So, I think this GNOME thing will also sizzle out after a while.
Except that we're in a different time period now than we were then. Even 4 years ago, disk sizes were small and a filesystem was all that was needed.
Now, With 500GB drives and storage increasing at even more phenomenal rates we are using it for more and more data and that requires a different paradigm.
Well, if I took the time to care about MS, I'd probably be anti-MS. But it really has no
effect on my life, so maybe you're right. Oh,
Wait, there is the news that I can't avoid hearing
about another microsoft virus/trojan/worm/flaw terrorizing people and threatening to bring down
the world's infrastructure, but I just shake my head and wonder what the fuss is about.
Being keen on databases, this SQL filesystem is interesting to me, though.
The poor man doesn't pay for my protection, I pay for his.
If only this was true, I'd be a happier citizen.
The reason the police are locally funded (and state police stay out of the cities) is so that people in wealthy neighborhoods don't have to support their fellow citizen, only exploit them.
I'm not trolling, you stated that you were wealthy and the fact that you were posting demonstrated your
greed in your need to protect the status quo by convincing people that they too could have the "American dream" and by your denigration of my character (still unknown to you). "I have meat, you want to take my meat and give it to others, I fight you is a natural if short-sighted sequence
of thought. Sequitor.
I don't aim to counter achievement, only foster a more balanced and socially responsible payout system. The majority of people in your position
are not there through personal achievement and the minority who are will continue to prosper through strength of personal attributes despite the higher tax.
My goal is better lives for a greater % of people. Peace and prosperity for everyone. If you have to wait another year before buying another piece of property in order for 1,000 scared pregnant teenage crack addicts to get treatment (including abortion) and counselling I'll vote to tax you every time. The same goes for law enforcement, prevention programs, public education, and a national health system.
I'm one of the top 5%
I'm sorry that you are, and your post is the perfect
example of the kind of person I don't mind taxing a whole lot more.
You probably have a lot of property that needs to be protected by the state if you make over 1 million $ in income per year. If not by our underpaid military, then by local police forces and crime prevention measures such as education. I see no reason why a poor man in the inner city should
have to pay for your protection, he has no stake in society. You, however are vulnerable and are the minority.
For the future: a personal attack is a logical fallacy (non sequitur - ad hominem). You have no clue as to who I am or what my motivations are. You, on the other hand, are motivated by greed and wish to protect your "hard earned" assets which is understandable but against the interest of our society.
I didn't know that. Thank you for your post. I'd still rather use a machine put together by a machine than by a person. Once something is automated correctly I'd rather trust the machine than the human.
Not too many people thing about the work that goes into making a chair (for example) fit properly, but it's a complex process and one that requires a lot more engineering than people realise.
With 10,000 years of prior art, forgive me if
I thought that chair design was something we as a society had already perfected...
very good post.
While I'm for redistribution of wealth from people who don't contribute through some kind of labor, the comment I had is that the reduction in food pricing and clothing pricing is wonderful until there is price fixing in Cereals that cost 4$ a pop or clothing that costs 30 cents to make,transport,etc and 50$ on the shelf.
I watched the harly davidson motorcycle manufacture and immediately saw ways for them to reduce up to 100 people in their manufacturing process through
automation. I thought this was all done in the
1980s and 90s.
good point, but maybe if you were willing to pay higher taxes, the fraternal order of extortionists wouldn't be so short on cash...
Better Idea, lets tax the top 5% and additional 100% more than they are paying now. They have more to lose, they should pay more to protect it.
Well, Linux has a great deal of separate functionality that you need to learn the
ins and out of.
Perl's CPAN is just another one to learn.
The process of constantly learning is training
that is invaluable.
Once you've used apt, or emerge, or portage
you end up scratching your head anytime someone
mentions using rpm.
Perl's CPAN isn't difficult but I imagine
the fact that these RPMS are binary versions
are what make them good...less waiting for
the IT professional with a Job to do.
Programming Languages by Sebesta meets most of your requrements.
For others learning the language I found these books helpful for C++:
Effective C++ by Meyers
Effective STL by Meyers
and STL C++ Standard Library by Josuttis
So, I think this GNOME thing will also sizzle out after a while.
Except that we're in a different time period now than we were then. Even 4 years ago, disk sizes were small and a filesystem was all that was needed.
Now, With 500GB drives and storage increasing at even more phenomenal rates we are using it for more and more data and that requires a different paradigm.
It all depends on the timing of the technology.
Well, if I took the time to care about MS, I'd probably be anti-MS. But it really has no effect on my life, so maybe you're right. Oh, Wait, there is the news that I can't avoid hearing about another microsoft virus/trojan/worm/flaw terrorizing people and threatening to bring down the world's infrastructure, but I just shake my head and wonder what the fuss is about.
Being keen on databases, this SQL filesystem is interesting to me, though.
Fear is the path to the dark side.....fear leads to anger.....anger leads to hate.....hate leads to suffering
And the Jedi were the greatest warriors of all time!
The poor man doesn't pay for my protection, I pay for his.
If only this was true, I'd be a happier citizen. The reason the police are locally funded (and state police stay out of the cities) is so that people in wealthy neighborhoods don't have to support their fellow citizen, only exploit them.
I'm not trolling, you stated that you were wealthy and the fact that you were posting demonstrated your greed in your need to protect the status quo by convincing people that they too could have the "American dream" and by your denigration of my character (still unknown to you). "I have meat, you want to take my meat and give it to others, I fight you is a natural if short-sighted sequence of thought. Sequitor.
I don't aim to counter achievement, only foster a more balanced and socially responsible payout system. The majority of people in your position are not there through personal achievement and the minority who are will continue to prosper through strength of personal attributes despite the higher tax.
My goal is better lives for a greater % of people. Peace and prosperity for everyone. If you have to wait another year before buying another piece of property in order for 1,000 scared pregnant teenage crack addicts to get treatment (including abortion) and counselling I'll vote to tax you every time. The same goes for law enforcement, prevention programs, public education, and a national health system.
Imagine a beowulf cluster of these!
Thats why they took both mainframes...they wanted the backup in case the first one broke...
I'm one of the top 5%
I'm sorry that you are, and your post is the perfect example of the kind of person I don't mind taxing a whole lot more.
You probably have a lot of property that needs to be protected by the state if you make over 1 million $ in income per year. If not by our underpaid military, then by local police forces and crime prevention measures such as education. I see no reason why a poor man in the inner city should have to pay for your protection, he has no stake in society. You, however are vulnerable and are the minority.
For the future: a personal attack is a logical fallacy (non sequitur - ad hominem). You have no clue as to who I am or what my motivations are. You, on the other hand, are motivated by greed and wish to protect your "hard earned" assets which is understandable but against the interest of our society.
I didn't know that. Thank you for your post. I'd still rather use a machine put together by a machine than by a person. Once something is automated correctly I'd rather trust the machine than the human.
am I the only one that thinks "Prosuite" looks way too much like "Prostitute"?
are you sure it wasn't his cousin's brother's sister's uncle?
Not too many people thing about the work that goes into making a chair (for example) fit properly, but it's a complex process and one that requires a lot more engineering than people realise.
With 10,000 years of prior art, forgive me if I thought that chair design was something we as a society had already perfected...
very good post. While I'm for redistribution of wealth from people who don't contribute through some kind of labor, the comment I had is that the reduction in food pricing and clothing pricing is wonderful until there is price fixing in Cereals that cost 4$ a pop or clothing that costs 30 cents to make,transport,etc and 50$ on the shelf.
I watched the harly davidson motorcycle manufacture and immediately saw ways for them to reduce up to 100 people in their manufacturing process through automation. I thought this was all done in the 1980s and 90s.
Why not just go through the phone book and sign everyone in it up? That would be the greatest present to give to a complete stranger.
good point, but maybe if you were willing to pay higher taxes, the fraternal order of extortionists wouldn't be so short on cash... Better Idea, lets tax the top 5% and additional 100% more than they are paying now. They have more to lose, they should pay more to protect it.
if only that held true for the RIAA....
follow the documentation in the kernel source on how to submit bug reports.
no! no more!
Well, Linux has a great deal of separate functionality that you need to learn the ins and out of. Perl's CPAN is just another one to learn. The process of constantly learning is training that is invaluable. Once you've used apt, or emerge, or portage you end up scratching your head anytime someone mentions using rpm. Perl's CPAN isn't difficult but I imagine the fact that these RPMS are binary versions are what make them good...less waiting for the IT professional with a Job to do.
Evolution created me out a pool of chemicals.
Nothing is Impossible.