For movies, the angle of the cameras is fixed on a certain point in the scene so if you only ever look at the point the cameras were focussed on then it will seem more real.
If you look around the scene, the effect is not real and there will be subtle differences which explains the nausea for a lot of people.
I've seen 3d movies since the mod 90's and played 3d games since the geforce 256. For games, I've noticed that it's only good for racing games where the eyeball angle is fixed mostly at a very far point down the road. With shooters, I look around the scene too much and feel that things aren't right, it seems to add latency to my reactions. After about a month of Quake 2 and a few others I had stopped.
What we really need for games is cameras in the glasses that look at where our eyes are looking and adjust the view angles accordingly. For movies, nothing is to be done because not everyone is looking at the same thing.
Advice for people with sensitive reactions to subtle changes in the world that is presented towards them, when watching a 3d movie, try not moving your head and always look where the scene is focussed on. You may be able to watch a little longer.
I'm still a huge UT2004 player but did give UT3 a couple of months when it came out and again this summer. I could probably narrow it down to a few reasons why a lot of people didn't enjoy ut3.
It's mostly dark pastel colours and looks more like a movie (which is what you don't want when you interact with an environment, but is what you want when being told a story... I don't need blur in a game, when I turn quickly, my eyes already blur natually because things are moving quickly [who even thought of putting blur in an fps... duh!]).
With all this blur and dark shading of every colour, you don't get a larger view in your environment and feel a little more alone even when on a team... or standing right next to someone.
When you're in a vehicle the camera view is too close to the vehicle. What the hell!
And my biggest peeve is that the game just feels slower. No double jumping.
Anyways, I'm one of those who has given pretty much every fps that's come out in the last 3 years a real try (at least 20-30 hours) and have not found one that's got something to entice me, in fact they're all going in the wrong direction... slow and blind.
I'm still open to try new ones anytime they come out and always keep my hopes up. But UT3 was the last time that I buy a game before I try it.
If I was a phone designer, reading this I would assume that I can install a realtime OS on the third core to perform phone and system management related functions, and use the other 2 cores for the user OS to run the UI and all the apps.
With a well developed system, these are the features this chip could allow:
- the user OS could reboot/freeze/crash and you can still make calls or stay on the line with the current call.
- you could be down to the last couple of minutes of battery life, and decide to shut off the user OS and only leave phone functionality on which would stretch that last 3 minutes into another hour (or more, or less).
- an app that takes all resources, would not affect phone functionality.
- there could be a real separation of data paths between the 2 operating systems (the user OS and the realtime OS) which could protect the realtime OS from viruses (although the separation could prevent certain features. This one could incite interesting discussion).
I think this is great product, we are sure to see more development in the industry along these lines.
well I can answer how big the middle is... how big is this internet called the Internet that I have between me and my site? And if you know that then you could probably tell me just about how protected it is too... here's a link that may help find some preliminary info:
tall is usually associated with storeys (not stories), but you make a good point that stories are associated with a Library of Congress, the only problem is the math. If tall were out of the picture it sounds like one Library of Congress has 3 stories in it.
interesting, I had always thought it would have been more advanced down in the US. I'm in Quebec and we have shapes as well as positions. Vertically same as you and horizontally the red is always at both ends, and the yellow is diamond shaped. Good thing we don't have diagonally positioned lights or the red and yellow would be a bit confusing. I couldn't even tell you if it's the same across the country here though.
Red lights are square and green lights are round. There is no failure for colorblindness... possibly full blindness though, but I haven't had the chance to ask any blind drivers about this.
he never said it only runs javascript applications.
what the hell does being a "real distro" have to do with what language the apps are written in?
I suspect from your comment that you are terribly unqualified to even understand the implications of what you're reading, or to wake up in the morning at all.
nettops are smaller and slower than laptops so when you surf the Internet you can only stay on top, I know they should have called them internettops but nettops rolls off the tong a little easier. If you spend any time on undernet you may have issues with a nettop.
nettops can be known to be dangerous since onthe top of the net it's harder to choose the tube you want to use since not all the openings of the tubes are on the top.
good for some, not for others...
the reason I say slow is because the percentage of travel is not for scenery (and to disagree about the "descent" trip times), myself and most people that I know do not take the train for the Toronto, Montreal, Ottawa and Quebec area because it adds no benefits to taking the car. There is no way it could be cheaper so the only benefit would be speed, and it doesn't exist. I would take it all the time if it were one hour to Toronto from Montreal.
Slashdot Mirror
yeah, that's all I wanted to know.
If you look around the scene, the effect is not real and there will be subtle differences which explains the nausea for a lot of people.
I've seen 3d movies since the mod 90's and played 3d games since the geforce 256. For games, I've noticed that it's only good for racing games where the eyeball angle is fixed mostly at a very far point down the road. With shooters, I look around the scene too much and feel that things aren't right, it seems to add latency to my reactions. After about a month of Quake 2 and a few others I had stopped.
What we really need for games is cameras in the glasses that look at where our eyes are looking and adjust the view angles accordingly. For movies, nothing is to be done because not everyone is looking at the same thing.
Advice for people with sensitive reactions to subtle changes in the world that is presented towards them, when watching a 3d movie, try not moving your head and always look where the scene is focussed on. You may be able to watch a little longer.
Cheers
Now if only Apple will come out with the iMadeIt, or the iBuiltIt or iTem or iDontKnowWhatever.
It's mostly dark pastel colours and looks more like a movie (which is what you don't want when you interact with an environment, but is what you want when being told a story... I don't need blur in a game, when I turn quickly, my eyes already blur natually because things are moving quickly [who even thought of putting blur in an fps... duh!]).
With all this blur and dark shading of every colour, you don't get a larger view in your environment and feel a little more alone even when on a team... or standing right next to someone.
When you're in a vehicle the camera view is too close to the vehicle. What the hell!
And my biggest peeve is that the game just feels slower. No double jumping.
Anyways, I'm one of those who has given pretty much every fps that's come out in the last 3 years a real try (at least 20-30 hours) and have not found one that's got something to entice me, in fact they're all going in the wrong direction... slow and blind.
I'm still open to try new ones anytime they come out and always keep my hopes up. But UT3 was the last time that I buy a game before I try it.
i^2 = -1 (definition of i)
if you want to let everyone know the definition of i then shouldn't it be alone on one side? It looks like you have not defined i to begin with.
If I was a phone designer, reading this I would assume that I can install a realtime OS on the third core to perform phone and system management related functions, and use the other 2 cores for the user OS to run the UI and all the apps. With a well developed system, these are the features this chip could allow: - the user OS could reboot/freeze/crash and you can still make calls or stay on the line with the current call. - you could be down to the last couple of minutes of battery life, and decide to shut off the user OS and only leave phone functionality on which would stretch that last 3 minutes into another hour (or more, or less). - an app that takes all resources, would not affect phone functionality. - there could be a real separation of data paths between the 2 operating systems (the user OS and the realtime OS) which could protect the realtime OS from viruses (although the separation could prevent certain features. This one could incite interesting discussion). I think this is great product, we are sure to see more development in the industry along these lines.
http://tech.slashdot.org/story/10/06/28/2340237/22-Million-SSL-Certificates-In-Use-Are-Invalid?art_pos=1
Cheers
There is an interesting story.
you won't be able to offload much to an "entry-level, integrated graphics chip"... if anything at all.
tall is usually associated with storeys (not stories), but you make a good point that stories are associated with a Library of Congress, the only problem is the math. If tall were out of the picture it sounds like one Library of Congress has 3 stories in it.
someone modded this informative. I wish I could mod a mod as funny!
i'm still waiting for the stars to align my first frame.... i'll let you know
interesting, I had always thought it would have been more advanced down in the US. I'm in Quebec and we have shapes as well as positions. Vertically same as you and horizontally the red is always at both ends, and the yellow is diamond shaped. Good thing we don't have diagonally positioned lights or the red and yellow would be a bit confusing. I couldn't even tell you if it's the same across the country here though.
Red lights are square and green lights are round. There is no failure for colorblindness... possibly full blindness though, but I haven't had the chance to ask any blind drivers about this.
he never said it only runs javascript applications. what the hell does being a "real distro" have to do with what language the apps are written in? I suspect from your comment that you are terribly unqualified to even understand the implications of what you're reading, or to wake up in the morning at all.
nettops are smaller and slower than laptops so when you surf the Internet you can only stay on top, I know they should have called them internettops but nettops rolls off the tong a little easier. If you spend any time on undernet you may have issues with a nettop. nettops can be known to be dangerous since onthe top of the net it's harder to choose the tube you want to use since not all the openings of the tubes are on the top. good for some, not for others...
part of this reminds me of how annoying it is to have people try to get into the elevator before everyone has gone out
and people from new brunswick and nova scotia
if it's not still day zero, don't call it a zero-day flaw.
sounds like if they were building cars, they would be trying to build them so that you couldn't use them to rob a bank.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_Law
the reason I say slow is because the percentage of travel is not for scenery (and to disagree about the "descent" trip times), myself and most people that I know do not take the train for the Toronto, Montreal, Ottawa and Quebec area because it adds no benefits to taking the car. There is no way it could be cheaper so the only benefit would be speed, and it doesn't exist. I would take it all the time if it were one hour to Toronto from Montreal.
and slow...
well you know you can get red hat for it. and if you look up their other offerings, they do have real supercomputers with a modified BSD.
when you're looking for the bathroom in the wrong place dylsexia