Slashdot Mirror


China Prefers Sticking With Dying Windows XP To Upgrading

tdog17 writes "China says it wants Microsoft to extend support for Windows XP because that will help in its fight to stop proliferation of pirated Microsoft software. A state copyright official says the release of Windows 8 means a substantial increase in the selling price of a Windows operating system, especially in light of the upcoming end-of-life of Windows XP, which is still used by a large percentage of Chinese. That could drive users to buy pirated copies of a new operating system because they are cheaper, he says."

333 comments

  1. Why by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why is Microsoft selling Windows 8 for so much more than Windows XP? For most uses it's not significantly better.......

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    1. Re:Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      They probably like money. It's a very common condition.

    2. Re:Why by Thanshin · · Score: 0

      Why is Ferrari selling its cars for so much more than Ford? For most uses it's not significantly better....... /irony
      Actually. I can't think of an example of item that's sold most because of it being significantly better instead of because of a better marketing.

    3. Re:Why by aliquis · · Score: 0

      Plastic bags over paper bags? (Though in lots of US movies and series they have paper bags with no handles.)

      Mouse over trackball?

      Condoms over.. urethra plugs?

      Matches over bow and two pieces of wood?

      I was thinking about Firefox over IE but then I got reminded Chrome is likely the most used browser then so I guess you're right on that one..

    4. Re:Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is Microsoft selling Windows 8 for so much more than Windows XP? For most uses it's not significantly better.......

      MSFT: "Because we're delusional enough to believe that whatever our UX designers come up with, we can cram it down the users' throats!"
      Hardware Manufacturers: "Because we're delusional enough to believe that Microsoft's monopoly can force everyone to throw out their old monitors and buy one with a touchscreen."

      The more interesting question is "China, WTF?"

      China: "We have the source code for XP and all the backdoors for it." AnonCow: "I wonder if the source code license that gave them the XP source gives them the Win8 source?" NSA: "If it does, what makes China think it has a true copy of the Win8 source?" PLA: "Exactly. XP it is."

    5. Re: Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paper bags are biodegradable. Plastic bags are not.

    6. Re: Why by Vaphell · · Score: 2

      Paper is not as ecological as you think it is. Its production uses a lot of energy, water and a variety of nasty chemicals.

    7. Re: Why by aliquis · · Score: 2

      I've seen claims on them that they are broken down by sun light.

      Regardless I throw my soft plastic in the recycle bin for soft plastic and before we had one of those I used the "rest garbage" bin instead because back then it wasn't recycled anyway so regardless of which bin you used it would get burned.

      Plastic bags hold better and hence they are better for me.

      What I normally use as a grocery bag is a 4 SEK IKEA Frakta Medium bag though, often lately I haven't brought it and taken those small fruit bags but that's pretty stupid, but if I don't have anything else and don't want to pay for a larger stronger plastic bag that's what I do.

      A regular plastic bag is like 1.5 SEK, the Ikea Frakta Medium is 4 SEK as said. Paper bag is likely at least 2 SEK.

      The Frakta holds way better and is about the size of the paper bags.

      http://www.ikea.com/sg/en/catalog/products/30161992/
      $0.9 in the US.

    8. Re: Why by Cenan · · Score: 1

      Paper bags are also rain-degradable.

      --
      ... whatever ...
    9. Re:Why by Zemran · · Score: 3, Insightful

      For someone that already has XP, the cost has already been paid and there is no future cost. If you try to force such a user to upgrade they will quite understandably object. Very few people who are being coerced feel a loyalty to the person (or company) that is coercing them and would rather go down the market and get a copy...

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    10. Re:Why by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 3, Funny

      "They probably like money. It's a very common condition."

      Nah. I think that's a myth. If Microsoft liked money they never would have released Windows RT or Windows 8.

    11. Re:Why by Sockatume · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's not that 8 is expensive, it's that XP has been heavily discounted due to age. A full XP licence at launch was a whole lot more expensive than a Windows 8 licence is today, even without accounting for inflation.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    12. Re:Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I on the other hand I think the dollar signs in their eyes obscured their vision too much. And that's why we got Windows 8.

    13. Re:Why by gigaherz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It is a common mistake to assume that an old machine has already been paid: the cost of maintenance tends to grow with time, while the value of the machine drops. There's usually a very definite point after which it is not worth maintaining an old machine, but usually by that time you have spent more money in unnecessary maintenance than you would have spent in upgrading the system when it was the right time.

      The same cost exists for software, although because of it's virtual nature, the cost of maintenance grows more because of obsolescence or lack of support, rather than repairs or replacement parts.

    14. Re:Why by TheLink · · Score: 1

      If the Chinese Gov cares that much maybe they should start throwing some resources at ReactOS or similar.

      People might have laughed at Red Flag Linux. But if they produce a working XP compatible OS I bet a number of large corporations would be sorely tempted.

      Microsoft might even start listening a bit better ;).

      --
    15. Re:Why by FaxeTheCat · · Score: 1

      Why is Microsoft selling Windows 8 for so much more than Windows XP?

      To the best of my knowledge, they have not sold XP since Windows 7 was released. At least not around here. Unless you mean XP starter edition, but that is a crippled version only sold with hardware. A Windows 8 license cost considerably less than XP cost when it was actually sold.

    16. Re:Why by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Healthcare.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    17. Re:Why by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Then you can't use your pirated copy of Office / Visio / Autodesk whatever.

      That's the real issue.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    18. Re:Why by realityimpaired · · Score: 2

      People might have laughed at Red Flag Linux. But if they produce a working XP compatible OS I bet a number of large corporations would be sorely tempted.

      I doubt that would make a difference for the situation in China, though..... my understanding was that the reason a lot of Chinese (and Koreans for that matter) are still using XP is because the online banks have written their websites to Internet Explorer 6 and have no intention of ever changing that. There's some sort of crypto module that they're using which is an ActiveX control and completely incompatible with anything else. Some of the more technically savvy users can have XP in a VM for that purpose, but most of the users are up shit creek and have to actually have XP installed.

    19. Re:Why by dAzED1 · · Score: 2

      the SNI extension to TLS is one of the biggest differences... The argument from China seems odd though. Microsoft's options are a) no one buys anything (since they already own it, or already know how to generate keys) or B) they use pirated versions of Windows...in neither option, does Microsoft make any money.

    20. Re:Why by Threni · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In many organizations, once you've paid for the device it's free. You have a few guys running around doing a reinstall when the hard drive dies or whatever, but they'll be doing that sort of thing anyway, and they're paid anyway. I don't agree that they magically get more expensive as time goes on. It's not like they are cars which require expensive repairs all the time. At some point a PC will cost more than it's worth to repair, but that's the point you chuck it and get a new one, and even then you can harvest parts as spares. That's why so many companies (and individuals) have XP machines (and why they'll be on Windows 7 in ten years time). It's a crazy waste of money to upgrade when for most people there is no advantage whatsoever.

    21. Re: Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      plastic is made by extracting a toxic substance (oil) out of the ground. once formed it is recyclable and burnable.
      Burying garbage in the ground is rather stone age.

    22. Re: Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clay, chlorine, bleach, titanium dioxide, sugars, starches, dioxin, plastics, and many more. Plus the energy to digest the pulp and process the wood, the clear cutting, runoff, waste water discharge, wood waste. paper waste, carbon foot print, and on and on. slightly more friendly than electrons, but is an add on, we use both.

    23. Re:Why by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      Why is Microsoft selling Windows 8 for so much more than Windows XP?

      Because they can.

      Microsoft isn't interested in being a charity, Microsoft is interested in making buckets of money.

      If they could figure out how to charge every person on the planet $1/day for the privilege of using computers, they would.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    24. Re:Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why wouldn't a pirated copy of Office work on an XP compatible OS?

    25. Re:Why by jbolden · · Score: 2

      No they wouldn't. Say by 2016 ReactOS is perfect. That still doesn't solve .NET applications. Say that takes 2 more years and gets them to .NET 2. By 2018 we are talking .NET 6 applications are standard in business, while they can now run 2005's software well.

      What's tempting about that?

    26. Re:Why by jbolden · · Score: 1

      That's really easy to fix. Obviously the banks can fix it. If not. Windows 7 comes with XP. Windows 8 hypervisor can easily support an XP / IE 6 for banking. If that were the problem I don't see why Microsoft couldn't have easily overcome it for paying customers.

      Now if these aren't paying customers then...

    27. Re:Why by kenh · · Score: 1

      Certain version of Windows 7 include XP, not all, and it requires fairly modern hardware (hardware virtualization) and that you have a legal version of Windows 7 (you have to pass the Windows Genuine Advantage check to download the required bits). Running Windows XP in a Windows 8 Hypervisor requires very modern hardware (not only have hardware virtualization but also SLAT support) and that the user source a Win XP install ISO and valid product key.

      --
      Ken
    28. Re:Why by kenh · · Score: 1

      Why not bring back BeOS?

      --
      Ken
    29. Re:Why by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      When components like the motherboard start flaking out is when it starts getting expensive to do. Someone has to pay for the work - it may not be you, but the organization certainly pays those people and purchases the parts.

      Failed hard drives happen to new machines. Failed motherboards should not.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    30. Re:Why by gigaherz · · Score: 1

      Yes, but eventually XP will not support new hardware so upgrading will not be an option anymore. By then, your software will probably not work in the latest OS so you will be stuck with software that requires an ancient OS, which in turn requires ancient hardware. And it wouldn't be the first time it has happened. You just have to look at all those computers still running DOS or Windows 3.x.

    31. Re:Why by jbolden · · Score: 1

      You are presenting why this isn't easy for consumers. GP was arguing that it was a structural issue. And I was saying it was easy for Microsoft to fix.

      As far as Windows 7 not including XP, I didn't know that but obviously that's something Microsoft can change, that's their policy. As far as it not working for illegal versions of Windows 7... again, paying customers only. As far as ISO XP, I was suggesting just running applications not the whole thing. But either way Microsoft could sell a XP ISO with Windows 8 in China for use with websites, or they could include it free.

      As for modern hardware... absolutely. Part of the point of Windows 8 is to start migrating people off old hardware. That's a feature not a bug.
      ____

      For consumers individually this is a problem. Mostly you are indicating problems for consumers who pirated. It is Microsoft's job to make sure stuff breaks for pirating consumers. As far as lower end hardware.... I agree with Microsoft's direction in driving people towards better systems or Android. In China you have an explosion of $75-150 Android tablets that can easily be supported by the banks for those too poor to afford good systems.

    32. Re:Why by Monsuco · · Score: 1

      Why not bring back BeOS?

      Because nobody ever used BeOS. Not that it wasn't a nice system, it was just that nobody ever used it.

    33. Re:Why by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Why is Microsoft selling Windows 8 for so much more than Windows XP? For most uses it's not significantly better.......

      Is it? ISTR Windows XP sold for around $200-300 back when it was new and shiny and not 3 versions old. Windows 8 is $200-300 as well.

      Of course, if you're comparing today, well, Microsoft stopped selling XP a long time ago (shortly after 7 came out), and the price was reduced because that's what happens to old stuff that's been out of a while - you can't continue selling it for full price anymore.

      Though, I don't get the argument that supporting XP protects against piracy...

    34. Re:Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another common mistake is to assume that a home pays extra for hardware maintenance. Most simply purchase the hardware via a one-off cost, with very few being tricked into buying the extended warranty. If something breaks, then the few quid it take to buy a new part is often much cheaper and easier.

      Another easy mistake to make is to assume that the end user pays for software maintenance. Typically, they simply purchase a licence via a one-off cost - such as with Windows XP. Yes, it costs Microsoft money to keep fixing XP but the user does not have to keep paying a yearly subscription to it. The cost to Microsoft is irrelevant to the home user you bought the licence already and wants to keep on using it.

    35. Re:Why by pepty · · Score: 1

      For someone that already has XP, the cost has already been paid and there is no future cost. If you try to force such a user to upgrade they will quite understandably object.

      Especially if the cost that has already been paid is zero. in 2011 Ballmer claimed 90% of Chinese copies of Windows were pirated.

      I think the concerns over there are:

      1. Exploits on unsupported copies of XP would be a drag on the economy.

      2. Actually paying for Microsoft software would be a drag on the economy.

      To solve the issue China should just buy Microsoft. Two birds with one stone: They could pay for Microsoft in US T-bills and then make China-specific versions of Windows based products and sell them at cost. Bonus: Microsoft products could behave ... oddly when installed in Taiwan.

    36. Re:Why by pepty · · Score: 1

      Why I have Windows 8 on my desktop: it was cheaper than Windows 7.

    37. Re:Why by burningcpu · · Score: 1

      Apparently you missed this statement:

      "At some point a PC will cost more than it's worth to repair, but that's the point you chuck it and get a new one, and even then you can harvest parts as spares."

      Replacing the motherboard certainly qualifies as the point that the pc is cost more than it is worth. But then, as stated, you can salvage the other components for another system.

    38. Re:Why by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      Yes, but eventually XP will not support new hardware so upgrading will not be an option anymore. By then, your software will probably not work in the latest OS so you will be stuck with software that requires an ancient OS, which in turn requires ancient hardware. And it wouldn't be the first time it has happened. You just have to look at all those computers still running DOS or Windows 3.x.

      Except virtual machines are now mainstream and easy to set up and maintain. My next rig will be a VM only affair so reinstalling my OS will consist of pulling the backup of my already configured VM. Hardware has gotten to the point even 3D games set to lower settings run quite well in a VM. So XP in its current form could potentially continue on in perpetuity.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    39. Re:Why by The123king · · Score: 1

      No, after pumping in so much R&D money, the only profitable thing to do is sell it, regardless of quality. Same thing happened with Vista after rewriting Longhorn twice

      --
      If you gave me a choice between a printer and a giraffe with explosive diarrhoea, i'll get my ladder and my raincoat
    40. Re:Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      XP could probably last another ten years*. And hardware support is just a matter of drivers. Hell, I have 1 Gb Ethernet that come with drivers for fucking DOS and Novel NetWare. Also, ipv6 is supported through updates (yes, DNS works fully on ipv6) but you need a third party DHCP client. Though someone might be able to back port the win7/vista one.

      *if microsoft would release updates, or even just the source code.

    41. Re:Why by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Say by 2016 ReactOS is perfect. That still doesn't solve .NET applications. Say that takes 2 more years and gets them to .NET 2. By 2018 we are talking .NET 6 applications are standard in business, while they can now run 2005's software well.

      .NET 6? Uh are we talking about the same thing here? I thought we were talking about people who are still stuck on Windows XP. The sort who are likely to also be stuck on IE6 and using old active X controls. The sort who might still be using .Net 2.0. And the sort who certainly wouldn't be using .NET6 in 2018.

      So it does not matter that ReactOS may never catch up with Microsoft, as long as ReactOS can catch up with the current businesses and organizations that are also having difficulty keeping up with Microsoft's changes.

      --
    42. Re: Why by OldeTimeGeek · · Score: 1

      Degrading in the sun doesn't do much good when most of the bags are buried in landfills.

    43. Re:Why by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Why not? I thought the whole point of having an XP compatible OS was to run the same apps that would run on Windows XP?

      So why wouldn't a pirated copy of Office run on an XP compatible OS?

      --
    44. Re:Why by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Why is Ferrari selling its cars for so much more than Ford? For most uses it's not significantly better

      No, but it is significantly more expensive to manufacture. You can't say the same about XP and W8, the development costs are the same for those. The Ferrarri is faster, accelerates faster, brakes better, and handles batter than the Ford. You can't say that about XP and W8, W8 is your Ford with the driver's window made of cardboard, the brake and throttle pedals reversed, and the rear view mirror removed. W8 is inferior to XP from a user's point of view. W7 was a step up from XP, W8 is three steps back.

      I was going to buy a new notebook, but they all come with W8 and Chrome. Come on, guys, give me W7 or kubuntu! Or at least let me install kubuntu without voiding the warrantee.

    45. Re: Why by Khyber · · Score: 1

      WOOD paper.

      Hemp paper is far easier and cleaner to do.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    46. Re:Why by c_woolley · · Score: 1

      I'm with you on this one. Considering that every copy of XP that I have seen since 2001 has been a pirated copy, I see a lack of common sense in this argument. In addition, while XP was a great OS at the time, in comparison, it Blue Screens left and right. I have yet to see a Blue Screen in Windows 7 or Windows 8, and I have owned both since they were released. They have come a long way, dealing with horribly written code from vendors that would crash the OS. XP also leaves the system vulnerable to so many attacks that are difficult to remediate due to updates in technology. Perhaps that is why China wants people using it though. Easy to backdoor it.

    47. Re:Why by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      You are free to keep using it.

      Just do not expect to get free updates nor activation for a fresh install nor expect the market including OEMs to honor your OS choice.

      If you have a VM of XP you can use it forever. But I wont care about your platform if I write software and there is coming a day where I write a web app as HTML 5 and I wont cater to your IE 8 anymore.

      Do not give me the bull that you use a real browser either. A good 50% use whatever comes with thier machine for a browser and under XP that 50% is IE 8.

    48. Re:Why by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      my understanding was that the reason a lot of Chinese (and Koreans for that matter) are still using XP is because the online banks have written their websites to Internet Explorer 6 and have no intention of ever changing that. There's some sort of crypto module that they're using which is an ActiveX control and completely incompatible with anything else.

      That article from last month was about South Korea banks, who have specifically targeted ActiveX and IE6.

      Not saying that China banks didn't do something equally as dumb...

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    49. Re:Why by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Uh are we talking about the same thing here? I thought we were talking about people who are still stuck on Windows XP.

      GP was talking about corporations not individuals.

      So it does not matter that ReactOS may never catch up with Microsoft, as long as ReactOS can catch up with the current businesses and organizations that are also having difficulty keeping up with Microsoft's changes.

      My point is that even if ReactOS can move fast (i.e.gets a cash infusion) best case they are a decade behind. Being locked out of everything from the last decade is a pretty big minus. I can see ReactOS working as a legacy support system for the next few decades. I can't see it being an OS of choice for anyone.

    50. Re:Why by Teun · · Score: 1
      The WinXP in Win7-Pro and Enterprise is incredibly slow but yes you could use it to by-pass some stupid banking failure.

      A free VM with your old copy of XP is a lot faster.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    51. Re:Why by Teun · · Score: 2
      Oh?

      Here Win7 was a free teaser for a Win8 laptop...
      Now it runs Linux :)

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    52. Re:Why by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Really? Do you know why it is slow?

    53. Re:Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a crazy waste of money to upgrade when for most people there is no advantage whatsoever.

      That's why Microsoft "retires" a product, to force users to upgrade whether they want to or not. XP can't be installed on a computer without having "Windows genuine advantage" authorize it. In a year or so you may have the physical WinXP installation CD, but MS servers will refuse to authorize it.

      That won't work for China though, they will just have their state run hackers create a keyfile generator and Microsoft knows this.

    54. Re: Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously have never worked in the paper industry. I have.

      The energy paper uses is almost free. They get it from burning the lignin they extract from the wood.

      Yes, a lot of water is used, but it's recycled up the wazoo. It's simply too expensive to do otherwise.

      Nasty chemicals? Sure, there is the bleach and the extractent, generally. After the process, these two combine to a salt, a low energy state. The sources of these chemicals are byproducts from other chemical manufacture, such as glass cleaner and fertilizer.

      Even the wood they use is groundwood (leftover stuff after logging) and fast growing species like scrub alder. Making paper from 'old growth' trees actually makes crappy paper. You want a fast growing tree to get the long fibers you want.

      Paper naturally breaks down in sunlight (it's just wood fiber, after all), decomposing into soil.

    55. Re:Why by Teun · · Score: 1
      Because we run some legacy Win3.x stuff I decided to install this XP compatibility layer on a Thinkpad W520 with Win7-Pro, it does the job but man is it slow, it is installed on a few other Thinkpads with similar behaviour.

      Sorry but I don't know enough about the guts of Windows to detect where it hangs.

      The same machine has an Oracle VB with WinXp and it's speed is like native...

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    56. Re:Why by atomicxblue · · Score: 1

      I think this is a classic case of not knowing your market, or not caring because of the potential profits. If the majority of the world hasn't upgraded to Windows 8, that should tell M$ something.

    57. Re: Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try dotnet 1.1! It's becoming more and more incompatible even on XP (thanks asp.not security updates borking normal .not1.1 apps!)

    58. Re:Why by atomicxblue · · Score: 1

      This is the same company who works to break standards by introducing their own versions of Microsoft specific HTML, C++, etc. Still haven't figured out why they do that, beyond vendor lock in.

    59. Re:Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It starts to get expensive when the machine(s) are so old that replacing failing hardware becomes difficult because it's been discontinued by the vendors and the rest of their offerings require Windows Vista and above for driver reasons. This is completely ignoring the fact that a severely outdated OS is horridly vulnerable to malware. I know I'm going to disconnect my XP system from my network when updates are no longer available; companies with thousands of them will certainly have to do so, or risk getting wrecked by a zero day exploit that won't get fixed because support has ended.

      Nothing magical about it; there's a point where the effort starts to exceed the reward. Eventually there's always a point where upgrading becomes necessary. It's a little like that old muscle car that's passed 300k miles and needs a new engine + transmission; hard to justify that from a cost standpoint.

    60. Re:Why by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Very interesting. I looked it up. Most common reason is default config is 256MB of RAM. Unless you changed that...

    61. Re:Why by TheLink · · Score: 1

      And how'd that make a difference? I was talking about those who are still stuck on Windows XP whoever they are.

      It should be obvious that a Windows XP compatible OS is not for the sort who keep up with Microsoft's latest stuff.

      --
    62. Re:Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No they wouldn't. Say by 2016 ReactOS is perfect. That still doesn't solve .NET applications. Say that takes 2 more years and gets them to .NET 2. By 2018 we are talking .NET 6 applications are standard in business, while they can now run 2005's software well.

      What's tempting about that?

      .NET (not only 2) is already supported by ReactOS thanks to the Mono project. ReactOS is really *the* alternative to XP, and despite the little resources the project has, it's progressing nicely (check their JIRA activity stream for example).

    63. Re:Why by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Even most corporations that are today on XP have lots of .NET applications. A corporation with some stuff on XP is different than a corporation willing to be a decade behind uniformly. It isn't just Microsoft's stuff it would be every software vendor they have they would have to be running old applications.

    64. Re:Why by TheLink · · Score: 1

      And why wouldn't .Net stuff that works on XP not work on an XP compatible OS?

      I'm not saying ReactOS is fully XP compatible, it's far from it at the moment. But perhaps with enough resources it would become compatible enough? Then maybe Microsoft will think twice before shoving stuff like Vista and Windows 8 to customers.

      As it is you can already install the .Net 2.0 redistributable package on it. http://www.reactos.org/wiki/Tests_for_0.3.15
      Whether it works or not is another thing ;).

      --
    65. Re:Why by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Why it wouldn't work is they haven't gotten there yet in getting a compatible library set working. The hypothetical is they get ReactOS finished by 2016 and then turn their attention fully to .NET 2, which takes 2 more years. When that's all done (in the hypothetical 2018) everything works but that still doesn't solve .NET 3, then all the layers of Vista related architecture (like the networking stack overhaul)....

      Microsoft did a lot of work to backport XP and thus allow people to remain on XP. Those backports aren't part of current React.

    66. Re:Why by Teun · · Score: 1

      Ah, something I need to check up on :)

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    67. Re:Why by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      It's a nonsensical argument, pay it no mind. The fact is that everyone in China pirates all their software, so forcing everyone to upgrade will only result in a spike in piracy numbers, which will make the guys (allegedly) trying to reduce piracy in China look bad. Looking bad (aka "losing face") is a big deal in most Asian cultures. That's really all that's driving this announcement.

      In reality, EOLing XP will make no practical difference in China any time soon. The Chinese love XP. I've sent refurbished laptops with clean installs of Win7 to friends in China, and the first call I get after they get it is "how do I install XP?" Anyone who thinks those people are going to give two shits whether MS continues to support XP or not is nuts.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    68. Re:Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You missed on Windows ME, Bob, Access (not the database, the communications program), and quite a few others :)

    69. Re:Why by LMariachi · · Score: 1

      Having an OS installed that is not getting any more security updates is not a "future cost?"

  2. Soooo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Chinese government wants XP's support extended because now that they have shown knowledge of widespread OS pirating they don't want to get caught doing it again.

    1. Re:Soooo by erroneus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh I can think of more reasons than that. For example, Windows XP is far more exploitable as it exists almost exclusively as a 32bit OS. Keeping their people exploitable better ensures they can continue to do what "no US government would even consider doing to it's own citizens."

      Also since China is extremely large, infrastructure change concerns are likely high on their list of concerns.

      And yes, if they don't have to buy any new licenses at all they should be pretty good to go without spending any more money.

    2. Re:Soooo by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Keeping their people exploitable better ensures they can continue to do what "no US government would even consider doing to it's own citizens."

      Captain, we are detecting large amounts of sarcasm in this sector. (If the Chinese want to keep using an highly exploitable OS so that the USA has an edge in any cyberwar, I'd say... let them)

      --
      READY.
      PRINT ""+-0
  3. They'll learn soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    For now they're still under the delusion that saving money and not needlessly upgrading are virtues. With time they'll learn to throw away perfectly good computers and millions of hours of training for shiny things.

    1. Re:They'll learn soon by kenh · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think you are confusing MS users with Apple users. ;^)

      --
      Ken
    2. Re:They'll learn soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yup ms has to force users to upgrade :)

  4. Errr ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't Windows 8 the cheapest one they've ever released (to buy)?

    1. Re:Errr ... by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Indirectly. It's the one with the lowest additional value to its user.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Errr ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Least valued. Easy to confuse the two.

    3. Re:Errr ... by Thanshin · · Score: 5, Funny

      "It's the [Windows] with the lowest additional value"

      That sentence scares me.

      There are dark places in the universe. Depths of irrationality where mathematics are just rituals and sorcery. A chaos where what should never be is fighting to escape. In that place there's a pit that even the horrors avoid. A tear where the tapestry of reality is at its weakest point.

      That's where they store "the Windows with the lowest additional value". And that's where it should stay. Watching us. Hungry.

    4. Re:Errr ... by SinGunner · · Score: 1

      Ah yes. The dreaded Monster Edition.

  5. Yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I live here (see IP) and I have NEVER, EVER seen a legitimate copy of XP.

    1. Re:Yeah right by hsa · · Score: 2

      The piracy is just the reason they tell the public.

      The real reason is that their firewall/surveillance software is not yet fully compatible with latest operating systems.

    2. Re:Yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or they are telling the truth - the % of legal over % non-legal is proof that price is not aligned with the market.
      I guess this 360 thing means MS does not know for sure either.

      With no compelling reason to pay more for genuine, the root of the blame is clear.

    3. Re:Yeah right by Phil+Urich · · Score: 1

      I live here (see IP)

      So, what's your IP?

      --
      I remember sigs. Oh, a simpler time!
    4. Re:Yeah right by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      Hey! What a coincidence. I live here too.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
  6. What happended to red flag linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did they find out that people just couldnt use it or was it so full of spyware that noone wanted to use it? Last time i heard a few years ago that was the official government mandated OS for China's government computers and schools.

    1. Re:What happended to red flag linux? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      It's still the #1, if not only, Linux distro in China. If the CPC made it mandatory, it would be the #1 Linux installed worldwide - ahead of RHEL, Ubuntu and even most Unixes, such as Solaris.

  7. Here in China... by plasticsquirrel · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Here in China, it is not really possible to even find a normal "legit" version of Windows. All versions found at any normal store will be pirated. A typical price for pirated Windows, sold in a professional looking box, will be about 18 yuan (~3 USD). There is even a common software program used to deliver updates to pirated XP machines. This software also comes with anti-malware tools, and is called "360." This program is the only way that China is able to keep going with Windows, circumventing copyright protection while still receiving regular updated from this service!

    A few months ago I was talking to a sales clerk at a computer market. I saw stickers for Ubuntu on the laptops there, yet the operating system was obviously Windows. I pointed at the sticker with a smirk, and asked him about it, already knowing the answer. He sheepishly tried to tell me how they put on Windows because that's the standard in China. Obviously they were getting discounts from the manufacturers for dumping the Windows tax, and then turning around and installing pirated Windows on these computers. By the way, these were big brand names like Dell, HP, Samsung, Lenovo, Asus, etc. Out of curiosity, I asked him if many people in China use Linux, and he said it is used mostly for servers (he mentioned Red Flag Linux specifically).

    --
    Systemd: the PulseAudio of init systems
    1. Re:Here in China... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I gather RFL is largely a bargining ploy with which to negotiate better prices from Microsoft. MS would ideally like people to pay for windows, but failing that they would still rather see pirate windows than linux dominate.

    2. Re:Here in China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sales people have to tow the company line; it do not matter what country they're in (that just changes what the company line contains).

    3. Re:Here in China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every xinhua have legit copies, well, usually it's just one copy on display. You can buy it though, but they'll be surprised.

    4. Re:Here in China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thieving bastards are just upset because Windows 8 won't update unless it's a legit license. They are sad they can copy Windows 8 but don't receive updates.

    5. Re:Here in China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can vouch for that more or less having lived in China. I'm not at all surprised. In fact I would expect the pusher cartels mentioned above (Dell, HP, Samsung, Lenovo, Asus) in tandem with other bigger nefarious partners, are the same people behind the whole operation - cheap little stores that sell Western movies/TV series/propaganda as well as XP, Windows 7 pirate copies, antivirus etc. Presumably, it's the spread of """democracy""".

    6. Re:Here in China... by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      They toe the line. The idiom comes from the situation of people standing at attention along a line, with their toes touching it.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    7. Re:Here in China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in China, it is not really possible to even find a normal "legit" version of Windows.

      Not true. I've been in China 5 years now. You can find legit copies both in boxes and installed on new machines at large electronic retail stores like DaZhongDianQi and SuNing. At the big electronic flea markets, it's almost always pirated copies of everything.

    8. Re:Here in China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps False Flag linux would be a better name.

    9. Re:Here in China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China must be REALLY f'ed up if they're paying money for pirated versions of software. Even with their Great Firewall, they have to be capable of finding pirated software themselves instead of buying a fake box...

    10. Re:Here in China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't come from that at all. The etymology is disputed but none of the earliest forms have to do with standing at attention.

    11. Re:Here in China... by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      From http://www.history.navy.mil/trivia/trivia03.htm:

      The space between each pair of deck planks in a wooden ship was filled with a packing material called "oakum" and then sealed with a mixture of pitch and tar. The result, from afar, was a series of parallel lines a half-foot or so apart, running the length of the deck. Once a week, as a rule, usually on Sunday, a warship's crew was ordered to fall in at quarters - that is, each group of men into which the crew was divided would line up in formation in a given area of the deck. To insure a neat alignment of each row, the Sailors were directed to stand with their toes just touching a particular seam.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    12. Re:Here in China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We bought Red Flag once. It is just outdated re-branding version of Red Hat / CentOS.

      It contains absolutely nothing of value.

  8. Pay for pirated copy? by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

    ...in light of the upcoming end-of-life of Windows XP, which is still used by a large percentage of Chinese. That could drive users to buy pirated copies of a new operating system..

    You mean to tell me the are paying for pirated copies? Why? Honestly can't they just torrent it just like everyone else on the planet?

    --
    ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    1. Re:Pay for pirated copy? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      China is something of a contradiction, due to the very rapid industralisation. The cities are as modern as any country (if a bit more polluted), but head just a little way outside them and you'll find subsistance farmers still living as their great-great-grandparents did. I'm guessing that not everyone can get broadband.

    2. Re:Pay for pirated copy? by johnsie · · Score: 1

      Not everyone has a good internet connection. You'll also find people doing the same thing across Central America, regardless of whether there is a great firewall or not.

    3. Re: Pay for pirated copy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At $3 a pop for each pirated version, it's only a month's pay for an illegitimate license. It's like getting engaged to DOS...

    4. Re:Pay for pirated copy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      because torrents, are poisoned.
      Chinese clever, not like dumb kid in West who use torrent.

    5. Re:Pay for pirated copy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are three points I can think of to this.
      1. A pirate copy in China goes for 5-10 yuan (not with the legit looking box), around 0.75 to 1.50 USD. Or with a legit looking box for up to 20yuan. You'll have to buy a virgin dvd (3-5 yuan) or a usb stick anyway.
      2. Not everybody's internet connection is decent so the download is a trouble.
      3. Decent Torrents for most software are for the English version, as much as there is plenty of multi language torrents and Chinese torrents, they are less common and less trustworthy than something you can go back to the guy and ask for a new one. If you buy the pirate one it's already burnt on the dvd and with everything in the native's language (remember that most Chinese can't understand any English).

      I'm Brazilian and lived in China, the situation is pretty much the same here in Brazil with a few differences (I believe there is more downloading proportionally) and the big difference is that pirate software here doesn't have honest prices, it's around 5 to 10 dollars, but as everything else the original prices are also higher over here, not because of our abusive taxes but because profit here is much much higher.

    6. Re:Pay for pirated copy? by kenh · · Score: 1

      Not really an option on your first computer, besides, they'd still need to get that torrent into a bootable format, like a USB key or a DVD, each of which would cost money, hence the market selling $3 bootable copies of pirated Windows in nice professional boxes.

      --
      Ken
  9. Microsoft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft "Hmmm, so... we can spend money to not get money. Or not get money. Reeeeal tough choice."

    Heck maybe it'll drive Linux adoption!

    1. Re: Microsoft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Long as they make their money doing outsourced work, they can't stray from Windows for the foreseeable future. Africa gets it: educate our kids using open source software or socially engineer a scam; neither requires Windows.

  10. increase in price? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    windows 8 actually cost less than windows 7... and less than what Windows XP was priced at.
    Microsoft NEVER lower the price of the OS, so even if they release Windows 8, the remaining copies of Windows 7 won't go down in price.
    Go back to bed China, you're obviously drunk what with everything you're doing lately.
    I say Microsoft should just release an update that borked every pirated XP machines in China. Not like they owe them anything, since the software wasn't even bought from microsoft to begin with. Pirates asking for better treatment... I've seen everything now.

    1. Re:increase in price? by Pi1grim · · Score: 1

      Yeah. MS does that - they lose huge market without hope of ever setting foot there again. But still, better to make it quick, then prolong the agony with Windows 8.

    2. Re:increase in price? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      How do they lose what they don't have? It's not like all those Windows copies were actually bought from them!

  11. The real reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The real reason is that there are many computers that have hardware that is not able to run recent versions with adequate speed and upgrading them with or without pirated software is too costly and they are filling their place more than well.

    1. Re:The real reason by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure I buy that. I tried installing Linux on an old Thinkpad T50 and it ran the OS just fine, but was still useless because it was too slow to run any modern web browser. (I can use about 2 or 3 tabs in chromium before the disk starts thrashing.)

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  12. New model mentality by Tekoneiric · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The only reason software companies have the new model mentality is to make money off what they push as a new model. Software companies would be better if they shifted away from that and to doing just version updates. 90% of the development costs are paid for on an existing OS, the rest is doing bug fixes and enhancements. I personally see no reason to go to Win8, I don't care for the interface. I tolerate Win7 because I can make it mostly like XP but wish I didn't have to add software to fix the start menu. I think the drive away from the standard desktop is partly killing the desktop PC. The standard XP style desktop works. Changing it makes no sense on a desktop PC. It requires people relearn things, increases IT support costs and slows down productivity. At work my productivity has slowed down going from XP to Win7 because on Win7 I have to deal with more of the little popup context menus that get in my way no matter how much I tweak it and the copy/paste issues of Win7 drives me crazy. I don't like to side with the Chinese government on anything but on this I agree... On windows, upgrading to Win8 doesn't make much sense.

    --
    *It's not what you can do for the Dark Side but what the Dark Side can do for you!*
    1. Re:New model mentality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention the 3 different "printer preferences" menu options on the device context menu. WTF is that. I think that's my favourite part of Windows - because I hate Windows.

      Used to be there was only one "printer preferences" menu, and it was fairly consistent with how you'd expect it to behave. Now it's like "okay which f'n prefrences am I looking for on this printer"?

    2. Re:New model mentality by Sockatume · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What's wrong with the Windows 7 start menu? It's essentially the XP one, except you can just tap a key and enter the first few characters of the app you want instead of dragging your mouse around some enormous list. You can revert to a Windows XP-style menu bar, too. Other than that it is the bugfixed, more technically-capable version of XP that you want: MS has been iterating on that same code base for a decade and a half now.

      Now, Windows 8, that was a miscalculation. One interface to rule them all is not an answer to the tablet conundrum.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    3. Re:New model mentality by Krneki · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wait until you see Windows server 2012. Every single sysadmin said "What the Fuck??!!!" the first time he logged onto the server.

      Seriously, how hard can it be to keep the Windos NT interface alongside the new one? Why keep pushing for the new GUI when most of the veterans hates to learn a new GUI?

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    4. Re:New model mentality by Sockatume · · Score: 3, Informative

      For future reference, because you might need it some day:

      "Properties" is the generic Device Properties pane you also get in Device Manager, which controls things like installing drivers. This is your lowest level.
      "Printer Properties" is Windows' generic settings for printers, which controls things like sharing the printer on the network or colour profiles. This is the next highest level.
      "Printer Preferences" is the manufacturer's software for controlling the printer, which controls features not supported under Windows's generic controls, like stapling or print quality. This is the highest level.

      They need better names.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    5. Re:New model mentality by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Err, XP-style task bar, I mean.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    6. Re:New model mentality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      With classic shell you can revert to 98 style menu, which i did. I still have the search box there, so i can type the program or go through the menu. Without classic shell the best i could get was that xp style with the empty menu at first, since i don't want to see a list of recently used documents and programs, so i had to always click on "show all programs", if i needed to get to the list.

    7. Re:New model mentality by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      They need better names.

      Yeah, like Windows RT and Surface.

      They need better brains.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    8. Re:New model mentality by KlomDark · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I did the same, installed Server 2012 on a new server, said WTF? Tried to run with it, had no luck with Hyper-V on 2012. Reformatted with Server 2008 R2, never looked back.

      They have really got to dump that shitty Windows 8 interface on professional hardware. Ain't nobody got time for that...

      Now Windows 8.1 on my laptop, it makes sense and I'm happy with it. But on a server? Give me a frikken break...

    9. Re:New model mentality by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      I must say, sir or madam: that the idea of never doing genuine software updates is nonsensical. I deal weekly with the extensive pain of supporting newer versions of software in older operating systems, typically in Linux. Newer features of core components often rely on newer features of other components, while other installed components rely specifically on the _older_ versions of the core components. Resolving that dependency hell is a a very time time consuming, and expensive process, It helps pay my salary, but often it's simpler to do a forklift upgrade of the while system and forward port any critical missing components.

      Is the upgrade path abused and over-used? Often, yes. But that doesn't mean it's automatically useless or meaningless.

    10. Re:New model mentality by Krneki · · Score: 1

      It first I thought it was only me, but the WTF exclamation is 100% confirmed when you first log into Windows server 2012.

      I picture this in my head.
      MS development team presenting Windows server 2012 to the sysadmins
      Sysadmins: WTF?!
      MS development: Yap, they love the new GUI, let's roll this into production.

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    11. Re:New model mentality by jbolden · · Score: 0

      Why keep pushing for the new GUI when most of the veterans hates to learn a new GUI?

      There are a couple reasons. The primary one is that Microsoft wants their GUIs unified between server, enterprise desktop and consumer desktop. Which means they need to move everything. The old GUI doesn't support modern hardware and can't scale to small screens. It can never be effective as a phone or tablet GUI.

      Moreover young people are having a very difficult time adapting to many of the traditional GUIs because they assume paradigms that really only make sense with respect to dual floppy computers. By breaking hard with those traditions they are able to have GUIs that match modern hardware and modern functionality better. Veterans won't like this because their understanding evolved along with the systems from the older paradigms. Microsoft is well aware of that. But they don't want to allow their user base to further fragment with respect to age and the young hate the traditional GUI more than the old are likely to resist the new.

    12. Re:New model mentality by Krneki · · Score: 1

      Yo gives us 2 GUI. How hard can it be?

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    13. Re:New model mentality by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Metro is one, what's the 2nd GUI?

    14. Re:New model mentality by kenh · · Score: 2

      Well, if you put a touchscreen on your server console it starts to make more sense... Just sayin'

      --
      Ken
    15. Re:New model mentality by Krneki · · Score: 2

      Yeah, so you can order a pizza* while in the server room. Seriously WTF?!

      *I managed to enter the marketplace thing while searching for the Exchange 2013 interface (I know now it's not there and it's 100% web based now). I said "no way they added all this shit to a server interface", they did!

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    16. Re:New model mentality by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with the Windows 7 start menu?

      Except that I never seem to be able to find what I actually want? Like the apalling 'ribbon', it seems to be based around only showing you what it thinks you want, which is almost never what I'm looking for.

    17. Re:New model mentality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      able to have GUIs that match modern hardware and modern functionality better.

      You mean dumbed down functionality?

      the young hate the traditional GUI more than the old are likely to resist the new.

      Older one here! Wanna bet?! We utterly despise the new GUI! We hate it more so get off my lawn!

    18. Re:New model mentality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they want to trap you in the new GUI. They want everybody's user experience to be of the Apple variety, the variety that teaches you that software, and computation itself, are not things you create and control, but things you pay a giant company for. It's part of the grand orwellian project to seal every user into a walled garden in the name of corporate profits.

      I wish there were a less horrifying reason. But when a company switches from something that has worked for 20+ years across at least 6 iterations to something that doesn't work, and then adamantly supports the not-working thing against a flood of criticism, mere stupidity can no longer explain it.

    19. Re:New model mentality by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      My pet peeve with it is that when you choose all programs it crams everything into a little space with a scroll bar and no matter what the damned thing is always two columns wide when given what I want to be there it should only take 1 column.

      And then there is the insistence on having a "show desktop button" next to the clock, which is also impossible to remove without some 3rd party addons.

    20. Re:New model mentality by atomicxblue · · Score: 1

      That was the impression when another network admin friend and I tried to set up networking on Vista when it first came out. It took about an hour because the OS refused to acknowledge the NIC driver.

    21. Re:New model mentality by cskrat · · Score: 1

      It worked flawlessly for me.

      1. Hit Start button on keyboard.
      2. Type "bash"
      3. Hit Enter

      Easy access to a proper interface.

      --
      My God! It's full of eval()'s.
    22. Re:New model mentality by cfsops · · Score: 1

      Ain't nobody got time for that...

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nh7UgAprdpM

    23. Re:New model mentality by KlomDark · · Score: 1

      Exactly what I had in mind when I said that. :)

  13. Get with the times... by Kjella · · Score: 5, Informative

    India which is much poorer:
    Win 7 & 8: 58%
    WinXP: 30%

    China:
    Win 7 & 8: 43%
    WinXP: 50%

    Africa, South America, everywhere else that is poor XP is in massive decline. This is basically China being the odd man out, they're the only ones who want to stick to XP. Now I'm guessing most of those copies aren't legitimate, but I don't see why that should be any different in China than the rest of the world. It's just that XP is the de facto standard I guess.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    1. Re:Get with the times... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China has more common sense when it get's to choice of UI, judging by those numbers. If getting with the times meaning ingesting every kind of tripe new paradigm that companies decide to shove down people's throats, than it's better not to go with the times.

    2. Re:Get with the times... by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      A year ago there was also an interesting situation when Vietnam was claimed to have the highest Windows 8 adoption rate.

    3. Re:Get with the times... by kenh · · Score: 1

      I suspect India runs more current OSes because of their close ties with US industries through their outsourcing industry.

      --
      Ken
    4. Re:Get with the times... by ADRA · · Score: 1

      You're making the assumption that the income and literacy curve is the same through the different markets. I'd imagine there are many more 'blue collar' Chinese computer users who can afford computers, but barely. Any added cost would push them too hard. India has a lot more abscess poverty with people that could never afford a computer. Also,
      India's literacy rate is 68%
      China's literacy rate is 95.1%
      (CIA factbook)

      --
      Bye!
    5. Re:Get with the times... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really poor people would use FOSS ........Linux ....FreeBSD ,meaning no-cost software. Gradually more and more people realise this
      Sadly poor people are usually not (widely) informed about the availability of FOSS.
      As always ....corporate blocking.

  14. Code Audits And Custom Patches. by enter+to+exit · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Another reason for keeping xp is that they very likely have the xp code audited and custom patched to their liking.

  15. No problem by jones_supa · · Score: 2

    I don't see the problem here. The price of Windows 8 is not more than Windows XP. And if the price is still a problem, just use a cracked copy like they did with huge amount of XP installations.

    Or just use the old negotiation tactic:

    Microsoft: XP support is ending but we are selling you this magnificent new operating system called Windows 8.
    China: Gee, I dunno, the price is kind of high. I think we'll just go with Linux...
    Microsoft: *gasp* Well, well, I believe we can negotiate something. Please, sit down, and would you like a cup of coffee? How about this new special price for you...
    China: Ok!

    1. Re:No problem by Zocalo · · Score: 1

      I don't see the problem here. The price of Windows 8 is not more than Windows XP. And if the price is still a problem, just use a cracked copy like they did with huge amount of XP installations.

      China had a discounted cost, feature limited, licensed copy of Windows XP and Windows 7 available (if you could find them - good luck with that!) in a mostly futile attempt to bring the endemic mass piracy of software under control. The Windows 7 version was discontinued with the launch of Windows 8, so the only legitimate option left in China is to buy or upgrade to a version of Windows 8.x that costs significantly more than new Windows XP/7 basic licenses used to cost.

      I think that reintroducing that option for Windows 8 is probably Microsoft's best tactic here - extending XP support again just postpones the inevitable repeat because China and South Korea *still* won't have cut their ties to XP by the new date, and will no doubt ask for another extention, and then another... It generates some revenue and throws the general Chinese populace a bone, for everything else they should have been planning the move to an alternate platform (Windows or otherwise) along with almost everyone else in the world with any clue of what's going to happen when support stops. Failing that, they can pay through the nose for Microsoft's extended support of XP option, or make available some third party tool to try and secure Windows XP as best they can, perhaps in conjunction with some support from that Great Firewall we keep hearing about.

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    2. Re:No problem by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      They did. Thus Red Flag Linux.

    3. Re:No problem by jbolden · · Score: 1

      That old negotiation tactic doesn't work.

      Microsoft: XP support is ending but we are selling you this magnificent new operating system called Windows 8.
      Company: Gee, I dunno, the price is kind of high. I think we'll just go with Linux...
      Microsoft: Go for it. Would you like Suse or RedHat's phone number? We find that most companies that don't already have a UNIX culture prior to a switch to Linux can blow through 2,3,4x their IT budget on conversion and still often fail. There are success stories but those companies were dedicated and focused on their IT infrastructure. If you want to be dedicated and focused on your IT infrastructure for years rather than your core business Ralf Flaxa will be happy to talk to you. He's a great guy and I'm sure you'll love working with him for years and years at a cost of many millions or billions.
      Company: Well now that you mention it maybe one of your alternative licensing options....

    4. Re:No problem by kenh · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is on it's third attempt to get people off WinXP - first came Windows Vista, then Windows 7 and now Windows 8 - I really don't think Microsoft is as concerned about supporting folks in China that insist on using 15 year-old technology. How many of those WinXP licenses did MS actually get paid for?

      --
      Ken
  16. If you can read Chinese you pay twice in China by ukoda · · Score: 2, Informative

    I live in China but don't read Chinese. Last year I brought a netbook here with the intent of running Linux Mint. Because I wanted more than the 2GB RAM limit on the knock-off models I brought a genuine Samsung which came with Windows 7. Having paid for an unwanted copy of Windows I thought I would look at dual booting it. It's been a long time since I used Windows so I had a play to see what Windows was like. I found I could not change the language from Chinese. Some research showed I was expected to pay for an upgrade to get Windows, that I paid for, to actual be usable. Microsoft really don't promote legal use of their products with such attitudes! I personally didn't mind as it just meant Linux got 100% of the HDD.

    In fairness to Microsoft I suspect Windows would be pirated here unless it was free or very close to free. People here don't seem to care. I guess it is one of the reasons for the low uptake of Linux here, no price difference so less motivation to investigate alternatives.

    1. Re:If you can read Chinese you pay twice in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Microsoft sells the chinese versions much cheaper than the others, so they use the language barrier to make sure people don't just buy the chinese version and set the language to English.

    2. Re:If you can read Chinese you pay twice in China by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      I found I could not change the language from Chinese. Some research showed I was expected to pay for an upgrade to get Windows, that I paid for, to actual be usable. Microsoft really don't promote legal use of their products with such attitudes!

      I don't quite understand, you were surprised by this? You were in China and bought a netbook locally, of course it's going to be the Chinese version of Windows.
      I understand the interfaces used on many Linux distros come with support for a large number of languages out of the box, but Windows comes in different versions for different languages and the ability to change the entire operating system to a different language is a feature you have to buy. It's always been that way and I'm not sure if that even changed in Windows 8. I'm sure part of this is to recoup the development costs with translating and localizing the OS.

      Most customers can't read another language fluently enough and have the desire to change their computer OS to it, so it's not really something that drives people to piracy. You can still run programs in other languages in the operating system often (given you added the necessary keyboard support for input/fonts), it's just Windows itself that's stuck in one tongue.

    3. Re:If you can read Chinese you pay twice in China by pne · · Score: 2

      I live in China but don't read Chinese. Last year I brought a netbook here with the intent of running Linux Mint. Because I wanted more than the 2GB RAM limit on the knock-off models I brought a genuine Samsung which came with Windows 7. Having paid for an unwanted copy of Windows I thought I would look at dual booting it. It's been a long time since I used Windows so I had a play to see what Windows was like. I found I could not change the language from Chinese. Some research showed I was expected to pay for an upgrade to get Windows, that I paid for, to actual be usable.

      Why single out China? If you bought your computer in the US but didn't speak English (perhaps your native language is Spanish... or even Chinese!), I don't think you can switch Windows to be in Spanish or Chinese without paying for a language pack or a Chinese-language installation CD.

      --
      Esli epei etot cumprenan, shris soa Sfaha.
    4. Re:If you can read Chinese you pay twice in China by teg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I found I could not change the language from Chinese. Some research showed I was expected to pay for an upgrade to get Windows, that I paid for, to actual be usable. Microsoft really don't promote legal use of their products with such attitudes!

      I don't quite understand, you were surprised by this? You were in China and bought a netbook locally, of course it's going to be the Chinese version of Windows. I understand the interfaces used on many Linux distros come with support for a large number of languages out of the box, but Windows comes in different versions for different languages and the ability to change the entire operating system to a different language is a feature you have to buy. It's always been that way and I'm not sure if that even changed in Windows 8. I'm sure part of this is to recoup the development costs with translating and localizing the OS.

      The reason is not the recoup the development costs - the reason is Price Discrimination: The ability to charge a different price in different markets. The optimal price for Windows in the US is much different than the optimal price for Windows in China - and if you can charge different prices here, Microsoft will make more money. Restricting language change is one mechanism to avoid Americans paying Chinese prices.

    5. Re:If you can read Chinese you pay twice in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can do with osx or linux. didn't realize windows was so braindead.

    6. Re:If you can read Chinese you pay twice in China by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      The reason is not the recoup the development costs - the reason is Price Discrimination: The ability to charge a different price in different markets. The optimal price for Windows in the US is much different than the optimal price for Windows in China - and if you can charge different prices here, Microsoft will make more money. Restricting language change is one mechanism to avoid Americans paying Chinese prices.

      I haven't seen the multilingual pricing of Windows in years, but it was an add-on iirc. You didn't have to pay $WindowsChina + $WindowsEn-US to get a version that could be switched between both.

      You bring up a good point, language locking would allow region-locking (in a loose way), but I still feel development costs are also a factor in this. Professional translators aren't cheap and sometimes dialog and menu commands (and interface element sizes) get changed as words/phrasing that does not directly translate from the original English. Not to mention legal text having to be adapted to the market's local laws. Microsoft doesn't have a group of people doing this for free like a FOSS OS would.

    7. Re:If you can read Chinese you pay twice in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can do it with the Ultimate version, which also has some additional features and, of course, costs more

    8. Re:If you can read Chinese you pay twice in China by James+McGuigan · · Score: 1

      But once you have gone to the trouble of deciding to support a new language/market, such as China, the production cost of making translations available on all your offerings is virtually nil. In the code settings it's most likely a set of a parameter settings within a unified codebase. The language pack option suggests that apart from a little install space, its not a difficult change.

      The core logic here is economics and profit maximization. Software has a high up front build cost, then a virtually zero marginal cost to produce future units. Copyright is a government enforced monopoly. Piracy is the non-monopoly free-market price of software based on its marginal cost of production (ie free, or simply the the cost of CD media plus retail markup).

      Profit = (Price - MarginalCostPerUnit) * Quantity - InitialCosts

      Assuming no piracy, For each individual there is a maximum price they would be willing to pay for the product before they would choose not to buy it, or to switch to something else. A business running a standardized Windows setup would, if forced, likely pay a very high price for more copies of Windows as long as its less than the cost of switching their entire setup. A chinaman with access to torrents is likely only to be willing to pay a small fee to "go legit".

      The laws of Supply and Demand in market economics means the quantity is heavily dependent upon price for a given market. A lower market price means more people will find the market price less than the price they would be willing to pay, overall it can increase profit, but it comes at the cost of making less money on all the previous units sold (this is known as poisoning previous sales).

      In a perfectly price discriminating market, everybody would be haggled up to the maximum price they would individually be willing to pay. This is not possible. But the average American has a far high disposable income than the average Chinese. Thus you maximize profit by selling to the rich Americans at the price they are willing to pay, and to the chinese at the price they are willing to pay, and make it very hard for the chinese to see their copies to the Americans.

    9. Re:If you can read Chinese you pay twice in China by mystikkman · · Score: 1

      Price discrimination is just a way to optimally recoup the development costs.

    10. Re:If you can read Chinese you pay twice in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He bought the OEM version of the OS. Totally different license terms.

      License Locked to 1 PC and usually 1 language.

      They usually sell for 20-30 dollars at most for a copy at volume depending on what the manufacture negotiated. The manufacture then puts on their website the full cost of a boxed version.

    11. Re:If you can read Chinese you pay twice in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With Windows 8, all versions allow multiple display languages. Living in China, this is pretty sweet for me, as the girlfriend and I can have 2 separate accounts with 2 different languages and easily switch between them.

    12. Re:If you can read Chinese you pay twice in China by kenh · · Score: 2

      You bought a Chinese computer with a Chinese version of Windows in China and you were upset because there was no easy/free way to change it to English?

      Were you also mad at Samsung for not including an English keyboard?

      And your heading is 100% incorrect - you say "If you can read Chinese you pay twice in China" - how so? By your own example you only "pay twice" if you can't read Chinese and instead require another language on your Chinese computer bought in China with a Chinese edition of Windows. If you COULD read Chinese, why would you need the English version of Windows?

      Windows 7 had the option of changing the install language via language interface packs for free, if you had the Ultimate or Enterprise versions - low-end, "Home" editions didn't have this ability.

      --
      Ken
    13. Re:If you can read Chinese you pay twice in China by reikae · · Score: 1

      I think it has changed in Windows 8, at least regarding English language pack. The Language pack download page says you can get the English pack on any language/edition of Win8. In Win7 it is restricted to Ultimate and Enterprise editions.

    14. Re:If you can read Chinese you pay twice in China by BLToday · · Score: 1

      I found I could not change the language from Chinese. Some research showed I was expected to pay for an upgrade to get Windows, that I paid for, to actual be usable.

      Yeah, that changed in Windows 7. Previous versions of Windows had language pack supports at Home and above editions but MSFT made that into an "enterprise" or "ultimate" feature in Windows 7. Very annoying for a lot of people I know that speak and write multiple languages, some of them have switched to Mac OS X for just that one reason.

    15. Re:If you can read Chinese you pay twice in China by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      You bought a Chinese computer with a Chinese version of Windows in China and you were upset because there was no easy/free way to change it to English?

      No, you dolt, they bought a general purpose computing device with a general purpose multi-language OS pre-installed on it and they were upset because, despite the fact that bits are in infinite supply, MS wanted to charge additionally for the language pack install instead of the price economics 101 would say an infinitely reproducible item would have: $0. That's why it costs nothing on Linux to switch languages:
      if ( supply == infinite ) price = ZERO; // Regardless of cost to create.

      You know how to eliminate all piracy? Stop leveraging artificial scarcity laws. Authors, like mechanics and all other labor market workers have an infinite monopoly over their work before it's created. Market what's scarce -- The ability to do work -- not what's in infinite supply: 1's and 0's. Unsurprisingly, this is how I make a living creating FLOSS.

    16. Re:If you can read Chinese you pay twice in China by unixisc · · Score: 1

      But those OSs also are free of cost - something not true about Windows

    17. Re:If you can read Chinese you pay twice in China by ukoda · · Score: 1

      Yes my heading is incorrect, it should read "can't", not "can", sorry I'm human and the title can not be edited on submitted.

      Where did I say I was upset? I was surprised, not upset. The ability to run Windows was never a purchasing requirement, simply a side effect of the purchase.

      Where did I say I was mad at Samsung for not including an English keyboard? It has, like all Chinese PCs I have seen, a standard USA keyboard.

      I'm sure the more expensive versions of Windows have multi-language support but version shipping with PCs here does not. I guess as long time Linux user I am spoilt but having everything I want. My point is if you buy a PC in another country and you want to be legal and use a Microsoft OS you may find you have an additional cost, which can be a motivator for piracy.

    18. Re:If you can read Chinese you pay twice in China by ukoda · · Score: 1

      Yes, from what I'm told I would have had to pay for a full version as the OEM version does not support add ons. I have no idea what that would have cost. As another poster pointed out it would be near impossible to physically buy a real copy of Windows in China but a pirated can be purchased at any computer shop.

      If I had purchased a full copy of Windows I suspect my bargain purchase net-book would not have been such a bargain. Fortunately it runs well on Mint and I'm very happy with it.

      We have a lot of Windows PCs at the office, all legal, but we buy the Ubuntu versions of the Dell PCs and install PCs fresh with Windows which I assume we are buy directly from Microsoft.

    19. Re:If you can read Chinese you pay twice in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multilingual_User_Interface
      Available free. It doesn't change the underlying language, though. It is just for end user GUI. I haven't tested it much, but I think overall it sucks.

  17. Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Translation: Please keep supporting Windows XP because...
    1. All the Rootkit XP's out there have China backdoors in them that we don't want closed
    2. Counterfeit Windows has rootkits installed by identity thieves, NSA, Russian hackers etc
    3. Windows 8 is too expensive, unwanted (or both)
    4. Chinese can't crack the Activation mechanism to Win8.

    Like the legitmate answer is 3, but if you've ever lived in ... oh any city on the Pacific coast (either in Korea/Japan or Vancouver/Seattle/SF) you'd notice that the most pirated versions of Windows are in fact Windows XP Chinese versions (eg Taiwan)

    Likewise, anytime I've fixed a computer for someone... even though it has the English interface, it's always a Chinese copy. It's that prolific.

    Microsoft should actually take this opportunity to open some pieces of XP and hand it to ReactOS, or maybe just BSD licence the parts needed for better compatibility.

    This solves two problems
    1. Pirated/Counterfeit XP copies are no longer needed to run XP legacy software
    2. Microsoft could in fact completely drop all backwards compatibility for 32bit software in the next version of Windows (installable as a "extra" cost) and force developers hands to finally develop software in 64bit mode.

    Yes I'm talking about fragmenting the desktop OS on purpose, or haven't you noticed how bulky Windows is? The type of fragmenting I'm talking about is having developers build AMD64 versions for windows 8+ using secure API's instead of legacy ones. (The C runtime itself has _s versions that take a size parameter just to avoid the buffer overflow problems)

  18. Nothing about China is legit by asmkm22 · · Score: 1

    They're going to be pirating the software anyway, so claiming MS needs to extend XP support as an anti-piracy measure is laughable. It's bad enough that they are responsible for so much of the spam and virus crap. I'd love to see their government somehow do what it wants, and completely isolate the people from the internet entirely, spam and all.

    Wishes and horses.

    1. Re:Nothing about China is legit by amalcolm · · Score: 0

      Nothing about China is legit Citation required - otherwise it's nothing but racism China makes all your shiny toys

      --
      Time for bed, said Zebedee - boing
    2. Re:Nothing about China is legit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      does this do? http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4519459&cid=45605745

    3. Re:Nothing about China is legit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Refutation: The Taklamakan desert is legit.

  19. Microsoft is running out of milk cows by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Used to that Microsoft can sell anything.

    Used to that anything with the Microsoft (c) brand on it, no matter if it's the OS or mouse or keyboard or office suite, they are guaranteed to sell like hotcakes.

    No more.

    With one fumble after another, with more and more alternatives to Microsoft's products (of which many of them are free), Microsoft is running out of cash cows.

    Right now they are so desperate that they are trying to milk Windows 8 as much while the going is still good.

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by Zemran · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have always found their hardware to be of much better quality than their software. Their software is not as bad as a lot of people say but I prefer OSX etc. I have had several M$ mice and keyboards in the past and have been very happy with them.

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    2. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by ciderbrew · · Score: 2

      My last mouse lasted 10 years. It was still working when I upgraded it for a r.a.t.7 which lasted a year :(

    3. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by gigaherz · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I had a wireless Microsoft mouse once, it lasted around a week on fresh new AAA batteries, after which it would start failing to transmit to the pc properly, until it just simply did not work. I decided not to every try any piece of hardware made by Microsoft again. In contrast, my experience is that any other OS I have tried fails to compare to a Windows 7 installation, including other versions of Windows.

    4. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Given that the overwhelming majority of users find their hardware to be excellent, is it not possible that you simply won the reverse lottery? Better to side with the larger sample size, after all.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    5. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 0

      The Rat7 is one of the finest products Ontario Knife has ever made.

      Seems like a pretty harsh solution for a broken mouse, though. Dispatching a suffering moose is probably a more appropriate use for it.

    6. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by gigaherz · · Score: 0

      It is most definitely the case, but it's extremely hard for me to remove something from my blacklist once it gets a place in it. In contrast, my Logitech G500 wired mouse worked so well, when it started acting up I bought another one. And then fixed the first one since I learned that the issue was easy to fix. So now I have a working G500, and another working G500 to be used in an emergency or as a source of spare parts.

    7. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by Joce640k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In contrast, my Logitech G500 wired mouse worked so well, when it started acting up I bought another one.

      So...you're comparing a wired mouse to a wireless one that only failed when the batteries ran out?

      How was the wireless one when the batteries were OK? Maybe the lesson should have been "avoid wireless", not "avoid Microsoft".

      --
      No sig today...
    8. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      I have always found their hardware to be of much better quality than their software.

      Yes, it is assembled only by the most-talented slaves.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by gigaherz · · Score: 0

      Crappy, even with new batteries. It worked, but it was never really smooth. Since I didn't know what to blame, I chose to blame both, and promised myself to never buy a wireless mouse or keyboard again, and to avoid Microsoft-branded hardware.

    10. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If those 2 are only 2 things you compare - than you are not in position to do that.

    11. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by onyxruby · · Score: 2

      It should be well made, Microsoft has been in the hardware business for about 30 years by now. Once upon a time they sold memory and logic boards for computers (they actually started as a Unix shop), things like mice have been getting sold for over 20 years and I've had good luck using their keyboards for over a decade. Their latest mice haven't does as well for me as I would like, but I they actually have a fairly good track record with making hardware (except for the xbox 360).

    12. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I...promised myself to never buy a wireless mouse or keyboard again, and to avoid Microsoft-branded hardware.

      I bought a Logitech wireless (Bluetooth) keyboard, solar rechargeable, and a Logitech wireless (Bluetooth) mouse for my notebook computer cum desktop replacement. These peripherals work smoothly with Ubuntu Linux and even automatically share an unified Bluetooth receiver dongle inserted into a USB port of te notebook computer.

    13. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by dAzED1 · · Score: 2

      Uh, there was never a time in the history of mankind that Microsoft was able to just sell whatever they want at whatever price...in China. That has never, ever, occurred. China is simply officially saying that this is still the case, as it has always been the case.

    14. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like so many other Microsoft features, the mouse design was stolen.

                          http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=19981216&slug=2789349

    15. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by Mister+Liberty · · Score: 0, Troll

      I had a battery operated MS mouse that exploded
      right there under my hand,

    16. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by rmdingler · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hmmmm... Much like the Foxconn laborers. It seems it is definitively in the interest of corporations to stop the spread of Western-style unions and their workers' sense of 'entitlement', eh?

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    17. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by Sockatume · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you read the actual court documents it would seem that Goldtouch had a long history of presenting its work to mouse companies, then suing any and all of them who released an asymmetric mouse. They tended to lose those cases. They did manage to get MS to settle in a case on mouse data protocols, if software patents are your bag.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    18. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by RulerOf · · Score: 2

      Wireless mice that take disposable batteries just plain suck... IMHO.

      Mice of that category do everything they can to lower battery consumption: lower scanning speeds, lower transmit power, various sleep states, and so on. Every one of those compromises, however appropriate they may be for the application at hand, makes for a less enjoyable experience.

      Rechargeable wireless mice.... they don't make those trade offs because they're not concerned with squeezing out every last possible second of battery life. You'll get better transmit distance, quicker response, and most importantly, an overall better experience that doesn't involve running out of fresh batteries.

      For the absolute best coverage, Logitech has some models that come with an extra battery pack that you can pop out of the mouse and into a receptacle on the dock so you don't ever "run out" if you forget to charge the mouse. Personally speaking though, I bought a bunch of MX5000 desktop kits (Bluetooth mouse + keyboard) when they went on clearance, and just keep one on the dock and one on my desk, and switch them out when the one I'm using dies.

      --
      Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
    19. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

      At work I switched a majority of keyboards and mice to Microsoft Wireless 800 sets. Mouse uses two AA's and the keyboard uses two AAA's. Not one has failed to work and they are cheap, $25-$30 per set. Some keyboards/mice are in areas where morons spill acetone onto them and they don't get glued or fail to operate. Once a mouse was glued to a tabletop after an acetone spill. I used a hammer and cold chisel the remove it gently, sanded the bottom lightly on a belt sander and it was good to go. And the shop has plenty of electrical noise from electron beam welders and pulsed Nd:YAG lasers, never have they failed to operate.

      My brother and I used the MS Intellimouse Optical for gaming before better mice came out for gaming. Perfect mouse for FPS's in its day as it had a button on each side so you could assign things like reload and alternate firing modes. That was around the time of Quake 2/3, Half Life/Team Fortress/Counter Strike and Unreal Tournament. Before that we had an Intellimouse Pro and were always cleaning out mouse cheese from the god damn rollers. both were very hearty mice and were slammed quite a bit during rages.

    20. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by hodet · · Score: 1

      When you have kids a wired mouse it the only option. Now we need a wired tv remote.

    21. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Used to that anything with the Microsoft (c) brand on it, no matter if it's the OS or mouse or keyboard or office suite, they are guaranteed to sell like hotcakes.

      Microsoft hardware peripherals were about the only genuinely good products they made. I really liked my Intellimouse Explorer and my Sidewinder joystick.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    22. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by ciderbrew · · Score: 0

      How old was the mouse? Not that the thing should explode ever.
      I just wonder if there is a cut off point when their peripheral hardware ( which I also count as functionally the best ) stopped being any good.
      I had good expectations for the surface; but they messed that up. Too many focus group and management meetings watering stuff down I expect. Get behind one mental designer and go for it.

    23. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by jbolden · · Score: 5, Informative

      Have you looked at the revenue figures for Microsoft? They are gaining "cash cows". Sharepoint is extending office, Lync is extending communicator, SQL Server has moved into data warehousing as well as increasing its share of applications. They earn about $20b a year.

    24. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by spire3661 · · Score: 2

      Actually the best coverage currently by logitech is to use rechargeable AAs. (Logitech G700) You can use a standard AA, the rechargable one or just go wired.

      --
      Good-bye
    25. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by kenh · · Score: 2

      What are you smoking?

      Microsoft sold memory boards for Apple computers so they could run larger programs (other software vendors sold similar memory cards, notably Lotus), they never sold "logic boards" (which I take to mean "motherboards"), and they most definitely were never a "UNIX shop" (they licensed and sold a version of UNIX called XENIX).

      Microsoft started business selling a paper tape containing their version of BASIC for the new personal computers being sold as kits in the early 70's.

      --
      Ken
    26. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      The original Sidewinder Precision Pro was awesome. The others, not so much - and MS dropped gameport support after XP (and the USB adapter did not use standard/HID protocols)

      Thanks, MS. Thanks.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    27. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by fisted · · Score: 1

      did you died?

    28. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ironically you probably run Microsoft branded software - which is the actual garbage - while Microsoft hardware turns out to be generally decent.

      Comment was written with my MS Intellimouse Expl 3, which, when i got 10 years ago, had already have a rough life in the hand of a CS pro gamer

    29. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by Monsuco · · Score: 1

      Right now they are so desperate that they are trying to milk Windows 8 as much while the going is still good.

      And when, pray tell, will the going for Windows 8 actually be good?

    30. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember this product, it was called The XboX 360 and it was made by Micro$oft, But for some reason the hardware suffered something like a 50%+ failure rate for the device.

      Point is Micro$oft has not produced a decent piece of hardware in over 2 decades. I have an old serial mouse that still works from Micro$oft but that was from 1992.

    31. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

      Really? The multiple reports of earlier versions of XBox 360 dying (one guy replaced his 12 or 14 times!) seem to indicate that their hardware might not be that much better than their software...

      Oh, you mean sub-$100 stuff like keyboards and shit.

    32. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Well, wait a minute, part of that was that in the old days, we were on the steep end of the curve on operating systems and office suites. People snapped up the next version in the (sometimes vain) hope that it would fix significant bugs in the old, or add much needed capabilities, or support new PC data connection types and hardware, which were also on the steeper end of the curve. Windows 3.1 was a huge update from Dos. Window 95 was a huge update from 3.1. Win98SE gave us USB support. Windows 2000 gave us a much more stable kernel. And so forth.

      I submit that right around Windows 2000 / Office 2000, the curve started flattening out. We reached the point of diminishing returns. Windows XP was a sweet spot -- stable enough for daily use, compatible enough to run almost anything, with a rich enough collection of peripherals. (I submit that Office 2000 is good enough for most people -- I still use it now, on Win7.)

      Windows 7 was attractive to me on my main workststion because the 64 bit version was very stable and for my work I need large amounts of memory. But for most people, 32 bit XP is good enough. Wife and daughter's machines still run XP, they're fine with it. Daughter has a touch screen ASUS running Win8, but I don't think she's powered it up in months. She doesn't like Win8, and XP meets her needs.

      At my work, we are just now pushing Win7 (not not NOT Win8) on the XP users, and there is huge resistance. Because XP is good enough, and the users just want to get work done. They don't want to play with operating systems. I've said this before --- the OS is not the application. The OS loads applications.

      One could say a similar thing about the PC industry as a whole. There was a time when most of us hungered for the next faster chip. But generic PCs have gotten fast enough that most users couldn't take full advantage of them. This reduces the need to pick up a new machine at every iteration. We're on the flat end of the curve.

      Microsoft's mistake was in believing that this rush to buy whatever new iteration they happen to crap out would continue forever. $$PROFIT. They couldn't see that the knee of the curve was approaching. So now they're struggling to find other ways to stay relevant.

      Parenthetically, I wasn't aware that the going was in any way good for Windows 8.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    33. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Same thing happened to me, at work. I finally gave up and went back to my old USB mouse, which I've been using ever since.

      Incidentally, I *hate* the Microsoft wireless keyboard that the company has issued me. Besides running out of battery after an astonishingly short time, it will lose contact with the PC periodically, or drop characters if I type too fast. It acts like it's just on the edge of the wireless range, but the PC is right under the desk less than a yard away. I think for Christmas I'm going to buy myself a wired keyboard and replace it when nobody is looking.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    34. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by mattytee · · Score: 3, Funny

      Comment was written with my MS Intellimouse Expl 3

      I've found that it is much easier to write a comment using the keyboard.

    35. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by ADRA · · Score: 1

      I've worked on a ton of enterprise projects and never once did a customer say that they would even consider SQLServer. It's all Oracle/DB2 in this space. You can list a series of new technologies, but frankly Sharepoint is SCM/Wiki, Lync is useless outside of a MS centric enterprise, and SQL Server is a cheaper also-ran enterprise DB. Without its requirements for exchange/(sharepoint? not sure if it uses SQLS backends), and its trivially simple setup, SQL server sales would be significantly smaller.

      --
      Bye!
    36. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by The123king · · Score: 0

      Like the nutter at the Apple helm got behind the calm, collected Jonny Ive. Businessmen hire for profit. Nutters hire for ideas

      --
      If you gave me a choice between a printer and a giraffe with explosive diarrhoea, i'll get my ladder and my raincoat
    37. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by cskrat · · Score: 1

      I have the G700S for my desktop and a M510 for my laptop.

      The G700 works well as a desktop/gaming mouse. The battery life is a bit weak in wireless mode, you can get somewhere between 12 and 16 hours on a charge, but you can always plug the cord in at any time to turn it into a wired mouse. You don't have to explain to your guild that you need to bow out mid raid to recharge or run to the store for batteries. As an added bonus, the cord also fits any micro-usb cell phone for charging or sync.

      The M510 is not rechargeable but works as smoothly as a $20-30 wired and will last about 6 months or more on a pair of AAs.

      I think Logitech has the whole wireless mouse problem "solved" at the moment.

      --
      My God! It's full of eval()'s.
    38. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by mcgrew · · Score: 0

      I have a Logitech mouse/keyboard combo I bought in 2001. The mouse still works well, but I had some non-rechargeable batteries in the keyboard leak, so sometimes I have to scrape the battery terminals to get it to work.

      But the mouse plugged right along, still going strong after more than a decade.

      As to MS mice, sorry, no matter how good folks say they are I've been using Microsoft software products for almost 30 years and they've always been abysmal. Why should I expect their hardware to be any better?

    39. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      It wasn't the fact that it was wireless, it was that Microsoft can't code for shit (yeah, I'll be modded down, so what?). I've had a Logitech infrared keyboard-mouse combination for over ten years. It's always been as responsive as wired counterparts I've had.

      I would guess that the hardware you had was fine (since MS doesn't own factories and has to farm it all out) but the drivers and other software for it were shit, like everything else they write.

    40. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Wireless mice that take disposable batteries just plain suck... IMHO.

      That hasn't been my experience. My mouse takes AA rechargeables, but I've had disposable, non-rechargeables in it and they worked as well as a wired mouse. Disposables lasted almost a month in it.

      For the absolute best coverage, Logitech has some models that come with an extra battery pack that you can pop out of the mouse and into a receptacle on the dock so you don't ever "run out" if you forget to charge the mouse.

      Mine's a Logitech, and the infrared reciever is also a charger -- you just pit the mouse in it and the batteries (two AAs) charge. It comes in handy because most of my TV remotes use the same size battery, so I keep rechargeables in them and simply swap with the mouse batteries when the remotes stop working.

    41. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by Teun · · Score: 1

      The mouse or the battery?

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    42. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by ciderbrew · · Score: 1

      >Why should I expect their hardware to be any better?
      You shouldn't; but they seem to have made some good mice and keyboards (peripherals really) in the past for some reason.

    43. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by BLToday · · Score: 1

      I like the feel of the Microsoft keyboard and mice, but durability was definitely not their strength. I've had plenty MSFT curve keyboard and laser mice die on me within 2 years. Logitech products, until recently, have been extreme durable. Recently, I've had a VX nano and MX Revolution (original version) die on me within 18 months too.

    44. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by Mister+Liberty · · Score: 1

      The batteries.
      Big mess under my bulged up hand and, a startling shock.
      Next I broke out LOL and must have thought something like 'Microsoft, what did you expect.'

      This was 2007, and it was a temp. 2nd hand replacement mouse when I had wrecked a Logitech Mouse.
      Never before or after had anything else but Logitech. They never failed me.

    45. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be nice if the facts fit your wishes? Too bad that they don't.

      Microsoft pretty much does sell it's stuff with little resistance. Windows 8 sales are down, but MS has made it clear that they're willing to take a short term hiccup in order to position themselves for the mobile movement. Win 8 on the Desktop is still a pain, but reviews are that it's in league with Android/iOS as a mobile platform purely on its own technical merits. It may well be that the Desktop/Mobile schizm is resolved over time as desktops pick up mobile features, such as touch screens. As an example, my wife's new Dell laptop has a touch screen, light weight, and decent (8 hours) battery life - three things that mobile devices traditionally had over the lap/desk top.

      Since the rule of thumb is "buy the 3rd one" the next update to Windows 8 (which is really a new usability model) will probably be the one that gets traction. They sold XBox at a loss for years before it finally became profitable. If you remember history, it took some time (of significant losses) before MS Word beat out Word Perfect, and for Excel to beat out Lotus 123.

      They have a monopoly on Desktop OSs, something they are now using (again) to leverage their way into a new market. (Mobile) And slowly, it's working. Windows 8 phone passed 10% market share in Europe recently. It became #3 in the USA some time ago. And while these milestones seem meager, if they only increase their percentage marginally from year to year, eventually they'll rule the roost as they've done with their Desktop OS. And they have more money than many countries, which buys them a *lot* of a time. That's no guarantee of success, but they are, in no fashion, doomed to fail, regardless of how many "fumbles" you may perceive.

      The real question to be answered over the next 2-5 years is whether or not Android can become replace Windows faster than Windows can replace Android.

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    46. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      Maybe the lesson should have been "avoid wireless", not "avoid Microsoft".

      Maybe just think outside of the box for once. Take your USB cable, plug it into your mouse pad. Now, near field induction to power your mouse or stylus. That's what I do with my Wacom mouse / pen tablet.

    47. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by Volshebnyj+Molotok · · Score: 1

      You wrote that comment with your mouse? LOL I'd like to have seen that!

    48. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by jbolden · · Score: 1

      By revenue:
      Oracle 33.8%
      DB2 31.4%
      SQL Server 13.9%

      By unit sales given how much cheaper SQL Server is, the above figures say a lot.

    49. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by cskrat · · Score: 1

      Another part of the good old days was that since everything was new the users were early adopters by definition. They weren't as strongly committed to the specifics of a given piece of software.

      Moving from Windows 3.1 to Windows 95 was at least as much UI change as going from XP straight to 8, skipping Vista and 7. If we made that exact same transition after people spent the better part of a decade getting familiar with 3.1, we would have the same "it was good enough" arguments.

      The truth, though, 3.1 wasn't good enough; it was built with hard coded assumptions about the limits of computer hardware, limits that were rapidly changing at the time. 95/98(se)/ME weren't good enough; they were attempts to extend the legacy DOS architecture well beyond it's original purpose. Stability on that line went to hell by the time ME came about. Windows 2000 (a.k.a. NT 5.0) was meant for business users and extended to add consumer friendly features with XP (a.k.a. NT 5.1). Those weren't good enough either. How many people can close their eyes and easily picture a Win XP BSOD? If you're worried about getting work done, I hope you remember to save frequently. Vista wasn't good enough, it was a fresh refactor to the NT 6.x kernel and showed signs of being rushed out the door at the end.

      Windows 7 and its counterpart Server 2008R2 (both a.k.a NT 6.1) were good enough at the time but two big things drove the push to Win 8/ Server 2012. On the consumer side, MS is looking at a booming tablet market full of consumers that just want a device to consume media, not create it; Windows 7 is not a suitable tablet OS and developing a wholly separate OS for mobile/tablet would be a massive waste of resources. On the server side there is a big push toward virtualization, cloud computing or whatever you want to call it. The consumer side brought us the Metro UI which has caused nearly all the backlash over Win 8 while the server side brought us things like a type-1 hypervisor included in the base OS and a kernel that can handle changes to the amount of physical memory visible on the fly.

      Windows 8/ Server 2012 aren't cash grabs resulting from MS assuming people will flock to buy anything new they release, they exist as solutions to use cases that weren't considered in Win 7/ 2008R2. Apple would be the company that makes that assumption with their "One more thing..." announcements and OS service packs bearing price tags.

      Throughout the history of Windows the biggest changes have been under the hood. How many of the people above that can picture an XP BSOD know, first hand, that the Win 8 BSOD was completely redesigned? I've seen it only once during an experiment in overclocking. Now consider that XP was much more stable than any of the 9x/ME versions before it. Every step of the way were people that cried "but it was good enough!" but I, personally, would rather *get work done* on Win 8 where my system uptime is mostly determined by the local power company. I can adjust myself to a new UI after a week or two of exploration; a price I'm happily paying to avoid losing whatever I'm working on to some random IRQ Not Less Than or Equal bug.

      The UI has only gone through two big changes, 3.1 > 95 and 7 > 8 (I'm ignoring 1.0 and 2.0 because they never gained mass popularity). Over the next several iterations we'll see the same tweaking that went into the 95 through 7 UI, i.e. change the colors, add curves, rearrange the menu, tone down the colors, make it look like glass, bigger icons and ditch the curves. We've already seen the first iteration with 8.1 restoring the start icon and allowing multiple metro apps on different monitors. Then, when everyone thinks that Metro is "good enough" MS will create something completely different to respond to a form factor or use case that has not been imagined or invented yet.

      And the masses will whine and complain again. So goes the circle of tech.

      --
      My God! It's full of eval()'s.
    50. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by TrollstonButterbeans · · Score: 1

      I have a fairly strong dislike for Microsoft like any good hardcore programmer, but I swear your post is wishful thinking and it ain't gonna happen.

      Microsoft does several things right and very consistently --- backwards compatibility is strong, yes the mess up the interface but then they correct it like with Windows 7.

      Microsoft can only be defeated by a *complete competitor* --- someone to defeat Visual Studio, to win in the "easy programming tools" department, someone to beat them in the "long term investment" department (I can run Windows 95 applications on Windows 8).

      Microsoft still is the flagship operating system because no one else will be consistent over the long-term to offer an alternative. This is the frustrating but true environment of today and I don't see someone eroding Microsoft in the desktop arena anytime soon either because none of their competitors offer even Microsoft's somewhat rocky, but consistent, stability.

      --
      Priest: "Universe from nothing, no laws of physics, sped up time"+ huge discrepancies. Creationism? No. Big Bang Theory
    51. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which begs the question (they licensed and sold a version of Windows called Windows 8) are they a "MS Shop"!

    52. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      With one fumble after another, with more and more alternatives to Microsoft's products

      when the government of the largest country in the world is petitioning you for support, you don't have much to worry about.

      Right now they are so desperate that they are trying to milk Windows 8 as much while the going is still good.

      they are trying to migrate people onto the latest version of their software so they don't have to staff to support earlier versions. pretty common and well understood practice.

    53. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Sharepoint uses SQL Server as the backend, yes. Although it can use SQL Server Express as well (I wouldn't recommend it).

      However, Exchange does not use SQL Server.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    54. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      > Moving from Windows 3.1 to Windows 95 was at least as much UI change as going from XP straight to 8, skipping Vista and 7. If we made that exact same transition after people spent the better part of a decade getting familiar with 3.1, we would have the same "it was good enough" arguments.

      My opinion, of course, but no we really wouldn't. 3.1 clearly was *not* good enough, especially in networking, which was starting to become a defining technology. Anyone trying to keep 3.1 happy on a TCP/IP network would reach for 95 like a drowning man reaches for something that looks like it might float. Moreover, 95 had excellent conveyance -- you knew by looking at it what to press to make stuff happen -- that Windows 8 is sorely lacking. Yes, I'll grant you that 3.1 to 95 is about the same amount of difference as XP to 8, but the latter feels more like going from XP to a certain video game.

      > Windows 7 is not a suitable tablet OS

      Agreed.

      > and developing a wholly separate OS for mobile/tablet would be a massive waste of resources.

      Enh. I'm sure this sounded logical in the boardroom, but as a practical matter it gave us Windows 8, which doesn't fit well on either PCs or tablets. Nobody really enjoys using it, except the people on Hawaii 5-0 (who are after all, actors) and employees at Redmond, who smile through gritted teeth. What Microsoft created was the classic "neither fish nor fowl". Yet another operating system that most people are skipping over. It succeeded at the "radically different" paradigm (3.1 -> 95 -> 2000/nt4 -> XP) but at a time when the interface really didn't *need* to be radically different -- they had already made an acceptable KVM GUI with XP, and they shouldn't have screwed with that. In a desperate effort to capture a marketplace where they had previously not been a player and still don't completely understand, they're crapping on their base. It's the worst of all possible worlds.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    55. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't seen a single Microsoft hardware device work properly yet. Their mice are constantly thrashing the USB port, even when not moving at all. Their keyboards likewise. The XBOX had hardware faults that went down in history, such as craters in the pc board. This stuff only works in Windows because Windows has all kinds of compensation code to cover these faults.

      Mobile? Let's talk Sync, their automotive voice recognition software, that fails CANbus protocol and fails to talk to common devices, even their own. Their phone platform is slow and primitive, and requires high power processors just to run at any kind of normal speed. This reduces battery life drastically.

      Oh...and remember when they tried make a portable music/video player?

      Microsoft started with BASIC, not hardware. It's the languages group that put Microsoft on the map in the first place.

    56. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't Apple more $y than Microsoft?

    57. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by atomicxblue · · Score: 1

      I'm using a Microsoft keyboard on my Linux machine. (Yes, I see the irony in that...) Their keyboards have very little force feedback and ergonomics allow me to type for hours on end without too much pain. Still wouldn't use their operating system, though. That's not even worth pirating.

    58. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by atomicxblue · · Score: 1

      It's hard to find anything in North America that is Made in USA or Made in Canada. I usually look for either one, since both countries have mostly fair labor practices, but it's sometimes impossible, depending on what you're wanting to buy.

    59. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by cskrat · · Score: 1

      I never had professional experience with 3.1 as I was still in middle school when it came out, so I can't really speak from experience on the networking woes therein. That said, I have no reason to believe that an OS that uses cooperative multitasking would be anything but nightmarish to network. But I did say that most of the improvements in Windows over the last 20+ years were under the hood.

      My main argument there was referring to the differences between the typical PC owner then and now as well as the different pace of changes in the industry. Back then, we didn't have Facebook, Candy Crush and Skype to draw in the general masses. A larger percentage of PC users then were techies, early adopters, and people that would later become slashdotters. Also, this was a time when PC systems were obsoleted by newer hardware by the time the shrink wrap hit the landfill (some hyperbole there but not much). After replacing an aging 25MHz 486SX with a 100MHz DX4 and then turning around a year later and buying a Pentium 166, you just kinda roll with the OS change as being part of the new system.

      I agree that they dropped the ball on the Win 8 UI. I think it will continue improve as it did with 8.1. From my development experience, and I could be wrong, it looks like many of its sins are the result of interference from an executive that nobody is allowed to say 'no' to. It struck me as odd that as soon as Balmer started packing his desk MS reversed course on several design decisions regarding the XBOne and they opened up 8.1 to MSDN subscribers for early access. But that could just be coincidence.

      Currently, their server OS and desktop OS are basically different builds/configurations of the same NT code base; it only makes sense that they would use it again for a tablet/phone OS. This is especially true if you remember the results of the Windows CE line, particularly as applied to earlier "smart" phones. Basing Windows tablets and phones on the NT core for 8 was the right idea with a poorly thought out implementation.

      All in all, I'd wager on Windows 9 (or whatever it will be called) fixing the bad, and possibly forced by executive fiat, UI decisions in 8.

      --
      My God! It's full of eval()'s.
    60. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Absolutely correct. WinCE was a mistake and Slab RT (or whatever it was called) was WinCE Mistake version 2.0. Using the same kernel is actually a smart idea. Trying to shoehorn the same GUI across all platforms wasn't.

      I think we're in agreement that it was a different world back then. My point was that Microsoft should have realized that the pace couldn't possibly continue.

      And yes, it's all a mess that a certain chair thrower made, that someone else is going to have to clean up. I suspect they will, eventually, but it's chaos right now. I support end users on Windows platforms, and I haven't been having a lot of fun, and frankly, it's made me grouchy.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    61. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft is running out of cash cows.

      Right now they are so desperate that they are trying to milk Windows 8 as much while the going is still good.

      Nope, they have a large market to harass for monies, and XP ain't going to get an extension due to it.

      I've used Windows since 3.1 and I'd never purchased a copy. Since XP is headed to the end of the line; I started getting
      "This isn't a genuine copy of Win7" alerts, something very new for me, This but one of a number of copies I've used,
      nothing I did blocked the notices, my IP was targeted I assume.

      Programs didn't open within a reasonable time, hell even within an unreasonable time. And the Internet didn't work.

      Everything I checked said the Internet was fine, I questioned my new router, and any other reasonable cause. Then I got my hands
      on a genuine version of Win7.

      Still everything ran like $#!t and no Internet, I glanced at the validation at one point and it claimed I had 25 days left
      on my trial, hell I'd never registered a version of windows before, I thought one just entered the number and that was it.

      I entered the number once more, it contacted MS, and like magic my Internet worked again, a matter of seconds after being
      told how a genuine copy is a good thing for everybody.

      This is just one case, I figure they are making a haul due to the end of life of XP.

      A note of interest: Everybody knows what an excellent piece of work Hiren's BootCD is http://www.hiren.info/pages/bootcd ,
      version 15.2 mentions it's got a mini XP (as had previous versions), It appears this version (15.2) is main stream and with the blessing of MS.
      XP is being phased out.

    62. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pity. It should be assembled for minimum wage by 20something American liberals so they can pay for my health care.

    63. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      I have always found their hardware to be of much better quality than their software. Their software is not as bad as a lot of people say but I prefer OSX etc. I have had several M$ mice and keyboards in the past and have been very happy with them.

      And I found the contrary, their hardware was mediocre, and third party hardware was superior, as was third party support.
      Examples from trivia
      keyboards, mouses, web-cams, tablets, cables, etc. Good hardware to run NT did not originate with MS.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    64. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you have cats a wired mouse often suddenly becomes an unwired mouse! Wireless ab initio is then a much better way to start off!

    65. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by shakezula · · Score: 1

      I completely agree. I am using a late 2012 iMac with a WheelMouse Optical USB I bought in 2000 because to me, its a MUCH better input device than the "Magic Mouse."

      --
      I know what you're thinking. Did I forward 65,535 packets or 65,536 packets?
    66. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by Douglas+Goodall · · Score: 1

      I just returned a high end Toshiba notebook to Costco for several reasons. The first was that either the fan or hard drive started making evil noises. I suppose I could have gotten warrantee service, but a failure after four months makes me cautious about Toshiba hardware. The other reason is that after giving Windows 8/8.1 an honest chance for four months, I can say unequivocally that I hate the operating system, hate the GUI, and feel almost nauseous trying to use it. Stuff that was intuitive and falling down easy with XP is counterintuitive and sometimes darn near impossible with 8. I have to believe that many other long time computer users feel as I do. What could be worse than being told by your employer that you have to use this crap?

    67. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by MooseMiester · · Score: 1

      Microsoft's "Milk Cow" isn't you, or me. It's corporate America and the U.S. Military. Individual consumers are a dropper in the ocean.

      --
      Murphy was an optimist
    68. Re:Microsoft is running out of milk cows by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      I have always found their hardware to be of much better quality than their software.

      That is such a high hurdle for their hardware to overcome.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  20. production and development cost by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ferrari cars cost just as much to develop as your average ford. However, the number of cars being sold, will make the development cost per car much higher. Add much higher production cost because of materials used, fabrication methods used, number of actions to produce a certain part and yield to the equation. Even if Ferrari would make a bold move and decide to sell their cars at the same price as Ford, they would still have to buy more expensive materials and do more to those materials before they are a car.

    MicroSoft may have put more money in developing Win7 initially than they did in XP, I wouldn't know if that's the case. The real thing is that the production cost per copy is negligible; they just turn a knob and come up with a sales price based on a marketing model.

    The home PC market is crashing since most people don't need a PC anymore to watch movies, communicate with their family or play games. The introduction of the computer in the home has moved from the single device to smart phones, tablets, media players and game consoles. People hardly need a "real" computer anymore and the budget for one has moved on to other devices. School going kids and students may need one to do school work on and learn, but the requirements for that sort of machine aren't that exciting usually and an older model or really cheap new hardware will do just fine.

    Offices don't really need PCs to do more than office work. To be honest, typing a letter or stuffing things in a spreadsheet hasn't changed much over the past ten years or so. Offices tend to move towards VDI where the machine the user has is only an input/output device and the "desktop" is actually running on a server, often not using a desktop OS in a VM, but simply a session on a server OS.

    MicroSoft is losing their monopoly in office suit software, server software, e-mail platforms and such. Several attempts to get new markets like search engines, media and music players, have failed to yield any profit and are costing them money. Depending on how you look at it, their game console business is a success, but the net profit they got from it is either not fantastic, or they are still in the red and it's not a commercial success at all. They have a large part of the market, but it's still not clear how much they have spent to get that and if they actually have recovered that money. The desktop PC market is shrinking rapidly and they need some way to keep all those developers paid and shareholders happy.

    With the current stock price and results they had in the past, shareholders have very high demands. This makes that they are turning the knob for the Windows7 and 8 desktop OS prices way up. This makes people either pirate it, or buy a PC that comes loaded with crapware to sponsor the price of the OS, or they move to another OS because they are tired of the whole windows clutter and viruses.

    In China, crapware sponsorship is worth next to nothing because piracy is much more prevalent there and sponsors expect very little return on the installations. That makes the OS very expensive to put on legally for vendors or end users, resulting in even more piracy.

    China has the power to convince MicroSoft to extend XP life and even sell it for a lower fee. If the Chinese government would decide to move to Linux as the OS for all official government desktops, home users will follow that sooner or later, especially if it was free and there would be less malware. It wouldn't be easy or cheap to do so for China, but this XP retirement is an event where they have a clear cost/benefit model that has a pivot point that is an actual threat to MicroSoft. If China would migrate to Linux, it'd give a much bigger threat to MicroSoft than a few German cities doing it. Even the cities migrations have already resulted in quite a few enhancements that make Linux a more viable desktop alternative. Once China puts their weight in, the reasons that keep linux away from the corporate desktop will disappear rapidly. Given the recent revelations

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
    1. Re:production and development cost by iONiUM · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, why do you write it "MicroSoft"? Their company name is clearly "Microsoft". Is it your like subtle way to say you hate them, like people who write M$ or Micro$oft?

      It seems childish and naive, especially since I'm pretty sure you know better.

    2. Re:production and development cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Im sorry, why are you sorry?

    3. Re:production and development cost by KlomDark · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Usually people who just write MicroSoft instead of Micro$oft (or M$) are just showing their age. For the first few years of the company's existence it was Micro-Soft, and most people dropped the dash for MicroSoft. Everyone-hates-dashes...

      It's not CHILDish, it's OLDish.

      Save your rage for the "M$" people...

    4. Re:production and development cost by jbolden · · Score: 1

      I think you are forgetting about Sharepoint and SQL Server as big wins of the last decade.

      ___

      As for extending the life of XP, no chance. XP already has done tremendous harm to Microsoft in creating a culture of long term no upgrading. They need to get their culture to be more like Apple's, more like it was pre XP, where people upgraded regularly. If China moves to Linux, so what?

    5. Re:production and development cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Does anybody else remember when it used to be "MICROS~1"?

    6. Re:production and development cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pot calls kettle black

    7. Re:production and development cost by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Big wins? Everyone I know who's touched either hates them. The PHBs might love them, but the people who have to touch them certainly don't.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    8. Re:production and development cost by jbolden · · Score: 1

      I know lots of developers who love them. But regardless, you can't use sales as the measure of "win" in one post and then discard it in the next. If "win" is defined by sales those are wins. If win is not defined by sales but instead by cool then things like F# and LINQ are huge wins.

    9. Re:production and development cost by Merk42 · · Score: 1

      China already has moved (or is moving) to Linux with Ubuntu Kylin http://www.ubuntu.com/desktop/ubuntukylin As far as people in China still using Windows, the majority of them are pirated copies. That's why they want extended support, they won't buy Windows 8.1 or even 7 because they never bought XP in the first place.

    10. Re:production and development cost by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      And yet there are so many good reasons to hate Micro$oft.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    11. Re:production and development cost by iONiUM · · Score: 0

      And in all these years, they just never noticed the name is now Microsoft? Give me a fucking break. It's on purpose.

      It's the same as those who use Ipad instead of iPad. For all the pedantic grammar and spelling nazi's on Slashdot, I've never understood why this kind of thing is accepted, and indeed, encouraged.

    12. Re:production and development cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could expand it to "I want to establish this post as having a faux-polite passive-aggressive tone".

    13. Re:production and development cost by opus_magnum · · Score: 1

      Could it be they don't care about piracy because they plan to make money from Windows Store?

    14. Re:production and development cost by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      Even my Apple ][ DOS 3.3 had 30 character filenames WITH spaces in 1980.

      Microsoft is always late to the party.

      References:
      * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_file_systems#Limits
      * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_DOS

      --
      Big Bang^H^H^H^H Sham Theory, Noun: popular Pseudo-Science-Fiction theory where no experimental results can be duplicated. Can we stick to REAL science please?

  21. lies, damn lies! by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 3, Interesting

    He linked the demise of XP to China’s efforts to stem software piracy by making pirated software seem a better option. “These practices affect the smooth operations of genuine software in China,” Yan Xiaohong is quoted as saying.

    Windows XP is easy to pirate but Win 7/8 is a total pain in the ass and updates thwart previously working cracks. Wouldn't this mean that moving to Win 7/8 would be more likely to prevent piracy? Then again, they could just help ReactOS, they sure as hell have reverse engineered Windows enough to make a proper implementation.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:lies, damn lies! by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Informative

      That is 100% wrong. XP is a pain in the ass to pirate and Windows 7 is the absolute easiest to pirate. Windows loader, one click and I'm done. Windows XP requires a mess to keep it from blacklisting the generated key.

      You really need to learn about piracy before you talk about it, because windows 7 has a huge OEM hole that makes it effortless to crack. Windows 8 is getting about as easy to crack as well.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:lies, damn lies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not true. exists are a win xp pro corporate university edition corporate key, that has unlimited uses, and disables genuine advantage, and all other tracking methods.

    3. Re:lies, damn lies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Happy fun english be hard.

      He provided proof in the name of the app and how it's done, you just threw badly assembled words together with no real information.

      So if anyone is "not true" it would be you.

    4. Re:lies, damn lies! by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      Agreed that Win7 is easy to pirate. Just google: "win7 iso" and lots of places to download the ISO.

      Heck even Microsoft tells you where to download it !?!?!
      http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_7-windows_install/windows-7-reinstall-download-needed-after-hard/d47f2375-4501-439c-9455-51b1d240635c?msgId=c27e4378-0f7b-413b-bfd8-f653b0f253d6

      e.g. Don't let the "msvista" directory name fool you.
      * Home Premium x86: http://msft-dnl.digitalrivercontent.net/msvista/pub/X15-65732/X15-65732.iso
      * Home Premium x64: http://msft-dnl.digitalrivercontent.net/msvista/pub/X15-65733/X15-65733.iso
      * Professional x86: http://msft-dnl.digitalrivercontent.net/msvista/pub/X15-65804/X15-65804.iso
      * Professional x64: http://msft-dnl.digitalrivercontent.net/msvista/pub/X15-65805/X15-65805.iso

      > windows 7 has a huge OEM hole that makes it effortless to crack
      Uh you don't even need to "crack" Win 7. Resetting the WPA garbage is trivial too; every ~30 days reboot to reset your system back to a clean un-activated copy :-)

      Reboot
      press F8 at startup
      Repair Computer
      System Recovery Options: Keyboard: US
      Username/Password
      (you will see: Windows found on Drive ?:)
      Command Prompt
      D:
      reg load HKLM\MY_SYSTEM "D:\Windows\System32\config\system"
      reg delete HKLM\MY_SYSTEM\WPA /f
      reg unload HKLM\MY_SYSTEM
      exit
      Reboot

      to display

      slmgr /dli
      slmgr /dlv

      WinXP is not that hard to find. There are MicroXP and TinyXP versions around.

      Concur 100% that cracking XP is more of a PITA to find the various boot-loaders.

    5. Re:lies, damn lies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Lumpy:

      Local Windows XP pirate DVDs come with 12+ versions of the OS: 32 or 64 bits, with or without support for RAID/SATA drivers, Home, Pro, Basic versions, Activated with key or not, OEM. You choose one...

      The common people choose OEM. At install they stop the installer and patches itself for become OEM, then they finish to install and happily run Windows Updates like a pro. :P No keys, no Genuine-nag window, no call home.

      I suggest that you use better your Google Fu or send Dave to a trip to Tijuana for more than Tequila. ;)

      Yours truly,
      The Average 3rd world user that needs to pirate apps for survive.

  22. Hey, Chicoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Upgrade to Vista.

    1. Re:Hey, Chicoms by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft should solve the XP problem by giving away free copies of Vista.

  23. ReactOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    IMHO, This is exactly where ReactOS will help, and run a generation of applications without Licensing nor waiting for Microsoft to patch stuff.

    1. Re:ReactOS by jfdavis668 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Only if it is ever finished.

  24. Ancient Chinese Secret by jfdavis668 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Keep using what works.

    1. Re:Ancient Chinese Secret by Threni · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Invest heavily in spyware for ancient insecure OS, then resist change"

    2. Re:Ancient Chinese Secret by StormReaver · · Score: 1

      Keep using what works.

      I agree, which is why I dumped Microsoft in 1999 and switched to Linux. Even back when Linux was "hard" to use, it still worked better than any version of Windows -- then and now. I don't see that changing any time soon.

  25. I hope Microsoft tells them to get stuffed by jonwil · · Score: 1

    I hope Microsoft does NOT give in to the demands of China for extending XP support, that OS (and the ancient broken version of IE it shipped with) need to die and ending security updates for it will be a good way to help do that.

    1. Re:I hope Microsoft tells them to get stuffed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could you know, also backport things to the OS to alleviate these problems ya know. Instead of disrespecting their customers.

  26. stop proliferation of pirated Microsoft software by nhat11 · · Score: 1

    LOL funniest thing I heard all day

  27. Wireless mouse with no power is worthless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the mouse should not go through the batteries that fast, if it does, then it's broken.

  28. New names? by justthinkit · · Score: 2

    Lobby, Mezzanine and Penthouse properties.

    --
    I come here for the love
  29. Why not... by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    XP is not "dying" I have servers running Windows NT 3.51 that still make more money an hour than 100% of the people here on slashdot. and they are 100% secure because they are on a segregated and airgapped lan.

    When you have something working and you have enough spare hardware to keep it working, why waste money and time "upgrading" simply because some idiots think you need to. Short of someone doing a "mission impossible" break in my servers are 100% hacker proof. Oh and here's a tip they ALL have the administrator password set as password1234.

    They are specialized servers that can play back 16 broadcast quality MPEG2 streams into digital video in CATV headends. 16 at the same time all from a single pentium 1 processor and barely any ram. the playback cards play the video directly from the SCSI hard drives. The replacement today from Seachange are less capable and break down more. These require nearly ZERO attention and continue to run year after year just printing money for us. and we have enough spare parts to handle any issues and give us a year lead time if we ever needed to do a complete upgrade to current tech. If an OS if supported means nothing at all if you have sysadmins and network people that actually have a clue as to what they are doing.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Why not... by Sockatume · · Score: 2

      Believe it or not, all of the other sysadmins and network people know what they are doing, it's just they work on systems that - as an inherent part of their function - can't just be set up in a box with no contact to the outside world. I mean, my Game Boy's never going to need well-designed user authentication, but I don't go around boasting of my network security acumen on the back of that.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    2. Re:Why not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lumpy, so you're saying these are the computers that own themselves?
      since you're a person on slashdot, evidently these computers make more money than you do.

    3. Re:Why not... by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1

      XP is not "dying" I have servers running Windows NT 3.51 that still make more money an hour than 100% of the people here on slashdot. and they are 100% secure because they are on a segregated and airgapped lan.

      Wow. You sure are full of yourself. So you really believe that there is not one person here in all of Slashdot who makes more in an hour than your customized servers do? Anyway, congratulations I guess on finding the only way possible to use NT and make it work, but I bet you have to reboot everything every couple of months or earlier anyway because NT sucks. And anyway, the fact that your one specialized set of circumstances make you or your company company a lot of money (assuming you are telling the truth) does not prove that XP is not dying.

    4. Re:Why not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      XP is not "dying" I have servers running Windows NT 3.51 that still make more money an hour than 100% of the people here on slashdot. and they are 100% secure because they are on a segregated and airgapped lan.

      Tell that to Iran (and even the US DoD have had their air gaps jumped).

    5. Re:Why not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By idiots that plug things into secure computers. IRAN Sysadmins too stupid to disable USB ports, etc....

    6. Re:Why not... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Not to know the average user works in a TV station and makes commercials all day.

      Real users do not have an IT staff.

      XP is a terrible OS. People now say its GOD because of Vista which before 2007 was bashed here for being insecure. Sure XP was a great OS in 2001. But the days of cooperative multitasking and operating systems who core design underneath is DOS 1981 era are over now. Phones, Raspberry pies, car computers, etc, are all multitasking preemptive style, multi user, and most have security built inside it.

      No I do not mean a password which is XPs style of security. I am talking DEP, ASLR, DRM, and other technologies. They just work and I would say my cars computer is as reliable as your setup.

      But what you have works well until the demand for HD will eventually force you to upgrade, but you my friend are a niche. XP is not appropriate for the internet, online banking, or even modern hardware. Its age is showing, and it appears to work but that does not mean it is safe to use and everyone who says otherwise is wrong. If you are not technically literate then Windows 7 or MacOSX are better platforms.

    7. Re:Why not... by SlippyToad · · Score: 1

      Lumpy, you're an idiot.

      I have servers running Windows NT 3.51 that still make more money an hour than 100% of the people here on Slashdot

      Yea, what happens when that hardware quits? And who do you call when it stops working? Don't tell me it never stops working. I built my share of 3.51 servers, back when it was a supported OS. It is not by even the remotest account a more stable OS than the modern Windows servers.

      You are one unexpected fuckup from being unemployed, Lumpy. You won't be back here to brag at all of us how your 3.51 install barfed on you and you got fired on the spot because you had absolutely no way to bring your antiquated gear back online. You have NOBODY to call. So when it goes bad, it will ALL BE ON YOUR HEAD.

      I would not be feeling so fucking smug there, buddy.

      --
      One day I feel I'm ahead of the wheel / the next it's rolling over me / I can get back on / I can get back on
    8. Re:Why not... by cskrat · · Score: 1

      Would my web servers be more secure if I airgapped a couple NT 3.51 boxes and set the passwords to password1234?

      Right now I'm running Apache on Linux with a single login account protected by a 2048 bit RSA key that can su to root with a 32 character password.

      Just looking for an expert opinion.

      --
      My God! It's full of eval()'s.
    9. Re:Why not... by cskrat · · Score: 1

      Windows stopped using cooperative multitasking with Win95 and NT never used it as far as I know.

      --
      My God! It's full of eval()'s.
  30. Re:bad BIOS saga continues - 12/13 by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    ""In our article, we describe how the complete concept of air gaps can be considered obsolete as commonly available laptops can communicate over their internal speakers and microphones and even form a covert acoustical mesh network,"

    This is 100% bullshit.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  31. Am I understanding this correctly? by davidbrit2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Their argument is basically, "Everybody is going to pirate the new software anyway, so please continue to sink money into supporting the old software that we've already pirated." Is that how I should be interpreting this?

    1. Re:Am I understanding this correctly? by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      "Please continue to put money into working on a product I have no intention of paying for."

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  32. Why can't American consumers... by Niet3sche · · Score: 1

    ...do the same? And why is there an expectation that a country can drive policy of private businesses? Is like it if Porsches were cheaper. However, I doubt that American consumers banding together in this would be given cheaper cars. The "it's a huge market and we have to bow to it at the expense of the locals" argument carries no weight in manufacturing any longer (e.g. coffee, textiles, clothing), so why do we unthinkingly give it a pass here?

    1. Re:Why can't American consumers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd love to see some consumer boycotts but I think 50 years of consumer brainwashing via commercials has taken it's toll on our spine.

    2. Re:Why can't American consumers... by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      China has a centrally-planned command economy, so it has the bargaining power to say "it's our way or the highway." American consumers are free to make their own choices, but the tradeoff is that it weakens our bargaining position.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  33. The real cost by inhuman_4 · · Score: 1

    More likely Win7 and Win8 are much harder to pirate, so a huge portion of the chinese economy is faced with either going without updates or actually paying for windows. Either way it's going to have a negative impact on the Chinese economy. Pay Microsoft (the Americans) or pay the hackers.

    1. Re:The real cost by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > More likely Win7 and Win8 are much harder to pirate, ...

      Huh?
      http://lmgtfy.com/?q=win7+iso

      Install WITHOUT a key. Every 30 days reboot into safe mode and reset the timer by DELETING the WPA registry keys. You can run Win7 Ultimate *indefinitely* this way, along with MS Security Essentials, etc.

      Reboot
      Press F8
      Repair Computer
      Start Command Prompt
      D:
      reg load HKLM\MY_SYSTEM "\Windows\System32\config\system"
      reg delete HKLM\MY_SYSTEM\WPA /f
      reg unload HKLM\MY_SYSTEM
      exit
      Reboot

      P.S.
      Never install KB971033

  34. MPEG4 may force you to upgrade by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 0

    Lot's of cable systems are loaded with MPEG2 but some have stared to move stuff over to mpeg4.

    Dish and directv dumped MPEG 2 HD a few years ago.

    1. Re:MPEG4 may force you to upgrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where did he say Dish and Direct TV? Are you even on the right website?

    2. Re:MPEG4 may force you to upgrade by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      By comcast your MPEG 2 NON SDV system sucks.

      Rogers, cox, Shaw, Time Warner Cable, cable vision and others have SDV and or MEPG 4 and have way more HD.

  35. 'pirate' its own software? by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    I gather from reading your comment and GP that we could actually be seeing M$ pirating its own software.

    MS would ideally like people to pay for windows, but failing that they would still rather see pirate windows than linux dominate.

    Right. This makes complete sense given the way we've seen M$ for the last 30+ years.

    I can completely envision a scenario where M$ releases pirated versions of XP through 3rd parties...lets say 'facilitates' it...

    Which explains this:

    There is even a common software program used to deliver updates to pirated XP machines. This software also comes with anti-malware tools, and is called "360."

    why else would *software pirates* take the time and effort to release updates? It takes manpower, people who have to be made to do the work. I know this is a bit easier given its China but still, pirates don't use resources this way.

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re:'pirate' its own software? by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      why else would *software pirates* take the time and effort to release updates? It takes manpower, people who have to be made to do the work. I know this is a bit easier given its China but still, pirates don't use resources this way.

      First, free tools to install windows updates are available online for legit copies of windows already. Auto-updaters are common on linux distros that have no plans to ever charge anybody for anything. So, it isn't entirely unheard of to offer updates without a revenue stream.

      Second, they aren't offering this stuff for free. The posts above talk about $3 professionally-boxed copies of windows. If you want somebody to buy your $3 box of windows instead of somebody else's 50-cent boxless disc then you need to offer a value-add.

      The only reason this stuff doesn't happen in the US is that the FBI would bust you if you sold pirated copies of windows. In a regulatory environment where piracy is not prevented, then it makes perfect sense that pirates would compete on quality/features/price/etc just as in any other market.

  36. MS should sell XP to China by alispguru · · Score: 2

    They could sell the Chinese XP rights to a company in cahoots with the government (and once you get above a minimum size in China, you're with the government or out of business).

    The government company would have the incentive and the government backing to get everyone in China on "legit" XP.

    MS gets money now. They get to transfer blame for XP support to someone else. They could encourage the Chinese to essentially fork XP, so the supported Chinese version wouldn't compete with recent Windows.

    Sounds win-win to me.

    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
  37. price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just checked the price of Windows 8.1. It costs only $109 on Amazon.com. is that expensive? Please enlighten me.

    1. Re:price by neminem · · Score: 1

      Yes, it is. Specifically, it's $109 more than it's worth.

  38. The real reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real reason is with the improved security they are having a hard time getting a tracking virus to install consistently on windows 7/8 and to hook into IE11 properly so they can monitor everything their citizens do. Its working just fine on Windows XP and IE6.

    1. Re:The real reason... by PPH · · Score: 1

      Just find out how the NSA does it. I'm sure the Chinese have a few people planted inside that organization who can tell them.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  39. Let's think about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That could drive users to buy pirated copies of a new operating system because they are cheaper

    What percentage of China is using pirated copies of XP?

  40. Pirated. by Holi · · Score: 1

    Aren't most copies of XP in China pirated?

    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  41. WinXP64 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am not moving from WinXP64 for my developer work, the winserver 2003 kernel and the XP tunning... whats not to like?

    Cero days arent really such a great risk with safe habits, and rollback rx and eset ss set up and updated inside virtualbox on kubuntu.

    Using wsus if i whant it, can reinstall from original cd and upgrade the installation to the most current updated state, no internet required

    WinXP is simple enought, very well known, easy decomposed using litepc xplite, and with asio and nvidia drivers does everything i need better and lighter than Win7

    My next reference platform for releases will not be vista, seven, eight, etc... suported and tested yes, but not required, I am now targeting Wine (and latter reactos i hope)

  42. Extend XP EOL so we can exploit it longer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China wants it extended so they can mine XP's bugs longer...

  43. IE... by akpak · · Score: 1

    I can see it. When every single new version of IE breaks all of our web applications (notably not developed by us, all third party), I often wish we could go back to XP also. It doesn't seem to matter how many times I tell our computers not to install updates automatically, and not to update IE automatically, somehow we always get the latest and "greatest" version of IE installed on a bunch of machines. I kind of like our few remaining XP machines, because they can't get anything higher than IE8 which works just fine.

  44. Doesn't matter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't matter how cheap XP is, Chinese companies still pirate it. Last company I was at had an office in China with a little over 200 employees, of those, 187 were running illegal copies of XP and Office. If anything, dumping XP and forcing people to switch to an operating system that is a little more robust in its anti-piracy measures will have a greater effect against piracy. Companies that cannot afford a Windows 7/8 license can use the official State sponsored Linux distro.

  45. Re:bad BIOS saga continues - 12/13 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, it isn't. Communicating using internal speakers and microphones can certainly happen, and can be used to form a covert network. The bullshit part is claiming microphones are an initial attack vector. From what I've read, the virus can't jump the air gap to an uninfected machine, but it can communicate with other instances of itself over air-gapped machines using the acoustic network. It's at least plausible.

  46. Is it about ease of piracy? by bjb · · Score: 1
    I'm just curious why sticking with XP would be desirable. I know that Vista/7/8 have higher system resource requirements, but is perhaps the driver being that it is easier to pirate a copy of XP?

    The basis for my statement there is simply because I know that XP only asks for a product key and I don't recall in recent history the activation mechanism being particularly strict. Vista/7 seems to start disabling itself after a while without a properly activated key and 8 seems to want an email address to tie your license to (from the one time I played with it out of curiosity). I'm figuring the Vista/7/8 mechanism is just tighter?

    --
    Never hit your grandmother with a shovel, for it leaves a bad impression on her mind...
  47. Re:Server 2012 doesn't comes with a gui by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    YOu guys are so resistant to change and that is dangerous in a field like IT where you are expecting to know everything about anything technical.

    I have no problem with as I use the Metro tiles ONCE. After that it is the MMC on the clients and powershell.

    The tiles are only bad if you need to multitask and do not want to be interrupted each time with a new screen each time you want to launch a new app. With a server you run a shell and maybe server manager and go away.

  48. XP IMO Still superior by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find most any new feature in Windows since XP SP2 has just been a token/marketing ploy to try and sell newer... I still run XP SP2 on all my systems, giving Windows Vista, and 7 a try for a weekend before reverting to XP for improved speed(yes even 32bit vs 64bit chips). The only real lacking is large memory support, but without new bloated apps who needs the additional memory.

    Everything newer seems to have fewer options/features; requires more computer to do less.

    I believe MS only added SP3 to XP to propagate .net framework and slow XP down to not make newer versions of Windows look so bad.

    Don't have any known security issues, only virus I ever had was let in by Windows Update taking the firewall down to apply the fix for the virus in question(MS Blast).

  49. Re:bad BIOS saga continues - 12/13 by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    Yes it is, If you knew anything AT ALL about computers or electronics you would know that. Go look up how audio pathways work in a computer kid.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  50. $15/yr for extended support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft can charge the rest of us dinosaurs who like XP $15/yr for extending the usable life of this os that does everything we need, am I right?

  51. liars by SlippyToad · · Score: 1

    Windows XP is one of the easier-to-pirate Microsoft OS'. Actually you just need to put in either all 1's or all 9's.

    So, the premise is total horseshit.

    --
    One day I feel I'm ahead of the wheel / the next it's rolling over me / I can get back on / I can get back on
  52. Windows XP Not Dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It continues to run just fine on all of my machines.

  53. What is China going to do... by DiEx-15 · · Score: 1

    What is China going to do when Microsoft tells them, as politely as possible, to go fuck themselves?

    Last time I checked, Microsoft was a US company and wasn't under any obligation to listen to the Chinese Government. I suppose China could say "Well, in that case, we won't sell Microsoft Windows [Insert number here]". However, considering China leads the way in copyright infringement and human rights violations, how much of a threat is that really? They could stop the sale of legit copies but that won't stop the pirated copies to be sold. To which Microsoft will create new ways to stop it. To then which means those who legitimately bought copies have to endure draconian anti-piracy things like always on DRM, etc

    In the end, no matter what Microsoft does, it won't change the inevitable outcome. China gets what they want (Microsoft bending over and taking it be it from piracy or doing as asked [dare I say: Demands?]). Microsoft comes up with an excuse for imposing their will on those who play by the rules (whether by DRM or by delaying the inevitable death of XP). Meanwhile, those who play by the rules get hosed and must endure it, less they change their perspective and get Linux or Apple.

  54. Still have customers in Asia running Win2K by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I still have plenty of customers in Asia still running Win2K. Most likely because of avoidance of "Windows Activation" as far as I can tell. The concept that you should pay for something you can't see runs deeply against the grain in many Asian cultures. This is why the entire "IP" protection thing is such a "pushing a noodle uphill" level of effort over there.

  55. Cheaper Windows won't sell better either... by ryocoon · · Score: 1

    Most copies of Microsoft _ANYTHING_ (and Adobe, and... well... almost every piece of software) is pirated inside China. Despite the government's assurances that things are getting better. I've been in China. I go to work centers and I see hundreds upon hundreds of machines that have disabled updates. Why? because if the updates were on, then their patches to get around authentication wouldn't work, and Windows would stop working, because it was a fake/stolen license. I've seen 5 legal copies of Windows in China, and 2 of them I bought and brought in myself. I've seen nigh over a thousand machines that all have illegal copies (aforementioned hundreds upon hundreds). Just let them stay on Windows XP and find ways to botnet them all to hell (oh wait, major Chinese companies HAVE ALREADY DONE THAT with their supposed security software).

  56. Re:bad BIOS saga continues - 12/13 by hab136 · · Score: 1

    >Yes it is, If you knew anything AT ALL about computers or electronics you would know that. Go look up how audio pathways work in a computer kid.

    Two computers sitting in the same room, with both speakers and microphones, could easily communicate by emulating a 300 baud half-duplex modem, for example.

    For even lower bit rates, use something like DTMF tones.

    What is it that you find implausible about computers using sound to communicate, considering we've been doing it for decades?

  57. Re:Server 2012 doesn't comes with a gui by KlomDark · · Score: 1

    Dangerous? How about massively increasing the time it takes to do basic administrative tasks. I've spent so much time trying to do things in Server 2012 that were absolutely simple from NT 3.5 to Server 2008 that I am officially now rebelling against their stupid Metro interface. Everything is fucked up.

    Try debugging an L2TP VPN connection using the silly new interface - you pass from old school to Metro to old school to Metro three times. It just ain't worth it.

    They can make a new UI, but nobody's gotta accept or use the damn thing.

    Even that Windows 8.1 laptop I was talking about in my parent post: I messed with that for two months. Two days ago I reloaded the thing with Windows 7. I have work to get done, don't have the time to mess with the latest Microsoft fad. Good riddance to bad rubbish.