Slashdot Mirror


Mystery of Ancient Calculator Finally Cracked

jcaruso writes, "It's been more than 100 years since the discovery of the 2,000-year-old Antikythera Mechanism, but researchers are only now figuring out how it works." From the article: "Since its discovery in 1902, the Antikythera Mechanism — with its intricate and baffling system of about 30 geared wheels — has been an enigma... During the last 50 years, researchers have identified various astronomical and calendar functions, including gears that mimic the movement of the sun and moon. But it has taken some of the most advanced technology of the 21st century to decipher during the past year the most advanced technology of the 1st century B.C."

241 comments

  1. The question on everyones lips... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Funny

    Did it run Linux?

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:The question on everyones lips... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Imagine a Beowulf cluster of those!

    2. Re:The question on everyones lips... by edwardpickman · · Score: 5, Funny
      Did it run Linux?

      It was designed by the famous Roman programmer Linicus Torivicus.

    3. Re:The question on everyones lips... by s20451 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Imagine a Beowulf cluster of those!

      Somewhat hard, given that it predates Beowulf by at least 600 years.

      --
      Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    4. Re:The question on everyones lips... by kfg · · Score: 5, Funny

      No one knows. Driver issues. Blame the manufacturer.

      KFG

    5. Re:The question on everyones lips... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Correct. Back then, they were called Hydra clusters, for obvious reasons.

    6. Re:The question on everyones lips... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What I find amazing about scientists is their dedication to discover and understand the past.

      If the big business (Sony/MS/Real *and* Apple) get their way all these little plastic discs and memory stones will just be pretty ornaments to our descendants.
      There will be no way to decode the data stored within.

      We will become a black hole in history (no goatse refs).

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    7. Re:The question on everyones lips... by kfg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Age of Information Dark Ages. We live at the dawn of an oxymoron. Yay us!

      I can just see 'em sittin' around saying "We don't know WTF they were thinking, because we don't know WTF they were thinking"

      You take F451, I'll take Time Enough For Love. We can pool camping gear.

      KFG

    8. Re:The question on everyones lips... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Nah, according to the article it's unprogrammable.

    9. Re:The question on everyones lips... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      it runs NetBSD silly!

    10. Re:The question on everyones lips... by theeddie55 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Linux? No, it ran windows, that's why it's taken so much time to try to figure it out.

    11. Re:The question on everyones lips... by Aeamarth · · Score: 1

      Of course it didn't, that's why it's so hard to do reverse engineering on it!

      I guess the microsoft of those times made it

    12. Re:The question on everyones lips... by ozmanjusri · · Score: 5, Funny
      Did it run Linux?

      The Antikythera mechanism is *not* user friendly, and until it is Antikythera will stay with >1% marketshare.

      Take installation. Antikythera zealots are now saying "oh installing is so easy, just do hammer-dowel install package, or hit package": Yes, because hitting with "hammer" makes so much more sense to new users than double-whipping a slave that does "setups".

      Antikythera zealots are far too forgiving when judging the difficultly of Antikythera configuration issues and far too harsh when judging the difficulty of slave storage issues. Example comments:

      User: "How do I get Quake 0.03 to run in Antikythera?" Zealot: "Oh that's easy! If you have Redtoga, you have to smelt quake_3_rh_8_i686_010203_glibc.tin, then do chmod +x with a file.....

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    13. Re:The question on everyones lips... by thc69 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Saying that something runs NetBSD is approximately equivalent to saying that something exists.

      Doesn't this run NetBSD too?

      --
      Procrastination -- because good things come to those who wait.
    14. Re:The question on everyones lips... by BoberFett · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Don't forget his wife Incontinentia Buttocks.

    15. Re:The question on everyones lips... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well it sure isn't a quality webserver

    16. Re:The question on everyones lips... by spidkit · · Score: 1

      It was designed by a Greek actually - Elinus Torvaldees. The Romans just wrecked their own boat.

    17. Re:The question on everyones lips... by 4wdloop · · Score: 1

      Wasn't he a Viking?

      --
      4wdloop
    18. Re:The question on everyones lips... by Per+Wigren · · Score: 2, Funny

      By that definition G5 Macs don't exist...

      --
      My other account has a 3-digit UID.
    19. Re:The question on everyones lips... by Ed+Avis · · Score: 3, Interesting

      'Linus' is already a Roman name - from the Greek 'Linos'. According to many theologians, the second Pope was one Saint Linus.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    20. Re:The question on everyones lips... by fellip_nectar · · Score: 1

      No, but I believe it was the original target platform for DNF.

      --
      Worst. Signature. Ever.
    21. Re:The question on everyones lips... by somersault · · Score: 1

      Hence it being cracked soon after this .. who knew that they'd actually provide useful documentation? :o

      --
      which is totally what she said
    22. Re:The question on everyones lips... by ivoras · · Score: 1

      No, but it might on Luna...

      --
      -- Sig down
    23. Re:The question on everyones lips... by floki · · Score: 1

      Did it run Linux?

      It was designed by the famous Roman programmer Linicus Torivicus.

      The time's not that far off. The second pope's name was Linus.

      --
      from the to-stupid-for-words dept.
    24. Re:The question on everyones lips... by Andy+Gardner · · Score: 1

      Somebody please inform this mod of humour and Monty Python..

    25. Re:The question on everyones lips... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is that a bad thing?

  2. Physical Perl by LearnToSpell · · Score: 3, Funny

    Remember folks, always document your calculators.

    1. Re:Physical Perl by Thornae · · Score: 5, Informative

      Remember folks, always document your calculators

      They did.
      From the article:
      '... X-rays exposed writing on surfaces mashed together in the Mechanism, and never before seen... He declines to be specific about what the writing says. "But it was basically an instruction manual on using the mechanism, and what its purpose was," he says.'

      --
      |>
      Here be Dragons
    2. Re:Physical Perl by LearnToSpell · · Score: 5, Funny

      Remember folks, always read the article.

    3. Re:Physical Perl by Sam+Nitzberg · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's a Cookbook !!!!

      Ummmmmm..... nevermind.....

    4. Re:Physical Perl by ajs318 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "All the runes that you will find were written by the ancient giants of Gorfland. They are no use to you since most are simply cooking recipies" -- what game was that from?

      Actually there is still some controversy regarding one of the oldest cookbooks ever found. There is a recipe which was once thought to be for flapjacks. However, another school of thought states that it is in fact a shortbread recipe. The debate is over the meaning of a phrase which was translated as "crushed grains". The original discoverers believed that this referred to rolled oats and when the recipe was carried out the result was indeed a passable flapjack. However, on another inspection it has been discovered that if flour is used for the "crushed grains" in the recipe, then a delicious shortbread results.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    5. Re:Physical Perl by Macthorpe · · Score: 2, Funny

      In other news, the EU fined the creators of the Antikythera Mechanism several hundred million euros today.

      A spokesman stated "You can't program it. It's taken people 50 years to find out how it works. They had a monopoly on ancient calculating mechanisms and there was no documentation, so without proper interoperability we cannot morally allow them to continue anciently calculating in the European market without some form of punishment."

      --
      "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
    6. Re:Physical Perl by Compaq_Hater · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was just thinking the same thing :), I loved that Episode of the Twilight Zone ("to serve man").

      CH

    7. Re:Physical Perl by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

      I kinda missed the part where the Antikythera Mechanism creators abuse their monopoly, grow up in a market based on copyright and then push for patents, create a multimillion dollar market for security because of the holes in their software, puppet companies to spread FUD over better working alternatives...

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    8. Re:Physical Perl by Macthorpe · · Score: 1

      Of course you did. It was before you were born!

      --
      "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
  3. You Whippersnappers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You whippersnappers got this fancy Antikythera thing... I used to have only abacus back then. Talk about being spoiled!

    1. Re:You Whippersnappers! by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1
      You whippersnappers got this fancy Antikythera thing...
      So hows the view from Mount Olympus?
  4. Just imagine... by Mish · · Score: 5, Funny

    But it has taken some of the most advanced technology of the 21st century to decipher during the past year the most advanced technology of the 1st century B.C."Maybe in 2000 years we'll have the technology to decode that sentence!

    1. Re:Just imagine... by epp_b · · Score: 1
      Maybe in 2000 years we'll have the technology to decode that sentence!
      That's asking a little much. I mean, slashdot and commas? C'mon.
    2. Re:Just imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, I thought we'd broken the secret behind those useful Stargates...

    3. Re:Just imagine... by kennygraham · · Score: 1

      Sadly enough, if the sentence stays worded like that, I don't see anywhere that a comma belongs.

  5. Nice! ... by Rowanyote · · Score: 1

    So is there enough information to reverse engineer it? RowanYote

    1. Re:Nice! ... by DogFacedJo · · Score: 3, Informative

      >> ... is there enough information to reverse engineer it?

          There is. The article gets to the point at the very end, and frustratingly turns out to be hype for the upcoming release of what it does. The point is that they found significantly more text (than had been previously found) by using x-ray tomography to show slices of its internals. The text they found included the manual which was conveniently written in greek.
          Apparently it turns out that the previous attempts to reverse engineer what it does were somewhat off.

          I agree with the above poster: it is not really news yet - they are merely about to present their results. Hate. Hype.

    2. Re:Nice! ... by slashbob22 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not a chance! Let me remind you of a little thing called the BC-CA. The BCCA is the predecessor of the DMCA, and if you think the DMCA is draconian - the BCCA prescribed death for every violation.

      --
      Proof by very large bribes. QED.
    3. Re:Nice! ... by gigne · · Score: 1

      I agree. I was disappointed with the lack of closure. It actually read more like an advert for HP, and how amazing they are.

      --
      Signature v3.0, now with 42% less memory usage.
    4. Re:Nice! ... by ZippyKitty · · Score: 1

      I seen a presentation on this a few months ago. (but did not RTFM)

      They are working on that - but some gears are missing. As well the case it was in is gone too and it appears that a lot of the documentation and text was on the case (I think there were some traces of the case that they could figure this out from). From previous work a model was made - but the new information showed a different gear configuration. I image that someone will build a new one soon though.

      ZK

      --
      Time flies like an arrow Fruit flies like a banana
    5. Re:Nice! ... by dido · · Score: 2, Funny

      And penned by no less than the great Greek legislator himself!

      --
      Qu'on me donne six lignes écrites de la main du plus honnête homme, j'y trouverai de quoi le faire pendre.
    6. Re:Nice! ... by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      The concept of copyright didn't exist in those days. Back then, most things were either passed around by memorising them and repeating them, or getting a slave to write it out by hand on a roll of papyrus. Authors made their money by by giving speaches, not from royalties on their books.

      Copyright came into being after the printing press was reinvented in the 17th Century, to encourage people to invest in them so they could mass produce copies of books.

  6. Just goes to show... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Don't throw out the instructions; archaeologists from the 40th century might need them.

    On the serious side, though... How much of our stuff will be unusable only 200 years from now?

    1. Re:Just goes to show... by Stormwatch · · Score: 3, Funny
      How much of our stuff will be unusable only 200 years from now?
      And even if anything still works, you can count on a Microsoft ad campaign to make you feel like a dinosaur for not upgrading to the latest version.
    2. Re:Just goes to show... by Suzuran · · Score: 5, Interesting

      As part of the Project Apollo research effort, I can tell you that the Apollo spacecraft (Which is arguably one of mankind's greatest achievements) didn't even make it 50 years - Even now, with the spacecraft still intact and the crew still alive, we are having to undertake a large reverse-engineering project with limited documentation to recreate the operation of the spacecraft.

    3. Re:Just goes to show... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      As part of the Project Apollo research effort, I can tell you that the Apollo spacecraft (Which is arguably one of mankind's greatest achievements) didn't even make it 50 years - Even now, with the spacecraft still intact and the crew still alive, we are having to undertake a large reverse-engineering project with limited documentation to recreate the operation of the spacecraft.
      It isn't functional and never was.
      When will people realize that the whole moonwalk thing was a hoax?
      Are even the astronauts so brainwashed that they believe they have been on the moon?
      Some lunatics!

    4. Re:Just goes to show... by wkk2 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Root cause of the problem: Since the equipment was out sourced to a contractor, NASA never obtained all the details or tooling. The contractors were under no obligation to retain the tooling necessary to make additional units. I suspect that someone said "we need space" and everything was sent to a landfill.

    5. Re:Just goes to show... by FlyingSquidStudios · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sure, it was all shot in a studio. What you don't know is that the studio it was shot in was ON THE MOON!

    6. Re:Just goes to show... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I predict in 200 years from now, Linux will be poised to take over the desktop.

    7. Re:Just goes to show... by McNihil · · Score: 1

      You can make that 20 years. I have stuff on 5 1/4 that will never see the day of light anymore. And programs on my Casio fx180 (well... 36 instruction programs are fairly easy to remember so I am not griping over those.)

      I have to say though that the device is one solid Prior Art... take that Sharp and HP!

    8. Re:Just goes to show... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Do you think that there will even be a "desktop" to take over 200 years from now.

    9. Re: Just goes to show... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      > How much of our stuff will be unusable only 200 years from now?

      Heh. Yesterday I saw a ~50 year old Studebaker, with a sign in the rear window asking whether my care would still run when it is that old.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    10. Re:Just goes to show... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Off topic, but I want to wish you good luck on your project. One of my hobbies is reverse-engineering software, and I'm envious that you have the skills to work on something with the scope of space exploration, and so much history behind it.

      Thanks for helping us get back up there.

    11. Re:Just goes to show... by Samah · · Score: 1

      Too scared to login before making those claims, AC? Just because you believe something was faked doesn't mean it was.

      To be quite honest I don't care either way. Since then we've:
      - positioned a solar observatory at the Langragian point between the Earth and the Sun,
      - landed robots on Mars and driven them around taking pictures like tourists,
      - done a fly-by of Saturn and returned breathtaking first-hand photographs,
      - launched a probe below the surface of an icy moon bringing back countless wealths of information.

      Landing a couple of guys on the Moon? Sure it might have been inconceivable back in '69, and the yanks *may* have done the dodge, but does it really matter? Hell no.

      --
      Homonyms are fun!
      You're driving your car, but they're riding their bikes there.
    12. Re:Just goes to show... by geobeck · · Score: 0

      When will people realize that the whole moonwalk thing was a hoax?

      Certainly it was.

      And the Mars missions are all hoaxes too. Robots driving through the desert? Come on, they didn't even show any canals!

      And the Voyager missions? I could see the strings suspending Saturn!

      Middle East conflict? Hoax! Shot in the Mojave desert.

      As a matter of fact, everything is a hoax fed directly into our minds through a big tube as we lie in a pool of bioactive plasma, powering the Machines...

      Oh shit; I took the wrong colored pill this morning.

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
    13. Re:Just goes to show... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Offtopic I know, but does this research effort have a website or discussion forum? I have quite a bit of documentation and artifacts from Apollo contractors, and may be able to put them to a good purpose.

    14. Re:Just goes to show... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Let that be a warning about closed-source hardware!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    15. Re:Just goes to show... by m_frankie_h · · Score: 4, Funny

      The whole idea of faking a moonwalk is absurd. This theory is intended to cover a much larger hoax --- that of America.

      There is, as any reasonable man can see, no american continent, the whole Columbus affair was a hoax, organized by the Portuguese government to cover up the fact that they are ruling the world.

      I am sure you can appreciate the ingenuity of inventing a conspiracy theory to cover up a much more important conspiracy.

    16. Re:Just goes to show... by Eivind · · Score: 1
      200 years from now, a very large fraction of the stuff we use today will be either completely disintegrated to the point where it's not even obvious it once was an object at all, recycled (for energy or materials) and thus completely gone, or broken utterly beyond repair.

      That was true 200 years ago too by the way. Nearly all objects made in the 18th century are completely gone, and most of the ones that aren't are broken.

      A very few objects endure much longer. Either because they're of very solid construction (pyramids), because they where continously important to someone, so was taken great care of. (many objects will last centuries if protected from moisture, extreme temperatures and physical wear and tear). True sheer luck, because they where continously maintained, or a combination of these factors.

      The last option, maintenance, gets more difficult with more modern objects, because they essentially require an entire industry for creating certain parts. Replacing a rotted plank on a wooden house is doable. Replacing a broken microchip made in a technology that hasn't been used in decades, and which no current factory is capable of replicating is a different matter. If you're satisfied with replacing the part with a modern "equivalent" part, then it gets a bit more doable, but still tricky.

    17. Re:Just goes to show... by WillAdams · · Score: 1

      Yep. Although none are quite 200 years old yet, the oldest things at my house fall into pretty much those categories:

        - ceramic milk jug which belonged to my great grandfather, ~1850 --- my daughter keeps it in her room and uses it to hold a flag
        - 2 volume edition of a translation of Flavius Josephus' _History of the Treasures and Antiquities of the Jews_ roughly the same time frame --- in rough shape, but not valuable enough to justify restoration or re-binding (yet)
        - an old cast iron reel lawn mower which belonged to my grandparents from 1927--- needs a new cutting blade (which unlike the one my wife and I purchased when we married is bolted, not riveted, so can be replaced), but I've already replaced the handle (branch from a crepe myrtle in our garden which my wife trimmed) and the roller (a pair of nested plastic pipes, one found in a parking lot, the other left over from adding a pipe to the T&P valve on our hot water heater). I use it to cut our grass this past summer and will again next.

      I fully expect all of the above to last for a very long time and make and pass the 200 year mark.

      William

      --
      Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
    18. Re:Just goes to show... by Harry_Ballsak · · Score: 1

      Don't throw out the instructions; archaeologists from the 40th century might need them. On the serious side, though... How much of our stuff will be unusable only 200 years from now? Are you serious? the /. db alone will be priceless!!!

    19. Re:Just goes to show... by Earle+Martin · · Score: 1

      Replacing a broken microchip made in a technology that hasn't been used in decades, and which no current factory is capable of replicating is a different matter.

      Pfft. You just need the right man for the job.

    20. Re:Just goes to show... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm portuguese, and I can pretty much garantee that we don't rule ourselves whenever the world.

    21. Re:Just goes to show... by pilkul · · Score: 1

      the yanks *may* have done the dodge

      No, there's no "may", the facts are unambiguous. And all the stuff you listed is less impressive in many ways than landing humans on the moon and bringing them back alive. Launching hunks of electronics on a one-way trip with no life support simplifies the problem a lot.

  7. slownewsday by Toby+The+Economist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Absolutely nothing new in this article, except that the latest team are going to be releasing their findings soon. Basically, it's a page filler, some entertainment, not news at all.

    Really, we need a new word, for news which isn't functional information, but just amusing/entertaining.

    I wish they'd bloody well get round to publishing the full translation of the text, though!

    1. Re:slownewsday by Cadallin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, I was really disappointed. I've heard about this device before, and more detailed specifics about it would be very interesting, but this article is just a fluff piece.

    2. Re:slownewsday by kfg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The entire story in a nutshell:

      "No comment."

      Film next week.

      Really, we need a new word, for news which isn't functional information, but just amusing/entertaining.

      "Rupert."

      KFG

    3. Re:slownewsday by PsyQo · · Score: 1, Funny

      There already is, well, two words really: The Sun

    4. Re:slownewsday by dr_labrat · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yeah, there are tags called slownewsday, fud, notfud and itsatrap. Not to mention the fact that, though it may be new to the editors, its not news.

      --
      The secret of success is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake those, you've got it made. (Marx)
    5. Re:slownewsday by rbochan · · Score: 1
      Really, we need a new word, for news which isn't functional information, but just amusing/entertaining.


      There is one

      --
      ...Rob
      The American Dream isn't an SUV and a house in the suburbs; it's Don't Tread On Me.
    6. Re:slownewsday by empaler · · Score: 1

      You got it.

    7. Re:slownewsday by duguk · · Score: 1

      You got it.seconded!

      motion carried?

      Duguk

    8. Re:slownewsday by kfg · · Score: 2

      Usage:

      "Hey, ja see the rupert about Spears in the Post the other day?"

      And the mind implodes into a psychic black hole of noninformation about nothing from nowhere.

      Welcome to the future. Here's your drool cup.

      KFG

    9. Re:slownewsday by GWBasic · · Score: 1
      Really, we need a new word, for news which isn't functional information, but just amusing/entertaining.

      Filler

      I actually enjoyed reading the article as I only recently became aware of the device. BT named a song after it on his new album, This Binary Universe.

    10. Re:slownewsday by v1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't you just love it when someone posts an article that basically say "hey we have something really interesting to tell you but we're not telling."? Usually being a tease is considered mean.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    11. Re:slownewsday by foobsr · · Score: 1

      Really, we need a new word, for news which isn't functional information, but just amusing/entertaining.

      I thought it was "news show" - you just perhaps have to create some variations along the lines of "net news show" (or should it read "tube news show"?).

      CC.

      --
      TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
    12. Re:slownewsday by Ravatar · · Score: 2, Funny

      The term you're looking for is "Digg".

    13. Re:slownewsday by Random+Data · · Score: 4, Funny
      Really, we need a new word, for news which isn't functional information, but just amusing/entertaining.


      Fox News?

    14. Re:slownewsday by dangitman · · Score: 1
      Yeah, I was really disappointed. I've heard about this device before, and more detailed specifics about it would be very interesting, but this article is just a fluff piece.

      Slashdot?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    15. Re:slownewsday by dangitman · · Score: 1
      Really, we need a new word, for news which isn't functional information, but just amusing/entertaining.

      Slashdot?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    16. Re:slownewsday by mrscorpio · · Score: 1

      me2!11!1!111111111111!!!!!!!!!!!

    17. Re:slownewsday by ruprechtjones · · Score: 1

      You mispelled my name, bitch.

      --
      Kip Hawley is an idiot.
    18. Re:slownewsday by killerkalamari · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      wheresthebeef

    19. Re:slownewsday by warrigal · · Score: 1

      How about faux news. Packed full of factoids (you know, items that resemble facts or have fact-like characteristics).

    20. Re:slownewsday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > There is one

      No, the purpose of Fark is to allow fat Americans to laugh at pictures of foreigners suffering at the hands of American troops. It also allows the bovine ones a space to show their outrage when someone suggests that perhaps it's the troops fault, and that maybe if they weren't killing civilians they wouldn't getting shot/blown up quite so often.

    21. Re:slownewsday by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Why do you have a cork on your fork?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    22. Re:slownewsday by satcomdaddy1 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Really, we need a new word, for news which isn't functional information, but just amusing/entertaining.

      Slashdot.
    23. Re:slownewsday by eolson22 · · Score: 1

      If nothing in this article was new to you, go read the full text of the article in Nature today.

      Surely you know already that there is an Antikythera conference to present this material.

  8. Beowulf cluster by PsyQo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Some archeologists suggest that the people who used this calculator, actually tried to build a Beowulf cluster out of these, but were unable to because Beowulf wasn't born yet.

    1. Re:Beowulf cluster by EraserMouseMan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just makes me think. If it's this hard to figure out what a geared mechanism does, how hard is it going to be for a hypethetical future generation discovering a computer to figure out what the heck it was for?

      If we all get wiped out by a comet or something and humanity has to start from scratch would we eventually end up using silicon? Or would we come up with a biological solution (like the human brain)? It's cool to think about.

      Maybe we've already dug up things that are more advanced than what we have but we're too primitive to recoginize what it is.

  9. stupid by vincpa · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Goes to show how stupid we are with the most advanced tech.

    1. Re:stupid by djupedal · · Score: 2, Funny

      Big deal - I know a couple guys, in the PRC, that could reverse engineer this thing and have working copies, with instructions in 12 languages, for sale on street before dusk...

  10. The terrible tapir. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ""It's been more than 100 years since the discovery of the 2,000-year-old Antikythera Mechanism, but researchers are only now figuring out how it works.""

    Hey! All you Jefferson "Light my Tapir" guys. Pay attention.

  11. Olden days people.. Pssh. by Asrynachs · · Score: 0, Funny

    I'm sure at the lab it went something like this...

    'Hey professor Roy, have you figured out how that ancient calculator works yet?'

    'Well no.. eh heh... It's sort of a mystery.. Those olden days people were a lot more cleaver than we gave them credit for. I think we might have to change our hypothesis'

    'ARE YOU INSANE?! We'll be a laughing stock! I can imagine the headlines now... "Scientists Change Hypothesis: Community Laughs at Expense".. I can't go through that again! You remember the Stone Henge fiasco?! The Bloody Scots threatened to raise Fingal!!'

    '...I'll get my gun'

  12. And the clock stopped... by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 5, Informative
    ...thus, by tracking back to which epicycles were extant in the cosmos at that time, we were able to pinpoint the moment of the crime (a piracy, perhaps?).

    Actually this story is a little old, people have had the Antikythera device scoped out for a couple of years now. It's a sort of geared astrolabe using an epicyclic model (an astronomical paradigm adopted in Ptolomy's ptime) and the parts inside the corroded find were derived by some good ol'fashioned NMI scanning.

    An astrolabe is basically a clock -- an analogue computer that correlates time, star position and latitude. Look 'em up -- they're beautiful instruments and very logically constructed. Each point indicates a star, the off-centre circles (al'mucanthers) are the projections of the celestial latitudes from the polar axis (think of a bunch of hoops on one spindle of a Tower of Hanoi model, then crank the spindle off the perpendicular by a few degrees, to give you an idea of the projection. Light source on top, your shadow rings are the al'mucanthers). Move the star pointer to one of those circles, then read the index off the rim of the device (the Mater). Because of their simplicity and elegance (the mathematical model, not the construction!) they were used up until Columbus' time. If the Antikythera device had been a better predictor, we might well have seen more of them. And a lot more gears. The only thing we still use from the development of the astrolabe today is the flat head screw, seen on one model in 1565.

    --
    Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    1. Re:And the clock stopped... by hughk · · Score: 1

      and how to build a complex epicyclic movement with ancient Greek tech? Sure, they had gears, but this is rather more of a mechanism. Our (so-called modern) astrolabes were quite crude by comparison, as were our clocks until the 16th Century or later.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    2. Re:And the clock stopped... by Cimon+Avaro · · Score: 2, Informative
      Actually this story is a little old, people have had the Antikythera device scoped out for a couple of years now. It's a sort of geared astrolabe using an epicyclic model (an astronomical paradigm adopted in Ptolomy's ptime) and the parts inside the corroded find were derived by some good ol'fashioned NMI scanning.
      I think you misread the article. It didn't say they used an epicyclic model but an epicyclic mechanism (instead of differential gearing). That is, they weren't specifically using an epicyclic mathematic model of stellar movements. What the story claims is that the physical mechanics of the machine worked like those spirograph things you get in cereal boxes, rather than the clockwork mechanisms we are all so familiar with.
    3. Re:And the clock stopped... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err... Not to nitpick, but definitely not NMI scanning - metal is the death for any resolution. It's pretty clearly some sort of high resolution CT scanning.

  13. Stargate plug by ultracool · · Score: 5, Funny

    They should have given it to SG1. Dr. Jackson would have figured it out in no time, and they would have used to save the Earth from a far more technologically advanced enemy.

    1. Re:Stargate plug by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      Now if I could only think of a fictional sci-fi character who makes snarky replies to people who use references to fictional sci-fi characters...

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    2. Re:Stargate plug by arcanumas · · Score: 1

      No need. It's already alien. I mean, the greeks are from Sirius aren't they?
      (this device has been used by some of the people believing in this crap for trying to 'prove' their stories)

      --
      Slashdot Sig. version 0.1alpha. Use at your own risk.
    3. Re:Stargate plug by steveo777 · · Score: 1

      Bruce "don't call me Ash" Campbell might fit that bill.

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
  14. Actually a very old word fits quite well. by shaitand · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I find that 'shit' is a rather appropriate word.

  15. No, just an EULA by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 3, Funny

    I agree not to leave this thing lying around for people to discover in 2000 years time. I agree not to reverse engineer this device......

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  16. Yes, Debian. by The_Abortionist · · Score: 1, Funny

    It should be released for the abacus soon as well.

    --
    Linux violates 235 Microsoft patents.
    1. Re:Yes, Debian. by MicrosoftRepresentit · · Score: 0, Funny

      An interesting fact about abacuses (abacii?): abacuses where not invented around 1000 BC as many believe. In fact, they where invented around 5000 BC, but it wasn't until four thousand years later that someone invented the hole, which allowed people to slide things onto other things. Until then, the abacus was just the frame and and metal rods, with some poor soul having to hold the marbles against the rods. It was very hard to use, and serves as a chilling metaphor for the state of Linux on the desktop today.

  17. Infotainment by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 1

    Some call it "infotainment."

    --
    Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
    1. Re:Infotainment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And others call it blogging...

  18. Just Goes to Show by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 2, Funny

    This just goes to show why documentation is so important. Kids, when you want your CoolWare 1.3.37 still to be in use 2000 years from now...document it!

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    1. Re:Just Goes to Show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe this will be the incentive Linux developers need to produce easy to use software with equally easy documentation? Na! The truly hardcore should be able to figure it out!

    2. Re:Just Goes to Show by snickkers · · Score: 1

      a few people have made a similar joke, but, the article goes to show just the opposite -- don't bother documenting stuff, because 2000 years from now it won't help people figure out what your thingamajig does. The device has the instruction manual printed on the side of it. In fact, truth be told, if the device came with perfectly understandable-at-a-glance instructions as to what it was, the device would lose all mystery and wouldn't be getting anywhere near the kind of attention it's getting right now.

      --
      GLORX 3:16
  19. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...they're only just now figuring out a highly complex bit of machinery from the time when humans were supposedly about 'as dumb as teh average ape'. Yeah right. This fits right in with the Biblical account of the flood - humans have always been highly-intelligent beings (come on you humanists, how does this not appeal?) and all they've been lacking after the flood is the right materials, knowledge, and man-power to create great civilizations. After all, how would you feel if just you and your family were dumped into a post-apocalyptic world with the bare essentials? I thought as much. And no, you wouldn't be living in a condo either. If you DID have a portable two-man tent it'd break down very quickly (relatively speaking) and nothing would be left afterwards, though that highly complex gadget you just couldn't do without manages to survive until those silly people way in the future decide to try and figure it out.

    1. Re:So... by P3NIS_CLEAVER · · Score: 1

      The difficulty of figuring this thing out is because it is fused together by corrosion, not because it is doing something so amazing.

      --
      Please sign petition to restore sanity to our banking system!!!

      http://financialpetition.org/
    2. Re: So... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      > ...they're only just now figuring out a highly complex bit of machinery from the time when humans were supposedly about 'as dumb as teh average ape'.

      I suspect they would come out well in a comparison with certain Slashdot posters.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    3. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know where you take this from, but nobody ever said anything about people beeing dumb 2000 years ago and records from different cultures around the world show rather advanced civilizations during those times; so it wasn't a post apocalyptic world like you describe either.

    4. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back then not all peope were as dumb as the average ape. To quote Gus Portokalos in "My Big Fat Greek Wedding" as he speaks to his future son in law in Greek:

      "When my people were developing philosophy, your people were still swinging from trees"

  20. wikipedia by laggist · · Score: 5, Informative

    heh.. lots of nice pics and write-up here

  21. News for Nerds by Yonsen · · Score: 0

    CALCULATORS! Who ever saw that one coming a lightyear away?

  22. dude, it's a wheel to a pizza oven !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Greek Pizza that is

  23. Its obviously.. by fortunato · · Score: 1

    A time machine!

  24. Relative Difficulty by nick_davison · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But it has taken some of the most advanced technology of the 21st century to decipher during the past year the most advanced technology of the 1st century B.C.

    To pull out the old quote, "It is twice as difficult to debug a program as to write it. Therefore, if you put all of your creativity and effort into writing the program, you are not smart enough to debug it."

    Without any information even about what it's supposed to do, beyond being a series of gears, without knowing if it's even a fragment of a larger whole - or even knowing if it actually worked for the intended process (or was the ancient equivalent of a buggy program), that makes for quite a challenge.

    I'm guessing, in the future, a massively advanced civilization that came across the ones and zeroes of Internet Explorer, without the O.S., without info about HTTP, without Windows or a computer based off that comical silicon technology they've only found fragments of, they wouldn't be able to figure it out either.

    1. Re:Relative Difficulty by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1, Troll

      "It was obviously an item of worship, because it certainly doesn't seem to be an item of technology"

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    2. Re:Relative Difficulty by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Of course not. Internet Explorer is difficult to figure out now.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    3. Re:Relative Difficulty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing, in the future, a massively advanced civilization that came across the ones and zeroes of Internet Explorer, without the O.S., without info about HTTP, without Windows or a computer based off that comical silicon technology they've only found fragments of, they wouldn't be able to figure it out either.

      In that case, I suppose they could make an informed guess, based on what is known about the previous culture's technology, its society, its hopes and dreams, and human nature itself. In fact, given this information, we are able to conclude that the Antikythera Mechanism was primarily used to view images of women in various states of undress.

  25. Yes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, but is it Turing complete?

  26. comments by superwiz · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else need convincing that comments might not be a waste of time?

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    1. Re:comments by Petrushka · · Score: 1
      comments might not be a waste of time

      To put it in CS language, surviving technology from the ancient world tends to be more binaries than source code. With some notable, and correspondingly important, exceptions (such as Vitruvius).

  27. The lesson? by yndrd · · Score: 1

    Properly document your hardware!

    1. Re:The lesson? by Dunbal · · Score: 2, Informative

      Properly document your hardware!

            They did, only no one could overstand the joyful tongueage it was scribated in. Press green button marked RED to activating your unit and with disdain you must...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  28. Like the Mormons' tablets... by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "He declines to be specific about what the writing says."

    WTF ... so they figure all this out, and then they keep the writing secret? What's up with that.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:Like the Mormons' tablets... by Petrushka · · Score: 5, Interesting
      they keep the writing secret? What's up with that.

      Because it's kind of hard to read, even if you know Greek. Quite a lot of work needs to be done to get the text transcribed fully, even if parts of it are easy to read. Have you looked at the third image in the slide show? Could you make an accurate transcription of the text shown?

      FWIW, I can read Greek, but all I can make out is some references to a "square showing a given" something, some numbers, and something about moving some bits of the mechanism but not others. The third line's got some words in it but I can't fit them together without context.

    2. Re:Like the Mormons' tablets... by Grail · · Score: 1

      Because the writing isn't just instructions on how to use the device, it also elucidates on what the device is used for. Which is going to freak people out.

      Vessels made of wood, sailing on an ocean made of water, powered by atmospheric wind?

    3. Re:Like the Mormons' tablets... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's perfectly easy to understand. There are two possibilities.

      1. There's writing on it, but it can't be read with certainty. Instead of making guesses to its contents, the researchers are leaving their speculation to its purpose, which can be more easily deduced. This can be because of:

      1a. They actually can't read enough of it to gather the content of the message. (i.e. "Turn the ... as the wheel ... place the ... will appear at ... Made in Mexico")

      1b. They have a translation of some sort, but aren't sure that it is correct, and are waiting for confirmation.

      2. The researchers made the annoucement subject to a non-disclosure agreement. These agreements are fairly common when making announcements prior to the publication of an academic article. You can make you're annoucement of your findings, but can give specifics about your findings until the article has been published. Just wait until the article is published, and then read the translation yourself.

    4. Re:Like the Mormons' tablets... by Poromenos1 · · Score: 1

      Also, second to last line, "as the whole (something) is divided", and last line "elliptic"? I can't make anything else out, and most of the text is missing :/

      --
      Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
    5. Re:Like the Mormons' tablets... by NoMaster · · Score: 5, Funny
      WTF ... so they figure all this out, and then they keep the writing secret? What's up with that.
      Because the bit they have recovered and translated so far reads "Disassembly or reverse-engineering for any purpose (including, but not limited to, for the purposes of interoperability or future compatibility) is prohibited by this licence".

      Basically, they've found the EULA. They're worried the BSA will sue them under the PMCA (Pre-Millenium Copyright Act)...

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    6. Re:Like the Mormons' tablets... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      "square showing a given"

      So you can read greek can you ? Hardly. It says "Insert coin here".

    7. Re:Like the Mormons' tablets... by eraserewind · · Score: 2, Funny
      but all I can make out is some references to a "square showing a given" something, some numbers, and something about moving some bits of the mechanism but not others.
      That's what it's meant to say! Some ancient maintenance engineer's guarantee of a job for life.
    8. Re:Like the Mormons' tablets... by WarlockD · · Score: 1

      You forgot one.

      3. They are waiting for the film crew of the History Channel to finish recording.

      PS - Why the hell were you modded "funny"?

  29. some things don't change by rgaginol · · Score: 1

    And what was true then which is also true today is that little device gave someone absolute job security - along with a middle manager to go along with it. Surely there is enough material here to do a "ye olde Dilbert" strip. Documentation - bah, keep it minimal, make sure you need to be employed since there isn't anyone on earth capable of maintaining it;)

  30. Getting less important by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Abacus: millions still in use today.

    Slide rules: very few still in use today, but they were very important from 1620's (when they were invented) until the 1970/1980s -- 350 years.

    Now, a calculator older than 5 years is a historical curiosity (although I still use a 15-year old calculator on a day-to-day basis).

    What we're seeing is a shortened lifetime for calculators, software, etc. which probably makes documentation less important (excpet for historical curiosity). You would not realisticly expect any software / device you design now to be in use 350 or 2000 years from now.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Getting less important by xQx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, and that's exactly the excuse we're going to hear over and over in 7,994 years when billions of man-hours are being spent on fixing the Y10K bug.

    2. Re:Getting less important by triffid_98 · · Score: 2, Funny
      You forgot to say "unless it was written in COBOL".

      You would not realisticly expect any software / device you design now to be in use 350 or 2000 years from now
      .
    3. Re:Getting less important by somersault · · Score: 1

      I wonder how many people are, or will be still writing software like this ("we're just at the start of the century now, we don't need 4 digits to store the year that we made our product on" and so on). I know I still write 2 characters for the year when writing on backup tapes :p

      --
      which is totally what she said
    4. Re:Getting less important by pcmanjon · · Score: 1

      >I know I still write 2 characters for the year when writing on backup tapes :p

      Well if you're still using backup tapes, and not a network RAID or network NFS share for backups (or DVD's) or something, you're still living in the 80's anyway and no wonder you only need 2 digits. :P

    5. Re:Getting less important by somersault · · Score: 1

      We use tapes to backup the network RAID storage (and some non RAID). DVDs aren't much use for backing up 120GB of data 3 times a week.

      I've also had bad experienecs with RAID due to our outsourcing IT 'experts' replacing a drive while I was on holiday (pretty soon after I'd started working here, we've since rid ourselves of that company), then it failing catasrophically a couple of weeks later. Due to that set of disks not being backed up (most of the data from it had been transferred to a new server, but there were still some Home folders on the old one), we had to spend thousands recovering our data, whereas it would have just been hundreds if it was a single hard drive (or free if it was being backed up to tape). Oh well.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    6. Re:Getting less important by eharvill · · Score: 1

      The 80s don't look so bad when a twister rips through those fancy network RAID and NFS shares one day. :P

      --
      At night I drink myself to sleep and pretend I don't care that you're not here with me
    7. Re:Getting less important by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 1

      Now, a calculator older than 5 years is a historical curiosity

      The TI-30 series is still popular, and hasn't received any upgrades that I know of. I don't know how long ago that was released, but I had one about 10 years ago.

      --
      I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
  31. Compass by Joebert · · Score: 0

    1) Astrological & Calendar functions
    2) Found on a shipwreck

    I get the feeling it was just a complicated compass.

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  32. Pfft by stunt_penguin · · Score: 1

    If it took them this long to reverse-engineer an ancient calculator with 30 gears, imagine how long it's gonna take them to reverse engineer that crashed alien ship in Area 51.

    No wonder they're keeping everyone out- they're embarrassed.

    --
    When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
  33. Heliocentric as well ... by pbhj · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I find it amusing.

    This is a heliocentric astrolabe style device from about 80BC; an advance from geocentric designs. Yet most people on /. appear to espouse the view that everyone before the middle-ages thought the earth was flat. Now granted - the rotation of planets around a common star doesn't necessarily imply the understanding of rotation of a non-flat planet but as soon as you consider other planets rising and setting you're going to start getting some major clues ... really, we've not developed that much.

    I guess at 1:43am I'm easily amused!

    1. Re:Heliocentric as well ... by TapeCutter · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yep, there are many people who were taught that "Columbus proved the Earth was round", however this guy worked out it's circumference about 2000yrs before Columbus was born. You'd think all the ancient art depicting the god Atlas carrying a globe would have given the Pope a fucking clue! Perhaps this means that by the year 3500 the church will have accepted evolution.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    2. Re:Heliocentric as well ... by Rostin · · Score: 3, Informative

      You'd think all the ancient art depicting the god Atlas carrying a globe would have given the Pope a fucking clue!

      Huh? Which pope and incident are you referring to? If you are thinking of Galileo, that wasn't about the shape of the earth, it was loosely about heliocentrism. I say "loosely" because if you do a little research, you'll discover that the popularly accepted version of the story has been highly exaggerated and simplifed to force it into the "religion vs science" mold.

      Perhaps this means that by the year 3500 the church will have accepted evolution.

      Maybe you should read this.

    3. Re:Heliocentric as well ... by JakartaDean · · Score: 1
      Yet most people on /. appear to espouse the view that everyone before the middle-ages thought the earth was flat.
      I certainly hope not. The idea that Columbus was the one who persuaded others that the earth was not flat is probabgly the oldest chestnut in our society. The earth is curved, as anyone who has watched a sailing ship sail away can verify: The waterline disappears first, then the hull, then the mast and sails slowly disappear from the bottom up. Everyone knew that, and consequently that the earth was not flat.

      The radius of curvature was uncertain, but most people had a pretty good idea, but Columbus thought it was much smaller. Had he been right, it would have been possible with the technologies of the day to sail to modern-day Indonesia. He was wrong, however, and only the lucky event of an unknown continent or two where he thought Indonesia was saved him and his crew.

      --
      The subject who is truly loyal to the Chief Magistrate will neither advise nor submit to arbitrary measures (Junius)
    4. Re:Heliocentric as well ... by TapeCutter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Damm it, what a screw-up! I already knew from reading Galileo's biography that basically he got in trouble with the pope because the pope interpreted his book as a personal insult, and yet I still managed to paraphrase the "religious dogma" story I was taught ~40yrs ago! Worst still I got the subject matter completely wrong. I also accept that only a fringe element of the church still doubt evolution.

      In short, I stand corrected on both the pope and the evolution comment, and am willing to serve as an example of just how powerfull myths can be.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  34. I'm curious by Kamineko · · Score: 1
    Would ancient timepieces suffer from overflow? Did they just stick a zero in front of the year back then?


    (Granted their calendar would register '1st century BC' at somewhere between year 3000 and year 4000, at a random guess.)

  35. Evil Technology by SinGunner · · Score: 2, Funny

    Doesn't this thing remind anyone of the countless ancient artifacts we've seen in movies that are expressly designed to summon some evil force (the devil, elder gods, pokemon, etc.) to the Earth to destroy or enslave mankind forever? Should we really be playing around with this thing?

    1. Re:Evil Technology by Lazarian · · Score: 1

      Somebody actually modded this insightful?

    2. Re:Evil Technology by antirelic · · Score: 1

      It was right around the time this device was discovered that Dick Chenney appeared.... Coincidence?!?

      --
      20th century Marxism is not progress...
    3. Re:Evil Technology by SinGunner · · Score: 1

      Modding something "Funny" doesn't count as a positive for the person. It's a flaw in the mod system. Thereby, certain individuals have taken it upon themselves to mod "Insightful" in lieu of funny due to its positive ramifications. Class dismissed.

  36. Link to Working Unit by EEPROMS · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Pictures and Images to a working unit can be found here

    1. Re:Link to Working Unit by vidarh · · Score: 1

      Except that if you'd RTFA, you'd have known that the theory of what the unit does that those "working units" are based on will supposedly be discredited by this new research.

  37. Everything is under control by The_Dougster · · Score: 3, Funny

    The reports of strange lights emanating from the lab were merely energy discharges from the material under the effects of the x-ray analysis, which is quite normal actually. Unfounded rumors of strange demonic figures running amok in the complex were likewise nothing more than a mischievous prank by a few of the overworked scientists who took a joke a bit too far. The security forces stationed around the building are merely there to keep pesky reporters from spoiling next-week's release. Any sounds which appear to be gunfire are simply sonic gas bubbles popping from out of the high tech equipment. So everything is completely under control, no need to worry.

    --
    Clickety Click ...
  38. Most Advanced? by JoeCommodore · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...most advanced technology of the 1st century B.C.

    Given that we know only as much about such ancient times by the encrusted ruins we find, how do we know that this was thier most advanced?? Ive read about the roman factories recently that gives me the impression we really don't know much more than what most og us have seen in Spartacus.

    --
    "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
    1. Re:Most Advanced? by cnerd2025 · · Score: 1

      I don't consider us to be so much more advanced than the ancient peoples. In fact, I think the Romans were about as advanced as society was about 300 years ago; in some ways, the Romans were more advanced than those who lived 300 years ago. Romans had running water, central heating, and even concrete. Remember, the Romans also invented the republic, making the "pure" Greek (direct democracy) system much more efficient while still running under the will of the people. I honestly believe that had the Germanic tribes (my ancestors) not sacked Rome nor had fundamentalist Christians not hated progress, society today would be much more advanced. Almost all aspects of modern society can be traced back to Rome, including our economics, government, and even society. This is particularly true of the US; the Roman nation was not called "Rome," but rather, "The Senate and the Roman People," much like "The United States of America." Certainly, Romans were much more brutal in their activities, but so were Europeans just 400 years ago. I think we owe a tremendous amount to the toga-wearing peoples.

    2. Re:Most Advanced? by NoMaster · · Score: 2, Funny

      All right, but apart from the sanitation, medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, the fresh water system and public health, what have the Romans ever done for us?

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    3. Re:Most Advanced? by freedom_india · · Score: 2, Insightful
      All right, but apart from the sanitation, medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, the fresh water system and public health, what have the Romans ever done for us?

      Democracy, structured standing armed forces kept separate from citizens, the concepts of Senate, Rule of law (although it favored citizens than slaves), engineering (they made bridge engineers stand under the bridges they built when soldiers were crossing to make sure it withstood them), navy, Predecessor to English, the court system, the Police (why do you think we call them cops now).

      If we lived under a Roman Republic now, am sure we would built bases on Moon and colonized Mars instead of struggling in Iraq.

      oh and osama would never have had b*lls to attack, knowing well he would hung by his....

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    4. Re:Most Advanced? by vhogemann · · Score: 1

      Hey,

      Don't forget that the Romans used SLAVES to do all the hard-work. Actually, it probably was the civilization that most relied on slavery. So while the Roman Democracy was a good thing for the Roman citizens, it was VERY bad for everybody else.

      I agree that the Greek, and then the Roman Democracy are the greatest legacy of the western cultures... But it worked only for a minority, and at the cost of the suffering and hard work of many, many people.

      --
      ---- You know how some doctors have the Messiah complex - they need to save the world? You've got the "Rubik's" complex
    5. Re:Most Advanced? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the Police (why do you think we call them cops now).

      Because they used to wear a copper badge...hence in UK\Ireland they are refered to as coppers \ cops

    6. Re:Most Advanced? by 14CharUsername · · Score: 1

      If we lived under a Roman Republic now, am sure we would built bases on Moon and colonized Mars instead of struggling in Iraq.

      Don't be too sure... the Romans had their share of failed campaigns in Parthia.

    7. Re:Most Advanced? by Andy+Somnifac · · Score: 1

      It seems that someone missed the joke.

    8. Re:Most Advanced? by orgelspieler · · Score: 1
      How different is Roman slave labor from minimum wage labor? Does our Republic really work that much better than theirs? We cannot know, because we weren't there.

      I just read an interesting bit of the Schrödinger's Cat Trilogy, and it talks about eliminating poverty by eliminating the need for menial jobs. It mentions Aristotle's argument that once the loom can run itself, we do not need slaves. Until technology becomes sufficiently advanced, we will always need people to do the shit-work. One of the few differences in our society, is the laborers get to decide which shit-work to do.

    9. Re:Most Advanced? by vhogemann · · Score: 1

      Slaves don't choose their masters, we do.

      --
      ---- You know how some doctors have the Messiah complex - they need to save the world? You've got the "Rubik's" complex
    10. Re:Most Advanced? by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

      Yes, you're right of course. But people stuck in the cycle of minimum wage jobs probably lump all the employers together. I have been blessed not to be in that group, but I'd imagine they see it as a non-choice.

    11. Re:Most Advanced? by vhogemann · · Score: 1

      Not only this, but these people CAN vote. Slaves didn't have this luck, and responsability.

      --
      ---- You know how some doctors have the Messiah complex - they need to save the world? You've got the "Rubik's" complex
    12. Re:Most Advanced? by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

      Excellent point. I wonder how different a place Greece and Rome would have been if their slaves were given even some fraction of a vote. but I digress. :)

    13. Re:Most Advanced? by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      Err... No. Roman Cops (Soldiers who doubled as Cops) had Shining Copper Shields.

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
  39. Yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is nothing compared to the constant "I love WII curse the PS3" article that keeps getting posted over and over again.

  40. Apparently... by jd · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...they were the ancestors of C programmers, as it was indeed documented but only in obscure comments embedded in the code.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  41. What in HELL... by FishinDave · · Score: 1

    ... is this story doing in Network World???

  42. Somewhat hard, but not impossible by Wolfier · · Score: 2, Funny

    1. Understand how this works
    2. Write an emulator for it
    3. Think of ways to parallelize
    4. Try it out in software
    5. If it works, build all the hardware

    Tada, here you go, a loosely-defined "cluster". :)

    1. Re:Somewhat hard, but not impossible by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Careful! The device looks like part of a Stargate to me. We don't want to end up letting Horus and the other Alien gods through!

    2. Re:Somewhat hard, but not impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Understand how this works
      2. Write an emulator for it
      3. Think of ways to parallelize
      4. Try it out in software
      5. If it works, build all the hardware

      Tada, here you go, a loosely-defined "cluster". :)
      6. ???
      7. Profit!

    3. Re:Somewhat hard, but not impossible by abradsn · · Score: 2, Funny

      You forgot...

      6. ????
      7. Profit!

  43. Re:Printable one-page version by stormpunk · · Score: 3, Informative

    I love moderators who blindly moderate informative. The site passes several hidden fields to the x.cgi script. Here is a working URL. http://www.networkworld.com/cgi-bin/mailto/x.cgi?p agetosend=/export/home/httpd/htdocs/news/2006/1127 06-antikythera-slides.html

  44. Y2K by able1234au · · Score: 0

    Did it suffer from Y2K problems? Perhaps Y(zero)K problems.

  45. already had it figured out by strength_of_10_men · · Score: 4, Funny

    BESURETODRINKYOUROVALTINE

  46. Netcraft Confirms It... by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 5, Funny

    Netcraft confirms it... Antikythera Mechanisms are dying!

    --
    Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
  47. I wonder ... by multimediavt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... had the Library of Alexandria not been sacked, would we still have the instruction booklet for this thingy?

    1. Re:I wonder ... by maubp · · Score: 1

      Did you read the article? The new X-ray based imaging revealed additional lettering which is believed to the instructions for using the device.

    2. Re:I wonder ... by multimediavt · · Score: 1

      Yes, I read the article and the Wikipedia article on the device, as well as a few others when the research began a while ago to decipher the thing. You missed the point, and the irony. If the Romans had not sacked the Library of Alexandria, the knowledge of this device may not have been lost for 2000+ years and science may have been far more advanced today and we wouldn't have to be using multimillion/billion dollar technologies to figure the thing out.

    3. Re:I wonder ... by HomelessInLaJolla · · Score: 1

      > we wouldn't have to be using multimillion/billion dollar technologies to figure the thing out

      What else were we going to do with that money? Give it to the politicians? They just give it to their friends. Better that it goes to science.

      --
      the NPG electrode was replaced with carbon blac
    4. Re:I wonder ... by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      Emperor Aurelian is claimed to be responsible for its destruction. And NOT Romans as you claim.
      Ceaser would never have destroyed the library voluntarily. He was not Attilla the Hun, or Genghis Khan.
      Secondly, the sacking is not agreed upon by anyone, as conflicting reports exist.
      Hey but then this is slashdot, where you have the God Given right to state any idea/suggestion with absolute certainity as Fact.

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    5. Re:I wonder ... by multimediavt · · Score: 1

      I never claimed to be stating fact about who sacked Bibliotheca Alexandrina or when, I was actually trying to be humorous (to a degree) with my first post. I was more commenting on the destructive nature of man and its historical influence on human development. I was not stating any other "fact" than that. BTW, you realize you contradicted yourself with the the first and third lines of your post proving that there are no "facts" to support your or my "claim" of who sacked the BA. I may have been spouting common knowledge (which is not fact before you try to jump on that) with regard to the Romans, but I didn't stick my foot in my mouth doing it.

  48. New word by Poromenos1 · · Score: 1

    Really, we need a new word, for news which isn't functional information, but just amusing/entertaining.

    Amews?

    --
    Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
  49. What did they find? by Shadyman · · Score: 0

    They found 1+1=2? Scary enough, the proof for 1+1=2 is a two-page proof.

    1. Re:What did they find? by meringuoid · · Score: 0
      Scary enough, the proof for 1+1=2 is a two-page proof.

      And so it should surely be! What better way to write out a mathematical proof dealing with the nature of twoness and its relation to a one and another one, than by doing it one one piece of paper, and another piece of paper, together forming two pieces of paper?

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:What did they find? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looking at your post history ... you're not funny, please stop posting, thanks.

  50. The actual decoded message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Be among the first to play Dvke Nvkem Forever, schedvled for release on the Antikythera Mechanism in 78 BC! Pre-order today!

  51. And Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    have already started a patents-infringment case

  52. So Does This Mean...? by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1, Funny

    So does this mean that two millennia from now that humans, or the robots that take over from them, will spend a century figuring out CALC.EXE?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  53. What if this contains current patents? by houghi · · Score: 1

    Would that not be a clear point of previous art?

    Also I thought that reverese engineering was heavily frowned upon.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  54. Serious genious by Dersaidin · · Score: 1
    With all our computers, technology, knowledge, understanding, etc, its taken us this long to figure out exactly how it works.

    It must have taken some impressive genius (Or geniuses) to build it in 1st century BC.

    1. Re:Serious genious by vidarh · · Score: 1

      More like it took some serious corrosion etc. to turn it all essentially into a block that would crumble if they started to pick it apart.

  55. Maya numerical astronomy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its amazing how ancient civilizations, had the creativity to develop custom numerical systems, that aproximated complex natural systems, with an accuracy that was surpassed only in the last centuries by our occidental culture

    For example the predictive maya table of Solar and Lunar Eclipses (http://tzolkinhaab.googlepages.com/Tabla_Eclipses _Mayas.pdf) that its totally integrated with his numerical astronomical time system...

    Even more wonderfull, its the simplicity how were defined the time units from the visible planets trought (in equivalent modern concepts) sampling from a (clock signal) basic serie derived of the combination of two counting numeric systems (base 13 and base 20)

    1. Re:Maya numerical astronomy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the pdf, it looks like the theory i first saw in a book called "Los libros del tiempo" (buyed in the Monte Albán, Oaxaca bookstore) wich proposes that the mesoamerican calendar was based in numerical relations, derived from the observation of the visible planets and through the analisis of their astronomic periods

      The mayas to designate a day used 20 names, counted with a numeric system base 13 (from 1 to 13), grouped in 5 days "weeks", and 20 days "months", to form 260 unique combinations like designations for days (number:name) in a repetitive calendar we call "tzolkin" divided in 65 days "seasons" (of course i am making a simil, werent called like that) Examples of the names are: Imix, Ik, Akbal, Kan, Chicchan, Cimi, Manik, Lamat, Muluc, Oc, Chuen, Eb, Ben, Ix, Men, Cib, Caban, Etznab, Cauac, Ahau. An example of a tzolkin date could be "1 Imix"

      The list of names had intercalated orientation (orient, nort, ponient, sout) so every "week" (5 days) started and ended with the same orientation... and every of the 260 designations of days informs elapsed days and orientation. They also divided the calendar in periods of 52 days (unique combinations of 13 numbers with 4 orientations)

      This system its then based on the relation of two sets: the base 13 numbers and the 20 names. The consecutive asociation was done trought simple counting, making pairs... there were not needed any operations with positional notation.

      All this counts (asociations) are cyclic... repetitive, but not identical because every repetition starts at a diferent point in the cycle. I think of them, like time units (for example [day:orientation] to name a "week") The name of the repetition its given by is starting day (for example "week" 1-nort) The relation of two sets with a difference in cardinality of 1 its very common in the maya "time units" (for example 5 days:4 orientations) and its called "movement efect" because the maya didnt have a word for "time", to talk about the elapsing of time they used words related to movement

      The maya also used a calendar of 365 days we call haab (divided in 73 "weeks" of 5 days or 18 "months" of 20 days plus 1 week... of bad luck) The haab is an alternate form of the tzolkin that relates (trought consecutive asociation) the number of day (from 0 to 19) and name of the month. Examples of the names of the month are: Pop, Uo, Zip, Zotz, Tzec, Xul, Yaxkin, Mol, Chen, Yax, Zac, Ceb, Mac, Kankin, Muan... An example of a haab date could be "4 Ahau - 18 Pop". Therefore, the day 0 Pop was the maya new year, and the haab date (for example "1 Imix - 0 Pop") designed the name of the year. The tzolkin-haab dates gave the mayas 94,900 unique combinations (of 260 tzolkin dates with 365 days of haab months) to name his days.

      Here comes the really interesting part... To measure longer periods of time, the maya keeped lists of dates "sampled" from the tzolkin-haab succession of days at some fixed interval. Doing a mathematical analysis of the numeric properties of this calendaric system, was found that some astronomical intervals produced lists of "sampled" dates sorted (as a whole or in part) in ascending, descending order or with a fixed marker. The astronomical intervals where aproximated because the mayas used only whole numbers.

      For example here are some lists of "sampled" dates at fixed intervals (using for simplicity 1Imix-0Pop as origin, not the historical 4Ahau-8Cumhu)
      365 days : 1Imix-0Pop, 2Cimi-0Pop, 3Chuen-0Pop, 4Cib-0Pop, 5Imix-0Pop, 6Cimi-0Pop, 7Chuen-0Pop, 8Cib-0Pop...
      Here, obviously se fixed marker its the "0 Pop" or new year day
      584 days : 13Chicchan, 12Muluc, 11Ben, 10Caban, 9Imix, 8Chicchan, 7Muluc, 6Ben, 5Caban, 4Imix, 3Chichan...
      Aproximated Venus sinodic revolution
      116 days : 13Caban, 12Ben, 11Muluc, 10Chicchan, 9Imix, 8Caban, 7Ben, 6Muluc, 5Chicchan, 4Imix, 3Caban...

    2. Re:Maya numerical astronomy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi! i too have that book (the 2d edition, buyed in Chiapas 3 years hago) "The books of time - Astronomic relations of the mesoamerican calendars". After seeing your post i did a more detailed recount of the points you mentioned

      The Tzolkin its ciclic, after the last combination (260 = 13:Ahau) the count continues with the first one (1 = 1:Imix) In the Aztek calendar this ciclic nature is related to the circular movement, on it the circle of the days divide the 360 in 20 arcs of 18 giving potitional meaning to the names (its not the observer who rotates, but what its observed like consecutive names for a fixed point (or points) of view of a perimetral part of a
      rotational movement).

      The Tzolking was divided in 13 "uinal"s or groups of 20 days (one group by every repetition of the names of the days) Every uinal whas divided in 4 "qintana"s or groups of 5 days. Every day of the qintana was dedicated to one of the 4 cardinal points (orient, nort, ponient, sout) to honor the "Bacab"s (Canzienal, Zaczini, Hozanek, Hobnil). This way, every of the 20 names of the days also designated one cardinal point and one number of day in the qintana (for example Lamat/rabbit = 3rt day of the qintana, 8th name of the uinal, its dedicated to the sout) This part i am not quite sure to understand the qintana was named by her 5th day?

      The Tzolkin was also divided in 4 "pitaos" of 65 days each one, and every 65 days were divided in 5 "cocij" of 13 days; the periods of both where named by his first date (for the pitaos 1:Imix, 1:Cimi, 1:Chuen, 1:Ahau in other words orient, nort, ponient, sout all in the 1st day of the qintana)

      The Tzolkin was also divided in 5 groups of 52 days each one named by his first date (1:Imix, 1:Ben, 1:Chicchan, 1:Ollin, 1:Muluc in other words 1st, 2th, 3th, 4ht, 5th days of the qintana all to the orient), and every group of 52 days were divided in 4 groups of 13 days, each one dedicated to one of the 4 cardinal points. In some Zapotec calendar (from Lachixila) betwen each of the 4 groups of 13 days were anotated 3 "flags" (Yoolleo, Yooyebaa, Yoolleo -again-, Yoocabila -in the same position that the markers that are in the aztek calendar-) In this Zapotec calendars also were another 4 "flags" that group 52 days (like alternate start/end points of the 52 cicle) anotated in the 6th day of each consecutive group of 13 days (Birogtiyoleoceagcayebaa, Bererogtiyooyebacedaleo, Birogtiyooleoceacabila, Berojtiyoocabilacedaleo)

      If one writes down series of days (from the tzolking) every fixed number of days "ciclicly", would form a list of dates that would not be composed by the consecutive asociation of the elements of two ordered sets (like the tzolking) but by "sampling" from a generator list (the table of the 260 dates composed by asociation that form the Tzolkin)

      One would quickly notice that when used for "ciclic sampling" some periods of days would generate a list with the prefix number or the name of the day ordered in ascending or descending order. (more on this after talking of the Haab)

      The Haab its not another unrelated calendar, but a numerated (from 0 to 19) day of uinal, postfixed with a name (uinal names: Pop, Uo, Zip, Zotz, Tzec, Xul, Yaxkin, Mol, Chen, Yax, Zac, Ceh, Mac, Kankin, Muan, Pax, Kayab, Cumhu; plus 1 named qintana: Uayeb). 1 Haab = 365 days = 73 qintana (of 5 days) = 1 qintana + 18 uinal (of 20 days) Remember qintana and uinal were Tzolkin "units" in other words the days of the Haab were "computated" by the Tzolking

      An asociation of the Tzolking date with the Haab date could be called Tzolkin-Haab (for example 4 Ahau:18 Pop) this its done by composing the elements trought the consecutive asociation of the ordered elements of the two sets. This count will repeat itsef after 52 years (18,980 days or variations of the combination of the 260 Tzolking dates with the 365 Haab dates, that form all the 949 unique names of 20 days (uinal) in other words its a "weel of uinal")

      When something worth to remember happens, one could write down

  56. Re:Just goes to show... Where? by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    On the dark side of the Moon, or the marked side of the dune?

    And all these years I thought is was a "windy day in Arizona"....

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  57. 1st century B.C. ??? by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

    OK, so I'm in pedantic mode here but shouldn't it be "last century B.C." instead of "1st century B.C."?

    After all, "1st century B.C." is the century the world started. Tricky to get that half right to say the least. And if we take the starting of the universe into consideration it sort of gets hopeles.

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
    1. Re:1st century B.C. ??? by jthayden · · Score: 1
      OK, so I'm in pedantic mode here but shouldn't it be "last century B.C." instead of "1st century B.C."?

      After all, "1st century B.C." is the century the world started. Tricky to get that half right to say the least. And if we take the starting of the universe into consideration it sort of gets hopeles.


      What's the first negative number? I'd say negative one is the first not the last. Same here, you start counting from zero. Granted they didn't use zero but still.

    2. Re:1st century B.C. ??? by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

      What's the first negative number? I'd say negative one is the first not the last.
      Just speak it out loud: "First century before Christ" and "Last century before Christ"
      How about: 1 century before Christ

      --

      I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  58. That's nothing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's going to take a lot longer than that for people to figure out some of the code I've written.

  59. Warranty void if seal is removed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Warranty void if seal is removed

  60. This is what happens when... by mbst · · Score: 1

    ...you don't ITFM (include the f.. manual).

    1. Re:This is what happens when... by vidarh · · Score: 1

      Obviously you didn't RTFA, or you would have seen that they did ITFM engraved on the device itself.

  61. RTFM! by Number6.2 · · Score: 1

    Oh, wait a minute...

    --
    "If god did not exist, it would be necessary to invent him" --Voltaire
  62. "Brian's life" has been remastered.. by cheros · · Score: 1

    Worth getting on DVD IMHO, it still makes me laugh :-)

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  63. Here come the DMCA lawyers... by gwayne · · Score: 1

    ...researchers are only now figuring out how it works...

    I hope it wasn't an ancient encryption device. There's nothing like being convicted of a felony for figuring out how something works...

  64. Nothing was faked! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't see any astronauts, but I have been through the footage frame by frame and while it definately appears to be a splice of several recordings, Micheal Jackson is actually doing the moonwalk.

  65. Well this is all good, but... by CannedTurkey · · Score: 1

    When can I get my working replica? I'm thinking a nice cherry wood case, with some polished nickel gears would look bad-ass on my desk.

    --
    Ingredients: Turkey, Mechanically Separated Turkey, Water, Salt, Flavour.
    1. Re:Well this is all good, but... by laing · · Score: 1

      See here.

  66. So there's a manual? how 'bout some details! by grant420 · · Score: 0

    So if you read TFA all you get to find out new is that, using a neat x-ray imaging technique, researchers found a how-to/what-for manual etched onto one of the bronze plates but won't tell the public what's in it.
     
    Lame, /.

    wasting my time and getting me all excited like that.

  67. The Real Important Question Is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Did anyone bother to patent this thing yet?

  68. Antithykera Jokes summary... by maroberts · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these!
    Netcraft says Antithykera Mechanisms are dying.....
    Does it have any Y0K rollover problems?
    Is the OS written by Linus?
    Does it run Windows?
    Did the Romans and Greeks do any Case Mods for this?
    Was sinking the boat the first Denial of Service attack?
    Users fail to upgrade to Antithykera 2.0 from Abacus 1.0!
    Antithykera Positioning System receiver fails to replace Astrolabe due to lack of satellite coverage...
    Some (but not all) of these are elsewhere

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  69. By Jove! by argent · · Score: 1

    Pluto is a Roman god, therefore all the controversy about whether it's a planet or not is their fault.

  70. stargate by trupoet · · Score: 0

    It uses seven symbols and activates a wormhole to another planet across the galaxy.

    Weird!