Slashdot Mirror


The Problem Of Unused Cabling

Makarand writes "Technological advances constantly render functional cable obsolete by demanding data transfers at higher rates which older cabling cannot support. New cables that support higher data rates are laid right over older wires. The old wires are simply left in place and abandoned. This interesting article talks about the problems caused by abandoned cabling. According to an estimate several billion feet of abandoned cable lies unused in the plenum spaces of buildings that allow air to circulate creating a fire hazard. Also, very few firms currently worry about removing cabling when they move out of a building."

271 comments

  1. Cost to remove? by satyap · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Wonder how much it would cost to remove and recover the metals in unused cables, and would it be offset by the sale of the metal?

    1. Re:Cost to remove? by Interfacer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think it is safe to say that the hours you have to spend to remove all cabling are 100 times more expensive than the price you would get.

      "Hello sir, i have a few thousand feet of used cabling, you can have it for 5000$ OK?"

      kind regards,
      Interfacer.

    2. Re:Cost to remove? by rf0 · · Score: 1

      Taking that the article says that landlords take it out of the deposit I guess not much. It might just not be worth the effort after employing someone to do it

      Rus

    3. Re:Cost to remove? by Zocalo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe. Remember that the policy here was that the cabling was to be removed after each tennant left. That means it is simply a case of removing any cable from the duct, as opposed to removing just the defunct cables from a tangle of spaghetti. I suspect that the latter would require a considerable quantity of time, and therefore money, to accomplish.

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    4. Re:Cost to remove? by mlush · · Score: 5, Informative
      Wonder how much it would cost to remove and recover the metals in unused cables, and would it be offset by the sale of the metal?

      Labour costs aside. I'd guess that (data) cabling is a pretty unattractive source of metals. Tons plastic would have to be burned to get to a useful amount of metal. Burning plastic produces all sorts of nasty compounds, which would have to be scrubbed from the emissions significantly boosting the costs.

    5. Re:Cost to remove? by The+Impossible · · Score: 2, Funny

      This depends on the amount.

      With my first boss we removed all cabling as the tiles didn't fit anymore. Selling the old cables funded:

      - the removal
      - replacing all BNC with CAT5 (in 1997)
      - a nice party for the company

      So it was worth the effort it took. (especially because the effort was limited to 'hey you, remove that junk' ;-))

      --
      ... Wenn ist das Nunstruck git und Slotermeyer? Ja!... Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput!
    6. Re:Cost to remove? by Niggle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Rather than try and salvage the metals from the cable, it would almost certainly be better to sell off the old cables as cables. Getting at the metal would involve getting rid of all the insulation etc. Selling them as cables means (at worst) putting new connectors on the ends.

      There might be legal issues preventing resale of some cables (toxic materials, fire regs. and so on).

      --
      - Blah blah blah, missing scientist. Blah blah blah, atomic bomb. -
    7. Re:Cost to remove? by operagost · · Score: 1

      It can't be too much of a hassle, as I heard that looters in Iraq were punching holes in the walls of government buildings to steal the cable.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    8. Re:Cost to remove? by idontgno · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Wonder how much it would cost to remove and recover the metals in unused cables, and would it be offset by the sale of the metal?

      Not nearly, if you factor in the cost of downtime caused by careless cable removal disrupting active cable in place. Beyond simple laziness, that's probably the reason I've seen the most for "It's not hurting anything, so just leave it in place."

      Our raised-floor facility across the hall from my office had 20 years worth of accumulated mainframe cabling, network cabling of three different Ethernet generations, and power cabling from 400 volt to 12vdc. And that's just the copper. Never mind three different kinds of fiber, 2 types of conduit, grounding cables (for the mainframe) complete with large ground planes glued to the subfloor, and several hundred serial cables (you know, DB-25 at each end).

      It's a miracle we had any uptime at all during the period when the system shop was removing all the dead copper.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    9. Re:Cost to remove? by kriston · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The looters were taking the electrical wiring. It holds lots of nice, heavy copper that you can get good money for by weight.

      --

      Kriston

    10. Re:Cost to remove? by alpha127 · · Score: 1

      The cost to remove can't be any more that the cost of not removing. In one company that I know of, when they recabled, rather than remove the old cabling, they simply moved the floor up an extra 2 foot! The building work over ran and held up the recabling! Cost lots extra!

      --
      I'm going to live forever, or die trying
    11. Re:Cost to remove? by Adm1n · · Score: 1

      Recycleing and getting the copper back is quite expensive, the sheaths are a number of diffrent polymers and require expensive and quite toxic solvents. Thus the cable are left or removed and thrown out like garbage.

    12. Re:Cost to remove? by mlush · · Score: 1
      It can't be too much of a hassle, as I heard that looters in Iraq were punching holes in the walls of government buildings to steal the cable.

      as kriston said they were after electrical wiring, and were probably not too concerned about the dioxin fumes from the smelting

    13. Re:Cost to remove? by Micro$will · · Score: 1

      This would be OK for cat5 or maybe even even RG58/10BASE2 (can be reused for low power HAM and CB), but who is going to buy cat3 or that old thick coax?

    14. Re:Cost to remove? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Often there are different tenants on different floors/parts of floors, so it will always be spaghetti.

    15. Re:Cost to remove? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Not nearly, if you factor in the cost of downtime caused by careless cable removal disrupting active cable in place. Beyond simple laziness, that's probably the reason I've seen the most for "It's not hurting anything, so just leave it in place."

      Couldn't you just set up a temporary wireless bridge connection while removing the cable?

    16. Re:Cost to remove? by vartvart · · Score: 4, Insightful

      we recently completed a re-cabling job of over 130 drops. somewhere in the neighborhood of 4KM of cable was installed, and about the same was removed. our interconnect charged us about $2400 CAD to remove the old cable, and they did it on a weekend so as not to interrupt our employees.

      we've done this in a few areas in our building; removing the old cable each time at a marginal cost.

      we remove the old cable mainly because it looks aweful! we are in an old building with no walls in which to hide cables. ladder-racks are used to transport the cable and they would get overcrowded if we were to keep the old stuff around.

      what's the point of keeping old, solid-core, CAT5 around? some of it is so brittle that it literally breaks apart if you bend the cable!

      plus, our interconnect recycles the cable and gets a few buck back for the copper -- although not much from what i've been told.

    17. Re:Cost to remove? by Thavius · · Score: 1

      What about just melting the plastic? I know it's just easier to toss it in a fire and get the metal from the bottom of the fire, but wouldn't it be possible to melt the plastic off the wires?

      Better than torching everything, but probably not as cost effective. Maybe if we outsource it to India...

    18. Re:Cost to remove? by robla · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you're after the metals, it's far more effective to granulate the cable, and then screen the output. No burning involved, and in many cases, the plastic coating can also be recycled. This is reasonably common practice, and it works pretty well.

    19. Re:Cost to remove? by N3Bruce · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Only part of the reason for the Iraqi stripping of cables was economic, as intact wire probably has value as intact wire in third world countries. Also, if someone can make even a couple of bucks over there for a couple of hours work, it is probably more profitable than the alternativess.

      Electrical wire is really the only common type of cabling that would be worthwhile by any stretch of the imagination that would be worth tearing out of a building. Also remember, that much of the looting was vandalism pure and simple done by people caught up in a fever of lawlessness.

      I had a reasonable quantity of old pitch and fabric covered #8 electrical wire, about 500 feet or so of the stuff that ran out to a barn here. I took it to the local recycler, who offered 3 cents a pound for it. 60 pounds of the stuff yielded a mere 2 bucks, which didn't even cover my gasoline to drive to the recycling center. I suspected there was at least 30 pounds of copper in there, which is worth about $25. but didn't want to go to the trouble and mess of burning the old insulation away. Proportionately, Cat 5 would be an even worse proposition, as there are probably mere grams of copper per foot of this cable. The heat of burning the plastic off of the cable would probably oxidize the little bit of copper it contains anyway.

      Some of the older 10 base 5 cables might have a second life for us ham radio operators, as it is equivalent to RG-8, a very common coaxial cable used in 2 way radio systems. Anybody who's got a few decent length runs (100 foot or so) of this stuff could get a few bucks for it at a hamfest. Don't bother with any oddball stuff, as it has little value for secondary uses.

    20. Re:Cost to remove? by mt2mb4me · · Score: 1

      Being an ex-electrician, Cable is worth alot less if it is not stripped to bare copper, when it is at bare copper you can sell it at market price, when it is not you like about 25% of market valuse due to the fact they have to strip the wire themselves. But i am sure wire removal companys strip it, and get the money out of it, for around $1 a pound for "trash" its worth it.

    21. Re:Cost to remove? by mlush · · Score: 1
      There might be legal issues preventing resale of some cables (toxic materials, fire regs. and so on).

      I think quality control would be a bigger issue. Cables are cheap, people are expensive, the manhours tracking down one dud cable could wipe out any saving on material

    22. Re:Cost to remove? by N3Bruce · · Score: 1

      The old thicknet (10 base 5) is equivalent to RG-8, and is even more useful for hams than RG-58.

    23. Re:Cost to remove? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Howdy,

      I know some scavengers here in Chicago (South Siiide!) who make a living--or who try to make a living--removing cabling from olde buildings.

      My block has a junkyard on it (18th and Normal), and these scrappers hear about a building being demolished, then go and remove cabling, ducting, etc., and take it to the yard. A demolition contractor will sometimes provide a ride, etc., and symbiotic relationships develop thereby.

      Copper is one of the more valuable metals to return in this way, but the only real values are heavy-gauge electical wiring--I know a guy who stashes lengths of this wire like squirrels do acorns b/c a section of a few feet is worth a few bucks. I've never seen ethernet cable passing below my window, but some guys will collect lengths of copper wire of any gauge to return, carry in shopping carts, etc.

      The junkyard on my block (Family Recycling, which sells to Cozzi) no longer takes wire with sheathing b/c I suppose they got in trouble for burning it off--so the scavengers have to burn it themselves (or hack it off against my building, e.g.) before returning it.

      FYI steel is worth basically zero and a scavenger won't waste his time unless there are some other metals involved (e.g. the copper wirings of a motor as part of a scrapped furnace system).

      Happy to contribute!
      Allan on the south SIIIIIDE!!!

    24. Re:Cost to remove? by Micro$will · · Score: 1

      Not if it has dozens of little holes in it. From what I hear, instead of cutting and crimping new connectors on the ends, they usually cut a hole into the cable and clamped a special tee onto them to add new nodes.

    25. Re:Cost to remove? by satyap · · Score: 1

      Actually, CAT3 would be great for model railroading. Oh wait, cat3 doesn't mean it's 3-core, does it?

    26. Re:Cost to remove? by uberdave · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's called a vampire tap, and I don't think it would have a significant effect on the signal carrying capacity of the cable.

    27. Re:Cost to remove? by steve_l · · Score: 1

      It depends on the cable.

      Fibre is worthless. Copper valuable enough on long haul connections that cable -theft is an issue in places like china. Fibre and cellphones are used there instead...

    28. Re:Cost to remove? by whatch+durrin · · Score: 1
      Back when I was a lowly electrician's helper (many moons ago) I had a difficult time making a car payment. I would collect scrap copper and strip it as I was watching TV. It kept me from bouncing checks several times.

      There were some guys there that probably made a killing off of scrap copper when a new install was done. I would somtimes get the 12AWG and lower stuff, while they would pile the large feed cables in their trucks.

      --
      ***
      Radio Shack. You've got questions...we've got blank stares(TM).
    29. Re:Cost to remove? by Saganaga · · Score: 1

      Maybe it would have been a better idea to take a second job instead of sitting around and watching TV?

    30. Re:Cost to remove? by seney · · Score: 1

      my friend worked installing cell sites. he'd take home the excess cable (the big cable, not cat-5 or anything like that), to his dad. his dad paid his taxes that year with the profits from the copper.

      i've also heard you can throw a spool of cat-5 on a nice fire and then collect the copper. i've never tried it as i'm not into burning plastic.

    31. Re:Cost to remove? by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      Yes, but that's one company, and the cost of not removing for most people is a lot lower. If you already have lots of space under your floors or above drop ceilings, it doesn't cost a lot extra to add more cables.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    32. Re:Cost to remove? by steve's+nose+is+blee · · Score: 1

      The company I work for also regularly removes a large amount of dead cable during recabling. The old cable looks bad, it can be very hard to work around,
      I guess it's a fire-risk (Most places where this is an issue have fireblock squirted into the conduit to prevent the cable jackets from spreading a fire past a firewall)

      And it's just that much fun to cut old twinx with a pair of shears =)

      "old solid-core CAT5" is actually just wall grade CAT5, it's not old, it's still in use, it's not designed to be flexed and bent a lot, as you described it will break.

      Patch cables use a different kind of CAT5 that has all those little fibers of copper inside each pair.

      Which is just one more reason not to make your own patch cables out of wall cable.

    33. Re:Cost to remove? by Micro$will · · Score: 1

      It's probably good for anything except reliable data transfer. I think its like cat5, but without the twists, allowing the signals to interfere with each other.

    34. Re:Cost to remove? by whatch+durrin · · Score: 1
      FYI, smartass -

      I was working a full time job and attending college. I would get home past 11pm, and had to wind down before I could do homework or sleep. For a period of about three years I was either working a FT and a PT or working a FT and attending school.

      --
      ***
      Radio Shack. You've got questions...we've got blank stares(TM).
    35. Re:Cost to remove? by robhancock · · Score: 1

      Cat 3 is twisted-pair like Cat 5, just not twisted as tightly. Good for 10Mbps max (or 100 Mbps using 100Base4 instead of 100BaseT, but that seems rarely used).

    36. Re:Cost to remove? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      Our raised-floor facility across the hall from my office had 20 years worth of accumulated mainframe cabling, network cabling of three different Ethernet generations, and power cabling from 400 volt to 12vdc. And that's just the copper. Never mind three different kinds of fiber, 2 types of conduit, grounding cables (for the mainframe) complete with large ground planes glued to the subfloor, and several hundred serial cables (you know, DB-25 at each end).
      That sounds awfully familiar. The submarine I served on in the 1980's went through three different generations of strategic missile systems in it's lifetime, and in places the cable trays were filled to the brim with cabling, much of it 'abandoned in place'. While you could swap out the systems by exchanging what amounted to rack mounted equipment, there was simply no way to tear out the racks to get at the cable in the overhead or down in the bilges, so they simply laid new cable alongside the old and called it good. (I vividly remember a terminal box once used for an analog interface, with only four of the one hundred terminals in use by the digital system that replaced it.)
  2. boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who really cares?

  3. One good use by GeckoFood · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Several years ago, I took some of that old cabling and stripped out the copper wire. I then used that wire as the loop on fishing sinkers. Saved me a good $0.02 - $0.05 per sinker, and I got to go fishing all summer. Life's pretty good sometimes.

    --
    Be excellent to each other. And... PARTY ON, DUDES!
    1. Re:One good use by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      Our data center is also the distribution point for telephone in the building. We don't have a phone switch. All of our lines go out to TPC, and come back. Lots and lots of punchdowns.

      Our floor is covered with telephone cable clippings. The best use I've found is to cut them into 5" lengths and use them as twist ties to hold bundles of working cable together. My KVM switch went from a mess to something sexy. My fiber cabinet finally looks presentable. The trick is to make bundles of smaller bundles. Start with a bundle of 3 cables, then bundle 3 of those bundles.

      The result looks almost organic.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  4. I love MJ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because he's a pedophile and insane.

    What sucks about him is that he's an american. Pathetic.

  5. Cutting cabling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The article mentions that it is now standard practice for companies leaving a building to cut the network/phone cabling just before they go.

    How damn stupid is that?? What else are they going to do, break the bloody windows?!

    1. Re:Cutting cabling by sjlutz · · Score: 5, Informative

      The standard practice is to recover assets when leaving a building. Just like a company takes it's servers, desktop computers, chairs, and desks, it also takes the relatively expensive network hook up equipment. This generally means the patch panels and the network racks. One rack, 6 or 7ft high, entirely populated with patch panels could easily have cost $4,000.

      Now, in some cases, people are jerks and do not take the time to cut the wires as close to the patch panels as possible. I have seen some cut where the wires enter the room (ussually through the ceiling). This makes re-using the wires impossible since there isn't enough left to do the hookups.

    2. Re:Cutting cabling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      What else are they going to do, break the bloody windows?!

      Bill G already took care of that. :)

    3. Re:Cutting cabling by putaro · · Score: 4, Funny

      The logic being it's their cabling. The last startup I did, the previous tenants had done exactly that. The cabling was cut within about two feet of the ceiling. There was a bit of slack in the cables, though, and we were cheap, so we wound up with our patch panels right up at ceiling level. Saved us a bunch of time and money upfront though any work afterwards had to be done on top of a ladder.

    4. Re:Cutting cabling by xclr8r · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sure they can take the patch panels, but cutting the cables is rediculous. They can disconnect the telco connectors from the punch blocks and take their equipment (thus leaving the cabling intact).
      This cutting of cable sounds more like unscrupulous contractors at work.
      Money saved and resources usage reduced. The Planet will thank you

      --
      Beware of those who profit off the docile and persecute the unbelievers.
    5. Re:Cutting cabling by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      All of our phone/fax patch panels are mounted to large pieces of plywood, which are then mounted to the wall. Every time the office is moved, on the last day of the move, the cables are cut just above these plywood boards and the whole setup is moved to the next place.

      You're right, though, this generally does leave no possibility of re-use for the next person. Then again, there was no cable there in the first place when we moved into most of these buildings.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    6. Re:Cutting cabling by acey72 · · Score: 1

      Well, the rack maybe worth saving, but reusing patch panels is a recipe for dodgy connections - punchdowns don't like repeated use.

      In my last job, which involved cabling quite a few commercial spaces in London, UK, people very rarely took cabling cabinets or patch panels with them. They did often cut the cables though, which always annoyed me (as it's so pointless) but then it made us more money when we had to recable the whole joint.

    7. Re:Cutting cabling by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 3, Informative

      We also take all of the locks with us, and the security system.

      This is simply an example of how businesses and individuals work quite differently in an area where people assume things are much the same. Businesses rent the space, not usually the facilities (ie phone, security, etc), so most of the phone equipment, including those lines they're cutting, were put in by the business, and are taken from place to place. For many people it's just not worth the effort to take the lines completely out, so cutting them is far more common, especially since re-using the line would be almost out of the question in the new building (though the new tenant of the old building could re-use the line if you don't cut it too close).

      We don't rent space expecting cat-5 cable to be in place, we rent it knowing that it will be easy for our people to put cat-5 in. We don't expect the phone line to be routed to the room we have designated for the phone equipment, or that the security will be up to our requirements.

      If it was a home bought and sold by an individual, you have to leave most of those things in place because the buyer expects them to be there. However, if you spell it out in the contract, you can still cut away the phone and cable for whatever reason, though, as an individual, you also expect those things to be in the place you're moving to (which, again, companies don't expect to find when they move into a new business space).

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    8. Re:Cutting cabling by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 0, Troll

      cutting the cables is rediculous

      What's ridiculious is that people on /. still haven't figured out how to spell that word properly.

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    9. Re:Cutting cabling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When we moved into a former military building they cut the cable on the outlet side and left no cable labling--had to tone the lot to find them for use. They also left little to no docs on the fiber connecting the buildings together.

    10. Re:Cutting cabling by Generic+Guy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The standard practice is to recover assets when leaving a building.

      My wife just went through this. She moved from a small office to a bigger office, and we left the Cat-5 wiring and patch panels behind. We took the switches, but all the wall jacks and the patch panel stayed behind.

      The issue is what is considered to be "assets". The problem is many of these improvements could quite easily be considered "capital improvments" which need to stay with the property, even if you move out. I think wiring easily falls into this definition. As the article points out, some leases need modern language to more clearly include other items -- perhaps such as patch panels an termination blocks. If you run wiring and then mount a patch panel to the wall (or floor for the bigger ones) I don't think it's unreasonable for the landlord to want to keep it intact, just as if you were to, say, build a garage on the back lot.

      When old tenants cut wiring to unusable levels but leave it dangling through the walls like leftover trash, that could be a potential legal offense.

      --
      { - Generic Guy - }
    11. Re:Cutting cabling by hacker · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      "What's ridiculious is that people on /. still haven't figured out how to spell that word properly."

      Considering you botched it also:

      ridiculous
    12. Re:Cutting cabling by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Touche. But at least that's fat fingers and not ignorance.

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    13. Re:Cutting cabling by Red_Harvest · · Score: 2, Funny
      What's ridiculious is that people on /. still haven't figured out how to spell that word properly.

      Yep, you said it :)

      Ridiculous - how hard can it be?

    14. Re:Cutting cabling by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 1

      Even if the people were to cut the wires as close to the patch panel as possible, wouldn't this be the corporate equivalent of the gradual degraduation of teleomeres?

      Eventually, after a building had four or five companies the cables would be so short as to make it impossible to repair the wiring.

      Surely it would be more cost effective to have standard connectors (RJ45's or whatever) rather than individually tied down cables?

    15. Re:Cutting cabling by faedle · · Score: 3

      They mentioned one of the reasons in the article: concern that a competitor might be able to use the infrastructure.

      Unfortunately, building managers are usually part of the problem. Take this example of a startup I dealt with. We moved into a basement suite of a large office building in the center of town. The building management knew what our business was, knew we were likely to need telephone lines. But when we finally moved in, guess what? There was no cabling from our suite to the phone room. We had to install about 250 feet of plenum-rated phone wiring.

      Now, here's the problem. So, time comes for us to move to larger facilities. We were going to sell the cable as scrap. We ask for access to the common areas so we can retrieve the cable. Guess what? Building management now considers the cable "theirs" and won't provide us access to the phone room to remove it.

      What did we do? Sawed it off at the entrance to our suite. Why? Because the building management wouldn't either compensate us for the price of installing the cable nor allow us to remove it. We paid for it, it's not theirs, so.. get out the hacksaw.

      Unfortunately, this is far more common than you'd believe. Building managers often look at high-tech companies as a cheap way to "update infrastructure" in older buildings without paying for it. In our case, the entire building, as a result of a lot of dot.com activity, now has fiber between floors, CAT-5 throughout, multiple electrical entries, etc. Who paid for all these upgrades? Not the building, that's for sure.

    16. Re:Cutting cabling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's still an asshole move. The idea that some new tenant is automatically a competitor is just idiotic.

    17. Re:Cutting cabling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather have a friendly bunch of idiots running around /. being 'ignorant' than a single fat-fingered (and arguably stupider) malicious jackass like you.

      Fuck off.

    18. Re:Cutting cabling by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

      I'd rather have a friendly bunch of idiots running around /. being 'ignorant' than a single fat-fingered (and arguably stupider) malicious jackass like you.

      #1.) I'm hardly alone

      #2.) You appear a bit malicious youself.

      #3.) Try taking responsibility for your posts, AC.

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    19. Re:Cutting cabling by PitaBred · · Score: 1
      "All of our phone/fax patch panels are mounted to large pieces of plywood, which are then mounted to the wall. Every time the office is moved, on the last day of the move, the cables are cut just above these plywood boards and the whole setup is moved to the next place.

      You're right, though, this generally does leave no possibility of re-use for the next person. Then again, there was no cable there in the first place when we moved into most of these buildings."

      That's the whole point though... that the wire can't be re-used, so they're forced to run new wire. On top of the crap you were too lazy to actually pull out. Leaving the tons of waste that is described in the article. Kinda like if you just took the wheels off of your car and left it in the middle of the road, rather than taking it to a junkyard, which would be responsible.
    20. Re:Cutting cabling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We paid for it, it's not theirs, so.. get out the hacksaw

      No, get out the lawyer. If it's yours, they can't deny you access to remove it.

      OTOH, if it's theirs, they owe you for providing/installing it.

    21. Re:Cutting cabling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      youself

      Good to see that your fat fingers and inability to read are still working for you. It's an interesting angle, but I'm glad to see that you're going for it whole-heartedly. It takes true devotion to push the envelope on inanity as far as you have; and I suppose that's something to be proud of for the likes of you.

      ----
      Damn straight. I'm all of those good 'm' words. I'm malicious, malevolent, malignant, and I'll even take credit for being hostile and combative--especially to innocent children and stupid fat-fingered bumbling idiots. I'm an all-around-asshole.

      Bad day to you, sir.

    22. Re:Cutting cabling by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

      push the envelope on inanity as far as you have

      Insanity?

      I suggest you check out what's going on in the real world to hopefully get some perspective on life. Hiding behind AC posts on /. doesn't seem to be helping your grasp on reality too much.

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    23. Re:Cutting cabling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insanity

      No, you dumb fucker: inanity. Grab a dictionary and look it up.

      I suggest you learn to read and develop some sort of comprehension of the English language (of which not only have you presently demonstrated a complete lack of understanding, but also a twisted eagerness to correct--especially considering the aforementioned lack of understanding) to hopefully get some perspective on life. Hiding behind a username on /. doesn't seem to be helping your grasp on the English language too much, daryl@introspect.net.

    24. Re:Cutting cabling by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

      I'm well aware of what inanity means. Your drivel simply isn't worth my full attention.

      You are still hiding as an AC, I see. Try growing a set.

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    25. Re:Cutting cabling by sploxx · · Score: 1

      > They mentioned one of the reasons in the article: concern that a competitor might be able to use the infrastructure.

      Sentences like this make me believe that there is
      some flaw in the way this cable market works.
      Cables cut to deny the competitors them are wasted
      resources, damn!

    26. Re:Cutting cabling by 5KVGhost · · Score: 2, Informative

      There was no cabling from our suite to the phone room. We had to install about 250 feet of plenum-rated phone wiring.

      Wow, that sucks. Wonder why they didn't have any cable installed?

      What did we do? Sawed it off at the entrance to our suite. Why? Because the building management wouldn't either compensate us for the price of installing the cable nor allow us to remove it. We paid for it, it's not theirs, so.. get out the hacksaw.

      Golly, do you think that the previous tenant might have done the same thing?

      Sorry, but that sort of scorched earth infrastructure policy is just stupid. Unless you were you actually planning on taking the cables with you to your next location and re-using them you should just leave them alone for the next person.

      If you put down new carpet or painted the walls, would your rip it all out and trash the place when you left, just out of spite?

    27. Re:Cutting cabling by faedle · · Score: 1

      Highly doubtful. The previous tenant was a barber shop, who had no phone. Hence, why there was no phone wiring.

      But, methinks you missed the point. Carpet and painted walls are usually part of the office: in our case, the building management paid for new flooring and a fresh coat of paint. They balked, however, at paying a measly $400 for the 50-pair of Plenum cable we installed.

      Yes, it's spiteful. It's even more petty that the building management couldn't pony up a couple of hundred bucks, though, to pay for the infrastructure we built for them.

    28. Re:Cutting cabling by 5KVGhost · · Score: 1

      Ok, you're right, I jumped to an unwarranted conclusion and was rude on top of that. I'm sorry.

      Some places do pay for building improvements and some don't. And some improvements are traditionally "absorbed" into the building even when a tenant leaves.

      But you're right, whatever they do, the building management should be consistent about it. If they recognize the benefit of new carpet and paint and pay for that, then they ought to do the same for IT infrastructure, too.

      I still think tearing it out is the wrong way to go, but I can understand why you'd do it.

  6. Fish by Stile+65 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've used old cabling to fish through the new cabling. I'm lazy like that.

    --
    I claim first use of "Error No. 0B" - or "No. 0B error." It'll be the new ID 10T!
    1. Re:Fish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not laziness - it's a damn good idea.

    2. Re:Fish by tmark · · Score: 1

      That won't work very well if, as the article suggests :

      1) you don't know where the cabling runs,
      2) the previous tenant cuts the wires.

    3. Re:Fish by kriston · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've tried this. The old cables stretch and break. First the jacket stretches, then the copper stretches. When I'm done pulling I get to watch the copper slowly creep out of the ends of the cables while the jacket retracts back but the copper doesn't. It was really creepy in a dark attic the first time it happened.

      --

      Kriston

    4. Re:Fish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, pulling 20 cat6 cables with one old cat3 cable generally isn't a good idea.

    5. Re:Fish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      That's why you use lubricant! It's no longer just for the bedroom. I've pulled a huge mess of lubricated cable with a single Cat 5 cable. That's a trick I learned working as an electrician while in college.

    6. Re:Fish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't do that if they used electrical tape to tape the wires together as they fed them from the spools. I found a place that did that last week, and I'm still ranting about it. Please don't do that. In any of the sets of wire that had more than a single wire, you couldn't pull without pulling all of the wires. That probably increased the time we spent by 5x. I've also see electricians do that on wires run in conduit. Insert more rants here...

    7. Re:Fish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's why you use lubricant! It's no longer just for the bedroom. I've pulled a huge mess of lubricated cable with a single Cat 5 cable.
      What kind of lubricant do you use for this? I would guess that petrochemicals present an unacceptable fire hazard (e.g. petroleum jelly). Butter, maybe?
    8. Re:Fish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      use a water based lube. oil based lube can cause small holes and then the sperm gets through. oh wait, i mean.... ....nevermind.

    9. Re:Fish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can buy lubricant that's specially made for this purpose. It is really, really slick like very strong liquid soap. Even places like Home Depot and Lowe's sell it in the electrical section. I have no idea what it costs since I get it free by the gallon at work. It isn't a firehazard since I've see cigarettes drop in it without it catching fire, and I think it's water-based since it dries.

  7. Moving out by mcbridematt · · Score: 1

    Also, very few firms currently worry about removing cabling when they move out of a building.

    Well, we have a sattelite dish that our tennant installed, and we kept it in place, because our estate agent thought "It would make the place more attractive".

    So, whats better?

    Leaving ethernet points in = $0
    Pulling out and putting in new ones = <insert_cost_of_pulling_out_+_putting_in_+_permits _etc>

    1. Re:Moving out by Ronald+Dumsfeld · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Leaving ethernet points in = $0

      Unfortunately, when the tenant moves out they're going to want to take all their switching equipment with them. That leaves a load of loose wires which may or may not be labelled.

      Come time to use wiring in an office you have to search through bundles of cables to find the ones you want. If the cable you find doesn't work you're left wondering if it's incorrectly labelled and comes out somewhere else, or is simply broken. If it's broken you've got the expense of laying in replacements, if it's mislabelled you've an expensive analysis job to undertake.

      So, no, using someone else's second-hand wiring is not zero cost.

      --
      Where's the Kaboom?
      There's supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom.
    2. Re:Moving out by PickyH3D · · Score: 2, Informative

      He was saying that for the company/person leaving it is zero cost. Businesses do not care about the company moving into the building afterwards and why would they? For you all know a competitor is moving in. If it's mislabelled then you can just rip everything out and start over. Why waste the money analyzing when you can spend less pulling it out and putting new stuff in?

  8. creating a fire hazard? by Wonda · · Score: 2, Insightful
    allow air to circulate creating a fire hazard


    i'd think the cables block the airflow, rather than start it??
    1. Re:creating a fire hazard? by line.at.infinity · · Score: 1

      The cables are inflammable and toxic, according to the article cache (main article /.ed).

    2. Re:creating a fire hazard? by kilf · · Score: 3, Informative

      The real fire hazard is due to the insulation on the cables burning or melting and emitting all sorts of poisonous fumes. Older cables are very bad for this. I shudder at the thought of a serious fire in some of the buildings described by posters- if the whole floor void (and presumably the risers) are chock full of all that plastic.

      *Some* modern cables are rated LSZH or LS0H- meaning "Low Smoke Zero Halogen" which shows that cable firms are considering this issue.

    3. Re:creating a fire hazard? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, "plenum spaces" are supposed to have plenum cable, according to fire code. Plenum cable doesn't burn, it just smolders.

      If that's what you meant by "inflammable," sorry. The word is "nonflammable."

    4. Re:creating a fire hazard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The full quote is "abandoned cable lies in the plenum spaces of buildings that allow air to circulate creating a fire hazard" and there should be a comma before creating. The plenum spaces allow the air to circulate, the cables create the fire hazard (because they're potentially flammable and the resulting toxic fumes spread through aforementioned plenum spaces).

    5. Re:creating a fire hazard? by Overzeetop · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Which is why building codes require special jacketed cables for use un plenum spaces (ie: plenum rated). If you install non-rated cables in the plenum space you are breaking the law, and could be liable to future tenants for remove of the non-complying cabling. Yes, that fact is usually ignored since nobody pulls a building permit when retrofitting low-voltage cabling and therfor there's no inspector to make sure it is done correctly (or, at least, to code).

      As a structural engineer, I deal with folks every day who do things "wrong" but they've never had a building fall down. I call it Luck, as defined by the myriad little things which don't have any reproducable/quantifiable strucutral value which - in the real world - tend to help out a bit (friction, drywall screws, adhesive on gun-nails, etc.). Combine that with safety factors approaching 3 and the rarity for a building to see a code-required load (usu. less than 2% chance per year) and builders and owners get away with a lot of $#!+.

      The fact is that the actual danger is fairly low, but when it's your family member that get's turned into medium steak - crispy on the outside with a warm red center - suddenly the $50,000 to remove the cabling seems like a small price to pay (and would have been a small price compared to the settlement or jury award).

      Well, I didn't mean for this to sound so gloom-and-doom. Remember that crispy human with gypsum and ash crust requires multiple failures - bad/blocked exits, non- or sub-functioning alarm and fire supression, ignition source, flammables. Keep your buildings well maintained and you can handle a bit of non-compliance.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    6. Re:creating a fire hazard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An other problem is that cables requires holes. Those holes can ge in walls that separete fire-comparitments. As long as there is no fire, there is no problem. But if there is a fire, the hole building could burn, and not only the fire compartiment. The hole point of fire compartiments is that the fire can't go out of the compartiment. This has the effect that only a part of de building burns and not the hole building.

      The big problem is that the compartiment must be realy good closed. If the hot air can escape, stacks of paper at the other part os the compartiment wall can start burning. And you don't want this to happen. Or at least not to fast. (If the fire is long, the wall cannot contain the fire. Typical times that the wall will de required to hold in Belgium are 1 a 2 hours. In a lot of cases the firefighters have finished of the fire by then). If there are holes in the walls, for obvius reasons, they can not contain the fire.

      After removing the cables, the holes musrt be carefully closed. (This is not a real problem a lot of good systems exists, but they must be used)

      For

    7. Re:creating a fire hazard? by line.at.infinity · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If that's what you meant by "inflammable," sorry. The word is "nonflammable."

      When I said "inflammable," I meant "inflammable," not "nonflammable." I'm so sorry that you are dead wrong on that one.

      According to the article, not some fire code, the cables can be toxic under fire. I was hazarding a guess that what the author wanted to say was that the cable was inflammable, but I might be wrong. The author should have explained what s/he meant by that. If the old cables are a fire hazard now, weren't they a fire hazard when first installed? How does the fact that they are old cables make them more dangerous? What is the problem now and what were the regulational loopholes that created the current state?

    8. Re:creating a fire hazard? by idontgno · · Score: 1
      Inflammable means flammable? What a country!
      - Dr. Nick

      The Simpsons knows everything.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    9. Re:creating a fire hazard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do you not understand the difference between the words "whole" and "hole", you dumb fuckwad?

    10. Re:creating a fire hazard? by DanDwig · · Score: 1

      Codes requiring plenum rated cable came out after it became a problem, therefore older installations are often not plenum rated. Also even plenum rated cable gives off toxic fumes when burned, it just so more slowly. Additionally multiple installations can block more of the airflow then is desirable causing other problems.

    11. Re:creating a fire hazard? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think (firefighting and telecom) (training and experience) trump one misinformed article. The insulation on plenum cable does not "burn" in an "inflammable" sense, but id does smolder. (Meaning that it still combusts, but it's much too slow to provide visible flame.)

      Unfortunately, the cumbustion does produce toxic smoke, but that's true of nearly all general cumbustion. We don't completely understand pyrolisis in the "real world" yet, so producing a product whose smoke is non-toxic is an empiracle persuit, at best.

      There are important points in the article, though. The one that strikes me first is airflow blockage. In fires, there are times when you don't want to ventilate an area, and times when you do. Airflow blockage prevents gases from reaching some places. While this is bad if you need oxygen (for a human), it could be good in the sense that the hot gasses from the fire may not penetrate the building as quickly. (HVAC systems are notorious for that.)

    12. Re:creating a fire hazard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuckwad is writing English as a second language, Jerk-off. Pay attention to the point and quit busting balls about trivial misspellings and poor grammar usage.

    13. Re:creating a fire hazard? by dcviper · · Score: 2, Interesting

      For shipboard installs, The US Navy requires Kevlar jacketed CAT5 vice the more common PVC (PolyvinylCHLORIDE) as PVC releases chlorine gas when burned.

      On a side note, when they decomissioned the USS Connstellation (CV-64) a 10'x 10' cable junction between the island and rest of the ship below the flight deck(03 level, i think, i heard this second hand) was completely filled with 40 years worth of all manner of cabling (phones, comms, radar, power) that no more cable could be run through that conduit. My roomate estimated that about 85% of the cable was dead.

      --
      Ummm, err, say what, now?
  9. Passing the buck... by danielrm26 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is one of those situations where it's just so *easy* to not take responsibility. I think the final solution in the article is best -- require a fairly large deposit when people move in, on top of requiring them to pay to install and remove the cable they use. If they don't remove it for whatever reason, you just take it out of their deposit.

    This is the most logical way to handle the problem, but it puts the business using this method at a disadvantage becuase they are possibly requiring higher deposits than competitors.

    --
    dmiessler.com -- grep understanding knowledge
    1. Re:Passing the buck... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Secure Wireless. I look forward to seeing that. Maybe we'll use winged pigs for interoffice mail too...

    2. Re:Passing the buck... by Azghoul · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's right, because it's technically impossible to encrypt a transmission just before sending it off and decrypting it once it's received on the other end...

    3. Re:Passing the buck... by tmark · · Score: 1

      The problem is, as the tenant deposits more and more money with the landlord, the landlord's incentive to cheat on the supposed removal services goes up. If the removal costs are as large as implied by the article, don't you think more than a few unscrupulous and/or lazy landlords will retain their deposits while not actually removing the wires themselves ?

    4. Re:Passing the buck... by lone_marauder · · Score: 1

      Actually, requiring the removal of old cabling when you leave a space could be disastrous. Sure, you'll get all the cat5 you ran, as well as the cabling supporting the security and climate control system, and about 100 feet of twinax that does something impossibly important for the grumpy men on the 13th floor.

      The landlord should bear the burden of cable management in the plenum spaces. They should install basic cabling, and a tenant should be allowed to install better, on the condition that they leave it in place (sans punch down blocks and racks) for possible re-use by the next tenant. The only people who should be running around in the ceiling pulling wires out are those responsible for ALL the wires.

      --
      who are those slashdot people? they swept over like Mongol-Tartars.
    5. Re:Passing the buck... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Actually, requiring the removal of old cabling when you leave a space could be disastrous. Sure, you'll get all the cat5 you ran, as well as the cabling supporting the security and climate control system, and about 100 feet of twinax that does something impossibly important for the grumpy men on the 13th floor.

      I had a client whose neighbor in the next suite hired some crazy Bulgarian network installers who offered to pull the old 10base2 coax out of the ceiling while they were putting in the new Cat5. But they got greedy and decided to cut out a huge length of really old 200-pair cabling. Unfortunately, it carried the phone lines for the entire north half of the building.

      The landlord should bear the burden of cable management in the plenum spaces. They should install basic cabling, and a tenant should be allowed to install better, on the condition that they leave it in place (sans punch down blocks and racks) for possible re-use by the next tenant. The only people who should be running around in the ceiling pulling wires out are those responsible for ALL the wires.

      Absolutely. Plenum spaces are the responsibility of the building. Making tenants pull out old cabling is asking for a nightmare.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    6. Re:Passing the buck... by crawling_chaos · · Score: 1

      I've managed two major office moves in my career. In both cases, we demolished 100% of the interior walls to get the configuration we required. The cable came out as a side effect of the demolition. How common is it for a tennant to move in and leave the existing walls? In most big office buildings, it doesn't seem to be common at all.

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    7. Re:Passing the buck... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you consider secure? Is wired secure?

    8. Re:Passing the buck... by bs_02_06_02 · · Score: 1

      This whole issue boils down to poor planning from building management. There's a big communication problem.
      The "horror" story that they present isn't that uncommon. There are companies that do the same thing in retail spaces all over the country.
      There are building managers that are trying to attract tenants. It mentioned a building manager that advertised "plug and play", only to have the new tenant move in and find all of the cables cut. Where was the building manager when the old tenant moved out? This could have been prevented.
      Building managers, in hard times, will relax conditions to gain tenants. Then, we hear about it in articles like this. Maybe it's time for a new building manager?
      Maybe it's time for the building manager to tighten up their leasing agreements.

      --
      -- No sig for you!
  10. Taking the article is already /.'ed by rf0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I can't RTFM so I will just say that if you look at some of the mess that companies actually leave such as old cat5 cables 1/2 hanging out the walls as well as some of the under floor.

    I did work at a DC once where to lay in new cable under the floor you had to physically have someone to push other cables aside so you could get another cable in. There was meant to be 3 ft of room between the tiles and the concrete floor. IT was all full of cables.

    They had a lot of downtime as each time your moved one cable it ended becoming disconnected from the switch or the machine. Soon went bust

    Rus

  11. already /.'ed by MenAtWork · · Score: 1

    anyone got a copy of the page, please post looks like even with only 5 replies the site is down ...

    a quickie /. ;0)

  12. When I sell my used PC... by jkrise · · Score: 0, Funny

    must remember to uninstall the Service Pack! oops, would that be doing a favor?

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
  13. Hours? Seconds more like.. by Channard · · Score: 5, Funny
    .. if you take a lesson from the BOFH school of thought.

    1. Feed loose end of cable out of building, into carpark.
    2. Attach cable to axel of bosses car, and forge email from CEO's wife saying she wants him now.
    3. Watch boss drive off at great speed.
    4. ?????
    5. Profit.

    1. Re:Hours? Seconds more like.. by thynk · · Score: 5, Funny

      4 is pretty simple in this one...

      4. Charge for 40 hours of "out of hours" work at the standard double overtime rate for both you and the PFY. Mark on timesheet as "Removal of Fire Hazard Material"

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
    2. Re:Hours? Seconds more like.. by ksheff · · Score: 1

      As a computer professional, his salary probably exceeded the old weekly allowance that would have made him eligible for overtime. The new limit was raised to $400-450 a week and I doubt very many sysadmins outside of a college environment work for that.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    3. Re:Hours? Seconds more like.. by thynk · · Score: 1

      And perhaps this is why he always maintains his status as a contractor (and in fact owns the contracting agency that places him there). Also please note that he works in the UK, thus making US pay scales a rather mute point.

      Of course, I am refering to "THE" BOFH, not a bofh in general...

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
    4. Re:Hours? Seconds more like.. by belphegore · · Score: 1

      Simple solution: just back-date the invoice, and make sure the accounting system shows that it's been on file for months but hasn't yet been paid. Then call up the accounts payable department, and demand to know why the invoice *still* hasn't been approved for payment after 300 days.

    5. Re:Hours? Seconds more like.. by Everlasting+God · · Score: 1

      My god, I didn't think anyone anywhere actually thought the word was 'mute'. That makes it use in sitcoms more sad than funny. Moot. The word is moot. If the TV is muted, the argument over the volume is moot. There, handy mnemonic device for you, free of charge.

    6. Re:Hours? Seconds more like.. by blair1q · · Score: 1

      >The new limit was raised to $400-450 a week

      Around here (Arizona) it's $28/hr. That's like $1120 per 40-h week, or $56K salary. Pretty easy to hit in IT. The point is, it could be $5.15/hr, and the new law says no time-and-a-half for administrative personnel. If you so much as "mentor" another employee, the employer can class you as administrative.

      But I love how my original post got two "Troll" mods despite being the truth. Must be a lot of disgruntled Bushies out there.

  14. Space.... by hughk · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The main thing about the older networks in particular was that the cables need space, lots of it and ducts get kind of full quickly.

    Removing cable can be a little tricky (you don't really want to put new strain on the production cables), but it is generally recyclable which can pay for the operation. However, if you start removing things, you had better make sure that the cables are tagged.

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
  15. plenum cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Isn't that why you use plenum rated cable in those spaces?

    1. Re:plenum cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's not just the fire hazards to take into account - too much cabling can block the ductways making new cabling difficult to install and old cabling difficult to maintain.

    2. Re:plenum cable by brakk · · Score: 1

      Plenum cable doesn't prevent fires or burn any less readily. The only difference is that when it does burn, the shielding doesn't release toxic fumes.

  16. Not so sure by cybermace5 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't know if I really believe this article all that much. A couple years back, at the place I work (*cough* will be unemployed from after Wednesday), they upgraded the network to CAT-6 and three times the ports. That meant they had to rewire the entire front office cubefarm, which is two stores with a 6" subfloor each, and wiring columns running between stories.

    When all those cables converge on a wiring closet, they start to get bundled up pretty high. There's almost no room to run additional cables, plus it would be a huge unsightly mess. We hired an outside contractor to do the job, so they did professional work and disposed of the old wiring. They almost had to...with a 6" subfloor, you either pull cables through with the old wiring, or rip up every single carpet square and floor tile. I can't imagine this situation being much different for other companies.

    --
    ...
    1. Re:Not so sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Did you get fired for being rubbish at your job then? Or for flirting on company time?

    2. Re:Not so sure by Amiga+Lover · · Score: 1

      I've seen some amazing things left behind by businesses who've moved, either using the previous place as a dumping ground or just going bust. Comms cables, networking cables, networking *hardware*, chairs, desks, shelving. You name it, if someone owned it it's been left behind at some time or another

      Reminds me of the recent story of a diligent sysadmin starting work at a new job, and running himself through a stocktake of systems and work performed. He not only found three servers running that didn't belong to the current occupant (his employers) but found they didn't belong to the previous one either. The servers went back to the occupant 8 years previous (who had since gone bust). Two companies who hadn't needed them had maintained them all those years.

    3. Re:Not so sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he got fired for not installing a twine pull along with the original cables. ;-)

    4. Re:Not so sure by operagost · · Score: 1

      Did they find a fourth server hiding behind a wall?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    5. Re:Not so sure by cybermace5 · · Score: 1

      Nah, the $2 billion company "merged" with a $6 billion company, and the ritual cleansing by fire is underway. Since I'm only a contract/temp anyway, the axe fell in the path of least resistance.

      Or maybe it was for mixing too many metaphors. ;-)

      --
      ...
    6. Re:Not so sure by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      The problem stems from the idiots in the executive suites refusing to listen to the Techs during remodeling or construction and have the office properly built with cable raceways floor tracks, etc.. this would be a NON issue.

      we have ZERO abandoned wiring in the office I am in now as it takes no effort to remove all old wiring during an upgrade.

      the "problem" is the fault of the so called leaders that ignore the requests of the IT department but are more concerned with paint color and artwork.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  17. Copy of the article by Biolo · · Score: 0, Redundant


    Bob Maderious will never forget the lease he brokered for property advertised as "plug and play" - only to find that it wasn't.

    His client had been thrilled that state-of-the-art wires and cables left behind by the former tenant would allow the new company to move in, plug in and go to work. Thrilled, that is, until moving day when the company discovered the previous tenant had cut the cables.

    "Cut it and left it," said Maderious, a broker with Grubb & Ellis. "I said, 'Hey, what's the deal with this?' (A broker) told me that the tech companies do that. They believe it's their investment in the space; why should a potential competitor get it for free?

    "The lease documentation had not caught up with practice."

    It still hasn't, but more brokers, landlords and property managers are catching on. Part of the reason is a change in the 2002 National Electric Code that requires the removal of abandoned cabling. The new code is not due to become effective in California until 2005 - unless this week's edict by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to suspend state regulations renders the code unenforceable. Literally, millions of miles of unused cable lurk in the nation's buildings.

    The situation has been exacerbated during the past decade by technological advances that render functional cable obsolete. Not only are there cables for telephones, computers and faxes, but every few years cables are manufactured that transmit data at higher speeds and business wants data as fast as it can get it so new cables are laid over the old wires.

    It is estimated that 60 billion feet of cable have been abandoned in the plenum spaces that allow air circulation through a building, creating a fire hazard. Older cable could be particularly toxic in a fire.

    "Year after year, people come in with new technology and don't bother to remove the old cable. It's out of sight out of mind." said Brian Turpen, president of All Systems, a San Ramon company founded in 1990 that installs and removes cable infrastructure. "I've seen ceiling tiles bending under the weight of old cable. There's so much congestion. It's become a problem with cabling falling out of the ceiling onto people's heads."

    Jay Miller, construction manager for Equity Office Properties, the largest publicly traded building owner in the country with more than 700 buildings and 124 million square feet of space, said he has witnessed what happens when high-tech companies move out of their space - it's not a pretty sight. Two major tenants, Automatic Data Processing Inc., which left ADP Plaza in San Ramon for Bishop Ranch, and PeopleSoft Inc., which moved into its own buildings in Pleasanton, are prime examples.

    "Here you had two companies instrumental in development of the properties and at one point were part owners of their buildings. The leases we had were not as strict as they ordinarily would be," Miller said. "In each of those cases, the companies had server rooms and phone closets scattered throughout the building, with miles of telephone and data cable that was left in place."

    Miller noted that PeopleSoft spent 10 years in their buildings. As the company grew, so did their cable infrastructure. "Now we're faced with the prospect of having to remove it," he said.

    As in most leases, Equity's contracts contain clauses requiring tenants to return the property to its original state once they leave, but that can be a tough clause to enforce, Miller noted. Buildings change hands, tenants move in, expand, go bankrupt and move out; meanwhile the cables continue to multiply.

    The problem of removing cable is twofold: It is not an easy job, especially if it requires finding and removing cables that run from, say, the 38th floor to the basement; Also, there is the question of who pays for the removal - the tenant who installed it and left five years ago, the new tenant just moving in or the building's owner?

    "When a tenant moves into second-generation space, they get a tenant improvement allowance. They

    --
    Stealing a rhinoceros should not be attempted lightly.
  18. You think unused cabling is a problem... by rodney+dill · · Score: 3, Funny

    What about the problem of used cabling.

    --

    Use your head, can't you, use your head,
    You're on earth, there's no cure for that
    - S. Beckett
    1. Re:You think unused cabling is a problem... by onomatomania · · Score: 1, Funny

      Holy jeebus. I can just see some new tech that they just hired to do some server maintenance...

      Boss: "Okay Fred, you'll be working right over here." (beep! Door opens.)

      Fred: (pauses for 3 sec and looks around) "I quit."

    2. Re:You think unused cabling is a problem... by Walterk · · Score: 1
      Fred: (pauses for 3 sec and looks around) "I quit."

      In this economy? More like:

      Fred: (pauses for 3 secs and looks around) "Looks like I'll put in a lot of overtime! Please don't fire me." (Checks for overtime rate)
    3. Re:You think unused cabling is a problem... by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 1

      Out of curiousity, what is the shiny aluminium object near the centre of the frame? To me, it looks like a trip-wire grenade.

    4. Re:You think unused cabling is a problem... by russotto · · Score: 1

      It's a portable lamp, hung by some of the cables. If it's got the usual 100W bulb in it, it easily gets hot enough when on to melt the cable insulation, too. All part of the atmosphere, I suppose.

    5. Re:You think unused cabling is a problem... by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, that makes sense ... just like the time one of our technicians left a box of back-up CD-ROMs on top of a unused heater, and his assistant switched it on to heat up the room.

  19. Fire Codes by shepd · · Score: 5, Informative

    Any place with a decent set of fire codes, and people who are actually following them, shouldn't be worrying. FT-5/Plenum cable is simply not a danger.

    Now, if residential "wood burns faster so who cares" FT-1 vinyl cable is used, you get what you pay for. That being said, if the fire inspector ever sees that stuff, you'll probably be looking at a really juicy fine.

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    1. Re:Fire Codes by DVDAshot · · Score: 1

      I was just thinking about that as well. At a previous job (in the halls of academia) we all had University issued respirator hoods. Should a fire break out, it seems that the materials that were used in the older cabling put off some really nasty gasses when they burn. Of course being your typical University IT department, we were located two floors underground in an area with no windows and one stair well in and out. Should a fire have broken out, I think the hoods would have been moot.

    2. Re:Fire Codes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any place with a decent set of fire codes, and people who are actually following them, shouldn't be worrying. FT-5/Plenum cable is simply not a danger.

      In a fire any type of cable which is in a roof void and is not properly supported by some form of containment/tray/basket/ducting is can present a danger under certain circumstances, e.g. a fire.

      For example using flammable ceiling tiles as a cheap way to hold up network cables is likely to cause those cables to fall onto a fireman during a fire! In the UK there are now several safety laws specifically to cover the situation of cables in fires. Any cable can present a serious danger if not installed safely.

    3. Re:Fire Codes by Richard_L_James · · Score: 1

      Any place with a decent set of fire codes, and people who are actually following them, shouldn't be worrying. FT-5/Plenum cable is simply not a danger.

      In a fire any type of cable which is in a roof void and is not properly supported by some form of containment/tray/basket/ducting is can present a danger under certain circumstances, e.g. a fire.

      For example using flammable ceiling tiles as a cheap way to hold up network cables is likely to cause those cables to fall onto a fireman during a fire! In the UK there are now several safety laws specifically to cover the situation of cables in fires. Any cable can present a serious danger if not installed safely.

  20. Electricians to the rescue by WillRobinson · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just put a sign out front, Free Cable.
    I guarantee you will get some electrician come pull every piece out. And it will not cost you a dime.

    1. Re:Electricians to the rescue by DerPflanz · · Score: 1
      Just put a sign out front, Free Cable. I guarantee you will get some electrician come pull every piece out.

      Or a load of geeks with no money looking for internet access.

      --
      -- The Internet is a too slow way of doing things, you'd never do without it.
    2. Re:Electricians to the rescue by karnal · · Score: 2, Funny

      But does it have HBO?

      --
      Karnal
    3. Re:Electricians to the rescue by surprise_audit · · Score: 1

      I used to work at a University that benefitted from a similar deal. A local company moved to new premises and my boss managed to arrange to salvage cable from their old building. We picked up hundreds of feet of old Ethernet cable that we could not have afforded otherwise. Mind you, this was back in the days when the orginal 1/2-inch thick coax was all the rage, so it was sturdy stuff. We rewired the University library with it, converting from 9600 baud X.25 to 10Mb Ethernet.

    4. Re:Electricians to the rescue by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that be cable theft. Don't you have to contact the cable company before you're allowed to resell your cable?

  21. Huh ? by tgt · · Score: 1

    ... the previous tenant had cut the cables. ... They believe it's their investment in the space; why should a potential competitor get it for free?

    What about burning the whole place down and having fun watching the potential competitor restoring it ? Isn't it an ethical issue ?

    The fire hazard argument seems to be made up just for the sake of the article to make it sound important. There is a lot of infrastructure, and it had to be planned properly anyway, fire or not. What, if someone moves in, the whole office becomes unusable ? Lack of information about existing wiring or it's uselessness, I see. So what ? Either you do it properly all the way or you'll have problems at some point later. No insurance will do the trick.

    --
    I like my outfit, it's inexpensive, but cool -- April Ryan
  22. Cost of removing cable by masoncooper · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When our office decided to re-cable we were told by the building that we couldn't pull new cable unless we removed all the old cable. It turns out the previous tenants had re-cabled at least three times before. We were initially quoted tens of thousands of dollars to have it removed but finally found a contractor who would remove it all for just a few thousand. As it turns out he had horribly underestimated the job and upon completion, expressed to us how much he had under-quoted us but still held to his quote.
    All in all, having pre-existing wiring is a double-edged sword. New tenants might like the idea of saving on cabling and such, but also can come back and bite you when it comes time to upgrade.

  23. Dont buildings come with services over there? by carndearg · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Judging by my several employers over the last few years the norm here in the UK for newer office space at least is that the building is put up with structured cabling already in place. This is usually cat.5, which happily takes care of any network or phone cabling requirements. This is seen as a major selling point for the office so the landlord is happy to provide it.
    It surprises me that landlords over there do not take the same view, though it is possible that there is some liability question under US law of which I am unaware.

    We are not without our cabling problems here though, my first job was at a major university, in a 1930s building. The original rubber insulated telephone cables were disused but still in place, and they had coagulated into a malevolent black mass in the risers and cable ducts. I am told they have now been removed, I pity the poor people who had to do it, they must have had to cut them out with an angle grinder.

    1. Re:Dont buildings come with services over there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It Depends.

      From the landlord's point of view, the perfect (small office) tenant is an insurance agent or a doctor's office. Anyone who has predictable and regular office hours, and won't be bringing in a lot of funny hi-tech gear, or have odd ideas about quality of service.

    2. Re:Dont buildings come with services over there? by isorox · · Score: 1

      We moved into this building in the 60's, theres all sorts of cables, coax (digital video, rf, analog video, probably some old networking), fibre (video, av and computer), multicore (audio, cat5, old phone cables, rs232, or just 2 wires to complete a circuit), power (a variety of AC and DC voltages), and probably some more.

      We are talking *tens* of thousands of miles of cable throughout the building.

    3. Re:Dont buildings come with services over there? by kriston · · Score: 1

      I am told they have now been removed, I pity the poor people who had to do it, they must have had to cut them out with an angle grinder.

      100% chance that those cables and their dried goop are actually still there.

      --

      Kriston

    4. Re:Dont buildings come with services over there? by swb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Some newer office spaces geared towards very small businesses (5-10 people) often have "built-in" networking and phone services. You get your own LAN, internet access, and phone service for some add-on price to your monthly rent.

      The problem with this model is that really requires that the building's office layout be fairly static. Many US office buildings, especially the larger ones, are huge empty spaces, made up mainly of cubicles, and even the "real" offices are made of modular partition panels. Since the layout is modular, the network generally can't come with the building.

      And even if the old tenant had wiring roughly where you wanted it to be (give or take an extra long drop cable), the cabling is often not up to any standard, poorly labeled, badly done, etc etc.

      A lot of building managers *are* hard-assed when it comes to riser space. Our Cal office must use just one riser tech, which is a nightmare when you're trying to schedule telco, a system vendor, and the offical riser techs in one day. Getting one to show up on time is a miracle, three?

    5. Re:Dont buildings come with services over there? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I think the problem is existing buildings, many of which were put up before Ethernet existed. I think companies buying and renting space will probably figure that as part of their move-in cost. Different companies have different needs, so there is no one-size-fits-all kind of solution. If a company were to decide that they want fiber between certain points of the building then that is another matter that can't be accounted for by a building seller or landlord.

    6. Re:Dont buildings come with services over there? by ces · · Score: 2, Informative

      It surprises me that landlords over there do not take the same view, though it is possible that there is some liability question under US law of which I am unaware.

      It really depends on the particulars of the tennant and building owner.

      With smaller spaces the company moving in or the building owner will often pay a departing tennant to leave network and phone cabling in place along with things like furniture and phone switches. In sublease situations it's not uncommon for the master tennant to require the subleasing tennant to leave things like walls and wiring alone.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
  24. Interplanetary network by lplatypus · · Score: 3, Funny
    According to an estimate several billion feet of abandoned cable lies unused in the plenum spaces of buildings that allow air to circulate creating a fire hazard.

    Several billion feet? That's not long enough to reach Mars even when it came really close recently: it was still over 180 billion feet away.

    Nevertheless, there is plenty of cable for making a link to the moon, which is merely about 1.3 billion feet from Earth. Of course, one may need quite a few bridges along the way to keep the signal alive and deal with the variety of recycled cable types :-) Also, the cable may need to be attached to one of the earth's poles to avoid getting wrapped around the earth by the moon's rotation.

    Wow, a cable to the moon would be quite an amazing feat of engineering. Do you think it may be remotely possible?

    1. Re:Interplanetary network by real_smiff · · Score: 1

      out of random pieces of old cable from buildings? no. i won't even ask what you want to do with that cable.

      --

      This is my Sig, this is my Gun. One is for Slashdot and one is for Fun.

    2. Re:Interplanetary network by Tazzy531 · · Score: 1

      You mean something like the space elevator?

      --


      _______________________________
      "I'm not Conceited...I'm just a realist..."
    3. Re:Interplanetary network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately the weight of the cable would tear it apart, I'm afraid...

  25. Some states actually have laws about this... by Iphtashu+Fitz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I know that here in Massachusetts the state laws require contractors to remove unused cable from plenums, raised floors, etc. when doing any renovation that involves those spaces. As was explained to me by one contractor the primary reason is the toxic gasses that can be released by PVC & other plastic coatings when they catch fire. Apparently contractors can be fined if they don't remove unused cables. This actually caused a problem at one place where I worked - we had 3/4 of a floor in a renovated office and the other 1/4 was vacant. When that space was leased out it was rebuilt and one day in the middle of the construction all our network connections on the walls between our space and this other space suddenly stopped working. The contractors incorrectly assumed that these were old cables so they ripped them out. Needless to say they ended up paying to have new cables run, but that took a couple days...

    1. Re:Some states actually have laws about this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The NEC Code Book, starting in 2002 is addressing the issue as well. Here is a quote that I picked up on the web. "Removal of Abandoned Cable Per NEC CodeBook: The definition of abandoned cable, as found in paragraphs 800.2 and 770.2 of the NEC 2002 CodeBook, states "....Installed communications cable that is not terminated at both ends at a connector or other equipment and not identified "For Future Use" with a tag." For copper cable, paragraph 800.52(B) of the NEC CodeBook states "...The accessible portion of abandoned communications cables shall not be permitted to remain.." Additionally, paragraph 800.52(1) states that abandoned cables in vertical runs shall not be permitted to remain. Article 770 makes the same requirements for optical fiber risers and horizontal cables. The NEC 2002 CodeBook requires that abandoned cable be removed for both copper and fiber." Here is the address of a .PDF version on the policy from a National Vendor on this issue. http://www.henkels.com/LOB/NetworkCablingSolutions /Abandoned%20Cable%20NEC%20Code%20Summary.pdf

  26. Give it away. . . by bplipschitz · · Score: 3, Informative

    The right cabling makes perfect feedline for HF radio applications. I removed well over 300 feet of Twinax from the building I work in, and I could take all I wanted for free. [I now feed a 40-meter dipole with it]. The loss characteristics are about the same is RG-8.

    All you amateur radio operators/SWL'ers, offer to remove the stuff for free.

    One caveat, it is really dirty work, depending upon the building.

    1. Re:Give it away. . . by dentar · · Score: 1

      i got two big rolls of rg58!! want it? (u gotta come get it..)

      --
      -- I am. Therefore, I think!
    2. Re:Give it away. . . by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      do you use just one of the center conductors, or both of them?

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    3. Re:Give it away. . . by wizman · · Score: 1

      And when you work with high band stuff, up in the Ghz range, and you need the really BIG (1 5/8" Andrew) cable, offer to tear it out of an old cell site or other transmission tower for free.

      And, if you're crafty (like my father tends to be), you can make a nice side business of selling used cable to other ham operators.

    4. Re:Give it away. . . by bplipschitz · · Score: 1

      do you use just one of the center conductors, or both of them?

      Both of them with Twinax. It is shielded, balanced, 100 ohm impedance feedline.

  27. Plenum Grade Cable by cyber_rigger · · Score: 1

    You mean they were not using the fire resistant (and more expensive) "Plenum Grade" Cable.

    1. Re:Plenum Grade Cable by kriston · · Score: 1

      Not fire-resistant, but fire-retardant. It still burns (no, it doesn't just smolder). The insulation is formulated such that it does not give up toxic gases while burning. The rationale is that plenum spaces are those which convey air through the building and anything inside those spaces must not become toxic when burning. Note that not every riser is necessarily a plenum space. The NEC does not call for plenum-rated cabling in a non-plenum riser. It is also not immediately obvious to the casual observer whether a riser should be considered a plenum space.

      Then again, using plenum cable will keep those workers in the plenum mines happy!

      --

      Kriston

  28. outsource cabling ? by Cedric+C.+Girouard · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In montreal, we have quite a few buildings where several companies are installed, and when it comes to cabling, you just can not install anything yourself. You rent the space, you rent the lines.

    You need a new drop ? No problem, a contractor is on site to install them, label them, keep track of them.

    It can lead to some pretty conflicts, but overall, when you get used to the fact that your responsability ends at the wall jack, it's a pretty good way to relieve us IT guys from one of the most boring area of the job.

    --

    Marriage is considered capital punishment for the theft of a goat in some third world countries...

    1. Re:outsource cabling ? by jburroug · · Score: 1

      That must a dream, I hate running new cable drops. The boss has never seen the value in having professional cable contractors come out and wire up the place right, which he should've done a couple years ago when he had this place built. Instead he just had the IT guys (at the time)run it all, they were somewhat less than qualified and didn't even know enough to realize how badly they were doing things. I woudln't mind running new drops from time to time if we had any sort of sane organization up there but the whole ceiling is just a rats nest of ethernet, phone, audio, alarm and bog knows what else all running every which way. Oh and the fiberglass insulation is just laying on top of the tiles so it's always an itchy, messy adventure.

      --
      "Listen: We are here on Earth to fart around. Don't let anybody tell you any different!" - Kurt Vonnegut
  29. Replace CEO's wife by CEO's mistress... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and loose all cables in half that time.

    Double profit ! $$$$$ :-)

  30. in Detroit.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ..leave a building with unused cables and the street pirates will get it, don't worry.

    There is an old hotel where the elevator motors on the roof have had all the copper stripped off and there are holes in the walls where people have torn wiring out.

    People have also stolen manhole covers here to sell for scrap, so I guess anything is fair game.

  31. Some Thoughts from an Expert... by lonb · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I used to run an ISP that was owned by a real estate firm. We wired many buildings in NYC and provided additional services, such as wiring tenant offices and providing Internet access. There are several considerations not pointed out here:

    A. Limitation of Knowledge. The guys who do a lot of the wiring work don't know what the cables do -- believe it or not. My two most experienced, and best, pullers couldn't tell you what ethernet was if their life depended on it. Heck, I had one guy who didn't know what T568b was, but could punch down Cat5 to a T568b block in five seconds flat. All they knew was what they were told to install.

    In the past I had specifically had discussions with them about pulling cables out. Unless they are explicitly directed by the landlord of the building (who knows even LESS than they do) they will not, and probably should not, touch cables that are pre-existing. This is due to fear of not knowing what they could be doing, and worse, what they are, or aren't, doing.

    B. Cross-office runs. In one of my buildings, for example, each floor was an average of 12,500 feet. The average office was 800 sq. ft. Most floors had upwards of 10-12 offices on them. In order to get riser pulls (cabling run in the central, vertical risers of the building) to office drops (termination points for those cables), these typically ran over the other offices. It was typical for the first office, closest to the riser) to have anywhere from 20-40 cables running through their plenum cores that had nothing to do with that office.

    Imagine you come in Monday morning, after a neighbor moved in that weekend, to find all your cabling (data, phone, cable TV, leased lines) had be removed by the overly eager data people.

    C. Simple CBA. The bottomline for any real estate firm is, well, the bottomline. The risk of fire due to overly full cabling space is fairly minimal compared to the risk of losing money and facing lawsuits -- or worse, losing tenants.

    The cost of pulling existing cabling plus the risk of damaging infrastructure minus the value of open space is just not in the favor of making the change. It's really that simple.

    When all is said and done, with my engineering cap on, I'd like to see thorough documentation on cables and better diagrams of floors showing what cable goes where -- and it's really not that hard. But try telling a rushing tenant that they have to wait two weeks while your engineering team documents cables, yeah right.

    Also, with my engineering cap on, I'd make one suggestion for anyone moving into a new office. If you are going to pull out the old cables, and it is in roughly strong strength, use it to snake your new cables! That's what we often did. There are a few snares with this trick to watch out for, but if you have good pullers they'll know what to do -- if you give them the green light.

    --
    "Ain't I a stinka..." - Bugs
    1. Re:Some Thoughts from an Expert... by philtre · · Score: 2

      Good comment. I occasionally end up pulling cable with the company we subcontract for cable runs. I have NEVER seen them remove cable. Simply because of the reason you stated. They don't know which to remove. If it were a case of removing all the cable, sure they'd do that. But 98% of the time the runs are being made to add to existing networks. I've never looked into it, but I've always been told (when I asked why we don't remove the unused ancient cabling) that it's not worth the time you pay the guys to pull it out. Maybe some of the earlier comments about electricians salvaging it are true in some areas, but here in Houston, I've never heard of that occuring. Only time cabling gets removed from any of my customer's sites is for a full remodel/renovation or fairly lengthy build-out.

      philtre

  32. Disposal deposits by dpilot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've considered this idea more generally in the past... paying a 'disposal fee' up-front on new goods to pay for their end-of-life costs. There are two problems with this idea:

    1: Technology changes, and those end-of-life costs are going to change, sometimes up, sometimes down. This in itself isn't a terrible problem, but it couples into problem 2.

    2: Disposal escrow would wind up creating some huge lumps of money. IMHO, whenever there's a huge lump of money, there's also a class of people who will find a way to attach themselves to it and start sucking it dry. In other words, that lump will never survive to do what it was supposed to do - pay disposal costs. Relative to item 1, someone (from that class) will find a 'new technology' to handle disposal and use the fund to develop that new technolgy. Maybe it'll work, maybe not, but odds are that the point will have been to gain access to the money, not to develop technology. Let's presume that 50% of the time the technology falls through, and the money's gone. We're right back where we started, only with a broken promise and either an environmental mess or the need for another government bailout.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    1. Re:Disposal deposits by Kris_J · · Score: 1

      Point two is valid, but this is a deposit held in trust. While it might well attract its share of leeches, either you remove your cabling and get your deposit back or you don't remove your cabling and you don't get your deposit back. Whether or not the owner decides to remove cabling you didn't remove is a separate issue. Surely it would be better to find a way to use this cable anyway...?

  33. Fire codes can fix this by Wansu · · Score: 2, Informative


    As soon as this issue appears on the radar screens of fire marshalls, it will be dealt with. Restricting air flow in the plenums and having materials which emit toxic fumes during combustion in suspended ceilings would get most firemen wound up.

    --
    Wansu, th' chinese sailor
    1. Re:Fire codes can fix this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Restricting air flow in the plenums and having materials which emit toxic fumes during combustion in suspended ceilings would get most firemen wound up.

      OK, I can see restricting air flow in the plenums... But emitting toxic fumes during combustion? Other than hydrogen, I can't think of any combustion that doesn't emit toxic fumes.

  34. Updated fire codes don't allow this by csoto · · Score: 1

    We haven't allowed "abandon in place" for a few years now. Our ceilings are so much cleaner now.

    --
    There exists no way of exchanging information without making judgments. --Bene Gesserit Axiom
  35. why we need editors(wetware, not s/w;-) by airdrummer · · Score: 1

    i had trouble parsing the original sentence, too...perhaps the following will help:

    According to an estimate,

    several billion feet of abandoned cable lies unused

    (in the plenum spaces of buildings that allow air to circulate),

    creating a fire hazard.

  36. Not universal practice by mwood · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We actually had a flag day, a few years ago, when a load of new comm. gear came in. The comm. guys spent days pulling up several layers of old cable 'cos they needed the space for the new. It made working under the floor much nicer. Now if we could get the power guys to stop laying 100kg of copper on top of our phone and data cables.... (Yeah, a structured wiring plan would help.)

    And whenever I retire a cable, or find that some less industrious person has abandoned one, I pull it up *now* before it becomes part of a mat that's too much to deal with. It's a great way to be productive late on Friday afternoon when you don't want to touch production software just before the weekend. But then, I actually fasten the holddown screws on connector shells, too, so I'm obviously a fringe nutcase. :-|

  37. Over here! by MoeMoe · · Score: 1

    I have no problem taking any of your... older... non-advanced... cat5 cables. Please, allow me to help fight pollution.

    --
    Business \Busi"ness\, n.;
    A scam in which all people involved perceive as beneficial...
  38. Them's not obsolete cables... by mwood · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...them's *pull strings*!

  39. Plenum vs riser cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IIRC there are (were?) two types of cable the last time I pulled wire, plenum and riser.

    The riser cable was supposed to be used when going between floors; it doesn't burn, thereby spreading the fire, but emits toxic smoke. The plenum cable was to be used in air circulation spaces, like above suspended ceilings; it will burn, but is less toxic.

    The problem I faced was, what about when you have to do both? (Run a distance on one floor, then go up to another floor and run a fair distance in another air space.) Either way you are breaking code somewhere.

    1. Re:Plenum vs riser cable by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      A hub, maybe? Put a metal hub in the transition point, plug the plenum cable in, plug a length of riser cable in, etc., etc.

    2. Re:Plenum vs riser cable by pbrammer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      According to the NEC 2002 ed, section 800.53(A) states that, "Abandoned cables shall not be permitted to remain." Section 800.53(B)(1) states the same thing. So, abandoned cables in plenum & riser spaces MUST be removed according to the NEC. Your local jurisdiction might have something different to say, but that's what's written in the NEC.

      Since that's cleared up now, I can move on to your question, "...what about when you have to do both."

      Section 800.53(G) & Table 800.53 state that you can substitue cable type CMP (communications plenum) for type CMR (communications riser). You CANNOT substitute CMR for CMP though.

      So, the layman's answer to your question is to run type CMP when you have both situations.

      Phil

  40. Re:-1 offtopic -1 flamebait -1 trolI -1 about /. by idontgno · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Alas, I've commented here so I can't mod, but I'd hook you up with -1 grumpy right about now.

    The mod system is irrational. Learn to enjoy its zen-like enlightenment. Striving to make sense of it will only give you grief, headaches, and sudden bloody diarrhea. (OK, maybe not that last one.)

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  41. All your cable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...are belong to us.

  42. Perhaps I'm smoking something but... by __aagmrb7289 · · Score: 1

    I'm using the same CAT5 that I installed in 1997 for my network. 'Course, I'm still at 100 Mb, but that's not too bad. What continual upgrades are being referred to here?

    1. Re:Perhaps I'm smoking something but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good for you. Some people had a CAT3 or even thin-ethernet back then and they like to upgrade. And if you have a CAT5 you might want to upgrade to CAT5e if you experience problems with your gigabit ethernet.

  43. Remeber Thin-net? by JesusHelper · · Score: 0

    Once, while working at SSA, I was running thinnet LAN drops in this one area. We discovered about 500 feet of coiled thinnet cabling tucked in the ceiling. Must have been put there by another contractor who wanted to charge them more. Ahhhh the good old days... oh, we removed it.

  44. Pointless by Mitchell+Mebane · · Score: 1

    While I would love playing UT2K3 with my lunar friends, I'm afraid the ping times would suck. Bad.

    --

    The roots of education are bitter, but the fruit is sweet.
    --Aristotle
  45. Too risky by pkesel · · Score: 1

    Like everything else, it comes down to risk. MOst often, all you can see is one end of a cable at a time, and you can't see how intertwined it may be with all those other calbes. To get it out you have to yank on it, which risks putting strain on everything else in there. And if one overzealous zip tie guy slapped one on in the middle there's no chance to get it by itself. The whole bundle will come out.

    --
    - Sig this!
    1. Re:Too risky by Loosewire · · Score: 1

      bloody zip tie's are more trouble than theyre worth

      --
      Slashdot - The one stop shop for procrastination
  46. Code Compliance by virg_mattes · · Score: 2, Informative

    > The problem I faced was, what about when you have to do both? (Run a distance on one floor, then go up to another floor and run a fair distance in another air space.) Either way you are breaking code somewhere.

    If you don't want to break code, you split the cable at the turns, and use plenum for the floor runs and a section of riser cable for the floor change. Yes, it's inconvenient, but building codes are rarely written with convenience in mind. So, in a word, you don't use one long cable for that whole run.

    Virg

    1. Re:Code Compliance by uberdave · · Score: 1

      No, you just use the higher rated cable for the entire run. Fire codes are *minimum* requirements. Assuming "riser" is rated higher than "plenum", then you can use "riser" rated cable wherever "plenum" is called for.

    2. Re:Code Compliance by pbrammer · · Score: 1

      FYI - Riser is lower than plenum. So, you'd have to use plenum wherever riser is called for in the mentioned situation.

    3. Re:Code Compliance by uberdave · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the FYI. I'd never heard of the "riser" rating until this thread.

  47. vertical cabling should use firestop by z_gringo · · Score: 1

    It is estimated that 60 billion feet of cable have been abandoned in the plenum spaces that allow air circulation through a building, creating a fire hazard. Older cable could be particularly toxic in a fire.

    Everywhere I have worked in recent years, local code has required the use of firestop at each floor with Vertical cabling. That way, there is no airflow between floors. Also, the plenum coated cabling is fire resistant. I have seen some abandoned cabling, but it's never been that big of a deal.

    --
    -- -- Warning. Do not stare directly at the sun.
  48. This article is a bunch of crap - well, maybe by 858naPS · · Score: 1

    I currently work for a property management company here in San Diego. We've had plenty of turnover in the last year or so, as a set of our buildings hit 5 years old, and we had several 5 year leases. Most of them were tech companies, or brokerage houses, which always have tons of network equipment and drops all throughout their space. We write our leases to include a little phrase that states they must remove all cabling, unless excluded in writing from the management company, upon exiting the building. And you know what? We stick to it. There's nothing worse for me or my guys than going up in a ceiling littered with wires - especially when a tenant half asses it and doesn't secure their wiring right, or leaves tons of unused cabling in the ceiling 'just in case.' This seems like it would be a pretty standard practice, and any owner / manager that doesn't have a clause like this in their lease is either lazy, or stupid, or both. The only exception to this is when we had a tenant go tits up. We just had to try to find a tenant that wanted the space as is, cabling and all. Fortunately we found one that wanted the whole floor and just dozed the place anyway.

  49. Broadcast installations are scary! by TheSync · · Score: 1

    I work in a typical broadcast installation that has seen a lot of changes over about 10 years. Each time, new coaxial cable was laid under the raised floor. First it was composite analog video and analog audio, then composite digital video and seperate AES/EBU audio, now 4:2:2 component digital video with embedded AES/EBU audio. Not to mention the addition and subtraction of channels and services, installation of new video switchers, routers, etc.

    Today, there is 1 foot of solid coax under the entire raised floor. They try to pull out abandoned cable, but it generally is near impossible to do much of that while keeping the place on the air.

  50. The solution to this is easy by iphayd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There should be some legislation that makes it illegal to cut the lines without removing them completely. When you vacate a space, the wiring should either be useable or gone.

    1. Re:The solution to this is easy by rangek · · Score: 1
      There should be some legislation that makes it illegal to cut the lines without removing them completely. When you vacate a space, the wiring should either be useable or gone.

      Yup, just what we need, more legistlation increasing the cost of doing business. I totally agree that business needs some regulation, but too many people just hit the "outlaw it" button too often without thinking of the cost.

      How about this, your company can fire you, and use the money saved to get rid of their old wiring so they are in compliance with your new law? How does that grab you?

    2. Re:The solution to this is easy by iphayd · · Score: 1

      The idea here is to make it uneconomical to merely clip the lines.

      If you upgrade the facilities, and are not willing to remove said upgrades, those upgrades should be available to the next tenant.

      This is like installing a 120GB hard drive in a machine, then when you sell the computer, open the hard drive, scratch the media, put it back in the computer, and strip out the screws.

  51. Rental Contract by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If buildings wanted the company, when they move out, to remove the cabling they should put that in the rental contract - 'Upon vacation all cabling should be removed a charge of $50/cable is charged for any unremoved cabling'

    Else it's the building's problem. So, if they consider it a problem they should remove the cabling within the spaces they own.

    1. Re:Rental Contract by surprise_audit · · Score: 1
      That works unless the company leaves due to bankruptcy. You can bet they'll have other things to pay off than a charge for removing unused cabling.

      Better than that would be an upfront payment held in escrow for "restoring the building" at the end of the lease. As long as the escrow account pays interest that keeps close to the rising costs of refurbishing, the building owner won't be too far out of pocket. If the company bails out early, at least part of the cost is covered.

  52. Re:in Detroit.. and also NY... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From what I have heard in news reports, people go down into the NYC subway system and cut the copper lines. Those are big F'ing wires though, about an inch in diameter. Apparently there is quite a bit of redundancy, because it doesnt effect operation of the system, though they were concerned that continued pillaging could start causing problems. However, I couldnt see how stealing cat3, coax or old phone cabling could ever really be considered a worthwhile activity. Even at retail, you can get 1000 ft for about $60. How is this cost effective? where does the market even exist to sell this stuff?

  53. Old Cabling Saves Lives by jvance · · Score: 1

    Just think about it for a second. If someone on the upper floors of the Twin Towers had had their wits about them, they could have ripped enough 10base5 cable from above the dropped ceilings to rappel all the way down to the ground.

    1. Re:Old Cabling Saves Lives by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      Actually fiber optic cable would have worked better. The glass core is quite strong. I've heard stories of people successfully using a pickup truck to run fiber.

      Cat5 is flexible plastic wrapped around a soft metal. It pulls apart like taffy under extreme conditions.

      Besides, it is perfectly reasonable for a stretch of fiber to run 1000-2000 meters. Cat5 craps out at 100 meters. If I had to choose my repelling apparatus, the orange jacketed stuff wins every time.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    2. Re:Old Cabling Saves Lives by jvance · · Score: 1

      Who mentioned Cat5 Cable? 10base5. You know - ThickNet, shielded coaxial cable? You could probably lift a pickup truck with that stuff.

    3. Re:Old Cabling Saves Lives by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      Who mentioned Cat5 Cable? 10base5. You know- ThickNet, shielded coaxial cable? You could probably lift a pickup truck with that stuff.

      My bad. You get so many typos on SlashDot, I thought he hit 5 instead of T and was talking about 10baseT. The thought that 10base5 was itself a wireing standard didn't cross my mind.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    4. Re:Old Cabling Saves Lives by jvance · · Score: 1
      You get so many typos on SlashDot, I thought he hit 5 instead of T and was talking about 10baseT.

      Check my history, dude. I never make tpyos.

  54. Pfff....fire hazards are everywhere. by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Insightful
    It is estimated that 60 billion feet of cable have been abandoned in the plenum spaces that allow air circulation through a building, creating a fire hazard. Older cable could be particularly toxic in a fire.

    I like how the article pushes the "fire hazard" angle, but doesnt' bother to look at which cabling, specifically, is the problem. It portrays it as a problem caused by companies installing network/phone wire recently, when the real problem wire is much older. Most new wire installed by knowledgeable installers is plenum rated-- which means it's self-extinguishing and not nearly as toxic when burned. The nastiest-burning wire you'll find in ceilings is the old pink-beige jacketed 25-200 pair phone cabling that was installed forty years ago by Ma Bell! What's more, much of this nasty multipair wire can't be pulled out because it's still being used. On top of it all, the toxic-fire hazard posed by wiring in the plenum space is miniscule compared to the nasty plastic crap that's in an office itself-- if there's a fire, that cheap desk chair burning is gonna put out nastier smoke than a bundle of cabling. Also, plenum air doesn't generally get pumped into anyone's office. Plenum spaces are used as return-air systems, so any smoke in there is going primarily into the building's air shaft, where it will set off a smoke detector that sends the air out a roof vent rather than back into the building.

    Don't get me wrong, as a network cabling installer I'm all for the removal of old cable. I've seen cable trays so packed with old crap that I couldn't get another run through. But the need of some people to pose every problem as a dire safety hazard drives me up a tree. I'm willing to bet that there are very few buildings where the communications wiring is even one of the top five fire-safety hazards.

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  55. Removing the cabling isn't very fun at all.. by Haven · · Score: 1

    What will Network Admins 20 years from now dig up and laugh about if we remove all the outdated cabling.

    You ever find something really really old and put it to use as a joke? I found an old 16 port lantronix (LTR16T) 10-baseT hub that went for 849 dollars when it was new sitting the bottom of an old storage unit at work.

  56. Old Fibre = Good Clothesline! by HonkinUnit · · Score: 0

    When my company deinstalled some old ESCON (mainframe) fibre cable, I took some of it and used it for clothesline. It's strong, it's orange, it's geek as hell.

  57. Old wires? You want old wires?! by Chordonblue · · Score: 1

    Here at the 'oldest girls' school in the US' I can show you some wiring history! The vast majority of this school's been around almost 270 years. Some of our basements are a real treat.

    There's everything down there from the original 1900's-era wiring (before standardized sockets), to the refits done in the 30's, to the stuff put in a few times after that. One time fuse blew a few years ago and it took our electician almost 4 hours to FIND it.

    When we got DSL a few years back, the phone company didn't ever try using the existing phone lines and just ran a CAT 5 to the trunk.

    Things certainly look better now than they did a few years back, but there's still plenty of history stapled to the wood. :)

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
  58. Not too uncommon by phorm · · Score: 1

    Really, this situation isn't too uncommon. I think that some network techs become like black widow spiders when it comes to cabling... laying it like a web to trap unwary visitors. Look closely... anyone see a maintenance person trapped in there somewhere?

    Seriously though, as far as cable volume this is nothing. Right now one of the sites I'm working at has over 200 cables, and when all your networking hardware is in one room running it to a connection becomes slightly messy no matter how you do it. Granted it's not as bad as in the picture shown, but still enough that trying to trace individual cables can become a long and arduous task.

    I'd hate to imagine what this could be like in larger companies, making 500+ cables run nicely has got to be a not-so-fun task in any situation...

    1. Re:Not too uncommon by ces · · Score: 1

      I'd hate to imagine what this could be like in larger companies, making 500+ cables run nicely has got to be a not-so-fun task in any situation...

      If the coms racks are set up properly it isn't too difficult you just have to put a little thought into routing the cable properly when you drop a new one in.

      Patch panels, cable trays, and color coded patch wires are your friend.

      The big fun comes when you outgrow what you had planned for, inevitablely the cabling turns into a rats nest at this point.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
  59. Re:Dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Bad kids/students might construct Tesla coils or EMP generators if they were allowed access to large amounts of wire. It's not safe. Or they might build a giant electro magnet and use it to attract somebody's car into a ditch.

    Children and non-qualified personnel should not be given access to so much wire.

  60. I work in a science museum... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
    The building went up in 1932. Our problem isn't unused cabling (of which there is plenty.) We have unused natural gas lines!

    But back on the subject, running through the basement is a massive nasty bundle of electrical and communication cable. It runs along the ceiling and seems to get bigger around every rennovation. When you talk about trunk lines, this literally grows like one.

    I lucked out in that one of my predicessors ran multimode fiber back in the early 90's. Lots of multimode fiber. Finding the endpoints is like a treasure hunt, though. You read old diagrams with descriptions like "Future Earth" and "Optics", only to discover that "Future Earth" is not the traveling exhibit space, and the "Optics" exhibit is now a utlilty space inbetween the new "Sports" exibit and the "Changing Earth", which hasn't since I was a kid.

    --
    "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
    --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  61. It looks funny now but... by phorm · · Score: 1

    You may have this problem at work, and really, it's not a problem to you, since everything is working as it should. It becomes a problem when, suddenly, critical PC #962 loses networking capability, and you have to find out which cable is dead and where between it and #961 other cables.

    I think this is the point between where people do one of several things:

    a) Run a whole new cable if the distance isn't huge, then you have #962 cables, and this does add up over time.

    b) Split an existing cable with a hub or whatever, then you have a dead cable in the ceiling.

    c) Try to trace the dead cable and replace it. When you have a heart-attack going through crawlspaces they may have a dead technician in the ceiling (from experience, the places where these cables reside are often not fun to visit)

    1. Re:It looks funny now but... by bluenova · · Score: 1

      You know, as far as tracing the cable goes...is it not standard issue for a technician to have a tone and probe set in their toolbox? I have always just toned from the wall jack back to the patch panel to find the other end. Slap a cable tester on both sides, and it should tell you the problem. Granted, it's not foolproof(I.E., if someone cuts the middle of the cable, you don't get a signal on the other end.) but it beats the heck out of crawling through ceilings.

    2. Re:It looks funny now but... by phorm · · Score: 1

      Got one, works fine, until you have several hundred cables to sort out, then you STILL have to go through the rack checking individual ones.

      Another trick is just to get an ammeter, slap a small battery on one end of the cable attached to the terminals, and check for current (best done when your cables aren't hooked to any hardware that might be damaged by battery current).

  62. Electrical Code by thomasdelbert · · Score: 1
    Part of the reason is a change in the 2002 National Electric Code that requires the removal of abandoned cabling.


    Actaully I am planning on redoing the electrical in my 1949 house, and leaving the old electrical wire dead and grounded - 55 year old 12 gauge copper just doesn't pull very easily. Anybody know if this rule applies to electrical wiring?

    - Thomas;
    --
    ___ This sig is in boldface to emphasize its importance!
    1. Re:Electrical Code by coldnight · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When I ripped out my Romex (steel covered cable) it was quite nasty... however, we had the drywall all down and pulled the plaster & lath down too so it was quite easy to see where things were sticking. Alot of the cable was cut in many places and removed from around the staples.

      You will need to check with a local person as the codes vary all over the country.. not everyone enforces the NFPA rules or adopts them as local ordinances. Fire code in the US is a massive mess... thus we have the highest fire fatality rate in the civilized world...

  63. There should be an option... by CustomDesigned · · Score: 1
    to keep well documented cabling. A policy of requiring a tenent to remove cabling when leaving is usually a good idea. However, sometimes the wiring is generic and well documented, and an asset to the next tenant. For instance, Cat 5 from several outlets in each room to a big patch panel in another room. In these cases, it should be possible to sign an agreement to leave such cable in place. The exiting tenent saves the removal costs. The entering tenant saves the installation costs.

    Even when the cable is obsolete, it is useful for pulling new cable through. It is a shame to have to redo all that crawl space work when leaving one wire between nodes while removing would be so easy.

    In fact, because of these inefficiencies with the exiting tenant rule, I actually prefer a rule requiring the incoming tenent to either use existing cable or remove it.

  64. Re:in Detroit.. and also NY... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those are big F'ing wires though, about an inch in diameter.

    Even at retail, you can get 1000 ft for about $60.

    Not if it's an inch in diameter.

  65. Sounds like a good case for wireless... by FirstTimeCaller · · Score: 1

    If I were a wireless networking company I'd be sending out reprints of this article to all my customers...

    Oh, and then I'd work on fixing security, so some yahoo in the parking lot can't tap into the corporate network! On second thought, maybe I'd do this one first...

    --
    Wanted: witty unique signature. Must be willing to relocate.
  66. Moving out-Mapping the wiresphere. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why even do all that? As one person pointed out. This should be considered a capital improvement, and the issue of what goes were can easily be delt with. Companies might even be encouraged to document, and leave it by adding the amount to the deposit they get back. Sort of a "landlord rewarding tenants for improvemets that increase value".

  67. Free germs with every cable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    One of the problems is germs and other "unhealthy" materials. Ductwork can be one of the biggest sources of illness in the workplace.

  68. Mother's Day week 1984 CO Fire from stripped cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    A day or two before Mohter's day in 1984 the At&t central office serving the then sole call center for FTD was busy removing old cabling. The were pulling wires along a metal trough when one of them stripped and started a fire. The whole central office was shut down for at least a few days due to the blaze and FTD couldn't get any more orders in for Mother's Day, the biggest day of the year for flower deliveries(yes bigger than Valentine's day). FTD got a second call center shortly after that. I can't find a web page about this incident so anyone with more details or a link, please reply. I believe this was somewhere near Chicago.

  69. outsource cabling ?-Build it, they will come. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think that part of the problem is that most buildings aren't really designed to have cables ran through them. Plus will wireless technologies reduce this particular problem?

  70. Obligat. Simpsons Quote: by MayorDefacto · · Score: 1

    "It's not about the money. It's about how much copper wiring you can rip out of the walls."

  71. American short-term mentality vs. UK attitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    IMH(Cowardly)O, the root of the problem is our distinctly American habit of ignoring any financial problem that falls after the coming quarter. Why remove the old tenant's cables when the whole shoddily-built office strip will be torn down or completely remodeled within ten years anyway?

    I'm reminded of Steve Martin attempting to impress the English woman in "L.A. Story": "Some of these buildings are over *twenty* years old!"

  72. Old cable ain't all that bad... by supabeast! · · Score: 1

    When one of my employers moved into a new building, we realized that we were going to have to run one cable very, very far. Fortunately, my boss poked around and found an old 10/100 fiber cable had been run from one end of the office to the other-so we just tossed some copper ethernet adapters on either end and stuck switches on either end. Not wonderful, but it beat the hell out of running cables through 100 feet of plenum.

  73. Aging of buildings by Jonathan · · Score: 1

    Even if the people were to cut the wires as close to the patch panel as possible, wouldn't this be the corporate equivalent of the gradual degraduation of teleomeres?

    Yes, and buildings eventually get torn down, don't they? Therefore cabling must have something to do with the aging of buildings!

    1. Re:Aging of buildings by Mercaptan · · Score: 1

      Heh, dirty bio-geeks.

      --
      -- "Sucks to your ass-mar"
  74. not quite by name_already_taken · · Score: 1

    From the landlord's point of view, the perfect (small office) tenant is an insurance agent or a doctor's office. Anyone who has predictable and regular office hours, and won't be bringing in a lot of funny hi-tech gear, or have odd ideas about quality of service. Speaking as a former landlord, I'd much rather have an office with some "hi-tech gear" in it than something that generates a lot of foot traffic and cars coming and going all day in my parking lot like a doctor's office. The best tenants I ever had were a sales rep who was only in the office four days a month and an insurance agent (who did have some funny hi-tech gear, but did very little work in the office). Landlords don't care about your office hours, since we don't live in the building. As long as your business doesn't annoy me or the other tenants or do anything illegal I don't care what you do in your rented space. As for "quality of service", what is that? Are you referring to how often the dumpster is emptied or some non-landlord issue?

    --
    Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
  75. An Idea Just in time for Xmas! by Dolemite_the_Wiz · · Score: 3, Funny

    Take all the unused cabling and thread unused AOL Trial CD's and you have yourself a great way to trim that Tree!

    Dolemite
    ________________

    --
    Save the World! Use a Quote!
  76. Wired Walls? by Mynn · · Score: 1

    Going forward, why not designate walls and such as "wired walls" much like raised floors are used for running wire. Make things a bit easier, I expect, for removal/locating wires.

    --

    Face it, people are stupid, and the internet is the place where they all meet.
  77. but, but... i don't need wires.. do i? by gamlidek · · Score: 1

    I only care about one wire: the T1 line. All the rest can be wireless. With LEAP authentication or RADIUS, who cares about all the other wires?

    oh wait, we all still require land lines for phone access... *sigh* where's my GSM in the building? I don't want any more wires!!

    -gam

    --
    "In theory, theory and practice are the same; in practice, they are not."
  78. Yes, There ARE too many stupid people in the world by firstkillallthelawye · · Score: 0

    And Darwin was wrong! Evolution does not weed out the weak! Instead they become our elected officials and college professors!

    --
    "The first thing we must do is kill all the lawyers" - Henry VI, Wm. Shakespeare
  79. I wonder... by LuYu · · Score: 1

    if this cabling could not be used to set up some sort of ExtraNet.

    Linking old/unused/unowned cables might make for a really cool hobbyists network if the locations of the cables could be known and the cables could be linked cheaply. Of course, a bunch of serial and coax cables would make for a fairly slow ExtraNet, but it would still be cool to route around the controls currently being imposed by our corporate masters.

    --
    All data is speech. All speech is Free.
  80. No change of practices in sight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just finished updating our site for 802.11b. Now, mgmt wants to change it all again!!! 802.11g infrastructure is just gonna have to be up there with the new .g.

  81. Cat5 may be worthless but lead piping is good by steve_l · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I live in an old house (1840), in the UK, and when we had the floors up we found lead piping for gas lighting, which was the premium source of light before electicity came along.

    After admiring the historical quaintess of century and a half old technology, we pulled it up and sold it for enough to cover some of the costs of the woodwork repairs, then laid down CAT5 (attenuation in stone is atrocious, especially for 802.11a, so CAt5 is the backbone).

    I hope in another 150 years someone will find the cat5 wiring and find it equally quaint, as they laugh at 100mbit bandwidth and IPv4 net addresses. At least I hope so -as I doubt they will find as much resale value in the wires as we did in the lead pipes.

  82. merciless simpsons quoting by spudwiser · · Score: 1

    "Bart, it's not about how much money you make... it's about how much copper wiring you can get out of the building with!" *rrrrrip!*
    -Head Geek from Dotcom Bust Episode

    --
    .cig - what you do after winning a good flame war
  83. It *is* the Landlord's cable now... by B747SP · · Score: 1
    Building management now considers the cable "theirs" and won't provide us access to the phone room to remove it.

    And rightly so, under Australian law at least. English and Australian law has a concept of 'tenants fixture' in commercial leases. A 'fixture' is any item (light fittings, exhaust fans, air conditioning ducts, cabling, etc) added to the tenancy (property). A 'tenants fixture' is something that the tenanct can take with him when he leaves. The other sort (can't remember the name, 'landlord's fixture' maybe?) is that which becomes part of the property and stays

    The differentiator is the way in which the item is attached to the property. Carpets stay, rugs go. Light fittings tend to stay. Cabling obviously stays, air conditioning obviously stays. Furniture goes, unless it is built-in. Commercial leases are pretty much always contracts between corporates, so they do have a lot of leeway to vary terms, etc (as opposed to residential tenancy agreements, where the govt tries to protect tenants from dodgy landlords by having a pre-defined and required set of terms) so the parties can of course specifically contract to include or exclude specific fixtures, etc. By default (ie: at common law), the tenant's fixtures rule applies.

    IANA.U.S.L, but if your law is anything like ours, then the cabling belongs to the landlord.

    We paid for it, it's not theirs, so.. get out the hacksaw

    You paid for it, it is theirs, and by getting out the hacksaw, you're opening yourself up to a lawsuit with the landlord sueing you to make good the damage to his property, and you'll lose the case.

    Strange, but true!

    --
    I find your ideas intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
  84. Building Codes limit abandoned wire. by flamingchicken · · Score: 1

    I don't know if this is the same in all states/countries, but here in Charlotte, NC for you to pass your electrical inspection after you do any remodeling of office space you have to remove all abandoned wire. In Phase 1 of our remodeling they removed about 100lbs of wire, in the second phase contractor failed the inspection because of "excess abandoned wire in plenum". And in most cases when you move into a new office space you will remodel it to some extent, so in regions where the building code is up-to-date it really should not be a problem.

    --
    Life is Short and Hard like a body building Elf
  85. Fire Hazard? by netik · · Score: 1

    Companies install plenum simply because it's NOT a fire hazard. Plenum saves lives.

  86. real old cables by petepdx · · Score: 1

    i consulted for a tenent in a building built before 1900. I made a board i have hanging in my office of each generation of wires. The oldest was a private extension for a railroad, not phone but telegraph, then there was western union telegraph, then teletype. The fist telephone demarc had a total of 36 pairs, this was at a time all of Portland has less then 1,000 phones. I followed those piars to the roof, i found the remains of where they then went to open wire. any way add fire pairs, then every generation of telco up to abandoned early fibre !

    you think you could cut all the old stuff ? One of the pre 1920's telco pairs still had dial tone !

    I spent two whole days trying to find room to feed
    CAT5 from the basement to my cleints offices.

  87. Bad idea by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    Someone would just come along and say all of that cabling in space is a fire hazard.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  88. Family members by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The fact is that the actual danger is fairly low, but when it's your family member that get's turned into medium steak - crispy on the outside with a warm red center - suddenly the $50,000 to remove the cabling seems like a small price to pay"

    Obviously you have never met my family.

  89. Cabling saved UCLA medical center in earthquake by popocatapetl · · Score: 1

    At a talk, I heard it said of the University of California Los Angeles medical center that after a major earthquake (perhaps it was the Northridge quake; I don't remember), the structural engineers figured that the building came close to collapsing (which would have been disastrous, since at the same talk I heard it said that it was the second largest building in the US after the Pentagon) when the earth shook, and it was the network cabling that ultimately made enough of a difference to hold it together. I hope someone can authoritatively either corroborate the story or consign it to urban legend status.

  90. Put a "buzzer" on it. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, when the tenant moves out they're going to want to take all their switching equipment with them. That leaves a load of loose wires which may or may not be labelled.

    So put a "buzzer" on it at the endpoint site, and sniff for it at the patch-panel site.

    A commercial cable installer will already have the equipment. (If you don't and are too cheap to buy your own, use a literal buzzer-and-battery to make radio noise and a battery-powered pocket radio to sniff for it.)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  91. Kennedy Space Center / Patrick AFB by amcc49 · · Score: 1

    Ten years ago, I heard that the almost filled cable trench at the X-Y building containing cables overlaid on top of obsolete cable generations from years before (undocumented and untrusted) was over 30ft deep, dating from the late 1940's. Any update ?

  92. Code Convenience by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

    > No, you just use the higher rated cable for the entire run. Fire codes are *minimum* requirements. Assuming "riser" is rated higher than "plenum", then you can use "riser" rated cable wherever "plenum" is called for.

    Not correct here, because according to code, riser and plenum cables are not interchangeable. They do different things (plenum is designed not to give off toxic fumes when it burns, and riser cable is designed not to burn). It's not a matter of "higher" ratings, it's that they're different.

    Virg