Elon always pretends he is an "engineer" in order to fool the tech nerds who have a lot of money into thinking he is one of them. In reality he is just a guy with a degree in economics from an Ivy League school who is good at raising money. His "engineering" ideas come from companies he acquired after getting pushed out of Paypal.
Self-landing rockets were done way before Musk did it. You are lying. But they are right about one thing: it is a publicity stunt. Self landing rockets isn't any better than the alternative, which is why no one else continued making them since they were first introduced 40 years ago.
You can train your NN with as much data as you want and you will never achieve autonomous driving. That is what Tesla-nuts don't understand: NN work NOTHING like the human brain does. NOTHING. The fact that they are even called neural nets is a scam.
No, the hardest part is the technical part. It DOESN'T WORK. It might never work. Tech nerds think everything is going to happen in the future. Guess what? It doesn't. That is why Windows 10 is still a thing.
All things are possible? No, that is scifi. Reality says otherwise. So does science. But you type dont know science or physics so just assume everything will happen.
It didn't "understand it" because it doesn't "understand" anything. It is a joke. How many permutations of "edge cases" are there on the planet? Billions. Trillions. Quadrillions. NN were invented in the 1960s. They aren't new. They are good for some things, but will ultimately fail.
You just answered why self driving will never work with the current approach: you can only train based on a dataset. You cannot create a dataset large enough to cover all permutations. We realized this in the 1970s with NN, but now a new generation is learning it all over again. It works better, because the processing speeds and data storage has increased, but it is still the same faulty crap underneath. Tesla is a joke, and autonomous driving is a joke too. "Enhanced Summon" is the best you are going to get out of your crappy Tesla, no matter how many "AI chips" they come out with.
Many of the people who buy Teslas are just tech nerds who got lucky in IT and made some money and blow it on a $60,000+ car. They like tech toys. Musk figured it out and now he has worshippers throwing money at him (until the recession hits).
Yeah yeah yeah...because one thing is possible all things must be possible. You guys keep repeating the same mantra, while wondering why you aren't living on Mars yet.
Exactly. That is why autonomous cars won't work until we build to road system FOR autonomous cars. Billions of dollars are being wasted on this effort.
....that autonomous driving is going to work? I mean, have you actually used software? Anything moderately complex has tons of bugs on it. And autonomous driving is extremely complex.
That isn't what I am saying. I am saying trying to make a program more efficient (in terms of memory usage/CPU usage/etc) is independent of wanting to automate things. Coders like to do the latter, but not all enjoy the former (I know I don't).
Very true. Most programmers aren't interested having a 100% efficient program at this point. But we are interested in automating tasks. The two things are independent, but the summary conflates the two. Probably written by a non-developer.
I love it when journalists use the term "more than X". What does that even mean? It could be 851 scientists or 10,000,000,000 scientists. It is used to indicate what the journalist thinks is "a lot" (e.g. consensus) when the reality is that hardly anyone was asked.
"promoting positive energy"? The guy is an ass who calls people "pedophiles" on Twitter.
Elon always pretends he is an "engineer" in order to fool the tech nerds who have a lot of money into thinking he is one of them. In reality he is just a guy with a degree in economics from an Ivy League school who is good at raising money. His "engineering" ideas come from companies he acquired after getting pushed out of Paypal.
Self-landing rockets were done way before Musk did it. You are lying. But they are right about one thing: it is a publicity stunt. Self landing rockets isn't any better than the alternative, which is why no one else continued making them since they were first introduced 40 years ago.
You can train your NN with as much data as you want and you will never achieve autonomous driving. That is what Tesla-nuts don't understand: NN work NOTHING like the human brain does. NOTHING. The fact that they are even called neural nets is a scam.
No, the hardest part is the technical part. It DOESN'T WORK. It might never work. Tech nerds think everything is going to happen in the future. Guess what? It doesn't. That is why Windows 10 is still a thing.
Not special. We just don't understand it. Maybe we will someday, but it doesnt mean we can replicate it.
All things are possible? No, that is scifi. Reality says otherwise. So does science. But you type dont know science or physics so just assume everything will happen.
It didn't "understand it" because it doesn't "understand" anything. It is a joke. How many permutations of "edge cases" are there on the planet? Billions. Trillions. Quadrillions. NN were invented in the 1960s. They aren't new. They are good for some things, but will ultimately fail.
You just answered why self driving will never work with the current approach: you can only train based on a dataset. You cannot create a dataset large enough to cover all permutations. We realized this in the 1970s with NN, but now a new generation is learning it all over again. It works better, because the processing speeds and data storage has increased, but it is still the same faulty crap underneath. Tesla is a joke, and autonomous driving is a joke too. "Enhanced Summon" is the best you are going to get out of your crappy Tesla, no matter how many "AI chips" they come out with.
Many of the people who buy Teslas are just tech nerds who got lucky in IT and made some money and blow it on a $60,000+ car. They like tech toys. Musk figured it out and now he has worshippers throwing money at him (until the recession hits).
Yeah yeah yeah...because one thing is possible all things must be possible. You guys keep repeating the same mantra, while wondering why you aren't living on Mars yet.
What "research"? They are doing the same crap that was done in the 1970s. It still doesn't work.
Exactly. And that why the Boring Company and Hyperloop are even more idiotic ideas. He wants to put CARS on sleds in tunnels. Pretty amazing.
Autonomous driving will never approach what humans can do. It ain't going to happen.
Exactly. That is why autonomous cars won't work until we build to road system FOR autonomous cars. Billions of dollars are being wasted on this effort.
....that autonomous driving is going to work? I mean, have you actually used software? Anything moderately complex has tons of bugs on it. And autonomous driving is extremely complex.
Even though everyone on Slashdot says "the raspberry pi sucks!" Yeah, well, guess what? They start at $5.
They already did it. It is called "Xfinity". Comcast is just the name of the parent company.
Poor Rei. The hits keep coming. Keep the faith though: only Tesla is able to create electric vehicles, so soon you will be rich!
That isn't what I am saying. I am saying trying to make a program more efficient (in terms of memory usage/CPU usage/etc) is independent of wanting to automate things. Coders like to do the latter, but not all enjoy the former (I know I don't).
Very true. Most programmers aren't interested having a 100% efficient program at this point. But we are interested in automating tasks. The two things are independent, but the summary conflates the two. Probably written by a non-developer.
Witchery! Get him boys!
I love it when journalists use the term "more than X". What does that even mean? It could be 851 scientists or 10,000,000,000 scientists. It is used to indicate what the journalist thinks is "a lot" (e.g. consensus) when the reality is that hardly anyone was asked.
Sexually assaulted? Oh yeah, I forgot about SJW talk.
Who cares? We all did things when we were 18. Grow up.