>> building a network at Apple that was so reliable, it never goes down. Not rarely -- never.
Thats logically impossible. No matter how many layers of failover and backup systems you have, each unavoidably has some probability of themselves failing. Even if VERY small, its still not never.
Yes I'm saying that in a race only between Trump and Clinton, then Trump is the best candidate. I think Trump is a moron, but he's still better than Clinton.
That does not make me filled with hate or a delusional liar. I'm doing this entirely based on the actual evidence for Hillarys continued lies, and even lies about her own lies, and blatant corruption and her selling out of the US to the highest bidder just for her personal enrichment, which she's provably been doing for decades.
OK, well I voted for Brexit and I told you why, but you're telling me you know my reasons better than I do, and that they're actually something different. Whatever dude.
Ahh Clinton the candidate of self-serving corruption. If you hate America, vote Clinton. If you can't think for yourself and trust the media to do all your thinking for you, vote Clinton.
> If you aren't filled with hate, vote for the best candidate
Don't worry I will. It so obviously isn't Hillary. I'd rather vote for literally anyone else in the US, even Trump, even though he's obviously a nut-job, at least he isn't part of the corrupt system that's trying to actively destroy the USA, unlike Hillary.
How convenient. Any excuse to keep living in denial, sticking your fingers in your ears and going LALALALA rather than ever have to make any effort, actually use your brain and double check any information that Hillary might actually be a fucking criminal. Keep drinking the Koolaid bro.
With Mars having a 96% Co2 atmosphere, it seems like this technology would be a dream come true for the first human explorers to Mars.
Elon Musk said that the first visitors would have to build a propellant plant and it would take many months to make their own fuel for the return journey. I wonder how significantly this technology and the abundance of Martian CO2 would speed that up?
...and another point, theres components of Windows 10 on my PC that I can see are using up significant amounts of CPU and network bandwidth for god knows what. I cannot tell what they are doing, and I am not allowed to uninstall them, or even delete their files even though I have so-called admin rights. THAT IS NOT AN OPEN SYSTEM.
>> You mean where she complained about the lack of security and went on record asking Congress for more funds for defending Americans,
You have to be fucking joking! she violated security so badly with her personal email server, if she was anyone else at all didn't already have Comey and Lynch in her pocket she'd already be in prison and certainly not allowed to keep any government job where she even comes into contact with classfied info. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
>> Or that the Clinton foundation does actual charitable works,
Yes. it does a few, just to maintain some level of creadbiluity, but not many. Its completely a front for syphoning hundreds of millions of dollars to the Clintons through. https://theintercept.com/2016/...
>> So when have you ever been unable to run whatever software you want in Windows? Use what ever hardware you want?
Your question is irrelevant and a a non-sequitur to the claim that Windows is the most open platform there is. Open does not mean it can just run everything. I want to be able to at least see exactly what IS running on my computer. With Linux not only can I do that, but I can also modify it if I choose....and to answer your question, I just had to buy a new printer because Windows 10 does not work properly with my (still working perfectly well under Linux) HP PSC 950.
And as for banning all muslims, why is it you lefties "conveniently" never quote what he ACTUALLY said: http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/07/... "Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on," a campaign press release said.
Can you even now see the "until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on," part" or are you morons always gonna live in denial and keep leaving it out in a lame attempt to divisively make it sound like he meant it to be permanent?
In my opinion, a good president should put Americans first and is what the anyone filling the role of President is MORALLY OBLIGATED to do. History has already proved that the whole notion of putting Americans first is something that Hillary cant even get her head around (other than in well-rehearsed sound bites) let alone actually do. Lets not even put Hillary and Morals in the same sentence because even you must see how absurd that is. Pretty much everything she's already done as Secretyary of State comes down to to putting American lives second for her own personal convenience, power, or financial gain, most usually but not always through the Clinton Foundation.
It was actually Ecuador that cut him off but do you REALLY believe that Ecuador care that much about what he posts about the US? I'd bet big that Hillary found some way to lean on them.
From the same article: "Many felt it was no coincidence that the internet was cut just after WikiLeaks had released another batch of emails from the campaign manager of the US presidential candidate Hillary Clinton."
...so in short its not trustable. This whole "putting Linux under Windows and making sure it sucks" thing seems like Microsoft's actual purpose was to come up with a clever way to make inexperienced people think Linux must be significantly worse than Windows,
No it really isn't. That whole racist thing is just how the remainers and media devisively painted it as a lame attempt to discredit Brexit through PeeCee-ism.
As far as I can tell, for most people that voted to leave (including me) the actual issue was the massive amount of corruption/cronyism in Brussels, and the EU's apparently still ongoing attempt at creation of a single federalist super-state that would have nothing recognisable as actual democracy.
> Police have been making valid arrests without cameras for a long time.
Sure but this technology wasn't really available. You could make a similar argument that people have been driving relatively safely for hundreds of years, but you can bet that won't stop the government from making humans driving cars illegal (on safety grounds) the moment that self-driving cars are perceived to be able to reliably take over.
> Performers don't want to stare at cell phone camera lenses, they want to see and connect with their fans.
Who cares what they want? They are being paid by the people with the phones (usually excessively well) to perform. They need to stop being prima-donnas and suck it up.
>> The device, which records video only when the officer decides,
I realise no-one wants to watch them in the bathroom, but having it totally under their control is too soft. There at least needs to be a way to ensure they can't just turn it off then give someone a beating or whatever. Maybe a rule that says they HAVE to have it turned on whenever they are dealing with the public, and that any arrest made without camera coverage is illegal/invalid.
I don't think she's anything other than whatever she thinks at the time is the best opportunity to get herself more money/power. If something happened such that the only way she could get to be President was as a Republican, you'd see her do the world's biggest U turn overnight, with "clever" explanations for everything that the media and therefore most of the sheeple would totally go along with.
Slashdot Mirror
>> building a network at Apple that was so reliable, it never goes down. Not rarely -- never.
Thats logically impossible. No matter how many layers of failover and backup systems you have, each unavoidably has some probability of themselves failing. Even if VERY small, its still not never.
Yes I'm saying that in a race only between Trump and Clinton, then Trump is the best candidate. I think Trump is a moron, but he's still better than Clinton.
That does not make me filled with hate or a delusional liar. I'm doing this entirely based on the actual evidence for Hillarys continued lies, and even lies about her own lies, and blatant corruption and her selling out of the US to the highest bidder just for her personal enrichment, which she's provably been doing for decades.
OK, well I voted for Brexit and I told you why, but you're telling me you know my reasons better than I do, and that they're actually something different. Whatever dude.
Ahh Clinton the candidate of self-serving corruption. If you hate America, vote Clinton. If you can't think for yourself and trust the media to do all your thinking for you, vote Clinton.
> If you aren't filled with hate, vote for the best candidate
Don't worry I will. It so obviously isn't Hillary. I'd rather vote for literally anyone else in the US, even Trump, even though he's obviously a nut-job, at least he isn't part of the corrupt system that's trying to actively destroy the USA, unlike Hillary.
>> it is a very very complex process
The most difficult part is stopping everyone drinking the product before you can get it to the converter.
He's not evil, he's a dumbass. But I'd rather take my chances with a dumbass than a blatantly corrupt career criminal.
How convenient. Any excuse to keep living in denial, sticking your fingers in your ears and going LALALALA rather than ever have to make any effort, actually use your brain and double check any information that Hillary might actually be a fucking criminal. Keep drinking the Koolaid bro.
With Mars having a 96% Co2 atmosphere, it seems like this technology would be a dream come true for the first human explorers to Mars.
Elon Musk said that the first visitors would have to build a propellant plant and it would take many months to make their own fuel for the return journey. I wonder how significantly this technology and the abundance of Martian CO2 would speed that up?
...and another point, theres components of Windows 10 on my PC that I can see are using up significant amounts of CPU and network bandwidth for god knows what. I cannot tell what they are doing, and I am not allowed to uninstall them, or even delete their files even though I have so-called admin rights.
THAT IS NOT AN OPEN SYSTEM.
>> You mean where she complained about the lack of security and went on record asking Congress for more funds for defending Americans,
You have to be fucking joking! she violated security so badly with her personal email server, if she was anyone else at all didn't already have Comey and Lynch in her pocket she'd already be in prison and certainly not allowed to keep any government job where she even comes into contact with classfied info.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
>> Or that the Clinton foundation does actual charitable works,
Yes. it does a few, just to maintain some level of creadbiluity, but not many. Its completely a front for syphoning hundreds of millions of dollars to the Clintons through.
https://theintercept.com/2016/...
>> So when have you ever been unable to run whatever software you want in Windows? Use what ever hardware you want?
Your question is irrelevant and a a non-sequitur to the claim that Windows is the most open platform there is. Open does not mean it can just run everything. ...and to answer your question, I just had to buy a new printer because Windows 10 does not work properly with my (still working perfectly well under Linux) HP PSC 950.
I want to be able to at least see exactly what IS running on my computer. With Linux not only can I do that, but I can also modify it if I choose.
Cool! Where can I download the source code?
What? I can't? I thought you said....
Keep drinking your PeeCee kooolaid while ignoring the truth dude.
http://fusion.net/story/17321/...
http://www.wnd.com/2015/07/fbi...
And as for banning all muslims, why is it you lefties "conveniently" never quote what he ACTUALLY said:
http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/07/...
"Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on," a campaign press release said.
Can you even now see the "until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on," part" or are you morons always gonna live in denial and keep leaving it out in a lame attempt to divisively make it sound like he meant it to be permanent?
In my opinion, a good president should put Americans first and is what the anyone filling the role of President is MORALLY OBLIGATED to do. History has already proved that the whole notion of putting Americans first is something that Hillary cant even get her head around (other than in well-rehearsed sound bites) let alone actually do. Lets not even put Hillary and Morals in the same sentence because even you must see how absurd that is. Pretty much everything she's already done as Secretyary of State comes down to to putting American lives second for her own personal convenience, power, or financial gain, most usually but not always through the Clinton Foundation.
Oh really?
https://www.theguardian.com/me...
It was actually Ecuador that cut him off but do you REALLY believe that Ecuador care that much about what he posts about the US? I'd bet big that Hillary found some way to lean on them.
From the same article: "Many felt it was no coincidence that the internet was cut just after WikiLeaks had released another batch of emails from the campaign manager of the US presidential candidate Hillary Clinton."
...so in short its not trustable.
This whole "putting Linux under Windows and making sure it sucks" thing seems like Microsoft's actual purpose was to come up with a clever way to make inexperienced people think Linux must be significantly worse than Windows,
... except they clearly haven't.
It seems like its actually you thats the freak here, you're seeing racism everywhere.
No it really isn't. That whole racist thing is just how the remainers and media devisively painted it as a lame attempt to discredit Brexit through PeeCee-ism.
As far as I can tell, for most people that voted to leave (including me) the actual issue was the massive amount of corruption/cronyism in Brussels, and the EU's apparently still ongoing attempt at creation of a single federalist super-state that would have nothing recognisable as actual democracy.
No.. the UK Government are not denying involvement, only the UK Treasury are. Not the same thing at all.
My usage was intended to reflect the paranoia of the McCarthy era. Nothing more.
> Police have been making valid arrests without cameras for a long time.
Sure but this technology wasn't really available. You could make a similar argument that people have been driving relatively safely for hundreds of years, but you can bet that won't stop the government from making humans driving cars illegal (on safety grounds) the moment that self-driving cars are perceived to be able to reliably take over.
>> if the camera really failed, for example (say it was damaged during the altercation)
Need to be VERY careful about ruling around this otherwise there WILL be a spate of officers "accidentally" damaging/disabling it.
> Performers don't want to stare at cell phone camera lenses, they want to see and connect with their fans.
Who cares what they want? They are being paid by the people with the phones (usually excessively well) to perform. They need to stop being prima-donnas and suck it up.
>> The device, which records video only when the officer decides,
I realise no-one wants to watch them in the bathroom, but having it totally under their control is too soft.
There at least needs to be a way to ensure they can't just turn it off then give someone a beating or whatever.
Maybe a rule that says they HAVE to have it turned on whenever they are dealing with the public, and that any arrest made without camera coverage is illegal/invalid.
I don't think she's anything other than whatever she thinks at the time is the best opportunity to get herself more money/power.
If something happened such that the only way she could get to be President was as a Republican, you'd see her do the world's biggest U turn overnight, with "clever" explanations for everything that the media and therefore most of the sheeple would totally go along with.