Very few background check violations are prosecuted. The Obama Administration's stated reason for it is lack of time and manpower. If the Obama Administration currently doesn't have the time or manpower to prosecute those who lie on background check forms, then why do they want more background checks, more paperwork and more forms? It's backdoor gun registration.
Where did you see that these are Windows based computers? I don't have experience with the Predator system but I do with other military drones and to be honest, I would be shocked if the flight computers run windows.
Airplanes have been doing for a long time what this invention claims:
"1. A computer-implemented method performed by a location aware device, the method comprising: configuring a processor of the location aware device to collect network information broadcast from a number of network transmitters over a time span; and storing the network information and corresponding timestamps in a database as location history data. "
No no no. A copyright owner may assign the right to sue for past infringement if the assignor also assigns the exclusive right that was infringed. The problem with righthaven and the plaintiff in the silvers case is that the assignee/plaintiff was not assigned one of the exclusive rights.
The Global Hawk is generally fully autonomous. The operators just upload a flight plan into it and it goes.
As far as I know, Predators still require an operator to control it the entire time it is in flight.
Do they really think transferring the domain into their control is even remotely likely? It's one thing when you're talking about a torrent tracker where an injunction alone is unlikely to prevent future infringement. But if the court tells Matt Drudge to take down that photo, I'm pretty sure he'll take it down (once his appeals are exhausted).
Judges have been known to do even dumber things. Why not try it out and hope you got a dumb one?
The image may very well be copyrighted. However, since both sides are news outlets, Drudge has more than valid claim to fair use of the image. Especially considering that the image was likely only one small part of the article that he linked to. If Righthaven wins on this case, then it may as well go after Google News next (it has snippits AND images). But hasn't that already been tried??
I've contacted my Senators on a variety of issues and almost every time I get a response. On this issue, however, I have sent the EFF form in to them about 20 times and have not once received a response. I take that back, the first time I sent it, one of them responded with an email about health care.
Slashdot Mirror
Very few background check violations are prosecuted. The Obama Administration's stated reason for it is lack of time and manpower. If the Obama Administration currently doesn't have the time or manpower to prosecute those who lie on background check forms, then why do they want more background checks, more paperwork and more forms? It's backdoor gun registration.
Here is one. You can find the others on your own http://www.cjlf.org/deathpenalty/DezRubShepDeterFinal.pdf
Used to be "Break My Window"
I'm old.
Yes. But it is often not worth the time or money.
Who is the sponsor?
It is often cheaper to sign the license than deal with a patent lawsuit that you know you will defeat.
Where did you see that these are Windows based computers? I don't have experience with the Predator system but I do with other military drones and to be honest, I would be shocked if the flight computers run windows.
Airplanes have been doing for a long time what this invention claims:
"1. A computer-implemented method performed by a location aware device, the method comprising: configuring a processor of the location aware device to collect network information broadcast from a number of network transmitters over a time span; and storing the network information and corresponding timestamps in a database as location history data. "
No. The plaintiff must choose either actual or statutory damages. Can't get both.
No no no. A copyright owner may assign the right to sue for past infringement if the assignor also assigns the exclusive right that was infringed. The problem with righthaven and the plaintiff in the silvers case is that the assignee/plaintiff was not assigned one of the exclusive rights.
what??
how do you prove the contract is the same in all cases?
The Global Hawk is generally fully autonomous. The operators just upload a flight plan into it and it goes. As far as I know, Predators still require an operator to control it the entire time it is in flight.
The grammar in the post is correct. The commas are correct and it is a correct use of which.
Yes because this stuff is not patented!
Tax strategies are and have been patentable for awhile. I wrote a paper that discusses them but it is a bit outdated now. There is a strong movement against them but I don't really see Congress doing anything in the near future.
Do they really think transferring the domain into their control is even remotely likely? It's one thing when you're talking about a torrent tracker where an injunction alone is unlikely to prevent future infringement. But if the court tells Matt Drudge to take down that photo, I'm pretty sure he'll take it down (once his appeals are exhausted).
Judges have been known to do even dumber things. Why not try it out and hope you got a dumb one?
The image may very well be copyrighted. However, since both sides are news outlets, Drudge has more than valid claim to fair use of the image. Especially considering that the image was likely only one small part of the article that he linked to. If Righthaven wins on this case, then it may as well go after Google News next (it has snippits AND images). But hasn't that already been tried??
Not nearly as scary as Barney Frank's rentboys. Or the drugs and sex they sell out of his apartment.
Anyone know why Motorola chose this court??
Republican Congress in the 90s.
Better link: http://pacer.cadc.uscourts.gov/common/opinions/201004/08-1291-1238302.pdf
oops...it's late for me
No. Tortuous.
I receive responses on other form letters.
I've contacted my Senators on a variety of issues and almost every time I get a response. On this issue, however, I have sent the EFF form in to them about 20 times and have not once received a response. I take that back, the first time I sent it, one of them responded with an email about health care.