Its the whole N word thing over again.,, as in.. Its OK for them to call each other it in normal everyday usage, but not ok for other people to even write the word. This is called Racial Equality.
>>. They can fly a missile some 50 min..How far can they get this thing to go if they are not shooting it straight up?
Some quick back-of-an-envelope calculations show they are probably pretty close to hitting California in 50 minutes, Assuming their missile is hitting about 7500 mph which according to Wikipedia at least, is apparently not unreasonable.
That said their test missile may not have contained a payload (and almost certainly didn't if the actual goal of their test was just to sscare other countries about their capabilities) so the extra weight of an actual nuke would probably be a very significant factor in the missile's actual maximum range.
...that Japan isn't retaliating after repeated WMD incursions of its sovereign airspace.
Can the Japanese even be sure just from the missile's trajectory that it isn't actually aimed at Japan? I mean the most effective way of using a nuke is actually not to hit the target but to detonate it in the atmosphere above the target.
It really makes me concerned about what would actually happen if the missile failed in flight and inadvertently landed on Japanese soil.
what about that statement? It comprises of 2 facts: 1) I stopped drinking the Tesla kool-aid when he claimed the new roadster has 10k nm of torque. This is true. I did.
2) 10k nm of torque is nearly 7400 ft lbs.
Neither are opinion.
>> Your basis for your disbelief is...
Nothing other than he said the car has 10knm of torque.
>> All your postings just prove that you are not just an idiot, you are stubbornly idiotic.
I'd rather be wrong than a totally arrogant dickwad AHole like you that resorts to fundamentally unnecessary personal attacks.
Not at all. I have seen more than enough evidence to convince me personally to believe in anthropogenic climate change. No I wont fall into your mistake of using AGW acronym to describe whats happening, as the W part is at best contentious, and often used to purposely sidetrack the whole argument. For me, Whether the effect of human caused damage is warmth or something else seems totally irrelevant to the real point which is that we should stop causing the damage in the first place.
My analogy is intended to apply to those who refuse to believe in AGW until they have totally irrefutable proof, which will inevitably never come both because the system we are trying to understand is so complex that they will always find some loophole to wriggle out of facing the fact that they are in fact wrong. THis is human nature. Even under the most obvious evidence, some people can literally never allow themselves to admit they were ever wrong. This holds true even if the cost is death of the entire planet, vs a relative very trivial cost of having to do something that possibly hurts the economy.
Personally I'd rather we affirmative take action now, be poorer if necessary, and even possibly proved wrong later, than leave it too late while waiting for ultimate proof that will never come because it is an impossibly complex system to fully quantify.
I'm sure those people that live in denial of AGW actually won't die happy knowing they saved the richest few people a few more bucks. It literally boggles my mind why others can't see it that too.
Yep. And have you noticed how big and heavy a Diesel locomotive motor is? Its pretty much the entire size of and much of the weight of the entire locomotive. FYI the diesel part is just an electricity generator. It never drives the wheels directly. The electric motor is always driving the wheels. You aren't fitting one of those motors in an 18 wheeler, let alone a small sports car.
My analogy is one of refusing to apply the brakes until obtaining a degree of proof only available after actually driving over the upcoming edge of the proverbial cliff. Early application of the brakes may ultimately prove to have been unnecessary and consequently expose you to embarrassment, but would have definitely left you still alive.
Yeah I stopped drinking the Tesla Kool-Aid when he claimed the new roadster has 10k nm of torque. That nearly 7400 ft lbs. For comparison (all in ft lbs): Honda Civic: 138-295 2017 Tesla Model S: 317 to 792 Bugatti Veyron Super Sport: 1106
Even if he succeeds, how does it prove the earth is flat or not?
I mean even if he got say 10 miles high (52k ft) you aren't going to see the curvature of the earth sufficiently to believe the world isn't flat, especially if you're already prejudiced that it is.
Dude Use nVidia's Linux driver, not the stupid opensource nouveau driver that is the default on most distros only because its open, not because it actually works.
Slashdot Mirror
Its the whole N word thing over again.,, as in.. Its OK for them to call each other it in normal everyday usage, but not ok for other people to even write the word. This is called Racial Equality.
>>. They can fly a missile some 50 min..How far can they get this thing to go if they are not shooting it straight up?
Some quick back-of-an-envelope calculations show they are probably pretty close to hitting California in 50 minutes, Assuming their missile is hitting about 7500 mph which according to Wikipedia at least, is apparently not unreasonable.
That said their test missile may not have contained a payload (and almost certainly didn't if the actual goal of their test was just to sscare other countries about their capabilities) so the extra weight of an actual nuke would probably be a very significant factor in the missile's actual maximum range.
Maybe they really just want to nuke the moon into the shape of Kim Jong Un's head.
...that Japan isn't retaliating after repeated WMD incursions of its sovereign airspace.
Can the Japanese even be sure just from the missile's trajectory that it isn't actually aimed at Japan? I mean the most effective way of using a nuke is actually not to hit the target but to detonate it in the atmosphere above the target.
It really makes me concerned about what would actually happen if the missile failed in flight and inadvertently landed on Japanese soil.
>> The only evidence you can claim for it is correlation between success and being Jewish.
Not true at all and you know it. And please stop putting your words in my mouth.
what about that statement?
It comprises of 2 facts:
1) I stopped drinking the Tesla kool-aid when he claimed the new roadster has 10k nm of torque. This is true. I did.
2) 10k nm of torque is nearly 7400 ft lbs.
Neither are opinion.
>> Your basis for your disbelief is...
Nothing other than he said the car has 10knm of torque.
>> All your postings just prove that you are not just an idiot, you are stubbornly idiotic.
I'd rather be wrong than a totally arrogant dickwad AHole like you that resorts to fundamentally unnecessary personal attacks.
>> I'm sure those people that live in denial of AGW
dammit you've got me doing it now. I meant ACC.
Not at all. I have seen more than enough evidence to convince me personally to believe in anthropogenic climate change. No I wont fall into your mistake of using AGW acronym to describe whats happening, as the W part is at best contentious, and often used to purposely sidetrack the whole argument. For me, Whether the effect of human caused damage is warmth or something else seems totally irrelevant to the real point which is that we should stop causing the damage in the first place.
My analogy is intended to apply to those who refuse to believe in AGW until they have totally irrefutable proof, which will inevitably never come both because the system we are trying to understand is so complex that they will always find some loophole to wriggle out of facing the fact that they are in fact wrong. THis is human nature. Even under the most obvious evidence, some people can literally never allow themselves to admit they were ever wrong. This holds true even if the cost is death of the entire planet, vs a relative very trivial cost of having to do something that possibly hurts the economy.
Personally I'd rather we affirmative take action now, be poorer if necessary, and even possibly proved wrong later, than leave it too late while waiting for ultimate proof that will never come because it is an impossibly complex system to fully quantify.
I'm sure those people that live in denial of AGW actually won't die happy knowing they saved the richest few people a few more bucks.
It literally boggles my mind why others can't see it that too.
I simply stated manufacturers published stats. You're the one making giant ASSumptions.
You mean like this?:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
How can just stating stats be wrong?
Great. Modded down for Just stating hard facts.
Fucking liberal peecee mentality is killing logical reasoning.
Yep. And have you noticed how big and heavy a Diesel locomotive motor is? Its pretty much the entire size of and much of the weight of the entire locomotive. FYI the diesel part is just an electricity generator. It never drives the wheels directly. The electric motor is always driving the wheels. You aren't fitting one of those motors in an 18 wheeler, let alone a small sports car.
>> The types of electric motors used in EVs have constant torque vs RPMs
Not even close.
My analogy is one of refusing to apply the brakes until obtaining a degree of proof only available after actually driving over the upcoming edge of the proverbial cliff. Early application of the brakes may ultimately prove to have been unnecessary and consequently expose you to embarrassment, but would have definitely left you still alive.
Assuming it was like HP and made any difference where you measured it, which it doesn't, wheel torque would make it even more of an exaggeration
Yeah I stopped drinking the Tesla Kool-Aid when he claimed the new roadster has 10k nm of torque. That nearly 7400 ft lbs.
For comparison (all in ft lbs):
Honda Civic: 138-295
2017 Tesla Model S: 317 to 792
Bugatti Veyron Super Sport: 1106
Even if he succeeds, how does it prove the earth is flat or not?
I mean even if he got say 10 miles high (52k ft) you aren't going to see the curvature of the earth sufficiently to believe the world isn't flat, especially if you're already prejudiced that it is.
Dude Use nVidia's Linux driver, not the stupid opensource nouveau driver that is the default on most distros only because its open, not because it actually works.
Are you also one of those dudes that will not believe that humans are causing any climate change, because there is no completely irrefutable evidence?
It sounds like the S9 really doesn't bring anything new to the party compared to the S8.
You can't remap it. You can only disable it.
>> comments like this can only be posted by a Russian propagandist.
haha lol. Thanks for proving my point, Anyone with an opinion different from yours must be a commie and be shunned. As I said, typical Libtard.
So much for the government enacting the will of the people.
Sorry but unlike you, I'm not prepared to give up my freedom to think for myself and just buy into the libtard lockstep social agenda brainwashing.