with concise clinical studies that give evidence that exposure for approx. one decade (with effects probably showing up 50 years later) is safe around?
So let us take the risk, we will see later. Yes, this is the scientific method.
No I am not familiar (beyond my skills of the idiom). But the explanation you give reminded me of American cars (no insult intended either - and this I wrote before being aware of the jerry-semantics).
As I do not know the term - and must only infer that "jerry" somehow refers to Germans (looked it up meanwhile and found that it is German soldier) - I feel I cannot be insulted (and I guess that there are very few of "us Germans" who know the term). On top of it, it may be the appropriate term for what they did in the former GDR - being creative in repairs while lacking resources (the corresponding bias is that the Americans can only achieve something if they have big supplies - and - if we enter the war scheme - 10 in supplies for 1 soldier in the field). I am sure that this bias is/was condensed into a term as well - that I am not aware of now, but I will find out.
Though this is not a final comment (2 a.m. and my wife visiting me), do not bother to use "jerry-rigged". And (or but) I am for sure not representative for the majority of "us Germans" (now this almost was an insult, taking me for a prototype:).
We might miscommunicate our sarcasm due to a different cultural background, thus infering in a false manner. I am German and you perhaps American, but I guess we play in the same league.
So while there's a lot of good reasons for Microsoft to do this, I still feel a tiny bit afraid that an already very powerful company is becoming a lot more powerful by gaining international recognition as a crime buster.
And once they have achieved a good reputation as a crime buster they go after people violating M$ patents - voice of the public opinion: "Fine, these bastards who steal IP deserve that!".
Really, we need a new word, for news which isn't functional information, but just amusing/entertaining.
I thought it was "news show" - you just perhaps have to create some variations along the lines of "net news show" (or should it read "tube news show"?).
In general, I am with you. I might add, though, that IMHO greater control (thus a better planning reliability) in the end leads to increased profitability (or efficiency with regard to the public sector, where all your arguments hold even more) which then via translates into money gained or saved.
... and, as far as I could understand (I lack some French) is focussed on a better usage of economic resources - that is - why pay M$ Euros. Good move.
And my bias is that France (for short) will not be bribed by M$s.
trying to design and create an even more advanced model
So the creationist are right, aren't they? </sarcasm> More seriously, the real fun only starts when unforeseen emergent properties insidiously creep in and suddenly erupt - a theme of many SF-stories, for instance.
How much dehumanized can we get? ( A _lot_ more, I know.)
I guess the word that you were looking for is "superfluous";)
And I wonder how long Sherry Turkle -- "Her point is that when you are sick, hurt, or elderly, "you really do want a person," not a robot." will stay director.
1. Take a fundamental concept
2. Describe it as complicated as possible
3. Put the result through a patent-lawyers office in order to make sure the
claims get even more obfuscated
4. Apply successfully for a patent
5. Profit!
Probably xtra presents, maybe it is cheap for the effect: (from TFA) "
At this point, some of the major commercial businesses which needed the documents have exited the market."
At least a misconception that NASA also publishes.
Quote: "If we put a thermometer in darkest space, with absolutely nothing around, it would first have to cool off. This might take a very very long time. Once it cooled off, it would read 2.7 Kelvin. This is because of the "3 degree microwave background radiation." No matter where you go, you cannot escape it -- it is always there."
You open seam tube, you, and this on the internets!
CC.
annology
:)
It is annoylogy, you insensitive clod
CC
Duh - poor me, not yet conscious again :(
CC.
Probably windows Services For Unix. Google is your friend (OK, has been, maybe).
CC.
Public domain - OK - but a language usually has some consistent grammar.
CC.
with concise clinical studies that give evidence that exposure for approx. one decade (with effects probably showing up 50 years later) is safe around?
So let us take the risk, we will see later. Yes, this is the scientific method.
CC.
jerry-rigged
:).
No I am not familiar (beyond my skills of the idiom). But the explanation you give reminded me of American cars (no insult intended either - and this I wrote before being aware of the jerry-semantics).
As I do not know the term - and must only infer that "jerry" somehow refers to Germans (looked it up meanwhile and found that it is German soldier) - I feel I cannot be insulted (and I guess that there are very few of "us Germans" who know the term). On top of it, it may be the appropriate term for what they did in the former GDR - being creative in repairs while lacking resources (the corresponding bias is that the Americans can only achieve something if they have big supplies - and - if we enter the war scheme - 10 in supplies for 1 soldier in the field). I am sure that this bias is/was condensed into a term as well - that I am not aware of now, but I will find out.
Though this is not a final comment (2 a.m. and my wife visiting me), do not bother to use "jerry-rigged". And (or but) I am for sure not representative for the majority of "us Germans" (now this almost was an insult, taking me for a prototype
Take care. I come back to the topic.
CC.
We might miscommunicate our sarcasm due to a different cultural background, thus infering in a false manner. I am German and you perhaps American, but I guess we play in the same league.
CC.
Like Halliburton?
CC.
I doubt that will have much impact on where most of the phishing originates, though, which is overseas.
If we believe this map and if we are African, Australian or Eurasian, overseas is indeed worst.
CC.
Microsoft will have more power to get the world's police "see things it's way".
In my days, this was called legislative power.
CC.
So while there's a lot of good reasons for Microsoft to do this, I still feel a tiny bit afraid that an already very powerful company is becoming a lot more powerful by gaining international recognition as a crime buster.
And once they have achieved a good reputation as a crime buster they go after people violating M$ patents - voice of the public opinion: "Fine, these bastards who steal IP deserve that!".
Another instance of Big Brother.
CC.
However
Why this wording? - not a native speaker with regard to any dialect of the English language I would have chosen "but indeed".
Furthermore, I totally second you. And did you ever have a look into the consequences of patented seed? Even more horror there.
CC.
Nope, I stopped gaming in the Leisure Suit Larry 3 days :)
:)
I however admit that I can imagine a hyper-meta-ctl-alt-shift-Simulacron 3 in which our universe is the simulation
CC.
Really, we need a new word, for news which isn't functional information, but just amusing/entertaining.
I thought it was "news show" - you just perhaps have to create some variations along the lines of "net news show" (or should it read "tube news show"?).
CC.
In general, I am with you. I might add, though, that IMHO greater control (thus a better planning reliability) in the end leads to increased profitability (or efficiency with regard to the public sector, where all your arguments hold even more) which then via translates into money gained or saved.
CC.
http://www.microsoft.com/chile/mapuzugun/
:), but M$ thinks otherwise. Actually, the spelling seems to differ depending on your own language.
Google thinks Mapudungun too
CC.
the absurdity of the contemporary take on IP, and perhaps the idea behind is to demonstrate this.
To me, a language clearly is in the public domain.
CC.
... and, as far as I could understand (I lack some French) is focussed on a better usage of economic resources - that is - why pay M$ Euros. Good move.
And my bias is that France (for short) will not be bribed by M$s.
CC.
trying to design and create an even more advanced model
So the creationist are right, aren't they? </sarcasm> More seriously, the real fun only starts when unforeseen emergent properties insidiously creep in and suddenly erupt - a theme of many SF-stories, for instance.
CC.
How much dehumanized can we get? ( A _lot_ more, I know.)
;)
I guess the word that you were looking for is "superfluous"
And I wonder how long Sherry Turkle -- "Her point is that when you are sick, hurt, or elderly, "you really do want a person," not a robot." will stay director.
CC.
Profit also implicitely comes if you are threatening potential competitors in such a way that they go away (or even do not enter the scene).
CC.
1. Take a fundamental concept
2. Describe it as complicated as possible
3. Put the result through a patent-lawyers office in order to make sure the claims get even more obfuscated
4. Apply successfully for a patent
5. Profit!
CC.
no presents for Bill's kids this Xmas
Probably xtra presents, maybe it is cheap for the effect: (from TFA) " At this point, some of the major commercial businesses which needed the documents have exited the market."
CC.
That's a common misconception.
At least a misconception that NASA also publishes.
Quote: "If we put a thermometer in darkest space, with absolutely nothing around, it would first have to cool off. This might take a very very long time. Once it cooled off, it would read 2.7 Kelvin. This is because of the "3 degree microwave background radiation." No matter where you go, you cannot escape it -- it is always there."
CC.