I'm not sure that someone cheating gives the tournament organizer a legal right to damage property [yes, it's just a cable, but they could have sued if they wanted to make more trouble] - don't they know how to ban?
The federal government has no incentive to make it illegal for them to coerce states into passing new laws.
Which is why the framers had the thoughtful foresight to make it illegal to begin with, since they knew they couldn't trust a later government to pass such a law.
How the hell do you think a gameshark works? that hex string you type in is A: the address where the "codes" you want to change are found and B: the new "codes" to change it to.
Even if there are multiple choices a distribution can choose from, the idea of a "login app" is, in the present day, considered part of the "OS" for consumer-level OSes.
That's not a very credible way to say that the second translation is better than the first, since neither mention the UN. Anyway, I was disputing the claim that the first translation wasn't "understandable"
Sure, now - but what happens next when some thoughtful lawmaker realizes that this _CLEARLY_ wasn't intended [after all, we don't allow this for tobacco, alcohol, pornography, etc] and to "close the loophole" by making it illegal for parents to buy adult-rated games [CDs, etc] for their kids?
who DOES decide? The ESRB certainly won't be allowed to decide - that would take away the state's "right" to take away someone's license for selling a game which is adult content despite being rated E and "they should have known better"
And the point of the post you're responding to is that the things on the list that Dilbert _actually_ fails to address aren't relevant to the "cubicle class.", and those which are, are in fact addressed in Dilbert.
While I can not debate the OSHA regulations exemption, I can debate the "first class" part. Nothing is preventing me from sending a letter via FedEx to someone (as I have done in the past)
Except for the Private Express Statutes, that is. They can deliver letters in _different_ (faster) time frames than first class, or packages in the same time frame, but not letters in the same time frame.
Slashdot Mirror
!= on pointers checks the memory location.
java has some sort of function to check the memory location too.
Mario games, for example, heavily use both buttons at the same time, though. [making B a toggle might work though in that case]
why not tax the drugs? if you're saying deny them all access to public health, then exempt them from all such taxes.
[with wireless controllers] I can sit anywhere in the damn room i please without distance issues.
+5 funny!!!
I'm not sure that someone cheating gives the tournament organizer a legal right to damage property [yes, it's just a cable, but they could have sued if they wanted to make more trouble] - don't they know how to ban?
But apple's right to dump its old merchandise before releasing the new model is being infringed
</sarcasm>
The federal government has no incentive to make it illegal for them to coerce states into passing new laws.
Which is why the framers had the thoughtful foresight to make it illegal to begin with, since they knew they couldn't trust a later government to pass such a law.
How the hell do you think a gameshark works? that hex string you type in is A: the address where the "codes" you want to change are found and B: the new "codes" to change it to.
Even if there are multiple choices a distribution can choose from, the idea of a "login app" is, in the present day, considered part of the "OS" for consumer-level OSes.
Year of Linux on the Desktop, indeed.
I'd believe it - not many other ways to explain the CS department's current policy that 'find' on directories not owned by you is explicitly forbidden
That's not a very credible way to say that the second translation is better than the first, since neither mention the UN. Anyway, I was disputing the claim that the first translation wasn't "understandable"
y and z are equally far apart on normal keyboard layouts as on german ones
What does the second version add that can't be understood in the first?
Sure, now - but what happens next when some thoughtful lawmaker realizes that this _CLEARLY_ wasn't intended [after all, we don't allow this for tobacco, alcohol, pornography, etc] and to "close the loophole" by making it illegal for parents to buy adult-rated games [CDs, etc] for their kids?
who DOES decide? The ESRB certainly won't be allowed to decide - that would take away the state's "right" to take away someone's license for selling a game which is adult content despite being rated E and "they should have known better"
yeah - they've really started to suck since then - it's kind of sad
to "scrap A for B" is to get rid of A in favor of using B instead.
And the point of the post you're responding to is that the things on the list that Dilbert _actually_ fails to address aren't relevant to the "cubicle class.", and those which are, are in fact addressed in Dilbert.
You're absolutely right - Emacs isn't a kernel ...yet
For your analogy to work, there has to be a law [even if somehow unenforceable] against driving 120mph on private property.
Cite?
So leave it to someone you hate
That should be char *punchline[]. using [][] causes a 96x4 character array to be instantiated.
Sure, blame paranoia on its object.
While I can not debate the OSHA regulations exemption, I can debate the "first class" part. Nothing is preventing me from sending a letter via FedEx to someone (as I have done in the past)
Except for the Private Express Statutes, that is. They can deliver letters in _different_ (faster) time frames than first class, or packages in the same time frame, but not letters in the same time frame.
There's no outline to delineate where one starts and the other begins. They look like one damn button with a crack in it.
The "crack" would be the 'outline to delineate' that.