Other kinds of privileges for the politically well connected that tend to
make and keep people poor – think occupational licensure and zoning laws,
for instance – would be absent from a freed market. So ordinary people,
even ones at the bottom of the economic ladder, would be more likely to
enjoy a level of economic security that would make it possible for them to
opt out of employment in unpleasant working environments, including
big businesses.
With the proliferation of "Right to Work" laws and states it has gotten much easier to get rid of any employee for practically any non-discriminatory reason, including their politics.
Non-union employees have essentially zero job protections and with the death of unions we have fewer and fewer union employees.
I work in right to work state. My sample size is small and possibly biased, but I've never seen this happen in practice. Employers keep poor performing employees to a fault and ultimately to the detriment of the org. Higher performers end up leaving.
Contract workers is effectively "try before you buy" on an employee. It's getting increasingly difficult to fire poor performing employees. Contract is a good bet for employers.
yeah, I try to stay out of the politics & stick to the technical realities.
Definition of the Differentiated Services Field (DS Field) in the IPv4 and IPv6 Headers https://tools.ietf.org/html/rf...
Your institution use the full 20G bandwidth at all locations? In my previous experience, remote clinics -- when properly shaped and policed -- can run on 10Mb virtual circuit or less. A friend manages 50+ medical imaging sites on a shared 500Mb EVC.
If your Tier 1 supplier is not shaping, then you're probably on a dedicated connection (not cheap) and not sharing the bandwidth with other subscribers. Not surprising from a HC institution; rising cost of HC & all.
QoS & neutrality are mutually exclusive. QoS is what manages traffic congestion that would otherwise break the interwebz. Net neutrality, while politically popular, is not technically desirable.
Definition of the Differentiated Services Field (DS Field) in the IPv4 and IPv6 Headers https://tools.ietf.org/html/rf...
Porn, Netflix, Emergency 911 VoIP calls... Net Neutrality says to treat them all the same.
Definition of the Differentiated Services Field (DS Field) in the IPv4 and IPv6 Headers https://tools.ietf.org/html/rf...
It's all defined in the contracts with the ISP. You expect your ISP to honor and provide the CiR agreed to in the contract. The way it's done is by classifying traffic, which necessarily implies no neutrality.
RFC 2474 Definition of the Differentiated Services Field (DS Field) in the IPv4 and IPv6 Headers https://tools.ietf.org/html/rf...
You have to classify traffic to prevent congestion. Congestion will break the interwebz. As soon as you're classifying traffic, which is already happening, you have no neutrality If you want a simple example of how neutrality breaks shared and limited resources, remove quotas from your file system or schedulers from CPU resource management.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rf...
"Annual agriculture is all about living through our concepts... our idea we've imposed on reality. And, when reality doesn't behave according to our idea, what do we do? We input... we can never input enough to make our false concept correct." @RestorationAgD http://bit.ly/1GnbtAA
Slashdot Mirror
https://daviddfriedman.blogspo...
All Wars Are Bankers' Wars https://youtu.be/5hfEBupAeo4
Lufthansa & Air France board optimally: back to front.
Gary Chartier
http://southpark.cc.com/clips/...
The Fourth Phase of Water: Dr. Gerald Pollack at TEDxGuelphU https://youtu.be/i-T7tCMUDXU
With the proliferation of "Right to Work" laws and states it has gotten much easier to get rid of any employee for practically any non-discriminatory reason, including their politics.
Non-union employees have essentially zero job protections and with the death of unions we have fewer and fewer union employees.
I work in right to work state. My sample size is small and possibly biased, but I've never seen this happen in practice. Employers keep poor performing employees to a fault and ultimately to the detriment of the org. Higher performers end up leaving.
Contract workers is effectively "try before you buy" on an employee. It's getting increasingly difficult to fire poor performing employees. Contract is a good bet for employers.
It's about time someone invoked the 10th amendment. Though, Montana may end up with the most congested links.
Meanwhile, everybody is distracted by "net neutrality" when it is precisely ISP competition that will keep the net neutral.
http://www.nationalreview.com/...
Renowned cancer scientist was paid by chemical firm for 20 years https://www.theguardian.com/sc... Nutrition Has a Consensus to Use Bad Science: An Open Letter to the National Academies https://www.realclearscience.c...
yeah, I try to stay out of the politics & stick to the technical realities. Definition of the Differentiated Services Field (DS Field) in the IPv4 and IPv6 Headers https://tools.ietf.org/html/rf...
Your institution use the full 20G bandwidth at all locations? In my previous experience, remote clinics -- when properly shaped and policed -- can run on 10Mb virtual circuit or less. A friend manages 50+ medical imaging sites on a shared 500Mb EVC. If your Tier 1 supplier is not shaping, then you're probably on a dedicated connection (not cheap) and not sharing the bandwidth with other subscribers. Not surprising from a HC institution; rising cost of HC & all.
QoS & neutrality are mutually exclusive. QoS is what manages traffic congestion that would otherwise break the interwebz. Net neutrality, while politically popular, is not technically desirable. Definition of the Differentiated Services Field (DS Field) in the IPv4 and IPv6 Headers https://tools.ietf.org/html/rf...
Porn, Netflix, Emergency 911 VoIP calls... Net Neutrality says to treat them all the same. Definition of the Differentiated Services Field (DS Field) in the IPv4 and IPv6 Headers https://tools.ietf.org/html/rf...
What CiR are you paying for? How does your Tier 1 provider shape and police your traffic before it hits their backbone?
It's all defined in the contracts with the ISP. You expect your ISP to honor and provide the CiR agreed to in the contract. The way it's done is by classifying traffic, which necessarily implies no neutrality. RFC 2474 Definition of the Differentiated Services Field (DS Field) in the IPv4 and IPv6 Headers https://tools.ietf.org/html/rf...
"Preferential treatment" is defined by the CiR in contract with the ISP. "Traffic management" necessarily implies no neutrality.
You have to classify traffic to prevent congestion. Congestion will break the interwebz. As soon as you're classifying traffic, which is already happening, you have no neutrality If you want a simple example of how neutrality breaks shared and limited resources, remove quotas from your file system or schedulers from CPU resource management. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rf...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programme...
Net neutrality is great and all until you have congestion, then the interwebs breaks to hell & back.
"Annual agriculture is all about living through our concepts... our idea we've imposed on reality. And, when reality doesn't behave according to our idea, what do we do? We input... we can never input enough to make our false concept correct." @RestorationAgD http://bit.ly/1GnbtAA