...around pulsars and other cosmological objects with very intense magnetic fields...
Given that the question you answered required not crushing the experiment, and presumably having to do with the terrestrial use of the field for fusion, the cosmological do not count...
But in complete seriocity, post a reference. I think you may be right, and it may have to do with a field so strong that the extreme vacuum energy results in non-linear propagation of the electric field. But Maxwell is linear and would not allow, if I understand correctly.
Total cost to put up an app on the app store is $99 for the developers certificate + time to develop app. Done. You can also set up a website that points to your App on the App Store if you want to do so; and do the other things you point out which are smart to do. But, no need to deal with Pay Pal - though it may not be hard, I doubt that every iPhone owner has a Paypal account, and it is hardly 1-click easy. I've never had it so easy to sell an application. And there is no way previously I could sell an app for $1 and expect to make any money. So far, as an independent developer, the App Store has been very good. I'm not biased, I'll look at android when a few million phones have been sold and there are reports that the android store is selling 100 millions apps. Same for OpenMoko.
I loved Systems 4 through 9. But cooperative multitasking, which was marketed by Apple as being much better than fascist pre-emptive multitasking, seemed like some variation of the Prisoner's dilemma.
pp is pretty common usage.
Google - "pp cross-section" site:aps.org
e.g.
http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v22/i13/p674_1
If it is good enough for Physical Review Letters, it should be good enough for you.
May I ask where you received you physics degree? Just curious.
Physics degree from Caltech. Not once was I marked down for my speling. I to understood the hole post. As long as you get F=mA correct you are allowed to graduate.
Ok, I'm not really sure how I became so confused: I continue to read your post as if you are suggesting it is a fallacy that a women would gain weight during pregnancy. Your post is included below. I don't see any mention of after in it. My browser must be replacing 'after' with 'during'. Weird.
I thought women put on weight during pregnancy?
Only if you count the baby. This idea that women gain ten pounds during pregnancy is a fallacy that was propogated[sic], in part, by an early belief in the medical establishment that women needed to gain weight for a healthy pregnancy. Once that idea was disproven[sic], fewer women forced themselves to gain weight during pregnancy.
In fact, most women only experience a mild increase in food intake while pregnant. My understanding is that it's more important to pay attention to sudden food cravings, as those are often signs of missing minerals and vitamins. (e.g. my wife wanted bananas while she was pregnant)
You should gain roughly 25-35 lbs. during your pregnancy.
Over the last two trimesters you should gain about 4 lbs. every 4 weeks.
How it breaks down
If you gained the average of range above, this is where the weight would go (totals are rounded):
Maternal:
Uterus 2.39 lbs.
Breasts 1.0 lbs.
Blood 3.09 lbs.
Water 4.15 lbs.
Fat 8.27 lbs.
Subtotal 18.89 lbs.
Fetal:
Fetus 7.5 lbs.
Placenta 1.6 lbs.
Amniotic Fluid 1.97 lbs.
Subtotal 11.07 lbs.
Total 29.96 lbs.
And even though you are posting on/. - I'll trust the baby center site over your own experience.
I remember keeping a pad of paper by the TV so I could write down the ingredients next time that episode came on. And what a happy boy when I saw that Safeway sold potassium nitrate on the same shelf as the sublimed sulfur in the pharmacy section of the store.
In 2003, a team of researchers published a report in Science magazine titled "Mars-like Soils in the Atacama Desert, Chile, and the Dry Limit of Microbial Life" in which they duplicated the tests used by the Viking 1 and Viking 2 Mars landers to detect life, and were unable to detect any signs in Atacama Desert soil.
I'd like to know what Phoenix would see in the same place.
It's been awhile, but last time I had a ticket it was 1000 ft AGL. With permission you could go below that. I think news helicopters and air ambulances are examples of exceptions.
You are well on your way to inventing the calculus. It is mentioned elsewhere, but when you integrate over a shell, the gravitational attraction is the same as if the shell were a point mass at the center of the shell.
When the GP talks about a long baseline, it is in reference to Very Long Baseline Interferometry. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VLBI And the advantage is very high angular resolution. But to use VLBI you need to keep your (minimum three) telescopes phase locked. At radio wavelengths of a few cm and longer this is pretty easy to do. The signal can be recorded in a phase accurate manner. At optical wavelengths of a micron or smaller this is very hard to do. I know of no way at present to record optical signals in a phase accurate manner suitable to this application. For optical interferometry http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astronomical_interferometer
the instruments have to be close enough to pipe the light into a common observation location. This will not happen from the moon to earth.
Two problems with your suggestion. 1) Baseline is not the limit of any planet searches. 2) Planet searches are done with optical frequencies.
You could put a radio telescope on the moon and do VLBI - but not an optical telescope.
The most difficult part right now of detecting planets using Doppler shift is a fixed frequency standard to compare the stars spectrum against - they are measuring centimeter/second movements of the star.
Baseline has nothing to do with the current limits.
AFAIK, the only optical interferometer of any note is at Keck - and I don't even know if it has been used yet.
See this article: http://optics.org/cws/article/research/33693
Why was it not legitimate? For a savings of $1,000 I would try to move it. I don't think the license expires when you stop being a student, you just can not upgrade - of course I have not read the license in some time so don't quote me.
I think it is much more important as a Physicist to be facile with math, hence my liking Mathmatica. It is very important that I can set up some DiffEq to represent my problem, but at least for me I need the help of something like Mathmatica to do anything beyond a simple harmonic oscillator.
My limited (and ancient) experience at SLAC and LANL is the FORTRAN library is already written in most cases, and if it is not you still want to use FORTRAN if you want to run on a fast computer - Cray X-MP last time I did it.
And I say this as a professional programmer fluent in C++ and Java.
Slashdot Mirror
Unless the spectra was already taken aren't we out of luck? I thought that it had faded away.
...around pulsars and other cosmological objects with very intense magnetic fields...
Given that the question you answered required not crushing the experiment, and presumably having to do with the terrestrial use of the field for fusion, the cosmological do not count...
But in complete seriocity, post a reference. I think you may be right, and it may have to do with a field so strong that the extreme vacuum energy results in non-linear propagation of the electric field. But Maxwell is linear and would not allow, if I understand correctly.
Were do you get that magnetic fields bend light? Not with Maxwell, not in a vacuum. Any reference to the contrary will be read!
Total cost to put up an app on the app store is $99 for the developers certificate + time to develop app. Done. You can also set up a website that points to your App on the App Store if you want to do so; and do the other things you point out which are smart to do. But, no need to deal with Pay Pal - though it may not be hard, I doubt that every iPhone owner has a Paypal account, and it is hardly 1-click easy. I've never had it so easy to sell an application. And there is no way previously I could sell an app for $1 and expect to make any money. So far, as an independent developer, the App Store has been very good. I'm not biased, I'll look at android when a few million phones have been sold and there are reports that the android store is selling 100 millions apps. Same for OpenMoko.
...cooperatively by each running program...
I loved Systems 4 through 9. But cooperative multitasking, which was marketed by Apple as being much better than fascist pre-emptive multitasking, seemed like some variation of the Prisoner's dilemma.
Here is an article giving an example of evidence that it is not normal stuff: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7587090.stm
At this point is seems pretty unlikely that it is a bunch of brown dwarfs.
Kind of like the microscope on Phoenix? http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/phoenix/news/phoenix-20080814.html
100nm resolution. DNA however is only 3nm wide.
pp is pretty common usage.
Google - "pp cross-section" site:aps.org
e.g. http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v22/i13/p674_1
If it is good enough for Physical Review Letters, it should be good enough for you.
May I ask where you received you physics degree? Just curious.
Physics degree from Caltech. Not once was I marked down for my speling. I to understood the hole post. As long as you get F=mA correct you are allowed to graduate.
Tell the sun you can't get a surplus of energy out of fusion.
That depends on what you mean by surplus. The sun converts mass energy into light energy. It's not creating more energy than it already has.
I thought women put on weight during pregnancy?
Only if you count the baby. This idea that women gain ten pounds during pregnancy is a fallacy that was propogated[sic], in part, by an early belief in the medical establishment that women needed to gain weight for a healthy pregnancy. Once that idea was disproven[sic], fewer women forced themselves to gain weight during pregnancy. In fact, most women only experience a mild increase in food intake while pregnant. My understanding is that it's more important to pay attention to sudden food cravings, as those are often signs of missing minerals and vitamins. (e.g. my wife wanted bananas while she was pregnant)
re-readGP. He is talking about not gaining during pregnancy.
Well I suppose the mods know nothing.
http://www.babycenter.com/pregnancy-weight-gain-estimator Pregnancy weight gain estimator
Estimate for my wife:
You should gain roughly 25-35 lbs. during your pregnancy. Over the last two trimesters you should gain about 4 lbs. every 4 weeks. How it breaks down If you gained the average of range above, this is where the weight would go (totals are rounded): Maternal: Uterus 2.39 lbs. Breasts 1.0 lbs. Blood 3.09 lbs. Water 4.15 lbs. Fat 8.27 lbs. Subtotal 18.89 lbs. Fetal: Fetus 7.5 lbs. Placenta 1.6 lbs. Amniotic Fluid 1.97 lbs. Subtotal 11.07 lbs. Total 29.96 lbs.
And even though you are posting on /. - I'll trust the baby center site over your own experience.
I remember keeping a pad of paper by the TV so I could write down the ingredients next time that episode came on. And what a happy boy when I saw that Safeway sold potassium nitrate on the same shelf as the sublimed sulfur in the pharmacy section of the store.
The Atacama Desert is 50 times drier than Death Valley. Apparently some areas may not have seen rain in 400 years.
In 2003, a team of researchers published a report in Science magazine titled "Mars-like Soils in the Atacama Desert, Chile, and the Dry Limit of Microbial Life" in which they duplicated the tests used by the Viking 1 and Viking 2 Mars landers to detect life, and were unable to detect any signs in Atacama Desert soil.
I'd like to know what Phoenix would see in the same place.
It's been awhile, but last time I had a ticket it was 1000 ft AGL. With permission you could go below that. I think news helicopters and air ambulances are examples of exceptions.
You are well on your way to inventing the calculus. It is mentioned elsewhere, but when you integrate over a shell, the gravitational attraction is the same as if the shell were a point mass at the center of the shell.
5 D's (Dodge duck dip dive dodge)
Don't you mean: "Ho! Haha! Guard! Turn! Parry! Dodge! Spin! Ha - THRUST!"
According to the history for the page - it has not been edited in three weeks. Weird...
When the GP talks about a long baseline, it is in reference to Very Long Baseline Interferometry. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VLBI And the advantage is very high angular resolution. But to use VLBI you need to keep your (minimum three) telescopes phase locked. At radio wavelengths of a few cm and longer this is pretty easy to do. The signal can be recorded in a phase accurate manner. At optical wavelengths of a micron or smaller this is very hard to do. I know of no way at present to record optical signals in a phase accurate manner suitable to this application. For optical interferometry http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astronomical_interferometer the instruments have to be close enough to pipe the light into a common observation location. This will not happen from the moon to earth.
Two problems with your suggestion. 1) Baseline is not the limit of any planet searches. 2) Planet searches are done with optical frequencies.
You could put a radio telescope on the moon and do VLBI - but not an optical telescope.
The most difficult part right now of detecting planets using Doppler shift is a fixed frequency standard to compare the stars spectrum against - they are measuring centimeter/second movements of the star. Baseline has nothing to do with the current limits. AFAIK, the only optical interferometer of any note is at Keck - and I don't even know if it has been used yet. See this article: http://optics.org/cws/article/research/33693
Why was it not legitimate? For a savings of $1,000 I would try to move it. I don't think the license expires when you stop being a student, you just can not upgrade - of course I have not read the license in some time so don't quote me.
I suggest one take advantage of the student pricing for Mathematica. Even the version from 5 years ago is better than anything else I have seen.
I think it is much more important as a Physicist to be facile with math, hence my liking Mathmatica. It is very important that I can set up some DiffEq to represent my problem, but at least for me I need the help of something like Mathmatica to do anything beyond a simple harmonic oscillator. My limited (and ancient) experience at SLAC and LANL is the FORTRAN library is already written in most cases, and if it is not you still want to use FORTRAN if you want to run on a fast computer - Cray X-MP last time I did it.
And I say this as a professional programmer fluent in C++ and Java.