I'm sure there will be some "evidence" or information good enough if he actually get sentenced anything. Which he's not atm.
Most people know nothing, and for sure no-one except the girl and Assange himself knows _ALL_, I assume.
Atleast I'm from Sweden and he's got the rape case back.
I haven't said he's commited rape. But I doubt it was made up (since the girl said they had sex so atleast they where together that far..) But then I just _ASSUME_ that he may have done something she didn't liked, and a no is a no in Sweden. I wonder if I didn't read something about cumming in her mouth or something such. Kinda retarded if that's all there is and he had "promised" not to but did anyway. But whatever. Bad behavior? Yes. The end of the world? Probably not. Or well, heard something about a broken condom to, so maybe she even gave oral with condom on but he had damaged it (or it was damaged) so she gut cum in her mouth. WTF do I know. I don't care much until he's sentenced because then I can believe what was said. I've got no interest in the latest Aftonbladet or Expressen stories.
Just sad that it happened here, but his history in the area didn't looked too good so not that weird that someone may not have liked him.
Stupid if he misbehaved but whatever, things move on.
Yesterday on Swedish TV regarding the election Lars Ohly was talking about how buying a prostitute should get harder sentences (6 months at most now I think) but thought (I think) that people should get out sooner from prison if they behaved well so that someone in jail for harsh mayhem could get out in 6 months instead of 1 year.
Yeah, because buying sex from someone willing to sell it and eventually close to kill someone is more or less the same.
It should rather be legal, if people are forced to sell sex that's another issue.
Anyway, that was somewhat unrelated. I hope he got the right sentence.
If they get anything working and some money I assume they can afford to build infrastructure at some point. I doubt it will just pop up from nowhere.
D isn't inhumane. Growing their own food would be more humane than depending on eventually getting hold of a surplus from the rest of the world, or not.
And they generate jobs for themselves while doing so.
Plus they get more people to sell and buy goods from.
Also are the west really "buying food for them" as much as "dumping food into their market for cheap because we got plenty to not risk a starvation, too bad they don't once the crop season goes bad in the western world"?
At 300 $ / can useful for 6000 liters isn't it better to drill a well?
Best method however would most likely be: a) kill their leaders. b) confiscate all weapons. c) give them 100% freedom and democracy. d) have them ban import of foreign food. e) give them generous (as in not greedy) small loans.
The rest they will solve themselves.
Point a and b isn't really necessary if part c is in place.
I read that you can filter out e-coli or whatever common bacteria there was in water with a regular piece of cloth since the bacteria where grouped into bigger groups/particles.
Too lazy to try to find the magazine but maybe someone else know what I was supposed to talk about:D
Anyway, simple techniques can obviously be beneficial to, even if they won't solve all.
But then again I have been known to eat for pleasure and not mere sustenance. The goal for anyone eating food should be to get fat.
"Don't eat for pleasure, eat for performance", getting fat and eating because you need to / what you need to isn't the same.
Regarding the flavors of course you can do that but imho it's stupid because you're consuming plenty of alcohol without getting drunk. Though you most likely enjoy it because you DO get somewhat drunk / associate it with being drunk / whatever.
Even if they are using the grapes from Tokay in Australia, the soil is different. The soil has a noticeable effect on the wine produced, even if the grapes and methods are the same, so restrictions on regional names make sense.
Except that last time I read about this just a few weeks ago it seemed like the wine "experts" couldn't notice that it was the same white wine when they compared the same white wine to the same one with added color making it look red... Personally I want to add that I somewhat doubt the taste of the actual color is 100% out of the equation.
Also the same wine in old/beautiful bottles also tasted better than when it wasn't in the same bottles..
And there was some comparision of French and Californian wines where the later won or whatever.
I don't care much, I don't like wine.
Chances however are that it's close to 100% snobbery and just the knowledge of knowing you have a more expensive product in your glass. The goal for anyone drinking wine, beer or liquor should be to get drunk.
I can taste the difference of chocolate or flavored teas. I wouldn't be so sure / seriously doubt it was far as noticing a difference on growing location thought. Rather processing, amount of sugar, flavorings, eventually kind of bean in the chocolate case.
As I would notice if I drank a gin with cranberry juice and ruschian added to it instead of a vodka with orange juice...:D
Slashdot Mirror
I don't think it's ever gone in Sweden. We don't have that stupid "oh so they didn't got you and now they never will!" AFAIK.
We used to have a maximum time for how long you could be prosecuted/sentenced but I wonder if we didn't dropped that very recently.
So if there is evidence you haven't done something showing up: Fine.
If there is evidence you did: Fine.
I don't follow the case.
I'm sure there will be some "evidence" or information good enough if he actually get sentenced anything. Which he's not atm.
Most people know nothing, and for sure no-one except the girl and Assange himself knows _ALL_, I assume.
Atleast I'm from Sweden and he's got the rape case back.
I haven't said he's commited rape. But I doubt it was made up (since the girl said they had sex so atleast they where together that far..)
But then I just _ASSUME_ that he may have done something she didn't liked, and a no is a no in Sweden. I wonder if I didn't read something about cumming in her mouth or something such. Kinda retarded if that's all there is and he had "promised" not to but did anyway. But whatever. Bad behavior? Yes. The end of the world? Probably not. Or well, heard something about a broken condom to, so maybe she even gave oral with condom on but he had damaged it (or it was damaged) so she gut cum in her mouth. WTF do I know. I don't care much until he's sentenced because then I can believe what was said. I've got no interest in the latest Aftonbladet or Expressen stories.
He's most likely guilty of something.
Just sad that it happened here, but his history in the area didn't looked too good so not that weird that someone may not have liked him.
Stupid if he misbehaved but whatever, things move on.
Yesterday on Swedish TV regarding the election Lars Ohly was talking about how buying a prostitute should get harder sentences (6 months at most now I think) but thought (I think) that people should get out sooner from prison if they behaved well so that someone in jail for harsh mayhem could get out in 6 months instead of 1 year.
Yeah, because buying sex from someone willing to sell it and eventually close to kill someone is more or less the same.
It should rather be legal, if people are forced to sell sex that's another issue.
Anyway, that was somewhat unrelated. I hope he got the right sentence.
If they get anything working and some money I assume they can afford to build infrastructure at some point. I doubt it will just pop up from nowhere.
D isn't inhumane. Growing their own food would be more humane than depending on eventually getting hold of a surplus from the rest of the world, or not.
How can it grow if everything is sterile to begin with?
http://www.vaccinationsguiden.se/vaccinationsguiden/vattenrening.asp
Clear and lukewarm: 2 drops 4-6% / liter of water.
Murky or cold: 4 drops 4-6% / liter of water.
Shake and wait for at least 30 minutes.
Free time equals black-jack and hookers
Fixed that for you :)
Of course we should subsidize it since that keeps us alive if things goes bad. If no-one wants to grow an excess of crops you're screwed if it does.
That's not the issue. The issue is that they don't. And that the excess is dumped there for prices they can't compete with.
But food is just one thing.
I think the Chinese have already bought most of Africa anyway.
Yeah, stupid China! Weird how financial and constructional help seem to be more popular than militarily one.
Kenya was doing well until they had an election and proceded to burn the country.
Kinda like when you elected Bush as president? Twice! .. :D
Yeah but China has started fixing that.
And they generate jobs for themselves while doing so.
Plus they get more people to sell and buy goods from.
Also are the west really "buying food for them" as much as "dumping food into their market for cheap because we got plenty to not risk a starvation, too bad they don't once the crop season goes bad in the western world"?
I think the chlorine taste may disappear by itself if you let the water sit for long enough (with ventilation that is)
No?
http://www.brita.com/intl/
Funny how we (Sweden) are not on the list. Guess they know our tap water already is just fine (if you have your own well maybe less so.)
I've read about a few drops of Klorin (NaClO) is supposed to help to. Though not against chemicals or heavy metals and such.
At 300 $ / can useful for 6000 liters isn't it better to drill a well?
Best method however would most likely be:
a) kill their leaders.
b) confiscate all weapons.
c) give them 100% freedom and democracy.
d) have them ban import of foreign food.
e) give them generous (as in not greedy) small loans.
The rest they will solve themselves.
Point a and b isn't really necessary if part c is in place.
I read that you can filter out e-coli or whatever common bacteria there was in water with a regular piece of cloth since the bacteria where grouped into bigger groups/particles.
Too lazy to try to find the magazine but maybe someone else know what I was supposed to talk about :D
Anyway, simple techniques can obviously be beneficial to, even if they won't solve all.
tl;dr
But then again I have been known to eat for pleasure and not mere sustenance.
The goal for anyone eating food should be to get fat.
"Don't eat for pleasure, eat for performance", getting fat and eating because you need to / what you need to isn't the same.
Regarding the flavors of course you can do that but imho it's stupid because you're consuming plenty of alcohol without getting drunk. Though you most likely enjoy it because you DO get somewhat drunk / associate it with being drunk / whatever.
I "like" tea, but then I'm addicted to caffeine.
No, the goal should be to drink just enough to get whatever health benefits are being posited this week.
The problem with that is that regardless of what the benefits would be the bad consequences is most likely worse even at that low level.
They just don't make the news very much.
Even if they are using the grapes from Tokay in Australia, the soil is different. The soil has a noticeable effect on the wine produced, even if the grapes and methods are the same, so restrictions on regional names make sense.
Except that last time I read about this just a few weeks ago it seemed like the wine "experts" couldn't notice that it was the same white wine when they compared the same white wine to the same one with added color making it look red ... Personally I want to add that I somewhat doubt the taste of the actual color is 100% out of the equation.
Also the same wine in old/beautiful bottles also tasted better than when it wasn't in the same bottles ..
And there was some comparision of French and Californian wines where the later won or whatever.
I don't care much, I don't like wine.
Chances however are that it's close to 100% snobbery and just the knowledge of knowing you have a more expensive product in your glass. The goal for anyone drinking wine, beer or liquor should be to get drunk.
I can taste the difference of chocolate or flavored teas. I wouldn't be so sure / seriously doubt it was far as noticing a difference on growing location thought. Rather processing, amount of sugar, flavorings, eventually kind of bean in the chocolate case.
As I would notice if I drank a gin with cranberry juice and ruschian added to it instead of a vodka with orange juice ... :D
Taste the difference of the grains? Doubt it :D
Yeah, the later is much more ok for all our governments. It seems ...
Patents and copyright is big deals, personal integrity not so much.
If it has already started burning then?
Because I can't see how anyone can claim how much energy 100 watts is.
What if it got enough solar cells to produce 100 watts for 24 hours before using the stored energy within 0.2 seconds to ignite the oil?
The robot moves around on the skimmer and not the other way around? Moving the robot is probably much easier =P
Ok, so what you are saying that instead of nuking the well now we should nuke the whole gulf? :D
It was bound to happen anyway. Better than having it in the ocean.
Only problem I assume is that the oil isn't at the surface.
Well, that and they don't have 5000 robots, and I don't see how they would "catch 'em all"(it).
Ohwell, Oracle can always run their database on Linux once they managed to kill Solaris. And by then ZFS on Linux will be good for them ;)
For the geekiness I'd have to ask if they can't fix a system for turning it into a cassette tape containing a C64-demo instead.
Though personally I'd preferred to have an Amiga bootable floppy instead.