you can just glance over, see that one of your colleagues has knocked over the water-cooler, and carry on working without breaking the flow. The buzz of background noise means that no noise really stands out - unlike say a library, where the noise of the person shuffling their papers may lead you to want to kill.

      Of course it works the other way as well - if you really needed a break at the point where the water-cooler toppled, what better excuse could you have?

      Perhaps you've never worked in a well-planned open-plan environment? I'm used to offices with sufficient space, lots of noise-absorbent material, and laid out so that you never have more than 10-15 people in direct sight.

      This article is a bit wanky, but makes some interesting points towards the end about the effectiveness of the environment (BA's headquarters at Waterside, a building I've worked at) being dependent on the motivation of the management team. This article is an interesting review of how office layout can affect your team's effectiveness. Both well worth a read.

      Cheers, Mike

      --
      The world has changed and we all have become metal men.
    4. Re:Oh dear god no by zoid.com · · Score: 1

      I agree and dissagree. We have an Open office at the moment and it has worked well but we are now reaching critical mass and it has turned around 180. I like the openness for learning via osmosis but this the openness can quickly becom disruptive. We are now looking at modular furniture.

    5. Re:Oh dear god no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha ha, sounds just like where I (used to) work.
      "The War Room" we called it!

    6. Re:Oh dear god no by Snap+E+Tom · · Score: 1

      hehe. It wasn't near Grand Central Station was it? 'Cause if it was, we gotta talk and you gotta tell me some stories :)

  13. Don't have that problem... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... theorized that productivity would rise if people could see more of their work spread out in front of them ...

    What if your work is in front of you, behind you, on both sides of you, and even hanging above you like a 100-ton anvil? Some cubicles are death traps waiting to happen. Especially if you got a Star Trek nut in a cube.

    1. Re:Don't have that problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you mean Locutus of Borg?

  14. Too little, too late by AusIV · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Unfortunately, stating that it was a bad idea decades after the fact does nothing for the poor beings trapped in these small cages.

    1. Re:Too little, too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, he does at least apologize for his wrong doings faster than the Catholic Church.

    2. Re:Too little, too late by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1
      does nothing for the poor beings trapped in these small cages.
      Hamsters, arise?
  15. Of course they are a bad idea! by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do you have any idea how hard it is to goofy off properly with people walking by?

    It bothers me even when I actually doing work.

    And here comes someone now.....

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  16. From the perspective of a new cube monkey... by MikeRT · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My first real programming job had me working in a lab with a few other students at an internship. We worked in an environment where we could all see what we were doing because of the total lack of privacy. Now that I am a graduate and a cube monkey, what I see is that cubicles offer the worst of both worlds. They give people the illusion of privacy, which is why a lot of people look at porn at work, and it also makes it much more casual to walk in and engage in idle chit chat since you have no door to knock on or authenticate access to.

    Cubicles are, however, a very good way to cheaply maximize space use because you don't have to build the walls, buy the doors and install the windows that are, well, kind of par for the course with having a bonafide office of your own.

    1. Re:From the perspective of a new cube monkey... by symbolic · · Score: 1

      Something just dawned on me - cubes are nothing more than movable partitions with junk that can be attached (like desks, shelves, etc). Walls are nothing more than floor-to-ceiling partitions, if you will. Maybe the next step is to back off from the standard cubicle and go for an office space that has detachable, movable walls. After all, building in doors, walls, etc., is the expense that companies are trying to avoid. It seems to me that it wouldn'd be too difficult to come up with something that might be almost as effective as a walled office, but not nearly as expensive as the "built-in" approach.

    2. Re:From the perspective of a new cube monkey... by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most leased office space is as you describe. Most of the inner walls are more or less temporary. When you agree to sign a multo year lease, they will move walls around for you. That is why many leased office spaces are so crappy. The walls are quickly thrown together dry wall, with doors etc....

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    3. Re:From the perspective of a new cube monkey... by guacamolefoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They give people the illusion of privacy, which is why a lot of people look at porn at work, and it also makes it much more casual to walk in and engage in idle chit chat since you have no door to knock on or authenticate access to.

      I think I see a market opportunity here. I'll hook a spare line from my desk phone to a RADIUS server and maybe some sort of electronic lock. Anyone who wants in my door must call me first on their cell phone and enter their code. I could probably even set times of day for more or less limited access. I could probably even verify by caller ID. A simple phone number pasted to the door would probably be sufficient to instruct visitors. I could link it to our office's remote access server to keep the passwords synched.

      A man can dream, I guess...

    4. Re:From the perspective of a new cube monkey... by Prophet+of+Nixon · · Score: 1

      And they never clean out the sub-cielings... ours are full of several generations of wiring and old repairs and crap.

    5. Re:From the perspective of a new cube monkey... by Amouth · · Score: 2, Funny

      I just picked a corner in the server room.. set up two 8ft folding tables.. used some extra file lockers as a rear wall and moved in..

      everything i need is right here. shure it is a little noisy and cold.. but who cares.. no one really bothers me

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    6. Re:From the perspective of a new cube monkey... by AlterTick · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Something just dawned on me - cubes are nothing more than movable partitions with junk that can be attached (like desks, shelves, etc). Walls are nothing more than floor-to-ceiling partitions, if you will. Maybe the next step is to back off from the standard cubicle and go for an office space that has detachable, movable walls. After all, building in doors, walls, etc., is the expense that companies are trying to avoid. It seems to me that it wouldn'd be too difficult to come up with something that might be almost as effective as a walled office, but not nearly as expensive as the "built-in" approach.

      Actually, pre-fab walls are old news. Problem is, there's a very distinct line one crosses when one goes from cubicle-style construction (which is basically classified as "furniture"), to full walls that either touch the ceiling or have their own ceiling, or have doors, or aren't "freestanding" (local building code varies). At that point it essentially becomes real construction, whether they're pre-fab panels or drywall n' stud. They then require building permits, inspections, licensed contractors, and have to comply for fire code, and health and safety regs, etc. That gets to be big, big money.

      --
      Conclusion: the Empire squashes the Federation like a bug. Accept it.
    7. Re:From the perspective of a new cube monkey... by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1
      It seems to me that it wouldn'd be too difficult to come up with something that might be almost as effective as a walled office, but not nearly as expensive as the "built-in" approach.
      Most offices I've worked in are like that: basically a huge open space with a few semi-permanent but movable walls in them.

      The idea doesn't work if you want to give everyone their own office anyway, not without renting a lot more floorspace. Cubes can be as small as they are because of the half-height walls, which give them the illusion of roominess. If you had to work in fully enclosed offices of the same size, it would feel like working in the broom closet.

      Still, anything beats open plan offices. I did see a combination of cubes and open-plan at a client office, which was a pretty good work environment. They used half height walls to section off areas for 6 or so people, each with their own free-standing desk (instead of them being pushed together like in a typical open-plan office). The desks all faced outwards in a different direction, and were far enough apart to create the illusion of privacy, yet close enough to be able to easily talk to your team mates.
      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    8. Re:From the perspective of a new cube monkey... by TekPolitik · · Score: 1
      They then require building permits, inspections, licensed contractors, and have to comply for fire code, and health and safety regs, etc. That gets to be big, big money.

      Part of the fire code will be that there needs to be at least one sprinkler in each room, so you have to reroute the sprinklers to make sure each office has one, and may need higher capacity pipes in the roof to ensure that each sprinkler still distributes the regulation amount of water in a fire. You also may need to add more lighting and more air conditioning. Some of these changes may be impossible, and where possible will result in ongoing additional power expense. Alternatively, you could increase the area allocated to each person, but then you have ongoing higher rent expense.

    9. Re:From the perspective of a new cube monkey... by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      Actually, pre-fab walls are old news. Problem is, there's a very distinct line one crosses when one goes from cubicle-style construction (which is basically classified as "furniture")

      On the bright side, when you decide to torch the place and escape to an island resort with your $305,326.13 in cashiers checks you can be sure that the resulting fire will pretty much take care of everything...including your red swingline stapler.

    10. Re:From the perspective of a new cube monkey... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Cubicles are, however, a very good way to cheaply maximize space use because you don't have to build the walls, buy the doors and install the windows that are, well, kind of par for the course with having a bonafide office of your own.

      Have you ever priced cubicles? Walls are cheaper than nice cubicles even if you stuff them with insulation and sound-deadening board, especially if you use steel studs. Plus structured wiring and electrical are much easier to make available every 4' on a real wall.

      Back in '2000 a nice cubicle setup (75 percentile on quality) for 80 people was greater than $300,000.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  17. Not quite true by WindBourne · · Score: 5, Informative

    Some of the other articles speak about that he still likes the cubicles. What he objects to, is small cubicles. When he designed it, they were about the size of a standard office. Now, they are about 1/6 to 1/8 of the size of an office. Big difference.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Not quite true by wildsurf · · Score: 5, Funny

      Now, they are about 1/6 to 1/8 of the size of an office.

      "Counselor, see me in my quarte-- .. er, my sixteenths."

      --
      Weeks of coding saves hours of planning.
  18. My personal opinion... by ErichTheRed · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I tend to agree, although don't forget that cubicles are a huge imporvement over rows and rows of desks with zero privacy whatsoever. Personally, I'd rather have an office, or at least a cubicle-sized space with a door I can close. It's very distracting for some people to hear everyone's phone conversations, music choices, etc. When I work on a problem, I tend to go lock myself in a lab or some other closed space so I can have "alone time" and carefully consider things.

    It wouldn't be hard at all to give current cubicles full-sized walls and doors. I think it would greatly improve productivity. Think of how many times you've had to listen to people talking two feet away from you while you're trying to concentrate.

    One of the main barriers to adoption is the fact that you can't oversee your staff like you can in a cubicle farm or open office. But then again, if you have to constantly watch them, do you really want them as employees? :-)

    1. Re:My personal opinion... by TheSkyIsPurple · · Score: 1

      >But then again, if you have to constantly watch them, do you really want them as employees? :-)

      More importantly, If you have to constantly watch then, does your boss want you as an employee?

    2. Re:My personal opinion... by akgooseman · · Score: 1

      The problem with isolating a cube dweller from everyone else's sounds is that you need a ceiling to do so effectively. The problem with ceilings is then you need ventilation and fire sprinklers to each cube. That's a huge cost and removes any advantage cubicles may have, in particular, being able to rearrange them into a new floor plan.

    3. Re:My personal opinion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget about germs! I can't tell you how many times I've caught a cold by my co-worker in the next cube who insists on coming to work when he is sick!

    4. Re:My personal opinion... by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It wouldn't be hard at all to give current cubicles full-sized walls and doors.

      It's not a technical problem, but it's a logistical nightmare. Any partition that spans from the floor to the ceiling is classified as a wall by most building codes, and would need to be constructed as such, and pass relevant inspections. While the cost for cheap walls might rival the costs of a floor-to-ceiling cubicle, cubicles are defined as furnitre, and may be devalued after only 7 years. Buildings can't be devalued for 40 years. I'm not sure what that means exactly, but I think it has to do with tax write-offs. (It also seems strange that you can devalue a building when real estate almost always increases in value, but that's another matter).

    5. Re:My personal opinion... by demaria · · Score: 1

      Why not make the temporary walls 7.5 feet tall? It'd accomplish the same goal.

    6. Re:My personal opinion... by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Except for that creepy 7'7" guy who keeps peering over the walls.

    7. Re:My personal opinion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      _____
        OO
      -------

    8. Re:My personal opinion... by Artifakt · · Score: 2, Informative

      The word you want is depreciation, not devaluation. Office furniture is usually depreciated with a period of either 5 or 7 years, for example stock shelves are usually figured at 5, file cabinets at 7, and so on. (if memory serves, the lawmakers in the New York legislature that first set up this system in the US (about 1790) actually had a debate where it was argued that shelves handled by the general public depreciate a bit faster than most office furniture since the latter is only being handled by people of the employable classes).
      Buildings and fixed constructions of various types are depreciated over 15 year (seen a lot for fences, baseball park benches and backstops, and such), 27.5 (the period most often required for residential rental property), 29, 39 (usually for non-residential real property) or 40 year periods. For these longer times, the periods that are only a year or two off of others exist mostly because there are some options such as straight line depreciation vrs various curves where more of the total comes off in the first years and less in the later ones, and these have become associated with specific periods.
              Land itself is never depreciated, and generally appreciates instead, which is one reason why real estate almost always increases in value.
              For what it's worth, helicopters depreciate in 5 years, and working horses still under age 12 in 7 years. There's lots of things beside fixtures and buildings that can be depreciated.
              Depreciation does NOT mean the same thing as devaluation. No one is claiming by taking depreciation that any car over 5 years old is somehow totally worthless, for example. The claim is that the worth that remains comes not just from the initial money spent on the car but increasingly from more money spent on maintenance and upkeep. This approach is pretty fair in most cases - how much is a 5 year old car that's never been serviced going to be worth? What shape would a 27.5 year old rental property be in if the landlord didn't do any maintenance, painting, or repairs the whole time?
              In more complex business situations, a lot of depreciation is basically "What's the equivalent of a 14 year old assembly line set-up likely to be worth in terms of potential profit to the business, if a competitor has a 3 year old version, or a brand new one?" (Or, if a potential competitor could rely on you having to stick with the 14 year old stuff for at least 10 more years before you could even consider replacing it, what would that do to your bottom line?).
              One good example of this is a car used for business. The car can be depreciated using a standard curve that also allows taking standard mileage, but if the business does this, they can't claim the maintenance, gas, oil, and so on. Alternately, they can claim the maintenance, parts, and actual fuel and oil costs, but then there's no depreciation or standard mileage at all allowed.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    9. Re:My personal opinion... by Barbarian · · Score: 1

      There seem to be three most common cubicle walls, 4 foot (i.e. no privacy at all), 5.5 feet (you have to make an effort to look over the wall), and 6 foot cubicles. The best are the 6 foot walls.

    10. Re:My personal opinion... by Mof-Tan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have worked in a cubicle environment in the states and now work in an office in Nagoya, Japan. Here in Japan they almost always (at least at big companies) use rows and rows of desks, with three-four people next to each other.

      I have been here 7 months now and I like this much, much more than those horrible american cubicles. And it didn't help that they were piping out white noise from the ceiling.

      I can't really put a finger on why this open style doesn't bother me. My best idea is that the cubicles create some kind of worst-of-all-styles situation. You are completely isolated and alone but still have no privacy.

      It really made me understand why mentally weak people are likely to go crazy at the work place. Have you noticed that that doesn't happen nearly as much in other countries where cubicles are less prevalent...

      --
      Die dulci fruere. Have a nice day.
    11. Re:My personal opinion... by sjames · · Score: 1

      Any partition that spans from the floor to the ceiling is classified as a wall by most building codes, and would need to be constructed as such, and pass relevant inspections.

      So have it 1 inch off the floor on legs and within 1 inch of the ceiling. Stuff the cracks with sound deadening fabric.

  19. Now he tells me by eviloverlordx · · Score: 1

    And here I thought that boxing myself up with the rest of the sardines was a good thing. Sheesh.

    --
    'Loose' is when your pants are three sizes too big. 'Lose' is when you misuse 'loose'.
  20. Moooo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Veal are forced into their cubicles, we choose to sit in these unnatural, life-negating gnome-holes. Any being that willfully chooses to spend a large portion of their life in one of these contraptions deserves their automaton fate.

    1. Re:Moooo by Forbman · · Score: 1

      Veal calfs also don't live to see more than a year of their pitiful existance, either. Perhaps you were referring to living the life more akin to that of a captive dairy cow. Sure, it's a nice twice a day drive from your house in west Beaverton to some point east, where you slog for 45 minutes to go 10 miles along US 26 (on a good day). You have a nice house (that is so much like every other house that is less than 20 years old), a trivial yard, a plethora of trivial "cool things", etc. Except unlike livestock, you do have some freedom of action, even if the short-term consequences may seem to be unacceptable. But you do have a choice. Livestock that do realize that they may have other options than the farmer wants them to have tend to end up in a freezer in little white packages in no time... OK, there was that Merlino ram that was on the lam [sic] for 5 or so years in NZ...

    2. Re:Moooo by nasch · · Score: 1

      So move to Vancouver. ;-)

    3. Re:Moooo by freeweed · · Score: 1

      Wow, it's just like reading LiveJournal!

      Quick, go ask your mom for $20 so you can buy the latest Jimmy Eat World album!

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  21. Re:Yes! ...and by NoseBag · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...don't forget the - to me - absolutely precious term:

    PRAIRIE DOGGING! ...naturally I mean the cube-farm-heads-popping-up kind, not the "I have to go to the rest room really bad" kind. Although the latter is mildly amusing too.

    --
    Cloned foods give the statement "We had that last week!" a whole new meaning.
  22. You should know the sordid history of this design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I worked on design of the cubicle. The original idea had us placing workers inside transparent spheres, but testing revealed some office environments devolved into crazy pinball machines or a bumper car ride from hell. Our second revision merely squared off the spheres and lowered the height for visibility. There was no long-term view to our design. We were just trying to meet a deadline.

  23. Can we kill the paging system as well? by newdamage · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The tandem of tiny cubes and the paging system is enough to drive one to insanity. Nothing like finally slipping into the zone to get some real work done when everybody leaves for lunch when suddenly there is the blaring overhead, "Will the owner of a black jeep please come to the front desk? Your lights are on."

    And suddenly I'm back to square one. I don't even think industrial strength ear plugs could block out most corporate paging systems.

    --
    ce n'est pas un Sig.
    1. Re:Can we kill the paging system as well? by corbettw · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nothing like finally slipping into the zone to get some real work done when everybody leaves for lunch when suddenly there is the blaring overhead, "Will the owner of a black jeep please come to the front desk? Your lights are on."

      Especially since, if you just wait a little while, the lights on that jeep will magically go off! It's a self-correcting problem!

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    2. Re:Can we kill the paging system as well? by yassax · · Score: 1

      You could replace the receptionist with one that doesn't speak very loud. Ours is uber quiet and I can barely hear her in our section of the building. Now, if somone else gets on there.. WHOA NELLY!

      --
      The answer to your next question will be 'not likely'.
    3. Re:Can we kill the paging system as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I didn't realize what a difference the paging system made until my division moved to another location. The main office's paging system was, well, abused. Incessant "So-and-so, please dial 1234... So-and-so, please dial 1234," all day, every day. (The fact that the receptionist had a whiny voice didn't help.) Then we ran out of space in the main office building, and my division was moved across town. Since there were multiple tenants, the paging system was for security only, and they almost never used it. Soon, we forgot what it was like to have Ceiling-Mounted Thought Disruptors operating constantly. Between that and the turnover, we were shocked by how bad the paging system was when we moved back to the home office. It only took two weeks of complaints from our division for the system to be reduced to critical use only.

      That may be the greatest contribution we've made to the company.

    4. Re:Can we kill the paging system as well? by generic-man · · Score: 1

      I've never had to deal with a PA system for any extended length of time; you can accomplish similar things with e-mail or corporate IM if you know everyone's at their desk with their "interrupt me" applications constantly polling for input. At least with a PA system you can wear headphones to drown it out.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    5. Re:Can we kill the paging system as well? by rdunnell · · Score: 1

      Definitely seconded. We had an annoying paging system that anyone could use at the old office. People all had pagers, mostly had cell phones, most were at their desk, but others still insisted on calling the receptionist and asking for them to be paged overhead. Or they'd get a phone call and just bounce it over to the receptionists instead of sending it directly to the person, and they'd page for that too. Developers (and others) would install cardboard over the speakers, turn them down, even physically disconnect them!

      Then one day there was a tornado that blew (literally) right past the office. Security paged everyone to take cover. Lots didn't hear the page because they had disabled the speakers. No one was hurt, but a lot of people were pretty scared to be sitting at their sixth floor window when a tornado flew by about 500 feet away. After that, every speaker was repaired, validated, and turned WAY up, then Security took over the intercom and no one else may use it. This carried over to the new building as well.

      It is so much nicer working here after they turned that off. It literally sounded like an airport terminal. Even the old grocery store I worked at gave their managers and critical staff in-building cordless phones to cut down on the overhead usage.

    6. Re:Can we kill the paging system as well? by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

      Dude, how'd you score a cube out on the Wal-Mart floor?

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    7. Re:Can we kill the paging system as well? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      the paging system is enough to drive one to insanity.

      At my last desk I had a speaker directly above my head. The receptionist was in the habit of inhaling before speaking but sometimes she would inhale and change her mind...

      Its a bit like DOS'ing me by leaving ports hanging.

    8. Re:Can we kill the paging system as well? by archeopterix · · Score: 1
      And suddenly I'm back to square one. I don't even think industrial strength ear plugs could block out most corporate paging systems.
      Maybe nonindustrial strength wire cutters could do the job.
    9. Re:Can we kill the paging system as well? by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      At least with a PA system you can wear headphones to drown it out.

      Until the day it's your jeep...

    10. Re:Can we kill the paging system as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a simple solution to that. Whenever I get moved to a new cubicle the first thing I do is stay late until nobody is around or come in on the weekend, open up the ceiling, and unplug the speaker(s) nearest me. Of course some day they'll figure out I've been leaving a trail of dead speakers around the building...

    11. Re:Can we kill the paging system as well? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      I don't even think industrial strength ear plugs could block out most corporate paging systems.

      I used noise-cancelling headphones and music/radio to deal with a similar problem before I realized this was symtomatic of a workplace that doesn't respect its employees.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  24. cubicles, open offices by l3v1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Back when I was in my last year at university I went to a job interview to a .net dev company. Everything went fine, the fellas I talked to seemed ok, tests I had to pass were not that PITA, the money seemed ok too. Yet, I didn't work there, not even for a day. Why ? Yes, "open" office.

    Back to the present, I have now a full time and a part time job. In the part time job my place is in a cubicle, sort of, 3 workplaces in a box, about 2m high "walls" between boxes. I only took it, because I only have to spend max. 2 days/week there, and I can also work remotely at times.

    And I know I'm not alone with this. FYI, I'm not a bad team player, still, I need my place where I can do my part alone. And yes, music.

    --
    I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
  25. "Now" believes it was a mistake? by Rick+Genter · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you read TFA, you'll see that Probst, the inventor of the cubicle, died in 2000. It was actually before then that he realized that cubicles were a mistake...

    --
    Don't underestimate the power of The Source
    1. Re:"Now" believes it was a mistake? by scolby · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      OMFG, that means we're getting communciations from beyond the grave? Somebody call John Edwards!

    2. Re:"Now" believes it was a mistake? by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, actually it was after that. When he was welcomed to hell with open arms, and placed in his cubicle.

      Though I'm not sure exactly how he got the message out to us...

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    3. Re:"Now" believes it was a mistake? by Terminal+Saint · · Score: 1

      Didn't you get that memo? I'll make sure you get another copy of it...

      --
      It's sad when choosing an installation directory on your own qualifies you as an "advanced user."
    4. Re:"Now" believes it was a mistake? by ultramk · · Score: 1

      Though I'm not sure exactly how he got the message out to us...

      I'm pretty sure they use Outlook down there.

      m-

      --
      You catch enchiladas by picking them up behind the head and holding them underwater until they don't kick anymore -VeGas
    5. Re:"Now" believes it was a mistake? by sharkey · · Score: 1
      Though I'm not sure exactly how he got the message out to us...

      John Edwards.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    6. Re:"Now" believes it was a mistake? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hilarious, thanks

  26. Windows by dpbsmith · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I don't think it's practical to give everyone a corner office, but everyone _could_ have a window.

    In Peopleware, Tom DeMarco & Timothy Lister observe that work better in offices with windows. When this is pointed out, management usually says "sure, but it's impossible to give everyone a room with a window."

    DeMarco and Lister's reply is that in fact every hotel in the world manages to do this.

    1. Re:Windows by HardCase · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't think it's practical to give everyone a corner office, but everyone _could_ have a window.

      whoosh!!!!

    2. Re:Windows by XenoRyet · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Yes, but hotels try for the most appealing use of their land space, not the most efficent. You could give everyone a window office, but it'll cost you. I imagine the price per day per square foot is much higher in a hotel than an office building.

      It is, of course, entirely possible that the cost will be worth it, due to the incresed productivity, reduced stress, and general worker well being. It's just not as straight forward as it may appear.

      --
      If forums teach us anything, it is that logic and critical thinking should be required courses in the public schools.
    3. Re:Windows by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 1

      Also: A hotel room has more floor space than the average office (that I've been in). This means they can arrange the rooms so that they all have a window without shrinking the building to hugely.

      Oh, and I've been in hotel rooms without a window.

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    4. Re:Windows by blhack · · Score: 0

      keep in mind that in a hotel, you are paying for the priveledge to be there. In an office, they are paying YOU for the priveledge of having you there. If you don't like the conditions, leave, and your job will be out-sourced to india.

      --
      NewslilySocial News. No lolcats allowed.
    5. Re:Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      In some countries, it is required by law that office workers have a view of the window.

    6. Re:Windows by khallow · · Score: 1
      keep in mind that in a hotel, you are paying for the priveledge to be there. In an office, they are paying YOU for the priveledge of having you there. If you don't like the conditions, leave, and your job will be out-sourced to india.

      Remember the context is also getting more work out of your employees.

    7. Re:Windows by Zerth · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hell, I don't even have an office, let alone one along an outside wall, and I have a window!

      In fact, nearly everybody here has a window, because the building used to be a window factory, so the previous company used their own product nearly everywhere in the construction. If it was to showcase them or to cut down on the cost of drywall, I'm not sure.

      Of course most of them look out onto stairwells or warehouse shelves, but at least they are windows:)

    8. Re:Windows by Bull999999 · · Score: 5, Funny

      work better in offices with windows

      This is Slashdot. I recommend that they get Linuxes instead.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    9. Re:Windows by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Funny

      So you just put windows in everyone's cubicle. Problem solved.

    10. Re:Windows by atokata · · Score: 1

      Which countries? I've been thinking about fleeing.

    11. Re:Windows by iocat · · Score: 1

      Doesn't Microsoft manage to do this? They may have interior offices there, but it seems like most people have windows.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    12. Re:Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have windows in the _walls_ of our cubes at my workplace. Like between the cubes. It's the most ridiculous thing I've ever seen, and I've seen a lot of ridiculous things. I can't imagine why they thought that was a good idea.

    13. Re:Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure we could, just make a window looking into the adjacent office.

    14. Re:Windows by zaphod_es · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's practical to give everyone a corner office, but everyone _could_ have a window.>

      They give me Windows, it does not help.

    15. Re:Windows by C_nemo · · Score: 1

      Actualy i work i a building(s) which was designed around the concept that every office/room with people in it should have a window. you can say alot about the building, but yeah, we all have windows.

      Essentialy the building is formed by rectangular building where each has a atrium/peghole in the middle which lets natural ligh into every office.

      its that ugly yellowish thing in the middle

      http://www.ntnu.no/info/pressesenter/bildebase/Fly foto/FLY2000_Marintek_naert_32.jpg

    16. Re:Windows by dajak · · Score: 1

      Yes, but hotels try for the most appealing use of their land space, not the most efficent. You could give everyone a window office, but it'll cost you. I imagine the price per day per square foot is much higher in a hotel than an office building.

      I think it is the other way around. Hotels are appealing if they are on cheap land. You only find tiny rooms with no view in very expensive places.

      Most hotel rooms I visit for work -- usually in inner cities -- are smaller than my office and I also have a better view. I do share the room with someone. I am not privileged: every room has a window. Workplaces without direct daylight are illegal in this country afaik. I don't think I have ever seen one here.

      This isn't about cubicles. It's about intensive human farming practices. Why should office space be cheaper than hotel space? You spend more time in your office, and the boss expects more loyalty from you than the hotel expects from its visitors. I don't care at all about the quality of hotel rooms (except on holidays when I want a separate kitchen, at least two rooms, a fullsize bath, and a balcony): I just sleep there.

    17. Re:Windows by maw · · Score: 1
      DeMarco and Lister's reply is that in fact every hotel in the world manages to do this.

      I agree with their sentiment, but what they say isn't true. I've stayed in more than one hotel room with no windows.

      Not much fun, of course, and never for more than one night. We always looked for something else a bit nicer for the next night.

      Oh, btw, despite making fuckall, I have a private office with windows that open and a bathroom (which includes a shower) that only I use. Not bad, hey.

      --
      You're a suburbanite.
    18. Re:Windows by Duhavid · · Score: 2, Funny

      But imagine the license fees to Microsoft!

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    19. Re:Windows by Dark+Coder · · Score: 1

      A 32-point corner multi-story building would afford a corner office for each and every co-workers, never mind the waste of real-estate space it consumes from such a small 'round' building.

    20. Re:Windows by swillden · · Score: 1

      In Peopleware, Tom DeMarco & Timothy Lister observe that work better in offices with windows.

      One company that I worked for briefly had just built a new building and all of their workspaces were laid out in what I thought was an ideal way. Each floor had windows all the way around, like most modern office buildings, and all of the non-management staff was in spacious cubicles around the outside edge, so everyone had a nice window (and this was in Salt Lake City, where the views are fantastic). All of the managers were in nice but open, unwalled desks in the center of the floor. There were a couple of glass-walled meeting rooms with blinds near the managers' desks, and a couple more regular meeting rooms at one outside edge of the building, so teams had places to meet and so managers had places they could meet with people in private.

      The idea was that the floor plan maximized communications between employees and managers, making it easier for managers to coordinate the work of their teams. At the same time, it gave the best locations to the people doing the real work, relegating the managers to their (fancy) desks far from the windows.

      Seemed like an excellent approach to me.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    21. Re:Windows by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Proof that Windows offers a lower TCO? ;)

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    22. Re:Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dammit! I don't want a window- I want a skylight.
      BTW I'm on the 34th floor of a 40 floor building.

    23. Re:Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should office space be cheaper than hotel space?

      Because hotels are built as long, thin buildings, precisely in order to give every room a window. However, this results in a higher cost building, because there's more exterior wall and support structure than necessary for the amount of floor space you get. Not to mention the fact that windows themselves are more expensive than solid wall, making a hole in a continuous wall costs more than not, and windows cost more energy to heat and cool.

      Also, hotel rooms are generally at least twice the depth of a typical cube, so you've have to flatten the hotel even further to give every cube-sized area a window, which further exacerbates these problems.

      Then, it's not that common to have these extremely long thin plots of land on which to build this idealized building. You certainly could just make the rest a parking lot or garden, but then you use a lot more land area per worker. You could stack many long thin buildings next to each other, but then they block each others' view and defeat the whole purpose.

    24. Re:Windows by belmolis · · Score: 1

      Just make the building circular. Then everyone can have a corner office with a window. Put the bathrooms, storerooms, coffee machines and so forth in the center, with a circular corridor that opens on the outside to the offices and on the inside to the bathrooms etc.

    25. Re:Windows by k8to · · Score: 1

      He didn't ask why is office space cheaper than hotel space. He asked why _should_ it be cheaper.

      You addressed the former.

      --
      -josh
    26. Re:Windows by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

      It is, of course, entirely possible that the cost will be worth it, due to the incresed productivity, reduced stress, and general worker well being. It's just not as straight forward as it may appear.

      This implies of course, that employers give a rat's ass about their employees. If you had read the article, you would know that the widespread adoption of the cubicle is in fact a sign that they do not. Companies don't care about people, they care about money. Sometimes, the two coincide and as a result, employees are treated better, but mostly the only things that keep us from getting daily beatings are the law and organized labour.

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
    27. Re:Windows by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      Because hotels are built as long, thin buildings,

      In many European countries, it's mandatory to a have a window in each office. Strangely enough, this does not result in "long thin buildings". There are lots of other shapes which result in window space for almost everybody: square with atrium (although this creates windowless space in the inner corners...), crosses, combs, or even round (with atrium). Or just old-fahsioned rectangular (with reasonable proportions), just small enough.

    28. Re:Windows by khayman · · Score: 1
      DeMarco and Lister's reply is that in fact every hotel in the world manages to do this
      Except in China, where they sometimes don't mananage to. Even for 4-star hotels. I now take care to specify when booking that I do like a window in my room.
    29. Re:Windows by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

      This is Slashdot. I recommend that they get Linuxes instead.

      This is Slashdot. It's GNU/Linuxes.

    30. Re:Windows by kz45 · · Score: 1

      So you just put windows in everyone's cubicle. Problem solved

      Why not have a corporate live "outside the window" cam and allow anyone to have it up on their desktop to stare out into.

    31. Re:Windows by kraut · · Score: 1

      > Strangely enough, this does not result in "long thin buildings".
      No, in investment banking you just have an entire floor open plan (apart from the corner offices). There is a window in line of sight; the fact that your are 100m away from it is surely irrelevant ;)

      Then again, in this industry it's often agreed that being close to your users is more important than having a comfy office; IMHO, this is borne out by results.

      --
      no taxation without representation!
  27. It's All Relative Really by aquatone282 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Prior to starting a second-career as a software engineer for a medium-sized defense contractor, I was an avionics technician in the USAF. My work areas were either windowless labs, aircraft hangars, or aircraft parking areas.

    I'll take this cube in climate controlled building with big windows any day. I have more privacy and more comfort. Plus, my co-workers don't fart, spit, and discuss goose-hunting all freakin' day long.

    Just my 2 cents.

    --
    What?
    1. Re:It's All Relative Really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because awful is better than really awful doesn't make it as good as OK.

      See, it's still relative.

  28. I don't mind my cubicle so much... by haplo21112 · · Score: 1

    ...my only real complaint is that the standard config of the cube is angled into the corner effect that allows people is creep up behind you. Not so bad if your listening, its when the headphones are on nad they have been stnading there and you had no idea. The whole thing creeps me out. I hate having my back to the flow of traffic. I tend to sit a little sideways as I can catch the door in my side-vision (which of course leads to neck and back stress.

    I'd really like a way to move the "door" off center and then twist the whole thing 90 degrees so my seated position would face me at the door. I know this would make my chair and the wall close buddies but I could live with that.

    Standard Config:

        --------
        |/-----|
        || |
        || |
        --- ---

    What would be better:
        ---------
        | ------|
        || |
        | \ ---|
              ------ Yeah its a little tighter but I'd actually have more deskspace and could see people approach...I'd also prefer that the wall in between the cubes be increased to 7' whcih would also serve again to get ride of that someones behind me feeling.

    --
    Power Corrupts,Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely, leaving one person(group)in charge is absolutely corrupt.
    1. Re:I don't mind my cubicle so much... by haplo21112 · · Score: 1

      Ok that didn't format at all like I planned...sorry about that...please ignore since I don't think I'll be able to format it right...

      --
      Power Corrupts,Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely, leaving one person(group)in charge is absolutely corrupt.
    2. Re:I don't mind my cubicle so much... by c0WG0d · · Score: 1

      Or you could just get one of these.

      --
      cowgod Esc:wq
    3. Re:I don't mind my cubicle so much... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      My cube is like that because I have a column.

      I chose it over a window seat with my back to the door hands down.

      I have no problems with leg rooms and the cube wall.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  29. Goofy Off? by Bob+Cat+-+NYMPHS · · Score: 1

    I can't even do that in complete privacy!

  30. Re:You should know the sordid history of this desi by Biff+Stu · · Score: 1

    Interesting? What the hell's wrong with the moderators? Don't you know a mediocre joke when you see one?

  31. Bullpens are bullshit by cgrayson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The collaborative power of people working on the same project sitting together is crap.

    For every time it saves time for one person (in a (typical?) four-person bullpen to be able to call out a question to the others, there's exactly three times it distracts and breaks the flow of the others.

    And that's purposeful interruptions; it's not even counting incidental distractions (phone calls, thinking-out-loud comments, etc.).

    I've worked in both private offices and open environments, and I'm with Joel. Privacy and lack of interruption is key for developers.

    1. Re:Bullpens are bullshit by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's especially bad if one of the people is a heavy Coke drinker. The sound of the pop tops opening! The coughing when he swallows wrong! The loud burping!!

      I don't know how my cubemates could stand it.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    2. Re:Bullpens are bullshit by xornor · · Score: 1

      I agree with you completely. I think everyone would love just working on a beach with their laptop, but would they be that productive having hot girls in bikinis walking by every five minutes?

      Enjoying your work environment and being productive are two different things. Open environments may be appropriate for certain occupations such as shipping centers or operations centers, but I don't think so for programming. I like to be able to concentrate on what I'm working on for extended periods of time without constant interruptions, intentional or otherwise. Ideally, you want privacy/noise-isolation but to be close enough in proximity with your fellow developers in case you need to have a 5 minute micro-meeting.

    3. Re:Bullpens are bullshit by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 1

      would they be that productive having hot girls in bikinis walking by every five minutes?

      Speaking as an Official Bikini Inspector (it's right there on the tee-shirt, sunshine), let me just go on record as reporting that's the only time that I'm productive. Other than that, it just opening and closing this little drink umbrella and feeding the sea gulls cigars.

      --
      Just junk food for thought...
    4. Re:Bullpens are bullshit by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

      I don't know how my cubemates could stand it.

      You should talk to them more. They probably can't.

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
    5. Re:Bullpens are bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Empirical evidence has shown this not to be the case, however. A "war room" environment doubles productivity.

    6. Re:Bullpens are bullshit by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      A "war room" environment doubles productivity.

      Maybe in a "putting out fires" situation. But on normal, day-to-day, low-priority work?

      You know, there's a reason why they call it a "war room."

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
  32. Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could just quit looking at dirty sites while at work!

  33. Multimedia != Better by CGP314 · · Score: 1

    Anyone else find it impossible to read an article that has not one, but two sets of scrolling photos next to it? Jeez, I'm trying not to get my work done here, but the distractions are just too distracting.

    -CGP

    1. Re:Multimedia != Better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why I always browse text sites with either:

      - Opera with GIF animation disabled and all plugins disabled (easily set via Quick Preferences menu)

      or

      - Firefox with GIF animation disabled (hidden about:config option) and FlashBlock

  34. I don't see how this could be by iamdrscience · · Score: 3, Funny
    Cubicles a Giant Mistake
    Impossible. Most cubicles are very tiny, and even of those that aren't I have never seen one that could be described as "giant".
    1. Re:I don't see how this could be by Zerbs · · Score: 1

      I've noticed that they keep getting smaller too. The one I'm in now is 6'x6', good thing I'm not clausterphobic. What was even worse, I knew a place where they didn't have cubes as much so as triangles or indentations. The wall layout looked something like this: /\/\/\/\/\/\/ with each person having 2 walls.

      --
      "22 astronauts were born in Ohio. What is it about your state that makes people want to flee the Earth?" Stephen Colbert
    2. Re:I don't see how this could be by codegen · · Score: 1
      Cubicles a Giant Mistake
      Impossible. Most cubicles are very tiny, and even of those that aren't I have never seen one that could be described as "giant".
      That's because it is an inverse square relationship, the bigger the mistake, the smaller the cubicle.
      --
      Atlas stands on the earth and carries the celestial sphere on his shoulders.
  35. The question we should be asking is this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In this day and age, why is stuff being stacked in an in-box?

    When I see a cubicle filled with piles of papers then I know I'm in the presence of a fool.

  36. Nothing new really by houghi · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have removed the typical cubical wall in several places and always the working together improved, wich is something you would want in general.

    Places that still demanded some sort of cubicle were given lower cubicle walls, so people could see each other when sitting down, not only standing up.

    Once when asked what type of cubicle people wanted, the answer was none. Taking away cubicles made people generaly happier, because they could see other people and also had the idea that their desk was much, much larger.

    There still is enough posibilaty to give people a bit of privacy or the idea of privacy when you place the desk in a good way.

    yes, you need to enforce 'clean desk' with it and generaly that is experienced as a good idea after a week or two. In general: trow out everything you did not use in the last year and remove anything from your desk (also stuff in drawers and such) you did not use in the last month.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    1. Re:Nothing new really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "so people could see each other when sitting down, not only standing up."

      I've worked in places that had that setup, its a poor decision at best, evil at worst. The last thing I need is someone peeping over the wall, scaring the crap out of me. Or better yet, if two people have monitors facing eachother, and out of the corner of your eye you see them and constantly think they're staring at you. Oh, and the fact that its even easier to overhear conversations.

      No thank you.

    2. Re:Nothing new really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What industry do you work in?

    3. Re:Nothing new really by karlto · · Score: 1

      All very good unless the employees are female, in which case all previously productive time will be spent gossiping.

      Apologies to both of the female readers who do not fit the stereotype.

    4. Re:Nothing new really by houghi · · Score: 1

      Then you need to arrage the setup that you cross eachother. How people scare the shit out of you because there is a 50cm board between the two of you, I do not know, unless the people normally sit under the table.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  37. I really missed out then... by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    My cubicles walls help give me more free time to spend on Slashdot... And, that's Stuff that Matters...

    I totally blew it when I didn't bother to patent double-decker desks. Imagine surfing /. and having your secretary at the desk above you... oh wait, this is /. never mind.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  38. No wall cubicles by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

    How about the space of a cubicle, but without the separator? It would certainly help in the feeling of space and you would be able to breath better.

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  39. Doesn't it depend... by Bombula · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... on the kind of work you're doing?

    --
    A-Bomb
  40. Speaking as one of the annoying... by Belial6 · · Score: 1

    I am one of the annoying people that are loud, pace, act goofy, and in every other way you can think of, annoy the other people in the office. I'll tell you, noise and activity help me be more productive. The fact that I have to dramatically tone it down, just to be tolerable causes a hit to my productivity. Luckily I am now a telecommuter, I have always found that my jobs with offices got way more productivity out of me than my jobs with cubes. Those of us that thrive in noise are perticularly screwed, because no one takes our needs seriously.

    1. Re:Speaking as one of the annoying... by karnal · · Score: 1

      Some days I think to myself that there's nothing funny about tourette's syndrome.

      And then you came along.

      --
      Karnal
  41. Cubicles inhibit brain growth by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Check out the article here by Kathy Sierra (of Head First fame). She quotes neuroscientist Elizabeth Gould of Princeton saying "complex surroundings create a complex brain". Basically, a monotonous environment causes the brain to stop producing new neurons. For years, it was thought that we were born with all the neurons we would ever have, largely because all studies of primate brains involved keeping the monkeys in cages -- an environment that inhibits neuron formation and growth! Now research shows that a stimulating environment fosters neuron formation and reduces brain stress. Time to bust out the electric screwdriver!

    --
    Just junk food for thought...
    1. Re:Cubicles inhibit brain growth by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      just do some creative decoration, put electric spinners with random objects on your cube wall as well as changing posters every week

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  42. corner offices for everybody by David+Jao · · Score: 2, Interesting
    To remedy this, I suggest corner window offices for all office employees.

    Maybe you meant it as a joke, but it is actually possible to get light on two sides of every room. See Joel's bionic office.

    1. Re:corner offices for everybody by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      Maybe you meant it as a joke, but it is actually possible to get light on two sides of every room. See Joel's bionic office.
      That article was written over two years ago about an office not yet entirely occupied. It would be very interesting to actually have a follow up on how well it works - rather than endless linking to the same stale article about how it might work out.
  43. Les Nessman by Derling+Whirvish · · Score: 2, Funny

    How about a strip of masking tape around you and your desk and a pretend door? Would that be any better?

  44. Can a dead man think? by frenchs · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "Apparently even the designer of the cubicle believes now that they are a bad idea."


    Now I might be totally off the reservation here, but can a man that died in 2000 really have come up with a new thought? He died in 2000, and before he died back then he said this. So saying he "believes now" is a bit misleading.

    That all said, cubicles suck.

    -s
    1. Re:Can a dead man think? by mrogers · · Score: 1

      He must have been Catholic - what you believe for the first 99.99% of your life doesn't matter, but what you believe in the last 10 seconds lasts forever.

    2. Re:Can a dead man think? by Winlin · · Score: 1

      Or he may be stuck in a permanent cubicle with demon neighbors who talk loudly on the phone, take his supplies and interrupt him...for all eternity. Now THATS diabolical punishment:)

  45. Damn I miss the server room... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got promoted to management and forced into an office!

  46. Well said. by chocolatetrumpet · · Score: 1

    Well said.

    --
    Spoon not. Fork, or fork not. There is no spoon.
  47. Fun with cubicles by Ratbert42 · · Score: 4, Funny

    In my office, one guy used cardboard to increase the height of his cube walls. We almost put in a masking tape / Les Nesman 4th wall and door for him, but he got moved to an office because he whined so much. Which led to everyone whining.

    I did something similar to keep my chatty neighbor from driving me nuts. I started by putting up a huge whiteboard so it stuck an extra foot above the cube wall. Then he couldn't Kilroy over the wall and chat. Then I put two extra desktop machines at the end of my desk to keep him from sitting on my desk to chat. As bonuses, it blocked the view a bit more and the extra white noise drowned him out. Then I had to put an old monitor and desktop on the floor behind my chair so there was nowhere left to stand in my cube to chat. My cube looks like something from Sanford-n-Son, but it keeps people away.

    1. Re:Fun with cubicles by RocketRainbow · · Score: 1

      You're Bob from Computer Boy aren't you?

      (Neo pops his head over the cubicle wall into Bob's cubicle, which is decorated with his cardboard box of assorted cables. Bob is a chubby, clearly long-suffering guy with circular glasses and a bad haircut, trying to work on something at his computer.)

      "Hey Bob, did you see that girl, with the-"

      (Bob looks up, with a weary expression on his face as he makes the minimum and most effective effort necessary to get rid of the interruption.)

      "Go away, please."

      "OK"

      (Neo bobs down behind the cubicle wall again and we all realize that this act is played out several times each day and Bob has learnt exactly what to say and do to get rid of Neo as quickly as possible without crossing the line and being rude.)

      --
      *#*#*#*#*#******* I love peanut butter sandwiches!
  48. You got it bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many of you already know the work environment in asian countries such as Japan, Korea, etc. There the workers for each section all sit at a main block of tables, facing each other two by two, with the section chief at the head of the block. No one dares leave for the night until the Chief does and he doesn't because his boss won't, ad nauseum...
        There is absolutely no privacy and the better, more productive workers are moved closest to the chief.

    and people wonder why they go out and get shitfaced almost every night...

    Disclaimer: I work for a Japanese company, but I'm thankfully based in the US, with a 5 foot high cubicle surrounding me and all my privacy.

  49. What Are Cubicles? by gilgongo · · Score: 1

    So far in my career have I not worked in, nor have I even seen the "cubicles" everyone here is describing. Partitions between groups of people at desks, yes. Offices with one or two persons in them, yes, but not these weird cubicle things you're all on about.

    I'm from the UK and pushing 40 years old. My work (technical project management for new media agencies) takes me inside many other company offices, mostly large companies in a variety of sectors. What they hell are these cubicle things? Working in them seems like hell on earth if you have to do anything other than write code all day. I'd go insane, certainly, because I need to talk to people face to face - people need to talk to me. If I want some peace and quiet to do something (like write a document) I stay at home and do it. We have VPNs and Skype these days - even easier.

    --
    "And the meaning of words; when they cease to function; when will it start worrying you?"
    1. Re:What Are Cubicles? by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      Indeed, I think cubicles are a purely US office thing and they sound horrific. I've never seen anything more than a foot-high desk divider in UK offices: every office I've seen looked like the office from "The Office".

    2. Re:What Are Cubicles? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Are you acting stupid just so you can brag that you've never worked in a cubicle before? Or are you actually clueless? (I'm going with option A, since you could have Googled the answer if you were clueless.)

    3. Re:What Are Cubicles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s/foot/meter/; #is more likely

    4. Re:What Are Cubicles? by Paul+Crowley · · Score: 1

      We used to dream of having a cubicle! Would have been a palace to us.

      I want to take a photo of our office - nearly twenty people in little desk groups, no partitions anywhere - and post it so all these Americans can realize how lucky they are...

    5. Re:What Are Cubicles? by gilgongo · · Score: 1

      > Are you acting stupid just so you can brag that you've never worked in a cubicle before?

      No. I have have never seen, let alone worked in, a "cubicle."

      > could have Googled the answer if you were clueless

      The answer to what, exactly? "Have I worked in a cubicle?"

      --
      "And the meaning of words; when they cease to function; when will it start worrying you?"
  50. Re:Yes! ...and by Cecil · · Score: 1

    When I worked in a cubicle, I had a burning desire to play whack-a-mole with people like that.

    Put your damn head back down, get back to work, and leave us busy and productive folks alone so we can get our jobs done, kthxbai.

  51. Ahhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Found the warning label: When ever I hear "theorized" it's normally code for: I am a jerk off academic.Cubicles are bs. Not much beats having a open fealing quietish place. Feng Shui anyone.

  52. Yupp I knew it. I am weird. by B5_geek · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Am I the only one who likes cubes? *
    I hate seeing anybody else, leave me to my own world and I can space-out and do the job better. I wish I was in a cube at my current job. (4-man open bullpen/closet with 2 desks, 2 PC's and 2 phones.) A cube would be an UPGRADE!

    *I only like the cubes that allow me to see the 'door' when sitting. Nothing is worse then sitting in a cube and not seeing people standing behind you. (yes I have a mirror taped to my monitor, I tell people it's because I enjoy the company.)

    --
    "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." ~Plato (427-347 BC)
  53. hah, your lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we have to share, 2 people to a cubicle, contractors are crammed in 3 to a cube. It does get fun though, like when I tell the homophobe contractor that one of the guys in his cube is gay and was asking if he was married in the lunch room. contractors also seem to have the lowest productivity for some reason...

  54. Cubicles: Warning ! by this+great+guy · · Score: 1
    "
    Unlikely, since he's been dead for several years.
    "
    Holy shit ! I have always said it, cubicles are dangerous for your health.
  55. Cubes are fine by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

    Cubes are fine. Just make sure that you don't have your serfs in cubes while the lords are in their offices. Your people won't appreciate the inquality.

    I've never heard anybody say, "I spent 6 years in college working my ass off to get a masters in engineering, and the dude who spent all of college drinking with his frat buddies gets paid double my pay and has a private office."

    1. Re:Cubes are fine by hole725 · · Score: 1

      Here is why cubicles are awesome....Forts for adults!

    2. Re:Cubes are fine by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Here is why cubicles are awesome....Forts for adults!

      They tend to frown on the big blanket over the top of the cubicle.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  56. /. one-act play. by kadathseeker · · Score: 1

    As I type this, I have just added the last of my defences to my cubicle, and my sanity. Barbed wire covers all edges, sandbags line the walls, camo netting cover the top, and my desk thrown in front of the doorway with a machine gun to defend through the gunport slits in the walls make my pillbox an impenetrable fortress. No more will I be constantly moved around for no reason and have my stapler taken from me!

    They tried one time too many, but I was ready, and now the police have the building surrounded and the negotiator is saying something about how me burning down Initech was a mistake, but I am safe between the walls of my beloved cubicle and stacks of TPS reports. They can pry my red Swingline from my cold, dead, hands. Come and get it, cube-Nazis! YEAAARGH!

    *sound of door-breaching charge*
    *sound of flashbang and teargas*
    *machine gun fire*
    *sound of explosion*
    *maniacal laughter*
    *screams*
    *sound of flamethrower*

    ACK! They got me, the bastards, carry on the casue withou- *BOOM!*

    *silence*
    *radio- "We got him sir! Tango down! Repeat, target neutralized! Get some medics in here!"*

    --
    The 'Net is a waste of time, and that's exactly what's right about it. - William Gibson
  57. Extreme Programming, anyone? by mcrbids · · Score: 1

    I've been long a fan of the Extreme Programming methodology, and as the "CTO" of a small company, (I'm the tech department, now hiring our first "other" programmer) I want to know if anyone here has used XP methodology, and what the optimum office environment for such methods would be?

    What's it like? What are the gotchas?

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    1. Re:Extreme Programming, anyone? by ichin4 · · Score: 1

      I find it quite telling that a fan of extreme programming, a methodology whoose central tenant is that programming should be done in pairs, is in fact the sole programmer in his organization. I wonder if any fans of XP have actually used it.

    2. Re:Extreme Programming, anyone? by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      I find it quite telling that a fan of extreme programming, a methodology whoose central tenant is that programming should be done in pairs, is in fact the sole programmer in his organization.

      There are other tenets of XP that I've used with great success: many small releases instead of one big release, focus on refactoring code and code evolution instead of the "GRAND SCHEME", improving the software turnaround cycle, etc. (in my company, we've shrunk the product delivery cycle to less than 2 hours, meaning that when any serious issues arise, we typically have a response time well under 24 hours)

      So, I've not been able to utilize XP completely, but I do enjoy the 6-figure income that I've earned as the "sole programmer" in my company.

      =)

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
  58. Psychotic Break Room by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Strange, I'm surprised that no one has mentioned PVPS; "Peripheral Vision Psychosis Syndrome". Evidently, when you see approaching objects in your peripheral vision, your brain perceives that as a threat and is supposed to respond in kind. Open offices conditioned workers' brains to "shut off" this instictive behavior. Suddenly - during the late 50s~60s I believe - office workers started having mental breakdowns for no apparent reason. The cube was supposed to alleviate that.
    But then again, try telling that to Milton...
    More here: http://www.visionandpsychosis.net/

  59. Re:Yes! ...and by karnal · · Score: 1

    heh..

    Put your damn head back down, get back to work, and leave us busy and productive folks alone so we can get our jobs done, kthxbai.
    --
    My Final Fantasy Movies are cool [iambitter.org]


    Now, that's just funny....

    --
    Karnal
  60. workplaces without daylight-- illegal? by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    yer insane... there is no such law, and I'm sure there are a lotta things you've never seen...

    think about it

    3rd shift employees
    coal miners
    the pentagon..
    submariners.

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:workplaces without daylight-- illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Gasp, maybe he's outside of the US?

    2. Re:workplaces without daylight-- illegal? by dajak · · Score: 1

      I just checked it. Computer screen workplaces without direct daylight are not allowed here in the Netherlands (see Stcrt. 1999, nr. 247/pag. 11 for readers of Dutch).

      Exceptions (submarine, photolab etc.):
      - worker spends less than two hours a day at the workplace
      - the nature of the work forbids daylight.
      - the function of the room forbids daylight.

      There are medical reasons: eye strain caused by lack of horizon and vitamin D deficiency from shortage of midday sunlight.

      The existence of the Pentagon is no excuse for cubicles (just like the existence of Burkina Faso is no excuse for paying people a dollar a day). Putting workers in a crate is antisocial.

    3. Re:workplaces without daylight-- illegal? by kraut · · Score: 1

      > The existence of the Pentagon is no excuse for cubicles (just like the existence of Burkina Faso is no excuse for paying people a dollar a day).
      The Pentagon almost certainly has a window in every office; it may have been part of the design spec.

      Also, Burkina Faso has a GDP of $1200 / heead, so a dollar a day would probably be a bad wage even there.

      --
      no taxation without representation!
  61. Original Poster is right by Prien715 · · Score: 1

    This just in:
    Charles Darwin believes in evolution.
    George Washington likes democracy.
    Dizzy Gillespie plays jazz.

    Sure he said it before he died, but is that what he believes? In English, we tend to believe that Mozart no longer "composes", but "decomposes".

    --
    -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
  62. I do one better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I SSH to my home box and run a browser on my system by forwarding X through the tunnel - everything is encrypted and no logs are kept on my system at work. Browsing is a little slower but not unbearable if I compress the stream.

    1. Re:I do one better... by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I SSH to my home box and run a browser on my system by forwarding X through the tunnel - everything is encrypted and no logs are kept on my system at work. Browsing is a little slower but not unbearable if I compress the stream.

      If you want to avoid the huge honking X overhead, forward your squid proxy port instead:

      ssh -C -L 3128:localhost:3128 your_home_machine sleep 28800

      .. and then, at home, run a squid on 3128 (configured in a way to be only accessible "locally").

      At work, configure a localhost:3128 as your proxy.

      It will still be slower than if you went through your employer's proxy, but not quite as slow as forwarding X.

    2. Re:I do one better... by warpSpeed · · Score: 1
      At work, configure a localhost:3128 as your proxy.

      It will still be slower than if you went through your employer's proxy, but not quite as slow as forwarding X.

      However if you bring up an X application it is running at your other server and not localy. If you use a proxy server everyghing you look at is run though a local browser application, running on your local machine. There is potential with a mis-configured browser to leave traces of what you were doing at on your local machine. Since your home browser is not being used for work purposes there is no reason to have it running localy. Just one more layer of security for the uber paranoid.

  63. as opposed to... by edmicman · · Score: 1

    this "open concept" crap where I can hear everything and everyone, every stupid cell phone, people are always walking by, and there's no privacy to do my web surfing at work!

  64. The optimum environment is a hallway of offices. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Seriously. The optimum environment for XP is everyone in their own office in the same hallway. It gives you enough privacy, and enough room to comfortably do pair programming (or to pack 3-4 people into one office for impromptu design sessions). It gives everyone room for two or more whiteboards in their office. You can leave the doors open and benefit from unconscious intake of other people's project-related conversations, but you can also close the door for total isolation when you need to concentrate on a hard problem.

    Other tips:
    (1) use an internal instant messaging system but make sure you can block IMs when you're busy so they don't distract you.
    (2) if you're like me and like to read e-mail the instant it arrives...just close your e-mail client when you need to get something done.
    (3) give window offices to productive employees. Consider rotating offices every 2 months or something, so everyone gets a window some of the time.
    (4) Supply couches (or other comfortable furniture) for people's offices. Certainly your project or team leaders (or whoever's office you usually end up in for small planning meetings etc) needs to have one.
    (5) make sure there's a lounge area near the offices (ideally its at one end of the hallway). It should have large windows with quality blinds on them. Couches and a coffee table or two. At least one REALLY LARGE whiteboard for design discussions.

    Cubicles really do suck. They are the worst of all worlds. Your best chance for achieving flow state, or for pair programming productively with a partner without distracting other people, is in an office where you can close your door.

  65. A good office by Kamineko · · Score: 1

    If you've ever played Indigo Prophecy / Fahrenheit, Lucas Kane has a damn fine office. Sure, there's a cubicle farm right outside it which he has to dive and dodge through, but they've got to have some use, right?

  66. You can do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had this done at one company I worked at. I just politely asked to have the door moved. I could have done it myself but the cube guys were in anyways and they had all the tools in hand. I think it took them a grand total of 5 min in my case since they just had to move a 3' panel. I can't quite make out your diagram but generally the opening is set up as far from the desk as possible ("it seemed like a good idea") while you actually want it touching one corner of your desk. This keeps the doorway in easy view and also allows you to turn your monitor slightly away from the door if, for example, your job involves confidential client data which shouldn't be broadcast to every Wally walking by. It also reduces stress and increases productivity: the animal part of our brain is very uncomfortable with sound or motion behind us and will allocate a big chunk of CPU to monitoring those potential threats.

  67. Cubicles... a giant mistake?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone page Ric Romero!

  68. I COMPLETELY DISAGREE! by ylikone · · Score: 3, Insightful

    With open-concept, I can't concentrate! I keep seeing things in my peripheral vision. I keep thinking somebody is staring at me. I feel like I am constantly in the spotlight. It would drive me mad I tell you.... MAD!!

    --
    Meh.
  69. Redundant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    Yes, the first paragraph of TFA mentions this fact (Propst dead for past six years) but the TFS reads like the (young?!) guy was just interviewed.

    All I can say is WTF?

  70. Battery Programmers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Years ago I worked at a bank where everyone called the developers the "Battery Programmers". It was because of how closely we resembled battery chickens in our cubicles (densely packed that is, not because we produced yummy packages of goodness or even that those above didn't even notice how often they shat on those below).

    When a programmer got bored often they would casually lob some object of distraction over the top in an attempt to annoy their fellow developer. It often worked.

    After years of battery life we had had enough and decided to try life without partitions. We removed them and, to the amazement and pleasure of our manager, found that we started to talk openly about work and that productivity and quality actually went up.

    We still lobbed objects at each other when we were bored but hit each other in the face much less often (we could see our targets) and didn't usually do it when there was a full cup of coffee to knock over (bad form, that).

    The partitions were never used again except for one day when we watched the CEO, Company Secretary and CIO walked into the computer room and wander around looking carefully into every nook and cranny. This puzzled us until after they were gone when the IT Manager let slip that there was a bomb scare which they weren't telling anyone about. The bomb was supposedly in the computer room. We got the partitions back out of storage and stacked them in front of the glass walls and then stacked boxes of paper as well. The bomb scare was a hoax so unfortunately I can't tell you how well partitions work as anti-explosion shielding devices.

  71. Hip hip hoorah. by crovira · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I fully agree. One of the places where I worked had a cubicle farm, where nobody worked, and a central open area where the 3270's were located (that should tell you how long ago it was, if you can even remember 3270 terminals.)

    That was where we were coding, reviewing stuff, learning off of each other, collaborating.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  72. Sheetrock and metal studs!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it's cheaper to pay for sheetrock and metal studs than fancy "modular" furniture. It's really expensive when you stick to the bigger names in the business...herman miller, steelcase, etc. The big sell of modular furniture is the fact that you can "re-configure" them into new shapes. How often does this really happen? I have been in a cube farm for 5 years with no changes in it's physical layout.

  73. ObWally by sharkey · · Score: 1

    Mom! Guess who got an office with a door!

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  74. Coffee flow by Trejkaz · · Score: 2, Funny

    You must be on crack to believe that. Anyone who works in a job that requires any kind of concentration (software development being the most obvious example) will, given the opportunity, enter a state of "flow" where they are wholly committed to the work they're doing.

    I certainly enter a state of "flow" when I've had too much coffee during the day, but I'm not sure it's the kind which actually enhanced productivity.

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  75. Nothing a little vinyl won't fix... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  76. shared offices? by victorl19 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Though it might not be practical to give everyone an office, why not assign offices dormitory style, shared offices with 2 or 3 people that find each other compatible. Of course, it sounds kind of idealistic, but its a middle ground.

    1. Re:shared offices? by NerveGas · · Score: 1

      In my office, the DBA and I have cubicles in the programmer's row so that we can communicate more efficiently with the programmers. The "front" of our cubicles (where the door is) faces large windows, and the back wall keeps the noise out. We get along pretty well, and felt like some openness and light, so we took down the wall between our cubicles. Then we took the front walls off, and replaced them with half-height walls, and one shared doorway. We built some short saloon-style swinging doors for the doorway, and put some potted plants along the inside of the half-height front wall.

      The result has a very spacious, open, and even "friendly" feel to it. Programmers can just stop on the other side of the half-height wall for a quick question, or come in and sit down if it's a longer discussion. And the poor saps that have to sit over in the rat-maze of high-density, full-height cubicles with nothing but fluorescent light come over and hang out just to avoid depression.

      A couple of years ago, I lucked into a free microwave. And a year ago, a family member for whom I've done a few favors gave me a small refrigerator. I swear, all the place needs now is a crapper.

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  77. Attention Deficit Disorder is Drug Marketing ploy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd explain it to you, but I see you already lost interest in the topic.

    How is Not wanting to pay attention to mind numbing worthless crap a Disorder?

    95% of Cubed jobs are beneath human intelligence and human dignity.
    Paper pushing, filling out forms, reading emails, answering phones, writing memos, creating reports.
    Worthless drivel the whole lot of it, a mind numbing, soul killing waste of time.
    'The Office', 'Office Space', and Dilbert say a lot about corporate culture.

    When people are stuffed into stalls and given less rights than horses and cattle, why should they enjoy it?
    (livestock is allowed to 'eat at their desks' - many people are not allowed such a freedom.)

    There is a reason little boys want to grow up and be firemen, superman, etc - excitement.
    I haven't met any children who want to grow up and be 'Assistant to the District Manager of Accounts Payable.'

  78. IF cubes are so great... by Banner · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    How come upper management never uses them? Even they know cubes are crap. At my last job I went from an office, where I was highly productive, to a cube where I didn't do a damn thing until I left. Too many interruptions, too much noise.

    1. Re:IF cubes are so great... by anubi · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yeh, I know what you mean.

      One company I used to work for thought cubicles were great. I guess managers liked seeing their engineers all boxed up in rows like a barn full of laying hens.

      Problem was I was productive in the lab, not in a cubicle. I didn't last long there.

      Funny, managers want engineers with "people skills", then think that holing us up in an enclosure similar to a bathroom stall is going to encourage productivity?

      There are not many things I can do in a cubicle-sized stall. Maybe testing efficacy of different laxatives, but thats about it.

      I figured such insight probably is similar to one who sees a beautiful report coming from a printer, buys that printer, takes it to the office, sets it up, and expects more fine work to come from the slot on the side of the machine.... completely unaware that the printer was hooked to a computer at the showroom.

      I know my parable looks ludicrous, but often appears to be the Occam's razor solution for what I observe.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

  79. Forget cubicles, go for telecommuting by jonwil · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I still dont understand why companies dont like telecommuting.
    In the modern world of email, instant-messaging as well as things like VOIP/voice chat and video confrencing, there is no reason that you couldnt have, say, developers working from home.
    No need to spend money even on cubes or open-plan office space.

    Have meeting rooms for those times when a face-to-face meeting is the only way to get things done and other alternatives wont work.

    Management can see how much work is being done by looking at how much code employees commit to the reository. Or by looking at how many of their assigned bugs or features or tasks they complete and sign off on (including how long it takes them to do each one).

    Advantages of working from home as I see it:
    1.No need to commute to work (saves money and time as well as saving the environment)
    2.Saves the company money in that they dont need to spend as much on cubes/offices/space, electricity etc etc etc.
    3.Allows workers to work a little more flexibly (in that as long as they are working the right number of hours, they dont necessarily need to be 9-5 mon-fri). Want to go to the movies? Work late other nights that week and take friday afternoon off.
    Living with school-age kids? Start work when they are off at school, work through until they come home, then do stuff with the kids until bed-time and spend a couple hours working after the kids are in bed to make up for the hours you didnt work in the afternoon.
    Need to go to the bank to sort something out? Go to the bank and make up the work later that day.
    4.Allows workers to work in what they might consider a better environment (Want to have your music playing? No problems. Dont want to wear a tie? No problems.)

    1. Re:Forget cubicles, go for telecommuting by kevingolding2001 · · Score: 2, Funny
      I still dont understand why companies dont like telecommuting.

      It's because most middle-level managers get paid on the basis of how many employees they have under them. In order to increase their salary, they prefer to have lots and lots of inefficient and unproductive employees rather than only a few efficient and productive ones.

      It's called 'empire building'.

    2. Re:Forget cubicles, go for telecommuting by Ocho · · Score: 1

      The main reason telecommuting is not more popular is simply that most people cannot be trusted to work at home. Although I agree with all the points you make here, it has been my experience that most people need to be in an office environment in order to be productive. Take the people around you right now that you see goofing off (not working) and picture them at home. A lot of people in the workforce lack the professionalism to work the honest 40 hour week at home, even if it is broken up into convenient chunks throughout their week.

    3. Re:Forget cubicles, go for telecommuting by Maltheus · · Score: 1

      I sometimes work from home, assuming it'll be layed back and I can goof off like you said, but I always end up being most productive there. Not just because it's quiet, but I don't feel rushed to get to lunch or go home at the end of the day. In fact, I end up working longer (no commute or getting ready for work), and I get more work done each hour when I'm there. I'm sure many people might abuse this, but even when I plan to abuse it, I find I get much more done than when I'm counting the minutes in my cube. I now work from home one a day each week, just so I can get my stuff done. There are way too many distractions in the office and I have to "reset" each time I'm distracted. Also, I have little interest in "killing time" at home. For instance, I'd never be posting to Slashdot from my home computer. It wouldn't even occur to me.

  80. Mental Breaks without Cubicles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cubicles are not necessary but Cubicle Level Protection is.

    Herman Miller introduced the Action Office 1 in 1964 but modified it to create the cubicle in 1968.

    What happened? Workers using the first prototype began having mental breaks. The problem was solved. Subliminal Sight and Peripheral Vision Reflexes had acted in the "Special Circumstances" those first movable close-spaced workstations created to cause the mental breaks.

    Today college students commit suicide and disappear because schools are unaware of Subliminal Distraction and the mental events it can cause.

    http://visionandpsychosis.net/Missing_Students.htm

    http://visionandpsychosis.net/College_Suicides.htm

    This psychology experiment was written so that a sixth grader could perform it.

    http://visionandpsychosis.net/a_demonstration_you_ can_do.htm

  81. shoot 'em if they can't take a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some people have said that I play too many violent video games. It makes me so mad that I want to whip out an uzi and shoot them but I DON'T. Instead I go down town roll a couple of bums or scare whores by pretending that I'm going to run over them with my car. Then I usually feel much better so I can home and my mom makes me dinner. But then she keeps naggin me about getting a job and I feel like getting a carrot pealer and stabbing her in the eye but I DON'T because I go to my bedroom, lock myself in, find my game controller which is usually in the semi-clean pile of underwear on the bed, not the 3 day old at the foot of the bed. I play GTA until 3 or 4 AM, jackoff and go to sleep. My friends do pretty much the same thing and aren't anymore violent than I am. F-- you guys.

  82. Grammar Nazi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is Slashdot. I recommend spelling it as "Linii".

  83. Who needs Cubicles... by sega01 · · Score: 1

    When you've got one of these... http://24.211.211.96/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=16

  84. What a developer really needs? by bazily · · Score: 1
    --
    Why cut IT when your office space costs $3/sf? gibso
  85. Every room gets exterior light in my new office by KWTm · · Score: 1

    On reading this thread, I begin to appreciate the design of my new office, where every room gets exterior light, even rooms that don't share a wall with the exterior of the building. This is accomplished by having the top 50cm or so of every wall be transparent, so that external light filters into the hallways and from there into the interior rooms. We still need room lights, but the whole place looks bright and cheery on a sunny day.

    --
    404555974007725459910684486621289147856453481154 in hex is "You sank my Battleship?"
    [GPG key in journal]
  86. they're just not popular in the UK by munkt0n · · Score: 0

    it's open plan heaven over here.

  87. A little slow, ain't he? by Tom · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It took him that long? For all I know, he and some corporate PHBs (who themselves, of course, have nice little offices) were the only ones who ever thought cubicles are a good idea.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  88. It's not only productivity, but also your eyesight by Angstroem · · Score: 1
    I don't think it's practical to give everyone a corner office, but everyone _could_ have a window.
    At least in Germany offices usually must have a window, it's generally not allowed to stick people into darkrooms, only some few exempts from that rules exist.

    While people here on /. seem to embrace the increased productivity of people having an own office (with a window...), there's also another point: in a cubicle you can't give your eyes a rest. They have only to work within a 3-feet radius (if ever), mostly being concentrated on the screen.

    If you have the chance to grab a windowed office, give it a try and just focus a very remote point outside every now and then. You will actually feel how this helps your eyes relaxing.

    There are also theories (no idea if proven or not) that without doing those "remote spot rests" your eyes age faster, i.e. you will get accomodation problems earlier than needed.

  89. Re:Attention Deficit Disorder is Drug Marketing pl by ltbarcly · · Score: 1
    You don't become 'Assistant to the District Manager of Accounts Payable' because you want to. It's a combination of circumstances and lack of other skills, and an unwillingness to take a pay cut to do something more interesting.

    95% of Cubed jobs are beneath human intelligence and human dignity.


    You greatly overestimate human intelligence.

    When people are stuffed into stalls and given less rights than horses and cattle, why should they enjoy it?


    You obviously aren't familiar with conditions on cattle ranches.

    You seem very angry. Still, not being able to focus on something despite making an effort to do so is a problem. I have dealt with this my entire life, and I wish I had been able to force myself to pay attention to all that boring homework I didn't do. If I had, I wouldn't be in a cubicle now.
  90. Speaking of Dilbert... by RetiredMidn · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This is a bit OT, but what the hell...

    In the 80's, I worked for a Major Software Company that is now little more than a brand name for a larger company. We had recently moved into a brand new building carefully designed for developers (i.e., adequate power and network connectivity, server areas), which happened to implement a strong preference for private offices (although some space was left open for potential cubicle space.

    Enter a new CTO, who expresses a disdain for private offices, and embarks on a plan to double- and triple-up people in the former private offices, and pack cubicles into any available open space (including underneath open stair cases). Morale drops.

    Almost immediately said CTO takes over the largest conference room on our floor, which can seat 20 comfortably and pack in 40 or more for a big meeting, and which happens to have a river view, as his private office! And then knocks down a wall and takes over the adjoining former single office as well! Morale tanks.

    You can't make this stuff up.

  91. Dilbert comic by nickyj · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dilbert complains to the PHB, "Just as I thought, my cubicle is two inches smaller today than yesterday!" PHB replies, "We installed real-time status adjusters in the cubicle walls. Sensors monitor your work and adjust the cubicle size according to your value." In frame three, co-workers sit in milk-crate sized cubicles as Wally says, "It's amazing how fast you get used to it."

    I can't find the original comic, but I have it printed out and stuck up on my cubical wall.

    --
    Causing Chaos Everywhere,
    Nik J.
    The strange world of a loner, in a populous city, drowning in society
  92. Re:Attention Deficit Disorder is Drug Marketing pl by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
    You don't become 'Assistant to the District Manager of Accounts Payable' because you want to. It's a combination of circumstances and lack of other skills,

    Well, if you're assistant of the district manager of whatever, it means that at least you have ass-kissing^H^H^H^Hpeople skills...

    and an unwillingness to take a pay cut to do something more interesting.

    I've heard those über-extroverts actually enjoy the brown-nosing... ;-)

  93. I love cubes ... no I'm not mad. by tombrown · · Score: 1

    I have worked in a variety of offices and have to say that I love the mixture of privacy (head down gettingon with it) and sociability (hanging around chatting)offered by full-height cubes.

    The UK is very keen on open plan, and it's just too distracting for me. On the other hand being shut in an office seems too isolated.

    The only thing I do like about cubes is the way they look when you walk into the room (like pig sty's).

    My three rules for good cube life are:

    1. Customise the lighting.
    2. Customise the space.
    3. Get some extra entertainment.

    I always kill the overhead lights, in the UK anything less than 50Watts per square metre seems to be impossible, so turn the tubes by 90 degrees or use an air pistol to take them out.

    Pin-ups are a must, family, hobbies, flags, etc etc... I have seen water scupltures, fish tanks (very nice fresh water fish), CD libraries (of the musical kind) the list is endless. In fact it was always a pleasure to see how people personalised their own space.

    A Hi-Fi is a must, preferably valve driven, but whatever it is make it bigger than the ipod.

    Finally lighting. Having killed the overhead lights, some nice subtle ikea desk lighting. I know someone that had a full standard uplighter.

    Would I swap my open plan office for a cube... yes all day every day.

  94. I don't like them, but they have some advantages by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

    I think cubes are not that used here in Europe.
    I was in the States for some time working in a project, and they gave me a cubible to work in. I found it really claustrophobic, I had never worked in such an environment before. But I must admit it was nice to concentrate in an environment that was lonely and silent most of the time. My office is a large open space always busy and noisy.
    I noticed people in the North of Europe cope really well in an open environment because they tend to work silently most of the time.
    In the South, however, as is my case, people talk to each other all the time, and tend to have meetings at their desks instead of using a separate room. It's annoying. Fortunately, I have my headphones and tons of MP3.
    Anyway, I'm glad I don't work in a cube.

  95. two things... by UncleGizmo · · Score: 1

    1. It's interesting [but not surprising] that once again the original concept is twisted by corporate gree^h^h^ goals. Rather than providing more workspace and some privacy [from the large-rooms-with-desks of the '40s and '50s], they pack 'em in to save on expense.

    2. From the comments here, it seems ludicrous to assume every department have the same office set - perhaps lawyers, personnel, etc. need offices with doors, programmers and other creatives need more open space [to collaborate], and sales doesn't need any permanent space. Too bad most companies use the cookie-cutter approach.

    --
    Who put this thing together? Me, that's who.
  96. Headphones + swedish deathmetal by hemanman · · Score: 1

    That will cure any concentration problems in noisy environments!

    I mainly use Opeth, but Faroese Viking Metal is not bad either.

    -H

  97. Says nothing about productivity by serutan · · Score: 1

    The article documents the history of the cubicle and the fact that people tend to hate them, but it doesn't say anything about cubes being more or less productive than anything else, let alone why. It mentions that the original Action Office shrank to the present cubicle as companies wanted to pack as many people as possible into a given space. But it seems to me that an array of desks in a big room would achieve even denser packing than cubes. Maybe I missed the point of this whole post.

  98. Slashdot in Lynx? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    It's pretty easy to goof off and look like your're working. You can't actually sleep at your desk, but just about anything else goes.

    Does Slashdot still render well in Lynx after the new CSS skinnning?

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  99. Cruise Ships have "Inside Staterooms" by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    DeMarco and Lister's reply is that in fact every hotel in the world manages to do this.

    Cruise ships don't. Always pay the extra $100 for the oceanview cabin. Waking up at 9am to pitch black darkness will totally screw with your vacation.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  100. Non-medical folk with poor logic skills. by sarkeizen · · Score: 1

    *sigh* No it's not ADD. It's (at best) a symptom of ADD. You see this is why the DSM-IV says things like:

    "6 (or more) of the following symptoms of hyperactivity-impulsivity have persisted for at least 6 months to a degree that is maladaptive and inconsistent with developmental level"

    http://add.about.com/cs/addthebasics/a/dsm.htm

    Look at that! (if you're still paying attention and haven't gone off diagnosing other people). You need a quantity of symptoms, over a prolonged period of time to a degree that interferes seriously with your functioning.

        Interestingly enough the edition that they are quoting doesn't mention anything remotely like 'hyperfocus' as a symptom. Even if it had and even if it somehow omitted the fact that you need to display a number of symptoms. You are stil making a directional fallacy. i.e. If some ADHD sufferers have trait X then all people who exhibit trait X have ADHD.

    Which if true would imply that everyone who has trouble sleeping has Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder as the DSM-IV says 'difficulty falling or staying asleep'.

    Not to mention you appear to be taking the wiki as gospel which is...well...a whole other internet 'disorder'.

    1. Re:Non-medical folk with poor logic skills. by ltbarcly · · Score: 1

      I've completely dealt with GP to my satisfaction. What you say is true. One symptom is not the disease. However, one symptom is a symptom of the disease, by hypothesis. So he has several of the symptoms (or characteristics which have a high level of correlation with the disease if you like) of ADD, as I previously pointed out.

      Now, as for taking wikipedia as gospel, it is at LEAST as accurate as gospel. However, that is a low bar. I think that wikipedia is fairly accurate, and has a very wide scope. Therefore it is convenient to link to it on slashdot, to give people a place to start if they are interested in hearing more about what I was posting about. You don't want to quote it in your PHD thesis (unless your thesis is on the topic: "The Time Averaged Accuracy of Community Network Information Systems" or some such) but if you want to know what a "varistor" is and where it might be found, wikipedia is hands down the best place to go. Check for yourself, there is a one page article on 'varistor'. The other alternative is to trek all the way down to the library and actually look it up, which people are not likely to do, which wouldn't be much more accurate in most cases anyway. Alternatively we could do a google search. Would you prefer random web pages with no fact checking to wikipedia's faulty fact checking?

      At the very least wikipedia will reflect what people are talking about with regards to any given subject. It is a great place to learn, even if you are too ignorant to take what it says with the proper amount of skepticism.

      The big problem with wikipedia is that people don't know how to not believe everything that they read. Wait, I should clarify. People either believe every word that they read, or if the text disagrees with their bumpkin notions of reality then they mock it and consider it worthless. So when wikipedia has errors (GHASP!!!) people like to shit themselves.

      However, every newspaper is 99% crap, written by people who have absolutely no expertise in what they are talking about.

      Think about your area of expertise. Now, when you read newspaper articles about that subject you probably laugh at all the hundreds of inaccuracies and misused technical words. Now, extrapolate. Every subject in the newspaper has the same level of accuracy, on average, as those articles you know to be crap. Of course magazines and TV are even worse, usually.

      At least wiki's have the potential to be fixed by people who know better.

      I am not making a 'directional fallacy'. I am stating that he had one clear symptom of ADD. If there is a higher than average statistical correlation of the presence of a symptom in a person and the presence of the disease, then if someone does exhibit the symptom they have a correspondingly higher likelihood of having the disease. That is what symptom means.

      If GP said 'I'm having chest pains' and I said 'go to a heart doctor' you would then reply, as you have shown, that it could all just be gas, and accuse me of diagnosing people over the internet. How is that helpful to anyone?

      Besides, the wikipedia article, of you cared to read it, goes over in detail your objections, including hyper-focus not being in DSM - IV.

      As a matter of fact, I would be willing to bet, if it could be proven, that you only learned of these objections from the article I posted, which you then throw in my face as a disease somehow.