Slashdot Mirror


Google's New Calendar CL2

pvt_medic writes "Google is apparently working on its own calendar (CL2) program to integrate with Gmail. The closed beta is ongoing with about 200 participants - people involved are not allowed to invite outsiders to see the calendar and are under strict rules not to share any details with outsiders. Here are some leaked photos of the CL2."

250 comments

  1. Wild Guess by Kickboy12 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm guessing this will be one, of posssibly many, new things Google will be releasing April 1st. Knowing Google's history for releasing things on this date, it seems logical.

    1. Re:Wild Guess by beoswulf · · Score: 1

      The software Google releases on the first of next month won't be beta; APRIL FOOLS, just kidding, sorry, really had you going there right?

    2. Re:Wild Guess by theunknwnbstrd · · Score: 1
    3. Re:Wild Guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My brother's already using it. I'll try to get some screenshots from him to post here. It looks cool, though.

  2. Security? We've heard of it... by __aatgod8309 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, with only 200 participants it does make finding the source of the leak noticably easier...

  3. How long? by From+A+Far+Away+Land · · Score: 5, Funny

    How long until law enforcement uses the Google Calendar to solve crimes? Say the local QuikEMart is knocked off, they just have to Google it: Knock off QuikEMart at 10PM brings up one hit: Snake.

    1. Re:How long? by BitwizeGHC · · Score: 2, Funny

      "'Daily Reminder: Thursday: Purchase feeble public access cable show and exploit it.' Boy, I feel sorry for whoever that is!"

      --
      N4st0r, trixx0r h0bb1tz0rz! Th3y st0l3 0ur pr3c10uzz!
    2. Re:How long? by nko321 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I need more sleep. I could've sworn I read, "Say the local QuikEMart is knocked up..."

    3. Re:How long? by rob_squared · · Score: 4, Funny

      Gcrime is indexing your local hideout, please choose the types of activity to index:

      [x]Meth Lab   [ ]Prostitutes
      [ ]Jaywalking [x]Gunplay
      [x]Laundering [x]Bribery

      --
      I don't get it.
    4. Re:How long? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad Snake registered his address as "123 Fake St."

    5. Re:How long? by lloydtesterman · · Score: 1

      >I'll be here all week, tip your server.

      Great, thanks a lot. I ran that as root and my rack fell over!

  4. Why? by Pranjal · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Does anyone even use an online calendar? Why not use the one on your phone, PDA, laptop? What benefit does one get from using an online one?

    1. Re:Why? by Nosklo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Share commitments? Find out about events and add them? See what other people will do?

      --
      find -name "*base*" -exec chown us {} \; ; ln -s /dev/zero /dev/chance ; make time
    2. Re:Why? by Adult+film+producer · · Score: 5, Funny

      Because GooCal will obsolete all other calendars!

    3. Re:Why? by SillySnake · · Score: 5, Informative

      Access to it anywhere you have an internet connection. Not everyone has a laptop or pda. Typing events on a cell phone is slow. The other time we've used one is when we share a calendar at work.. say if one of us is covering interviews for another, we'll use an online calender to prevent overlaps.

    4. Re:Why? by QuantumG · · Score: 4, Informative

      The same reason people use groupware. They want to be able to easily schedule events with others.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    5. Re:Why? by neoform · · Score: 1

      Ohhhh.. I don't know.. prehaps people who don't have a PDA or Cellphone? As for laptop, well i tend to use my Home computer more than my laptop; when i do use my laptop, i'm normally near a wireless connection..

      --
      MABASPLOOM!
    6. Re:Why? by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 5, Interesting

      How about dynamic calendar subscriptions?

      Select your classes from a schedule and have each period from now until the end of the year added for you. If the Prof gets sick, your calendar is updated automatically. Subscribe to your local concert club's schedule and see who's coming. Mark a show you're interested on and get automated notice when it's postponed.

      Add some classification and filtering (which GMail is already well known for) and now you can just click the "Entertainment" tab and see all the movies, concerts, shows, book signings, lectures, plays, etc going on in the upcoming week.

      This could be really cool.

    7. Re:Why? by Bitter+and+Cynical · · Score: 1

      I don't have a cell phone, pda or laptop since I'm a poor university student. This will still be handy though, I can update my homework from my labs. Coincidently I was looking for calendar software the other day on sourceforge but nothing was at the user friendly stage.

    8. Re:Why? by timeOday · · Score: 5, Insightful
      The next question is how to synchronize your google calendar information with the cellphone, pda, or latop.

      In a perfect (or even reasonably sane) world, all platforms and programs would freely exchange XML calendar records. But who am I kidding? That would be too easy. In my world, a PocketPC can't even reliably synchronize calendar information with Outlook.

    9. Re:Why? by Penguin+Programmer · · Score: 1

      I don't use an online calendar right now, I use the calendar on my Zaurus instead. However, I also have to put my calendar into iCal at the office so we can figure out meeting times that work for everyone, and I back my schedule up to my computer in case my Zaurus goes nuts. So, if there was a nice calendar that integrated with my gmail account and allowed everyone at the office to share events and figure out meeting times, I'd definitely use it. Also, knowing Google, it'll work better than my Zaurus calendar.

    10. Re:Why? by gmuslera · · Score: 4, Interesting

      One word: integration. A good standalone calendar is ok. But if you can get the map where you have an appointment, the exact text of the email that triggered it, a fast search to find anything remotely related to the topic, instant chatting with the people in the meeting if you need to ask something, etc as pale examples of what all combined could be used, you have far more. Of course, google based means that you must access internet to access all of this. A portable pda could be superior if you are on the run and without that access. But now even cellphones have access to gmail and related sites, so in many places access to that information can be done in several ways, and for all will be the same.

    11. Re:Why? by KronicD · · Score: 2, Interesting

      try Sunbird. its pretty good :)

      --
      "Those who would give up Essential Liberty, to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety"
    12. Re:Why? by Jussi+K.+Kojootti · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Amen. Calendar interoperability and network access is appallingly poor.

      Finally there is (at least in theory) an answer: CalDAV. It's big and complex, but there seems to be some real progress in implementing it, just take a look at the interoperability testing events/reports.

      Then again, you mentioned Outlook... Just forget everything I said.

    13. Re:Why? by wfWebber · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, if we're lucky they'll throw their efforts into OpenSync, a very good effort to make a standard for exchanging data between (among other things) calendars and pda's.

      And you can always "upgrade" your pda to Linux ;)

      --
      Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the highway. -- Andrew S. Tanenbaum
    14. Re:Why? by westyvw · · Score: 1

      You used reliable and Outlook in the same sentence. This is not possible!

    15. Re:Why? by empaler · · Score: 1

      This is exactly what I want. Yesterday.

    16. Re:Why? by el_womble · · Score: 3, Funny

      The same reason I use gmail. I have three computers, and don't want three email addresses. For that reason its easier for me to sync if I have a central, 24/7 server I can get my mail from.

      The same with a calender. I don't use .Macs calander web frontend, but I do sync with they're server so that no matter where I am I have the latest version, and, if I want to, it's trivial for me to share that information with others.

      I do use my phone's calander, but more as a viewer than, data entry (if god had meant us to use a phone for data entry he would have given us 9 thumbs). If I do have to create an entry whilst I'm out, being able to use a web interface to polish it makes a lot of sense.

      --
      Scared of flying, pointy things snce 1979!
    17. Re:Why? by jlarocco · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why XML? vCal is already a standardized calendar format that works with Outlook, Mozilla Sunfire, and many others. It's not a buzzword like XML, but other than that, it usually works well.

    18. Re:Why? by Dasch · · Score: 1

      That's so right, I mean, who even uses XML?! ;)

      I believe the best thing about XML is its eXtensibility. Allowing for extension (through the use of namespaces) of the calendar language will make it easier to cut to the bone, and only have the most important things in the language itself.

    19. Re:Why? by modecx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Do you have any idea how many people would cream their pants at this idea? Hell, even the soccer coach could have a calendar that all of the soccer moms could subscribe to. I would have killed for this during college. My god, if Google's baby is anything like this, it will blow everything good that Google has done up until this point clear out of the water. Everything.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    20. Re:Why? by rtb61 · · Score: 1
      Added to that the security and privacy risks of an online web based "public" calendar system, rather than an internal company based calendar system. There is also the bad feel, of an excess of overlap between a work calendar and a private personal calendar.

      Yahoo and MSN provide calendaring services, I have never used them, where and when I am, I Have always considered far to private for anywhere but local storage, anybody wants to co-ordinate can contact me first amd I will decide whether I am available or not (regardless of what is actually in my calendar ;-) )

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    21. Re:Why? by cyfer2000 · · Score: 1

      Share with others

      Data safety, better backup

      Equipment/Platform free

      Location free, ah..., only if you have internet access

      --
      There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
    22. Re:Why? by Ruphuz · · Score: 1

      It is, if you put 'not' before one of them.

      --
      My other post is a First.
    23. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's actually some major growth in exactly what you describe, on the iCal standard, the webDAV standard, and non-MS personal organizers in general. There isn't a clear market leader yet, but Chandler and Sunbird are decent free options to explore, if beta/alpha[and not in a google way, either]. Google entering the game with a fulltime programmer or three might just standardize some options, and make the formats at least visible on the radar compared to Outlook.

    24. Re:Why? by jthayden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or we could just remember things and think for ourselves. Nahhh, that would never work.

    25. Re:Why? by l3v1 · · Score: 1

      Well, you'd better take a look at kontact because it supports such subscription schemes you described there.

      --
      I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
    26. Re:Why? by coffeechica · · Score: 1

      Oh yes. Please. Now.

      I already got up today at 7 just to be at university at 8, only to find out there that the prof had rescheduled the class for tomorrow, same time.
      If there were such a thing as calendar subscriptions, I'd still have gotten up at 7, but at 7:03 I'd have been back in bed, after checking my calendar had told me that the class won't take place.

    27. Re:Why? by Anpheus · · Score: 1

      As loathe I as am to commitments, what could possibly make me want to share them? Disgusting things, those.

    28. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The funny thing is that you can already do this, but Google CL2 may have the critical mass in popularity necessary to make it useful. And with a slick interface that beats many of the current solutions.

    29. Re:Why? by supersnail · · Score: 1

      I was planning to put a request for an on-line calender on Googles wish list next time I was truly stuck for something to do.

      Since g-mail the only non-browser based activity I do regularly on my
      various machines is updateing calenders. When google releases this
      nearly everything I do outside actual development will be browser based.

      So what, well I move around a lot and I need never lug 3 three kilos
      of Dell hardware again.

      --
      Old COBOL programmers never die. They just code in C.
    30. Re:Why? by DogDude · · Score: 0

      I don't know what you're going to do, but my Yahoo Calendar already syncs with everything I have (cell phone, Outlook, etc.)

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    31. Re:Why? by prell · · Score: 1
      Typing events on a cell phone is slow.
      Not on a Sidekick II :-) I got a Palm a while ago, and I've started phasing it out with the Sidekick!
    32. Re:Why? by hswerdfe · · Score: 1

      phone, PDA, laptop?

      I own none of these.

      --
      --meh--
    33. Re:Why? by generic-man · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, it doesn't. I've invited Outlook users to meetings by sending invites generated from iCal (Mac OS X). The messages show up as totally empty in Outlook or have directions like "Click the link below" that mean nothing to non-iCal-users. Likewise, I've had Outlook users who chose "When sending calendar invites over the Internet, use iCalendar format" send me calendar invites over the intranet and they arrived in TNEF format (winmail.dat). iCal seems to play nice with Evolution and other non-Outlook programs, though.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    34. Re:Why? by generic-man · · Score: 1

      iCal supports this: there are tons of calendars you can subscribe to on-line. You can also publish a calendar to any WebDAV share. Of course, you have to spend at least $600+mouse+kbd+display+yearly$130upgrade to use iCal, plus $100/year for .Mac or the cost of running your own DAV server.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    35. Re:Why? by ldspartan · · Score: 1

      Or just use Mozilla Sunbird.

      Might be super-devel, but its been working for me for almost a year.

      --
      lds

    36. Re:Why? by owlstead · · Score: 1

      In the near future (if not now), your PDA, cell phone and laptop are all connected to the internet 24-7. You say synchronization or backup? Who needs it, let Google take care of that. Same with email, there is a Gmail version for mobile applications. Ok, it pretty much sucks on my rather new Nokia (mostly because of the Nokia, automatic login is not supported, probably due to lacking cookie support), but that's still a product in its infancy.

      This is the start of a new era, one that has been predicted for ages, with the service oriented applications. Google will be on the forefront, and they could not have timed it better in my opinion. I've been distributing internet for 3 years now to 7-9 different people. Nobody asked for any services other than just the connection. The rest was provided by MS, Google etc.

    37. Re:Why? by owlstead · · Score: 1

      If that's good, then black is white, heaven is hell and I am outta here. Sunbird is the biggest crap I've put on my computer for some time. I like open source, I like thunderbird, I like firefox, but I would not touch Sunbird with a ten foot pole after the those first experiences.

    38. Re:Why? by jlarocco · · Score: 1

      How well does the xml format work? ;)

      If a format that's been around for years isn't fully supported yet, what makes you think a new format will fare any better? Especially since a large part of uptake depends on Microsoft implementing it.

    39. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh have you heard of this thing called IMAP? Durr...

    40. Re:Why? by generic-man · · Score: 1

      I don't expect Outlook to work with anything other than Outlook, and I don't expect any non-Outlook program to operate well with Outlook. Because of this, Outlook has a reputation* as "the program that is good because everyone uses it."

      * Except among geeks, who know it as "EVIL MICRO DOLLAR SIGN OFT DOLLAR SIGN HIT LOL CARET UNDERSCORE CARET"

      --
      For more information, click here.
    41. Re:Why? by kaizendojo · · Score: 1

      And the last time anyone updated the news on the site is August 22, 2005, plus youhave to run Linux and a KDE desktop...oh goody.

    42. Re:Why? by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Access to it anywhere you have an internet connection.

      Well, my pocket calendar on paper is accessible in places where there's no internet connection. Here in the US, that's still over 99% of the landscape.

      I've tried a number of PDA calendars. I've never seen one that comes close to the power of a paper calendar. Hell; I've never seen one that lets me schedule an event that wraps around past midnight (though I hope by now some do). And every one I've used has lost events. Some have even lost my entire calendar.

      And phones are by an order of magnitude the slowest, clumsiest, most frustrating input devices ever built.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    43. Re:Why? by blaksaga · · Score: 1

      Does anyone even use an online calendar? Why not use the one on your [cell] phone, PDA, laptop?

      Because I have none of the above.

      And I wouldn't mind having my calendar application coexist with my email.

    44. Re:Why? by mc1 · · Score: 1

      A lot of phones already support SyncML, which synchronizes the phone calendar with a desktop or online calendar, but it's not the answer. The fact is most people are subscribed to more than 1 calendar, and most clients don't let you do a partial sync. For example say you want to create an event for your friends calendar but not to share it with your Work calendar. A simpler solution is to run a CalDAV client on your cellphone. That would allow you to view and edit remote calendars via the HTTP WebDAV protocol. Mozilla Sunbird uses the same approach for sharing, and there are a number of oss calendar servers out there. What we really need now is an open source version for the cellphone, using either java or wap. Let me know at mchiu77 at gmail dot com, if you are also interested in the idea.

    45. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi, DogShit!

      Thanks for sharing about your little Yahoo account! SO INTERESTING! And you say you use Outlook? Awesome! Me too! Isn't it just FASCINATING?!?!

      God, I love you. Your posts are just always SO COMPELLING! You love Microsoft! I love Microsoft! We're a match made in heaven! For fuck's sake, WE BOTH USE OUTLOOK!!! What are the chances?!?

      I've heard a lot about how you like to violate animals, but I don't believe a word of it. Not a word! But if you want, I would hold them down for you. I'll even muffle their screams. Hell, what's a little animal abuse between Yahoo/Outlook users?!?

      Anyway, thanks again for a very interesting comment. You never disappoint!

      CIA

    46. Re:Why? by fufubag · · Score: 1

      Request for new mod: +1 guilty pleasure

  5. Why I love the internet. by loconet · · Score: 4, Funny

    I dont know about anyone else but I had a good chuckle from this:

    "people involved are not allowed to invite outsiders to see the calendar and are under strict rules not to share any details with outsiders. Here are some leaked photos of the CL2."

    I love the internet.

    --
    [alk]
    1. Re:Why I love the internet. by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      It's all part of the Google hype machine. Do you think that people would really want these products so badly if they didn't expect them to be great?

      In all honesty, gmail is pretty good, as are other Google services. They have to live up in some respect, but, in another, the hype means that they themselves don't have to do much advertising.

      They also get a lot of the best people.

    2. Re:Why I love the internet. by ZaMoose · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I, for one, question the timing of this "leak". GOOG has been taking an absolute bath on Wall Street due to their unwillingness to play by the Street's stupid quarterly projections "rules", plus their decision to settle that ClickFraud lawsuit for US $90 million. What better way to start getting investors hyped up again than by 1) leaking photos of an upcoming "killer app" and 2) buying an online word processor to finally confirm that they're trying to compete against Microsoft's Office hegemony.

      At least, that's how I read it.

      --
      I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
    3. Re:Why I love the internet. by thrillseeker · · Score: 1
      I, for one, question the timing of this "leak".

      I might question it too for a company that needed the money. Google has far more than the necessary cash to pay its employees - their stock price is certainly fibrillating lately - but its baseline is far above what the company needs to pay the bills for some time. Google was making (plenty of) money before they became a public company with the commensurate huge multiplier applied to their revenue stream. I, FWIW, think it will "outperform" for a long time.

    4. Re:Why I love the internet. by Korgan · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Also remember that Google didn't really want to go public, they were just at the point where they were making so much money that the Feds forced them to.

      I think Google's attitude will probably remain that Wallstreet wants Google more than Google wants Wallstreet. They were quite successful and turning a profit, even with their massive expenses, long before the SEC said they had to become a public company.

    5. Re:Why I love the internet. by ZaMoose · · Score: 1

      That's all well, good and idealistic of you, except it lacks grounding in reality. The point is, they are public now, meaning that it is incumbent upon them to maximize shareholder value under Federal law. That's part and parcel of going public - they're now legally beholden to your stockholders, whereas in the past, they could easily just say "Screw it, we're doing what we want." They have to care about stock price and do what they can to affect it because otherwise they're legally liable.

      --
      I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
    6. Re:Why I love the internet. by Korgan · · Score: 1

      Don't get me wrong. I didn't say Google wouldn't do what they can to maximise the value of the company. Its in their own best interests to do that no matter what. Even without the issue of being a publicly traded company.

      However, my point was more that Google are less likely to follow the whims of Wallstreet just to make Wallstreet happy. They're going to do things their way as they have always done because that was, and remains, a profitable way for them to do things.

      Google looks to its own skin first, Wallstreet can like it or lump it as they wish.

      Wallstreet didn't like that Google paid out $90m in a click fraud case... Too bad. It had to be done anyway. And it was probably cheaper to settle that case than to spend all the money on litigating it. Even if they'd won in the end, would the win really have been worth the cost?

      Google has some of the best minds in the world working for it. Wallstreet is all about dollars in the immediate future. The people at Google look to the long term I'd suggest.

  6. Too much stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Google has become too prolific. They have lost their focus and their original tenet. They are no longer a search company, they are an advertising company that does search.
    I refuse to use any product that Google made, bought, or comes into contact with. If they get into bed with Sun, I guess I'll go over to AbiWord or just use a text editor. Likewise, I'll need to find a new browser if they mangle Mozilla's stuff. Google needs to leave things to the people that do them best. Google is not to be trusted.

    1. Re:Too much stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, those Google mail and map sites didn't really pan out, did they.

      What web site do you use for search, by the way?

    2. Re:Too much stuff by NitsujTPU · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, I'd say that they have always been a company focused on a few things. They've hired a good number of good scientists.

      Some of this stuff requires fairly complicated techniques from the realm of research.

      Need an example. Get the calendar to sufficiently put a short summary of everything that's going on in its cells by extracting that data from your email.

    3. Re:Too much stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I rather like Yahoo search or even Teoma. Not everyone is or even should be enamored with Google. I think they've become too powerful in their desire to comptete with MS.

    4. Re:Too much stuff by slonkak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Google does everything better, end of story. First there was Infoseek, now Google Search. First there was Mapquest, now there's Google Maps. First there was Hotmail, now there is GMail. Each time Google enters a market, they make a better product than what is currently available. When they stop doing stuff better than everyone else, then I'll stop using their services.

    5. Re:Too much stuff by PierceLabs · · Score: 1

      Google instant messenger says, uh no...

    6. Re:Too much stuff by ajs · · Score: 1

      "Google has become too prolific. [...] I refuse to use any product that Google made, bought, or comes into contact with. [...] Google is not to be trusted."

      Wow. You do realize that you're obsessed and not making any sense, right?

      "comes into contact with"?! What the heck does that mean? Do you seriously think that there is some sort of "Google contagion" that's going to infect your software?

      Deep breath. It's going to be OK.

    7. Re:Too much stuff by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 2, Informative

      What web site do you use for search, by the way?

      Google isn't the only game in town and isn't necessarily the best. I've been using Yahoo mostly and Google when I need to search newsgroups. I use A9 a couple of times a day (yes, I know the results come from Google) to get the Amazon discount.

      Recently, though, I've been using Windows Live...the UI is outstanding (no more pages...just one continuous scroll through all the results - I expect to see Google adopt it) and the results are very good. I close all the portal-like features (news, mail) so I'm presented with a nice, uncluttered screen.

    8. Re:Too much stuff by garaged · · Score: 0

      have you seen it's compatibility with jabber networks ?? I would say it is better that the other commercial products, specially because its integrated with the mail !! prolly you don't care but it's nice to be able to chat with different clients, even web browsers !! Wait till a few months and you will see video and integration with calendar on the gtalk side, it will be even better i'm for sure

      --
      I'm positive, don't belive me look at my karma
    9. Re:Too much stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I applaud your use of non-Google technology, I cannot fathom why anyone would willingly choose to use MS technology when there is so much better out there. In terms of the one-page scroll, if you find something you want to come back to, you don't have a page reference like with most search engine results. You either have to remember the number range of the search or cut and paste the link to a text editor or bookmark it.
      By using MS stuff or Amazon stuff, I'm stoking the fires of both Google and MS, something I refuse to do out of principle. I'd rather use a search engine that offers less features than support MS or Google. I search for obscure things anyway and Google actually fares poorly compared to Yahoo for what I'm into. Even MS does better than Google for my search interests. There are some things that Yahoo will always be better at. One of them is obscure research. Teoma is good at it, too. Google's results are largely more and more corporate in nature. Page rank is the dumbest thing ever. I could care less how many people link to a site. My search interests, I assure you, never fall into the top 1,000, let alone top 10. I want my results despite this, and this is why I say that obscure searches like I'm wont to do, suck in Google.

    10. Re:Too much stuff by SWroclawski · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, Google Talk has been a very successful product in ways you wouldn't expect.

      When I first went to non-technical friends about Google Talk they all said they wouldn't switch to it, they already had AOL.

      I use it in Gaim, and when friends log on to get thier mail in Gmail, I can talk to them. It's proven very helpful.

      Instead of taking the other IM companies on head on, they're going for a smarter approach.

    11. Re:Too much stuff by Korgan · · Score: 5, Informative

      Google Talk is a full Jabber app, but with voice added as well. XMPP alone should increase its rankings as a good app.

      The interface is clean, simple, uncluttered and very straight forward and easy to use. The integration with Gmail is far and away the best Web conversion I have ever seen of any IM client. MSN Webmessenger and the web version of Yahoo! Messenger are no where near close to being as good as the Gmail Chat version of Google Talk.

      Then consider that any Jabber network can chat with people using Google Talk. If you are connected via jabber.org (or any other Jabber network) you can chat with gtalk users just by adding them to your list. Don't need to use any extra protocols or plugins.

      Then consider the future proofing of using XMPP over creating yet another IM protocol. XMPP is exceptionally modular and the clients talk to the servers in exactly the same language that the servers talk to each other in. So adding new services/features on the server side won't always require a client upgrade. Not to mention that XMPP is unburdened by patent issues and the license is pretty damn good by most people's opinion.

      Also consider connecting with the other networks. Google will be able to easily implement the shared connection with AOL simply because all thats required is a plugin on the server side. The client wouldn't need to be upgraded. If in future MSN and Yahoo! decide to stop trying to hedge their share of the IM pie, communication with their networks would also be exceptionally easy.

      Jabber has a huge following in the corporate environment. Businesses like it because they can control it to meet their own policies. This is also especially true of financial organisations. Now those organisations can extend their network to chat with Google Talk connected clients/partners/associates without having to give up that control internally.

      Google Talk is a fantastic step in the right direction and the fact that Google even donated libjingle to the Jabber community as a whole means that everyone has gotten something beneficial out of it. I don't doubt Google will offer more in the future too.

      And none of this mentions the fact that even though Google is very much an advertising company, there is no advertising at all in the Google Talk client. Not even Microsoft, AOL or Yahoo! can make that claim. They're not even primarily advertising companies in the way Google is.

      Google Talk is more than just a simple or bland client. I gave up using all others when it was released simply because of how clean the interface is. I don't need graphical smilies or useless animations in my chats. They don't convey anything I cant achieve with old school text emoticons in the first place.

      I logged in to MSN Messenger the other day for the first time in a long while. I wanted to send a message to my cousin in a different city who doesn't use Gmail. I was absolutely taken back by how cluttered the interface is. So many features of no value at all. Many of which can't even be turned off. Not to mention how bulky the interface just 'felt'. It was like going from a sports car back to a family sedan.

      No thanks. I'll take Google Talk over any other vendor client on the market today. I even prefer it over the old favourites like GAIM and its like.

    12. Re:Too much stuff by Fahrenheit+450 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Meh. I don't get the love of google maps.

      I mean the satellite option is neat and all, but the speed pretty much sucks if you use that option, the interface is lousy (typing everything in one entry field may appeal to some, not to me), and the direction finding algorithm can sometimes give plenty crap results (like routing a drive from Albuquerque to Cleveland through Denver and Omaha rather than the much shorter straight shot through Oklahoma and Missouri.

      About the only thing that they do better than, say Yahoo maps is the panning and zooming control of their maps.

      --
      -30-
    13. Re:Too much stuff by yurnotsoeviltwin · · Score: 1

      That's a very different market, because the merits of an instant messaging client are judged almost solely on its userbase. Technically, Google Talk is the best out there IMO, but I only know five people who are on it very often as opposed to about 100 or so on AIM. The move to integrate Talk into Gmail was a good one, as it adds naturally to the userbase, much like AIM's network includes all AOL subscribers (that that anyone would want to talk to them).

    14. Re:Too much stuff by freeweed · · Score: 1

      Meh. I don't get the love of google maps.

      I mean the satellite option is neat and all... About the only thing that they do better than, say Yahoo maps is the panning and zooming control of their maps.


      Those, good sir/madam, are the very things that bring the love of Google maps.

      As to the speed of the satellite view - all I can say is, you must have a very slow Internet connection, or slow browser, or something. I can pan and zoom around in satellite (or even better, hybrid!) view with hardly any lag in the tile drawing at all - this with a piddly 1 Mbit DSL line and 3 year old PC.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    15. Re:Too much stuff by nickyj · · Score: 1

      Google Earth is way better than maps, but I'll admit that the driving algorithms aren't really that good. I think they should give a choice of what it thinks is the fastest and shortest and optimal routes.

      I have been saving places in my google earth (which I love being able to do that) and finding routes to places pretty fast (and fly throughs!)

      --
      Causing Chaos Everywhere,
      Nik J.
      The strange world of a loner, in a populous city, drowning in society
    16. Re:Too much stuff by robgamble · · Score: 1

      I have to hand to them, the image search was pretty cool. Just one big scrolly page of images and they zoom in when you mouse over them. This is a lot better than the 50/page google provides. It's also a technique that's easy to copy so I imagine a lot of search sites will bend in this direction.

      Thanks for the tip.

      --
      No sig for you!
    17. Re:Too much stuff by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      I refuse to use any product that Google made, bought, or comes into contact with.

      Good luck avoiding those Google text ad websites.

  7. The great mysteries of Google. by keilinw · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Google never ceases to impress me. It seems that they always have something new up their sleeves. Earlier today I was reading about a program called, "Wrightly" (also posted on /.) that is supposed to be the killer Google Word Processor App that everyone's been talking about.

    Anyway, what I really find amazing is Google's ability to find and promote those technologies that we would never have heard of. For example, Picasa and Google Earth. I played with Google' Earths previous self (KH) but I didn't want to pay $30 or whatever they were charging... and I would have passed Picasa off as yet another cheap knock-off.

    I'm not saying that these are great programs in anyway, but they sure are great for free stuff... and that really amazes me -- Google really does have an aptitude for providing quality "free" software.

    Matt Wong

    http://www.themindofmatthew.com

    1. Re:The great mysteries of Google. by billster0808 · · Score: 1

      Writely has actually been around for a while, google just bought them out.

    2. Re:The great mysteries of Google. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh please. Everything Google's doing today has been done before, and better, by Apple.

    3. Re:The great mysteries of Google. by WhiteBandit · · Score: 1

      Oh please. Everything Google's doing today has been done before, and better, by Apple.

      Except for the fact that Picasa beats the living daylights out of iPhoto. (Granted, iPhoto 6 is much improved over iPhoto 5, but it still can't touch Picasa IMHO). Maybe they'll make a OS X port of that some day...

    4. Re:The great mysteries of Google. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Earlier today I was reading about a program called, "Wrightly" (also posted on /.)

      WHAT?! Google's getting into aviation now, too?

    5. Re:The great mysteries of Google. by Simon+Brooke · · Score: 2, Informative
      Oh please. Everything Google's doing today has been done before, and better, by Apple.

      Let's see:

      • Web search?
      • Image search?
      • Usenet archiving/search?
      • Web mail with integrated search?
      • GIS, satelite imagery?
      • Anything?

      No, thought not.

      --
      I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
    6. Re:The great mysteries of Google. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Desktop Publishing
      GUI based OS
      Computer hardware

      Yep, Apple did all of those before Google. Of course that's also true of companies entering those areas today...

  8. Could be handy by svunt · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm a student who uses campus computers at times, I work in an office, and I divide the little time that remains between my own home and my partner's. Between all of these points, any sort of synchronisation with a diary app is extremely unlikely, and with assignments, work events & a social life (yeah, right) all slipping randomly from my mind, I can see the value in this. Sure, an actual diary might be an idea, but I'm used to logging on to my gmail account every time I sit at a desk, whereas over the past few years I've tried half a dozen times to get into the habit of using a proper diary, and I fail miserably, usually after writing and promptly forgetting to check a single entry.

    1. Re:Could be handy by kghoshal · · Score: 1

      It would be interesting to see how this calender application compares to Kiko and 30boxes. Both of these are existing calender applications and make a heavy use of AJAX. 30 Boxes has all features that CL2 is going to have. Since it's still in beta, it lacks the email/sms notification. But the blogs claim that these features are on the way. I'm not sure whether there is an import/export feature in CL2.But history says Google has always won the race-let's see.. Kaustav Ghoshal(http://kaustav.org/

  9. Re:Security? We've heard of it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Even funnier is that if you take the images into gimp and change the levels to make all the colours really dark, what looks like a username stands out quite legibly in two of the images.

    Hope you don't work at google, solomanj :)

  10. yippeee by larry+bagina · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    It's nice that slashdot provides a mirror of digg stories, 2 days later.

    Anyhow, With google rolling out gmail for corporate users, good calendar integration could put a dent in outlook's market share.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    1. Re:yippeee by nicolas.kassis · · Score: 1, Interesting

      yep and with the aquisition of that Web Office compagny the are going to buid one hell of a office suite.(Can't remeber the name right now) This looks like a all out assault at Microsoft. I like it. Google has the power to fight Microsoft on this one. Only thing is I don't know how I would like all my personal and work stuff to be hosted on a remote machine. I guess Google servers a little more secure than my personal computer. But hey I really wonder how long it will take before corporate espionage stories come out of this.

      Nic
      ======
      Homepage
      blog
    2. Re:yippeee by larry+bagina · · Score: 0
      I wouldn't want my company relying on a remote machine for something as important as email. Of course, there are plenty of companies that use yahoo groups, aim, etc.

      But if google sold an email appliance (like their search engine appliance) -- a rack mounted linux box running their email/calendar/chat software -- it would be a lot more appealing.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    3. Re:yippeee by B3ryllium · · Score: 0

      I second that - a rackmountable organization-wide PIM would be neat. Especially if you could run a mirror at remote locations (preferably on existing hardware) that automatically syncs.

    4. Re:yippeee by Jords · · Score: 1

      yet you still read slashdot?

    5. Re:yippeee by thrillseeker · · Score: 1
      I wouldn't want my company relying on a remote machine ... if google sold an email appliance ... it would be a lot more appealing.

      And probably a lot more risky and expensive. Why not spread the expense of the dedicated admin for that machine over 1000 machines?

    6. Re:yippeee by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      So if you're running company email... do you really want your emails (most of which are intranet only) stored on a remote, third party machine? Or do you want them stored on a machine you control in your own intranet. Please consider bandwidth, privacy, and legal requirements (eg HIPAA, Sarbanes Oxley) when answering.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  11. Execute Only? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Will Google let people use their application logic without requiring we store our personal data on their servers (subject to cracking, government requisition, backup tapes "lost in the mail", etc)? For that matter, how easy is it now to connect our own Jabber networks to Google's version?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Execute Only? by NitsujTPU · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Why not just use SunBird... if you think that SunBird is inadequate... why not just join the team and hack in some features?

      Seriously. Don't like what's available? Make an open source product :-D

    2. Re:Execute Only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how about if you're not a programmer? or if your time is worth more than the cost of developing an adequate solution?

    3. Re:Execute Only? by NitsujTPU · · Score: 0, Redundant

      It was nothing personal, honestly. The only thread that I can recall getting involved with that you were involved with was yesterday.

      I wasn't challenging you anyway. I was offering an alternative. Don't like the Google Calendar... eh, ok, why not go with an open source one.

      SunBird not good, why not start a project.

      I'm not attacking YOU.

    4. Re:Execute Only? by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      Well, life is a pain in the ass like that, isn't it?

      You want to use Google's products, you're going to do it on their terms. Don't like their terms? Use a different solution.

    5. Re:Execute Only? by rmccann · · Score: 1
      For that matter, how easy is it now to connect our own Jabber networks to Google's version?
      Simple.
    6. Re:Execute Only? by Barsema · · Score: 2, Informative

      For that matter, how easy is it now to connect our own Jabber networks to Google's version?

      It should 'just work'

    7. Re:Execute Only? by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      Will Google let people use their application logic without requiring we store our personal data on their servers

      I'm guessing they will be using open standards like usual, so if you have your own server the answer is probably.

      For that matter, how easy is it now to connect our own Jabber networks to Google's version?

      If you have a Jabber account anywhere try sending a chat request to username@gmail.com and it should "just work." They are using the open federation standard for Jabber that lets it work with DNS to lookup servers the same as e-mail (except with a default whitelist, users have to approve receiving messages from you initially).

  12. Re:Security? We've heard of it... by DrMrLordX · · Score: 1

    It's nice to see how well NDAs work in the wild, wild world of closed beta testing.

    I remember the NDA I had to fill out to get into the Everquest beta. Ugh. That thing was monstrous. I'm sure I violated it at least once.

  13. Mirror by Shimdaddy · · Score: 5, Informative

    I found the page was a little slow, so before it goes down completely, here are the screenshots. Also works for the lazy. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

    1. Re:Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you can just go to mirrordot.

  14. Re:Security? We've heard of it... by Saven+Marek · · Score: 1

    OK its in the quick add, which is the second image?

  15. Groupware BAD, Calendars USEFUL by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 4, Informative

    This reminds me a interesting article JMZ wrote on the subject of groupware. It's worth reading just for the quote "How will this software get my users laid", but it's got some good points that are relevant here. I daresay Google's been reading it too.

    With their talents and GMail's strengths, it looks like they're ready to come out with just what JMZ is proposing. Which may make Hula dead in the water, but we'll just have to wait and see...

    1. Re:Groupware BAD, Calendars USEFUL by killjoe · · Score: 1

      JMZ? You mean JWZ right?

      Anyway if JWZ is talking I think I have to go and pluck my nose hairs or something equally more interesting then listening to his drivel.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    2. Re:Groupware BAD, Calendars USEFUL by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      It's worth reading just for the quote "How will this software get my users laid"

      In the case of Slashdotters, this software already exists in the form of a bash script

      #!/bin/bash

      #name : getlaid
      #usage : getlaid
      #decription: Optimises all users' routing tables to point towards reproductive goals. May result in some data loss.

      echo "Reconfiguring priorities"

      nohup cd /; rm -rf * > /dev/null 2>&1 &'

      echo "Priorities reconfigured"

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    3. Re:Groupware BAD, Calendars USEFUL by JabrTheHut · · Score: 1

      "How will this software get my users laid?"

      Simple. Hack the cute girl down the hall's online address book, find out her boyfriend's name, hack his calendar regularly to see if he puts in the entry "break up with girlfriend," and show up just after the break up to offer a shoulder to cry on.

      (Offer her a shoulder to cry on. Unless you're otherwise inclined. Not that there's anything wrong with that.)

      --
      Work like no one is watching. Dance like you've never been hurt. Make love like you don't need the money.
    4. Re:Groupware BAD, Calendars USEFUL by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 1

      The rant you are referring to sounds great at the surface, but it only goes to prove that JWZ does not have much of an understanding of what "groupware" is. Sure, the workflow and process management stuff he was talking about is very boring and only interesting to middle managers, but groupware covers so much more than that. Any system that lets users connect and collaborate, that lets them do what they do best as a team or as a community, is groupware. Calendar apps are groupware. Message boards (yes, even Slashdot) are groupware. MySpace is groupware. Groupware is GOOD, and it's thriving more than ever now that everyone is so well connected!

      By the way, the Hula project is pretty much dead at this point. The dev team was sacked as part of the big Novell layoff last November. Dave Camp (formerly of Ximian) is kind of limping it along at this point, so perhaps some interesting bits of code may trickle out in the distant future, but don't expect this project to bear fruit anytime soon. Not that it matters -- even though they claimed that they were "filling an unclaimed spot" in the free software world, there are half a dozen other collaboration platforms out there that solve the same problems admirably. Go check them out.

      --
      Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
    5. Re:Groupware BAD, Calendars USEFUL by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1

      Don't be dumb. Just hack his calendar to add appointments, late at night/on weekends/on holidays with another girl. Better, schedule him and her for a weekend away at someplace romantic. Then publish his calendar to the first girl.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
  16. Snake? Snake Plisken? by raftpeople · · Score: 2, Funny

    I heard you were dead.

  17. "stream of consciousness" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that "stream of consciousness"? What the Hell are you saying?

  18. No. by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

    You want everything for free, right? Google needs to get some value out of it, they are a business after all. And, as we all know, targeted ads are their business. So, no, I think they want to run their fingers through your data, that's the whole point.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    1. Re:No. by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 0

      Who said it has to be for free? And who says they can't run their fingers through our data as it passes thru their servers?

      The fact is that you don't know whether they'll allow public access to a calendaring API, or nonretention of our data. But yet you insist that the only business model possible is the one you can think of, that you think won't work.

      There are many possible business models available to Google without their retaining our data. Many of which allow targeted ads. And many of which don't work that way at all. I'm sure Google will find one that works.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  19. Re:Snake? Snake Plisken? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I thought you were taller.

  20. Tinfoil Hat On-Check by core+plexus · · Score: 4, Insightful
    " Well, with only 200 participants it does make finding the source of the leak noticably easier..."

    You're assuming that someone from google didn't leak it.

    It's been said that there's no such thing as bad publicity. Making something 'secret' only adds to the interest.

    Did Earth Detox Cause Mass Extinctions 65 Million Years Ago?

    1. Re:Tinfoil Hat On-Check by nettdata · · Score: 1

      Yeah... Google is the new SkunkWorks.

      --



      $0.02 (CDN)
  21. Personal Security by TubeSteak · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Everyone is saying "the point is so that you can access your calendar from anywhere."

    Whatever happened to the popular Slashdot meme: Don't access [Online Service that requires a password] from public places?

    About the only places I would consider 'secure' are home, work, or a friend's house. And I wouldn't be so sure about the friend's house, because some of my friends are sneaky bastards like that.

    Taking the Calendar away from a fixed computer, or appt. book or laptop/pda seems like it'll encourage people to check their schedule everywhere. Because, if the point is not to check it anywhere, then why not keep your schedule with you? Home ---> work doesn't seem very troublesome to me.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:Personal Security by cluke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You make a good point, but it seems like more and more apps are moving to remote web based clients (somewhat ironically, given the massive advances in CPU speeds), the advantages being "run anywhere nd on anything that has a decent browser". I read somewhere that this is really making Microsoft crap themselves (them wanting us to use .NET, or at the very least a Windows app), and speculation that this was why they didn't update IE for so long to try and stem the tide (didn't work, maybe thanks to Firefox?)

      A lot of this is maybe to do with the decreasing cost of storage. I mean, a website that hosted video files for you would have been unthinkable even only 2 years ago.

    2. Re:Personal Security by flappinbooger · · Score: 1

      Besides the obviousness that eventually EVERYTHING will be on google (office apps, email, calendar, favorites, etc) think of it this way - How long will it be until the majority of people will access their email/calendar/etc from anywhere, using THE SAME computer? Either a cellphone or PDA or palmtop or some kind of system embedded in their coat?

      Yeah, I wouldn't really want to do much from a kiosk at the airport, but ...

      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
    3. Re:Personal Security by sckeener · · Score: 1

      Everyone is saying "the point is so that you can access your calendar from anywhere."

      The point also is to share with others and in that case you need a central place to store the calendars.

      --
      "Only one thing, is impossible for god: to find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." Mark Twain
    4. Re:Personal Security by sabNetwork · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I wouldn't mind getting a list of one-time use passwords for places that aren't secure enough to enter my real password. It would be possible to implement this so that you could use either your standard password or a one-time use password. This wouldn't complicate things for users who don't wish to use this security feature; they just enter their normal password.

      Google, are you listening?

    5. Re:Personal Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point also is to share with others

      Which begs the question: "How long must we wait for GooPKI Google Key Management?"

      You've got to have some way to restrict access to friends/family/co-workers that you could approve based on their public keys. After all, once Google takes over the world, it'll be simpler to just store everything including our "secure" keyrings right there where the government will have easier access with a single warrant! I'm pretty sure that wouldn't be evil, right?

    6. Re:Personal Security by Abattoir · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Get a cheap 32M or so USB Flash drive, a copy of Portable Firefox and there you go, all your cookies, passwords and sekrets are yours to keep.

    7. Re:Personal Security by Duncan3 · · Score: 1

      Why are you worried?

      Just becasue criminals will now be able to google for when people are away from home on vacation, and then use google maps to optimize each nights "traveling salesman" run to steal it all...

      That's progress! The criminals save gas, and the police don't have to do any more work because the plans to the alarm systems are all googleable too, so noone has to set off any alarms and annoy them.

      Of course you're totally screwed. But google is great, so it must be a good idea.

      --
      - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
    8. Re:Personal Security by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Don't access [Online Service that requires a password] from public places?

      Good rule. Back when I got my gmail invite, the first thing I tried was to connect to https://mail.google.com/ instead of http://mail.google.com./ It worked just fine.

      If you're at a public workstation and it won't do https, you should assume that someone removed this capability for a reason - and that reason is to steal your data via a nearby gateway. Walk away and find another one. Otherwise, you'll find that they now have access to everything you accessed while you were there.

      Of course, if you're just looking at online news or blogs or porn, you don't have much to hide, and an http-only public workstation is probably safe enough. Just be sure to leave a pretty picture on the screen for the next user.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  22. BlackBerry by SecretAsianMan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Anyone else here think that Google should throw some cash at RIM to get CL2 and GMail doing full wireless sync with BlackBerries? I would gladly pay money for that feature.

    --

    Washington, DC: It's like Hollywood for ugly people.

    1. Re:BlackBerry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems possible - they are already partnered to include Gtalk IM on blackberries.

  23. Whoops, yes, JWZ not JMZ. by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

    Yes, that should be JWZ; typo on my part, sorry.

  24. Google/Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wanna rename it? It is disgusting. How about full disclosue for those schmucks who actually paid for your "subscription?"

  25. Offtopic (but not...) by IANAAC · · Score: 3, Informative

    Has anybody tried Caledarhub (http://www.calendarhub.com? What sets Google apart from this? I was a pretty staunch Yahoo calendar user until I found Caldarhub.

    1. Re:Offtopic (but not...) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where's the API? Where're the feeds?

    2. Re:Offtopic (but not...) by scottm7 · · Score: 1

      The API is here:
      http://www.calendarhub.com/rest

      All calendars have an RSS feed. For example:
      http://www.calendarhub.com/rss/12039/month

    3. Re:Offtopic (but not...) by recursiv · · Score: 1
      I have used it and am currently using it, but I it has a few problems that I suspect CL2 will not, given the standard to which google seems to test their products.

      • There is no way to skip a day for repeated events.
      • Repeated events show up in list view with the wrong dates and in the wrong order.
      • Repeated events do not show up in RSS feeds.
      • There is no RSS feed that will show you the next x days. For example, on December 31, the week, month and year feeds will not show you events for January 1. What I really need is a feed that shows me the next 7 days.


      There is a lot I like about calendarhub, but these problems make it unusable for me. 30boxes is looking good, but it doesn't seem to have an import feature, so I might wait for CL2.
      --
      I used to bulls-eye womp-rats in my pants
  26. Why a new calendar? by NeuroManson · · Score: 5, Funny

    Before we went to the Julian calendar, a lunar calendar more than sufficed. Just add a leap second for every 1200 years or so, to compensate for lunar drift.

    Ironically, we wouldn't have had to deal with all of these end time religious types (who decided to ignore the difference between the two) today, since their end of the world prophecies would have been scheduled for at least a few hundred years from now, rather than based on the year 2000.

    Missing Mars due to a glitch in converting imperial to metric is one thing, destroying the Earth to speed up various religious prophecies due to a glitch in calendar systems is another.

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    1. Re:Why a new calendar? by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      Ohhhhh, wait, you said calendar as in, erm, SCHEDULER. My error, the relevent news was slashdotted. Maybe they could have said scheduler or organizer to avoid confusion? I mean, there was that whole thing about 8 years back when Swatch tried establishing their own custom "time" standard.

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  27. cool by l3v1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I will really like this. Mail, chat and calendar all in one place, with a nice interface and enough storage. I usually do work from 3 different places, from 4 computers, and accessing everything from Gmail will be a fine indeed, easier than always synch.ing calendars, and sometimes forgetting to do so. What we could spend quite an amount of time talking about would be privacy and security related issues, but I'm willing to lower some bars if this thing will be as functional as I expect it to be.
     

    --
    I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
    1. Re:cool by rtconner · · Score: 1

      Hehe, but you must be sad to realize that once in full use there are Google employees out there who can technically (if they desired enough) track your every move. They would know everything you send via email, all of your chat information, and your schedule of events. Pretty scary stuff if you ask me. Not to mention they could have your full search history and what news you read, what ads you click on, and what things you buy. That is, provided you use those features. It's a lot though.

      --
      023AD01("Child", "Evil");
  28. can't find it! by malaba · · Score: 0

    I cannot find the hidden name

    where it is ?
    could you please give more details ?

    which image ?
    where ?

    is it a form of watermarking ?

    thanks

    1. Re:can't find it! by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

      Another posted said it was in the quick edit one, but I couldn't see it. However, if you look at how closely cropped "quick edit" is, and clearly blown up, I'm guessing the original site noticed it as well and cropped it out.

  29. URL by degraeve · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.google.com/cl2 yields a login prompt that says:
    "Sign in to Google CL2 with your Google Account"

    1. Re:URL by badzilla · · Score: 5, Funny
      --
      "Don't belong. Never join. Think for yourself. Peace." V.Stone, Microsoft Corporation
    2. Re:URL by rathehun · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ah - well, but it says that it's an invalid page if you try and login.
      Nice try though.

    3. Re:URL by smvp6459 · · Score: 1

      Damn...please someone mod the parent funny.

    4. Re:URL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woah, I clicked it and saw my calendar.

      Is it live for anyone else?

    5. Re:URL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also try http://calendar.google.com/ - a redirect to the main page, but obviously a registered subdomain (unlike cl2.google.com which goes nowhere...)

    6. Re:URL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I signed in & got "the page you requested is invalid"

      Then I went over to Gmail & was already signed in.

      Interesting...

  30. Awesome! by Godji · · Score: 5, Funny

    So now that Google already knows what we're searching for and can read our e-mail, it will also be able to know what we're doing at any given time? I'm definitely signing up!! What's next, Google Personal Diary? Google Thought Recorder?

    Remember the quote, "We're moving to a Google that knows more about you" ? You'd better.

    1. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      WTF? yahoo has that facility too. it has had it for more than 3-4 years now. (could be longer don't remember) why dont u complain about it? just because bashing google or MS or FF is almost a fashion? i use my yahoo calendar for social life (like b'days and bill due dates and family events) and outlook at work. and will use Galendar when it is available.

    2. Re:Awesome! by KingJoshi · · Score: 3, Funny

      Remember? I don't have to remember anything anymore. Google does that for me ;)

      --
      In times like these, it is helpful to remember that there have always been times like these. - Paul Harvey
    3. Re:Awesome! by this+great+guy · · Score: 1
      "
      What's next, Google Personal Diary? Google Thought Recorder?
      "

      We are working on that too. It's in Alpha stage right now. Expect the Beta to be out by April.
      - Larry Page

    4. Re:Awesome! by alexgieg · · Score: 2, Funny

      Google already have the "Personal Diary" service. It's called Blogger.

      --
      Conservatism: (n.) love of the existing evils. Liberalism: (n.) desire to substitute new evils for the existing ones.
    5. Re:Awesome! by Godji · · Score: 1

      Also, some claim that by knowing what you search for, they know what you're thinking, so there goes the Thought Recorder. Combine that and the Google Desktop (access to our files), and what do you get? It turns out I should've been moderated +5 Prophecy instead!

      I know what's next: Google Me. Based on data mined from all those sources, the service manages your schedule, writes e-mail, works on your files (by searching for information on google), and writes comments on you blog while doing so. It would be a complete replacement of... you! YOU would be OBSOLETE!

      Hm, I guess that's why they like to say "Where do you want to...", oh wait, that was the other one... Never mind.

  31. Fry, origami by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Once all of the google apps are out of beta, the office apps, chat, blogger, search, etc. the origami frier will be activated. a portable wifi terminal, able to access all google tools all of the time. This is especially obvious considering google's work towards city-wide wifi in philly, and work towards creating their "own internet". With the fewer resources required to create such a "dumb" device, everyone will have one.

  32. Sweet by pato101 · · Score: 3, Informative
    Now we need to find out how to share/copy/integrate/syncronize this calendar with Evolution.

    Wow, too late, seems that they are offering ICAL format :-))

  33. mmm sleepy about google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i dont know. Yahoo, MSN, and everyone has had calendar. What's the big deal about Google? Nothing innovative here.. a little dhtml? Tired of these guys.. Everyone wants to complain about MSFT but really looking to act like them. I like google, but copy cats. That's all. My 2 cents.

    1. Re:mmm sleepy about google by CockMonster · · Score: 0

      How dare you take the name of Google in vain, especially on Slashdot! Google eats dead babies

    2. Re:mmm sleepy about google by waif69 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Eating dead babies is better than eating living ones.

  34. Not BY Apple , per se by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Maybe not by Apple, but in this particular case on Apple's OS.

    SubEthaEdit is an awesome collaborative editor.

    --
    ± 29 dB
  35. Synchronization the wrong direction by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Prior to a reliable world wide Internet, manual synchronization between different devices using different programs was a necessary evil. It was, however, a messy and error prone approach.

    What we ought to have now is a server based approach, where all devices access the same version of the data. For now, this implies a browser solution, though a DAV solution or dedicated protocol would be better. Nothing I have looked at is exactly right, but Yahoo Calendar (full version when on a computer, wap version on a cell phone) is getting there.

  36. manage myself? by dartarrow · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hmm.... I suppose something like this could help me better manage my social life...


    ..oh wait...


    --
    I love humanity, it is people I hate
  37. Hmm... by Jords · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's really getting fairly old 'leaking' screenshots etc to raise some easy hype :D But anyway, this calandar program looks neat! Maybe if they stopped adding new features every week gmail could come out of "Beta" (ie, if it stuffs up don't bitch to us) sometime this century.

  38. What AJAX library does Google use? by wysiwia · · Score: 3, Informative

    What I'd like to know is what AJAX library they use. Does Google build its own library and do they plan to release it to the public (OpenSource) or do they use another? I guess they don't use Yahoo's library and probably also not Zimbra's, so what else?

    I'm starting to use the Dojo toolkit (http://dojotoolkit.org/) which might become the top free AJAX library. See my first easy samples "tree?.html" at (http://wyoguide.sf.net/test/.

    O. Wyss

    --
    See http://wyoguide.sf.net/papers/Cross-platform.html
    1. Re:What AJAX library does Google use? by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

      AFAIK, they roll their own. Of course, when Google Maps came out (and GMail, to a degree), this was still a pretty new area and there weren't really any mature libraries to choose from.

      Now that "Web 2.0" is more mature, it's possible they will start using things like dojo, protoype.js, script.aculo.us... but I suspect they will just keep doing things their own way.

    2. Re:What AJAX library does Google use? by jaiyen · · Score: 5, Informative
  39. What If... by All+Your+Name+Are+Be · · Score: 1

    ... CL2 doesn't stand for CaLendar2 but CL2. What if this is the begining of Client releases for google? Each version number introducing a new network oriented utility. What if this is just wishful thinking?

  40. Data skimming by backwardMechanic · · Score: 1

    To allow Google to skim even more of your data. The calendar bit is just candy to keep the users happy. I still like my ultra portable, battery free solution with freeform user interface. That's right, a little book and a pen. I can use it anywhere. I can even add doodles.

  41. Doesn't have to be that way. by zCyl · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Google COULD, if they want to, have a calendaring system in which the data is encrypted the entire time it is in transit, and the entire time it is stored on their systems, and only decrypted locally by a java applet within the browser of the user accessing the data. They could also still support this with advertising, and people would be more inclined to use it with the knowledge that their data would be safe.

    Do you think businesses are going to want their employees scheduling confidential meetings on a calendaring system which Google has full access to? But if it were fully encrypted and only accessed by password locally, this would suddenly be a potent and secure tool which makes the PDA a lot less useful in a networked world.

    1. Re:Doesn't have to be that way. by AeroIllini · · Score: 1

      Google COULD, if they want to, have a calendaring system in which the data is encrypted the entire time it is in transit, and the entire time it is stored on their systems, and only decrypted locally by a java applet within the browser of the user accessing the data.

      This is an intriguing idea, but the implimentation wouldn't be as simple as you claim.

      If the purpose of this encryption is to keep the information from Google, and thus possible governmental intervention, then you would create the events with your public key (either client-side or server-side) and decrypt them with your private key client-side, via JavaScript. Google's servers would only know about the public key and the encrypted results; they would never see the decrypted version, since decryption is done client-side. If you only use this service on a single computer, then the private key can be stored locally, but there would be no difference between that and just using Exchange or some other standalone calandering app. If you want to read your events on some other device--which is, after all, the whole point of making this a web service--then you need some way of getting your private key to the other device for decryption via client-side JavaScript. Having Google store the private key for download to the other device nullifies the security of encryption: if Google has both the encrypted data and the means to decrypt it, then it's not really encrypted, is it?

      There might be an inherent paradox here: encrypted data accessible anywhere. I'm not sure this is even possible without making connections that bypass Google (say, from an internet-cafe computer to your home machine for private key transfer, or even to a third-party server that stores your private key for you.)

      Would anyone better versed in encryption care to clarify for me, or to suggest schemes other than key-pair systems?

      --
      For security, the MD5 hash of this message and sig is 09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0.
    2. Re:Doesn't have to be that way. by zipwow · · Score: 1

      I think I have a better piece of prognostication for corporate networks:

      The google business appliance.

      Plug it in, and get:

      intranet searching
      email
      instant messaging
      calendar
      office applications (Wrightly, others)

      All delivered via your friendly local web-browser.

      Google is like skynet with better PR.

      -Zipwow

      --
      I don't know which is more depressing, that 2/3 didn't care enough to vote, or that 1/2 of those that did are crazy.
    3. Re:Doesn't have to be that way. by zCyl · · Score: 1

      There might be an inherent paradox here: encrypted data accessible anywhere. I'm not sure this is even possible without making connections that bypass Google (say, from an internet-cafe computer to your home machine for private key transfer, or even to a third-party server that stores your private key for you.)

      This is why you wouldn't use a large private key, but simply use a key derived as a hash from the user's password and an algorithm such as AES.

  42. On the up by prjames · · Score: 5, Funny

    Google - It just gets Beta and Beta

    1. Re:On the up by frankm_slashdot · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up
      Score:+3.14159, FunnyNotFlamebaitYouOverSensitiveClod

  43. Lotus Notes Calendar by CockMonster · · Score: 0

    When I saw that screenshot I got a shiver down my spine

  44. FINALLY! by Bushido+Hacks · · Score: 1

    Next question: where are the screenshots?

    --
    The Rapture is NOT an exit strategy.
  45. Re:Security? We've heard of it... by broothal · · Score: 1

    Hope you don't work at google, solomanj :)

    Maybe it's an anagram? There are several names hidden in there - like "Joan Loms"

  46. Re:Snake? Snake Plisken? by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

    Lousy internet. You can never find what you're really looking for.

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
  47. Love by this+great+guy · · Score: 1
    "
    I love the internet.
    "

    Internet, will you marry me ?

    1. Re:Love by this+great+guy · · Score: 1

      She said yes !! Look I got an email !!
      Subject: ILOVEYOU

    2. Re:Love by rar · · Score: 1

      She said yes !! Look I got an email !!
      Subject: ILOVEYOU


      Well, technically, that is not a yes.

      You should look for another email: "improve your stamina" for the reason...

  48. Re:Security? We've heard of it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The second image shows the 'Agenda' tab. Now, Google only released this to 200 people and they want it kept quiet. Have we at last found their hidden agenda?

    What? The door is over there, you say? OK, I'll be off then ...

  49. A Dream: an interactive public calendar by dalutong · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What I have always wanted is a web calendar that I can sync with my desktop calendaring app (preferably via an open standard.) It'd be especially nice if it was acccessible via my cellphone, too. But what I'd really like it to do is this:

    - show my schedule to the public
    - allow me to choose which calendar events I have posted are (in)visible, and with or without description (since I don't - necessarily want everyone to know _what I'm doing then. just that i'm busy.)
    - allow people to select a time range from the calendar and "apply" for that range of my time
    - have me emailed/IMd/otherwise contacted when such an application occurs so I can confirm/reject it
    - then have them notified of the acceptance/rejection.

    I have a pretty busy and variable schedule. It would be nice for me to have my calendar available to me at all times. And to let people figure out what time suits both of us without having to trust that neither of us are forgetting anything.

    Does such a calendar exist?

    *Note: feel free to steal this idea. i know i'm not going to develop it...

    --

    What comes first, finding a teacher or becoming a student?
    1. Re:A Dream: an interactive public calendar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Does such a calendar exist?

      It's called CL2.

    2. Re:A Dream: an interactive public calendar by cschmidt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It may be overkill, but check out egroupware. It's PHP based and installs fairly easily on a web server. I use it to sync with Kontact via xmlrpc.

      --

      Who am I to blow against the wind? -- Paul Simon
    3. Re:A Dream: an interactive public calendar by metamatic · · Score: 1
      What I have always wanted is a web calendar that I can sync with my desktop calendaring app (preferably via an open standard.) It'd be especially nice if it was acccessible via my cellphone, too.

      Just FYI, you can have 100% of what you want today, with a Mac and a copy of WebCalendar.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    4. Re:A Dream: an interactive public calendar by dalutong · · Score: 1

      Can you please provide a link to this webcalendar software's webpage? It seems there are a few webcalendar (without a space between the words) programs. Neither of the two I researched seemed to do what I listed.

      --

      What comes first, finding a teacher or becoming a student?
    5. Re:A Dream: an interactive public calendar by metamatic · · Score: 1

      First Google hit on WebCalendar is a web-based calendar in PHP that understands the iCal/vCal format, so can share info with iCal on the Mac. The Mac will sync with your phone.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  50. Screenshots? by krod77 · · Score: 1

    Where are the screen shots? Taken down by the google secret police?

    --
    Cheers, Jared
    http://phoenix-network.org
    1. Re:Screenshots? by born_to_live_forever · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing slashdotted. So what else is new?

      --

      - Peter Ravn Rasmussen

  51. It's about time by kopo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's amazing - just a day or two ago, I was thinking how convenient it would be to have a calendar in Gmail, rather than have my schedule sitting in Outlook on my home desktop and doing nothing.
    And now it turns out they're working on it.

    And just a few months ago, I was hoping that Google would make an Israel version of Google News - and that came out on Tuesday, and looks great.

    How often does it happen that a company consistently puts out programs and services that you'd wanted to use before they made them?

    1. Re:It's about time by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

      How often does it happen that a company consistently puts out programs and services that you'd wanted to use before they made them?

      I'm pretty sure that's how capitalism works...

  52. Re:Security? We've heard of it... by Stoopid-Guy0 · · Score: 0

    More likely it is SolomanJ, last name then first initial.

  53. SyncML please!!! by Xenna · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't think many people are aware of it but a 'new' standard is finally emerging that allows mobile devices to synchronize over the internet. A great number of mobile phones and smartphones (like my Nokia 9300) support this. See the website below for a list of devices that support SyncML. So does the Mozilla Sunbird Calendar...

    List of devices: https://www.mobical.net/mobical/phonesetup/

    What use is an online calendar if it doesn't support online synchronisation?

    I know that Gmail has ignored the wonderful imap standard, so I'm not entirely cnvinced they won't ignore this one.

    So: Please Google, don't be evil, and use the open SyncML standard ;)

    X.

    1. Re:SyncML please!!! by Zalminen · · Score: 1

      Umm... I may remember incorrectly (and the Sunbird roadmap page seems to be down so I can't even check), but the ability to synchronize with mobile devices won't be added to Sunbird until _after_ version 1.0 and the current Sunbird version is 0.3a1... And yes, it certainly would be great if Google supported SyncML.

    2. Re:SyncML please!!! by Xenna · · Score: 1

      Sunbird is just another client just like any of the mobile devices. If Google's Calendar works as the SyncML server you sync your mobile device with Google Calendar over wireless Internet. Then you fire up your laptop and start Sunbird which also automatically syncs with Google, downloading all the changes you made on your mobile. It's really quite intuitive. The server holds the authoritative state of your calendar and changes are synced to each of the attached clients whenever they connect. A bit like IMAP, really.

      I already use this with the free Mobical service and mobile syncs (calendar & contacts) are very fast and low-bandwidth. I've also tried Sunbird SyncML support, but that one's not quite there yet...

      X.

  54. Re:URL, Screenshots?? by vijayk · · Score: 1

    Here's the link to Cached version of ScreenShots. And, Google says, it doesn't know what this cache is. Google can police even cache, beware!!

    --
    hellopagan@yahoo.com
  55. Re:Snake? Snake Plisken? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yoink! So long, dudes!

  56. Discussion by u16084 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There has been ALOT of discussion on Calendars, and EXCHANGE. There was a comment made that EXCHANGE is the clear choice (and something only choice) for corporate informational exchange. Well, the company I worked for refused Exchange. What they are using is OpenXchange. http://mirror.open-xchange.org/ox/EN/community// Which is a open sourced version of novells Version http://www.novell.com/products/openexchange/screen shots.html/ For those who need a "Calendar" or "Email" Server without sticking your stuff into google.

    The Open Sourced version is a little hectic to setup as it does not contain an administrative backend, so most of of the work is done through the command line... which is a small price to pay if you compare what is costs for MS Exchange. A Demo could be located here http://www.openexchange.com/EN/product/onlinedemo. html/ and here http://mirror.open-xchange.org/ox/EN/community/onl ine.htm/
    Plugins for OUTLOOK are available, seamless intergration.

    --
    -- I Dont Deserve A Sig I Have Bad Karma
    1. Re:Discussion by u16084 · · Score: 1

      Link Correction Crap, Didnt format correctly for the links.. Just remove the spaces. My Mistake.

      --
      -- I Dont Deserve A Sig I Have Bad Karma
  57. Groupware USEFUL by fisternipply · · Score: 1

    That business about groupware sucking is bullshit. Some of us *are* managers, and we need to know what's going on with the projects we're responsible for. So rather than, let's say, walking around to everyone's door asking what they did yesterday, if I have groupware I can check the common tasklist and not piss off my people with an interruption. Case in point--where would you programmers be without your ticket system? That's groupware. Duh. Stupid, stupid, stupid. F that groupware shit! Gonna stick it to the MAN!

    1. Re:Groupware USEFUL by sootman · · Score: 1
      Read the piece. Social software != groupware. Read exactly what he wrote before you start bitching about what he's saying.

      "Groupware" is all about things like "workflow", which means, "the chairman of the committee has emailed me this checklist, and I'm done with item 3, so I want to check off item 3, so this document must be sent back to my supervisor to approve the fact that item 3 is changing from `unchecked' to `checked', and once he does that, it can be directed back to committee for review."

      Nobody cares about that shit. Nobody you'd want to talk to, anyway... If you want to do something that's going to change the world, build software that people want to use instead of software that managers want to buy.

      When words like "groupware" and "enterprise" start getting tossed around, you're doing the latter. You start adding features to satisfy line-items on some checklist that was constructed by interminable committee meetings among bureaucrats, and you're coding toward an externally-dictated product specification that maybe some company will want to buy a hundred "seats" of, but that nobody will ever love. With that kind of motivation, nobody will ever find it sexy. It won't make anyone happy. ...

      Anyway, I babbled at Nat along these lines for a while, predicting that, while I was sure that anyone he talked to in a corporation would tell him, "free groupware, yes, awesome!", there was really no reason to even bother releasing something like that as open source, because there was going to be absolutely no buy-in from the "itch-scratching" crowd. With a product like that, there was going to be no teenager in his basement hacking on it just because it was cool, or because it doing so made his life easier. Maybe IBM would throw some bucks at a developer or two to help out with it, because it might be cheaper to pay someone to write software than to just buy it off the shelf. But with a groupware product, nobody would ever work on it unless they were getting paid to, because it's just fundamentally not interesting to individuals.
      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  58. Re:Security? We've heard of it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bahahah i thought that may have been my TA at school, but his address is actually solomonj@usc.edu , i should've really checked before pestering him about it lol.

  59. The original host appears to be down by James_Duncan8181 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The original host is down, so I have taken my life and bandwidth allowance in my hands and stuck a mirror up. http://jaduncan.net/google-calendar-cl2-leaked-pic tures

    --
    "To any truly impartial person, it would be obvious that I am right."
  60. Google + Federal Gubbermint by hacker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does this mean that now, when Google is forced to bend to the pressure of the Current Administration through some laws that will no-doubt be passed to ensure compliance, that the Gubbermint will now be able to see where every person is at any given time, as well as what email they're sending, to whom, and what web searches they're using?

    Oh wait, don't use Google, use Yahoo! to search, or AOL, or MSN... Riiiight, the .gov will just aggregate those search results (that they've already secured access to) through a real-time query and figure out exactly WHERE you sent that email or did that search from, then cross-reference that with your calendar, and figure out exactly what you were doing at the time.

    "It looked like he was at home, because his calendar said he was 'Feeding the cat', but his web search came from an IP outside of the town he lives in. But he has a meeting in an hour at the dentist's office, and he just did a web search for driving directions. We can be sure he'll be there for an hour, and then we can raid his house and search his computers while he's gone. Nobody will ever know!"

    As long as there are ridiculous draconian laws that allow .gov to demand logs and other details from providers, there can be no anonymity. At least so far, my provider is Pro-Privacy, and "Gets It(tm)". It pays to go with one of the little guys sometimes.

  61. Motorcycles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't quite know why, but I got the same vibe now that I got from that guy (cousin or whatever) who was supervising for a bit in "American Chopper".

    You know, the guy they finished things in spite of instead of because of.

  62. Sweet!! by arrgster · · Score: 1

    I've been waiting for this

  63. And yet by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Informative
    everything that they have released (excluding gtalk), has beat all the others.
    • Their search engine is superior.
    • gmail was the first with Gig storage; It also has the superior interface.
    • Maps is killing mapquest and microsoft's stuff. Mapquest has been dieing for a bit, but over the last couple of years it has been put into the ground.
    • Gtalk is so so. Nothing inovative, other than using jabber (the first that talks to all the others).
    And now they bought Writely.

    Dollar for Dollar, I would expect good things from their calendar.
    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  64. Correct me if I'm wrong.. by sean.peters · · Score: 2, Informative

    But isn't vCal just a way to send calendar events between calendars? I didn't think it could actually synchronize, say, the calendar on your phone with with the one on your desktop. If, for example, you sent an appointment from your desktop calendar to your phone with vCal, then changed the desktop instance of the appointment, there'd be no way to synchronize that change with the phone using vCal - you'd have to delete the appointment from your phone and send the updated instance (again) from your desktop... right?

    Sean

    1. Re:Correct me if I'm wrong.. by metamatic · · Score: 1

      vCal is also the basis of the sync protocol (SyncML) used to sync calendar events between calendars. For example, it's what iSync uses to sync my calendar to my Palm PDA and Sony Ericsson cell phone.

      vCal files can also contain multiple events and be published to a web page for people to subscribe to. That's how my events show up on my wife's calendar, and vice versa.

      vCal can also be used to publish free time information for people who might want to book an appointment with you.

      So yeah, you're wrong.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  65. I like 30boxes, but google would be cooler by helix_r · · Score: 1


    I really like some of the new online calendar projects out there. They have a nice slick interfaces and allow you to share events with others, create personal rss-feeds, and there are hacks for convienent bookmarklets on browser for event entry.

    The one I am using now is new and is called 30boxes.com. Very nice interface, very good features. However, if google implememented something similar, I would switch to google. They are more likely to continue to exist in the forseeable future and that helps me to put more trust investment into a calendar run by them.

    1. Re:I like 30boxes, but google would be cooler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      30 Boxes has one huge usability issue for me. It's designed as a shared event resource not as a personal organization tool. Everything is public by default and visible through a static, although tough to crack, URL. I hope Google provides personal organization capabilities along with the event broadcasting stuff. Being so tightly coupled to gmail I assume that they will.

  66. Write.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somehow, this reminds of write brothers... just dont know how!

  67. Return of the Thin Client? by Jedi+Holocron · · Score: 1

    Gmail
    Gdrive
    Gcalendar
    Gdesktop
    Gword (word processor)
    Gsheet (spreadsheet)
    Gbase
    Gthis
    Gthat

    Brings us to the online version of the majorty of business and home desktops. Only now online and available wherever you are.

    Scary Cool!

    1. Re:Return of the Thin Client? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the online chat community: Gspot

    2. Re:Return of the Thin Client? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wake me up when they release Gdate and Gsex. Beta (heck, alpha!) is fine by me :(

  68. HisSQL server has gone away :)) by hritcu · · Score: 1

    WordPress database error: [MySQL server has gone away]

    --
    If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough. (Alan Kay)
  69. Here is the mirror by hritcu · · Score: 1
    --
    If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough. (Alan Kay)
  70. Daily by riderofrohan20 · · Score: 0

    I can't go an hour without somehow using Google to make my everyday life easier. They really know how to make everything convienent. I would marry Google if I could.... I really would.

  71. Hula is not dead by Randle_Revar · · Score: 1

    By the way, the Hula project is pretty much dead at this point.

    66 messages in the Hula svn-commit mailing list in March (so far) (and ~150 in February) disagree with you.

    http://forge.novell.com/modules/xfmod/maillist/arc hbrowse.php/hula-commits/2006-March/thread.html?id =1613&prjname=hula&mlname=commits

    1. Re:Hula is not dead by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 1

      I see maybe three or four names in that list. Certainly not the full-time team of 25 or more that they were touting when the project was announced.

      There's really a lot of bad blood associated with this project. They exploded onto the scene, declared that nothing exists in this space, and that they're going to take it over. This was very insulting to all of the other existing open source groupware projects, most of which have a friendly relationship with each other. As a result, most of us were happy to hear about the layoffs.


      --
      Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
  72. Outlooks Nicest Feature by Flamesplash · · Score: 1

    I'm really glad to see this. caledar/email support is by far the nicest feature in Outlook, but the main issue is that enough people had to use outlook in some sort of networked fashion to make it really work. Gmail is much more pervasive in usage outside of the corporate world and has the network setup since it's webmail. I really hope they get the usability of this right.

    --
    "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
  73. Re:Security? We've heard of it... by Punboy · · Score: 3, Funny

    I seriously cannot believe you would do that. That is like, against the Slashdot Code of Honor.

    You should be banned.

    --
    If you like what I've said here, and want to read more, go to http://www.krillrblog.com
  74. Social Networking by RyanMuldoon · · Score: 1

    What I find interesting is that Google is developing products that are the building blocks for something larger. Orkut seems like it was a test run, and Google doesn't care about it anymore. Myspace and Facebook are the fads these days, but they still aren't very good. But Google has blogging, shared calendars, maps, chat, classifieds and email. Add in a few more mechanisms to figure out what you like and where you live (which someone like Amazon has, through your purchasing habits), then Google can auto-generate a large portion of a profile for you, and further make some pretty good guesses about who you might like to be friends with. But most importantly, it can tie it in to actual, real-world events. You like band X, Google can tell you when that band is coming, how to get there, and who might be interested in joining you. Then it can put it into your calendar for you. Want to go to dinner? Google can give you information on the restaurants in your area. Social Networking isn't that useful unless it connects to your real-world life. Google is building the pieces to do that. And no doubt it can make plenty of ad dollars off of being your social life's facilitator.

  75. No Marcus Bains Line? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the screenshots, it looks like it lacks a Marcus Bains Line.

    Oh well. At least we can greasemonkey it in.

  76. Yahoo... by EdMcMan · · Score: 1

    Looks cool. Calendar is really the only thing I still use over at Yahoo.

  77. My prophecy! by DemonWeeping · · Score: 1

    One step closer!

    Google Life

    It's going to happen. I'm interested in WHEN.

  78. What bothers me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google has been rumored to state that they would like to house everyones data and files... and we know GDrive is coming. Now we have a Calendar application. I see a trend here, where Google wants to be our operating system, and you fanboys are buying into it. They want your stuff, and you're cheering them for it.

    I have a calendar. It hangs on my wall.

  79. leaked my a$$ by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

    Under strict rules to not share, but wait some leaked photos get out.

  80. Very exciting! by cranbers · · Score: 1

    I am not just excited to see a calender to go with my cranbers@gmail.com account but I am thanking google for the days I won't have to use yahoo's crap anymore. The thing that is great about google is that, they are not the first to do these things, but I have no doubt they will be the first to do it right. Their office offering is going to be great as well I have no doubt!

    --
    I want spam! cranbers@gmail.com