C'mon. There is no safe place on Earth. Oooo, don't build in the forest because it might burn. Oooo, don't build near the water because it might flood. Oooo, don't build in middle America because tornadoes.
For what? So Washington can come up with flawed budget proposals faster so they don't have to sit around Washington as much as they did when they had to come up with flawed budget proposals by hand?
This guy had it done years before the encounter in question. It's still demonstrably better than pretty much every other method. http://www.vasectomy-informati...
A friend of mine was dating a woman who said to him one day, "I'm pregnant and it's yours." He said, "Yeah, well, I had a vasectomy years ago." And that was all she wrote.
That no woman would assault another woman and no man would assault another man. I have personally witnessed two women who had been living together get into a major domestic violence situation with one another. Several people, myself included, called 911 to report it and the dispatcher (a women, btw) said, "Oh, it's nothing. It's two women." Uh...WHAT?!?!?
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. IoT, is going to foster disruptive startups. GE hasn't got what it takes to play in that sandbox.
First, you need to design quieter propellers because the sound of a bee swarm is going to give away your position. Second, you need to come up with a battery that has a much higher energy density.
It's a mostly male field of employment. Further, it's a mostly male nerd field of employment. Male nerds generally have trouble dealing with the opposite sex. It's always been that way. Female digital agents satisfy a small part of their desire to communicate with the opposite sex.
IMHO, the clothing manufacturers are behind this. They have been secretly gaslighting us for the past 10 years by cutting clothes just a little bit smaller and labeling them the same as before in order to save money. Example: Levi's 505 and 550 jeans are now cut for emaciated hipsters when they should have left them alone and made a new number.
Particularly in the case where you tell a subordinate to do something and they insist on debating every detail. Just effing do it and shut the hell up.
Came here to ask this question. Trial lawyers don't work for free. Somebody has to be paying them to keep working on this. My guess is that it's a long con. SCO figures that Linux is EVERYWHERE and will reach even further with IoT so if they can win a court case, they can go after license fees till the cows come home.
Having worked there in the early 90s, I can tell you that the place runs more like Fairchild Semiconductor than Apple. RHIP and the left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing.
What people should learn from this is that while the media loves to think that they know everything about everything, they really don't know jack squat. Sadly, far too many people believe the media particularly when they cherry-pick elements of a story or pull the NPR tactic of reporting one specific incident hoping that the listener will generalize in that direction.
Having tried all manner of VR attempts going back to the early 1990s, there are a number of things that developers keep missing. They mainly can be attributed to not engaging all the senses. No wind is a big one. No proper G forces is another. The first would be fairly easy to do and Disney did it in Soaring along with smell. Accurate G forces just can't be accomplished with your standard hydraulic motion table base. But there is another one that IMHO causes VR and 3D in general to fall apart and that is the fact that humans like to look around as opposed to being force to focus on what the director wants you to look at. Trouble is that because film has depth of field, you can't focus on what you want to. If you shot the thing with a light-field camera and then tracked what the viewer was looking at and focused the image there, that might solve the problem.
I've been around long enough to remember the nature of the content back in the 1980s and it sure as hell wasn't anything like it is today. Reporting back then used to be actual reporting. Now, they take the approach of cherry-picking one or two sob stories to get you to generalize on a larger issue. Decidedly unethical.
Because a ridiculously low percentage of FOIA requests made during the current administration turned up anything. The whole concept is ridiculous. "We demand to see the documents on *insert controversy here*" "There are no documents." "Oh, okay, thanks." How hard is it for the government to say, "We can't find anything."? What are you going to do? Say they are lying? Prove it.
Slashdot Mirror
But do they have a device to detect the obvious inter-dimensional portal that Nessie swims through to avoid being found?
C'mon. There is no safe place on Earth. Oooo, don't build in the forest because it might burn. Oooo, don't build near the water because it might flood. Oooo, don't build in middle America because tornadoes.
For what? So Washington can come up with flawed budget proposals faster so they don't have to sit around Washington as much as they did when they had to come up with flawed budget proposals by hand?
This guy had it done years before the encounter in question. It's still demonstrably better than pretty much every other method.
http://www.vasectomy-informati...
Right... just as soon as they get rid of the 21,238 results for "Che Guevara"
A friend of mine was dating a woman who said to him one day, "I'm pregnant and it's yours." He said, "Yeah, well, I had a vasectomy years ago." And that was all she wrote.
Uh...yeah, we're engineers, not salespeople.
Seems these tech firms have no trouble whatsoever allowing those with SJW street-cred to spout off all they want.
Google manages to keep a robotics group going that won't create a practical product.
That no woman would assault another woman and no man would assault another man. I have personally witnessed two women who had been living together get into a major domestic violence situation with one another. Several people, myself included, called 911 to report it and the dispatcher (a women, btw) said, "Oh, it's nothing. It's two women." Uh...WHAT?!?!?
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
IoT, is going to foster disruptive startups. GE hasn't got what it takes to play in that sandbox.
This has already happened. Not with Paypal but Bank of America.
http://www.outdoorlife.com/blo...
First, you need to design quieter propellers because the sound of a bee swarm is going to give away your position. Second, you need to come up with a battery that has a much higher energy density.
It's a mostly male field of employment. Further, it's a mostly male nerd field of employment. Male nerds generally have trouble dealing with the opposite sex. It's always been that way. Female digital agents satisfy a small part of their desire to communicate with the opposite sex.
IMHO, the clothing manufacturers are behind this. They have been secretly gaslighting us for the past 10 years by cutting clothes just a little bit smaller and labeling them the same as before in order to save money. Example: Levi's 505 and 550 jeans are now cut for emaciated hipsters when they should have left them alone and made a new number.
Particularly in the case where you tell a subordinate to do something and they insist on debating every detail. Just effing do it and shut the hell up.
Came here to ask this question. Trial lawyers don't work for free. Somebody has to be paying them to keep working on this. My guess is that it's a long con. SCO figures that Linux is EVERYWHERE and will reach even further with IoT so if they can win a court case, they can go after license fees till the cows come home.
Having worked there in the early 90s, I can tell you that the place runs more like Fairchild Semiconductor than Apple. RHIP and the left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing.
What people should learn from this is that while the media loves to think that they know everything about everything, they really don't know jack squat. Sadly, far too many people believe the media particularly when they cherry-pick elements of a story or pull the NPR tactic of reporting one specific incident hoping that the listener will generalize in that direction.
Having tried all manner of VR attempts going back to the early 1990s, there are a number of things that developers keep missing. They mainly can be attributed to not engaging all the senses. No wind is a big one. No proper G forces is another. The first would be fairly easy to do and Disney did it in Soaring along with smell. Accurate G forces just can't be accomplished with your standard hydraulic motion table base. But there is another one that IMHO causes VR and 3D in general to fall apart and that is the fact that humans like to look around as opposed to being force to focus on what the director wants you to look at. Trouble is that because film has depth of field, you can't focus on what you want to. If you shot the thing with a light-field camera and then tracked what the viewer was looking at and focused the image there, that might solve the problem.
"I exaggerated." - Spock.
I keep forgetting to troll these people.
I've been around long enough to remember the nature of the content back in the 1980s and it sure as hell wasn't anything like it is today. Reporting back then used to be actual reporting. Now, they take the approach of cherry-picking one or two sob stories to get you to generalize on a larger issue. Decidedly unethical.
Because a ridiculously low percentage of FOIA requests made during the current administration turned up anything.
The whole concept is ridiculous. "We demand to see the documents on *insert controversy here*" "There are no documents." "Oh, okay, thanks."
How hard is it for the government to say, "We can't find anything."? What are you going to do? Say they are lying? Prove it.
Right. Because there aren't dozens of other locations in the Caribbean to build a research lab.