Slashdot Mirror


Hackers Steal Keyless BMW In Under 3 Minutes

An anonymous reader writes with this bit from ZDNet: "It's cool to have a keyless BMW, until you no longer have a keyless BMW. Hackers have figured out how to break into such cars with ease. BMW has acknowledged there is a problem, but is not doing enough to protect its customers (video)."

486 comments

  1. "stealing" by For+a+Free+Internet · · Score: 5, Funny

    It is not "stealing" unless you are a slave to the notion of "property." In the future, everything will belong to me, so this won't be a problem any more. Hi Laura!

    --
    UNITE with the Campaign for a Free Internet because today, our future begins with tomorrow!
    1. Re:"stealing" by sourcerror · · Score: 5, Funny

      But, but you wouldn't download a car!

    2. Re:"stealing" by bbelt16ag · · Score: 2

      is it just me or did you all hear gone on 60 seconds in your head when you read the headline? The new one with nicolas cage...

      --
      NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER GIVE UP! "No limitations, no boundaries, there is no reason for them."
    3. Re:"stealing" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sure I would, but I'm gonna need a bigger printer.

    4. Re:"stealing" by bkcallahan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, first thing that came to mind, and having to wait for a dog to shit to get the keys back.

    5. Re:"stealing" by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      There is a "new one?"

      Why? The original film was sufficiently stupid for decades of not being punished by a "prequal"

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  2. Nice to know... by gadget+junkie · · Score: 5, Funny

    that my "old" BMW 3 series has a complicated security mechanism: to open it, you must have access to the ignition lock.

    --
    "If a boss demands loyalty, give him integrity. But if he demands integrity, give him loyalty." (John Boyd, 1927-1997)
    1. Re:Nice to know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why blame us engineers? Subject line should be: Keyless test fails when in production. Hobby programers prove incompetence

    2. Re:Nice to know... by slew · · Score: 2

      that my "old" BMW 3 series has a complicated security mechanism: to open it, you must have access to the door key .

      FTFY

      Otherwize it might be hard to get back in if you lock the doors if you had to get access to the ignition lock ...

      Of course on most older cars the door lock and the ignition lock are keyed the same for convenience of carrying one key. The ignition lock on many modern cars are electronic/RF "keyed" and the mechanical part of the composite ignition key (if there is one) is sometimes just for the door or maybe just the glove-compartment/petrol cap since onn higher end cars, the doors can often only be electronic/RF keyed as well...

    3. Re:Nice to know... by snspdaarf · · Score: 4, Funny

      that my "old" BMW 3 series has a complicated security mechanism: to open it, you must have access to the door key .

      FTFY

      Otherwize it might be hard to get back in if you lock the doors if you had to get access to the ignition lock ...

      Of course on most older cars the door lock and the ignition lock are keyed the same for convenience of carrying one key.

      No, no, no. He owns a convertible.

      --
      Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
    4. Re:Nice to know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that my "old" BMW 3 series has a complicated security mechanism: to open it, you must have access to the door key .

      FTFY

      Otherwize it might be hard to get back in if you lock the doors if you had to get access to the ignition lock ...

      In every car I've owned (at least 3 - there's a few hazy years so it could be more :s) the same key that opens the doors, also starts the ignition - so having 'access to the ignition lock' is having 'access to the door key', and vice versa.

      So you didn't really fix anything - you swapped one statement for an equally true one.

    5. Re:Nice to know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      so having 'access to the ignition lock' is having 'access to the door key', and vice versa.

      Only if you're from some bizarre little country where the "lock" is the thing on your "lockchain" that you stick into the "key" and turn to open it.

      My reading of it was more like you could only open the doors if the key was in the ignition. Which I could see happening if you had a really fucked up security system installation that was wired in wrong and lost power if the key was turned to off.

    6. Re:Nice to know... by slew · · Score: 1

      key != lock

      A key can be put in your pocket when you leave the car, the ignition lock is (usually) secured to the steering column or somewhere near the dashboard. I think most folks would find it hard to put a dashboard of their car into their pocket (unless it was a matchbox-sized car).

      Although some folks take do take larger items like audio system faceplates with them, I don't think they take the ignitionl locking mechanisms of their cars..

    7. Re:Nice to know... by The+Grassy+Knoll · · Score: 1

      As an owner of a Triumph Spitfire, I used to pop the bonnet (hood) and take the rotor arm with me.

      Good luck starting it up without THAT...

      On a related note, we Spitfire owners never lock our car doors because of the insurance excess payable on repairing a sliced-open soft top...

      .

      --
      They will never know the simple pleasure of a monkey knife fight
    8. Re:Nice to know... by rpstrong · · Score: 1

      You don't need to put the whole dashboard in your pocket, just the ignition lock. Watch the original 'Gone in 60 Seconds' where they steal a Rolls-Royce by pulling the wiring harness off the back of the ignition lock and then plugging it onto a spare lock/key assembly. (Yeah, this was before steering column interlocks).

    9. Re:Nice to know... by rpstrong · · Score: 1

      I had ignition switch problems with my Spitfire Mark II (Lucas electrics, don't you know) and I used to keep a coiled jumper wire behind the battery. The starter solenoid was not only conveniently located near the brake cylinder, but it also had an extended piston with a rubber boot on the end that you could press to activate the starter. Connect the wire, press the button, and go...

  3. Whats the difference... by Moheeheeko · · Score: 5, Funny
    ....between a BMW and a porcupine?

    On the porcupine, the pricks are on the outside.

    1. Re:Whats the difference... by spire3661 · · Score: 5, Funny

      85% of all BMW owners Ive met are assholes. Strangely this doesnt apply to Mercedes owners.

      --
      Good-bye
    2. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does BMW stand for?

      Big Money Waster.

    3. Re:Whats the difference... by TWX · · Score: 2

      They're only about 65% in my experience...

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    4. Re:Whats the difference... by QRDeNameland · · Score: 2

      What does BMW stand for?

      Big Money Waster.

      The best one I've heard is Behold My Wealth.

      --
      Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
    5. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny. I've seen the exact opposite.

    6. Re:Whats the difference... by Dahamma · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's amazing how many BMW owners are assholes on the road ("I need to win the commute!") And some Mercedes owners seem to act like they own the road ("why is everyone in my way today?"). But neither scares me as much as Lexus soccer moms ("wait, did I drop my Luna bar under the passenger seat again? Oh, there it is! Hoooonnk screeeech!")

      Overall I'd much rather be driving next to someone who cuts you off on purpose than one who didn't even realize they were doing it ;)

    7. Re:Whats the difference... by SJHillman · · Score: 4, Funny

      Around here, it's mostly Lexus and Prius owners that are total dicks. BMW owners are a mixed bag depending which suburb you're in. Newer Buick owners tend to just be horrible drivers, but that may be because they remember when flint was discovered.

    8. Re:Whats the difference... by Yetihehe · · Score: 3, Funny

      In Austria - Bayerische Mist Wagon (Bavarian manure wagon)

      --
      Extreme Programming - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Developers
    9. Re:Whats the difference... by Grishnakh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yep, at least the person who cuts you off on purpose is actually watching the road and aware of their surroundings. They may be acting in an unsafe manner, but it's still a lot better than someone whose attention is elsewhere; the aggressive drivers who cut you off rarely actually hit you, because they're just being rude, but usually know their car's dimensions pretty well to pull off the maneuver without incident. I'm not saying it's great, but it's preferable to someone who's looking under their seat, at their kids in the back, texting on their phone, etc. instead of looking at the cars around them.

    10. Re:Whats the difference... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      85% of all BMW owners Ive met are assholes. Strangely this doesnt apply to Mercedes owners.

      Judging by their average behavior on the road, 95% of Mercedes owners are assholes. I drive one, and that's probably an anecdote in favor of my argument, although I'm a give-what-you-get driver and if someone doesn't treat me like a dick I'm extremely considerate on the road, so I like to think I'm the exception. This assholishness reaches its Northern Californian peak somewhere around Marin, on the 101. BMW drivers are at least usually in a hurry, and thus you don't get stuck behind them as often as the Mercedes drivers, who typically feel entitled to the passing lane whether they're passing or not. Mercedes tend to cost a bit more than BMWs, so that makes sense; the richest people tend to be the most self-entitled.

      On the next Geraldo, what we think of Prius drivers.

      Another thing I've noticed is that there's no camaraderie between Mercedes drivers like there is among, say, Ford drivers. Not having owned a BMW, I can't speak to the Bavarian influence, but the only Mercedes owners than tend to even nod to one another when they pass or meet are in old turbo-diesels, and the older the better. Even most of the people in ones as new as mine (a W126) usually look like they think they're better than you.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:Whats the difference... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      What's funny with the Buicks is that they've been on a campaign for a while to attract younger drivers. Of course, it really hasn't worked out that well.

    12. Re:Whats the difference... by SJHillman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I was stopped at a traffic light during my morning commute when I watched a woman in the lane next to me slowly roll into the Lexus in front of her, then back off. The Lexus (male driver) then reversed and gently bumped into her. I can only hope they at least knew each other, but even then I wouldn't be playing gentle bumper cars given how touchy some airbag sensors can be.

    13. Re:Whats the difference... by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

      Break My Wallet (expensive repairs)

    14. Re:Whats the difference... by Bigby · · Score: 3, Interesting

      BMW has an entry-level model that allows people who can't actually afford their cars to get their cars. This is not the case with Mercedes. Those people can generally afford their cars. People who try to spend their way into luxury and debt at the same time tend to be the a$$holes you speak of. Those that actually earned their money to buy such a car are not so much.

    15. Re:Whats the difference... by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      Barely Moving Windows, in my experience.....

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    16. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i've been driving buicks since i was 16.

      of course, that's because my grandfather just gives me his car when he buys a new one.

      still they're awesome cars as far as i'm concerned.

    17. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's because there seems to be some kind of Strategic Crown Victoria and Cutlass Ciera Reserve from which old people obtain their vehicles, at least in my area.

    18. Re:Whats the difference... by DustyShadow · · Score: 1

      Used to be "Break My Window"

      I'm old.

    19. Re:Whats the difference... by mcgrew · · Score: 2

      Overall I'd much rather be driving next to someone who cuts you off on purpose than one who didn't even realize they were doing it

      Not me, a BMW won't do as much damage as a Lexus. But my observation is the twentysomethings who have one of those giant four seater pickup trucks with what looks like thirty inch wheels are the worst. They drive stupid AND are assholes. But I guess being born into money might give one a sense of entitlement, which probably explains the BMW and Ford assholes. They really do think they're better than you.

    20. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but you both are pure 100 percent...

    21. Re:Whats the difference... by grimmjeeper · · Score: 1

      What does BMW stand for?

      Big Money Waster.

      I heard it was "Bought My Wife".

    22. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      85% of all BMW owners Ive met are assholes. Strangely this doesnt apply to Mercedes owners.

      In the UK it is more like 97% and even higher for VW and Audi drivers assholes the lot .. strangley enough hotly followed by Rover drivers (I am driving my rover and will not get out of the way)

    23. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Funny thing is that in Europe it's the Audi drivers (personal experience only).

    24. Re:Whats the difference... by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Bowel Movement on Wheels

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    25. Re:Whats the difference... by cvtan · · Score: 1
      First of all, this traditionally is a Porsche joke. Secondly, my BMW is 40 years old and still runs, so negative comments do not apply.

      http://www.cardomain.com/ride/230140/1972-bmw-2002

      --
      Sorry, but gray text on gray background is making my eyes bleed.
    26. Re:Whats the difference... by deadweight · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As a BMW owner, I can say that it seems 85% of the people who come near me turn into assholes when they see the blue-and-white symbol. Do you REALLY need to play boy racer in your Camaro and pass me on the right, drop back, pass me on the left, get ahead of me, and slam on the brakes when I have 3 little kids and a freaking DOG in the car? Do I look like I want to race you? Do you need to make dumb-ass global warming comments when my car gets better MPG than yours? Do you really need to carry on about the 1%ers ruining everything when my car has 200,000 miles on it?

    27. Re:Whats the difference... by Critical+Facilities · · Score: 1

      BMW has an entry-level model that allows people who can't actually afford their cars to get their cars. This is not the case with Mercedes.

      Not true. Mercedes also has a lower end model that is comparable with other new sedans. Heck, there are pickup trucks that cost more than this one.

      With that said, I don't disagree totally with the point you're making. I think way too often, the attitude of the folks driving these cars has more to do with how they want to be perceived (i.e. powerful, wealthy, stylish, etc) than anything else.

    28. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's amazing how many BMW owners are assholes on the road ("I need to win the commute!") And some Mercedes owners seem to act like they own the road ("why is everyone in my way today?").

      Well that's what the old SDI Satellites are there for, if it moves, SHOOT IT.

    29. Re:Whats the difference... by torkus · · Score: 1

      Didn't you see the video? It still is...or is again 'Break My Window'

      In other news, the 80's are back.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    30. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought a Buick when I was 16. But then again it was a 1970 GS 455.

    31. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're in SF: Basic Marina Wheels

    32. Re:Whats the difference... by mholve · · Score: 0

      "Die Frau sieht aus wie einen BMW." (Brett mit Wärtze).

    33. Re:Whats the difference... by frosty_tsm · · Score: 1

      Yep, at least the person who cuts you off on purpose is actually watching the road and aware of their surroundings.

      You ignore the ones who expect you to brake to avoid them from hitting you as they enter your lane.

    34. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, when I cut someone off I usually give them the bird too -- for their benefit. That way there is no confusion; it was intentional.

    35. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only three comment levels deep and already a discussion of how quickly thieves can steal a BMW has devolved into a discussion of how bad soccer moms are at driving their vehicles. Classic.

    36. Re:Whats the difference... by Ogive17 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I just think 85% of people are assholes, no need to categorize them by favorite car brand.

      :)

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    37. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because BMW is the Apple of cars. Overpriced, locked and insecure. But shiny.

    38. Re:Whats the difference... by Joce640k · · Score: 2

      Yep. The "asshole BMW owner" demographic all started buying Audis about a decade ago. BMW is slowly becoming OK again.

      --
      No sig today...
    39. Re:Whats the difference... by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Totally agree with the Lexus drivers thing - they're the ones who irk me the most. They seem to believe they're better than everyone else and that they own the road, and that you're damn lucky they reluctantly share it with you. I've also noticed however that the new crop of SUV driving soccer moms are getting really bad too, which honestly surprised me. We typically think of males as more aggressive, but behind the wheel of a big vehicle, I guess some women get a testosterone boost -they can be right pricks.
      I can't say I've noticed anything about Prius drivers though. Unless you count Brian Griffin ;)

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    40. Re:Whats the difference... by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      Now, I have some experience with this having recently test drove all of these -- I bought a 328, so I guess I'm part of the problem :) *

      A Mercedes C-class (like a 250) can actually be leased about $50 cheaper than the equivalent BMW (a base 328), and this is actually cheaper than an Audi A4 presently. This is probably just a local and temporary phenomenon, but they've been pushing these.

      *(I work in Hollywood and own Apple gear too, you can save your abuse. On the Slashdot moral continuum I'm somewhere between Bill Gates and Ed Gein.)

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    41. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Yeah, when I cut someone off I usually give them the bird too -- for their benefit."

      Yeah, that's pretty hilarious, but actually not nearly as funny as them seeing you in court when they sue for assault and winning, after the judge sees the photo they took of you flipping them off. THAT is hysterical!

      Oh, you didn't know flipping someone off is assault? It is in most states.

    42. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a 3-BMW owner, this is one of my favorites!

    43. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seconded. It's a recycled Porsche joke. Friggin kids these days.

      Oh and - "Bitch More Wine"

      I drive two - at once - because I like them

    44. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to play bumper tag with people I knew all the time in the 70s, when bumpers were made of steel with maybe a strip of rubber on them and a 2mph impact didn't cost $2000.

    45. Re:Whats the difference... by Scragglykat · · Score: 1

      Title of your article should have been "Bumping Uglies"

    46. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ford isn't typically the brand one associates with rich people.

    47. Re:Whats the difference... by MachineShedFred · · Score: 5, Informative

      The large amount of software hacking and modifications available for the N54 / N55 engines and the iDrive systems disagree with your "locked" assertion.

      Show me another car where you can get a $500 piggyback module that allows you to change engine performance through the steering wheel controls by hijacking signals on the CANbus, or changing gauge function on the fly: http://www.burgertuning.com/jb4_pnp_BMW_performance_tuner.html

      These engines are a software hacker's dream.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    48. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it really sucks because nowadays everyone either has a dash cam or takes a picture with their phone within the nanosecond of you flipping them off.

      Also, you're an idiot.

    49. Re:Whats the difference... by tompaulco · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Mercedes also has a lower end model [edmunds.com]that is comparable with other new sedans
      If $35k is comparable with other new sedans, I guess I won't be buying a new sedan ever again. Interesting how median household income has increased by about 70% in 20 years, while the price of an average new car has increased by over 130%.
      heck, there are pickup trucks that cost more than this one.
      Well, that is because pickup trucks are luxury items now. I feel really bad for farmers, because they used to be able to just go buy a pickup truck and it would be cheap, rugged, and last forever. Now they have to drop $40k to get a serviceable truck. No wonder the farmers can't earn a living. 20 years ago, a Ford F-150 could be bought brand new for $10k. Now it costs on average about $35k and can cost as much as $52k for a well equipped one.That is a five fold increase in cost while salaries have not even doubled.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    50. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. BMW seems to bring out the asshole in other drivers. If I had a quarter for every toyota, ford (especially pickup trucks), honda, or whatever that decided they were Vin Diesel when passing me and my 16+ year old BMW....I'd have 48 quarters.

      The worst drivers on the planet are the ones driving the huge, freaking SUV's (Taho, Escalade, Excursion, etc) ALL BY THEMSELVES AND CARRYING NOTHING. They love to tailgate, and if you are doing only 5 above the speed limit in a residential neighborhood try to intimidate you into going faster.

    51. Re:Whats the difference... by CSFFlame · · Score: 1

      The N54 tunes MUCH better with it's dual turbos than the N55. Comedy 135i's are amazing.

    52. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Break My Wallet, everytime I have to take it to the dealer. I mostly DIY, but sometimes I have to defer.

    53. Re:Whats the difference... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      "wait, did I drop my Luna bar under the passenger seat again? Oh, there it is! Hoooonnk screeeech!"

      I'm assuming that this is spoken to a friend over a cell phone held between chin and shoulder, in which case it would be a correct depiction.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    54. Re:Whats the difference... by alfredos · · Score: 1

      As a former BMW car owner and current BMW motorcycle owner, my experience is quite the opposite. Not cheap indeed, but not expensive either and at all times very professional. I claim no serious study but my company owns a Smart (which is maintained by Mercedes, at least here in Spain) and I find BMW far more reasonable.

    55. Re:Whats the difference... by agallagh42 · · Score: 1

      In my experience, the single worst vehicle for douchebaggery on the road is the Audi Q7. BMW/Mercedes/Audi drivers in general are pretty bad, but there is no other single model that is as close to 100% d-bag driven as the Q7

      --
      Carpe Cerevisi - Seize the Beer
    56. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They love to tailgate, and if you are doing only 5 above the speed limit in a residential neighborhood try to intimidate you into going faster

      There are advantages to driving 20-year old pickup trucks with steel frames. Especially when your rear bumper is at their grill level.

      A/C (with minor scratches on the rear bumper)

    57. Re:Whats the difference... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      is actually watching the road and aware of their surroundings.

      If you think that's a substitute for safe driving at moderate speeds with ample stopping distances, I encourage you to watch more Russian dashcam videos...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    58. Re:Whats the difference... by agallagh42 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And yet, the speed limit in the passing lane is the same as the speed limit in the right lane. If I'm going at least the speed limit, I don't give a fuck which lane I'm in or who is behind me.

      Who said anything about speed limits? If you're not actively passing someone (or in bumper to bumper traffic), you should not be in the passing lane. Period. Doesn't matter how fast or slow you are going.

      --
      Carpe Cerevisi - Seize the Beer
    59. Re:Whats the difference... by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      how are you going to hit them? They're *passing* you....

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    60. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, at least the person who cuts you off on purpose is actually watching the road and aware of their surroundings.

      You ignore the ones who expect you to brake to avoid them from hitting you as they enter your lane.

      That's what your gun is for...

    61. Re:Whats the difference... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      That's only 'cause 35% of them are pretty much permanently in the garage.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    62. Re:Whats the difference... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I encourage you to actually read posts in their entirety before jumping to conclusions.

    63. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a motorcycle rider, I couldn't agree more.

    64. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is called a passing lane for a reason it is reserved for passing.

      If you are going the same speed as the car next to you then you can be pulled over for obstructing traffic, ticketed, and fined.

    65. Re:Whats the difference... by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I hope you get a ticket for clogging the passing lane.

      not because I'm a speeder, but because you're obviously a passive aggressive douche.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    66. Re:Whats the difference... by StatureOfLiberty · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Got to know. Was that pun intentional? "Newer Buick owners ... because they remember when flint was discovered"

      flint (the rock)?
      or Flint, Michigan - Buick City Complex.

      Loved it - intentional or not.

    67. Re:Whats the difference... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      In a car crash, everyone burns and dies at the same pace. It's the great equalizer...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    68. Re:Whats the difference... by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You don't have a dash cam? I sure as hell don't DARE to drive on our roads anymore without one. They're cheap and they can really make insurance hassles a lot easier.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    69. Re:Whats the difference... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      What really makes matters worse here is that as an added bonus, just in case this didn't result in an accident, said phone will hit the floor, acting as some kind of additional chance for Darwin.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    70. Re:Whats the difference... by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      But you can't even do a wheely

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    71. Re:Whats the difference... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Don't say it hasn't worked out, the average Buick driver is now just around 60!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    72. Re:Whats the difference... by sdguero · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You gotta love the Prius drivers cruising along at 68 MPH in the fast lane during rush hour with their eyes glued on the MPG meter. Unbelievably annoying. They are the new Volvo (but for MPG instead of safety). Meanwhile people are risking lives to get around them by swerving into the slow lanes and get back up to 75-80 MPH.

    73. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly, you're probably either grossly exaggerating or flat out lying. No one thinks BMWs are for "1%ers". No one thinks they're race cars or for performance. That Camaro driver knows it. You know it. Just stop lying.

    74. Re:Whats the difference... by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Informative

      And yet, the speed limit in the passing lane is the same as the speed limit in the right lane. If I'm going at least the speed limit, I don't give a fuck which lane I'm in or who is behind me.

      In the state of California, it is illegal to prevent passing by riding in the passing lane when it is possible to merge to the right, regardless of speed.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    75. Re:Whats the difference... by cusco · · Score: 1

      I've driven in Peru and Ecuador, I wouldn't have hesitated to drive in Italy or Spain, but even being a pedestrian in Moscow scared the living crap out of me. I've never been anywhere that I could have opened the passenger window at 100+ kph and been able to frelling punch the diver in the next car. WTF???

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    76. Re:Whats the difference... by MachDelta · · Score: 3, Informative

      Modern vehicles have to pass a 5mph crash test with no damage. Rolling into someone at a light should be fine. I once wrecked (in the "it was already scrap" sense) a late 90's Sunfire at a friend's farm and drove it ~15mph into a tree and it just bounced off. Hardly even scratched the bumper. We were pretty impressed with that car actually. It took a hell of a beating before it gave up. Taught us some interesting things too, like that you can tow a car by the trunk lid but not the hood ;)

    77. Re:Whats the difference... by cusco · · Score: 1

      Oh, no, the Hummers are the worst. I learned a long time ago to never signal before changing lanes in front of one because they feel it's their duty to keep anyone from getting in front of them. Escalades and Navigators are slightly better, but not much.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    78. Re:Whats the difference... by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I won't necessarily blame the car, but perhaps the douches that drive them, but the early to mid 2000s bmws broke down new more than any other car my friends/colleagues had.

      side of the road style breakdowns too.

      they were also the most attractive, fun to drive and ride in cars of the bunch. And had some of the best interiors, I'm not trying to hate, but anecdotally they had a bad run, can't speak to now though.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    79. Re:Whats the difference... by cusco · · Score: 1

      And if it lasts for ten years they're lucky. My dad drove his Dodge Dakota in his remodeling business for a decade and a half, until the body was so rusted out that the doors started to fall off. My brother-in-law figures he's luck to get 8 years out of a new truck.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    80. Re:Whats the difference... by thelexx · · Score: 1

      Instances of me getting cut off and tailgated dropped to nearly zero when I started driving an '85 CJ7 with a 4" lift and steel bumpers. Happens nearly every time I drive my other car (an old Mercedes diesel) so I noticed the effect almost immediately. And the Jeep is not significantly faster than the diesel except off the line, nor do I drive it faster (the opposite if anything).

      --
      "Gold still represents the ultimate form of payment in the world." - Alan Greenspan, 1999
    81. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my experience, SUVs are bad (second-most dangerous vehicle type), but minivans are worse. SUV drivers generally are aware of the existence of other vehicles, lane markers, traffic signals, pedestrians, and so on. They often choose to ignore those things, but they do realize they exist. Minivan drivers, however, seem completely clueless. It's not that they deliberately pulled out in front of you and slammed on their brakes to cause an accident. They just didn't know you were there at all. In the extraordinarily unlikely event that they did realize you were there, they probably assumed that you would choose that specific moment to start using your latent telepathic or precognitive abilities to take evasive maneuvers in advance of the need to do so becoming apparent.

      If I can predict what a driver is likely to do, I can plan around it and avoid a dangerous situation entirely. The most dangerous drivers are therefore the ones who are completely unpredictable, and minivans are the worst of the lot.

    82. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I disagree a fat person will burn longer...

    83. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've noticed a similar statistic with pickup truck drivers.

    84. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not really.. The standard changed over the years but "no damage" was never in the standard. No damage to safety equipment and engine were in the standard. Some cars have get thousands of dollars of damage from a 5 mph tap.

    85. Re:Whats the difference... by snspdaarf · · Score: 4, Funny

      I watched two people do that back in high school. It was funny until they managed to lock bumpers. Then it was not funny anymore.

      It was hilarious.

      --
      Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
    86. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think you're just reinforcing the argument that you're a douche.

    87. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you display your wealth, people assume you're a dick. So stop displaying your wealth. Is your beamer REALLY that great of a car, or did you just buy it because you wanted to feel like you've "made it"?

    88. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another difference: you might someday have a porcupine, but I doubt your mom will buy you a BMW

    89. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do, but I realize I'm in the 0.1% instead of acting like everyone will sue me each time I flip the bird.

    90. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      See http://www.sparebumper.com/index.php?act=viewProd&productId=44&catId=15

      5 mph "damage free" bumpers are not the standard and haven't been in the US since bumper standards were at their peak in the early 80's.

    91. Re:Whats the difference... by gparent · · Score: 3, Informative

      Maybe the laws in the United States are different, but over here if you're merging you're supposed to yield, not cut everyone to be ahead of the pack. It is not an obligation to move to the passing lane when there are cars trying to merge even if it can be convenient to do so.

      AKA, it's a merge lane, not a "go as fast as you can before cutting the next 6 people who were on the highway a longer time than you" lane.

    92. Re:Whats the difference... by jazman_777 · · Score: 1

      I like to think I'm the exception.

      We all do.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    93. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Keep right except to pass." It's actually the law on limited-access roads.

    94. Re:Whats the difference... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      So you come here to make up strawman arguments and look like a complete ass? Why don't you go somewhere else to troll?

    95. Re:Whats the difference... by Stele · · Score: 1

      That's because it's 100% of the Mercedes owners.

    96. Re:Whats the difference... by fotoflojoe · · Score: 1

      Mea culpa, this is no lie. I owned a BMW M3 for a few years and could literally feel myself becoming a big(ger) asshole every time I got in it. Since trading the thing in for a different make, I no longer encounter that strange sensation.

    97. Re:Whats the difference... by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Cock-blocked a few here in Houston. Some will change three lanes in a row in one diagonal sweep with no blinker (a illegal maneuver) or, attempt to jump into the on-ramp at the last minute. Dude, I was in a RAV4! The prick ate those white flexy pole thingies (used as a lane divider). I'm sure him and his car was safe (minor bumper scratches I'm sure). Still, he didn't have to pull a dick move on me. He did, and lost. Obviously he fucked with the wrong guy =)

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    98. Re:Whats the difference... by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      The increase in CAFE and various other safety standards are to blame. Not to mention additional taxes, especially in Western Europe.

    99. Re:Whats the difference... by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      Modern vehicles have to pass a 5mph crash test with no damage. Rolling into someone at a light should be fine.

      This is only applicable if your bumpers line up. I have a 2001 Subaru -- bumper lower than knee height. I was sitting at a stoplight when the lady behind me yakking on her phone rolled her Lexus SUV into the back of my car. The bottom of her bumper was 10 cm above the top of mine, so it crumpled the hatchback lift door. That wasn't cheap.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    100. Re:Whats the difference... by gparent · · Score: 2

      Honestly, I really don't care about people too stupid to learn how to merge without having to stop. You're the one trying to get on the lane, why the fuck should I yield for you when you fail to be competent at it? Use your own brakes. I'd rather hang myself than imagine a version of me that cannot merge like an adult without having eight lanes wide worth of highway.

    101. Re:Whats the difference... by Qzukk · · Score: 3, Interesting

      how are you going to hit them? They're *passing* you....

      I've met (fortunately without hitting) two classes of people whose antics force me to brake while I'm doing 60 on the freeway:

      One class tries to fit into a space that is 1.5 car lengths wide by flooring it, pulling over at 65+, nearly rear-ending the guy in front doing 60, then slamming on his brakes to 55- so he can make space in front of him.

      The other class hasn't got a fucking clue what's going on, and starts pulling into my lane while I'm about even with him. I'm look over at him through his passenger window and he doesn't even turn his head to look at what's going on when I start honking.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    102. Re:Whats the difference... by Scoth · · Score: 1

      Tell me about it with the truck driver one. I had a run-in with one of those a few months ago, just finally got my car fixed from this. He didn't even realize he'd hit me for a moment, I could see him turning the wheel more trying to figure out why his truck wasn't turning.

      Fortunately I knew the guy from work so he was more embarrassed than anything, but it was a pain.

    103. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rolling into someone at a light should be fine. I once wrecked (in the "it was already scrap" sense) a late 90's Sunfire at a friend's farm and drove it ~15mph into a tree and it just bounced off.

      Only if the bumpers line up. Try rolling a Civic into the back of an F-150, and you'll end up with a trailer-hitch shaped hole in your radiator

    104. Re:Whats the difference... by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Problem with Mercedes is the turn signals don't work. Kinda sadd for such a nice car.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    105. Re:Whats the difference... by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Technical, the parent is correct. Out of courteous respect though, I agree with you. I've personally found myself in a situation in which I'm going slightly above the speed limit in the far left lane. I'm passing cars for sure, but there was one truck creeping up on my ass. I simply changed one lane to my right so that he may pass shortly before changing back over to the left lane again. You never know, he/she could have been running on cruise control.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    106. Re:Whats the difference... by jbwolfe · · Score: 3, Informative

      I considered installing a dash cam too, but then I realized it might be used against me (as in a court of law). Most would call me an asshole behind the wheel. Fair enough, though just like everybody else, I'm certain my driving skills are superior (only in my case they actually are ;-). I've sincerely run out of patience with apathy and inattention. BTW, I extend the following courtesies to all fellow drivers even if they don't reciprocate: stay right except to pass, slower traffic keep right, leave room for those turning right on red, if I pull out in front of you, you will not need to apply the breaks, use turn indicators, pull off the road if I'm lost, forgive innocent errors, never use the horn instead of evasive action, merge at the same speed as traffic, use cell phone only to stream music to the car audio system...I love driving, I just wish everyone else did too.

      --
      Have you ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac?
    107. Re:Whats the difference... by Jeng · · Score: 2

      You're the one trying to get on the lane, why the fuck should I yield for you

      I really don't give a shit if I get in behind or in front of you, just don't actively block me from getting on the highway. If traffic is backed up and you are in the merge lane, then someone will have to let someone in front of them and it might as well be you.

      I'm not one of those assholes who runs up to the end of an on ramp and then tries to get on, I try at the earliest point I can.

      Also, be aware that different lanes are used for different purposes so use the correct lane for what you are doing.

      Don't be an asshole.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    108. Re:Whats the difference... by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Unless it's a trophy wife behind the wheel. When you live in the inner city, you can spot them a mile away.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    109. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you should get a dashcam and record it and turn it over to the cops

    110. Re:Whats the difference... by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      What's funny is I bought a Challenger at the end of 2011, and have noticed since, that Mustang drivers tend to be assholes more than half the time, other challenger drivers seem to be nicer, and the Camaro drivers are pretty decent as well... ymmv. And I agree with another post in the thread that the Lexus driving soccer moms are the worst.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    111. Re:Whats the difference... by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Actively aggressive too, cute.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    112. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sir are an asshole.

    113. Re:Whats the difference... by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, I agree. I've noticed most Lexus SUV's I've seen have been driven erratically. And it was a Lexus SUV that wrecked my first car, though the driver's losing consciousness might be a valid excuse. The bad driving happened enough, that I developed a stereotype about Lexus SUV owners.

    114. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "In a car crash, everyone burns and dies at the same pace. It's the great equalizer..."W

      But in the BMW the seat will continue to massage you 'til the very end and if the battery lasts, even past the end.

    115. Re:Whats the difference... by gparent · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's my entire point. Don't be an asshole. If you have to accelerate and cut me to merge, you're doing it wrong and should slow down instead. I'm not going to go out of my way to accelerate and prevent you from merging, but if you tried to pass me in the merge lane for no other reason than to pass me in the merge lane, I might push gas a little hoping you learn how to merge the proper way.

      Basically, avoid surprises. I'm glad you don't "race to the merge"*, that's really the most annoying and dangerous concern.

      There's really no reason why people on the motorway should have to yield to you if you know what you are doing.

      * god, I'm working with Android at the moment and I see tag names everywhere ever since we started discussing this

    116. Re:Whats the difference... by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      I like to think I'm the exception.

      We all do.

      Not me, I'm an exception. I never think I'm an exception.

    117. Re:Whats the difference... by jnork · · Score: 2

      “The best swordsman does not fear the second best, he fears the worst since there's no telling what that idiot is going to do.”

      --
      Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult.
    118. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The new Buick Regal turbo v4 2011 with adjustable sport/luxury suspension is awesome. I got a Mercedes C300 2011 instead, but mostly because the GM dealership was full of the stereotypical, hard sell sleaze balls. Plus they made it seem like an epic chore to get the trim that we wanted, or to lease instead of purchase. The lady at the Mercedes dealership was much nicer and was a joy to work with.

      Well, that and the wife thought the Buick ride was too soft, even with the sport suspension enabled. I kept trying to tell her that it was a feature, not a bug. But like most people these days luxury is defined by European and Japanese standards. Not everyone can appreciate the classic American floating cloud suspension.

      Also, as a new Mercedes driver I've come to realize two things: 1) BMW drivers are truly complete assholes. 2) Mercedes drivers watch out for each other. There are a lot of Mercedes driver in the Bay Area, and even on the very first day we drove it we were amazed by the pleasantries Mercedes drivers granted each other on the road. Pleasantries the rabble just wouldn't understand ;)

      Not sure if I'm going to revert to a commuter sedan after the lease is up. But it's been fun so far.

    119. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      European resident here. +1 to parent.

      Audi drivers piss me off. They don't even realize their car is nothing but an expensive Volkswagen.

    120. Re:Whats the difference... by Fatch+Racall · · Score: 1

      Those trucks are the worst. Especially when I'm on the motorcycle. Regardless of if they're running diesel or regular, but have them set up to run so rich they'll spew black smoke. So, if you're next to them, you aren't seen(because their mirrors don't work), if you're in front of them, they're tailgating you, and if you're behind them, you can't see shit and inhale 500 cigars worth of lung death. One started changing lanes into me(i had no shoulder to move over to) so i kicked their door hard as i could and laid on the horn(and hit the brakes. It was quite a maneuver). Still almost got sandwiched.

      --
      #include <disclaimer.h>
    121. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a pretty decent set of rules. I use the same except I will avoid idiots THEN honk at their stupidity. Turn indicators are one of the most important safety feature of a car and it's a shame that more people do not use them. Use your turn signal and I will literally slow down a bit to make let you merge if it seems difficult for you, but if you fail to use them I will act like you do not exist.

    122. Re:Whats the difference... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      What the heck is there to "appreciate" with the "classic American floating cloud" suspension? It sucks. You can't feel the road, the handling is vague, you can't corner worth a damn, what good is it? Why would you want a car that requires you to come to a complete stop before you can negotiate a turn? I drove a Lincoln Town Car like that a long time ago, and it was a horrible experience. The steering wheel was just like those old-time arcade racing games where the wheel could spin in circles and there was no feedback, no resistance, and no stops.

      But I know what you mean about the sleazeballs at dealerships. It does seem to depend a lot on the dealership, but the high-end makes seem to have much nicer salespeople to work with. I went to a Honda dealership not too long ago to look at a particular car and the salespeople seemed like a bunch of neanderthals. I guess I should have checked the reviews on Google; they're pretty horrible.

    123. Re:Whats the difference... by Dahamma · · Score: 3, Funny

      That wasn't bumper cars. I think you just witnessed a Lexus mating ritual. 9 months later a new Scion will be born.

    124. Re:Whats the difference... by Dunbal · · Score: 0

      You first. I like it here. Not to the point of clicking little widgets and setting "friends" and "enemies" of course, but why bother reading my posts if they offend you so much?

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    125. Re:Whats the difference... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Then why bother posting at all? If you can't make it all the way through a comment before replying, then don't bother.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    126. Re:Whats the difference... by agallagh42 · · Score: 2

      I hope you're not saying that the AC is correct. It is actually a legal requirement that you must not travel in the passing lane if you are not actively passing someone. Going the speed limit is irrelevant. If there is room to move out of the passing lane, you are legally required to do so, and you can get a ticket if you don't. Unfortunately, such tickets are fairly rare.

      --
      Carpe Cerevisi - Seize the Beer
    127. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's when you get out and "accidentally" roll her phone into her face several times.

    128. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A nice deal for $160 on one of these I just saw: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=9SIA0YX08C4599

    129. Re:Whats the difference... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say you are more skilled... but I would say you are actually paying attention to your vehicle and your surroundings.

      That more than makes up for any gap in skill. You're miles ahead of the pack already.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    130. Re:Whats the difference... by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      My personal favorite variant of that is the Escalade with 22" low profile tires (extra bonus for spinning rims). Seriously, low profile tires on an SUV? Kinda takes the "sport" and "utility" out of the acronym.

    131. Re:Whats the difference... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the play-by-play. Let me assure you that we all care.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    132. Re:Whats the difference... by gameboyhippo · · Score: 1

      You could just stop tailgating people. Just a thought.

    133. Re:Whats the difference... by X0563511 · · Score: 0

      Lets be fair, when the speed limit is 65, you can't get pissy because he's going 70 and you want to go 80.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    134. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure you can pick up a V6, 2-seat, regular-bed F-150 for around $15k (sticker!). Those are the "fleet & farm" version that the dealers can't get rid of at the end of the model year. Watch closely and you can pick one up for around $10k from a desperate dealer.

    135. Re:Whats the difference... by sdguero · · Score: 1

      In San Diego, the traffic flows between 75 and 80 MPH in the fast lane. All the time. It's more like 70-75 MPH in LA area (where I grew up/used to live) but for some reason it's faster down here. Whatever the signs say, if I hang out behind a car going 65-70 MPH in the fast lane, cars behind me do aggressive things to get around both of us. It creates a dangerous situation, and I swear 60-80% of the time the cars doing this are prius models. The other lanes are perfectly OK to go 68 MPH in without slowing down 4 lanes of traffic and causing a ruckus but some Prius drivers insist on going slow in the fast lane.

    136. Re:Whats the difference... by drkstr1 · · Score: 1

      You would really enjoy driving in northwest Washington. There is an understanding here that traffic flows much better when you cooperate. The annoying ones are those who won't take the space you opened up for them, causing a "slow down standoff." :)

      --
      Fanboy Status: Apache Flex, C#, Eclipse, KDE, Pirate Party, Ron Paul, Slackware, Windows 7
    137. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing like a luxury sedan with a honda sized engine (yes, the 2.8 counts...hondas are bigger now).

    138. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brings Me Women

    139. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'd assume it's also illegal to exceed the maximum speed limit, so bitching about people not changing the lanes when somebody in a "constant need" is appearing doesn't result in much sympathy

    140. Re:Whats the difference... by luther349 · · Score: 1

      i hear you there. i had a old 325 and because it had the old e30 body every street racing punk just had to try and race it.

    141. Re:Whats the difference... by richlv · · Score: 1

      sounds likely. how rare are tickets for going over the speed limit ?
      personally, i am exceeding speed limits rather often, especially when i'm on two wheels. i might even complain in my helmet in some cases. but i never, ever think i have any privileges over others or allow myself to flash lights or do anything more. i brake down and obey the speed limit or whatever is the speed other person feels comfortable with, even if it's below the posted limit

      --
      Rich
    142. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technically, if I'm running 120mph in the passing lane, it can be argued that I'm probably passing everyone else. . . . .

    143. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what excactly are the cops going to do with your dashcam video?

    144. Re:Whats the difference... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I don't give a shit about sympathy, that and eight bucks will buy you a venti latte at starfucks. I'm talking about a sense of entitlement that results in a less-safe road, because most people in that situation will go around them on the right whether it's safe or not. I have my moments, but in general I am very good about not creating an unsafe situation for other motorists... these days. I had my young and dumb phase. Now I'm less young, and less dumb.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    145. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes you can. The fast lane is called the 'passing lane'. Not the 65 lane. The signs on the highway, and the traffic laws say 'slower traffic keep right', not 'vehicles going less than 65 keep right'.

    146. Re:Whats the difference... by vivian · · Score: 1

      Sounds great at first, and it is good having the flexibility of hours, but believe me, working from home isn't all it is cut out for. Working from your mum's house is an open invitation to "just take a five minute break to fix ..." several times a day.
      You will be distracted by telemarketing calls, friends and family expect you can just drop what you are doing to help out with things,(because you can just catch up later, rlight?) and you don't have that nice delineation between the start and end of your working day.
      If you do start working from home, make sure you establish right from the start that between 9:00 to 5:00 (your hours may vary) you are strictly at work and should be treated as such.
      Mostly though, I miss working in a team environment and having people to bounce ideas off, and being able to get home and not think about work.
      After working from home for 5 years, I can't wait to get back into a regular office environment.

    147. Re:Whats the difference... by VisceralLogic · · Score: 1

      Mercedes also has a lower end model [edmunds.com]that is comparable with other new sedans

      If $35k is comparable with other new sedans, I guess I won't be buying a new sedan ever again. Interesting how median household income has increased by about 70% in 20 years, while the price of an average new car has increased by over 130%.

      Obviously, there is a range. You can pick up a brand new Chevy Aveo for $12k, or a Nissan Altima for $21k. But the $35k fits in with Lexus IS and ES, VW EOS, Audi A4 and A5, BMW 328, etc.

      --
      Stop! Dremel time!
    148. Re:Whats the difference... by mhajicek · · Score: 1

      Escalades Navigators and Hummers also seem to be the most likely to be illegally parked in a handicapped parking spot, though I can't find any hard data.

    149. Re:Whats the difference... by VisceralLogic · · Score: 1

      The large amount of software hacking and modifications available for the N54 / N55 engines and the iDrive systems disagree with your "locked" assertion.

      Show me another car where you can get a $500 piggyback module that allows you to change engine performance through the steering wheel controls by hijacking signals on the CANbus, or changing gauge function on the fly: http://www.burgertuning.com/jb4_pnp_BMW_performance_tuner.html

      These engines are a software hacker's dream.

      APR's EMCS (http://www.goapr.com/products/ecu_upgrade_20tsivl_long.html) does the same for many VW models.

      --
      Stop! Dremel time!
    150. Re:Whats the difference... by Macman408 · · Score: 1

      Not true; I bought my car 2.5 years ago, and some of the included literature clearly spelled out that the bumper was designed to protect against impacts with a fixed barrier up to 2.5 mph. (This is roughly equivalent to a 5 mph impact with a similarly-sized car, though.)

      Also, the that the "no damage" part only applied for model years 1980-82, and it wasn't really no damage - the bumper was allowed a 3/8-inch dent and a 3/4 inch displacement from the impact. Since 1979, there has been a requirement of no damage to other safety systems or the rest of the car body, though.

    151. Re:Whats the difference... by mhajicek · · Score: 1

      There was an article a few months ago that found Prius drivers to be most likely to violate crosswalks and stop signs.

    152. Re:Whats the difference... by mhajicek · · Score: 1

      They just don't crash them, so they don't need new ones.

    153. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here.

      85% of BMW owners are definitely not Mercedes Owners.

    154. Re:Whats the difference... by agallagh42 · · Score: 1

      No, wrong, that can't be argued. If there are no other cars on the road, or even if the lane to your right is empty, you are not passing, and you must by law move to the right. Your speed is completely irrelevant to this particular law.

      You have to be overtaking another vehicle to occupy that lane. That's the only thing that matters.

      --
      Carpe Cerevisi - Seize the Beer
    155. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bavarian Money Waste

      Which is ironic, since my 93' touring saves me so much money it is ridiculous.

    156. Re:Whats the difference... by agallagh42 · · Score: 1

      While that is very noble and accommodating of you, it doesn't change the fact that the person driving in the passing lane is breaking the law. If they are not in the process of overtaking another vehicle, they should not be in the passing lane.

      --
      Carpe Cerevisi - Seize the Beer
    157. Re:Whats the difference... by RoknrolZombie · · Score: 1

      Interesting...10 years in Vegas taught me the opposite...

    158. Re:Whats the difference... by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      In addition to what other commenters said about the passing lane only being used for passing, it is possible to get a ticket for going too slow even if you're exceeding the speed limit - it all depends on the flow of traffic

    159. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lexus -- parked with police in an accident.
      BMW -- on the tow truck
      Mercedes -- in the shop.

    160. Re:Whats the difference... by Macman408 · · Score: 1

      +1 to this. As long as the slower-moving car waits for an acceptable opening in the fast lane so as to not cut anybody off, and is actually passing slower-moving traffic in the lane(s) to the right, there's nothing wrong with it. There's no race to see who can be the fastest one in the fast lane... Otherwise one could say the same thing about the GP himself; "You gotta love the $STEREOTYPICAL_GROUP cruising along at 75 MPH in the fast lane during rush hour with their eyes glued on the radar detector. Unbelievably annoying. They are the new Prius (but for $MOTIVATION instead of MPG). Meanwhile people are risking lives to get around them by swerving into the slow lanes and get back up to 85-90 MPH."

      Two other observations - if you're driving in a way that risks lives, it sure as hell isn't the fault of the people you're going around. Take a chill pill, wait for a safe opportunity to get around slower-moving traffic, and then resume your reckless behavior far from the rest of us. Second, I rarely see people actually driving in the fast lane for long periods when they shouldn't be - Prius or not. If you give them a chance to move over, they might just take it. As an example, I avoid cutting off semi trucks, at least in part because my brother was a semi driver, and related many stories where cars would pass him, pull into his lane, and then (either intentionally or accidentally) slow down, nearly getting flattened in the process. So if I'm passing a semi at 70 MPH and somebody approaches from behind at 85, I may speed up a little for their benefit (and to get them off my bumper), but I won't cut off the semi to get out of their way. They often have no such qualms, however, and will go from tailgating me to cutting off the truck the instant there's a car length's difference between my bumper and the semi's. This means I then have to wait for them to pass me before I can move over - and if the cars behind them are just as rude and follow suit, I can end up stuck in the fast lane while a few morons zip by, at least until one of them gives me a chance to signal and move over. Not saying the GP does this, but it happens way more often than it should.

      I'm always amazed by the people who completely ignore the speed limit, and seem to think that they have some sort of speed entitlement to which they are guaranteed.

    161. Re:Whats the difference... by richlv · · Score: 1

      is that a huge concern ? is it a bigger hazard than somebody speeding ?
      i'd say no, and i'd claim that speeding is worse. so much that i would expect people to feel at least a tiny bit ashamed of it and not flame others who are "in their way".

      so what is actually the huge problem with people in that lane who are not below the speed limit ?

      --
      Rich
    162. Re:Whats the difference... by PoopMonkey · · Score: 2

      The number of people you'll find owning SUVs that actually do anything sporty or utility-like is pretty much a rounding error. The same with people driving pickups. They think they look cool so they buy them. Around here, these tend to also be the people I see in the ditch the most in snow because they think that their vehicle will keep them safe without actually having any driving ability.

    163. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the speed limit was 65 on most US highways

    164. Re:Whats the difference... by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      I've definitely met the latter. The former, not since I left a specific city.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    165. Re:Whats the difference... by cusco · · Score: 2

      Or parked in a space (or two) clearly marked "COMPACT". Since my little truckette is older and starting to look a little rough around the edges I'll park in the next space over. Right in the middle of the space, perfectly between the lines. If I'm lucky they'll be climbing in their passenger door when I come back out and I can laugh as they crawl over the middle console and then take about four tries before they can back out (once with the spouse giving the most hilarious hand signals trying to assist).

      I used to have a 'Citizen's Arrest Parking Ticket' that I would leave on cars, with nice check boxes and penalties such as being sent to the Click & Clack School of Remedial Parking, but I lost my template in a computer upgrade and never got around to recreating it.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    166. Re:Whats the difference... by agallagh42 · · Score: 1

      That is irrelevant to the conversation. I'm not trying to argue the relative merits of different laws. Armed robbery is a bigger hazard than speeding, does that make speeding irrelevant?

      All I'm saying is that in many jurisdictions around the world, this law is on the books. If you don't think breaking this law is a big deal, that's fine, you're allowed to have an opinion. Doesn't change the facts though. And it won't get you out of a ticket either

      --
      Carpe Cerevisi - Seize the Beer
    167. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seeing as how Ed Gein lived with his mother and Bill Gates did something cool with DOS once, I'm sure you'll fit right in.

    168. Re:Whats the difference... by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      During rush hour traffic, that law would be impossible to enforce. You can't leave the entire left lane open and clear for only looking to pass someone on the right lane. Often the flow of traffic among the different lanes will undulate at different speeds.

      ec. 545.051. DRIVING ON RIGHT SIDE OF ROADWAY. Texas Law

      (a) An operator on a roadway of sufficient width shall drive on the right half of the roadway, unless:
      (1) the operator is passing another vehicle;
      (2) an obstruction necessitates moving the vehicle left of the center of the roadway and the operator yields the right-of-way to a vehicle that:
      (A) is moving in the proper direction on the unobstructed portion of the roadway; and
      (B) is an immediate hazard;
      (3) the operator is on a roadway divided into three marked lanes for traffic; or
      (4) the operator is on a roadway restricted to one-way traffic.

      (b) An operator of a vehicle on a roadway moving more slowly than the normal speed of other vehicles at the time and place under the existing conditions shall drive in the right-hand lane available for vehicles, or as close as practicable to the right-hand curb or edge of the roadway, unless the operator is:
      (1) passing another vehicle; or
      (2) preparing for a left turn at an intersection or into a private road or driveway.

      (c) An operator on a roadway having four or more lanes for moving vehicles and providing for two-way movement of vehicles may not drive left of the center line of the roadway except:
      (1) as authorized by an official traffic-control device designating a specified lane to the left side of the center of the roadway for use by a vehicle not otherwise permitted to use the lane;
      (2) under the conditions described by Subsection (a)(2); or
      (3) in crossing the center line to make a left turn into or out of an alley, private road, or driveway.

      While I don't know, rush hour traffic be be considered an "obstruction" even if the cars in fact are moving. Also, "normal speed" is not the speed limit. It's the average speed among cars relative to each other. At least that's how it's been explained to me.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    169. Re:Whats the difference... by cyborman · · Score: 0

      Not all states have this requirement. Alaska State law permits driving in the left lane so long as your not doing under the speed limit. Arkansas law just states you cannot obstruct traffic by driving continuously in the left lane. North Carolina as well allows Driving in the left lane unless your doing 10 MPH under the speed limit.

    170. Re:Whats the difference... by baegucb · · Score: 1

      Your mistake. Turn signals are optional equipment on expensive cars. ;)

    171. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because if they pull in in front of you when only the front 90% of their car is past you then the rear 10% is going to hit/clip your car, unless you slam your brakes on and risk the car behind you failing to react quickly enough to avoid hitting you.

      If they're past you they're not going to hit you, unless they do something really silly like moving over and slamming their brakes on (which does happen).

      While they're passing you there's still a risk of them hitting you.

    172. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should feel privileged. That's the mating dance of the Lesser Spotted Lexus. Very rarely observed in public.

    173. Re:Whats the difference... by Immostlyharmless · · Score: 1

      I live in Arizona, You can go 40 miles at a stretch here without turning the wheel (seriously..) on I-10. Speed limit here is 75, Cops don't care as long as you're under 85, (or look illegal, but that's another topic). Set the cruise control at some where between 83-84 range and slip into the fast lane, getting right as people roll up on you. It's really not that hard to do. I'm surprised most people don't use cruise more seeing as it's usually pretty standard in any car of the last 20-30 years. The ones that really drive me crazy are the ones that speed up when no one's around them, then slow down to a crawl when passing a truck or other cars... ...argh....

    174. Re:Whats the difference... by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 1

      so what is actually the huge problem with people in that lane who are not below the speed limit ?

      First, they impede the flow of traffic. When the passing lane is used for passing, then cars are able to use more of the road capacity by spreading out along it, rather then being concentrated in fifty cars all piled up with short stopping distances behind two cars driving the same speed next to each other with a huge empty highway ahead of them.
      Second, in some states (like the one I live in), the speed limit is a recommendation, not a hard limit. If the majority of traffic is exceeding that recommendation, then it's considered safe to do so. So if you are on a rural highway driving the "speed limit" in the passing lane, you're going to have a major pile-up of traffic behind you who want to pass you. That's simply inconsiderate. What does it cost you to drive in the proper lane for not-passing? It's not like you're going to be driving at a different speed just because you're doing it in the correct lane?
      Third, among those people piled up behind you are going to be people who get tired of staring at the back of your car and end up passing you in a much more dangerous manner, pulling over to the right in a little gap, then passing and pulling back left into a little gap. That doesn't happen if people use the passing lane for "passing" instead of "driving".

      If you aren't going to drive at least 5-10 mph faster than the person in the right lane in order to pass, then just drive in the right lane, either just ahead or just behind them. It doesn't cost you anything and many people will be safer and happier as a result.

      Now just don't get me started on people who stop at the end of off-ramps that become their own right-lane and don't even require a merge... it's apparently completely unconscious habit, because all the signs say no stop required and the lane markers are clear that there is no stop required, but they seem to want to come to a stop and look for traffic anyway, as if it's going to jump over the curb to hit them as they drive...

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    175. Re:Whats the difference... by c++0xFF · · Score: 1

      Let me add two more: make room for others to merge, and don't force me to move around.

      Some drivers think that's it's ok to force their way around as they change lanes, etc. Slowly pushing their way between two cars where no room exists, for example. Tailgating also fits in this category. So does slowing down to piss of the person tailgating you. Instead, let's just be courteous on the road ... is that too much to ask?

    176. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only people got tickets for crap like that. Blocking lanes because they deem you should be driving slower than them. Driving 10-20 under the limit. Leaving 1 carspace in front of them at the lights when it's bumper to bumper.

      We were on a 1 lane road once. Car in front was driving 20 under. Next was a cop car, then 2 other cars. After 5min driving like that the sirens wailed. Fine at last they were getting pulled over. But no, once they pull over (which itself took long enough) the cop just drives past.

    177. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the laws in the United States are different

      Each individual state is responsible for its own traffic laws here. The basic rules are the same across the country, but as soon as you dig into the details, you find differences. Also, traffic enforcement and fines are radically different from state to state.

      Consequently, drivers behave very differently across the country. In California, you'll see large numbers of highway drivers set their cruise controls exactly at 65MPH due to the high speeding fines and strict enforcement. In Massachusetts, you can find packs of highway drivers doing 90MPH while swerving around trucks doing 50MPH

    178. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That changed... Try 2.5 MPH

    179. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the US, laws like that are written by the individual states. What you claim is true in some places, false in others.

    180. Re:Whats the difference... by undefinedreference · · Score: 1

      Being a 'merkin, I thought it was all in my head, but apparently I was correct. The only total dickheads I encountered were Audi drivers, particularly the small and mid-sized ones. They reminded me of 3-series and 5-series BMW drivers in the US...

    181. Re:Whats the difference... by Yunzil · · Score: 1

      You think traffic laws make a difference in how people drive here. :3

    182. Re:Whats the difference... by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      What the heck is there to "appreciate" with the "classic American floating cloud" suspension?

      A 600 mile day across some of America's 'quality' highways should answer that question.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    183. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it is possible to get a ticket for going too slow even if you're exceeding the speed limit - it all depends on the flow of traffic

      Please cite some evidence of this. There is a lot of urban legend that goes around driving and traffic laws. Some of it is true, some of it is false, and some of it varies by country, state, and locale. I've received a ticket before for going with traffic (it was a massive speed trap).

      (posting anonymous because I modded here)

    184. Re:Whats the difference... by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      About 10 years ago I was driving through central IL on I-55 during a total white out. Was going about 10mph in a rented Taurus. A cocky bastard in a Land Rover blew past us at about 45mph. We caught up to him a couple miles later - he was standing in the median next to his now upside down Land Rover.

    185. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ford isn't typically the brand one associates with rich people.

      we're talking redneck rich

    186. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't the video being used against you be against something that says you don't have to incriminate yourself in court, and thus are not required to show your own video as evidence?

    187. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll not stay to the right if I am going to turn left eventually or have to constantly pass people anyway.

      I know I piss off some folks but no way I am moving over, just to have to move back over to the left lane, for someone who wants to go 10 miles over the speed limit when they have a nice empty lane beside them.

    188. Re:Whats the difference... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      We were on a 1 lane road once. Car in front was driving 20 under. Next was a cop car, then 2 other cars. After 5min driving like that the sirens wailed. Fine at last they were getting pulled over. But no, once they pull over (which itself took long enough) the cop just drives past.

      I constantly see cops pull up behind someone in the fast lane, hang out there for a while, then pass them on the right, late for the line at Krispy Kreme. It would be nice if they would write them a ticket, but it's not WORTH enough. They make much more writing speeding tickets, so they stick with those.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    189. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The great thing about a Prius is that you can absolutely hammer on it with a lead foot and still get close to 50mpg. Too bad most Prius drivers think you have to drive it like there's an egg under the accelerator.

    190. Re:Whats the difference... by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      I used to fully agree with this statement. However in the last couple of years I have noticed that the pricks seem to be migrating to Audis.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    191. Re:Whats the difference... by treeves · · Score: 1

      I still don't understand why GM kept Buick and dumped Oldsmobile. Oldsmobile had some cool cars. Buick OTOH....

      I also think Jetta drivers tend to be pretty crazy, just like they're in a big hurry and don't care how that affects anyone else. Plural anecdotes and all that.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    192. Re:Whats the difference... by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      And yet, the speed limit in the passing lane is the same as the speed limit in the right lane. If I'm going at least the speed limit, I don't give a fuck which lane I'm in or who is behind me.

      Yes, but there is also a law that says you are only supposed to be in the passing lane if you are passing someone. If you are driving in the passing lane and are not going faster (which is what is required to pass) than the traffic to your right, you are violating the law every bit as much as the person who is trying to get around you at 10 mph over the speed limit.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    193. Re:Whats the difference... by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      is that a huge concern ? is it a bigger hazard than somebody speeding ?

      At times it is. I drive on a road that regularly gets backed up. One of the biggest reasons that its backups start is someone riding the passing lane at below the average speed for that lane with no one in front of them. If someone gets on the road half an hour before the normal rush hour backup and does that for the 10 miles of heavy traffic on that road with no one in front of them but just enough traffic to their right to prevent people more than one car back to get around them to the right, they will move rush hour up by about half an hour and make it overall worse.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    194. Re:Whats the difference... by hey! · · Score: 1

      85% of all BMW owners Ive met are assholes. Strangely this doesnt apply to Mercedes owners.

      Maybe the Mercedes owners encounter a different population of BMW owners than you do.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    195. Re:Whats the difference... by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      The reason that pickup trucks have become "luxury items" is because the CAFE standards now apply to them. This means that manufacturers cannot afford to sell as many of them as the demand would be if they were not priced as luxury items.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    196. Re:Whats the difference... by hawk · · Score: 1

      Oldsmobile was a self-inflicted wound.

      It was a top performance vehicle, and then they had that truly *idiotic* campaign in the 70's of "This is not your father's Oldsmobile."

      Uh, bright, guys--your fathrs olds likely had a 455 Rocket V-8.

      I still haven't quite forgviven my wife for selling her father's car to a cousin twenty years ago. A 67 or 68 olds 88. OK, so it was brown--but it had the 455 rocket , , ,

      How they screwed up Buick is beyond me. Buick was *the* gadget brand for all the coolest new things.

      GM didn't deserve to survive turning gadgety Buick and high-performance Oldsmobile into stodgy brands.

      hawk

    197. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      California Vehicle Code (C.V.C.) 21654 (a)(b), in case you cared. Go to www.ca.gov and poke around until you find all the laws - online.

      AC

    198. Re:Whats the difference... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Yes, I've made many trips like that in fairly stiffly-sprung small cars. I don't have a problem with it, and it's preferable to a car where you'll "lose control" as soon as you try to swerve around an obstacle in the road.

      However, I've been on some really horrible washboard dirt roads in the desert where I imagine that soft suspension might actually be a benefit, but that's not something most drivers ever do.

    199. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are the asshole for getting in as early as you can, if people are waiting behind you, backing up the whole exit onto the road you are coming from. if you drive to the front of the the merge lane, more cars can enter the exit and reduce the traffic on the road you are leaving.

    200. Re:Whats the difference... by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      did you "meet" them, or just have to share a road with them.

      not refuting or anything. i drive a beamer, but i don't own it :) i'm an '88 corolla driver at heart, but i have to be careful not to drive the BMW in the same way (speed laws and all that).

      tl;dr - anybody who drives a car that makes them feel more important than everyone else on the road will drive like an arsehole.

      conversely, anybody who drives a car with a high likelihood of containing an arsehole due to the above rule of thumb will be treated like an arsehole by other drivers.

      there was a marked difference between how i was treated in the blue corolla hatch versus how i'm treated in a 325i. the effect can be offset by wearing a stupid hat though. more research is needed, and more funding - i want to see how driving a maserati changes things...

    201. Re:Whats the difference... by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      exactly. if you drive normally and someone's scrambling to pass you, they'll be gone if you let them pass.

      if someone's not watching the road, but driving otherwise within the law, you'll be stuck trying to avoid them until one of you turns off or you finally tire of it and break the speed limit to get the hell away from them.

      thankfully, when police have stopped me after an incident like this, they've actually not booked me and understood completely. i guess they have to share the road with idiots all day long, to say nothing of the automatic -10km/h they'd incur everywhere they went because they were in a police car (people don't realise that if you're at the speed limit, you wont be booked. there's no need to slow down just because there's a cop around).

    202. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For 0$ if you have Android: DailyRoads Voyager https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.dailyroads.v&hl=en

    203. Re:Whats the difference... by AF_Cheddar_Head · · Score: 1

      Chicago ?

    204. Re:Whats the difference... by AF_Cheddar_Head · · Score: 1

      Bullllshitt, you don't start down the mergw lane until you see the gap you will match speed with and merge into. Idiots like ypu that stop at the end of a merge lane should be shot. merge lane AKA acceleration lane. Of course the rules are different when traffic is slow, you need a lot less length to match speed with slow traffic.

    205. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a Lancer Evolution which is basically a very high output 2.0 liter inline 4 cylinder motor running 32psi of boost from a huge turbocharger.

      And I seriously mean a HUGE turbocharger! Takes a good 3 seconds to spool up on the highway and it sounds like a Jet is taking off as it builds boost and starts whistling.

      I make sure to spin it up and produce all 570 horsepower when passing Hybrids who block the fast lane.

      I can let off the gas as my car is even with theirs and still coast about 6 car lengths past them after blasting a considerable amount of air directly at their car.

      I want to get a bumper sticker that says "I build boost to pass your hybrid"

    206. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      18 and driving a Buick. They're not bad cars by any means. ...granted, I don't own it, so any car isn't a bad car.

    207. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You assume a lot, and you drive a BMW. You're not helping to dispel the stereotype.

    208. Re:Whats the difference... by jrumney · · Score: 1

      The ticket would not be for "going too slow", it would be for obstructing traffic, or failure to keep right or something like that which is an actual traffic regulation.

    209. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have this, it's pretty awesome. You can change the boost with the steering wheel's radio controls. Want about 400hp and over 400lbs of torque - dial it in; want your 27 mpg near-luxury German car back, dial it back:)

    210. Re:Whats the difference... by sjames · · Score: 2

      When merging, I have to merge in front of someone. You don't seriously think you're so amazingly great and important that you can't be bothered with the common courtesy of allowing someone to merge, do you?

    211. Re:Whats the difference... by sjames · · Score: 2

      When you see that someone is trying to merge, you should increase the gap with the car in front of you so he doesn't have to pull a stunt like that.

    212. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Germany:
      - Bring Mich Werkstatt (Bring me to repair shop)
      - Bei Mercedes Weggeworfen (Thrown away at mercedes)

    213. Re:Whats the difference... by dr_canak · · Score: 1

      "Interesting how median household income has increased by about 70% in 20 years..."

      Care to share where you read the median household income has increased 70% in the last 20 years? That's so far from correct I have to assume you were simply exaggerating to make a point...

    214. Re:Whats the difference... by richlv · · Score: 1

      Second, in some states (like the one I live in), the speed limit is a recommendation, not a hard limit.

      that would be the exception (similar to autobahn) where i would agree that going slower would require moving to the right.

      --
      Rich
    215. Re:Whats the difference... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Mirror, signal manoeuvre.

      Not signal, manoeuvre. You don't start indicating just because you want to move and expect people to get out of your way.

      Don't be an asshole.

      Agreed.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    216. Re:Whats the difference... by RaceProUK · · Score: 1

      That only works if the merger is indicating his/her intentions. Unfortunately, a lot of drivers don't know what the orange lights are for, let alone how to use them properly.

      Note: I'm speaking from experiences in the UK.

      --
      No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
    217. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My brother, in New Zealand, is a 3-series BMW driver. He's also one of those fucking morons who'll park in the middle of two spaces just to make sure nobody parks beside him.

      He never parks far from where I do. If I ever have the opportunity, I will park so close to him that he can't get out without a can opener and a lot of grease.

    218. Re:Whats the difference... by gwjgwj · · Score: 1

      If the lane to my right is empty, why is the person behind me in the left lane?

    219. Re:Whats the difference... by agallagh42 · · Score: 1

      Who said there was someone behind you?

      And if there was... it is also technically illegal to pass on the right. So if he wants to legally get past you, he has to wait for you to move over.

      --
      Carpe Cerevisi - Seize the Beer
    220. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love you

    221. Re:Whats the difference... by agallagh42 · · Score: 1

      Right back at ya!

      --
      Carpe Cerevisi - Seize the Beer
    222. Re:Whats the difference... by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      The U.S. Census bureau. lists median income for 1992 at about $30k and median income for 2010 ( the most recent year for which stats are available) as about $49,500. If it trends up at the same rate then median income for 2012 would be about 65% to 70% higher than 1992. In fact, I was being conservative, as the lower the percent that median income has increased, the more outrageous it is that vehicles have increased in cost by more than 100%.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    223. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that would be the exception (similar to autobahn) where i would agree that going slower would require moving to the right.

      If you're not passing anyone, you are already required to move to the right. Stop breaking the law.

    224. Re:Whats the difference... by richlv · · Score: 1

      i'm not. but if somebody is, and they drive at the posted speed limit (with the exception mentioned above), there is no way how they are harming anybody else... who is not breaking the law. at which point it is an extreme hypocrisy to complain about others.
      if you exceed the speed limit, you understand that any action anybody else does to please you is pure politeness and you do not expect to always receive it - unless you are an impolite bastard who thinks everybody should please them. not that there's shortage of such people on the roads.

      --
      Rich
    225. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seconded in noticing BMW owners being assholes on the road.

    226. Re:Whats the difference... by dr_canak · · Score: 1

      But those numbers do not appear to be adjusted for inflation, which you have to take into account when making comparisons like you are. In 1990, the median income was around $49,000, in inflation adjusted dollars. In 2010, it was also just a tad under $49,000.

      http://www.census.gov/prod/2011pubs/p60-239.pdf

      take care,
      jeff

    227. Re:Whats the difference... by bkcallahan · · Score: 1

      You probably don't want to know that in Pittsburgh, there are freeway ramps with stop signs at the end. When I visit, I just blow through them at speed.

    228. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And whatever you do, don't use directionals or they'll speed up to make sure you don't get in front of them!

    229. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's amazing how many BMW owners are assholes on the road ("I need to win the commute!") .......

      Way too true.
      The issue is horse power.
      The safest thing we could do in the
      next couple years is legislate limits
      on horsepower to weight ratios.

      Those that are interested in the environment should
      be all over this. This has as much to do with
      miles per gallon as any design parameter.

      Now there will be a number that wish to establish
      a cap and trade open market for this. They will
      trade one or more peddle cab/ rickshaw horsepower
      bonus to permit an upgrade to their personal rocket sled.

    230. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That might be a California thing. You guys seem to have a larger than typical share of asshole drivers, even by the already high standards of major cities.

      In my experience, the worst drivers in this area (central Florida) are the rednecks in the gigantic pickup trucks, and the young kids in the muscle cars (I would be such a happy man if Ford recalled all Mustangs). BMW drivers can be jaw-droppingly bad (and indeed have left a bad association with the brand in my mind), but they at least have the virtue of being rather rare.

      You're right about that sense of camaraderie. As the proud owner of a W123 diesel that's as old as I am, they are the only Mercedes that I pay any degree of special attention to (and occasionally vice versa). In my book, anyone with similarly discriminating taste deserves my respect.

    231. Re:Whats the difference... by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      The issue is horse power.
      The safest thing we could do in the
      next couple years is legislate limits
      on horsepower to weight ratios.

      Actually, it sounds elitist, but I'd almost argue the real problem is "horsepower to price ratios". Despite what you might assume, the Porsche, Lotus, Ferrari, Maserati, etc drivers out there (though a bit less common) seem to be some of the safest and most easy going on the road.

      I think they are a somewhat older crowd and no longer need to "prove" they are the better/more aggressive driver than the BMW drivers... or maybe they are more worried about getting in an accident :)

    232. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is in Texas, Florida, Georgia, Alabama, and North Carolina as well.

      And in at least a couple of those states, the speed limit is actually 'within 5 mph of the general flow of traffic, regardless of posted maximum speed'.

      In Florida specifically, due to pricks who wouldn't even get out of the fast lane for emergency vehicles, you will serve 30 days in jail for doing so if they catch you doing it and they are actively using under cover cars to catch people doing it.

      I dare you to drive through Jacksonville FL in the left lane slow enough for people to pass you on the right for more than a few minutes. Please, that'll get you off the road for at least a month, note speaking to the GP post here :)

    233. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd love for you to have a dash cam to incriminate yourself with when you rear end me cause thats really about all its useful for.

      --BitZtream

    234. Re:Whats the difference... by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      You don't have to take inflation into account. You just have to be consistent on both sides of the equation, which I was. I can certainly take inflation into account. If we do that we will find that in adjusted dollar terms, a 1992 Ford Sedan would have cost $17,000 in inflated dollars, whereas a new Ford Sedan today will cost about $30,000. So, in inflation adjusted dollars the cost of an average new car has risen by 76%, while the median household income has risen by 0 percent.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    235. Re:Whats the difference... by coolmoose25 · · Score: 1

      Driving is best done by being an asshole... For instance, in your example, you merge early and don't use the whole merge lane. What happens? Someone behind you runs up to the end of the lane and merges in front of you. I don't care whether or not he merges in front of you, but I DO care that you wasted the entire merge lane by merging early. You probably had to do it at a steeper angle, and you probably disrupted the highway traffic more that if you had just picked two cars to merge between, and paced with the gap between them until you were at the reasonable end of the merge lane and then merged into traffic. By doing this, you allowed everyone behind you to utilize the whole merge lane, allowing more cars on to the ramp, and smoothed the entire merge for everyone.

      Same thing applies to the 4 way stop. Somebody gets there first, but they are "not an asshole" and so waive you through even though it's not your turn. You waive back and say "hey, not an asshole, it's your turn, you should go." Instead of going, "not an asshole" waives at you again and you've both sat there longer than you should have - much longer.

      Long story short, exercise safe and expeditious traffic habits, use all of the merge lanes so that true asshats don't get to cut the line, go when it's your turn, and everything works out better.

      --
      Brawndo: It's what plants crave!
    236. Re:Whats the difference... by fotoflojoe · · Score: 1

      It's astonishing how many people simply don't understand this.

    237. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually in theory traffic flows better if the merging cars stay in the merge lane as long as possible. Why squeeze the traffic into fewer lanes any earlier than you have to? Read up on the zipper merge (http://www.dot.state.mn.us/zippermerge/).

      But unfortunately this doesn't work in real life because the people who are already on the highway won't let the 'late mergers' in, because they think they're being assholes and trying to jump ahead in traffic, and this brings the whole thing to a screeching halt. Though this really only applies in heavy, slow-moving traffic. If the cars on the highway are moving pretty well, then it's probably best to merge whenever you have the best opportunity.

    238. Re:Whats the difference... by rant64 · · Score: 1

      I've sincerely run out of patience with apathy and inattention

      This. But there's nothing legal you can do about it.

    239. Re:Whats the difference... by AF_Cheddar_Head · · Score: 1

      Most places with the stop signs/red lights at the bottom of the ramp have enough space to accelerate into traffic. I have been behind move than a few drivers that stop again at the end of the acceleration lane because they didn't identify the gap and accelerate to match speeds GRRR.

    240. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay. Driver's Ed refresher.

      For those of you who weren't paying attention, the left lane (In the US/Canada) is the express lane and the right lane is the LOCAL lane.

      To clarify this, the farther you are traveling, the further to the left you should go.

      On a two lane highway that means that if you are not within 2 miles of your destination you should be in the left lane, but if you have just merged or if you are under two miles from your exit you should be in the RIGHT lane.

      On a 3 lane interstate, treat the middle lane as the in-city lane and the left lanes at intercity. You shouldn't be in the far left lane if you are exiting in the city through which you are passing.

      More than 3 lanes, the far left lane should always be reserved fr people who do not need to see the city. Period. If you are traveling from LA to NYC and going through Chicago, the far left lane is for you.

      This has saved me years in commutes and intercity travel.

    241. Re:Whats the difference... by agallagh42 · · Score: 1

      What you just wrote has absolutely no basis in law in any jurisdiction of Canada or USA that I've ever heard of.

      --
      Carpe Cerevisi - Seize the Beer
    242. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The second situation is commonly called "driving around Boston".

      - T

    243. Re:Whats the difference... by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      Interesting how median household income has increased by about 70% in 20 years

      And adjust that for inflation and no one in the middle has seen a raise in over 10 years.

    244. Re:Whats the difference... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Actually, since I don't tailgate, the main reason I have it is assholes cutting in in front of me and hitting the breaks like there is no tomorrow. A very much enjoyed pastime by some who like to milk your insurance (and drive your insurance premium through the roof at the same time).

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    245. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why you don't dawdle around at 60, instead just pass everybody to get out of the way of the morons.

    246. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two Thumbs Up!!!!

    247. Re:Whats the difference... by bluetoad · · Score: 1

      I'm not one of those assholes who runs up to the end of an on ramp and then tries to get on, I try at the earliest point I can.

      Bear in mind that if merging early might seem polite. However, it will put multiple points of insertion in queue. So someone merges at the end, everyone behind does slow down a small amount. Someone merges 3 cars behind, cars after that point have now slowed down by 2 increments etc. The slowdown is made worse by some people who need to immediately maintain a huge gap when someone merges in front of them. The correct thing to do is have 1 merging point and cars go one for one. And no clowns should speed up and break the system cutting people off. Not slowing the traffic down is the politest thing you can do.

    248. Re:Whats the difference... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Those giant $65,000 trucks are.

    249. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is actually a legal requirement that you must not travel in the passing lane if you are not actively passing someone. Going the speed limit is irrelevant.

      Depending on your jurisdiction, this is incorrect. In most states, you must move over if you're driving slower than normal traffic, even if that's faster than the posted speed limit. Only some states follow the rule you state.

      http://jalopnik.com/5501615/left+lane-passing-laws-a-state+by+state-map

    250. Re:Whats the difference... by gottabeme · · Score: 1

      Your assertions are full of false dilemmas and hasty generalizations.

      1. Just because someone is driving at the speed limit in the left lane does not mean he cannot move to the right lane to let faster cars pass in the left lane.

      2. There are situations in which it is completely reasonable to drive in the left lane even if not passing other cars, such as a) poor road condition in the right lane; b) an urban area with many on- and off-ramps and lots of merging traffic, when the driver is passing straight through; c) a right lane that is too crowded to maintain safe following distance (3 seconds minimum for average cars, 5+ recommended, or even more required for heavier vehicles).

      3. Then there are times on the Interstate when I'm going 3-5 mph over the speed limit in the left lane, passing cars in the right lane, sometimes in order to get to a place in traffic where I can drive in the right lane at the speed limit and maintain safe following distance. Then drivers who want to drive 7-10+ mph over the speed limit come up and tailgate me until I can safely drive in the right lane. (I'm not talking about urban rush hour traffic where everyone in a lane drives far over the speed limit.) In this case, my options are to a) maintain my speed until I can drive safely in the right lane; b) increase my speed to far above the speed limit to avoid being tailgated (tailgating being unsafe for all drivers on the road, as it removes any margin for error if an evasive maneuver or hard braking were suddenly required), which doesn't guarantee that the driver won't simply speed up as much as I do; or c) merge into the right lane in an unsafe spot in traffic. In this situation, I feel no obligation to get out of the way of a driver who insists on exceeding the speed limit by 2-3 times more than I already am, and I refuse to put drivers in the right lane in an unsafe situation and require them to brake, which cascades backwards.

      This situation happens over and over every time I make a trip on the Interstate, because there are fundamentally two types of drivers: those who are aware and those who are oblivious--or those who are safe and those who are unsafe.

      There are plenty of oblivious drivers who will cruise in the right lane at unsafe following distances--I refuse to do that. There are also plenty of oblivious drivers who will always drive faster than the car ahead until they start to tailgate them, regardless of the speed limit or the other car's speed; these drivers can also be recognized by their tendency to not even see cars ahead of them until within about a hundred feet, and their refusal to move into the passing lane until very close to the car ahead, even when the left lane is empty as far as the eye can see.

      Then there are drivers who are aware of traffic and of safe following distances, who avoid being trapped or surrounded by other traffic, who try to not be in such situations for longer than necessary, and who refuse to put other drivers at additional risk. Sometimes driving this way means inconveniencing oblivious drivers of the second kind. Too bad--they're already inconveniencing other drivers by their lack of awareness and self-important attitudes.

      --
      "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
    251. Re:Whats the difference... by gottabeme · · Score: 1

      That is not the cause of backups. The cause of backups is failure to maintain safe following distance. This requires people to slow down by more mph and more rapidly, which cascades backwards--rather than slowing slightly for a few seconds long before safety is compromised.

      The solution is for the drivers who insist on driving so fast to maintain safe following distance at all times, and only pass when it's safe to do so--rather than tailgating the "slow" car and cutting off drivers in other lanes in order to pass. Of course, they won't.

      Try this: next time you hit a traffic jam, keep some distance from the car ahead, and come to a stop as rarely as possible, increasing and decreasing speed gradually. This will let other cars merge into your lane easily, and prevent cars behind you from having to stop. You won't be able to see it, but you'll be helping to reduce the jam effect behind you. (You'll even be being green, because stopping and starting burns more fuel.)

      --
      "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
    252. Re:Whats the difference... by gottabeme · · Score: 1

      The speed limit is a speed limit. If there is a minimum speed, it will also be posted, under the speed limit.

      Or would you have the police detain drivers for not violating the law? Regardless of whether it's polite, it doesn't make it illegal.

      --
      "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
    253. Re:Whats the difference... by gottabeme · · Score: 1

      Hasty generalization there, but so are most of the posts about the law, since the law varies by jurisdiction, making most of these arguments moot.

      Situation: car in right lane whose speed varies from +2 to -2 relative to the speed limit. Car in left lane driving speed limit in attempt to pass car in right lane. Another car in left lane, whose driver is impatient, wants to drive +10, and who is tailgating the car ahead.

      Who's violating the law?
      Who's violating the spirit of the law?
      Who's driving safely?
      Who's driving unsafely?
      Who's being polite?
      Who's being impolite?
      Who, if anyone, should be pulled over by police?

      The only real solution is for cars to be locked to the same speed and minimum following distances, with accurate measurements that don't vary by car. Even if this were technically possible, and I suppose it would be if money were no object, it would impinge on individual freedoms. No, thanks.

      The real problem is people. People are selfish and don't have respect for the dangers inherent in driving. They think they are more important than other drivers, and that an accident won't happen to them.

      And you can't fix stupid.

      (Or you could seriously crack down on unsafe driving, but then who'd still be on the road?)

      --
      "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
    254. Re:Whats the difference... by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but you are mistaken. The primary cause of backups on most of the roads I drive are more cars on the road than its carrying capacity, when cars travel at a slower speed it reduces the carrying capacity of the road.


      BTW driving the way you suggest on the roads I drive will further slow down traffic as it will cause cars in the other lane to believe that they can gain something by changing lanes into my lane, meaning that I will have to slow down even further to allow sufficient space between me and the car which just merged in front of me...repeated by the next car in line as soon as the gap opens up enough for them to perceive the same thing. I am familiar with the principle which you speak of, it works on roads with moderate traffic, but when traffic is travelling at 15 miles an hour on a road designed for 75 mph speeds it does not work.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    255. Re:Whats the difference... by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      In the story you tell, the car attempting to pass should speed up a few miles an hour over the speed limit in order to get in front of the car in the right lane whose speed is varying. However, the guy tailgating him is the most in the wrong in this situation. It would be acceptable for the guy who wants to go faster to close the gap as he approaches the car in the left lane until he is just barely tailgating, then slow down to a safe following distance. By following that he communicates to the car in front of him that he desires to go faster, but is not rude about it. Of course if you are the car in front you should understand that while you are in the left lane, this guy is likely to drift up closer than you are comfortable with just because his "set" speed is faster than yours and it is hard to reset your default speed (I am assuming that the situation is one where it is not immediately obvious that setting a new cruise control speed is in order). However, unless he is rude it will not quite enter into the tailgating distance after the initial approach (and even then just barely). In the situation you described, usually the driver most at fault is the one in the right lane whose speed is drifting up and down. Usually someone who is doing that tends to speed up as someone comes into their peripheral vision and then slows down again once the other vehicle drops out of their peripheral vision. This is not conscious, but one should be aware enough of their surroundings and speed to notice when they are doing it and slow down slightly until the car passes (or if you realize that the car is passing because you slowed down below your intended speed, speed up slightly above intended speed until it becomes obvious to the person attempting to pass that you are going faster than they wish to go). The problem with the speed up solution is that people have a tendency that once they start passing someone they unconsciously speed up to continue the overtake and pass.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    256. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh I don't know, I do this all the time and it's usually because the other driver is being inconsiderate/not paying attention. I pay attention to the room I have around me. If I see 1.5-2 car lengths, I put my turn signal on and give the person 10 full seconds to slow down and let me in. Many times, they just sit there drooling on their own knees refusing to give me room to get over (and this is usually when I'm trying to get over to an exit, not when trying to pass a person). So yes, I WILL pull in front of you and force you to break, and I do consider it your fault if you had better things to do than notice the turn signal I had going for 10-20 seconds before getting over.

    257. Re:Whats the difference... by gottabeme · · Score: 1

      It's never acceptable to tailgate, even to send a signal that you want to pass. A simple flash of the headlights is safe and effective. A driver could need to swerve or slam on the brakes at any moment. Impatience is no excuse for not maintaining safe following distance. Repeat after me: it's never acceptable to tailgate.

      --
      "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
    258. Re:Whats the difference... by gottabeme · · Score: 1

      Carrying capacity is just a fancy way of saying that people are stupid and impatient. If people maintained safe following distance, traffic could always flow smoothly, regardless of speed or the number of cars. Backups happen when ONE car has to slow down so much that the car behind him does, and so on--it ripples backward like ripples in a pond. This usually happens when either a) a car has to merge into an adjacent lane, and the driver in the lane did not leave sufficient room; or b) when there's an accident and people slow down to rubberneck. Even when an accident requires closing a lane, it COULD happen smoothly, but what happens is that cars in the closed lane wait until the last second to merge so they can be "in front", and when they can't merge they end up having to come to a stop, which ripples backward down the lane. Then cars in the open lane have to slow down or stop to let cars in the closed lane merge, and voila, traffic jam in both lanes.

      It's all about human impatience and stupidity. When cars maintain safe following distance, it's possible to merge without forcing other cars to slow down enough to cause a jam. The problem is that a tiny fraction of drivers actually do this because, again, people are impatient and stupid.

      --
      "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
    259. Re:Whats the difference... by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      If the carrying capacity of a highway is 100 cars (that is there is room on that highway for 100 cars between exit A and exit B), and there are 100 cars on the road, then if another car attempts to get on the highway at exit A, there will be a backup. Look at a road sometime. You will notice that there is a finite amount of space on that road. That means that there is a finite number of cars that will fit onto that road. If the number of cars that attempt to get onto that road exceeds that number, there will be a backup even if everybody maintains a safe following distance. One thing that effects the carrying capacity of a road is how long cars stay on the road. The faster cars leave the road, the more cars that can use the road in a given time frame.
      While it is true that people following cars in front of them too closely can cause a backup on a highway that has not reached carrying capacity, most of the roads where I experience backups are operating at their carrying capacity (and there are more cars that want to get onto them).

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    260. Re:Whats the difference... by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Damnit, Emacs!

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    261. Re:Whats the difference... by VisceralLogic · · Score: 1

      Ha ha, you got me! Sometimes I have a different user name.

      --
      Stop! Dremel time!
    262. Re:Whats the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you see that someone is trying to merge, you should increase the gap with the car in front of you so he doesn't have to pull a stunt like that.

      Obviously you've never driven in California. I used to do that and give me the requsite 3 car-lengths, and three people will do it instead of one. I always say that the only thing you'll win in a race on the freeway is a tombstone. /me leaving on time, driving in the slowlane going 60 and fuckyou.

    263. Re:Whats the difference... by bkcallahan · · Score: 1

      You're thinking of traffic metering, probably. I'm talking about a red fucking stop sign, ~20 feet from the merge point/paint. Unbelievable, really.

    264. Re:Whats the difference... by AF_Cheddar_Head · · Score: 1

      Your right I am thinking of traffic metering. The traffic engineer that put the stop sign there probably should be shot, though it sounds like Honolulu which doesn't seem to have any acceleration lanes on the H-1 downtown. I guess the land to build them was just too expensive.

  4. audi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    that's why i drive an audi.

    1. Re:audi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you a Saudi?

    2. Re:audi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, so you already knew this?

      You could have made enough money selling that information to get yourself a real nice car.

    3. Re:audi by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Or are you rowdy?

      (Ow-Di versus Aw-Di)

    4. Re:audi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's why i drive an audi.

      No, you drive a rebranded Volkswagen with some parts produced by Skoda and finished-off with a heathly dollop of smugness.

      Much like Bentleys these days: chassis is the VW Phaeton and the body is made by Skoda.

  5. Where's the insurance industry? by ip_freely_2000 · · Score: 1

    They're on the hook to replace these cars....and I'd be making damn sure my customers didn't buy another BMW they'd have to pay out on again.

    1. Re:Where's the insurance industry? by Insightfill · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ah, but will the insurance companies deny these claims like they have in the past?

  6. Club by magarity · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sounds like BMW owners are going to make a run on Pep Boys to get "the club".

    1. Re:Club by avandesande · · Score: 4, Informative

      Steering wheels are a thin steel hoop enclosed in foam you can hacksaw through them in less than a minute.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    2. Re:Club by santiagoanders · · Score: 1

      Similar principles apply when locking your bicycle. Always lock it to something at least as difficult to cut as your bicycle lock/chain.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_iI3rctM0Dw

      --
      "There can be little doubt that union activities lead to continuous and progressive inflation." F. A. Hayek
    3. Re:Club by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

      That's not the point, same way as house locks and the Kensington lock on a laptop doesn't offer any real security. If somebody wants *your* car/house/laptop, you need much substantially stronger security to keep them out. But most thefts are crimes of opportunity, and it is sufficient to make it more of a hassle than something else, whether it's another theft or walking home instead of stealing a ride and driving. Steering-wheel locks and Kensington locks have a secondary purpose, which is to force the thief to damage the item in a way only stolen property would be. A meth head can't sell a stolen laptop with a busted kensington slot; no pawn shop or even quasi-reputable dealer will take it.

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    4. Re:Club by avandesande · · Score: 1

      Opportunists aren't going to be hacking into a BMW either, which is what the article is about. I would agree that a club has some preventive value....

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    5. Re:Club by avandesande · · Score: 2

      Another is to never lock a door on a convertible, if someone cuts through the roof to get inside the cost will be much more than anything they could have stolen.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    6. Re:Club by Jeng · · Score: 1

      Lets see them saw through this.

      http://www.spyworld.net/AutoTaser.htm

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    7. Re:Club by Translation+Error · · Score: 3, Informative
      Actually, The Club may not be very useful against professional thieves. From Jim Burns, a former Chrysler engineer (source):

      At some point, the Club was mentioned. The professional thieves laughed and exchanged knowing glances. What we knew was that the Club is a hardened steel device that attaches to the steering wheel and the brake pedal to prevent steering and/or braking. What we found out was that a pro thief would carry a short piece of a hacksaw blade to cut through the plastic steering wheel in a couple seconds. They were then able to release The Club and use it to apply a huge amount of torque to the steering wheel and break the lock on the steering column (which most cars were already equipped with). The pro thieves actually sought out cars with The Club on them because they didn't want to carry a long pry bar that was too hard to conceal.

      --
      When someone says, "Any fool can see ..." they're usually exactly right.
    8. Re:Club by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2

      I used to own a ragtop convertible and could never feel ok with that lifestyle. it makes some sense to leave your doors unlocked and try to 'save the top' but you also have to leave nothing of value, ever, in the car. its just too limiting. sold the car. hassle factor too high.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    9. Re:Club by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I always use the break pedal lock models myself.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    10. Re:Club by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      You assume that the thief is observant enough to notice that the vehicle is unlocked.

      In any case, you can fix the roof with duct tape.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    11. Re:Club by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      The what? You just break the brake pedals off? Sounds expensive.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    12. Re:Club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can remove it even quicker with a hammer and a screwdriver.

      http://www.ehow.com/how-does_4795901_club-steering-wheel-lock-device.html

  7. That's an improvement... by tompaulco · · Score: 1

    That's an improvement over traditional locks, which can be defeated in 60 seconds, at least according to Driver's Ed class, and of course, the movie.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    1. Re:That's an improvement... by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      I believe it. Having broken into my own car, and friends cars, it took me a lot longer, but ive seen an experienced person open a car door with a slim jim (not recomended on newer cars with air bags in the door)...its fast. (I have also seen them fumble and nearly fail....)

      Hell a friend of mine that used to steal cars when he was younger locked himself out of his... and I had to help him break into it, with hardly any tools in sight. Took us nearly an hour and, in the end, we used a long stick (yes stick, like off a tree) to hit the door open button, through a crack we wedged open in the door jam with other sticks.

      Once you are inside well.... its just a matter of popping out the ignition lock cylinder with a screw driver on many cars (I know a few that wont work at all on...like my old buick that basically had a resistor built into the key that it would read)

      So the vast majority of cars are... a bit easier to steal than these BMWs.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    2. Re:That's an improvement... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got locked out of my vehicle a few months ago. The tow truck driver slid an inflatable plastic bladder in between the window and top of the door. He then pumped in some air, which gave him about a 2" gap that he could easily slide a flexible rod into and hit the unlock button. Took just over a minute, just because he kept missing the unlock button.

    3. Re:That's an improvement... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      My 22 year old Cadillac has a telemetry key they costs $US80 to copy.

      I'm sure 20 years ago professional car thieves could steel it (I think they brought a new lock, key and matching engine computer). Now the pros won't touch it. Amateurs never could get them.

      As the convertible top costs $US1000 I leave the doors unlocked at all times and never leave anything worth steeling in it.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    4. Re:That's an improvement... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI- Cars don't usually have airbags in the door. The side airbags are in the front seats and the side curtain airbags are in the roof.

      There's still plenty of things you can mess up inside a door with a poorly-wielded slim jim, but an airbag is not one of them.

    5. Re:That's an improvement... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Locks on Cars, Homes... Are not the end all be all in Securing your property. They are there to keep the "honest, honest".
      You are parked in a parking lot. you have your doors unlocked. Someone who is not really planning a crime, sees your car, attracted to it. Lifts up the handle and gets in. They can take the radio, or whatever, not a big deal. If the door is locked. They don't have the tools to get in without being noticed so they go back to their life.

      I had my car broken into. They wanted my (10 year old GPS). My doors were locked. They used a screw driver or a hammer and broke the window and got in. The doors were still locked when I found my car was broken in. The person really wanted to get into my car, so they did.

      Being that it will take a hacker 3 minutes to break in. Is really no big deal. If I really wanted to take you car, I can just break the window. Without any expensive electronics.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    6. Re:That's an improvement... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, hate to be a grammar nazi, but you mean stealing, as in, to take that which is not yours without permission. Steeling would be the process of making steel... This post hurt me to read...

    7. Re:That's an improvement... by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Locksmiths have a book that show exactly how to open various cars. It's precise enough to show where to put the wedges (placed between the window and the outside window seal), where and how deep to put the slim jim, and which way to move it.

          A friend of mine has locked herself out of her car several times. I happen to have an almost identical car, so if it were to happen, I could pop my door open in 3 to 30 seconds.

          In a lot of cars, the electric lock buttons don't work if the alarm is set (doors locked with the remote). Our cars both require the resister key, so I haven't bothered to try to pick the ignition lock.

          From what I understand, the door locks are difficult to pick, so I haven't bothered trying. I can open a house lock in about 5 seconds. The same for cheap to mid grade cash boxes and low end consumer "safes". The first cash box I had to pick was in middle school. The teacher lost the key, so I volunteered to open it with a paperclip. I spent more time straightening the paper clip, and breaking it into two pieces, than I spent opening the lock.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    8. Re:That's an improvement... by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      Once you are inside well.... its just a matter of popping out the ignition lock cylinder with a screw driver on many cars (I know a few that wont work at all on...like my old buick that basically had a resistor built into the key that it would read)

      So the vast majority of cars are... a bit easier to steal than these BMWs.

      Not to be pedantic but there is a very simple, very effective measure: RFID chipped key + Keyless Entry. The keyless radio uses an encrypted rolling code that has proven exceptionally difficult to crack (it's been in use for decades and there are no major weaknesses even close to as serious as this ODBC one). Lock the car with the keyless and the computer completely refuses to do anything until its been unlocked again. RFID prox in the key means that even if you forget to lock it, or someone pulls the battery cord to reset the state, the computer still wont do anything until it senses the right key placed next to the ignition column. Again, proven very strong from a brute force or exploit standpoint.

      And the price for this sophistication? Most respectable auto makers (like Honda) have been putting them on EVERY car they sell with power locks, for over a decade. Car theft statistics bear this out, the most commonly stolen cars are ones without this system in place, and models that have this feature standard are almost never "conventionally" stolen (as in, glass busted, ignition hotwired, and driven away.)

    9. Re:That's an improvement... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Steeling would be the process of making steel..."

      Or bracing, as in "Steel yourself" = "Brace yourself".

    10. Re:That's an improvement... by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Locks on Cars, Homes... Are not the end all be all in Securing your property. They are there to keep the "honest, honest". You are parked in a parking lot. you have your doors unlocked. Someone who is not really planning a crime, sees your car, attracted to it. Lifts up the handle and gets in.
      Anyone who would steal something that belongs to someone else just because it was left unlocked doesn't belong in our society. I could walk by a convertible with the top down, a purse on the floor and a bag of money in the seat and I would not even CONSIDER taking anything.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    11. Re:That's an improvement... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Anything that causes pain to grammarian is good by me.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    12. Re:That's an improvement... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone who would steal something that belongs to someone else just because it was left unlocked doesn't belong in our society. I could walk by a convertible with the top down, a purse on the floor and a bag of money in the seat and I would not even CONSIDER taking anything.

      Good for you! Here's your cookie!

      Now then, glad you can judge what people do and don't belong in society. Whoopsie! Turns out the ones who don't belong in society ARE in society! Right now, in fact! What now, smart guy?

    13. Re:That's an improvement... by Cramer · · Score: 1

      Yes, this is called an immobilizer. It is COMPLETELY USELESS if you can get to the OBD port to program a new key. THIS is the problem with the idiot BMW... it's trivial to program a new key. Plus the other levels of stupid before you even get there... breaking a window doesn't set off the alarm!!!

      (BTW, US OBD-II standards require the port be unpowered until the ignition is turned on.)

    14. Re:That's an improvement... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... but ive seen an experienced person open a car door with a slim jim...

      That's must have been pretty cool to see someone break into a a car using this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQjdHUX2T4c

    15. Re:That's an improvement... by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Interesting. Especially since the source of this information was a police officer who was wielding a slim jim. In fact, he stated that it was against department policy to slim jim open cars for people (though they still carry the slim jim in the cruiser), becasuse, he claimed, that several officers have been seriously injured by setting off side skirt airbags in car doors.

      He opened the door anyway, after asking if the car had such air bags (it didn't).

      In fact, I was told this by multiple cops. The second one, campus police at the school where I worked, later on, was more amusing. He pulled out his slim jim and said that it was against policy for him to do it (for the same reason) but, that if I wanted to try, I could.

      As I was taking him up on this, I thought if the keys are in the car, maybe we can see them, since there is little point to opening the door without the keys anyway. He agreed that this was true and tried to see in with his flashlight. He was unable to see the floor very well, though, and immediately grabbed the slim jim from my hands and popped the door open in about 2 seconds.

      So much for policy.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    16. Re:That's an improvement... by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      I often wonder things like.... ok this clearly could deter theieves, but.... what about legitimate owners?

      This is not a theoretical problem. Notice I mention how my old buick had a resistor in the key blank? well there were 20 key blanks, each with different values. How do I know this? Because I lost my only copy of the key!

      Not only that, but GM had no record of my car being fitted with a security system so the local shop had no clue which of the 20 blanks it was... and there was a lockout after a couple of tries. Took them about 2 days to find the right key blank.

      So I have to wonder, if you add up all the incidents of legitimate owners locked out of their cars, time and money etc, how does that inconvinenece compare to all of the incidents of stolen cars? Do these actually save people time and money in the aggregate or cost them even more?

      I lose the key to an older car, its a few bucks to fix. My Jetta has a "security key", and they soak you for over $300 when you need a new one (which of course has to be activated).

      Clearly having a car stolen can cost more, and even be more of an inconvenience, However, its so much less likely to happen than lost keys (can't comment on other failures).... that I do have to wonder if these things actually pay off.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    17. Re:That's an improvement... by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

      Not really. Traditional locks combined with electronics made the thief had to circumvent 2 problems. Especially on 10 year old European cars, ignition barrels weren't very easy and could well take over 10 minutes to "crack". If you had to do that and replace a computer, you'd be looking at 10+ minutes exposed. This is a less than 3 minute job with no damage to the car at all and nothing showing to the police that the driver had just stolen the car.

      --
      I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
    18. Re:That's an improvement... by Cramer · · Score: 1

      Simple answer... don't lose your g** d*** $300 key.

      That $300 is supposed to be a deterrent to losing the key. It also means thieves are much less likely to go that route to boost a car -- 'tho it's a popular hollywood plot device. Also, the key adaption process is complex -- and on modern makes requires access to a database at the manufacturer.

      If any idiot with a file can make a key for your car, then any idiot can drive away in your car. (I've seen a repo man cut a key for a truck in under 30s.) These electronic anti-theft devices are *supposed* to make it harder to walk off with someone's car. BMW has obviously failed in every way here.

    19. Re:That's an improvement... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      It's not so much a grammar problem as just choosing the wrong words. You might as well turn your post into a mad lib.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    20. Re:That's an improvement... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see how that even addresses the question, much less answers it. Its more like telling the person comparing auto insurance plans that he should just not get in an accident. Nice for an individual but, totally misses the forest for the trees.

      As has been pointed out countless times, the primary purpose of the vast majority of locks is simply to convince opportunists to look for an easier target. There is little point in overdoing security, since security never buys you anything, it is, at its absolute best, insurance against larger costs. It doesn't make sense to spend more on security than what you are protecting is worth, its never going to pay off.

      So the cost of lost keys, which will happen, could, in the aggregate, actually cost people more than all of the thefts that would have been prevented...just by it happening more often.

      Of course, there is also the question of why adding rfid and a little cutout circuitry/code justifies a $300/key cost....aside from...it really being more scam to charge people for new keys than actual protection. Does the protection justify the cost? Or does the cost nullify the benefit?

    21. Re:That's an improvement... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      There are a lot of people out there. A lot of them who are overall a benefit to society, however there is a fair number of people who has not developed the "Super Ego" so they when they see the purse in the convertible, they don't think. That isn't mine, so I should leave it alone, besides I know how I would feel if someone took my money. They think more of the lines, look at that Rube, she left her money wide open, she deserves to get it stolen, if it isn't by me, then by someone else, and I really would like the money for myself.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    22. Re:That's an improvement... by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Any tips on appropriate literature?

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    23. Re:That's an improvement... by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          I don't have any of the books. I learned the hard way (trial and error). Having taken plenty of car doors apart for various reasons (replacing speakers, window motors, door handles), I already know how the inside of the door of a variety of cars look.

          A quick Google search turned up this.. The National Locksmith - Auto Lock Manual . I don't personally know anything about that book, so it may be worthless.

          You can always take a locksmith course, and/or ask a local locksmith.

          And there's always info online. I know on one car I have, the books say to use a slim jim in one spot. People online say to use a coat hanger in another spot. Both work just as effectively. On that car, I'm happy with the knowledge that the alarm will go off as soon as you pop the lock, and it will take at least a minute to silence the alarm. If you don't silence the alarm with the key fob, you won't start the engine. Without the right key, you won't be driving it anywhere anyways. The ECM simply won't let the engine run. It won't let the fuel injectors, nor ignition work. You can always bypass the starter, but it will only crank, not run.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  8. Not quite as bad as the Summary seems by DigitalSorceress · · Score: 5, Informative

    I own a MINI with a keyless entry system ... MINI is made by BMW these days, so I was a bit concerned.

    My first vision was "Yikes - someone either grabs my signal out of the air or else they have some 'rainbow box' that tries a bunch of freqs/combos really fast so they can essentially walk up to my car, get in, and go."

    Turns out they have to break your window and connect to your OBD port... This sucks, but to my mind, it's not a whole lot of difference between that and breaking the window then hot-wiring the car. ... If they could just walk up and get in and drive away as if they had the valid key, I'd be a lot more concerned. ... checks insurance policy ... at least I've got theft insurance.

    --

    The Digital Sorceress
    1. Re:Not quite as bad as the Summary seems by Alex+Zepeda · · Score: 1

      On the older 3 series (E46) the driver's door lock was super easy to pick because of sloppy tolerances (apparently about 700EUR will buy you the tools you need to do it in a few seconds). Picking the lock is, of course, a lot more subtle than breaking a window... and will typically disarm the alarm too.

      --
      The revolution will be mocked
    2. Re:Not quite as bad as the Summary seems by LordNimon · · Score: 1

      You're paying extra for a security system that's supposed to be better than hot-wiring a car, so I don't understand why you're not concerned.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    3. Re:Not quite as bad as the Summary seems by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      This sucks, but to my mind, it's not a whole lot of difference between that and breaking the window then hot-wiring the car.

      The ECU/ECM controls all engine functions. If it doesn't give the go ahead, your car won't run, no matter how many wires are cut apart or spliced together.

      You don't hotwire modern cars.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    4. Re:Not quite as bad as the Summary seems by westlake · · Score: 1

      Turns out they have to break your window and connect to your OBD port... This sucks, but to my mind, it's not a whole lot of difference between that and breaking the window then hot-wiring the car. ...

      True and, in the real world, a lot can happen in three minutes.

    5. Re:Not quite as bad as the Summary seems by shadowrat · · Score: 1

      You're paying extra for a security system that's supposed to be better than hot-wiring a car

      I could have sworn you were just paying extra for a name.

    6. Re:Not quite as bad as the Summary seems by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      No offense, as I'm sure you love your Mini, but nobody is going to spend 3 minutes trying to steal it. There just isn't enough payout for the effort and risk. A real BMW, however, would be well worth it.

      Your comment is either terribly ignorant or designed to cause offense, because the Honda Civic is the most stolen car (and the Accord is #2, down one spot from the last time I looked.) If it's worth stealing a Civic, it's worth stealing a Mini.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Not quite as bad as the Summary seems by citizenr · · Score: 2

      This sucks, but to my mind, it's not a whole lot of difference between that and breaking the window then hot-wiring the car.

      The ECU/ECM controls all engine functions. If it doesn't give the go ahead, your car won't run, no matter how many wires are cut apart or spliced together.

      You don't hotwire modern cars.

      You swap car computer and drive off.

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    8. Re:Not quite as bad as the Summary seems by Idbar · · Score: 1

      I checked the video. Am I confused? But they took about 2 minutes to open the freaking car, then they push it out of the driveway. Probably the same time it takes to do that with any other car. So afterwards, they do a bunch of stuff, and they get the car going? Just like... wait... any other stolen car?

      I'm not a BMW fan, but this doesn't sound like news. What really pisses me off is that I no different, I drive a Toyota and they charged me $500 for a replacement key, that certainly doesn't seem to add much up to the security.

    9. Re:Not quite as bad as the Summary seems by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      You're kidding, right? The Mini has far more cars on the road than the higher-end BMWs, so its parts are far more valuable. High-end BMW owners don't buy possibly-stolen parts (like off Ebay or Craigslist), they go to the dealership to get all their service for $$$$. Mini owners are much more likely to do their own work with parts bought on the secondhand market.

      This is the same reason that Hondas topped the most-stolen car lists for many, many years; lots of people had them, lots of their owners worked on them (even swapping engines and the like), so the parts were valuable.

      What the heck is someone going to do with a stolen $80k BMW anyway? They can't register it and get valid tags. They can't strip it and sell it for parts for the reasons above. They might just joyride in it, but the best they can do is ship it to South America and resell it there. Most cars stolen in this country are stolen for their parts, not to ship to 3rd world countries where there's no law enforcement WRT stolen cars, which is why you never see really high-end cars place very high on the stolen-cars lists.

      If you think stealing a Mini "isn't worth it", you're a moron (though honestly, a Honda Civic or these days a Hyundai would be a better choice).

    10. Re:Not quite as bad as the Summary seems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You assume that the sticker price of the car has something to do with it's value when stolen. I'd content that the ability to sell the stolen car or parts are what determines how much it's stolen. The top 3 cars are also very very popular cars, meaning there's a lot of demand for parts, and for the car itself. A mini is both not terribly expensive, and rare.

      Unless you have some insider knowledge about why people steal which car, and the value of stolen cars, my theory is just as plausible as yours.

    11. Re:Not quite as bad as the Summary seems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Turns out they have to break your window and connect to your OBD port... This sucks, but to my mind, it's not a whole lot of difference between that and breaking the window then hot-wiring the car. ... If they could just walk up and get in and drive away as if they had the valid key, I'd be a lot more concerned. ... checks insurance policy ... at least I've got theft insurance.

      Until they figure out how to bypass the keyless door locks, which has happened with other manufacturers.

    12. Re:Not quite as bad as the Summary seems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In most vehicles, the ECU & several other parts are coded with the VIN. If the ECU, the ABS system, the Airbag controller, the transmission module, & the body control modules don't agree on the VIN, the engine won't start. Not impossible to swap all of them, or to re-code a new ECU with the correct IDs, just takes more time/money.

    13. Re:Not quite as bad as the Summary seems by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I'd content that the ability to sell the stolen car or parts are what determines how much it's stolen.

      Yes, that's right, cars are typically stolen to be broken down into parts.

      Unless you have some insider knowledge about why people steal which car, and the value of stolen cars, my theory is just as plausible as yours.

      People steal cars when they're easy and when there's a market for used parts. German parts cost more than Japanese parts, so there's actually more incentive to steal those cars, but the Japanese cars are usually staggeringly easy to steal, except sometimes the luxury marques; they don't just add asphalt, they sometimes add an immobilizer, too.

      My 1986 IROC was stolen in SF. It was found completely stripped, as in, professionally. They recovered only the body. It wasn't exactly a valuable car when it happened, but the parts are worth money, so away it went.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re:Not quite as bad as the Summary seems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> I could have sworn you were just paying extra for a name.

      You are. BWM == Oldsmobile

    15. Re:Not quite as bad as the Summary seems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why on earth would picking the lock disable an alarm???
      Alarms will go even nuts if the lock solenoids stop working (can't lock when you push the button).

    16. Re:Not quite as bad as the Summary seems by v1 · · Score: 1

      The ECU/ECM controls all engine functions. If it doesn't give the go ahead, your car won't run, no matter how many wires are cut apart or spliced together.

      Watch the video that the OP links to. They hotwired it to silence the alarm. Then they pushed it out of frame, probably chained it to another car or maybe even winched it up on a flatbed after that. They'll muck with the ECU lock when they get it back to the chop shop and can take their time.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    17. Re:Not quite as bad as the Summary seems by guisar · · Score: 1

      I don't know about Minis but the "good" news about BMWs (IMHO) is that it's pretty likely the door solenoid is broken and the door won't open even if it's unlocked. Once you get past that, it's pretty likely there will be some other electrical or mechanical fault which prevents the thief from taking off. Long gone are the days when German "engineering" implied reliability- I've owned BMW or Mercedes since 1978 but every model I've owned which was built since 1997 has been COMPLETE shit- very, very unreliable primarily because of electrical issues. I'd say German cars are the British cars of the new decade.

    18. Re:Not quite as bad as the Summary seems by NJRoadfan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ...and even if you have theft insurance, be prepared to fight. Some insurers have this bright idea that since you car has an immobilizer security system that its impossible to steal. They apparently hasn't heard of the low tech method of using flat bed tow trucks to take cars off of the street. Most high end cars are stolen around here using a flat bed. Once they have the car, they then crack the immobilizer system at their convenience, re-key/re-code the car, and ship them off to Eastern Europe or South America.

    19. Re:Not quite as bad as the Summary seems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ship it over-seas to waiting buyers.

    20. Re:Not quite as bad as the Summary seems by icebike · · Score: 1

      because the Honda Civic is the most stolen car [msn.com] (and the Accord is #2, down one spot from the last time I looked.)

      Your story was from 1995.
      If we are going to quote yesterdays obsolete news, can we at least keep it from the same century?

      By 2001, the Civic and the Accord had worked their way from the top of the list to about 140th position

      Since then Honda has been working very hard to eliminate this, with coded keys and top notch electronics.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    21. Re:Not quite as bad as the Summary seems by Mysticeti · · Score: 1

      It may depend on the model of the MINI. The Clubman is at the bottom of the list of stolen cars:
        http://usedcars.about.com/od/avoidingproblems/a/Top-10-Least-Stolen-Cars.htm

      The fact that many MINIs have manual transmissions may have something to do with it. Seeing a stick shift might be enough to deter the average punk joy rider.

    22. Re:Not quite as bad as the Summary seems by Mysticeti · · Score: 1

      34% of MINIs are sold with a manual transmission. 50% in New England.

      Citation: http://blogs.insideline.com/roadtests/2011/08/2011-mini-cooper-s-countryman-mini-launches-manualhood-ad-campaign.html

    23. Re:Not quite as bad as the Summary seems by icebike · · Score: 1

      You assume that the sticker price of the car has something to do with it's value when stolen. I'd content that the ability to sell the stolen car or parts are what determines how much it's stolen. The top 3 cars are also very very popular cars, meaning there's a lot of demand for parts, and for the car itself.

      Only expensive cars are stolen for parts.
      Other cars are simply stolen, had the plates switch with some other plates and sold fir dirt cheap to people who don't worry about license and registration.

      The top cars in 2001 (last figures I can find on the net) sorted by Thefts per 1000 Vehicles Produced, is an odd list of cheap and mid range cars. Nothing really expensive shows up till well down the list.

      Like breaking into Operating systems, people go with what is EASY, not what will get them the most money. The high price thefts are the work of professionals, and a lot of those cars leave the country intact, without even being stripped for parts.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    24. Re:Not quite as bad as the Summary seems by Cramer · · Score: 2

      Because you're turning the lock exactly as if the proper key were used. There's no immobilizer loop in the door locks to confirm a proper key is being used.

    25. Re:Not quite as bad as the Summary seems by icebike · · Score: 1

      The ECU/ECM controls all engine functions. If it doesn't give the go ahead, your car won't run, no matter how many wires are cut apart or spliced together.

      Watch the video that the OP links to. They hotwired it to silence the alarm. Then they pushed it out of frame, probably chained it to another car or maybe even winched it up on a flatbed after that. They'll muck with the ECU lock when they get it back to the chop shop and can take their time.

      Exactly. It was a gang of 4, not a lone Johnny Hotwire.
      They didn't dare try to start it, they simply pushed it away and had a commercial looking flatbed wrecker waiting nearby.
      They weren't even too concerned with covering the cameras even though they knew they were there.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    26. Re:Not quite as bad as the Summary seems by Cramer · · Score: 1

      The parts are worth many times it's showroom sticker price. The engine and transmission are worth a few thousand. (and it doesn't take long at all to drop them. Ask my race team mates how fast they've swapped an engine at the track.)

    27. Re:Not quite as bad as the Summary seems by Cramer · · Score: 2

      They walk up, smash the window, then reach down to the OBD keeping out of sight of the alarm sensors, program their own key, unlock the car (disarms the alarm -- notice the lights flash), get in, push it far enough away noone will hear it start up.

    28. Re:Not quite as bad as the Summary seems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They didn't push the car because they couldn't start it. They pushed the car because they didn't want to wake the owner.

      It isn't clear why they futzed around for two minutes before pushing the car, though. The 1M only comes in manual transmission, so it's not like it was stuck in park until they had a working key. If it was an automatic, they probably would have had needed the key to get it into neutral.

    29. Re:Not quite as bad as the Summary seems by icebike · · Score: 1

      It looks like Honda continues to make improvements.

      From 2001 when the Civic was stolen 1.76 times per vehicle produced, in 2009 it is down to 0.7830 thefts per vehicle produced.
      See http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-10-24/html/2011-27370.htm

      The Top 3 stolen vehicles per vehicles produced are the Audi S8, Shelby G2, and BMW M5. #4 was the Dodge Charger topping the list of what could be called production run cars (production over 50 thousand units).

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    30. Re:Not quite as bad as the Summary seems by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If we are going to quote yesterdays obsolete news, can we at least keep it from the same century?

      Yeah, I'm lazy, so sue me; it still proves the point that people are willing to steal cheap cars. Your correction does prove the point that people also steal the easiest cars, I guess. Immobilizers are becoming more common so auto theft has become, if not more difficult, at least more expensive.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    31. Re:Not quite as bad as the Summary seems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention that on the video, they're rolling it away by pushing - who knows what they did when they got off-camera? They might have just disengaged the transmission interlock (a process *EVERY* car has a manual-no-key-needed override for for towing,) and put it in neutral, then towed it away with another vehicle.

    32. Re:Not quite as bad as the Summary seems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I may be mistaken but what happened to the alarm when the window was broken? This seems to be the gaping hole in security, not the key-less start mechanism.

    33. Re:Not quite as bad as the Summary seems by citizenr · · Score: 1

      In most vehicles, the ECU & several other parts are coded with the VIN. If the ECU, the ABS system, the Airbag controller, the transmission module, & the body control modules don't agree on the VIN, the engine won't start. Not impossible to swap all of them, or to re-code a new ECU with the correct IDs, just takes more time/money.

      Dont know about most, but I read in a paper less than a year ago about few guys with a trunk full of modded car computers they used to do just that - get into a car, swap and drive off.

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    34. Re:Not quite as bad as the Summary seems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does look like that, doesn't it?

      I was confused about apparent nudge in the end of the video too, good explanation!

    35. Re:Not quite as bad as the Summary seems by Inda · · Score: 1

      Those Mini engines can almost be picked up by a single strong man.

      Catalytic converters and alloy wheels are the parts stolen around here. Spare wheels on 4x4s command the largest prices.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
  9. Computer rooted with physical access, news at 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Looks like they're using the ODB port to gain access to the car's computer. No car computer is going to be secure when you've got low level debug port right next to the hood release.

  10. What? by Oxford_Comma_Lover · · Score: 1

    How is stealing a keyless car possible unless they don't bother to spend a few bucks on implementing a good friend-or-foe system? (Which would be much cheaper then what they charge for an electronic "key")

    --
    -- IANAL, this isn't legal advice, and definitely isn't legal advice for you. Also, Squee!
    1. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A friend or foe system would suck, because then you'd always have to go to the dealer to add a key. Better to just do it the same way most cars deal with someone adding a key: set off the alarm.

      If you're doing it, your neighbors hate you, but it's okay. If a thief is doing it, you just sleep through it like every other time your alarm goes off.

      Seriously, they just need to add a glass break sensor(don't most high end cars have these?) and fix the intrusion sensor blindspot.

    2. Re:What? by Cramer · · Score: 1

      you'd always have to go to the dealer to add a key

      On modern immobilizer systems you have to anyway as the manufacturer is the only one with the security code(s) and the necessary proprietary software. My VW bug is old enough to have that code on the vin key tag.

  11. Luckily.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    cars with keys are never stolen.

  12. Sounds like the old R series by Pope · · Score: 1

    whose ignitions locks were all pretty much the same key. Want someone else's bike? Use your own key and ride away!

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  13. Actual Youtube Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DshK4ZXPU9o

  14. Typical geeks... by gatfirls · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Got the whole OBD hacking figured out but sticking a peice of tape on a camera is a mechanical feat out of their reach.

    1. Re:Typical geeks... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Got the whole OBD hacking figured out but sticking a peice of tape on a camera is a mechanical feat out of their reach.

      Well, they'd have to get up on a ladder and heights make their noses bleed!

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:Typical geeks... by Taibhsear · · Score: 1

      Strange since they touched or blocked each camera at least once. They obviously knew they were there. Which makes me think they might have wanted the owner to know and see what they were doing. Either that or the cameras had some kind of auto-alarm if the signal blacks out for more than a few seconds. /$0.02

  15. Problem and Solution by BronsCon · · Score: 2

    Problem: The OBD-II port, which, by mandate in most countries where it is required, may not have any access controls applied to it, is being used for non-diagnostic purposes

    Solution: Use a separate port with some actual securty measures for any functions you aren't legally required to expose via OBD-II

    Damn, it took me all of 2 seconds to figure that one out, and I'm not a security expert.

    --
    APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    1. Re:Problem and Solution by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      That would require the automakers to have a new tool provisioned, and all the dealers to buy the tool. The tools usually cost the dealers several thousand dollars, because the automakers lack the talent to make their own tool. Or they could just have some decent security before you are allowed to issue any commands you're not required to support by the standard, which would only require a software update to the existing scan tool, which they would distribute to dealers via the internet.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Problem and Solution by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Then they should do this? You go ahead and tear down my solution and say "but this would work much better", but that doesn't disprove my argument, they could and should be doing *something*.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    3. Re:Problem and Solution by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      that doesn't disprove my argument, they could and should be doing *something*.

      I wasn't trying to disprove your argument, I was explaining to you one reason why they wouldn't want or need to add another port. It's also just something else to break, it has to be located somewhere and they're already having to locate the OBD-II port, etc etc.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Problem and Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe make this new interface something standard, like, I dunno, a USB port? Heck, you could even have it do double duty and hook it into the stereo so the car can play MP3s from an MP3 player or the like. Still have a marginal increase in cost in parts, but since the parts are so readily available, I don't think it'd be that big of a deal.

    5. Re:Problem and Solution by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      It's funny, though, that my 2000 Corolla has a separate diagnostics port, for functions not required to be accessible via OBD-II. It can't have cost *that* much if my $15k car included it; it's not too much to ask on a car going for $80+K.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    6. Re:Problem and Solution by gmarsh · · Score: 2

      Actually, the OBD-II specification mandates that you provide a certain set of PIDs without any access restrictions.

      As long as that functionality is there, you can do whatever else you want with the port - including locked down, proprietary things. Pretty much car manufacturer out there does this.

    7. Re:Problem and Solution by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Except BMW, apparently. :P

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    8. Re:Problem and Solution by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Well, leave it to Toyota to complicate the situation unnecessarily. It probably cost Toyota a hell of a lot to do that, given how many Corollas they sell. I wouldn't be surprised if someone got sacked over that. Since BMW isn't liable for your car being stolen due to crappy security, I doubt anyone will get sacked over this :p

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:Problem and Solution by NJRoadfan · · Score: 2

      Don't know if its the case with BMWs, but I know VW Group cars (Audi, VW, SEAT, Skoda, etc.) require a dealer computer that contacts VW corporate in order to re-code cars to new keys. The OBD ports in those cars also don't work unless the car is in the "on" position.

    10. Re:Problem and Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They aren't directly liable, but this type of thing affects sales. Don't be surprised if someone gets sacked.

    11. Re:Problem and Solution by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      The port only working if the car is in the "ON" position is the case with most vehicles with a turn-key ignotion, including BMW. I'm not sure how that would work with a push-button system like in the BMWs in question in this article.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    12. Re:Problem and Solution by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why I only just now thought of this but...

      If the dealership only needs a software update, the thieves only need a software update. It's a lot wasier to move bits than it is to move physical hardware. If you're doing it for security, hardware is the way to go, thus a separate port.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    13. Re:Problem and Solution by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

      No, it's not the case. BMW just stores passwords on keys and stores the same passwords unencrypted in the car's computer. BMW keys could only be bought preprogrammed from BMW themselves, until someone in China found out how they worked and started selling blank keys and copying equipment. How naive can you get?

      --
      I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
    14. Re:Problem and Solution by NJRoadfan · · Score: 1

      On most keyless ignition cars, pushing the start button without pressing on the brake switches the car "on" without engaging the starter.

    15. Re:Problem and Solution by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Good to know, I've been eyeing a Veloster recently.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    16. Re:Problem and Solution by gmarsh · · Score: 1

      I'm suspecting that the BMW is "password protected" in a way (unique knowledge required to get into the car's ECU - PIDs to hit, passphrases, etc) but if the car thief that knowledge then it's essentially open anyway.

      Pretty much the only way you'll make a perfectly secure system is by putting the equivalent of a TPM chip in the car and using a cryptographic channel between the car and BMW themselves. Do authentication at the garage and employee levels, and have BMW log everything that happens to every car it talks to, so any malicious use gets recorded and you can figure out who enabled your car to get stolen. Do code signing in the ECU so they can't reprogram the ECU to run different code, authenticate the ECU against other modules in the car so they'd have to basically swap every module in the car... and the list goes on.

      But fuck that. I want a car I can maintain. I bought a $300 "VAG-COM" cable for my VW which lets me access pretty much everything computerized going on in the car, and it has been endlessly useful - it's easily paid for itself by allowing me to do my own maintenance.

      I would not be surprised at all if there's some way for a person with the same tool to disable the immobilizer in my car, hotwire the car and steal it. But I'm content with that - the odds of having my car stolen by geeks with scan tools is pretty low, and even if it does happen, I'm pretty sure auto theft insurance ends up costing less than paying for dealer-only maintenance on a german car.

      Besides, they'd just invent a better car thief. If they completely lock down a car as I've described, someone would end up stealing a car by hooking up a Megasquirt system just to prove a point...

  16. The basic design flaw: key recovery... by nweaver · · Score: 5, Informative

    The basic design flaw is how key duplication/recovery is handled.

    On my motorcycle (a Concours 14 with keyless ignition), to program a new key you need an existing key. The disadvantage is, naturally, if you lose all your keys, you need to replace the computer!

    But its better than the alternative. On the BMW, all you need to do is plug into the OOBDII port and tell the computer "Here is the new key". This means if you lose all your keys, you don't have to buy a new computer... But it also means that anyone who can break into the car can create a key and drive off.

    --
    Test your net with Netalyzr
  17. Looking at this with a very wrong scale in mind by Prikolist · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A few years there was a great story in Wired about breaking locks. In summary, even the world's most secure locks are not meant to survive more than 10-15 minutes. And it tells the story of a few experts that broke down one of these locks in under a minute. 3 minutes on a car lock? Either the hackers haven't figured out the best way to break in yet or the security is actually amazing. Wired story

    --
    I think Linux isn't better than Windows hence in the slashdot realm I'm a troll
    1. Re:Looking at this with a very wrong scale in mind by deadweight · · Score: 1

      A flatbed pwns ANY car.

    2. Re:Looking at this with a very wrong scale in mind by nweaver · · Score: 1

      But a flatbed is expensive, and often hard to steal (they aren't parked out on the streetcorner)

      This is done with a couple hundred bucks of stuff.

      --
      Test your net with Netalyzr
    3. Re:Looking at this with a very wrong scale in mind by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

      No, those 10-15 minutes are destructive minutes. This is non-destructive and non invasive. This is making a fitting key for the most advanced lock without another key to copy from. Try doing that with the latest advanced mechanical locks...

      --
      I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
    4. Re:Looking at this with a very wrong scale in mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but how do you do it without sounding the alarm? In this case, they broke the window, disabled the alarm, put it in neutral, pushed it out of earshot, and then presumably put it on a flatbed or made a key and drove it off.

      dom

    5. Re:Looking at this with a very wrong scale in mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of that time is spent opening the door without breaking the window. After that it takes about a minute to program a new ignition key.

    6. Re:Looking at this with a very wrong scale in mind by deadweight · · Score: 1

      I used to own an MR2 and we had one guy on the forums in the UK. He was going on about all his alarms and tracking devices and how hard it would be to steal his car. Last we heard, it was seen heading out of town on a flatbed and never did get recovered LOL

  18. It must be by cvtan · · Score: 1

    Of course BMW is using a special security system that is not used by anyone else. Right.

    --
    Sorry, but gray text on gray background is making my eyes bleed.
  19. Not any more. That crown goes to Audi owners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thay've taken over from BMW as the choice of drivers who think they own the road and are almost guaranteed to do really stupid things to get where they want in zero seconds.
    As for the Merc's? They are usually as the side of the road waiting for the tow truck. This especially applies to AMG Mercs.

  20. "Blind spot"? by InsaneMosquito · · Score: 1

    I'm not an engineer, nor do I play one on TV, so I'm curious - how does an ultra sonic senor have a blind spot?

    1. Re:"Blind spot"? by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

      It's directional and aimed to detect people in the seats. If you want sensors to cover every inch of the car, you'll need dozens of them.

      --
      I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
    2. Re:"Blind spot"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ultrasonic sensor works basically like a radar. http://sensors-actuators-info.blogspot.com/2009/08/ultrasonic-proximity-sensor.html

  21. The Suckage Of Car Electronics Is High by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Every "computer" I've ever encountered in the automotive world is proprietary, ridiculously overpriced to replace, invariably mounted in asinine places, and the manufacturers won't even give you the most basic user manuals for them. If you want to know what the pinouts are for the various modules, you're on your own. Sure, not everyone wants to know that about the system they are driving around or attempts to troubleshoot them, but I do, and if I'm going to pay a lot of money for one, I am also buying the electronics and I want to be able to use them, or in this case, maybe hack a solid state switch into one of the lines of the OOBDII port to patch the flaw myself. Having the manufacturer give me the runaround when I want to know how to get the readings out of the various sensors that I bought is not acceptable. In terms of the obligatory car analogy, the overall situation with automotive electronics sucks so bad that it's like itself.

    1. Re:The Suckage Of Car Electronics Is High by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Mod Up for Extreme Truthiness.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  22. Looks like a failed hack to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you watch the video, they end up pushing the car away. How is that "hacking" the OBD-II? Any manual trans car (only Americans drive automatics) can be stolen by breaking the window, popping it out of gear, and/or releasing the parking brake and pushing it away.

  23. Speaking of Backfires by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 4, Interesting


    Sounds like BMW owners are going to make a run on Pep Boys to get "the club".

    What Car Theives Think of the Club

    At some point, the Club was mentioned. The professional thieves laughed and exchanged knowing glances. What we knew was that the?Club is a hardened steel device that attaches to the steering wheel and the brake pedal to prevent steering and/or braking. What we found out was that a pro thief would carry a short piece of a hacksaw blade to cut through the plastic steering wheel in a couple seconds. They were then able to release The Club and use it to apply a huge amount of torque to the steering wheel and break the lock on the steering column (which most cars were already equipped with). The pro thieves actually sought out cars with The Club on them because they didnâ(TM)t want to carry a long pry bar that was too hard to conceal.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:Speaking of Backfires by Zeromous · · Score: 1

      True story, I was picked up and driven to high school once in just such a vehicle (an older GrandAm stolen via club in this precise manner). The guy who picked me up said: "Oh that? That was easy, the hard part was doing it fast enough to not be noticed by foot traffic".

      --
      ---Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A START
  24. Lexus too by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    Many, many years ago (at least 3) I read on slashdot about keyless Lexuses being broken into in approx 4 minutes on average. They used a universal transmitter card on a laptop to try all combinations or something like that and it only took 4 minutes on average to do so. Oops. So that wasn't even some encryption key leak or something, they just never bothered to calculate brute forcing time when they made the car.

    Of course, if someone is too lazy to press a button or turn a key to open and start their car, they deserve to get their car stolen so they can think about what a lazy asshole they during the long walk home.

    1. Re:Lexus too by Cramer · · Score: 1

      That was a relay attack. They had someone get close enough to the real key to relay signals from the car to the key. That's not really a "hack"; all they did was virtually bring the key closer to the car.

      And it won't work on my 2010 Lexus. The car knows within a few feet where the key is. (in fact, it knows if the key is inside or outside the car, and if the person holding the key is the one touch the car -- you can stand next to me and not unlock the car.)

    2. Re:Lexus too by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

      That's just opening the car, this is making a key to actually start and drive the car and afterwards, lock and unlock it.

      --
      I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
    3. Re:Lexus too by metaforest · · Score: 1

      ^^ this

      My landlord has started replacing traditional door lock/ keyed deadbolt sets on apartments with keyless entry keypad locks with 4 of 10 coding (WTF) and an internal(keyless) deadbolt. So far he has only been doing this for apartments that turn over. The reasoning appears to be that he is sick of dealing with lockouts.

      This is the dumbest solution I can imagine for a unsecured building. A patient thief is going to have a fairly easy time trying combos a few at a time until they get a match.

      If the landlord starts pushing this on current residents, I'm outta here.

      Keyless entry CAN be safe than keyed entry, but no one wants to spend the money to do it right. Heck, they don't even do it right for keyed entry most of the time.

  25. Re:The basic design flaw: key recovery... by Jeng · · Score: 3

    The difference between your post and everyone else's post is it appears you actually RTFA.

    --
    Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
  26. Re:The basic design flaw: key recovery... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I think my Lincoln has the right idea, but it could be taken farther.

    To make a new key, you need 2 keys (to prevent valet from copying the key). If you have 1 or no keys, there is a time delay to make a new key, You must have possession of the car and a special programmer for a few hours . This prevents almost all theft, unless they tow your car away.

  27. Re:The basic design flaw: key recovery... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    This means if you lose all your keys, you don't have to buy a new computer

    Now if BMW made people buy new computers if they lost their keys - that I'd understand. But this doesn't seem to have much upside for them. They could at least sell a $200 USB device ($2 cost) that held the cryptokeys matched to a set of physical keys and not have such an easy defeat available via ODBII.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  28. Yawn... by mcgrew · · Score: 0

    A locksmith can get past a physical key in three seconds. Maybe not the new ones with electronics in the keys, though, but I wouldn't doubt it.

    1. Re:Yawn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've known a few locksmiths. Drilling out a lock takes a lot longer than three seconds, and no a slim jim doesn't work on most modern cars.

    2. Re:Yawn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Drilling out a lock takes a lot longer than three seconds, "

      They do that only for morons they bill by the hour.

    3. Re:Yawn... by digitalsolo · · Score: 1

      Are these locksmiths equipped with battering rams and or bricks to throw through the window? That's the only way your blanket statement has any prayer of being something bearing a resemblance to accurate.

      --
      Just another ignorant American.
    4. Re:Yawn... by philip.paradis · · Score: 2

      I've watched locksmiths get into multiple modern cars with pick kits and a couple of other tools in a matter of seconds per car. In fact, I've never seen one have to resort to drilling anything out. You appear to know crappy locksmiths.

      --
      Write failed: Broken pipe
    5. Re:Yawn... by Khyber · · Score: 3, Interesting

      For a car, you only need a wooden wedge to give yourself access to the solenoid and door handle mechanism without breaking any windows.

      Hi, I used to work for Pop-A-Lock.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    6. Re:Yawn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wedging the door a little and using whatever unlock mechanism the car presents is standard procedure these days. Doesn't take much time at all with experience.

    7. Re:Yawn... by Cylix · · Score: 1

      I used to lock myself out of my car quite often. The good news was my friends father was a lock smith. (We'll consider this a trade out as I tended to do a lot of technical support for him.)

      Probably around the third time he simply gave me the tool and explained the process. (I think that particular moment I was at his house).

      Then I managed to lock myself out fairly far away, but in a sealed parking area. It just so happened the attendant had lock picks for loan to those who pulled such a stunt as myself. He was fairly surprised I picked the proper tool I needed and popped my lock in seconds.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
  29. Re:The basic design flaw: key recovery... by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

    Your motorcycle's ignition lock may be quite amazing, but it will always be defeated by four guys and a full size van.

    No lock or safe will stay shut given effectively unlimited time.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  30. hacker != thief by ScubaForLife · · Score: 2

    If you steal a car, you aren't a hacker. You are a thief. Stop calling people that break the law, "Hackers".

  31. What's the fuss? They added a new feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not just keyless, but carless as well.

  32. Static the answer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about a car that builds a huge static charge when parked, and requires a strong password to discharge?
    Be sure to park it away from lawyers, though.

  33. Install by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    Lo Jack. Shit works. My dad had his car returned to him 2 hours later, and the thieves got busted.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    1. Re:Install by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New generation BMWs have the BMW assist. I believe you can file a police report and BMW will share your car location with the police.

    2. Re:Install by El_Oscuro · · Score: 1

      You could also get an ignition kill switch. My dad got one 40 years ago when his car got stolen for use as a getaway car in a bank robbery.

      --
      "Be grateful for what you have. You may never know when you may lose it."
  34. Just Tow It by sexconker · · Score: 1

    The easiest way to steal a vehicle is to just tow it.

  35. If someone wants your car... by couchslug · · Score: 1

    ....all they need is a cheap lift and an old pickup to bolt it on and they can drag it off in seconds.

    If you are repo driver, no one cares, so a thief using the same equipment could drag cars all day (and I'm sure many do).

    It ain't like the fat fucks on "reality" television except for the "fat". :-)

    Repo drivers just pull up, hook up (or toggle a few switches if they have in-cab controls) , and drive off.

    People don't take any action even when you are driving down the street with the towed vehicle brakes still locked and the tires smoking! (Once clear if the property you release the parking brake.)

    Here's a decent vid of the process:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SEIPNKPvID0

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  36. Commercial: When you want a keyless BMW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    When you want a keyless BMW, you go to the keyless BMW dealer.
    When you go to the keyless BMW dealer, you buy a keyless BMW.
    When you buy a keyless BMW, you want to show off your keyless BMW.
    When you want to show off your keyless BMW, you park it predominately in an area frequented by hackers.
    When you park your keyless BMW predominately in an area frequented by hackers, said hackers steal your keyless BMW within 3 minutes.
    Don't buy a keyless BMW and park it predominately in an area frequented by hackers who can steal your keyless BMW within 3 minutes.

  37. This is how by Oxford_Comma_Lover · · Score: 1, Informative

    They may be going faster than you when they pass, but their behavior can result in an accident where you hit them anyway. This occurs where they are slowing down or you are speeding up, meaning it is possible for the vehicles to collide despite the fact that they are passing you. This frequently occurs when you are overtaking a vehicle in the lane next to you moving more slowly than yours (usually the right lane in the United States), and someone behind that vehicle in that lane comes up and slips into your lane in front of you, relying on you to change your velocity or acceleration in order not to be hit, or allowing an unacceptably thin margin of error.

    --
    -- IANAL, this isn't legal advice, and definitely isn't legal advice for you. Also, Squee!
    1. Re:This is how by doccus · · Score: 1

      They may be going faster than you when they pass, but their behavior can result in an accident where you hit them anyway. This occurs where they are slowing down or you are speeding up, meaning it is possible for the vehicles to collide despite the fact that they are passing you. This frequently occurs when you are overtaking a vehicle in the lane next to you moving more slowly than yours (usually the right lane in the United States), and someone behind that vehicle in that lane comes up and slips into your lane in front of you, relying on you to change your velocity or acceleration in order not to be hit, or allowing an unacceptably thin margin of error.

      Actually, agreed.. its the D*ckheads that pass you and then slam on the brakes.. WTF is going on in their heads?

  38. CAN bus access makes it easier than that...? by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

    If you can get on the CAN bus, you may be able to talk to the ECU, Body Computer, etc without going near the OBD port.

    The CAN bus allows devices to talk to one another without any kind of central host (duh, the purpose of a bus). I read somewhere (possibly bullshit) that on some cars you can get onto the CAN bus through the exterior side mirrors (wiring) and then issue PIDs that way to talk to the rest of the car.

    At least on my Honda, the ECU is offline unless there's a key turned in the ingnition...but maybe you can "fake" that status by issuing various PIDs through the CAN bus?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAN_bus
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OBD-II_PIDs

    --
    With the first link, the chain is forged.
    1. Re:CAN bus access makes it easier than that...? by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, messed up my terminology a bit. PIDs are just requests for data, I don't think they can actually *affect* anything or change data.

      But yeah, the CAN bus is where you can make mischief.

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
    2. Re:CAN bus access makes it easier than that...? by JimCanuck · · Score: 1

      Normally OEM's use LIN Bus for stuff connected to your doors. Much cheaper then CAN, and CAN in cars is typically drive train and safety related only, as its a relatively slow communication method that is designed to make sure critical messages go out, and that means dropping non-critical ones (as a inherent design that is actually wanted and needed).

  39. Then get out of the way! by lamer01 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I drive BMWs and there's nothing more irritating that people that don't get out of the way

  40. I guess you never heard of the C300 by lamer01 · · Score: 1

    You can buy one for low 30s.

  41. Re:The basic design flaw: key recovery... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would like to say that actually on a BMW replacing a key is a tiny bit more complicated. You can't use any key it is supposed to have 1 of 10 EWS chips that are mated to the cas unit. So when ever you order a key they assemble your key with one of those chips. Then once the key comes they can pair it with the car. Now in the settings of the computer you do have options of turning a key on or off (so technically disabling a key) but you can't just use any key for any BMW

  42. The BMW Fob Sucks for many other reasons by scorp1us · · Score: 1

    Old style (key):
    Insert into ignition
    Using edges of key, twist to start.
    Turn key to off position
    Remove key.

    New FOB system
    Insert fob into slot. Do not accidentally hit the trunk release button when doing so.
    Press start button (seperate motion)
    Press stop button (seperate motion)
    Remove key. Do not accidentally hit the trunk release button when doing so.

    Now they look a lot a like, except the with the fob there is the potential to open your trunk because that part always sticks out, and that's how you have to grasp it. Additionally with the conventional key you can do it all in one smooth motion. You can't with the start button.

    What BMW should have done, is when you stick your fob in the slot, since there is a spring loaded position where it latches (like a SD media slot) is have you push the key in and use that for the starter. No extra button needed.

    While I love my BMW (e46) I won't buy another BMW again because they've just made stupid design mistakes like that. To be trendy they actually made it worse. And don't get me started about their nav system. It always opens even if you don't want it to. Even if you set the setting for it. And that rotary wheel is the worst input idea ever. I'd rather an Atari joystick.

    --
    Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    1. Re:The BMW Fob Sucks for many other reasons by Phibz · · Score: 1

      What car do you have? I have an e46 2005 M3 and it uses the old diamond style twist key, not a push to start button. Also I have the navigation system and while I agree it's terrible, I never had an issue with it opening unless I pressed the eject button on purpose.

      Did the facelift models get a start button? I didn't think so.

    2. Re:The BMW Fob Sucks for many other reasons by scorp1us · · Score: 1

      I have an e46 M3 like you. The e96 series has the stupid fob-only (no tumbler shaft) that I am talking about. Which are the same fobs that are alloiwing the vehicles to be stolen.

      THIS DAMN THING

      --
      Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
  43. Re:The basic design flaw: key recovery... by Pope · · Score: 1

    You ever try lifting a Concours 14?

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  44. Re:The basic design flaw: key recovery... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can attest to the four guys and a full size van. My first Kawasaki Ninja was "liberated" from my possession in a similar manner.

  45. copyrights ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why doesn't BMW copyright the access codes and let ACTA and the others laws stop these nefarious thieves??

  46. Re:The basic design flaw: key recovery... by nweaver · · Score: 1

    Apparently not, because thats 6 people and 2 hernias to throw in a van... that thing is HEAVVVVYYYYY (having had to pick it up once)

    --
    Test your net with Netalyzr
  47. This is a tragedy! Be helpful! by GT66 · · Score: 1

    Being a conscientious member of society, I try to look out for BMW owners and help secure their vulnerable and expensive machines by removing the wheels thereby rendering them immobile and therefore secure. You're welcome. You can find your wheels on eBay if you need them.

  48. toggle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just have a garage install one of those tiny, black-lever hidden toggle switches someplace inside, and it's damn near impossible to figure where it's located, even when looking right at it. They are the best (added) security device in the world for keyless entry vehicles when you have to leave them parked in questionable circumstances. It's a cheap install too.

    1. Re:toggle by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Mod up.

      Removing a fuse works well too. My buds lost several Chevy truck steering columns on their wrecker over the years, but the CHUDs never stole the truck because they put all their work into cracking the column and gave up when that didn't work.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  49. Quite easily by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1

    Reflections off internal surfaces causing interference,and shadowing, just like with mobile phone signals..

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  50. Easy solved by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

    They just up the premiums for BMW cars by 200%. Yes, true figure in the UK. Imagine how screwed you are owning one of these BMWs. Can't pay insurance, it will get stolen and nobody wants to buy your car because it's probably stolen already, will be stolen soon and even if they don't steal your car, the insurance will steal your money and then not pay out "because it's a known problem and you didn't put on extra security" or some lame excuse.

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
  51. No, it is as bad by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

    The private keys that validate the proper "electronic key" is used, are plain text stored in the car's computer. Some cheaper than $200 chinese tools that are readily available can read those private keys and program a $50 or less replica blank electronic key with those private keys. That is all that is needed to drive off with your brand new "high tech" BMW.

    There are several tricks to get inside the car, some not publicly known ones seem to make it possible to do so quickly without having to force anything. The best known one is to jam the keyfob frequency so careless owners will not lock the car and not check for the indicator lights to blink. In many countries "chirping" is illegal and most owners don't press the button until they have already turned their back to the car and are walking already.

    I'd say that is pretty bad, considering that it's just as easy to steal a modern $100.000 BMW as it is to steal a 35 year old Dodge.

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
  52. It's not about OBD by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

    It's about being stupid enough to store plain text passwords for all the 10 possible keys for the car in the car's memory.

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
    1. Re:It's not about OBD by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah, that too

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  53. Re:The basic design flaw: key recovery... by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

    I didn't read TFA, but I know what is the real problem. You can't tell BMW "this is the new key", but the BMW tells you what the new key is. You can then program the new key on the spot and it doesn't even needs to be activated. There's 10 plaintext passwords in the BMW, for all possible keys that computer is ever going to be talking to.

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
  54. Re:The basic design flaw: key recovery... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you lose all keys you can usually order a new one from a dealer. Bring in your registration when you order it. It's not cheap though as they know you're stuck and a new computer + keys is expensive.

  55. Re:The basic design flaw: key recovery... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The upside is that it's cheaper and simpler to make it reprogrammable. These things aren't designed from scratch, and the features and misfeatures are driven by all the random OEM and custom parts they've accumulated over the years.

  56. Finally something Dorthy's interested in. by Dorthy+Fischer · · Score: 1

    These people aren't professional burglars, they may burglarize things for a living but they;re not professionals. For all we know they saw this in a movie and rehearsed for years, The drives a little portly for breaking into secure places. -Dorthy Fischer greets to f00

  57. insurance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If your vehicle is found and there is no damage showing the intruder got in via force. You might be f'd in the A. A friend had his car broken into using an onstar hack. You can see from the logs on the system that they tried to remote start the car using onstar as well. The best part here, is that he didnt have onstar subscribed services.

    Then it gets better... the insurance company wont pay for them destroying the interior because the car was not physically broken into.

  58. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That depends on the local laws in your area. For the United States, see this list of state laws: http://www.mit.edu/~jfc/right.html

    That being said, if you are blocking traffic, you are a douchebag.

  59. Is it wrong of me to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I feel bad to say this, but what the hell.

    CoooOOoooOOOoooooooooOOollll!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  60. Totally fooking wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    NO NO NO. You are way off base on this. All drivers are supposed to stay as far as right as possible EXCEPT WHEN PASSING. People who loiter in the middle lane are idiots and they piss me off, -especially- when they stay there even while people are passing them on the right. Drivers in the right lane are not 'blocking' you from entering the highway unless they are tailgating, and that is another problem altogether. Go review your driver's manual. Here's how the manual in my state reads:

    "On roadways with two or more lanes in your travel direction, use the right lane for driving unless...
    * You are passing another vehicle.
    * You are making a left turn.
    * The right lane is blocked.".

    And in another place:

    "Stay to the right and only use the left lane for passing. On an expressway with three or more lanes in your direction, use the far right lane for slower driving, the middle lane for faster driving, and the far left lane for passing."

    Bottom line: The right lane is not a 'merge lane' for your convenience. Deal.

    1. Re:Totally fooking wrong by Jeng · · Score: 1

      Looks like different states give different rules and the rules I have been going by make a lot more sense than the ones you just pulled up. Btw, what state are you in?

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
  61. Re:The basic design flaw: key recovery... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nonsense. On that system the recovery system isn't replacing the computer.
    1. enter new key
    2. watch it fail then wait 15 minutes precisely
    3. enter key again within 60 seconds

    Repeat that three times and tada!!! New key works and ALL old keys are wiped from memory.

    The alternative is to do what everybody else that repos motorcycles do. Remove the computer/ignition. You can see the engine. It's like claiming your firewall is flawless but leaving the servers outside.

  62. ...with a tennis ball? by TheRealHocusLocus · · Score: 1

    The only problem is, once you've defeated the keyless entry and anti-theft systems you are left with a luxury BMW, which has power windows.

    I hate power windows.

    --
    <blink>down the rabbit hole</blink>
  63. Keyless entry security by SlashDev · · Score: 1

    I never understood the security behind key-less entry systems, anything electronic security can be broken into, although the BMW system has been hacked, I'm pretty sure that others will follow soon.

    --

    TOP DSLR Cameras Reviews of the top DSLRs
  64. forgot to tell them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    low tech is high tech.

  65. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  66. Great video protection demo by fgouget · · Score: 1

    This really shows how efficient these video protection(*) cameras are at deterring and preventing crime. It also show how helpful they are at solving them when they do happen: now the police are looking for four smurfs who escaped from their comic book. No doubt they will have caught them within hours!

    (*) 'Video protection' is the new double-plus-good term for 'video surveillance'.

  67. Achtung! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Audi R8 with Lamborghini V-10 engine is superior to any BMW or Mercedes, so get off my road... the left lane belongs to me!
    The only other cars worthy of cruising next to me are Porsche, Maserati, Ferrari or Lamborghini. Don't even mention any American cars, you make me laugh.

  68. Three minutes by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

    They obviously aren't trying. I can do it in under a minute. But then again it's my job.

    --
    The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
  69. They pushed the car ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they had stolen the car. Why didn't the thief's drive the car away instead of 2 of them pushing it while 1 steers ?