The main reason Google's stock went down was because their earnings report was disappointing. The Wall Street Journal sent out an alert to its subscribers and has an article specifically on that story.
It becomes a matter of rights when you force people to do things such as "be respectful" as according to:your: definition of respect. What happens when:you're: the one on a plane, you're bored, and your best friend calls you? Besides, cabin noise drowns out most talking I think. Nevertheless my two latter points are nowhere near as important as my first, the one regarding your rights.
Okay, then let's also ban ugly girls from getting on the plane, because that irritates me far more than cell-phone chatter. How about just a general no-talking allowed rule? Don't you value your rights?
As a college student, I am on TheFaceBook.com I'd guess that this audience is full of would-be adopters of video blogging, but video blogging isn't going to happen. People have enough of a hard time mustering up the courage to put up a static photo of their own self that I doubt they'll regularly post videos online.
TummyX--I'm not sure if calling somebody "totally fucking retarded" is exactly conducive to anything productive. I'd suggest perhaps taking the dick out of your ass and growing up, you fucking loser.
...So they are sueing them because they "must" of done something that is totally legal, or:should: be totally legal? Judges should be allowed to fine people for being stupid. Are they? IANAL.
I can't believe people are actually complaining about the space shuttle polluting. If it spewed nerve-gas laced radioactive material, I still wouldn't care, though I suppose they would have to launch farther away from civilization. That's like saying we shouldn't X-ray a broken leg to see how to fix it because it might raise the risk of cancer by.0045% So many people, like that one person who asks questions in class just to hear his/her head rattle/use big words/get brownie points, are better off dead because they totally muck up the machinery and piss me off.
If Microsoft's products weren't utterly horrible, his prediction might be correct, because, why carry a phone AND an ipod when the phone serves the ipod's purpose? Yes, his prediction is correct if you believe, as he does, windows doesn't suck, which it does.
Actually the speed has nothing to do with how clearly it can take pictures...speed is relative--it's already going thousands of miles per hour depending on which frame of reference you use.
How is detecting emissions with a laptop in a bag detecting interference with the plane? I see no data presented in this article; I call shinanigans.
The main reason Google's stock went down was because their earnings report was disappointing. The Wall Street Journal sent out an alert to its subscribers and has an article specifically on that story.
Because the motivations of the congressional editors are selfish, not altruistically pursuing truth.
you're a fucking idiot asshole. I hope you know that.
It becomes a matter of rights when you force people to do things such as "be respectful" as according to :your: definition of respect. What happens when :you're: the one on a plane, you're bored, and your best friend calls you? Besides, cabin noise drowns out most talking I think. Nevertheless my two latter points are nowhere near as important as my first, the one regarding your rights.
Okay, then let's also ban ugly girls from getting on the plane, because that irritates me far more than cell-phone chatter. How about just a general no-talking allowed rule? Don't you value your rights?
If you hate cell phones so much, why do you use one? Couldn't you just turn the phone off before you went to the bathroom?
Why don't you just fly privately? Gosh.
On my Gulfstream 550 they let me use the cell phone.
How about Jules Vern?
Would be to terminate all non-responding programs when the user got mad...unless of course the emotion-detection software wasn't responding...
As a college student, I am on TheFaceBook.com I'd guess that this audience is full of would-be adopters of video blogging, but video blogging isn't going to happen. People have enough of a hard time mustering up the courage to put up a static photo of their own self that I doubt they'll regularly post videos online.
I have a mini fridge, so I drilled holes and leave the power supply in there. Works PERFECTLY!
... ./ did it to me.
hahahaha.... think hard now...when was the last time you got laid? thiiiiink.
TummyX--I'm not sure if calling somebody "totally fucking retarded" is exactly conducive to anything productive. I'd suggest perhaps taking the dick out of your ass and growing up, you fucking loser.
...So they are sueing them because they "must" of done something that is totally legal, or :should: be totally legal? Judges should be allowed to fine people for being stupid. Are they? IANAL.
No, they were 100 miles off the coast of SOMALIA. Hahaha, I misread it like you did the first time as well.
I can't believe people are actually complaining about the space shuttle polluting. If it spewed nerve-gas laced radioactive material, I still wouldn't care, though I suppose they would have to launch farther away from civilization. That's like saying we shouldn't X-ray a broken leg to see how to fix it because it might raise the risk of cancer by .0045% So many people, like that one person who asks questions in class just to hear his/her head rattle/use big words/get brownie points, are better off dead because they totally muck up the machinery and piss me off.
If Microsoft's products weren't utterly horrible, his prediction might be correct, because, why carry a phone AND an ipod when the phone serves the ipod's purpose? Yes, his prediction is correct if you believe, as he does, windows doesn't suck, which it does.
I hope you are being sarcastic. Those protesting the war are :correct:
Americans seem to be good at having strong opinions about things they know nothing about...for example, the war on Iraq.
I hope the RIAA goes down in flames; what assholes.
I want to know: has the "somebody else was on my network" defense been used by somebody sued by the RIAA? If so, did it work?
Actually the speed has nothing to do with how clearly it can take pictures...speed is relative--it's already going thousands of miles per hour depending on which frame of reference you use.