Slashdot Mirror


University of Florida Eliminates Computer Science Department

DustyShadow writes "The University of Florida announced this past week that it was dropping its computer science department, which will allow it to save about $1.7 million. The school is eliminating all funding for teaching assistants in computer science, cutting the graduate and research programs entirely, and moving the tattered remnants into other departments. Students at UF have already organized protests, and have created a website dedicated to saving the CS department. Several distinguished computer scientists have written to the president of UF to express their concerns, in very blunt terms. Prof. Zvi Galil, Dean of Computing at Georgia Tech, is 'amazed, shocked, and angered.' Prof. S.N. Maheshwari, former Dean of Engineering at IIT Delhi, calls this move 'outrageously wrong.' Computer scientist Carl de Boor, a member of the National Academy of Sciences and winner of the 2003 National Medal of Science, asked the UF president 'What were you thinking?'"

628 comments

  1. Computers are a fad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    n/m

    1. Re:Computers are a fad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Just like TVs were a fad I'm sure. *sarcasm*There will be absolutely NO jobs for all the people who will build websites for big companies, or create the newest DRM, or do something nice like program medical tools.*/sarcasm*

    2. Re:Computers are a fad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      <woosh> WOOOOOOSH </woosh>

    3. Re:Computers are a fad. by trum4n · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There should be no jobs for anyone writing DRM. Only pain.

    4. Re:Computers are a fad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There should be no jobs for anyone writing DRM. Only pain.

      Actually, you raise an interesting point. Perhaps we could pay programmers not to produce DRM. Sort of like how, in the US, we often pay farmers to not produce corn. It sounds like a protection racket, true. I'd sign a paper saying I'll spend 10 hours a week not producing DRM in return for a subsidy...

    5. Re:Computers are a fad. by trum4n · · Score: 2

      I could go for that. They don't need to know i've never written a useful program in my life, right?

    6. Re:Computers are a fad. by plalonde2 · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's correct. If you've been writing DRM you haven't produced a useful program.

    7. Re:Computers are a fad. by s122604 · · Score: 1

      Sure there will, just not in America

    8. Re:Computers are a fad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoosh! =)

    9. Re:Computers are a fad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      640K comp sci grads should be enough for any country.

    10. Re:Computers are a fad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe one day you'll come up with some IP that you want to protect. Your attitude is easy to have when you produce nothing of creative value.

    11. Re:Computers are a fad. by trum4n · · Score: 1

      As a musician, you are wrong.

    12. Re:Computers are a fad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a developer of closed-source, for-profit software, I am right.

    13. Re:Computers are a fad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As a pirate who has probably downloaded your closed-source, for-profit software with the DRM already stripped out, I am amused that you think DRM actually protects your IP.

    14. Re:Computers are a fad. by philip.paradis · · Score: 1

      Some people like pain.

      --
      Write failed: Broken pipe
    15. Re:Computers are a fad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UF made a statement to clarify:

      http://www.eng.ufl.edu/news/uf-statement-made-april-23rd-2012/

  2. The Department of Redundancy Department by JoeMerchant · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Can we study the same things in other departments without having a dedicated Computer Science niche to go with Computer Engineering, Software Engineering, etc.?

    1. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by CastrTroy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My thoughts exactly. Most schools I've been to don't have a computer science department, but rather lump it in with the math or engineering department. Computer science is a programme of study not an entire department.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by SJHillman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      At the school I went to, computer science degrees were part of the school of liberal arts and sciences (in the same building as astronomy, physics and math) and IT degrees were part of the school of business. It worked fairly well as there wasn't much overlap between the two and the CS students (a very small program compared to IT) benefited from being close to the math and physics departments.

    3. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by _8553454222834292266 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Computer science is a programme of study not an entire department.

      Only if you're at a bad school.

    4. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Uh, no... Physics is to Mechanical Engineering as Chemistry is to Chemical Engineering as Computer Science is to Computer Engineering.

      Science is very, very different from engineering. Science is focused on the theoretical, while engineering is focused on applying that theory to the real world, subject to various resource constraints.

      Given that they are so different, it makes absolutely no sense to try to group them together, especially in some attempt to "save money".

    5. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Yes. Then in five years someone will notice there's a possibility to reduce overlap & duplication by centralizing it into a kind of internal service bureau that delivers modules on a subcontracting basis.

      Five years after that, some bright spark will have the idea that if they stuck several of the courses together and added a few new ones they could offer a CS degree.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    6. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Like this one? They're cutting CS to save $2m. Meanwhile, their $99m/yr athletics program is getting a modest boost... roughly $2m.

      I think even their underwater basket weaving majors can do the math on that one.

    7. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by jythie · · Score: 1

      That is hard to say, though for an American school it is a bit odd. Depending on how old the school is, its computer science curricula might have developed any number of ways, and quite a few keep pieces of it in their math and electrical engineering departments with 'computer science' being a specialization within mathematics while computer engineering (hardware/software) and software engineering (process) living within the EE dept or as separate departments within engineering.

      If one is studying literal 'computer science' it often is a program or a specialization since that focuses on things like theory and computation.

    8. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by spyked · · Score: 1

      Ok, so imagine you want to teach computer architectures. Which aren't quite electrical engineering but they aren't theoretical computer science either. Which department would you assign that to?

      I'd also add that any good computer architect should be skilled in both hardware and software-related issues, in electronics, electrical engineering as well as some discrete math. I don't see how you can put all those together outside of a CS department.

    9. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by jimbolauski · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Their athletics program makes money, not from ticket sales but from donations and ticket sales. When a school wins a national championship or two they get many more alumni opening their wallets. Schools have a very good idea of how much money their sports programs bring in and they spend accordingly. The best way to save UF CS department is to get donations from CS alumni or to make donations directly to the CS department.

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    10. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Can we study the same things in other departments without having a dedicated Computer Science niche to go with Computer Engineering, Software Engineering, etc.?

      Not in sufficient depth, at least in my opinion. Complexity theory? Database theory (yes, theory, not just "here's how to write a simple SQL statement)? Compilers? These could all be in other departments, but an undergrad pursuing a degree in another field will not have enough time to study computer science in any respectable depth. Double major is not the answer if CS is spread over more than two other departments. Spreading CS across math and engineering departments deprives students of the chance to become computer scientists.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    11. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Dog-Cow · · Score: 4, Informative

      They don't make money from ticket sales... they make money from ticket sales?

      Someone skipped logic 101...

    12. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Someone skipped logic 101...

      He probably went to UF...

    13. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by buddyglass · · Score: 4, Informative

      Separate budgets. Athletics pays its own way. Nuking the entire athletic dept. wouldn't create any additional money for CS.

    14. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by geoffball · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The UF athletic depart makes most of its cash from the television contracts of the football and basketball teams.

    15. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      I think it's sad that all the educational and research departments must shoulder the burden of state budget cuts, while athletics gets to keep most (if not all) of its spoils.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    16. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most schools call that Computer Engineering. It differs by electrical engineering by only a few classes. Which classes? The ones you just described.

    17. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Uh, no... Physics is to Mechanical Engineering as Chemistry is to Chemical Engineering as Computer Science is to Computer Engineering

      You obviously do not have an Engineering Degree.

      First off, you have obviously never heard of Engineering Physics, which has the same requirements as a Physics Degree, but with ABET requirements tacked on to the electives.

      Second off, even with a normal Physics curriculum, you can take Mechanical Engineering courses, and the FE, but it will take more than 4 years to your PD, I believe 8 for a non-ABET accredited Physics degree. You cannot do this with Chemistry to Chemical Engineering.

      Lastly Computer Engineering focuses on things like computer hardware and there can be a nebulous area between Computer Engineering and Electrical Engineering. Where as Computer Science degrees may be under the Engineering School, or Arts and Sciences School.

    18. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Princeton, Harvard, Stanford, Carnegie Mellon, Waterloo, UW-Madison, UT Austin... Ever heard of them?

    19. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Computer Engineering/Software Engineering isn't the same as Computer Science.

      In Computer Science we usually take a course in Computer Engineering and a course in Software Engineering, to get some concepts from those other areas of study into the students. However Computer Science, real Computer Science, is less about the technology, and more about the Mathematics of performing optimal computations.
      Software Engineering isn't as much about optimal computations, it is more of a way of getting the software to work, and building larger complicated systems, which need to be maintained over time.
      Computer Engineering is more of a hardware level approach, where the goal is is optimize basic elements but not complex systems.
      Computer Science is in the middle. We use the optimized basic elements that the Computer Engineers make, and we create more complicated computations using them. Then Software Engineers take what the computer scientists have made and implement them into a practical design.

      When it gets to real life jobs, all three areas of studies often give us a similar career path. However depending on your study you have different approaches to the problems we face.
      So lets say a for a Job of a Software Developer (with 5 years experience)
      When there is a problem to be solved.
      A computer Engineer focused person, would use the features in the hardware to leverage more Optimized Lower level commands to their beck and call to help them solve issues, now this will create a fast solution, but may not run on other platforms.
      A Computer Science focused person, would try to separate themselves from the hardware a bit more, and go into creating logic and routines, these routines will tend to be rather optimal, however they will probably miss something the hardware gives us for free, but will run on other platforms.
      A Computer Engineer, will create code in a clean well documented manner, it will often be the less optimal, and slowest solution. However it will tend to run well on other platforms, easy to maintain, and usually more stable.

      They all approach problems differently and when you get them together to work on a problem, you can get some heated discussions, but if they actually work well together they come up with some very good solutions.
      Dropping Computer Science is a bad idea, because then you will loose the middle of the road approach in computing.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    20. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      If there was not much overlap then it sounds like those were some worthless IT degrees. I guess this is where we get interview candidates for IT jobs that can't even script perl or python much less write actual code.

    21. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Chillas · · Score: 5, Informative

      They do not make money. The median net loss of each of the Division 1A schools' athletic programs is in the vicinity of $7 million annually.

      --
      --- Math illiteracy affects 8 out of every 5 people.
    22. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure if you'll consider my school (SHSU) a "decent school," but we have a dedicated CS department.

    23. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Sounds like UHa, They were under the Department of Math, Physics, and Computer Science. While it was 1 department they were actually 3. They were 1 department in terms of administration goes. However your area study were very different. Computer Science Professors didn't normally Teach Math or Physics. And Vice verse... (The only exception was a Physics professor who sometimes taught FORTRAN)

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    24. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I tend to think highly of my university, and while it does have a CS department by now, it is a department in name only because it is actually the fusion of a few outcroppings of other departments.

      You see, they try to eliminate redundancy at our local universities. So some departments share certain programs (even across universities) and you get constructs where you suddenly study math, electric engineering, mechanical engineering, statistics and even business administration (that's where the organizational and team leading lectures are located), just because you wanted a CS degree.

      It sounds complicated now, but it's very well organized and streamlined, you don't even really notice much of it save that you run across town to get to the different universities involved and get your certificates from three different universities (which are then accumulated into one degree. Don't worry, the paperwork is done for you).

      If you have three universities (one each for technical, humanist and economy studies) in your town, it's the sensible thing to do. Instead of running three math departments, roll it into the tech university. They have (had ... *sniff*) the best prof anyway.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    25. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by roothog · · Score: 1

      Most schools I've been to don't have a computer science department, but rather lump it in with the math or engineering department.

      If the universities that you've attended have a single "engineering department", then you've attended low quality universities.

    26. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That underwater basket weaving degree is what landed me the job at Starbucks....

    27. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by roothog · · Score: 1

      If you want people that write python, perl, and real code, then you should be recruiting CS grads, not IT grads. IT is a soft business degree.

    28. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Rostin · · Score: 4, Informative

      The majority operate at a loss, but many, including UF, do make money.

    29. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree completely. Each program of study is inherently it's own department because every program needs several things: people to teach, people to administrate, and people to learn. Not having a CS department implies that in order to get a degree in Computer Science you have to jump through hoops and be a part of several Colleges and degree programs. Not only that, but contributions to the field from Ph.Ds will be few and far between because Computer Engineering researchers are too busy working with routers, DSPs, computer architectures, and generally more hardware and low-level programming, while Math researchers are far too busy doing math (not to mention that Mechanical Engineers are working on materials and machines, Electrical Engineers are working on circuit hardware, etc). So this goes back to the point that CS is inherently completely different from Engineering and Mathematics.

    30. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by LordLimecat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So if someone wants to go down the path towards a CCIE and work on internet backbones, in your mind CS would cover that? Because to my mind that falls under IT, and most CS majors arent going to know how to work on a real internet router.

      Or lets say we want to implement WPA2-enterprise with RADIUS, is that something you suppose your typical CS major is going to have expertise in?

    31. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by FireFlie · · Score: 1

      My thoughts exactly. Most schools I've been to don't have a computer science department, but rather lump it in with the math or engineering department. Computer science is a programme of study not an entire department.

      Based on your experiences, I would think that you went to a very tiny school, and had very little interaction with other colleges or universities. I went to a small school for my undergrad where the entities you described would serve as "departments." I'm finishing my graduate studies at one of the many universities large enough to have an entire school of Engineering. The department of Computer Science is only one department within this particular school.

    32. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a poorly worded response below, but I know what he was trying to say. The athletic budget comes from ticket sales, not from the state budget that funds departments. Singling out an increase in the athletic budget is a false argument - it's not an either-or situation. In fact, the athletic association has donated millions in profits to cover state budget shortfalls.

    33. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Not at any decent school it isn't.
      If you can't script you can't sysadmin. If you can't script you can't be a netadmin, what the hell can you do?

    34. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by chill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I find both of your examples to fall into the realm of technical certificates, not University level study.

      I've always thought of CS vs IT as Engineer vs Technician. One designs the other implements and operates.

      For example a CS student should understand compiler theory including things like language tokenization, code generation, parse trees and the like.

      An IT student needs to know "./config && make && make install" and have a working knowledge of an IDE like Visual Studio or Eclipse along with be fairly proficient in a language or two.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    35. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by skids · · Score: 2

      Or lets say we want to implement WPA2-enterprise with RADIUS, is that something you suppose your typical CS major is going to have expertise in?

      Neither is your typical "IT" grad. IT tends to be pretty high-level on the technical details; it's more a resource-allocation/business/management major.

    36. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Lluc · · Score: 4, Informative

      Computer science is a programme of study not an entire department.

      Only if you're at a bad school.

      For example, the University of California at Berkeley with its combined EECS dept? They're only ranked #1 in the 2010 US News ratings...

    37. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Science is very, very different from engineering. Science is focused on the theoretical, while engineering is focused on applying that theory to the real world, subject to various resource constraints.

      Most Universities with both Computer Science and Computer Engineering departments don't focus on the "theory vs. application" split so much as they do on the "Software vs. Hardware" split. It would be better if they did, but perhaps we should just focus on getting universities to not eliminate those departments altogether for now.

    38. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by FireFlie · · Score: 1

      IT is a soft business degree.

      Not if it is done well. IT may include web development as well as *nix, network, server, and database administration. I wouldn't want someone in any of these roles that wasn't capable of scripting.

    39. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      From my experience at University, the Athletic department kept any money they made (including ticket sales and bowl profits), as well as took a large line Item from the budget. They even had their own Logo and Web Font that couldn't be used by the rest of the University. Triumph of the Jocks!

    40. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you think a typical IT grad is going to be able to work on a real internet router? At least the CS grads will understand binary and subnetting.

      Kids right out of college are not going to have expertise in anything. They should have the background knowledge to learn the technology and systems of a company.

    41. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Bigby · · Score: 2

      What money is UF Athletics getting from the State? Please tell... What money is it even getting from the Academic side of the University??

    42. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the school I went to, computer science degrees were part of the school of liberal arts and sciences (in the same building as astronomy, physics and math) and IT degrees were part of the school of business.

      Was this by chance NYU?

      In any case, you're talking 2 schools with each with a department (IT vs CS). That's double the overhead for teaching CS and IT separately.

    43. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      My degree is in Network Administration, so we were very heavy on hands-on with Cisco gear, but we also needed experience with programming (either VB.NET or Java), BASH scripting, batch files/Powershell, HTML, Linux (CentOS was required for one class, Fedora for another and other classes let you choose your own distro) and Windows server administration, hardware (class was loosely based around A+ cert), database administration, project management, technical writing, etc. Likewise, all of the programming students still needed some server administration and networking classes.

      The comp sci students on the other hand did a couple classes of C++ and that was about it for IT-related experience. They mostly focused on design (hardware and software) rather than implementation or maintenance.

    44. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus, donations from alumni, and purchasing of junk with the Gators brand on it increase with successful athletics. Many universities are mainly ways of hosting footballogy and basketballogy.

    45. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      False, its already a combined Department

      http://www.cise.ufl.edu/

      It contains

      Computer Engineering (CEN) (ABET Accredited)
      Computer Science (CSE)
      Computer Science (CSC)
      Digital Arts and Sciences (DAS)

    46. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      The way it broke down is CS degrees are for getting a job designing hardware at Intel or software at one of the big software vendors. IT degrees are aimed at supporting enterprise IT infrastructure, not creating a product.

    47. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by AnObfuscator · · Score: 1

      At UF, there are (were?) CS degrees offered though Liberal Arts and Sciences, as well as the College of Engineering. I chose the former, as it was an easier administrative change from Physics.

      --
      multifariam.net -- yet another nerd blog
    48. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The majority operate at a loss, but many, including UF, do make money.

      Yes. UF's athletic department is profitable.

      And UF's Athletic Department gives money to UF every year for academics as well. I think it was somewhere in the neighborhood of $6 Million last year.

    49. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by SecurityGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The best way to save UF CS department is to get donations from CS alumni or to make donations directly to the CS department.

      You may be right, but this is a desperately sad state of affairs. Tuition of the students attending should be sufficient to pay for the CS department. If it's not, they shouldn't have a CS department. I know many are desperate for uniformity, but it's really OK if not every single institution offers exactly the same programs of study. Schools also do a ridiculous bunch of things that I, as a former tuition paying student, don't want them spending my money on. Stop that.

    50. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      If the IT kid does not have a grasp of subnetting how did he graduate?

      What sort of shitty departments are these?

    51. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Which you cannot support without scripting and knowledge of all kinds of underlying things.

    52. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by subanark · · Score: 2

      Same here. Washington State University was able to negotiate getting an equal share of all tv revenue regardless if they make it to the finals or not (otherwise the best team gets money to keep getting better). That money is being to hire an expensive football coach and do major construction on the stadium to add premium box seats (which they also convinced the student government to raise fees to help pay for).

      On article topic, our CS department is having minor cut backs, but is doing "fine" as a long while back when CS was getting going it was merged with Electrical Engineering to prevent it from closing. Although I have a CS degree, I'm working for the Horticulture department, which isn't in any danger of getting cut.

    53. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      He should have already done that in college, I know I had to. We also had to know CIDR, BGP and RIP(for some reason) and a slew of other related things. On top of which without that sort of underlying knowledge he will never learn the technology and systems of a company.

    54. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Ok then, who gets all the money for the licensed merchandise that you see everyone wearing around here?

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    55. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by DeathElk · · Score: 1

      So, they must count the money from ticket sales in the department of redundancy department.

    56. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      That's not a degree. That counts as a trade school with a preparation course for a bunch of industry certifications.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    57. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, no... Physics is to Mechanical Engineering as Chemistry is to Chemical Engineering as Computer Science is to Computer Engineering.

      Science is very, very different from engineering. Science is focused on the theoretical, while engineering is focused on applying that theory to the real world, subject to various resource constraints.

      Given that they are so different, it makes absolutely no sense to try to group them together, especially in some attempt to "save money".

      You're very wrong. Science and engineering are very much tied together. Physics is lame without engineering - what good is a theory if it doesn't improve the lives of everyone around? The reverse is true, engineering cannot progress without the tireless efforts of scientists. The best research projects I've been a part of involve a mix of scientists and engineers and hence I believe combining the groups is brilliant. Cutting people is senseless though. I don't think this move has anything to do with increased integration.

    58. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by DesScorp · · Score: 3, Informative

      They do not make money. The median net loss of each of the Division 1A schools' athletic programs is in the vicinity of $7 million annually.

      Florida, in the football loving South Eastern Conference, is not one of them. They make a lot of money from football. Second, no tax funds go to the athletic program. All SEC schools fund their athletic programs separately from the main budget, and all of the athletic money comes from ticket sales, TV revenue, bowl payouts, merchandise, etc. Athletics takes not one single dollar from state appropriations in the SEC.

      --
      Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    59. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Rolgar · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Maybe. But as an activity that can build excitement for the school among potential schools, you can see a loss as an advertising cost to bring in new students and other interest.

      An example most folks aren't aware of:
      Kansas State University (I'm an alumnus) up until 1987 was the worst Division 1A football school as far as historical record, and it wasn't even close. We had a 0-26-1 record in 27 consecutive games. Sports Illustrated did a cover story on how bad we were. Enrollment was trending down, with projections having us losing our football program and other significant loss of status.

      Around that time, we hired an assistant coach from the University of Iowa, Bill Snyder. In 1993, we began a 10 year run where we won at least 9 games every year, and finished ranked in the top 25 every year. The decline in enrollment reversed. The school has had many successes academically as well as athletically (one of the top schools for Rhodes, Truman, Goldwater and other graduate scholarship contests, we were awarded the BioDefense facility, although funding may get cut due to politics), much of it due to the enthusiasm generated by having a winning program, and the perception that the people in charge know how to build success.

      If that is the outcome that can come from a winning athletic department, I'm sure many universities consider that an investment in the overall success of the school. Now, our particular athletic department just became profitable enough that it is going to be run without state assistance. All money spent must be generated from sales, media contracts, conference profits, and donations. This year's $20 million profit is funding facility enhancements to keep us competitive with other schools which will probably outspend us in this area long term.

    60. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'd rather see the "Computer Related Disciplines" all given a well rounded picture of theory and practice.

      Not that this should ever happen, but I had a student in digital design once tell me that they didn't have to know how to create a sub-directory in their simulator software account because "that's not what this class is about." Likewise, there are waaaay too many engineers who will implement a quick hack that "works" with no regard for the theory/science aspects of the problem that would point out that their "working" solution is only 1% efficient and won't scale with significant volume increases.

    61. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by KernelMuncher · · Score: 2

      The big teams spend money as quickly as they possibly can. The goal is not to amass revenue but to have no extra money left over at the end of the year (they are non-profits by law). So there is lavish spending everywhere. They house the entire football team at a hotel the night before home games. They send the entire 200 person band to bowl games with hotels & meals. These teams have incredible practice facilities that are like indoor stadiums. The list is endless.

    62. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have lived in Florida for 6years now and have one teenager in public school. And a 5 and 6 year olds let me tell you the whole freakin education system in FL skipped logic 101

    63. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by DesScorp · · Score: 2

      Computer science is a programme of study not an entire department.

      Only if you're at a bad school.

      This is absolutely silly. Why does UF have to do it the way others do it? Further, why does every single state university have to have a CS department? They don't all have law schools or medical schools. At a lot of schools, several fields are folded into larger departments, without any real loss of quality.

      --
      Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    64. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by buback · · Score: 1

      Yeah because the primary purpose of a university is to make a profit. Sure, in the past the athletics programs were there for the benefit of the student body, but now it's the scholastic programs that are there for the benefit of the fans.

    65. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by paiute · · Score: 1

      ... I'm working for the Horticulture department, which isn't in any danger of getting cut.

      True that. In academia there are a surplus of hors to support.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    66. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by _8553454222834292266 · · Score: 1

      http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/Programs/two_ways.html

      The Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences (EECS) major is housed in the College of Engineering and culminates in a Bachelor's of Science degree.
      The Computer Science (CS) major is housed in the College of Letters and Science and culminates in a Bachelor's of Arts degree.

    67. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by _8553454222834292266 · · Score: 1

      Still not its own "department". Maybe school quality factors into this more than whether the departments are merged.

    68. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my experience, the funding for the athletics is partially student fee based, partially ticket sales based, partially advertising based, partially tuition based, partially government funded, partially lottery funded, and partially alumni based. That said, when they ask me to donate money as an alumni, I ask them how much their sports coaches make. When they say $2 million, I say, if they have that kind of money to waste, then they don't need mine. Typically, they then say, it is a different pot of money, and I say nonsense.

    69. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Wovel · · Score: 2

      Or MIT with its combined EECS department. Or Maybe Caltech where it is combined with the Math department. Man all these schools suck. Maybe he was thinking of UT where it is part of the Engineering school. Oh wait.

    70. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Wovel · · Score: 1

      You really have no idea what you are talking about do you? Find one significant program where CS is a separate department.

    71. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by themightythor · · Score: 1

      I think the point that s/he was trying to make is that most people assume that college athletics makes their money (or at least the lion's share) from ticket sales when the reality is that they make their money by and large from donations with ticket sales comprising a small portion of revenue. That said, I think colleges should stop viewing their athletic programs as an end unto themselves and as a means to an end, namely to generate revenue for the college at large. After all colleges are still ostensibly academic institutions.

    72. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Wovel · · Score: 2

      I agree it sounds like he is looking for ITT Tech

    73. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      Call it what you will, but it's given me a great edge in getting decent jobs rather than starting at the ground floor. Isn't that what really counts in a degree anyway?

    74. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Who the fuck cares if it makes money - it's a STATE UNIVERSITY not a CORPORATION. It doesn't have to "make money". It has to Educate People. Eliminating the CS dept while boosting Football is embarrassingly retarded. You want to know why America is Collapsing? Bullshit like killing the CS dept while boosting Football is why the USA is Collapsing. It's being crushed by a massive case of the stupids and a malingering condition of ignorance complicated by fantastically poor judgement.

      --
      Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    75. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by SJHillman · · Score: 2

      You really don't need to know the physics behind how a processor works in order to administer servers. You don't need to know how Python directly affects bits to write a script. Do you think every mechanic has a deep understanding of thermodynamics before they begin working on cars? Or carpenters understand the molecular biology of different wood species? It helps to understand the basics, but you don't need the same in depth knowledge it takes to design things from scratch.

    76. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by k10quaint · · Score: 2

      Because the job of the University of Florida is to make money, not educate students. Now I know to discount any degree I see from that state.

    77. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by internerdj · · Score: 1

      I'm curious; do these numbers include alumni donations?

    78. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

      "If you can't script you can't sysadmin. If you can't script you can't be a netadmin, what the hell can you do?"

      Windows admin!

      Click Remote Desktop icon ... wait ... select web server #1 from drop-down list ... wait ... type password .. wait ... Start -> services ... wait ... highlight hung IIS service, click restart ... wait ... log out. Repeat for web servers #2-N.

      --
      0 1 - just my two bits
    79. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, a non- or minimally educated populace is much easier to control. If the governor could get rid of all the colleges and universities, in another generation or two, think how easy it'll be to privatize everything under an umbrella company that he and his buddies run.

    80. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You really have no idea what you are talking about do you? Find one significant program where CS is a separate department.

      Purdue University has both Compter Engineering and Computer Science

    81. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by k10quaint · · Score: 1

      You are arguing about semantics. What is, and what isn't a department etc. RTFA alert. If MIT or Cal was "eliminating all funding for teaching assistants in computer science, cutting the graduate and research programs entirely", you would flip the fsck out. Who cares what department what was in when. No more MS or PHDs in CS is a huge blow to the "program" (and I use that word losely and ironically).

    82. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by steveb3210 · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      Fundamentally, networking and the related algorithms are very much within the domain computer science.....

    83. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by TigerTime · · Score: 1

      You don't know how athletic departments work for major schools. The school doesn't fund the athletic department at all. The budgets are completely separate. The athletic department makes money of of donors, tickets, tv, and merchandise. That money is spent on athletics and facilities.

      The school makes money off of tuition and funding. That money is spent on facilities and teachers.

      At no point is a school like UF going to kill off a educational program so they can divert that money to build a nicer stadium. That's just ignorance on your part.

    84. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      If they stop offering a CS degree, think how much easier it'll be to administer the school. Besides, how many people with CS degrees do you really ever run into, if you're on the admin/money side of things at a university. Come to think of it, most of those weird math/science/research guys are not cool to hang with and they're mostly lib'ruls as well. Can't spell lib'rul with out soocialist in there somewhere. Might be best to get rid of all those weird departments, along with the screechy Lit/history/sociologists people as well. They're always looking down at us MBA'ers and Coaches. If only they could have a school that taught business, sports, and construction trades, man, that'd be just grate!

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    85. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by mikael · · Score: 1

      My undegraduate university was like that, being distributed across the city. Might not have been fun in the rain, but it did give us the chance to go outside and get some fresh air.

      It's rather an academic debate as to whether Computer Science, Mathematics and Engineering should be in different departments or not. Usually they will be in the same faculty anyway (Arts vs. Engineering , and each professor will be responsible for their own research grant applications. But having separate departments is usually a measure of how many research groups they have.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    86. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Yup, computers for business majors. Just enough theory so that they can be put in charge of an IT shop and require weekly status updates and ways to capture employee progress for their yearly reviews.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    87. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At CMU Computer Science is an entire school, not a department. But what does CMU know, it's just a no-name regional school.

    88. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a little problem. The "bad and inefficient" are not necessarily eliminated at the lowest level. Going that way might end up with not the bad and inefficient universities going away (those might very well thrive, for example "paper mills" and universities providing education that the job market does not need but are popular for irrational reasons), since they are actually quite efficient and providing a piece of paper.
      Instead the US would collapse.
      Which of course would take those bad universities with them, so evolution is working all right.
      It's just that we humans general think it is not ok to take a whole economy down into the drain just to "fix" a few bad players. Evolutionary mechanism don't care about that. People just prefer to forget that a perfectly working ecosystem isn't a necessary outcome of evolution, "everyone is dead" (most of the time only in a certain area and for a limited time though) is very much possible, too.

    89. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

      Uh, no... Physics is to Mechanical Engineering as Chemistry is to Chemical Engineering as Computer Science is to Computer Engineering.

      Science is very, very different from engineering. Science is focused on the theoretical, while engineering is focused on applying that theory to the real world, subject to various resource constraints.

      Given that they are so different, it makes absolutely no sense to try to group them together, especially in some attempt to "save money".

      The conclusion may or may not be valid, but the assertion that science is "very, very different" from engineering is quite false, especially when you look at research done in chemistry vs. chemical engineering departments and see that the overlap is immense.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    90. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Alex+Belits · · Score: 2

      No.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    91. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by The+Pirou · · Score: 2, Funny

      You're erroneously linking interest in athletics to interest in colleges. While there are those who base their college choices on sports teams, for many people it is still about the Education and the Experience.

      My freshman year at USF was also the inaugural year of our football team. I remember the commentary going around the campus newspaper about the money we were being offered by UF and FSU to play their football teams (not a prayer of winning). The whole thing would have been an embarrassment to our school for losing all season if we'd accepted offers like those, and looking back I still don't think that being offered the equivalent of 1/3rd of UF's CS department so that they could've won one more game in a season was a valid expenditure on their part, even for advertising "Look at us, we're the Gators! We aren't computer literate but we stomped all over that first year newb football team. They use computers, look what good it did them!"

    92. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      At my work, we use CS majors to design and provide Tier 4 support for distributed computing systems on our multi-node clusters as well as code new software apps to run simulations and visualizing of data. With several 10k+ core systems and thousands of users, we keep these guys busy. But still, if the University system backs away from CS and engineering type of degrees, I'm sure we'll be able to offshore this kind of work and keep America competitive. At least, by the time that happens, those currently in charge will have grabbed their golden parachutes and will be drinking mai-tais on the beaches of Dubai.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    93. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      Penn State had a separate computer science department until they merged it in the late 90s. Now it's part of the engineering department. CS and E.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    94. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Nimey · · Score: 1

      Och aye? If their athletics program makes money, then why did they need a larger budget?

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    95. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by LambdaWolf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They don't make money from ticket sales... they make money from ticket sales?

      Someone skipped logic 101...

      The GP's post made sense to me.

      Their athletics program makes money, not from {ticket sales} but from {donations, ticket sales}.

      Unequal sets. :)

      --
      "This algorithm runs in constant time. Come on, 2,147,483,648 is a constant..."
    96. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What money is UF Athletics getting from the State? Please tell... What money is it even getting from the Academic side of the University??

      This is a BS argument. The athletic dept ultimately gets their cash from the basis of their fan base, and where exactly do you think they get their fans from? By and large it is their university affiliation. To think that the athletic dept gets nothing from the university besides cash is a completely myopic viewpoint. If the UF football team was instead the "Gainesville football team", how many fans would they have?

      Athletic depts in general should be kicking back a lot more than they do to their university hosts, because frankly without them nobody would care who they were.

    97. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Wovel · · Score: 1

      They increase their budget because they need to spend their projected revenue increase. A significant portion of that increase will be in the contribution to the university. Read the budget (it is public information and I linked it 10 times in this thread already).

    98. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Only if you're at a bad school.

      Been there, you are absolutely correct unfortunately :(

    99. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      Because the job of the University of Florida is to make money, not educate students. Now I know to discount any degree I see from that state.

      Even if it is from FIT, USF or UCF? Your logic is flawless.

    100. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Wovel · · Score: 1

      TFA is a sham. It completely misrepresents both the change and the athletic budget. Perhaps instead of having faith in an absurdly inflammatory article with no facts in it, you should do a little research on your own.

    101. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Wovel · · Score: 1

      It does represent what is wrong with University Education today. People think it is a trade school.

    102. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      Computer science is a programme of study not an entire department.

      Only if you're at a bad school.

      This is absolutely silly. Why does UF have to do it the way others do it? Further, why does every single state university have to have a CS department? They don't all have law schools or medical schools. At a lot of schools, several fields are folded into larger departments, without any real loss of quality.

      Demand. Yes, there is a demand for highly qualified CS'tists (and STEM graduates in general.) OTH, Florida (where I currently live) absolutely sucks when it comes to engineering jobs. Most of my acquiaintances and ex-colleagues have gone to other states for better paid, more interesting opportunities. So perhaps UF closed its CS department because there is local state demand (lots of CS grads, and very little jobs.)

      Still this is sad, a sad indictment on Florida (and one more sign for me to GTFO).

    103. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Not these days, they now have to know powershell. Even in windows land things are much improved and require actual knowledge.

    104. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      Ok, so imagine you want to teach computer architectures. Which aren't quite electrical engineering but they aren't theoretical computer science either. Which department would you assign that to?

      I'd also add that any good computer architect should be skilled in both hardware and software-related issues, in electronics, electrical engineering as well as some discrete math. I don't see how you can put all those together outside of a CS department.

      That class goes firmly into a Computer Engineering curriculum while being accessible as an elective for CS and EE students.

    105. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Since to administer them you must first buy them, you actually do need to know some of the finer points of modern CPUs. At the very least, what operations your usage of this server require and what architecture is best suited to that use. Sure I can't design a modern cpu, but I can build a shift register and have a good general understanding of what is going on. I actually have done a wire wrap cpu and while it was a pain I learned a lot.

      You may well need to know what python is doing under the hood when something does not work and you are stracing it. Not knowing the fundamentals often means a total inability to know how to troubleshoot a system. Not knowing what a car engine is really doing is why so many mechanics now just swap parts until the error goes away. This is expensive for everyone involved and means repairs take longer than they should.

    106. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why the hell are academic institutions blowing their money on athletic programs? Does the NBA finance academic programs? I don't get it.

    107. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The majority operate at a loss, but many, including UF, do make money.

      Maybe, maybe not. Take the case of the University of Nike^h^h^h^h Oregon, which is another one of the few that claims to make money. Turns out it actually operates on all kinds of hidden subsidies from academics. Athletics also costs academics in other ways, such as channeling donations away. It would not shock me at all if these hidden costs also apply at Florida and other schools that claim to make money.

    108. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by spire3661 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The point is to EDUCATE, NOT MAXIMIZE REVENUE. The PROFIT is a well educated citizenry.

      --
      Good-bye
    109. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by elistan · · Score: 1

      Various universities structure things differently. I have no idea what computer science "should" be, but here's a sampling:

      Carnegie Mellon - School of Computer Science.
      Computer Science Department
      Entertainment Technology Center
      Institute for Software Research
      Robotics Institute
      Human-Computer Interaction Institute
      Lane Center for Computational Biology
      Language Technologies Institute
      Machine Learning Department

      At CMU, CS gets its own school/department/division, as well as its own major within that.

      MIT - School of Engineering Includes:
      Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
      Materials Science and Engineering
      Mechanical Engineering
      Nuclear Science and Engineering
      Aeronautics and Astronautics
      Biological Engineering
      Chemical Engineering
      Civil and Environmental Engineering

      So it's a combined program within the engineering department.

      CalTech - similar to MIT - Division of Engineering and Applied Science
      Aerospace
      Applied Physics and Materials Science
      Bioengineering
      Computing and Mathematical Sciences
      Electrical Engineering
      Environmental Science and Engineering
      Mechanical and Civil Engineering

      Again combined, but with math, and under sciences.

      WISC - Department of Computer Sciences under the College of Letters & Science

      Again, nested, but not a combined major.

      YMMV.

    110. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, if they did nuke the athletics department, it would open up the football stadium for live action Halo deathmatches.

    111. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I had a similar coursework, with a lot more lower level stuff, I also minored in Sociology. Am I also what is wrong with University education?

      Believe it or not actually handling the equipment is needed to learn how to deal with many different examples. Is premed not a university education? They also handle the equipment, aka bodies.

    112. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by forkfail · · Score: 2

      College football does not make money for education. There's a lot of money flowing, but almost none really ever goes to education.

      --
      Check your premises.
    113. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Compaqt · · Score: 2

      Well, I actually agree that it should be possible for one school to offer astronomy (if they have a telescope), and for another to offer archaeology.

      The thing that I think got people going about this is: When you say "Florida", the first thing people think is "spring break, year round". So UF eliminating compsci leads them to think "they're playing into the stereotype". That's why I think people are reacting to this like they are (including alumni who want the school to known for academics and not just for being a Florida college experience.)

      --
      I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    114. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the University of Waterloo, CS is one department within the Faculty of Mathematics.

      I think that one can honestly say that Waterloo is “significant” when it comes to math and computer science.

    115. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which has a large and distinct Computer Science Division, offering two different degree tracks through two different colleges. Back in the 90s, I got my B.A. in Computer Science from the College of Letters and Sciences, while some friends got a B.S. in Computer Science from the College of Engineering.

    116. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Compaqt · · Score: 1

      Wait, but couldn't they put in an endowment instead of spending on coke?

      Actually, come to think of it, how can schools have endowments then, if they can't put money in the bank? (The balance has to be $0 at the strike of midnight, New Years Eve.)

      --
      I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    117. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say it's more computer scientist/software engineer/it technician representing scientist/engineer/technician. A computer scientist can prove an obscure algorithm, an engineer can use it to build a complex system and the technician can operate it, if probably not implement or design it.

    118. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Like this one? They're cutting CS to save $2m. Meanwhile, their $99m/yr athletics program is getting a modest boost... roughly $2m.

      Methinks they are trying to solve the Traveling Salesman problem by brute force.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    119. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by CosaNostra+Pizza+Inc · · Score: 1

      and theology. Conservaturds are big on theology

    120. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by similar_name · · Score: 1
      Are you sure about that? At least according to this article only 7 schools did that in each year of the 5 year period looked at.

      Counting only revenue generated by the athletic departments — including money from ticket sales, donations, radio/TV and marketing rights payments — the number of schools able to cover their athletic expenditures fell to 14 in 2009, down from 25 the previous year. This measure of generated revenue against total expenses is the yardstick the NCAA uses to determine whether an athletic program is self-supporting. Only seven met this benchmark during each of the five years studied: Georgia, Iowa, Louisiana State, Michigan, Nebraska, Oklahoma and Texas.

    121. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by forkfail · · Score: 1

      Education is the long term investment that always is obvious in it's payoffs, but very hard to put an exact numeric value to.

      But - skip education a generation, and watch what happens.

      --
      Check your premises.
    122. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The budget of the athletic program is entirely separate from the University and receives no funding from the state. The UAA generates revenue from ticket sales, boosters, and the SEC and it is solely responsible for the funding of athletics at UF. Cutting the CS department is a decision the University is making that falls outside the budgeting decisions of the athletics department. Sure, there is an issue for where individuals want to put their money, but "Give athletics, take academics" is a false dilemma in this case.

    123. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by forkfail · · Score: 1

      Horseshit. It all comes from the same well.

      --
      Check your premises.
    124. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I found in my CS degree is that I learned about networking and methodologies. Now that I work in the telecom industries as a programmer I have found that my degree is more than enough to cover all the things the network guys know about with all their certs. You can always read manuals to figure out how to implement things in one piece of equipment or another but to under stand collision avoidance vs detection is useful for every piece of equipment.

      I wouldn't look at it as one vs the other. I would look at it that if we all had CS degrees, certs would probably go out the window. CS under the math department I feel is the way to go. Everything with computers is about math.

      Everything with a processor is a computer, if its a watch or a server. Networking equipment or otherwise.

    125. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by forkfail · · Score: 1

      Difference with your examples is that they don't organize them that way to save money; they do it because they think that is the way to do it.

      Which is fine.

      It is also a far cry from cutting bits out of the CS curriculum to add 2M to the pool so it can be sent over to the football team.

      --
      Check your premises.
    126. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FWIW: As someone who conducts interviews for those exact kinds of positions, I'd rather that a new college hire show a well developed programming background than specific protocol experience.

    127. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      It's not just about state tax money. There are other sources of income (research grants, patent licensing, tuition) for the university. Does the University of Florida gets an appropriate share of the UAA revenue considering how much revenue the UAA generates with its affiliation with UF? In 2011, the UAA made $96.5 million and gave an unrestricted "contribution" of $4.8 million which is around 5%. Should UF demand more?

      Since you did mentioned tax money, I found some interesting information while reading the UAA budget and its associated audit. Chapter 1006 Section 71 of Florida Statues allows the UAA to retain all of the state sales tax collected for use in women's athletics. For the years ending June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010, the amount retained was $1.48 million and $1.49 million respectively. You thought they were profiting on just the inflated price of concessions?

      I'm sure if I really look hard enough, I can find more fungible state money floating around.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    128. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by CosaNostra+Pizza+Inc · · Score: 1

      "When it gets to real life jobs, all three areas of studies often give us a similar career path." Sort of, yes. Computer Engineers usually go onto become system-level developers in software (as in OS, drivers, etc) and/or Hardware (HDL, VLSI, PCB design, etc). Whereas computer science and software engineers do application-level software development. There sometimes is a fine line between the two.

    129. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by forkfail · · Score: 1

      The thing about CS/CE is that it is one place where the product and the design are very close together; the distinction isn't so sharp - there's a lot of gray area.

      Often the blueprint resembles (and becomes) the product; pseudo code and algorithms are directly translatable to code.

      This is very different from the equations that determine materials strength becoming a bridge.

      --
      Check your premises.
    130. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by wiredlogic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      most CS majors arent going to know how to work on a real internet router.
      University education isn't supposed to be vocational training. In academia you learn academic concepts, not on the job skills.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    131. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where I went, CS was a part of the department of mathematics. I know at other universities, its a part of electrical engineering. Besides having a degree in CS, I went to another college and got an associate degree in electronics engineering. There is a fair bit of overlap all around, but more between EE and CS than there would be between IT and CS. The former have strong math components attached to them, whereas IT is associated with business, and there is no math component attached (light arithmetic attached to cost/balance, but no tensor calculus, differential equations, laplace transforms, fourier transforms, eigenvectors, graph theory, ring theory, or any other fun fun mathemagic, where questions on the exam are totally different from any problem you've seen (just changing the numbers is an exact problem, changing the structure of the problem where you have to rearrange how you solve the problem (divide by the exponent, then take the cross product instead of multiply by the factorial and then integrate).

    132. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      Only if you lack reading comprehension. He said they don't make money just from ticket sales, but from ticket sales and alumni donations.

    133. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 1

      That's why they are opening Florida Polytechnic University, to meet the demand. Right there at the bottom of the article that you didn't read.

      Most likely, FPU can accommodate any student that leaves U of F.

      It's pretty much the opposite of a sad indictment, and demand is being met.

    134. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      You're erroneously linking interest in athletics to interest in colleges

      And you're erroneously trying to say there is no interest. There is clearly an overlap, as shown that schools with winning teams notice an increase in enrollments.

      And yes, it would have been stupid for your school to accept that money. But that has absolutely nothing to do with the topic at hand.

    135. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by yali · · Score: 2

      "Make money" is relative. All universities, including the ones like UF that claim to make money, certify that their big-time sports programs are "substantially related" to their educational mission, and the IRS and state tax boards choose to believe it. As a result, the university's revenue from tickets, TV broadcast rights, advertising, and merchandise are tax-exempt. Donations from boosters are tax exempt (and a tax writeoff for the donor). Construction of stadiums and other sports facilities is funded with tax-exempt bonds.

      Next time you turn on the TV and see a bowl game or March Madness, realize that as far as tax policy is concerned, you are watching a charity event among nonprofit institutions. If that makes sense to you (something you might ponder in between the action while watching a beer commercial or two), then yes, perhaps UF is making money.

    136. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      Just because something is part of the government does not mean it should be a sinkhole to swallow taxpayer dollars.

      I won't disagree, but I will say that just because something isn't profitable is not a reason for it to not exist.

      As for the Post Office, despite what you may think, they were actually profitable for quite some time. The downturn on their profits is mostly attributed to the rise of email, and trend away from written communication, rather than any kind of "government inefficiency" you might try to blame.

      And as for Amtrak, well, lets give them the same amount of subsidies that we give air travel and roads, and see how poorly they do.

    137. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'll change their tune when all the football players in computer science transfer to other schools to play!

    138. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Tuition of the students attending should be sufficient to pay for the CS department. If it's not, they shouldn't have a CS department.

      UF is a public school. Public schools are heavily taxpayer subsidized. That means that NONE of the programs at a public school are paid for solely through tuition. Under your criteria, there would be no classes at all.

      Compare the tuition for public vs. private and you'll see the difference. Even then, private schools are subsidized by donations to some extent, and tuition still does't pay the full cost.

      I know many are desperate for uniformity, but it's really OK if not every single institution offers exactly the same programs of study.

      I agree. Students who care about getting the best will seek the college with the best program in their field, not the best "party school". As long as one state school in a state does have a program, I have no problem with specialization. (One school per state so there is still an opportunity for in-state tuition levels for those who can't afford "the best".)

      Schools also do a ridiculous bunch of things that I, as a former tuition paying student, don't want them spending my money on. Stop that.

      And as both a current taxpayer and former tuition paying student, I say amen to that, brother.

    139. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      Computer architecture? Like processor architecture? That would most definitely fall under the Electrical/Computer Engineering department.

      If you're talking about architecture of software programs, then that would definitely fall under Computer Science or Software Engineering.

      Besides, just because the Computer Science department might be separate from the EE department doesn't mean they can't collaborate for things like this that are common. In fact, they'd be incredibly stupid not to. There's a very good chance the students from the different departments are going to be working together in the real world, might as well get them used to it as soon as possible.

    140. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by buddyglass · · Score: 1

      Note that athletics programs don't only contribute money. Some analysis here and here. This effect is probably even more pronounced at a mid-range state university like Florida. People would continue to go to Berkeley even if it had no football program. For a school like UF or FSU, though, losing that visibility probably costs you significantly in terms of student interest and quality of applicants.

    141. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point is to EDUCATE, NOT MAXIMIZE REVENUE. The PROFIT is a well educated citizenry.

      As long as you can write that on a paycheck and have it accepted for services rendered...

    142. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by interkin3tic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But if you eliminate whole departments, you lose interdisciplinary links. You eliminate any quality in classes that other majors need. If UF offered computational neurobiology for example, it probably won't for very long now. Can't really see how the students are going to learn the upper-level computing skills they'd need. They'll try to compensate by having some biology professor who kinda knows computers try to teach the class, but the result will be less well-rounded students.

    143. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Maybe they're just deciding that their university shouldn't focus on CS, and should let other universities do that. If their CS department is weak, then why not cut it? Students can go to other schools for that. My university, for instance, had a Mining Engineering school; that's something that very few engineering schools have. I don't see anyone complaining that every university in the country doesn't have a Mining Engineering department. If you want to study a particular field, you go to the school that offers the best program for that, which you can afford and is accessible to you.

    144. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally I see 4 discaplins that each overlap a bit and often are grouped together:

      Electrical Engineering (circuit design, low level logic, probably some assembly/C coding)
      Software Engineering (design patterns, use of IDEs, proficiency in a handful of languages, a lot of "best practices")
      Computer Science (theory of computation, algorithm design/analysis)
      Information Technology (setup and maintenance of common systems)

      Generally the first 3 are worth a 4-year degree with CS being the most logical one for further education (a doctorate in Software Engineering seems odd to me.) IT on the other hand is more a 2-year degree or a series of certifications.

      Now the tricky thing is that in the real world you get a lot of programs pick one of those names and merge two or more of the curriculums... and it's not necessarily even the curriculum matching the name. Often you'll get a "Computer Science" program that's actually "Software Engineering and Information Technology."

    145. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Demand. Yes, there is a demand for highly qualified CS'tists (and STEM graduates in general.)

      There's a huge demand for STEM graduates willing to work for peanuts. Universities don't care about that; they care about the demand from prospective students. How many students are demanding CS curriculae? If there's not many students wanting to go into that field, then it makes perfect sense to cut it. Or, if there's sufficient students, but they just don't like your university, and are skipping it to go to other universities with better-recognized CS programs, again it makes perfect sense to cut it and focus on programs your university is good at.

    146. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by jbengt · · Score: 1

      Tuition of the students attending should be sufficient to pay for the CS department. If it's not, they shouldn't have a CS department.

      With that logic, there would be no departments at all in any university, except maybe law or MBA programs.

    147. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Compaqt · · Score: 1

      Right, I know, I said that.

      Then I went on to state why (some people) are reacting negatively to this (because it reinforces the idea of Florida colleges being party schools).

      I'm not putting that idea forward, but I think some people think it.

      You can't really refute that because it's about perceptions.

      --
      I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    148. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Many" can refer to an absolute number rather than a percentage. E.g. "many people died of smallpox" but it's also true that 65-70% of the people infected survived.

      Only "most" requires a majority.

    149. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can, but you can't support it well.

      I did a stint in government as a network security administrator. I've never seen a group of more useless people in my life. Button clickers, the lot of them.

    150. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by rokkaku · · Score: 1

      Did you read the original article? The CS program at UF is ranked 39th in the country. Not amazing, but certainly not worthy of being shut down. I see plenty of employers begging for more H1B's because we can't produce enough software folks for industry, so I'd say that, yeah, we do need just as many CS programs as we can get.

    151. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by slew · · Score: 1

      Computer science is a programme of study not an entire department.

      Only if you're at a bad school.

      AFAIK, MIT and Berkeley have a joint EECS department and they are consistently in the top 10. I don't think I would consider these bad schools for Computer Science. Caltech doesn't have a computer science department either , they have a Computing and Mathematical Sciences Department (aka CMS). This consists of 3 programmes of study: Applied+Computational Mathemetics, Computer Science, and Control and Dynamical systems. Although they aren't necessaarily the top rank in CS (near the top 10), it's a small school so CS doesn't warrent a whole deparartment.

    152. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I'm basically agreeing with you.

      I don't know much about this particular school, but if it really is a party school, then maybe they should concentrate on that instead of trying to keep a poorly-performing program alive. Not every university needs a program in every subject. Lots of universities don't even have engineering schools, and lots of engineering schools don't have programs in certain subjects (mining and nuclear, for instance, have very few schools in the country that offer these programs). Just because everyone these days thinks "we need more programmers!!!" doesn't mean every university needs to maintain a CS department, especially when the demand from businesses and politicians don't match the demand from actual students.

    153. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Separate budgets. Athletics pays its own way. Nuking the entire athletic dept. wouldn't create any additional money for CS.

      They shouldn't nuke the Athletic department. They should merge the budgets and then pilfer the money and fund the CS department.

         

    154. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by vjoel · · Score: 1

      Not another redundant Department of Redundancy Department redundancy!

      --
      What part of `yes no` don't you understand?
    155. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Compaqt · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm probably agreeing with you, too, bro.

      Perhaps they should focus on being a party school. But some people (including alumni) didn't like that, and that's why they were complaining.

      --
      I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    156. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember watching us (K-State) get slaughtered by Nebraska on the football field in 1990 when I was a freshman. The change in the football program affected the entire state. It's sad that we place so much importance on a game; but that's the way things are. I just wish the college of engineering had been able to cash in on the popularity, but even with a good football program bringing in money we couldn't compete with the Big 10 universities when it came to salaries. Why? Because their football programs made more money than ours. I wish athletics and academics were completely separate institutions starting in middle school, but that will never happen in US public schools.

    157. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I see plenty of employers begging for more H1B's because we can't produce enough software folks for industry, so I'd say that, yeah, we do need just as many CS programs as we can get.

      No, we don't. I don't care how many employers are begging, the only thing that's important is how many students are begging for these programs. If there's insufficient demand by students, then it makes perfect sense to trim back on these things. How many students are demanding programs in nuclear engineering? Not many. Consequently, we don't have many places where you can earn a degree in it. It should be the same for CS. It doesn't matter how many employers are begging for it; if they want more CS candidates, they need to offer higher salaries. It's simply supply-and-demand. These stupid companies have been begging for STEM employees for a couple decades now, but never raising salaries, so it's really a bunch of lies to try to get people cheap.

    158. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The College of Engineering has a combined EECS department, which grants BS/MS degrees, and has a hardware/engineering focus. The College of Letters and Science has a CS department, which grants BA/MA degrees, and has a software/theory focus. The former grew out of the original EE department; the latter forked off from the math department. Students from each department routinely take courses offered by the other. When I went there, I took probably about half CS courses and half EE/EECS courses (my degree is in EECS).

      Point is: CS is so important that Cal has not 1, but 2 departments dedicated to it.

    159. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by RatherBeAnonymous · · Score: 1

      Who the fuck cares if it makes money - it's a STATE UNIVERSITY not a CORPORATION. It doesn't have to "make money".....

      Sadly, that is not true. I wish it were. I work for a non-profit school. We HAVE to make money or else we can not make payroll, keep the lights on, operate buses, heat the buildings, etc. Non-profit does not mean no-profit and it does not mean that we are not a business, it just means that there is no owner who gets to take the surplus money home at the end of the day.

    160. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      Education improves when there is competition for students. It rewards efficient organizations and eliminates inefficient ones. They die-out through their own wastage of funds on stupid endeavors (like sports). If it turns-out that killing the CS department was a mistake, then people will stop going to U of FL, and the place will be forced to either improve or die. Same thing that happened with Circuit City..... that is the beauty of the free market. The power belongs to the people to kill-off poorly run companies that are not meeting want the people desire.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    161. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      I've always thought of CS vs IT as Engineer vs Technician. One designs the other implements and operates.

      Theres more to it than that. IT folks are going to be responsible for things like ACLs, setting up VLANing, setting up secure remote access, etc. Im sorry, but thats just not something a programmer-turned-part-time IT guy should handle at any company of any resonable size. Does he understand the different types of VPN? Does he have a firm grasp on the difference between opening TCP port 1723 and UDP port 1723? Or what the difference between TCP port 47 and IP protocol 47 (GRE)?

      From personal experience, the answer tends to be no. Even with a firewall as simple as a Sonicwall, leave programmers in charge of the firewall for any length of time and you end up with row upon row of contradictory ACLs, with noone really sure what rules are needed and what arent.

      Perhaps youre right that you can get a lot of those skills from a certificate level study (for example going thru CCNA classes will get you a lot of the way there), but what seperates a good IT person from a bad one are those specifics-- really understanding what VPN DOES, how firewalls function, how to troubleshoot performance issues on a server, how to troubleshoot issues with packet loss or routing loops, etc. That spans several certificate programs, and at that point I could say "you can become a programmer just by taking a quickie on Java programming". Yea, you could, but you wouldnt be very good at it, thats the point.

      I think that they are very close in some ways and the foundationals should perhaps be the same-- learning logic gates and some basic programming languages (scheme, C++, etc) would be great whether you end up in CS proper or IT-- but towards the end things really branch off. An IT guy doesnt need to know assembler, and a programmer probably doesnt need to understand how to set up RADIUS authentication for WPA or understand the specifics of how RSTP trees are set up.

    162. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Those type of programs can be good-- I went thru one myself-- but they tend to deemphasize theory in favor of practice.

      Think how disastrous it is when someone with no understanding of programming theory (what Big O is, for example) tries to do anything of any complexity. It can be just as bad when someone who doesnt understand the basics of the OSI model tries to do networking.

    163. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't look at it as one vs the other. I would look at it that if we all had CS degrees, certs would probably go out the window.

      Id probably agree with that, but it seems like a waste to get a 4 year degree emphasizing programming and then spend your time working in a career on Cisco gear at a major ISP. Wouldnt it have been better to have more IT specifics? Why not branch it out into specialties in the CS degree program?

    164. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Working on a real internet router requires knowledge of subnetting, the OSI layer, ethernet / TCPIP specifics, routing protocols, etc. Thats not vocational, its theory.

    165. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      To be fair, I ignore all solicitations from my universities alumni department. It wasn't an athletic school in the first place so there's no competition there. But the alumni group is just a bit lame. When I was a student alumni money went to projects that most students opposed but which were rubber-stamped by the administration, and friends who had graduated remained in the dark (one asked me how everyone liked the new student center and was shocked to learn that students didn't even want it). There are enough places already to send my charity money without wasting it.

    166. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      So why not share that income from sports with the entire university? If sports income is kept exclusively within the sports department and they're not being team players, then why not just divorce the sports department from the university and let them go it alone?

    167. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by roothog · · Score: 3, Informative

      You really have no idea what you are talking about do you? Find one significant program where CS is a separate department.

      Sure. From the 2010 US News rankings of Computer Science:

      1. Carnegie Mellon. Separate CS and ECE.
      1. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Combined EECS. Separate CSAIL.
      1. Stanford. Separate CS and EE.
      1. UC Berkely. Combined EECS. Administratively split into separate EE and CS divisions.
      5. Cornell. Separate CS and ECE.
      5. UIUC. Separate CS and ECE.
      7. Washington. Separate CSE and EE.
      8. Princeton. Separate CS and EE.
      8. UT Austin. Separate CS and ECE.
      10. Georgia Tech. Separate CS and ECE.

      Need I continue, or is this enough evidence that maybe I do know what I'm talking about and that you should be quiet for a while?

    168. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Time for university to step up and tell them not to do that and instead to allow the university to spend the "extra" money in non-sports programs that need it.

      When I was in grad school, any research grants we had were sent to the research office to be doled back to us. We had a hard limit on how much each graduate student could be paid so if you had a huge grant you either hired more students or the university kept the excess (which went to other departments, paid profs who had fewer grants, etc). Why shouldn't sports programs operate under the same rule? If the university is an educational institution then the non educational departments should serve as funding sources.

    169. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Some people can not measure things without it being converted to dollars first.

    170. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      But - skip education a generation, and watch what happens.

      You end up with Florida?

    171. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by zlives · · Score: 1

      logic dept. was cut years ago

    172. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Separate budgets but common university. How does that work? There are laws against family members sharing money with each other? If they were separate universities then your logic makes sense. Everywhere else in the world the universities have shared services. What if a corporation worked this way, and the sales department refused to share any revenue with the HR department?

      At the start of the year the school should have figured out that the sports department has more than enough revenue and that it should allocate more of that budget to the poorer departments instead, in order to improve the primary mission of the university which is to educate students and not provide televised entertainment events.

    173. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      If it needs no money from state and university, then UF Athletics should be spun off into its own organization. Can it survive without being affiliated with a university? If it can then it should go it alone. If it can't it should act like a team member and share revenue.

    174. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by zlives · · Score: 1

      CE

    175. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by mako1138 · · Score: 1

      I am a Berkeley EECS graduate, and I don't think you understand how it works. The department is a single entity, the EECS Department. However the University offers two different _majors_ that lead to a CS degree, in different Colleges. I don't know why they do this, but for example, you generally cannot double major if you're in the College of Engineering, but you can if you're in L&S. So it only has a bearing on your advising and degree requirements.

    176. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Counting only revenue generated by the athletic departments â" including money from ticket sales, donations, radio/TV and marketing rights payments â" the number of schools able to cover their athletic expenditures fell to 14 in 2009, down from 25 the previous year. This measure of generated revenue against total expenses is the yardstick the NCAA uses to determine whether an athletic program is self-supporting. Only seven met this benchmark during each of the five years studied: Georgia, Iowa, Louisiana State, Michigan, Nebraska, Oklahoma and Texas.

      Geaux Tigers!!!

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    177. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      It used to be that Kansas and Missouri offered reciprocity (in-state tuition) for certain programs. Kansas didn't have any dental schools, and Missouri didn't have Architecture. That is an example of ranging things so it works best for everybody. Sure, it is great for both states to be able to support both programs locally, but small departments are expensive to run.

      If Florida only spent $2MM per year on CompSci, it must not have been much of a program.

    178. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Or those IT people who can script perl or python but know nothing about CS, such as how to implement a perl or python like language.

    179. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      The job of the University of Florida is to produce research (I believe it's an R1 school) and then educate students, but they have to figure out the most cost-effective way of doing it. They aren't going to educate everyone on everything, so they evaluate outcomes and other scenarios (are CS grads getting jobs? Are other depts., such as the math dept., producing more students who get jobs as programmers or placing students into grad programs? Are there viable alternatives in the region? etc.)

      There's also the other side of it: if you have a bunch of tenured faculty that aren't performing well, the easiest way to get rid of them is to shut down the department. That may be what is really at play here: a group of ineffective professors who have neither taught students effectively nor produced good research (in this case, winning grants or creating new technologies.) The best way to reboot is to nuke the department. rather than going through the excruciating, legally fraught, and expensive task of winding down your faculty.

    180. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      As for the Post Office, despite what you may think, they were actually profitable for quite some time.

      As the only form of communication to get more expensive every year. Legislated monopolies are not a good example of efficiency.

    181. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Yaztromo · · Score: 1

      My thoughts exactly. Most schools I've been to don't have a computer science department, but rather lump it in with the math or engineering department. Computer science is a programme of study not an entire department.

      It may depend on how educational institutions are organized in your geographic area, but I'm not aware of any Universities which have a computer science program which don't have it organized as a department.

      Very few Universities have a faculty of Computer Science, but they will have a department as a sub-unit under another faculty (usually Science, Math, or Engineering). There is generally sufficient students and staff however to form a department as a sub-unit to a faculty.

      Yaz

    182. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by jmerlin · · Score: 1

      How about theoretical & particle physics? I mean, after all, in SG:A and SG-1, Rodney McKay and Samantha Carter are physicists yet are capable of writing entire operating systems, reprogramming the "base code" of replicators (you know, sentient machines that constantly rewrite their own code and adapt, you'd think that's trillions to quadrillions of lines of code!), and they can write these awesome software applications to interface with Lantean technology millions of years ahead of our understanding in their spare time, and only in a few short years! Surely, we have a lot to learn from physicists.

    183. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't have to know PowerShell. It will simply make GP's chore much faster and easier.

    184. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by crunchygranola · · Score: 1

      I know many are desperate for uniformity, but it's really OK if not every single institution offers exactly the same programs of study.

      But if one university in the Florida system has a Computer Science Department, it should be U of F. Its role has historically been as the flagship science and engineering university in Florida. When the flagship loses this key field, it is cause for alarm.

      --
      Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
    185. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      The problem is that the people who choose a school based on the success of their sports teams are for the most part not the students you actually want to attract. The students who are principally focused on the quality of education they will receive are also the ones most likely to care enough to put in the time to get a good education, which means they will (hopefully) do better in life, which means more money flowing back to the school through donations, etc.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    186. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      They will if they want to get a job.
      Who would in 2012 hire a windows admin that does not know powershell?

    187. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Frobnicator · · Score: 1
      Non-profit does not mean you need to have zero cash at the new fiscal year.

      A non-profit organization simply means that the capital funds cannot be withdrawn by individuals; it is not their profitable enterprise. Non-profit organizations can (and do) accumulate wealth --- they are just a little bit limited to what they can do with the money.

      Non-profit organizations can carry as much money as it takes to do business. For example, a non-profit healthcare company may have a billion or so invested in hospitals and medical equipment, they don't need to sell everything so they are completely broke every fiscal year.

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
    188. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by hoppo · · Score: 1

      The athletic department does not receive funding from the university. In fact, the UAA is one of the University of Florida's largest benefactors, donating in the neighborhood of $6 million annually.

    189. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by hoppo · · Score: 1

      Why not do some research instead of postulating on a message board. Because if you did, you'd know that the athletic department donates over $6 million to the university per year.

    190. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by hoppo · · Score: 2

      You've just justified tearing the entire university system asunder.

      If student tuition could keep academic departments afloat, we would never hear about budget cuts. But it's fantasy. The University of Florida, for example, after budget cuts, will be getting over $800 million dollars in the next academic year. Divide that by roughly 50,000 undergrad + grad, and that's about $18K/student. Tuition is $4K in-state, $24K out-of-state, and the student body definitely skews more toward in-state students. So money received from tuition pales in comparison to what the state sends.

      In higher education academics, departments are funded, and justify their existences, through grants. Unfortunate as it may be, that's the way of life. And UF's CS department was not taking in enough grant money to justify remaining a standalone department.

      IMO, people are looking at this a bit backwards. This should be highlighting what poor stewards of tax money public colleges and university have been and continue to be. A lot of attention is put on the athletic department, which subsists without state or university funding, turns a profit, and is a major donor to its host school. Yet a blind eye is turned to the fact that this school is raking in billions, yet cannot find a way to keep legitimate academic programs intact.

    191. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by DetriusXii · · Score: 1

      Can we study the same things in other departments without having a dedicated Computer Science niche to go with Computer Engineering, Software Engineering, etc.?

      Not in sufficient depth, at least in my opinion. Complexity theory? Database theory (yes, theory, not just "here's how to write a simple SQL statement)? Compilers? These could all be in other departments, but an undergrad pursuing a degree in another field will not have enough time to study computer science in any respectable depth. Double major is not the answer if CS is spread over more than two other departments. Spreading CS across math and engineering departments deprives students of the chance to become computer scientists.

      I'd like specifics. Which department should handle a compiler? Compilers bring in regular expressions for the syntax, create a parse tree for the semantics, and transform that parse tree into an intermediate pseudo assembly translation and then into the native machine code. I wouldn't trust mathematicians to understand the coding work, I wouldn't trust engineers with the coding work either. Which department should handle database courses? Entity relations, foreign key maps, many-to-many relationship tables, object relational mappers, triggers, and authorization schemas are something that most business departments don't have the technical ability to deal with. A business major acquaintance struggled to understand primary keys using MS Access. How do you plan on the business department to teach PostgreSQL, MySql when most of their students don't have the capacity to learn these DBs and aren't their for their primary purpose to learn new DBs. Which department should teach version control systems? Engineering is mostly pen and paper, mathematics is mostly pen and paper. It's only computer science where application code is built and has the foresight to provide students with version control tools so that the student can understand. Web frameworks and web languages....Once again, business departments don't have the capacity to understand the difference between a POST request and a GET request.

    192. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by hoppo · · Score: 1

      Actually it's your argument that's BS. The "indirect benefits" argument is usually the last resort when all others have been trounced.

      The fact is, if you were to eliminate the UF athletic department entirely, it would not change the situation with academics one bit. Well, that's not true. There would be 6+ million fewer dollars flowing into the university's general fund. But that aside, people are making it a guns/butter situation. But it's not. There is no hard financial opportunity cost to some academic program associated with the operation of the university athletics program. And there certainly is no opportunity cost where these intangibles are concerned, either.

    193. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by hoppo · · Score: 1

      Your naivete is adorable.

    194. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Now, our particular athletic department just became profitable enough that it is going to be run without state assistance. All money spent must be generated from sales, media contracts, conference profits, and donations. This year's $20 million profit is funding facility enhancements to keep us competitive with other schools which will probably outspend us in this area long term."

      So when the athletic department is losing money, it gets subsidized by the state, but when it's making money it *doesn't pay any back*? But it gets to keep spending on itself? That's some featherbedding.

      It would be more fair to the state and more sportsmanlike if spending was constrained to the *median* of competing schools. I want to admire my teams for winning with human skills, not because they've got the fanciest facilities. And if the facilities don't improve wins, they aren't justified.

    195. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by scot4875 · · Score: 1

      It helps that any donations not specifically targeted to an organization on campus typically get credited toward the athletics department. Since most donations just go to the school without stipulations about where it should be spent, this means that the athletics department gets to take credit for nearly all donations.

      But also, by your logic, if the athletics program is so profitable, why keep the rest of the school open at all? Most of the rest of any school is a big money loser.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    196. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by scot4875 · · Score: 1

      As we've learned from Darwin, competition weeds-out the bad and inefficient, leaving behind the well-adapted.

      No, we didn't learn that AT ALL. What Darwin taught us is that we get the traits that are selected for; currently we are selecting for universities that have winning athletics programs. By themselves, "bad" and "inefficient" don't mean jack shit in the context of natural selection.

      Not to mention that education should be viewed as an INVESTMENT, not an expense. If you think it's too expensive to make sure we have a well-educated populace, just think about the alternative.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    197. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by scot4875 · · Score: 1

      I know you've already pointed it out, but if you hadn't, this statement shows that you clearly don't have a CS degree -- or even know what computer science is.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    198. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      I know a few "real life" physicists, most of physics "ain't exactly rocket science," even the particle guys spend a lot of time doing some very simple-minded stuff.

    199. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by rokkaku · · Score: 1

      Right on!

      If businesses really needed more STEM graduates, they could send a very clear signal, and we've yet to see that signal.

      (We *are* seeing surging enrollments of CS students, but you're absolutely right that making the argument that way is far sounder than talking about mere rhetoric from business.)

    200. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right - computer science has 0% to do with the name of the department, much like a 'sub department of math' as OP outlined.
      Totally apples-to-apples comparison. Why didn't I think of this!

    201. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If the UF football team was instead the "Gainesville football team", how many fans would they have?"

      Ummm...you know there is an entire multi-billion dollar league of football teams that aren't affiliated with universities, right? The NFL manages to keep plenty of fans interested to the tune of billions of dollars in revenue annually.

    202. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by daniel_mcl · · Score: 1

      Unless things have drastically changed since (recently) I went to Caltech, math is its own department -- part of the division of physics, math, and astronomy -- and CS is its own department as well -- part of the division of engineering and applied sciences. There's also an applied/computational math under the E&AS umbrella, but that's not anything like either math or CS.

      --
      I used to read Caltizzle. I was a lot cooler than you.
    203. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Why do they bother? Is it all one big money churn, where a bunch of people scheme together to suck as much money out of it as possible, it obviously has very little to do with education.

      As for research, well realistically undergraduate and post graduate education could very well do with a complete cut. Undergraduate Universities should be pretty much education only environment with no research and with post graduate facilities having a high focus on research.

      As for sports, dump it out all together and let it sink on swim all on it's own, if it is marketing to promote schools seriously you are doing schools a disservice, basically promoting physical prowess "I can lift a hundred pounds" over mental prowess "I can spell a hundred pounds", the message you're sending out to future generations is perverse and stupid.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    204. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're off by a level, maybe you just tend to experience the low end of both fields? A CS person should be able to innovate in the space of information theory and algorithms and such, even if they often do drudge work churning out actual useful code to make a buck. An IT person should be perfectly capable of writing decent code (even at the level of code generators and compilers and the like), even if they often do drudge work just compiling and installing stuff to make a buck.

      An IT person who can't code is really bottom of the barrel in their field, and a CS person who just churns out boilerplate code but can't innovate in the theory areas is in the same boat. And thus, CS students need tight coupling with Math departments, and IT students need tight coupling with CS departments.

    205. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by XrayJunkie · · Score: 1

      ... and again I am reminded to Idiocracy [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiocracy] ...

    206. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      That's why they are opening Florida Polytechnic University, to meet the demand. Right there at the bottom of the article that you didn't read.

      Who says I didn't read it? Yes, the article mentions FPU, but it also mentions state-wide budget cuts that have cause (in great part) UF to close its CS departments. My response was intended to answer DesSCorp's question, not a reference to anything said in the article. That should have been obvious if you had applied some reading comprehension skills as opposed to engaging in drive-by-posting, looking for opportunities to post a quick reply to stuff you barely read yourself.

      Most likely, FPU can accommodate any student that leaves U of F.

      It's pretty much the opposite of a sad indictment, and demand is being met.

      Uh, read TFA, the one you claimed I didn't read, where it talks about the budget cuts across the state. FIU closed its Systems Engineering department a few years ago (a stupid thing to do considering South Florida is in desperate need to attract the Space/Defense/Engineering firms that exist in Central Florida.) Then, more budget cuts come in, and UF closes the CS department (as opposed of, I don't know, shrinking it or merging it with a larger engineering department). And all the while UF increases its Athletics budget and Rick Scotts opens a new university (as if budget cuts didn't exist..)

      You live in Florida? You work in Florida? I do. I've been since 1990, and working in software there since 1994. I see things from the ground, I've seen the tech decline that has transpired for the last two decades. And yes, this is a sad indictment on the state.

    207. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      Demand. Yes, there is a demand for highly qualified CS'tists (and STEM graduates in general.)

      There's a huge demand for STEM graduates willing to work for peanuts. Universities don't care about that; they care about the demand from prospective students. How many students are demanding CS curriculae?

      As I mentioned to y b4dc0d3r, my reference to "demand" was in response to DesSCorp's hypothetical question.

      If there's not many students wanting to go into that field, then it makes perfect sense to cut it.

      If that were to make sense, it would also make sense NOT to open a brand f*cking new university (FPU) with a BS in Information Technology and with other universities in the state expanding their CS program, wouldn't it? But that is not the case, so no, it does not make perfect sense.

      Or, if there's sufficient students, but they just don't like your university

      It isn't mine. I'm not a UF graduate. Nice assumption by the way. Let me know how this method of argumentation works for you.

      and are skipping it to go to other universities with better-recognized CS programs, again it makes perfect sense to cut it and focus on programs your university is good at.

      The CS program at UF was one of the most recognized programs in the state. Sorry, the dissapearance of this department has nothing to do with the quality or demand for it, and a lot more for budget cuts that have been occuring at the state level and by academic mismanagement. But don't knock yourself trying to believe this. You are free to believe otherwise and assume it has to do with lack of educational quality or demand. Opinions != fact and all that jazz.

    208. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      University of Florida also makes a *really* large amount of coin from licensing of GatorAid....

    209. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Working on a real internet router requires knowledge of subnetting, the OSI layer, ethernet / TCPIP specifics, routing protocols, etc.

      Not really. It requires the ability to follow instructions and knowledge in how to configure the specific router in question.

      Thats not vocational, its theory.

      Irrelevant. Actual knowledge of subnetting, the ISO layer, the other things you listed and a bunch more is however required in order to design the router in your example. Very different from subsequently operating/configuring/managing it.

    210. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You hit the nail right on the head. The only thing to add is that is not a US-only trend to replace the goal of producing educated people to improve the country by the goal of maximise profit and f*** everything else (and better yet if people goes arround without proper education as it becomes easy to make them support the most absurd causes (like giving up privacy for security).

    211. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      Given two schools which are approximately equal in academics, would you consider someone who chose the school with a better sports team as one of the tiebreaking criteria to be a "student you don't want to attract"?

      Despite what you want to believe, a lot of people like watching sports. Having a good sports team on campus means that there is one more option for things to do while you're there.

    212. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1

      I can accept that.

      --
      Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    213. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the money comes from thin air.

      While we are talking "Education"... how about grab some Econ 101.

      And maybe some Engl 101 while we are at it. Because most of you are using a bit of hyperbole to address the situation.

    214. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      You should come work for a university - its far from being a unified solitary company - its more like 200-300 different companies fighting for resources.

      Bottom line - any money your department makes - you pretty much get to keep.

    215. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look up 'malingering.' I don't think it means what you think it does.

    216. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      CMU's CS department is actually it's own *school* within the university now. A while back they demanded and extorted that. Yet 1983-1987 the CS then-department couldn't be bothered to offer an undergrad degree.

    217. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Doug+Jensen · · Score: 1

      Check out the SCHOOL -- not just department -- of CS at CMU.

      --
      Doug Jensen
    218. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      You're erroneously linking interest in athletics to interest in colleges. While there are those who base their college choices on sports teams, for many people it is still about the Education and the Experience.

      You do realize that part of "the Experience" IS the sports? You do realize that MANY people choose schools not soley based on education. The base it on location (close or far from home, near a beach, etc) and for many people the success of the sports plays a role.
      I enjoy watching sports and probably would not go to a school that didn't have a decent sports program

    219. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      If you dont understand how routing protocols work, I shudder to think of the results of trying to implement even something as simple as RIP. You may be able to follow the directions, but that may not prevent you from introducing massive security holes or routing loops.

      Ditto with STP or VLANs: Without understanding the principles, you will be hopeless trying to configure them even if you understand the commands. With STP for example, you may indeed end up with a spanning tree, and its root may be in the most unbelievably inconvenient place and slow the entire network down.

    220. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Stuarticus · · Score: 1

      But it's not a sporting club, it's a university. There's something seriously wrong with the American education system when college "football" takes $100m a year to run.

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
    221. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Stuarticus · · Score: 1

      At least all your NFL players will have degrees in "Sport Science" they can put to good use.

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
    222. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Stuarticus · · Score: 1

      I know it'll sound like insanity as you've been conditioned to think that's the way it should be, but maybe all Universities should spin off their sporting clubs into independent institutions and operate as educational institutes. Leave the training to the sports clubs, it works everywhere else for every other sport. As far as I'm aware America is the only country that seems to think that the 2 need to go hand in hand.

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
    223. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your comment is irrelevant to the thousands of Windows admins who already have jobs.

    224. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      If everything about the two schools were otherwise equal, then sure, but in practice, no two schools are equal unless you aren't looking at the details.

      In academics, one school might have a stronger Biology department, whereas the other school might have a stronger English department. And even within a narrow area, one school might have an amazing journalism school, but only limited facilities for student TV production, whereas the other school might have a stronger production curriculum with a weaker J-school.

      A given student will face differences in cost, differences in availability of scholarships, differences in what the student has to do to keep certain scholarships, and so on. And the facilities that schools provide will vary in quality and upkeep, from dorms to cafeterias to exercise facilities.

      And location matters. Some folks want to stay close to home, others want to go far away, and still others prefer something in the middle. Some folks want to be in a city, some in the country, some prefer to be near (but not in) a city, and some people don't care.

      And no matter what girls may tell you, size matters. Can you walk to class or is the campus so big that you have to take a bus? Do you prefer a school with a huge number of people, or would you rather know everybody in your major? What about class sizes? Thirty people? Fifty? Two-hundred? Are your classes mostly taught by professors, or are all of the classes for the first two years taught by a grad student? Are most of the classes taught by instructors? Are those instructors people who work in your particular industry, or is the school just being cheap?

      Do you want to join a frat or a sorority? Does your school have them? What about clubs or professional organizations in your major? Debate teams? Competitive science or math teams? Other organizations?

      Once you factor in all of those concerns, someone who is serious about academics (or even socializing) will usually find enough other differences to mostly render the quality of the sports team moot. If the local ball team sucks you can always watch a better team on TV or drive to another school to watch a weekend game. For that matter, even a bad team can be fun to watch. You can root for the other team, play with a beach ball in the stands, and generally act like a complete jackass, and nobody will fault you for it. Or you can leave after the band does its halftime show like they always used to do where I went to undergrad (but they did stick around to hear us).

      Either way, my point is not that having a good sports team on campus doesn't provide useful entertainment. My point is that with the number of actual differences between any two schools you might choose, the number of non-sports-playing students who end up picking based on that should get lost in the noise, statistically speaking. If it isn't, that suggests that you have a bunch of students with somewhat misplaced priorities.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    225. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wrong... Just like Texas and Michigan, etc. These programs are incorporated as separate entities. They get 100s of millions in revenue and only a couple million gets kicked back to the school. Yet students get in trouble if they sell their jersey. I think the head coach of Texas said, after he was in the spotlight for his huge contract renewal, that they were proud to have given over $7mil to the school over the past 5 years...Don't quote me on the exact numbers, but that is ballpark. These programs don't really belong to the school. It's a total scam and a shame, since you'd think that college could really be affordable if all the profit was put back into the educational system.

    226. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      u misspelled berkly

  3. Hopefully athletic programs are still intact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gator CHOMP!!

  4. good ridance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    their program sucked anyway.

  5. "What were you thinking?" by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "What were you thinking?"

    Well, probably something along the lines of "That department did not publish well enough and the students did not bring in enough money".

    1. Re:"What were you thinking?" by tverbeek · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Speaking as a refugee from academia after spending most of my adult life attending or working at colleges, I would say this is exactly right.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    2. Re:"What were you thinking?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And also: "We do have the gators. Do we really need anything else? Especially amything related to academia?"

    3. Re:"What were you thinking?" by ledow · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Then get some decent staff and raise the prices if necessary (or raise the number of students, which would probably be easier).

      If a WHOLE DEPARTMENT wasn't publishing good stuff, you need to start again from scratch. To my mind, that's no different to a WHOLE COMPANY having people who just sit on their bums all day.

    4. Re:"What were you thinking?" by booyoh · · Score: 2

      I completely agree with you on this one. After all, universities are just businesses trying to maximize their profit. On a side note, articles like this one remind me of the movie "Idiocracy" and where our nation is heading in the future.

    5. Re:"What were you thinking?" by Seakip18 · · Score: 1

      B/c if a professor doesn't publish, they're a bum?

      --
      import system.cool.Sig;
    6. Re:"What were you thinking?" by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      Then get some decent staff and raise the prices if necessary....

      How much have the school's prices been raised in the past? How many unnecessary expenses have been allowed to waste school money? How much of the money problem is due to what the teachers and administration have been doing?

    7. Re:"What were you thinking?" by lubricated · · Score: 1

      absolutely.

      --
      It has been statistically shown that helmets increase the risk of head injury.
    8. Re:"What were you thinking?" by mattbelcher · · Score: 5, Informative

      This might have been true in the past but it isn't true of the current CS department. Since UF was designated a "Research 1" university, the CISE department has made huge strides to increase its research competitiveness. They have won 12 NSF CAREER awards for young faculty, received 11 best paper awards at major conferences in the last 5 years, and have quintupled their external research grant funding.

      --

      Shockwave Flash movies are the greatest thing to happen to non-sequitur humor since Japan.

    9. Re:"What were you thinking?" by sonamchauhan · · Score: 2

      Maybe they teach well?

      You know, the other thing that colleges are meant to do?

    10. Re:"What were you thinking?" by lubricated · · Score: 2

      Only teaching faculty/staff are expected to teach only. At a research University, you are expected to publish.

      --
      It has been statistically shown that helmets increase the risk of head injury.
    11. Re:"What were you thinking?" by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      By the time you get to university, you are expected to be able to teach yourself. The point of going to a university is that teaching yourself is a lot easier when you have easy and regular access to people at the top of your field. If these people are not publishing, then they are probably not at the top of the field anymore...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    12. Re:"What were you thinking?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      having studied cs (not in the US), I vastly preferred the professors that focused on teaching rather than research. I understand that research is and should be a big part of any department, but dismissing individual professors on just the one metric (no matter which one) would be a shame, and results in departments getting hollowed out until universities decide to drop them.

    13. Re:"What were you thinking?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To my mind, that's no different to a WHOLE COMPANY having people who just sit on their bums all day.

      Honestly I don't think bums make very good chairs. They move around too much and tend to stink. Plus you have to feed them because dead ones are too low to get you into the proper ergonomic position at your desk.

    14. Re:"What were you thinking?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking as an inmate of academia in the engineering/CS world (not at UF), I'd say it looks like some internal politics thing that outsiders are never going to fully understand. (That doesn't mean it's a good idea-- it may be some unbelievably stupid internal politics thing.)

      They're not completely eliminating computer science, they're folding it back into the electrical engineering department proper. That's not a bad thing in itself; the two disciplines are very closely connected. It's hard to tell what's happening with the research budgets; if the CS research budget is gutted, that would be a bad thing in itself. And it looks like some faculty are getting whacked (which I guess is where the cost savings is coming from) so that would obviously be a bad thing for those faculty members.

    15. Re:"What were you thinking?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've pointed this out in other cases, but it could be part of a weeding. If the quality of the younger faculty is really much improved, then it is possible that the department has accumulated dead wood. Since the dead wood is all tenured, it can be difficult to get rid of them, or motivate them to do anything. However, depending on how the school is structured, tenure may be granted to a specific department. Hence, one game is to dissolve the department, which takes away everyone's tenure, then redistribute people to other appropriate departments, where they either re-earn tenure or not.

      There are other ways to get rid of tenured faculty who are being unproductive (catch them doing something illegal, give them a really bad office, put them on very unpleasant committees) but they are slow and unreliable. If they have a solid split between "young & productive" and "old, unproductive, and tenured", dissolving the department may be the best option.

    16. Re:"What were you thinking?" by rokkaku · · Score: 1

      Last I checked, the department was rated 39th nationally, and it brought 17% of the money to the College of Engineering while only costing 10% of the budget. It's not that the department wasn't delivering, it's that there is some ugly internal politics going on:

      http://saveufcise.wordpress.com/

    17. Re:"What were you thinking?" by mnanu · · Score: 1

      "That department did not publish well enough and the students did not bring in enough money". How did you come to this conclusion? I am a PhD student at UF and this is not true at all. It is the best CS dept in Florida and one of the best in the southeast of the country. The enrollment is so high that it brings in 17% of the college revenues while consuming only 10% of the budget.

    18. Re:"What were you thinking?" by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 1

      "How did you come to this conclusion?"

      I didn't come to that conclusion, I speculated that the university management may have reasoned along something like those ideas.

      "It is the best CS dept in Florida and one of the best in the southeast of the country."

      Best? Using which metrics? (http://www.harzing.com/pop.htm#metrics)

      "it brings in 17% of the college revenues while consuming only 10% of the budget"

      So, the financial argument goes away there, unless it brought in even more before... ;)

      Good luck with the university management. They are not necessarily the best at what they do, at the campus, or, in any corner of the nation.

    19. Re:"What were you thinking?" by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      "What were you thinking?"

      Well, probably something along the lines of "That department did not publish well enough and the students did not bring in enough money".

      The uni in the town where I live has done some downsizing since the economic crunch hit, and basically they look at:

      a) How many students are graduating with this degree?

      b) How much research grant money is the faculty bringing in?

      If the combination of answers is too low, they're honing an axe for your program.

      I suspect they also asked themselves whether any billionaire alumni would be offended by the cut, but of course they wouldn't advertise that if they did.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    20. Re:"What were you thinking?" by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      Only teaching faculty/staff are expected to teach only. At a research University, you are expected to publish.

      Even at a research university, it depends on what they were hired for. Some are teaching-only, some are research-only, some have combined responsibilities.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    21. Re:"What were you thinking?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What were you thinking?"

      Well, probably something along the lines of "That department did not publish well enough and the students did not bring in enough money".

      They have great faculty, several NSF fellows and I am sure they have lots of grants, fundings. Their grad school ranked 35th. So, publication count argument is non-sense.

  6. One more thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...that Florida shares with yogurt.

    1. Re:One more thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Florida has culture ?!!??!

  7. Makes Sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Because the average CS student sucks at football.

    1. Re:Makes sense by roothog · · Score: 2

      Computer Science is an expensive department to maintain.

      Cite? It's actually a pretty cheap department. Just need office space and electricity for computers, which is really no different than, say, an English department.

      I don't even really remember what I learned in English classes.

      Sounds like we should shutter English departments if they're doing such a bang-up job educating their graduates.

    2. Re:Makes Sense by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      In order to make the collage more suitable, to recruit football players, they will drop all departments where students go who tend to be smarter then the average football players (They are some really smart ones, but normally if they get in to play foot ball, they tend to be handed a golden spoon for years, and have forgotten what it takes to study and learn).
      U of F College of Football and Home Economics.

       

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    3. Re:Makes Sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do know that UF is a respectable medical school, right? They are no John Hopkins but they still pull rank with some of the top medical research universities. Having said that, I prefer FSU as my football college.

    4. Re:Makes Sense by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      In order to make the collage more suitable, to recruit football players, they will drop all departments where students go who tend to be smarter then the average football players (They are some really smart ones, but normally if they get in to play foot ball, they tend to be handed a golden spoon for years, and have forgotten what it takes to study and learn).

      Florida State had a Rhodes Scholar on their football team only 2-3 years ago, and most football players don't major in parks and rec like a lot of people believe, there's a surprising number that take difficult majors such as math or engineering. With the NCAA rule that gives players 5 years to play 4, a lot of players will go into graduate school for their 5th year/4th season. And I have a real issue with you claiming that football players forget what it takes to study and learn. Each week football players have to study a different team, learn what they do in various situations that can vary greatly depending on the position of the field, the time left in the game, the score, and the down and distance. My Division II team had a playbook almost half an inch thick that we had to memorize, and not just our jobs but the jobs of those around us as well. And these plays were often adjusted week to week depending on the characteristics and trends of our opponent, and scouting reports themselves could be half at thick as our whole playbook was. Then there's the film study, which during the regular season takes up anywhere from 3-8 hours in a week (depending on personal preference), and closer to 3-4 hours a day during camp. A lot of people don't realize the preparation that actually goes into football at the collegiate level. And it gets even more complicated as you move into the professional level. Dumb people are not likely to succeed in football at a competitive level. A lot of these guys might not be smart, but they aren't stupid.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    5. Re:Makes Sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sure, but with a good chunk of the nerds now gone.... who will do their homework to get them those fancy degrees?

    6. Re:Makes sense by Almandine · · Score: 1

      There's the costs of continuously upgrading to the latest high end computers as we can't have the students learning on outdated slow equipment. There's the costs of servers and network infrastructure as modern computer systems are all connected. There's the cost of software licenses for the software running on those computers and these can get expensive. There's the cost of a dedicated IT team to maintain all that equipment, assuming that it is seperate from the general campus IT. For some universities, there's the cost of specialized gear such as virtual reality systems, robotics systems, cameras for computer vision, fiber optics equipment such as lasers, etc. It's not just office space and electricity.

    7. Re:Makes sense by roothog · · Score: 1

      A lot of what you rattled off is purchased by faculty with their own research funds acquired by winning grants.

      Instructional labs are going away because students have personal laptops instead, but even when they were around, most of the equipment in them was donated by major companies like Intel.

      If the necessary backend infrastructure is for research, then research funds pay to keep it operating, including staffing. If it's not for research, then let the campus run it.

  8. Official Response from UF: by Metabolife · · Score: 5, Funny

    NERDS!!!!!

    1. Re:Official Response from UF: by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the chuckle, I wish I had mod points.

      --
      ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
  9. not eliminated? by jank1887 · · Score: 4, Informative

    FTFA:

    The majority of students would be transferred to the hardware-oriented ECE department
    The CISE department would be converted to a teaching-only department
    50% of faculty would be transferred to other engineering departments (ECE, ISE, and BME)

    so, if it will be a teaching only department, that doesn't seem the same as eliminated. They'll move the engineering in with the Electrical and Computer Engineering department, and it seems leave CISE to teach programming.

    1. Re:not eliminated? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      FTFA:

      so, if it will be a teaching only department, that doesn't seem the same as eliminated. They'll move the engineering in with the Electrical and Computer Engineering department, and it seems leave CISE to teach programming.

      So in other words, they are eliminating computer science.

    2. Re:not eliminated? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Engineering != science. It doesn't make sense to merge the two departments, no more than it makes sense to merge the physics department with the mechanical engineering department.

    3. Re:not eliminated? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better tell schools like Berkeley, MIT, etc. I'm sure they wouldn't have gone through with the merger had they just read your comment first.

    4. Re:not eliminated? by roothog · · Score: 1

      FTFA:

      I don't see that quoted text in the article at all. Anyway, supposing it's true, what's happening with the other 50% of the faculty? Fired?

    5. Re:not eliminated? by CowTipperGore · · Score: 5, Informative

      Indeed. TFA is very misleading and inaccurate opinion piece written by a contributor who usually focuses on healthcare issues. If you read the items he references in his hack job, you'll see that CISE program is not eliminated at all. The computer engineering programs are being moved from CISE to the Electrical and Computer Engineering department. Graduate programs and research work will continue in computer engineering there. Most graduate programs and research work in CISE will be eliminated, but the computer science BS and MS programs will remain. The projected savings are $1.36 million out of a $4 million in cuts across the university.

      For what it's worth, this article is one of several opinion pieces carried by Forbes attacking this decision and all are full of inaccuracies and outright lies. Computer science research is being cut. The computer science programs remain. Computer engineering research remains but is moved into Engineering instead of CISE.

    6. Re:not eliminated? by dachshund · · Score: 3, Insightful

      50% of faculty would be transferred to other engineering departments (ECE, ISE, and BME)

      Just to clarify: The other 50% of faculty will move to better Universities. All of the good ones anyway.

      My University is already treating this as a huge hiring opportunity.

    7. Re:not eliminated? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking as an employee of the University of Florida, and a friend of a number of people directly affected... You're completely wrong.

      Short form: UF is eliminating the software track of computer science. You want to design a computer chip? Then you can do that at UF. You want to program? Don't go to UF.

    8. Re:not eliminated? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Engineering != science

      Why is this bullshit statement constantly repeated in this thread? Is this what people without training in engineering actually believe?

    9. Re:not eliminated? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Professors always like to say these kinds of things but in my experience it's very hard to move departments because most schools would rather hire new PhDs. Plus, my guess is that they're going to move the professors with grants to the other departments. The ones left behind to teach will be those without grants. No one poaches faculty members without grants. Why bother?

  10. No problem! by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 1, Troll

    They'll still have football, right? Good to see they've got their priorities straight.

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
    1. Re:No problem! by jythie · · Score: 2, Informative

      Apparently the elimination of the computer science department funded a 2% increase in the athletics budget.

    2. Re:No problem! by buddyglass · · Score: 1

      As many commenters to the Forbes article have pointed out, the athletic department funds itself and actually donates money back to the University. If you eliminated athletics at UF entirely it would not generate any additional money to fund the CS Department.

    3. Re:No problem! by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      The same year I started college, they cut baseball, track and field, and a couple other sports (all of which had competitive records) to fund a larger football stadium (the football team averages less than 4 wins per year). It turns out their $5 million "stadium" is actually a bunch of new bleachers and an ugly 900 square foot concrete building.

    4. Re:No problem! by stoolpigeon · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not at all. The sports program is independent and actually feeds millions of dollars into the school.

      Bringing sports into it may lead to discussion on cultural values - but the money spent by the school on academics and sports are not related.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    5. Re:No problem! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not at all. The sports program is independent and actually feeds millions of dollars into the school.

      What you mean to say is, UF athletics has its own fundraising organization independent of the University, which feeds millions of dollars into the athletics program independent of the normal budgeting process that other University departments are subject to.

      The idea that university athletics supports university academics in any way, shape, or form is dubious to say the least.

    6. Re:No problem! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sports program is independent and actually feeds millions of dollars into the school.

      No it doesn't..

    7. Re:No problem! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not at all. The sports program is independent and actually feeds millions of dollars into the school.

      Bringing sports into it may lead to discussion on cultural values - but the money spent by the school on academics and sports are not related.

      And that is the problem with American colleges. Have to have a sport to provide funds (to the over-paid coaching staff included) for a college that would rather cut money in Education. No wonder America's education level is below so many other countries.

    8. Re:No problem! by Bigby · · Score: 2

      How many people around the country would know about UF if it didn't have an athletics program? It is proven that a good athletics program increase applications to a school. It is a marketing tool for the academic side of the school. So yes, a self sufficient athletic program, like at UF, is a HUGE benefit to the academic side of the school. By huge, I mean 10's of millions a year they otherwise would not have had.

    9. Re:No problem! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not at all. The sports program is independent and actually feeds millions of dollars into the school.

      Bringing sports into it may lead to discussion on cultural values - but the money spent by the school on academics and sports are not related.

      The University of Florida is a classic example of what a joke college athletics is. Parking is tight on-campus. The only way to really have a chance at guaranteed spot was to be faculty, administration, or the football team.

      They might as well drop the pretense. Have the school hire professional players for the school, and let the actual students play on their own fields and informally. Aside from everything else, that would reduce absurdities like the alumnus who paid a player $10K to wash his car. That one happened at FSU, IIRC.

    10. Re:No problem! by niado · · Score: 2

      Interestingly, another article from the site you provided linked to here. I guess the UF athletic program has dumped ("donated" ?) a large amount of money into the university coffers.

      That businessofsports.com site is pretty cool. It looks like I'm going to lose several hours of my life browsing there today, thanks!

    11. Re:No problem! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many people around the country would know about UF if it didn't have an athletics program?

      Who cares?

      It is proven that a good athletics program increase applications to a school.

      Again, who cares? Why would you want more applications from students whose interest was sparked by a football team?

      It is a marketing tool for the academic side of the school.

      It is a marketing tool, yes, but for the academic side? (And the idea that academics is only a "side of the school" is absurd. Academics should be the school; that's why it's a school and not a pro sports team.

  11. But the good news is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Additional resources have been freed up to staff the Physical Education, Sports Management and Communications departments.

  12. lol... ECE here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yup, everyone knows that a pure CS major is a joke. Move the classes into the Engineering and Math departments where they belong. If you want a joke degree, there are plenty of online universities.

    1. Re:lol... ECE here by _8553454222834292266 · · Score: 1

      Idiot troll.

    2. Re:lol... ECE here by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Yes Engineers or Mathematicians are renowned for their ability to write good software. You explain their faults in terms of Big O you get blank stares at you. And stand up and say because their code takes 10 lines to run vs your 50 their code is faster.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    3. Re:lol... ECE here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A good engineer would never be so foolish. And the same could be said of someone well-trained in CS.

      Unfortunately, in general I trust those trained in actual engineering more than I do CS grads/people when it comes to solving problems efficiently and cost effectively. However, this is not to demean CS. A good CS person just hard to find - most have no clue about BigO. I know there are crappy engineers as well but they are far fewer than the "infestation" of crap CS graduates in my area (Northeast, US). I simply do not understand how these people have degree's.

      With respect to the main topic, I think that if UF's CS program outputted worthless graduates then I'm thrilled they axed the department. And that is coming from someone with a BSc in CS.

    4. Re:lol... ECE here by Culture20 · · Score: 2

      A good CS person just hard to find - most have no clue about BigO.

      You can't get past the CS weed-out classes without learning about Big O.
      You can't get through the anime club presentations without learning about Big O.
      You can't join ACM if you know about Big O.

    5. Re:lol... ECE here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you're probably one of those CS majors who believes that "every program has at least 1 bug" is a truism.

      FYI, most of the students in the ECE program had no business being there, but you incorrectly assume I was one of them.

  13. UF - the party school! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    UF - the party school!

    Having degrees that actually require "study" is against school policy?

    OTOH, how many people go to UF for CS degrees? It isn't like a top 10 school or anything. #39 isn't really that bad. http://grad-schools.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-graduate-schools/top-science-schools/university-of-florida-134130 Their math department is ranked in the 50s, so perhaps that should be eliminated too?

    BTW, I live in a nearby state and we have lots and lots of UF grads here. Some are really smart, unfortunately, none of these folks are in the school's administration.

    When I think of UF, I think
    * sports
    * marketing
    * business
    * biology (location, location, location)

    I don't think engineering, CS, architecture .... sorry.

    1. Re:UF - the party school! by buddyglass · · Score: 1

      UF has the best overall academic reputation of any state school in Florida. You may not think of "engineering, CS, architecture" when you hear "UF", but that's also the case for the vast majority of state schools nationwide. Not everybody can be Berkeley, UCLA, Illinois, Wisconsin, Washington, Ga. Tech, Michigan or Texas. Does that imply everybody else (e.g. UF) should drop those programs?

  14. Surely you jest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it April 1st again already? Surely this is some sort of joke?

  15. Re:Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To be fair, you would probably have a better chance of introducing "mens' studies". You could major in strip clubs, beer consumption, and ... I'll let you work out the rest.

  16. Website down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    University President: Our website is down! Quick! Get it back up!
    Staff: Sir, we have no more computer science department. Remember?

    1. Re:Website down by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      You're joking, but that is actually a sizable cost factor.

      My university gets by with students doing about 99% of the IT administrative tasks, from running cable to running servers, from writing accounting software to writing course management software. You can NEVER get cheaper workers than your students as a university, they work for some extra credit. Try to beat that cost.

      Need some new software? No problem, Software Engineering part 2 deals with creating a real life project and producing it from conception to installation in a team. Form 3-4 teams from the students of this year, give them the task to write that software. Hell, you will even get 4 complete custom built-to-spec solutions to pick and choose from, where even only one of them would cost you in the 5 digit range. Don't want a custom solution? Make it a requirement to use standard software and the teams should only "glue" them together. You write the specs, after all.

      And all of that for some course credit.

      Eliminate the CS department? Are you effin' kidding?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Website down by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Oh, I forgot: In case you find out half a year later that the software sucks, just give the same assignment to next year's class again. You can even try over and over 'til you get what you want. Even if (like most people) you don't even know yet what you want.

      Plus, you get the source.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Website down by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Most collages have an IT Staff outside of the computer science department...
      Granted most are hired by CS students who technically graduated but are not smart enough to work in the real world.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  17. Agenda 21, one way or another by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When asking UF officials about this bold move, one official stated, "Dude just wait. This is only the beginning of The Plan, we are looking forward for a 25 and 50 year agenda to close all remaining schools in the state, we will be Agenda 21 compliant. Our sustainability plan is on schedule"

  18. Not right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They are running an online petition on the website here: http://saveufcise.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/how-you-can-help/

    Personally, I can vouch that the research output from one of the professors in this department, Tim Davis, (http://www.cise.ufl.edu/~davis/) has found its way into industry software like Matlab and other engineering applications. It will be a loss to the community to see this go.

    1. Re:Not right... by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      Personally, I can vouch that the research output from one of the professors in this department, Tim Davis, (http://www.cise.ufl.edu/~davis/) has found its way into industry software like Matlab and other engineering applications.

      And he's probably among one of the professors that are being moved into the engineering department. Makes more sense for him to be in the engineering department if most of his work goes to engineering applications. It's not like they're throwing the teachers out on the street, as the summary implies through omission.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  19. Re:Meanwhile... by jythie · · Score: 1

    Grievance mongers.. nice little sexist jab there.... also nice bit of hypocrisy in general... 'how dare they cut something I like to fund something they find valuable! Here are a list of things I don't find value in they should cut instead!'.

  20. Re:Meanwhile... by Lord+Crowface · · Score: 1

    Seriously? While some of those degrees look more like they belong at a technical school or a community college, some look legit to me. Also, academic Religious Studies (as I assume the Religion department is) tend to look at religion in a more anthropological and sociological perspective than a "belief and preaching" perspective. Thus, the typical Religious Studies department would be a very bad fit for a seminary.

  21. Maybe its just time to.... by 3seas · · Score: 1

    ... move beyond computer industry imposed constraints on those who use computers. Time for those who use computers to automate for themselves.

  22. Drop football, save $100 million by hxnwix · · Score: 0

    The football coach alone may make more than the entire CS department costs. Make football intramural and allocate resources to education.

    1. Re:Drop football, save $100 million by mjr167 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You are mistaken... football is a profit center,not a cost center for universities. You can sell tickets to football games; you can't sell tickets to CS.

    2. Re:Drop football, save $100 million by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They also pull in a massive amount of money through merchandising and ticket sales. College football in FL is bigger than NFL. And unlike the Bucs, you can see college games on TV.

    3. Re:Drop football, save $100 million by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tuition = tickets? :)

    4. Re:Drop football, save $100 million by Amouth · · Score: 5, Insightful

      and this is where i have to ask what is the core competency of a university? to make money? to entertain fans? to educate students?

      Just be cause you can make money at something doesn't mean you should focus resources on it, unless it's one of your core competency.

      If it really is a "profit center" and something they can make money from, great but they need to contract control of it out on set terms and use the money generated by it to increase the educational offerings and make it easier for them to achieve in their reason for being, educating students.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    5. Re:Drop football, save $100 million by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That depends on the quality of your CS department. Football is not a profit center because of ticket sales, it is a profit center because rich alumni come back to remember the good ol' days of getting drunk and cheering for their fellow students receiving concussions, and then give large donations. If computer science departments inspire that sort of money-giving, they could become profitable also (and they might; if a rich alumnus owes his wealth to the education he received, he is likely to make a donation).

      There is also the matter of research. Universities get a nice chunk of the money that researchers pull in from grants, and even more if those researchers hire graduate students (whose tuition is typically covered by the grant). A computer science department that has decent enoguh research could bring in lots of money for a university, as well as free advertising.

      You know what does not help a university? Stories like this one -- stories about how they castrate their CS department to save a few pennies. I am curious about the rest University of Florida's budget -- how much do they spend on administrative salaries, resodding grass, and so forth. Chance are they could have saved the money elsewhere, if keeping the computer science department had been a priority.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    6. Re:Drop football, save $100 million by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      That depends on the quality of your CS department. Football is not a profit center because of ticket sales, it is a profit center because rich alumni come back to remember the good ol' days of getting drunk and cheering for their fellow students receiving concussions, and then give large donations. If computer science departments inspire that sort of money-giving, they could become profitable also (and they might; if a rich alumnus owes his wealth to the education he received, he is likely to make a donation).

      Computer science doesn't get you your own television network like football did for University of Texas, no matter how rich or successful your graduates have been. Of course, Texas killed their conference by getting that network, but that's a different story.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    7. Re:Drop football, save $100 million by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Their "core competency" is to educate students.

      The football team generates a profit. Much of that profit is fed back into the university to fund academics. Eliminating the football team would thus necessitate further cuts.

      It's amazing how shortsighted many Slashdotters are. Wait, no. The other word. Sad.

    8. Re:Drop football, save $100 million by mattphillips · · Score: 1

      A state funded university is NOT a profit center of any sort. People who think this way are obviously the reason why this is happening in the first place. Its a school, not a pro football team. Seriously sad people.

    9. Re:Drop football, save $100 million by Alomex · · Score: 1

      There have been many studies on this, and outside of a few well known programs, they are most definitely not profit centers. Even according to the NCAA own figures

      Less than 7 percent of Division I athletics programs had positive net revenue between 2004 and 2010. In the Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS), only 22 of 120 schools showed positive net revenue for the 2010 fiscal year, eight more than in 2009.

      For FBS schools, the median [subsidy] amount was $9.8 million in 2010

    10. Re:Drop football, save $100 million by roothog · · Score: 2

      and this is where i have to ask what is the core competency of a university?

      Gets 18-year-olds out of their parents' houses.

      Also beer pong.

    11. Re:Drop football, save $100 million by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's true for the University of Florida and a handful of other top football schools. It is not true for all universities with D1 Bowl Division football programs. Not even close.

    12. Re:Drop football, save $100 million by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Get outta my US you pinko commie! How much more un-American could you be to suggest dropping college football for something as petty as an education?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    13. Re:Drop football, save $100 million by sribe · · Score: 1

      You are mistaken... football is a profit center,not a cost center for universities. You can sell tickets to football games; you can't sell tickets to CS.

      This is what athletic departments claim. However, they cook the books in a variety of ways in order to support the claim. The real is, that if you count all the expenses and subsidies that athletic directors exclude, they are actually substantial drains on the universities--except for perhaps the top dozen programs in the country.

    14. Re:Drop football, save $100 million by TarrVetus · · Score: 1

      You can sell tickets to football games; you can't sell tickets to CS.

      That may change.

    15. Re:Drop football, save $100 million by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 1

      Thanks for such an insightful summation of the problem!

      I would have worded it a bit differently. I would have said that the problem is that UF is using a business model rather than the academic model you would normally expect from an institution that calls itself a University.

      It is true that UF has given the world Gator Ade, but then it is also true that Gator Ade is now full of HFCS, which is not a very good thing to pour into the body of someone who is doing heavy exercise. UF has developed the faint, sweet odor of early corruption, like that emanating from a dead body that is not yet quite rotted enough to call carrion.

      --
      Will
    16. Re:Drop football, save $100 million by Amouth · · Score: 1

      sadly there is more truth in your comment than i'd like

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    17. Re:Drop football, save $100 million by garyebickford · · Score: 1

      Portland State University's new College of Engineering and Computer Science building was paid for with an $8 million grant, and the school renamed after a returning EE grad Fariborz Maseeh, who made a zillion dollars founding a startup in MEMS. He was also a foreign student, originally from Iran, BTW. Many of the smart folks at Intel and Tektronix are graduates from what is now known as Maseeh. (It should be noted that he went to grad school at UT Austin and MIT).

      EE is not the same as CS, but I figure this counts - they're a lot closer in similarity than either is to basket weaving or football.

      I once read an article which noted that while Michael Jordan made something like $30,000 a day, he would have to play basketball for several hundred years to catch up to Bill Gates. (I don't recall the actual numbers.) I would be interested to see a comparison of total CS-related employment income vs. total pro sports income, especially when you could the Bill Gates, Larry E, Larry P, etc. I would expect that it shows that there is a potential for CS grads to contribute back to the schools that exceeds anything the football jocks can do. But it's mostly spread thinner among more people.

      --
      It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
    18. Re:Drop football, save $100 million by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a myth that needs to die. Here is a link I found: http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2010/01/19/subsidy

      More schools than not have to subsidize their athletic departments. The last time I checked, only about 20 athletic departments are fully self-funded. It's possible that Florida is one of them, but for the most part football is a huge money sink. It loses money for the schools, they keep them around because people want them and it's the best way for them to identify with their school post-graduation.

      CS theoretically sends graduates out into the real world who end up working good jobs and paying taxes to the state, so it's a profit center in the long-run. But of course, the long-run is something that nobody in government today (especially the far right wing government that Rick Scott and his allies are running) understands. What a shame.

    19. Re:Drop football, save $100 million by Bigby · · Score: 1

      Don't confuse CS-related income with BIZ-related income. How much of Gates' income was from CS-related innovation? How much was from good business decisions? You could do something similar with Michael Jordan, but really, ALL of his income came from his athletic ability. You can't say the same about Gates.

      The Google founders probably have the most CS-related income. For a while, they paid someone else to handle the business side of things.

    20. Re:Drop football, save $100 million by garyebickford · · Score: 1

      But from the same perspective, all those football rooting alumni made their money elsewhere as well. This does lead me to wonder how much does the average CS graduate donate back to their U, or especially their CS/ECE dept.? I confess, I'm not a big donor by any count.

      I should note that the last time I was in school, I ran into some of the basketball players in the gym occasionally - they were all good guys and worked very hard, and from what I could tell were planning on real jobs after graduation. I'm not denigrating anyone who can get a college to pay for your full ride! The ones I met were using it as an opportunity to get someplace in the world. Of course their practice and training schedule was intense - I doubt that any of them could have taken a full CS load at the same time even if they wanted to. There just aren't enough hours in the day. But, once those guys got out and got middle-class jobs, maybe their kids could do CS.

      --
      It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
    21. Re:Drop football, save $100 million by Wovel · · Score: 1

      At UF Football is a profit center. Since the story is about UF, I suppose that is relevant.

    22. Re:Drop football, save $100 million by Wovel · · Score: 1

      Last year the Athletic department contribute $6 million to the university (beyond the Services used by the department). http://www.uaa.ufl.edu/uaa/Executive_Summary_2011-2012.pdf

      So, by cutting football (read the budget) You would be killing two more similar departments, not just CS.

    23. Re:Drop football, save $100 million by Alomex · · Score: 1

      Even there it isn't. Surprisingly enough, the entire athletic department operates at a net loss.

    24. Re:Drop football, save $100 million by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That depends on the quality of your CS department. Football is not a profit center because of ticket sales, it is a profit center because rich alumni come back to remember the good ol' days of getting drunk and cheering for their fellow students receiving concussions, and then give large donations. If computer science departments inspire that sort of money-giving, they could become profitable also (and they might; if a rich alumnus owes his wealth to the education he received, he is likely to make a donation). There is also the matter of research. Universities get a nice chunk of the money that researchers pull in from grants, and even more if those researchers hire graduate students (whose tuition is typically covered by the grant). A computer science department that has decent enoguh research could bring in lots of money for a university, as well as free advertising. You know what does not help a university? Stories like this one -- stories about how they castrate their CS department to save a few pennies. I am curious about the rest University of Florida's budget -- how much do they spend on administrative salaries, resodding grass, and so forth. Chance are they could have saved the money elsewhere, if keeping the computer science department had been a priority.

      This proposal is absolutely ridiculous as it will dismantle one of the most needed field of study today.

    25. Re:Drop football, save $100 million by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      It's almost guaranteed that UF Football is a profit center. Yes, many programs cost more to run than they bring in, but perennial top 10 teams, especially those in the big conferences (SEC , oh yes) make money. Lots of it.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    26. Re:Drop football, save $100 million by Minwee · · Score: 1

      Their "core competency" is to educate students.

      Now I understand why they just fired all of the teaching assistants. So they can educate the students better.

      Thanks for clearing that up.

    27. Re:Drop football, save $100 million by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very few athletic programs are self supporting--not even all the NCAA top 10 break even. Profitable athletic programs are for the most part a testosterone fueled myth.

  23. hmm by buddyglass · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm curious: why Computer Science? The program shouldn't be very expensive on a per-student basis, especially compared to the physical sciences. Was the department just uniquely dysfunctional or under-performing? Why not cut, say, physics? Not that Physics should be cut either, but the choice of Computer Science seems arbitrary.

    1. Re:hmm by overshoot · · Score: 1

      The program shouldn't be very expensive on a per-student basis, especially compared to the physical sciences.

      That's the problem: it doesn't cost much and as a result doesn't draw big research grants. The University cut of a research grant pays for a lot more than just keeping the lights on, and when money gets tight that makes all the difference. Don't imagine that CS will be the last.

      --
      Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
    2. Re:hmm by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They're saying it was inefficient to have it as its own department separate from computer engineering and software engineering disciplines.

      But I wonder where one would study advanced topics in computing now. Maybe the answer is "not at the University of Florida."

    3. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you buy high end computer for each student and buy licenses the toll gets higher.

    4. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As an alumni and current employee of the University of Florida:

      It's NOT just Computer Science that's getting cut. The state of Florida has cut the University's budget by 5%, and this is the fifth year of cuts in a row. I know of at least two other departments which have been axed (both coincidentally in Physics).

      The problem is that these budget cuts have gotten to the point where even minor cuts are rendering the department unsustainable, and not just 'poorly run' departments. So rather than a 5% cut gutting entire colleges, entire departments are getting axed to give other departments a bit of breathing room...

      It's a crappy situation, but the economy is finally coming out of the gutter, so hopefully it's the last year this song and dance have to be made...

    5. Re:hmm by buddyglass · · Score: 1

      I understand that times are tight, but there's a reason they cut Computer Science and not "Math" or "Chemistry". That's what I was trying to figure out. Does the Florida legislature set tuition for state schools in Florida, or do the universities have that prerogative? If it's the university's prerogative, why not just raise tuition? Or if they want to lay the burden solely on CS students then create a per-class-hour fee that only applies to CS classes. That's what my alma mater did.

    6. Re:hmm by buddyglass · · Score: 1

      So don't? Seriously. If a student needs a PC for personal use he can provide it himself. If he needs a license for a class then treat the cost as if it were a textbook. Negotiate an "educational rate" with the publisher and let the students bear the cost. Especially if it's that or "shut down the entire department."

    7. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting AC because I have heard a little bit from people who are actually there.

      Yes, that department is uniquely dysfunctional. How do you get rid of dysfunctional staff with tenure? Cut the department, let them leave, publicly declare "mea culpa" in a few years and attract productive new talent to lead the department. It pains me to say this is probably accurate because I graduated from that department in the 90's. I've also interviewed around Gainesville (with in the past few months) and was told that I did "very well" on the employment exams because I understood simple concepts like "pass by reference" versus "pass by value" and could tell them how a stack worked. Seriously, in a college town with a functional CISE department, these should NOT be questions that make me stand out from the crowd.

      You want evidence from the outside that this is true? The CISE students who are protesting the department being cut launched a protest website - as a wordpress blog. "Sign the Petition !!! Save Computer Science at UF!!!"

    8. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I'm curious: why Computer Science?

      Easy answer: The UF CS students were getting tired of hazing by the UF football players, so they hacked the football player's Facebook accounts.

    9. Re:hmm by buddyglass · · Score: 1

      Some will still make sense in the Math Dept. Other research might make sense in the engineering school. But yeah, there's some things that don't seem to fit into either of those.

    10. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Computer science is ridiculously cheap to teach now days. All that you need is a few rooms full of five year old desktop computers. Compared to say chemistry it is just pennies.

    11. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go an hour down the road to University of Central Florida.

    12. Re:hmm by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1

      Perhaps at the Department of Computer Science of the University of Miami.

      If there is not enough demand to make it worthwhile, then maybe not every university needs a CS department? There is not exactly a lot of computer-related industry in Florida.

    13. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The legislature currently sets the tuition. There's a bill working its way through the process to allow the state universities to raise tuition to 'market rates' (the state universities of Florida have MUCH lower tuition than most around the country, so it would allow a lot of headroom for tuition raises).

    14. Re:hmm by steveb3210 · · Score: 1

      My CS department did everything with Linux/Unix, C, C++, Java....

      What are these licensing fees you speak of?

    15. Re:hmm by robthebloke · · Score: 1

      Nice idea in theory, but you have things like liability insurance that will put pay to using 5 year old PCs. Most universities will dispose of PC's after 4 years, 5 years at the very most. The inability to empty the computer labs of computers between lectures, means that in teaching resource terms, it's actually extremely expensive resource (compared to a lecture theatre re-used by 20 different lectures from 20 different courses over a week). It's this reason, combined with extremely uncompetitive pricing of computer equipment within universities (i.e. you'd go through Dell/HP due to quantity), that makes CS expensive to teach.

    16. Re:hmm by GungaDan · · Score: 1

      "why Computer Science?"

      Because the Women's Studies department needs a new sofa for its faculty washroom.

      --
      Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
    17. Re:hmm by bzipitidoo · · Score: 2

      Dysfunctional department is the best explanation I've read.

      Texas Tech has had similar difficulties with its CS department. In the 80s, when they elevated CS from being a part of EE to an independent department in the College of Engineering, they needed more professors in a hurry. They raided related departments. These departments (EE, MIS, and Math) used this as an opportunity to dump their worst professors. Consequently, CS didn't have the usual 1 or 2 rotten apples, the whole department was rotten. Flunked students like crazy, didn't teach fundamental concepts such as big O, and spent inordinate time on rather trivial stuff. An entire semester of Data Structures for a superficial look at linked lists and binary trees? No analysis of insert, delete, and search times, which admittedly is more difficult if the students aren't been taught about big O. Didn't even cover B-trees. Just endless drills on writing code to copy pointers around. Any student who dared speak up about such things would end up flunking. There were so many unfair ways to get a failing grade. The teachers were bitter, angry people who hated each other, disrespected their new discipline, hated that they'd been rejected by their chosen discipline, and were far from above taking it out on the students. The College of Engineering had a graduation rate of 20% which I think is poor, but CS managed a new low of 5%, and it was only that high after massaging the numbers.

      CS at Texas Tech has improved-- there was really nowhere for it to go but up. They didn't actually kill the department, but they thought about it and threatened to do so. Now I hear they're in trouble once again.

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    18. Re:hmm by Almandine · · Score: 1

      Oracle makes a lot of software with which they charge expensive license fees.

    19. Re:hmm by Almandine · · Score: 1

      You'll also need servers, a network infrastructure, and personnel to maintain the equipment. Plus, all that equipment needs to be replace or upgraded every so often. And that's only the general equipment. If the department goes into specialized fields within CS, they'll also need special equipment.

    20. Re:hmm by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      For what it's worth, I don't see the value of teaching CS students about the Big O either.

      --
      +1 Disagree
    21. Re:hmm by mnanu · · Score: 1

      Well CISE is actually the dept with the highest revenue to expenditure ratio in the college of engineering at UF. The budget cut is not based on sound economics

  24. Re:Meanwhile... by ledow · · Score: 1

    "Golf and Sports Turf Management" - I thought you were joking. A BSc in that?!

    Excuse me while I die laughing.

  25. Re:Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, in Florida Golf and Sports Turf Management Degrees are need to work on some Golf courses and such. Also, Recreation, Parks, and Tourism is a huge part of Florida and is why there is no income tax.

  26. They can save much more by aglider · · Score: 4, Insightful

    by dropping all the departments!

    --
    Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
    1. Re:They can save much more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure why that's +5 Insightful, you probably didn't read the article just got mad because you're into computers and made a nonsensical statement. If someone made such an uninformed nonsensical statement but it disagreed with your preconceived notions I'm sure you'd be all over them for it.

    2. Re:They can save much more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're all well aware that if they dropped all departments they'd lose money, so it's not as if it was just an honest mistake.

    3. Re:They can save much more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it was meant to be a "+5 Funny" or a "-1 Troll". Slashdot dropped their "Meaningness Dept." to save some money, and that's the result!

  27. Re:Meanwhile... by ioErr · · Score: 2

    He disagrees about which subjects are valuable. I don't see any hypocrisy in that, just a difference of opinions.

  28. Re:Meanwhile... by hackula · · Score: 2

    Religion (this is why we have seminaries!)

    Religious Studies is completely different from seminary; Religious Studies being the one where you actually are informed about religions, seminary being where you are misinformed about one.

  29. Since the UF football team is on a down swing... by MooseDontBounce · · Score: 1, Insightful

    they probably need the money to help the team. Everyone knows SEC football titles is WAY more important then actual classes.

  30. Bruce Edwards by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1

    For all the Teaching Company fans out there, it is ironic that Bruce Edwards makes some of the best Math lectures available around. So there he is moving education into the 21st century when the same university he teaches at is forgetting that the 21st century is going to be a mix of computers, robotics, and biology. I wonder what their stance on evolution is?

  31. Re:Meanwhile... by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

    How is "Women's Studies" note sexist?

  32. It's all about saving money by overshoot · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Florida has to cut the budget somwhere, and universities are hotbeds of radical socialist indoctrination. Especially computer science. Now, if the CS department could pay its own way like football does that might be different.

    Fortunately, Florida State has found a solution to the problem: their economics department has found a sponsor who will provide lots of funding in return for veto power over new faculty hires. UF is no doubt looking for to improve on the method.

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
    1. Re:It's all about saving money by scharkalvin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Too bad their sponsor is one of the worst things that has ever happened to this country. The family involved is worse than the KKK in it's anti american John Birch attitudes. They don't believe in global warming and the environment. FS should tell them to take their money and stuff it where the sun don't shine.

    2. Re:It's all about saving money by overshoot · · Score: 2

      FS should tell them to take their money and stuff it where the sun don't shine.

      From a source literally next door to FSU Economics, the decision to accept the funding was very controversial -- but it was also made at a level way above the departmental level.

      I don't recall whether the faculty senate took up the issue or not -- I can certainly see why they might.

      --
      Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
    3. Re:It's all about saving money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "universities are hotbeds of radical socialist indoctrination"

      Protip: Put the mindless dittohead remarks after the point you want to make, so rational readers don't skip over the rest of your post.

      On second thought, save us all some time and keep doing it.

    4. Re:It's all about saving money by DustyShadow · · Score: 1

      Who is the sponsor?

    5. Re:It's all about saving money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the solution to the mythical "radical socialist indoctrination" is explicit radical right-wing indoctrination?

    6. Re:It's all about saving money by Nimey · · Score: 1

      Whoosh!

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
  33. Re:Meanwhile... by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

    I knew a few people who went through programs like that when I lived in FL. It can lead to a very lucrative career. It may be a stupid society that generates the need for the program - but the people in the US who study it now are not stupid.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  34. Don't be trolled! by jaymzter · · Score: 2

    The author of the TFA implies that the University cut the CS program to bank roll athletics. In fact, the athletic department receives NO funding at all from the school! Not only that, the athletic department gifts the school $6-$8MM annually, and has previously upped the contribution to help the university not have to make cuts.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Florida_Athletic_Association

    So it's OK to decry the dropping of a major department, but don't let the story get spun by the ignorant or those with an agenda.

    --
    If thou see a fair woman pay court to her, for thus thou wilt obtain love
    1. Re:Don't be trolled! by cplusplus · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think you're mistaken. Their athletic department costs the university over $100+ million per year, but only generates about half that in revenue (see this handy link). Maybe they couldn't come up with the head coach's bonus this year (he got something like $2.5 million)?

      --
      "False hope is why we'll never run out of natural resources!" - Lewis Black
    2. Re:Don't be trolled! by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      The sales department might bring in more money than the research department of a business, it doesn't mean that a budget increase for sales isn't taking from others. Football is a source of revenue, but that's nothing special about football dollars that makes them better to spend only on football/athletics.

    3. Re:Don't be trolled! by jpate · · Score: 2

      The link you provided says that the athletic department spends over $100 million per year, but that the football program generates a little over half of that in revenue. The football program is not the only source of revenue for the athletic department. Men's basketball revenue and alumni donations cover the rest. Most Division I FBS schools lose money on athletics, but Florida is one of the few that stays in the black.

    4. Re:Don't be trolled! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're mistaken. Their athletic department costs the university over $100+ million per year, but only generates about half that in revenue (see this handy link). Maybe they couldn't come up with the head coach's bonus this year (he got something like $2.5 million)?

      You might want to re-read the article.

      Football alone generates half of the revenue. The rest of the revenue comes from TV contracts, boosters, etc.

      It doesn't cost the University anything.

      It's a separate entity that makes a profit every year and it donates money to the University.

    5. Re:Don't be trolled! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're mistaken. Their athletic department costs the university over $100+ million per year, but only generates about half that in revenue (see this handy link). Maybe they couldn't come up with the head coach's bonus this year (he got something like $2.5 million)?

      From the link you provided, the FOOTBALL PROGRAM ALONE generated OVER half that. Basketball also brings in a lot of revenue. And alumni donations are for the athletic program are not included in that..

    6. Re:Don't be trolled! by Bigby · · Score: 1

      You are mistaken. I am not sure how you are interpreting that article. First, it says that football generates 57% of the athletic department's revenue. Basketball makes a crap-ton of profit too. Also, royalties added another 15%. It also doesn't include booster donations to the general athletic fund. A school like Florida (or Penn State or Ohio State or Michigan) ALWAYS keep their expenses under their revenue. A few years ago, Michigan generated $17 million in profit for the school.

    7. Re:Don't be trolled! by cplusplus · · Score: 1

      Men's basketball brings in $2 million. All others sports account for $-16 million. Their booster club does bring in a lot, at $36 million! But that aside... Florida’s athletic department receives about $2.5 million from student fees and other $2 million from the state, which were not cut. Computer Science was.

      --
      "False hope is why we'll never run out of natural resources!" - Lewis Black
    8. Re:Don't be trolled! by jpate · · Score: 2

      Nope. Men's basketball brings in $2 million in ticket sales, but brings in over $8 million (see page 17). There are an additional $19 million in revenues not tied to a specific sport (such as licensed merchandise and marketing agreements).

      Please, read your sources carefully before misleading people with specific numbers.

    9. Re:Don't be trolled! by jpate · · Score: 1

      I should clarify: I think it's terrible that the computer science department was cut (I'm currently a PhD student in a CS department, although not at Florida). I just don't think the solution is to demonize the athletic program, especially when the athletic program is self-sufficient. The proper target for our outrage is the current batch of politicians who are perfectly happy to gut education and infrastructure in the interest of maintaining senseless wars and subsidizing unsustainable agriculture and energy policies.

    10. Re:Don't be trolled! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did I miss something, your link indicates stadium rental of 1 dollar. Does that mean the football team paid 1 buck for renting the stadium for the year of use? Wow, if thats true, I'll take that deal and become a concert promoter!

    11. Re:Don't be trolled! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, you are mistaken. A lot of large athletic programs do not receive any state funding and rely on their own organizations to pool money from ticket sales, boosters, and their respective conference orgs. The athletic department doesn't cost the University shit because it's a separate budget. Did you even read the UAA link or their site? I doubt it because you didn't even read the link you posted, which clearly contradicts your "half that in revenue" statement.

      Why is this crap modded informative?

  35. Re:Meanwhile... by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

    And how did not get written as note?

  36. Re:Meanwhile... by hackula · · Score: 2

    OK, giving each of these an enormous budget does not make sense, but I think each of these are legitimate lines of study in some proportion. You really do not think Sociology is a big deal?? ...As in the study of the thing we all complain about all the time and would really like fixed, if only we could better understand how it really works??

  37. Official protest from the students: by Chemisor · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hey! We're not nerds. We're geeks!

    1. Re:Official protest from the students: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      knowing the difference makes you pretty darn nerdy!

    2. Re:Official protest from the students: by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Do nerds even exist anymore in the US?

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    3. Re:Official protest from the students: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you bite the heads off of chickens? What did they ever do to you?

    4. Re:Official protest from the students: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, in the engineering department.

    5. Re:Official protest from the students: by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Geek it the PC term like mentally challenged or handy-capable or the many others that are around. Even the bearded lady at the circus says she want's to be called Italian-American.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    6. Re:Official protest from the students: by Anarchduke · · Score: 1

      Yes, absolutely, I buy a box of Nerds every couple of weeks.

      --
      who prays for Satan? Who in 18 centuries has had the humanity to pray for the 1 sinner that needed it most? ~Mark Twain
  38. Makes sense by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

    Computer Science is an expensive department to maintain. If the school wasn't doing well in it, there's no reason to keep it around. I'm sure there are dozens of other colleges in the area that still have program you could get into. When I went to college there wasn't such a thing as a computer science department outside of major, very expensive universities that I couldn't get into. So I majored in English and took whatever computer classes they had. Here I am, all these years later, a DB admin. I don't even really remember what I learned in English classes... I'm pretty fluent in English... so maybe that.

  39. Re:Meanwhile... by royallthefourth · · Score: 1

    You don't build strength in your movement by turning students and faculty from different departments against each other. You say a tax revolt is "needed", but so far it's only in your imagination. There's no course charted for it, and it won't happen. The most likely way to keep the CS department intact is for the students and faculty to continue the organizing around the issue that they've already been doing. Once they're organized, they can shut the whole university down until their demands are met. That's how collective power works, not by sitting at home deciding not to pay taxes and praying that everyone else is doing the same.

    By the way, I'm sure those 3 music degrees don't actually represent 3 whole separate departments, just different course arrangements.

  40. Tough Call by jimmifett · · Score: 0

    CS overlaps with quite a bit, so I can see some redundancies.

    However, I'd have first cut useless junk like diversity studies or political "science".

  41. You're trolling, but ... by oneiros27 · · Score: 3

    Very few sysadmins that I know have degrees in computer science.

    They have degrees in science, engineering, or for some, no degree at all. All focused on problem solving skills, but no so much on the heavy math that comes from CompSci degrees. We need to worry about getting things built and keeping them working -- the most efficient way to sort something doesn't really come up too much.

    And as someone who has worked for a university ... I was surprised how none of the IT staff taught classes. Some of the CompSci faculty hadn't been in the industry for 10+ years, and would show slides w/ 15 year old computers in them. It was cringe-worthy.

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
    1. Re:You're trolling, but ... by skids · · Score: 1

      I was surprised how none of the IT staff taught classes

      There is a pretty hard line drawn between staff and faculty at many institutions. Occasionally one of our staff gets an invite as a guest lecturer, but it is very rare. Partly this is because the portion of the IT staff that most directly interfaces with faculty is desktop support, and they are way too busy to even think about such endeavors. Second to that is Academic Computing, and those are more day-long-meetings people than techies. If they were to guest speak it would probably be in a business-of-IT area, not CS.

    2. Re:You're trolling, but ... by Nimey · · Score: 1

      My alma mater has IIRC only one IT staffer (the Windows sysadmin) teaching, but he teaches photography classes.

      When I was a student, the CS department head was laughably outdated. In the early '00s he taught us 8086 assembly using a non-macro MS-DOS assembler in a basic computer design course (we had the option to use DEBUG.EXE instead, heh). 8086 is /not/ the best way to get one's feet wet with assembly, to say the least.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    3. Re:You're trolling, but ... by quantaman · · Score: 1

      System administration and IT support is not computer science or programming, and after the introductory courses technical skills aren't what's being taught in computer science. It's like comparing being a machinist or technician with having an engineering degree, there is a certain level of mechanical ability certain engineering disciplines need, but they won't be on the level of a machinist or technician, and they don't have to be.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    4. Re:You're trolling, but ... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      And as someone who has worked for a university ... I was surprised how none of the IT staff taught classes.

      It happens sometimes. I know of an IT staff member who occasionally teaches System Administration.

      I think the reason it doesn't happen very often is that IT topics aren't what CS programs usually teach.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    5. Re:You're trolling, but ... by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      8086 is /not/ the best way to get one's feet wet with assembly, to say the least.

      I'm... not so sure about that. When I learned assembly in class, it was on an "easier" assembly language (though no macros or string support either, so it was doubly tedious) and my big problem was... I was bored. Not due to the ease, just the opposite; I couldn't see how this particular language was practically applicable. I wanted to write assembly for x86, I wanted to try out examples on my home computer, and when I found out that all the assembly we were learning was for a cpu that no one used anymore, my interest level just plummeted.

  42. If you feel that strongly about it by gelfling · · Score: 1

    Staple a check to your sternly worded letter.

  43. Hidden costs of football by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are mistaken... football is a profit center,not a cost center for universities. You can sell tickets to football games; you can't sell tickets to CS.

    Football is NOT a profit center, it only appears that way if you ignore some of the costs: extra campus security required to protect the campus during and after games (drunken fan students cause a lot of direct property damage and indirect assault damage), all the non-football sports programs that you MUST fund if you want football and federal funds under Title IX, etc.

    1. Re:Hidden costs of football by xeno314 · · Score: 1

      Actually, with a major athletics program, they are profit centers. They (football and men's basketball, generally) fund the rest of the sports programs. I can't speak for UF, but as a former student of another SEC school, I can tell you that the athletics program did not receive any funding from the university or government, they paid for the off-duty police officers required for basketball/football games, and funneled large sums back to the university in scholarship funds each year.

      That's not to say that they didn't *try* to sneak things in from university funds every now and then, but that was pretty much universally squashed by taxpayers and faculty every time. The programs paid for their own facilities and upkeep.

      Now, whether the current state of major collegiate athletics is appropriate to an academic environment is another discussion altogether, but in my experience the programs aren't draining any university funds, quite the opposite. The value of the programs in revenue generation and in driving admissions (schools with great athletics programs do see those numbers move with the success of the programs) is objectively there. It doesn't feel particularly clean, but it could be much worse, I suppose.

  44. Going backwards? by yoshi_mon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Speaking as a Gator who went to school back when if you wanted to study computers you had to go into the Engineering School it sounds like they are moving backwards. As in like when I went to UF if you wanted to study CIS you had to take Calc 1-3 (ok...most of us were fine with that), Chem 1-2 (hum...), and Physics 1-2 (gahhh?), along with some other very non-CIS related but much more related Engineering classes. In effect if you wanted to learn to be a programmer, network engineer, or even a web designer you had to have the background of a EE.

    It was total overkill and drove a lot of students away from the department. But at the time, late 80's-early 90's, the whole PC thing was still relatively brand new so that a large institution like UF had not adapted its curriculum was no huge shock. Disappointing yes but not all that shocking.

    Now TFA is very light on details on how what the new curriculum for students would be. If they are indeed going back to asking CIS students to have EE level requirements. So this might just be a bit of good ol' yellow journalism. But it is indeed worth of some attention such that we can full details on how and why this is happening.

    --

    Really, I know what I'm doing...Ohhhh, look at the shiny buttons!
    1. Re:Going backwards? by spidrw · · Score: 1

      Graduated with a degree housed in CISE in 2005 -

      They never actually granted any degrees, as they weren't a 'college'. CIS/MIS came from Business, CS came from Liberal Arts, Comp Engineering came from Engineering. Comp Engineering still had to take Chem, Physics, etc; CS had to take a foreign language (stupid libs) and CIS/MIS had to take accounting and economics.

      The CISE department though is where all of those students took their 'computery' classes, most of which overlapped between degrees. Lots of opportunities for inter-college teams and projects, which was great.

      I can see how there may have been some un-necessary overhead, but at the same time since there are applicable Comp-Sci-related degrees from multiple colleges, its existence made sense to me.

      I don't think they'll eliminate any degrees as a result of this, but I do see resource contention being a problem eventually. Oh you're a CIS student, well then you don't need access to the lab in the Engineering building. That CS guy wants to take a database class, well too bad because the database professor is funded by the Business school. All I know is that department has given me a great career so far, and I would think that even in this economy it probably has some of the best hiring numbers for new grads. Of course, nobody looks at those numbers, because the hires get counted for Liberal Arts, Business or Engineering instead...

    2. Re:Going backwards? by yoshi_mon · · Score: 1

      The CISE department though is where all of those students took their 'computery' classes, most of which overlapped between degrees. Lots of opportunities for inter-college teams and projects, which was great.

      And I'm sure the degrees far outside of the CIS department. Why would you not want your computer geeks teaching the basic computer classes to your MBAs (shudder), your Law Department, basically every department outside of Engineering will likely not expect their students to having the same level of basic IT knowledge that and Engineering student might have. And even then there are likely to be exceptions.

      Not that I have any new information but after thinking about what was said in TFA it seems like a pure cost cutting move due to budget cuts.

      And again for those who missed it, the UF athletic department ADDS to the university's bottom line. They are just now getting to keep a bit more of the money they generate. If we want to have the argument that they should fund more of the university's academics that is fine. But remember, adds.

      --

      Really, I know what I'm doing...Ohhhh, look at the shiny buttons!
    3. Re:Going backwards? by LateArthurDent · · Score: 1

      As in like when I went to UF if you wanted to study CIS you had to take Calc 1-3 (ok...most of us were fine with that), Chem 1-2 (hum...), and Physics 1-2 (gahhh?), along with some other very non-CIS related but much more related Engineering classes.

      Sounds great. I hope the curriculum also included 9-12 hours of liberal arts.

      You're getting a degree, not a certification. What you're paying for is a well-rounded education with emphasis on a major of your choosing.

      In effect if you wanted to learn to be a programmer, network engineer, or even a web designer you had to have the background of a EE.

      Really? Because you didn't list a circuits, electronics, DSP, emag, or semiconductors course. What's the EE background you're talking about here? Physics and calculus isn't an EE background, it's background all disciplines need. It's information you need to lead a normal day to day life.

    4. Re:Going backwards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I currently attend, and the program is nearly the same. The only difference is that I don't need Chem 2.

    5. Re:Going backwards? by yoshi_mon · · Score: 1

      Now that this thread is pretty much over I just wanted to add for the record a retort to this troll.

      It's information you need to lead a normal day to day life.

      Seriously? I guess I better tell all my finance, lawyer, and other friends who never even took Calc I, let alone anything beyond like some high school physical science classes, that they are all doing it wrong.

      That without college Physics I and II, that without college Chemistry, that without Calc III with Differential Equations that they are failures. That law degree that is sitting there on your wall, throw it away good sir and mam. You need to go back to school to learn more hard science to lean a normal day to day life says the 7 digit UID /. poster! (Can you even count that high? You fitly lib art major. You did not even take college Calc!)

      BTW they changed the curriculum at UF idiot. What happened when I was there was only because before PCs had not been around. If you wanted to play with computers before that time you pretty much had to be an EE because of the hardware at the time. But it makes no sense that someone needs and engineering level of background to write a web page.

      --

      Really, I know what I'm doing...Ohhhh, look at the shiny buttons!
  45. A Leap in the Wrong Direction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    My wife and I both graduated from this department several years ago. This department offers the best education; the liberal arts counterpart program is weak. If you want to be good, or you want to be the best, you would enroll in this department.

    My wife and I have both launched into incredibly technical and lucrative careers, and now that we are raising our 2 children I'm continually alarmed at the divestment of science and engineering in this country. This morning I joked with her that our jobs will be secure for the next 25 years, because now our children won't even be able to enroll in a department of this caliber. In fact, if I want our kids to become engineers, at what point will I have to send them to India or China? The University of Florida is certainly taking a step down.

  46. Florida Polytechnic??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This may be related to the recent stripping of USF Polytechnic from USF creating the twelfth public university, Florida Polytechnic.

    Lot's of politics here, possibly related to a powerful senator's retirement plans!

    1. Re:Florida Polytechnic??? by mrmtampa · · Score: 1

      submitted as AC cause I was too lazy to login.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet (I, v, 166-167)
  47. Re:Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Anyone who thinks music is a simple major is a damn fool.

  48. It makes sense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What percentage of students who graduate from computer science programs actually practice computer science after the fact? I speculate that number is extremely small, and the vast majority go into software development, with most of those building web applications. Many media schools offer courses in building web applications. Oh, and if your institution offers mathematics, why do you need computer science?

  49. There's plenty of that by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I work for an engineering college at a big university and we have some departments that really need cutting. I'm talking departments that, literally, have less than 10 students. Well when you have low enrollment numbers like that you don't really bring in the money to support a department head, a few professors, support staff, and so on. They are a drain on resources and need to be cut.

    One way or another, a department needs to bring in enough money to support itself. Now that could be directly bringing in money through research grants, but can also be through tuition. Departments that do a lot of teaching but little to no research can be plenty valuable because if students are coming for those classes, they are bringing in tuition dollars.

    If they can't bring in money to support themselves, meaning pay the salaries, capital and operations costs, all that kind of thing, then they need to be cut in size or eliminated entirely. It is neither fair nor smart to say "Let's grab money from a successful department and use it to prop up an unsuccessful one."

    1. Re:There's plenty of that by MxTxL · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It is neither fair nor smart to say "Let's grab money from a successful department and use it to prop up an unsuccessful one."

      It would not be smart if your only goal is to run the University as a business, where you cut unsuccessful revenue centers and fund/build/grow the more successful ones to focus on profitability of the corporation. From that respect, economy of scale works the same way as it does at Coca-cola or Wal-Mart. Cut the under-performers. It is cheaper, easier and more profitable to pump out 10 million of the same widgets than it is to pump out very small batches of all-different widgets.

      HOWEVER

      If you are a believer in the concept of academic freedom and in the power of diversity of knowledge and thought (idealistic, I know) then it is vital that more successful departments fund less successful ones. I, for one, want there to exist people who study Latin, despite there being a limited usefulness for it as a career. I want people who study ancient Macedonian philosophy, basket weaving, Sanskrit and all the other fields that most people might deride as training for a career at McDonalds. I want there to be someone who knows everything there is to know about the inner politics of ancient Sumeria. The sum-total of human knowledge is vast and it is important that it be preserved but also expanded with the rigor of academic scrutiny.

      I want this done, because the concept of Academia demands it. If we churn out millions of kids at a time all with the same thoughts and ideas gleaned from mass-market jobs training programs, we will lose the intellectual diversity that is needed to preserve academic and scientific expansion. There may be nothing that someone studying ancient Indian tapestries can ever tell a nuclear engineer that will advance his work, but both types of people are necessary to increase the useful progress of art and science.

      I understand that the bills need to be paid in order to keep the lights on, and also that there are fields that have much more use in the real world as careers. There are certain fields that have more utility in advancing cutting-edge science and, rightly, should receive more attention for their greater potential to advance the human race. However, we shouldn't neglect more arcane knowledge entirely because of this. The more popular fields need to subsidize the less popular ones, less we risk whole branches of study dying off. This is not the most efficient method of creating profit for the university, but that shouldn't be what universities are all about. They should be about increasing the sum-total of human knowledge in all branches.

    2. Re:There's plenty of that by Wovel · · Score: 1

      Keep in Mind that UF is part of the University of Florida system and there is a still bigger picture to consider.

    3. Re:There's plenty of that by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      beliefs are nice, but they don't pay the bills.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    4. Re:There's plenty of that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is a very well done post and I agree with you for the most part, execpt to add that along the same lines of thought every university doesn't have to offer every possible area of study. Even though UF is a large one and this might be the start of some kind of trend, it isn't like there aren't plenty of other choices for prospective CS candidates.

      I'd also point out that even though the 'everyone pays their own way' concept is a fundamentally good way to run a variety of institutions, a lot of people with no direct hand in running anything any way at all want to apply it to every situtation they see. As if it were some grand unified theory of BA. It isn't. Even your examples of Coca-cola and Wal-mart are fluent in the application of loss leaders. They also understand the value in keeping their brand visibile even when the practices they undertake to do so don't directly pay for themselves. Budweiser always buys quite a lot of air time during the NFL Super Bowl and that can't directly pay for itself. McDonald's props up stores even when they don't earn a profit, because they see value in having a presence 'everywhere'.

      This is far too complex an endeavour to successfully apply some enormously simplified philosophy to every decision.

    5. Re:There's plenty of that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree. In ancient Sumeria, I'm sure they had schools that taught the inner politics. They might have called it political science and devoted an adequate number of resources to it to suit their current needs. As they might have had history and basket weaving as well. Over time, we cannot associate the same number of resources to teaching the same fields year after year. The inner workings of ancient Sumeria does nothing to help further our knowledge of current and relevant topics. Engineering and Science have numerous fields and sub fields that can most certainly use those resources and more minds being set on those problems more than turning out a few more basket weavers. There will always be people who take up basket weaving and are interested in the mysteries of ancient Sumeria. Universities do not need to take resources from fields that will or atleast have the chance of giving our society meaningful results to further your need that some child can aspire to become a master basket weaver, and then work at McDonalds because cheap or machine labor makes adequate baskets at a better price. Whole branches of study naturally die off, and allow for additional branches in more useful areas to open up. Instead of just math, how many fields of study under mathematics are there now? How many will there be in the future, as even more minds open up to the current fields and expand on them?

    6. Re:There's plenty of that by SecurityGuy · · Score: 2

      Part of what you're describing is what libraries are for. That's where we should be simply curating collections of human knowledge. Advancing them? Ok, I'll put that in universities. Yes, those libraries could also be...university libraries!

      I do agree with you about the value of having a set of people who know everything about narrow and arguably useless disciplines simply to preserve the knowledge. The thing is how many you choose to have around, and whether that number should grow or shrink. It always bugged me that we massively overproduce certain degrees. I read once that the thing a PhD in English prepares you for is creating other PhDs in English, and that there were about 1,000 newly minted English PhDs every year for every such job opening. We need to tell people things like this. College advising mostly sucked when I went. I was appalled to hear one advisor's whole routine more or less summed up as "what do you like? Then try these courses..." What you like is all well and good, but this whole degree thing is a big commitment, and often costs a lot of money. Making sure you get fair return, which is NOT necessarily money, is important. Maybe there are 100 people in the US who know the inner politics of ancient Sumeria. That means about 3 jobs a year should open up. If we're producing 1,000 PhDs in the subject, 997 of which go on to be bitter Mickey D's workers lamenting the crushing burden of their student loans, perhaps we should should consider that.

      Also, I might argue that the support of knowledge with no hope of return, no value save in preserving it, should be funded by people with spare cash and the desire to do so, not out of the general fund of any state.

    7. Re:There's plenty of that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. This isn't a corporation. Right now, corporations are crying blue rivers of tears about not being able to get qualified people. They aren't training those people themselves. As baby boomers really start to retire en mass, the shortage won't be '2-3 bodies in every department', it will be 'short 50 and none of the "business-savvy" types have the first clue about what is supposed to be going on'. Entire departments decimated, and companies falling down because they can't get qualified people, and being eaten by other companies that *can* get qualified people. People who study business think every social structure should be like a business. NO! WRONG WRONG WRONG! Libraries don't run like a business, hospitals shouldn't run like a business, and schools shouldn't run like a business. They all cost money and don't generate money. This is the way its *supposed to be!* In a pure 'must make money or be cut' world, we would have no good hospitals, no good schools, no government, no police, no fire departments, in short, no society. There are places in the world (parts of Africa, Afghanistan, etc.) where tax rates are *very low*. Anyone wanting these low rates can move there, pay no school tax, pay no property tax, just pay off the local warlord for security, pay for your own firetruck (if the warlord wants more money your house could burn down), and you would have to pay an ungodly amount of money to send your kids to a school in another country where they have school taxes (unless you don't mind the kids being illiterate). Oh, and if you get sick, you have two options 1) die 2) travel while sick to a country where they fund their 'money losing' hospitals. Publicly funded hospitals are better because they benefit from economies of scale, long term funding, established treatment programs and social stability. But you can go the other route. Poppies are blooming in Afghanistan right now!

    8. Re:There's plenty of that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, for one, want there to exist people who study Latin, despite there being a limited usefulness for it as a career. I want people who study ancient Macedonian philosophy, basket weaving, Sanskrit and all the other fields that most people might deride as training for a career at McDonalds. I want there to be someone who knows everything there is to know about the inner politics of ancient Sumeria.

      I want a 12 inch....well, never mind.

      The problem is that the schools have other priorities. The school's priorities begin with the $751,000/year President and his 90% defined benefit pension + lifetime gold plated healthcare bennies for his entire family. Other priorities include a large and growing administrative staff, to help our intrepid President administer our school with such brilliance and care.

      Once all of these crucial priorties are handled there is precious little left for Music Therapy.

    9. Re:There's plenty of that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is neither fair nor smart to say "Let's grab money from a successful department and use it to prop up an unsuccessful one."

      My spouse is an alumnus of a very prestigious university in which both the law school and medical school are consistently ranked in the top ten in the world. At this school, at least 33% of the tuition charged to law students is sent directly to the medical school because, as the university sees it, people expect "elite" law schools to be expensive but it is a moral imperative to keep the tuition at the medical school as low as possible, regardless of its "elite" status.

    10. Re:There's plenty of that by hoppo · · Score: 1

      I read once that the thing a PhD in English prepares you for is creating other PhDs in English...

      Sounds like an Amway pitch.

    11. Re:There's plenty of that by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I work for an engineering college at a big university and we have some departments that really need cutting. I'm talking departments that, literally, have less than 10 students. Well when you have low enrollment numbers like that you don't really bring in the money to support a department head, a few professors, support staff, and so on. They are a drain on resources and need to be cut.

      They do need to take some care about that. Just because they have very few students with that major doesn't mean the department should be cut, as that department may be providing support to other departments in terms of lower level courses that those other departments need. For example, my school graduated only a small number of physics majors a year (well into single digits), however, the school considered the program important as the engineering and other departments relied heavily upon the 100- and 200-level courses. If the school didn't have the physics major and 300- and 400-level courses to go with it they figured they would have a lot harder time finding good professors who wanted to teach there.

  50. Re:Flori-duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, it IS a bad thing... Right now everyone who lives if Florida is concentrated in Florida. If it sinks those guys are going to move SOMEWHERE and do you really want that spread out over the whole country?

  51. No, not at all by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    Football is a profit center at most universities, at least most big ones. The reason the coach can get paid so much is because they bring in that kind of money. Where I work, football, men's basketball, and donations fund the entire athletics department. I'm talking all the staff and facilities, and every single scholarship including all those for non-money sports (like volleyball and women's golf). Oh, and they give back some money to the general fund. As such they get to pay the coach what they like. They make the money, they can afford it.

    Sports make a shit ton of money. On tickets to be sure but media is the big one. Schools are paid a massive amount for the rights to televise a game. Then of course there's merchandising. They license their logo for products and fans love to buy them.

    So no, in most cases cutting athletics would cost the school money, not save money. University of Florida is certainly one of those, they make a lot on their athletics. If you want to cut athletics because you are a geek that hates jocks then ok, but call it what it is. They best idea money wise is to keep it around.

  52. Posting as AC.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am posting as AC because I am well aware that a lot of UF fans/alumni are rabid in their support for the school and own shotguns. Things may have changed since my time at UF, but when I was there there (1999-2003) there were many redundant computer degrees:

    Decision Information Sciences (School of Business)
    Computer Information Science (School of Business)
    Computer Information Science (Liberal Arts and Sciences)
    Computer Information Science and Engineering (College of Engineering)
    Digital Arts and Sciences (Fine Arts/Engineering)

    The delta between these degrees was maybe 10-15% change in classes. It could be that they are just trying to clean up a lot of that redundancy, and streamline their operations.

  53. Re:Meanwhile... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Now here's something that should attract students!

    4 years of Sping Break!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  54. Re:Meanwhile... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Bet Willy from the Simpsons holds that degree.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  55. UF isn't known for their Computer Science Dept... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come to UCF where academia is still a higher priority than sport (although that gap is slowly getting smaller).

    There are tons of areas where your degree in CS can be put to use.

  56. It's obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well everyone knows that computer's just aren't science! Computers have no place in modern society.They are obviously saving that money for something more important to today's world, like Administrator salaries or classes in Intelligent Design.

  57. Give credit where credit is due... by E_Ron.Eous · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Thank the Republicans who control the Florida legislature who have been cutting funding for education while at the same time providing more tax cuts and subsidies to business all while creating another State university that won't dilute the already deficient funding for education.

  58. What makes you think a university does one thing? by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    Universities are for all sorts of purposes. Education is one, a big one. They make a lot of their money from student tuition and spend a lot of resources on student education. However that's not all they do. Research is another. Universities do a shitload of research of all types. Some of it is pie-in-the-sky pure research, some of it is targeted development, some of it is corporate funded, some of it is government funded, etc. Public service/access would be another, at least for public universities. They often run public museums, have public libraries, and so on. They give some back to the public (and are required to).

    However they are also out to make students happy. University is NOT supposed to be some place you go for 4 or 6 or 10 years to do nothing but study and hate life. You'll have trouble funding a lot of people interested in doing that. They work on that happiness in all sorts of ways and sports is one of them, particularly in America. Americans love them some sports and university sports are popular, and not just with the students. Also it happens to be that you can make some money doing it, as well as getting advertising for your school.

    None of the goals are mutually exclusive, nor are any of the smaller goals I didn't enumerate. Universities don't have to focus all on one thing and you don't have to trade off one for another. This is particularly true because the money doesn't all come from one place, it isn't all in one pot. For example a big $10 million research project doesn't take away resources from education. That money comes from a grant, and it isn't as though it could be stolen and given to classrooms, that would be illegal and if you tried, you'd not get any grants.

    Likewise it isn't as though you could just take all the money brought in by athletics and spend it elsewhere, because then you'd have no athletics program and bring in no money. Same with donations to it. Those are made for a specific purpose and you use them as the donors want or you don't use them at all. We got a stadium upgrade/expansion recently on account of a large private donation from a guy who played football here at one time. That money couldn't go to anything else, he donated it to athletics and that is what it had to be used for. However that expansion didn't hurt the general fund at all, it was funded by that donation, so it isn't stopping a new 100,000 sq ft engineering building from being built.

    There's no reason sports can't be one of the things universities do, and I see no reason to hate on them for it.

  59. CS is redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    No, you shuld be hiring programmers with a technical degree. CS programs don't make scientists. They don't make programmers. I've yet to figure out what good they are, since they give a shitty liberal arts education, which I do value (in a dollars sort of I want to hire you because you'll contribute to my company) and a shitty engineering education, and a shitty programming education. Most of the CS graduates wasted a lot of time and money on getting nothing more than a hangover and a tech school education. However, the tech school grads went to college because they're hungry and want to make themselves better.

    1. Re:CS is redundant by V!NCENT · · Score: 5, Interesting

      What kind of a shitty university do you get these from? In my country (not the US), I'm not even halfway and already I had to learn:
      1. Operating System design;
      2. industrial processor assembly languages;
      3. UML;
      4. java;
      5. C;
      6. C++;
      7. Processor designs;
      8. Math;
      9. Logic;
      10. MySQL;
      11. Unix and Windows networking;
      12. Internet protocols (TCP/IP, UDP, etc);
      13. Networking architecture (internet tiers, wireless networking, industrial ethernet, etc.)
      14. Logic boards (breadboards, soldering, reading ARM specs and erreta's etc.)
      15. Writing a Bluetooth device driver;
      16. Game design (3D modeling, OpenGL, storyboarding, etc)
      17. Professional skills (project management, documentation, etc.)
      18. Optimizing algorythms;
      19. Learning industrial processes;
      20. What did I miss?

      Sound like the level of eduation in your area sucks balls...

      --
      Here be signatures
    2. Re:CS is redundant by Wovel · · Score: 2

      Our countries have trade schools as well. We are discussing university education. It is possible we define this distinction differently.

    3. Re:CS is redundant by forkfail · · Score: 1

      Language design.
      File system design.
      Assembly (yes, it still does matter).
      Graph theory.
      Algorithmic theory.

      --
      Check your premises.
    4. Re:CS is redundant by forkfail · · Score: 1

      Trade schools don't teach the math and theory that can turn a practitioner into an expert.

      Development/CS/programming is unique in that the design and implementation are so close to each other; the perfect design is, in fact, perfect code.

      --
      Check your premises.
    5. Re:CS is redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Algorithms properly. Yes it does suck balls. Currently I am taking classes in TWO programs that, for whatever reason I am not allowed to double major in without a transfer and loss of credit. Its the only way I will learn a healthy dose of programming AND network/system tasks.

    6. Re:CS is redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a Canadian university of no particularly special note, my CS degree was a lot of:
      - software engineering and design patterns (team coordination, UML, design diagrams, etc. etc.)
      - technical writing
      - OO programming in general
      - AI algorithms, machine learning, image processing for AI, mobile robotics
      - graph algorithms, theory
      - advanced data structures, algorithms
      - algorithmic complexity analysis (lots and lots and lots)
      - parallel processing algorithms, theory
      - system architecture
      - discrete mathematics
      - finite automata
      - cryptography theory
      - relational databases
      - graphics (taken from a bottom-up approach; we didn't even get to using OpenGL, though we got a thorough understanding of the mathematics involved)
      - and through the various courses, we used: Java, C, C++, Prolog, Lisp, Python, Perl, C++/Qt, MySQL, and Assembly for a simplified VM whose name escapes me

      This is mostly because I pushed myself towards the more theoretical end, as well as taking every AI course I could. There were also courses on real-time systems, network programming, Human-Computer Interfaces, and others. And there were "softer" (less theory) courses; I could have spent more time on languages and software engineering.

      The hardware-related courses (with the exception of Real Time Systems, which necessarily includes hardware) were all in the Computer Engineering and Electrical Engineering departments of the Engineering faculty (the CS department being part of the Math/Science faculty), but were an option for electives. I didn't take any.

      The only undergrad compiler course offered was pretty shit, unfortunately. The Operating Systems course was really high-level and poor as well. I would have liked more low-level systems programming stuff.

    7. Re:CS is redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could make almost a list like that yet I have just couple of years in the un-versity(7 year average for graduation from that place, figure out where it is).

      However, that would be a silly list, could be mostly covered by a lower level institution too. If people coming from there could get a program running though on their own without the course material to keep their hand...

      Having MySQL there as it's own point isn't doing any favors by the way, it's exactly the kind of thing that makes it look like a lower tech school hands on education that just focuses on getting the students through a certain list pre-planned tasks, which is the opposite what a real university is meant to be.

    8. Re:CS is redundant by V!NCENT · · Score: 1

      I've never heared of the term trade school before, but that seems to be it. After getting a bachelor I can go to a (what you call) university and do a master (and skip the bachelor part). One the possibilities is in the area of Quantum computing, but I'm not sure if (aside from the fun aspect) I'm going to do that. It's expensive and possible the horror of overqualification.

      --
      Here be signatures
    9. Re:CS is redundant by V!NCENT · · Score: 1

      Well there are certain directions one can choose, and given that I wanted to go for Embedded Systems, databases isn't part of what I have to learn or go in depth with, and so it's probably not even on the checklist of what I can do, but it's considdered important to know that I do get a feel of what databases are.

      But the point of the new style of education in my country is not learning something (since after four years the stuff you learn is outdated anyway) but that students learn how to learn new stuff, so when one gets a job, a student knows how to keep up with technology. It's not that I got taught about MySQL, it was "This is your first project; make a prototype security door by soldering some components together to a CD-ROM drive, include some sencors, program the microcontroller, create administration software for it and attach it to a database. Acces cards are rfid chips, figure it, figure out how to secure it on the rfid level and database level. Also host the database. Go."

      We do have a 'mediocre proffesion education' in my country that's all about getting certificate x, learn technique y, learn Cisco, but that's not what I'm doing. Hell MySQL was on the checklist of high school (along with Basic, lol).

      --
      Here be signatures
  60. As a computer science graduate by Dareth · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As a computer science graduate I often ask why I did not have the choice to get a degree in systems administration.

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
    1. Re:As a computer science graduate by chill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That isn't a degree, it's a certificate.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    2. Re:As a computer science graduate by skids · · Score: 1

      As a computer science graduate I often ask why I did not have the choice to get a degree in systems administration.

      Because once people read the decription of the course materials, they would high tail it out of there. :-)

    3. Re:As a computer science graduate by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Which could explain why everybody is so bad at it.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    4. Re:As a computer science graduate by Bigby · · Score: 2

      You can get a degree in Business Administration; right?

    5. Re:As a computer science graduate by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      You can probably get a degree in used car sales, but it would be worth about as much.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    6. Re:As a computer science graduate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You did. It's called Management Information Systems (MIS). The employer requiring a CS degree for a SysAdmin position doesn't know the difference between the two. I wouldn't hire a CS grad to configure servers, and I wouldn't hire a MIS grad to write a compiler.

    7. Re:As a computer science graduate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try a 2 year community college next time.

    8. Re:As a computer science graduate by robthebloke · · Score: 1

      If you're a fan of watching grass grow, playing in sand pits, and mowing lawns, then there's a BSc designed just for you.... golf course management!

    9. Re:As a computer science graduate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the Dept. Chair of the U of A CSCE dept was asked that she responded that they did not give out degrees in custodial work.

    10. Re:As a computer science graduate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can get a degree in Business Administration; right?

      Yes and you can see everyday how well this is working out....

    11. Re:As a computer science graduate by kiwimate · · Score: 1

      As a computer science graduate I often ask why I did not have the choice to get a degree in systems administration.

      For the same reason an aeronautical engineer didn't have the choice to get a degree to be a pilot.

      As others say, if that was what you wanted then you should've gone to a trade school or a technical institute.

    12. Re:As a computer science graduate by chuckinator · · Score: 1

      I'm not totally sure, but I sure as hell wish that class was a required course for anyone with a CS degree. I fail to understand how so many people can claim to be geniuses at writing software and be so brain dead when it comes to understanding how production grade software is actually put together and used in the real world (ie, not the duct tape and bubble gum projects they put together for their senior thesis).

  61. Where is the problem here . . . ? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You want to study Computer Science? Enroll somewhere else. You live in Florida, and want to study Computer Science cheaply at a state subsidized school? Move.

    If folks in Florida sees no point in educating Computer Science students, let 'em. The loss will be theirs. Say "Hello" to your new neighbors from India.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:Where is the problem here . . . ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      new neighbor. I understand why this school did this. You joke about it, but why would a company hire a person BS when they can get someone from another country for the same price with masters. It is sad that CIS degree only means something if you have a master with 10 years under your belt to get a job now. I have a few friends that have BA is CIS and only can get help desk jobs, because it is cheaper to get someone from over seas than it would be to pay for them. So let me see spend a 30k a year for 4 years that will only land you a 30k a year job. I don't think so.

    2. Re:Where is the problem here . . . ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go to the University of Central Florida. We actually care about academia and have a better Engineering and Computer Science departments.

    3. Re:Where is the problem here . . . ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No need to move. It was a pretty even split between FSU, UF, and FIU when my high-school class graduated. Some Florida state schools are simply better for certain types of majors. FSU and FIU have some pretty decent comp sci or related courses of study and active research divisions.

    4. Re:Where is the problem here . . . ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      UF is not the only school in Florida. Florida state has a decent CS program, University of North Florida, Florida Institute of Technology, University of South Florida, and University of Central Florida all have respectable programs. Now if you want a job in Florida in a tech field, good luck with that, the lack of good tech jobs has caused me and several others to leave over the last few years.

    5. Re:Where is the problem here . . . ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. I've interviewed over 100 developers over the last two years out of whom 80% were non-citizens. This in a period when jobs were "hard to find."

    6. Re:Where is the problem here . . . ? by glitch0 · · Score: 1

      You live in Florida, and want to study Computer Science cheaply at a state subsidized school? Move.

      There are other schools in Florida with good CS programs, you know... FSU is ranked in the 70's for CS research, for example.

      --
      -Glitch "We all know Linux is great...it does infinite loops in 5 seconds." - Linus Torvalds
    7. Re:Where is the problem here . . . ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You live in Florida, and want to study Computer Science cheaply at a state subsidized school? You're fucked.

      FTFY.

      State schools are only subsidized for their own residents.

  62. Need more TECH schools / Vocational for IT not CS by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Most tech schools tech real IT skills and have any number of different tracks.

    CS tends to focus to much on coding and high level theory. Some CS programs are so much on the theory you get people who are poor programs out of them.

    also they don't trun out people who can do ADMIN work / other IT work.

    http://www.networkworld.com/news/2011/022511-it-graduates.html

    Now when you can learn more in a 2 year tech school that so that most CS programs are to long and don't cover the right areas.

    Now we need IT to be more like a trade with going education that is not just BA, masters, PHD, post doc, and other higher level stuff that you see at colleges. For some to have to take a 2+ year on going education with all the filler and fluff classes is not the right way to learn new IT skills and for working pro's it likely you can only find classes that fit your time at community colleges (most are only 2 years BUT DO OFFER classes as NON Degree) or tech schools or online classes.

  63. Three Words by Bastian227 · · Score: 1

    DOES NOT COMPUTE

  64. Re:University of DUMBSHITS! by jellomizer · · Score: 0

    The sad truth, is that most of the university money doesn't come threw students. But threw grants, alumni donations, government support, and sports.
    If schools really wanted to save money, they will stop building new buildings every couple of years, and use the money to renovate existing buildings, for those of you in college, I challenge you to analyse the utilization of the classrooms of all the building at any one moments, I would expect that during peak hours there is a 50% utilization of all the classrooms. However when you try to build a brand new building you get more support from the big payers.
    The school I recently graduated from is building a brand new Business Building. Why? Who really knows. Business students don't need much. A classroom with a projector for power point, a podium, and the ability to break up in small groups, perhaps some Wi-Fi. We are not talking about Science classes that needs Gas for Bunsen burners, or large equipment to study new and interesting stuff. They can operate well in a normal classroom. Why build new ones, when the old ones work fine?
     

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  65. IT should be NON Degree / Non-Matriculated Student by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    IT should be at the NON Degree / Non-Matriculated Student level as a lot of TECH / IT work does not fit in a Traditional Degree plan.

    Move to a Badges system http://chronicle.com/article/Badges-Earned-Online-Pose/130241/

  66. Re:"Steven Salzberg, your blog sucks?" by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 3, Informative

    I don't get the outrage here. The article might just as well have positioned this as moving the education to the new Polytechnic. But that's not good for page views. So we get this opinion piece instead.

    Based on tuition and costs, there could be anywhere between 85-200 students covered by this department to get the $1.7M savings. And there is a Polytechnic being created in Tampa specifically for this kind of thing. Why invest in something that is going to be poached by your new University anyway?

    Meanwhile, just two days ago, Florida governor Rick Scott approved the creation of a brand-new public university, Florida Polytechnic University, to be located near the city of Tampa. In an unintentionally ironic statement, Gov. Scott said

            âoeAt a time when the number of graduates of Floridaâ(TM)s universities in the STEM [science, technology, engineering, and mathematics] fields is not projected to meet workforce needs, the establishment of Florida Polytechnic University will help us move the needle in the right direction.â

  67. Here's why they cut Computer Science by ggraham412 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A number of posters have been wondering why UF cut the Computer Science department. It is because the administrators at the University of Florida want more funding from the state of Florida, and a useful and popular STEM program is a higher value hostage than, say, any Arts and Humanities program.

    My basis for this is OP's linked article in Forbes, which quite transparently links the elimination of the department with state budget cuts. Could you imagine how that would read if UF threatened closure of a Literature department and elimination of courses in postmodernism and semiotics? Most sane people would yawn at that.

    1. Re:Here's why they cut Computer Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm all for de-funding higher education. Social reconstruction has become more important that teaching skills and analytic thinking. If they want to conform society as a whole, let them do it on their own dime. Besides a far more focused and frankly more beneficial computer education can be had outside of the university system. When I was learning computing the only thing they taught at the university level was programming and computer theory. You could have went through your entire computer science curriculum never learning about networking, ethernet, or even what a computer was composed of at the hardware level.

  68. need a way to learn/certify in smaller increments. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People need a way to learn / certify the skill they have gained in smaller increments.

    And college CS is to long and is not life long.

  69. To hell with colleges by ebinrock · · Score: 1

    Bottom line, employers need to stop requiring or even preferring degrees. Phooey! College degrees are such an expensive, artificial barrier to employment. Employers need to focus on just getting the people who have the skills, period - whether they learn from a training center or under a tree from their uncle. Recognized certifications are probably a good litmus test of whether people have the skills. And then, employers need to go back to the good ol' fashioned apprenticeship programs like they had in the 1800's for blacksmiths and so forth. And...here's an idea...why don't employers provide training, and ongoing training, for their employees? Wow.

    1. Re:To hell with colleges by gtall · · Score: 1

      Yeah, which company would want well-educated individuals who can do more than the thing currently in front of them. All a job will ever require is just a bit of training for the life time of that job...which would be about what, 4 years in this day and age. Then the employee can be let go or retrained for a job they'd have no trouble doing without re-training if they only had a real education.

    2. Re:To hell with colleges by wyattstorch516 · · Score: 1

      When the Supreme Court overturns Griggs v. Duke Power Co. employers will stop requiring degrees. Until then they have to unless they want to get sued.

    3. Re:To hell with colleges by ebinrock · · Score: 1

      Okay, not sure what you're saying, but college is not real education. Sorry. I went to a four year college and it was all but worthless. I finally learned how to think AFTER I got out of college and into the real world. College was so boring - it was like High School 2.0; I really didn't learn anything new. And for what my parents put in financially, they could have paid for about half of my house. Seriously.

  70. Reason for CISE cuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I graduated from CISE in 1989 and have a little feedback. The Dean of the College of Engineering asked CISE to merge with Electrical and Computer Engineering and apparently they refused to cooperate. This plan is a result of the Dean being displeased with CISE not doing what she wanted.

    Trying to determine what is best for the UF College of Engineering it seems that this is a stupid idea. CISE is responsible for bringing in 17% of the funds of the College while using 10% of the resources. They also have a high percentage of esteemed professors and a high number have been awarded NSF CAREER grants. So, using objective standards, it is arguable that CISE is the best department in the College. Punishment is not appropriate for one's best department.

    A better solution would be to cut all the College departments 2% which is the amount of the cut. It's a shame that in the real world, the best solution does not involve cuts to athletics. I note from a previous poster that Athletics costs $100M per year and generates about half that. Perhaps it would be more logical for the state of Florida to drop all college athletic programs, but this is America and football trumps engineering.

  71. Re:Need more TECH schools / Vocational for IT not by Sentrion · · Score: 1

    Ya, dat dus suck. All dat reeding, riting, litterature, english, and term papers. you can leev out all dat filler and fluff classes cus the only skilz you need to suckseed are programs skilz. And its about time I get payed what dos MSCS and "software enginers" guys get paed.

  72. On the bright side— by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their sports budget of 99 million is being raised by 2 million (no kidding).

  73. Re:Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which proves you've never actually been to a seminary, as you have no clue what is actually taught there. (Not a faith-based argument, but rather a curriculum one.)

  74. Re:Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Study of women, versus study of men.

    Studying rocks versus studying trees.

    The world would be a lot better off if people didn't feign upset at some fabricated discrimination just to justify their own prejudices. I've heard the same protests about African-American history, it's never genuine, and you'll have to pardon me for being judgmental, but I'm sure you are as well, with a preconceived notion of the class being full of some man-hating rhetoric.

    Sure, it could be done from simply a biological perspective (though I recall some examples of how doctors just did not want to think about gynecology no more than a century ago), but there's more to human gender than just the mechanics. And you can do it without finding explanations like "Women are genetically less intelligent than men, the numbers show that" to justify discrimination.

  75. CS...good riddance by enpingado · · Score: 1

    As a UF engineering alumni, i shed no tears for a CS department. Like some have mentioned, it's a glorified BS is technology buzzwords, nothing more. The students are worried because they will not be able to perform in real engineering department. Boo Hoo.

    1. Re:CS...good riddance by gubers33 · · Score: 1

      Most engineering programs require students to take many useless classes in terms of that they will be doing in the real world. I was an Computer Engineering major and then switched into Information Science and Tech. Math and Physics I an say were beneficial in my thought process for programming classes. However, taking Chem my freshman year was a complete was of time that I could have filled with a more useful class. There were a couple other engineering classes I took in my first two years in which case I consider a waste of time not to mention a couple thousand dollars.

      --
      Just because you are wrong and I called you out on it doesn't mean I am a Troll.
  76. Re:Meanwhile... by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

    Most of those are well-defined areas of academic study. For instance, most of the ______ Studies majors are all about studying the history, culture, and challenges of a particular society. There's some BS there, but there's BS in physics too (e.g. the Bogdanov Affair), and there's some valuable stuff that comes out of those departments.

    The 3 music degrees make complete sense: Music Education is about teaching music and preparing students to work as school band directors and the like. A B.A. in music is about the academic study of music, including its theory, history, physics, and psychology. A B.M. in music is for those training to become better classical or jazz performers. My guess is that they overlap faculty and courses quite a bit.

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  77. Athletics is trivial nonsense. by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

    If the athletics department makes money, it's sole purpose should be to plow that money back into other departments that train students to do actual useful things (i.e. non-entertainment oriented tasks which would exclude ethno-musicology, gender studies and performance art and include math, engineering, accounting, CS, architecture and so on).

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
    1. Re:Athletics is trivial nonsense. by Wovel · · Score: 1

      The UF Athletic Department contributed over 6 million dollars to the University (More than 3x the CS budget being cut). The department also paid 1.6 million for University Services they Consumed. All of their facilities, salaries, and scholarships (another 1.5 million that went to the University BTW) are funded from the athletic department budget as well.

      If they run a budget surplus, that goes (at least in part) to the University. http://www.uaa.ufl.edu/uaa/Executive_Summary_2011-2012.pdf

      Your assumption that arts and humanities are not useful is so incredibly flawed it is sad to think you might have more than a junior high education.

    2. Re:Athletics is trivial nonsense. by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

      In fact, I got a liberal arts education, complete with arts and humanities.

      Within the domain of of arts and humanities is "useful information that makes you a better citizen/person" such as philosophy, creative writing, primate and cultural anthropology, political science, sociology and so on. Other areas like the aforementioned ethno-musicology, gender studies and performance art - not so much. There are core subjects, most of which are semantically equivalent to "human behavior of groups" or "communicating in a useful manner" that are useful. There are also lots of courses that are the equivalent of "underwater basket weaving" or "art appreciation" that are not.

      The point is utility. Ethno-musicology isn't generally useful enough to be included in a college curriculum. It's a net drain on resources.

      --
      Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
    3. Re:Athletics is trivial nonsense. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      You know the saying: A college president's job is to provide sex for the students, parking for the faculty, and a winning for the alumni.

      Most athletics departments "make money" by means of rich donors.

      There's cause for astonishment if those donors specify that part of the money should go to academics.

      A lot of people think it's detestable, but I don't think it actually costs taxpayers any money. It's just sort of a club attached to the university.

      Some donors go for immortality rather than entertainment, e.g. a building or lab or endowed chair with their name on it. I don't think many rich people just donate for academics for the good of society.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  78. In its place... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    UF's president has proposed a new faculty to be called "The Faculty of Luddites and Creationists". In other news he has also declared that the university calendar will be set back 100 years and women will not be permitted to enroll in any UF programs. The Geography department will be required to flatten all their globes as they depict a false view of the world... IDIOTS at UF.

  79. Just the first step by Rambo+Tribble · · Score: 0

    Now we can move on to eliminating the sciences altogether. After all, they teach hackneyed ideas like global warming, evolution and more than four elements; stuff we sure don't want our kids learning.

  80. Blame squarely on GOP by Eravnrekaree · · Score: 0

    The blame for this squarely lies on the Republicans which control Florida's Legislature. To understand what is going on here Florida Legislature has been cutting funding for all universities and therefore are leaving schools with not enough funding to operating, leaving difficult tuition and funding choices. UF would not have made these cuts had their funding not had taken a massive hit. If the media did its job and tracing this back to Republican policies it would be something that people would remember at the polls. Don't like attacks on our schools so we can give more tax breaks to billionaires who move jobs overseas? Maybe time to vote Democratic.

    Most countries highly prize computer science and technology, that the US seems to no longer be able to afford to develop a skills base for being a leader in technology. While other countries are increasing their investments in technology education we are cuting them. This indicates the Republicans path they have the US on to a third world future.

    1. Re:Blame squarely on GOP by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Tuition is supposed to pay for the cost of schooling. Please explain why my taxes should pay for your schooling.

      And, a better explanation is that the administration staff is overpaid. The president of UF makes $750,000 a year. That is more than the president of the country.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    2. Re:Blame squarely on GOP by RazorSharp · · Score: 1

      I also blame the GOP for a lot of things, and in this case they do deserve some blame, but you also have to blame the university for their knee-jerk reaction to having their funds cut. They probably paid Will Muschamp that much or more for his 7-6 season last year, not to mention how much they paid their assistant coaches.

      They also could have courted boosters, especially alumni with CS degrees.

      It was irresponsible for the state legislature to cut funding for education, an unfortunate trend throughout the country that has escalated the cost of higher education throughout the last couple decades, but I don't believe for a second the university couldn't have made this a priority. If they needed to scrape up an extra $1.7 million a year for their football or basketball team, they would.

      I also don't like the idea that we expect the government to fund higher education but at the same time 1) we still expect students to pay exorbitant amount of money to attend college with money mattering more than academic achievement 2) the government doesn't actually control the universities. Until the federal government takes control of our higher education system it will continue to function as a place for rich kids to spend most their time partying. Most kids don't enroll in higher education to learn because we provide them with far too many opportunities to go to college while side-stepping the learning process, provided that mommy and daddy can foot the bill. Schools like UofF are the worst offenders in this regard, so is it any surprise they don't prioritize education and run the university like it's a business, the P&L reports dictating what stays and what goes?

      --
      "From the depths of my skeptical and rationalist soul, I ask the Lord to protect me from California touchie-feeliedom."
    3. Re:Blame squarely on GOP by cmattdetzel · · Score: 1

      First - efforts to increase tuition at UF have been continually rebuffed by the Board of Trustees and the Florida legislature. The price of tuition is largely a political matter over which students have no control. If you want to see changes, get involved and vote.

      Second, please stop perpetuating the "not with my tax dollars" trope. To the extent some small portion of "your taxes" (Florida has no state income tax, so you must be referring to sales or use taxes) is ultimately distributed by state government for higher education, it is done this way for the same reasons that my taxes are used to pay for building and maintaining the roads and bridges you drive on, and the law enforcement and fire departments that protect you and your property, and any number of other sovereign-provided privileges, immunities, rights and services that you enjoy as a citizen of the United States and (presumably) a resident of Florida.

    4. Re:Blame squarely on GOP by Sentrion · · Score: 1

      I don't think you understand the mindset of today's Republican Party:

      1. The only fair tax is a flat tax, and the only purpose of government should be to push that tax rate as close to 0% as possible. Charging fees for government services is OK. For example, national forests do not manage themselves, so those who visit should have to pay a fee to cover the costs of managing the national forests.
      2. Building and maintaining the roads and bridges you drive on should be the responsibility of private corporations. The state should auction off all public roadways and use the proceeds to pay off all public debt. The new owners should be allowed to collect tolls, and by the magic of the free and unregulated market, any roads worth maintaining will be maintained.
      3. Law enforcement should not be a financial strain on tax payers. Private security firms like Academi, previously known as Xe Services LLC, Blackwater USA and Blackwater Worldwide, do the job of maintaining law and order for efficiently that government agencies like the local police department, state troopers, FBI, CIA, or US Army. Under the current system tax payers still have to fund the hiring of these firms, but ideally individuals who care about law and order will contract with such firms to patrol their neighborhoods and keep skittle-toting thugs away from their property.
      4. The US court system is bloated, backlogged, and too expensive to maintain. Private arbitration firms can dish out justice more efficiently. Eventually all of the US courts can be privatized, especially the meddlesome US Supreme Court that is still stacked with FDR appointed activist judges who constantly trample on the Constitution.
      5. The original signed copies of the US Constitution should not be preserved in bloated and wasteful tax-payer funded government agencies such as the National Archives, Library of Congress, or national institutes/museums. The Constitution has such a high value that it should be auctioned off to the highest bidder, along with the holdings of all these other government agencies. Private depositories and wealthy collectors can preserve our national treasures more efficiently. Museums that house such artifacts should be entirely self-funding from ticket sales and the private sale of over-priced artifacts, such as the Declaration of Independence. Those who cannot remain solvent should be allowed to fail.
      6. Fire departments should not be tax supported. Those who wish to have fire protection should pay fees to the fire and rescue company of their choice. Here is a great example of an efficient operation: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/39516346/ns/us_news-life/t/no-pay-no-spray-firefighters-let-home-burn/
      7. Sovereign-provided privileges, immunities, rights and services should not be the responsibility of a tax-supported government. All privileges, immunities, rights and services should be treated as commodities to be auctioned off and/or privatized so that the delivery of such privileges, immunities, rights and services will be more efficient.

      Bottom line: Asking tax payers to pay for anything is morally reprehensible.

    5. Re:Blame squarely on GOP by Gripp · · Score: 1

      all undergraduate study, at every state college, is covered 5/8's by taxes. tuition is only the other 3/8. That is the portions in FL at least - not sure about other states. That is why "out of state" and graduate students pay more. and that is why a state college costs less than a private one.

    6. Re:Blame squarely on GOP by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      Well, skippy, I do vote and I don't go to university. I am a real adult. I actually work.

      Sales, use, and property taxes are taxes and a portion of my taxes go to support the university system. Gas taxes go towards building and maintaing the roads. If you live in Florida, then you probably use the roads and bridges, enjoy the protections of the police and fire departments and all the other things you mentioned. If you don't live in Florida, your taxes don't go towards any of that.

      What you didn't explain is why my taxes should go to something that will not benefit me or the rest of society. Explain why my and everyone else's tax dollars should go to paying someone's college tuition for an education that will benefit only that third person?

      Hell, if you are so hell bent on giving your money to someone else, you can mail it to me.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    7. Re:Blame squarely on GOP by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      That doesn't answer my question. Explain why taxes should be going to pay for any tuition at all. I will see no benefit from it and neither will most people. You want to go to college, you want to get a degree, a degree costs money, so why shouldn't you ALL the cost as you will be reaping the benefits of your education? And, more importantly, why is tax money going to support degrees that will cost more than the seeker will be to pay off?

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    8. Re:Blame squarely on GOP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could it be that those mean-hearted Republicans are trying to offset a fall in tax revenues (possibly per capita rather than in absolute terms) due to the recession? The state's main fiscal obligations are to education, it is not generally feasible to cut state budgets without dipping into education, be it higher or primary. UF as a flagship should have the largest endowment of state universities and be best situated to weather the fiscal storm vs relatively young universities like USF and UCF.

    9. Re:Blame squarely on GOP by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

      Tuition is supposed to pay for the cost of schooling. Please explain why my taxes should pay for your schooling.

      The idealized view is that a educated public makes a better society.

      The cynical view is that your legislature doesn't give a damn about education, but needs a university as a status symbol.

      For a more pragmatic answer, much of modern technology stems from universities. Businesses don't like to invest in basic research because it's not going to make a positive impact on their next quarterly earnings report. But your state taxes support institutions that do keep basic research alive in this country, and your federal taxes boost it (e.g., via the National Science Foundation grand programs).

      And even stuff that isn't invented at universities is often invented by people who your tax dollars helped educate. (Yeah, there are some famous examples of non-educated people who did cool stuff, but how much of our total innovation do they account for?)

      And finally, university towns tend to have a more educated populace than a similarly-sized town without a university, and so businesses like to locate there. That provides jobs even for non-educated people; every business needs clerical help etc., which may not sound very glamorous, but beats the hell out of flipping burgers for a living.

      If you want to whinge, I suspect you'll find that we spend more money on corporate welfare than we do on higher education, and that corporate welfare money just goes into some shareholders' pockets. At least you're getting something, perhaps indirectly, from the public investment in education.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    10. Re:Blame squarely on GOP by Gripp · · Score: 1

      Because we would prefer that the general populous be educated. The more the better. It is to our detriment even. Under educated societies are dangerous in a number of ways - even for the people who are "better/above" than the general populous. It's not a place I would want to live, at least. So what your tax dollars are paying for is a better society. Thinking that it is merely paying for some individuals chance at success is vastly short-sighted.

    11. Re:Blame squarely on GOP by cmattdetzel · · Score: 1

      Well, skippy, I do vote and I don't go to university. I am a real adult. I actually work.

      When trying to convince others that you are “a real adult[,]” it’s probably a good rule of practice to avoid remarks that make you seem like a petulant child.

      What you didn't explain is why my taxes should go to something that will not benefit me or the rest of society. Explain why my and everyone else's tax dollars should go to paying someone's college tuition for an education that will benefit only that third person?

      Florida residents are subject to and bound by the laws of the State of Florida. Except where federally preempted, the supreme source of law of in Florida is the Florida Constitution. Article IX, Section 1 of that document provides, in pertinent part:

      The education of children is a fundamental value of the people of the State of Florida. It is, therefore, a paramount duty of the state to make adequate provision for the education of all children residing within its borders. Adequate provision shall be made by law . . . for the establishment, maintenance, and operation of institutions of higher learning and other public education programs that the needs of the people may require.

      Art. IX, sec. 1(a), Fla. Const., available at Flsenate.gov (emphasis added).

      In other words, the simplest answer to your question is “because it’s the law.” If you don’t like it, you are free to (a) relocate to another state or (b) avail yourself of the provisions of Article XI, Section 3, which sets out the method by which citizens such as yourself may propose amendments to the Florida Constitution through ballot initiative. Whining about your taxes here is the coward’s option, and wholly unpersuasive.

    12. Re:Blame squarely on GOP by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      "Establishment, maintenance, and operation of institutions of higher learning" doesn't including tuitions support. Conversely, if you believe it does, why aren't institutes of higher learning also a part of the "high quality system of free public schools that allows students to obtain a high quality education"?

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    13. Re:Blame squarely on GOP by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      So, you are saying that secondary education is, in fact, under-educated, yes? You don't want to live in the U.S.A of today? Or, are you setting up a straw man?

      Prove that a population consisting solely of college graduates most of whom are in debt from getting their degree(s) is better than one in which not everyone has a college education.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    14. Re:Blame squarely on GOP by Gripp · · Score: 1

      when did I say any of that? We currently live in a decently educated society. So, NO... I didn't say that I don't want to live in the USA of today. And that is because more people are able to afford higher education. and NO I don't believe that high school is not enough - even private schools.
      If you are looking for further examples, look to any first world nation. If you are looking for a contrast comparison, look to any third world nation. Notice any distinct patterns? Figure there may be a correlation? I know that you would love to save an extra few dollars on your taxes (and we really are talking a small amount), but the consequences are simply not worth those savings, IMHO. Lastly, if you really need a professional opinion, rather than common sense, I would direct here http://emlab.berkeley.edu/~moretti/lm46.pdf .
      I would go as far to say that the decrease in average education levels, created by increased costs in higher education from our taxes NOT going toward it, would result in crime levels that offset the savings in increased police budgets. That is, in the end you wouldn't be saving any money.

    15. Re:Blame squarely on GOP by cmattdetzel · · Score: 1

      Students attending Florida’s state universities have to pay tuition to attend. As I’ve already pointed out, state law requires that the state expend money from general revenues for the “establishment, maintenance, and operation of” these state universities. I’m not aware of, nor have you pointed out, any “tuitions support (sic)” that exists as some separate series of payments to college students. I certainly don’t remember receiving any such “support” when I attended UF, so enlighten me, if you will. Supporting cites to specific provisions of the Florida Statutes, Laws of Florida, and/or Florida Administrative Code would be helpful and appreciated.

      At bottom, I think your problem is with the law--chiefly, that you don't control it. I suspect that, like most people who’ve taken up the “not with my tax dollars” refrain, you believe that you should receive the benefits of citizenship, and of residing in the State of Florida, without cost to you—at least not unless *you* approve of any such costs in advance. In other words, you reject the sovereignty of the government of the State of Florida and of the United States of America, believing (foolishly, to be sure) that *you* are an exception to the laws which govern all other citizens and residents.

      Or, perhaps you are simply making an (ineloquent and contrived) argument that you don’t like the state of the law, in which case your gripes were already addressed in the portion of my previous comment regarding relocation and/or ballot initiatives, supra.

  81. Re:Need more TECH schools / Vocational for IT not by gtall · · Score: 1

    Totally correct. Why should companies get well-rounded individuals who know more than a few tech tricks and can think for themselves. Companies should be happy with narrow-minded people who are only good for one or two things while they are in style; when the style changes, companies can get rid of those people get some new hires who are narrowly focused on the new whiz-bang stuff. IT changes much too quickly for people with a depth of knowledge. People just need to get over the fact that they are to be nothing more than fodder for the next mini-trend in IT. They'll be happier being only employed for a bit before they are let go to pursue...well...maybe they can find work as garbage collectors.

  82. Am I the only one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one who suspects a desperate attempt at getting attention to reduced state funding for education?

  83. Maybe a pay cut is in order by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

    The president of UF gets a total annual compensation of $751,000. So, by cutting an entire department, they were able to save ~2.25 times the salary of the president of the university. How is it he is worth 44% of an entire department?

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  84. Re:Meanwhile... by wyattstorch516 · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a real lucrative career path there.

  85. Sports: "But it brings in donations/over cost" by Rhys · · Score: 1

    I happen to have gone to a large midwestern big 10 and I've heard all the same thing about the sports program. I've also worked at said same school while my better half was doing her PhD work, and then some after. They paid the "big 2" coaches well over a million a year. Plus get to keep paying it on contract buyouts.

    Let's just say they aren't paying their administrative/it staff, nor even most professors like that.

    So when the engineering dept called up looking for a donation, I said, sorry but no. When the U quits pissing money away on the big 2 coaches like that, call me back. Until then you get nothing.

    If having sports is a revenue center because people donate to it, you don't have to bitch about it. You can swim against the tide.

    My state funded high school, which does not piss buttloads of bucks away on sports programs (it has sports, but they clearly aren't a focus like at college) does get a nice donation from me, every year.

    --
    Slashdot Patriotism: We Support our Dupes!
    1. Re:Sports: "But it brings in donations/over cost" by Wovel · · Score: 1

      Well at UF the athletic deprtment makes more than $6 million in contributions plus pays $1.5 million in scholarships to the University. Not sure how it was at your schools. Eliminating those coaches (funded from the Athletics budget and revenue) would cause the school to lose at least $6 million a year in revenue. If you are talking about a major school like Wisconsin, the result would be the same. Firing the coaches would result in the school having less revenue in the general fund.

    2. Re:Sports: "But it brings in donations/over cost" by Wovel · · Score: 1

      BTW, I bet your state funded high school has a lot more waste than the University you refuse to support. I suppose you are happy to donate to layer upon layer of pointless administration.

  86. 3rd World Country by assertation · · Score: 1

    Everything I have seen/heard coming out of Florida, starting with the 2000 elections, moving through the Martin shooting and now this makes me consider Florida to be a 3rd world country embedded within the United States.

    1. Re:3rd World Country by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      Everything I have seen/heard coming out of Florida, starting with the 2000 elections, moving through the Martin shooting and now this makes me consider Florida to be a 3rd world country embedded within the United States.

      Most of the United States is a third-world country embedded within the United States.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  87. How good of a program was it? by SilverJets · · Score: 1

    How good of a program was it? If it was mediocre at best isn't it better for the university to put funding into programs it can do better and let students that are interested in a computer science degree pursue their studies at a university with a better program?

  88. Re:IT should be NON Degree / Non-Matriculated Stud by Mabhatter · · Score: 0

    This is why CS people AREN'T QUALIFIED to be IT people!

    Consider it the difference between an architect and a contractor. One does complex work, but the other is responsible to get your house built on time and budget. Sure contractors don't need a degree, but even small IT departments are easily million dollar plus now... Definately worth having a person with a degree.

    What kind of money are typical CS workers directly responsible for???

  89. I saved computer science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I saved computer science. What did you ever do?

  90. Computation by Myopic · · Score: 2

    Aside: ever since I was in my CS program, I've always disliked the name "Computer Science", largely because I spend two full years of college never using a computer for any of my classes. Calling it Computer Science puts the machine at the center of the endeavor, whereas really it is an abstract conceptual field, like all liberal studies.

    I think the field should be called "Computation".

    1. Re:Computation by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1

      Coincidentally, FSU has degrees in Computational Science: http://www.sc.fsu.edu/education

    2. Re:Computation by Wovel · · Score: 1

      It is the science behind computing (Normally). Maybe you should have read the catalog before spending $10ks....

    3. Re:Computation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, considering a computer does not have to be digital I think "abstract conceptual study" is perfectly warranted. If you really want a "computer" on your desk then fine - you can have a Difference Engine, enjoy :-)

      The problem with CS is that most students don't want a real computer science education. What they want is "High Level Digital Computer Software Programming and Maintenance with no Math" ... wait no that is wrong, nobody really cares how the computer works. So how about "High Level Software Programming and Maintenance with no Math"?

      This is not a bad thing, it's just that companies used to get what they needed by way of CS graduates. These days though, CS is very far removed from what industry wants. Companies just want people to program their latest SAAS app. A replacement degree/cert program has not been pushed/accepted by industry and CS is not going to change anytime soon. I think we are just in a weird spot right now, hopefully that will change.

    4. Re:Computation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the same note: what exactly is sciency about computer science?

      (e.g. compare it to say physics---what similar science methodology is used in computer science? Do computer scientists make observations then come up with various models to explain those observations? e.g. there's a reason why Math or Logic aren't "science"... perhaps computer science isn't a science either).

    5. Re:Computation by doshell · · Score: 1

      Indeed. There is nothing empirical about Computer Science, since it's just a branch of mathematics. Perhaps a more apt name would be "Computer Theory", since this seems to be a pattern for fields of mathematics (Graph Theory, Group Theory, etc.)

      --
      Score: i, Imaginary
    6. Re:Computation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? You didn't need a computer for yours? For two years? Where I went, intro-to-programming classes meant that you actually had to write programs. The second programming class had linked lists, stacks, trees, recursion, etc. all of which meant fingers typing in programs and submitting them. Subsequent classes, system calls, operating system joy, etc. Some other courses were more specific: AI meant learning lisp (on your own), and applying modus tolens, modus ponens, introduction, elimination and universal instantiation, on decision trees (type in your own software, hand in assignments), electronic submission of assignments was easier than trekking down to the university to put it in a box before either 7:00am or 8:00 AM on the day its due. Did you really do everything on paper? I occasionally had to show pre-worked paper solutions along with software (they even accepted coffee napkins). Some classes were much more theory (cryptography). Others insisted on software (networking). I think that just about all of them wanted software of one kind or another.

    7. Re:Computation by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      I agree. However, a lot of schools do call it "Computing Science(s)", "Computational Science(s)", or the like.

      I like "Information and Computation", but business schools think they have a trademark on the term "Information". But "Information and Computation" is really what the field is all about.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    8. Re:Computation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I often describe it as the intersection of mathematics and linguistics, with a science component thrown in if you study in an engineering school. A lot of the world calls the field "Informatics" or some derivative thereof, for the reasons you mention.

    9. Re:Computation by Myopic · · Score: 1

      Yeah. My first and second classes were programming classes, first in C++ (intro) then in some LIST-like languages (second class). After that I spend two full years doing proofs and runtime analysis and induction and algorithms, with little or no programming on computers. Yeah, okay, I might have typed up answers and submitted them on a computer, but I wasn't writing and compiling software. After that, in my senior year, we did a lot of programming again in intensive classes. Other students may have mixed in a programming class into their junior year. I graduated in 2002.

    10. Re:Computation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where I got my degree, my major was called "Computer Science/Information Science."

  91. New T-Shits: "U of FL: Does not compute" by scorp1us · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What you expected a message body?

    --
    Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
  92. Not Every School Needs Computer Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't understand why every University feels like they need to offer every program. Do we really need a computer science program at U of F? Obviously it's being closed due to lack of interest. If people want to study compute science and they live in Florida they have plenty of other options.

  93. IT follows manufacturing - offshore by walterbyrd · · Score: 0

    IT is even easier to offshore than manufacturing, there is nothing to ship, just zap files back and forth.

    No reason to teach CS, or IT, in the US. That stuff is on the way out. Stick a fork in it.

  94. CS Dept. lol... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does a CS professor who has never had a real job in IT actually have anything valuable to teach? I doubt it. If you need a class to learn about developing software, then software development isn't for you. No one who's done anything significant in IT ever learned anything useful in a CS class. CS is one of the fortunate fields where you can do great things and make a ton of money without even bothering with college. Jobs, Gates, Torvalds, Ritchie, Zuckerberg, etc. Just do it.

  95. not every college offer everythign to save money by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Some states are pushing colleges to specialize and develop a critical mass of faculty and graduate students in what they specialize.

  96. Does not compute by shadowrat · · Score: 1

    I don't understand why everyone is so hacked off at this. This is clear evidence that UF is not where you want to go to study comp-sci. If you are a student you can forget about UF. If you are some other school, it means more prospective students for you. And really, do we need a bunch of half-assed computer science programs in this country? About the only people who get the shaft on this are the computer science staff at UF, as they need to find a new job, and students who enrolled in comp-sci at UF (though really it's not that hard to go to a different school. I know you kids think it's the end of the world, but it's not).

  97. You don't have to go to college for that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude,

    I have a degree in CS, and I learned how to administer unix system 20 years ago over the course of 2 weeks by just playing with it.

    The other posters are right. You want to go to a trade school, not a university.

  98. They need the funds ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... to support the Jello shots off naked coeds graduate program.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  99. A "trade" vs. "profession". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a computer science graduate I often ask why I did not have the choice to get a degree in systems administration.

    You did have a choice. You could have instead gone to your local community junior college and gotten yourself an associates degree in "computer technology"... because being a sysadmin is (in the 21st century) no longer constitutes being in a "profession", nowadays it's merely only a skilled technical trade, much like being an "electronics technician" (aka, parts-swapper). Computer Science and Computer Engineering, however, are still considered professions, though it's uncertain for how much longer they'll remain so.

  100. Some things seem missing from this story by Parker51 · · Score: 2

    When budget cuts happen at a University, usually they must eliminate entire departments, as you can't selectively fire tenured faculty within a department, outside of reasons like gross misconduct. Otherwise, you're picking some pretty serious fights with accreditors, civil courts, and faculty professional organizations (AAUP, etc.).

    But why was computer science chosen? Usually, it's low-enrollment, low-income (from grants, etc.) programs like philosophy or entomology that fall under the axe, often at smaller campuses within a state system. Does the computer science department not bring in enough government grants and private development money? Enough tuition-paying students? A good enough track record with placing students in professional careers that make use of the education?

    Is this part of a game of University - Legislature brinksmanship where the University is threatening to cut desirable programs in a thinly-veiled effort to shame the government into coughing up more money?

  101. Designed to Stimulate Attendence to Florida Tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I too was on the initial bandwagon of outrage but then I read TFA. FTFA:

    Meanwhile, just two days ago, Florida governor Rick Scott approved the creation of a brand-new public university, Florida Polytechnic University, to be located near the city of Tampa. In an unintentionally ironic statement, Gov. Scott said

    “At a time when the number of graduates of Florida’s universities in the STEM [science, technology, engineering, and mathematics] fields is not projected to meet workforce needs, the establishment of Florida Polytechnic University will help us move the needle in the right direction.”

    From a different article:

    "Gov. Rick Scott signed a much-debated bill Friday to immediately create a 12th public university in the state of Florida — effectively severing USF Polytechnic from the USF System to create Florida Polytechnic University and leaving many questions unanswered."

    Clearly the point here is to start moving computer science and technology disciplines over to Florida Tech(which is called, at the moment, USF Polytechnic). If you can get the same (or superior) programs from UF the incentive to go to Florida Tech will be smaller. I wouldn't be surprised to see many of the faculty from UF move over to USF Polytechnic. Basically the idea is to create a dedicated institution specifically designed for the sciences/engineering instead of having these disciplines taught at UF.

    As much as people hate Rick Scott (count me in), and as unpopular as he is - doesn't it seem there might be a longer view to take here?

  102. I'm fine with that by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

    So long as you are fine with footing the bill via taxes. If you aren't, then you need to deal with cuts. It isn't fair to ask undergrads to have their tuitions balloon even more just to support shit that they have no use or interest for. Nor it is fair, and not really ethical or legal, to take research money from a grant for a specific purpose and redirect it to other uses. So you need to foot the bill for that shit with your tax dollars. You do that, I'm pleased to have whatever you want. You don't then I'm sorry but shit has to go.

    If you try to fund everything by taking money from things that are doing well you end up driving everything to mediocrity or worse, which them means that they won't do so well, you'll get less students, less money and get in a nasty feedback cycle of things going to shit.

    Also I'm not talking about getting rid of all professors, just departments, and the associated overhead. My office is in the ECE department and we have processors that specialize in FPGAs, antennas, remote sensing, lasers, bioinstrumentation and so on. However they don't each get to have their own department. They are all under the auspices of ECE.

    So with your Latin example I'm fine with having a professor of Latin in the Languages department. I'm not fine with having a Latin department.

    Like it or not universities have to run like businesses because bills have to be paid. You have to decide what is and is not worth spending money on. This is more true than ever with cuts from public funding. We are a public university but we are now below 30% public funding. The rest is tuition and research. The lower that public number goes, the more we have to concentrate on what brings in money.

    1. Re:I'm fine with that by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      This is a good point - and I think in essence you agree with GP. It's important not to confuse courses with departments. Consolidating departments doesn't necessarily mean that you are going to be spitting out graduate after graduate with the same base of knowledge. You don't need a Macedonian History department for somebody to become an expert in macedonian history - that can be a focus in your graduate (or even undergraduate) level studies in a History or Anthropology department. After all, when you're specializing in a subject area in college, you interact with the professor who is the expert in that subject. The department really only provides administrative support.

      --
      +1 Disagree
  103. oh brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well computers are on their way out anyway. What kids need today are the skills to build hunting and gathering tools!

    In all seriousness, we need more CS departments and less social engineering departments.

  104. it makes you feel good about yourself, doesn't it? by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

    No, you shuld be hiring programmers with a technical degree. CS programs don't make scientists. They don't make programmers.

    Linus Torvalds. Yukihiro Matsumoto. James Gosling. Should I continue?

    I've yet to figure out what good they are

    Operating systems. Compilers. Database engines. Distributed algorithms. Network Protocols. Should I continue?

    since they give a shitty liberal arts education

    Care to name a university or two that fit that description? And once you do that, care to explain how these two examples might describe the CS departments at, say, MIT or CalTech?

    which I do value (in a dollars sort of I want to hire you because you'll contribute to my company) and a shitty engineering education, and a shitty programming education.

    Most of the CS graduates wasted a lot of time and money on getting nothing more than a hangover and a tech school education. However, the tech school grads went to college because they're hungry and want to make themselves better.

    See, you have been waiting for a while to say this. It's been fermenting on your head, rationalizing your critique of CS as a means to pet your own ego, and now you have done it on the public interweebz, getting a hard-on in the process. Please continue, let us know how you feel.

  105. Artsies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'Nuff said :-(

  106. Eliminate the English department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eliminate the English department

  107. Well, isn't this jolly news for a Monday. by forkfail · · Score: 1

    Why should we train our next generation to code when our MBA is taught that quarterly profits are maximized by outsourcing everything? To hell with the long term; let's just grab everything we can now and screw the future.

    --
    Check your premises.
  108. The return of "I R Uh En-ga-neer"... by ArtFart · · Score: 0

    Considering Governor Scott's general mindset, it would appear that the objective is probably to create a school dedicated to turning out code pushers with wind-up keys in their backs, uncorrupted by access to a liberal-arts education. People who'll go to work every day and do what they're told, unencumbered by such pollutants as critical thinking skills or any awareness of some rather inconvenient parts of history.

    1. Re:The return of "I R Uh En-ga-neer"... by forkfail · · Score: 1

      Or math. Or compiler or OS theory. Or language theory. Or algorithmic theory. All of which makes for a far, far better coder.

      --
      Check your premises.
  109. Grrrr... by forkfail · · Score: 1

    Made me so mad I lost control of my grammar.

    --
    Check your premises.
  110. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It IS the university of Florida. It's all football and partying. We should do the right thing and give Florida to Cuba.

  111. Clearly the next step... by msobkow · · Score: 1

    Clearly the next step is to have server maintenance done by the volleyball team. And the basketball team can handle the campus networks. :P

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  112. Size of their football budget? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone know the size of the football budget for this school? IMHO, 1.7 million is a small portion of that budget.

  113. There use to be no "Computer Science" by kimgkimg · · Score: 1

    I think "Computer Science" came about in the 80's. Prior to that, computer software skills were bundled into Management Information Systems (MIS) degrees.

    1. Re:There use to be no "Computer Science" by forkfail · · Score: 1

      There used to be no chemistry. Mixing chemicals skills were bundled into alchemy.

      (PS: Snark aside, you're wrong. CS was bundled in with EE, or math, or even arts and sciences. But MIS was added later for the business majors for whom "math was hard.")

      --
      Check your premises.
  114. Fund God. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One nation under God.

    God is good. God is great. Let us thank Him for where we were in "Biblical times".

    With luck, we'll be back there real soon.

    Only religion will set you on the path to American Freedumb. Strong religious faith can bring about the end to the Evil of Progress (except as it benefits the mind-controllers, of course).

    Just look at what strong religion has done for the jews and the muslims! C'mon! Don't you want to live like them?

    Again, like Tennessee, Florida gets it right.

    Bye 'bye Miss American progress ('ceptin' fer self-protectin' shootin' irons!).

    Next stop, year 0!

  115. more women in power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    more women in power and more equal women would have solved this problem by adding more fuzziness to the game.

    sad that they did not try that approach.

    add fuzziness and complexity folks, that will cause sheeples to adhere more to flogics.

  116. Show me the money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they don't have/can't raise the money, this decision is justified. The school has to justify its activity to taxpayers, who can't keep endlessly funding education when they are in the red, and if this department, for whatever reason, wasn't attracting students, then it's not a bad move.

    Although I'd like to see colleges and universities drop Liberal Arts programs, so that students don't think that it will get them widely available jobs, and at the end of their graduation, find out otherwise.

  117. FL to Fund university by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they are trying to save money, why fund a new state university /

    http://www.usforacle.com/news/scott-approves-new-florida-polytechnic-university-1.2733717

  118. football? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so florida wants to concentrate on their football program i guess?

  119. Good Deal! by N8F8 · · Score: 1

    Good deal for UCF and Florida Tech

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
  120. I wonder... by dezent · · Score: 2

    I wonder If any uni in India will shut down their CS?

  121. You get posters like cpu6502 by publiclurker · · Score: 1

    Apparently, the damage has been going on for awhile.

    1. Re:You get posters like cpu6502 by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1

      exactly.

      --
      Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
  122. I really should tell you to look it up yourself by overshoot · · Score: 1

    But no, it's one of the Kochtopus tentacles.

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
  123. Horticulture by dtmos · · Score: 1

    I'm working for the Horticulture department, which isn't in any danger of getting cut.

    There's a really great joke in there somewhere about trimming hedges, or maybe grafting plants, but I just can't put my finger on it.

  124. Basic Components??? by bhpratt · · Score: 1

    Computer Engineering is more of a hardware level approach, where the goal is is optimize basic elements but not complex systems.

    I'm sorry for my Computer Engineering bias showing so obviously here, but..."basic elements"? If you, as a Computer Scientist, see devices such as microprocessors as "basic elements," I think you need to branch out a bit. Sure, there's much more to a computer system than the processor, and you need plenty of software to get all the hardware components working together, but I still would classify an ARM or Intel or GPU (or countless other types of) processor as a "complex system."

    Nothing against Computer Scientists or software engineering or anything...lets just give credit everywhere its due.

    There, I feel better now :-)

  125. We Need to Hear by glorybe · · Score: 1

    The administration needs to explain this to the public. Frankly it seems idiotic to me to suspend computer science at a very good university. What I suspect may be going on is that Florida has an over the edge, extreme, right wing, governor. The man is a dogma infested, pseudo educated, half wit. I'll bet that the University is under a financial attack from its own governor and must do nonsense like this to appease him. His ilk is doctrinal in that they consider education exists only to cause employment of graduates. Apparently poets, astronomers and basic computer scientists according to them should never be in college in the first place. After all, when we look at the classifieds we just never see poets wanted just like we don't see computer scientists wanted.

  126. No dice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, this is fine. The more CVs I can chuck in the recycling bin, the easier my job gets. UF just found a spot in File 99 next to Argosy and University of Phoenix...

  127. underwater basket weaving majors? by formfeed · · Score: 1

    I think even their underwater basket weaving majors can do the math on that one.

    You sound like you disapprove of underwater basket weaving majors ?!
    I think with rising sea level that major has some future in Florida

  128. Re:"Steven Salzberg, your blog sucks?" by nolesrule · · Score: 1

    Because that's not really what's happening. The new polytechnic university and this move at UF have nothing to do with each other. The timing was just a coincidence.

    Furthermore, the new polytechnic university wasn't really needed and the state can't afford it. It was the brainchild of a moronic state senator who wanted to make a legacy for himself on his way out the door due to term limits (he also has a road to nowhere project in the budget) by converting a satellite branch of USF in Lakeland (not Tampa) with a couple thousand students into a full fledged university. Furthermore, by ramming it through the state budget instead of going through the plan laid out by the State University Board of Governors, it will take several years for this new university to get accredited, so they will have trouble actually attracting students.
    Meanwhile, they've cut the budgets to the other 11 state universities by a combined $200 million this year, with FSU, UF and USF taking the biggest hits.

    --
    -- nolesrule
  129. future news by beep54 · · Score: 1

    In the future, the University of Florida will drop all physics courses. But they will continue with a mathematics curriculum since paper and blackboards are fairly cheap.

  130. Really by bladesinger · · Score: 1

    1.295 billion dollar endowment (http://www.nacubo.org/Documents/research/2011_NCSE_Public_Tables_Endowment_Market_Values_Final_January_17_2012.pdf) and 1.7 million dollars is too much money for a lucrative academic major that produces some of the highest paid graduates in the country (average BLS statistics will tell you that). This is obviously politically motivated.

  131. Good thing that they didn't cut.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Women's Studies
    Communications
    Issues Of Latino Homosexuality: The Untold Story
    Suburban Sociology As Expressed In Liberated Atheist Literature
    Fundamentalism In Today's Society: A Presentation Explored In American Folklore
    Liberated Darwinism And Liberal Multiculturalism In The American Landscape
    Research Capstone In Feminist Evolution In Modern America
    Dynamic Exploration Of Mexican Endeavors In Today's Society
    Masterpieces Of Liberated Multi-Ethnic Dance
    Contemporary Asian Symbols: An Interdisciplinary Approach
    Contemporary Female Morals & Life
    Contemporary Middle Eastern Civilization: Ideas In Transition ...you get the idea.....

  132. Universities are the Future NOT profit centre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Universities are the countries future - NOT a profit centre.
         

  133. Making Room for Intelligent Design Courses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given that Florida is one of those anti-science states, they are probably making room for a new Intelligent Design course.

  134. Heavy Math? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have degrees in Electrical Engineering, Industrial Engineering, and Computer Science and the math needed for Comp Sci was trivial. I'm a sysadmin, also, and I think not having a Comp Sci degree for that is a risky proposition. 95% of what I do is easily done by anyone who drifts into System Administration. But the remaining 5% of what I do---often in an emergency---is dangerous to the health of a company. I've had about 10 of these critical events. 9 I resolved quickly. The one time I couldn't was when a 'system adminstrator' who didn't have the necessary background, stepped in before I got there and 'fixed' the problem.

  135. Re:"Steven Salzberg, your blog sucks?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You must not be from Florida. The idea of opening a new university for STEM when 4 established institutions (UF, FSU, USF, UCF) are sorely lacking in funding and get cut every year is unbelievable. This is cronyism beyond anything I have ever witnessed, plain and simple. Poly wont even be accredited when its opened!

  136. Re:Need more TECH schools / Vocational for IT not by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

    CS tends to focus to much on coding and high level theory. Some CS programs are so much on the theory you get people who are poor program[er?]s out of them.

    You can get fourth-rate students out of any program.

    Theory is what teaches programmers to sort in O( n log n ), rather than in O( n^2 ) + brag about some negligible optimization you made that saved a line of code.

    If you haven't had all the theory-type classes, you're not qualified for anything more than programming up an algorithm that someone else has carefully specified for you.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  137. Re:Designed to Stimulate Attendence to Florida Tec by snottykid · · Score: 1

    Florida Tech is Florida Institute of Technology. It is a private school in Melbourne, Florida.

  138. The Cyberwar is coming and we will not be prepared by snottykid · · Score: 1

    China is laughing at us. Remember the commercial with the Chinese students laughing after the professor says "now they work for us". http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OTSQozWP-rM

  139. And in other news by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    Florida has a university.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  140. Novel solution to reduce headcount by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Disband the athletic department and sell the stadiums. Create a reality TV show of students actually studying instead of partying.

  141. Florida too hot for CS by wye43 · · Score: 1

    Is it just me or there aren't many companies hiring software developers in areas that have warm climates?

    1. Re:Florida too hot for CS by Mindjiver · · Score: 1

      India?

      --
      I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!
  142. hooray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Less competition!

  143. Ditch digging 101. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keep 'em stupid so they vote Republican.

    Then they'll be able to get Home Schooled phd's. Dr. of Flat Earthism.

  144. New CS events - tickets now on sale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The CS students plan to takeover "The Swamp" and sell tickets to the CS bowl. Football vs. Computer Science it a winner take event.

  145. Computer Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My college has the Dept of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Everytime they ask for donations, I ask what is the difference between the two? The answer is: Which electives you choose. I heard last week that the dept is dropping the Computer, will once again just be Dept of Electrical Engineering.

  146. Bit belated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My college did this last year. Not a CS major, because they are in some ways a java mill, but the biggest issue is that the college killed a graduate program it was quite renowned for, and the CS department, a place that was small, had an excellent SF ratio, and was one of the few programs that produced employees with starting salaries of 80k. They also killed the art studio department, which I was in favour of.

  147. Technically CS was absorbed into CISE... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So technically UF doesn't have a standalone CS department since its been absorbed into the CISE department (Computer and Information Science & Engineering).
    They still issue degrees in Computer Science, (not yet ABET accredited but in the processing of getting accredited) in the form of :

    a BS of CSE (more engineering-based) and BS of CSC (more liberal arts-based)
    http://www.cise.ufl.edu/academics/undergrad/

    Somewhat analogous to the EECS college at Berkeley, where they stress that the best current and future real-world solutions should not be viewed as segmented into software-only and hardware-only solutions. which is exemplified by their CS and EE division professors doing quite a bit collaborative research.