Slashdot Mirror


Pirates Thwarted by Sonic Weapon

Kristian Hermansen was one of dozens to submit a story about would be pirates attempting to take control of a cruise ship of the coast of Africa, only to be twarted by some sort of sonic weapon known as an LRAD, or Long Range Acoustic Device.

599 comments

  1. Brown noise? by DerKwisatzHaderach · · Score: 0, Funny

    heh heh

    1. Re:Brown noise? by Loconut1389 · · Score: 5, Funny

      me? I think the parent post is hillarious. Military and cruise ships using 150 decibel brown noise weapons? Now that's an idea!

      Reminds me of an old joke... Now this isn't the exact version, but its as close as I can remember...

      Whenver the captain of an old spanish galleon was heading into battle, he always asked his assistant to fetch him his red pants so that if he were to be injured and bleed, his crewmen would not see the blood and lose hope. One day, they were heading into battle against a massively powerful enemy. The captain saw the assistant already going to fetch the red pants and shouted, "Stop! This time, get me my brown pants!"

    2. Re:Brown noise? by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      sonic weapon known as an LRAD, or Long Range Acoustic Device.

      The article got it wrong. It was a cruise ship, filled with old farts. That was no LRAD, it was fucking '70s DISCO!

    3. Re:Brown noise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey Johnny? You know that song that's #1!? Hung Up by Madonna? Yeah, the song with the ABBA MELODY?

    4. Re:Brown noise? by turgid · · Score: 1

      '70s DISCO!

      ...Played on bagpipes by the Queen's Royal Highland Fusiliers...

    5. Re:Brown noise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great old joke! If you want the origional version read on (personally I like the Pyrates "The Ballad of Old Redcoat" which is the joke set to music, then again, I drink so...)

      ong ago, when sailing ships ruled the waves, a captain and his crew were in danger of being boarded by a pirate ship. As the crew became frantic, the captain bellowed to his First Mate, "Bring me my red shirt!" The First Mate quickly retrieved the captain's red shirt, which the captain put on and led the crew to battle the pirate boarding party.
      Although some casualties occurred among the crew, the pirates were repelled. Later that day, the lookout screamed that there were two pirate vessels sending boarding parties. The crew cowered in fear, but the captain, calm as ever, bellowed, "Bring me my red shirt!"

      Once again the battle was on. However, the Captain and his crew repelled both boarding parties, though this time more casualties occurred.
      Weary from the battles, the men sat around on deck that night recounting the day's occurrences when an ensign looked to the Captain and asked, "Sir, why did you call for your red shirt before the battle?"
      The Captain, giving the ensign a look that only a captain can give, exhorted, "If I am wounded in battle, the red shirt does not show the wound and thus, you men will continue to fight unafraid."
      The men sat in silence marveling at the courage of such a man. As dawn came the next morning, the lookout screamed that there were pirate ships, 10 of them, all with boarding parties on their way.

      The men became silent and looked to the Captain, their leader, for his usual command. The Captain, calm as ever, bellowed, "Bring me my brown pants!"

    6. Re:Brown noise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's an addition to this joke, but I can't remember how it goes but for the punchline: "Get out my yellow windbreaker!"

  2. obligitory Simpsons by Njoyda+Sauce · · Score: 0

    OW! My freaking ears....

    --

    You can only be young once, but you can be immature forever.
    1. Re:obligitory Simpsons by romango · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't a pair of earplugs make this a useless approach?

    2. Re:obligitory Simpsons by ethanms · · Score: 1

      ...it would also make it fairly difficult to run your ship if no one could hear while being bombarded... 150dB is quite loud, so chances are that the ear protection would be very bulky.

      the solution to this of course is to counter-act that sound using a highly directional microphone, some off the shelf PC/DSP equipment, and a big ass amp & speaker

      It's not 100% effective, and there are clearly ways to couteract, but at least it will be keeping the Somali's off the cruise ships backs for a while.

    3. Re:obligitory Simpsons by Flaming+Babies · · Score: 0

      http://www.helmetfx.com/communications.htm

      No idea if this stuff is good enough,
      but I'm guessing equipment like this which is used trackside
      during a NASCAR race would be good enough for short periods of time.

      --
      The right to be heard does not automatically include the right to be taken seriously.
    4. Re:obligitory Simpsons by objekt · · Score: 1

      Yarrr, thee sonic disruptor has thwarted me plans. Yarrr.

      --
      -- Boycott Shell
  3. And if it wasnt for.. by mdobossy · · Score: 5, Funny

    And if it wasn't for you pesky kids and your LRAD, I would have gotten away with it too!

    1. Re:And if it wasnt for.. by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're all units in my game of Civilization IV. Those "pirates" were the barbarian Galleon unit trying to take on my uber destroyer unit. I used my Future Tech to take it out.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    2. Re:And if it wasnt for.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Thank goodness they had one of these devices lying around!
      Do all cruise ships have one or two of these acoustic devices, now?
      In case of mutiny or pirates or rioting?

      And how soon before there is a prosumer version that I can install in my car, to swap out the horn?

    3. Re:And if it wasnt for.. by gforce811 · · Score: 1

      if you were quoting scooby doo, the term is 'meddling' kids... not to be anal or anything. :-p

    4. Re:And if it wasnt for.. by broggyr · · Score: 1

      They occasionally said 'pesky', too

      --
      Irony? Yea, it's like goldy and bronzy, only it's made of iron!
    5. Re:And if it wasnt for.. by gforce811 · · Score: 1

      oh, i meant no offense. at least i learned something today.

    6. Re:And if it wasnt for.. by coronaride · · Score: 1

      Honestly, mutiny on a cruise ship? I can just see it now...

      "We've had enough of this torture! If I have one more crepe forced down my throat, I'm going to kill someone!"

      "Oh my god, yes! That bastard captain has to have his fancy formal dinner every night! I won't eat that Baked Alaska, I just won't!"

      "Too true! Too true! It's time to mutiny! We start by taking out the cruise directory. I'm so tired of his prancing about, trying to get everyone to join those tortuous and cheesy game shows!"

      "It's settled then! It's time to mutiny...[cough] Right after I finish this eclair and nap for a few hours on the Lanai Deck."

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, go into business for themselves.
    7. Re:And if it wasnt for.. by SamBeckett · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Please, teach me to play this game. I spend hours upon hours hitting End Turn, hoping that one day I will be able to build space ship. BUT NOOoo 2050 always comes too soon. PLEASE TEACH ME!

      Yes. I am serious.

    8. Re:And if it wasnt for.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes...we win...stupid pirates.

    9. Re:And if it wasnt for.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you manage your tech tree properly, and you have a decent number of cities constructed by the late 1800s, getting a space race victory should be very doable. Try playing on a lower difficulty or something, I got a space race victory in my second or third game of Civ4.

    10. Re:And if it wasnt for.. by identity0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dear Player,

      We, the residents of your game of Civilization IV, would like to air some grievances with you.

      Yes, you have been managing our tribe, "Americans", very well, and we have you to thank for our endless bounty of TV reality shows. However, there are still some problems that we humbly ask you to address.

      First, while the government type "Theocratic Mock Democracy" has raised our citizen's morale, we think it is high time that we switch to a more advanced one, such as "Secular Humanist Republic" or "Constitutional Democracy". Many of us are afraid that we are regressing to the government type of "Monarchy", and possibly even "Despotism". Please note that we have the Statue of Liberty Wonder, we will not incur the usual series of rioting and violence when we switch governments, and your citizens will be happier for several turns if we choose a real Republic or Democracy!

      Secondly, we are told by experienced players that reasearching the discovery of Intelligent Design is a bad idea, as it leads to a dead end in the tech tree. It only gives the Wonder of the Dunce Cap of Kansas (-5 research in the city it is built), and the unit "Preacher-teacher", which gives +1 happiness and -1 research in every city it establishes a school in. We recomment instead reasearching Darwainism(2 free tech. advances), with the goal of Genetic Engineering, which makes available the Wonder of Cure For Cancer(1 happy citizen in every city). It is much more useful in the long run, and the other tribes won't be laughing at us as we destroy our future research abilities.

      Third, please note that even in a Theocratic Mock Democracy such as the one we live in currently, keeping troops stationed more than 5 squares away from our cities can lead to morale problems, and requires 2 shields of upkeep per unit. You have kept many of our units in the cities of the Babylonians to keep down the unrest and maximize the trade points from their Oil resource squares, and it is costing our own cities very much. Isn't it about time to move those units back to their home cities?

      Fourth, our city of New Orleans has recently gone from population 8 to population 1, because of a combination of natural disaster and mismanagement. We do not seek to point blame at anyone, but please, for the love of Sid Meier, have the Engineer units fix the Levee city improvements and check the flood preparatioin of other cities on rivers and coasts. As well, if you had not used the Engineers to drain the Marsh squares near the city to increase trade points, we might have been better off. Also, some belive if you had not been so stingy with your upkeep for the Levee city improvements(2 coins per turn), this whole mess might have been prevented.

      We thank you, dear player, for listening to our grievances and we kindly beseech thee, benevolent mouse-mover, to look upon us with kindness as we go about, living our lives turn by turn.

        Signed, The Civs

      P.S. We have heard the cities of the French, under Emperor Jacques Chirac, is undergoing Revolt because their citizens happiness was mis-managed. Don't let this happen to you!

      P.P.S. Now would be a good time to use our military to take over the French, or at least their capital of Paris. It has the Eiffel Tower Wonder(improves diplomacy with other nations), as well as many city improvements.

      P.P.P.S. When are we going to get our own game, "The Civs"? It would be just like the Sims, but with more bloodthirsty combat! It would be great! Let's show those wussies at Maxis what a REAL party (orgy & gladiators at the colosseum) and city disaster (riot + stealth bombers + alpine troops + barbarian horde + spies) are!

    11. Re:And if it wasnt for.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    12. Re:And if it wasnt for.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Christ, you're pathetic!

    13. Re:And if it wasnt for.. by Muchsake · · Score: 1

      You cant take over the French - Thats the job for us brits with the Special relationship wonder (U.S. Poodle in 10 downing St)

  4. Wikipedia reference by tgtanman · · Score: 1, Informative
    1. Re:Wikipedia reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    2. Re:Wikipedia reference by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 5, Funny

      The article seems to omit the fact that this is possible and effective against the pirates, because they play COUNTRY 'MUSIC' through this thing.

      --
      "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
    3. Re:Wikipedia reference by gambit3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      well, I'm guessing that, depending on where you are in the world, Rap music might be substituted.

    4. Re:Wikipedia reference by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1, Insightful

      well, I'm guessing that, depending on where you are in the world, Rap music might be substituted.

      I hate to burst your bubble, but the vehicle mounted version of these weapons are already in heavy use by Gangstas across the US! Just visit Chicago sometime and I guarantee you'll end up in a drive-by LRAD at least once!

      The most shocking part is that these dangerous weapons are reaching the hands of our kids! Think of the children! Won't someone, please think of the children?!

    5. Re:Wikipedia reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      In case wikipedia goes down, here's the article:

      Slashdot trolling phenomena make up a large subset of the bizarre and complex subculture found on the popular technology website Slashdot. They are a mixture of juvenilia, sarcasm, deliberately bad jokes, tasteless nonsense and highly developed and artistic attempts to provoke outraged responses from other forum users, or amuse them. Slashdot trolling is a subset and a microcosm of Internet trolling in general. Some of these behaviours are usually considered to be more offensive or insightful than others. On Slashdot, many of these phenomena have become the object of parody.

      Slashdot trolls can generally be divided into four categories: disruptive, offensive, deceptive, and idiosyncratic. Disruptive trolls are those which intend to disrupt the normal flow of things on Slashdot, either by decreasing the signal-to-noise ratio or by causing the pages to render incorrectly. Offensive trolls exist for the sole purpose of offending as many people as possible. The purpose of deceptive trolls is to trick people into either following a link or reading a comment which seems legitimate but is actually a troll. Idiosyncratic trolls are those which are specific to Slashdot and have elements of Slashdot culture and history in them creating, in effect, an inside joke.

      Some of the Slashdot trolling phenomena originated on Segfault, whose shutdown of commenting forced trolls to a new host.
      Disruptive trolls

      The purpose of disruptive trolls is to cause the pages of Slashdot to display in an undesirable way or to otherwise bring attention to themselves. The two major categories of disruptive trolls are crapflooding and page-widening.
      [edit]

      Crapflooding

      Crapflooding is the posting of many nonsensical or gratuitously offensive messages in order to disrupt the normal functioning of Slashdot and annoy its users and editors.

      Later versions of the software behind the Slashdot website had an updated lameness filter to prevent posting of the same message more than once. However, crapflooders began avoiding this restriction by varying the content of the message after each post. Crapfloods can be performed manually with a dedicated user repeatedly clicking through the posting options each time, or automated by a piece of software. Automated crapfloods are -- not surprisingly -- larger, more effective and more frequent. The subject of crapflooded messages varies. Some examples include:

              * Offtopic stories
              * Pornographic/Homoerotic sex scenes with the names replaced with those of the slashdot editors or open source celebrities.
              * Incoherent nonsense that contains the correct letter frequencies so the lameness filter recognises it as vaguely English.
              * Offensive Base64 encoded images or text.

      Warning, potentially offensive external links:

              * An example of crapflooding
              * Another crapflood example

      [edit]

      Page widening/lengthening

      The original page widening posts were simple messages consisting of one long stream of characters with no spaces. This caused browsers to render a very wide page with horizontal scroll bars, making it nearly impossible to read the comments page. Slashdot began inserting spaces into any long run of characters to prevent this and so began the evolutionary battle between Slashcode and the page widening trolls. Newer and more inventive ways of causing page widening were discovered, with the use of blockquote tags and the "." character to cause extreme widening on Internet Explorer. These methods were also eventually closed off by the Slashdot editors. Improvements in browser software have also closed many of the loopholes used to widen pages.

      Examples of pagewidening include:

              * a slashdot page widened
              * a rare example of a pagewidening book review (September 2003)
              * a pagewidening post using blockquote tags

    6. Re:Wikipedia reference by HD+Webdev · · Score: 0, Redundant

      From the Karma Whore link:

      Karma whores are individuals, or messages themselves, that attempt to receive feedback in the form of karma points. Often these will be needless information (such as a link to a Wikipedia article relevant to the subject being discussed),

      I thought that I had seen everything until I read Wikipedia mentioning that it's relevant articles are needless information.

      --
      This is not a dream, not a dream...we are transmitting from the year 1-9-9-9.
    7. Re:Wikipedia reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still think being able to project a belly-dancer where the pirates are would be more affective.

    8. Re:Wikipedia reference by perdu · · Score: 2, Funny
      --
      You only use 2% of your DNA
    9. Re:Wikipedia reference by cayenne8 · · Score: 0, Troll
      "...depending on where you are in the world, Rap music might be substituted."

      Eek....remember, the terms rap and music are mutually exclusive terms, and should not be uttered in the same sentence.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    10. Re:Wikipedia reference by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Bzzt! Wrong!

      The baseline frequency in country music is way to low.
      The pirates don't know what is pick-up truck is.
      Now you could possilby be talking about some of the more recent stuff, like 'The Dixie Chicks', but all that is indistinquishable from the typical Pop pablum.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    11. Re:Wikipedia reference by JediTrainer · · Score: 3, Funny

      The article seems to omit the fact that this is possible and effective against the pirates, because they play COUNTRY 'MUSIC' through this thing.

      That was the first model. The new enhanced (super-secret) model plays WESTERN too!

      --

      You can accomplish anything you set your mind to. The impossible just takes a little longer.
    12. Re:Wikipedia reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      C'mon, mod parent up funny you bastards

    13. Re:Wikipedia reference by robertc5 · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing that the song was "Puberty Love". Also effective against tomatoe attacks.

    14. Re:Wikipedia reference by macdaddy357 · · Score: 1

      That's funny! I wish I had mod points, but I will bet the mods snub you just like the Academy snubbed that great film.

      --
      How ya like dat?
    15. Re:Wikipedia reference by cdrdude · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean Brittany Spears?

      --
      This sig is neither interesting, nor humorous. Including meta-humor.
    16. Re:Wikipedia reference by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1

      What's the difference?

  5. Dupe by grahams · · Score: 5, Funny

    How many times are we going to have to read stories about music labels putting up false album tracks containing dreck such as Ashlee Simpson in place of Metallica? We get it, the labels don't like pirates....

    1. Re:Dupe by Pulse_Instance · · Score: 1

      This could entirely be the labels, but it is also possible that it is some idiots idea of a joke.

    2. Re:Dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you win today's "Failure To RTFA, Or Anything Else, Award"...

    3. Re:Dupe by flosofl · · Score: 1

      My hat is off to you, sir. You have captured the essence of the quintessential ./ post.

      Brilliant.

      --
      "This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence" - Vyvyan "The Young Ones"
    4. Re:Dupe by splatter · · Score: 1

      Arrrr... Were going to send you to Davy Jones locker...
        cue music " take the last train to boston..."

      Aarrr.... Not THAT Davy Jones......

      --
      "(I) have this unfortunate condition that causes me not to believe a single thing any politician says when a mic's on.
  6. Too bad it doesn't use the brown note by technoextreme · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think it would be more effective than just giving them a headache.
    Pirate:Argggg we've popped our pants. Run.

    --
    Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
    1. Re:Too bad it doesn't use the brown note by slavemowgli · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's just an urban legend.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    2. Re:Too bad it doesn't use the brown note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that was actually disproved on a recent episode of MythBusters

    3. Re:Too bad it doesn't use the brown note by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Other researchers have noted flaws in the methodology of the experiment. Rather than test the entire spectrum below 20 Hz, the MythBusters tested only three specific frequencies: 5, 7, and 9 Hz. In addition, the strategy of surrounding the subject with speakers without accounting for phase effects would have resulted in a loss of effective power being transmitted, especially at the geometrical centre of the speakers.

      Your very own link suggests that the experiment may have been flawed.

      The rumor that I've heard most often is that it's a specific frequency next to 8Hz, and that it's sort of a universal resonance frequency. (ObDisclaimer: I believe in the fractal nature of the universe.) See also: Schumann Resonance.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Too bad it doesn't use the brown note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah because the mythbusters are leaders in the world of science...

    5. Re:Too bad it doesn't use the brown note by angryLNX · · Score: 3, Funny

      Pirate: Earrrg! Swab the poop deck! Hell, swab the whole deck! With bleach!

    6. Re:Too bad it doesn't use the brown note by mincognito · · Score: 1

      According to this report the pirates would have loved it. Ninjas continue to be the most effective counter measure against pirates.

    7. Re:Too bad it doesn't use the brown note by Otter · · Score: 1
      Helpful explanation from Wikipedia:
      Note: The Brown note was proved to be non exixstent on a recent episode of Mythbusters on the Discovery channel.It was on a "recent" episode of Brainiac, which involved the viewer in the experiment, and proved true.
      Well. OK, then.
    8. Re:Too bad it doesn't use the brown note by loose_cannon_gamer · · Score: 1
      Apparently we slashdotting types are interested in resonance frequency trivia.

      (And yes, I had that version of the compiler, and was quite amused by the sample program.)

      --
      In Soviet Russia, us are belong to all your base.
    9. Re:Too bad it doesn't use the brown note by mrdogi · · Score: 1
      Pirate:Argggg we've popped our pants. Run.

      What were they made out of, paper or plastic?

    10. Re:Too bad it doesn't use the brown note by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      If I recall that episode of Mythbusters correctly, they DID try sweeping the entire frequency range between 0 and 20Hz, but perhaps didn't remain on any specific frequency long enough to provide the prolonged exposure necessary to produce results.

    11. Re:Too bad it doesn't use the brown note by siriuskase · · Score: 1

      Surely this catagory is completely unneccesary:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Linked_from_ Slashdot

      --
      If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
    12. Re:Too bad it doesn't use the brown note by plsander · · Score: 3, Funny

      How does that skit go... oh yea..

      Setting: on a pirate ship, A Captain, a lookout, a cabin boy.

      Lookout: Captain, there be one ship off the port bow.
      Captain: How many guns?
      Lookout: twelve guns.
      Captain: Prepare for battle! Cabin boy, get me my red jacket.

      --after the battle, a while later--

      Lookout: Captain, three ships off the starboard bow.
      Captain: How many guns?
      Lookout: 6, 12, and 8.
      Captain: We can take them... Prepare for battle! Bring me my red jacket!

      --after the battle...--

      Cabin Boy: Sir, why do you ask for your red jacket when we go into battle? Does it bring us luck?
      Captain: Aye, that it does. It brings luck to the men - As long as they see me standing, they will fight. The red jacket keeps them from seeing if the enemy has drawn blood.

      Lookout: Captain! 15 Ships of the line off the port bow!
      Captain: Arr - we canna out run them... Prepare for battle! Cabin boy, bring me my brown pants!

      --curtain--
      Yes, I did spend too many summers at camp.

    13. Re:Too bad it doesn't use the brown note by Castar · · Score: 1

      In this situation, wouldn't the poop deck *be* the whole deck?

      --
      I yearn for you tragically. A. T. Tappman, Chaplain, U.S. Army.
    14. Re:Too bad it doesn't use the brown note by lotus_out_law · · Score: 1

      Not only the pirates, but the ships crew and all the passengers tooo.. :-)

    15. Re:Too bad it doesn't use the brown note by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Or it's simply not true, or this would be far more than a myth, and probably pretty well documented.

      The Mythbusters could assmeble the testing equipment quite easily, surely some geek interested in this could've done the same the past few decades and experienced any results, assuming they were indeed there.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    16. Re:Too bad it doesn't use the brown note by rufuseddy · · Score: 0

      This is off topic but why does wikipedia think we are vandals? It warns that that article is linked from slashdot and to check the page history for vandalism! Im hurt = ( (sorry for my crappy spelling.....)

      --
      Giggidy Giggidy Gigg-a-dy
    17. Re:Too bad it doesn't use the brown note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Argggg we've popped our pants.

      They must have pooped a lot for their pants to have popped!

    18. Re:Too bad it doesn't use the brown note by Jeff+Benjamin · · Score: 1

      LOL, I love the disclaimer at the top of that link.

      >This article has recently been linked from Slashdot (backlink). Please keep an eye on the page history for errors or vandalism.

      Good to know we've got such a good reputation here.

  7. Damn those... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn those dolphins! These things get out of hand!

    1. Re:Damn those... by waterlogged · · Score: 1

      Dolphin bites can be very nasti!!!!

      --
      I couldn't fail to disagree with you any less.
    2. Re:Damn those... by macdaddy357 · · Score: 1

      If dolphins are so smart, why do they live in igloos?

      --
      How ya like dat?
  8. Aaarrrrrgh!! by illtron · · Score: 4, Funny

    I imagine that the RIAA is calling the Navy about how it can get some sonic anti-piracy weapons of its own.

    I find that most of the music put out by major labels these days is a painful enough torture, but hey, that's just me.

    --
    Slashdot: 24 hours behind every other site or your money back!
    1. Re:Aaarrrrrgh!! by Kahless2k · · Score: 1

      Nah, they wouldnt be asking for one themselves; They'll just claim Prior Art (I agree. most of the crap they release IS painful) and patent the idea..

    2. Re:Aaarrrrrgh!! by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      Actually, as soon as that sound was broadcast the first time, it became a public performance and thus falls under automatic copyright.

      Unfortunately for the designers of the system, that tone was first aired in 2 Live Crew's first album and the navy now owes over $100M in royalties. The RIAA has brought suit to at least 15 end users of the system, and two or three grandmothers of those users.

    3. Re:Aaarrrrrgh!! by linzeal · · Score: 1

      The technology was developed after the USS Cole accident per the article. If the army does not have this on their ships it is their own damn fault.

  9. Oooooh! by HepCatA · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is kind of like death metal to hippies!

    1. Re:Oooooh! by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Real hippies love death metal.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    2. Re:Oooooh! by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Or The Grateful Dead to speed freaks.

      Or either of those to the rest of the population.

  10. Twarted? by HaydnH · · Score: 1, Informative

    ...only to be twarted by some sort of sonic weapon

    Did you mean thwarted?

    Haydn.

    --
    Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so. - Douglas Adams
    1. Re:Twarted? by mekkab · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, "twarted" works if you say it with an Irish lilt.

      Mekka.

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    2. Re:Twarted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Perhaps they twarted saw a puddy cat. They did! They did! They did see a mean ol' puddy cat.

      (Spelling has been corrected since you posted that though)

    3. Re:Twarted? by iainl · · Score: 1

      I read it as "twatted by some sort of sonic weapon" and had visions of them being beaten over the head with a subwoofer, so go figure.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    4. Re:Twarted? by Bueller_007 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "twarted"

      Clearly, Cmdr Taco is the code name for former Canadian prime minister Jean Chretien.

    5. Re:Twarted? by munkt0n · · Score: 0
    6. Re:Twarted? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Did you mean thwarted? (Score:2, Informative)"

      What? Do we have a bunch of Wheel of Fortune fans here or something?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    7. Re:Twarted? by kfhickel · · Score: 2, Funny

      "You know, I really hate it when that happens."

      (Think Billy Crystial in SNL circa 1978 or thereabouts)

    8. Re:Twarted? by kfhickel · · Score: 1

      yeah, yeah, ok, Crystal, not Crystial.

      Just Bite Me, OK?!?!?! ;>

    9. Re:Twarted? by teknopagan · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Thanks, dude...you just made me piss my pants at work.

      --
      The Russian Mafia will mod you down just to see if the Moderate button works.
    10. Re:Twarted? by krewemaynard · · Score: 1

      So you saw the word's root, "twat," and thought of a subwoofer? Cue the sterotypical no-girlfriend jokes in 3, 2...

      --
      I saw it on Slashdot, it must be true!
    11. Re:Twarted? by pianophile · · Score: 1

      (Think Billy Crystial in SNL circa 1978 or thereabouts)

      Billy Crystal was on SNL for the '84-'85 season, FYI.

      --

      'Your brain is God.' -- Dr. Timothy Leary
    12. Re:Twarted? by JohnnyLocust · · Score: 0, Redundant

      You know.... boys have dwicks, girls have twarts.

    13. Re:Twarted? by macthulhu · · Score: 1

      Then that would be the dreaded Yellow Note?

      --

      Someday a real rain is gonna come...

    14. Re:Twarted? by Smauler · · Score: 1

      twat
      Noun. 1. The female genitals. [1600s]
      2. A contemptible person, an idiot.
      Verb. To hit, to thump. E.g."I twatted him before he had chance to twat me."

    15. Re:Twarted? by Shishberg · · Score: 1

      Yes, as in "I twarted I twaw a pwuddy twat."

    16. Re:Twarted? by teknopagan · · Score: 0

      Umm...redundant how?

      --
      The Russian Mafia will mod you down just to see if the Moderate button works.
  11. Celine Dion by karvind · · Score: 3, Funny
    I wonder if they were playing Celine Dion to scare away the pirates.. she just goes on and on and on and on ....

    Or may be Neil Diamond..

    1. Re:Celine Dion by Bob+McCown · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or maybe Tom Jones?

      I hear its not unusual...

    2. Re:Celine Dion by masklinn · · Score: 1

      Or Avril Lavigne's version of Chop Suey?

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    3. Re:Celine Dion by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Funny
      Or may be Neil Diamond..

      Man, that would be sweet if you combined it with a Howitzer and some shoulder rockets.

      "On the boats and on the planes..."

      Rat-tat-tat-tat

      "They're coming to America..."

      Whiiiiiizzzzz

      "Never looking back again..."

      KABOOOOOOOMMM

      "They're coming to America..."

      Whooooooosh

      "Home, don't it seem so far away..."

      Rat-tat-tat-tat

      "Oh, we're traveling light today..."

      Sploooosh!

      "In the eye of the storm..."

      WAHBOOOOOOOM!

      "In the eye of the storm!"

      Amercian Flag Waves in the Wind


      They'll be running for their lives before you know it. Never underestimate the force multipling effect of a little psychological warfare. ;-)
    4. Re:Celine Dion by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nope. I checked the file sharing networks. Pirates don't seem to be deterred by anything like that.

    5. Re:Celine Dion by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      The Pirates (next month) then fire back with Rick Astley's "Never Gonna Give Youuuu Uhhhhpppp... Never gonna desert youuuuuu".

      Then the target/victim will fire back with a deluge of Kenny G's Christmas Specials... By Valentine's day, one of them will be playing "Arrow Through My Heart"...

      Eventually, one of them will be playing a library track from the opening of "Deep Rising", that catchy, military-like/adventuresome tune... (Which, I might add, was a weird juxtaposition I saw on NHK or one of the local stations around 1/05... It was played over and over as restaurant owners showed their sticky-tape anti-rat tactics. The hidden cameras caught and replayed the red of the rats' eyes as they struggled to rip themselves off the sticky tape, only bleeding to death as they left limbs on the tape..." Dah-thut duh.. Dah-thut duh.. Dah-thut duh.... Dah-thut duh...Dah-thut duh...Dah-thut duh ... Dah-thut duh.... Dah-thut duh.... Dah-thut DUH.... DUH-THUH......" I think that newsclip went on for about 4 minutes from many angles, elevations, light levels and audio reverbs...

      Oh, but about those sea rats...

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    6. Re:Celine Dion by southpolesammy · · Score: 1

      ObMovie Quote from Good Morning Vietnam

      Cronauer: Army uses Ethel Merman today to test jamming Russian radar. Here's a brief part of that test. "Oh, I've got a feeling....That love is here to stay." When asked for a reply, the Russians went, "What the hell was that?"

      --
      Rule #1 -- Politics always trumps technology.
    7. Re:Celine Dion by pmancini · · Score: 1

      Replace Neil Diamond with Billy Joel singing "We Didn't Start the Fire" and you'd have something!

      We didn't start the fire
      It was always burning
      Since the world's been turning
      We didn't start the fire
      No we didn't light it
      But we tried to fight it

    8. Re:Celine Dion by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Man, no offense intended - but you seem way too familiar with Neil Diamond song lyrics.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    9. Re:Celine Dion by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1
      Nah. Doesn't have that same sort of simple and strong sound that mingles with fireworks very well. If you're looking for something more appropriate, try Twisted Sister. Goes well with shotguns and grenade launchers:


      "Oh We're Not Gonna Take It!"

      Blam! Blam!

      "no, We Ain't Gonna Take It!"

      Thump! Whiiiizzzzz...

      "oh We're Not Gonna Take It Anymore!"

      BOOOOOOMMMM!!

      "we've Got The Right To Choose And..."

      Splooosh!

      "there Ain't No Way We'll Lose It!"

      Blam! Blam! (tat-tat-tat in the distance) Thump! Whiiiizzzz...

      "this Is Our Life, This Is Our Song"

      KAAAAABOOOOOOOOMMMM! (Jolly Roger flies high on the defending ship in defiance of the Pirates!)


      Ok, I'm having way too much fun with this. :-P
    10. Re:Celine Dion by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      And thanks to Google, you can be too!

      Don't forget to pick up "Forever in Blue Jeans" and "Sweeeeeeeeeeeet Caroliiiiiiinnne!" (Bum... bum... baaaaaa!) while you're there. :-P

    11. Re:Celine Dion by kisielk · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of the famous Apocalypse Now scene where they were playing Ride of the Valkyries from their helicopters while blowing up a Vietnamese village.. the irony of course being that the composer Wagner was an anti-semitist and a favorite of Hitler's...

    12. Re:Celine Dion by werewolf1031 · · Score: 1

      Dude, are you friggin' drunk?!

      Step awaaay from the song lyrics... :P

    13. Re:Celine Dion by joschm0 · · Score: 0

      The ultimate weapon would be Kenny G. That shrill sound from whatever that thing he plays just goes right through my brain like a hot knife cutting through butter.

      --
      01/20/09
    14. Re:Celine Dion by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Dude, are you friggin' drunk?!

      I'm not as think you drunk as I am. *hiccup* (That soda pop must have been extra bubbly. :-P)

      Step awaaay from the song lyrics... :P

      No, you step back! I've got campy song lyrics and I'm not afraid to use them! I'm serious man! I'm listening to Madonna's "Burning Up" at this moment, and I'm just crazy enough to use them! ;-)

      God, I'm having WAY too much fun with these campy songs. More soda pop, please!

    15. Re:Celine Dion by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the famous quote at the end of that scence from the AirCav Colonel...

      "I love the smell of Napalm in the Morning..it smells like VICTORY"

  12. Ninjas With Guitars! by mekkab · · Score: 1, Funny

    And they wail so hard on their guitars it makes the pirates peepee hurt.

    Now that is Real Ultimate Power!!!

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  13. i've got something even worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    its called a wife. worse than any military weapon. Tis no woman, tis a remorseless shrieking machine.

  14. In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... Pirates thwart you!

    1. Re:In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I distinctly recall reading the article text that this was off the coast of Africa, not Soviet Russia.

    2. Re:In Soviet Russia by xaque · · Score: 1

      Right, which is why the pirates were thwarted... Isn't logic fun? :)

  15. The pirates are dying off anyway... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Global Warming is having a direct and measurable impact on the endangered pirate population according to The Flying Spaghetti Monster theory,
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_spaghetti_mons ter
    "Global warming, earthquakes, hurricanes, and other natural disasters are a direct consequence of the decline in numbers of pirates since the 1800s. A graph showing the inverse correlation between the pirates and global temperatures was also provided. This component of the theory highlights the logical fallacy of correlation implying causation. "

    1. Re:The pirates are dying off anyway... by Thud457 · · Score: 1
      The obvious conclusion that we can draw from this graph is that ninjas drive SUVs.

      But this fails to shed light on the ancient conundrum, "If monkeys fight robots, does a robot monkey fight with itself?"

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    2. Re:The pirates are dying off anyway... by saintp · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't we outlaw LRAD, then, in order to encourage growth of the pirate population?

    3. Re:The pirates are dying off anyway... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dummy, don't know you know science??

      It means the earth is starting to cool.

      The Intelligent Designer sure works in mysterious ways..

    4. Re:The pirates are dying off anyway... by talksinmaths · · Score: 1

      Global Warming is having a direct and measurable impact on the endangered pirate population

      No no no, you've got it all wrong. It is the decrease in the number of pirates that is causing global warming. Don't you understand the difference between cause and effect?

      --
      Don't you have someone you'd die for?
    5. Re:The pirates are dying off anyway... by arodland · · Score: 1

      The obvious conclusion that we can draw from this graph is that ninjas drive SUVs.

      No, the obvious conclusion we can draw is that ninjas are mammals.

    6. Re:The pirates are dying off anyway... by xappax · · Score: 1

      Whoever told you that is a total liar. Just like other mammals, ninjas can drive SUVs OR be totally awesome.

  16. Wow...a pirate story about actual pirates... by Stradenko · · Score: 4, Funny

    I sure hope the pirates didn't record the noise made by the LRAD for sale as bootleg CDs on the asian market...

    1. Re:Wow...a pirate story about actual pirates... by s4ck · · Score: 1
      obligatory comment...

      I for one welcome our Borwn Noise overlord.

      *insert fart joke here*

  17. Sonic weapon? by hal2814 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Didn't know Doctor Who was battling pirates now.

    1. Re:Sonic weapon? by indifferent+children · · Score: 1

      What, you recommend holding-off pirates with a screwdriver!?!

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    2. Re:Sonic weapon? by FusionDragon2099 · · Score: 1

      Ever been bored? Ever had a long night? Ever had a lot of cabinets to put up?

  18. interesting... by xao+gypsie · · Score: 1

    ..I was not aware that pirates like that even existed. Anyone know anything on the subject? You don't hear much about them here in St. Louis, MO....

    --


    xao
    http://TheHillforum.hopto.org
    1. Re:interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not aware that pirates like this exist? I know StLouis is the arsehole of America, but piracy is at one of its highest levels in HISTORY. My god man, Google up Pirates, South China Sea, indonesia, pirates, oh, hell you get the picture.

      And the rest of the world wonders why Americans support their governments foreign policy. See we assume that you get world news in the US, apparently that was a silly assumption on our part.

    2. Re:interesting... by afidel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Pirates are a major concern from the horn of Africa to SE Asia.

      Seaborne piracy against transport vessels remains a significant problem (with estimated worldwide losses of $13 to $16 billion USD per year)

      More info can be obtained form Wikipedia.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    3. Re:interesting... by Secrity · · Score: 1

      There are probably better places to go on holiday than to Somalia. Somalia has no central government and the country is run by warlords. Google is your friend. You could also try http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/2863.htm or http://www.lonelyplanet.com/worldguide/destination s/africa/somalia

    4. Re:interesting... by fdiskne1 · · Score: 3, Funny

      You don't hear much about them here in St. Louis, MO

      That would be because there aren't many of them in St. Louis MO. I'm not sure, but it could be the lack of high seas. ;-)

      --
      But why is the rum gone?
    5. Re:interesting... by grolaw · · Score: 1

      There is an enormous problem with piracy - mostly in S. Asia, off the coast of W. Africa & in the Middle East. Do a Google search on "Samuel Pyeatt Menefee" "Regional Piracy Centre"

      One part of his Bio:
      Closely involved with questions of oceans law and maritime violence, Menefee is Chair of the Maritime Law Association's Working Party on Piracy. He holds positions as IMB Fellow of the I.C.C. - International Maritime Bureau (London) and Fellow to the Regional Piracy Centre (Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia), and is a member of the I.C.C. Consultative Task Force on Commercial Crime.

    6. Re:interesting... by lupinstel · · Score: 1

      They were passing through to the Seychelles which is a semi-remote, very nice island chain off the east coast of Africa. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seychelles

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Cthulhu.
    7. Re:interesting... by jrumney · · Score: 1
      Pirates are a major concern from the horn of Africa to SE Asia.

      More like South America to SE Asia via Africa.

  19. ARGH! by NeonRonin · · Score: 1

    Aarrgh! Pass me the Excedrin for me Migraine! Arrrgh!

    --
    -- NeonRonin
  20. Natural in some humans by pogofish · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oddly enough, my wife has one of those built in.

    --

    A man without a God is like a fish without a bicycle.
    1. Re:Natural in some humans by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      did you stack the plates like I asked you?
      did you clean out the kitty-litter box?
      did you forget to buy the toothpaste?
      will you rub my feet?
      will you take the trash out? ...

      one of these days Alice... *POW* straight to the moon...

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    2. Re:Natural in some humans by anthonyclark · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah it must be so terrible, such torture to have a partner and responsibilities in life.

      Sorry for the snark, but 5 minutes rubbing feet and 10 minutes cleaning a cat box? That's not exactly a long time away from your WoW auctions, is it?

      Not to jump on the GTD bandwagon, but if it takes 10 minutes or less, just do it right now, you'd be amazed at how much easier your life becomes :-)

      (oh, and use lotion on those feet, peppermint body shop foot lotion work wonders on sore female feet)

      --
      ----- Documentation is worth it just to be able to answer all your mail with 'RTFM' - Alan Cox.
    3. Re:Natural in some humans by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      hehe, i know i have no right to complain, but it's kinda fun to do it.

      the only offense i take is that you think i play WoW! i'm a diehard FPS player. (and CivIII)

      I like peachy lotions though.

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    4. Re:Natural in some humans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Oddly enough, my wife has one of those built in.

      On which end?

    5. Re:Natural in some humans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what I thought when I read this story on CNN several days ago. A bunch of women were screaming like mad and scared the crap out of the pirates. Smart captain took all the credit (after cleaning his own pants) :)

    6. Re:Natural in some humans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to jump on the GTD bandwagon, but if it takes 10 minutes or less, just do it right now, you'd be amazed at how much easier your life becomes :-) Would your wife do the same if you regularly ask her to do various tasks that take 10 mins or less ? Just curious.

    7. Re:Natural in some humans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're making the assumption that the wife is a partner, and does lots of chores herself.

    8. Re:Natural in some humans by Muchsake · · Score: 1

      No use lavender oil it has aphrodisiac qualities.

  21. Huh? by ajiva · · Score: 0

    That doesn't make sense! The AP article claims the pirates were 100 miles away from the cruise ship when they fired rockets. Yet the Wikipedia article claims LRAD is effective from about 300 to 500 meters well under a mile, much less 100 miles. Heck at 100 miles, the Cruise ship has at least 5 HOURS before the pirates can catch it. Seems like a no news story to me...

    1. Re:Huh? by Nos. · · Score: 1

      No, they weren't:
      The Spirit was about 100 miles off Somalia when pirates fired rocket-propelled grenades and machine guns as they tried to get onboard.

      The cruise ship was 100 miles off the coast of Somalia when the pirates fired. We don't know how far away the pirates were.

    2. Re:Huh? by cyberwave · · Score: 1

      No, they were 100 miles off the coast of SOMALIA. Hahaha, I misread it like you did the first time as well.

    3. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 for reading the article, -2 for reading it incorrectly. Reading comprehension is your friend. The AP article states the ship was 100 miles off the coast. The pirates were also in ships, along side the cruise ship, not standing on the coast. That would make them what, regular muggers?

    4. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the article says that the cruise ship and the pirates were 100 miles off the coast of Somalia. It doesn't say how far away the pirates were from the cruise ship.

    5. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      100 miles off the coast of Somalia, not 100 miles away. Read the article before you complain.

    6. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article claims the ship was 100 miles away from SOMALIA, not the pirates, if you're going to RTFA at least read it properly

    7. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The Spirit was about 100 miles off Somalia when pirates fired rocket-propelled grenades and machine guns as they tried to get onboard.
      Hmm... I fail to see where it says the cruise ship (named "The Seabourn Spirit") and the pirate ship were 100 miles apart. Unless you think "Somalia" is the name of the pirate ship. I'm much more inclined to think they're referring to the nation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Somalia I imagine both The Spirit and the pirate ship were 100 miles off the coast of Somalia. The article seems pretty clear on this, but I guess if you didn't know Somalia was a country you might think it's a pirate ship.
    8. Re:Huh? by Secrity · · Score: 1

      They were close enough that at least one of the passengers claimed to see one of the pirates grin when he fired an RPG at the ship. The passenger was lucky that he watched the RPG being launched and lived to tell about it.

    9. Re:Huh? by dogolopee · · Score: 1

      No, the article says "The Spirit was about 100 miles off Somalia when pirates fired rocket-propelled grenades and machine guns as they tried to get onboard." The pirates from the description and common snese were pulled along side the ship. The ship was 100 miles away from shore, and the pirates right next to ship. No where does it say the pirates were 100 miles away from the ship.

    10. Re:Huh? by timeOday · · Score: 1
      Actually, the article says that the cruise ship and the pirates were 100 miles off the coast of Somalia. It doesn't say how far away the pirates were from the cruise ship.
      They were quite close indeed. Here's a more vivid account.
    11. Re:Huh? by masklinn · · Score: 1

      Reading comprehension: failed.

      The ship was 110 miles from the coast of somalia when they were attacked, there is no information on the distance between them and the pirates, but when pirates try to board your ship they're usually quite close...

      Not to mention that I've yet to see machine guns and hand rockets (rocket-propelled grenades isn't a synonym for Scud you know) with a 110 miles (180km) operational range.

      Even less so with any kind of accuracy.

      In fact, most specific surface to ships missiles don't even reach that kind of ranges. US Harpoon has a 110km range (68 miles), french Exocet barely reaches 70km (43 miles) and UK's Sea Eagle has Harpoon's 110km range.

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    12. Re:Huh? by plover · · Score: 1

      No, the AP article claims the attack occurred 100 miles off the coast of Somalia. The pirate ships were within small arms range of the cruise ship. Among the weapons the pirates used included rocket-propelled-grenades. Some RPGs have sights calibrated to 250 meters, although when you're shooting at a target the size of a cruise ship, it's probably still effective a longer distance. In any case, LRAD has an longer effective range.

      --
      John
    13. Re:Huh? by harrkev · · Score: 1

      What annoys me is that the cruise ship used a non-lethal sonic weapon. We are talking about real pirates here. People who kill and loot. I wouldl ave rather the cuise ship used the sonic weapon to stun them, and then follow up with an RPG and machine guns. Otherwise, these jerks will try this again with a less-well prepared ship, and the outcome may be quite different.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    14. Re:Huh? by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1

      It kind of implies somewhere between 0 and 628 miles, no?

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    15. Re:Huh? by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      not only that, but an RPG can't go no 100 miles... unless it flies into a tube that injects more propellant into it at every couple of miles.

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    16. Re:Huh? by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

      Our thinking is that that this cruise ship should invite a platoon of fully armed military personell for a free vacation off the coast of Somalia...

      Nothing's funnier than shredding pirates with a momma duece while sippin a mai tai!

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    17. Re:Huh? by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1
      When I first heard about this, I immediately wondered if the cruise ship crew had any real weapons to use to thwart attacks from a small boat. A 50 caliber automatic would be ideal for this.

      Which brings up the question, are there any restrictions on bringing your own guns aboard a cruise ship? Can I just stash my AR-15 in my baggage, along with a few loaded 100 round drum magazines?

    18. Re:Huh? by nomadic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's a freaking cruise ship, not a destroyer. Do Ma and Pa really want to spend their 50th wedding anniversary watching people getting slaughtered? Why does everyone on slashdot think life is just one big FPS?

    19. Re:Huh? by jumpingfred · · Score: 1

      All the cruise ships I have been on have you go through metal detectors.

    20. Re:Huh? by dfenstrate · · Score: 1

      How many pirates would have to get perforated before they learned to leave certain ships alone? I'd imagine word would travel fast, even amongst pirates.

      Sure, the passengers on one ship might hear some gunfire, but the next several voyages would be quite peaceful.

      --
      Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
    21. Re:Huh? by nomadic · · Score: 1

      It doesn't work that way, it's not like there's a big pirate community that shares information, these are rural uneducated villagers who get their hands on AK-47s and a few small boats and head out. Kill them and others take their place.

    22. Re:Huh? by Yahweh+Doesn't+Exist · · Score: 1

      lolz, tru dat

    23. Re:Huh? by mikael · · Score: 1

      Even luckier was the lady whose cabin was hit by the RPG. Fortunately, she was in the bathroom at the time.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    24. Re:Huh? by idontgno · · Score: 1

      I'm on j00r ship and I'm killin j00r d00ds! PWNT!

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    25. Re:Huh? by Firethorn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't know about your parents, but my Ma and Pa would be activly participating in the pirate shoot, and my Grandparents would be cheering.

      Consider what the parent said. These are known pirates. They are known to commit such crimes as murder, torture, rape(if there's any females on the boat), kidnapping, etc...

      Marine movement being what it is, it's mostly impossible for the authorities to track the pirates down after the fact, especially if they're based out of a consenting harbor. Which is a big part of the problem, as these people are often part of small, tight-knit towns/villages, thus the whole village will help cover up their activities.

      Which would you rather have? A half hour of gunfire, or a three day run huddled in the middle of the boat? A group of pirates, dead, unable to pirate anymore, or a group that have learned some of what doesn't work, ready to try again next month?

      If I'm on a cruise through any of these areas(and I include the caribbean), I know that I'd be far more able to relax if I know that the crew has some heavy weapons and know how to use them. Pirates are known to be at work in many areas of the world, and many people recommend having at least small arms available in yachts. It's like a mugging/kidnapping, if you submit to your attacker, rather than lessoning the damage you'll sustain, you simply make it easier for the evil men to do whatever they want to do to you.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    26. Re:Huh? by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      Or just make sure the cruise ship hires the proper cook, in case it comes under siege or something.

    27. Re:Huh? by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      How many rural uneducated villagers that will turn to theft, rape and murder can there be? Kill enough of them and there will be no more.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    28. Re:Huh? by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Only a few billion. You're talking about the largest demographic on the planet.

    29. Re:Huh? by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      You really believe there are that many immoral people? Regardless, it doesn't disprove my point. Just means that we need more ammo.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    30. Re:Huh? by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 1

      This just in...there are bad people who will do bad things if they believe they can get away with their bad deeds. Sometimes an armed opponent is sufficent deterence.

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
  22. huh ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...what did you say ?
    I cant hear you !

  23. i bet it felt like... by Zugot · · Score: 1

    *** ZAP!!!! ***

    (i hate the lameness filter)

    --
    -- Bryan
  24. I call B.S. by tkrotchko · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Sounds like an ad placement by the company making/selling them. No quotes, nobody identifiable. Same as that lady who microwaved her cat, or the kids who found razor blades in the halloween goodies, or that toilets flush the other way below the equator.

    And even if true, next time, won't the pirates just wear earplugs?

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
    1. Re:I call B.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As some other posters have pointed out, there are other sources in addition to the one linked in the story. For example this.

    2. Re:I call B.S. by geomon · · Score: 1

      "And even if true, next time, won't the pirates just wear earplugs?"

      Depends on the frequency of the tone. Bone transmission of sound is possible at the dB ratings cited in the article.

      Unprotected by earplugs or earmuffs a person can go deaf within a couple of minutes at dB ratings above 110.

      --
      "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
  25. Rioters are next? by mindaktiviti · · Score: 1

    I wonder if rioters will be next for this type of weapon?

    On a related note, could these sonic weapons cause any other damage besides hearing? Could it affect things like the heart or other organs?

    1. Re:Rioters are next? by plover · · Score: 2, Informative
      Israel has used sonic weapons on a violent mob. It was reportedly more effective than tear gas and rubber bullets.

      Wikipedia says that most "lethal sonic weapons" are science fiction, although they note that underwater sonic weapons are definitely lethal. High powered sonar has killed fish and whales, and there is speculation that some whales may use sound to stun prey.

      --
      John
    2. Re:Rioters are next? by Misch · · Score: 2, Funny

      Canada has also developed a sonic weapon. However, it's only been tested on relatively friendly crowds, who have often paid for the experience.

      --

      --You will rephrase your request for me to go to hell. Goto statements are not acceptable programming constructs
    3. Re:Rioters are next? by Aumaden · · Score: 1
      From here:
      • 140 dB Extremely damaging to hearing no matter how short the time exposure
      • 190-195 dB Human eardrums rupture 50 % of the time
      • 198-202 dB Human death from sound wave alone.
      From what I read, death generally occurs due to lung damage that induces air embolism.
      So, in answer to your question: yes. If you pump out enough energy, it will be fatal.
  26. Leave the pirates alone! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're just contributing to global warming! :-(

  27. Ugh. Thanks. by Gruneun · · Score: 1

    Now, I have a mental picture of that skinny banshee screaming off the front of a cruise ship, again.

  28. Just a point.... by FreakyControl · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Only to be thwarted by? From TFA, "The subsidiary of Carnival Corp. was investigating whether the weapon was successful in warding off the pirates, he said. The ship's captain also changed its course, shifted into high speed and headed out into the open sea to elude the pirates, who were in two small boats, he said. He had no further details."

    I'm sure it certainly contributed, but they're not even sure it actually was the reason why the pirates weren't able to catch them.

  29. Non-Lethality is important by PaxTech · · Score: 4, Funny

    We simply cannot afford to kill any pirates, since the worldwide decline in the number of pirates is clearly responsible for global warming.

    --
    All movements for social change begin as missions, evolve into businesses, and end up as rackets.
  30. Lethal Weapons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone know if any of these cruise ships carry lethal weapons? Automatic rifles and such?

    1. Re:Lethal Weapons? by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      There's a billion people on a cruise ship. You're telling me they couldn't take three pirates? Just smack 'em off the railing with a stick when they try to climb aboard.

    2. Re:Lethal Weapons? by william_w_bush · · Score: 1

      the pirates had kalashnikovs and rpgs, stop watching so much tv.

      --
      The first rule of USENET is you do not talk about USENET.
    3. Re:Lethal Weapons? by bcattwoo · · Score: 1
      yeah, I will let him take the first line of defense. Maybe if I am lucky the pirates only have a couple hundred rounds of ammo each.

      I have heard of pirates taking cargo ships, which may have a crew of only a couple dozen, but not a cruise ship. Mind you, I don't really keep up on pirate activity though.

    4. Re:Lethal Weapons? by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 0

      Element of surprise and a sharp/blunt object would thoroughly put the balance of power in the hands of the civilians. Well, ideally. I keep forgetting we're a culture of fear now.

    5. Re:Lethal Weapons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good luck. It's a cruise ship, and even IF you could organize a few passengers to repel borders you would likely be busy repelling on the starboard side while the crew is busy surrendering on the port side.

      Consider: The mere thought of armed, violent resistence will get this post modded to -10. These are the same people that go on cruises past Somolia and other places where piracy is a way of life and an AK-47 is not against the law.

    6. Re:Lethal Weapons? by ScentCone · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Element of surprise and a sharp/blunt object would thoroughly put the balance of power in the hands of the civilians. Well, ideally. I keep forgetting we're a culture of fear now.

      Anyone without body armor and their own heavy weaponry should be afraid of a bunch of cutthroats with AKs and RPGs. Those guys shot an RPG right into someone's cabin. The passengers might have strength in numbers, but three guys with 40-round magazines would be able to kill over 100 of them more or less immediately. I don't think the remaining couple hundred would so willing to join the frey.

      No, the solution is aggressive defenses manned by the ship's crew, and proper weapons training, at least for the officers.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    7. Re:Lethal Weapons? by surprise_audit · · Score: 1

      Oh, I don't know... If people on the cruise ship realized they had pretty much the same options as passengers on a hijacked airplane, the pirates wouldn't get away with it so easily.

    8. Re:Lethal Weapons? by Gerhardius · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most cruise ships do not have an armory, a few very well may but the next question then would be "is anyone trained to use the weapons?" Cruise lines generally don't like paying their crews very much, at least the folks one doesn't see, and I just can't see an investment in "security" when it is a relatively simple matter to change cruise routes. The last time a cruise ship was taken by pirates/terrorists was in 1985 when the Achille Lauro was "seajacked" by four terrorists. How can 4 guys take control of a cruise ship with over 400 people on board? It is amazing how easy it is to pacify tourists with a few AKs and some grenades. Shipping companies that transit areas of high pirate activity rarely arm their crews, but many opt for other defensive systems. These include, but are not limited to: electrified railings, audio weapons, and trained security personnel. Some areas, like the Straits of Malacca, have such a high rate of piracy that ship owners are hiring ex-military types as armed security. Maritime piracy is an interesting issue, the well organized gangs in South East Asia may have ties to elements of the Chinese military, or the government of Indonesia. Entire ships have "disappeared" only to be spotted undergoing a paint job and name change in a remote bay. Naturally this is not what the pirates were after in this case, they were out to take as much as they could as quickly as they could and then get off the ship.

    9. Re:Lethal Weapons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >There's a billion people on a cruise ship.

      Correction: There are about a billion elderly pensioners on a cruise ship. This kind of slow travel holiday is mostly popular among the well-off retired people. Essentially you would have a geriatric insurrect army against the pirates. Now, maybe the old lady would beat Omar and Jusuf on the head with her walking cane and yell at Barky, her lap-dog to bite off Mehmed's balls ... maybe. But don't count on it! The captain did what was right: to rev the hell out of his ship's mighty diesel engines and flee as fast as possible.

  31. Let the guessing begin by Morinaga · · Score: 1
    The "tune" played at such a "high-pitched, piercing tone" was Lovin, Huggin, Squeezin by Journey.

    Freeking Pirates.

    1. Re:Let the guessing begin by flyinwhitey · · Score: 1

      I have stopped believing you

      --
      How pathetic are you that you follow me from topic to topic and waste all your mod points at once modding me down?
  32. Interesting. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

    I personally had thought that cruise ships in contested areas would want to carry a very small contingent of military personell that would take the fight to pirates. I would think that a few stories about high-seas pirate ships being sunk by an RPG or two would probably help deter further incidents.

    1. Re:Interesting. by nomadic · · Score: 1

      I personally had thought that cruise ships in contested areas would want to carry a very small contingent of military personell that would take the fight to pirates. I would think that a few stories about high-seas pirate ships being sunk by an RPG or two would probably help deter further incidents.

      I wouldn't think so. The last thing you want on your cruise ship is a firefight with tourists getting caught in the crossfire. And honestly piracy isn't exactly a safe job. I know everyone likes to think "the bad guys" are cowards at heart, but if you're a desperate criminal who makes a living with his AK-47 you're probably expecting to run into resistance occasionally, so it's not like this would scare you off.

    2. Re:Interesting. by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      desperate, yes
      Well trained, no. Most are rank amatuers when it comes to armed conflict.
      brave? In some ways only.

      I've read about this problem, and it seems to work out much like dry-water criminals. They show an overwhelming tendency to avoid 'hard targets', or at least what they think are hard targets. They're after money/supplies, not battles. You show an increased chance of resistance, of fighting back, and they'll go off looking for an easier target.

      I mean, there was an incident where a US Navy cargo ship was 'approached' by pirates. Well, this cargo ship, being navy, had a few deck weapons(I believe a .50cal AA type gun, but depressable to cover the ocean), and this was after the USS Cole attack. They opened up, and the pirates turned around and ran away.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    3. Re:Interesting. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      The last thing you want on your cruise ship is a firefight with tourists getting caught in the crossfire.

      In this case, an unarmed ship got fired upon and was struck with an RPG, it was too late, passengers were already endangered. I don't think this is sufficient justification to simply let the criminals have their way.

      And honestly piracy isn't exactly a safe job. I know everyone likes to think "the bad guys" are cowards at heart, but if you're a desperate criminal who makes a living with his AK-47 you're probably expecting to run into resistance occasionally, so it's not like this would scare you off.

      I don't know if that's true. I would think the fact that every private cruise ship is a) basically unarmed and b) is a floating wealth barge filled with wussy people basically attracts flies.

  33. LRAD ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We call her Celine Dion here in Canada ehhh!

  34. Pirates?! Rawk! by ottffssent · · Score: 5, Funny

    Pirates, man! I mean, a real actual honest-to-$deity story. On Slashdot. About pirates! I mean, PIRATES. The ones with hats. And parrots. I never thought I'd see the day.

  35. Non-lethal sonic weapon is cute... by Starker_Kull · · Score: 1

    ...but if someone fires at you with an RPG, I think it's time to break out the torpedoes and snipers and not bother with the non-lethal crap.

  36. And in next week's news.... by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Pirates use sonic weapons to take over cruise ship.

    Seriously, technology can be used for good and ill, and when it comes to military and paramilitary technology, the arms race never ends.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  37. Boy is that disappointing. by xenicson · · Score: 3, Funny

    I really was hoping that a LRAD was going to be a giant Airzooka.

  38. Sad by wolfemi1 · · Score: 1
    You know, I personally find it sad that when I read "Pirates" in the title, my first thought was illegal downloaders rather than actual pirates.

    I guess that the *AA propaganda really works, in that the common usage of the word pirate is what they want it to be, rather than what it actually is.

  39. Roger the cabin boy by EwokMolester · · Score: 0

    I seem to remember a similar storyline in an episode of Captain Pugwash.

    Master Bates (he he).

  40. LRAD plays Disaster Area... by Anonymous+Monkey · · Score: 1
    ...and Pirates all go deaf, can't think, and slink away.

    All joking aside, that's kind of cool. I know I run from any irritating noise. I wonder if the same weapon could be used to stop rioters, or other civic disturbances. It could, in theory, prove cheaper and cleaner than tear-gas, tazers, or foam.

    --
    We are the Borg...
  41. If you want to really annoy the pirates by jeffs72 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Instead of the siren from a smoke detector, use a tape loop of my 20 month old crying becase we won't let her continue to throw things down our stair case. Or maybe some britanny spears really loud, or any boy band music at all (NYKOB for teh win).

    --
    This article has recently been linked from Slashdot. Please keep an eye on the page history for errors or vandalism.
  42. 100 miles off the coast by kwerle · · Score: 1

    You mis-parsed the article. It was 100 miles off the coast. It doesn't really say how far apart the ships were.

  43. other news stories by WillAdams · · Score: 2, Informative

    Looking at news.google.com one can find a bit more detail from more familiar sources:

    http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/africa/11/07/somalia .pirates.sonic.ap/

    The 100 mile figure is that that's how far off the coast the cruise ship was --- the weapons used don't have near that sort of range.

    William

    --
    Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
  44. travel where u arent welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Some suggest arming cruise ships. But being armed on the high seas itself, sadly, can be considered an act of hostility. For example, would we want armed boats anywhere in our vicinity .. even if they technically were in international waters? Only lightly armed? .. but they have to be long range enough to deter or eliminate threats.. correct? The problem is, which boats can be armed and not considered threats? And no you can't just go by flag or registration (which can be stolen/faked). Also you can't tell what people look like from a distance cause they can put makeup/disguise.

  45. Ba dum bum by DarkHand · · Score: 5, Funny

    So a pirate walks into a bar with a steering wheel and an active LRAD device on his crotch. The bartender says: "There's a steering wheel and an LRAD device on your crotch!" The pirate says: "Yar, I know! They're both driving me nuts!"

  46. After spending millions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in research and devlopment for the LRAD, Biff countered the LRAD with two cigarettes stuffed neatly in his ear.

  47. Weekly piracy report by __aagctu1952 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Oh yes. Pirates are as active as ever. Only nowadays they have machine guns and RPGs instead of blunderbusses and cannons...
    Just read IMB's Weekly Piracy Report for an idea of how active and how dangerous modern pirates are.

    1. Re:Weekly piracy report by The+Salamander · · Score: 4, Funny

      Does this mean global temperatures are decreasing?!?

    2. Re:Weekly piracy report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ICC reports states: Ships not making scheduled calls at Somali ports are advised to keep at least 200 nm from the Somali coast.

      Wow, I wouldn't expect that such a distance could make a difference.

    3. Re:Weekly piracy report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The ICC reports states: Ships not making scheduled calls at Somali ports are advised to keep at least 200 nm from the Somali coast.

      Wow, I wouldn't expect that such a distance could make a difference.

      Yeah, any closer than 200 nanometers, and van der Waals forces will pull you right over to the pirates just like a tractor beam!

      (And yes, I know "nm" in this context means nautical miles.)

    4. Re:Weekly piracy report by Thalagyrt · · Score: 1

      In this case nm stands for nautical miles. See the definition here.

      --
      Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo!
    5. Re:Weekly piracy report by joib · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm wondering why these cargo ships are not defending themselves. Cargo ships are pretty stable even in choppy seas, and have lots of steel to cover behind. Just a simple high power rifle with a scope, and you could pick off these pirates when they're coming in their dinky open boats way before they get into range to shoot anywhere near accurately. Hell, given a machine gun, everybody on that little pirate boat would be dead meat within seconds.

    6. Re:Weekly piracy report by 2old2rockNroll · · Score: 1

      And here's one for you.

    7. Re:Weekly piracy report by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Well a lot of countries wouldn't look kindly on cargo ships with machine guns mounted on them.
      if you look most cargo ships can out run the pirates if not ramming seems like a possibility. Sounds like we need to start flying some P-3s out of DG. Maybe see if we can add a laser targeting pod and a few hellfires just for good measure.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    8. Re:Weekly piracy report by big+tex · · Score: 1

      Best link resulting from that site:
      An Electric Fence for boats.

      Let's think this through, boys and girls: an ELECTRIC fence for BOATS.

      --
      I think I need a new sig here.
    9. Re:Weekly piracy report by flyingsquid · · Score: 1
      Oh yes. Pirates are as active as ever. Only nowadays they have machine guns and RPGs

      Pirates with RPGs? "Arrr, kill me elf, will ye Blackbeard? Curse ye and keel haul ye, you be the cheatinest Dungeon Master on the Seven Seas!"

    10. Re:Weekly piracy report by xaque · · Score: 1

      Wow... I wish they had an RSS feed of that.

    11. Re:Weekly piracy report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      200nm somalia must have one steep coast line

    12. Re:Weekly piracy report by werewolf1031 · · Score: 1

      In lieu of mod points, I grant you a +10% experience bonus!

      Funny shit, dude. Thanks for making the daily /. read worthwhile. :)

    13. Re:Weekly piracy report by mfrank · · Score: 1

      Sounds like someone needs to turn a merchant ship into a modern day Q-ship and take out some trash.

    14. Re:Weekly piracy report by Migraineman · · Score: 1

      Looks like Indonesia and Nigeria are good places to avoid too. I didn't realize Nigeria was a hotbed of maritime Pirate activity. Maybe all the 419-scammers are looking to branch out.

    15. Re:Weekly piracy report by Migraineman · · Score: 1

      Dammit, shoulda included the link to the 2004 Maritime Piracy Maps.

    16. Re:Weekly piracy report by indiechild · · Score: 1

      How could your comment be moderated insightful? Interesting perhaps, but insightful???

      Methinks you've been playing too much Call of Duty. It's damn hard to shoot long guns accurately on a ship that's heaving and rolling on the ocean. The rule of thumb when engaging vehicles, boats or hardened targets is that you need some decent firepower, and that means 7.62mm or .50caliber heavy machineguns or bigger. Don't forget that these pirates may be shooting at you as well, which makes your job that much harder.

    17. Re:Weekly piracy report by instarx · · Score: 1

      Just a simple high power rifle with a scope, and you could pick off these pirates when they're coming in their dinky open boats way before they get into range to shoot anywhere near accurately. Hell, given a machine gun,...

      Well as someone else pointed out shooting from a moving platform is easier said than done, PLUS you would be shooting at a small boat that was even more mobile than your shooting platform.

      Secondly, what is to say that there is only one boat? The attacks described in the weekly piracy metioned a "mothership" that had the ability to launch multiple small attack boats. Even with a machine gun you might very well be unable to deter multiple simultaneous attacks from multiple directions. Of course there is nothing to prevent the pirates from having machine guns in each boat. I could easily see the situation getting pretty desperate pretty quickly even with a machine gun for defense.

      Everything seems real easy to solve sitting at home in an armchair, and people always make the assumption that terrorists and pirates are not too bright and are easily deterred, but that is not always correct. Remember, when the US was in Mogadishu we had machine guns, snipers, and attack helicopters and we STILL got our butts kicked. Don't underestimate your opponent.

      As I write this it occurs to me that these pirates could effectively neutralize a defensive machine gun or rifle by simply putting some women and children on the bows of their attack boats.

    18. Re:Weekly piracy report by joib · · Score: 1


        How could your comment be moderated insightful? Interesting perhaps, but insightful???


      You must be new around here, thinking that the moderation system generally works as it should. ;-)


      Methinks you've been playing too much Call of Duty


      Uh, is that some video game? Well, not knowing what it is I guess I haven't played it.


      It's damn hard to shoot long guns accurately on a ship that's heaving and rolling on the ocean.


      Umm, having actually been aboard big ships, I can tell you that big ships don't heave very quickly, even in very high seas. Practically speaking, in the relatively calm weather required for these pirates to operate, a big ship is more or less a stationary platform as far as firing a rifle is concerned.


      The rule of thumb when engaging vehicles, boats or hardened targets is that you need some decent firepower, and that means 7.62mm or .50caliber heavy machineguns or bigger.


      Uh, did you see the pictures of these pirates in their boats? We're talking about 6 m open wooden or fibreglass boats with an outboard motor, with about 3 people aboard. You don't exactly need a battleship to disable those. A rifle bullet will go through a boat like that like a hot knife goes through butter, for lack of a better analogy. But yeah, a machinegun would be even better (that's why I mentioned it in my previous post).


      Don't forget that these pirates may be shooting at you as well, which makes your job that much harder.


      Yes, of course. But my point was that a big ship is a significantly better gun platform, offering much better stability and protection from incoming fire, than a 6m open boat.

    19. Re:Weekly piracy report by Tekgno · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Ships not making scheduled calls at Somali ports are advised to keep at least 200 nm from the Somali coast.

      200 nanometers? Isn't that a tad close?

  48. Learn How To Read by DaFallus · · Score: 1

    The Spirit was about 100 miles off Somalia when pirates fired rocket-propelled grenades and machine guns as they tried to get onboard.

    The ship was 100 miles off the coast. Nowhere does it say how far away the pirates were from the cruise ship. I would assume that they were about a few hundred yards away from the ship if they were close enough to use rpgs or machine guns, and also about 100 miles from the shore. Learn how to read...

    --
    No one cares what your captcha was

    Houston TX, USA
  49. Fear Our Response by silverbax · · Score: 1

    "And now...we shall defeat you with the awesome power of SOUND."

  50. I do hope... by MaestroSartori · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...this didn't result in anyone getting an Angry Pirate :D

  51. Re:duh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The friendly article says the ship and the pirates were 100 miles off the coast of Somalia. NOT that they were 100 miles apart

  52. New Headline by AxsDeny · · Score: 5, Funny

    Timbers Shivered by Shivering Timbres

    --

    zork% mv *.asp /bin/darkroom
    283 files eaten by a grue
    1. Re:New Headline by Dirtside · · Score: 4, Funny

      Even more concise:

      Shivering Timbres Shiver Timbers

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    2. Re:New Headline by AxsDeny · · Score: 1

      Touché. I've had my poopdeck scuttled.

      --

      zork% mv *.asp /bin/darkroom
      283 files eaten by a grue
  53. LRAD by TropicalCoder · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's application by the military and police is controversial because of ethical questions, but this seems an ideal use of this technology in private sector. Commercial ships at sea cannot use heavy weapons by international treaty. The Long Range Acoustic Device, or LRAD, is a so-called "non-lethal weapon" developed after the 2000 attack on the USS Cole off Yemen as a way to keep operators of small boats from approaching U.S. warships. The 45-pound, dish-shaped device belongs to a developing arsenal of technologies intended not to kill but to deter. The sonic weapon, which measures 33 inches in diameter, can direct a high-pitched, piercing tone with a tight beam. Neither the LRAD's operators or others in the immediate area are affected. The LRAD's shrill tone can be as loud as about 150 decibels well beyond the threshold of pain. Inside 100 yards, you definitely don't want to be there. The device is currently being tested in regions of Baghdad, Fallujah, and other regions of Iraq as well as by police in New York City during protests of the 2004 Republican National Convention. It is based on "Hypersonic Sound" - a process called acoustic heterodyning. What makes acoustic heterodyning possible is that air molecules behave nonlinearly. Ultrasonic speakers create sound at more than 20,000 cycles per second, a rate high enough to keep in a focused beam and beyond the range of human hearing. Step into the beam and you hear the sound as if it were being generated inside your head. Reflect it off a surface and it sounds like it originated there. At 30,000 cycles, the sound can travel 150 yards without any distortion or loss of volume.

    1. Re:LRAD by alleycat0 · · Score: 1

      According to the article, LRAD is "installed as a *part* of its defense systems" (emphasis mine). What other weaponry are these cruise ships packing?

      --
      I am not a number - I am a free man!
    2. Re:LRAD by The+Mayor · · Score: 1

      What exactly does heterodyning have to do with air molecules behaving nonlinearly? I understand acoustics fairly well, and understand that if the baffle around the transducer is greater than 1/2 wavelength, you get beaming instead of radial dispersion. This, combined with aliasing effects, is what I understood caused heterodyning. I've never heard anything about air molecules behaving nonlinearly as a cause. Can you elaborate?

      --
      --Be human.
    3. Re:LRAD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do headphones help counter this?

    4. Re:LRAD by BenEnglishAtHome · · Score: 1
      Commercial ships at sea cannot use heavy weapons by international treaty.

      Could you provide a link, please? The first thing I thought when I heard this story was "Where was the trained crewman with the Barrett 50? Or even one of those semi-auto M2HBs you can get nowadays?" I always assumed that commercial ships at sea had a right to shoot back, with heavy weapons if they had them. Then again, maybe I just don't know how you define "heavy weapons." Obviously, I'd like to read up on this so any sources you can provide would be welcome.

    5. Re:LRAD by Kelson · · Score: 1

      The LRAD's shrill tone can be as loud as about 150 decibels well beyond the threshold of pain.

      Heck, just the article's description of "like a smoke detector, but louder" made me wince. That'll be effective enough on its own, even without reaching 150 db.

    6. Re:LRAD by Yahweh+Doesn't+Exist · · Score: 1

      a rape whistle and some plastic knives

    7. Re:LRAD by Technician · · Score: 5, Informative

      Can you elaborate?

      Yes.

      Sending a 1Khz tone a long distance would require a large reflector to produce a relatively tight beam. Sending a 30 KHZ tone requires a much smaller reflector to deliver the acoustic power the same distance. The small dish sends high power signals. For example if we sent 30Khz and 31Khz, they would both travel in a well defined beam as a ~30Khz signal. Unfortunately we can't hear 30 Khz ultrasonic signals (except for a few audiophiles ;-). ) Air at high volume is not linear. For example you can compress air to several atmospheres. The reverse is not true. You can not draw several atmospheres of vacuum. You are limited by the hard limit of pure vacuum. Air compressing and expanding is non-linear.

      Now enter a couple very high intensity sound waves of two frequencies. Now you have non-linear mixing. In non linear mixing (just like in a radio reciever) you get out the 2 original frequencies + the sum and the difference. Therefore 30Khz + 31 Khz is 30Khz, 31Khz, 61Khz and 1Khz. Now you have delivered a very loud and painful 1Khz sound using the tight beam delivery of 30Khz with a small dish.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    8. Re:LRAD by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      That still doesn't sound like it has anything to do with air behaving non-linearly. Any two tones at any intensity will produce a beat frequency between them. One of the ways of tuning an instrument is to listen for the beat then try to make it accelerate until you can no longer hear it. That's basically how the little hand held instrument tuners work.

    9. Re:LRAD by The+Mayor · · Score: 1

      This is not a case of air not being linear. This is a case of the summation of wavelets resulting in beaming, as opposed to a radial dispersion pattern. This is true of any wave (electromagnetic, water, or air/gas). If the width of the transducer is less than 1/2 wavelength, you get a radial dispersion pattern. Likewise, if the tranducer is greater than 1/2 wavelength, you get no dispersion (hence beaming). This is the reason why speakers have enclosures. The enclosure prevents the backwave from cancelling with the front wave. This is also the reason why eclosureless speakers (like those from Martin Logan and Magnepan) tend to be fairly large.

      The combination of frequencies is known as aliasing. Aliasing is what allows sonic frequences to be created from two supersonic frequencies.

      There's nothing about linear versus nonlinear behavior of air in effect there as far as I know.

      One advantage of this effect, for audiophiles (at least once the patents expire--I believe they were awarded in the mid-90s), is that a single tranducer can reproduce then entire audio spectrum. 20Hz-20kHz is 8 octaves, a mammoth feat for any single tranducer to reproduce in linear fashion (by linear, here, I mean that doubling the input power doubles the output power). However, move that from 100kHz-120kHz (resulting in the same 20-20K range when using this heterodyne concept), and the tranducer only needs to create roughly 1/4 of an octave linearly in order to recreate the entire audio spectrum. That task is far easier to do than doing it the "old fashioned" way.

      In about 10 years, I would expect to see a plethora of audiophile-quality speakers that consist of an incredibly tiny flat square panel tranducer, coupled with a reflecting device that reflects the sound in a radial pattern. Or perhaps we'll end up with directional reflectors that are able to follow us, allowing a "Minority Report"-type directional advertisements.

      --
      --Be human.
    10. Re:LRAD by Robotbeat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I am doing acoustic beam-forming (well, the reverse process, actually) for my senior undergraduate Physics research. I am using a ~10 foot array of 64 microphones in a sort of spiral pattern. You wouldn't actually need to have a physical reflecting device, since you can just use an array of speakers to form a beam. This makes the "Minority Report"-type of directional speakers easier to aim, since you can aim them without any moving parts (besides the sound production, of course), and also you can use a single array to aim at multiple targets simultaneously and dynamically.

    11. Re:LRAD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And permanently and irreparably damaged the hearing of anyone in the way, due to the inaudible, but extremely high energy, ultrasonic 30KHz tone.

    12. Re:LRAD by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      I'll note that, while the definition of 'heavy weapon' can vary, the M2, while a heavy machine gun, is not generally considered a 'heavy weapon', which is reserved for things such as artillery level guns, mortars, other things that a normal human can't even consider moving around by hand that would generally be permanently mounted to the deck of whatever ship it's installed in.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    13. Re:LRAD by Technician · · Score: 1

      That still doesn't sound like it has anything to do with air behaving non-linearly. Any two tones at any intensity will produce a beat frequency between them.

      The difference in this system and tuning up instruments is related to linear and non-linear mixing. When tuning a couple flutes 1 octave above middle a (440 Hz) and this system is the results. When tuning two flutes and one is 1 Hz off, you would have simply 880 and 881 Hz. You do not get 1 Hz and 1761 Hz. What about the beat? It is there, but simply as a modulation of amplitude of the combined sound. It does not make the walls vibrate at 1 Hz. Ask the sound guy with the analizer. The subsonics in a room are due to the building air handler, not due to a few flutes and violins. At low sound pressure levels air is quite linear.

      Now back to the defense weapon.. Very high sound pressure levels are used. When they strike an object, the reflection creates standing pressure waves putting the air sound pressure levels into non-linear range. Non-linear mixing results in the area. New sum and difference frequencies are generated. This is where the 1Khz sound comes from in the above example. The 1Khz sound originates at the surface where the signals combine be it the target boat or the target persons head. From there it propogates like a 1Khz sound, not like a 30 Khz sound that delivered it.

      This weapon does not just result in a 30Khz signal AM modulated at 1Khz. 1Khz is generated as a result of the sound pressure levels causing non-linear mixing. This is why it is limited in range to about 300 Meters. Beyound that, the SPL drops out of non-linear range.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    14. Re:LRAD by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      You can produce difference tones with instruments playing different frequencies that do sound very much like a third instrument playing at a different frequency, not like a modulation of the other two. Also, speaker systems exist that use ultrasound in just the way you suggest -- two ultrasonic carriers differing by the desired frequency interfere to produce the desired sound. I think they could even control where the sound seemed to be coming from -- like a virtual speaker they could position in space. That wasn't at levels anything like 150dB.

      I might be wrong, but I suspect that a sound wave that produced even a 0.5 atm overpressure (which would still put it in a fairly linear range, according to your explanation) would tend to have some nasty effects no matter what frequency it was. Probably especially if it was ultrasound (more energy).

    15. Re:LRAD by Technician · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't actually need to have a physical reflecting device, since you can just use an array of speakers to form a beam.

      This is true at long wavelengths where the array can combine into a single wavefront. At short wavelengths, diffraction lobes steal power from the main beam. A reflector is more effecient with fewer lobes. With an array on the other hand each transducer would require less power and has the advantage of being scaliable to high power and steerable by phase changes so it can point multiple targets quickly as well as correct for wind turbulance. (crosswind can carry the beam off target) The back end for an array raises it's cost considerably over a dish.

      I am interested in your research. Are you using individual mic amplifiers and ccd delays before a summing network so aim and focus can be adjusted?

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    16. Re:LRAD by Technician · · Score: 1

      Aliasing is what allows sonic frequences to be created from two supersonic frequencies.


      Alisaing is a sampeling artifact. Sampeling a high frequency by taking samples near the signal frequency produces results far removed from the original waveform. This is not the same result as mixing 2 high frequencies in a linear transducer (Quality speaker)which results in 2 undistorted frequencies. IF they are near each other in frequencies, they appear as a AM modulated sound of the frequency (beat frequency volume modulated) not the two frequencies and a bass note (3 notes of steady volume). They do not produce a low note unless there is non-linear mixing somewhere (speaker or amplifier clipping).

      In about 10 years, I would expect to see a plethora of audiophile-quality speakers that consist of an incredibly tiny flat square panel tranducer, coupled with a reflecting device that reflects the sound in a radial pattern.

      Don't expect a small flat square transducer to replace your 200 watt subwoofer anytime soon and rattle the dishes in the dish cabinet. Non-linear mixing also produces Sum frequencies in addition to the originals and Difference.

      Non-linear is generaly a bad thing in High-Fidelity.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    17. Re:LRAD by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Please don't take this the wrong way... I hope you fail. One thing I don't need is advertising that can track me because I'm wearing my Nike's.

    18. Re:LRAD by Robotbeat · · Score: 1

      Actually, I am simply feeding each mic (they're the electret-type with a built-in FET amp) into one of 64 A/D inputs into a computer and then recording all of the signals simultaneously. To aim and focus the beam, I can simply delay the signals after-the-fact so that the effective "paths" from a certain test point are equal for all the microphones (I suppose this could be done in real-time, but I only have like 2 months max to finish this, so I need to keep it simple). I am going to then integrate the intensity of the sound for a certain test point over a broad range of frequencies and for a period of about a fifth of a sec, and then do that for another test point until I have a 3d array of the integrated sound intensities, and then feed that as a 3d media (fog) density file into POV-ray to image it, and then do that whole process 300 times until I have a minute-long animation of the sound-intensity. I need a rather large array in order to get a decent directionally-correlated response for low frequencies, but I haven't decided if that's worth the effort. I haven't decided whether to make the array like 10 feet in diameter or only about 3 feet (3-1m, for you who use more rational units than me). I am planning on using a modified 5-arm spiral pattern which is optimized to reduce side-lobes and maximize the beam focus for a very large range of frequencies. I am limited to ~64 microphones (because any more would cost too much and would be too hard to interface with a single computer, and I've seen pretty decent results with only 64 mics). I also plan on ultimately recording a choir with the array so that you can have this animated 3d intensity image of the choir, and one could also focus on a single voice (or maybe even remove that single voice from the over-all recording, if it's anything like my own voice ;) ).

  54. Great by EulerX07 · · Score: 1

    This is not only good for pirates, it also should be helpful against Utsusu Mojoro. /first thing I thought off.

  55. oh cooomee... on..... by charon_1 · · Score: 0

    "a cruise ship of the coast of Africa"

  56. Thwarted by distantbody · · Score: 1

    Apparently they were'nt abba fans.

  57. Pirates my ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These chumps are nothing more than terrorists on a ship.

  58. Good there were no Sony CDs by AgentGray · · Score: 1

    Otherwise, they wouldn't be able to play!

    Imagine the hoops to jump through. :)

    --
    "Power corrupts. PowerPoint corrupts absolutely."
  59. MOD PARENT by everphilski · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Wish I had mod points...

    1. Re:MOD PARENT by everphilski · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      gah... not the guy with the wikipedia ref. to the sonic beam... the one with the reference to karma whore... twas funny as hell...

      -everphilski-

  60. Kate Bush by pklong · · Score: 1

    I didn't know Kate Bush was ding cruises now. Thought she was busy on her new album.

    --

    Philip

    Signatures are broken

  61. LRAD Countermeasure? by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 5, Funny

    Has anyone had a chance to play with one of these? (Or been played with by someone with one of these like at the 2004 republican convention in NYC? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LRAD)

    Since it is just sound, and apparently high-frequency sound (thus relatively low-energy vs low-frequency sound) I wonder if something as simple as noise-cancellation headphones would provide significant protection against LRAD usage.

    Will we see pirates wearing Bose noise-cancellation headphones and listening to pirated music while they pirate real ships now?

    1. Re:LRAD Countermeasure? by Reverberant · · Score: 5, Informative
      I wonder if something as simple as noise-cancellation headphones would provide significant protection against LRAD usage.

      Noise cancelling headsets (and noise cancelling technologies in general) don't work all that well for high-frequency sounds since the impinging noise and the 180-degree shifted sounds need to be perfectly aligned at the ear to cancel each other out. That's difficult to do with high-frequency sounds because of the relatively small wavelengths involved.

      Now passive hearing protectors (e.g. ear plugs) work very well at high frequencies. However, the best ear plugs reduce sound by 20-30 dB at high-frequencies. If the LRAD literature is true, and it can produce sound levels of 150 dB, than ear plugs can reduce it to 120 dB, which is still uncomfortably loud.

    2. Re:LRAD Countermeasure? by srleffler · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that if your noise cancelling headset slips into phase with the LRAD sound it will blow out your eardrums.

    3. Re:LRAD Countermeasure? by MidnightPsycho · · Score: 1


      > Has anyone had a chance to play with one of these?

      I saw a live demo of the Audio Spotlight (http://www.holosonics.com/)
      here at work. It works on a similar priciple . . . The technology is
      amazing .. . . .

    4. Re:LRAD Countermeasure? by HEbGb · · Score: 1

      LRAD can't produce 150dB at distance - only at extremely short range (a couple of meters). Passive hearing protection will work quite well against it, and, better yet, holding up a piece of wood with just bounce the beam right back to the guy that sent it.

      Piece of cake. Nothing to see here.

    5. Re:LRAD Countermeasure? by pi_rules · · Score: 1

      How about ear plugs with ear muffs over the top?

      Shooters do it all the time when they pull out some of the really big boomers.

    6. Re:LRAD Countermeasure? by po8 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Add a nice big parabolic dish of your own, and see how good the originator's ear protection is.

    7. Re:LRAD Countermeasure? by plantman-the-womb-st · · Score: 1

      A company in my building is starting to help market these things as they are now being offered to police agencies and the like. They were demonstrating one last week to a group from the local police department and I had the extreme misfortune to be walking through the parking lot at the time (yes, they completely failed to warn or notify ANYONE that a WEAPON was being tested). The "warning tone" they mention is ear spliting and extremely high pitched. The unit they tested was only turned up to about 30% they told me afterwards, but it was so forcefull (by this I mean loud) that I literally was knocked off my feet. Apparently the sales rep saw me and thought it'd be hilarious to aim it at me. My ears didn't stop ringing for hours. The cops thought it was hilarious. I'm still considering sueing. It'd be like walking down an office building hallway and unexpectedly being hit with a taser, then hearing some guy say, "See, very effective." Counter-measures I would think after feeling the effect myself, would be nearly impossible.

      --
      Say bad words about my book, in cold oatmeal, or I shall sue!
    8. Re:LRAD Countermeasure? by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 0, Troll

      Your story highlights one of the biggest problems with this new category of "non-lethal weapons." - Since they are suppossedly "non-lethal" they are much more prone to mis-use by poorly-trained or even untrained operators. The results for many such "non-lethal weapons" can actually range all the way up to lethality when used "out of spec."

      If I were you, I'd sue. If the company that actually sells the product can't be relied upon to use it appropriately, how can anyone expect their customers to learn and follow proper procedures?

    9. Re:LRAD Countermeasure? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Not to mention that if your noise cancelling headset slips into phase with the LRAD sound it will blow out your eardrums.

      How would it "slip into phase"? It's not a pair of belt-driven 3 phase generators, it's an electronic device. It's about as likely to "slip" into phase as a mirror is likely to "slip" into showing your reflection upside down.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    10. Re:LRAD Countermeasure? by fred+fleenblat · · Score: 1

      parabolic would have to be perfectly aimed in order to work.

      corner cube reflector would be a better choice.

    11. Re:LRAD Countermeasure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've obviously never been to a funhouse.

    12. Re:LRAD Countermeasure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about ear plugs with ear muffs over the top?

      As long as they have some kind of radio thingy in there.
      Otherwise, it's..

      "Pirates...attack!"
      "You need a snack?"
      "I said PIRATES, ATTACK! NOW!!!"
      "What did you say?"
      "What?!?"
      "What????"
      "..."
      "Hey...where'd that ship go?"

    13. Re:LRAD Countermeasure? by keilinw · · Score: 1

      Howard Leight Industries posts some of the Noise Reduction Ratios for their earplugs: http://www.howardleight.com/products/products2.asp ?id=4#

      It looks to me that the 33dB Noise Reduction Ratio (NRR) that they came up with is actually just a mean NRR. Higher and Lower frequencies get 40-55 dB reduction ratios. This, combined with the fact that the LRAD is capable of doing 150 dB Max at close distances then it is possible that foar earplugs are an effective deterrant. But hey, these guys aren't concerned about hearing loss are they? I mean.. they are firing grenade launchers from point blank!

      I actually a bit curious about this LRAD. Is it similar to the directed energy beams that were discussed a few years back? You know, the ones that operate on the principle of firing TWO highly directed high frequency sound beams NEAR each other and using mathematics and physics to predict how the two beams will interact through interference and produce audible noise at controlled distances. Is the LRAD the same thing or is it just a directional loudspeaker?

      Anyway, I think earplugs might be an effecitve countermeasure.. that or deaf pirates!

      --Matthew Wong

      http://www.themindofmatthew.com/

    14. Re:LRAD Countermeasure? by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Or, if you're a good enough shot, and have a stable enough platform(not likely out in the ocean, I'll admit), a few bullets should silence the thing. If not, well, that's what shotguns and machineguns are for.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    15. Re:LRAD Countermeasure? by po8 · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't I be concerned about the efficiency of a reasonable-sized corner reflector at these frequencies? I agree, though, not having to aim would be great.

    16. Re:LRAD Countermeasure? by blake213 · · Score: 1

      I used to work for ATC, and I performed some of the measurements on the LRADs. They're pretty loud, and with the "kill tone" fed through it, it can pretty much stop you from being able to function. The kill tone is just a FM signal, I don't remember exactly the frequencies but it sounded something like 3kHz-8kHz at a 10Hz modulating rate. At 150 dB, you better have ear plugs.

      --
      mund freud.
    17. Re:LRAD Countermeasure? by fred+fleenblat · · Score: 1

      I would think that a parabolic and a corner cube with the same cross-sections would have about the same gain and frequency response on-axis. off axis the cc wins by so much that even some on-axis loss would

      1Kz ~= 1 foot wavelength so 2ft diameter reflectors should do a nice job of any plain old acoustic countermeasures. however if the beam width is 50 ft at your position you're only going to send back a fraction of a percent of the power anyway, parabolic or not, so unless the entire side of your ship is lined with cc's it's pretty much a waste of time.

      focused ultrasonics are a bit more of a problem. the interference frequency will just kind of appear on any surface nearby so you won't be able to reflect that, plus the ultrasonics are likely coming from offset positions so the parabola will not be able to reflect both at the same time, and even if the cc does reflect both it won't result in anything destructive reflecting back since it will be out of focus.

  62. I can't help but wonder... by Mexmexmex2000 · · Score: 1

    ...how this new technology will impact Disney's Pirates of the Caribbean ride and Treasure Island's nightly pirate battle.

  63. Sonic Fifth by BodhiCat · · Score: 1

    My neighbors are trying to form a rock alternative punk band and feel they have the right to practice at all hours of the night. I retaliated with Die Fünfte at 200 watts per channel at full volume. A dose of Ol'Ludwig did the trick. Now that's a sonic weapon.

    1. Re:Sonic Fifth by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

      Personaly I use Bluegrass as a weapon against those jerks
      A banjo loud mean and nasty will cut right through (C)rap music

      --
      Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
  64. 150 decibels by xenomouse · · Score: 3, Informative

    "It can be as loud as about 150 decibels..."

    According to this decibal chart, that's somewhere between "jet at 100 feet" and "death of hearing tissue." I used to go to a summer camp near an air force base, and A-10 warthogs would frequently fly overhead. I doubt they were any closer than a few hundred feet, but they were still incredibly loud. It was near impossible to hear anyone speak/yell until the aircraft had passed. As for this weapon, my guess is that the pain of the sound it produces (while the most noticeable of the effects) is probably no more important than the fear and confusion it imbues.

    1. Re:150 decibels by mwlewis · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, it's still quite a ways away from death of tissue. Since dBs are logarithmic, 150dB vs 140dB is 10 times as loud, while the death of hearing tissue (180dB) is 1000 times as loud as 150dB.

      --
      JOIN US FOR PONG!
    2. Re:150 decibels by dfung · · Score: 1

      Just to be accurate, dBs are logarithmic so 150dB is 10x the energy of 140dB, but you brain perceives it as only twice as loud (before it melts into goo). That's why they're "decibels". An increase from 14 Bels to 15 Bels is perceived as a doubling in volume.

      I think that military jets taking off will exceed 120dB when you're this close and I suspect that the pilot can exceed that level significantly if they decide to operate their plane like that.

      It's hard for me to believe that a smoke detector is *only* 80-90 dB though.

  65. So for the record... by RandoX · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The boats weren't 100 miles apart?

  66. League of Justice... by Exluddite · · Score: 1
    "...pirates attempting to take control of a cruise ship of the coast of Africa, only to be twarted by some sort of sonic weapon..."

    Aquaman?

    --
    What does this button do...
  67. Batten down the hatches, man the cannons by waterlogged · · Score: 1

    So instead of the water survival class they make you take you have to have an hour of Shipboard defense now? I can see it now... "pull on the lever to chamber the shell, slid the bolt forward ... billy? are you paying attention?.... aim and slowly squeeze the shot off and don't forget to brace for recoil." ;-)

    --
    I couldn't fail to disagree with you any less.
  68. Obligatory by COMON$ · · Score: 1
    Ok too many here...

    Is there DRM on this Acustic Noise?

    Didnt Aquaman destroy this on Smallville?

    Does this mean there is a rootkit on the cruise ship, obviously these were the wrong kind of pirates.

    Sorry Had to do it.

    --
    CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
  69. Armed cruise ships? by RandoX · · Score: 1

    Didn't expect a cruise ship to be armed, even with non-lethal weaponry. Of course, I wouldn't expect to be attacked by pirates these days either. Can't RTFA, it's FUBAR.

    1. Re:Armed cruise ships? by iamlucky13 · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't really consider LRAD to be armament. It's like carrying a whistle, or maybe pepper spray, through a bad neighborhood.

      It might not be a bad idea to have a few crewmen on ships that cruise in potentially dangerous routes trained to use, for example, a Mk-19 or an M-2 Browning. I somehow doubt they would maintain their enthusiasm for attacking cruise ships when 40mm grenades start flying their way at 300 rounds/minute or .50 caliber rounds start drilling holes completely through their boats. Actually, the best would probably be a Bushmaster 25 mm cannon. It's the same gun used on the Bradley IFV's and the LAV 25 "Strikers" the media is so infatuated with. Mounting it in an armored turret right on the sun deck should protect the crew while giving it a good field of fire and offering a sense of adventure for the sunbathers. It wouldn't matter if the pirates tried to attack in greater force. The Bushmaster has several times the effective range of an RPG and it can make swiss cheese of just about anything lighter than a tank.

  70. It could have been worse by Nybble's+Byte · · Score: 0

    They could have played John Tesh music.

  71. Obviously Mariah Carey by b0r1s · · Score: 1

    No text.

    --
    Mooniacs for iOS and Android
  72. FSM by droptone · · Score: 1

    We now have proof the Flying Spaghetti Monster is assisting terrorists. I want to see supporters of this un-American religion to be exiled from America!

    --
    Every post I make begins with the assumption P=~P.
    1. Re:FSM by bombadillo · · Score: 1

      Beat me to the FSM reference! However, if we use this sonic weapon we can eliminate the main cause of global warming.....pirates!

      All subsequent FSM posts will now be modded redundent.

    2. Re:FSM by masklinn · · Score: 1

      It's actually the disappearance of pirates that cause global warming, as proven by this explicit graph[/url]

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    3. Re:FSM by bombadillo · · Score: 1

      Good point! You can tell I am not a practicing pastafarian.

    4. Re:FSM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      All subsequent FSM posts will now be modded redundent.

      Actually, your post should be modded redundant. Someone beat you to it by 20 minutes.

  73. Be Greedo by dada21 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A bit OT but fun to know...

    Pirates do exist, and account for nearly $16b in losses annually. If you're interested in a career like Han Solo, piracy is an option.

    Most pirates today work between Eritria and Mumbai. Seychelles is very casual about accepting boats without valid port histories. The pirate ships are often large yachts with fast ciggy boats for docking. Glocks and Kalishies are the norm. The dress is much like the old pirate look -- bandanas, beards, loose shirts, etc.

    Pirate robbers make the news often, yet most pirates are smugglers (food, drugs, medicine and health equipment). Countries with US/UN embargoes pay well -- 400% over the white market rate.

    Cuba was easy money until 9/11, now we have our Coast Guard pretending to fight terrorism but actually destroying the free market in smuggling.

    Malaysia has a growing piracy need as the government gets more religious. Somalia and Sri Lanka both ignore the pirates like Seychelles.

    Take a trip to Dubai or Seychelles. Hook up with the right crowd and you can make 6 figures easily.

    Arrrrr!

    1. Re:Be Greedo by mosch · · Score: 1

      If Seychelles allows piracy, why did the cruise ship seek safe harbor there?

    2. Re:Be Greedo by dada21 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Seychelles is strict on crimes committed on the Isles. But their immigration at the port is very laissez faire. I'll be going back to Dubai (and hopefully Seychelles) in a few months, and I actually was intending to do a web
      documentary about opportunities in working in the Indian Ocean black market. Robbery is wrong, but smuggling and violating tariffs/embargoes is A-OK to me.

    3. Re:Be Greedo by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      Somalia and Sri Lanka both ignore the pirates like Seychelles.

      I don't know about Sri Lanka but I keep hearing that Somalia doesn't really have a government at the moment.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    4. Re:Be Greedo by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A smuggler isn't a pirate--he's a smuggler. Pirates attack opther ships, board them and steal from them (generally also killing passengers & crew). And we need to revoke the treaty which forbids commercial ships from carrying heavy weapons. A rocket into the pirate boat would do a lot better good than a little smoke-alarm noise.

    5. Re:Be Greedo by dada21 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Somalia is a tough one for anarchocapitalists. Some people say its a terrorist blood-curdling country of death and nihilism. Others say that some of the overlords are very fair and the liberty is great. I haven't personally visited, but I would like to, just to see.

      Traveling to countries that seem scary in the news is fun and I recommend it for everyone with a little bit of courage. It was one of the prime reasons I gave up government -- visiting Cuba 13 years ago, visiting Persia/Iraq before the second war, and visiting parts of the Saud region such as Dubai (freer than America every was and every will be in every way, including free religion). Now the lady and I travel more to the "worst" places only to see that they're sometimes better than what I see in my own Chicago, Los Angeles, and New York. In fact, even Ethiopia is a gorgeous country with wealth and opportunity. Just don't go living in the desert allowing your government to walk all over you.

    6. Re:Be Greedo by dada21 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm all for arming boats with heavy weapons. The ICC and other government cartels need these international laws in order to protect their Navy monopolies. I'm anti-piracy but pro-smuggling, but most smugglers are affiliated with piracy groups as well. Although in reality most of these pirates aren't organized as a large group (RIAA style?), they do generally have their own territories and shipping lanes. It amazes me that more ships aren't attacked, especially with the anti-heavy weapons laws that are more heavily enforced than the protection of the shipping lanes.

      To be honest, everyone I know with a yacht in deep waters already carries decent guns for protection. It is pretty easy to dump them if you're boarded by a coast guard or naval vessel.

    7. Re:Be Greedo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most pirates today work between Eritria and Mumbai.

      The Malacca Strait between Malaysia and Indonesia are the most pirate-infested.

    8. Re:Be Greedo by loose_cannon_gamer · · Score: 3, Funny
      Must... beg... forgiveness... for the following:

      I think the most appropriate weapon for these ships to carry would be cruise missiles.

      Thanks, I'll try not to post again all week.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, us are belong to all your base.
    9. Re:Be Greedo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The gun nut hath spoken.

    10. Re:Be Greedo by Plunky · · Score: 1

      To be honest, everyone I know with a yacht in deep waters already carries decent guns for protection. It is pretty easy to dump them if you're boarded by a coast guard or naval vessel.

      Well I guess you are an american then, most US cruisers I've met had a gun on board, but very few other nationalities ever would have.

      I fully expect some company to start up Pirate Cruises in the near future, actually getting harassed by pirates or your money back!

    11. Re:Be Greedo by ceoyoyo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Smugglers smuggling food, medicine and health equipment... there's something wrong when there's a market for smuggling such things.

    12. Re:Be Greedo by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      what's the 'heavy weapons' cut off at the moment?
      A 9mm pistol?
      A P90?
      An AK47?
      A BREN gun?
      An M2 Heavy machine gun (or equivalent)?
      An M61 Vulcan Autocannon?
      BOFORS gun?
      4.5 Inch artillery?
      18 Inch artillery?

      Surely to fight off a speedboat you don't need 'heavy' weapons per se, you just need a lot of lighter weapons

      Has the UN thought about passing a security council resolution providing for military escort for aid freighters? I don't suppose pirates are likely to try anything whilst staring down a fully equipped modern destroyer or frigate - a perfect trial mission for new ships.

      --
      FGD 135
    13. Re:Be Greedo by iabervon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, heavy weapons would just make ships more valuable targets for pirates. Cruise ship crews just aren't going to be very attentive, especially since pirate attacks are rare, and once they're in boarding range, rockets aren't going to be a good idea. And rockets would work really well against the sorts of ships that pirates target, so they'd be eager to get them. It's better to have an LRAD, which is effective at repelling the pirates, but not a weapon they'd be able to use effectively.

    14. Re:Be Greedo by EricTheGreen · · Score: 1

      Take a trip to Dubai or Seychelles. Hook up with the right crowd and you can make 6 figures easily.

      Nice lucre, but I bet the health insurance is lousy.

      Probably no 401(k) matching, either.

      Cheap b***rds!

    15. Re:Be Greedo by Flying+Purple+Wombat · · Score: 1

      I fully expect some company to start up Pirate Cruises in the near future, actually getting harassed by pirates or your money back!

      I know a few guys who would sign up for such a cruise, provided they were allowed to bring their own weapons. Target practice!

      --
      If God had meant for man to see the sunrise, He would have scheduled it later in the day.
    16. Re:Be Greedo by Zed2K · · Score: 1

      Do you get dental with that?

    17. Re:Be Greedo by efuseekay · · Score: 1

      Malaysia has a growing piracy need as the government gets more religious.

      The first part of the sentence is true. The second part is debatable. The causal connection claimed is completely non-sequitur. Just another example of random association so prevalent nowadays.

      --
      Mode (3) smart-aleck mode. Press * to return to main menu.
    18. Re:Be Greedo by ElVaquero · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sorry, only close to correct. Most modern piracy occurs in Southeast Asia. You can check the Piracy Reporting Centre of the International Chamber of Commerce's International Maritime Bureau for more data. There's a number of fun stuff at the site including a weekly report of all reported pirate actions (though, a lot goes unreported for various reasons). The link is here: http://www.icc-ccs.org/prc/piracyreport.php You can also see yearly break downs in number of attacks here: http://www.icc-ccs.org/prc/piracy_maps_2004.php http://www.icc-ccs.org/prc/piracy_maps_2003.php http://www.icc-ccs.org/prc/piracy_maps_2002.php http://www.icc-ccs.org/prc/piracy_maps_2001.php It is a truly fascinating subject and I'm glad I got the opportunity to research and write about it last year. Yarr!

    19. Re:Be Greedo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'd say that any of the common military-caliber rifles (5.56x45, 7.62x39, 5.45x39, 7.62x51) would probably be a good idea. The H&K G3 and G36 and the M16 come to mind right off. Something full-auto like the FN M240 (7.62x51mm belt-fed) wouldn't necessarily be a bad idea for the big boys either. That's not really long-range or powerful enough to do much to a large ship, but would deter speedboats pretty well. Bigger stuff might be possible, but probably nothing larger than 30mm ADEN cannon, or the high-velocity US 25mm units. Anything much over 30mm can seriously chew up a warship, if they catch 'em with their pants down.

      Anything on a fixed, remote-operated mount like the Bofors 57mm, OTO Melara 76mm Super Rapide, AK-130 130mm or United Defense 127mm/62 would be horrible overkill. One well-placed 127mm round can collapse a smallish multistory building without too much trouble, or blow the turret clean off a T80 main battle tank.

    20. Re:Be Greedo by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

      BFG 9000

    21. Re:Be Greedo by dada21 · · Score: 1

      The Maylasian government will be way more hardcore Muslim than the Middle East, within the decade.

      Hence, many items, even liquor, will find a receptive black market. From personal experience (O'hare Airport contracting) I was told import customs by plane in Malaysia are getting tougher.

      Hence, smuggling via boat.

      No non-sequitir.

    22. Re:Be Greedo by darkmeridian · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, .50 caliber machine guns are used on boats against fast-moving rubber vehicles the bad guys use to attack/board. A gun of this caliber destroys any rubber or fiberglass hull bad guys are using. Rockets are unnecessary overkill.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    23. Re:Be Greedo by sandmaninator · · Score: 1


      Private yachts that cruise to other countries generally do not carry guns because most every country on the planet has very strict laws against private citizens carrying firearms. That means that every port you sail into, in order to clear customs you need to give them your weapons. They lock them up for you until you leave their country.

      I cleared my boat through Bermuda customs and had to "lend" them my plastic flare gun. It's a pain in the arse that very few cruisers want to put up with.

    24. Re:Be Greedo by KylePflug · · Score: 1

      Hell, you don't need much more than a .22 if they're coming at you in an inflatable.

    25. Re:Be Greedo by efuseekay · · Score: 1

      Actually, I am Malaysian and my fiancee works in Saudi Arabia. I am an atheist, she is a Christian.

      Your assertion about Malaysian government becoming way more hardcore than Middle East is just plain ignorant polemic.

      Import customs are tougher in malaysia has nothing to do with government secularity/religiousity. We are more secular than Turkey. It has, however, a lot to do with trade barriers being raised by both countries to protect their goods.

      --
      Mode (3) smart-aleck mode. Press * to return to main menu.
    26. Re:Be Greedo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've personally heard the LRAD. It's not pretty. Even at the lowest levels the default tone is damn annoying, and increasing the volume just slightly begins a new kind of pain. The pirates weren't driving thier ships or shooting RPGs when they had their hands covering their ears. Honestly, heavy weapontry is a bit overkill and the logistics of maintaining equipment, training crews, and securing heavy armaments is quite taxing. There is an amazing variety of non-leathal weapons that require very little knowledge to take care of a threat, and the LRAD makes a perfect example. -Tim E.

    27. Re:Be Greedo by dada21 · · Score: 1

      This is untrue and mostly a "help me US" bias. THe Malacca Straights by far have the most reported pirates, but those are also countries that are begging us to intervene financially, if you ask me.

      I travel the countries on the Indian Ocean and from what I can tell, and this is my honest opinion, the wealthy independent nations don't complain about the problem as much as the poor dependent nations do.

      Your mileage may vary, but I've little faith in the ICC or any other organization that is constantly looking for US taxpayer handouts.

    28. Re:Be Greedo by jeffmeden · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      There's something wrong, namely that I can think of plenty of BAD uses for all of the above. Supporting an oppressive dictatorship, for example, in defiance of a trade embargo, for example, would be a bad use since those supplies let the opposition stay strong (and continue oppressing and whatnot). Don't bother reminding me that there are lots of furry, cuddly, nice countries that earn embargoes for political reasons. I don't care.

    29. Re:Be Greedo by John+Hurliman · · Score: 1

      This is already done. A large part of the US Navy's job is escorting commercial ships through foreign waters, and protecting our shipping routes. When a large oil tanker leaves Alaska heading to the other side of the world you bet there's at least one military ship escorting it.

    30. Re:Be Greedo by ross.w · · Score: 1

      You're assuming the inflatable is inflated with gas. As an example, Sydney Water's river gauging people use inflatable boats for stability (they regularly go out in flooded rivers, and a regular boat is too easy to capsize), but they inflate them with expanding foam rather than air.

      That way they don't get deflated when the membrane tears on a snag.

      Same principle means a single .22 bullet wouldn't do much if the pirates used this trick.

      Multiple rounds from a .50 Cal machinegun on the other hand...

      --
      If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
    31. Re:Be Greedo by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Actually, heavy weapons would just make ships more valuable targets for pirates.

      Yes, that's why aircraft carriers and battleships get hijacked all the time... The heavy weaponry isn't a deterrent, is it? It's a VALUABLE TARGET, right?

      Start making sense... It would make the ships a slightly more valuable target, but it would be FAR more dangerous and difficult to take-on that ship in the first place.

      It's better to have an LRAD, which is effective at repelling the pirates, but not a weapon they'd be able to use effectively.

      That's ridiculous. Pirates will find a way to make use of any weapon they get their hands on.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    32. Re:Be Greedo by chihowa · · Score: 1

      So... punishing civilians for the actions of governments (which are, in your case, oppressive dictatorships - so necessarily not representative or accountable to the people) is a good thing?

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    33. Re:Be Greedo by BlastQuake · · Score: 1

      I agree, firing Tom Cruise at pirates would be a VERY effective deterrant. :)

      --
      "What use is power to the Keeps of Balance?" -Disnt of Nightmare LpMud
    34. Re:Be Greedo by johansalk · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yes, a trade embargo against food and medicine are GOOD, let those stinkin' socialists and their kids starve, be ill and die, because the USA *must* always be right: This excerpt is from a 2002 Oxfam report entitled Cuba: Social Policy at the Crossroads: Maintaining Priorities, Transforming Practice ""Cuba's achievements in social development are impressive given the size of its gross domestic product per capita. As the human development index of the United Nations makes clear year after year, Cuba should be the envy of many other nations, ostensibly far richer. [Cuba] demonstrates how much nations can do with the resources they have if they focus on the right priorities - health, education, and literacy."" -- the United Nations, April 11, 2000 http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/castro/sfeature/sf_vi ews_uriarte.html

    35. Re:Be Greedo by splante · · Score: 1

      Actually, smugglers are often pirates too, these days. The point is they aren't traditional pirates, after particularly valuable cargo on the boat; they're after the boat itself for use in smuggling. The laws that allow law enforcement to confiscate the boat in cases of drug smuggling make it too expensive to keep buying boats for smuggling, so they pirate them.

  74. resistance by distantbody · · Score: 1

    The annual N*sync vacation was strongly resisted by locals.

  75. So Much for the Flying Spaghetti Monster by MikeyTheK · · Score: 1

    Oh man! I was so hoping that the Flying Spaghetti Monster would be the new science of choice, yet the number of pirates appears to be increasing dramatically, which means that global warming should be reversing, but it can't be because of CO2 emissions. AAAAUGH! My theology is in shambles!

    --
    Friends help you move. Real friends help you move bodies.
    Never forget: 2 + 2 = 5 for extremely large values of 2.
  76. Muadib! by spidergoat2 · · Score: 1

    Well, it seemed to work in 'Dune'.

    1. Re:Muadib! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the movie. That annoyed a lot of fans of the book, which lacked "weirding boxes" and instead featured the "weirding way", the Fremen name (= "witchcraft") for a martial art perfected by the Bene Gesserit.

    2. Re:Muadib! by AdmiralWeirdbeard · · Score: 1

      ugh. if your only experience of dune is that craptastic movie, you might need to have your geek card revoked. jesus.
      at least watch the sci-fi miniseries. it didnt totally suck ass.

      --
      Come read my stupid blagablog. Rants and Giggles
  77. Warlords of the Sea by Puhase · · Score: 1

    Is it really all that surprising that there are pirates off the coast of Somalia. As a US General said on NPR yesterday, "That place is basically just Madmax and Thunderdome". Two men enter, one man leaves. So the Somali warlords got some speed boats, I don't think that makes them pirates. A few quick bouts of scurvy, an influx of bad eye patches, a wooden leg or two and a parrot would go a long way for these guys. Until then, its a bunch of crazy dudes with Russian AK-47's made in the 70's shooting in the air and firing incredibly inacurate grenades. They wouldn't even know what a mizzen-mast was, let alone the ever-important jigger-mast. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mast_(sailing)

    --
    I am and always will be a stereotype, because who in their right mind prefers mono?
  78. ear plugs? by sucati · · Score: 1

    so basically I can thwart this "weapon" w/ some heavy duty ear plugs?

  79. Que the FSM jokes by zymurgy_cat · · Score: 1

    Let the Flying Spaghetti Monster jokes begin!

    --
    -- Fugacity: Confusing chemists since 1908
  80. Sony? by lofoforabr · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who read Sony instead of Sonic, making a direct relation to music pirates?
    THought this was some new kind of DRM news.

  81. Government Warns Building Supplies Merchants by RationalRoot · · Score: 1

    To be on the lookout for anyone with a wooden leg, and a large parrot trying to buy ear plugs or ear muffs.

    --
    http://davesboat.blogspot.com/
  82. Eardrums Be Gone by jlechem · · Score: 1

    FTFA "The device's makers compares its shrill tone to that of smoke detectors, only much louder. It can be as loud as about 150 decibels, while smoke alarms are about 80 to 90 decibels."

    Isn't that loud enough to burst an eardrum? That is pretty painful.

    --
    Hold up, wait a minute, let me put some pimpin in it
  83. Active Denial System by DaFallus · · Score: 1

    This is what the US has been testing in hopes of stopping rioters...
    Active Denial System

    --
    No one cares what your captcha was

    Houston TX, USA
  84. Now you will witness by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 2, Funny

    the firepower of this fully armed and operational cruise ship!

  85. Re:Pirates?! Rawk! by mountain+troll · · Score: 1

    wah, the guys from al-qaida are diversifying. well, they did that rubber raft thing a while back...

  86. More on sonic weapons... by noahmax · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...including the L.A. Sheriff's Department's ultra-powerful sonic blaster, is here. nms

  87. During next years Talk like a Pirate day. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Yaarrr. What's that ye say? I can't be hearin' ya. Yarrrr".

  88. Ahem... "Pirate" is Un-PC now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe the correct term you're looking for is "Terraform-challenged terroristically-adept".

    -V.P. Cheney

  89. That's no cruise ship... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's a fully operational battle station!

  90. Re:Pirates?! Rawk! by rnelsonee · · Score: 2, Informative
    I know - I was surprisded to learn that pirates cost our company moeny (albeit indirectly) - we build large devices that are used on ships, and once in a while we test our systems in African waters. Apparantly pirates will come along in rafts armed with AK-47s and board the ship. They open up our devices, with hundreds of thousands of dollar's worth of components, only to look for and steal batteries. As a result, my company is forced to pay very high premiums for insurance for this.

    In any event, we're told to just do whatever the pirates say, and don't try to act like a hero.

  91. Home Entertainment Center by AviLazar · · Score: 1

    Yea but can I get this with one of the BOSE Lifestyle systems?

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  92. "We do not do torture!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your tin foil hats can't protect you from LRAD!

  93. common? by DreadSpoon · · Score: 1

    Only if you're a computer nerd. The majority of the rest of the world only recognizes one kind of pirate, and that sort generally includes bloomers, parrots, ships, cutlasses, cannons, and/or Johny Depp.

  94. *ping* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ha ha! The ping of death appears in two consecutive stories!

  95. CounterMeasure Technology Discovered by Evil+W1zard · · Score: 1

    Pirate unions will be requiring the wearing of ear plugs due to on-the-job safety hazards from LRAD devices.

    --
    News Reporters Make Tasty Polar Bear Treats!
  96. Ouch! by Rinnt · · Score: 1

    From TFA:

    The device's makers compares its shrill tone to that of smoke detectors, only much louder. It can be as loud as about 150 decibels, while smoke alarms are about 80 to 90 decibels.

    So even if you were prepared with a pair of regular 30dB ear plugs, you're still getting hit with 120dB. Sure, some people may be able to stand that level of noise if it was music of their choice (like a concert). Just imagine, though, having to listen to an annoying sound like your smoke detector at that level... And for a prolonged period? Guess it's better than getting killed.

    1. Re:Ouch! by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      So even if you were prepared with a pair of regular 30dB ear plugs, you're still getting hit with 120dB.

      Not necessarily. 150dB is only reached at extremely close range. At longer range, say ~100 meters, it's probably 100dB-30dB for the plugs(cheapies). Wear muffs on top of them for another 30-40dB of protection, and you might only be exposed to ~30dB. Then you simply take out the device with your real guns before boarding.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  97. The Power of These Forces Combine by prisen · · Score: 1

    RIAA + MPAA == U171M473 P1R473 W34P0N!!!!1111111ELEVEN

  98. What we need.. by GuyinVA · · Score: 1

    .. to combat pirates is more global warming! http://www.venganza.org/

  99. Dangerous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They look pretty friendly, except for the RPG of course.

  100. Noise Canceling Headphones. by Gotung · · Score: 2, Funny

    But what if the pirates have these: Bose QuietComfort 2 Headphones ??

  101. No.... can't be. Pirates are unstoppable. by DroopyStonx · · Score: 1

    You can't THWART A PIRATE'S PLANS.

    What in the DOUBLE-YOU-TEE-EFF...

    --
    We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
  102. How many times do we have to reming you... by gg3po · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...to stop using their terminology. It's not *piracy*, it's infring... hold on, wait a sec... this is about real pirates, you say?!? Can't ... I don't... how to proceed...

    --
    ---
    1. Re:How many times do we have to reming you... by lordofthechia · · Score: 1

      "I don't... how to proceed..."

      We can turn over the IP addresses of these pirates over to the RIAA/MPAA and have them take care of the problem. Likewise we could ship some RIAA execs and lawyers to the open waters off the coast of Africa all blinged up so as to be educated in the sublte differences between copyright violators and pirates.

      --
      Georgia Tech, the leader in Chia(tm) technology.
  103. Earplugs? by comzen · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...hmm, so why can't you just stuff your ear holes with the same earplugs used for band practice and going to Metallica concerts?

    --
    Crunch!
    1. Re:Earplugs? by comzen · · Score: 1

      Oops, I'm sorry Mrs. Metallica fan. I wasn't implying that Metallica was bad, only that they were loud. However, many of the bands I've played in were both loud and bad. One of my best friends has Tinnitus from years of head banging. It's a very nasty affliction and a sad state of affairs for a music lover and musician. So go ahead and mod me as a troll, however you inference is unjustified.

      --
      Crunch!
  104. Nerdy Would-be Pirates by tiktok · · Score: 1

    If they were Software Pirates I'm sure they could've hacked into the navigational system and taken over easily!

  105. first palistinians then pirates and next... by Stanneh · · Score: 1

    did you know that they have these ready to use in new york on you during every protest you might make there.

    --
    I Predict A Riot
  106. Lifting content from wikipedia? by rsborg · · Score: 5, Informative
    Since you're just cutting and pasting portions of your content from wikipedia, why don't you just paste the link?

    Something you left out from the wiki content:
    "At maximum volume, it can emit a warning tone that is 151 decibels (1000 W/m) at 1 metre, a level that is very capable of permanently damaging hearing."

    I'm not sure I'd call that "an ideal use of this technology in private sector" as you put it... ethical concerns don't just go away if you're "private sector".

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    1. Re:Lifting content from wikipedia? by Detritus · · Score: 1
      Would you prefer the use of an M2 .50 Caliber Machine Gun?

      These pirates are the scum of the Earth, and they are a major problem in certain areas of the world. Anyone who attacks an ocean-going ship with knives, automatic weapons, and RPGs, deserves a short trip at the end of a rope.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    2. Re:Lifting content from wikipedia? by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but what are the ethical concerns of using a weapon in self defense?

      Also, if the device can damage hearing at *one meter*, what will it do to a ship full of people at 100 meters?

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    3. Re:Lifting content from wikipedia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the "ethical" thing would have been to let the pirates hijack the ship?

      Are you French or something?

    4. Re:Lifting content from wikipedia? by emeb2 · · Score: 1
      I'm not sure I'd call that "an ideal use of this technology in private sector" as you put it... ethical concerns don't just go away if you're "private sector".
      Maybe they meant "pirate sector".

      (ducks)

    5. Re:Lifting content from wikipedia? by kidcharles · · Score: 1

      151 dB at 1 m. I got a feeling the pirates didn't get this close. It may be a tightly focused beam but it would be greatly diminished in amplitude 100's of meters away.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une sig.
    6. Re:Lifting content from wikipedia? by MrScience · · Score: 1

      I seriously doubt they would wait until the pirate dingy was 1 metre away before turning it on. At full volume.

      --

      You quitting proves that the karma kap worked. The most annoying of the whores shut up. --CmdrTaco

    7. Re:Lifting content from wikipedia? by rco3 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Nope. They don't go away. But when the first RPG explodes in a passenger cabin and you're prevented by international law from having the sort of heavy weapons that the situation calls for, the ethical question becomes fairly simple and straightforward - something like "if you get the opportunity for a kill, do you leave enough remains for the family to bury?" Whether or not to deploy any weapons you might have simply isn't a question.

      This is in stark contradiction to the case of using sonic weapons for crowd control at the 2004 Republican national convention, in which case the ethical question is, "Do Republican politicians know what the word 'ethical' means?"

      --

      Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
    8. Re:Lifting content from wikipedia? by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "ethical concerns don't just go away if you're "private sector"."

      Not a corporate executive, are we?

    9. Re:Lifting content from wikipedia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Also, if the device can damage hearing at *one meter*, what will it do to a ship full of people at 100 meters?

      150dB/1m = 130dB/100m (inverse square law *), then subtract somewhere in the neighborhood of 0-10dB for atmospheric effects. That's still VERY LOUD but not deafening. If someone pointed this thing towards you at 100m, you'd just cover your ears (which would give you about 20-30dB of attenuation), and run the other direction. If you got yourself behind a wall, you could even remove your hands.

      * Yes, I know that they're trying to use a parabolic dish to combat the inverse square law, but it still applies because we're not talking about a "sound laser." Instead, you add in a "gain" factor for the portion of the spherical source that's reflected by the dish, and that's included in the initial quote of 150dB/1m.

    10. Re:Lifting content from wikipedia? by brre · · Score: 1

      No, he's lifting expression from wikipedia.

  107. Is LRAD an ultrasonic system? by Thagg · · Score: 1

    I recall a few years ago reading about some engineers at MIT that had developed a sonic projection system that worked in a novel way. They exploited nonlinearities in the way that ultrasonic waves propogated through the air, so that by putting out just the right pattern of ultrasonic pulses the system would generate extremely colliminated audio-range frequencies at some distance from the "speaker", as in this system.

    The advantage of this is that you can get very directed sound from a small speaker. Usually to get narrow beamspread waves you need a source that is at least many times the wavelength. Middle A has a wavelength of about two feet, requiring a unweildy (to say the least) speaker to get aimable sound.

    Anyway, it appears from the limited information that I've seen that LRAD is the same system, weaponized. Does anybody know if this is in fact the case?

    Thad Beier

    --
    I love Mondays. On a Monday, anything is possible.
  108. The ideal vacation? by Azathoth!EDC · · Score: 2, Funny


    Shuffleboard? Out. Pirates? In!

    Arrr! Avast, me hearties!

  109. weapons of mass deafening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What did you say? I didn't quite hear you? Oh, a Chinese company is selling these cheap to pirates and protestors. The pirates will use them as a non-lethal means of taking over vessels. Protestors will use them to easily move through police barricades.

  110. Technical workarounds for pirates by dcavanaugh · · Score: 1

    What prevents the pirates from using noise-cancelling headphones to mimimize the sound? They have all kinds of super-duper headsets for pilots that might work. I have a low-tech (passive) headset for aviation, which cuts the sound 23db. Some of the ANR headsets go well beyond that.

  111. Sonic wave to thward pirates? by Mr.Fork · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can see it now - I want to burn a DVD a couple of HBO's Rome episodes and a high-pitch scream comes blaring out of my speakers to thwart myself, a pirate, from burning the disk.

    --
    Management is doing things right; leadership is doing the right things. - Peter F. Drucker
  112. Non-lethal? by dtjohnson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why bother with a non-lethal weapon? These folks doing the pirate stuff are not nice people. Why not mount a couple of .50 caliber machine guns on the cruise ship fore and aft and let the cruise ship crew have some target practice on the guys in the pirate zodiacs so that they will be less of a threat to the next boat or ship that comes by?

    1. Re:Non-lethal? by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      You may miss a few people with the gun.

      200 Decibels of sound is pretty much gonna get everyone.

    2. Re:Non-lethal? by surprise_audit · · Score: 1

      Apparently some mis-guided politicians set up an international treaty that prevents non-military ship from carrying weapons. These would be the same guys who go everywhere by gov't-funded air travel and are thereby not putting themselves in harm's way anyway...

    3. Re:Non-lethal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      >Apparently some mis-guided politicians set up an international treaty that prevents
      >non-military ship from carrying weapons

      How do you definitely distinguish non-military and military ships if both kinds are fully armed? Well, you can't. In a war this would effectively mean all vessels in sight are fair game ==> you get Lousitania on the cube and so a lot of civilian coffins.

      The treaty is very right. It is the world navies' task to patrol the high seas and hang the pirates they find from the mast. Passanger, fishing and cargo ships should hold to their own jobs. Sorrowfully this important anti-piracy mission seems abandoned by most navies of today and we should remind our governments to do their job.

    4. Re:Non-lethal? by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 1

      Perhaps we're not all as blood thirsty as you?

      In international waters, with pirates, I can actually see the case for lethel weapons. OT, but in the US and other countries where we're supposedly "innocent until proven guilty", lethal weapons carried by law enforcement might truely be seen for the problem they are. Effective non-lethal weapons would be a welcome thing.

    5. Re:Non-lethal? by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Effective non-lethal weapons would be a welcome thing.

      Very true, however the problem we're seeing is misues of these 'non-lethal' devices for situations that previously would have been defused by talking. There's even a number of cases where the usage of tasers may have contributed or caused the death of those they're used on.

      There's cases of cops here using them on seven year old kids, on a suspected drug user to forcibly obtain a urine sample, on pregnant women(multiple times!), 80 year old woman in nursing home, etc. Then there's the pepper ball that killed the college student.

      A problem with a truly safe 'non-lethal' device, especially when it comes to self-defense, is that there is little deterant for the attacker, because of: "What's the worst that could happen? I could get stunned for a little while?" vs "She's got a gun! She might kill me!"

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    6. Re:Non-lethal? by mfrank · · Score: 1

      Sinking their boat when they'r 100 miles offshore . . . priceless.

    7. Re:Non-lethal? by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 1

      I believe all of that is a problem with the implementation, not the weapons themselves (though there's room for a lot of improvement in the weapons). I just cringe every time I hear about a suspect being shot and killed - we most definately have the technology to stop suspects if they need to be stopped - tazers, rubber bullets, bean bags, etc. are good starts, but I don't think it's the police's job to hand out punishment or death sentences.

    8. Re:Non-lethal? by bitingduck · · Score: 1

      With an M2 you can probably sink the boat pretty easily even if you miss all the people in it.

      Unless it's an armored (and actually armored, not just mild steel) boat, an M2 on board the ship, firing from elevation, is going to make the small boat a very unpleasant place to be.

    9. Re:Non-lethal? by dfenstrate · · Score: 1

      Passenger, fishing and cargo ships should hold to their own jobs.

      Self defense is a fundamental right.

      --
      Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
    10. Re:Non-lethal? by dfenstrate · · Score: 1

      but in the US and other countries where we're supposedly "innocent until proven guilty", lethal weapons carried by law enforcement might truely be seen for the problem they are.

      When someone is attacking you, the fact that a criminal act is in progress is not in question. We do not need a large legal system, a couple lawyers, a judge, and a jury to figure out that something bad is going down. Killing the attacker at that point is not a matter of 'justice' ,'innocence', or 'guilt', but a matter of self-preservation. Police officers have the same right of self preservation as the rest of us, in addition to the duty to protect bystanders from an obviously dangerous individual.

      --
      Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
    11. Re:Non-lethal? by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 1

      That'd be fine as long they only used their weapons in those situations.

  113. So half-baked, it's burnt by SuperBanana · · Score: 2, Funny
    It's application by the military and police is controversial because of ethical questions, but this seems an ideal use of this technology in private sector. Commercial ships at sea cannot use heavy weapons by international treaty. The Long Range Acoustic Device, or LRAD, is a so-called "non-lethal weapon" developed after the 2000 attack on the USS Cole off Yemen as a way to keep operators of small boats from approaching U.S. warships.

    That's the stupidest thing I've ever heard. The USS Cole was bombed by suicide bombers who piloted a boat straight at the ship and then blew themselves up.

    A 150 decibel noise seems like a pretty minor convenience compared to blowing yourself up.

    Furthermore- let's say the powerboat Good Times is headed towards the USS Paranoid is just a bunch of folks havin' a good time and not noticing the fact that they're bearing down on a warship (sounds strange given how dumb you'd have to be to do it, but people do leave the 'bridge' or controls of their boat quite often. They also tend to get drunk on their boats quite often too.)

    With everyone on board unable to move or think because they're incapacitated with pain (and I presume inability to stand because of the inner ear getting wacked out)...don't you think it would be a tad bit difficult for anyone to get up to the controls and stop the boat or change course before it enters some abritrary "safety zone" and get blown into little fiberglass splinters by one of the Paranoid's deck guns?

    God, the whole thing sounds like something crafted on HalfBakery.com. Nevermind that far as anyone can tell, the pirates were outrun, not knocked out by some sci-fi weapon...

    1. Re:So half-baked, it's burnt by nmos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A 150 decibel noise seems like a pretty minor convenience compared to blowing yourself up.

      So does putting them in jail but it's still effective if you can manage it. Just because someone is willing to die doesn't mean that they are willing or able to endure pain.

    2. Re:So half-baked, it's burnt by drew · · Score: 1

      That's the stupidest thing I've ever heard. The USS Cole was bombed by suicide bombers who piloted a boat straight at the ship and then blew themselves up.

      A 150 decibel noise seems like a pretty minor convenience compared to blowing yourself up.

      Furthermore- let's say the powerboat Good Times is headed towards the USS Paranoid is just a bunch of folks havin' a good time and not noticing the fact that they're bearing down on a warship (sounds strange given how dumb you'd have to be to do it, but people do leave the 'bridge' or controls of their boat quite often. They also tend to get drunk on their boats quite often too.)


      If the people piloting a boat toward you are incapacitated from the noise, then it should be a trivial matter to move out of their line of travel assuming the boat you are on is not at anchor.

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    3. Re:So half-baked, it's burnt by at_slashdot · · Score: 1

      "A 150 decibel noise seems like a pretty minor convenience compared to blowing yourself up."

      Blowing yourself up is something that doesn't take much time, while a 150 decibel noise can go on and on. The difference it between death and torture, some people prefer to die than to be tortured.

      --
      "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." -- Prof. Dumbledore
    4. Re:So half-baked, it's burnt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It can also be used for long-range hailing, at lower decibels. If you radio them and they don't respond, they mighta just not had their radios turned on. If you blast them with sound saying "Turn away or be shot," you can be more confident you're right when you open up with the .50-cals.

    5. Re:So half-baked, it's burnt by E-Rock · · Score: 1

      Well, the 150 decible, bleeding from the ears level is only at a range of 1 meter. At a hundred meters, it's probably closer to the "what the hell is that" level. Perfect for getting the attention of the drunks aboard the Good Times and preventing any loss of life.

      I do agree that at either level it does no good against someone set on suicide.

    6. Re:So half-baked, it's burnt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      let's say the powerboat Good Times is headed towards the USS Paranoid....With everyone on board unable to move or think because they're incapacitated with pain...don't you think it would be a tad bit difficult for anyone to get up to the controls and stop the boat or change course before it enters some abritrary "safety zone" and get blown into little fiberglass splinters by one of the Paranoid's deck guns

      It always amazes me when people are creative enough to think of arguments like this, but then completely unable to come up with the solution to the problem.

      No one ever said this weapon had to be left on for 5 minutes at a time. I doubt a pair of 1/2 second bursts is going to incapacitate anyone, but it sure as hell is going to get their attention....any hey, now that we have their attention, we can instruct them to turn away.

    7. Re:So half-baked, it's burnt by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      If they turn it on at ~500 yards, it's probably equivalent to a loud fire alarm. Likely to wake people up and have them checking out what's going on. Kinda like a fog horn.

      It's probably not really bad until <200 yards

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  114. Yeah, good idea by tgd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Anyone who uses Mythbusters as a real source of proof of something working versus not working either don't watch the show, or don't understand the things they're testing.

    Its entertainment, not science. The fact that it could be used as a source to declare something an urban legend is a sign of the risk using Wikipedia as an authoritative source.

    1. Re:Yeah, good idea by kidcharles · · Score: 1

      I happen to think that Mythbusters, while highly entertaining, does a pretty good job of testing myths. They are very systematic and have a decent grounding in science. Sure they like to blow stuff up at the end for fun, but the part before the explosion is usually quite rigorous.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une sig.
    2. Re:Yeah, good idea by autocracy · · Score: 1

      Almost... I remeber the episode where they tested using the A/C versus using the windows. They tested the windows at 55mph, but the A/C at 45mph... or was it vice-versa? Point being that sometimes they do point things out with strong evidence, but it is more entertainment. The "real" conclusion would be dependant on the vehicle, and the speed of operation whether the A/C or windows down is the better cooling solution.

      --
      SIG: HUP
    3. Re:Yeah, good idea by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      That was, perhaps, one of the worst tests ever. The amount of fuel in the vehicles may have been grossly out of balance due to their method of testing. The data from the onboard computer was probably more accurate. They should have used a non-recirculating system with a small, calibrated resevoir in the engine compartment.

      yuk...I feel dirty now.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    4. Re:Yeah, good idea by sjames · · Score: 1

      Its entertainment, not science. The fact that it could be used as a source to declare something an urban legend is a sign of the risk using Wikipedia as an authoritative source.

      They do use (somewhat) scientific methods though they sometimes lack rigor. No matter how rigorous, absense of evidence is not evidence of absense.

      So, if they tried it and it worked, we would have reason to believe the effect is real. However, they did not produce the hypothesized result. This tells us that their method does not produce the hypothesized result but does not categorically disprove the effect. Depending on their thoroughness in a particulat case, it certainly does raise the level of doubt.

      In that particular case, I would have liked to see a slow frequency sweep and an effort to make sure Adam was not sitting with his lower abdoman in an antinode.

    5. Re:Yeah, good idea by antic · · Score: 1


      True. Real scientists rely on the Brainiacs segment "Tina Turner with a Bunsen Burner" for their knowledge... :)

      --
      'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
    6. Re:Yeah, good idea by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

      Or at the very least, rigorous enough. Most myths after all, are pretty dodgy to begin with and wouldn't require a lot of rigor to dispel them.

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
  115. So... by edburnham · · Score: 1

    Does it work on deaf people?

  116. In Solvat Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pirates thwart you!

  117. The pirates are my cousins! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Hard to believe right? I am from the coastal city of Bosaso on the horn of Africa, and some of my relatives took pride in their high-seas piracy. I have always heard of illegal Japanese and Norwegian ships illegaly fishing in our shores, while Somalis, with not central government and coast guard, sat around in anger and frustration.

    This piracy started as a way to defend our coast-lines from illegal international fishing. Somalia hasn't had a government since 1990, and our fish resources became the loot of international fishing conglomerates. Others have used our coast to dump their waste, even nuclear waste.

    After the fall of the Somali government, our coast guard's ships and vessels were looted by tribes. Some of our ships and boats were sold to illegal fishing companies, which didn't go far but stayed to fish in our waters! While other boats stayed in the hands of tribal leaders and warlords who used them for piracy and people smuggling to the middle east, although more often as a vehicle for products and trade with Yemen, our neighbor to the North.

    It's funny how companies registered in Democratic developed nations, and pay their taxes there, are the ones looting our natural resources and using our sea and land to dump their waste.

    http://gurukul.ucc.american.edu/ted/somalia.htm

    http://www.mg.co.za/articlePage.aspx?articleid=249 733&area=/breaking_news/breaking_news__africa/

    http://somalinet.com/news/world/Somalia/1063

    I wish the international community would deploy high-tech sonic weapons to defend us against real theives, not just pirates, blinded and deafended by greed.

    - Mahammad Darwish

    1. Re:The pirates are my cousins! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      it is even more funny how most of the reports of piracy involve them looting cruise ships (cause those are the most damaging fishing ships right?)

      hopefully they ditch the nonlethal and just start killing the pirates

    2. Re:The pirates are my cousins! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, this is a huge load of crap!

    3. Re:The pirates are my cousins! by Dr.+Binders · · Score: 1, Funny

      My cousin was a sucessful pirate before his untimely death, leaving behind 15 MILLION dollars. I need your help to transfer that money from Somalia into your bank account. Discretion is advised.

    4. Re:The pirates are my cousins! by aquatone282 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you and your cousins should spend less time raiding and more time establishing law, order and democracy in Somalia.

      Sorry - you're right. It's easier to complain than it is to fix something yourself.

      My bad.

      --
      What?
    5. Re:The pirates are my cousins! by g8oz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Perhaps you and your cousins should spend less time raiding and more time establishing law, order and democracy in Somalia.

      Easy for you to say from the comfort of your chair. What do you know of the anarchic reality of a failed nation? In a similar situation you would probably be loading up on brown pants. So don't be such an ass.

    6. Re:The pirates are my cousins! by geobeck · · Score: 1

      Having a stable democratic government doesn't necessarily prevent foreign fishing vessels from raping your fisheries. *cough*Grand Banks*cough*

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
    7. Re:The pirates are my cousins! by strikethree · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You have no sympathy from me. Your fellow countrymen paraded around a couple of dead bodies from my country's military. We were there trying to help you and that is how you treat us... laughing, partying it up, and defiling honorable men. If it would have been up to me, I would have carpet bombed all of Mogadishu. You are not a civilized people and do not deserve any help.

      strike

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    8. Re:The pirates are my cousins! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why?

    9. Re:The pirates are my cousins! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when will people like you begin to understand that not everybody welcomes US soldiers on their soil? the rest of the world doesn't like us. not anymore. think about it.

      yeah, yeah, i know. freedom and democracy. that's the official version. the inofficial one is a bit different.

    10. Re:The pirates are my cousins! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have no sympathy from me. Your fellow countrymen paraded around a couple of dead bodies from my country's military. We were there trying to help you and that is how you treat us... laughing, partying it up, and defiling honorable men. If it would have been up to me, I would have carpet bombed all of Mogadishu. You are not a civilized people and do not deserve any help

      Your fellow countrymen blew each other up in the Civil War, in Oklahoma City, at the Olympics, and they beat the hell out of black people back in the day. Oh, wait, you mean you can't judge individuals based on the actions of a few? How insensitive of me!

    11. Re:The pirates are my cousins! by strikethree · · Score: 1

      yay, another anonymous coward. it was NOT the actions of a few. i am in iraq now. they are killing my countrymen. i do NOT advocate carpet bombing iraq. why? because for the most part, they are not carrying american bodies through the streets while the entire city turns out to join the grisly parade. spare me your unthoughtful responses in this heavily offtopic thread.

      strike

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    12. Re:The pirates are my cousins! by strikethree · · Score: 1

      then do not ask for help. easy answer.

      strike

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
  118. Listen, deaf pirates by migloo · · Score: 1

    Listen, deaf pirates, this is your chance.

  119. Not that LRAD by LoonyMike · · Score: 1

    I think they used $sys$LRAD

  120. Cuban Privateers, Arrrhhh by Yanray · · Score: 1

    I think Castro and his good freind from Venuzuella need to get themselves some Pirates. That way they can Raid the Evil Empires cruel repressive corporate shipping.

    It'd give dubbuh a good reason to kick thier *(^.

    --
    --"Sorry for the inconvience." Gods Last Words to his Creation
    DNA, So Long and Thanks for all the Fish
  121. The ship's message ... by hotspotbloc · · Score: 4, Funny
    ... as the crew of the pirate boats rolled around on the deck with the worst headache of their lives:

    CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW?

    --
    "I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence or insanity but they've always worked for me" - HST
    1. Re:The ship's message ... by Scott7477 · · Score: 1

      GOOD!

      --
      "Lack of technical competence coupled with the arrogance of power, as usual, leads to no good end."
  122. Cruise(r)ships? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A couple of 5" guns should make short work of any but the most determined pirates.

  123. they heard you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    "This article has recently been linked from Slashdot (backlink).
    Please keep an eye on the page history for errors or vandalism."

  124. Global Cooling on the Way by Ranger · · Score: 1

    The fact that pirates are in the news should please His Noodly Appendage. That means the number of pirates is going up. And if the numbers of pirates are going up that means the Earth will start cooling again. Check out this graph er I mean this graph which shows the current trend. Expect it to trend downwards. Ramen.

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
  125. You don't hear much in the US by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Because of the Coast Guard. US waters are essentially free of pirates. Now I suppose that could depend on your definition, some peopel considder smugglers that use ships to be pirates and we do have drug smugglers that come in by sea, but in terms of pirates attacking ships it's essentially zero. The Coast Guard has a very active presence and there's little that can be done about them. An attack on a Coast Guard ship is an act of war and they then can (and will) scream to any navy ships in the area for support, and they navy will come and sink your ass (also some CG ships have reasonably large deck guns).

    However in many areas of the world, particularly Africa but also South America and Asia to an extent, where there's not sucha powerful sea patrol, it's more common than you'd think.

    1. Re:You don't hear much in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The USCG high endurance cutters have almost the same ballistic armament as a USN cruiser. Nonetheless, both ships have still been attacked by pirates.

    2. Re:You don't hear much in the US by dfenstrate · · Score: 1

      Nonetheless, both ships have still been attacked by pirates.

      Who proceeded to win darwin awards, I imagine.

      --
      Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
    3. Re:You don't hear much in the US by zach_d · · Score: 1
      oh yeah, the us coast guard does a great job protecting the whole north atlantic. its really a wonder that other countries bother having a navy at all, and their ships are a common site in the med, and the along the japanese coast... infact most of the sea except the east coast of africa, and the along the coast of malayasia are protected from piracy by the us.

      seriously, its not the us coast guard thats reduced piracy, its the fact that piracy is a lot harder to get away with throughout the world. reaction times of world wide security forces, not just american, have gone from weeks, to hours.

  126. Re:Pirates?! Rawk! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The ones with hats. And parrots.

    Actually, this is the kind with AK-47s and ski masks.

  127. 150 decibels only slaps at the problem... by afabbro · · Score: 2, Interesting
    ...200 decibels solves it.

    (Wikipedia notes that "Sound levels of around 200 dB can cause death to humans").

    --
    Advice: on VPS providers
    1. Re:150 decibels only slaps at the problem... by BTG9999 · · Score: 1

      As all should know the loudest possible sound is 194dB because of the physics of sound. The reason is that at 194dB, the low pressure of the compression wave we perceive as sound is at vacuum levels. Therefore you cannot reduce the lowest pressure anymore and so have reached the maximum sound level.

    2. Re:150 decibels only slaps at the problem... by afabbro · · Score: 1
      IANAAE (I Am Not An Acoustics Engineer) but...

      ...louder sounds are listed at this Wikipedia article on decibels. It mentions the Space Shuttle at 215db, eardrums rupturing at 198db, etc.

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
  128. Leave the Pastafarians alone by Flaming+Babies · · Score: 0

    If they aren't careful with that Weapon,
    we may be in further danger of global warming...
    www.venganza.org/

    --
    The right to be heard does not automatically include the right to be taken seriously.
  129. Pirates? Bah... by OldSchool · · Score: 0

    The press should describe them for what they really are - terrorists.

    1. Re:Pirates? Bah... by turgid · · Score: 1

      Why? Do they have oil wells?

  130. Hmm. by RonaldReagan · · Score: 0

    Haven't these people seen Batman Begins? That microwave dealie would have been way better.

  131. I think it would work better if by queenb**ch · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd like to test the effects of this when it's used to play Wayne Newton instead of the high piched sonic squeal. Although, there may not be much difference...

    2 cents,

    Queen B

    --
    HDGary secures my bank :/
    1. Re:I think it would work better if by uncqual · · Score: 3, Funny

      I believe the rules of international warfare would rule out using Wayne Newton's work as the sound input - much for the same reason one isn't supposed to use mustard gas anymore.

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
    2. Re:I think it would work better if by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      Nahh..play the squeals and grunts of a group of Pigs...that should really make them mad and deaf at the same time ;)

    3. Re:I think it would work better if by ksheff · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean Slim Whitman? His yodel killed those pesky Martians.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
  132. This is news? by softweyr · · Score: 2, Funny
    I'm pretty certain the 'Type R' next to me at the stoplight this morning has one of these LRADs installed, too. Problem is, the kid that owns it is too stupid to properly employ the high frequency sound needed to really kill, so the booms and thumps coming from his car just annoy me instead.

    I can't wait for the inevitable Slashdot article on how to make your own LRAD from a Pringles can.

  133. In Reality .... by king-manic · · Score: 1

    The weapon was a Celine Dion Record played at volume 11. It nearly killed every living thing with taste within a 3km radius.

    --
    "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
  134. Re:LRAD addendum by TropicalCoder · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Some links from my research: Hypersonic Sound: Popular Science http://www.prisonplanet.com/audios_the_next_big_th ing.html Popular Mechanics http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/audio/1 279591.html (explains acoustic heterodyning) Sorry - I've lost the link that said commercial ships at sea are not allowed to use heavy weapons by international treaty. It was in a story published on Sunday, March 6, 2004 by the Los Angeles Times but that factual tidbit was not from an authority anyway, and no source was provided for it.

  135. So would this be a ... by Flaming+Babies · · Score: 0

    Weapon of Mass Distortion?

    --
    The right to be heard does not automatically include the right to be taken seriously.
  136. It's a pity... by Bill+the+Cat · · Score: 1

    ...they didn't just use a few rifles. Probably would have solved the problem a lot quicker, and not left the bad guys alive to continue their attacks on shipping.

  137. Louder than smoke detector alarms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The device's makers compares its shrill tone to that of smoke detectors, only much louder. It can be as loud as about 150 decibels, while smoke alarms are about 80 to 90 decibels.

    Should be effective then. The first time I experienced a "modern" smoke alarm system, I stayed in my room for 30 seconds trying to figure out how to avoid going through a hallway containing one of the alarms.

  138. lol by Run4yourlives · · Score: 1

    Damn, where are the mods when you need them...

  139. (Reduced) Myth busters by Mr+Guy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The primary complaint is that due to the nature of their format, they are forced to reduce the myth until it is no longer meaningful. Just because they 'did' a myth doesn't mean they satisfied all possibilities. They have more than once 'disproved' myths that are known true, by rephrasing the myth until they were testing something with no meaning at all.

    An example of this is the episode on the five second rule. They tested whether bacteria transfers in five seconds. What they should have tested, is whether there was harmful bacteria present. Yes, it transfers. Yes, the food is still most likely safe to eat, due to the lack of harmful bacteria.

    1. Re:(Reduced) Myth busters by efuseekay · · Score: 1

      They tested whether bacteria transfers in five seconds. What they should have tested, is whether there was harmful bacteria present. Yes, it transfers. Yes, the food is still most likely safe to eat, due to the lack of harmful bacteria.

      Uh, I think you are being pedantic there.

      --
      Mode (3) smart-aleck mode. Press * to return to main menu.
    2. Re:(Reduced) Myth busters by Skater · · Score: 1

      I enjoy the show, but my favorite was when they tested whether driving around with your windows open is more or less fuel efficient than using the air conditioner at a given speed. The problem? They tested exactly ONE make and model vehicle, an SUV. Erm, hello? Cars? Pickups? Other SUVs, for that matter?

      Sure it was interesting, but one example is anecdotal at best. They certainly proved there is a point at which it's more efficient to use the A/C (well, maybe not, because they had a very low sample size - I didn't calculate the variances to check), but for only one vehicle.

    3. Re:(Reduced) Myth busters by Mr+Guy · · Score: 1

      Yes, but that's the point of the show isn't it? Truth is pedantic. They declared a busted myth that food is safe after 5 seconds on the floor, based on growth of completely harmless bacteria, mold, and fungi. It's relevant that they most likely could have eaten the whole dish of growth that they created with no ill effects.

    4. Re:(Reduced) Myth busters by Mr+Guy · · Score: 1

      The one on alchohol's effect on your driving was even worse. It had me screaming at the screen that they "conclusively proved" it was dangerous after barely passing a driving test while sober, then barely failing it based on subjective measures while tipsy, and I'm a strong believer in stiff penalties for accidents caused under the influence (including other drugs and sleep deprivation if I had my way).

    5. Re:(Reduced) Myth busters by sjames · · Score: 1

      They declared a busted myth that food is safe after 5 seconds on the floor, based on growth of completely harmless bacteria, mold, and fungi. It's relevant that they most likely could have eaten the whole dish of growth that they created with no ill effects.

      That's not all that unreasonable. They demonstrated that bacteria can transfer in under 5 seconds. Therefore, the '5 second rule' is irrelevant to the safety of dropped food. While it could be argued that for some reason every single harmful bacterium somehow transfers more slowly than the harmless ones, that would require a depth of testing beyond their scope. As far as we know, there is nothing about harmful bacteria that would intrinsically make them transfer more slowly. If you think otherwise, please do contribute to the process of science and demonstrate it. That's the way good science has always worked. Until then, I will assume that the 5 second rule is not at all meaningful to food safety.

    6. Re:(Reduced) Myth busters by Mr+Guy · · Score: 1

      Except that isn't the myth. The myth is that food is safe to eat after 5 seconds on the floor. This is true. It's true up to some very large number of seconds, because the floor is safe to eat off of. All they disproved is that 5 seconds is any safer than 10, but the basis of the myth, that the food is safe to eat, wasn't tested. In spite of that, they still declared the myth busted and said that food wasn't safe, which was incorrect.

    7. Re:(Reduced) Myth busters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have more than once 'disproved' myths that are known true, by rephrasing the myth until they were testing something with no meaning at all.

      Actually, my favourite is the "pyramid power" episode.. where their initial test (against common sense) comes up *positive*.. so instead of re-running the test, they change the test completely, and then throw out data that they don't like so that they can say "negative".

    8. Re:(Reduced) Myth busters by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Your misunderstanding is absolutely incredible. I hate the Mythbusters as much as anybody, but you're just spouting nonsense.

      Except that isn't the myth. The myth is that food is safe to eat after 5 seconds on the floor.

      No, that's not even close to the myth. The myth is that food that has fallen (onto the floor, ground, etc) is safe if it has been touching for less than 5 seconds. If the myth was that eating food off the floor is safe, it wouldn't have "5 seconds" in it's title. It also would be a complete waste of space, because bacterial growth varies from one person's floor to another, so you can't make any such blanket statement.

      If you want to complain about the mythbusters, just bring up how their data proved that droping a hammer reduces the surface tension of water before you fall in yourself. Or their complete ignorance on how to rip an axle from a car (hint: using cable is like using a large rubberband).

      http://www.snopes.com/food/tainted/dropped.asp
      http://www.colostate.edu/Orgs/safefood/NEWSLTR/v8n 3s03.html
      http://www.readymademag.com/feature_9_eatofftheflo or.php
      http://www.cbc.ca/stories/2003/09/16/five_second03 0916

      http://www.google.com/search?q=5+second+rule
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    9. Re:(Reduced) Myth busters by sjames · · Score: 1

      All they disproved is that 5 seconds is any safer than 10, but the basis of the myth, that the food is safe to eat, wasn't tested.

      They showed that 5 seconds has nothing to do with it, thus, the 5 second rule is false. That is, if you drop 2 pieces of food, pick one up at 4 seconds and the other at 6 seconds, the 5 second rule would suggest that the first is safe and the second should be thrown away. They showed clearly that the extra 2 seconds makes no important difference. Depending on your floor, both are safe or both are not. The larger question of is food that falls on the floor safe to eat at all was not their objective.

    10. Re:(Reduced) Myth busters by moeffju · · Score: 1

      Harmful bacteria are not somehow more inert or slower than others. If there are harmful bacteria, it doesn't matter how long the food was sitting on the floor.
      The 5 seconds rule as such is just silly. With current standards of hygiene, though, food should almost always be safe to eat after it was on the floor.

      Does not apply to toilets or similar. Use common sense.

      --
      follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/moeffju
  140. Question... by Joe5678 · · Score: 1

    So here's my question, since the device is a big dish that looks to be external, how difficult is it just to shoot the damn thing?

  141. only on /. by argStyopa · · Score: 0

    Cuba was easy money until 9/11, now we have our Coast Guard pretending to fight terrorism but actually destroying the free market in smuggling.

    That's like those darn cops ruining the "free market" in theft? What fascists!

    --
    -Styopa
  142. LRAD Device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Turns out this is just some guy on a mega-phone yelling:

    "Move along, nothing to see here!"

  143. test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  144. Re:Pirates?! Rawk! by corngrower · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, but I didn't see any mention of the parrots.

  145. True, now if only the /. headline was accurate by upside · · Score: 1

    If you RTFA you'll find that they are investigating whether the sonic weapon was effective at all. The ship headed out to sea at full speed while the pirates in small boats were left behind.

    --
    I'm sorry if I haven't offended anyone
  146. Going on a cruise in pirate infested waters... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    adventure cruising! Your ship carries defensive weaponry to repel pirate attacks! Little more interesting than the usual mostly-over-60 social club cruise!

  147. How long by Muhammar · · Score: 1

    How long it will take for the pirates to buy and use this kind of nonlethal weapon? It is much better blasting the cruise ship with piercing sound rather than with grenades if crating panic and confusion is the goal.

    Stun gun works not only for defense against muggers - it is a good mugging weapon.

    There are "non-lethal" laser weapons that cause permanent eye scarrig/blindness unless the victim gets emergency eye surgery. These weapons are pretty impressive on mid mid-range distances(hundreds meters) and can reportedly produce a cone of blinding flashes that can be about 1 meter wide. Reportedly, US military was in talk with Russians on this and they agreed that they would not field such weapons.

    --
    I doubt that we will ever figure out - and I suspect that even if we did figure out we couldn't do much about it
  148. Bah, old news, Ryu did this back in the early 90's by modi123 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Haaaaaadoooken!

  149. A squad of about 20 marines... by thewils · · Score: 1

    ...taking some "R&R" from a nearby warzone might be a more effective defence.

    --
    Once I was a four stone apology. Now I am two separate gorillas.
  150. No, I call B.S. by 2short · · Score: 1

    Ahh, the usual shlashbot rush to be the first to say some obscure slashdot-only tech story is BS from some crank. But if you want to win at that game, you need to make sure it acrtually is an obscure slashdot-only tech story. As opposed to something that Google finds from a couple thousand different news sources.

    "And even if true, next time, won't the pirates just wear earplugs?"
    You do not remotely comprehend the volume level we are talking about.

    1. Re:No, I call B.S. by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Ahh, the usual shlashbot rush to be the first to say some obscure slashdot-only tech story is BS from some crank. But if you want to win at that game, you need to make sure it acrtually is an obscure slashdot-only tech story. As opposed to something that Google finds from a couple thousand different news sources.

      You believe too highly in news agencies if a couple of thousand sources cover it. ;-)

      Seriously, bull has spread mighty quickly before.

      What you need to look at is the sources for the article, not the number of articles on Google News.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    2. Re:No, I call B.S. by 2short · · Score: 1

      Well, you are welcome to do that by simply clicking on the link I provided. The fact is, the use of this sonic weapon vs pirates is not the BS the orginal poster suggests. It happened in front of many witnesses and has been widely reported on with quotes from those witnesses, etc. etc. The BBC story has a picture of it. The Reuters one has first-hand accounts of what it sounded like. It is quite simply not BS.

  151. Sonic DRM rootkit anyone? by epsalon · · Score: 1

    Oh, it's about physical pirates, and sonic rather than sony. Nevermind.

    Mod this post -1 not funny!

  152. On Aircraft Carrier by Scorchmon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've actually seen one of these on a US navy aircraft carrier. I was on the flight deck of the USS Carl Vinson when we were going through the Suez Canal, and one of the officers was showing off this device towards the forward end of the flight deck which looked like a speaker on a stand. It had a panel with a bunch of standard phrases and warnings and different languages to broadcast voice messages. It also had settings for unpleasant noises to ward the target off. He only demonstrated it with the volume turned down very low, but he basically said that with the volume turned up it's pretty painful.

  153. How do you suppose?... by Dasher42 · · Score: 1

    "Note to self: remove that Clapper from boat's ignition."

  154. Actually, yes... by bradleyland · · Score: 1

    I do think they should use lethal weapons. Which thought is more likely to dissuade an attacker wielding RPGs and small arms?

    A: If I attack this cruise ship, I may or may not be repelled by an uncomfortably loud sound.

    B: If I attack this cruise ship, I may or may not be repelled by 2,000 rounds per minute of hot lead.

    I'm going to have to go with B.

  155. very convenient by koekepeer · · Score: 1

    two strikes in one:

    - get rid of the pirates
    - collect the fish that float around after the attack - free dinner!

    a very smart concept, indeed

  156. Re:Pirates?! Rawk! by fatcatman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In any event, we're told to just do whatever the pirates say, and don't try to act like a hero.

    Screw that. That just encourages them to continue attacking. If people would fight back, maybe this would end.

    I mean, look: These are the pirates - and their pirate "ship" - that attacked the cruise ship. The news is calling this a "speedboat". It looks like the ratty, $500 fishing boat the poor people down the street from me own.

    Don't tell me you couldn't fend off these rascals with the appropriate weapons. I know I could. Sure, they've got machine guns and rocket fired grenandes. Big whoop. The ships they're attacking are huge. I mean, I'd sit on top of the ship and pick these twerps off with a high powered rifle before they even got close enough to launch their attacks. Or toss a few grenandes back at them. Get one in that boat and - poof - no more pirates.

    Do this a few times and watch how fast the pirate problem disappears.

  157. all hail Zardoz! by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    The gun is good. The penis is evil.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  158. That's not a parrot on his shoulder... by jamrock · · Score: 1

    ...that's an RPG 7. National Talk Like A Pirate Day has never been more relevant. Arrrh me hearties! Anything to foster communications with the poor, misunderstand corsairs. Seriously, this is the first such incident I can recall hearing of in this region; usually it's the Phillipines and Indonesia.

  159. LRADs, Microwaves, and Nuclear Weapons by Un+pobre+guey · · Score: 1
    Somewhere in this story there is an interesting subtext. With new weapons such as LRADS, microwave antipersonnel rifles/cannons, pilotless drones and armored vehicles, and a wide variety of other emerging military technologies, why would anyone want to build nuclear weapons?

    I can understand that they are trying to play the deterrent game by trying to set up a Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) scenario, but there are three problems there. First, it is difficult to set up if your opponent can build the weapons more quickly, in larger numbers, or with significant performance advantages. Secondly, it is immensely expensive. Many billions of dollars need to be spent over many years, and only a trickle of weapons, if any, will come out in the medium term. If you come up against significant international resistance, the costs can become impossible to pay. Thirdly, and here's the clincher, it is not clear that MAD will deter nuclear war among today's nuclear opponents. Would India, Pakistan, North Korea, Iran, Israel, and the dozen or two other nuclear powers or soon to be powers shoot first? How quickly would they resort to them if they were on the losing side of a serious conventional conflict?

    It would seem that MAD isn't what it used to be, and most or all of the smaller nations that are investing enormous amounts of money on the marriage of missiles and nuclear weapons would be better off leaving such 20th century technologies behind and investing heavily on the newer generations of high tech weaponry. More bang for the buck, and probably more practical boots-on-the-ground security for their countries.

    1. Re:LRADs, Microwaves, and Nuclear Weapons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you must be stupid. nuclear weapons are there to defend against *countries*. all these hi tech toys are basically junk when a real army attacks you with MLRS's, howitzers , tanks, gunships and fighter bombers.
      good for crowd control - not good for much else.

    2. Re:LRADs, Microwaves, and Nuclear Weapons by Un+pobre+guey · · Score: 1
      Nuclear weapons have negligible battlefield value. Their use would spark a similar response from the opponent or from international alliances, formal or informal. In either case, the use of nuclear weapons would have dire consequences for their users, at very least preventing them from achieving whatever military or political goals they were pursuing.

      If North Korea were to use one against South Korea or our troops there, we would doubtless have international support for effectively ending the postwar Nort Korean regime by force. The North Koreans probably consider this an undesirable outcome. Likewise, if Iran were to use them against Israel, the old regime would be quickly removed with broadbased international support. Go down the list and you will see that the consequences of their use are so bad, that it is pointless to use them. Even battlefield nukes would galvanize international support for emasculating the aggressor. If they are of so little military value, and they are so expensive, why have them?

      This, of course, aside from the situation in the nuked target. Radiological contamination, mass hysteria, a potentially large number of casualties. It would be off limits to both the attacker and the victim. Imagine our own military trying to control Iraq if we had vaporized part or all of a major Iraqi city. Would we still have allies there? Would the "Coalition of the Willing" still exist? Would more terrorists rush in to fight us? Would our soldiers have to wear NBC gear in 100 degree heat? Would we face an entire planet pushing for sanctions against us?

      Please don't repond with something like "Oh yeah? Well fuck them! We can do without them!", or "We have the military resources to overcome all of those things." Those would be 1) dumb, and 2) unfounded answers.

      With regards to your belief that the high tech weapons are "basically junk when a real army attacks you with MLRS's, howitzers , tanks, gunships and fighter bombers," you failed to read my post correctly. Modern day conventional weapons, especially those we are using now, are high tech weapons, and they have permitted us to destroy older technologies quickly and on a large scale. Old-fashioned artillery is worthless if you can fly in and destroy it without your aircraft being shot down, as we do today. You are just plain wrong. Adding significant compute power to both ordnance and military vehicles, developing high quality remote sensing for military forces of all kinds, and using things like microwaves and even high-powered laser beams (although these can cause significant collateral damage) are far more cost-effective projects than nuclear weapons, and that is the core of my point.

  160. Are there any pirate baiting cruises out there? by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    I think it'd be hella fun to go on a luxury cruise near Somalia, with an all-you-can-fire bullet deal, and the automatic weapon of your choice.

    I'd take a turrent-mounted M60!

  161. Re:Ethical concerns by TropicalCoder · · Score: 0

    > Sorry, but what are the ethical concerns of using a weapon in self defense?

    They are certainly not MY personal ethical concerns. In my research, I came across some discussion on the issue of using LRAD for crowd control. The concern of some of the posters was that innocent bystanders - women and children in the crowd - could get hit by the beam. Also saw issues about police using this weapon to "control" demonstrators (equated with supression of free speech). Personally, I thinks LRAD is better than rubber bullets - those actually kill people, innocent bystanders included. However, there are people out there that would take issue with any weapon.

  162. Somebody load us up the bomb... by kurbchekt · · Score: 0

    Brings new meaning to "All your base are belong to us", now don't it?

  163. Safety Tip by rlp · · Score: 1

    Don't sign up for cruises on the 'Grand Line'.

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
  164. Army Of Darkness Comes to Life? by TheNarrator · · Score: 1


    "Alright you primitive screw-heads, listen up. See this? This is my boomstick! It's a 150 decibel double-barreled LRAD. American Technology's top of the line. You can find this in the sonic goods department. That's right, this sweet baby was made in San Diego, CA; retails for about one hundred nine, ninety-five thousand. It's got a metal stock, cobalt blue steel, and a hair trigger. That's right, shop smart, shop American Technology!"

  165. What a coincidence by tompaulco · · Score: 1

    I read another article, several actually, about another pirate attack on a cruise ship this weekend, also near Somalia, except in that attack, the cruise ship simply gunned the engines and outran the pirates.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    1. Re:What a coincidence by shdragon · · Score: 1

      I also read a similar article. What I don't understand is how a large cruise ship with a maximum speed of 35 knots can outrun a speedboat. Typically speedboats have a top speed of 40-50 knots.

      --
      "...we dont care about the economics; we just want to be able to hack great stuff."
    2. Re:What a coincidence by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

      Speed boat cannot do those speeds in open water ..unless it is a ciggerrette or a donzi

      --
      Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
    3. Re:What a coincidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The open sea has much larger waves than close to the coastline. If a cruise ship can get far enough away from the coast then small boats have no chance.

    4. Re:What a coincidence by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Speed boat cannot do those speeds in open water ..unless it is a ciggerrette or a donzi

      not to mention that a proper ship will be able to keep that speed up for days, whereas a speedboat will quickly reach the point where they have to return to refuel. Especially the poor pirates in these regions probably don't have full tanks of fuel.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  166. Wait a minute by StreetChip · · Score: 1

    Everyone assumes the ships were full of Pirates out to rob the passengers of the cruise line. How can we be sure that they weren't really just wanting to come on board to ask for donations to the FARM-Africa http://www.farmafrica.org.uk/ charity? Ignore the rocket launchers and automatic rifles just for a second to think about those poor, starving Africans!

    --
    LeoPolus Web Design: http://www.leopolus.com
  167. Re:Pirates?! Rawk! by Firethorn · · Score: 1

    We were discussing this on The highroad and the general consensus that these pirates could have been dealt with, permanently, with things varying from various sizes of machine gun(.30-.50+ calibers), to airgun launched grenades/dynamite, over/under shotguns.

    Scruitinizing the incident, the articles never seemed to deny the cruise line having firearms, merely that firearms weren't used.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  168. Apparently LRAD goes to eleven... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  169. This was a cruise dimwit. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    With old pensioners and the like.

    No wonder you USians screw everything you touch. You are fucking barbarians when it comes down to deal adequately with violence, you just name the dead people collateral damage and wait to be hailed as heroes.

    Pathetic.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:This was a cruise dimwit. by maelstrom · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Excuse me, but I believe the barbarians are the pirates attacking the cruise ship in the first place! It would be pathetic if you took the ramblings of a 14 year old Slashdotter who played too much Counter Strike to use as a stereotype for all Americans.

      --
      The more you know, the less you understand.
    2. Re:This was a cruise dimwit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No wonder you USians screw everything you touch. You are fucking barbarians

      I know - barbarians, we are. The whole lot of us. When intruders break into our homes, instead of standing by while they rape our wives - "It's OK, honey. Let him finish up and he will leave." - we actually defend ourselves.

      It's tragic, really. The world would be a lot better place if Americans were a bunch of pussies, just like you.

  170. Clarification on Pirates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please, let's notmade the same mistake as the rest of the media. These were not pirates. They were not going to take over the ship, or rob the thousands of passengers of their valuables after overtaking the crew, and climbing on-board (dozens of feet from the surface of the water) from their small speedboats.... No.

    These were plain and simple terrorists. Yes, the "t" word. They just wanted to kill, damage and take hostages. That's why the RPG and the automatic weapons. Do you remember the USS Cole? Was it attacked by pirates?

  171. Re:Pirates?! Rawk! by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

    Actually, this is the kind with AK-47s and ski masks.

    Don't worry, give it a hundred years and I'm sure we'll romanticize these pirates too. Kids will be wearing jaunty ski masks and waving around plastic RPGs, while the real pirates are attacking cruise ships with therm-optic camoflauge and lasers.

    Actually, can we skip right to romanticizing the camoflauge and laser pirates?

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  172. Piracy and Music Sales by jabelar · · Score: 1

    I expect the recording industry will waste no time in going after these pirates with lawsuits.

  173. Whales? by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

    That's pretty smart using sonar to cause a mass whale beaching on the pirates vessel...

    My only question is, how many downloaded songs did they find on the pirate ship?

  174. They all got shivering timbers now by Neebone · · Score: 1

    Arggg

  175. Useless Weapon??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The crew of a luxury cruise ship used a sonic weapon that blasts earsplitting noise in a directed beam while being attacked by a gang of pirates off Africa this weekend

    Doesn't sound like a very useful weapon to me if it only works against pirate attacks on the weekend off the coast of Africa ...

    1. Re:Useless Weapon??? by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      It is actually quite sophisticated. It emits a high frequency (ultra sonic) sound which creates a beam in the air. Any sound can then be modulated on that beam - voice warnings, screaches, country music, anything really. On the ship, they modulated gun fire sound onto the beam, making the pirates think that the ship is returning fire.

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
  176. Re:Pirates?! Rawk! by karnal · · Score: 1

    Yea. As soon as I saw that picture, I thought - hell, even with a bowling ball, you could probably sink that "ship". Just toss it at them as they wave at you. "CATCH!" *splinter* glub glub.

    Then, their RPG wouldn't be so easy to hold on to. heh.

    --
    Karnal
  177. This was innocents under threat by pirates/goblins by Firethorn · · Score: 1

    Then give the pensioners guns and let them go at it. ;)

    You are fucking barbarians when it comes down to deal adequately with violence

    I beg to differ. Sure, our view is different, but I don't really want to try using the French model, seeing as how they seem to like letting riots go on for weeks. I mean, we talk about riots lasting more than a couple hours as a long one.

    I wonder, what's your suggestion for permanently reducing the pirate problem of the area, and how much governmental cost would it incur?

    you just name the dead people collateral damage and wait to be hailed as heroes

    I challange you to find an army, in active operations, with less 'collateral damage' than the US Military. Besides, here we're simply talking about taking the pirates out before they can board so the only casualties, unless the pirates get lucky or are carrying hostages, will be pirates. These pirates are not like the 'noble' ones in so many movies. They are criminals, taking advantage of operating in a location without much active law enforcement.

    To figure out conservative american thinking in these matters, assign each human life a value of 100. Dogs and other animals are maybe in the single digits. For each crime, deduct a value from the 100. The sooner it's happened/happening, the greater the deduction. The exact value depends on the conservative and the crime. Attempting to commit murder is generally a deduction of around 100-200. Thus actually making the value of that person's life, at that moment negative. Thus, making it a contribution to humanity to waste the 'goblin*'. We're still going to try to avoid collateral damage, of course.

    *Technical term for humans who, through their acts, have shown themselves to be a negative value for the good of humanity.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  178. Nonsequitur != random by deesine · · Score: 1
    Just another example of random association so prevalent nowadays.
    It's not random. Most people don't have a problem connecting the dots from religious governments -to- banning certain goods & services -to- smugglers/pirates filling in the gaps. What's debatable is the influence that governments turning more religious has on overall smuggling/piracy rates versus other factors, such as international sanctions.

    Just because you don't see the causal connection does not mean it is random. Your claiming so is probably just as big a problem as the "random association so prevalent nowadays".

    --
    damaged by dogma
    1. Re:Nonsequitur != random by efuseekay · · Score: 1


      Oh I don't know I agree that "most people" will make this this connection. (Maybe most people in the US, i don't know.) Religious governments don't have to ban goods, they just ban ideas, and vice versa. Indeed, governments don't have to be religious to ban lots of ideas. Singapore, Malaysia's neighbour, is as secular as you can get, but virtually runs a police state. So there.

      Just because you don't see the causal connection does not mean it is random. Your claiming so is probably just as big a problem as the "random association so prevalent nowadays".

      An assertion (such as the OP) that is based on a false premise is wrong, even if the asserter believe it. Now, one can argue if wrong == non-sequitur. One can split hairs of course :).

      --
      Mode (3) smart-aleck mode. Press * to return to main menu.
  179. Yes by jgoemat · · Score: 1

    and I'm sure that's all that's smuggled. No weapons or slaves...

    1. Re:Yes by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Oh sure, the smugglers probably smuggle all kinds of abhorrent things. But why do food and medicine need to be smuggled along with weapons and slaves?

    2. Re:Yes by wronskyMan · · Score: 1

      To hide the real cargo in case they get caught?

      --
      --- You shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you mad- Neal (not Cowboy) Boortz
  180. Heh.. by Shawn+is+an+Asshole · · Score: 1

    Music and movie downloaders tried to attack a ship? Was it an RIAA cruise ship?

    --
    "It ain't a war against drugs.it's a war against personal freedom" --Bill Hicks
  181. Re:Pirates?! Rawk! by RedWizzard · · Score: 1
    In any event, we're told to just do whatever the pirates say, and don't try to act like a hero.
    Screw that. That just encourages them to continue attacking. If people would fight back, maybe this would end.
    One of New Zealand's most famous sailors, Sir Peter Blake, was on a yacht anchored off the mouth of the Amazon delta. When pirates boarded the yacht he fought back. He was shot and killed. Fighting back is not going to stop these attacks, it's just going to result in more victims' deaths. Wikipedia link.
  182. Re:This was innocents under threat by pirates/gobl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I challange you to find an army, in active operations, with less 'collateral damage' than the US Military.

    Easy: the British Army. Fighting beside you in Iraq, except they've killed fewer civilians, even relative to the size of their force. Oh, and your great American pilots have killed quite a few British soldiers, too. I challenge you to find an army in active operations with more "friendly fire" kills than the US military...

  183. Thwarted? by jgoemat · · Score: 1
    From the article:
    The subsidiary of Carnival Corp. was investigating whether the weapon was successful in warding off the pirates, he said. The ship's captain also changed its course, shifted into high speed and headed out into the open sea to elude the pirates, who were in two small boats, he said. He had no further details.
    There is nothing there that says the attack was thwarted. The fact that it was still be investigated may suggest it was not. If their last radio transmission was that they were using their LRAD and they headed out to deep sea, maybe the pirates caught up to them shortly after. Since there were two pirate boats they could just come out on both sides of the ship. Unless they had two LRADs, it could only be used on one pirate ship at a time.
    1. Re:Thwarted? by Typing+Monkey · · Score: 1

      They scared them away and then headed for their next destination as I recall.

  184. What they don't tell you..... by mormop · · Score: 1

    Is that the high pitched tone just stuns them. It's the following 30 minutes of Leonard Cohen sings the Smiths greatest hits that has them hurling themselves into the sea.

    --
    Hmmmmmm..... Deep fried and look like Squirrel.
  185. Re:Pirates?! Rawk! by Shotgun · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sir Peter Blakes problem was that he was on a yacht and he fought back at the wrong time. He had already lost before he began fighting. Being on a cruise ship with the pirates at a safe distance...totally different tactical situation.

    --
    Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
    Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  186. Torture by HermanAB · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, no, playing Country music beamed at pirates, is torture. That is not allowed under the Geneva convention.

    BTW, the Nairobi hospital in Kenia reported a large increase in Somalis with banana leaves stuck in their ears...

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
    1. Re:Torture by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 1

      But hillbilly Marines are immune to its effects, so are safe in deploying this weapons system.

      --
      "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
  187. The Slim Whitman LRAD by jdfox · · Score: 1

    Load that sucker up with "Indian Love Call". It's already been proven effective in battle:

    [RAYGUNS FIRING]
    "ACK ACK ACK ACK".
    "Grandma!"
    "ACK."
    Oh, my God.
    [SLIM WHITMAN YODELING FROM STEREO]"When I'm callin' You-oo"
    "Richie, I think these guys are very sick."
    "What's happening to them? What's killing them?"
    "I think it must be my music."

  188. don't count on dumping your gun by vinn01 · · Score: 2, Informative

    To be honest, everyone I know with a yacht in deep waters already carries decent guns for protection. It is pretty easy to dump them if you're boarded by a coast guard or naval vessel.

    I guess that you've never been boarded. I have. After that experience, I wouldn't take the chance of getting caught with an illegal gun. You're under constant surveillance from the momement they decide that your boat looks interesting. You might not have any idea that a cutter is approaching until it's right in front of you. They can come up real fast on a yacht puttering along at five knots.

    You *might* have the opportunity to go below and dig out your illegal gun. You *might* have the opportunity to toss it out a port hole on the lee side of the boarding party. But don't count in it.

    On the other hand, I've had friends who were attacked by pirates off the coast of Venezuela. It was a close call for them.

    I suggest keeping plenty of flares stocked for a flaregun and travel in groups when possible...

  189. pirates with RPGs, machine guns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And my ethical concerns go right out the window. Make them all deaf fuckers. Too bad they didnt use laser beams to melt their eyeballs as well.

  190. Watch the stock move! by Chapter80 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Do your own research, but this is just one of those things that makes a small company's stock go haywire!

    The Company that makes LRAD technology is called American Technology Corporation.

    Looks like they are losing money but small enough that something like this might cause the stock to jump!

    Full disclosure: I'm in.

    Watch and learn, kids. Next, the SPAM will start going out, touting the stock (not from me!). In a couple months, the bottom will drop out. But between now and then, there's money to be made.

    1. Re:Watch the stock move! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you suggesting that we Slashdot Wall Street????

  191. aljazeera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there was a much more in depth story on aljazeera.com. The captain of the cruise ship moved all the passengers to the interior, the rpg hit an empty cabin and exploded. No body died, but some were injured. The captain tried to ram the boats before making a break for it. No mention on aljazeera about a sonic weapon though. Honestly the ship would have been better of returning machine gun fire. A Ship with 2 .50 cal cannons could have taken out the pirate boats and done the world a favor.

    They say that pirate attackes are happening much more frequently now. The official warning was to stay more than 50 miles from teh coast of Somalia, but this ship was 100 miles offshore. The warning is now raised to 150 miles, since this should put ships out of the range of the small inflatable runners.

    The site also mentioned attacks on oil tankers, where the arabs demanded to be taught how to pilot the supertankers. I'm glad I live in Iowa. When one of these tankers detonates it will be a damn mess.

  192. Pirates repelled by sonic weapon by Drfruitloop · · Score: 1

    Before the pirates attacked


    Dinner:

    Beans on toast
    Bean stew
    Bean souffle
    Bean crumble
    Bean cookies
    Bean soup..............

    --
    A man chooses, a slave obeys - Andrew Ryan.
  193. Re:Pirates?! Rawk! by fatcatman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Right. He engaged in hand to hand combat. Good way to get killed unless you're well trained.

    When you're perched on a large ship, watching this dinky little "pirate ship" approach - for crying out loud, it was barely big enough to hold the four pirates - you totally have the tactical advantage. Unless you're not paying attention to your radar, you should see these fools coming a good long time before they're close enough to launch their attack, let alone board your ship.

    If they've boarded your ship, everything changes, of course.

  194. Remember when a sharp wit was enough? by ilduce · · Score: 1

    You fight like a dairy farmer.
    How appropriate. You fight like a cow.

    You make me want to puke.
    You make me think somebody already did.

    I'm not going to take your insolence sitting down!
    Your hemorrhoids are flaring up again, eh?

    I got this scar on my face during a mighty struggle!
    I hope now you've learned to stop picking your nose. ...and the pirates are defeated. No need for a stupid noise maker.

  195. Range by BrokenSegue · · Score: 1

    TFA quotes 150 decibels. Anyone know at what ranges it can emit noises at the volume level. I'd guess that the volume drops off pretty quickly over distances.

    --Robert Davie

  196. some people bad, all people bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "Your fellow countrymen paraded around a couple of dead bodies from my country's military"

    By your definition therefore the Iraqi population has the right to carpet bomb all of your country, we've all seen footage of (a minority of) US troops behaving badly and posting the images online. By your definition *you* are not a civilised people either.



    Grow up.

    1. Re:some people bad, all people bad... by strikethree · · Score: 1

      By your definition therefore the Iraqi population has the right to carpet bomb all of your country, we've all seen footage of (a minority of) US troops behaving badly and posting the images online. By your definition *you* are not a civilised people either.

      Grow up


      Well Mr. Anonymous Coward... It seems you have conveniently twisted "my definition" since I did not advocate carpet bombing because only a few people were committing atrocities. The entire city was out parading around the bodies and cheering. I do not see a large number of Americans cheering on such atrocities; otherwise, I would completely agree with your assertion that Iraqi's would be justified in carpet bombing all of America.

      Let's keep things real. Such distortions as you have presented are for people who have no solid arguments or who have a political agenda to fulfill.

      strike

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    2. Re:some people bad, all people bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you haven't seen a large number of Americans cheering our acts of abuse, torture, murder, and corpse defilement, then evidently you haven't visited freerepublic.com or any of the other big right-wing websites lately.

      By the way, not all Somalis were cheering for the deaths of those soldiers. What you're performing is called generalization, also known as bigotry.

    3. Re:some people bad, all people bad... by __aailob1448 · · Score: 1

      You know, you're right! Those mogadishans are savages. For that matter, all ethiopians are savages. In fact, all black people are savages! Animals just like monkeys only worse because they murder and rape and steal. We ought to slaughter them all. Let's me and you don our Ku Klux Klan robes and get cracking!

      Seriously though, you're an ignorant moron using laughable logic. Travel a bit and maybe you'll become less of a moron than you already are.

    4. Re:some people bad, all people bad... by strikethree · · Score: 1

      finally, an anonymous coward who is not twisting things.

      you are correct, i have not visited any right wing websites. if they are acting as uncivilized as you suggest, then they "deserve to be carpet bombed".

      you are also correct in that not all somalis were cheering. there were huge crowds of tens of thousands of people, filling dozens of city blocks. that is enough for me to condemn them as a whole; and yes, i am wrong in thinking that way. that is why i do not have control of the Big Red Button.

      strike

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    5. Re:some people bad, all people bad... by strikethree · · Score: 1

      ah. the race card. at least you are not an anonymous coward. :)

      i find your assumptions amusing.

      strike

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
  197. lower limit, yes. upper limit, no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For transient phenomena, you don't need an average pressure of 1 atmosphere. Vacuum is the lower limit, yes. But the upper limit is a lot higher that 2 atm, for example in the vicinity of an explosive event.

  198. that is one way to put it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another, more correct, way would be to say that African Islamic Terrorists were twarted...

    You say tomato, I say it right.

    They weren't trying to steal the boat, hence, not pirates.

    -JNY

  199. to swap out the horn? by mnmn · · Score: 1

    You must be from Pakistan

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
  200. thwarted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HA! Thwarted.
    Avast ye scallywags, man that aft LRAD and point her athwartships! There be pirates on the star'brd gunn'l!

  201. Re:Pirates?! Rawk! by mnmn · · Score: 1

    Look behind you, a three-headed Somalian monkey!

    Now I can test my theory that Caribbean pirates actually had Caribbean accents.

    YA MAAAN! ARRR...

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
  202. If it's Country Music,it's death metal to everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They play Country Music outside the McDonalds to keep the kids from loitering. But it keeps everyone away. People cross the street to avoid it to keep their ears from bleeding.

  203. Arrr... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yaar, me liver! Me ears bleed from tha din!

    Truth lads, ye ne'er try aplunderin' those with energy weapons.

  204. what if the pirates had LRAD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    would they be able to disable the cruise ship's crew and board?

  205. Re:Oooooh! OB: SP & Slayer death metal by splatter · · Score: 1


    Cartman: All right, everyone listen up! The hippie jam band festival is now fourteen miles in diameter and five hundred thousand hippies thick.

    Randy: [closes his eyes] My God...

    Cartman: In less than three days, all of South Park will be completely consumed. My only hope is to fight our way to the center of the crowd, and reach the heart, here. [points to the stage] If we can reach the stage, we can upload this Slayer CD into their music system. [shows off a CD-R of Slayer music] Hippies can't stand death metal. If everything works, they should disperse just before they consume us all.

    --
    "(I) have this unfortunate condition that causes me not to believe a single thing any politician says when a mic's on.
  206. Dune II by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

    Does this remind anyone of the Atredies Sonic Tank from Dune II? Well, except for the part where the target explodes, I suppose.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  207. Lasers by Dominic+Burns · · Score: 1

    Very, very bright lasers.

    Try steering something when your eyeballs are on fire.

  208. Re:Pirates?! Rawk! by floormasn56 · · Score: 1

    In any event, we're told to just do whatever the pirates say, and don't try to act like a hero.

    Just like airline hijackers... Don't mess with them and you won't get hurt...
    "Hey isn't that the World Trade Building?"

  209. Re:Pirates?! Rawk! by identity0 · · Score: 1

    I remember reading an account of sailing around the world solo from a guy who had made a lot of money in the early 80s as an Apple II programmer. He ran into pirates around Indonesia, and he waved a shotgun at them as they tried to board, and they ran away. He said he was sure they would have killed him had he not scared them off.

    Yeah, you should stop pirates before they board, because they have the advantage once they're on board - they're likely a lot tougher than your average Apple programmer, at least :). The other thing is that they're unlikely to sink your ship, because the whole point of piracy is to steal the stuff on it.

    IIRC, the big shipping companies who had problems with piracy around Indonesia recommended their crews use the fire hoses to keep the pirates from being able to climb onboard, but do everything as the pirates say if they got inside.

  210. Hand out the 9's by Dog135 · · Score: 1
    what's the 'heavy weapons' cut off at the moment?
    A 9mm pistol? ...
    Surely to fight off a speedboat you don't need 'heavy' weapons per se, you just need a lot of lighter weapons

    Good idea. When a pirate shows up, they should have compartments open up loaded with 9mm handguns. Everyone grabs one and starts shooting at the boat.

    Even a .22 would be dangerous if you have enough coming at you. (or if you ever decide to get out of your armored boat)

    *sigh* if only...
    --
    "That's so plausible, I can't believe it!" - Leela
  211. Re:Pirates?! Rawk! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't you just keep a bunch of batteries to give them?

  212. Photos of the pirates by The+Hobo · · Score: 1

    link

    Requires flash

    --
    There is another kind of evil which we must fear most, and that is the indifference of good men. -- Boondock Saints
  213. Re:Pirates?! Rawk! by identity0 · · Score: 1

    Found the guy's webpage, he is Paul Lutus, who wrote the Apple Writer for the Apple II, and now has a HTML editor called Arachnophillia. His homepage is here, and here is his sailing story.

    Truly an interesting guy.

  214. Threat-down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here comes the Threat-down! Number 5 on the list! Pirates!

  215. Re:Pirates?! Rawk! by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    As it turns out, small boats, especially those the size of a rowboat, do not have a significant radar reflection, and certainly no greater reflection than even extremely small waves. Aside from the fact that a cruise ship is not likely to be equipped with a tactical radar, radar operators have to squelch a minimum return in order to get a clear picture of their surroundings. The minimum is subject to wave height, atmospheric conditions, and to some extent the range setting. If the returns weren't squelched, the display would appear as either thousands of points or sheer "whiteout." It's not like radar/sonar in the movies where you see a picture of a plane or boat moving continuously in some direction. There's a blip on your screen which may or may not be noise or interference, which does not move, and is only repainted once per revolution of the sweep. By turning the decay rate down it's possible to see rows of successive dots, but there's a fine line between confirming a trail of dots attributable to a small craft and seeing elephants in the clouds.

    A port is a completely different story. While almost all ports have entry and exit lanes, and navigational laws, these may not be clearly defined or enforced in third world countries. It's likely you're going to have fishing boats everywhere, along with ferries, pleasure craft, shuttles taking crew back and forth from large ships, etc. The biggest concern is risk of a collision, so large vessels usually post watches to maintain visual confirmation of every target (other boat) within sight, to monitor their speed and heading, updated at regular intervals, and report any possibility of collision. In spite of the risks, small craft will often pass directly in front of large ships, just like cars that dart across the railroad tracks. (And much like a train, there's basically nothing the ship can do to prevent a collision in those circumstances.)

    So in the first case, on open ocean, you're unlikely to see a small boat on radar, or even visually until it's rather close. In the second case you have a plethera of small craft all around you. If you were driving around in traffic and I told you were was a car full of men with guns who were going to open fire on you when they got close enough, you could be as paranoid and suspicious as you wanted, but there'd be no way to pick them out until they reveal themselves by opening fire.

    Now in THIS case, the craft was identified as a threat as it was approaching; probably because one of the watches saw a guy with an RPG perched on his shoulder. Likely the "pirates" were relying on the display of force to gain compliance. If the pirates had employed even the slightest amount of subtrifuge and gotten close enough, the cruise ship may not have had the opportunity to test their new defense. Although given the fact that they were waving and smiling at the photographer, it doesn't seem likely that they were actually prepared to use violence.

  216. And Larry was at the RNC last year in NYC! by ejp · · Score: 0

    I posted to slash last year that at the RNC (Repbulican National Convention) this was ready to go. Yet, no one cared. Now it's blast some pirates and it's big news. Figure that one out!

  217. File Downloads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doh! No wonder my Kazaa downloads usually end up being bogus files with high pitched sounds these days.

  218. Sonic weapon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it's the same cruise ship attacked by pirates in 2 small boats armed with rocket launchers and machine guns that has been in the news here then the story is a little wrong.

    The pirates fired 1 grenade which failed to explode (but lodged in the side of the ship). They got on board, shot one crew member (he survived) and made off with some money, cameras etc.

    The ship sailed to the nearest safe port and was evacualted and bomb disposal guys removed the grenade head. ....it's hard to beleive that somethign on the internet could be wrong?

  219. Re:Pirates?! Rawk! by hkmwbz · · Score: 1
    "Although given the fact that they were waving and smiling at the photographer, it doesn't seem likely that they were actually prepared to use violence."
    They fired rounds at the ship, even with their RPG. There were undetonated rockets on the deck after the attack.
    --
    Clever signature text goes here.
  220. Effective anti-piracy measure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's actually an electric fence you can put on your ship: http://www.secure-marine.com/ship/ship1.htm

    Your typical commercial vessel isn't going to be easily effected by small arms fire, so as long as you can keep people off the deck you just have to worry about boarding. How do you prevent the pirates from boarding? Just set up a 9000V electric fence around your deck!

    dom

  221. depends on which ten minute activity you mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well let me just say, I have at least one activity that takes ten minutes or less that I frequently ask my wife to do, and you wouldn't believe the stink she puts up about it.

  222. Re:Pirates?! Rawk! by CyricZ · · Score: 1

    My penis weeps at the death of your RPG character. Final Fantasy is a very tragic game like that.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
  223. Re:Pirates?! Rawk! by RedWizzard · · Score: 1
    Sir Peter Blakes problem was that he was on a yacht and he fought back at the wrong time. He had already lost before he began fighting.
    Sure, but I was replying to a blanket statement:
    Screw that. That just encourages them to continue attacking. If people would fight back, maybe this would end.
    In some cases it might be possible to repel the attackers but in general it is safer not to attempt it.
    Being on a cruise ship with the pirates at a safe distance...totally different tactical situation.
    It only takes one stray bullet to kill a passenger. What would that do to the cruise line as a business? It's probably not worth the risk, even in that situation.
  224. yeah but nasty business and nasty people by fantomas · · Score: 1

    yeah but anybody who's smuggling is probably involved in other nasty business... I mean if somebody doesn't give the smugglers the promised cash for their smuggled load, or turn up with goods after said smugglers have handed over a sports bag of dollars, well they probably don't call the local police to sort it out. Probably don't mind carry high value drugs alongside your cheap cigarettes and that kind of cargo usually comes with lots of nasty karma attached as well...