And using the Walmart Pay would be any different than using a credit or debit card how? One way you swipe a card to get your payment info. Another way you present a QR code that uniquely identifies you, looks up your payment info. Both ways process the transaction basically the same from that point on.
This isn't running the transaction through Google or Apple Pay like an in-game purchase would do, racking up large transactions mommy and daddy end up paying.
That's what I'm asking, specifically for the position of President but I guess any federal elected title or high ranking position (Sec. of State, Sec of Defense, etc). If you are prevented in the private sector from holding security clearance does that legally prevent you from holding that office or title? I'm not talking strictly from a moral/ethical/philosophical ground of what should be, rather what is actually legally the case.
Unlimited Data. $50 a month. Roaming data in 100+ countries. Free rental of WiFI router.
You forgot little to no service in many rural (and some not so rural) locations. If such things are important for your use, T-Mobile may not be the best choice. It's gotten better the last while, but it's still doesn't come close to Verizon and AT&T's footprint.
...I can tell you that if I did this, I would be fired, lose my clearance, and most certainly never be granted another.
Does the president have to go through the same process for obtaining security clearance? Or does clearance just come with the title? Is it theoretically possible that the President could not be cleared to receive secret (or higher) classified information?
Yes but motherboards with the Displayport out are a rarity, especially with AMD motherboards for APU.
Newegg lists at least 77 motherboards that support displayport and Intel 6th generation (skylake) CPUs that will do 4K. I beleive 5th generation Broadwell-H CPUs will also do 4K over displayport. Why are you stuck on just using AMD motherboards with APUs?
It's not really a leak though if you've paid a subscription for the commercial service. It's only leaked if you reshare that information unauthorized, or someone figures out how to share the information without a subscription and authorization to do so.
It certainly indicates that the data was not truly secure in the first place, at the very least!
Not necessarily. PHI data may have been encrypted when stored on disk. Ransomware infection re-encrypts data making it unusable for it's intended purpose, but PHI data, even if it managed to leak out, is still protected.
Another scenario which is probably much more likely is PHI is kept on a secured server. Client computer becomes infected. PHI was never compromised. Does that still trigger a notification?
From the image shown on the tweet (emphasis added):
We have been testing with WIndows Insiders a preview of the "Messaging Everwhere" feature that allows you to receive and send text messages from your Windows 10 phone directly to and from your Windows 10 PC.... The ability to reply to text messages on your PC using Cortana is unaffected
So what this actually means I have no idea. I have zero interests in texting using any MSFT product, be it a WIndows Phone, Cortana, Messaging Everywhere, or Skype.
2000-2002 he had the highest average driving distance* over the season of any Tour golfer. Oddly enough those years weren't his longest averages of his career though. And there is only about a 15 yard difference since 2000 between his lowest average and highest average.
* drive distance statistics are measured twice per round selected on 2 holes that face approximately opposite directions to counteract any effects from wind.
That wouldn't work. How you have it would result in anyone of either gender whose birth and identified gender are the same would appear as one gender (false), and anyone who has changed gender would appear as the other gender (true).
But it would be a due process violation to just automatically revoke it. And there are already established processes with the legal system for dealing with code violations or civil infractions.
Golf - steroids will allow much more power hence much farther drives
Except drive distance isn't necessarily a indicator of overall golf performance. If you're on a 400 yard hole, it doesn't matter that much if you drive it 300 yards and have a 100 yard approach, or drive it 350 yards and have a 50 yard one. It's a few years old, but here's a pga.com article about how almost all of the long ballers didn't make the cut for the 2012 US Open.
I'd say that doping for power is less of a factor in golf than doping for other reasons, like recovery, endurance, concentration, or as you mentioned steadying.
There's a huge difference though between providing a security update when an obscure bug, buffer overflow, or some other specific vulnerability is fixed, and an entire OS upgrade is relentlessly, essentially forced on the user.
It appears from option 3 here that the content provider still could provide a https or otherwise encrypted feed and still qualify for the zero rating. T-mobile has to be able to detect the video feed, so perhaps such content needs to be served from a particular host, ip, port, etc. But it doesn't appear that they have to have visibility into the actual content.
T-Mobile's Binge on does offer free streaming (both radio and tv) for qualified rate plans.
No, it offers streaming that does not count against your 4G data limits. You pay for the streaming, just not on a per-byte basis.
That's what I meant. It's semantics. Since I qualified it with with "for qualified rate plans" obviously it's not free as in no cost. It's free as in no additional cost for it not to count against your caps.
They don't advertise it, but I believe there is a porn site that is part of Binge On
If you go to the Binge On page and click on the link "See list of all streaming services", scroll to the bottom of the pop up box and say you're over 18, they say that MiKandi and Streamate. So they aren't advertising it, but they do mention it.
T-Mobile's Binge on does offer free streaming (both radio and tv) for qualified rate plans. But I was under the impression that any provider could opt in or out of the program once they met the technical criteria for the reduced bitrate streams. It saves the provider bandwidth to get the stream to T-mobile, and it saves t-mobile bandwidth to get it to the customer. There's no denying any service access to T-Mobile's customers, requiring bribe money to T-Mobile in order to be included in the service, nor prioritizing any service over another as far as I can tell (but could be wrong).
Just thinking of all the computer devices that I have at home: 2 laptops: fans are so quiet you'd have to have the microphone next to the vent to hear it cellphones and tablets: no fans server: If you can hear the two cpu fans over the 9 jet engine fans for the power supplies and disk arrays running at full speed 100% of the time, you can have my data. computer 1: passively cooled computer 2: Just has a large pretty silent 12V constant speed CPU fan
At some point though, we start introducing machines so advanced that they don't need that operator anymore. Sure, there needs to be someone supervising them, but that person already existed - he/she is just supervising machines now instead of people. You're not adding efficiency so much as you're just replacing labor.
It reminds me of the scenes in the 2005 version of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. In the movie Charlie's dad's job as the was eliminated at the toothpaste factory where he twisted on the caps. It was replaced by a machine that did it. However in the end his dad got a job servicing said robot.
Replacing a human with a robot doesn't automatically equate in that human job never working again. As you pointed out who supervises the robot? But who also programs them? Builds them? Installs them? Services them? Who makes all the parts and components that were used to build them? Eliminating one job can result in other jobs being created.
If you look at advances since the Industrial Revolution, most resulted, in some way, of machinery replacing the work that humans did either completely or making them much more efficient. More efficiency means either higher production if existing demands were not met, or a workforce that could expand into other areas because they were no longer needed to produce the basic necessities. It's why everyone doesn't every working hour growing crops and raising animals just to survive.
Slashdot Mirror
And using the Walmart Pay would be any different than using a credit or debit card how? One way you swipe a card to get your payment info. Another way you present a QR code that uniquely identifies you, looks up your payment info. Both ways process the transaction basically the same from that point on.
This isn't running the transaction through Google or Apple Pay like an in-game purchase would do, racking up large transactions mommy and daddy end up paying.
That's what I'm asking, specifically for the position of President but I guess any federal elected title or high ranking position (Sec. of State, Sec of Defense, etc). If you are prevented in the private sector from holding security clearance does that legally prevent you from holding that office or title? I'm not talking strictly from a moral/ethical/philosophical ground of what should be, rather what is actually legally the case.
You forgot little to no service in many rural (and some not so rural) locations. If such things are important for your use, T-Mobile may not be the best choice. It's gotten better the last while, but it's still doesn't come close to Verizon and AT&T's footprint.
Does the president have to go through the same process for obtaining security clearance? Or does clearance just come with the title? Is it theoretically possible that the President could not be cleared to receive secret (or higher) classified information?
Don't underestimate the overhead expense of context switching.
Newegg lists at least 77 motherboards that support displayport and Intel 6th generation (skylake) CPUs that will do 4K. I beleive 5th generation Broadwell-H CPUs will also do 4K over displayport. Why are you stuck on just using AMD motherboards with APUs?
It's not really a leak though if you've paid a subscription for the commercial service. It's only leaked if you reshare that information unauthorized, or someone figures out how to share the information without a subscription and authorization to do so.
Ignore him. He's that guy.
Not necessarily. PHI data may have been encrypted when stored on disk. Ransomware infection re-encrypts data making it unusable for it's intended purpose, but PHI data, even if it managed to leak out, is still protected.
Another scenario which is probably much more likely is PHI is kept on a secured server. Client computer becomes infected. PHI was never compromised. Does that still trigger a notification?
Coming soon to a popup notification on your windows desktop:
"Do you not want to not install Skype to not take over all your conversations you don't not want to not receive?
Select Yes to install. Select Cancel to skip not installing. X to being install now."
I reread it multiple times.
From the image shown on the tweet (emphasis added):
So what this actually means I have no idea. I have zero interests in texting using any MSFT product, be it a WIndows Phone, Cortana, Messaging Everywhere, or Skype.
2000-2002 he had the highest average driving distance* over the season of any Tour golfer. Oddly enough those years weren't his longest averages of his career though. And there is only about a 15 yard difference since 2000 between his lowest average and highest average.
* drive distance statistics are measured twice per round selected on 2 holes that face approximately opposite directions to counteract any effects from wind.
That wouldn't work. How you have it would result in anyone of either gender whose birth and identified gender are the same would appear as one gender (false), and anyone who has changed gender would appear as the other gender (true).
Just don't ask about the photocopier.
But it would be a due process violation to just automatically revoke it. And there are already established processes with the legal system for dealing with code violations or civil infractions.
Except drive distance isn't necessarily a indicator of overall golf performance. If you're on a 400 yard hole, it doesn't matter that much if you drive it 300 yards and have a 100 yard approach, or drive it 350 yards and have a 50 yard one. It's a few years old, but here's a pga.com article about how almost all of the long ballers didn't make the cut for the 2012 US Open.
I'd say that doping for power is less of a factor in golf than doping for other reasons, like recovery, endurance, concentration, or as you mentioned steadying.
My compiler says that criminal.attractive is undefined. Can you post the code for that property so that the system knows what attractive is.
Also, I think criminal.gender is deprecated. These days, I think you're suppose to use criminal.birthGender or criminal.identifiedGender.
There's a huge difference though between providing a security update when an obscure bug, buffer overflow, or some other specific vulnerability is fixed, and an entire OS upgrade is relentlessly, essentially forced on the user.
It appears from option 3 here that the content provider still could provide a https or otherwise encrypted feed and still qualify for the zero rating. T-mobile has to be able to detect the video feed, so perhaps such content needs to be served from a particular host, ip, port, etc. But it doesn't appear that they have to have visibility into the actual content.
That's what I meant. It's semantics. Since I qualified it with with "for qualified rate plans" obviously it's not free as in no cost. It's free as in no additional cost for it not to count against your caps.
If you go to the Binge On page and click on the link "See list of all streaming services", scroll to the bottom of the pop up box and say you're over 18, they say that MiKandi and
Streamate. So they aren't advertising it, but they do mention it.
T-Mobile's Binge on does offer free streaming (both radio and tv) for qualified rate plans. But I was under the impression that any provider could opt in or out of the program once they met the technical criteria for the reduced bitrate streams. It saves the provider bandwidth to get the stream to T-mobile, and it saves t-mobile bandwidth to get it to the customer. There's no denying any service access to T-Mobile's customers, requiring bribe money to T-Mobile in order to be included in the service, nor prioritizing any service over another as far as I can tell (but could be wrong).
Is this any different really than Netflix's Open Connect for instance? It seems to be an advantage for everyone without being a detriment to anyone.
If only there were some type of a book or service that you could use to look up a definition of the kibosh...
Just thinking of all the computer devices that I have at home:
2 laptops: fans are so quiet you'd have to have the microphone next to the vent to hear it
cellphones and tablets: no fans
server: If you can hear the two cpu fans over the 9 jet engine fans for the power supplies and disk arrays running at full speed 100% of the time, you can have my data.
computer 1: passively cooled
computer 2: Just has a large pretty silent 12V constant speed CPU fan
It reminds me of the scenes in the 2005 version of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. In the movie Charlie's dad's job as the was eliminated at the toothpaste factory where he twisted on the caps. It was replaced by a machine that did it. However in the end his dad got a job servicing said robot.
Replacing a human with a robot doesn't automatically equate in that human job never working again. As you pointed out who supervises the robot? But who also programs them? Builds them? Installs them? Services them? Who makes all the parts and components that were used to build them? Eliminating one job can result in other jobs being created.
If you look at advances since the Industrial Revolution, most resulted, in some way, of machinery replacing the work that humans did either completely or making them much more efficient. More efficiency means either higher production if existing demands were not met, or a workforce that could expand into other areas because they were no longer needed to produce the basic necessities. It's why everyone doesn't every working hour growing crops and raising animals just to survive.