Seriously man, give me a break. Morals went out the window about 2 generations ago. With 12-year olds experimenting with oral and anal sex as a "safe" alternative these days, along with the Internet feeding those wicked desires to show off to the world, I'd say that old-school mentality on this topic is pretty much toast.Well I guess that's all fine and dandy if you want to be married to today's typical 12 year old. Apparently my 30 year old wife and I have a little more old-school mentality then today's kids.
You have to pay to view the answer... but only if you're too stupid or lazy to scroll to the bottom?
I wondered that too in the past, but then someone here pointed out that the answers are only visible when you follow a link from a search engine. Visiting the page from a non-search engine, searching EE, or going from a bookmark doesn't show the answers. It's not real hard to circumvent if you want to, but not the most convenient either.
Because obtaining trademarks is costly and time-consuming
It's a few hundred dollars for the application fee if you do the work yourself. If you have someone else do it, it might be a few times that in many cases. Bing! Information Design likely spent far more working with an attorney to file this lawsuit then what it would have cost to get a trademark. And their company has been around since 2000 according to their site, so time-consuming really wasn't a factor either.
I was looking for a french book publisher, so I tried to do a google search for "Editions du Seuil publishing house". It didn't return back any results though. Weird. I guess I'll go with someone else that has an online presence.
Those GPS things? Personally, I don't like them - they want to hold your hand all the way across the continent. Every turn, every fuel stop, every restaurant. When I travel, I want to make the decisions, not have MapQuest, or anyone else decide which ramp to exit or enter the interstate on. Travel is supposed to be an adventure - let me decide when, where, and how.
They only hold your hand as much as you let them. If you chose to follow their directions for every turn, that's your choice. If you only want them to help guide you in the general direction, they can do that too.
I've never had a problem taking a trip or reading any type of map. My wife is the opposite so I had gave her a Garmin last Christmas. We took a trip from Indiana to North Carolina to visit her parents earlier this year and brought along our 3 sons ages 6-8. Highway route, it was a fairly simple trip as we were only following a couple of major highways the entire way. However having the GPS was wonderful as we could easily see how far it was till upcoming exits or reststops for bathroom breaks, how far restaurants or gas stations were for meals or to refuel, or just to answer the frequent "Are we there yet" or "how long till we get there".
On the way home, I decided to take a slight detour to the New River Gorge Bridge. I remember it from when I was growing up, and thought my boys would like it. Except I didn't exactly know where it was at. A few button pushes later, I already knew where it was, the best way to get there (which wasn't a major interstate route), and how much time we would "lose" with the detour. I could have tried to find it on a paper map, but I might not have been able to find it nor quickly determine how far away it was.
Except that Santa Cruz is synonymous with crackpot on slashdot due to people with silly names working for SCO.
The SCO that operated in Santa Cruz is not the same SCO that sued IBM. The Santa Cruz Operation company came out with Xenix, SCO UNIX (OpenServer) and Unixware. They purchased Tarantella earlier this decade, and then sold off their Unix-related business to Caldera. As their primary business was now Tarantella, they changed names. Caldera then took over the SCO moniker eventually becoming The SCO Group. It was that company, formerly Caldera, that took on Novell, IBM, et al.
Pay me now or pay me later. The debt is still being accumulated, whether it's going on your personal credit report or the national debt. Unless you are saving up before attending the higher education, you are attending now and paying back later. Sounds a lot like borrowing to me.
It depends on what version of MOSS you are licensing. The base server license is around $4k. Each user also needs a standard cal at around $95, and optionally an enterprise cal for another $75 to utilize the enterprise services. Alternatively instead of the CAL route, you can license the entire server with Sharepoint for Internet Sites for around $40k which gets you unlimited users on the one server. There are also additional server editions for just search, excel services, and forms server that are less then $40k but have reduced functionality.
A typical enterprise Sharepoint farm has two load balanced front end servers, plus a back end application and search server. If you had 200 users licensed for enterprise use, it would cost around $46k for the 3-server setup. However if you went the Sharepoint for Internet Sites route, it would be $120,000 for those same 3 servers. Sharepoint for Internet Sites advantage though is that you don't need CALs, so for extranet scenarios or where you don't know specifically how many external users would be authenticating to the server, you are covered.
To be properly licensed, you'll also need the appropriate license(s) and/or external connectors for Windows Server and SQL server for the internal and external users. Those costs are hard to give estimates as it varies from company to company. If a user already has an existing Server or SQL cal, an additional one may not be required for an installation.
I think it depends on what flavor of SharePoint you are using. Windows Sharepoint Services (WSS) is licensed as part of Windows Server, so you aren't paying extra for something that you may already have. Microsoft Office Sharepoint Systems (MOSS) is licensed separately can the costs can very rapidly grow to very large numbers for larger enterprises depending on what features are desired or how the farm is laid out.
But that's not Verizon monitoring you. That's the copyright holder "monitoring" you and sending the DMCA letter to Verizon, who passes it on to you. They are legally responsible to do that, but AFAIK they could care less what you are actually downloading.
The paranoid crowd will argue that either method might still be able to be recovered. I thought I saw an article once here that in the real world basically debunked this myth. Physical destruction just takes the process one step further. Plus it's quicker then running some type of a disk wiping program.
Of course, I don't know how they manage in the US without a national ID.
Social security number is probably the most likely candidate for the primary match. I don't remember the last credit application I made that didn't ask for a social security number.
What does it matter if he does? Millions of people share the same names with a parent, sibling, or child. Even between complete strangers same names are very common. If they are inserting data into their databases based on a first/last name match, the system would be extremely flawed.
Slashdot Mirror
I wondered that too in the past, but then someone here pointed out that the answers are only visible when you follow a link from a search engine. Visiting the page from a non-search engine, searching EE, or going from a bookmark doesn't show the answers. It's not real hard to circumvent if you want to, but not the most convenient either.
Dictionary - learn how to use one
It's a few hundred dollars for the application fee if you do the work yourself. If you have someone else do it, it might be a few times that in many cases. Bing! Information Design likely spent far more working with an attorney to file this lawsuit then what it would have cost to get a trademark. And their company has been around since 2000 according to their site, so time-consuming really wasn't a factor either.
I was looking for a french book publisher, so I tried to do a google search for "Editions du Seuil publishing house". It didn't return back any results though. Weird. I guess I'll go with someone else that has an online presence.
They only hold your hand as much as you let them. If you chose to follow their directions for every turn, that's your choice. If you only want them to help guide you in the general direction, they can do that too.
I've never had a problem taking a trip or reading any type of map. My wife is the opposite so I had gave her a Garmin last Christmas. We took a trip from Indiana to North Carolina to visit her parents earlier this year and brought along our 3 sons ages 6-8. Highway route, it was a fairly simple trip as we were only following a couple of major highways the entire way. However having the GPS was wonderful as we could easily see how far it was till upcoming exits or reststops for bathroom breaks, how far restaurants or gas stations were for meals or to refuel, or just to answer the frequent "Are we there yet" or "how long till we get there".
On the way home, I decided to take a slight detour to the New River Gorge Bridge. I remember it from when I was growing up, and thought my boys would like it. Except I didn't exactly know where it was at. A few button pushes later, I already knew where it was, the best way to get there (which wasn't a major interstate route), and how much time we would "lose" with the detour. I could have tried to find it on a paper map, but I might not have been able to find it nor quickly determine how far away it was.
So what monopoly does Comcast have again?
Well, it was prior to being posted on /.
Links followed from Google always have the answers at the bottom, at least from my experience. The same link from elsewhere or bookmarked don't.
The SCO that operated in Santa Cruz is not the same SCO that sued IBM. The Santa Cruz Operation company came out with Xenix, SCO UNIX (OpenServer) and Unixware. They purchased Tarantella earlier this decade, and then sold off their Unix-related business to Caldera. As their primary business was now Tarantella, they changed names. Caldera then took over the SCO moniker eventually becoming The SCO Group. It was that company, formerly Caldera, that took on Novell, IBM, et al.
It's not really an assumption is it if until now the "standard" only called for [a-z0-9-].
Pay me now or pay me later. The debt is still being accumulated, whether it's going on your personal credit report or the national debt. Unless you are saving up before attending the higher education, you are attending now and paying back later. Sounds a lot like borrowing to me.
So who pays those taxes? Oh, that's right. The same people that are getting that education (eventually).
A person had a protective order that was allegedly violated. That user was arrested and is getting their due process. News at 11.
It depends on what version of MOSS you are licensing. The base server license is around $4k. Each user also needs a standard cal at around $95, and optionally an enterprise cal for another $75 to utilize the enterprise services. Alternatively instead of the CAL route, you can license the entire server with Sharepoint for Internet Sites for around $40k which gets you unlimited users on the one server. There are also additional server editions for just search, excel services, and forms server that are less then $40k but have reduced functionality.
A typical enterprise Sharepoint farm has two load balanced front end servers, plus a back end application and search server. If you had 200 users licensed for enterprise use, it would cost around $46k for the 3-server setup. However if you went the Sharepoint for Internet Sites route, it would be $120,000 for those same 3 servers. Sharepoint for Internet Sites advantage though is that you don't need CALs, so for extranet scenarios or where you don't know specifically how many external users would be authenticating to the server, you are covered.
To be properly licensed, you'll also need the appropriate license(s) and/or external connectors for Windows Server and SQL server for the internal and external users. Those costs are hard to give estimates as it varies from company to company. If a user already has an existing Server or SQL cal, an additional one may not be required for an installation.
I think it depends on what flavor of SharePoint you are using. Windows Sharepoint Services (WSS) is licensed as part of Windows Server, so you aren't paying extra for something that you may already have. Microsoft Office Sharepoint Systems (MOSS) is licensed separately can the costs can very rapidly grow to very large numbers for larger enterprises depending on what features are desired or how the farm is laid out.
Sure you can. This is Slashdot. It's never stopped anyone before.
Don't forget "skilled practice at the art of bringing down the plate glass door. It's hard to break tempered glass, isn't it?
But that's not Verizon monitoring you. That's the copyright holder "monitoring" you and sending the DMCA letter to Verizon, who passes it on to you. They are legally responsible to do that, but AFAIK they could care less what you are actually downloading.
Please reference a single instance where Verizon has cared what you download?
From the BBC article:
From the summary:
Apparently the exchange rate between countries is so bad these days that a few months just doesn't last nearly as much as it once did.
The paranoid crowd will argue that either method might still be able to be recovered. I thought I saw an article once here that in the real world basically debunked this myth. Physical destruction just takes the process one step further. Plus it's quicker then running some type of a disk wiping program.
Social security number is probably the most likely candidate for the primary match. I don't remember the last credit application I made that didn't ask for a social security number.
What does it matter if he does? Millions of people share the same names with a parent, sibling, or child. Even between complete strangers same names are very common. If they are inserting data into their databases based on a first/last name match, the system would be extremely flawed.
But the LHC uses helium, so that problem should be solved.