Slashdot Mirror


Nokia Leaks Phone With Full GNU/Linux Distribution

An anonymous reader writes "It is now clear why Nokia has been so slow with S60 updates: the upcoming N900 just left everything else in the dust. Unlike Google's Linux platform, Nokia is not intentionally breaking compatibility with real distros, choosing instead to bring you the unmatchable power of GNU/Linux on your phone. This is the most awesome device I have ever seen: MAP3 CPU/GPU, 3,5" 800x480 touchscreen, keyboard, Wi-Fi, HSPA, GPS; 5-MP camera, CZ lens, 32 GB storage, SD slot; X11, VT100 terminal emulator, APT package manager. Estimated price without credit: $780 (N.5800: $390, iPhone 3GS: $750). Developers should note that even though the current desktop is still GTK+, Qt will be standard across all Nokia platforms in the near future (less powerful phones will use Qt on the Symbian kernel). Users can download flashing software from Nokia, and patches can be submitted at the Maemo site."

621 comments

  1. Hmmm by El+Lobo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "bring you the unmatchable power of GNU/Linux". Cheesiest. Line. Ever. On /.

    --
    It's time to realise that Abble's products are the biggest abomination these days. Just say NO to the dumb iAbble way!!
    1. Re:Hmmm by dov_0 · · Score: 1

      The year of Linux on the mobile device?

      --
      sudo mount --milk --sugar /cup/tea /mouth /etc/init.d/relax start
    2. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bring you the unmatched power of GNU/Linux

      I just fixed that for you

    3. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hey, it doesn't do Windows!

    4. Re:Hmmm by V!NCENT · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "bring you the unmatchable power of GNU/Linux". Cheesiest. Line. Ever. On /.

      Just for the record: is there anything that you can name that can do more than Linux? Ever had an OS run on your wristwatch that was also able to run on the world fastest super computers, space exploration and operation critical medical hardware?

      Just curious...

      --
      Here be signatures
    5. Re:Hmmm by SilverEyes · · Score: 5, Funny

      "bring you the unmatchable power of GNU/Linux". Cheesiest. Line. Ever. On /.

      Just for the record: is there anything that you can name that can do more than Linux? Ever had an OS run on your wristwatch that was also able to run on the world fastest super computers, space exploration and operation critical medical hardware?

      Just curious...

      Batman can do anything.

      --
      Interesting.
    6. Re:Hmmm by br4nd0nh3at · · Score: 0

      Sounds like an advertisement for the Death Star.

    7. Re:Hmmm by nortcele · · Score: 0, Troll

      "bring you the unmatchable power of GNU/Linux". Cheesiest. Line. Ever. On /.

      Yup. It should have been just "Linux" instead of "GNU/Linux". (Sorry RMS... just had to stir the pot.)

    8. Re:Hmmm by eugene2k · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Ahh... so that's what Obama's secret identity is!

      --
      Apple has "Mac vs PC", Microsoft has "Laptop Hunters", Linux has recession
    9. Re:Hmmm by lsolano · · Score: 1

      The year of linux on the mobile desktop ?

    10. Re:Hmmm by SilverEyes · · Score: 1

      The year of linux on the mobile desktop ?

      It will be next year, I swear. For realz this time. Year after that, Microsoft will be bankrupt. Disclaimer: I Am Not An Economist

      --
      Interesting.
    11. Re:Hmmm by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      "bring you the unmatchable power of GNU/Linux". Cheesiest. Line. Ever. On /.

      But also very true --- in the mobile world at least.

    12. Re:Hmmm by Locutus · · Score: 1

      what I made of that was along the lines of it using a full GNU/Linux kernel and most of what you'd get/use on a laptop or deaktop. When you look at what's on all the other devices, you see they are something much less than what you get on your desktop. Apple's iPhone uses a special SDK although it's still Objective-C based, Google's JVM-ish platform, Microsofts WindowsCE based OS, Palms new WebOS, etc. The N900 appears to bring a standard Linux kernel, GNU utilities, and what's expected on pretty much any distro under the GUI. I think that has pretty much been the standard fare for the N8xx series but this time they stuck a GSM phone in it so someone decided to get cheezy with the description.

      I was surprised to see a comment that Windows Mobile was dead and that Microsoft has plans for trying to shrink Windows down to run on these and porting it to these CPUs. If they're targetting 2012, it'd probably be 2014 before it was anywhere near useful. And yes, I've heard Windows 7 works on "netbooks" but never have I seen it stated they were running the required anit-virus software and the one time I heard a user say he'd installed anti-virus he said Windows was unusable on his netbook. So, having "the unmatchable power of GNU/Linux" on a phone is pretty cool but not something people generally even think about since they've never had it on such a small device before.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    13. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Call me when you get full screen flash video working properly.

    14. Re:Hmmm by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      Seems similar to laptops and desktops so far, TBH. I've had a few chances to play with an OpenMoko phone running Debian - fun, but not exactly usable for anything that requires stability or a working system of any sort. The same goes for the stock OS on those things...

      Hopefully Nokia will do a better job, but somehow I don't think I should be getting my hopes up.

    15. Re:Hmmm by ant-1 · · Score: 1

      You. must. be. new. here.

    16. Re:Hmmm by V!NCENT · · Score: 1

      OK, give me your number and I'll call you yesterday.

      --
      Here be signatures
    17. Re:Hmmm by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Just for the record: is there anything that you can name that can do more than Linux?

      Slap Chop. Which reminds me, you're gonna love my nuts.

    18. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But can he run Linux?

    19. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BatmanOS, featuring the belt interface.

    20. Re:Hmmm by SBrach · · Score: 1

      Full screen flash and time travel? Impressive.

    21. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux is quite nice, but OS400, z/OS, VMS, and QNX are all better in their own ways.

    22. Re:Hmmm by V!NCENT · · Score: 1

      What the fsck are you on? Install Ubuntu, go to the package manager and search for flashplugin-nonfree, install it and your done :/

      --
      Here be signatures
    23. Re:Hmmm by Dragonslicer · · Score: 5, Funny

      is there anything that you can name that can do more than Linux?

      Chuck Norris

    24. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd wait for the Windows 7 Mobile phone coming soon to a Microsoft software and phone shop near you.

    25. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fsck are you on? Install Ubuntu, go to the package manager and search for flashplugin-nonfree, install it and your done :/

      And my done?

      (BTW, the time travel comment was because you said you'd call him yesterday.)

    26. Re:Hmmm by hao3 · · Score: 1

      the n97/nokia 5800 has a windows 3.1/95/98 emulator for it (uses dosbox). i'm not sure how well it works or what programs you can run on it, but it's there.

      --
      "Impartiality is a pompous name for indifference, which is an elegant name for ignorance." - G.K. Chesterton
    27. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a piece of corn inside his douche.

    28. Re:Hmmm by hawkinspeter · · Score: 1

      Outer space is only there because it's scared to be on the same planet as Chuck Norris

      --
      You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
    29. Re:Hmmm by msimm · · Score: 1

      "bring you the unmatchable power of MAN". Cheesiest. Line. Ever. On /.

      Sorry, but if Man can do more (that's human kind to members of the opposite sex) and it still sounds cheesy maybe the line is just...cheesy!

      --
      Quack, quack.
    30. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chuck Norris

    31. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you're referring to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I've recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.

      Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU which is widely used today is often called "Linux", and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU Project.

      There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Linux is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine's resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system is basically GNU with Linux added, or GNU/Linux. All the so-called "Linux" distributions are really distributions of GNU/Linux.

    32. Re:Hmmm by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 1

      Little kids wear Batman underwear. Batman wears Chuck Norris underwear!

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
    33. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except give birth and breast-feed.

    34. Re:Hmmm by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      The problem with Nokia is that they suck week old witches piss up a straw when it comes to software[1] but they don't realise it. S60 on the phone I have (E71) isn't brilliant (poor interface, random lockups) but for real craptitude try any of the accessory programs such as Nokia PC suite. The word "flaky" was made for it. Then there's Maps Loader which gave me lots of fun recently. Out of Beta my ass.

      [1] At least on the visible features - apps, GUI. Low level stuff like firmware and drivers I'm not so sure. Things do tend to work, more or less, if you can find where to configure them.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    35. Re:Hmmm by Zumbs · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bat OS?

      --
      The truth may be out there, but lies are inside your head
    36. Re:Hmmm by hao3 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      --
      "Impartiality is a pompous name for indifference, which is an elegant name for ignorance." - G.K. Chesterton
    37. Re:Hmmm by inKubus · · Score: 1

      Speaking of Supercomputers, can you imagine a beowulf cluster of the new N900's?

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    38. Re:Hmmm by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Sod off. I'm Batman. You're Spartacus.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    39. Re:Hmmm by pseudonomous · · Score: 1

      For instance, Batman can breath in space

    40. Re:Hmmm by drseuk · · Score: 1

      is there anything that you can name that can do more than Linux?

      No - even my mum admits that she required a third-party extension to instantiate me.

    41. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jay Miner

    42. Re:Hmmm by tsa · · Score: 1

      Strange, the only problem I have with S60 is that it's so slow... I have an E65 which is very satisfactory to me. But if I can get the N900 together with my provider of choice (I live in Europe so hopefully that won't be much of a problem), AND it can sync with the Mac as easily as my E65 does now, I don't need the iPhone anymore. The future looks bright!

      --

      -- Cheers!

    43. Re:Hmmm by tsa · · Score: 1

      The only underwear that will not blend!

      --

      -- Cheers!

    44. Re:Hmmm by centuren · · Score: 1

      "bring you the unmatchable power of GNU/Linux". Cheesiest. Line. Ever. On /.

      Just for the record: is there anything that you can name that can do more than Linux? Ever had an OS run on your wristwatch that was also able to run on the world fastest super computers, space exploration and operation critical medical hardware?

      Just curious...

      NetBSD?

    45. Re:Hmmm by hawk · · Score: 1

      >what I made of that was along the lines of it using a full GNU/Linux kernel

      Yikes!

      Now we're supposed to acknowledge GNU on the kernel, too? :(

      hawk

    46. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given that I have more than a dozen of them on my desk, yes (ranging from early macro-boards to identical-to-what-will-be-shipped prototypes)

      They suffer heavily from ineffective parallelisation due to slow inter-processor communication (point-to-point USB netowrk, or even worse - WLAN), and the FPU's sub-par too.

      But that was probably too much information, sorry to spoil your joke.

    47. Re:Hmmm by mikiN · · Score: 1

      Well, I can call you yesterday right now. Well, since you're an AC so I don't know your real name, I can call you anything. Let's do both :-)

      Hello yesterday, how are you?

      Hello anything, nice to meet you.

      --
      The Hacker's Guide To The Kernel: Don't panic()!
    48. Re:Hmmm by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Just for the record: is there anything that you can name that can do more than Linux?

      It would be nice if there were more than a few decent applications for it, though.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    49. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if the pieces "justifying" it being "named" GNU/Linux would even be installed on the default maemo - it's not like being compiled with gcc itself is sufficient to do a landgrab (unless they want to pretend it's GNU/*BSD and GNU/MacOS), glibc itself is iffy imo being made by the same people as gcc, and in this case it probably would use one of the alternatives. That basically leaves the shell and utilities, which in an embedded will probably not be coreutils but busybox, which is not part of GNU, and pretty much everyone (that matters to me that is) has bash lying around...

      Then again I don't really care about that nonsense, if they want to call something GNU/Linux, they can knock themselves out (but even GNUisance doesn't use the line), the OS I use are MacOS and Archlinux - and to a certain extent I could say Linux in the case of some of my embedded OS equipped tools which come with only the kernel and a few dedicated stuff over it, and actively call it linux as opposed to "Fedora Core" "OpenSUSE" or "Ubuntu".

    50. Re:Hmmm by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      There's an emacs mode for that!

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    51. Re:Hmmm by jon3k · · Score: 1

      I run Windows 7 (along with Fedora) on an HP Mini 2140 with AVG (free) anti-virus and it runs great, even better than XP I'd say.

    52. Re:Hmmm by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      As a porter of "desktop" games to linux-running portables, I can comfortably say that 99.5% of all floating point math in desktop applications is unnecessary. 80% of it works just fine with integer math, and the remaining can be done with a light fixed point library.

    53. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever had an OS run on your wristwatch that was also able to run on the world fastest super computers, space exploration and operation critical medical hardware?

      Oh god, don't stop... tell me more! [fap fap fap]

    54. Re:Hmmm by Locutus · · Score: 1

      screwy editing, I was typing along the lines of "GNU/Linux system" etc but then figured I'd try mentioning the kernel,, all the stuff above the kernel but below the desktop. I really sucked at that didn't I.

      lash me with a wet gnuddle, I deserve it for this.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    55. Re:Hmmm by Locutus · · Score: 1

      Isn't that one of those beefed up "netbooks" or better yet, small laptop? From what I saw, it's got an Intel Atom (1.6 GHz), RAM installed is 1 GB, and it's got a 160 GB Hard drive along with a price tag over $500US. I know someone who bought one of the first HP "netbooks" and to get 4 hours of runtime he had to get this battery which stuck out the entire length of the device and across the bottom.

      So I'm sure there are a good number of "netbooks" which have enough power these days to run Windows with anti-virus after all, since Microsoft jumped in, the hardware has jumped considerably. The problem is, you lose what advantages were originally there, long runtimes, and light weight, cool running.

      but fair enough, I didn't spec what the others had and were saying they had performance issues. So the trick is to buy in the high end and you'll probably be able to run Windows with AV software and maybe something else for a few hours.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    56. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But does he run GNU/Linux?

    57. Re:Hmmm by V!NCENT · · Score: 1

      You're. *sigh* grammarnazi

      --
      Here be signatures
    58. Re:Hmmm by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      a third-party extension

      That's no way to refer to your mother's turkey baster.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    59. Re:Hmmm by willyd357 · · Score: 1

      No, I'm Brian of Nazareth... and so is my wife!

    60. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with Nokia is that they suck week old witches piss up a straw when it comes to software[1] but they don't realise it.

      I think this is one of the indicators that they are finally starting to realize it. The current phones have a great feature list, but a sucky UI, and these days (eg. Hero, iPhone, Pre) a beautiful and snappy user experience trumps dozens of nonessential features any day. IMO the only way Nokia can prevent it's intelliphone lineup from a slow death is a Maemo- and QT-based UI that's completely redesigned to make usability the (not "a") top priority.

      Myself, I'm currently very happy with iPhone GS after more than a decade of different Nokia models.

    61. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Chuck Norris"
          That is true. Chuck can also screw up politics, Linux can't do that....... :^|)

    62. Re:Hmmm by jon3k · · Score: 1

      We've also got about 30 HP Mini 1000s (1151NR to be exact) that we got from Verizon for $199 with contract (you can get the Ubuntu version from HP starting at $279). Exact same hardware, sold 4-5 hour battery life and the things barely weigh 2lbs and are less than an inch thick. They all run XP with Trend OfficeScan (which we use at $work) and they all run fantastically well. We started with a pilot program of 5 of them and now we can't roll them out fast enough.

      Also with our HP discount I only paid $408 for my HP Mini 2140 with an extra gigabyte of ram (2GB total).

    63. Re:Hmmm by jon3k · · Score: 1

      Also my HP mini 2140 is tiny, light and has great battery life, I'm still getting 3 hours and the thing weighs under 3lbs, and is all aluminum. It's a great little device. I've also got Fedora 11 running on it as well. Both run fantastically well on the little thing. It also runs cool ("cool running" as you put it). I even threw an OCZ Vertex SSD in it for a couple days just for fun. The only problem is that it's only SATA1 so I only got about 150MB/s reads and 110MB/s writes (far slower than the SSD is capable of) but it sure was snappy.

    64. Re:Hmmm by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      NetBSD?

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    65. Re:Hmmm by zukinux · · Score: 1

      is there anything that you can name that can do more than Linux?

      Easy, Chuck Norris!

    66. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I once installed Debian on Chuck Norris.

    67. Re:Hmmm by V!NCENT · · Score: 1

      You can even download pr0n with it so you can yerk of to that ;) Hahahaha :P

      --
      Here be signatures
    68. Re:Hmmm by AlexiaDeath · · Score: 1

      That's because Batman runs Linux. DUH.

    69. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It didn't last long, as he then reflashed himself back to his proprietary ChuckOS. Not over the network or from BIOS, mind you, but from the fundamental constants of the universe.

  2. Err, so just like the Pre? by QuoteMstr · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Pre runs a practically normal Linux distribution. Granted, all the applications are written in Javascript and not some compiled language using C, but I look at that as a good thing.

    1. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Presumably also it does not spy on you like the Pre does.

      Also remove the word 'practically'.

    2. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Firstly, if it only runs javascript applications as you say, then it's hardly any more of a "real distro" than Android is.

      not some compiled language using C

      There are other compiled languages besides C. There are a lot of them in fact...

      but I look at that as a good thing.

      I suspect from your previous comment that you are terribly unqualified to even understand the implications of what you're saying, or to make that comment at all.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    3. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by ultrabot · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Pre runs a practically normal Linux distribution. Granted, all the applications are written in Javascript and not some compiled language using C, but I look at that as a good thing.

      You realize that it doesn't matter if the device runs Linux when the development environment is locked down, right?

      You don't have to hack C or C++ to make programs for this device either; PyGtk has emerged as the most popular programming platform for third party developers of Maemo software.

      What Nokia is bringing to the table is completely different from Android / Palm - it's a full, open Linux, no strings attached. You can develop software using the tools you want to use, instead of sticking to Java or Javascript.

      --
      Save your wrists today - switch to Dvorak
    4. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by digitalunity · · Score: 1

      I read there is going to be a new Palm(not a Pre) coming to AT&T later this year or next year. I'm hoping it will be much like the Pre, but more refined and it wont spy on me.

      Think I'm asking for too much?

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    5. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Firstly, if it only runs javascript applications as you say, then it's hardly any more of a "real distro" than Android is.

      Why?

      What's the difference between, Javascript as the language and HTML/CSS as the GUI, or using Python as the language and XML to do the GUI? And yet the first is "not a real distro", while the second is. Why?

      There are other compiled languages besides C. There are a lot of them in fact...

      Yes, but the real question is, "since when is being compiled a requirement?"

      I suspect from your previous comment that you are terribly unqualified to even understand the implications of what you're saying, or to make that comment at all.

      I suspect you're a language snob who dislikes Javascript for no rational reason.

    6. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1, Troll

      Wow, this got modded flamebait *seconds* after it was posted. *Seconds!* Some moderator has a real stick up their ass...

      I'd love an explanation of how this posting (which says I suspect someone dislikes Javascript for no rational reason) is more flamebait than the parent it was responding to (which says applications made with Javascript can't possibly exist in a "real" distro.)

    7. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by WaywardGeek · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      I'm really looking forward to writing cell phone apps in QT4. The way Apple, Google, and Palm have caged their apps into power-hungry slow interpreted virtual environments is crazy. It's a cell phone.... code should be compiled. Anyway, there's tens of thousands of great apps for Linux that would easily port if the phone companies allowed it. For example, I see that the espeak speech synthesiser was ported to Android, but to do it required a custom negotiation with Google! You can't just port C apps to Android, iPhone, or Palm Pre... you need special permission. Similarly, all the great close-sourced apps, like speech recognition and high-end GPS navigation, are all compiled apps and require negotiated contracts for support on the phone. All we geeks get to write are pretty interpreted interfaces that call the pre-compiled stuff.

      OpenMoko was on the right track with their Linux phone. Unfortunately, the company behind it is more paranoid than Apple, and has sucked all the fun out of developing for that platform. I think the concept of free, open-source software must translate to "innovative way to suck a few bucks out of geeks" in Taiwan.

      --
      Celebrate failure, and then learn from it - Nolan Bushnell
    8. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by e70838 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would like to give an answer, but this would remove all my hopes to recover a better karma

    9. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 4, Informative

      The distinction between "full distro" and "non-full distro" is one that the slashdot summary defined, and is not nessesarily something that I agree with.

      That said, the summary makes it pretty clear that it's using the term to make a distinction between a phone that uses a traditional userland and interface, and one with a custom-ish one that doesn't really support "native" (poorly defined, I think most people understand what it's trying to say though) linux applications. I'm not trying to inflect my believes here.

      I suspect you're a language snob who dislikes Javascript for no rational reason.

      I never said anything was wrong with javascript, I'd be unqualified to properly insult it even if I wanted too. Your insulting assumption is I assume the reason you're modded flamebait.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    10. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sir_Lewk has fanbois in powerful places eh?

    11. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by pedestrian+crossing · · Score: 1

      HOLY WAR!!!

      --
      A house divided against itself cannot stand.
    12. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by samkass · · Score: 1, Informative

      You seem to have a significant mis-understanding of iPhone software. The iPhone is based on a C kernel with an Objective-C interface/library layer. Both of those languages are compiled languages. All third party "native" apps for the iPhone are compiled Objective-C apps. The compiler is gcc, and the target is either x86 for the emulator or ARM for the iPhone. And Objective-C on the iPhone allows the direct linking of C or C++ libraries.

      It's true that Apple locks down their App Store, but that's a separate business decision, not a technological one.

      --
      E pluribus unum
    13. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by QuoteMstr · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Is Firefox locked down because its interface is written using XUL and CSS? Palm is doing essentialy the same thing.

      The Palm contains no DRM. The native GUI toolkit is XHTML, CSS, and Javascript, yes, but that fact alone doesn't make it "locked down". If you need compiled code for performance reasons, you can write a browser plugin or use dbus to talk to a compiled daemon.

    14. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by FooAtWFU · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I take it you're not even interested in trying to make an app like the barcode scanner on my Google phone... which not only scans barcodes and QR codes and such, but does so with a real-time video view (instead of making you take a snapshot with the camera when you have it exactly right). Obviously not having those capabilities, even as a possibility, is a good thing.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    15. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You got modded flamebait because the certain mods don't give a shit what moderation stands for. You don't need to cry about it, it was basically moderation trolling.

    16. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Miseph · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      "What's the difference between, Javascript as the language and HTML/CSS as the GUI, or using Python as the language and XML to do the GUI? And yet the first is "not a real distro", while the second is. Why?"

      What's the difference between a semi-truck and a sportscar? That's what your question boils down to. Both can get you from point A to point B, but getting them there is going to be quite different. It's not that you couldn't move freight with a sportscar, it's just that a tractor trailer is much better at it... but if you're just going to the store and want the trip to go quickly and want to look cool en route, that sportscar is probably gonna be your best bet.

      "Yes, but the real question is, "since when is being compiled a requirement?""

      Since people started using languages that need to be compiled before they aren't just cryptic plaintext? If the best tool for the job is a language that needs to be compiled, then you'll have to compile or deal with a sub-optimal tool.

      "I suspect you're a language snob who dislikes Javascript for no rational reason."

      I suspect that you're a script kiddie who is under the mistaken impression that Javascript is the best thing ever because... um... it just is ok! There are things Javascript does very well, but that isn't the same as doing all things well.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    17. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by cicuz · · Score: 1, Funny

      .. Batman!

    18. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      You forget the best part.

      It's not locked to some "app store" with "approved apps"

      This alone will make it explode ahead of the iPhone and Andriod phones.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    19. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      The N900 is not comparable to firefox. It is comparable to a Thinkpad, that fits on your pocket, and is also a cell phone.

      I don't have time to learn some one-off development environment that the folks at Palm thought was cool. I use standard POSIX/GNU/Linux for software I develop. If that software will run on my phone with minimal porting effort, that would be very cool.

    20. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      The distinction here, as I see it, is mainly a stylistic one. (certianly nothing to get all uppity and offended about)

      On so called "full distro" phones (not my term, slashdot summary said it) you don't need to "write a browser plugin or use dbus to talk to a compiled daemon." On so called "full distro" phones, your GUIs don't have to be javascript or CSS or whatever, they are just standard X applications (the full distro runs X11, as noted in the summary).

      In other words, I wouldn't call firefox "locked down", but if I were to compare it with, say, ubuntu then I would be willing to assert that ubuntu was a more "full" development platform.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    21. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by QuoteMstr · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see you run something like Emacs or Wireshark on a phone anyway. The user interface constraints of a phone will practically require you to rewrite a GUI anyway. As for non-GUI code: that runs just fine on a Pre. Remember: it's just a normal Linux system with a different GUI.

    22. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 4, Informative

      "What Nokia is bringing to the table is completely different from Android / Palm - it's a full, open Linux, no strings attached. "

      Android is a complete linux distribution that uses a different Window Manager and has a well defined consistent Object Oriented development platform. You can hack root on the T-Mobile G1, for example, and then install any Linux binary you care to build against the FOSS source code that you can download and build at will. Furthermore, to write applications which leverage the Androids advantages all you need is a PC and there is no need to jailbreak at all. The consistency in behavior one observes regardless of the application installed from the Android Market is a direct consequence of this enforced development consistency. Android rocks !!!

      (I believe they are adding C/C++ support at some point in the relatively near future IIRC)

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    23. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      Firefox is written in C++. That their interface description are written in a purpuse build script-like language is just a design separation. Look at it this way: You couldn't make a new Firefox on pre, because it requires compiled C++.

    24. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by V!NCENT · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As much as I would like to see that happen; history shows that whoever is best at marketing, wins. I'll spare you the examples, because otherwise I would be modded down for (-1, incomfortabl- errrrr.... trolling or flamebaiting.

      --
      Here be signatures
    25. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he was refering to the palm pre you stupid idiot

    26. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by diamondsw · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, but the real question is, "since when is being compiled a requirement?"

      Ever since performance or memory usage has been. And thus always will.

      --
      I don't know what kind of crack I was on, but I suspect it was decaf.
    27. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, maybe I missed it, but where, exactly, in the summary does it say that Javascript apps can't be part of a "real" distro? In fact, the only definition I can see in the summary is that Nokia's "real" distro doesn't purposely break compatibility with standard desktop apps. That's it.

    28. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      I suspect you're a language snob who dislikes Javascript for no rational reason.

      Tried to mod you "-1 - You've got to be kidding" but it doesn't seem to be an option.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    29. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 0

      And yet both semi-trucks and sportscars somehow share the exact same freeway.

      (BTW, which one is Javascript?)

      I never made the claim that Javascript was appropriate for all apps- you came up with that little gem. But that doesn't change my point: an app made with Javascript is as "real" as an app made with anything else.

    30. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      FLAMEBAIT!!? Or pure ignorance? .NET is not a native app environment. And guess what? Microsoft banned all benchmarks for it because it is SLOW. *Compiled*, *native* apps run almost always faster than some non-compiled crap. Saying "fsck compiled apps - I only care about by (insert favourite interpreted lang here)" is either flamebait or ignorance.

      You can get sooo much more out of a phone if you only run native apps on the slow ass processor without draining the battery completely. If you really want examples, please write an implementation of some MPEG4 codec in Javascript and then we'll compare it to execution speed for a C implementation. I suspect you may have trouble running the Javascript decoder anywhere in real time.

      Cheers!

    31. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pre uses a package manager? News to me.

    32. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by abigor · · Score: 0

      1. iPhone apps are compiled, as someone else noted. Objective C is a nice language. You don't need special permission to port apps to the iPhone - what on earth are you talking about?

      2. Android's environment is not slow or interpreted (JIT compilation) - not sure about power requirements, but they obviously aren't crazy. Second-guessing Google's Android team is really foolish. I guarantee you that they are way smarter than you are.

    33. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 2, Insightful
      There are many, many more mobile java apps out there that don't require porting between platforms, because they're already on a standard platform. On the blackberry, speech recognition, GPS navigation, et all are all in java - and perform very well. Why have to make a custom compiled port for each platform, when you really can just "write once, run anywhere"? Not to mention the key word in your anti-"interpreted" diatribe: "closed". The supply of open source compiled apps for mobile devices is much smaller than J2ME/et al.

      That being said: google/android just gives all that the big fat middle finger by not supporting the java mobile standards in the interest of establishing themselves as a standard. Ridiculous.

    34. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by SerpentMage · · Score: 4, Interesting

      While I tend to agree with you, the issue here is that Nokia is not exactly a company that can't market. If this were say Samsung, then maybe you have a point.

      I own Nokia shares and let me tell you I am bleeding! But I have not given up hope. And right now I am looking for a smart phone. And this is THE PHONE!

      I wrote a blog entry where Nokia is about to tap into something that all of the other vendors are missing.

      Imagine a world where your phone is your server. Imagine for a moment where your server is your life and tagging everything as you go along. Imagine for the moment where the phone would sync with the telco and distribute your data. THIS IS BLOWOUT THINKING!

      The iPhone and Pre can't do this because they don't allow server processes. The Android could do this, but Nokia is targeting this 100%. From what I see Nokia is creating a cloud of mobile devices. Android assumes your data is somewhere in the cloud. I personally would prefer having my cloud in my pocket and letting others access it.

      I know with this new Nokia device I will use it as my life and blood. That's where I will store my documents, etc, etc.. And when I need it on the road? Its there. Don't like the screen size, Wow, I remote window into the device...

      We are about to embark on a new computing platform and I am for it...

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    35. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      The same was said of compiled assembly vs. hand-written assembly.

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    36. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by tepples · · Score: 1

      If the best tool for the job is a language that needs to be compiled

      I think part of the point is that dynamic interpreted languages like Python and JavaScript are usually "good enough" for the kinds of apps seen on a phone.

      Another thing to consider: An interpreted or bytecode-compiled language is usually easier to sandbox. That's why phones allow Java ME apps but use a major-publishers-only policy on BREW apps, and why the Xbox 360 allows XNA apps in Creators Club but uses a major-publishers-only policy on C++ apps.

    37. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by morcego · · Score: 1

      I just can't imagine any reason for Javascript on this one. One of the reasons for javascript (and web based Java) is so the application will run on the client, not on the server (yes, I know about ssjs etc). Why would anyone use it on a platform that is both the server and the client ? Sorry, it really sounds stupid to me.

      --
      morcego
    38. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Dan9999 · · Score: 1

      he never said it only runs javascript applications. what the hell does being a "real distro" have to do with what language the apps are written in? I suspect from your comment that you are terribly unqualified to even understand the implications of what you're reading, or to wake up in the morning at all.

    39. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by quercus.aeternam · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ok, I'll bite.

      Your shocked dismay at being modded flamebait is entirely irrational, as you are entirely misrepresenting what Sir_Lewk said.

      He did /not/ say that 'applications made with Javascript can't possibly exist in a "real" distro.' He said that any Linux offering that limits itself to /one/ language cannot be considered a full distro.

      That is debatable - but I very much empathize. IMO, a fundamental feature of Linux is its openness, which allows me to do whatever I please on my hardware (even run ancient COBOL apps - though some work would be required) with minimal effort.

      ---------------

      Now, to your previous post:

      Sir_Lewk is mentioning that both Palm's Web OS and Android are castrated distros.
      Nokia's offering is /not/ arbitrarily limited by language - which is a huge boon to development. If you want an already existing application, you don't need to rewrite it from scratch in whatever language, you /port/ it.

      As to "since when is being compiled a requirement?", consider this: who would to convert a compiled language into an interpreted one? If you want platform compatibility, you /port/ the compiler. Being compiled is a requirement if you don't want to attempt to convert a language /designed/ for compilation into an interpreted one.

      As to your ad hominem attack on Sir_Lewk, it lends you absolutely /no/ credibility.

      ---------------

      I have now explained what you have requested. IMHO, your posts easily fall into the realm of flamebait. You are not worth another explanation unless you can demonstrate understanding.

      I wish you the best of luck.

    40. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It doesn't and nor do I. It's entirely in your overreactive imagination. If I were a phycologist I'd make some sort of claim about your mind fabricating things because it has some sort of fruedian ax to grind. Wants to feel like a martyr or something. Thankfully I don't beleive in that psuedo-science crap so I'll assume you're just dense and try to explain it slower this time.

      Nokia's "full distro" doesn't break compatibility with standard desktop apps because it doesn't make you use Javascript. Javascript driven GUIs could certianly be part of a so called full distro, provided other types of applications are also possible.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    41. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by SilverEyes · · Score: 1

      I thought computers were generally better at optimizing than humans these days. Certainly are at least faster :P http://wesnerm.blogs.com/net_undocumented/2005/06/human_vs_comput.html I realize it's contested, anyone have any more recent actual research or papers?

      --
      Interesting.
    42. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by SilverEyes · · Score: 1

      I had no idea phycology was pseudo-science! That pond scum is obviously the work of some alchemy or witchcraft!

      --
      Interesting.
    43. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by introspekt.i · · Score: 1, Funny

      Just get modded "Funny: 5". That's your first class ticket to good karma. Insightful and Informatives are hard to get and you should only reach for them if you know spot on what you're talking about.

    44. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Miseph · · Score: 1

      "And yet both semi-trucks and sportscars somehow share the exact same freeway."

      Why should the pavement care what sits atop your tires? And don't forget about all those tractors, go-carts and even bicycles that people use to get around on the small dirt roads and paths they sometimes need to take to make it the rest of the way.

      "(BTW, which one is Javascript?)"

      Neither. Both. Whatever. It's just an analogy, and if the Slashdot Analogy Rules didn't require it to be car-related, I would have stuck with hand tools (Q:"Is Javascript a hammer or a screwdriver?" A:"Neither, it's a pair of needle nose pliers.") instead, since frankly I think that would have been more appropriate.

      "I never made the claim that Javascript was appropriate for all apps- you came up with that little gem. But that doesn't change my point: an app made with Javascript is as "real" as an app made with anything else."

      You certainly implied it. Suffice it to say there are just as many reasons not to code your web-page in C as there are not to code your kernel in CSS. I'm sure that you could find a way to do either if you really tried hard enough, but ultimately it just won't work very well because you're using the wrong tools.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    45. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't know why decided to ignore what I wrote and jump to your own conclusions about what I thought in the first place.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    46. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Miseph · · Score: 1

      And I think that some people don't care what their cell phone manufacturer/carrier think is best for them or why they think that, don't want to settle for "usually good enough", and are excited about the idea of simply running whatever the hell they want without any artificial restrictions on language or scope. It's not a matter of Python or JavaScript not being the best options for certain things, it's a matter of having options beyond those for the things they aren't very good at.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    47. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by ebuck · · Score: 1

      So if I never compile my machine code, the performance or memory usage must suck?

      Setting the performance and memory usage requirements down as requirements, instead of discovering what they are after the fact, is what makes code work fast with little memory. It is very rare to find a platform that's so messed up it cannot perform quickly with little memory. When you do find such a platform, odds are it was provided by a third party who didn't give a hoot about performance or memory consumption.

    48. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Calithulu · · Score: 1

      Of course it is a pseudo-science. Why do you think Xenu supports it?

    49. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by schon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's not locked to some "app store" with "approved apps"

      Neither is Android.

      This alone will make it explode ahead of the iPhone and Andriod phones.

      iPhone perhaps, but Android has no restrictions on installing non-market apps. Market is a convenient place to get new apps, but if you want to install from somewhere else, you're perfectly free to do so.

      Perhaps you need to update your propaganda?

    50. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Alef · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, the fact that you can hack a some Andriod based phones doesn't exactly make the platform open in that respect. Furthermore, if I am to write software and share it with people who are not geeks and/or care for their warranty, I have to stick with the API:s provided in the "stock version".

    51. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by edivad · · Score: 1

      What Nokia is bringing to the table is completely different from Android / Palm - it's a full, open Linux, no strings attached. You can develop software using the tools you want to use, instead of sticking to Java or Javascript.

      Exactly. I only hope they won't get caught in the AAPL and GOOG trend of locking down devices, later in the path.
      IMO the way Nokia is approaching these new devices is the right one, from a Development POV and from a Freedom To Use POV.
      If they'll play their marketing cards correctly, we might have a very serious competitor to AAPL and GOOG, in the mobile space.

    52. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by sorak · · Score: 1

      The Pre runs a practically normal Linux distribution. Granted, all the applications are written in Javascript and not some compiled language using C, but I look at that as a good thing.

      You realize that it doesn't matter if the device runs Linux when the development environment is locked down, right?

      You don't have to hack C or C++ to make programs for this device either; PyGtk has emerged as the most popular programming platform for third party developers of Maemo software.

      What Nokia is bringing to the table is completely different from Android / Palm - it's a full, open Linux, no strings attached. You can develop software using the tools you want to use, instead of sticking to Java or Javascript.

      Yep. I am so excited, I can't wait to buy one of those at the Verizon store...

      CRAP! Well, it sounds like a great product. Too bad that there's no way in hell my provider is going to allow me to use one.

    53. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by hotchai · · Score: 1

      which one could be running wesnoth in the future?

      Forget the "future". Maemo already runs Wesnoth, and quite well at that.

    54. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      hardly any more of a "real distro" than Android is.

      While an argument can certainly be made that loading Android onto a device isn't quite the same as putting something like Ubuntu on it, do give it its due.

      I've written several useful little programs in python with this. Also, while you do have to jump through a few hoops, you can always do this and use any programming language you want. It works pretty good on my phone and the lack of an X server is taken care with the handy vnc client found in the market.

      Not saying that Android deserves to be spoken in the same breath as what's usually considered a full distro but, after a little work, it doesn't have to remain as gimped as some people seem to think it is.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    55. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      The Pre runs a practically normal Linux distribution. Granted, all the applications are written in Javascript and not some compiled language using C, but I look at that as a good thing.

      How the hell is that a good thing?

      I mean, OK, I'm asking in kind of an inflammatory way there, but I am serious. To me, running interpreted code on an embedded device seems like the most retarded idea possible. How is it even close to a good idea, when running on a device with relatively slow CPU and limited battery power, to not optimize the code for runtime efficiency before you put it on the device?

      Pretty much the only things a VM buys you are architecture independence and a certain measure of protection against exploits. Neither one, IMO, ranks above battery lifetime or runtime performance. (I don't know if ARM supports stuff like non-executable memory pages - that would provide a lot of the same protection as interpreted code...) And in the case of WebOS it's not even a bytecode VM (or is it?) - it's interpreting textual program code...

      I've used PalmOS 5 for roughly the last six years. It seems like they've been stacking bad decisions (i.e. PACE) with more bad decisions (i.e. NVFS) - and now with WebOS they've made a clean start with some even worse decisions. It's mind-boggling, truly. At least it seems this time they are going to follow through with some good native code options...

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    56. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Simon80 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Firstly, if it only runs javascript applications as you say, then it's hardly any more of a "real distro" than Android is.

      Why?

      What's the difference between, Javascript as the language and HTML/CSS as the GUI, or using Python as the language and XML to do the GUI? And yet the first is "not a real distro", while the second is. Why?

      Nobody is putting words in your mouth, you really do imply this above, by questioning why the Pre distribution shouldn't be considered a "real distro". The Pre distribution isn't a real Linux distribution because you are unable to run applications that are developed to run on the Linux platform. Instead, you are forced to use the web-based platform that Palm has chosen to be the only way to develop apps for the Pre. By suggesting that the Pre distribution should be considered real, you are implying that it's acceptable to require all apps to be written using Javascript exclusively for the logic.

      I don't think you implied this intentionally. Rather, it looks like you simply have poor reading comprehension, at least in the context of this conversation. If you don't believe me, ask yourself why multiple Slashdotters are arguing with you about a couple of comments of yours.

    57. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      Also, while you do have to jump through a few hoops, you can always do this and use any programming language you want.

      Second sentence in my second paragraph should have had the link in it. Yay for previewing.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    58. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Simon80 · · Score: 1

      Go to the parent of your comment, and then go to the parent of that comment. At that point, hopefully you will realize that your comment was a mistake.

      Also, being a "real distro" has everything to do with what language the apps are written in. In a real distribution (i.e. a real general purpose Linux distribution), you can choose whatever language you want, as long as the footprint isn't too big for the hardware. If a system doesn't offer this choice, then it isn't really a Linux distribution, not in the sense that people care about.

    59. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by kamochan · · Score: 1

      And when I need it on the road? Its there.

      ...except when it's not, since someone's nicked it. Or the fat dude on the bus sat on it. Or you left it on the cafeteria terrace table and it happened to rain. Or when the sub-standard quality battery melted the device.

      Portable terminals need to be disposable, not contain your life (or blood IMHO).

    60. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by QuoteMstr · · Score: 1

      The iPhone and Pre can't do this because they don't allow server processes.

      Lies.

      quotemstr@castle ~$ ps -eo pid,cmd
          PID CMD ...
        1045 /usr/bin/PmNetConfigManager
        1046 /usr/bin/luna-prefs-service
        1051 /usr/bin/mediaserver -l --gst-debug=1
        1052 /usr/bin/rdxd -s
        1056 /usr/bin/hidd -v -f /etc/hidd/HidPlugins.xml --output-syslog
        1059 /usr/sbin/storaged -s -d
        1062 /usr/bin/uploadd -v
        1069 /usr/bin/provisioner
        1072 /usr/bin/UpdateDaemon
        1074 /usr/bin/PDFService
        1077 /usr/bin/OfficeService
        1078 /usr/bin/BrowserServer
        1085 BluetoothMonitor
        1089 /usr/sbin/audiod -n -1
        1108 /usr/bin/PmBtStack -C /dev/btuart -B 115200 00:1D:FE:38:C7:18 1 0x3afc 16888 1
        1143 /usr/bin/PmWanDaemon
        1147 /usr/bin/PmConnectionManager
        1159 /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5-palm/bin/java -Xexact -m 10M -Djava.library.path=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5-palm/
        1168 /usr/bin/LunaSysService
        1177 /usr/bin/extractfs -f /var/luna/data/extractfs
        1179 /opt/sbin/dropbear -g -F -p 222 -p 22
        1181 /usr/bin/fileindexer
        1183 /usr/sbin/powerd
        1185 /usr/bin/pulseaudio --log-target=syslog
        1187 /usr/sbin/memchute
        1189 /usr/bin/PmWiFiService
        1191 /usr/bin/LunaSysMgr
        1196 /usr/bin/dnsmasq -d -C /etc/dnsmasq.palm.conf
        1201 /usr/bin/pubsubservice
        1207 /usr/bin/TelephonyInterfaceLayerCdma
        1520 /usr/bin/PmBtEngine
        1601 pppd /dev/tts/modem0 file /etc/ppp/options-cdma mtu 1480
        1671 /usr/bin/LibpurpleAdapter
        1693 /usr/bin/locationadapter
        1698 /usr/bin/contextupload
        2549 /opt/sbin/dropbear -g -F -p 222 -p 22
        2582 -bash
        2694 ps -eo pid,cmd

    61. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by spotter · · Score: 1

      native code applications exist on the pre. the only thing that has to be created via html/javascript is the outer ui of the app. the inner ui can be implemented as a native browser plugin and do whatever native code can do.

      furthermore, any language that has dbus bindings, say whatever scripting language you want, can run in the background and communicate with the html/javascript ui that users see.

    62. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Simon80 · · Score: 1

      Sure, it runs just fine, but you have to go through hoops to run any such code on the Pre. Maemo allows any user to run native applications in whatever language, and installation is easy. See this for an example. If you have to wrestle with the platform in any way to run an app like pidgin, then said platform isn't a "normal Linux system" to any extent that would be considered exciting.

    63. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by QuoteMstr · · Score: 1

      Funny that you should mention Pidgin, because Palm actually uses libpurple, the Pidgin backend, for its IM backend. As for the front-end --- why the hell would you want to run the stock Pidgin GUI on a phone anyway?

    64. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Maybe one of these guys has mod points. Fortunately for you, a couple of these guys probably do too; bitching about bad moderation usually garners an "offtopic".

    65. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by QuoteMstr · · Score: 1

      Why would anyone use it on a platform that is both the server and the client ? Sorry, it really sounds stupid to me.

      Perhaps because Javascript is actually a decent general-purpose programming language.

    66. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by QuoteMstr · · Score: 1

      Pre uses a package manager? News to me.

      Yes.

    67. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Simon80 · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't, I certainly don't. The point is that a developer is free to port something like that with little effort (keeping in mind that most apps like pidgin won't happen to be included in the base system), and then publish it in a form that can be installed by even novice users of the device, without any arcane tweaking as a prerequisite.

    68. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Stele · · Score: 1

      You've pretty much guaranteed now that I (and probably many others) will spend the rest of our mod-points modding your posts in other discussions Flamebait. Have a nice day!

    69. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by RivieraKid · · Score: 1

      Except +1 Funny doesn't affect karma.

      --
      "Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves
    70. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Rebelgecko · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Funny doesn't count for karma. Otherwise, I would have made a joke instead of informing you of this.

      --
      CATS/Diebold '08- All your vote are belong to us!
    71. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      Nokia's "full distro" doesn't break compatibility with standard desktop apps because it doesn't make you use Javascript. Javascript driven GUIs could certianly be part of a so called full distro, provided other types of applications are also possible.

      I'm curious as to how much a PITA it's gonna be to compile new apps for this fone.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    72. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by quickOnTheUptake · · Score: 1

      Firstly, if it only runs javascript applications as you say, then it's hardly any more of a "real distro" than Android is.

      Why?
      What's the difference between, Javascript as the language and HTML/CSS as the GUI, or using Python as the language and XML to do the GUI? And yet the first is "not a real distro", while the second is. Why?

      Well, a few, but that doesn't appear to have been the point. The point, as I see it, is that if in fact the Pre is locked down so that only apps that are written in a particular interpreted language will run on it ("if it only runs javascript applications as you say"), then it is not a full Linux distro (" it's hardly any more of a 'real distro' . . .").
      It doesn't really matter what the interpreted language is; It isn't a matter of JS v. Python v. Perl v. Java. Rather it is the fact under that scenario a tremendous amount of linux software will not run on it without being completely rewritten in another language (to say nothing of the fact that whatever language you pick will probably not be well-suited for many of the programs).

      There are other compiled languages besides C. There are a lot of them in fact...

      Yes, but the real question is, "since when is being compiled a requirement?"

      Well, it isn't depending on what we are talking about, but to go back to the last point, being able to run binary programs is a requirement of a "full linux" just because so much linux software is written in compiled languages.
      Moreover the point he was picking was the odd way you described compiled languages. There are some languages that compile to C then get run through a C compiler, but these are a rather small and relatively insignificant class; Most compiled languages cannot be said to "use C". Saying that they are "written in Javascript and not some compiled language using C" makes you sound like you don't actually know what you are talking about.
      Which brings us to GP's last point which was that you actually appear to be clueless and incompetent to make the evaluation that you did.
      Now, I don't actually know whether the Pre is locked down so it will not run apps that aren't in JS, so I'm not commenting on the Pre itself; however, your comment does appear to state that it only runs JS apps, (". . . all the applications are written in Javascript . . .") and this is what the GP picked up on (". . . if it only runs javascript applications as you say . . ."). And in this respect he is absolutely right.

      --
      Mod points: Guaranteed to remove your sense of humor.
      Side effects may include gullibility and temporary retardation
    73. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by morcego · · Score: 1

      Not questioning how good javascript as a language is. However, you get a lot of overhead on a system with somewhat limited resources. So you have to add not only the interpreter, but also the browser and GUI, and that is a lot of overhead.

      --
      morcego
    74. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      My son chose vi.

      Emacs for life!!!

      Oh, come on, Stallman. The odds of emacs running on the new Nokia phone are slim at best. And besides, emacs isn't an editor, it's a religion. And on top of it all, I still like nano better, and with its small footprint, much more liable to run on that phone.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    75. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by quickOnTheUptake · · Score: 1

      I confused the GGP and P. Mea culpa.

      --
      Mod points: Guaranteed to remove your sense of humor.
      Side effects may include gullibility and temporary retardation
    76. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 0, Troll

      Awesome.

      Want me to pop you off an email whenever I post? It could give you a leg-up on all the other people rushing to mod me flamebait.

    77. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want others to access something in tour section on the "cloud" then the phone is not the place for information to be stored. Why would you have it there? It is connected to a device that has a poor intermittent connection. Also, the phone can be more easily lost. I think a better solution is something that syncs the data between a server and your phone. This way you always have the data even when you are out of service.

      If this is Nokia's strategy down the road, I say dump the stocks.... This can't be good.

    78. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Stele · · Score: 1

      Yes please.

      But really - can't take a joke?

    79. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by WillDraven · · Score: 1

      *ding ding ding* We have a winner! Sir Lewk wins by knockout in the 6th round.

      As reward you get this friend belt. Blakey Rat gets foe'd for being a meanie.

      (I know this is dumb, I'm sleep deprived)

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    80. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by supernova_hq · · Score: 2, Informative

      The N810 (N900 predecessor) already HAS wesnoth in the repos!

    81. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      You forget the best part.

      It's not locked to some "app store" with "approved apps"

      This alone will make it explode ahead of the iPhone and Andriod phones.

      Bullshit.

      The N800 has been able to do this for 2 and a half YEARS!

      I have an N810 and while it doesn't have a cell chip built in, it has full capabilities to pair up with a bluetooth phone and be used AS the phone.

      As much as I would LOVE this series of devices to beat apple, nokia's marketing is absolutely crap when it comes to their linux phones.

    82. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by johnny0099 · · Score: 1

      Portable terminals need to be disposable, not contain your life (or blood IMHO).

      How long does the average red blood cell last?
      120 days
      I haven't had a cell phone that's lasted less. Just don't forget to do your backups.

      --
      Get your dogma outta my yard!
    83. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      .NET code is JIT-compiled to native code, which then runs (Java does the same, by the way). It's not interpreted. The slowness comes from things like array bound checks, null pointer checks, and garbage collection - not from it being "non-native". And you can have all such checks in a compiled language just as well (case in point: D).

    84. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, as amazing as this sounds before you use your phone as a real mobile computer - one which you remote into to use - we need to make significant advances in battery life.

    85. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      You guys all miss the point, both with Pre and with Android.

      With either one of those, if Google or Palm decide to remove Linux and replace it with, say, BSD - or, for the fun of it, WinCE - tomorrow, nothing will change for you. That's why they aren't truly "Linux distributions" - in both cases, Linux is just an implementation detail, about which neither the end user nor the developer should care (or even know about).

      While this Nokia thing is Linux exposed directly as a platform.

    86. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Not to be a troll, but pointing out the particular logical fallacies in use like that gives you a real air of 'douchebag' - the same kind of feel that got Socrates his hemlock juice (well, that plus a good stubborn streak).

      I'm not saying your wrong... but generally that gives you a holier-than-thou or smarter-than-thou appearance.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    87. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by johnny0099 · · Score: 1

      Notice the Maemo 5 (Fremantle) Transfer & sync button on the bottom left:

      me syncy

      --
      Get your dogma outta my yard!
    88. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by johnny0099 · · Score: 1

      Death, taxes and what you said.

      --
      Get your dogma outta my yard!
    89. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      From an outside perspective it's hard to separate the wheat from the chaff...

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    90. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by oji-sama · · Score: 1

      Like laptop? Or mini-laptop? Or early insanely expensive mobile phones? Or even the current phones, whatever the price?

      And the quip about the battery quality? right....

      --
      It is what it is.
    91. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      native code applications exist on the pre. the only thing that has to be created via html/javascript is the outer ui of the app.

      Believe it or not, many thousands of Linux applications already have a UI, and very close to zero of them have their UI implemented in html/javascript. If the Pre can't use that existing UI, and thus those thousands of existing applications, then it's hardly a full distro.

      I suppose that if someone were to write a full Xserver in html/javascript, then it could be argued that the Pre, at that point, could easily become a full distro, but until that happens (and I'm not holding my breath), the argument that the Pre is basically as crippled as Android seems fairly sound.

      The fact that I can run a more-or-less unmodified Apache or Sendmail on my Pre is not a feature I find particularly useful or compelling, although I suppose it is, technically, an "advantage" of the Pre over Android. :)

    92. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by pseudonomous · · Score: 1

      if emacs could run on the supercomputers of the 80s, surely it can run on the mobile phones of today.

    93. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by quercus.aeternam · · Score: 1

      Thanks -

      It's good to get direct feedback - it certainly helps to see other people's perspectives.

      At any rate, thanks again, and have a great day!

    94. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Earthquake+Retrofit · · Score: 1

      I haven't been granted mod points in months. That must be why I'm feeling so much better these days.

      Steve

      --
      Fifty years of Yippie! 1968-2018
    95. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "You guys all miss the point, both with Pre and with Android."

      Oh the irony ! ROTFLMAO

      "With either one of those, if Google or Palm decide to remove Linux and replace it with, say, BSD - or, for the fun of it, WinCE - tomorrow, nothing will change for you."

      Evidently you think that completely sacrificing security, robustness, etc is equivalent to "no change". Also, your saying that running WinCE I can telnet in to the device and do a ps aux | grep myapp, etc. which isn't true.

      "That's why they aren't truly "Linux distributions" - in both cases, Linux is just an implementation detail, about which neither the end user nor the developer should care (or even know about)."

      If your a developer who doesn't think the choice of OS for which you develop is important (critical, really), then please improve the overall software quality level on the planet by choosing a different field of employment. Your assertion that it is not a "complete" Linux distribution implies that there is such a thing as an incomplete distribution. There is no standard, ISO or otherwise, that defines what does and does not constitute a "complete" Linux distribution.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    96. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      Have you seen how much disk space emacs takes up lately????

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    97. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Some moderator has a real stick up their ass..."

      By all appearances, you're the one getting the stick up YOUR ass! Stop sniveling, you whiney bitch!

    98. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Javascript Born to be wild!

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    99. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the most awesome phone ever!

      The are no comparable alternatives.

      I just bought an LG phone from Alltel, and it sucks donkey ass. The platform runs stupid Qualcom CREW? software which does not let you run any programs on it unless you pay.

      That is royally dumb.

      I want to be able to write my own programs and put it on my phone. And no, I do not want to pay some company so I can put it on there.

      Why is it that here in USA this shit happens:
      1) Phone is locked to 1 provider only
      2) Service is 4 times as expensive here than it is in rest of the world
      3) SIM card phones are not available (I assume those are GSM?) so you have to pay arm and a leg to switch to another provider
      4) Phones are locked down and the only way you can run your own software on them is to pay tons of money to the either phone manufacturer or the phone service provider

      You can do all of those things on phones in foreign countries (even old Nokias run .jar files - think Opera Browser).

      So, why in the hell this shit does not work here?
      And why is it so expensive?

      The only reason that I can think of is GREED.

    100. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Not to be a troll, but pointing out the particular logical fallacies in use like that gives you a real air of 'douchebag'

      Not a troll - that's an ad hominem.

    101. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nokia has 40 odd percent of the smartphone market. Apple has 15% or thereabouts and rising fast, Andriod has uh, s.f.a. What Nokia or Apple does in this market is significantly more important than Google for the time being.

    102. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by AlHunt · · Score: 1

      >Not to be a troll, but pointing out the particular logical fallacies in use like that gives you a real air of 'douchebag'
      >>Not a troll - that's an ad hominem.

      Maybe, but you should leave sexuality out of it.

      --
      1 in 4 Maine children in struggle with hunger.
    103. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Javascripts's not just part of the distro - it's one of the essential apps. Nokia Maps is basically ~100000 lines of .js source running over webkit.

    104. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Toonol · · Score: 1

      There is a loud segment of slashdot that just hates Javascript. It's not a bad language at all; much better than many in common use (say... PHP). The hostile moderators are unable to seperate a fairly decent language from the occasionally annoying uses of it.

      I see the same thing with flash. Actionscript 3, which is closely related to Javascript, is really nice. A lot of cool and interesting things can easily be done in Flash. But, some people think of "punch the monkey" ads, and assume that flash is a bastard child of a programming language.

    105. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by mikiN · · Score: 1

      if emacs could run on the supercomputers of the 80s, surely it can run on the mobile phones of today.

      ...or on a wristwatch (see post somewhere up tree). Only the watch will probably be so bulky it'll tear your arm off or make you look like an escaped convict.

      --
      The Hacker's Guide To The Kernel: Don't panic()!
    106. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Toonol · · Score: 1

      Thus proving him unarguably correct about you, Stele, having a stick up your butt?

    107. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Toonol · · Score: 1

      Ever since performance or memory usage has been.

      In other words, compilation isn't a requirement for 90% of applications. Performance and memory usage rarely matter, unless you're writing a game, video-editing, or other such really heavy software. And even then, memory usage can be sacrificed.

      I don't necessarily LIKE that, but it's the trend.

    108. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Toonol · · Score: 1

      You dislike Javascript for a rational reason? That's fine, I suppose; but it's rare. Most of the vitriol against Javascript is undeserved. Javascript gets the blame for the faulty way in which the web evolved. If javascript didn't exist, some other language or technique would be used to annoy browsers.

      Seriously... I suspect if Lua or Python had been incorporated into Netscape, everybody would be hating on those languages right now.

    109. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      not only that but you can get around nano without spending 3 years learning stupid shortcuts!!!

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    110. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      Being a real distro requires the ability to run apps in any language i want (e.g any compiled language w/ a compiler for my arch, or any interpreted language with an interpreter for my arch)

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    111. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      I would not consider firefox a full distro, if somebody produces an entire OS and the only interface i was given to interact with was writing firefox extensions and web pages, then yes i would consider that OS locked down!

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    112. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      because its my phone and i fucking want to! Just because its completely stupid, is not a good enough reason to not let me! Ofc the palm has a damn good reason to do this, because its not trying to be a full linux distro, evidently this is!

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    113. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Knytefall · · Score: 1

      you can use that too! you have your choice.

    114. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by pseudonomous · · Score: 1

      I got 84440 K, but that doesn't include depedancies; still you probably don't need the dependancies if all you want to do is edit text. Xemacs only takes 34448 K; I would think that if you compiled without X11 support, libsvg, libjpeg, ... and bunch of other options, you slim either of them down quite a bit more in addition. but I guess both are huge when you compare them to the 1144 K nano. but Xemacs in particular doesn't seem that bloated compared to a 29101 K vim w/o X11 support.

    115. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by shoor · · Score: 1

      I don't know what you mean by compiled assembly. Do you mean having things like having macros? To me, assembly is code where the programmer gets to express exactly what the machine's opcodes will end up being, and doing it symbolically so the opcodes don't have to be memorized. Also, doing other convenient bookkeeping like figuring out addresses. Macros don't diminish the ability to get that precision, at least they shouldn't.

      The difference between an interpreter and a compiler, as I understand it, is the interpreter has to convert the higher level code into machine code at the time you run the program, and do it every time you run the program, barring some sort of just in time caching of the just created machine code perhaps. So the interpreter is invoked and run every time the program is run, while the compiler is invoked only once to generate the machine code, and after that, only the machine code is invoked to run the program. To me that's a big, fundamental difference. There are advantages and disadvantages to each approach. An interpreter knows more about the environment at the time of execution for example, and can adapt to it. The compiler, on the other hand, can take longer optimizing since the code isn't going to be run right away.

      --
      In theory, theory and practice are the same; in practice they're different. (Yogi Berra & A. Einstein)
    116. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine for a moment where your server is your life

      For the majority of the readers, this shouldn't be too hard.

      this new Nokia device I will use it as my life and blood.

      Yes, yes.

    117. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by javajedi · · Score: 1

      N900 supports Flash. Pre doesn't.

    118. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by QuoteMstr · · Score: 1

      And you can have all such checks in a compiled language just as well (case in point: D).

      Don't forget SBCL.

    119. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by message144 · · Score: 1

      Um, have you actually tried getting root on the G1? Unless you have the older versions of Android or have the developer phone, it is now extremely difficult to get root.

    120. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by V!NCENT · · Score: 1

      I think that's a very good strategy; The cloud is awesome as long as a server is up or a company doesn't drop the service or if a company doesn't go bankrupt.

      That said; have all your docs and stuff stored in your phone and still be able to have a cloud.

      Besides, with current phones everybody has already stored their messages, phonebook, calander on the phone itself, so there is no extra worry about privacy, especially because you, yourself, are in charge of your data and not some company.

      Genius idea Nokia, if it wasn't for the fact that everything has already been working like this for ages. It can only be done if Nokia would make it an open industry-wide standard, otherwise this kinda tech would not catch on...

      --
      Here be signatures
    121. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You gotta be kidding me. Exposing lousy logic and specious arguments, which is what a real debate does, is somehow a negative? If so, all the trolls win and truth then has no more value than a lie.

    122. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by jamiethehutt · · Score: 1

      As much as I would like to see that happen; history shows that whoever is best at marketing, wins.

      Generally yes.

      But among my geek friends we're pretty interested in the G1, if only because it's a phone that might actually let us do what we want. And this, well I want this now, I mean even with my current phone I can't backup texts or phone numbers without a Windows system and some Nokia applications. This thing looks like I could write a cron job to back up everything to my server over SSH nightly. I want, I'm going to tell my friends, and that's pretty good advertising... ;-)

    123. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by randyleepublic · · Score: 0

      Got bad news for you. Nokia makes the best cell phones in the world, and for that they are doomed. "Best" = most reliable at transmitting and recieving radio waves. They drop less calls than any other brand, by a wide margin. That is why they are doomed.

      The carriers hate them. Drop less calls = more load on the infrastructure. The asshole carriers play a very nasty game where they dial down your service to just the level at which you are not actually at their office with a pitchfork. Then they oversell their capacity. Profit! Nokia throws their calculations all off.

      --
      Social Credit would solve everything...
    124. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Jyms · · Score: 1

      This form factor will not make it. Comparing my HP6915, N810 and HTC Magic (as partial laptop replacement):

      HP 6915
      The 240x240 touch screen is okay, except that most WM5 software is written for 320x240. The the device/keyboard can be operated with one hand. The OS (WM5) sucks, but despite this the device is usable and can replace a laptop for a lot of task.

      N810
      Awesome screen (800x600 touch screen). Nice OS (Meamo). Hard to use with one hand. Hard to use with two hands. Big and heavy.

      HTC Magic
      Decent screen. Nice OS (Android). Works well with one hand.

      The HP 6915 is ancient, so the HTC Magic wins easily, but the N810 places last.

      Remove the sliding keyboard and replace it with a proper usb port and vga out. Write a nice thumb pad. The screen is so big that you can even put it on the side in landscape mode. Alternatively, have a slide out thumb pad. Till then, my N810 will spend most of its life in a drawer.

    125. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have written apps for just about every smartphone out there, can't think of a BREW phone I haven't written for (which probably means nothing to you but this is your c code on most phones), iPhones, Android. High level languages are where it's at now. I can write an Android app in an hour that would take me 8 hours in c. And the Android app looks better. Welcome to the future where memory and processing power overcome the limitations of c style implementation. Don't get me wrong...it has it's place. Full 3D game's need c and c++, assembly reconstruction, the whole nine yards but most apps don't. Just my take from experience in the industry. Even this linux kernel uses Qt. Take it for what it's worth (Free...thx intrawebz).

    126. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      No, but pointing out the specific flaw "ie, ad hominem" makes one sound like they are a know-it-all. That's all that I am saying.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    127. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      It will be simply like iPhone I bet, gcc --target=arm etc. on Desktop/Laptop. It is not like they will be pushing to compile things on poor ARM which is never designed for such purposes.

      I think however, they may include gcc toolchain for PR purposes and people who accepts the "I don't need laptop, I have smart phone" lifestyle.

    128. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      Funny doesn't count for karma. Otherwise, I would have made a joke instead of informing you of this.

      However, your attempt at being modded "Informative" instead, has failed - you are modded "Insightful".

      And my post can be interpreted both as funny or informative, but "Insightful" wouldn't be too wrong, either.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    129. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by dwater · · Score: 1

      You can even run Python on S60/Symbian...

      --
      Max.
    130. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Urkki · · Score: 1

      Is Firefox locked down because its interface is written using XUL and CSS? Palm is doing essentialy the same thing.

      Hint: Firefox is not an operating system. Your question is meaningless as it is.

      But sure, a Firefox based device could be locked down, by crippling normal Firefox features (configuration, add-ons etc).

    131. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by Urkki · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see you run something like Emacs or Wireshark on a phone anyway. The user interface constraints of a phone will practically require you to rewrite a GUI anyway. As for non-GUI code: that runs just fine on a Pre. Remember: it's just a normal Linux system with a different GUI.

      Let me tell you, at least emacs can be used very nicely on a QWERTY phone, even in text terminal (putty/ssh or telnet or serial connection). Running it natively with GUI support could make it only better.

      Only problem with any real application would be screen size, many modern applications have been designed for a larger screen, and their UI just doesn't fit in too small screen (just resize an application on full PC and see how small you can make it before there are problems with layout).

    132. Re:Err, so just like the Pre? by gblfxt · · Score: 1

      android did add some c/c++ support in their NDK.

      http://developer.android.com/sdk/ndk/1.5_r1/index.html#overview

  3. Bah! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    About 6 months ago I bought an E71. As an ex Psion 5mx[1] user I'm really disappointed. It's buggy and has an incredibly clunky interface. Just my luck that they won't be bothering to fix anything. First Nokia I've owned and probably the last.

    [1] It ran EPOC, the ancestor of Symbian. Clean, simple, intuitive and reliable.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:Bah! by donstenk · · Score: 1

      I have had Nokia smartphones for 5 years and I agree with you. My last (until a month ago) is a E61i, great phone with a terrible and slow interface. Instead of buying the E71 or 97 I got an iPhone which, of course, is great but expensive.

      --
      Dennis Onstenk
    2. Re:Bah! by jewps · · Score: 1

      I don't know what kind of E71 you have but mine is awesome. Easily one of the best handsets I've used, and I have used tons over the years being in the industry and all (was anyways). The build quality, all the way to the speed and features, is top notch.

      Symbian isn't so good, but at least it is fast on the E71, some-what.

    3. Re:Bah! by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't know what kind of E71 you have

      How many kinds are there, you sarcastic prickdribble?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    4. Re:Bah! by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      I have E71 as well. It's crap. The difference between us is probably the fact that I have an iPod touch, so I know what my cell-phone could be like. It could have slick and smooth UI, it could be easy to use, it could have powerful apps that are dead-simple to install. It could be capable of playing back my media properly. I could have a web-browser that was actually usable.

      But no. Instead of that I have an UI that is about as advanced as Windows 3.1 was. I have crappy performance. I have an UI that I have to navigate with tiny plastic joystick. I have crappy plastic keyboard, which means that the screen is tiny. I have utterly useless web-browser (Of for Christ sake, I have to navigate a tiny pointer with the joystick so I could click on links!).

      Sure, E71 is the best Nokia I have ever used, And I have used Nokias since 1997 or so. Which, when you really think about it, is very, very sad. Nokia is the biggest in the business, and they have decades of experience in this stuff, and THIS is the best they can come up with?!?

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    5. Re:Bah! by halfhaggis · · Score: 1

      Opera Mini will make your crappy browser problems go away.

      Otherwise your points are sort of valid, but you could see how small the screen was and how plastic the keyboard was before you got the phone. So why'd you get it if they were so terrible?

      --
      "Write down your worries and then depress your companions by reading them out loud." - Eeyore's Little Book of Gloom
    6. Re:Bah! by sznupi · · Score: 1

      I think you'll looking at main Nokia business from a skewed perspective; Nokia 1100, 1202, 2330 classic, etc. are their main products, showing what they are capable of.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    7. Re:Bah! by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      Opera might give me a bit better browser, but it's still not nowhere near as good as Safari on the iPod is.

      Why did I get the Nokia? It was issued to me by my employer, that's why.

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    8. Re:Bah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Symbian isn't so good, but at least it is fast on the E71, some-what.

      The point the parent was making was that Symbian ought to have been good, since Psion's EPOC32 (and EPOC16 before that), on which it is based, was awesome; but Nokia managed to make it something that "isn't so good".

      And it was fast. EPOC on my 7.68 MHz Psion series 3a ran perfectly fine, doing all the things Windows CE clumsily struggled to do on much faster machines.

  4. Corrections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's not MAP3.. it's OMAP 3

    And the VT100 term emulator is based on gnome-terminal (at least it is in older maemo and I see no reason for them to have written a different one)

    1. Re:Corrections by Pepebuho · · Score: 1

      can it run VNC?

    2. Re:Corrections by MightyMartian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If it runs VNC and you can get a Remote Desktop-compatible client on it, I'm getting one.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    3. Re:Corrections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      can it run VNC?

      Sure, maemo is just a debian derivative. You can run anything on it.

    4. Re:Corrections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course. Also SSH w/ X forwarding, NX, RDP, and one or two others.

      Basically, if you can do it on a generic Linux/GNU/X/GNOME stack without some proprietary code (such as Skype) you can probably do it in Maemo -- they've made a real effort to do things right, with standard libraries and interfaces everywhere they're applicable.

    5. Re:Corrections by speculatrix · · Score: 1

      you can also run rdesktop client too. where have you been for the last N years?

    6. Re:Corrections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it runs VNC and you can get a Remote Desktop-compatible client on it, I'm getting one.

      get an openmoko for far less if you want VNC and a shell

    7. Re:Corrections by BikeHelmet · · Score: 1

      So it's basically a Pandora phone, rather than console? And backed by a huge company, which means mass production in the hundreds of thousands to millions.

  5. is it actually a phone? by Speare · · Score: 3, Informative

    I searched for the word "phone" throughout that linked article, and nowhere did it mention things like, oh, talking and listening and dialing. No "3G" or "GPRS" mentions either. The N810 and N800 and (N)700 Internet Tablet models look just like this, but WITH NO PHONE GUTS. A few screenshots look like they have phone features, but it really seems odd that a review/preview just doesn't even mention such obvious things. Maybe it's just Skype for all I know.

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
    1. Re:is it actually a phone? by Em+Emalb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      WHAT?

      Of course it's a phone, it runs Linux! :-P

      (I swear sometimes slashdot could post an article on a rat eating plant and if said plant ran linux it would be proclaimed the coolest thing ever.)

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
    2. Re:is it actually a phone? by radish · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well there's a screenshot of a dialler, and the status screen shows an IMEI number, so I'm going with "yes it is a phone" :) Nice hardware for sure, and open-ness is a benefit for us hacker types, but they need to work on that UI. Still, interesting!

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    3. Re:is it actually a phone? by steve6534 · · Score: 1

      You can actually see the SIM slot in it so it must be a GSM capable phone.

    4. Re:is it actually a phone? by mriya3 · · Score: 1

      in this image http://www.mobile-review.com/review/image/nokia/rx51-n900/pic24.jpg you can see a SIM card in its slot. So I would say it can actually be used as a phone. Plus you can spot a speaker hole next to the screen (on the left)

    5. Re:is it actually a phone? by quarterbuck · · Score: 1

      At a price of $750 it is more a computer than a phone anyway. BTW, the author did mention that this was not a review but just "first impressions" .
      I'll ignore the stupid summary and slashvertisement just for the fact that (s)he did not break the article into 10 sub-pages for page count.

      --
      http://slashdot.org/submission/1062723/Cheap-mobile-data-plan?art_pos=2
    6. Re:is it actually a phone? by proverbialcow · · Score: 1

      I searched for the word "phone" throughout that linked article, and nowhere did it mention things like, oh, talking and listening and dialing.

      That's because they want to gloss over the side-talking component. =) Plus, when they talk about the microSD slot, they only show it in a picture with the cover off...

      --
      The only surefire protection against Microsoft infections is abstinence. - The Onion
    7. Re:is it actually a phone? by hemanth.hm · · Score: 1

      Unmatchable power of GNU/Linux on your "phone", it says but what you are saying is the fact i feel. Linux stuff

    8. Re:is it actually a phone? by Efreet · · Score: 4, Informative

      To quote TFA

      "I thought it wouldn't make much sense to go through all features of the phone just yet - I'm not lazy, I just have to leave some bread for Nokia's announcement guys!"

      So I suspect you didn't read TFA very well.

      --
      This sig wasn't worth reading, was it.
    9. Re:is it actually a phone? by SilverEyes · · Score: 3, Funny

      As if an article on a rat-eating plant isn't awesome enough? I'm not really aware of plants that eat anything larger than insects or small amphibians.

      --
      Interesting.
    10. Re:is it actually a phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      HSPA is a form of 3G. So yes, it's a phone.

    11. Re:is it actually a phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it course it would, we finally had something to replace all the windows-running nuclear plants

    12. Re:is it actually a phone? by MynockGuano · · Score: 2, Informative

      I tried to RTFA, but apparently the author assumes that I spend day and night reading his website and know the story behind all his half-alluded-to technologies. The only bit of coherent information I was able to garner from that pile of misspelled words, glued together with condescension, was how great the author thinks he is for being all "insider" and stuff.

    13. Re:is it actually a phone? by Keruo · · Score: 4, Informative

      No it's not. Nokia doesn't call N-series devices phones.

      They are multimedia computers which have capability to make calls over 3G networks.

      N(700/800/810) were all marketed as internet tablets and had no phone capability to begin with.(beyond skype that is)

      This N900 is next gen internet tablet with builtin 3G. You can do much more with this device than you can with "normal smartphones" as it runs complete operating system.

      You can even install and run openoffice on this device.

      --
      There are no atheists when recovering from tape backup.
    14. Re:is it actually a phone? by amoeba1911 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Looks like it's the successor of N800 series, and new feature is the built-in phone and back mounted camera. I had an N810, and that thing is awesome. The 800x480 display really sets them things apart from other gadgets of similar size which resort to 320x480. It makes a world of a difference when you're browsing the web.

    15. Re:is it actually a phone? by AlecC · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    16. Re:is it actually a phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (I swear sometimes slashdot could post an article on a rat eating plant and if said plant ran linux it would be proclaimed the coolest thing ever.)

      Especially if the rat ran on Windows, or had a UI implemented using javascript...

    17. Re:is it actually a phone? by rotorbudd · · Score: 1

      Here's awesome. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/science/article6799283.ece Giant rat-eating nepenthes plant named after David Attenborough

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it, but artillery is addressed to " Whom It May concern"
    18. Re:is it actually a phone? by SilverEyes · · Score: 1

      Cool! After a little digging http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nepenthes_attenboroughii has a couple references to http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/122221934/abstract?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0 which seems to imply rodents are there by accident, just like they could drown anywhere. Apparently a rat was observed in the 19th century to be in a pitcher plant (on the article you linked), but this may be sensationalism http://www.cpukforum.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=33295&st=0&p=250762&#entry250762

      --
      Interesting.
    19. Re:is it actually a phone? by speculatrix · · Score: 1

      but you can install linux on a dead badger! http://www.strangehorizons.com/2004/20040405/badger.shtml

    20. Re:is it actually a phone? by SerpentMage · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Its a phone...

      Look at the image where it says: IMEI Address

      This is:

      Short for International Mobile Equipment Identity, a unique number given to every single mobile phone, typically found behind the battery.

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    21. Re:is it actually a phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My N800 has a dialer too, but it isn't a phone. It supports Skype and SIP and bluetooth connects to my $20 cell phone for data.

      iPhone fanbois (N800 has)
      - `apt-get install` for 1,000s of Linux apps, all free. There's a gui version too and you can add any repository that YOU like hosted on any web server.
      - multitasking - a current N800 easily runs 5 apps at the same time today including GPS, media playback, web browsing, xterm (w/ rsync in the background), and pidgin.
      - Swappable microSD memory - while running; N800 uses SD size and has 2 slots.
      - Flash has worked for 2 years
      - Skype has worked for 2 years

      This is a portable device, so how much more do you need?

    22. Re:is it actually a phone? by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      Uh, wut? Windows Mobile has pretty much moved to 800x480... just check out all the current HTC devices (Diamond 2, Touch Pro 2, HD and so on) or stuff like the Omnia Pro or Toshiba TG01...

    23. Re:is it actually a phone? by bitspotter · · Score: 1

      Did you happen to catch the GSM SIM card slot in the photos?

    24. Re:is it actually a phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That rat-eating plant doesn't run linux. Meh.

    25. Re:is it actually a phone? by i.of.the.storm · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure this one (N900) is actually a phone though. And uh, there are a bunch of N series phones, see N95, N96, N97, and I think some N80 series too. But I don't actually own any of them, although this N900 is pretty appealing. But in the end I don't think it would function that well as a phone, so I'd prefer to get a Palm Pre or Android device.

      --
      All your base are belong to Wii.
    26. Re:is it actually a phone? by jfanning · · Score: 2, Informative

      The site is from Russia and the articles in English tend to have rather interesting grammar and punctuation. So give them a break.

      Second, the site is well known for leaking pre-release Nokia models (among others). I have no idea how they do it or where they get the protos from, but they are good at it and they know their shit.

      If you followed the global mobile news you would know about mobile-review already. But most in the US don't know shit about anything except RIM, Apple and Motorola.

    27. Re:is it actually a phone? by jfanning · · Score: 1

      Uh huh. Except these Nokia devices had 800x480 screens several years ago.

    28. Re:is it actually a phone? by Keruo · · Score: 1

      See Nokias press releases: N95, N96, N97
      Here's one for N80 aswell since you mentioned it.

      See the pattern? All of them are called multimedia computers, not phones according to the press releases.
      Phone is something you can use to make calls, and perhaps send text messages.
      These things are much more than that, and Nokia doesn't market them as just-a-phone.
      N-series are computers with builtin phone capabilities.

      Who needs appstores when you can "apt-get install application" to your phone.

      Honestly, does any multimedia computer/smartphone function well as just a phone? Hell no. They all suck at it.
      But if you need a device you can just make calls with, you don't spend $500-1000 on it unless you're completely insane, or incapable of calculating what 24 month contract actually costs you.

      --
      There are no atheists when recovering from tape backup.
    29. Re:is it actually a phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I grow Nepenthes.

      Whilst it's never happened to me, I can confirm that they do at least catch, and decompose mice. See here for an example:

      http://www.hartmeyer.de/Bilder_allgemein/N_truncata_mitMaus_720.JPG

      The article the parent post RE: Nepenthes attenboroughii is misleading as it kind of gives the impression the ability of this newly discovered Nepenthes to catch rats is unique to this species. It's not, there are even bigger Nepenthes already well known, and in fact there is a popular tale amongst carnivorous plant growers in the UK that a zoo had some growing in a small monkey enclosure (the common name for Nepenthes is "Monkey cups" as monkeys have been known to drink from them). Unfortunately they had to remove the plants because baby monkeys kept falling into the pitchers and needing to be rescued so it seems likely that yes, they could even catch and hence kill some species of small baby monkeys.

      Nepenthes truncata is an example of a species that grows pitchers bigger than N. attenboroughii.

    30. Re:is it actually a phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it's not. Nokia doesn't call N-series devices phones.

      They are multimedia computers which have capability to make calls over 3G networks.

      N(700/800/810) were all marketed as internet tablets and had no phone capability to begin with.(beyond skype that is)

      This N900 is next gen internet tablet with builtin 3G. You can do much more with this device than you can with "normal smartphones" as it runs complete operating system.

      You can even install and run openoffice on this device.

      Actually, there are quite a few N-series devices that are phones:

      http://www.gsmarena.com/nokia_n86_8mp-2713.php - Nokia N86
      http://www.gsmarena.com/nokia_n85-2496.php - Nokia N85
      http://www.gsmarena.com/nokia_n96-2253.php - Nokia N96

      As the article said: "I thought it wouldn't make much sense to go through all features of the phone just yet - I'm not lazy, I just have to leave some bread for Nokia's announcement guys!"

      The reviewer is focusing on the non-phone hardware specs and the fact that this is the first Maemo-based smartphone that Nokia has released, and will go into the phone details after the official release/announcement.

      It's basically one of their Internet tablets with phone hardware added.

      Which is what I've been waiting for for a very, VERY long time.

    31. Re:is it actually a phone? by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Nepenthes attenboroughii.

      David Attenborough has rat-eating clones of himself now? The horror... the horror...

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    32. Re:is it actually a phone? by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      Good to know... I thought the person I was replying to was implying that 800x480 screens are currently exclusive to these devices. Thanks for clearing that up.

    33. Re:is it actually a phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh, it's Apple and Google with their 'smart phones' that lowered this standard of not running a 'complete operating system'. On Windows smartphones programmers and users have always been able to take full advantage of the device and the operating system.

      Maybe we should rename the Android and iPhone to just 'witty' phones and the keep the term smartphone for these awesome linux devices and the windows phones.

    34. Re:is it actually a phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look again at this picture: http://www.mobile-review.com/review/image/nokia/rx51-n900/pic22.jpg
      And this: http://www.mobile-review.com/review/image/nokia/rx51-n900/pic24.jpg

      Looks like a SIM slot behind the battery doesn't it?

    35. Re:is it actually a phone? by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      My Toshiba G900 windows mobile was bought several years ago and it has an 800x480 screen and full qwerty slide-put keyboard, can be programmed using the awsome visualc development environment, has wi-fi,3g and goforce5500 3d accelrator (same as in iphone) and runs any app I throw at it unrestricted. There is very new stuff little hardware that n900 brings to the table.

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    36. Re:is it actually a phone? by jfanning · · Score: 1

      GPS, 32GB of built in storage for starters.

    37. Re:is it actually a phone? by MynockGuano · · Score: 1

      If you followed the global mobile news you would know about mobile-review already. But most in the US don't know shit about anything except RIM, Apple and Motorola.

      Truth be told, I don't follow them, either. The summary leads one to believe there's an interesting technology article somewhere in there, but there really isn't anything of the sort (which is probably why I don't find mobile phones very compelling in the first place--for such a potentially-important class of technologies to be hindered by some inexplicable need to be tied to a phone service does not make sense to me).

  6. $800? by Lord+Ender · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How can you justify that cost? For $800, you could buy a netbook, a basic smart phone, plus hookers and blow.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    1. Re:$800? by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 4, Funny

      In fact, forget the smartphone and netbook...

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    2. Re:$800? by Neil+Watson · · Score: 3, Informative

      Miniaturization. I can't fit a netbook in my pocket. Close not quite.

    3. Re:$800? by andre_pl · · Score: 0

      What planet are you on? this seems pretty reasonable as far as smartphones go. granted IMO they're ALL ridiculously expensive. but this seems about on par with what I would pay for an android or pre phone. (Candian Citizen here, I can't even get my hands on a pre yet, and an android device will run me about $700 CAD) I've been saving up to buy a nice smartphone outright (dont want to get locked into an expensive data plan with rogers) and was trying to decide between an HTC android phone and a Palm Pre. but this looks like it might be a better fit.

    4. Re:$800? by greenguy · · Score: 1

      That's what I'm thinking. Well, not verbatim. I was actually thinking for that much, I could get a desktop computer, a netbook, and a cheapo cell phone.

      Really, this looks cool, but not $780 cool. Guess I'll wait for the N1000.

      --
      What if I do the same thing, and I do get different results?
    5. Re:$800? by couchslug · · Score: 0

      "For $800, you could buy a netbook, a basic smart phone, plus hookers and blow."

      Your ideas intrigue me, and I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    6. Re:$800? by SilverEyes · · Score: 2, Informative

      Your problem is that your pockets aren't big enough.

      --
      Interesting.
    7. Re:$800? by sardaukar_siet · · Score: 1

      Totally inaccurate: depends on the hookers and blow SO MUCH.

    8. Re:$800? by Anonymatt · · Score: 2, Funny

      You don't meet your hookers online and then call them?

    9. Re:$800? by Kagetsuki · · Score: 1

      If you subscribe to a service contract on most services they will subsidies the cost. I use Softbank (Japan), the cost of my phone in cash would be close to $900 if you converted to US currency, but it's completely free with my 2 year service contract (I have unlimited internet, cheap calling, and a variety of other services so averaging $450 a year is nothing). If I cancel the contract I pay the remainder. The same is true for the iPhone, I think I heard you get it for several hundred dollars in the US but without a service contract the device is outrageously expensive, no?

    10. Re:$800? by FudRucker · · Score: 1

      depends on how big your pockets are.

      --
      Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    11. Re:$800? by doconnor · · Score: 1

      One advantage is you only need one device in your pocket instead of a bunch of them.

      The other advantage is your netbook wouldn't be able to connect to the Internet through the cell network.

    12. Re:$800? by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      Is that a netbook in your pocket, or are you just happy to see me?

    13. Re:$800? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can you justify that cost?

      By buying it from $TELCO_AGENT, which will give you a nice disconunt? $780 is the "list price", not the price the consumer will pay (according to the summary, it's barely more expensive that the Iphone 3GS, at $750 "list price")

    14. Re:$800? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2, Funny

      How can you justify that cost? For $800, you could buy a netbook, a basic smart phone, plus hookers and blow.

      Thanks to the Communists in Congress we can only rent hookers now.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    15. Re:$800? by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 2, Informative

      How can you justify that cost? For $800, you could buy a netbook, a basic smart phone, plus hookers and blow.

      You must live in the US, where the cost of a mobile phone is heavily subsidized by multi year contracts for wireless plans. If and when Nokia's new model makes it to the US, expect to see it for $199 when purchased with a two year contract from your wireless carrier.

      --
      Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
    16. Re:$800? by maxume · · Score: 2, Informative

      They don't subsidize the cost of the phone, they build it into the monthly payment.

      It would be accurate to say that they are helping the buyer finance the phone, but they aren't doing it at a loss.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    17. Re:$800? by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      I'll wait for the N1000

      What, you wanted the one that will look for Sarah Connor? She ain't listed in the phonebook anymore since she got a cell phone. OTOH, her face is on MySpace.com...

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    18. Re:$800? by KeithIrwin · · Score: 1

      No, but you could get a SmartQ 5 MID (runs an Ubuntu derivative, also compatible with Mer). Those are $150 or so. That'll fit in your pocket and do the netbook stuff. Really, SmartQ 5 + less impressive smartphone sounds pretty much equivalent to this, and way cheaper.

    19. Re:$800? by maxume · · Score: 1

      Unless you happen to buy one of the netbooks with such functionality, or can share your phone's connection over Bluetooth.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    20. Re:$800? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problem is no existing netbook has anything like the battery life of one of these. This is mainly because the generic linux offerings have terrible power management, while nokia tend to actually fix it for their hardware.

    21. Re:$800? by zero0ne · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking:

      netbook + verizon USB wireless card + bluetooth headset.

      Then all you need is Skype or whatever.

      That would work right???!

    22. Re:$800? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's only $30 more than an iPhone.

    23. Re:$800? by Thaelon · · Score: 1

      It's about the same as an iPhone 3GS and those are selling like hotcakes.

      Also, netbooks don't' fit in your pocket or connect to most wireless carriers. Bear with me, this is kinda long, but has a point...

      I for one, love my iphone. It's so powerful as to be a near-pocket computer and doubles as a really good phone and MP3 player, with a very nice camera by phone standards (I've taken worse pictures with digital camera, often). It's basically the all-in-one device I've been waiting for that's fast enough to not be painful, with a capacitive touch screen that's got a truly amazing smudge resistant coating. The smudgy mess on those N900 pictures looked downright awful. As I look down at my iphone sitting on my desk right now the display is literally gleaming without a mark on it. Just from having it in my pocket for 2 minutes.

      All of this awesomeness makes me wonder if Nokia can truly rival it. I have an N810 and really loved it...until I got my iPhone. Now it's collecting dust despite how much I loved it as an ebook reader. The hassle of finding and converting ebooks to a format it can read is generally outweighed by the convenience of the kindle iphone app and the fact that I can get new, scifi/fantasy titles via Amazon. I don't *like* the fact that they're DRMed to hell & back, and the kindle reader app sucks horribly compared to the customizability of FBReader, but overall the iPhone wins out.

      All of that for $700, or $200 and a 2 year wallet parasite. And if the N900 can rival the iPhone on functionality and usability with about the same price tag? I'm *very* interested.

      --

      Question everything

    24. Re:$800? by idontgno · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ah, tethering. You forgot to add "as long as your cell provider isn't a money-grubbing pig about it." (i.e., disallow it unless you pay them more per month).

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    25. Re:$800? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only there were some larger, removable pockets that one could attach externally. Perhaps held on with some sort of carrying strap that could be worn over the shoulder?

    26. Re:$800? by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "Problem is no existing netbook has anything like the battery life of one of these."

      Wait and see. What's the battery life of your average smartphone when a data connection is active? Two/three hours max? You can get that on a netbook too.

    27. Re:$800? by SilverEyes · · Score: 1

      Nah, that would never work. It would be too easy for others to steal from them without some kind of zipper. Even then, the zipper would break easily enough. Further, people could just take them outright as it would be uncomfortable to wear such a sack while napping.

      --
      Interesting.
    28. Re:$800? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it's not locked to any carrier, and unlocked phones tend to cost a lot more than locked ones, but the cost of freedom is always high...

    29. Re:$800? by sorak · · Score: 1

      And did you notice that the iPhone is only $30 dollars cheaper? Cell phones are ridiculously expensive. The only reason we get out of the store with one for less than $350 is because the cost is subsidized by the provider and then made up over the next two years.

    30. Re:$800? by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      How can you justify that cost? For $800, you could buy a netbook, a basic smart phone, plus hookers and blow.

      Hm, really? Your mom must have lowered her rates...

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    31. Re:$800? by Tolkien · · Score: 1

      Fuck the cost. Based solely on the slashdot summary, I feel this is the kind of phone that is near impossible to force into planned obsolescence. That alone to me makes the cost worthwhile because I wouldn't have to buy a new phone every year.

    32. Re:$800? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And mine aren't deep enough.

    33. Re:$800? by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 1

      I agree. However, it's cool to think that in 2-3 years I could buy a phone such as this for about $150, and run any software on it that I like.

      I hope we're reaching the point of diminishing returns, where there just isn't much left to add to a phone that people actually want. Then perhaps the service providers will have to start competing on cost of the contract rather than shininess of the phone. (Yeah, I know, good luck with that!)

    34. Re:$800? by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      I have a Vodafone UMTS subscription. Theoretically, according to the TOS, I am not allowed to tether it. However, how are they ever going to prove that I loaded a webpage over Bluetooth on my laptop, or straight on the phone? The HTTP request looks the same from their end.

      Mart

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    35. Re:$800? by i.of.the.storm · · Score: 1

      That price is unsubsidized. If you noticed, it has the unsubsidized iPhone price right after, which is $750 apparently. All phones cost much less after carrier subsidies.

      --
      All your base are belong to Wii.
    36. Re:$800? by jfanning · · Score: 1

      How can they justify the price of an iPhone? The 3GS is much more expensive than that if you buy it unlocked.

      Of course you do realise that Nokia always listed the unlocked price unlike Apple and AT&T who have seemed to have convinced the entire US population than an iPhone only costs $199.

      This will be even cheaper than the Nokia N97. In Finland the full retail price of the N97 is 620 EUR. An iPhone 3GS is 1100 EUR. So, considering the N900 is the same platform (OMAP3) as the iPhone I think Apple is gouging you a little...

    37. Re:$800? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your problem is that your pockets aren't deep enough.

      There, fixed that for you.

    38. Re:$800? by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      1) It's a luxury device that will be subsidized in the US.
      2) It's a very small form factor, and could be handy in lots of non-traditional cellphone places. My Subaru Legacy has an optional (expensive) navigation unit; I was thinking about building a Carputer from ARM like stuff, and this looks to be about perfect, and probably cheaper. Added carphone tech is a bonus.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    39. Re:$800? by dwater · · Score: 1

      Right, I had this same thought - how can they tell in order to do anything about it?

      --
      Max.
    40. Re:$800? by idontgno · · Score: 1

      By crippling the phone. But a lot of savvy users (e.g.., /.ers) will avoid phones like that. Unless it's an iPhone. They'll eat that up, crippled free tethering and all.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    41. Re:$800? by dwater · · Score: 1

      How do they cripple my phone if I don't give it to them?

      --
      Max.
    42. Re:$800? by idontgno · · Score: 1

      Do you update your firmware? If so, they can. If you don't, I suppose they can't. But running old firmware seems a bit extreme. I don't know of any practical fallout, but I could imagine the possibility (unpatched security vulns, for obvious example).

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    43. Re:$800? by dwater · · Score: 1

      I get my firmware from Nokia and it has nothing to do with whatever service provider I happen to be using...I don't think we're considering the situation where Nokia decide to disable tethering, are we?

      --
      Max.
    44. Re:$800? by idontgno · · Score: 1

      No, as far as I can tell Nokia isn't disabling tethering and probably won't. But not all phone vendors are so flexible.

      And this is where I note that I've veered offtopic a smidge. iPhone can disable tethering at the drop of a firmware update (and will, apparently, at the insistence of its US network provider), and the architecture is closed so that the user can't do anything about it. (Or, at least, anything easy or permanent: "not easy" usually means a hack or jailbreak, "not permanent" usually means "unhacked and re-jailed after the NEXT firmware update.")

      OTOH, it appears that the Nokia will be immune to that. Even if the net provider insists on disabling stuff in the released firmare, the open-source basis means that a moderately-clever user can fix it with minimum hackish black magic. So, yeah, the Nokia seems a better option to me, too. I won't buy an iPhone, no matter how cool, because it's just a shiny jail. The Nokia has caught my eye, and other than the eye-watering price seems like the perfect smartphone for me. We shall see.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  7. Open Source ? by bug1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Are the drivers it requires open source ?

    Do Nokia playing nice, are they prepared to go out of their way to obey licenses or are they just interested in 0 cost rather than libre software ?

    1. Re:Open Source ? by bug1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      To answer my own questions....

      Apparently this device is based on Maemo, from its website; "Maemo is a software platform that is mostly based on open source code" (emphasis mine)

      Expect proprietary blobs wherever they can get away with it.

    2. Re:Open Source ? by jonwil · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nokia seem to be in compliance with other versions of their linux tablet OS so there is no reason to suspect that this will be any different.
      If by some chance it has phone functionality, it will almost certainly be like the OpenMoko phone where the phone functionality is in a blackbox on a seperate baseband CPU.

    3. Re:Open Source ? by sznupi · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Uhm...don't forget that Nokia LGPL-ed Qt, and recently is open sourcing Symbian.

      So while of course there are also practical reasons for what Nokia is doing, don't, FFS DON'T, paint their actions like they're sleazy bastards that are conspiring against you!

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    4. Re:Open Source ? by Minwee · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Expect proprietary blobs wherever they can get away with it.

      Or wherever those pesky government regulations require them to. You can't just hack together your own code, plug it into the GSM network and expect the FCC to just smile and look the other way.

    5. Re:Open Source ? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Uhm...don't forget that Nokia LGPL-ed Qt, and recently is open sourcing Symbian.

      So while of course there are also practical reasons for what Nokia is doing, don't, FFS DON'T, paint their actions like they're sleazy bastards that are conspiring against you!

      This "is open sourcing Symbian" meme is irritating. Can you download the full source code now? No? Then it's not open source.

      Plus Symbian's C++ API blows for development. They're just trying to keep the dead horse alive by talking about open sourcing it sometime in the distant future.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    6. Re:Open Source ? by PTBarnum · · Score: 4, Informative

      In my experience, (which admittedly is years out of date) you can't build a phone with a libre radio and expect to get it past type acceptance. There are a lot of very precise regulations on the way a phone has to behave on the air, and in many cases the manufacturer is at least theoretically liable if the device misbehaves. Allowing users to mess with the protocols is therefore widely regarded as a bad idea by manufacturers, carriers, and regulators. When I was doing smart phone development, I was working on a totally proprietary system with no way for the end user to install apps, but we still used dual processors to ensure our app code didn't interfere with the GSM stack.

      Obviously, things may have changed since then, but I'm not aware of any phone where the user can get direct control over the radio. If there is an exception to that, I'd love to hear about it.

    7. Re:Open Source ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are the drivers it requires open source ?

      They have opened everything they code on the driver side. See the "phonet" driver that recently landed in the upstream kernel. That's all you need to talk to the nokia phone chips.

    8. Re:Open Source ? by sznupi · · Score: 1

      http://developer.symbian.org/
      http://www.englishpage.com/verbpage/presentcontinuous.html

      Are you still confused now?

      PS. And please, don't give us that "I don't like it, therefore it's irrelevant" BS. Fact is, Symbian is the most used OS in mobile phones (at least in those where OS is of any concern to end-users). It will be migrating towards the segment currently occupied by S40. It will use Qt API (happy now?). Open sourcing it is very notable.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    9. Re:Open Source ? by speculatrix · · Score: 1

      actually, Nokia learned a lot of lessons from the 770, N800 and N810 when buying hardware to ensure that drivers for hardware weren't proprietary/closed, so the new device will be a lot more open than the old one. Go check out MER (http://wiki.maemo.org/Mer_Blueprint) for a community effort to have a completely OSS maemo derivative.

    10. Re:Open Source ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or wherever those pesky government regulations require them to. You can't just hack together your own code, plug it into the GSM network and expect the FCC to just smile and look the other way.

      You sure about that?

      (That covers the server side; if you can have your own server, you can s

      Just because you need to follow regulations/conventions/standards doesn't mean you can't use FOSS to do so.

    11. Re:Open Source ? by tepples · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can't just hack together your own code, plug it into the GSM network and expect the FCC to just smile and look the other way.

      You can if all GSM/UMTS-related code runs on a dedicated core that communicates with the main core (which runs the apps) through a well-defined interface. The Nintendo DS and Nintendo DSi, although not phones, follow the same general scheme: one core to handle audio, Wi-Fi, and power management, and one core to handle everything else.

    12. Re:Open Source ? by dmon · · Score: 1

      http://developer.symbian.org/

      Are you still confused now?

      Hmm.

      "Clone the package source code from version control" -> "The page you are trying to access is restricted to members of the Symbian Foundation."

      Yes. I am still confused.

    13. Re:Open Source ? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Well if they want to open source it, why don't they just open source it? Then you could say "They HAVE open sourced it", and I'd agree. What's irritating is making a pseudo commitment to open source at some point in the future (which they could still welch on) and trying to claim the credit for that now.

      Open source or not it still blows though, both for users and developers. And now that both Sony Ericsson and Nokia are distancing themselves from it, I'd predict it won't be so common in ten years time. Which is why they're trying to put some open source gloss onto it without actually following through.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    14. Re:Open Source ? by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Looks like you really wanted to click, out of two links, not the one with "OSS code" in its description, but the other - and trying to download things not yet open-sourced under Eclipse license (but somehow liberally available)

      Try here: http://developer.symbian.org/oss/

      Still?

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    15. Re:Open Source ? by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Really, why can't you people, in the case of Nokia, understand that it takes time? After all...I was seeing much greater understanding in the case of Sun. Or Carmack and his engines.

      Check other post in this thread for part of Symbian that has already been open-sourced.

      And...you do realize that developing for Symbian will also rely on Qt, right? That it will get relegated to mainstream? That Sony Ericsson released their first S60 (OSS Symbian starts from S60) mobile phone JUST NOW? (and 10 years is a long time...a bit pointless to use such timescale in the case of rapidly evolving tech; also, Symbian has half of the market at this point, it's hard to go up with renewed interest/announcements/product releases...)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    16. Re:Open Source ? by FunkyELF · · Score: 1

      Uhm...don't forget that Nokia LGPL-ed Qt, and recently is open sourcing Symbian.

      So while of course there are also practical reasons for what Nokia is doing, don't, FFS DON'T, paint their actions like they're sleazy bastards that are conspiring against you!

      Uhm... they probably LGPL'd Qt just so they can release closed source software linking against it.

    17. Re:Open Source ? by sznupi · · Score: 2, Informative

      Are you serious?...

      Ehhh...if Nokia owns Trolltech (nvm "if they can change license like that"), they also have access to commercial Qt license...for free.

      Why you all can't get over the fact that there were no short-term benefits for Nokia in making Qt LGPL-ed? (long-term, sure, probably...but that's the goal of OSS/free software, right? Right?!)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    18. Re:Open Source ? by Minwee · · Score: 1

      You sure about that?

      Yeah, I'm pretty sure about that.

      To transmit on a licensed frequency the entire device doing the transmitting needs to be approved, not just the hardware. That means that any software which is directly involved in transmission or reception _needs_ to be locked down. It can mplement all sorts of friendly ABIs and talk as nicely as it wants to with the end user, but allowing the end user to run random firmware on a device which broadcasts on licensed frequencies is a one way ticket to getting beaten with a stick by your friendly neighbourhood regulatory agency.

    19. Re:Open Source ? by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      You can't just hack together your own code, plug it into the GSM network and expect the FCC to just smile and look the other way.

      You can if all GSM/UMTS-related code runs on a dedicated core that communicates with the main core (which runs the apps) through a well-defined interface. The Nintendo DS and Nintendo DSi, although not phones, follow the same general scheme: one core to handle audio, Wi-Fi, and power management, and one core to handle everything else.

      You know, I skimmed over this post until I saw "Nintendo DS" and then I was like, "Hey, is that tepples?" XD

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    20. Re:Open Source ? by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      Hmm.

      "Clone the package source code from version control" -> "The page you are trying to access is restricted to members of the Symbian Foundation."

      Yes. I am still confused.

      Did you purchase a copy of Symbian or a phone that runs it? Remember that "open source" does not necessarily mean "available to the general public".

    21. Re:Open Source ? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Actually in this case it means you need to have a company, sign a bunch of documents and pay $1500 per year

      http://developer.symbian.com/wiki/display/pub/Symbian+Foundation+Membership+Guide#SymbianFoundationMembershipGuide-Membershipeligibilitycriteria

      Membership of the Symbian Foundation is available to organizations meeting the following criteria
      1. Must be an incorporated company or organization. Individuals can not become a Member.
      2. A parent company should sign on behalf of all controlled entities and the applicant company should not have a parent company. If there are reasonable reasons why a parent company may not become a member, then the parent company must co-sign the Deed of Adherence in conjunction with the applicant company.
      3. Successful submission of the Membership Application Form.
      4. Receipt by Symbian Foundation of Signed of the Deed of Adherence.
      5. Members also wishing to contribute source code or other artefacts are further required to sign and return the Member Contribution Agreement.
      6. Approval of membership by the Symbian Foundation.
      7. Receipt of payment of the annual membership fee of $1500 USD + 15% VAT (where applicable).

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    22. Re:Open Source ? by jfanning · · Score: 1

      Nokia and Intel recently announced a deal on oFono, which is basically Nokia's opensource stack to control the phone section of the platform.

      As far as I know it basically uses "AT" commands to control the GSM/UMTS chipset.

      So the stack is opensource, the chipset is not.

    23. Re:Open Source ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just go look at the linux kernel source in the arch/arm folder. I ran
        find . | xargs grep -i nokia\ corp | grep Copyright | wc -l
      119

      So 119 files in arch/arm was either created or modified by Nokia. Thats definitely helpful to the open source movement IMO.

    24. Re:Open Source ? by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Doesn't approximately everything you said also apply to why there'd never be an open source WiFi driver? That's what I was hearing 5-10 years ago...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  8. Nokia bought Trolltech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    So it should be no surprise that they go for Qt instead of GTK+ in the long run.
    Which is a good thing, actually.

  9. Shell apps? by Neil+Watson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've been thinking about one of these new Linux phones for my next upgrade. What kind of access does one have to the shell? Can one using an ssh client? How does one transfer data to a Linux workstation? Can one install more shell apps (e.g. ipcalc, tdl and remind)?

    1. Re:Shell apps? by u38cg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What I wonder is how long it will be before these phones *are* your computer and you just plug in a fullblown screen and keyboard wherever you want to sit and work. We're essentially there, just nobody does it yet.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    2. Re:Shell apps? by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      From what the slashdot summary seems to be saying, you would do all of these things like you normally would with a linux workstation install. If that is the case it could be what I've been waiting for, for quite a while.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    3. Re:Shell apps? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      For the N800 systems, Nokia even provided Maemo VMware development images where you could build your own apps, and shove them over to the tablet.

      You needed to jump through some hoops to get root (ssh) access, but the info was all available on the Net.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    4. Re:Shell apps? by Ctrl+V · · Score: 1

      What I wonder is how long it will be before these phones *are* your computer and you just plug in a fullblown screen and keyboard wherever you want to sit and work.

      Or this plus a built-in projector Maybe throw in a virtual keyboard for good measure.

    5. Re:Shell apps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. root access xterm via busybox environment.

      2. yes, ssh is available (both client and server)

      3. scp, usb, smoke signals...pretty much any method that would work with a "normal" PC running linux will work with this

      4. yes...the device uses a pseudo-standard debian software library that one can download new apps from. Kismet is a handy one ;)

    6. Re:Shell apps? by Col.+Klink+(retired) · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, Maemo is pretty much a full Linux distribution. You can ssh into the device and ssh out from the device. On the N810 (with a large enough MicroSD card) you can even install a full Debian distribution. It's still ARM, so don't expect it to be as fast as a Desktop, but everything works (mplayer, pidgin, Open Office, VNC client & server, etc).

      --

      -- Don't Tase me, bro!

    7. Re:Shell apps? by mpapet · · Score: 1

      I have an aged nokia n-series that is a clamshell design, runs the psion OS. I've got an ssh (putty!) client for it. For the win32 crowd, they still have a remote desktop client. (not fun to use on a tiny screen I imagine)

      Most Americans don't seem to realize that Psion OS had tons of apps written for it waaay before Apple got started.. As a longtime n-series owner, I could never get the buzz for an iPhone. It did far less than my n-series and was more expensive.

      An maemo phone is exactly what I was waiting for. I'm happy to pay for it up front. $700 is a bargain for a device I mostly control.

      --
      http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
    8. Re:Shell apps? by Lost+Engineer · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering... how did they do this? The N800 appears to have and ARM CPU, yet VMWare does not appear to support ARM guests.

    9. Re:Shell apps? by tyldis · · Score: 1

      A device like this with Maemo has a shell, an ssh client and even an ssh server if you want. It does whatever you want it to granted is has the horsepower to do it.

    10. Re:Shell apps? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      The VMware appliance is a thingy that you run on your PC (and, yes, it is a Linux client). You can develop and simulate code that will run on the N8XX. A cross compiler which is part of the development environment produces code for the ARM.

      For more info: http://maemo.org/development/

      I think I need to shake down Nokia for providing them with all these free advertisements.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    11. Re:Shell apps? by arielCo · · Score: 1
      Here's an idea. Quoth timeOday:

      Given that the most-used features of cellphones are things other than talking on the phone (presumably included in the "Other 9%")

      Even if this were serious, it only seems odd because we use the misnomer "cellphone" instead of something more accurate like, I dunno, personal digital assistant. Imagine if people insisted on thinking of PCs as typewriters (since word processing was an early killer app) and they were still called typewriters, and people started whinging that PCs shouldn't be able to run web browsers because "that's not typing," and "when will we all return to typewriters that just type!" It's nonsense.

      --
      This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.
    12. Re:Shell apps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my n810 is a linux computer:

      Easy to set up ssh
      (Gnome?) terminal is no fun with the supplied keyboard, but is pre-installed
      Connects by USB as a device to transfer data
      Many many repos for additional apps
      Easy to use for PyGtk development, just ssh in (apt-get install vim and) you're coding away.
      haven't tried other terminals, since when I really need a terminal I ssh in from Konsole.

      If they are just upgrading Maemo for this all that should remain true.

    13. Re:Shell apps? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Well, even old Nokia phones based on Symbian could do this: http://maddox.xmission.com/putty3.gif
      And Linux is *much* better at this. (As I know from installing it on my PDA.)
      So you can bet on it!

      Unfortunately it's all dependent on how good the keyboard is. Touchscreens and even numeric keyboard are out of the question.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    14. Re:Shell apps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the Android phones the SD card mounts just like any USB stick so you can then transfer files as usual.

    15. Re:Shell apps? by mr.mctibbs · · Score: 1

      This has actually been my biggest beef so far with trying to purchase a cell phone. Despite some modest google searching, I still can't get a straight answer on "what level of access do I have to the device and how hard is it to develop applications using the device components and services?" for any of the major devices. And God save you if you want to get help from ANYONE who works at the mobile stores. I've yet to encounter a single person who can answer even simple questions about the technology that underlies any given device.

    16. Re:Shell apps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure about the new toy, but on my n810 I usually just scp files to the device. Alternatively, the device can be hooked up to a USB port and treated like any other external storage device.

      So, yes, full shell access is available, including ssh-ing into the toy. In fact, maemo is of the Debian family and uses their package management (apt-get etc.) in addition to the (slow) GUI for package administration.

    17. Re:Shell apps? by rkhalloran · · Score: 1

      Since this looks like an upgrade of the existing N800/810 tablets to include GSM phone capability, YES you can get shell access, SSH to/from other boxes, etc.

      Check this link for the "official" catalog of Maemo apps, most/all of which I'd assume will work on this new unit, and this one for additional projects in various stages of development.

    18. Re:Shell apps? by mungtor · · Score: 1

      Just plug a headset into your netbook and you're set, if you want to look at it that way. A netbook won't fit in your pocket, but it's not a burden to carry around for the most part.

    19. Re:Shell apps? by shank001 · · Score: 1

      I've been thinking about one of these new Linux phones for my next upgrade. What kind of access does one have to the shell? Can one using an ssh client? How does one transfer data to a Linux workstation? Can one install more shell apps (e.g. ipcalc, tdl and remind)?

      Just buy yourself the Openmoko (http://www.openmoko.com). Install debian on it; and you can do whatever-the-hell-you-want-to!

    20. Re:Shell apps? by OpenGLFan · · Score: 1

      I want that so badly. I got an Android phone because it was easier to write apps for, but if the iPhone were more open I would want so badly to get a new iPhone, a set of Myvu Crystal glasses, and some sort of small bluetooth keyboard.

      If Microsoft has its head on straight with the Zune HD, it might win in this regard, but the lack of phone/3G is probably a killer. But wouldn't it be awesome to just be wandering around and, if you need to get some work done, whip out a pair of Geordi-glasses and pound out some code? Then, when you're done, fold it all away and walk off?

    21. Re:Shell apps? by Animaether · · Score: 1

      If netbooks are any indication - I'd say it'd be a while for a large chunk of the computer users.. unless you only use your computer for the tasks it is well-suited to (e-mail, webpages, text processing, a spreadsheet, etc.). Some of the slower netbooks are barely capable of playing back YouTube content in high quality / HD playback mode, however; nevermind cellphones.

      'a while' could be as little as 10 years, though, if trends continue.
      ( I'd say '5', but the difference between current notebooks and mine, which is ~5 years old, is not -that- big. Evolutionary, rather than revolutionary. )

    22. Re:Shell apps? by johnny0099 · · Score: 1

      Maybe check this link out:

      Video demo of Nokia n800 running Android in VMware

      More info, including this video, can be found at this link:

      Nokia N800 runs Android in VMware: Video Demo

      --
      Get your dogma outta my yard!
    23. Re:Shell apps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the current problem with this is the size of vga/dvi ports. there should be a standard for plugging screens via usb. (yes, it might be too slow for gaming, but would be soo flexible for standard use. and usb is also getting faster)

  10. most awesome? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is the most awesome device I have ever seen

    someone is clearly not familiar with the LHC.

    1. Re:most awesome? by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Maybe when the 'adrons quit clogging the pipe.

    2. Re:most awesome? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      But the LHC won't be up to full power this year, and isn't expected to be able to make phone calls until early 2014.

    3. Re:most awesome? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does the LHC fit in your pocket?

    4. Re:most awesome? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The LHC is like most women; frigid, a bit temperamental, and capable of making things that nothing else can.

      Did I miss any salient points?

    5. Re:most awesome? by humina · · Score: 1

      I guess he should have said this is the most awesome device that works and doesn't leak liquid helium he has ever seen.

      --
      check out the best blog ever:
      http://oehlberg.com
    6. Re:most awesome? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Large Hardon Collider?

    7. Re:most awesome? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah...Jack Straw totally RAAAWWWKKZZZZ!

    8. Re:most awesome? by Kynde · · Score: 1

      > The Large Hardon Collider?
                              ^^^^^^
      Sounds a bit gay to me...

      But yes, the (currently existing) large hadron collider would be nothing compared that.

      --
      1 Earth is warming, 2 It's us, 3 it's royally bad, 4 we need to take action NOW
  11. Two rival factions by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 5, Funny

    I like how there are two rival Slashdot cellphone factions.

    There's the "phone should just make phone calls and not have all this shit added on!" faction, which is pre-dominant in a lot of stories.

    And then there's the "I can't possibly get by with a phone that doesn't have VT-100 emulation!" faction, who are probably all rushing out to buy this thing right now.

    I, uh, don't really have anywhere clever to go with this idea though...

    1. Re:Two rival factions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be perfectly honest, I think a phone should just make phone calls, send texts/email and have VT-100 emulation, without any other shit added on.

    2. Re:Two rival factions by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      If you are going to mutate a phone into a general
      purpose computing device you might as well do it right
      and put the device under the full control of the end
      user.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    3. Re:Two rival factions by sqldr · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, my requirement is that it has smooth corners, and preferably a flange at the end so it can easily slide in and.. actually, forget I said that.

      --
      I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.
    4. Re:Two rival factions by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      send text

      full VT100 eh? But I don't want to use emacs to text someone, FFS!

      j/k

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    5. Re:Two rival factions by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      I, uh, don't really have anywhere clever to go with this idea though...

      Take a photo of your idea, then post a link to it on your Twitter with the GPS coordinates of where you were when you first thought of it. Then run it through the dishwasher (your phone does have a dishwasher built in, right?) and render the result into a 3D visualization of how your idea would look as an mp3.

      Or at least, that's what I assume you're supposed to do with those damn things; I'm a "simple phone" kind of guy myself.

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    6. Re:Two rival factions by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      It's OK. Please leave now. You have already done enough damage by creating this false dichotomy. ;)

      I bet it's really a Gaussian distribution in-between your two extremes.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    7. Re:Two rival factions by intheshelter · · Score: 1

      There's actually 3 factions. The third is the faction of people who point out how many factions there are for a topic. . .

      Sorry, couldn't resist.

    8. Re:Two rival factions by Col.+Klink+(retired) · · Score: 1

      There are two types of people in the world: people that believe that there are two types, and people who don't.

      --

      -- Don't Tase me, bro!

    9. Re:Two rival factions by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I use to be part of the "phones are for making calls and the occational SMS" crowd.

      But eventually 3G phones became rather good, and most important of all, data in my native Finland became dirt cheap.

      Nowadays I use my phone's data capabilities every day. Once I've dropped the kids to daycare I check a website that can tell me which of three bus stops to walk to, instead of trying to remember the 20+ buses' schedules that I would otherwise check to get the same effect. It's even better when I want to take the bus home after a night out. I can input my location in the route guide website and it will calculate a reasonable route for me.

      Google maps has proved useful too, as my phone has GPS. The navigation software with voice guidance actually works, so I have no need for a dedicated navigator. The camera has a real xenon flash, so social snaps even in a dim environment are actually perfectly viable. Wikipedia is handy to settle factual disputes in the bar... ;)

      The thing is, I think of my phone as a portable multimedia computer with phone-features attached. I could live without the features it provides, but given that 3G phones are so cheap these days it would make little sense for me to do so.

      --
      .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    10. Re:Two rival factions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The funny part is that the phones which the latter group likes can emulate the ones the former group prefers. There just needs to be a config checkbox somewhere labelled BIG BUTTONS. When that box is checked there is no fancy GUI, no advanced features, no apps, just a screen which shows a bunch of BIG BUTTONS, 0-9, *, #, and lets you dial out and receive calls. That way everyone is happy, right?

    11. Re:Two rival factions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course not, you want to use Vi for that

    12. Re:Two rival factions by pughjl · · Score: 1

      I'd like my phone to make and receive calls well. I'm liking my N95 for just that reason. My WinMo took too many steps to dial. The slider keyboard doesn't work so well for a phone. From the screenshots, it looks like your going through three pages to make a phone call--select phone app, select dial or contact, dial/select contact, then probably have to select the phone number for that contact to use. Having a full on, user programmable computer is cool, and I'm looking for that in my next phone, but the device for me will primarily be a phone.

    13. Re:Two rival factions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of the good old days, when you had a phone, a modem, and a VT100 terminal for calling those bulletin boards. I think I missed a trick ... should have bundled the three together and sold it as a 'smart phone' to that 2nd faction.

      Faction 1: You don't need a damn modem and terminal to make a phone call. Do you want them tangled in the extension cord and tripping you up, when you just want to make a call in another room?
      Faction 2: Of course you need the modem and the VT-100. Have you every tried calling a bulletin board with a normal phone? It's not much fun after the first 3 seconds is it?

    14. Re:Two rival factions by Delkster · · Score: 1

      I guess I could count myself in to either of the factions.

      My phone is four years old, based on an ancient Nokia platform, can't really surf the web, data connections are limited to GPRS, and it doesn't have a decent music player. On the other hand, it's easy and slick for calls, its T9 keypad is decent for texting -- unlike some other mid-range phones I've tried -- and I can tether it over bluetooth if I really, really need to check that mail or something. And it cost about 160 euros four years ago.

      I have no urgent need to replace the phone, but if I did replace it for any other reason than it ceasing to work, obviously I'd want something more. If I got a device capable of being a general web device, communications platform, music player and whatnot, I wouldn't want to be limited by the details of its software. Its usefulness to me as a communications platform would be limited if it only allowed me to connect to a single IM service such as MSN and not other IM services or SSH, or if I couldn't have a decent IMAP client on it for e-mail; it wouldn't be that great a music player if it didn't play the formats I have music in; and if I could search the web and read e-mail but not copy and paste an address from e-mail into the web browser or a map application and switch between the applications with ease, that would be rather cumbersome.

      If I go the route of doing all those things on a mobile device, I'll want it to be more or less a general-purpose computer limited not by such details of the software supplied by the vendor, even if physical size and hardware will always place practical limits. Having played around with an N810 before, the N900 seems intriguing in this sense. However, I don't desire to have all those things in my pocket quite enough yet to justify the price right now. Perhaps some day.

      Until then, I'll stick to my old paradigm of just having a small device for making calls and texting.

    15. Re:Two rival factions by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      I'm from the "put all the OSS you want on a phone, but until your GSM/UMTS/CDMA/3G stack isn't open, it is not an interesting toy" faction.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    16. Re:Two rival factions by 21mhz · · Score: 1

      Us who live by YTV Reittiopas should now demand a standardised geolocation API in browser-side JavaScript, and its adoption by websites like this journey planner. Imagine, requesting a route from where you are now, at the click of a button. Web browsers in mobile devices make this possible.

      --
      My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
  12. Why is this takings so long.... by earnest+murderer · · Score: 1

    I think this is fascinating news. But with all this functionality being delivered across so many platforms...

    WHY do I still have a PC?

    If someone figures out a way to get the device to output to a display and input from a keyboard/mouse. Even if there is another pc involved it would still be useful to many.

    --
    Platform advocacy is like choosing a favorite severely developmentally disabled child.
    1. Re:Why is this takings so long.... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Probably because this device has 256 megabytes of RAM and costs almost 800 dollars, while any old piece of shit from the dell sales circular has at least 2 gigabytes of RAM and costs 300 dollars.

    2. Re:Why is this takings so long.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its predecessors (770, N800, N810) all had the ability to use bluetooth keyboards, and with a bit of hacking, bt mice as well. To the extent that USB host mode worked (easily on the N800 and N810, only with extra hardware on the 770), USB mice and keyboards act just like their BT counterparts. But video output has been the short end, with only very limited support for certain USB/VGA dongles.

      The N900, however, will have TV-out through the headphone jack, like the N-series phones. Not sure what resolutions will be available on an external screen, but that functionality will be there.

    3. Re:Why is this takings so long.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TV-Out
      Bluetooth Keyboard

      Both have been supported on Nokia phones for a good few years now. No mouse that I am aware of though, since generally no pointer on phones, maybe this is different since it has a larger screen.

    4. Re:Why is this takings so long.... by cboslin · · Score: 1

      One day we will have a virtual monitor, in the air above the device. At least the Nokias (N770 was released in 2005) have a decent size screen and full browser.

  13. features or benefits by petes_PoV · · Score: 4, Insightful
    OK, nice spec 'n' all -but what will I actually be able to do with this puppy that I can't do with my "ordinary" smart phone, or PDA or computer or whatever this turns out to be?

    I don't buy an appliance just because it runs Linux or X11 - however I *might* buy one if these features add new functions, or make existing ones easier. So far as what I've already got is concerned, the only thing that comes to mind would be the ability for me (and not anybody else) to log into the phone remotely and use its functions across a network connection.

    Other than that, my experience of smart phones is that the keyboard's too small for serious word-work, the screen's too small for almost everything (esp. watching movies) and it's also far too dim to use in daylight. The music player's nice and the camera while limited is good enough for "happy snaps", almost all of which are discarded or ignored as soon as they've been taken. I.e. all features, but few benefits.

    So come on Nokia, don't try to impress me with megabytes and gigahertz, tell me what I'll be able to do now, that I couldn't do before. That's where the sales are.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    1. Re:features or benefits by earnest+murderer · · Score: 1

      Hate to repeat myself, but as you said... the screen/keyboard are too small for serious work... But the rest of the hardware is completely competent and in some ways better than a typical PC.

      What this new crop of phones needs is a mechanism to drive an external display and keyboard.

      --
      Platform advocacy is like choosing a favorite severely developmentally disabled child.
    2. Re:features or benefits by andre_pl · · Score: 0

      I wont need to run a VM and 2 shit proprietary apps just to put a ring-tone on my phone. thats a plus in my book.

    3. Re:features or benefits by gubers33 · · Score: 1

      Well usually, Linux is a very fast operating system, where or not this translate to the phone GNU/Linux I don't know. One thing that will be nice is that since it is Linux and open-source, theoretically you could have a free app store and not have to pay the 3.99 you pay for a lot of iPhone apps. The terminal emulator could be extremely useful for IT people in that theoretically you could trouble shoot boxes straight from your phone if you have a wireless connection and install VPN onto the phone so that you could VPN tunnel into your network through a firewall and trouble should Unix boxes.

      --
      Just because you are wrong and I called you out on it doesn't mean I am a Troll.
    4. Re:features or benefits by Col.+Klink+(retired) · · Score: 3, Informative

      You can use a bluetooth keyboard. You can also use a VNC server on the phone and do your work from a VNC client on the desktop (or just ssh into the device).

      --

      -- Don't Tase me, bro!

    5. Re:features or benefits by BobMcD · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So come on Nokia, don't try to impress me with megabytes and gigahertz, tell me what I'll be able to do now, that I couldn't do before. That's where the sales are.

      (Making a few assumptions here)

      1) Find an open source application anywhere on the web
      2) Download it
      3) Install it

      This is directly contrasted against the existing options which all go more like:

      1) Find an application on the provided store*
      2) Pay for it
      3) Download it
      4) Install it

      * Note the store reserves the right to approve apps on their own terms.

      If you're the sort of guy that doesn't ever imagine running something other than what is provided in the (Apple) store on your phone, you're not going to miss much. If you get frustrated by the notion of other people controlling what you are allowed to run on a device you own, the choice theoretically offered by an open platform should be a win.

      I say theoretically and should because this all depends on someone providing the applications. Or at least modifying existing apps to work on your new phone. If no one does this for you, and you can't do it yourself, then your freedom of choice isn't going to get that much exercise.

    6. Re:features or benefits by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      and the screenshots of the UI in the review show a 'TV out' feature (and other reviews mention the tv-out port, but don't say what type it is - I doubt it's SCART) so you don't really need a VNC client, just a huge LCD TV! :)

    7. Re:features or benefits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use x11vnc with my current internet tablet. I can also use an external USB or bluetooth keyboard with the existing n800 as the n800 can act as a USB host. The n900 should support a mouse.

      I haven't dug through their kernel recently but beagleboard, which people have been using to prototype SW for the n900 due to the similar CPUs, has hdmi and the default install of beagleboard runs at 1024x768.

      n810 has transflective display and I'd be surprised if the new one didn't as well. http://tabletblog.com/2007/10/n810-is-sunlight-readable.html

      Given the iphone 3gs is about as expensive without a contract, expect a locked down version to be sold by tmobile or someone like that.

    8. Re:features or benefits by petes_PoV · · Score: 1

      What this new crop of phones needs is a mechanism to drive an external display and keyboard

      Yep, and if I could connect to it via wifi or whatever, using an X11 remote desktop (or as another have said VNC), *and* I can stream the phone audio to/from the device in the same way, then you could leave the phone in your brieface when you arrive at work and just initiate a remote connection to your desk PC. Maybe even have a screen icon that flashes when your phone rings.

      I would also like the ability to log into the phone and (maybe) use the camera from it. Take a photo of whereever the phone is and then drag it back to where I logged in from. The possibilities for abusing this are huge, but if the supplier doesn't implement features like this - and so give the owners some benefits, why build the features in?

      There's lots of potential here - but I won't pay for potential, I'll spend my money on what it can actually do.

      --
      politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    9. Re:features or benefits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, use your geek brain. They told you what hardware it has, and that it runs open source software, Linux at that - that means the possibiliies are virtually endless only restricted by the hardware and your own imagination. Whoever reads the specs knowing it runs Linux and doesn't get any cool ideas should give up their geek card, seriously...

    10. Re:features or benefits by Hatta · · Score: 1

      tell me what I'll be able to do now, that I couldn't do before.

      Anything you can do with a linux PC now, I'd imagine. Wanna run ScummVM? RasMol? SSH into your home machine and check your rtorrent session? Don't think of it as a fancy phone. Think of it as a portable linux box with telephony as only one of the features.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    11. Re:features or benefits by AnyoneEB · · Score: 1

      The article mentions TV-out and shows a screenshot of a configuration screen for it (with the TV-out in PAL mode). On the other hand, it is not clear what kind of sound output the device has. The article seems to say that the TV-out plug and a micro-USB plug are the only ports on the device, so that would mean no headphones/headset jack, so I am not sure how you would get sound to a TV for watching movies off of it. I guess it is still useful for displaying photos and presentations anyway.

      --
      Centralization breaks the internet.
    12. Re:features or benefits by randallman · · Score: 4, Informative

      * You can watch a movie on this phone. The screen on these things (I have an n800) is stunning at 800 x 480. I and some of my relatives have enjoyed full length movies on my n800 and I keep my personal video collection (dv converted to mpeg4) on it.

      * word-work? Never heard that term, but I'll assume you're talking about messaging (I hope your not talking about word processing). Many people are quite efficient on each of the various keyboard input setups and this has two of them; touchscreen and pop-out keyboard, so you probably just need practice.

      * In case you missed the article the camera is very nice. Carl Zeiss; 5.2 MP. More than enough for "happy snaps".

      * Maemo is a very active community (http://www.maemo.org) with lots of great software. So what is it that you want your phone to do? More than likely there is an application to do it.

      We (the geeks) have been clamoring for an open platform phone and now it appears we're getting it. I admit that I get excited at the thought of being able to ssh into my phone, run scripts and write programs in Python/GTK and configure pretty much any and every aspect of the device. If you don't, you're probably not a geek and this whole thing will be lost on you.

    13. Re:features or benefits by Col.+Klink+(retired) · · Score: 1

      Full out-of-the-box support for bluetooth audio (A2DP/AVRCP) are one of the big fixes in the new version of Maemo.

      But beyond that, other sites at least have indicated that the N900 will still have a 3.5mm audio jack.

      --

      -- Don't Tase me, bro!

    14. Re:features or benefits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nokia hasn't even announced the device yet, so don't tell them what they should do to impress you. :) Details will become clearer very soon.

    15. Re:features or benefits by hao3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      symbian has apps for answering (and texting) through your computer using and remotely taking pictures/video.

      --
      "Impartiality is a pompous name for indifference, which is an elegant name for ignorance." - G.K. Chesterton
    16. Re:features or benefits by hao3 · · Score: 1

      it's a smartphone. of course it has a headphone/speaker jack.

      --
      "Impartiality is a pompous name for indifference, which is an elegant name for ignorance." - G.K. Chesterton
    17. Re:features or benefits by dmihalko · · Score: 1

      i had an n810 (wifi only), and the vpnc/rdesktop combo alone was worth their weight in gold when traveling w/o a laptop. throw in the webcam/mic for gizmo/google talk with voice was very nice when traveling outside the US for free calls the gps worked very nicely after it locked in. plus every app you could want/need is free. the ability to use those applications above from anywhere cell coverage is available, without tethering a device to a cell phone over BT is reason enough for me to buy one when prices come down. that is the exact reason i got rid of my n810... i am not often around wifi, and hate carrying multiple devices.

    18. Re:features or benefits by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

      How bout:

      Standard web browser that can have more than one page open at a time

      minimize the web browser to watch a movie or do whatever

      Most web enabled phones cant do any of that.

    19. Re:features or benefits by Fluffy+Bunnies · · Score: 1

      3.5mm stereo plug is what Nokia has used for it in the past.

    20. Re:features or benefits by jfanning · · Score: 1

      How about on my N810, The official browser is a Firefox 3.0 based browser (MicroB) that works, but is a little slow. Or I have Tear, a Webkit based browser, which is quite a bit faster.

      I use both for Google Reader every day, while checking my emails at the same time. It streams music in the background, or I can minimize the browser and watch a movie.

      And seeing as that is OMAP2 with 128MB of ram, and the N900 is OMAP3 with 256MB, I think it shouldn't be a problem.

    21. Re:features or benefits by AnyoneEB · · Score: 1

      As the sibling mentioned, other sites have mentioned that it does, which makes sense. I thought Nokia might be being silly and only supporting Bluetooth headsets.

      --
      Centralization breaks the internet.
    22. Re:features or benefits by cboslin · · Score: 1

      Warning this is a LONG post, if you do not like long posts skip to the bottom, however you will miss some useful resources that I linked in as well as the justification for my answer. Just saying...

      OK, nice spec 'n' all -but what will I actually be able to do with this puppy that I can't do with my "ordinary" smart phone, or PDA or computer or whatever this turns out to be?

      By my definition, the N770 (first released Nov 2005, 4 years ago) , N800, N880 and now the N900 are the ONLY SMART PHONES out there, perhaps you could add the Google Android to that list, though I have not looked at the Linux distro they have running on it yet to be sure. (I am assuming that they did not hamstring it for some proprietary hardware, cause if they did, that is NOT smart) If the hand held (phone, tablet, whatever) will NOT run one of the many distros of Linux, than it simply AINT smart!

      With Linux versions that will run on very slow processors, slower than any of the Nokias or so called smart phones that cellular companies try to force on you what is their excuse for not including Linux? Linux is more secure. Linux gives you more options. With the cellular companies, their phones, all of them are locked down, unable to run Linux, unable to even access a WiFi hot spot. Where is the sense in that? How is that smart? Will any of those cellular company provided phones run with RAM memories less than 128MB, or even 256MB, because there are distros of Linux that will! With such low specifications needed to run Linux (and a wealth of applications to enhance your user experience), what is their excuse not to utilize it? Is it ONLY to limit your choice, limit your freedom and tie you in to some pathetic tired pricing system, some failed selection of applications, many of which do not do half of what you need to do anyway?

      Sorry but how is this SMART? It is NOT.

      With the Nokias, even without Mameo, you have full web browsers available, trust me once you have that, you will not want anything less. You should not be limited to less! It just is NOT smart.

      What is "smart" about tethering and limiting choice?

      Can you say dd-wrt, I knew you could.

      What is "smart" about using cellular minutes when you have a WiFi access point available to you (Note: If you are at work or home, you can, should, have a WiFi Access point (dd-wrt) available to you. That covers 80% of your waking and sleeping life, so no need to waste cellular minutes with a WiFi and VoIP solution available. Wasting cellular minutes is stupid, even worse when they charge you extra for going over. When you consider that a Linux VoIP solution, such as Skype is really a killer app with a TCO (Total Cost of Ownership) of less than $100 per year. That is SMART, less than $9 per month for service to chat and call anyone on your continent.

      When your cellular company sends you an inflated bill with charges that you did not make, than uses their customer-no-service people to send you to collections, their loss, its NOT SMART! Would you pay for calls you did not make? Neither will the rest of us!

      One calendar to rule them all. There can be ONLY ONE!

      If you have run any Personal Information Management software (PIM) on any of the current hand helds and you use it seriously:

      • like in the Franklin's Planner method where you spend a few minutes every day planning the day, week and month;
      • schedule appointments;
      • close tasks out after you successfully complete them;
    23. Re:features or benefits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, nice spec 'n' all -but what will I actually be able to do with this puppy that I can't do with my "ordinary" smart phone, or PDA or computer or whatever this turns out to be?

      You could ask the same about the iPhone. What can it actually do that other phones couldn't? Nothing, but it does everything better.

  14. linux? by curtix7 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    but will it run linux?

  15. Red Pill / Blue Pill option . . . ? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    . . . as an owner of an N800, I would like to know if they will still provide the "Easter Egg" / "Red Pill / Blue Pill" option for installing all the cool (and usefull) apps.

    Unfortunately, these also could make it easy for some dork to brick the thing.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:Red Pill / Blue Pill option . . . ? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I guess I should have provided a link: http://wiki.maemo.org/Red_Pill_mode

      WARNING: Red Pill is not intended for use by users, power-users, nor the vast majority of developers. Red Pill mode is very likely to break your tablet and should not be used unless you know exactly what you are doing.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re:Red Pill / Blue Pill option . . . ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AFAIK the only thing the Red Pill did was disable the dependency check for packages so you could shoehorn apps made for previous Internet Tablet versions into later without updating them and they may or may not work. Even without this hack you're already able to install whatever you like as long as it is packaged properly in .deb format.

  16. Re:woohoo! by mcgrew · · Score: 3, Funny

    unmatchable power of GNU/Linux on your phone

    Yay!

    Estimated price without credit: $780

    Crap, I can't afford one. I lose phones too often; I'm on my third phone this year. When I had a Razr a few years ago I got insurance on it, and the insurance company cancelled me when I dropped the third one in the toilet trying to answer it when I was taking a piss. The way I go through phones I'm lucky to be able to afford the $100 one I have now.

    Of course, the Razr was expensive at first, at least I'll be able to get one of these in a few years.

  17. A great market idea! by JohnMurtari · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Folks, I think they new they had to make a strategic move to keep/increase market share. If they do deliver and make it a great open source platform running Linux -- they could have a LOT of applications. Could be a fun device!

  18. Yeah but by Cornwallis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    can it make phone calls without dropping signal? I'm still waiting for that.

    1. Re:Yeah but by Anonymous+Cowar · · Score: 1

      You've waited 20 years too long. An old analogue bag phone connecting to an analogue tower can get a passable signal 50-60 miles into the wilderness (read: no-coverage areas) beyond where my razr got a whisper of a signal. Then they took the analogue tower down and I had to rely on other means of radio communication whilst collecting road-side sensor data.

      That motorola bag phone weighed more than most laptops nowadays but i think it only dropped calls while going into deep roadway tunnels where the FM radio would stop working or during really nasty lightning storms.

    2. Re:Yeah but by petes_PoV · · Score: 4, Funny

      In almost every country in the world, the answer is "yes - we can do that already". I have heard that some, more remote parts of Africa and Siberia still have poor coverage - does anywhere else still suffer from this?

      --
      politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    3. Re:Yeah but by boshi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well since it is GSM I would say in the United States, no. Elsewhere in the world, you will probably fare better.

      --
      Blog
    4. Re:Yeah but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Move to a country where operators actually compete for customers' money. Judging from Slashdot comments, and personal experience, *any* country in Europe, and pretty much any other part of the developed world must be better than US on average.

      I'm yet to see a phone that would have problems maintaining the calls here in Finland, or well, almost anywhere I've gone, and many of those places have been pretty damn middle of nowhere. (Well, some parts of deserts in China actually posed a problem, but do your calling locations compare with that?) And I haven't noticed friends having particularly more problems with cell coverage with their different phones, either.

    5. Re:Yeah but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finland: Smaller than Montana, but with more than five times the population.

    6. Re:Yeah but by xZgf6xHx2uhoAj9D · · Score: 2, Informative

      Finland has 10 people?

    7. Re:Yeah but by jfanning · · Score: 1

      Population density is always the same shit answer from the US.

      Maybe you should learn your geography a bit better. Finnish Lapland has a population density of about 2 people / square kilometre and it has almost 100% coverage.

      Only in the US do you have a 1st world country with such crap coverage.

      The cost per square kilometre is going to be the same for a given population density in the US as anywhere else no matter the area to cover. So how come they can do it everywhere else except in the US. And your cellular providers even charge you much more in the US than anywhere else.

    8. Re:Yeah but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      North Dakota

    9. Re:Yeah but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many people in Europe have no clue what it's like to live in a "large" sparsely populated country. The US is densely populated compared to some places, but when was the last time you drove in Finland for an hour at 85mph without seeing a building? The range of the current towers just won't cut it.

  19. TFS by jDeepbeep · · Score: 1

    Mobile Review got hold of one and has an article with specs and photos:

    article

    This is the same article linked to in TFS(ummary)

    --
    Reply to That ||
  20. gtk+ - not Qt?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really like the Qt developerment environment. The interface builder is intuitive and the Qt framework is an excellnt design. Creating a development environment wsa easy - includes were just the include directory and the libs were in the lib directory as it should be. All in C++ by the way and the documentation is top notch. I was building my first Qt app in 20 minutes.

    gtk+. Creating the build environment took over an hour of hunting down include directories in places that I would never have thought there would be includes. The same goes for the lib directories. Glade I found to be a pain in the ass. The interface produced is a generated xml file that is read at runtime. Its all in C - win32 GUI programming is a piece of cake compared to gtk+ - I love C, but when it comes to boilerplate GUI code, it's mind numbing.

    What's my point is relation to the article? They're moving away from any mobile UI standard - Qt or Java - and they're moving to a UI framework that's overly complicated.

    gtk+ was spawned from the GIMP, btw.

    Now, I'm sure I can't be the only one that dislikes developing in gtk+, meaning, this new platform may not take-off like some folks think it will.

    1. Re:gtk+ - not Qt?!? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Maemo is actually not a new platform, though it hasn't run on a phone before, and it is gradually moving off gtk and towards QT, it just hasn't gotten there yet.

    2. Re:gtk+ - not Qt?!? by GigaplexNZ · · Score: 1

      It's only using GTK+ for now since it is reusing Maemo code. They will transition to Qt in the near future.

  21. Re:woohoo! by stevey · · Score: 1

    Losing a phone once I can understand, but after the first time I'd be taking a lot more care where I put it!

    If nothing else you should consider getting phone insurance - the premium won't be huge and if you lost phones as often as you suggest it practically pays for itself.

  22. Down the Pan eh? by RotateLeftByte · · Score: 1, Informative

    If you are that accident prone why not buy used phones. You know the ones that people chuck in a drawer when they get their next shiny new toy.

    Get them unlocked and you are good to go.
    My skinflint cousin does it this way.
    He then signs up for sim only contracts.

    --
    I'd rather be riding my '63 Triumph T120.
  23. Re:woohoo! by SilverEyes · · Score: 1

    When I had a Razr a few years ago I got insurance on it, and the insurance company cancelled me when I dropped the third one in the toilet trying to answer it when I was taking a piss

    Losing a phone once I can understand, but after the first time I'd be taking a lot more care where I put it!

    If nothing else you should consider getting phone insurance - the premium won't be huge and if you lost phones as often as you suggest it practically pays for itself.

    Second paragraph, third sentence.

    --
    Interesting.
  24. Re:woohoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree about being more careful, I've yet to lose or break a phone after maybe 9 years.

    If nothing else you should consider getting phone insurance - the premium won't be huge and if you lost phones as often as you suggest it practically pays for itself.
    Maybe you should try reading the whole comment you're replying to.
    -- gid

  25. Maemo is a very nice platform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Disclosure: I've been a fan of Nokia S60 smartphones for a while, despite the quirks and interface 'uniqueness' (s60v5).

    I picked up an N810 (last display model at a store) recently and was very impressed with the OS2008 release of maemo. It's a beautiful interface on an easy to use platform. I like the form factor for a tablet (but heavy for a phone). I think the N900 shows a lot of promise. I do hope that it is fully functional as a phone.

    I'd love to be able to kill -9 a call from a command prompt someday :-)

    1. Re:Maemo is a very nice platform by johnny0099 · · Score: 1

      This is the bummer. I think the n810 is about 225 grams and the n900 is rumored at 190 grams. Also, the n900 might be thicker than the n810 by 4mm. :(

      The good part, kind of, is the length x width should be very close, if not smaller, than the iPod touch/iPhone.

      --
      Get your dogma outta my yard!
  26. No, it runs CP/M, on a 2GHz Z80A by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's also a plan to port VMS across.

  27. cli? by anonieuweling · · Score: 1

    How is the commandline environment of this device?
    I experienced how lacking the situation on the N810 was, so I do hope they improved their installation (depmod, module autoloading, ethernet over usb, gpsbt library hacks, package manager doesn't know all libs, etc, etc

    1. Re:cli? by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      How is the commandline environment of this device?

      The only phone I had that I needed a command line for was the same one that required me to SSH into the device to set the volume during a call. For those not following along, THIS IS NOT A GOOD THING.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
  28. cool - results? by Tom · · Score: 1

    This is cool, really cool. A full Linux machine in your pocket. Wow.

    Though I do wonder how useful it will actually be. Can Linux bypass the desktop and go straight to the next big thing? User interface and good design are important on such small devices (and frankly, most phones fail more or less), and they're not exactly traditional strongholds of the Linux crowd.

    Nevertheless, this is certainly something interesting.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    1. Re:cool - results? by Tetsujin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is cool, really cool. A full Linux machine in your pocket. Wow.

      Though I do wonder how useful it will actually be. Can Linux bypass the desktop and go straight to the next big thing? User interface and good design are important on such small devices (and frankly, most phones fail more or less), and they're not exactly traditional strongholds of the Linux crowd.

      Personally, those issues don't matter to me. That is, at a basic level I don't care about whether this device succeeds (beyond my own self-serving interest, the desire to buy future versions, perhaps) - I don't care whether it's the "next big thing" that everyone will like - what matters is that it's a device I would like.

      My personal reason for wanting a phone running straight Linux is pretty simple: it's what I enjoy. I ran a Powerbook for several years because I thought the combination of a commercially-backed OS and a Unix core would satisfy me - but I've actually been much happier since switching to an EEE running Linux. It just feels right. X apps aren't treated as "foreign", I can install the latest VNC or Firefox or whatever without buying an OS upgrade, etc. I think I would enjoy a Linux phone for similar reasons. I have a Treo now, running a decrepit (and crash-prone now, thanks to PalmOS features like PACE and NVFS) old copy of LispMe... that's great, but what if I want to tinker with Python or Haskell or C or whatever? That's the great thing about phones running Linux - you can just install and run that stuff. In PalmOS it would be a significant effort to port it. There's still a fair bit of work if you want to port something to a phone and have it look nice (having a GUI well-fitted to the device in question is very important!) - but a lot of the time if I can just get a thing working I'm OK with some rough edges.

      Some people want a phone that they can watch movies on, or tilt left and right to make the car steer. That's great stuff, I am super happy that they can get that. I'm after something a little different. I thought Android might be the way to go, now I'm thinking this might be what I need.

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    2. Re:cool - results? by dwater · · Score: 1

      It sounds like you had a similar experience as I had with OS X/Aqua. I bought a Powerbook because it was unix...but they changed things in annoying ways and the UI didn't work quite right with others. Changing back to Linux made me feel free again.

      --
      Max.
  29. Nice, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But, will it blend!?

  30. Awesome by dandart · · Score: 1

    Sounds great. I can't wait for Qt.

  31. When the price comes down a bit by killmenow · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This will likely be my next major phone upgrade.

    I own an N800 and an N810 and do some Maemo development work on them. They're IMHO awesome devices. I don't know or care about Nokia in general but they have been steadily improving this line of devices since the N770 and I just cannot begin to tell you how slick they are (again IMHO).

    I use skype and gizmo to make VoIP phone calls on them at any Wi-Fi hotspot and they are just fun to play around with. The biggest problem with them, in my experience, is people expect them to be phones and don't get the idea that it's just a handheld PC. Adding cell phone capability with the N900 (and increased horsepower) will, I think, cross this device over from enthusiast toy to a more mainstream "smartphone" even though I think the term does the device a dis-service.

    It's just more than a phone. I've never used a cell phone that had a web experience remotely close to the desktop/laptop world. The N800/N810 is 100 times better than any cell phone @ web browsing. The games available (for the most part if it runs on Linux, it'll run on these devices and I've enjoyed playing MAME games on mine), the productivity tools, the multimedia capabilities, etc.

    I've never developed apps for the iPhone but I've tinkered with BlackBerry development, Android development and Maemo development. While I think it's not as well-documented perhaps as Android or BlackBerry, and getting set up to do development on it is not as simple, it's easily manageable and *much less locked down* than the other platforms. Developing for Android isn't too bad but I think it still is a bit more locked down, developing for BlackBerry you are also definitely limited by what RIM (and the cell providers) will allow you to do. I hope that with Maemo 5 and the new cell-phone stuff, Nokia doesn't cave to cell providers and start locking shit down on these devices and instead keeps to the spirit of the original open-ness so I can still write apps that do what *I* want them to do, not what T-Mobile wants them to do.

    1. Re:When the price comes down a bit by wasabii · · Score: 1

      I think the claims of the Android being 'locked down' have absolutely nothing to do with your ability to write apps for it, just your principaled stand.

      Are you going to be distributing apps that run as root?

      The security model on Android is USEFUL: it keeps apps isolated from each other. if Maemo doesn't have this, there will be no third party market of any reasonable size. Soon as there is some dumb shit will release an app that takes over phones and makes them zombies.

    2. Re:When the price comes down a bit by tepples · · Score: 1

      The biggest problem with them, in my experience, is people expect them to be phones and don't get the idea that it's just a handheld PC.

      Apple managed to get over that hump with the iPod Touch. How did that happen?

    3. Re:When the price comes down a bit by blackraven14250 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      pre-N900 series Primary Function: PC

      iPod Touch Primary Function: Music Player

      Anyone who has even heard the word iPod for like 5 years before the touch came out immediately thought "Music". Nobody went into the store to buy an iPod not having that in their head. The iPod touch isn't marketed or meant to be a phone. It's meant to play music.

      OTOH, you'd be hard-pressed to find many people outside of tech circles that would even know about the N-series. There's no mainstream marketing for it, and it doesn't have a name that's a synonym for its' function.

      My point is, Apple never had a hump to get over with the iPod touch. Nokia doesn't have a hump to get over with the N900 in terms of customers having the wrong expectations. Nokia does have to get the word out about this thing, but that's not quite what you were talking about.

    4. Re:When the price comes down a bit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The security model on Android is USEFUL: it keeps apps isolated from each other.

      Yes, but being able to run something as root on occasion is also useful. Most apps don't run as root on my PC either, but I still have root access if I need it.

  32. To paraphrase a TV celebrity by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    " I totally DO know what it is, and I WANT it"

    Now, what to do with my G1... Oh, wait, a remote terminal for my N9000.

    Ah.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  33. Re:woohoo! by somersault · · Score: 1

    You deserve a medal for reading his massive post in its entirety.

    --
    which is totally what she said
  34. And, just to clear it up a bit... by OpenSourced · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How does this works with the Microsoft-Nokia deal to have Office in the Nokia phones? Don't tell me we are going to have Office in Linux!

    --
    Rome taught me patience and assiduous application to detail. Virtues which temper the boldness of great, general views.
    1. Re:And, just to clear it up a bit... by benmhall · · Score: 1

      The announced MS/Nokia deal was just for S60.

    2. Re:And, just to clear it up a bit... by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Don't tell me we are going to have Office in Linux!

      No, Linux will run in Office. It will be a nice upgrade from macro viruses.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  35. Re:woohoo! by illumin8 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When I had a Razr a few years ago I got insurance on it, and the insurance company cancelled me when I dropped the third one in the toilet trying to answer it when I was taking a piss.

    Here's a novel concept: Don't answer the phone while you're taking a piss...

    --
    "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
  36. damit! by fredan · · Score: 1

    and I just bought an Nokia N97 :-/

    1. Re:damit! by hao3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      i'd still keep the n97. i just got one, and i quite like the d-pad, it's quite handy, especially browsing. although the n900 has the separate arrow keys, a d-pad seems convenient.

      --
      "Impartiality is a pompous name for indifference, which is an elegant name for ignorance." - G.K. Chesterton
  37. Re:woohoo! by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I dropped the third one in the toilet trying to answer it when I was taking a piss.

    That's why I have mine on a lanyard.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  38. Re:woohoo! by stevey · · Score: 1

    I did read that - I meant rather that you should try getting another insurance company to cover you.

    I'm not sure where you're located but here in the UK there are several options, thats ignoring household content policies which can often be used to cover phones.

  39. They bought Trolltech, and this is the result by just+fiddling+around · · Score: 3, Informative

    They bought Trolltech and their Qt Extended phone OS last May, which is completely open-source.

    If you want to see what the OS is like, go and see one of the forks: QtMoko, Qt Extended Improved, and probably others. I am using QtMoko on a Freerunner and the interface is sweet even if some parts need more polishing.

    --
    You're not old until regret takes the place of your dreams.
    1. Re:They bought Trolltech, and this is the result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      No.

      N900 uses Maemo which afaik predates Trolltechs qtopia, openmoko, android etc. It uses GTK as primary toolkit, and Qt only as "community supported", emerging tech. If you want to have some kind of idea what kind of system it is, nokia has already existing line of products using it (n700, n800, n810), and some kind of emulator or something is probably included in the devkit.

    2. Re:They bought Trolltech, and this is the result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it's not. This is not running Qt based UI or using Qt Extended. Qt will be used in the next Maemo platform, though.

    3. Re:They bought Trolltech, and this is the result by Capt.+Beyond · · Score: 1

      Actually no. Maemo is not based on Qtexteded/Qtopia. This version of Maemo is based on GTK+. Development on Qtextended was dropped, and all the developers started developing Qt Mobility and Declaritive UI instead.
       

      --
      -- "Perceptions create reality. By changing your perceptions you change your reality."
    4. Re:They bought Trolltech, and this is the result by Capt.+Beyond · · Score: 1

      Sorry to say, Maemo does not predate Qtopia. Qtopia was shipped on the Sharp Zaurus in 2003.

      --
      -- "Perceptions create reality. By changing your perceptions you change your reality."
  40. Application signing by FreezeS · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm curious why nobody mentioned this subject. For me this is a major PITA when trying to develop on S60. 20$ for the privilege of running my own application on my own phone ??? No, thanks. Does anyone know if this scheme is going to be implemented on this phone ?

    1. Re:Application signing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm curious why nobody mentioned this subject. For me this is a major PITA when trying to develop on S60.
      20$ for the privilege of running my own application on my own phone ??? No, thanks.
      Does anyone know if this scheme is going to be implemented on this phone ?

      It's not. And even if it was, you'll get Linux with full root access & user flashability, so you'd see a workaround in matter of days.

    2. Re:Application signing by peppepz · · Score: 5, Informative

      You can already run your own application on your own phone, officially and for free.
      Just use the Open Signed Online service.

    3. Re:Application signing by bytestorm · · Score: 1

      Previous releases of the Maemo OS have not required any kind of application signing. That said, it's possible they added it to the new device, but I think it's extremely unlikely.

    4. Re:Application signing by snadrus · · Score: 0

      I doubt it. I've programmed on the N800 running the same Maemo system. They recommend programming on a PC first, then copying it over, but I only used that to upgrade the OS (before it had Wireless OS upgrades).

      Now, I program in Python (pyGame, PyGTK) on the phone itself using a bluetooth keyboard.

      I never paid anyone anything after I bought the device, even though I got 2 OS upgrades and 100s of games & programs off the different repos.

      --
      Science & open-source build trust from peer review. Learn systems you can trust.
    5. Re:Application signing by ducky10 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Application Signing is how Nokia is going to control how people distribute applications for this device - this control is a big deal and is not explained in the article. It is a big deal because it determines how "open" the system is: If Nokia has to approve all applications then is this system open at all?

      The link to Symbian's Open Signed Online is an S60 version of how Nokia has done "open" before. I don't think this is the kind of open that people are hoping for, but unless we hear otherwise, it's the type of open we should expect from Nokia.

      Another way to consider the benefits of this phone is to ask how many people have really ever used Symbian's Open Signed Online? Are you. then, the only ones that are supposed to be excited about this phone?

    6. Re:Application signing by EvilNTUser · · Score: 1

      I don't know about that website, but I've signed Symbian apps on my own computer.

      --
      My Sig: SEGV
    7. Re:Application signing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...for 36 months at a time, with restricted access to the API and a warning dialog when the application starts, as long as they feel like keeping the service running and signing off on every change you make and every device you intend to install on. Or so I gather from the linked page. Sounds great.

    8. Re:Application signing by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      A single unauthorised text message can cost a fortune to you or worse, a device calling some Ocean Island with insane price.

      Lets not forget the amazing trojan capabilities. Device is actually a full feature communications device with camera/voice capabilities. On Symbian, we speak about 100M potential victims and possibly real communications breakdown unlike Apple's excuse for J2ME or app store.

      It is good of them that they allow personal signing tied to hardware IMEI, nothing else.

      I have used open signed just for 2 apps, salling clicker S60 client (so it can add itself to startup) and Dr. Jukka's apps which require special permissions since they access deep parts of Symbian. Rest? I have never needed such signing.

      BTW, Nokia sells 10M phones over the weekend, yes el-cheapo dumb ones (although they got decent J2ME) included. All those "dumb" ones will be running Symbian Foundation at one time at future. So, Nokia (or other vendors) doesn't have the luxury to completely open the device to black hats just to prove they are open.

      There are 2 options:

      1) Torture click happy users so they will at least be warned numerous times if the "happy dancing something" app does more than dancing but give option to highly technical and developers "sudo" web service.

      2) Setup "app store" without any kind of forgiving fanbase like Apple's and demand apps to be reviewed like the entire userbase are 6 year old idiots. While on it, disable things like multitasking since "they eat battery".

      Make your choice really...

    9. Re:Application signing by peppepz · · Score: 1

      Do you know a cell phone manufacturer that is more "open" than Nokia?

    10. Re:Application signing by FreezeS · · Score: 1

      This makes a good argument against very expensive text messages.

  41. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  42. Seems to me.... by trum4n · · Score: 1

    its an HTC Touch Pro (my phone) with a GUI that's a bastard son of an iPhone and a PSP. Nothing to see here, move along.

    1. Re:Seems to me.... by hao3 · · Score: 1

      except it doesn't run windows mobile.

      --
      "Impartiality is a pompous name for indifference, which is an elegant name for ignorance." - G.K. Chesterton
    2. Re:Seems to me.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it looks like the HTC tho. and mine dosent run winmo either. It also says sprint and is on the verizon network.

  43. Want! by symbolset · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm going to have to find a way to get one of these. Decent video, open formats, always on cellular wireless. A gorgeous interface. And I can add applications with apt.

    I think a lot of projects are going to start putting more priority on compiling to the ARM platform.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  44. A phone with X11 and apt? by malevolentjelly · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I hope they included pulseaudio, too, because there wasn't enough retarded linux desktop crap on mobile phones.

    The most intelligent linux platforms fit for mobile have been Android and Creative's Plaszma so far... this is just retarded overkill. Is it just built for sysadmins and freetards or something? How big can that market possibly be?

    1. Re:A phone with X11 and apt? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not a phone. So, basically, you couldn't be more wrong.

    2. Re:A phone with X11 and apt? by Limburgher · · Score: 1

      Mr. Ballmer? Is that you?

      --

      You are not the customer.

    3. Re:A phone with X11 and apt? by malevolentjelly · · Score: 1

      Haha, oh my god. You are so clever! You're right, because I don't like the idea of having a giant apt cache on my cellphone, I must be the CEO of Microsoft!

      I see why slashdotters are renowned for their wit!

  45. VNC has been running in MAEMO for four years. by DingerX · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's in the garage.

    If it works in Diablo, and on N770s, n800s and n810s, the n900 has got you covered. The n900 may be a phone, but with its OMAP processor and MID heritage, the nerd angle is already covered.

  46. Sounds like an ad to me by Cannelloni · · Score: 1

    "the unmatchable power of GNU/Linux" Linux is not "unmatchable" by any means. There are other operating systems with the same capabilities.

    --
    Beauty is in the beholder of the eye.
  47. OMG! Sign me up. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1, Funny

    Wow! It has a VT100 emulator? Wow! That means I can tell both emacs and vi to go to hell and launch EDT editor! Holy Cow! How did I past 25 years without a VT100 emulator I can't figure out. I still need a CRA0: card reader and MT0A: tape reader emulators. But I buy this and wait for the retired VAX-11 engineers to hack it up in open source!!!

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  48. Moblin? by nikanth · · Score: 0

    Moblin competitor? Intel versus Nokia?

  49. GNU/Linux?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Something tells me Richard Stallman had a part in this.

  50. Are they FOSS hookers? by cenc · · Score: 1

    As long as they are free and open source hookers as in Free beer.

    1. Re:Are they FOSS hookers? by antoinjapan · · Score: 1

      Open sores maybe....
      I know, I know ...its terrible

    2. Re:Are they FOSS hookers? by wonmon · · Score: 1

      Finally, someone who appreciates my work on open source hookers.

      Regards,
      - The Ice Truck Killer

    3. Re:Are they FOSS hookers? by awrowe · · Score: 1

      GNU/Hookers?

      --
      A.I. Research. The peculiar science in which we know the question and we know the answer, but can't show the working
  51. Re:woohoo! by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    That was the last time I ever answered the phone while pissing. The trouble is, I like beer.

  52. Re:woohoo! by ShannaraFan · · Score: 1

    > dropped the third one in the toilet trying to answer it when I was taking a piss

    Because calling them back wasn't an option? I wish I got important phone calls like this...

  53. Re:woohoo! by gabebear · · Score: 1

    Hmmm... I don't suffer from this affliction, but I am amazed at how people drop there phones in the worst places. My mother managed to drop her little Motorola in a cup of coffee.

    For me a lanyard would probably get my phone destroyed. I'd try throwing it from one hand to the other, have the line go taught, and have it smash into something. The worst I've done it have the phone fall out of my pocket into a gutter(while it was raining). After the phone dried out it was fine, I love LG.

  54. I can't believe everybody missed this point . . . by mmell · · Score: 1

    . . . can you imagine a Beowulf cluster of these? . . .

  55. Profit by zero0ne · · Score: 1

    1) Help Nokia market this phone
    2) Create botnet for this phone/linux....
    3) ...
    4) ....
    5) .....
    6) Profit?

    yeah yeah, a crappy first try at a profit post, but really, a botnet on a _linux_ phone? that'll be the day

  56. If this is anything like the N800... by hovercycle · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Do not get a Nokia. I own a Nokia N800 and compared to the iphone it is absolute shit! I say this from experience, don't be fooled by the fact that it uses linux! Even with a terminal installed they are not that cool ( I have a fold out keyboard also and it still sucks) , unless the touchscreen is equivalent to what the ipod touch has. And I'm sure it is probably the same type of touch screen that the N800 has which is crap! IPOD is unmatch and will be for a while still!

  57. Re:woohoo! by geminidomino · · Score: 2, Funny

    > dropped the third one in the toilet trying to answer it when I was taking a piss

    Because calling them back wasn't an option? I wish I got important phone calls like this...

    Spoken like someone without a girlfriend. A callback 30 seconds later... wow, that's ballsy.

    "Where WERE you? I tried calling you!"
    "Yeah, I'm calling you back, I was in the head"
    "You're with that bitch, aren't you?"
    *Head-desks*

  58. Re:woohoo! by speculatrix · · Score: 1

    here's a novel idea: use a lanyard. a lot of phones come with them but people are too lazy/stupid to bother. in some countries they use cellphones like medallions!

  59. Re:woohoo! by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    I just wasn't thinking. I'd been in the car, and my friend saw her friend on the gound with two police officers standing over him, so we pulled into the gas station so she could run over to help. I took the opportunity to go inside the store and relieve myself.

    It turned out that rather than arresting the fellow, the cops were helpiing him -- he was elderly (and drunk) and had fallen down. We wound up thanking the cops and taking him home.

    The bastard pissed on my car seat. No good deed ever goes unpunished...

  60. Re:woohoo! by ShannaraFan · · Score: 1

    Married, actually. A girlfriend like that wouldn't last long.

  61. Such a beautiful day by slack_prad · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    CAN'T BELIEVE I'M BEING FORCED TO USE THIS SHIT BROWSER AT WORK!

    Scrolling is so painfully slow .. it's like playing a pixellated lagging game.

    IE6

    --
    Sent from my desktop computer
    1. Re:Such a beautiful day by chord.wav · · Score: 1

      Ugh! I think Guantanamo prisoners are allowed to use better browsers!

      Somebody should make a Firefox-in-an-Active-X or something. Nobody should take to that kind of suffering.

    2. Re:Such a beautiful day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do a search for Portable Firefox

  62. Re:woohoo! by SilverEyes · · Score: 1

    "Yeah, I'm calling you back, I was in the head"

    "You're with that bitch, aren't you?"

    Maybe it's slang I don't recognize, but this doesn't seem like an unreasonable response to me :P

    --
    Interesting.
  63. Overage fees by tepples · · Score: 1

    Imagine a world where your phone is your server.

    Imagine the overage fees when you exceed the 5 GB per month cap that the network imposes on your server's Internet connection.

    1. Re:Overage fees by bemymonkey · · Score: 4, Funny

      Imagine not being able to call 911 because your phone got Slashdotted...

    2. Re:Overage fees by johnny0099 · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I'm both laughing and crying. Good times.

      I wish I mod points for you.

      --
      Get your dogma outta my yard!
    3. Re:Overage fees by mahmud · · Score: 1

      Imagine the overage fees when you exceed the 5 GB per month cap that the network imposes on your server's Internet connection.

      Imagine living in a country with competitive telecom market where most GSM/3G providers don't have network traffic cap and flat-rate data plans cost peanuts! (hint: these places actually exist, and I live in one of them)

    4. Re:Overage fees by tepples · · Score: 1

      Imagine living in a country with competitive telecom market

      Now imagine that country having restrictive immigration policies and probably no official language in common with my own.

    5. Re:Overage fees by JAlexoi · · Score: 1

      Even it wasn't Slashdotted, it would not help me dialing 911, since Nokia and a bunch of us are in Europe, where 112 is THE number, you insensitive clod!

    6. Re:Overage fees by AlexiaDeath · · Score: 1

      Funny, but no. Emergency numbers work in most civilized countries even from a phone without a SIM card.

  64. Re:woohoo! by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    I want to trade my ST:OS phone for a ST:NG model! The thing rings, you tap it and talk. Want to talk, tap it and say who you're calling. You can't lose it because it's pinned to your shirt. My old Razr was voice activated, even though sometimes it confused Mom with Mike when I was calling one or the other.

  65. Re:woohoo! by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

    Well you just know all those insurance companies will share risk data...
    "Customer goes through phones like mint candies, do not issue phone insurance!"

    Then when they start really using the DNA information accumulating everywhere it will be:
    "DNA database indicates the customer has a predisposition to drop his phone during urination, do not issue phone insurance!"

    --
    You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
  66. One faction's rationale by tepples · · Score: 1

    There's the "phone should just make phone calls and not have all this shit added on!" faction, which is pre-dominant in a lot of stories.

    This faction includes tightwads like me, who use a mobile phone primarily to arrange rides and a land-line for everything else. We don't want to upgrade from our $6/mo Virgin Mobile plan to something that costs an order of magnitude more.

  67. Verizon? by edmicman · · Score: 1

    Soooo...when's it coming to Verizon?

    1. Re:Verizon? by Mulder3 · · Score: 1

      Poor Americans... I don't rely at all on mobile phone provider... If want a certain phone, i simply buy it from whatever store i want and swap the SIM card from my old phone to the new one... Oh... wait... Verizon uses that crap called CDMA... We don't have that in Portugal... However you could just buy a non-verizon CDMA phone, and get Verizon to activate the phone's ESN on you account right?... I simply don't get why you, Americans, buy providers banded phones with features crippled... When you could buy non-branded phones and swap the sim card(or active the new phones ESN in case of CDMA)

    2. Re:Verizon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CDMA is not crap. It's the phone-lock-in policy of the US carriers that is crap.

      You need to be clear on the distinction between the communication technology the phone uses and the ... erm ... customer-loyalty assurance practices of the industry.

    3. Re:Verizon? by Mulder3 · · Score: 1

      I agree... However you have to agree that CDMA/EV-DO is a inferior technology when compared with UMTS/HSDPA...

    4. Re:Verizon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree... However you have to agree that CDMA/EV-DO is a inferior technology when compared with UMTS/HSDPA...

      I don't know. But even if it were, so what? These technologies are leap-frogging each other all the time. Granted, maybe HSDPA can multitask better. But most carriers pretty-much match their competitors in bandwidth. I'm not so sure about power efficiency of the handsets. (Used to be that CDMA had the edge over WCDMA here. Is this still true?)

      Besides, customers don't get into geek-wars about the technology. They care about other things, like coverage, cost, phone and plan features, etc.

      That said ... boy do I wish the US and Canadian CDMA carriers offered SIM cards for their phones.

  68. Suitability for development? by Commander+Doofus · · Score: 1

    Been looking for a Linux phone / PDA to develop apps for. Any thoughts on how this would compare to Palm Pre / Mojo / webOS?

    --
    Want to improve your life? This guy will show you how!
  69. Still not an iPhone though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so what's the point?

    1. Re:Still not an iPhone though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course its not an iPhone. Its better.

    2. Re:Still not an iPhone though by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      so what's the point?

      I don't want an iPhone. Nothing wrong with it, just the iPhone ain't for me. I guess that's the point.

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
  70. I doesn't matter by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

    What you state is true for the Linux "brand". Unless the I/O capabilities and application code running on the "worlds fastest super computers" can run on your wristwatch, it doesn't matter.

    1. Re:I doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha ha, is that the best argument you can come up with? You proprietards are growing even more pathetic by the day.

    2. Re:I doesn't matter by V!NCENT · · Score: 1

      What ClosedSource is saying is not really far from the truth. At least he is bringing some serious arguments to the table instead of pure lies and insults only. However it's completely besides the point.

      --
      Here be signatures
    3. Re:I doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, really, what so-called ClosedSource is saying is a straw man. Nobody said you are going to copy the same binaries onto a super computer as you would a wrist watch running Linux. However, the kernel running on that super computer, as well as the hypothetical wrist watch came from here. So, yes, with some requiring more work than others, many of the same apps can be ran on both.

      For example, I'm typing this on a desktop running Debian GNU/Linux. I also happen to have a T-Mobile G1, also with Debian installed on it but compiled for the arm architecture. Many of the same apps run on both. I type in apt-get install firefox on the desktop, firefox gets installed. I type apt-get install firefox on my Android phone running Debian and it gets installed. Try that with Windows/WinCE. Or OSX/OSX for the iPhone, etc.

    4. Re:I doesn't matter by ricegf · · Score: 1

      They both run xterm. That's all that matters.

    5. Re:I doesn't matter by V!NCENT · · Score: 1
      --
      Here be signatures
  71. The first thing I noticed by codepunk · · Score: 1

    The first thing I noticed is how the UI is not consistent, every screen things are arranged differently.

    --


    Got Code?
    1. Re:The first thing I noticed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The screenshots are from a prototype of the device - Nokia has not even announced this phone yet. Expect the final UI to have a bit more polish.

  72. Re:woohoo! by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

    Man I hate it when people do that. Don't talk to me while you're pissing, taking a dump or in the bath. In fact anytime your pants are down, just leave the phone alone and get to the business at hand (as it were.)

    --
    If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
  73. Re:woohoo! by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's a brilliant idea! Why didn't I think of that?

    Put my dick on a lanyard!

    --
    This space available.
  74. Android by killmenow · · Score: 1

    I've only just begun getting into Android. I may be wrong there. I like what I've gotten into so far it just seems way too tied to Google. That's what I meant.

    But I freely admit I could be wrong because I've really only just begun with it and have not gotten far enough in to figure out how easy it is to run Android on whatever device I want and not rely on Google's services. I believe it can be done as I seem to recall some story about Android powering set top boxes and even a netbook.

  75. So I'll be able to have Cron? by r_jensen11 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If I can put Cron on this thing, it will be worth it. Setting schedules for changing profiles (automatically switch phone to silent at 8:30, switch back to normal at 5:30) would almost be worth it on its own.

  76. Crippled, how? by getuid() · · Score: 1

    A nokia phone with a more-or-less-debian on it?

    Sounds almost too good to be true. And so far, whenever somthing sounded too good to be true, it was. So, right now I'm just burning to see how Nokia's going to cripple this one...

  77. Re:woohoo! by speculatrix · · Score: 1

    OK, get an watch phone, these have voice dialling, and with a bluetooth headset you can pretend to be a borg.

  78. Re:woohoo! by geminidomino · · Score: 1

    "Yeah, I'm calling you back, I was in the head"

    "You're with that bitch, aren't you?"

    Maybe it's slang I don't recognize, but this doesn't seem like an unreasonable response to me :P

    It means "bathroom"

  79. Re:woohoo! by couchslug · · Score: 1

    "Here's a novel concept: Don't answer the phone while you're taking a piss..."

    I'm incontinent, you insensitive clod!

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  80. Re:woohoo! by sorak · · Score: 1

    When I had a Razr a few years ago I got insurance on it, and the insurance company cancelled me when I dropped the third one in the toilet trying to answer it when I was taking a piss.

    Here's a novel concept: Don't answer the phone while you're taking a piss...

    ...unless your using hands-free or bluetooth.

  81. Look at the bright side.. by cheros · · Score: 1

    Following that line of reasoning you'd have to cope with EDLIN on Windows driven phones :-)

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  82. Which one is Javascript? by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1

    The Dodge Ram on 33s riding proud at 65 in the left lane.

    --
    "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
    1 John 4:14
  83. Re:woohoo! by ioshhdflwuegfh · · Score: 1

    Very useful, especially if you have detachable penis.

  84. Looks good but here's the catch by gilesjuk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Apple created iPhone OS and are developing it with each release.

    Nokia and others keep developing platforms, then letting them stagnate, then dropping them and creating another platform.

    Just give your users some continuity, stop switching between platforms, it seriously annoys developers as they don't have time to master a platform and it annoys users who get sick of rebuying applications for each device.

  85. Re:woohoo! by Runaway1956 · · Score: 0, Troll

    What a loser. You know that laptops come with lock down cables, right? So, get one for your phone, FFS. Now, you're going to ask me, "What do I lock it down to?" Oh ye of little imagination. You've heard of body piercing, right? Take your lame ass down to the local piercing shop, lay your tallywhacker on the counter, and have a ring put into it. (Yes, they make rings small enough to fit your equipment.) Take all of your jeans, cut a little hole in the bottom of the pocket so you can pass that cable through. Attach one end of the cable to your ring, attach the other end to the phone. Problem solved. And, just THINK of what you and your girlfriend can do with that cable at night!! Oh, one last thought. Turn the ringer off on your phone, and just let the thing vibrate.

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  86. So the FCC won't let me be or let me be me by tepples · · Score: 1

    And I think that some people don't care what their cell phone manufacturer/carrier think is best for them

    What about what their national government agency that regulates radio communication thinks is best for them? Some less-expensive phone architectures run baseband and apps on the same core. These need some sort of sandbox, or applications will be able to step all over the baseband. FCC no like.

  87. You have no idea what you're talking about. by QuoteMstr · · Score: 1

    embedded

    First of all, modern Javascript is fast. Even if it weren't, this isn't your grandmother's Intel 8080. Modern cell phones have processors that would beat the pants off a desktop machine from a scant few years ago while using a reasonable amount of power. (Counter-intuitively, using a faster processor saves power because you spend less time running code and more in low-power sleep.)

    Pretty much the only things a VM buys you are architecture independence and a certain measure of protection against exploits.

    Don't forget cleaner, smaller code and a certain insulation from API changes. Have you so quickly forgotten the pain of the Great Symbian ABI break? With Javascript, there is no ABI to break, which gives the platform developers far more flexibility in improving the platform.

    And in the case of WebOS it's not even a bytecode VM (or is it?) - it's interpreting textual program code...

    You clearly have no idea how modern Javascript runtime systems work. They're compiled to bytecode for ages, and modern Javascript engines compile down to machine code. Like I said, modern Javascript is fast as hell.

    stuff like non-executable memory pages - that would provide a lot of the same protection as interpreted code

    There are more vulnerabilities in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in your philosophy. Non-executable pages provide some protection against some attacks, but they're not a panacea.

    At least it seems this time they are going to follow through with some good native code options...

    They are already there if you really need them. You can write a browser plugin (using NSAPI, the API that's been stable for 15 years) or you can write a normal, boring Linux process in whatever language you want, and have your Javascript front-end communicate with it over dbus. (That's how WebOS reuses libpurple, the same library that Pidgin uses.) But chances are, you don't need to write native code.

    1. Re:You have no idea what you're talking about. by johnny0099 · · Score: 1

      But chances are, you don't need to write native code.

      I think history has shown that this is only true in your dreams.

      Don't get me wrong, dreams are good, but reality's better.

      --
      Get your dogma outta my yard!
  88. Re:woohoo! by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    I am a cyborg, I have a device (CrystaLens) implanted in my left eye.

    You will be assimilated!

  89. or buy a Palm Pre: also uses a standard distro by Knytefall · · Score: 2, Informative

    the Palm Pre has a standard OpenEmbedded based distro. you can install packages from the OptWare repository. enjoy fully supported, debugged and tested Linux components that are updated on a regular basis--all written by very talented engineers who are committed to getting awesomeness to customers as often as they can. (has Nokia ever released updates as often as Palm has for webOS?)

    don't like javascript apps? rip out the webOS window manager and put whatever you want on it. or maybe you want both. you can always switch between the two. the development community has already figured out how to do this.

    and the Mojo javascript development environment does have its strengths. it's the first platform since the computers of the 80s where you can hack on it right out of the box.

    how could you not love a company that made the contra code an officially-supported way of entering development mode?

  90. Re: Cell phone as a computer by AshboryBass · · Score: 1
    I haven't tried it, but I bet my Logitech bluetooth keyboard works with a phone. From there, all that's missing is:
    1. Some sort of video out
    2. Software and UI for running in computer mode.

    When you think about the amount of new TVs with built-in VGA and HDMI inputs, a phone that grows into a computer could become popular.

  91. Re:woohoo! by dmihalko · · Score: 1

    thats the only time to answer a phone... at least at the strip club.

  92. VT100 terminal emulator??? by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

    My computer science upbringing consisted in serial line terminals. The DEC VT220 is where I did loads of work on. That was late 80s and I have never ever used or seen a VT100 as by that time that was considered ancient. As I'm in the category older/mature, I'd wager that not only the vast majority of prospect clients will not give a rat's arse about VT100 but also most of us techies. Hell, will the phone come with a 25 pin RS232 port? Maybe grandpa Ken and Dennis -and I say this with the utmost respect- might remember the VT100 all too well, but for most of us it is merely the simplest protocol by which a terminal works.

    Whoever wrote the blurb isn't a hands on techie. Otherwise he/she would have just referred to a terminal emulator.

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
    1. Re:VT100 terminal emulator??? by EvilNTUser · · Score: 1

      I think you just answered your own question. VT100 is the lowest common denominator. Notice how the summary also said "X11" rather than "X11 with compositing extensions", which would be more impressive but detract from the point.

      Even Wikipedia calls VT100 the "de facto standard" of terminal emulators. It's also what I set my terminal to when some software asks about it, because I know it'll work.

      --
      My Sig: SEGV
    2. Re:VT100 terminal emulator??? by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

      Where ever did you see a VT100 emulator being advertised as such in the last 10 years? Currently, terminal emulation technology can almost be considered commodity. Nowadays you're likely to run an emulator using xterm, ansi or dtterm protocols.

      Advertising VT100 is like putting on your hotel brochure that you have modern copper plumbing. Of course you have, it's 2009 for god sake.

      --

      I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
    3. Re:VT100 terminal emulator??? by EvilNTUser · · Score: 1

      Yes, but do you have modern copper plumbing *on your phone*? ;) I think it's pretty funny a modern cell phone supports a really old terminal emulation standard out of the box.

      I still occasionally get screwed up characters in certain situations. VT100 always works.

      --
      My Sig: SEGV
    4. Re:VT100 terminal emulator??? by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

      I used to get bothered by terminal emulators and shells. I still fail to understand why most shells were so picky about BS (0x08) and DEL (0x7f.)

      It must have been years since I used a terminal emulator that didn't negotiate the correct protocol. Mostly xterm-color is used and works pretty well.

      Sure, way cool VT100 is still around and on mobile phones too. I bet it won't take long before some hosty will inevitably use a 3270 emulator.

      --

      I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
    5. Re:VT100 terminal emulator??? by EvilNTUser · · Score: 1

      To be honest, I can't actually remember when my last problem was. I think it involved Cygwin, SSH, OpenBSD and GNU Screen.

      --
      My Sig: SEGV
  93. Re:woohoo! by MarceloR2 · · Score: 1

    Simple solution is get a lanyard and carry the phone wound your neck. Ignore anyone who attempts to criticize you, you've got your reasons!

  94. Interpreted code on an embedded device is retarded by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

    And in the case of WebOS it's not even a bytecode VM (or is it?) - it's interpreting textual program code...

    You clearly have no idea how modern Javascript runtime systems work. They're compiled to bytecode for ages, and modern Javascript engines compile down to machine code. Like I said, modern Javascript is fast as hell.

    You've made some good points, for sure.

    Storage space on these devices is an issue as well, however. It seems rather silly to store source code on your device in addition to a native binary. Given that this is Palm we're talking about I'm not convinced that their runtime engine is terribly well optimized for time or space... That's sort of a separate issue, of course, more specific to the Pre itself. But ever since PACE failed to go away I haven't trusted Palm with any serious technical decisions. :)

    One issue that makes a huge difference here is whether WebOS programs are stored as Javascript source or as byte-compiled code. If it's the former then that is simply cracked - blatant waste of limited resources. If it's the latter, that's more reasonable. I still don't think it's too bright to run interpreted code on an embedded device, but at least if the "interpreted code" is an intermediate, compact byte code that's a bit better.

    stuff like non-executable memory pages - that would provide a lot of the same protection as interpreted code

    blah blah blah blah Non-executable pages provide some protection against some attacks, but they're not a panacea.

    And interpreted code is?

    I mean, look at the overall situation: really, there's very little a process can do on an OS unless the OS kernel allows it. Network communication, I/O, CPU utilization, thread or process creation, memory utilization, whatever - it all goes through system calls, and the OS kernel is at liberty to deny any request that it chooses to. The only thing an interpreted environment offers beyond this in the way of safeguards is protection from hardware vulnerabilities - flaws in the CPU's implementation of access control that could result in privilege escalation issues.

    At least it seems this time they are going to follow through with some good native code options...

    They are already there if you really need them. You can write a browser plugin (using NSAPI, the API that's been stable for 15 years) or you can write a normal, boring Linux process in whatever language you want, and have your Javascript front-end communicate with it over dbus. (That's how WebOS reuses libpurple, the same library that Pidgin uses.) But chances are, you don't need to write native code.

    The hell I don't.

    First off, maybe I've got some hefty established code base I want to port over, rather than re-write in a new language. (The HanDBase people are apparently facing this issue - their app was written for PalmOS in C. To move it over to the Pre - natively, I mean - requires either porting that C code or rewriting the damn thing...)

    Or maybe I just have some code that I need to run fast. Games are one of the most common scenarios. (Palm, I've heard, are already addressing that...)

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  95. Ten-hut! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, +5 insightful, the MS astroturfers are both numerous and popular on Slashdot these-a-days!
    Now get to work soldiers and mod me down!

  96. Smart phone PDAs will dominate coming convergence by dbdweeb · · Score: 1

    Nokia, the world's largest handset mfgr is getting into netbooks and Dell, the world's largest PC mfgr is getting into handsets. As a developer I need to know who's going to win the battle. I am in serious need of a cystal ball...

    I've been trying to psych myself up and jump in to Android development with both feet but that means getting back in to Java, the SDK and the Android way. I can apply myself to learn and master any language but I want to understand the future before I drink the Koolaid. Google went to great lengths to create a secure sandbox in order to appeal to the security conscious carriers but the Maemo openness is more appealing. Does Maemo have a chance against the Android juggernaut?

  97. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you mean your phone?

  98. Re:woohoo! by shank001 · · Score: 1

    Spoken like someone without a girlfriend.

    This is /. We don't have girlfriends, so we don't know.

  99. Re:Interpreted code on an embedded device is retar by QuoteMstr · · Score: 1

    Given that this is Palm we're talking about I'm not convinced that their runtime engine is terribly well optimized for time or space...

    Do some research before spreading FUD. Palm WebOS uses V8, the same Javascript engine that Chrome uses. It compiles to machine code.

    Storage space on these devices is an issue as well, however. It seems rather silly to store source code on your device in addition to a native binary.

    You're not storing the source and the binary: you're storing the source and generating the binary at runtime. You don't need to simultaneously hold in memory all the compiled code for all programs, or even the whole of a single program. Furthermore, source is often smaller than the binary. Saving the generated code wouldn't be advantageous either because the time it takes to generate it is trivial. This whole line of argument is specious.

    And native code [is a panacea]?

    The set of vulnerabilities in managed code is a subset of the set of vulnerabilities in native code, barring bugs in the runtime environment. Of course managed code isn't invulnerable, but many common attacks against native code simply don't apply.

    First off, maybe I've got some hefty established code base I want to port over, rather than re-write in a new language.

    If the code is portable to Linux, do what Palm did for libpurple and abstract it away. If, as in your example, the code is written for some obscure, dead environment, then you're going to have to port the code anyway regardless of what Palm offers; at that point, you might as well just port it to Javascript.

    Or maybe I just have some code that I need to run fast. Games are one of the most common scenarios.

    For graphics and sound, yes. There are APIs for that, including a 3D canvas extension that (AFAIK) will be distributed soon. The 2D stuff already works very well.

  100. very nice by OrangeMonkey11 · · Score: 1

    I really like that fact that they put a cover on the camera lens. I have to get a new back cover for my phone since my lens is all scratched up and my picture turned out all fuzzy and have a smokey effect.

  101. This is great new because my N97 SUX by kurt555gs · · Score: 1

    I just "upgraded" my wonderful N95 8GB to a buggy, strange, morphodite N97. I also have the Nokia, N770 and N800 tablets which rock. I know I just blew 700 bux and change on the awful N97, however I will give Nokia this one mistake. I hope the N900 is like the tablet with a phone, and more.

    I'll be 1st in line.

    --
    * Carthago Delenda Est *
  102. Re:woohoo! by X0563511 · · Score: 1

    So? Does it really take you that long to piss?

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  103. Re:woohoo! by X0563511 · · Score: 1

    "Yeah, I'm calling you back, I was in the head"
    "You're with that bitch, aren't you?"

    "Yea, actually I was. I forgot to tell you I'm breaking up with you, you clingy, narcissistic jackass. She'd say hello, but my cock is in the way." would be the proper response to that. Substitute "jackass" for your choice of word.

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  104. Re:woohoo! by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    I have huge kidneys and a huge bladder.

  105. Re:woohoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > dropped the third one in the toilet trying to answer it when I was taking a piss

    Because calling them back wasn't an option? I wish I got important phone calls like this...

    Spoken like someone without a girlfriend. A callback 30 seconds later... wow, that's ballsy.

    Wow. I'm really sorry for you, but some of us have mentally stable girlfriends, thankyouverymuch.

  106. Re:Interpreted code on an embedded device is retar by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

    Given that this is Palm we're talking about I'm not convinced that their runtime engine is terribly well optimized for time or space...

    Do some research before spreading FUD. Palm WebOS uses V8, the same Javascript engine that Chrome uses. It compiles to machine code.

    Sorry, don't really know where to get this kind of information about WebOS. But, you know, Palm really hasn't inspired a lot of confidence in me over the last five years. That's not FUD, that's fact. But I also accept as fact that their new platform may have its act together a little better than I thought. It's just very counter-intuitive, you know? I'm used to Palm being the sad old shadow of their former glory. :)

    Storage space on these devices is an issue as well, however. It seems rather silly to store source code on your device in addition to a native binary.

    You're not storing the source and the binary: you're storing the source and generating the binary at runtime.

    You either store two copies of the program all the time, or re-interpret it each time you run... Or something in between (caching strategy) - either way, storing textual program code on the device is very wasteful.

    And [managed] code [is a panacea]?

    The set of vulnerabilities in managed code is a subset of the set of vulnerabilities in native code, barring bugs in the runtime environment. Of course managed code isn't invulnerable, but many common attacks against native code simply don't apply.

    Still not convinced that's worth a big chunk of runtime performance, storage, and severe restriction in the choice of development languages - but that's just me. :)

    If, as in your example, the code is written for some obscure, dead environment, then you're going to have to port the code anyway regardless of what Palm offers

    Palm users aren't supposed to talk about PalmOS as an obscure dead platform... XD

    In the case of HanDBase they already ported the app to WinCE and other platforms, including the desktop version of Windows, basically rewriting the whole database interface to work with flat PDB files... It's still pretty natural to expect they'd have to rewrite the GUI for a new platform, but they've got a bunch of code which, one would hope, would simply be reusable on a new platform. Work that's already done which shouldn't have to be redone, or retested. This is somewhat complicated on platforms where apps are expected to be fully managed and language choice is limited.

    Anyway - as I said you've made very good points... I'd like to look at the platform from a somewhat different angle. Ignoring the whole managed code/Javascript issue, which is also a matter of taste from my perspective- What's so great about WebOS? All I really know about it is what's on Wikipedia, combined with the fact that a lot of people seem to think it's really quite fantastic, for reasons I can't quite pin down.

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  107. Re:I can't believe everybody missed this point . . by jfanning · · Score: 1

    Funny you should mention that.

    Mozilla uses a cluster of N810's for developing/testing Fennec...

    http://blog.johnford.info/14-more-nokias/

  108. stupid question by metasonix · · Score: 1

    If Nokia wanted Maemo to be an ongoing, living OSS project, they'd let other manufacturers make hardware to run it. In fact, they'd actively ENCOURAGE other manufacturers. With more platforms, there would be more impetus for developers to produce Maemo apps.

    I have yet to see a low-power consumption "general purpose PC" using an OMAP3 or 4 processor. Seems to me that would be a great machine for commercial thin-client or embedded/kiosk uses, or netbooks, or other handhelds. AFAICS, there is no such hardware on the market--just the Nokia 700/800 series. (The few OMAP3 small computers I've seen have been like the Glacier E2000--they stick you with miserable old Windows CE, take it or leave it. Or you get Android. Or you get a Palm Pre, and you're stuck with whatever that thing runs, and a devel community that only cares about porting old Palm OS apps to that new OS.....That's your choice. Want to install a more general-purpose OS? Sorry.)

    This is likely to be a great little machine, and I'm probably going to buy one. Say what you will about the older Nokia tablets, they are valid handheld computers, the web browser is better than any on other handhelds, and their screens make the iPhone's display look pathetic. However, it would be nice to see Maemo enjoy a more diverse future, than running on a single Nokia handheld.

  109. Re:woohoo! by X0563511 · · Score: 1

    Perhaps you can work on increasing your urethral diameter :P

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  110. bsd b*tches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bsd ftw!

    1. Re:bsd b*tches by V!NCENT · · Score: 1

      Too bad my friend: not only is BSD lightyears behind Linux with lack of features and support, but if you benchmark it with Linux then it's is also faster.

      *BSD is dead. That's not me flaiming *BSD or anything, just fact. Oh and Netcraft confirms it.

      --
      Here be signatures
  111. Err, real Linux apps available by Kludge · · Score: 1
  112. No signing -- just repos by DingerX · · Score: 1

    The way Maemo currently works on the Nokia Tablets is without signing. I would assume, though, that they get some control over what applications get according to the repository they're in. So far, getting into Maemo-extras (or whatever it is) hasn't appeared to be a hurdle for anyone with a legitimate product.

    My biggest beef is that those OMWeather folks seem to update their build every week or so.

  113. Underwear smoke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't breathe this!

  114. Tsk, tsk. by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 1

    Imagine Beowulf of those, dude.

  115. Guys, can you do me a favor? by mqduck · · Score: 1

    Can anybody lend me $780? You know I'm good for it.

    --
    Property is theft.
    1. Re:Guys, can you do me a favor? by cboslin · · Score: 1

      Get a Nokia N800, cheaper, two Micro SD slots, GPS module (extra of course) and it has the FM chip that was discontinued in the N880. I think it will only set you back about $300 today, check pricegrabber. Now ask if anyone can lend you $300 and that you are good for it.

  116. Nice....but not for me by MrClever · · Score: 1

    It runs linux (w00t) and has a really nice screen. However, it's a brick. I think I'll stick with my iPhone 3GS and Netbook running linux combo thanks; lug a brick when I need to, simplicity and elegance when I only want the phone.

  117. Troll, but I'll play by agnosticnixie · · Score: 1

    The shell can be switched to zsh with ease and almost everyone uses bash somewhere
    The utilities in an embedded are usually busybox which are not part of GNU, hell, you could even run the BSD utilities.
    The kernel can run alone and most linux applications run a kernel without shell or utilities in the embedded world.
    The GNU system is a retcon after even the GNU Project internally admitted that GNU was a failure as a full stand-alone OS because its kernel design choices were poor and the kernel hackers had ridiculous priorities.
    The distributions are OS in and of themselves. I don't use GNU/Linux, I use Archlinux.

  118. Re:woohoo! by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

    As somebody who, is currently being frustrated by the cheapest phone available (Sony Ericsson have crippled the software so bad it doesn't have features the N500 had, deleting oldest sms, etc), I really hope that linux makes its way down the food chain to cheap nokia phone a few years in the future.

    --
    IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
  119. $780? Yeah right by shiftless · · Score: 1

    Estimated price without credit: $780

    LOL. Thanks, but no thanks.

  120. Re:woohoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    please.

  121. Re:woohoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Estimated price without credit: $780

    WTF? My credit score affects the price I'm quoted for a phone?

    Presumably this meant to mean "without a contract subsidy"? Some of us choose PAYG based on usage, but it doesn't stop us buying a non-crappy phone.

  122. My observations.. by mxh83 · · Score: 1

    Did anyone notice how filthy the piece in the link is. It seems as if someone rubbed it on an oily pig before taking the pics.

    And the original post is obviously a promotional thing by one of Nokia's drones. Can't anyone see that.

    As for the phone, well I don't care about Linux part, but seeing the screenshots there are so many UI mistakes that know they are not gonna do anything to the iphone market share. Some companies just don't get it.

  123. Re:woohoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    iPhone is $750 by real price, so all of them who compare this to that, price is not that different. :)

  124. Challenge by randyleepublic · · Score: 0

    I will buy one of these. But one thing will totally suck: synchronization with Outlook. If any of you code monkeys had any balls, you come up with an app that would reliabley and painlessly sync this bad boy with my hosted exchange. I would pay a monthly fee for that to "just work!"

    --
    Social Credit would solve everything...
  125. Re:woohoo! by beaviz · · Score: 1

    Here's a novel concept: Don't answer the phone while you're taking a piss...

    ...unless your using hands-free or bluetooth.

    I'm always using the hands-free method when taking a piss...

  126. I still prefer my G1 for on-the-go hacking by ansible · · Score: 1

    That N900 is nice. Really nice screen and processor.

    But the battery isn't going to be big enough. I had to get a 2600mAh battery for my G1 (which makes the phone quite fat) just to get some decent usage out of it. The standard 1100mAh wasn't nearly enough on the G1, so I doubt a 1300mAh one on the N900 is going to be sufficient either.

    The other critical factor for me is the keyboard. The G1 has all the symbols you'd normally use in programming, and I really appreciate that. Well, except for the escape key, but that's mapped to the trackball with the ConnectBot application (local terminal and ssh client).

    Still... a laudable effort from Nokia. If I could just talk them into one more row of keys...

  127. You don't have permission to distribute by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

    Are you joking? Port application for what? For some idiot intern CS student to reject it?

    How will you distribute? To 1% nerds who bought iPhone but hacked it to be a real smart phone?

    They reject Google, the giant, Internet God, whatever you call them... They openly joke with FCC. As a single developer, your application won't be rejected right? For what reason exactly?

  128. no glibc, no x11 is the problem. by dfries · · Score: 1

    Android is a complete linux distribution that uses a different Window Manager and has a well defined consistent Object Oriented development platform.

    Different window manager? It doesn't even run X-windows. Between not having X11 and not using glibc (trying building shared library for google android), means you can't even begin to compile an existing Unix GUI application for Android. That is the bigger gripe to me than if it shipped with all the normal programs I expect with a complete Linux distribution. With a Linux Standard Base distribution, download the source, compile, and run, not with Android.

    1. Re:no glibc, no x11 is the problem. by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Who says you need X11? Who says you need glibc? If you want them, go ahead and add them. The platform is fscking Open . What part of that are people are having trouble understanding? You have access to all the drivers. You have access to the Linux kernel source. You have access to entire Source Code repository via the correct tool for all things Linux related (Linus' git). What's your issue?

      I'm guessing you don't have an embedded systems development background, or you wouldn't think twice about whipping up a Cross Compiler, grabbing the tree, making the changes you want, and creating an signing the package. Trust me, it is all there. People are doing it all the time.

      OTOH, many people are just writing apps for the Android platform. It has a purpose. It is fast, provides a consistent user experience in a way most most other Linux distributions don't. It leverages The Astonishing Tribe, who are doing some amazing things you couldn't acheive easily, if at all, with X11 and a typical Window Manager from a desktop distribution.

      Again, it's not a desktop. It is a device that blurs the line between a netbook and an embedded system. If you want to run a non-embedded, non-Android enabled distribution feel free, but there are a plethora of reasons to run highly customized Linux distributions on their embedded system/hand held hybrid, HTC Dream device. You clearly haven't invested the money and time to own one and put in the research and work, or you would already have figured all of this out (one would hope.)

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    2. Re:no glibc, no x11 is the problem. by Alef · · Score: 1

      I honestly have a little trouble following your argumentation here.

      Can't you see that there is a difference between a common GNU/Linux distribution and a highly customized Java oriented software platform that happens to use the Linux kernel underneath? Don't you think it could be reasonable to make a distinction between the two at all?

      The fact that the source code is available for Android devices doesn't automatically make it an open Linux platform in any practical sense. You are not meant to hack root on a HTC Dream, and even if you manage to it's a very non-standard thing to do.

      Sure, should I hack it and effectively replace the Android distribution with a hand rolled Linux distribution of my own as you are suggesting, I would be able to develop on it like an ordinary GNU/Linux/X11 system. But that would be rather pointless because I'd be the only person in the world with such a phone. Not to mention that it would require many man-years of work to recreate all the functionality that would no longer work or to make the Andriod software stack interoperate with all the new applications.

      By all means, I agree that Android is an open software platform. But failing to see that Maemo is something quite different when it comes to being a Linux device platform is just fooling yourself, in my humble but considered opinion.

    3. Re:no glibc, no x11 is the problem. by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      You seem to be under the mistaken belief that you need to hack root in order to install the distribution of your choice on the HTC Dream. Maybe that is what you are missing. People hack root to keep the Android platform and add functionality. If you want to switch to Debian, you need only take your queue from Nike, and just do it.

      In any case, I'm not running an online course here. Suffice it to say that the trouble you are having following my "argument" is due to your inexperience in several areas. No offense intended, but rest assure that the reason is that.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    4. Re:no glibc, no x11 is the problem. by Alef · · Score: 1

      You are pretty arrogant to assume that everyone that disagrees with you are just ignorant or inexperienced. (In fact, this is starting to feel like I'm feeding a troll.)

      So basically you are saying that Android is an open Linux platform because you can, well, reflash the device, completely remove Android and put something else in there? Using the same logic I could say that Windows 7 is a Linux system, you just have to wipe the hard drive and install Ubuntu. That simply doesn't make sense to me, and it is not due to lack of experience.

    5. Re:no glibc, no x11 is the problem. by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      I don't assume you are ignorant or inexperience because you don't "agree" with me. I do so because you make statements like ": So basically you are saying that Android is an open Linux platform because you can, well, ...". I do so because you seem to believe that matters of fact are open to debate and disagreement. It's as if you believe that reasonable people can disagree on whether the Earth is flat or spherical.

      Try to get this; Android is Open because you have access to the entire source tree, and are free to modify and build it yourself, then replace the version on the device with your custom build.

      Saying it's closed because the user can't easily hack root is absurd. Since you like analogies, it is like saying that I am not running a complete and Open Linux distribution because my system is secure. So again, you see, I consider you to be ignorant or inexperienced because you can't seem to figure this out even after it has been explained to you several times. Of course, come to think of it, you deny the inexperience but not the ignorance so I guess we agree as to which it is ... ;-)

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    6. Re:no glibc, no x11 is the problem. by Alef · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I think the semantic discussion is rather uninteresting. (And for the record, I never said Android isn't open software -- quite the opposite actually.) I'll give you that it is a fact that Android is an open Linux platform according to your definition of an open Linux platform, whatever that may be, and then we can leave that at that.

      Now, let's go back to the main point:

      • Do you, or do you not agree that there is a noteworthy difference between Maemo and Android, in terms of developing or porting common Linux software for it?
      • Can you accept that the ability to reflash your individual device and replace a significant portion of its software stack is not equivalent to buying a device which in its stock configuration already supports your development environment without modification (and hence including all other units sold on the market)?

      If you can agree with those two points I am satisfied.

  129. Re: Cell phone as a computer by dfries · · Score: 1

    1. Some sort of video out

    They referenced TV output, PAL at least, maybe next time they'll put an HDMI port on it.

  130. Please make calling people easy. by DaVince21 · · Score: 1

    Having all this cool stuff on a phone is awesome, but please do not forget the most practical part of a mobile phone: being able to call people. My SHC Touch Diamond makes it hell, especially when calling to automated services.

    --
    I am not devoid of humor.
  131. How I learned to stop worrying and love Linux by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

    It sounds like you had a similar experience as I had with OS X/Aqua. I bought a Powerbook because it was unix...but they changed things in annoying ways and the UI didn't work quite right with others. Changing back to Linux made me feel free again.

    It was kind of a surprising progression for me. I mean, I've been using Linux exclusively on my home desktop since 1997 or so (and, prior to that, dual-booting since 1995) - I went with Mac for my first laptop because I wanted to avoid configuration hassles and have some measure of commercial software support for it. I think the first time I started to realize it wasn't such a great fit was when I was using the laptop for slide presentations - first using Open Office (and having to deal with Mac's X server issues with the clipboard, dual-monitor support, and full screen mode) and then Keynote... But I was creating this content on the desktop, using GIMP and KPresenter and so on (having discovered that I actually really don't like OpenOffice very much) - so I had to go through an annoying series of transitions to get from KPresenter to Keynote. Even GIMP wasn't terribly at home on the Mac at that time, since there was no native GTK port at that point (once a native port did materialize, I had to upgrade the OS to use it)...

    It's kind of surreal to think of it in these terms, but I switched away from Mac to Linux (for my laptop, anyway) because it's better at running the software I want to run.

    Also when I got my EEE I also tried Gnome for the first time. (I've mostly been a KDE user) That's been a great experience - just as it "feels right" for me, personally, to have a desktop running on an X server, running a bunch of GNU software, GNOME also somehow just "felt right" when I first used it. It hasn't been a perfect experience (for instance it has an annoying habit of dimming the screen while I'm doing things - and if an application is using sound and the machine suspends, the application's sound won't work when the machine wakes again...) but I've enjoyed it quite a lot.

    Even as old as it is I think my Powerbook is still a great piece of hardware... More compact than most laptops but much more luxuriously spacious than my EEE... If I could run Linux on it well, I would. (The main things there are wi-fi and graphics support - I think the state of those isn't so good on PPC Linux.) I haven't really put in the time to determine whether I could bend Mac OS into an environment in which I could feel at home... I think if I weren't using my EEE so much I might use the Powerbook a lot more. :)

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
    1. Re:How I learned to stop worrying and love Linux by dwater · · Score: 1

      > I haven't really put in the time to determine whether I could bend Mac OS into an environment in which I could feel at home...

      I did try this - my problem was specifically with Aqua rather than Mac OS X itself. It seemed Apple insists *I* change to do it their way.

      I also loved my Powerbook h/w and was running PPC Ubuntu on it for quite a while, but I don't think Ubuntu controller the fans properly and it eventually died of heat exhaustion.

      I've taken a look at the later Apple h/w with a view to doing the Microsoft thing of no accepting the licence for OS X and getting my money back but I just don't like the look of the newer stuff .... the TiBooks just were perfect, IMO.

      I am very tempted by the new Nokia netbook...its design, to me, seems to 'nod' back to the old TiBook (even though, I'm told, it's Aluminium).

      --
      Max.
  132. Re:woohoo! by Loko+Draucarn · · Score: 1

    Or swap out the headset for a yellow fedora and coat, and pretend to be Dick Tracy.

  133. Definitely not in the dust - Sharp NetWalker by islisis · · Score: 1

    5inch 1024x600 touchscreen, touch-typable keyboard, ubuntu preinstalled?
    Sharp NetWalker
    Don't discount the original linux clamshell proponents!