Slashdot Mirror


Gmail's Mic Drop April Fool Backfires Horribly Costing People Their Jobs (telegraph.co.uk)

An anonymous reader quotes a report on The Telegraph: Google is facing a fierce backlash after introducing a new tool for April Fools' Day that has cost some people potential jobs. The new Gmail Mic Drop button, which sits next to the normal send button, ends an email thread forever by muting all future replies to the sender, and firing off a gif of a minion 'mic dropping' at the same time. After an immediate backlash the feature was taken down early on Friday morning. Some people using it had failed to see the funny side, saying that by accidentally pressing the button instead of simply sending the email, they have appeared rude or unprofessional, in some cases costing them jobs.

252 comments

  1. Good! by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    this is how we weed out the dumb people at the office.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Good! by itamihn · · Score: 1

      "Score: 10"?

    2. Re:Good! by itamihn · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ah, it's all in binary now. Great, we really needed that change, not that UTF-8 nonsense.

    3. Re:Good! by billybob2001 · · Score: 5, Funny

      You mean UTF-1000

    4. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right? The kind of people who click this by mistake are the kind of people who hit "reply all" by mistake and render e-mail useless with "please remove me from this mailing list".

    5. Re:Good! by invid · · Score: 5, Funny

      I liked the score better when it was in hex.

      --
      The Moore-Murphy Law: The number of things that will go wrong will double every 2 years.
    6. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think anyone who uses gmail or Yahoo mail for their business is an idiot.

    7. Re:Good! by Translation+Error · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Falling victim to a bad user interface does not mean someone is dumb.

      --
      When someone says, "Any fool can see ..." they're usually exactly right.
    8. Re:Good! by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Carl, we talked to you about missing the point.... Come to my office and bring everything in your desk with you.. Stan from security will be assisting you.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    9. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean UTF-9001.

    10. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. If you're doing something that is "so important" to you, then you should be a little more thoughtful and careful in your actions.

    11. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please remove me from this thread.

    12. Re: Good! by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

      Absolutely. I saw it last night, and it was clear that clicking it would send all replies to /dev/null. I thought it was a great way to deal with online harassment. If you're too stupid to read, maybe you need to stick to phone calls.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    13. Re:Good! by neilo_1701D · · Score: 2

      Carl, we talked to you about missing the point.... Come to my office and bring everything in your desk with you.. Stan from security will be assisting you.

      One week later: "I'm sorry, I never saw that email"

    14. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I love it. It's silly, little nerdy, and understated. Has a comfy old-Slashdot feel to it.

    15. Re:Good! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not particularly politely put, but that's exactly the core issue. If email is so important to you that you can lose your job if it does the wrong thing, then you should be using an email service with an SLA (or hosting your own in-house). If you're using email for business, then don't use a provider whose business model involves scanning your email.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    16. Re:Good! by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Sometimes the mail servers are slow.

      For a while I had a 4pm meeting, nearly every day it would be cancelled at 3:45 and I would get the email notice sometime after 6pm....every....fucking....day....

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    17. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please remove me from this thread.

      NO ONE ELSE REPLY TO THIS THREAD!!! /all cap filter thingy

    18. Re:Good! by tinkerton · · Score: 1

      You mean UTF-1000

      That'll be UTF-1111101000 then...

    19. Re:Good! by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

      You mean UTF-10001100101001

    20. Re:Good! by Teun · · Score: 1

      Absolutely right and include hotmail and live mail to this short-list of unprofessionalism.
      If your customers or employers are sensitive to the kind of prank of the article you have every reason to use a professional mail service.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    21. Re: Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *drops mic*

    22. Re:Good! by mjwx · · Score: 1

      I liked the score better when it was in hex.

      Pah, it was better when the scores were in the original Klingon.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    23. Re:Good! by Ken+D · · Score: 3, Funny

      Was that you?
      Sorry. I would hit send, shut my laptop and go home.
      After supper I open my laptop and Outlook would sync my outbox.....

    24. Re:Good! by billybob2001 · · Score: 0

      I never realised it was in hex.

      Always thought it was octal.

      I guess it could have been any integer base >= 6.
      (obviously not 10 though, that would be far too silly)

      btw, are there ever any rogue 6 scores these days?

    25. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love how morons are so discrimintory about intelligence. Get a clue, Einstein: only fucking idiots work for someone else.

    26. Re:Good! by mlw4428 · · Score: 1

      Not really. Google even admitted that there was a bug that, after sending the image, any subsequent emails could have the image attached to those even without pressing the button. It could be that many of these people who reported the issue sent the funny email once, intentionally, and then all subsequent emails got it too. They shouldn't be considered "dumb" when it was the stupid engineer and QA teams who were too stupid to see a simple bug. For once, it was the stupidity of the "computer people" and not of the "luser".

    27. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry but I do not have the ability to remove you from this thread as I did not start it.

    28. Re:Good! by kruug · · Score: 2

      > I just sent off an email with my resume to the first person who wanted to interview me in months," one user posted in a Google Help forum. " I clicked the wrong button and sent it with the mic drop. This isn't about people getting fired over sending out a "mic-drop", this is about people who don't have jobs or don't use their current employers e-mail service as their personal e-mail service missing out on potential employment because of a joke.

    29. Re:Good! by phorm · · Score: 1

      No, but it does show they might also be that person that sends a "reply-all" at the wrong time and causes bad things to happen...

    30. Re:Good! by billybob2001 · · Score: 1

      Of course :-)

      But I think you meant UTF-1000010001110100000111001001000

    31. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yay, shitposts are no longer -1, they'll be 11111111

    32. Re:Good! by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      I dunno.... not being hired by people who would hold being the victim of a april fools joke against you seems like no great loss. Who wants to work for dumb pricks?

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    33. Re:Good! by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Falling victim to a bad user interface does not mean someone is dumb.

      In this case it does.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    34. Re:Good! by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      Mod parent RnVubnk=

    35. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to google, time and again, it does.

    36. Re:Good! by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Not really. Google even admitted that there was a bug that, after sending the image, any subsequent emails could have the image attached to those even without pressing the button. It could be that many of these people who reported the issue sent the funny email once, intentionally, and then all subsequent emails got it too. They shouldn't be considered "dumb" when it was the stupid engineer and QA teams who were too stupid to see a simple bug. For once, it was the stupidity of the "computer people" and not of the "luser".

      They were dumb to press it the first time. Really dumb. It made it clear that any future replies would be rejected. So if you don't want them to send a reply, just don't send them one.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    37. Re:Good! by mlw4428 · · Score: 1

      I think you misunderstand. If I had clicked to add that graphic to one email, there was a bug that would have that happening in future emails, including those not going to the same contacts. It impacted ALL outgoing emails, for SOME people.

    38. Re:Good! by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      I propose we set the scores to Morse Code.

      (Will this post be rated . . . . . Funny or . . . - - Insightful?)

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    39. Re:Good! by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      I saw the "mic drop" feature last night before it was pulled. It was a button right next to the Send button and the same size as the Send button. It said Send plus an outline image of a hand dropping a mic but that could be easily missed. The color was different than the normal buttons, but, again, this could easily be missed in the rush to click Send. The difference between the two buttons wasn't stark enough and confusion was going to happen. The joke wasn't horrible, but they could have made it the two buttons different enough to avoid mistaken clicking.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    40. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I guess not getting that the whole thing is an April fools joke, understanding that there was never a Mic-Drop email, and that nobody lost there job should probably be a prerequisite for working in business too. But then what do I know. You do know none of this happened, right?

    41. Re:Good! by edtice1559 · · Score: 0

      I can't figure out what a 100 score actually represents so I don't know how high this got modded, but many small businesses use gmail for their email. Also there is a paid version of gmail for enterprises. And if you are a job candidate, you will often use your gmail address. You don't want to use your current employer's email for finding a new job for what I hope are obvious reasons.

    42. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a PM once who did that for real all the fucking time.

    43. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not particularly politely put, but that's exactly the core issue. If email is so important to you that you can lose your job if it does the wrong thing, then you should be using an email service with an SLA (or hosting your own in-house). If you're using email for business, then don't use a provider whose business model involves scanning your email.

      You apparently do not realize that gmail has now taken over outlook as the top enterprise email solution for Fortune 500 companies.

    44. Re:Good! by war4peace · · Score: 1

      I would if they paid me enough. I have thick skin but thin wallet.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    45. Re:Good! by serbanp · · Score: 1

      Thank you for pointing out that nowadays there are many more idiots in business environments!

    46. Re:Good! by omnichad · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I can't figure out what a 100 score actually represents

      You don't belong here.

    47. Re:Good! by tripleevenfall · · Score: 2

      "In some cases losing jobs" :::throws the BS flag:::

    48. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not surprising considering how cluttered and confusing the Gmail web interface has become over the years. I try to use it mostly from the Seamonkey mail client, but Gmail does not seem to update that anymore with all inbox entries - started noticing the gaps about a year or 2 ago. Another tactic I use sometimes is to specify the "old-fashioned" HTML Gmail style, which is not quite so messy to deal with in a web browser, although it does lack some newer features like clicking the check box above a column for blanket action on each item like deleting a group of emails.

      My wife almost refuses to deal with via the web UI since it keeps confusing her with new "enhancements", and the lack of folder organization which she does obtain with Thunderbird - "labels" just don't cut it. I am not sure if she has gaps in email there, as I do with Seamonkey, but she uses Gmail even less than I do in preference for ISP-based service/email she has used for many years now. She is an elementary grade teacher, not an IT person, and just does not "think in Gmail". Ironically, her school system has gone all in with Google services such as business accounts for document sharing, business Gmail accounts, and Chromebooks - she puts up with it, but curses the whole time she has to work with it (at home, not where the kids can hear it at school ;-} ).

      Now I use other email providers a lot more as my main way of coping, but there is too much important email for me tied to Gmail, and I have not taken the time to forward/archive it in other clients.

    49. Re:Good! by unrtst · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Ah, it's all in binary now.

      Unless you have mod points and mod someone. Sadly, it then displays in normal base 10 after the mod.

    50. Re:Good! by suso · · Score: 2

      What we need now is for those Slashdot users who have binary numbers as their actual username to chime in.

    51. Re:Good! by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      In all seriousness, converting integer bases is a lot easier than implementing Unicode.(Remember, Slashdot can't just plug in a library; they need to update the shitpost filters and whatnot too or else we're going to end up with a wide variety of goatse ASCII^Wunicode-art.)

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    52. Re:Good! by rjhubs · · Score: 1

      A 10110-uid should get this joke.

    53. Re:Good! by hawguy · · Score: 1

      I don't know how I got on this thread, but please remove me too.

    54. Re: Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me too

    55. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There are 10 kinds of people who understand binary: those that do, those that don't and those that would rather use trinary.

    56. Re:Good! by wisnoskij · · Score: 3, Informative

      I really don't agree. Gmail is stable and just works all the time. If your goal is to always have access to your email, rolling your own email server will be many times worse at accomplishing that. If your goal is security, you are probably 100% right.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    57. Re:Good! by marklark · · Score: 1

      Used all my mod points yesterday... :^/

    58. Re: Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We use Gmail at work and it's great. You're the idiot.

    59. Re:Good! by Krojack · · Score: 2

      A lot of small businesses use Google Apps as it's a good price for the service and easy to manage. This includes hosting the email for the company on their own personal domain name.

    60. Re:Good! by Alumoi · · Score: 1

      If you mean using a gmail address with outlook then you're right. Configuring gmail's POP3 in outlook is child's play.

    61. Re:Good! by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 0, Troll

      Oh, I understood all right. Only a dummy would use that feature even once. Sounds to me more like a feature than a bug. The whole "minion" thing is way overdone , not to mention also stupid. Let the emos send them to each other, along with a bunch of stupid emojis.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    62. Re:Good! by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      If your goal is security, you are probably 100% right.

      That's assuming you hire someone skilled in the field. For a small business owner with just a few machines and maybe the CEO's nephew fixing the computer you're better off with Gmail

    63. Re:Good! by lgw · · Score: 1

      Google doesn't have QA teams, obviously.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    64. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      001 binary = 1 decimal
      010 binary = 2 decimal
      011 binary = 3 decimal
      100 binary = 4 decimal
      101 binary = 5 decimal

      The usual scoring system, but base 2 instead of base 10.

    65. Re:Good! by Sowelu · · Score: 1

      I always liked the subtle "There are 11 kinds of people in the world: Those who understand binary and those who don't."

    66. Re:Good! by Hylandr · · Score: 1

      UTF-WHoosh

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    67. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hah! Is the missing 3rd category "undercaffeinated"?

    68. Re:Good! by gustygolf · · Score: 1

      Here's what the interface looked like:

      https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-GYn... ...That's not a 'bad user interface', that's an awful user interface.

      --
      "Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 58 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment" -- slashdot, driving users away.
    69. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The third category consists solely of Sir C. A. R. Hoare, who reminds you to always check your null references.

    70. Re:Good! by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Some companies just want their email to work so they can get on with earning money.

    71. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it's "Those who understand binary and those who prefer unary" ;)

    72. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You either still don't understand, or you're doubling down on your mistake. You made it very clear what you thought it meant when you said:

      It made it clear that any future replies would be rejected. So if you don't want them to send a reply, just don't send them one.

      This isn't what happened, and nothing was very clear.

      This isn't the first fuck-up from a Google prank. The one some years ago where they added autoplay sound to the Google homepage (regardless of whether it was visible) to celebrate pac-man was pretty egregious too. You may remember that as not autoplaying sound until you mouse-hovered it -- that was after they fixed it.

    73. Re: Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this didn't impact those using Google Apps, just the public Gmail.

      The real problem is that they put the MicDrop control in a place of a common existing control: Send+Archive. If you automatically Tab Tab Enter to send because that's where the control always is, you might not even glance down and see the button changed.

    74. Re: Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its a meta fool. U fell

    75. Re: Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really. Because gmail is like a central repo.

    76. Re: Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't try to justify this outrage. Just don't.

    77. Re:Good! by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2

      One of Gmail's biggest strengths in an office environment is its search tools. I've asked repeatedly around here what you should do to get your own Google-quality search capabilities with an in-house server (or client on gmail's server) and so-far haven't gotten an answer that meets enough criteria. (Google's speed being the big one...). I'm still looking for this, suggestions much appreciated.

      So, yeah, I think Gmail, even in it's web form (as opposed to using an email client) is pretty slick in an office environment. They do have one draw-back that is absolutely maddening, though. They will change the UI of their web interface on a whim, worse they'll do it in the middle of the week. This happened to me, once. Smack in the middle of a hectic week on a project and the UI on my email suddenly goes all minimalist on me with no option to switch it back. Because, you know, being under pressure to get an email out is the perfect time to investigate hieroglyphics to deduce where the bullet-point button is.

      I think it's sad that most of the lessons I've learned about the drawbacks of using web-services came ftom using Google. Still angry over Reader!

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    78. Re:Good! by Bitbeisser · · Score: 1

      Why are people in an "office" using a web browser for their e-mail in the first place?

    79. Re: Good! by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      I missed it entirely, but I have to agree that if you misclicked it...you failed one of the basics of doing professional emails: reading carefully everything and manually clicking send. (Don't use hotkeys, and you might be best off turning them off if you can't remember to never use them when it matters.) Being able to mute somebody is an awesome ability, and if you can't exercise basic care when sending emails related to your job search you probably won't manage anyway to hold down any job where 'paying attention to important details' is required...and that's assuming you get it in the first place...

    80. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is how we weed out the dumb people at the office.

      Is this how you lost your job?

    81. Re:Good! by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      And there is something to prevent them from implementing UNICODE support in some modules (possibly only for internal testing, if the interfaces aren't equipped for passing UNICODE through) prior to implementing it on core modules?

      I was told, at college, when this new "object oriented" programming approach was being touted, that this was one of the points of that revolution. when was it ... oh yes, in the early 1980s.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  2. META-April Fools! by CajunArson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The story about the backlash is the meta-April Fools about the Mic Drop feature.

    --
    AntiFA: An abbreviation for Anti First Amendment.
    1. Re:META-April Fools! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Its actually real! That is the real META-META-April fools joke!

    2. Re:META-April Fools! by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

      Ha, the joke's on everyone!

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    3. Re:META-April Fools! by malditaenvidia · · Score: 1

      I feel like I'm in an episode of Portlandia.

  3. Don't use Gmail for your work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Seriously, free webmail is unprofessional.

    1. Re:Don't use Gmail for your work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So what do you recommend people use? gmail is the predominant email provider I see when I review resumes , followed by Hotmail and ISP email.

    2. Re:Don't use Gmail for your work. by geekmux · · Score: 5, Funny

      Seriously, free webmail is unprofessional.

      Good luck explaining that to an entire generation who thinks that running a business online consists of creating a Facebook page and signing up for Gmail.

    3. Re:Don't use Gmail for your work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Er, gmail also has a paid version, which people use professionally. There's a difference between the free webmail (@gmail.com address) and gmail with a domain (@yourdomain.com). Seriously, what kind of unprofessional idiot doesn't know this already?

    4. Re:Don't use Gmail for your work. by msauve · · Score: 1

      For less than $100/yr, one can get a domain, web site, and email services and be in control of their own destiny. For free, one can use any POP/IMAP client with gmail and not be subject to Google's constantly changing UI.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    5. Re:Don't use Gmail for your work. by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I knew it was possible but I just tried it recently and for the low price of nothing you can get Yandex to host all the email (with your own domain - just change your mx records) you might need to send as a regular user. It actually seems to work rather well - I've been poking at it.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    6. Re:Don't use Gmail for your work. by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Seriously, what kind of unprofessional idiot doesn't know this already?

      The type that practices unprofessionality professionally.

      Seriously though using free Gmail for your internal business email is stupid - using the paid version is fine (we were on it ourselves until my boss got the brilliant idea to switch to Office 365 - he's gone now but we're stuck with it for the time being. Gmail was much better).

      For a private individual though fee Gmail is fine to conduct business on. I've done my own personal domains and ran email servers (before we migrated to hosted email at work I admined our on-site server). Overall it's just way more frustrating than its worth for a regular user. Just pay attention to your username and pick something somewhat tasteful. You don't want to be applying for a job or a loan with sexynips87@gmail.com.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    7. Re:Don't use Gmail for your work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If it makes money, then it is a business.

    8. Re:Don't use Gmail for your work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what do you recommend people use? gmail is the predominant email provider I see when I review resumes , followed by Hotmail and ISP email.

      The parent said for anything Professional. People sending in resumes are giving you their Personal email address, and it's perfectly OK to use gmail, hotmail, etc. for Personal use.
      Just don't use your ISP provided email, except as a burner or spam-catcher account.

    9. Re:Don't use Gmail for your work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By emailing from a small domain in theory you are in control of your own destiny. In practice your outgoing emails get marked as spam or phishing more often when they arrive in a gmail inbox. After all, unlike large email providers you have no system in place to prevent abuse, so it's reasonable to assume the worst. A per-domain classifier would fix this, but why bother when the current system of lumping every small domain together as spammy is so efficient at convincing you to come back to a large provider.

    10. Re:Don't use Gmail for your work. by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Erm... so paying for a domain and hosting for something I might use every 2 years is better.

      Right.

      Realistically GMail is fine. Any perspective employer is going to call you on your phone first, so a good phone manner is far more essential.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    11. Re:Don't use Gmail for your work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sending out a resume and applying for a job (by email) are by definition professional uses of email.

    12. Re:Don't use Gmail for your work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, free webmail is unprofessional.

      Good luck explaining that to an entire generation who thinks that running a business online consists of creating a Facebook page and signing up for Gmail.

      I'll have to explain it as an emoticon:
      >:-(

    13. Re:Don't use Gmail for your work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this April fool mic drop thing was only applied to the free version, not the paid business version

    14. Re:Don't use Gmail for your work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Seriously, free webmail is unprofessional.

      My gmail address helps me weed out pretentious assholes from the line of potential employers.

    15. Re:Don't use Gmail for your work. by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      Why would you use gmail to do your own business on? Pay for a domain, get the domain hosted for free, and get the mail hosted for free. It's what I do. The company that hosts my mail provides up to five mail accounts and after that (or more than 5GB of storage) you have to pay. I have an NAS running a mail server at home where I store all my archived mail but then I like to keep a lot of stuff.

    16. Re:Don't use Gmail for your work. by msauve · · Score: 1

      Most web/email providers support DKIM. Additionally, false positives are a recipient issue, not a sender one.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    17. Re:Don't use Gmail for your work. by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      If you're sending emails on behalf of your business, false positives cost you many. They may not be caused by your severs, but they are your problem.

    18. Re:Don't use Gmail for your work. by NetNed · · Score: 1

      Well hookers and blow FTW then!!

    19. Re:Don't use Gmail for your work. by msauve · · Score: 1

      If you're running a business with a gmail/hotmail/etc domain, you're doing it wrong and losing even more money. Really, having a personal/personal business domain hosted by a reputable provider doesn't produce false positives as a matter of course.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    20. Re:Don't use Gmail for your work. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Even with a personal Gmail, you can import from a custom domain's POP account and send out via SMTP. Effectively, you can use Gmail as the front face of a domain-backed email for free.

    21. Re:Don't use Gmail for your work. by 14erCleaner · · Score: 1

      My employer uses its own domain for email, hosted by gmail. It costs more than zero, but at least we know the hosting company won't go out of business.

      --
      Have you read my blog lately?
    22. Re:Don't use Gmail for your work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google apps for business isn't free -- at least not anymore. And it's quite good for the price. Paying for email services is miserable, expensive, error prone, and dangerous (spam, DOS, viruses, etc.). Google Mail does a pretty good job for companies not wanting to wade into that arena. And you don't have to use their web GUI, you can use POP/IMAP just like any other service.

      So likely very few Google business users ever saw that mic drop icon.

      I'm fairly sure the whole story is bullshit for AFD, anyhow.

    23. Re:Don't use Gmail for your work. by Maritz · · Score: 1

      If you're looking at their resume, it's not their work email now is it? If you're looking for a job you're hopefully not going to put your current employer's email down there.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    24. Re:Don't use Gmail for your work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who uses local email clients in 2016?! You want to installed dedicated software, which comes with a ton of unwanted shit, just to use email? What fucking company do you pretend to work for?

    25. Re:Don't use Gmail for your work. by DogDude · · Score: 1

      Paying for email services is miserable, expensive, error prone, and dangerous (spam, DOS, viruses, etc.).

      That's bullshit, AC. Paying for email is how one gets *good* service.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    26. Re:Don't use Gmail for your work. by Alumoi · · Score: 1

      Yandex? As in Russian Google?

    27. Re:Don't use Gmail for your work. by Sowelu · · Score: 1

      Eh, my place supports webmail or local clients for the same account. Local clients are faster, have better calendar and meeting integration, more responsive UIs, let you see your last-known mailbox offline when you don't have internet access, etc etc. They'll always be superior for my purposes.

    28. Re:Don't use Gmail for your work. by beanpoppa · · Score: 1

      Or, for $50/year you can get a GoogleApps account, plus $15 for the domain registration. You don't HAVE to use the Gmail web interface. You can bring your own POP/IMAP client. It's cheaper than rolling your own mail server, just in terms of the power savings if nothing else, and probably with better availability.

    29. Re:Don't use Gmail for your work. by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Yup. As in those same people. Putin's reading my WP confirmation emails!

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    30. Re:Don't use Gmail for your work. by Cramer · · Score: 1

      Right. Because Google doesn't arbitrarily shutdown services. One might think gmail, and apps for biz would be safe, but I wouldn't take that bet. (remember, they killed postini.)

    31. Re:Don't use Gmail for your work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you hiring? I have extensive Facebook, Gmail, Hookers, and Blow experience and believe I would make a valuable contribution to your team.

    32. Re:Don't use Gmail for your work. by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      Google's april fools joke should've been discontinuing their search engine in order to refocus on exciting new cutting edge markets.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    33. Re:Don't use Gmail for your work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's an emoticon? Did you mean emojis!? They are so cute, aren't they!

      Hey... if you look at those symbols sideways it looks kind of like a retro emoji. Did you know that? I bet you could get Zuckerberg to offer you 2 billion for inventing retro emojis.

    34. Re:Don't use Gmail for your work. by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      ... which is what I do with my @goatse.cx email address.

      Yes, goatse.cx is a perfectly respectable email-hosting domain these days. They're also reportedly intending to open up for yourdomain.goatse.cx registration too. It might not be suitable if your business is in selling personalised bibles, but it'll be wonderful if your business is ... well babyjesusbuttplug.goatse.cx would work pretty well, I think. Amongst people who are in on the joke.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  4. All part of a plan by ickleberry · · Score: 1

    Google hates employees anyway and wants to replace them all with their own version of Skynet

  5. Anyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Anyone actually see this happen? Think the story itself is a hoax.

    1. Re:Anyone by hughbar · · Score: 1

      Yes. It just seemed 'stupid', so I thought it was a 'fail fast, fail often' feature from the young genii in the Googleplex.

      --
      On y va, qui mal y pense!
  6. So glad I don't use Gmail! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't need Google's help; I never get a second interview in any case, because I ask the hard questions!

    Are you interviewing applicants just to make yourself look important?
    Are you seriously planning to hire anyone?
    What exactly is it that you think you do here?

    1. Re:So glad I don't use Gmail! by Kenneth+Stephen · · Score: 0

      Come on, moderators - this is funny. mod it up please

      --

      There is no such thing as luck. Luck is nothing but an absence of bad luck.

    2. Re:So glad I don't use Gmail! by srichard25 · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Are you seriously planning to hire anyone [ from this country or is this just a necessary step before you bring in cheap H1B visa labor ]?"

      It helps to be as accurate as possible in your interview questioning.

    3. Re:So glad I don't use Gmail! by mobby_6kl · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Are you willing to hire cheap H1B visa labor?"

      Because I am the cheap H1B visa labor, so it's a valid and important question.

    4. Re:So glad I don't use Gmail! by previewlounge · · Score: 1

      there needs to be a Spinal Tap mod option of going all the way to Funny 11 for this one

  7. Resend email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surely the job applicant could have just sent another email with a different subject line...? Or am I not understanding how it worked?

    1. Re:Resend email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're thinking about Dolly Parton. I don't know why.

  8. They Took Er Jerbs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They Took Er Jerbs!

  9. gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you use gmail for anything important, you're doing it wrong,

  10. What dumbass uses gmail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Especially for work?

    1. Re:What dumbass uses gmail? by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Especially for work?

      Uh, that "dumbass" you're referring to happens to be an entire generation that practically demands every online service be provided for free.

      Let's just say they're enjoying their spoils today.

    2. Re:What dumbass uses gmail? by anegg · · Score: 1

      Sadly enough, this appears to be true. I told some of my 16-year old daughter's friends that Google goes through their e-mail (when they use a Google address), and they had a hard time believing it, and wanted to know why Google would do that. I pointed out that the service had to be paid for SOMEHOW, and that monetizing their e-mail traffic was how. They seemed genuinely puzzled that there was any bill to be paid...

      I guess my generation assumed "free TV" was really free, and current generations assume "free information services" are really free. I think I better check and make sure that my kids really get how the bills are paid.

  11. 11000101101011111110110001? by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 1

    I don't get it. I was thinking it might have been 20160401 in decimal, or it was something Bender said in Futurama.

    1. Re:11000101101011111110110001? by JustOK · · Score: 2

      I ...think...I saw.. a...a... 2!

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    2. Re:11000101101011111110110001? by kwiecmmm · · Score: 2

      It was just a dream, Bender. There's no such thing as two.

  12. Costing them their jobs? by BitZtream · · Score: 0

    Its 9am EST, so 13:00 GMT ... and you want to tell me someone has already been fired because they sent a gif in an email?

    Let me go ahead and clear something up for you, that douche bag was going to be fired today ANYWAY, the email had nothing at all to do with it.

    Can we please not make such retarded fucking statements in the summaries for articles? Can we use at least an ounce of thought before regurgitating some bullshit you heard someone else spew?

    God I fucking hate slashdot on April 1st.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    1. Re:Costing them their jobs? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      I woke up and saw this story on the Guardian's website and thought it was an April fool too, but no, apparently it's legit. Google played a prank, kinda messed up the UI for it, and people are very upset and Google had to pull it. If it is a giant meta April fool's, then there's a lot of independent, often rival, groups cooperating with one another to pull it off.

      It's also past noon in the UK, and the Guardian has revealed a different April fool's article is "their" April fool, so they're sticking by the story.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    2. Re:Costing them their jobs? by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      Which for reference anyone in the EU cannot simply be sacked for clicking on that button. Well they can but the courts will then rule it an unfair dismissal so you would be dumb as an employer to sack someone for it.

    3. Re:Costing them their jobs? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      and you want to tell me someone has already been fired because they sent a gif in an email?

      Not quite. He was supposedly fired for not responding to the (presumably urgent) replies he was sent (because this "feature" doesn't deliver them).

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    4. Re:Costing them their jobs? by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      "God I fucking hate slashdot on April 1st."

      It ain't just Slashdot. The internet (and most people) suck much more than normal on April 1st...

    5. Re:Costing them their jobs? by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      If it is a giant meta April fool's, then there's a lot of independent, often rival, groups cooperating with one another to pull it off.

      Well, "cooperating" would be one explanation. "Falling for each other's prank" would be another...

    6. Re:Costing them their jobs? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      And then, a year or so later, once the employee has won the case for unfair dismissal, the employer has to pay a whole three months of the salary in compensation. And the employee who sued their former employer has to find a new job. Guess how easy that is.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    7. Re:Costing them their jobs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sending "urgent" business email to a personal account would be a foolish "business practice".

  13. Re:Dear Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yet you are here on April Fools day getting your news.

  14. Re: Dear Slashdot by courteaudotbiz · · Score: 1

    No sense of humor here? I am looking for that day every year! That's a classic since I am a member (circa 2004) and probably before my time, and I love it. If you don't, well just come back tomorrow. BTW, even the most serious news outlet will have their April's fool story today.

  15. Re:Dear Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Every year, I have to quit Slashdot for a day and get my tech news elsewhere.
     
    Which day are you talking about since it's fairly apparent that you didn't do this today? You see, what matters to the owners of Slashdot aren't the feelings of the users, it's the page hits. It makes no difference to them if you come here to shake your fist or to be a positive member of their community.
     
    And as a side note, there isn't much real tech news here anyway. If you're looking for real tech news there's a thousand pages that are better. The science, business and political news is even worse.
     
    I'll go as far to say that if I couldn't troll here I wouldn't ever bother to visit Slashdot. Sorry for anyone who is butthurt of this but it is the truth.

  16. Cost them "potential" jobs? by argStyopa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You might argue that "oh noes, the button was too close to the send button, and I accidentally clicked it", however....

    It didn't cost you the job because you mic-dropped the target, but it may have cost you the job because you demonstrated a disregard for/sloppiness with details. (In exactly the same way even trivial misspellings in resumes or cover letters can cost you a job: not because they don't think you can spell, but because you didn't care enough to double check something important thoroughly.)
    It may seem trivial, but when I get 00's of resumes for a position, honestly the first cull is going to be the obvious misfits and barring really eye-grabbing qualifications, trivialities such as misspellings (or mic-drop emails) for that very reason.

    So did the mic drop actually cost you the job, or reveal that they really probably shouldn't have hired you?

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:Cost them "potential" jobs? by Kythe · · Score: 2

      I think that's reaching. According to images of the interface, the "Send Mic Drop" button was right next to the correct one, it was orange (so more noticeable, and one might logically think it's the "send" button) and until one read the story, it wasn't even clear that it did something different than a regular "send".

      I think you might be getting a little twitchy on the "roundfile" button yourself if you would treat something like this as disqualifying. Just my $0.02.

      --

      Kythe
    2. Re:Cost them "potential" jobs? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      It will cost you the job when someone replies to your job application, congratulating you on sense of humour (who doesn't love minions?), telling you you're just the person they've been looking for, and offering you double the salary.

      Because you won't get the reply. The feature mutes any replies.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    3. Re:Cost them "potential" jobs? by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      There are a LOT more job candidates than there are jobs for them these days. That sort of sloppiness DOES send a message to a potential employer...

    4. Re:Cost them "potential" jobs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might argue that "oh noes, the button was too close to the send button, and I accidentally clicked it", however....

      It didn't cost you the job because you mic-dropped the target, but it may have cost you the job because you demonstrated a disregard for/sloppiness with details. (In exactly the same way even trivial misspellings in resumes or cover letters can cost you a job: not because they don't think you can spell, but because you didn't care enough to double check something important thoroughly.)
      It may seem trivial, but when I get 00's of resumes for a position, honestly the first cull is going to be the obvious misfits and barring really eye-grabbing qualifications, trivialities such as misspellings (or mic-drop emails) for that very reason.

      So did the mic drop actually cost you the job, or reveal that they really probably shouldn't have hired you?

      Misspelling on a CV or cover letter is completely different. It may be an indication of office skills, eg: proof reading before sending or running a spell check, but accidentally hitting the tiny button that was next to the other tiny button that you meant to press...that's not an indication of anything except a poor user interface. It would be ridiculous to refuse someone a job for such a thing.

      Maybe you should your exacting standards next time you make a trivial slip?

    5. Re:Cost them "potential" jobs? by asavage · · Score: 1

      It actually replaced the reply and archive button so people who usually press reply and archive inserted the mic drop gif instead.

    6. Re:Cost them "potential" jobs? by 14erCleaner · · Score: 4, Funny

      It may seem trivial, but when I get 00's of resumes for a position, honestly the first cull is going to be the obvious misfits and barring really eye-grabbing qualifications, trivialities such as misspellings (or mic-drop emails) for that very reason.

      00's? You just culled yourself.

      --
      Have you read my blog lately?
    7. Re:Cost them "potential" jobs? by Kythe · · Score: 1

      I understand that there are a lot of applicants to weed through. What I'm saying is that I see little difference between weeding out based on being fooled by something like this and simply discarding every other application.

      I'm no fan of sloppiness, either. But to me, this isn't a sign of sloppiness. It's a sign of being human.

      --

      Kythe
    8. Re:Cost them "potential" jobs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It also sends a message to people that if they are hired that they should immediately start looking for a job that isn't working for assmunches.

      One of the rather unfortunate things is that you often don't know how worthless and incompetent the management of a company is until after the hiring decision has been made.

    9. Re:Cost them "potential" jobs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? With the Send + Archive active, that button is on the Far Left. The Send + Mic was on the right. The Send + Archive is also set as blue, where the normal send is White.

      Also, the first time I opened up a Reply, There was a nice message that said what the Send + Mic did and pointed right at that button.

      I'm on the default theme, no CSS modifications, etc... etc... Maybe one of them screwed it up, but with the default. Nope. Didn't happen. It was obvious it was a different button. You couldn't even say it replaced the Ctrl + Enter for send as that was still attached to the send button.

    10. Re:Cost them "potential" jobs? by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

      A surprising number of people seem to have read the article only half way. Near the end, it confirms that there was a bug that in some cases, would send the gif even if the correct button was clicked.

      But that aside...

      Muscle memory is a powerful feature of user interfaces. Anyone that's ever done research into HCI--and frankly, anyone that's had an interface change unexpectedly underneath them--knows that muscle memory and consistency of interface are principles you design around. Being able to send an email without looking at the buttons is a FEATURE, NOT A BUG. If the interface changes without warning, you are GUARANTEED to cause problems. With a service the size of gmail, this outcome wasn't just possible, it was inevitable.

    11. Re:Cost them "potential" jobs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who click buttons without reading them are idiots.

    12. Re:Cost them "potential" jobs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He prefers unary, you insensitive clod!!

    13. Re:Cost them "potential" jobs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that message that perhaps the potential employer needs to cut back on HR because they are so busy pruning resumes for misspellings that they're throwing out potentially good candidates?

  17. Re:Dear Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude,

    Are you backed up and need to go number 2?
    Do you need some "me time" to chill?
    How about a beer?
    Maybe a cat video?

    Relax - it's just the internet...no need to go nuclear.

  18. I am fed up with these icons and UI changes by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 5, Funny
    I work in software and I sit through endless hours of meeting where we mull over mundane user interface changes. We agonize over minor things like reorganizing a menu tree that has grown too big. Or replacing an icon chosen ages ago in a hurry, which does not really represent the feature it stands for, but our users are used to it and have learned to associate it. Is it worth replacing it? etc.

    Then comes google and android. Menu items and user interface paradigms and rules are changed at the whim. One day it is the "gear", suddenly it is gone and there is a the three lines, suddenly it is nine dots in a matrix, then dot dot dot... Some thing that appears to be some decoration in the phone app is the "new" interface for a well known functionality used to be located somewhere else.

    Ages ago I watched a young boy play Super Mario Brothers. He ran along some path, stopped at some seemingly random location, banged his head on the brick 8 times, a gold bar fell out. Pocketed the points and ran along. I asked him, "how did you know there is a gold bar on that brick?". He said, "Well, you keep banging your head on every brick in the wall to see if there is something?". "You banged your head on EVERY brick eight times on this tunnel?", He goes, "nah, I banged some 30 or 40 times, this brick needs only 8 hits".

    I wonder if that boy grew up, got a job designing user interface for Android apps. They seem to think, after every release the user should try every gesture on every pixel to re-learn how to use this app.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:I am fed up with these icons and UI changes by bfpierce · · Score: 2

      Maybe this is a shocker, but Google and Android also spend hours on UI/UX testing, research, and so on.

      Maybe they're just more efficient at it than your company is?

    2. Re:I am fed up with these icons and UI changes by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      Playing around with Android TV the other day, I couldn't figure out how zoom worked without a touchscreen. I already tried the mousewheel, dragging various corners, double-clicking, triple clicking.... punching it into a search engine found the answer...

      Double-click-drag.

      Might be the most unintuitive action I can think of.

    3. Re:I am fed up with these icons and UI changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol. You guys suck.

    4. Re:I am fed up with these icons and UI changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Appeal to authority fallacy much?

      I raise you with: Windows 'Metrol', and Office 'The Ribbon'... LOL.

      So no, they don't know what they're doing. They're paying 'UX designers' to destroy their own company from within, by ruining the interface, because they have to CHANGE things in order to justify their jobs.

    5. Re:I am fed up with these icons and UI changes by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

      Ages ago I watched a young boy play Super Mario Brothers. He ran along some path, stopped at some seemingly random location, banged his head on the brick 8 times, a gold bar fell out. Pocketed the points and ran along. I asked him, "how did you know there is a gold bar on that brick?". He said, "Well, you keep banging your head on every brick in the wall to see if there is something?". "You banged your head on EVERY brick eight times on this tunnel?", He goes, "nah, I banged some 30 or 40 times, this brick needs only 8 hits".

      He should have hit it 4,294,967,303 times, just in case.

    6. Re:I am fed up with these icons and UI changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see how that can be true. The Gmail interface couldn't be worse. I can't imagine it's anything more than a single developer's idea of something that might be cool.

    7. Re:I am fed up with these icons and UI changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A) They are efficient at making changes.
      B) They are also effective at reverting changes because of (A).

      I'm glad they aren't an enterprise company.

    8. Re:I am fed up with these icons and UI changes by Dagmar+d'Surreal · · Score: 1

      ...and yet, after all this running of your mouth, the normal Send button stayed right where it's always been, making your entire post a non-sequitir.

    9. Re:I am fed up with these icons and UI changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they're just more efficient at it than your company is?

      Given the steep decline in any google products usability, I'm going to go ahead and say no, no they aren't.

    10. Re:I am fed up with these icons and UI changes by safetyinnumbers · · Score: 5, Funny

      "You banged your head on EVERY brick eight times on this tunnel?", He goes, "nah, I banged some 30 or 40 times, this brick needs only 8 hits".

      I never before appreciated just how well video games could prepare you for life in general.

    11. Re:I am fed up with these icons and UI changes by swb · · Score: 2

      Maybe this is a shocker, but Google and Android also spend hours on UI/UX testing, research, and so on.

      I want to believe that the heavyweights (Google, Microsoft, Apple, etc) really do invest a lot of time, money and manpower into user interface research. But why do the results often feel like they just hire artists looking to make a name for themselves with a unique visual approach?

      "Human Factors" is an actual academic discipline and I find it hard to believe that aggregated wisdom in that field supported radical changes in user interface for established products. Your users have many man-hours of learning invested in how to accomplish tasks and throwing all that out for an art-centric design change doesn't make sense.

      It may be that new or significantly upgraded products would benefit from new user interfaces, but how that gets done and how it's balanced against trying to retain the knowledge of your existing user base would suggest something more evolutionary and less rip-and-replace.

      Even a brand new airplane with new avionics keeps a number of basic controls from previous airplanes. Cars make minor changes to shifter placement or add buttons to the steering wheel, but at the end of the day would they consider just ditching the steering wheel for some other control? Swapping the gas and brake pedals or doing away with them altogether?

      It makes me wonder if the UI/UX experts at Google, et al actually even reference the existing research and knowledge in human factors, or if they have some kind of "we're in technology, so we know everything" mindset. Or they just figure that most of the their userbase is disposable, and they're more interested in acquiring the 14-24 set who have less established knowledge and seem to care more about overall "look".

    12. Re:I am fed up with these icons and UI changes by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Which says not a thing to his point.

    13. Re:I am fed up with these icons and UI changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From what I read, the "Send and Mic Drop" button replaced the "Send and Archive" button on certain GMail UIs.

      Now, I don't use "Send and Archive", and I don't even know why anyone would, but apparently there are some people who find it useful (GMail does provide it, after all). For those people, replacing the button does make his post relevant.

      I think that's probably one of the hardest lessons to learn for people working with user interfaces. "It works on my machine" and "I don't find it useful" don't cut it. You're making the user interface for other people. What happens on *their* machine, and what *they* think is what matters. The fact that you find a change obvious doesn't mean your users are going to find it obvious. A bunch of UX design principles are putting your ego on the shelf, and actually listening to what other people want/need - something which is hard for most people.

    14. Re:I am fed up with these icons and UI changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That does not say much for Google/Android results....

    15. Re:I am fed up with these icons and UI changes by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Maybe this is a shocker, but Google and Android also spend hours on UI/UX testing, research, and so on.

      That's just more evidence that UI/UX is a joke of a job title. Remember iTunes has UI/UX experts working on it, too.

      There are some people who are good at UI/UX, but there are a lot of people who are really bad at it.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    16. Re:I am fed up with these icons and UI changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time Spent != quality

      One issue with Android's team, is that they spend too much time re-doing old work, and not enough time asking "should we redo this old work?"

      Then answer is almost always "no". Hence, a floppy disk being the universal save icon that everyone still knows, despite many people never actually seeing one.

    17. Re:I am fed up with these icons and UI changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they're not more efficient. I have worked in software and UI design for over 20 years, sometimes designing user interfaces that control quite dangerous chemical processes so there can be absolutely no confusion in how they work. 140Mandak262Jamuna is correctly stating a very common frustration with Google and Apple (and even Microsoft)--they change the UI too frequently which greatly diminishes productivity. Their changes often obfuscate how to do things, create longer click paths, create heavier UIs that are not as performant on lower bandwidth connections and frustrate users.

    18. Re:I am fed up with these icons and UI changes by Keybounce · · Score: 1

      *NEVER* let a programmer design a user interface.
      A programmer will design an interface based on what the programmer wants/likes.
      A good program will be designed based on what the user wants/likes.

      Give the programmer the specs for the UI, just like you give them specs for the program's function.

      ===

      Do you really want details? Ok.

      *Every* website that uses CSS to force a given font/size on the users, regardless of what that user says in their preferences is the font and size that they want.

      Is your screen 92 DPI? Fine. Why do you assume everyone has a 92 DPI screen?

      Are your eyes good enough to read 12 point fonts? Oh, wait -- you're specifying 12 _pixel_ fonts. How big will that be on the user's screen? How good are their eyes? What's the difference between reading a 9 point printed font (At about 1000 DPI) at 12 inches, or a 12 pixel screen font at 92 DPI at 22 inches?

      Should I go on?

      "Ribbon Bar". Gee, a language that everyone can work with -- an english version, a spanish version, a french version -- just by changing the localization text for the menu display, or a brand new hieroglyph language that isn't previously known to anyone, and where the contents of your bar change every time the program thinks you want to do something else, so that nothing can be depended on? The only reason I was ever able to use any of the "ribbon bar" programs was because I had memorized the key combinations (ctrl-this and ctrl-that).

      Now, some things are "User interface designer" issues. Someone had to design and spec that ribbon bar. Someone had to approve that design. Several people should have been fired.

      But most web page CSS things seem to be nothing more than a web page authoring tool that just spits out fixed CSS with no real ability to do anything else. And then companies that use that tool without really understanding the horrors of that tool.

      So one programmer writes a web page tool with bad CSS output.
      Another company uses that tool, may even try to design a good UI, and fails because of their upstream.

      ---

      Even in the older days of actual applications: Did a programmer make the GUI for 1-2-3, and other early spreadsheets? Sure. Were they just copied into newer spreadsheets without thinking? Mostly.

      Did a programmer make the GUI for almost all X applications? Yep. Every programmer made a different GUI. Was there any way to make things standard?

      Xerox actually studied users, and said, "Here's how to make an interface that's usable".
      Microsoft took half, discarded half, and say "This is how all programs will behave".
      Good? Bad? Consistent.
      Could you actually adjust the sizes of things? Sure.
      Did things fit on-screen if you did? Often, no.

      Along comes the browser interface. Everything scrolls. No more "won't fit". User-specified base font, and site-specific "bigger/smaller" from that.
      Oh, wait -- programmers override the "everything scrolls". Programmers override the user font. Do things now fit? Often, no. Can you force bigger fonts? Sure. Do things overlap, or go off-screen, or get clipped, or otherwise ruined? Yep.

      Does the computer make it trivial to support large fonts, or other accessibility features for people who need it? Yes.
      Does the law require that it be used? Not in the USA -- the Americans with Disability act only applies to physical places, not cyberspace.

      ====

      User interfaces are not trivial. They are second only to "correctness" of program behavior. "Documentation" is third. "Performance", "Behavior", "Features", etc., are fourth.

      That's a restatement of "First, make it work; then, make it work well". "Make it work" includes "Make it usable".

  19. Re: Dear Slashdot by in10se · · Score: 1

    Yes, most new sites might have one or two jokes. That's fine. They're funny. Slashdot just basically gives up on news for the day.

    --
    Popisms.com - Connecting pop culture
  20. Binary FTW by wkwilley2 · · Score: 1

    Honestly, I like the binary. I think it should stay......or if it takes up too much room, just convert to hexidecimal and leave it at that.

    Bring back the "News for Nerds" mantra.

    --
    Have you ever fallen asleep at the keybhanusdiog?
  21. wow by sootman · · Score: 1

    Is this for real? If so: congratulations, Google, you won Internet Jackass Day.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand this would have been a GREAT feature to stop unwanted spam.

  22. OT: Good Job New Slashdot Owners! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It looks like the new Slashdot owners are posting real stories on April 1 instead of fake stories that weren't even remotely funny. Good job. That alone makes Slashdot better than under any previous ownership, including Malda.

    They did do one cute Easter egg which I found cute. That's doing April Fools the right way.

    1. Re:OT: Good Job New Slashdot Owners! by antdude · · Score: 1

      What Easter Egg? I think I missed it. :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  23. Re:Dear Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go fuck a pink pony.

  24. You know what's unprofessional? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

    You know what's unprofessional? Accidentally pressing the big yellow button.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  25. Re:Dear Slashdot by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

    Dear /.

    It's April the 2nd here.

    Signed, The future.

  26. Re:Cost them "potential" jobs? No. Saved them time by petes_PoV · · Score: 1

    it may have cost you the job because you demonstrated a disregard for/sloppiness with details

    It probably did both sides a favour. The employer now knows not to call that individual for interview and the applicant won't have to travel to an interview they are (highly) likely to fail.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
  27. Re:Dear Slashdot by mccalli · · Score: 1

    I think somebody needs a pony hug...

  28. Glad to hear it's an April fools gag by Immerman · · Score: 1

    When I checked my email last night and saw the new feature I immediately tried to find a way to turn it off, because it seemed an utterly pointless feature, and I knew it was only a matter of time before I carelessly clicked it by mistake. Gad to see it's already gone.

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  29. April 1st... by MitchDev · · Score: 0

    ...Will people ever grow out of this nonsense?

    1. Re:April 1st... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Angry, serious, pissed off people are one bad event away from being angry, serious, pissed off serial killers.

      This is our way of coping with the stress of daily life. We try to inject some fun into our lives at the expense of others.

    2. Re:April 1st... by tsqr · · Score: 1

      ...Will people ever grow out of this nonsense?

      Probably not. It appears that most people enjoy it, as it's been going on all over the world for hundreds of years.

    3. Re:April 1st... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      Ahahhaahh April fools! Of course not. Any other questions?

    4. Re:April 1st... by MrTester · · Score: 2

      There are serious important issues in the world that need our attention.
      Worrying about people who enjoy pranks is not one of them.

    5. Re:April 1st... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lighten up Francis

    6. Re:April 1st... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On a day when my pointless AC posts can get modded +10 or even +105 funny, HELL NO!

  30. If you want to appear professional by Foundryman · · Score: 1

    Perhaps, If you want to appear professional, and conduct business, maybe you shouldn't be using the gmail web interface for sending emails in the first place?

    1. Re:If you want to appear professional by tom229 · · Score: 1

      Or gmail/gapps at all. My favorite thing ever is when I get calls from IT departments that can't send us email because a gmail or outlook IP got registered for spamming. I simply reply "hmm... our dedicated self hosted transfer agent has never been on a list. I wonder why?" Perhaps it's because we don't outsource the critical workflow of our company. If this story is even true (i suspect it isn't) it looks good on gmail users.

      --
      If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
  31. NOT FUNNY by jasonbrown · · Score: 1

    Google! Please take your job serious. This is no longer the '90's. WTF.

    --

    "Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press"
    1. Re:NOT FUNNY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Google! Please take your job serious. This is no longer the '90's. WTF.

      Users! You get what you pay for. Open your wallet, or kindly STFU.

    2. Re:NOT FUNNY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See it's an attitude like this that we can't have nice things. Or a little fun some times. Because, you know, business is serious.

    3. Re:NOT FUNNY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been paying them with tiny percentages of my soul every day for years now. Or have they found a new revenue stream besides collecting and selling users' personal information?

    4. Re:NOT FUNNY by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of opportunities for fun, but business tools is NOT one of them. MS learnt this lesson a long time ago with easter eggs that used to be in every product. If you want your tools to be taken seriously and used by enterprises then don't fuck with them on a whim for a bit of fun, It sends the wrong message about how you manage the system and can have unforseen consequences.

  32. Nothing new here by Dagmar+d'Surreal · · Score: 3, Funny

    In other news, stupid people continue to blame others for their inability to perform simple tasks (like clicking a blue button that's been in the same place literally forever, instead of an orange, animated one) without fucking things up.

  33. No sympathy by nospam007 · · Score: 0

    Sorry if I have no sympathy for webmail users.
    Just use a fucking email program!

  34. Re: Dear Slashdot by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 0

    It's a long standing tradition. Some of us still have a sense of humour. So here's an on topic idea - why not make your post a "mic drop" post and say no more on the subject?

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  35. Using gmail is unprofessional and rude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Using gmail is unprofessional anyways.

    It displays a lack of privacy consideration for everyone else who interacts with that account thru email.

    How rude.

  36. eh by supernova87a · · Score: 1

    Since when does humor come without someone's expense? Every single goddammed change in some publicly-used application is going to have someone complaining that something inadvertently bad happened because of it. In 1 billion people, you can find someone, somewhere who used it incorrectly. I for one am glad for many people to be amused for one day at the expense of a few people who didn't look carefully enough.

    1. Re:eh by PPH · · Score: 1

      Still waiting for Microsoft to jump up and yell "April Fools" over the Metro UI.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  37. Re:Dear Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To the new Slashdot owners:

    Please disregard the OP, the majority of us actually love the April Fools day jokes, so long as they are not repeated 3 times in one day as Slashdot tends to do with most stories. Also, please move the Polls back to the feed, they are too easy to miss when off to the side. Other than that, you are doing a great job!

  38. Comcast? made a very evil one now seems to be dead by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1
  39. if you fell for it, idiot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you can't take the 1 seconds it takes to confirm you are pressing the right button, how could I possibly trust you to conduct business correctly? You should be fired..

    Everyone crying, get a life and find something important within yourself. Don't use google if you cant handle the lulz. Weirdly, you have that choice, right?

  40. Pretty unprofessional by ErichTheRed · · Score: 1

    Have the Gmail designers forgotten that email is now the "old fogey" way to communicate, and that it's a lot more official than IMs or text messages?

    I probably wouldn't have fired anyone over this, but responding to an email thread with a "mic drop" by King Bob is the ultimate childish way to end a conversation. I'm reminded of my wise-beyond-his-years 5 year old just turning his back on a conversation he doesn't want to have. There are some people I'd love to do this to because they drive me nuts, but surprise, some people do still act like adults. Something like this could be interpreted as very rude; there's a reason why Exchange/Outlook doesn't have this feature.

    It's cute, but it belongs in an IM or one of those social coder tools like Slack, not in email. Email is the new paper mail.

  41. Reply all by Varenthos · · Score: 1

    I'm willing to bet it's the same people who always seem to hit Reply All instead of just Reply.

  42. Not just Android - it's "design" dontchaknow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I wonder if that boy grew up, got a job designing user interface for Android apps. They seem to think, after every release the user should try every gesture on every pixel to re-learn how to use this app."

    All UIs are like this now for the most part. Things like the ellipsis, the gear, the hamburger menu, magic unmarked corners and gestures are common even in desktop software now. I'm mostly used to it now, but being more "experienced" it's a big shift from the ugly-but-usable stuff in the past. I do wish designers would surface more of the functionality rather than making you find it every time.

    One thing I can't live with is bright white background, light grey text. Who thinks this is a good design and makes for readable content??? If I could wave a magic wand and fix one UI problem, that would be it.

  43. Thats what you get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For using gmail period.

  44. Re:Dear Slashdot by JazzLad · · Score: 1

    Can I have the lotto numbers?

    --
    "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
  45. I misunderestimated the stupidity of webmail by Sloppy · · Score: 1

    I used to think that webmail was a fundamentally stupid idea mainly because it's impossible for it to be done securely. (The IMAP client is some other computer with which you'd have to share your keys, so there's really no point in even trying to do things sanely.) It inhibits the practice of people signing and encrypting email, and thanks to network effects, an entire dimension of technology is effectively denied to nearly everyone. Spam, phishing, surveillance: they could be gone by now, but we still pay the price thanks to webmail. It's at least a candidate for the title of Neo-Luddism's Most Glorious Victory.

    But that's just beating a dead horse. Here it is, early 2013 and nobody cares about security anymore. Nobody is reading our emails and nobody ever gets phished. No reason to update these two paragraphs for 2016 because I'm sure that nothing will happen to make people start thinking about this stuff again. ;-)

    ---

    But it never occurred to be that there was a whole other dimension to webmail's stupidity: that the user interface might suddenly change in sneaky ways, without the user telling the computer to install an update. Thanks, Gmail, for being another legitimate reason that people think the software industry is controlled by user-hating morons.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    1. Re:I misunderestimated the stupidity of webmail by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      But it never occurred to be that there was a whole other dimension to webmail's stupidity: that the user interface might suddenly change in sneaky ways, without the user telling the computer to install an update.

      Welcome to webapps. Google is actually kind of the king of ruining web interfaces; G+ gets notably worse with every iteration.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  46. Just a dumb idea by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Talk about brutal . . . I saw one screen capture of the "minion mic drop" GIF pasted into a funeral home director's email to the deceased's family. Not sure if that one was fake or not, but with 900M users, how could Google possibly think this was a good idea?

    1. Re:Just a dumb idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly, who thinks using a free service for work is a good idea?
      You get what you pay for tbh fam.

  47. This could be useful by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

    Particularly in the case where you tell a subordinate to do something and they insist on debating every detail. Just effing do it and shut the hell up.

  48. I never understood this obsession by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    American companies have with implementing actual changes to their products just to mess with people 1 day of the year.
    It's bad enough newspapers publish bullshit stories.

  49. Re: Dear Slashdot by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

    Traditions can be stupid.

  50. It missed the idea of "April Fools" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To be proper April Fools joke, it shouldn't have really muted replies or sent the mic drop image to anyone. It should have razzed the sender in some entertaining way for clicking the button, like popping up one of their well-known animations. For it to really do what it said it would do, it's a new feature, not a "fooled you" joke.

  51. It didn't backfire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It worked wonderfully. They got people to believe this actually happened!

  52. Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If anyone lost their job over something that simple, it is for the best for 1 of 2 reasons -

    1 - They were already on the fence anyway, and the bosses were looking for an excuse to can them. Now they can move on.

    2 - If their workplace is that fucking uptight, they shouldn't want to continue working there anyway. Now they can move on.

    1. Re:Good by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      or

      3 the muted replies made them miss an deadline.

    2. Re:Good by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      or

      3 the muted replies made them miss an deadline.

      Too soon unless the deadline was for the same day. In that case, see 1).

      I think it's awesome. I wish they still had it. Wish Slashdot had that feature. Reply with a dropped mic. I guess I could put in a recipe that takes slashdot responses and sends them to /dev/null

  53. UX Genius At Work by JustBoo · · Score: 1

    **Once again, a UX Genius at work. And once again, proving they are the dumbest people in high-tech.

    **My lawyer, Mr. Douchesniff has informed me I need this disclaimer: My response is predicated on the assumption this is an April Fools article thing. If it isn't, it should be, if it was, it was meant to be, if it wasn't, then it's not, but and including the option that it might have been until its proven that it was. Or not. Caveat Emptor You Fool. And so on and some such. (It's the best $4,000 I've ever spent.)

  54. People should pay attention by grahamtriggs · · Score: 1

    I hate April Fools. I don't like the idea the Google did this, and I think there are things they could have done differently in implementing it.

    But, it still was an unusual looking send button, in an unusual position. I get that people don't fully understand what the mic drop button is going to do - but still, that's as good a reason to just not use it. And it wasn't that hard to choose not to use it.

    This is all rather symptomatic of a larger problem in society - that people just don't pay attention to what they are doing. Whether it's walking into you while they are chatting or texting on a mobile, or walking into and falling down a lift shaft without looking to see if the lift is there.

    We all need to slow down a bit, take a breath, and pay attention to what we are doing.

  55. Not Really by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

    "I just sent off an email with my resume to the first person who wanted to interview me in months," one user posted in a Google Help forum. " I clicked the wrong button and sent it with the mic drop. Well, I guess I'm not getting that job. Words cannot describe how pissed off I am right now. I'm actually shaking. One click, ONE CLICK and I lost the job. Goddamnit. Not funny, google. I'm going to go cry now."

    You didn't lose a job. You never had it. You probably weren't going to get the job anyway.

    --
    'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
  56. Re: Dear Slashdot by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    Traditions can be stupid.

    Just to point out "can be" isn't the same as "are."

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  57. Some Institutes use GMail with SLA by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    If email is so important to you that you can lose your job if it does the wrong thing, then you should be using an email service with an SLA

    I work at a university where we have an SLA agreement with Google (mainly to cover privacy issues) and are supposed, though not required, to use GMail for all official email. However it's also not the type of environment where you would ever get fired for something like this...although it might raise a few eyebrows!

  58. Just walk past HR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ask to see HR and/or the break room.

    They have to post all H1B applications there, along with salary. Look for your job description in one of those (along with the salary).

  59. Gmail at work. by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 3, Informative

    Seriously, free webmail is unprofessional.

    I am guessing that you are not aware that many universities use GMail for business under agreements where Google will actually manage the email for the university domain i.e. my university email address is essentially a GMail account that I can access through GMail on the web or via IMAP. We have an agreement with Google which means that they agree not to mine our email for advertizing and we don't get ads displayed on the Google pages. They also gave us unlimited Google Drive space as well although I suspect if I tried dumping petabytes of ATLAS LHC data there it might turn out to have a limit at some point.

  60. This Is The Kind of Really Stupid Thing You Do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when you don't realize you live in a bubble.

    Entitled fools, April 1 or otherwise...

  61. Re: Dear Slashdot by msauve · · Score: 1

    Traditions can't be stupid, only people can be stupid.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  62. Clickbait Headlines by Notabadguy · · Score: 1

    Summarizing the ACTUAL news as reported:

    -One single person reported that they fired off a resume to a potential employer with the mic drop button.
    -They then reported that they were mortified, and instantly assumed Google cost them the job.
    -They didn't bother to resend their resume with an explanation of the Mic Drop feature.
    -They assumed that they were going to GET the job, despite as they described, "It being the first person willing to look at my resume and interview me in months."

    So news as actually happening:
    -A few people are terrible at e-mails and shouldn't be using it.
    -A pretentious unemployed person blames Google for their own poor decision making skills.

  63. Good by tehlinux · · Score: 1

    Sweet, I was worried I wouldn't see any minions today...

    --
    Most linux users don't know this, but the man pages were named after Chuck Norris. Chuck Norris fsck'ing hates noobs!
  64. drama queens by prof_robinson · · Score: 0

    People that use mic drops are simply drama queens. If you need to use a mic drop to make a point, you don't have a point - all you can do is shut down the conversation and run away with your tail between your I egs

  65. The MIC drop is senseless vandalism by TheRealHocusLocus · · Score: 1

    The 'mic drop' is people deliberately
    damaging precious things they rely on,
    things they would not wish to replace,
    things they do not know how to fix,
    and is the sign of a decaying society.

    ~Signed, sound technician

    --
    <blink>down the rabbit hole</blink>