I do not think this was the point of the article. The point of the article was that insecure systems exist in this manner and to bring awareness to it.
I do not like their solution ideas though, they could have easily pointed out that many servers have the ability to allow/disallow access to files/directories quite easily. I assume any self respectable server administrator would know that, but what about Jan the secretary at the DoD who first reads the article?
The only thing for protecting data is on the server.
There will always be people and robots that hit up the robots.txt file and INTENTIONALLY harvest the data they are not supposed to harvest.
In fact, the patent system in Australia was so bad that if something had NOT ever been patented there, it could be (Prior art was completely irrelevant). In fact, a few years ago a lawyer patented the wheel.
The cops could do whatever they wanted because there would be no judge to say no.
It's not about just the internet
on
Google v. Microsoft
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
It is in terms of things like the Google Toolbar.
It's just a matter of time before the MSN toolbar is included by default with IE.
That is how it similar to the Netscape wars. Search is going clientside and they want it specialized for YOUR needs. That's where the competition comes in.
I think AOL did it and I knew a hosting company (that since went out of business) that had done it prior to '00.
It's sad that people are filing patents with the only intent to sue with them. The one where Microsoft loses in-browser application support for example. Was this person ever planning on introducing this technology on their own? I doubt it.
I hate these people.
So they complain that Windows XP costs $99 one time, but a frequent battery replacement and frequent OS upgrades from Apple are somehow okay at the same and higher prices?
You're suggesting that the communist government is better than our republic?
Get the heck out then because we don't want you as much as you don't want us (it does not matter which free nation you're in, just move to China, Cuba, or North Korea and enjoy).
"people now have the possibility to receive email"
And you do not think it will be supervised AND filtered? Get a clue before you open your mouth. Better yet, just don't open your mouth because your opinion is a waste of time and energy.
He was saying that for the company/person leaving it is zero cost. Businesses do not care about the company moving into the building afterwards and why would they? For you all know a competitor is moving in.
If it's mislabelled then you can just rip everything out and start over. Why waste the money analyzing when you can spend less pulling it out and putting new stuff in?
that tracks what they do.
Either they'll then become good enough with computers to prove you wrong (at which point you don't have a chance anyway), or they won't do anything.
If all else fails, really do it.
I always felt the problems dealing with XSS were obvious.
Stating it in this great of detail just asks for the same problems in respect to stating how to exploit specific buffer overflows (as seen in bug reports for MS and Linux).
He isn't saying that you shouldn't aspire to write the best code possible, but as everyone knows, it doesn't always turn out that the code is unbreakable.
Accidents happen and that's why there is insecure code on every platform and in every platform.
His point was simple: If you have protection on the outer rim, the problem with the code can hopefully go unabused (again, there are even more exceptions here, but the point is clear!).
Why would you spend the kind of money that a Mac requires for an office suite?
If you want Adobe Photoshop, then use a Mac, but if you want anything else, get something else.
At this point Nutch is coded entirely in Java, however persistent data is written in language-independent formats so that, if needed, modules may be re-written in other languages (e.g., C++) as the project progresses.
This is freedom of speech; they cannot go after this because this is simply documentation of a theory. This is a simple, general guide that does not target specific programs.
Slashdot Mirror
That's what MyDoom.A was for and how it breaks in.
I do not like their solution ideas though, they could have easily pointed out that many servers have the ability to allow/disallow access to files/directories quite easily. I assume any self respectable server administrator would know that, but what about Jan the secretary at the DoD who first reads the article?
The only thing for protecting data is on the server. There will always be people and robots that hit up the robots.txt file and INTENTIONALLY harvest the data they are not supposed to harvest.
In fact, the patent system in Australia was so bad that if something had NOT ever been patented there, it could be (Prior art was completely irrelevant). In fact, a few years ago a lawyer patented the wheel.
So at least now they have this now.
The cops could do whatever they wanted because there would be no judge to say no.
It's just a matter of time before the MSN toolbar is included by default with IE.
That is how it similar to the Netscape wars. Search is going clientside and they want it specialized for YOUR needs. That's where the competition comes in.
China is in the process of getting away from MS. What influence could they have when the government itself is building a competing product?!
After so many times people stopped believing the source.
I do not believe repeat liars. So when I see something reputable, and a little less biased, then we will see. The NY Times does not count.
I think AOL did it and I knew a hosting company (that since went out of business) that had done it prior to '00. It's sad that people are filing patents with the only intent to sue with them. The one where Microsoft loses in-browser application support for example. Was this person ever planning on introducing this technology on their own? I doubt it. I hate these people.
So they complain that Windows XP costs $99 one time, but a frequent battery replacement and frequent OS upgrades from Apple are somehow okay at the same and higher prices?
I hope not. Oh well, I live in the U.S. anyway.
Get the heck out then because we don't want you as much as you don't want us (it does not matter which free nation you're in, just move to China, Cuba, or North Korea and enjoy).
And you do not think it will be supervised AND filtered? Get a clue before you open your mouth. Better yet, just don't open your mouth because your opinion is a waste of time and energy.At least do it on a Monday thru Thursday.
He was saying that for the company/person leaving it is zero cost. Businesses do not care about the company moving into the building afterwards and why would they? For you all know a competitor is moving in. If it's mislabelled then you can just rip everything out and start over. Why waste the money analyzing when you can spend less pulling it out and putting new stuff in?
that tracks what they do. Either they'll then become good enough with computers to prove you wrong (at which point you don't have a chance anyway), or they won't do anything. If all else fails, really do it.
This is VERY old news.
Linux servers are the most hacked servers out there for the same reason Windows desktops are the most hacked. They're in the majority.
Flames? I don't care because I probably won't read the pathetic responses to come. That's life.
Oh, I forgot you wouldn't want to hear the common sense reasoning.
I always felt the problems dealing with XSS were obvious. Stating it in this great of detail just asks for the same problems in respect to stating how to exploit specific buffer overflows (as seen in bug reports for MS and Linux).
Enough said? And Cascading Style Sheets...
Accidents happen and that's why there is insecure code on every platform and in every platform.
His point was simple: If you have protection on the outer rim, the problem with the code can hopefully go unabused (again, there are even more exceptions here, but the point is clear!).
Why would you spend the kind of money that a Mac requires for an office suite? If you want Adobe Photoshop, then use a Mac, but if you want anything else, get something else.
I rest my case.
This is freedom of speech; they cannot go after this because this is simply documentation of a theory. This is a simple, general guide that does not target specific programs.