Slashdot Mirror


User: jpu8086

jpu8086's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
113
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 113

  1. Re:Conservative? on Bob Barr Weighs In On Trusted Computing Group · · Score: 1

    come to think of it, so am *i*. all i can say is "oops."

  2. Re:Conservative? on Bob Barr Weighs In On Trusted Computing Group · · Score: 2

    "most of us are libertarian"

    how the heack do you know that? i really want to know. i, for one, am not a libertarian. i *am* just not that selfish.

    ou seem to suffer the "elitist" syndrome. you definitely seem to think the rest of the work is dumb and only you and a select few are the ones that should control the world. wake up brother, your line of thought is entirely idiotic.

    groupthink does exists among libertarians. otherwise, they won't be a group. and no, you are not that intelligent, elite, or insightful. you're a snob. and that is it.

  3. Re:Jesus, I'm conflicted. on SBC Refuses To Name File-Sharing Users · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Dude, companies are not evil. Just the lawyers that run them are.

    So, in your rejoicing of the possibility of both companies going bankrupt, you forget that lawyers (the greatest evil) are getting rich.

    Lawyers get what they want -- always. Everyone else gets screwed.

  4. Re:Gates driving style on Microsoft Money Leads To Street-Legal Porsche 959s · · Score: 1

    thats the stupidest analogy i've heard of late. in honor of that lame comment:

    "if cmdrtaco eats the number of times he reposts the same story, get your children to grow some food for the world's survival."

    seriously, grow out of your gates-envy. he is not that bad for being the devil.

  5. Re:What Steam could have been and won't be: on Valve Releases, Tries To License Steam · · Score: 1

    You, my friend, are a true idealist.

    However, basic economics of distribution system will tell you that this will not happen. At least not any time soon. or ever. It is almost a Catch-22 problem.

    Game publishers dont want to undercut their distributors who sell a substantial amount of their games (ie, BestBuy, Fry's, CircuitCity, etc). If they undercut them by 60%, you can bet that Fry's is going to take the item off the shelves due to lousy sales and low-price guarantees.

    Now, game publishers just lost a lot of non-hardcore gamers who purchase games ocassionally in the store (that is a lot of people).

  6. Complimentary lyrics... on Valve Releases, Tries To License Steam · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'm a little teapot, short and stout
    This is my handle, this is my spout
    When I get all steamed up, then I shout
    Just tip me over and pour me out!

  7. Re:Have you EVER heard of ... on Microsoft Plans IE Changes Due to Plugin Patent · · Score: 1

    Not to sound ethnocentric, but Americans do have more money. It is the world's largest economy. The next 5 economies stacked together don't add up to the American economy. So, please...

    And, I never compared America as being the largest vs. the world. I said it in the context of it being the largest vs. any other economy. So, guess what? It is the largest market for many big-time European and Japense companies too -- Phillips, Nokia, Sony, etc.

    BTW, the world has had 6+ billion people for sometime now ;-)

  8. Re:Have you EVER heard of ... on Microsoft Plans IE Changes Due to Plugin Patent · · Score: 1

    Are you serious? Because the parent.parent statement didn't make any sense.

    You only install a plugin (as in the program, the executable) once. The patent is for the plugin not for the files that utilize the plugin. So, if some crazy site did use 10 flash files, you won't have to click "YES" each time. As long as you did it once (and only once -- not per site but per install/lifetime), you should be OK!

    I don't see that as being a problem.

  9. Have you EVER heard of ... on Microsoft Plans IE Changes Due to Plugin Patent · · Score: 2, Interesting

    WTO? The World Trade Organization?

    Do you know why so many farmers protest? Do you know why so many humanitarian groups protest? Do you know why so many environmentalist protest? Do you know why you should protest?

    Because WTO is on the path to universal patents. Less I be mistaken, some form of across the border patent recognizations already happens. Patents filed in the USA have to be accepted by all countries with a presence in USA (and that means any big company that wants to make money ;-)

    So grow up. Isolating your biggest market is not a good idea for any company. Suberting a plugin installing with an additional click doesn't hurt anyone.

  10. Re:Let us get the facts straight. on No Americans Need Apply · · Score: 1

    Big OOOOPS.

    You are correct.

  11. Re:Meeeeeh on No Americans Need Apply · · Score: 1

    A definite no-no for standards. Here is proof.
    Netscape put that shit in, just like too much other crap like frames.

    Here are people requesting alternatives at w3.org

  12. Let us get the facts straight. on No Americans Need Apply · · Score: 4, Informative

    Disclaimers: I was born in India. However, my family moved to USA since I was 14. I consider myself American.

    Fact #1: Americans (and others) can work in India
    Fact #2: Lots of Americans (and others) do work in India
    Fact #3: A Visitors visa is different from a Work visa (just like USA)
    Fact #4: If you travel on visitors visa, you cannot change it to work visa unless you leave the country first. Basically you cannot transfer visas without changing your port of entry (guess what? just like the good ol' USA)
    Fact #5: This guy traveled to India on a work visa and applied for a job
    Fact #6: Following fact #4, he got denied a visa.

    BTW, all these facts are responses to USA's visa policies. India has a repuation for treating citizen of outher countries the same way other countries treats it's citizens. For example, USA charges a fee for each applicant of a visa (may it be student, work or travel) to people from India. Guess what India does? They charge a fee to Americans who want a visa to India too. Nepal doesn't charge a fee for Indian citizens. So, India doesn't charge a fee to Nepalese citizens. So, that is it guys: tit-for-tat.

    However, moving tech jobs offshore is bad, and so are H1B visas in todays economy. They were good during the boom days when we couldn't hire enough people.

  13. Re:Meeeeeh on No Americans Need Apply · · Score: 1

    You talk about complying with standards and then break them yourself. You're one ignorant evangelist. NOBR is not part of any HTML standard. Never was.

    Yes, I do use Mozilla FB. And, I do know standard HTML.

  14. Re:Conflict? Not Too Surprised on EA And ESPN Team Up, Despite Sega Deal · · Score: 1

    Good point. Minor error: Disney owns ABC. Disnet owns ESPN. So, they're siblings controlled by the wishes of the parent.

  15. Re:Legacy GSM? on Cracking GSM · · Score: 1

    Uhhhhm, shouldn't the word be "sarcasm?"
    Irony only applies if the stated facts are true.

  16. Re:SCO on SCO Targets US Government, TiVo · · Score: 1

    Wow. I'm impressed

    The mods are humans, they *do* have a sense of humor after all.

  17. Re:SCO on SCO Targets US Government, TiVo · · Score: 1

    That is truly hilarious buddy.

    You spent atleast 30 minutes thinking/typing that.

    Meanwhile, check out this post by the original poster.

    he is GAY ;-)

    So, it seems that your logic skills equate to jack shit. Sorry, I win. Again.

  18. Re:SCO on SCO Targets US Government, TiVo · · Score: 1

    Ha ha ha ha ha! Another stereotype, funny guy.

    It doesn't matter who or what I am.

  19. Re:SCO on SCO Targets US Government, TiVo · · Score: 1

    Thank *YOU*!

  20. Re:Uh oh on SCO Targets US Government, TiVo · · Score: 1

    pjack's journal has an entry mentioning linux saving her - yes, I said he! - marriage.

    Wait did you he, or did you say her?

    Given that there aren't very many places where homosexual marriages are allowed, it would seem probably that pjack's female

    America != World. Most places are light years ahead of America in the social aspect of life. There are plenty of places in the world that allow gay marriages.

    And why would pjack be referring to a boyfriend and a marriage?

    Umm, people can have extramarrital affairs, you know? Wait no, not in America.

  21. Re:SCO on SCO Targets US Government, TiVo · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Holy crap, now I realize why homosexuality is such a big deal in the liberal/conservation scheme of politics. It seems to overcomplicate too many scenarios.

    I realize my bigotry and have already apologized in a previous post. But, you can never be sorry one too many times.

    I hope the mods don't mark this as redundant.

  22. Re:SCO on SCO Targets US Government, TiVo · · Score: 1

    You're right. I realize my mistake.

    If the 2nd poster is reading this, please accept my apologies.

  23. Re:SCO on SCO Targets US Government, TiVo · · Score: 1

    Ah ha! 3 quick posts pointing out the same something: it wouldn't have been a distasteful joke if the 2nd poster was a gay male.

    However, it is clear that the intention of the 2nd poster was to point out a female correlation as there are plenty of male geeks out there. And following normal population deviance, there should be normal number of gays among them. Therefore, it wouldn't have been funny if the comments weren't inteded for a female.

  24. Re:Uh oh on SCO Targets US Government, TiVo · · Score: 1

    Excuse me! How the heck did this person admit that they were a female? Wake up and smell the coffee: there are gay people in this world!

  25. Re:SCO on SCO Targets US Government, TiVo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha. Soooooo funny. Slashdot mods also seem to think so.

    This joke seems only funny in an old-school way: a joke when made my a insenstive male clod thinking there are only hetrosexual people in this world. However, ever given a thought that the original poster could have been a gay male? Then your joke wouldn't be that funny, would it? Actually, I am sorry: it would be funny, however, we would just be laughing at you. And even if the original poster is an awesome geeky female, this joke seems inappropriate for slashdot.