Must be one of the new versions. I tried one six or seven months ago and lasted less than a minute before getting hit by motion sickness. Granted, I get it pretty quickly from FPS (I can play for about five minutes and then I'm laid-up for hours) so I might be overly sensitive to the experience.
We watch them via On Demand, which usually has them a couple of days later and with which we can skip through commercials. (Forgot one: We also watch Downton Abbey via cable On Demand)
There are three reasons we keep cable:
1) American Pickers (I know Netflix has it, but we've seen all of those and it's our relax-without-thinking show that we look forward to sitting down together each week once the kids are asleep)
2) Walking Dead (Ditto Netflix, although I don't know how current they are. That said, I'm increasingly becoming decreasingly interested in the show)
3) It costs $10 more to get Internet access without also getting cable.
Spock: Captain, I'm receiving an odd error message from the 3D printer transporter...
Kirk: What's the error message say?
Spoke: It says, 'PC load letter.'
Kirk: PC load letter! What the fuck does that mean???
Oh bullshit. So long as you don't preface the word with "yellow" there is plenty of ethics in journalism. The issue is that there's very little in the news business - or more accurately, "the business of news." In the vast majority of cases, reporters receive their assignments from editors who receive "guidance" from their editors who, in turn, receive their marching orders from company/corporate owners (who in turn receive them from stockholders). Now I think it can be argued that there's a difference between "journalists" and "reporters" but that argument goes both ways: In effect all journalists should be "reporters" in that they report whatever has/is occurred/occurring. On the flip side both journalists and reporters want one thing: The big story, either for lofty ideals or to get promoted to a higher-ranking position.
Underrated film but I seem to recall that painting the atmosphere (or something similar) caused a global catastrophe. Obviously not saying this will result in the same unfortunate scenario but just found it interesting.
So what? At least in the US companies will "convince" Congress to repeal any parts of the agreement that might affect their profits, regardless of what the majority of people want.
Slashdot Mirror
> My biggest fear is we're fostering the next generation of crap coders
Really? Mine's clowns.
I share your pain - I can't play them either. The condition is real and has been documented and researched by the army. Easy-to-read article here
Must be one of the new versions. I tried one six or seven months ago and lasted less than a minute before getting hit by motion sickness. Granted, I get it pretty quickly from FPS (I can play for about five minutes and then I'm laid-up for hours) so I might be overly sensitive to the experience.
> Where was the satellite over geographically when it exploded?
The Earth.
Captain, I see no reason to stand here and be insulted.
Yes, but the Amendment's delivery is delayed due to bad weather. FedEx apologizes for the inconvenience.
And nothing of value was lost.
Internet only: $83
Internet + TV: $73
You may be right when taking into account taxes, but full disclosure I didn't even think about that until I read your post...
> which seems to be effective since they have had NO students disappear due to magic spells
;)
Correlation != causation
We watch them via On Demand, which usually has them a couple of days later and with which we can skip through commercials. (Forgot one: We also watch Downton Abbey via cable On Demand)
There are three reasons we keep cable:
1) American Pickers (I know Netflix has it, but we've seen all of those and it's our relax-without-thinking show that we look forward to sitting down together each week once the kids are asleep)
2) Walking Dead (Ditto Netflix, although I don't know how current they are. That said, I'm increasingly becoming decreasingly interested in the show)
3) It costs $10 more to get Internet access without also getting cable.
Maybe I missed it but how was the question phrased?
What is this? Paradise By The Dashboard Light?
No. It was because cotton had better lobbyists.
Spock: Captain, I'm receiving an odd error message from the 3D printer transporter ...
Kirk: What's the error message say?
Spoke: It says, 'PC load letter.'
Kirk: PC load letter! What the fuck does that mean???
And for SSL you wrap tinfoil around the string, right?
I vaguely recall their early tagline as being "The Ultimate Collection Of Winsock Software" before branching out to things like being a registrar.
But those are all from your trip to Disney in China, right?
Oh bullshit. So long as you don't preface the word with "yellow" there is plenty of ethics in journalism. The issue is that there's very little in the news business - or more accurately, "the business of news." In the vast majority of cases, reporters receive their assignments from editors who receive "guidance" from their editors who, in turn, receive their marching orders from company/corporate owners (who in turn receive them from stockholders). Now I think it can be argued that there's a difference between "journalists" and "reporters" but that argument goes both ways: In effect all journalists should be "reporters" in that they report whatever has/is occurred/occurring. On the flip side both journalists and reporters want one thing: The big story, either for lofty ideals or to get promoted to a higher-ranking position.
If they were offered a lucrative buyout.
Underrated film but I seem to recall that painting the atmosphere (or something similar) caused a global catastrophe. Obviously not saying this will result in the same unfortunate scenario but just found it interesting.
Hence the Ingress game as a source of said data.
Wasn't the same thing true of the Buck Rogers (the one with Gil Gerard, Erin Gray et al)?
If you want the answer from a Theoretical Physicist, turn to page 43.
If you want the answer from a Quantum Physicist, turn to page 63.
So what? At least in the US companies will "convince" Congress to repeal any parts of the agreement that might affect their profits, regardless of what the majority of people want.
Wait. We are talking about Net Neutrality, right?