No, you entirely misread the point because you decided to be a partisan moron instead.
Funny, on rereading the only partisan moron I see is the one screeching "Bu..bu..BUSH!".
Whihc isn't me.
Even more funny is how you ASSUME I'm partisan for hating a lame childish debate tactic that has made political discourse absolutely worthless. Funny how you HAVE TO assume I'm partisan so my criticism of your post can be dismissed, when the reality is I DESPISE the tactic and it's effect on discourse, which has exactly fuck all to do with my political ideology.
I hated it just as much when it was "Bu..Bu..Clinton go this dick sucked" but you don't know that. Because you ASSUME people who call your stupid political trolling what it is, stupid political trolling are AGIN YA, cause you don't have the intellectual ability to think beyond "if they ain't fer us, they's agin us".
The proposed settlement, announced late on Friday, calls not only for Facebook to discontinue Beacon, but also back the creation of an independent foundation devoted to promoting online privacy, safety and security.
That's great, if only something like that existed already, they could avoid the cost of starting a whole new organization.
What amazes me is that supposedly intelligent people...
Make bullshit claims that his wife was the only victim?
Stop lying guy, you're making an ass of yourself.
Well the way the Republicans get away with destroying civil liberties, supporting torture, and selling the American public out to corporate interests is by distracting voters with sex scandals
Well, when the Democrats get away with destroying civil liberties, supporting torture, and selling the American public out by distracting the public with race and class baiting.
Oh yeah, I guess when you were ranting you forgot about the people you support being scumbags themselves.
As an aside, it's always been frustrating that such a mewling sycophant as yourself has a vote, considering your willingness to remain ignorant and lie to support your points.
No it doesn't. It only needs to be material to the case, your #2 is made up out of thin air.
While he did lie under oath, it didn't affect the outcome of the case.
And committed perjury in the process. Your "it didn't affect the outcome of the case" qualifier isn't codified anywhere in law, and has fuck all to do with the perjury he committed.
"Uh, did you read the posting? That wasn't a user issue, that was a SYSADMIN issue."
Nothing in his post says he's a sysadmin.
" The guy was talking about diagnosing a network service issue which is something a sys admin would worry about, not an end user, who has more important things to worry about like using a browser, or an e-mail tool."
I have to remote desktop frequently, and I'm not a sysadmin, nor do my duties in any way resemble those of a sysadmin. You seem to be making things up out of thin air.
"Jeezus, don't hate Linux because it works, hate it because the other OS isn't as expert friendly, dude!"
Jesus, don't flame others because you make wrong assumptions, flame others because you can't read worth a fuck.
Seriously though, no one anywhere said or implied anything that would lead one to definitively know he was a sysadmin, so flaming that guy because your made an invalid assumption is a dick move.
"And what exactly did the theoretical vulnerability do to us?"
Cost man hours to make sure it wasn't an issue.
Which is actionable, and can be brought up in a suit.
Don't worry, you're stupid, you miss simple things, you shouldn't feel bad that you're not observant or intelligent enough to understand what others who are much smarter and more informed than you are discussing.
"We don't factor in the 3 billion already spent in this decision"
If this weren't a political entity, then you would be correct.
As it is, the 3 billion already spent is a VERY important variable in the CONTINUED support of NASA.
Your analysis is naive, as it considers NASA a business, not a political entity that is subject to voter whims like "THEY ALREADY WASTED THREE BILLION ON THIS".
Ignoring that, or pretending that "We don't factor in the 3 billion already spent in this decision" is wrong and ignorant of the polics that are involved in 3 billion dollar government spending decisions.
This isn't an implementation of RFC1149. *sigh* It even says so in the summary, not even the freaking article
So why are you posting?
Just to whine like a bitch I guess.
Or are you going to be one of those intensely obnoxious losers who insists THEIR whining like a bitch ISN'T, and that there's a legitimate reason for whining like a bitch like you did.
Slashdot Mirror
"No, it has nothing to do with Bush"
You've said this and I've proven you were lying.
"You built up a strawman around your own intent."
I proved this is a lie as well.
And since you HAVE to have the last word, you may.
"It has nothing to do with Bush, I also consider Clinton and Bush 1's corporatism to be dysfunctional"
You said "the last 8 years NOT "the last 20 years".
Of course, IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH BUSH right?
Do you believe this crap when you spew it, or do you know you're full of shit and are just playing it up?
"2. YOU made it a Bush point."
From YOUR post
"Or do you really believe "the last 8 years" haven't been completely dysfunctional, too?"
Seems you're a liar.
Funny, on rereading the only partisan moron I see is the one screeching "Bu..bu..BUSH!".
Whihc isn't me.
Even more funny is how you ASSUME I'm partisan for hating a lame childish debate tactic that has made political discourse absolutely worthless. Funny how you HAVE TO assume I'm partisan so my criticism of your post can be dismissed, when the reality is I DESPISE the tactic and it's effect on discourse, which has exactly fuck all to do with my political ideology.
I hated it just as much when it was "Bu..Bu..Clinton go this dick sucked" but you don't know that. Because you ASSUME people who call your stupid political trolling what it is, stupid political trolling are AGIN YA, cause you don't have the intellectual ability to think beyond "if they ain't fer us, they's agin us".
Grow the fuck up.
Which just makes your repsonse that much more pathetic, not less.
"if you had bothered to check what I consider sound economics"
Guy, your response to a point easily countered by real facts was INSTEAD to screech "Bu..Bu..BUSH!"
The chances of me caring what you think about anything after seeing you do that are pretty infinitesimal.
"To say that there is no analogue of Windows group policy is begging the question."
No actually, it isn't, and it appears you're proven you don't know what that means.
"Bu..bu..BUSH!"
Obama could be President for a hundred years and you people will still be screeching "BUSH!" every time someone criticizes him.
It's really pathetic.
"If you want to be buzz-word compliant, then yes, kind of."
I see you're trying to be pedantic douchebag compliant.
Congratulations, you succeeded.
That explains your posts
No there isn't. The original statement was
Which ECHELON, while invasive, does not do. Nothing does that, not even the NSA, and there are no articles that show otherwise as it isn't done.
You should try to read for comprehension, you'll avoid errors like that in the future.
That's great, if only something like that existed already, they could avoid the cost of starting a whole new organization.
http://www.eff.org/
It's not working. What don't you get?
Your customers resent being treated like shit, and this little stunt won't do anything to change that.
It's a new entertainment world, and you're dying, but don't even know it.
Reading up on the different file systems Hadoop and GFS , it appears these are used primarily for "cloud computing".
Is that correct?
I recall reading somewhere that there will never be a proper 'cure" for cancer because of the nature of our cell reproduction processes.
That said, why is it everything is a "cure for cancer"? The hyperbole has gotten way old.
Include the voters.
Make bullshit claims that his wife was the only victim?
Stop lying guy, you're making an ass of yourself.
Well, when the Democrats get away with destroying civil liberties, supporting torture, and selling the American public out by distracting the public with race and class baiting.
Oh yeah, I guess when you were ranting you forgot about the people you support being scumbags themselves.
As an aside, it's always been frustrating that such a mewling sycophant as yourself has a vote, considering your willingness to remain ignorant and lie to support your points.
Actually, yes he did.
No it doesn't. It only needs to be material to the case, your #2 is made up out of thin air.
And committed perjury in the process. Your "it didn't affect the outcome of the case" qualifier isn't codified anywhere in law, and has fuck all to do with the perjury he committed.
Glad I could explain to you why you're wrong.
"Uh, did you read the posting? That wasn't a user issue, that was a SYSADMIN issue."
Nothing in his post says he's a sysadmin.
" The guy was talking about diagnosing a network service issue which is something a sys admin would worry about, not an end user, who has more important things to worry about like using a browser, or an e-mail tool."
I have to remote desktop frequently, and I'm not a sysadmin, nor do my duties in any way resemble those of a sysadmin. You seem to be making things up out of thin air.
"Jeezus, don't hate Linux because it works, hate it because the other OS isn't as expert friendly, dude!"
Jesus, don't flame others because you make wrong assumptions, flame others because you can't read worth a fuck.
Seriously though, no one anywhere said or implied anything that would lead one to definitively know he was a sysadmin, so flaming that guy because your made an invalid assumption is a dick move.
"And what exactly did the theoretical vulnerability do to us?"
Cost man hours to make sure it wasn't an issue.
Which is actionable, and can be brought up in a suit.
Don't worry, you're stupid, you miss simple things, you shouldn't feel bad that you're not observant or intelligent enough to understand what others who are much smarter and more informed than you are discussing.
What are MS and Cisco's legal liability here?
If they're aware of a problem for this long, and provide no fix, then aren't they totally on the hook?
They should be, but somehow, I doubt it.
"It's been dead for a while because of all the open-source goodness of Openmoko's Freerunner"
AHAHAAHHAAHAHHAAH
An old, technologicaally obsolete piece like that is what you're slurping?
Thanks for the laugh, "Openmoko" this chump says...
"We don't factor in the 3 billion already spent in this decision"
If this weren't a political entity, then you would be correct.
As it is, the 3 billion already spent is a VERY important variable in the CONTINUED support of NASA.
Your analysis is naive, as it considers NASA a business, not a political entity that is subject to voter whims like "THEY ALREADY WASTED THREE BILLION ON THIS".
Ignoring that, or pretending that "We don't factor in the 3 billion already spent in this decision" is wrong and ignorant of the polics that are involved in 3 billion dollar government spending decisions.
Why haven't you killed yourself yet?
You make the most vapid, useless, moronic, pandering posts, seriously whore, no one will miss you.
Your vagina, maybe, but the rest of you, no fucking way.
So why are you posting?
Just to whine like a bitch I guess.
Or are you going to be one of those intensely obnoxious losers who insists THEIR whining like a bitch ISN'T, and that there's a legitimate reason for whining like a bitch like you did.
No one cares.