At any time after Lincoln freed the slaves, you could find apologists with examples like yours, but that didn't keep blacks from getting lynched, or crosses from being burned.
"You shouldn't ask of others what you're not willing to provide yourself"
Please point to any part of my post that doesn't meet my own criteria.
Sorry whore, but if you're going to log out and post AC to defend your stupidity by trolling me, try to do so with a troll that actually applies and isn't moronic.
Oh right, Microsoft isn't in the vaccine business.
So please explain why, apart from an intense desire to have your ass sued, would you "pursue" employees who are presumably meeting their obligations to MS?
Oh right, because you needed something to say because you posted so early.
401k's are long term. Try to find a 10 year period sincve their invention when they haven't increased in value, then get back to me with an informed opinion instead of your current one.
As to executive compensation in relation to worker pay, the situation is echoed EVERYWHERE in the world.
It seems fairly clear you have no idea what the fuck you're running your mouth about.
"is an institutionalized and systematic suppression and dis-enfranchisement of a specific racial/ethnic community - usually backed with state sanction, but not always so."
What the hell?
No.
If I call a black person a "stupid nigger", that's racist, and there's nothing institutionalized or systematic about it.
Stop making up your own definitions, especially when they're so easily shown to be wrong.
Why can't we restrict political candidates from advertising on TV and radio?
And please, don't answer with anything remotely related to the 1st amendment, it has been torn to shreds by the political process and the rules governing how said process occurs for years.
I'd prefer not to see so many campaign ads (especially this year, it felt like I was trapped between two monkey cages at the zoo) and I see no constitutional right to advertise.
And it just MIGHT bring the cost of campaigning down.
And when I'm using my gun to hunt food, how is it a "weapon designed to kill people"?
In the future, don't tell people their argument is "naive" then naively ignore (I'm assuming it's naivety and not intentional) points that directly refute you and make your argument false.
We've had enough of that from your Republican cohorts, thanks.
"That's what I'm doing (among other, private actions). What are you doing to get us there?"
Nothing, which is just as effecive as what you're doing.
Nice to see you're still a pathetic loser who gets what little social interaction he has from the trolls he makes on a web board. You live for arguing with people until you're defeated (like now) at which point you rely on insults and nonsensical musings. You know you're not very smart, so you attack anything that resembles evidence of that, knowing you can't live with being less intelligent than you portray yourself.
I own your fucking soul, and there's still not a fucking thing you can do but make another idiotic response in defense, because you can't let someone else get over on you.
"'Trolling' means posting something designed to produce only predictable responses."
You posted to defend your grammatically incorrect post, PREDICTBLY.
"More so, because you can't even read a grammatically correct sentence"
If you were capable of writing one, then maybe you could say that and it would be true.
"What a stupid cunt you are."
See, trolling. How easy you are to manipulate.
"Do you need me to explain that to you, too?"
Not really, you're a pathetic loser who gets what little social interaction he has from the trolls he makes on a web board. You live for arguing with people until you're defeated (like now) at which point you rely on insults and nonsensical musings. You know you're not very smart, so you attack anything that resembles evidence of that, knowing you can't live with being less intelligent than you portray yourself.
See, you already explained it to me, you just didn't realize it.
And by the way, what was it, "Good doggie, who's a good doggie".:)
I own your fucking soul, and there's not a fucking thing you can do but make another idiotic response in defense, because you can't let someone else get over on you.
"Now your perfect symmetry of the common denial projector is complete."
What fun, now try a sentence that actually has meaning please. Preferably one that is constructed according to the rules of grammar. The quoted attempt does not meet the criteria.
"And you're using "trolling" to mean something that isn't trolling."
Well, I think what he meant was something like the above quoted sentence, which precisely meets the definition of trolling.
Hate it all you want, you're a fucking idiot. Who say incredibly stupid shit like "Now your perfect symmetry of the common denial projector is complete". I mean, do you realize how incredibly fucking stupid your post looks with a nonsense statement like that?
"'In my case, the border guard pulled up a file showing that I had been arrested at the US Mission to the UN where, on International Women's Day, a group of us had tried to deliver a peace petition signed by 152,000 women around the world,' says Benjamin. "
That's a quote from one of the principles. Are you suggesting she's lying about the arrest record she was shown?
Sometimes the levels of partisan dickery you people display is downright frightening.
Slashdot Mirror
"Disappear" has been used as a verb in the vernacular for years.
But don't let your ignorance of an extremely common use of the word stop you from making a pedantic observation that isn't even correct.
You're exactly right, it proves nothing.
At any time after Lincoln freed the slaves, you could find apologists with examples like yours, but that didn't keep blacks from getting lynched, or crosses from being burned.
So India's leadership has been open to every class huh?
Why don't we ask the untouchables that people like you pretend don't exist anymore how accepted they feel.
Until then, why don't you stop lying to yourself and the audience, and shut YOUR uniformed mouth.
"You shouldn't ask of others what you're not willing to provide yourself"
Please point to any part of my post that doesn't meet my own criteria.
Sorry whore, but if you're going to log out and post AC to defend your stupidity by trolling me, try to do so with a troll that actually applies and isn't moronic.
Thanks
Congratulations, you hit on the essntial points the judge was making, only less intelligently and less coherently.
Perhaps you should get smarter before you say nothing of value in the future, like you have done here.
Or, instead of not being an oblivious twat, you could continue missing the point.
Could you please do away with the retarded pseudo-stream of conciousness crap, and ridiculous tween speak and unnecessary characters?
Instead, try to demonstrate that you can actually compose a coherent sentence that doesn't resemble a fucking verbal train wreck.
Thanks.
Oh right, Microsoft isn't in the vaccine business.
So please explain why, apart from an intense desire to have your ass sued, would you "pursue" employees who are presumably meeting their obligations to MS?
Oh right, because you needed something to say because you posted so early.
What you should have said there is "I don't have a fucking clue about the process, but I'm going to run my idiot mouth and be wrong anyway."
It more accurately depicts you.
The white vote DID NOT DIFFER SIGNIFICANTLY, which is the point you seem too stupid to get.
And said point makes your entire whiny diatribe irrelevant.
Fuck off now before you say something else wrong and stupid.
401k's are long term. Try to find a 10 year period sincve their invention when they haven't increased in value, then get back to me with an informed opinion instead of your current one.
As to executive compensation in relation to worker pay, the situation is echoed EVERYWHERE in the world.
It seems fairly clear you have no idea what the fuck you're running your mouth about.
When I consolidated my loans in 2005, the average student loan debt was less than 15,000.
Post figures that demonstrate your claim that "most loans are alot (sic) higher than 30,000" or admit you were lying.
By the way you won't find said figures, so don't bother trying, just accept that you got caught lying.
Or maybe you just made a stupid analogy because your world view isn't very developed and you're not very bright.
No, I retract that maybe.
Read that line about "whiners and sour grapers" again, I don't think you realize it was directed at you.
I stopped reading when you made the massively stupid comparison between salaries today and "feeding slaves" or "feeding cattle".
It's amazing to see someone so jealous of the wealthy that such an idiotic comparison makes sense.
Let me ask fuckwit, how many slaves owned homes, cars, and had 401k's?
God damn you made a ridiculous attempt to support your world view.
"is an institutionalized and systematic suppression and dis-enfranchisement of a specific racial/ethnic community - usually backed with state sanction, but not always so."
What the hell?
No.
If I call a black person a "stupid nigger", that's racist, and there's nothing institutionalized or systematic about it.
Stop making up your own definitions, especially when they're so easily shown to be wrong.
"I don't know about you, but I see an outlying statistic on both extremes."
I don't. I see numbers which closely represent political ideology, apart from the blacks.
Thanks for supporting the AC's point with statistics, it's a shame you had to refute your own argument in the process.
"Term limits are nearly impossible to implement in practice. "
Funny, the constitutional amendment restricting the president to two terms has been exactly the opposite of what you claim.
Apart from your unsupported claim, that seems to be refuted in practice, I see nothing that supports your position.
Why can't we restrict political candidates from advertising on TV and radio?
And please, don't answer with anything remotely related to the 1st amendment, it has been torn to shreds by the political process and the rules governing how said process occurs for years.
I'd prefer not to see so many campaign ads (especially this year, it felt like I was trapped between two monkey cages at the zoo) and I see no constitutional right to advertise.
And it just MIGHT bring the cost of campaigning down.
Truth hurts huh?
I love that I can air your dirty laundry then KNOW a post from you is coming to defend yourself.
It's fun to wind your loser ass up then watch you dance. Thanks for being too stupid to realize you're proving me right.
Dance for me again bitch, your mental illness won't let you stop replying, even though you'e confirming everything I said.
How does it feel to know that ANYTIME I LIKE (prior post is proof) I can make you respond?
It must suck for you to know you're my bitch.
But holy shit do I enjoy the laugh your pathetic denials give me. I mean a "cunt"? Really? Do you have anything else, cause you've overused that one.
Why don't you try something that ISN'T your generic response to people who prove you wrong?
God I love owning you, and I can't wait to see your moronic attempt to show otherwise that instead proves me right.
Post. You can't stop, so don't try.
Nothing you said there refutes his point.
And when I'm using my gun to hunt food, how is it a "weapon designed to kill people"?
In the future, don't tell people their argument is "naive" then naively ignore (I'm assuming it's naivety and not intentional) points that directly refute you and make your argument false.
We've had enough of that from your Republican cohorts, thanks.
"That's what I'm doing (among other, private actions). What are you doing to get us there?"
Nothing, which is just as effecive as what you're doing.
Nice to see you're still a pathetic loser who gets what little social interaction he has from the trolls he makes on a web board. You live for arguing with people until you're defeated (like now) at which point you rely on insults and nonsensical musings. You know you're not very smart, so you attack anything that resembles evidence of that, knowing you can't live with being less intelligent than you portray yourself.
I own your fucking soul, and there's still not a fucking thing you can do but make another idiotic response in defense, because you can't let someone else get over on you.
But I just did. Again.
"'Trolling' means posting something designed to produce only predictable responses."
:)
You posted to defend your grammatically incorrect post, PREDICTBLY.
"More so, because you can't even read a grammatically correct sentence"
If you were capable of writing one, then maybe you could say that and it would be true.
"What a stupid cunt you are."
See, trolling. How easy you are to manipulate.
"Do you need me to explain that to you, too?"
Not really, you're a pathetic loser who gets what little social interaction he has from the trolls he makes on a web board. You live for arguing with people until you're defeated (like now) at which point you rely on insults and nonsensical musings. You know you're not very smart, so you attack anything that resembles evidence of that, knowing you can't live with being less intelligent than you portray yourself.
See, you already explained it to me, you just didn't realize it.
And by the way, what was it, "Good doggie, who's a good doggie".
I own your fucking soul, and there's not a fucking thing you can do but make another idiotic response in defense, because you can't let someone else get over on you.
But I just did.
"Now your perfect symmetry of the common denial projector is complete."
What fun, now try a sentence that actually has meaning please. Preferably one that is constructed according to the rules of grammar. The quoted attempt does not meet the criteria.
"And you're using "trolling" to mean something that isn't trolling."
Well, I think what he meant was something like the above quoted sentence, which precisely meets the definition of trolling.
Hate it all you want, you're a fucking idiot. Who say incredibly stupid shit like "Now your perfect symmetry of the common denial projector is complete". I mean, do you realize how incredibly fucking stupid your post looks with a nonsense statement like that?
I guess not, you keep posting. And getting owned.
"'In my case, the border guard pulled up a file showing that I had been arrested at the US Mission to the UN where, on International Women's Day, a group of us had tried to deliver a peace petition signed by 152,000 women around the world,' says Benjamin. "
That's a quote from one of the principles. Are you suggesting she's lying about the arrest record she was shown?
Sometimes the levels of partisan dickery you people display is downright frightening.