The point was mostly that even though we have and have bought a bunch of planes we have few to none which are ready to actually go up there if needed.
Also I guess if they where to bomb the response would come too late.
Bildt claim the Russians likely haven't even noticed the talk about FRA helping NSA collect information from their area, Gotland was completely undefended and I have no idea where the communication cables are in the Baltic sea but I at least assume Gotland and the surrounding area is of some strategic interest and that possibly some cables can be around there. And regardless what was the practice round towards the FRA for if not to state an example? Maybe it was just a coincidence or practice which happened to have that target that time..
Of other interest is that Russia got S-400 SAM in Kaliningrad with reach well into Sweden whereas Sweden haven't got jack shit of such capability.
What good are your planes when they (never reach the air or) are shot down?
As for crippling we still spend more than say Finland. I don't get why US would appreciate little defense in Sweden? Oil money maybe. Or federal. Or whatever.
Then again Sweden possibly had to (no contract signed yet) buy stuff back worth four times more from Brazil whereas US can spend wherever they want. The Brazilians also wanted technology transfers and some production over there plus it seemed they also wanted a model developed so that it could carry Brazilian weapons.
So what is the better deal in the end? For SAAB or for the tax payers (is it a good idea that we develop planes ourselves? Sweden have already bought about 200 Gripen/JAS-39, the idea is to order 60 more. Offer to Brazil was for 36 planes. What do we need 260 planes for? When Russia brought planes (don't remember if it was bomb planes or not) to Gotland and later close to where FRA (our surveillance agency) was operating they never seemed to get any planes up into the air regardless. We have very few at stand by for such activities. Also in the 80s I think we had closer to 800 planes at most, we've scrapped a whole lot of Viggens/JAS-37 (all? =P, we don't use them regardless) because we don't need them.)
The positive for us is of course that we've already leased / leased and sold planes to Hungary and... the Czech republic. Thailand and South Africa have bought planes, the Swiss government want to buy some but the people will vote on it. Now if Brazil buy some who knows whatever India, Denmark or some other countries (I think I've missed at least one) will buy some too.
It's likely a better deal to share the production and cost with others rather than just built it for yourself at least. Even if we may have to sell them in very attractive deals.
Maybe it work different in the US where you supposedly had different tax rates depending on how long you had held the property. Here where it's just 30% on any profits all the time it doesn't really matter when you bought anything or what you've done previously.
I don't see why, average price per share is good enough for stocks and would be good enough for bitcoins.
Keep track of all your purchases and you know what you've paid for them, then inform the right authorities about any sales (of coins, a.k.a. also purchases of other things using them) giving the numbers sold, at what exchange rate and your average price paid for the ones you hold.
Which of course will get pretty tricky if you buy an item which have no value set in NOK, USD, Euro or such.
Can anyone explain why the Radeons is faster than the Nvidia cards?
I could simply look over at wikipedia for how the cores are configured but I guess that may not tell the whole story. Anyone got the technical details?
Is it a hardware difference or do it have anything to do with drivers too?
I don't know whatever that actually mean, how it is or how reliable anything else is. Maybe someone with some actual knowledge can provide the answers:) (My thought was that one could likely use different randomizers.)
Guesswork. They take what they think they know and use it to make a guess that will change every time they find out what they thought they knew was wrong. It's fun to follow but don't put too much faith in it.
My thought was something about how Amazon would be much more successful than eBay too. Then again eBay sell stuff differently.
I think it's a cool idea:), the more sci-fi now the better! Except the scary stuff. Or maybe especially the scary stuff? Undecided there =P. Nah, fuck the spying part, or bring more Hackers (the movie.)
Isn't it quite a bit better that I say use one password for Facebook and then identify on a lot of other places with the Facebook credentials rather than use the same password on lots of different pages there each one can be broken into and my password cracked rather than just Facebook?
Also if it's say logging in to write a comment on some blog or say on Tom's hardware or whatever why do I even need the freaking log-in in the first place? I would be happy enough with leaving my name.
If you don't have a tracker of some sort for all your passwords and you don't want to ask for a new one each time you want to log-in re-usage will happen.
I wont make unique strong passwords in every place using my mind.
I wouldn't care if criminals could post as me on Tom's hardware..
Also what I kinda like is the bankid stuff we've got here where you can log-in into your Internet bank, make some kind of certification and store that locally and then say when you are to declare your taxes you can log-in using that and a password. Obviously fail if someone get hold of the certificate in a way which have it work + password but don't need any unique or good passwords for each page at least.
(the dictionary complain about login and reusage so..)
I think those random password generators and "keeptrackors" is the most convenient and best but I've also considered using https://www.grc.com/offthegrid.htm or that together with something else.
As for the the guy talking down the "bunch of words"-approach I guess one could take words from different languages and then throw in a few extra characters and numbers in a few groups here and there just to mess up if someone only use dictionaries and then it would become somewhat harder (though if one use the same password or the same places for things always it's not all that great anyway.)
I've seen claims on them that they are broken down by sun light.
Regardless I throw my soft plastic in the recycle bin for soft plastic and before we had one of those I used the "rest garbage" bin instead because back then it wasn't recycled anyway so regardless of which bin you used it would get burned.
Plastic bags hold better and hence they are better for me.
What I normally use as a grocery bag is a 4 SEK IKEA Frakta Medium bag though, often lately I haven't brought it and taken those small fruit bags but that's pretty stupid, but if I don't have anything else and don't want to pay for a larger stronger plastic bag that's what I do.
A regular plastic bag is like 1.5 SEK, the Ikea Frakta Medium is 4 SEK as said. Paper bag is likely at least 2 SEK.
The Frakta holds way better and is about the size of the paper bags.
I know. I once used 1Password and good passwords, but it didn't worked with Opera and all OSes. KeePass is more transferable but I feel I want to be able to access from everywhere and I also want to have access to passwords for things not web-related.
The first solution I had was passwords in a gpg-encrypted local text file but I stopped using that when I stopped using the drive which held both the file and the gpg key.
Got to be a whole freaking lot better than the 8 characters stuff even with various cases, numbers and symbols.
I love how people with a clue suggest people use different passwords everywhere and then more or less every single page in the universe require you to have a freaking login and often don't use any central stuff for doing so (somewhat better now with facebook and Google then again do I really want to connect my accounts that way?)
Guess a certificate / private key and password isn't all that much better but it's way more convenient.
Slashdot Mirror
The point was mostly that even though we have and have bought a bunch of planes we have few to none which are ready to actually go up there if needed.
Also I guess if they where to bomb the response would come too late.
Bildt claim the Russians likely haven't even noticed the talk about FRA helping NSA collect information from their area, Gotland was completely undefended and I have no idea where the communication cables are in the Baltic sea but I at least assume Gotland and the surrounding area is of some strategic interest and that possibly some cables can be around there. And regardless what was the practice round towards the FRA for if not to state an example? Maybe it was just a coincidence or practice which happened to have that target that time ..
Of other interest is that Russia got S-400 SAM in Kaliningrad with reach well into Sweden whereas Sweden haven't got jack shit of such capability.
What good are your planes when they (never reach the air or) are shot down?
As for crippling we still spend more than say Finland. I don't get why US would appreciate little defense in Sweden? Oil money maybe. Or federal. Or whatever.
#amigaswe?
At least I doubt trust had much to do with it as far as the actual planes go. More likely political reaction from being spying upon before.
I don't know which plane is the best deal, both planes was the ones being under consideration since they had forgot about Rafale due to cost.
I wouldn't be surprised if SAAB/Sweden bends backwards a lot and try to give a really good deal for the trade to happen.
US/Boeing may not have or want to.
Then again Sweden possibly had to (no contract signed yet) buy stuff back worth four times more from Brazil whereas US can spend wherever they want. The Brazilians also wanted technology transfers and some production over there plus it seemed they also wanted a model developed so that it could carry Brazilian weapons.
So what is the better deal in the end? For SAAB or for the tax payers (is it a good idea that we develop planes ourselves? Sweden have already bought about 200 Gripen/JAS-39, the idea is to order 60 more. Offer to Brazil was for 36 planes. What do we need 260 planes for? When Russia brought planes (don't remember if it was bomb planes or not) to Gotland and later close to where FRA (our surveillance agency) was operating they never seemed to get any planes up into the air regardless. We have very few at stand by for such activities. Also in the 80s I think we had closer to 800 planes at most, we've scrapped a whole lot of Viggens/JAS-37 (all? =P, we don't use them regardless) because we don't need them.)
The positive for us is of course that we've already leased / leased and sold planes to Hungary and ... the Czech republic. Thailand and South Africa have bought planes, the Swiss government want to buy some but the people will vote on it. Now if Brazil buy some who knows whatever India, Denmark or some other countries (I think I've missed at least one) will buy some too.
It's likely a better deal to share the production and cost with others rather than just built it for yourself at least. Even if we may have to sell them in very attractive deals.
Got me thinking ..
What if TPB was the only ones who had released (held a torrent/magnet link for) this?
Would that have meant copyright was extended 20 more years because now they had been released?
Mind blown.
Seem like they didn't got the track names right though? =P
Because you can't dance to electric music?
No one dances at raves? To EBM? In clubs?
Everyone is dancing in front of their TVs when some classical music is sounding?
Maybe it work different in the US where you supposedly had different tax rates depending on how long you had held the property. Here where it's just 30% on any profits all the time it doesn't really matter when you bought anything or what you've done previously.
I don't see why, average price per share is good enough for stocks and would be good enough for bitcoins.
Keep track of all your purchases and you know what you've paid for them, then inform the right authorities about any sales (of coins, a.k.a. also purchases of other things using them) giving the numbers sold, at what exchange rate and your average price paid for the ones you hold.
Which of course will get pretty tricky if you buy an item which have no value set in NOK, USD, Euro or such.
And for bitcoins (SHA256?)? Same there?
Can anyone explain why the Radeons is faster than the Nvidia cards?
I could simply look over at wikipedia for how the cores are configured but I guess that may not tell the whole story. Anyone got the technical details?
Is it a hardware difference or do it have anything to do with drivers too?
I googled it:
http://www.openbsd.org/crypto.html#hardware
https://lobste.rs/s/gbe1zl/we_cannot_trust_intel_and_via_s_chip-based_crypto_freebsd_developers_say
I don't know whatever that actually mean, how it is or how reliable anything else is. Maybe someone with some actual knowledge can provide the answers :) (My thought was that one could likely use different randomizers.)
Yeah. That's why.
("I only searched for global thermonuclear war to trick you into thinking I was interesting! Seriously!")
Yeah. Play some Castlevania and maybe one day you can beat Mega man!
Maybe the government could do the same.
Set the default to share everything with the NSA and just hide the setting somewhere obscure, like at the bottom of the sea somewhere or something.
Or just change where it is and replace the defaults every now and then.
Guesswork. They take what they think they know and use it to make a guess that will change every time they find out what they thought they knew was wrong. It's fun to follow but don't put too much faith in it.
It sure beats: "Because God!"
lol :D
My thought was something about how Amazon would be much more successful than eBay too. Then again eBay sell stuff differently.
I think it's a cool idea :), the more sci-fi now the better! Except the scary stuff. Or maybe especially the scary stuff? Undecided there =P. Nah, fuck the spying part, or bring more Hackers (the movie.)
"Because we know why and you don't."
Isn't it quite a bit better that I say use one password for Facebook and then identify on a lot of other places with the Facebook credentials rather than use the same password on lots of different pages there each one can be broken into and my password cracked rather than just Facebook?
Also if it's say logging in to write a comment on some blog or say on Tom's hardware or whatever why do I even need the freaking log-in in the first place? I would be happy enough with leaving my name.
If you don't have a tracker of some sort for all your passwords and you don't want to ask for a new one each time you want to log-in re-usage will happen.
I wont make unique strong passwords in every place using my mind.
I wouldn't care if criminals could post as me on Tom's hardware ..
Also what I kinda like is the bankid stuff we've got here where you can log-in into your Internet bank, make some kind of certification and store that locally and then say when you are to declare your taxes you can log-in using that and a password. Obviously fail if someone get hold of the certificate in a way which have it work + password but don't need any unique or good passwords for each page at least.
(the dictionary complain about login and reusage so ..)
I don't have a smartphone.
I think those random password generators and "keeptrackors" is the most convenient and best but I've also considered using https://www.grc.com/offthegrid.htm or that together with something else.
As for the the guy talking down the "bunch of words"-approach I guess one could take words from different languages and then throw in a few extra characters and numbers in a few groups here and there just to mess up if someone only use dictionaries and then it would become somewhat harder (though if one use the same password or the same places for things always it's not all that great anyway.)
I've seen claims on them that they are broken down by sun light.
Regardless I throw my soft plastic in the recycle bin for soft plastic and before we had one of those I used the "rest garbage" bin instead because back then it wasn't recycled anyway so regardless of which bin you used it would get burned.
Plastic bags hold better and hence they are better for me.
What I normally use as a grocery bag is a 4 SEK IKEA Frakta Medium bag though, often lately I haven't brought it and taken those small fruit bags but that's pretty stupid, but if I don't have anything else and don't want to pay for a larger stronger plastic bag that's what I do.
A regular plastic bag is like 1.5 SEK, the Ikea Frakta Medium is 4 SEK as said. Paper bag is likely at least 2 SEK.
The Frakta holds way better and is about the size of the paper bags.
http://www.ikea.com/sg/en/catalog/products/30161992/
$0.9 in the US.
Plastic bags over paper bags? (Though in lots of US movies and series they have paper bags with no handles.)
Mouse over trackball?
Condoms over.. urethra plugs?
Matches over bow and two pieces of wood?
I was thinking about Firefox over IE but then I got reminded Chrome is likely the most used browser then so I guess you're right on that one..
I know. I once used 1Password and good passwords, but it didn't worked with Opera and all OSes. KeePass is more transferable but I feel I want to be able to access from everywhere and I also want to have access to passwords for things not web-related.
The first solution I had was passwords in a gpg-encrypted local text file but I stopped using that when I stopped using the drive which held both the file and the gpg key.
Also it was a reference to all those old "bla bla You're not allowed to login bla bla bla" messages on various machines.
Got to be a whole freaking lot better than the 8 characters stuff even with various cases, numbers and symbols.
I love how people with a clue suggest people use different passwords everywhere and then more or less every single page in the universe require you to have a freaking login and often don't use any central stuff for doing so (somewhat better now with facebook and Google then again do I really want to connect my accounts that way?)
Guess a certificate / private key and password isn't all that much better but it's way more convenient.
I've made one:
It'snotallowedtotypethisifyou'refromtheNSA!
(Actually that would make a pretty good password.. maybe I sho..)