Slashdot Mirror


Cindy Smart Knows Better Than To Say Naughty Words

D'Sphitz writes "Cindy Smart, the first doll in the world to be able to read, tell the time and do sums. Cindy Smart 'sees' via a camera located under a bee on her overalls and has a computer 'brain' that can recognise more than 600 words and objects, although she refuses to recite certain 4-letter words. 'We don't say those kind of words,' she shrills, refusing to even spell obscenities. 'That's a bad word.'" Sounds like a good candidate for a personality transplant.

499 comments

  1. How can they really stop it? by dtfinch · · Score: 4, Funny

    It won't be long until some kid has her read "eye yam sofa king we todd did."

    1. Re:How can they really stop it? by jargonCCNA · · Score: 2, Insightful

      -laughs-
      Probably won't carry the same weight as when you trick a human being to do it; its voice synthesis probably isn't on par with AT&T Natural Voices.. it'll probably be kind of choppy, halting, broken English.

      --
      Matthew G P Coe
      http://mgpcoe.blogspot.com/
    2. Re:How can they really stop it? by dtfinch · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here's what it sounds like read by Microsoft Mary.

    3. Re:How can they really stop it? by saden1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Screw Cindy, I want Teddy from A.I.

      --

      -----
      One is born into aristocracy, but mediocrity can only be achieved through hard work.
    4. Re:How can they really stop it? by CptChipJew · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...you'll break.

      (if you haven't seen AI, you won't get it)

      --
      Vonal Declosion
    5. Re:How can they really stop it? by darkov · · Score: 5, Funny

      Indeed. Let's see Cindy get around:

      "I like to swallow"
      "Do me by the backdoor"
      "Call the football team I'm wet"
      "Daddy likes to do me too"

      and so on...

    6. Re:How can they really stop it? by alatesystems · · Score: 1

      /me eats the food anyway against Teddy's sage advice.

    7. Re:How can they really stop it? by alatesystems · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Here's what it sounds like when read by AT&T Natural voices as suggested by parent. Please be kind to my cable modem.


      Chris

    8. Re:How can they really stop it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fortunately the doll will say "Lunix sucks" and even agree that it does suck. But if you try to get her to say "Linux" then she says "that's a bad word. We use Windows around here."

    9. Re: How can they really stop it? by krymsin01 · · Score: 1

      Just make it say: Don't you think you're being a little hard on the beaver? No bad words there.

      --
      stuff
    10. Re:How can they really stop it? by Choron · · Score: 3, Informative

      Or better, you can try it online http://www.naturalvoices.att.com/demos/ in English, French, Spanish and German.

      --
      "Naughty, naughty, naughty, you filthy old soomka !"
    11. Re:How can they really stop it? by jtalkington · · Score: 1

      Too bad they haven't really figured out how to make it sound more human. I read an article a few (maybe 5) years ago that suggested that it didn't sound right because there was no breathing, as with human speech. That would be cool, but I'm waiting for the heavy breathing version ;)

    12. Re:How can they really stop it? by geekster · · Score: 1

      4Q

    13. Re:How can they really stop it? by geekster · · Score: 1

      This one sounds even better, well sometimes. Try "valley girl" ... "like, yah, what ever, 4q cok soker" ... fun stuff.

    14. Re:How can they really stop it? by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Probably if you add slight mistakes in it'll be more realistic. Slight blurring of words.. breathing stops.. stutters.. etc. When I usda do text bots the ones that could make typos and make human-like grammar mistakes were far more convincing. People would often talk to them for hours before figuring out the weren't real people. I'd suspect voice follows the same rule.. add in fuzziness and people will believe it more.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    15. Re:How can they really stop it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      > it'll probably be kind of choppy, halting, broken English.

      That didn`t stop Bush becoming president!!

    16. Re:How can they really stop it? by Phishpin · · Score: 2, Funny

      When I used that, it sounded pretty good. One thing that can make it choke though:

      fhqwhgads

      --
      -phish
    17. Re:How can they really stop it? by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just out of curiousity, if I taught the doll to say "This is a stickup. Give me all your money in a bag" and took it into a bank, would they arrest Cindy, or me?

    18. Re:How can they really stop it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She seems to be better off saying "eyam sofa king pee stoff." :)

    19. Re:How can they really stop it? by tzanger · · Score: 1

      "usda?"

      Used to, perhaps?

    20. Re:How can they really stop it? by ralphclark · · Score: 1

      "faha queue" works a lot better. Check it out.

    21. Re:How can they really stop it? by ralphclark · · Score: 1

      "phack you" is also good, but sounds different.

      whichever, you need a comma before the "cok soker" bit.

    22. Re:How can they really stop it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are just sick.

    23. Re:How can they really stop it? by darkov · · Score: 1, Funny

      You are just sick.

      Maybe so. I thought about leaving the last one out, in the name of good taste, but, of course, this is Slashdot, so I thought better of it. If I was really sick I would have posted these:

      "Mommy ate my furry clam"
      "I like to eat little boy's stools"
      "Daddy tore me with his huge member"

    24. Re:How can they really stop it? by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      I think this bot has successfully proven its point.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    25. Re:How can they really stop it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Bend over and smile like a doughnut!"

    26. Re:How can they really stop it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pop that voice box in a RealDoll and put it to work.

    27. Re:How can they really stop it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      this girl needs religion.

      "Jesus, I'm coming"

    28. Re:How can they really stop it? by PCM2 · · Score: 1
      "Call the football team I'm wet"
      Whoah! Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these things...
      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    29. Re:How can they really stop it? by ShortSpecialBus · · Score: 1

      whoa!

      she spelled fhqwhgads right!

      --
      //FIXME: Bad .sig
    30. Re:How can they really stop it? by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      I don't understand the "we todd did" part -- it doesn't come across very clearly in the responses you got with wav/mp3 files.

      However, I've been playing around with the AT&T demos and I found a string that produces what I think you wanted:

      "eye yam sofa king way stud"

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    31. Re:How can they really stop it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fork? :)

    32. Re:How can they really stop it? by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      I kinda got it to say that; the video is here for those who haven't heard it.

      At the AT&T site put in:

      "come on fu-who-goo-gauze" and it sounds pretty decent in Mike's voice; Cindy draws it out a bit too long.

      This is fun for a Sunday afternoon. ;-)

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    33. Re:How can they really stop it? by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      Screw Cindy, I want Teddy from A.I.

      How about Cindy from The Sixth Day?

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    34. Re:How can they really stop it? by finkployd · · Score: 1

      FAHORGANGRADS!

      Coach Z, I told you to leave like an hour ago.

      Finkployd

    35. Re:How can they really stop it? by pyrrhonist · · Score: 1

      It's "retarded" said in a New England accent, you retahd.

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    36. Re:How can they really stop it? by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Exactly so. Another example would be that people greet each other with 'Wassup' and not 'What.. is.. up' like most voice apps might use. Errors are more human.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    37. Re:How can they really stop it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That didn`t stop Bush becoming president!!

      I can't decide if the missing "from" is just another layer of clever wit, or run-of-the-mill slashdot sloppiness. Given the content, probably the latter.

    38. Re:How can they really stop it? by rifter · · Score: 1

      "That didn`t stop Bush becoming president!!"

      I can't decide if the missing "from" is just another layer of clever wit, or run-of-the-mill slashdot sloppiness. Given the content, probably the latter.

      Actually "from" would be superfluous in that sentence, though in US English it is commonly used in such contexts. Perhaps the original speaker is a Briton or an Anglophile. Personally, I think it is too bad that US English has degenerated so badly. Most people seem to speak and write little better than chimpanzees on this side of the water.

    39. Re:How can they really stop it? by rifter · · Score: 1

      Fortunately the doll will say "Lunix sucks" and even agree that it does suck. But if you try to get her to say "Linux" then she says "that's a bad word. We use Windows around here."

      runs on a C64 can't be all that grandiose by modern standards.

  2. That's all well and good... by PetWolverine · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...but can she run Linux?

    --
    I found the meaning of life the other day, but I had write-only access.
  3. spelling? by Dorothy+86 · · Score: 3, Funny

    okay, now cindy, spell icup

  4. -1, Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And which words would those be?

  5. recognizes more than 600 words or objects by prichardson · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There are over 500,000 words in the english language. she recognizes slightly over .1% of them. I give her about 5 minutes reading any book with a decent vocabulary before she craps out. I know this is a toy, but memory isn't that expensive these days.

    --
    Help I'm a rock.
    1. Re:recognizes more than 600 words or objects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh I seriously doubt its the memory but rather the subtle differences between some of those 500,000 words. Thats why you can speak numbers into phone systems today or navigate multiple choice systems but not openly speak.

    2. Re:recognizes more than 600 words or objects by dtfinch · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That may just mean that she can give spelling and definitions for 600 words.

      You can give most speech synthesizers a random string of letters and they will sound it out.

    3. Re:recognizes more than 600 words or objects by Peridriga · · Score: 0

      With 10 numbers (0-9) those systems only need to know 10 words (w/ some give for dialect)

      Bah. don't propose theories w/ thinking them through

    4. Re:recognizes more than 600 words or objects by simon_aus · · Score: 5, Funny

      So I'm guessing that this is a blonde Cindy. Not the enhanced brunette model to be released sometime Q2 2004.

      --
      Stopping myself...Abort (core dumped)
    5. Re:recognizes more than 600 words or objects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With 10 numbers (0-9) those systems only need to know 10 words (w/ some give for dialect)

      Bah. don't propose theories w/ thinking them through


      Yes exactly, but what theory are you talking about?

    6. Re:recognizes more than 600 words or objects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, with a vocabulary of only 1100 words (iirc - look up some linguistic resources if you want to be certain), you can get by without any problems in 95% of all conversations.

    7. Re:recognizes more than 600 words or objects by Bugmaster · · Score: 4, Funny
      Actually, that's a good point. What I'd like to see is a doll like this, but with learning capability. In the simple case, you'd just give it USB and download word lists into it. In the complex case, you'd give it WiFi, and hook it up to google, so that it can learn in real-time.

      Then, all you have to do until it develops intelligence and comes after you with plasma weapons...

      --
      >|<*:=
    8. Re:recognizes more than 600 words or objects by hazem · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You really don't need so many words to communicate effectively.

      Doing a rudimentary word count of this current page of comments gave about 950 unique words, including mis-spellings, names, and e-mail addresses.

      When I was studying Arabic, a 500 word vocabulary was a good benchmark to reach. 1000 words meant, barring grammar problems, that you could speak and read pretty proficiently.

      I'm sure they're expecting kids will be putting kid-level pages up in front of the doll. With a controlled vocabulary, that might only include a vocabulary of a few hundred words.

    9. Re:recognizes more than 600 words or objects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hook a learning doll upto Google and let it learn? Are you insane?!

      I don't want a childs doll learning about BDSM horse sex in a tub covered in its own feces while praying to Xenu about clams and how much Windows sucks in those pictures of your cat.

      It'd be like Childs Play meets Sex Slave Sluts Vol. IV

    10. Re:recognizes more than 600 words or objects by mrhartwig · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thank you. I almost sent milk through my nose all over my laptop, but thank you.

    11. Re:recognizes more than 600 words or objects by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      Why is this modded funny? On almost every slashdot story I always hear of someone who shot milk through somewhere as the result of some joke. Who the hell drinks milk anymore?

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    12. Re:recognizes more than 600 words or objects by sketerpot · · Score: 4, Funny
      I once wrote a program that was supposed to find super nintendo roms from Google. It never developed intelligence, it just found one zip file for something completely unrelated and WENT OFF CHASING AD BANNERS FOR THE REST OF ITS GODDAMN DAYS, THE FUCKING IDIOTIC THING!

      We don't say those kind of words. That's a bad word.

    13. Re:recognizes more than 600 words or objects by Josuah · · Score: 1

      There are over 500,000 words in the english language. she recognizes slightly over .1% of them. I give her about 5 minutes reading any book with a decent vocabulary before she craps out.

      This is a children's doll. Those books are going to have a very limited vocabulary. Think Sesame Street. If you need this doll to read books with you, something is seriously messed up in your head.

      Besides, I'm guessing those 600 words probably cover most of what I just wrote. Maybe leaving out seriously, probably, guessing, and sesame. (But I would think it includes serious and guess.)

    14. Re:recognizes more than 600 words or objects by !3ren · · Score: 2, Funny

      No worries.
      It would just stumble on the definition of "WAR" and be unable to save the human race until Bruce Willis kissed it.

    15. Re:recognizes more than 600 words or objects by flewp · · Score: 1

      Who the hell drinks milk anymore?

      I do. I use it to wash down your breakfast pants.

      --
      WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
    16. Re:recognizes more than 600 words or objects by simon_aus · · Score: 1

      Hope your'e ok. Aparrently it's a good cure for that amphetamine burning.

      --
      Stopping myself...Abort (core dumped)
  6. Ken says... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Funny


    Ken says he'd rather have a beowulf cluster of Barbies.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:Ken says... by smcn · · Score: 0, Funny

      Actually, he said he wanted to have a clusterfuck of Barbies.

    2. Re:Ken says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and barbie wants a werewolf.

  7. MOD THIS SHIT TO HELL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  8. DO NOT CLICK ON PARENT LINK by irving47 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    DO NOT CLICK ON PARENT LINK

    --
    I had a sucky sig.
    1. Re:DO NOT CLICK ON PARENT LINK by grug0 · · Score: 5, Funny
      Cindy should be programmed to recognise goatse and tubgirl.

      We don't click those kind of links... That's a bad link.

    2. Re:DO NOT CLICK ON PARENT LINK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe slashdot should be programmed to as well, then this shit wouldn't happen

    3. Re:DO NOT CLICK ON PARENT LINK by dracocat · · Score: 1

      Please be more specific next time. Just telling me not to click made me click!

    4. Re:DO NOT CLICK ON PARENT LINK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you bother with these warning? Anyone stupid enough to click a link without checking where it goes deserves what he gets. After a couple of times, he'll learn his lesson.

    5. Re:DO NOT CLICK ON PARENT LINK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But that would violate the /. policy of absolute free speech.

      Perhaps /. could be programmed to automatically mod messages down to -1 that had a link to goatse or tubgirl. Yeah! That might work!

  9. Life imitating hollywood by Powercntrl · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Sim Pal doll in The 6th Day was named Cindy. I wonder if this is more than just a coincidence...

    --

    ---
    DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    1. Re:Life imitating hollywood by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      Heck, when I saw the headline I thought the doll was part of the marketing campaign surrounding Elizabeth Smart...

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  10. Who thinks "Damn" is a bad word? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    come on are ya that senitive

    1. Re:Who thinks "Damn" is a bad word? by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      When Lewis saw the western frontier, and the majestic rivers... Clark said, "Dam it".

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  11. Obscoene? by niko9 · · Score: 4, Funny

    'We don't say those kind of words,' she shrills, refusing to even spell obscenities

    I guess she won't be saying McBride or SCO anytime soon either. ;)

    1. Re:Obscoene? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Soviet Russia jokes
      Profit jokes
      All your base jokes

    2. Re:Obscoene? by brian728s · · Score: 1

      Whats "obscoene" is your spelling

    3. Re:Obscoene? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None of which get modded Funny.

  12. dirty math by kfort · · Score: 5, Funny

    it says she can do math, but will she recognize 8 / 0?

    "We don't do that math", "That's a naughty divisor!"

    1. Re:dirty math by Alien+Being · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's when her head starts spinning around like Linda Blair.

    2. Re:dirty math by dtfinch · · Score: 1

      I wonder if she can handle numbers larger than 32 bit.

      "Five billion plus one billion is one billion, seven hundred and five million, thirty two thousand, seven hundred and four."

      Hearing something like that could really traumatize some first graders.

    3. Re:dirty math by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      Five billion is already over 32 bits.

      Jason
      ProfQuotes

    4. Re:dirty math by glenebob · · Score: 1

      >> will she recognize 8 / 0?

      See, I think to that she should say "divide by zero? fuck you." I can wish :-)

    5. Re:dirty math by zzendpad · · Score: 1

      zarquon:~> bc
      bc 1.06
      Copyright 1991-1994, 1997, 1998, 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
      This is free software with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.
      For details type `warranty'.
      2^32
      4294967296
      6000000000-42949672 96
      1705032704

    6. Re:dirty math by billybob · · Score: 1

      You clearly did not get the joke. Please resume stroking.

      --
      Joseph?
    7. Re:dirty math by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      Of course I got the joke, it's just not real geek humour if he makes such a fundamental mistake. He couldn't load the 5 billion into a 32 bit unsigned integer to begin with. If he'd said 4 billion + 2 billion it would have been funny.

  13. HAHAHHA by Ghostx13 · · Score: 5, Funny

    My kid sister had this caterpiller toy that had buttons that would say the number, letter, or phonetic sound that was associated with the button. It took me about 30 seconds to figure out that if I hit the phonetic f key and the phonetic q key it would go fa que. Needless to say my kid sister thought this was hilarious, not because she knew what it said, but just to see every one elses reaction. I don't think my parents every replaced the battery in that thing....

    1. Re:HAHAHHA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I have a Caterpillar that will refuse to play certain combinations of letters in phonetic mode without putting a little jingle in between. I think our alphabet ball has a similar quirk, and these things are at least two years old.

      It's interesting to see what it's willing to sound out uninterrupted... I remember feeling it actually had a fairly broad knowledge of female anatomy.

    2. Re:HAHAHHA by wizard · · Score: 2, Informative

      The caterpiller is Alphabet Pal. My daughter has one. First time one of my friends saw it he tried to do make it curse. It just laughs instead most of the time, but there are a couple more words that they missed.

    3. Re:HAHAHHA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yeah, great, you fooled a children's toy. Feel proud.

    4. Re:HAHAHHA by dtfinch · · Score: 1

      My niece has one of those.

    5. Re:HAHAHHA by dtfinch · · Score: 1

      They must have revised it I guess.

    6. Re:HAHAHHA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fooled the fools that created it more like.

    7. Re:HAHAHHA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually, older versions of that Catapillar did say naughty words when in letter pronounciation mode and presented with "f" and "k" in quick succession.

      The new version just laughs and says that it tickles.

    8. Re:HAHAHHA by rune2 · · Score: 1

      More fun than sticking a Megadeth tape in a Teddy Ruxpin eh? :-)

    9. Re:HAHAHHA by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

      Not really. I'm very certian that that toy was explicitally created for the sole purpose of saying the f-word.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
  14. i am waiting for the day... by ufs · · Score: 1

    when someone installs linux on her.

    1. Re:i am waiting for the day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      awww yeah install linux on a chick!!

      there you go thats a fantasy for most people here

      hey baby got any linux inside you?
      want some?

    2. Re:i am waiting for the day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that linux looks so becoming on you...

      of course if i was on you id be come'ing too!

      thank you thank you
      ill be here all night

      props to led zeplin!

  15. Am I the only by The+Old+Burke · · Score: 2, Troll
    ... one that think that this is stupid?
    Why can't we let the children be children while they are still young? Do they need all this tech?
    Most girls would be satidfied with a old fashion doll without all this hihg-tech stuff.
    So someone please think of the childre instead of trying to earn a buck by trciking innocent parents into buying these items.

    --
    Proud patriot and republican voter.
    1. Re:Am I the only by bersl2 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Some adults still play with dolls. Of course, they're life-size blow-ups...

    2. Re:Am I the only by lrucker · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Not me, however I'd have been satisfied with the high-tech stuff without the doll.

      Seriously, though, through most of history toys have been teaching tools, not mere playthings - girls had dolls to learn how to take care of children, etc. So a high-tech toy is more appropriate for today's children than an "old fashioned doll"

    3. Re:Am I the only by chewmanfoo · · Score: 1

      ... one who doesn't see the inability of a child's doll to say obsenities as evidence that the doll needs a "personality transplant"? Forming the sounds of words society deems as obscene is only proof that something can speak, choosing not to say them is, in my opinion, evidence that it can think as well.

    4. Re:Am I the only by WegianWarrior · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Disclaimer: I don't have kids of my own (yet), but I'm the proud uncle of two.

      There are a few things I've learned the last few years (and looking back on my own childhood, they become very clear):
      - The simple, non-complex toys are played with more often than the high-tech gadgetry. My oldest niece plays a hundred times as much with her ragdolls and with her Barbie (*shudder*), than she do with the 'true to life' babydoll she got two years back. The fancy toys holds the kids interest for a short while, but they are very likely to return to the toys that allow them to play in freeform.
      - Boys and girls do play difrently. From what I've seen, girls will go for the 'readymade toys' like dolls and pretend-stoves, while boys will seek out toys that allow they to create and modify, like Lego or Mechano (or even better; a hammer, some bits of wood and a handfull of nails).
      - Kids today have, as a general rule and in the parts of the western world I've seen, more toys than they had when I grew up - and I'm not that old. My guess is that a lot of parents would rather buy toys for their kids than to play with their kids - and the rest are giving into peer-preasure.

      --
      Everything in the world is controlled by a small, evil group to which, unfortunately, no one you know belongs.
    5. Re:Am I the only by kfort · · Score: 3, Funny

      oh yeah, nothing makes a better child's toy than a handful of nails. Where the hell are you from? Please don't have kids.

    6. Re:Am I the only by Safety+Cap · · Score: 1

      You can entertain a kid for months with nothing more elaborate than a wooden top...

      --
      Yeah, right.
    7. Re:Am I the only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Proud patriot and republican voter.


      This is completely off-topic but if you really consider yourself to be a patriot, then you may want to reconsider your political affiliation. It appears that the Republicans do not have the best interests for the American people.
    8. Re:Am I the only by phrogeeb · · Score: 1

      Perhaps if you had grown up with a similar toy, you would be able to spell words like 'children' and 'tricking' and 'high'

      --

      ------

      "Will the highways on the Internet become more few?" --George W. Bush, in Jan. 2000

    9. Re:Am I the only by AvantLegion · · Score: 1
      > So someone please think of the childre instead of trying to earn a buck by trciking innocent parents into buying these items.

      If there's no market for it, the market will reject it.

      The only products that get bought are products that people want.

      Of course, there's no accounting for tas^H^H^H stupidity.

    10. Re:Am I the only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Generally speaking some kids are interested in high tech toys, some aren't.

      Hopefully the parent knows that the kid either does or doesn't like these types of toys.

      Better yet the parent can ask "do you want that toy".

      I agree that most parents shouldn't be parents though, considering theyprobably have difficulty keeping a household plant alive.

    11. Re:Am I the only by DarkZero · · Score: 1



      Or they just don't read anything bad into giving their kids toys. I mean, really, which situation is more likely:

      A) "Oh, that looks like a nice toy, I bet Little Johnny would love that!"

      B) "This will shut the brat up."

      C) "Oh, well... all of the other parents give their kids hundreds of toys, so I guess I should too, even though I think it's ultimately wrong."

      I'm thinking "A", since that's the one that I've had the most experience with, both among my parents and other parents. If they see a cool toy and they can buy it for their kids, they buy it. There doesn't have to be a malicious or lazy reason behind every parenting decision that someone else makes that you, personally, would not. There are different ways of bringing kids up and yours is not necessarily the best.

    12. Re:Am I the only by thynk · · Score: 5, Funny

      Please don't have kids.

      Why the hell shouldn't he have kids? I grew up with ample access to nails, bits of wood and hammers. The ONLY thing that ever got hurt was my pride when I'd ask for an honest opinion of what I'd created.

      We need more parents who are willing to let their kids grow up and experience things first hand. I'm not saying that it's a good idea to give a kid a box of matches, a gallon of gas and tell them to have a good time in their bedroom. That sort of thing should done outside after all.

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
    13. Re:Am I the only by KentoNET · · Score: 1

      Dolls that spell prevent posts like taht ;)

      --
      "You tried your best and failed miserably. The lesson is...never try. Heh!" -Homer
    14. Re:Am I the only by ces · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm not saying that it's a good idea to give a kid a box of matches, a gallon of gas and tell them to have a good time in their bedroom. That sort of thing should done outside after all.

      Ah yes such great fun. After that you can move on to plastic explosives. Need to be careful with that though, incidents involving semtex and the principal's car may take a bit of explaining.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
    15. Re:Am I the only by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "girls had dolls to learn how to take care of children, etc"

      and how to wash clothes.........do the dishes......cook..........errr....can I even say that stuff? Whoops, nm, forgot where I was. And yes I know there's some geek girls out here but its not like you girls don't laugh at this stuff too.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    16. Re:Am I the only by RALE007 · · Score: 1
      We need more parents who are willing to let their kids grow up and experience things first hand. I'm not saying that it's a good idea to give a kid a box of matches, a gallon of gas and tell them to have a good time in their bedroom.

      Damn straight, that's what their friends bedrooms are for!

      --
      Beware blue cats moving at .99c
    17. Re:Am I the only by CrackersnSoup · · Score: 1

      Rule Sets Thinking

      My firewall make decisions about what packets to
      allow in. It doesnt think. It does as I say. It
      would be far closer (yet far from) thinking if it
      watched my traffic nad decided "this looks like a
      virus, I will red flag and notify"

      These doll's are the first steps to a AI (imo)
      We have came a long way from the days of synthetic
      sounding voice. Next, a irc bot will be combined
      with a voice synthisizer and have it randomly call
      people on the phone (assuming I ever have time to
      finish, guess I could OSSize my project)

      There is a Professor in Witchita, KS that is
      working with quantum neural networks. Since the
      human brain contains quantum matrial (to me) this
      seams like the logical method to atemps AI with.
      To date "true" AI has failed for many reasions, one being that to be Inteligent you can not simply
      just exist. "I think there fore I am" does not
      apply without great leaps of faith that you do
      not only think, but already decided that you
      exist. Anyone else remember their childhood, about
      5-6 when you knew you existed as a person with
      thought and direction, not just existing.

      epiphany: A comprehension or perception of reality
      by means of a sudden intuitive realization.

      Crackers`n`Soup
      Wher oh where shall I go today??

    18. Re:Am I the only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when did Randian Economics enter into the mechanics of entertaining children? That really cracks me up.

    19. Re:Am I the only by TheLoneDanger · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying that it's a good idea to give a kid a box of matches, a gallon of gas and tell them to have a good time in their bedroom. That sort of thing should done outside after all. So, you're not for them having sex in front of a blazing fire at home, but all for exhibitionism? Kinky.

      --

      "But I trust in the people's capacity for reflection, rage and rebellion." -Oscar Olivera
    20. Re:Am I the only by kfort · · Score: 1

      get real. We are talking about 5-6 year olds. Kids that age don't have the needed dexterity to safely use hammer and nails. For a child closer to 10 or so I would agree with you.

    21. Re:Am I the only by bullestock · · Score: 1
      get real. We are talking about 5-6 year olds. Kids that age don't have the needed dexterity to safely use hammer and nails. For a child closer to 10 or so I would agree with you.

      Bollocks. My daughter is nearly 6, and she enjoys banging nails into a piece of wood (though she doesn't quite have the necessary muscle strength for it).

      So what if she should happen to hit her own finger? That's minor compared to the feeling of pride she gets from having created something herself.

    22. Re:Am I the only by kfort · · Score: 1

      fine, you are right. At least wait until she is 8 before you let her at the power-saw and blowtorch, ok?

    23. Re:Am I the only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, I'm sorry, but WTF? Insightful? My comment really doesn't deserve that.

    24. Re:Am I the only by naNoox · · Score: 1

      Or Real Dolls...

    25. Re:Am I the only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have kids of my own (yet), but I'm also the proud uncle of two little twin girls, but on top of that the girl I've been seeing for a couple weeks now, we've been screwing without any contraception almost from day one and now her period is late... Dammit... Why couldn't she just have said: "WE DON'T HAVE THAT KIND OF SEX!" oh and why OH WHY was I SOOOO STUPID?!?!?!?!?!!!!!.

    26. Re:Am I the only by Syrrh · · Score: 1

      We need more parents who are willing to let their kids grow up and experience things first hand. I'm not saying that it's a good idea to give a kid a box of matches, a gallon of gas and tell them to have a good time in their bedroom. That sort of thing should done outside after all.

      This is exactly the kind of toys my parents, and many others I know played with. Boring day? Grab the gunpowder! Want to test a friend's gullibility? Don't send him to the dictionary, go to the nearest electric fence!

      Just because something is potentially dangerous doesn't mean it shouldn't be allowed in sight of your kids. I was shooting guns when I was 10. Does that mean I went out and shot everything I wanted? No, I knew damn well that guns were too dangerous to fool around with.

      Kids should be protected from things that will KILL them. Anything that's merely harmful, just give them a warning and let them get burned so they learn. That teaches them a good lesson in safety, and reminds them to pay attention to your warnings next time.

    27. Re:Am I the only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the age of 6 I was constructing model aeroplanes and learning the dynamics of flight, could already wield a twin-tank oxy-acetalene torch to construct a go-kart frame and built my own skateboard entirely out of wood at the age of 7 using woodworking chisels. Parents and -much- older siblings who take an active interest in a child's development are far too lacking in this world. "Won't somebody think of the children?" is a very tired refrain.

    28. Re:Am I the only by kfort · · Score: 1

      you are confused. 'think of the children' is the refrain they use to take away the rights of adults, not to keep kids safe.

    29. Re:Am I the only by thynk · · Score: 1

      Yup, that's exactly how I feel. If my kids want to play with a gallon of gas and a box of matches, they WILL NOT do it in their room. Honestly, if they want to play with anything that's seriously dangerous, I'll be right there with them. Unsupervised play with stuff like this is how kids get killed, regardless of what the liberals think. I say this because the "School of life" is the best teacher, but the tuition fees are really high, and I've already paid some of them - no reason why my kids can't learn from the "classes" I've already had.

      With you haveing a gun growing up, you made a key point I always try to bring up. Gun safety begins at home. You were more than likely taught how dangerous a gun is, long before you ever picked one up. You were probably taught that it was a tool, not a toy (a damn fun tool at that). Key point - you were taught.

      I might have to pick up a gun for next summer when my kids come to visit again. Shooting and gun safety was on the things my education was seriously lacking in until I joined the Army.

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
    30. Re:Am I the only by finallyHasANickname · · Score: 1
      Shooting and gun safety was on the things my education was seriously lacking in until I joined the Army.

      Strange. :-| When I was a kid, the NRA literally taught us that stuff. We could get hunting licenses at 12 years of age but only on the condition that we got official safety instruction. (It was every night for about a week IIRC, and for example, with absolute humorlessness, we heard stuff like,

      "Before climbing over the fence, don't just rely on the safety. All mechanisms fail, and the safety is just a little helper not to be relied upon--certainly not while taking the chance that a barb could click the safety off. Open the action, be it pulling back the bolt or pump or breaking a single shot or double barrel. Keep the action open!"
      As far as I knew (and basically everyone else IIRC), that's what the NRA was for back then. Anyway, this might be a halfway interesting link.
    31. Re:Am I the only by Cloetus · · Score: 1

      How many kids do YOU have? Jeez...

    32. Re:Am I the only by thynk · · Score: 1

      Strange. :-| When I was a kid, the NRA literally taught us that stuff.

      You had it better than I did. If there was a hunter safety corse, I wasn't allow to go to it. My parents were willing to let me grow up "unprotected" in a lot of ways, but this wasn't one of them. :-(

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
  16. Word is around the doll house... by Agent+Deepshit · · Score: 5, Funny

    She doesn't know how to say 'no' either.

    1. Re:Word is around the doll house... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are 90% of /.ers really closet pedophiles?

    2. Re:Word is around the doll house... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think most men are, actually.

    3. Re:Word is around the doll house... by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      Are 90% of /.ers really closet pedophiles?

      Well, considering that only 10% of the posts here have been open about it, that would leave about 90% still in the closet.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  17. Cindy says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's mine you blonde bitch!

  18. looks like a good candidate for a transplant by mrgreenfur · · Score: 1

    or an update... someone make her say better stuff. like 'shop shop shop'.

    see, http://www.rtmark.com/blo.html for other related brilliance.

  19. Vogel? by Orion_ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Okay, this is cool and all, but this doll can recognize "more than 600 words and objects" (which, as pointed out elsewhere, is not that many), and they used one of them on the German word for bird??

    1. Re:Vogel? by BenV666 · · Score: 1

      They actually achieved some compression with this, since it also is the dutch word for bird :)

  20. Yes... by cliffy2000 · · Score: 1

    Did you realize a beowulf cluster of these things COULD RULE THE WORLD? ...and they could abolish bad language while they're at it.
    Feeeeeeeeear Cindy Smart! Feeeeeeear her and her evil army of doll clones!

    (Thank you, Slashdot, for not having -1, Insane.)

  21. anything is possible by SHEENmaster · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Furby can run PicoGUI.

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
    1. Re:anything is possible by Wulfstan · · Score: 1

      Um, yeah, but did you check the date on that announcement? Sounds like an April Fool's joke to me...

      --
      --- Nick, hard at work :->
  22. someone please think of the children!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    OMG, the children

    will some think of the children!!

  23. Creepy by JasonMaggini · · Score: 4, Funny

    This sounds like the kind of doll that comes to life at night, eyes glowing red, saying "You must kill mommy and daddy," while its head spins completely around.

    1. Re: Creepy by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > This sounds like the kind of doll that comes to life at night, eyes glowing red, saying "You must kill mommy and daddy," while its head spins completely around.

      "Chainsaw not included."

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:Creepy by Simonetta · · Score: 4, Funny

      Your comment reminds me of the story of the "Kill Mommy!" doll.

      It was about ten ? years ago. A doll that was advertised on the box as saying " I want Mommy" would actually say "Kill Mommy!" in a deep growling voice.
      It turned out that the doll was made (in China) with two versions for the North American market. One with an english voice and one in spanish. The shipment of spanish-speaking dolls got misplaced in a Hong Kong warehouse for over a year and their batteries wore down. Then the dolls were placed in English language packaging and sent to the USA.
      The spanish phrase for 'I want mommy' is "quiero mommy" and with the weak batteries the voice came out really low and slow "Kee aill o Mommy!".

      It's almost as funny as when General Motors executives couldn't understand why the Chevy Nova was not selling in South America. Then some bright boy realized that 'No Va' is spanish for 'it doesn't go - it doesn't work'.

    3. Re:Creepy by Captain+Nitpick · · Score: 2, Informative
      It's almost as funny as when General Motors executives couldn't understand why the Chevy Nova was not selling in South America. Then some bright boy realized that 'No Va' is spanish for 'it doesn't go - it doesn't work'.
      Not true.
      --
      But then again, I could be wrong.
    4. Re:Creepy by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      What OS does this thing run? WinCE? Just wait til small children start begging their parents for new copies of Microsoft Office. The lil doll will crawl up to their ear at night and whisper advertisments.

      Or maybe it cold get a virus that made it say naughty things? That'd be rather funny.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    5. Re:Creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >you jerk, you can't debunk a FACT

      From the site,which you've clearly not read, just like you didn't question the original assertion:

      "It's a wicked irony, then, that the people who use this example are engaging in the very thing they're decrying, because a little preparation and research would have informed them that it isn't true."

      and

      "the Chevrolet Nova's name didn't significantly affect its sales: it sold well in both its primary Spanish-language markets, Mexico and Venezuela. (Its Venezuelan sales figures actually surpassed GM's expectations)"

      and

      "the Caribe sold in Mexico was manufactured by Volkswagen, not General Motors"

      Still...it's not a lie if you believe it...

    6. Re:Creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's almost as funny as when General Motors executives couldn't understand why the Chevy Nova was not selling in South America.

      That's almost as funny as every other time some dimwit references an urban legend as if it really happened. :p

    7. Re:Creepy by TheTimoo · · Score: 1

      Mitsubishi is selling their 'Pajeiro' as 'Montero' in (I think ) Portugal. Because 'padjeiro' means jack-off...

      --
      "Be careful or be roadkill" - Calvin
    8. Re:Creepy by hankaholic · · Score: 3, Informative
      It's almost as funny as when General Motors executives couldn't understand why the Chevy Nova was not selling in South America. Then some bright boy realized that 'No Va' is spanish for 'it doesn't go - it doesn't work'.
      ...which is to say, not very funny at all, as the GM "marketing blunder" wasn't a blunder at all.

      As a simple Google search for "Chevy Nova Spanish" reveals, this never happened.

      The first link revealed by Google debunks this myth:

      For starters, nova and no va don't sound alike and are unlikely to be confused, just as "carpet" and "car pet" are unlikely to be confused in English. Additionally, no va would be an awkward way in Spanish to describe a nonfunctioning car (no funciona, among others, would do better), just as in English we'd be more likely to say "it doesn't run" than "it doesn't go."
      The second linkprovided by Google is slightly better.

      My favorite quote from the article:

      Assuming that Spanish speakers would naturally see the word "nova" as equivalent to the phrase "no va" and think "Hey, this car doesn't go!" is akin to assuming that English speakers woud spurn a dinette set sold under the name Notable because nobody wants a dinette set that doesn't include a table.
      The article also points out the fact that you can't market a car in Spanish-speaking countries without Spanish-speaking people finding out about it. GM dealers in South America would be stupid to sit idly by while GM asked them to sell a car whose very name implied that it was unable to move.

      But, I guess it's easier to assume that GM's entire marketing team didn't know enough to realize that people on a different continent speaking another language might have another interpretation for the name of a product, and that everyone in Mexico and South America involved in marketing and selling the car would be too lazy and drunk to mention anything to their regional managers if the name actually was likely to kill sales.
      Even if nobody in Detroit knew enough rudimentary Spanish to notice the coincidence, the Nova could not have brought to market in Mexico and/or South America without the involvement of numerous Spanish speakers engaged to translate user manuals, prepare advertising and promotional materials, communicate with the network of Chevrolet dealers in the target countries, etc.
      As both articles point out, the Nova actually sold quite well in South America, exceeding GM's expectations.
      --
      Somebody get that guy an ambulance!
    9. Re: Creepy by OMEGA+Power · · Score: 1
      > This sounds like the kind of doll that comes to life at night, eyes glowing red, saying "You must kill mommy and daddy," while its head spins completely around. "Chainsaw not included."

      Cindy's new brother Chucky Smart comes with a real butcher's knife though

    10. Re:Creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    11. Re:Creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The blind faith in snopes is fun to watch. The argument seems to hinge on GM's sales expectations and internal studies that scopes can't possibly have access to.

      My new slogan for car pets: "Munching on car pets is fun for boys and girls." Will it affect sales in the positive ot the negative? What studies should we do to prove sales are affected by this slogan?

    12. Re:Creepy by be-fan · · Score: 1

      The Pajeiro is Montero in the US too.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    13. Re:Creepy by Yorkshire · · Score: 1

      Don't assume this never happens, the Rolls Royce Silver Mist had a similar problem in Germany

    14. Re:Creepy by hankaholic · · Score: 1

      "Similar problem", in this case, means that "nothing happened and an urban legend was started."

      I'd not saying that problems never happen, I'm just saying that the person claiming to have been amused when the GM blunder occurred is bluffing; he heard the story and took it as fact without factual evidence, such as sales numbers to back up his claims of unmet sales goals. I decided to try to help to debunk this myth. I'm a Ford guy myself, but I do think it's a little sad how people will spread untruth about a company when information debunking the rumor is easily found.

      Or is spreading unfounded myth about companies only a bad thing when SCO does it?

      --
      Somebody get that guy an ambulance!
    15. Re:Creepy by stinkbomb · · Score: 1
      It's almost as funny as when General Motors executives couldn't understand why the Chevy Nova was not selling in South America. Then some bright boy realized that 'No Va' is spanish for 'it doesn't go - it doesn't work'.

      This is an offensive urban legend that assumes Mexicans are complete idiots:

      http://www.snopes.com/business/misxlate/nova.asp
    16. Re:Creepy by finkployd · · Score: 1

      No, their arguement hinges on the fact that no Spanish person would confuse "Nova" with "No Va". Similar to how (and this is their example) an English speaking person would not confuse "Notable" with "No Table". It is an urban myth, get over it.

      It always amuses me to see someone react angrily when something they have been passing off as fact to appear smarter is shown to them to be a myth :)

      Finkployd

    17. Re:Creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the argument in favor of the urban legend being true hinges on, what exactly?

    18. Re:Creepy by luisdom · · Score: 1

      Funnier than the Nova: Mitsubishi was trying to sell a 30.000$+ 4x4 named Pajero in spain. Later, they had to rename it as Montero, as nobody wanted to spend that much in a car that ... er ... well, likes to please itself so often.

      (Pajero ~ A person that masturbates often)

  24. Cool, by simon_aus · · Score: 1

    I have to admit I loved the original Bob the Builder story. This sounds like a cool opportunity for marketing a "Tourettes Cindy".

    --
    Stopping myself...Abort (core dumped)
    1. Re:Cool, by dtfinch · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind that only like 3% of tourettes victims randomly FUCK! CRAP! SHIT! FUCK! FUCK YOU ALL IN HELL! shout profanities.

      Oops.

    2. Re:Cool, by Jad+LaFields · · Score: 1

      This is true, the medical name for that type of tourettes is something like corphrala or something.

      And here's a really quick google search. %30, not %3

      --
      [SIG] It's like putting a moose in the blender -- a recipe for disaster!
    3. Re:Cool, by dtfinch · · Score: 1

      I suppose I was a bit off. Though I just did a quick search myself ad many sites say 10-15%. Some say 5-10%.

      I was diagnosed with tourette's back in the 5th grade.

  25. Imagine a beowolf cluster... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    No, maybe we shouldn't

    1. Re:Imagine a beowolf cluster... by tgrigsby · · Score: 1

      Did you say, "Cluster?"

      I don't think Cindy would approve.....

      --
      *** *** You're just jealous 'cause the voices talk to me... ***
  26. what about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does she DO naughty things?

    1. Re:what about... by kfort · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      shes into beastiality

    2. Re:what about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      w00t! Plushie sex!

    3. Re:what about... by kfort · · Score: 1

      How is this offtopic? Did you even click the link? It's a fucking joke lighten up.

  27. Welcome Cindy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I for one welcome our new smart doll overlords

  28. nice... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    does it run linux?

  29. What's wrong with Germanic roots? by kramer2718 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Man it really kills me how words with Germanic roots have gotten such a bad name. Why is 'feces' a more acceptable word than 'shit'? Because it come from the Latin 'faex' rather than the Old English 'scite'?

    Why does 'intelligent' sound more sophisticated than 'smart'? Because it comes directly from french rather than Old English?

    Just because our (as in english speakers') priests used to speak Latin while our kings used to speak French does not mean we should favor one part of our language over another. Orwell has a very interesting piece, Politics and the English Language, which deals with this issues.

    It pisses me off so much when people try to limit my vocabulary. This is off-topic just a bit, but ...

    I was in a class called 'Images of Africa in Film and Literature.' I read some good books and saw some interesting films. Generally, I was enjoying it. Then one day, someone (maybe me?) refered to native South Africans. The prof got upset. "We just don't use that word," he said. The jist of his argument against the word was that many ignorant people use it to refer to stereotypic, primitive people who live in the jungle, hunt heads and dance around cauldrons.

    These stereotypes are, of course, not encouraged by the academic community which studies Africa. But Jesus H. Fucking Christ, native just means someone who was born in a particular place or apeople which has resided in a location for a long time.

    After that, I just really lost interest in the class and respect for that prof. I just did enough to get by, and I still got an A.

    So in conclusion, thought/word/language police, FUCK OFF!

    1. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by kfort · · Score: 1

      perhaps thats why she also knows German words, compensation?

    2. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by bersl2 · · Score: 1

      There is a time and a place for each word. Certain words are used for different effects.

    3. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by onemorehour · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You have an interesting point, but I doubt that every day English users are thinking about the linguistic roots of words when making such value judgements.

      I think that the value people place on words is influenced only very indirectly by past usage. People think "intelligent" sounds more sophisticated than "smart" because "smart" is used more commonly. It's a bit circular, I know, but I think it's true.

      Remember the first time you heard the word "epiphany"? Since its meaning is so specific, you probably thought it was a sophisticated word. Once you found out that everyone and their mother was using it, it probably lost its lustre. The word "perogative" lost all its dignity when Will Smith explained it to the masses. I guess I just think that language snobbery is a facet of generalized snobbery: things that are common are looked down upon, while esoteric things are elevated. I think there's also a point to be made about polysyllabic words sounding more sophisticated than monosyllabic ones, but I don't think I need to prove it.

      -----

      As for your story about your experience in that class, I agree with you completely. However, your professor has a point--linguistic connotations can creep in subconsciously, and really affect the way a particular question or statement is framed. While "native South Africans" sounds innocuous, "the natives" might be a bit problematic. For example, "native New Yorkers" would sound fine, but referring to the citizens of New York as "the natives" would only be done as a joke. What your professor probably should have done instead would be to point out some of the negative connotations of that word in order to make people aware of them. Censorship, though, is almost always counterproductive.

    4. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by mindriot · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Man it really kills me how words with Germanic roots have gotten such a bad name. Why is 'feces' a more acceptable word than 'shit'? Because it come from the Latin 'faex' rather than the Old English 'scite'?

      Simple. It just happened. The Old English word was just the one used by, let's say, less sophisticated people, much more often. The other one, though, was 'imported' by probably more sophisticated people, and is obviously used fewer times, and has a different connotation. 'Shit' simply happens to mean something different than 'feces', it is a more vulgar word.

      Still, I think overly limiting the vocabulary ('gosh darn') is mostly hypocritical and serves no real purpose... kids, for example, say 'god damn' anyway, and on average, it doesn't make them much better or worse...

      But the trick is that you have to learn where to use what kind of language, more generally -- say, when at a job interview or when at a party with your friends, and as such limiting the use of certain 'bad words' is a matter of proper education.

    5. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, once, my speech was censored. I said blow me to the principle. Ah, middle school.....

    6. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by kfort · · Score: 2, Informative

      First of all, it was Bobby Brown Second, if you are going to try to act smart (or intelligent) by making linguistic arguments about big words like prerogative you should at least learn to spell.

    7. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by Fourier · · Score: 4, Informative

      The word "perogative" lost all its dignity when Will Smith explained it to the masses.

      The word prerogative lost all its dignity when everyone started pronouncing it "perogative". :-)

    8. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by jtroutman · · Score: 1

      If you really want to get your anger around something, read Diane Ravitch's The Language Police. It's an in-depth look at what words (and therefore, ideas) are banned and the rationale behind doing so. Not recommended for people with a tendency toward hypertension, you may have a stroke.

      --
      I stole this sig from a more creative user.
    9. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      I study at the University of Wollongong in Australia, and did a subject on Australian Literature. One of our lectures was, I kid you not, an entire hour on the politics of using the word aboriginal instead of aborigine. Apparently, aborigine is phoentically too similar to indiginee, which has assosications with primitivism that the aboriginal community finds unpleasant.

      Aboriginal is an adjective, aborigine is a noun, but in this English class, we were told to ignore the rules of grammar for the sake of political correctness. I didn't go to too many lectures after that.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    10. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by SpriteGF · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not a bias against roots. The connotation of words is what people most respond to. Classic English example is "shack," "cabin," and "cottage" all mean "small dwelling," but which of these would you rather live in? I wouldn't want to live in a shack, because the word's connotation is negative. English speakers don't just use the denotative meaning of words; they keep the connotation well in mind.

      Another example is, do you call a particular person "African American," "black," or the N word? They all have vastly different implied meanings, but they all refer to the same race. (Even I refuse to say the latter because I don't have sufficient karma to burn. :))

      I'm not sure what exactly distinguishes the connotations of shit and feces, except that the latter is far less likely to provoke people because it's relatively unused and very neutral.

    11. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by kramer2718 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are right that those Middle English speakers who lost to the William the Conqueror were quite a bit less sophisticated than the Norman nobility who came to rule them. The fact that there were quite unsophisticated people in Normandy at the time didn't have much effect on the English language.

      I guess I really have three points (they are also made by Orwell as linked-to by my grand-parent post):

      1. There are quite a few maligned words out there (many 'four-letter' words and other four-letter words; many Germanic-rooted words) that are quite wonderful and expressive if they aren't over-used.

      2. Big words (often from French or Latin) are okay, but many people use them to obscure things and sound important.

      3. The most important factor in word choice should be accuracy, ease of expression for the writer/speaker, and ease of comprehension for the reader/listener.

    12. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by kramer2718 · · Score: 1

      But a significant portion of a particular word's connotation comes from its linguistic roots. It's that bias which I have a problem with. Joe Schmoe may not recognize it, but history has quite a significant effect on his everyday language.

    13. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by njchick · · Score: 1
      Something similar happened in Russian. When Russia was conquered by Tatars in the 13th century, Russians learned Tatar obscene words and started using them together with the traditional expressions. The "old" words were considered more offensive than their Tatar counterparts and were later forgotten.

      Now the words from Tatar are considered obscene, and the Latin counterparts are used when no offence is meant.

    14. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by AntiOrganic · · Score: 1

      I like how you referred to the "Language Police." Have you read that book? If not, you should.

    15. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by EddWo · · Score: 1
      --
      "Taligent is still pure vapor. Maybe they'll be the last who jumps up on Openstep... "
    16. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by Sunnan · · Score: 2, Informative
      Man it really kills me how words with Germanic roots have gotten such a bad name. Why is 'feces' a more acceptable word than 'shit'? Because it come from the Latin 'faex' rather than the Old English 'scite'?

      Why does 'intelligent' sound more sophisticated than 'smart'? Because it comes directly from french rather than Old English?

      It's because the words 'shit' and 'smart' are used much more commonly (which in turn may be because they're from Old English). They're words you've known since you were a kid, you're more familiar with them, they're more mundane. Using the "fancy" words is putting on a mask of unfamiliarity, you soften the message because people's brain use the time they would've been shocked/unimpressed by (ever so slightly) decoding.
    17. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by kramer2718 · · Score: 1

      No. I haven't. I will, thanks.

    18. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by gfody · · Score: 1

      fuck and shit are like the only curse words we have left. if they become even more common than they are now WE WONT HAVE ANY FUCKING CURSE WORDS!

      they are curse words because they are 'bad'.. they also give our language more granularity for expression. imagine trying to express maximum urgency or negativity without curse words.. you end up sounding like a wimp. "GO AWAY YOU.. DUMMY!" vs. "FUCK OFF DICK"

      curse words are good.. but there is a time and place for them. having dicipline, or "language police" as you put it is the only way to keep these words in reserve

      --

      bite my glorious golden ass.
    19. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by McDutchie · · Score: 1
      Man it really kills me how words with Germanic roots have gotten such a bad name.
      [snippety-snip]
      Then one day, someone (maybe me?) refered to native South Africans. The prof got upset. "We just don't use that word," he said. The jist of his argument against the word was that many ignorant people use it to refer to stereotypic, primitive people who live in the jungle, hunt heads and dance around cauldrons.

      These stereotypes are, of course, not encouraged by the academic community which studies Africa. But Jesus H. Fucking Christ, native just means someone who was born in a particular place or apeople which has resided in a location for a long time.

      Well, "native" is a Latin word meaning "born", so by your own earlier argument you should really be saying "born South-Africans".

      Quod erat demonstrandum -- er, I mean: It had to be said.

    20. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by Theolojin · · Score: 1

      Why does 'intelligent' sound more sophisticated than 'smart'? Because it comes directly from french rather than Old English?

      actually, 'intelligent' comes from latin, not french . the manner in which you phrased your question leads one to infer you think the two words have the same meaning. they are similar but they do not mean the same. 'smart' has the idea of *existing* knowledge. when one needs the answer to a question, one generally asks a smart person because that person is knowledgeable. when one needs to figure out a problem, one asks an intelligent person because intelligence indicates an ability to learn in new situations. for example, if one is reading a book and encounters a new word, a smart person may know the definition of the word but cannot determine the meaning from the context. an intelligent person may not know the definition of the word but may (and probably will) be able to glean the meaning from the context. smart people are often intelligent and intelligent people are often smart, but i have known smart people who could not figure out a problem that was obvious to an intelligent person and i have known intelligent people who could not answer questions as readily as a smart person. overall, it is better to be intelligent than smart, just as it is better to be wealthy than rich.

      --
      Life is short; think quickly.
    21. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by Tevye · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Another example is, do you call a particular person "African American," "black," or the N word? They all have vastly different implied meanings, but they all refer to the same race. (Even I refuse to say the latter because I don't have sufficient karma to burn. :))

      Well now, a lot of it depends on whether I'm talking about race in America or out of it. African American really can't be talking about race (or at least shouldn't be, I realize that that's how it's used) because it doesn't say a thing about blacks in any other country than America. I'm pretty sure that if I took a trip to Africa, for instance, I don't think that a majority of people there would not be African American, though they would likely be black. That's not the only thing lacking in the term African American though either. How many white Africans who move to America will be called African Americans? Even if they try, how many would be taken seriously? 'African American' has some problems in that it's really centered with Americans in mind, it assumes that Africans are always black (assuming it's supposed to be a term of race, which it seems to be), it doesn't translate to black Europeans or white Africans, it just doesn't really work.

      So, what do you all in the rest of the world use? Foreigners never seem to mind calling me white, so I wonder if they've settled on any other terms?

      --
      We're on a mission from God.
    22. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by Pentagram · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I was in a class called 'Images of Africa in Film and Literature.' I read some good books and saw some interesting films. Generally, I was enjoying it. Then one day, someone (maybe me?) refered to nigger South Africans. The prof got upset. "We just don't use that word," he said. The jist of his argument against the word was that many ignorant people use it as an insult.

      These stereotypes are, of course, not encouraged by the academic community which studies Africa. But Jesus H. Fucking Christ, nigger just means someone who was is black!

      After that, I just really lost interest in the class and respect for that prof. I just did enough to get by, and I still got an A.

      So in conclusion, thought/word/language police, FUCK OFF!

    23. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do you call a particular person "African American," "black," or the N word?..they all refer to the same race.

      No they do not! Pray tell, how is a person who is native to an African country an "African American"?

      An African American is simply a person who is born in the United States and is of African decent. Outside of the United States, African American is meaningless.

      How about we just refer to people as "people" and if you need to, the country or area they're from E.g. "Liberican person", "American person", "Australian person"

    24. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by hambone_p · · Score: 1

      I once had a heated discussion with my future brother in-law on affirmative action. My argument was that affirmative action was racist. No, NO, NO bro-in-law kept repeating, that's not possible. We went around and around in circles until I realized his definition of racism was different than mine.

      According to his definition only the suppressors can be racist. The have-nots, the suppressed, can never be racist, bigots yes, but NEVER racist.

      I tried to explain that my meaning of racist was one race showing prejudice against members of another race based strictly on race, not on culture or wealth, but strictly on race.

      He explained to me that in any academic setting he'd ever been in (he has his masters in social work) racism was, by definition, the practice of the suppressors acting against the suppressed. By that definition if you're a member of race that is seen as suppressed, even if you're the CEO of a fortune 500 company, you can never be racist. You get a free pass, you can never be labeled a racist.

      How can you have an intelligent conversation when you're speaking two different languages? It seems to me that some people are teaching a different definition of a perfectly good word to further their own political agenda.

      [Following definitions edited to avoid the evil lameness filter!]

      From WordNet 1.7:

      racism
      n 1: the prejudice that members of one race are intrinsically superior to members of other races
      2: discriminatory or abusive behavior towards members of another race.

      From Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary:

      Bigot n.
      1. A hypocrite; esp., a superstitious hypocrite. [Obs.]

      2. A person who regards his own faith and views in matters of religion as unquestionably right, and any belief or opinion opposed to or differing from them as unreasonable or wicked. In an extended sense, a person who is intolerant of opinions which conflict with his own, as in politics or morals; one obstinately and blindly devoted to his own church, party, belief, or opinion.

      From Jargon File

      bigot n. [common] A person who is religiously attached to a particular computer, language, operating system, editor, or other tool (see {religious issues}). Usually found with a specifier; thus, `Cray bigot', `ITS bigot', `APL bigot', `VMS bigot', `Berkeley bigot'. Real bigots can be distinguished from mere partisans or zealots by the fact that they refuse to learn alternatives even when the march of time and/or technology is threatening to obsolete the favored tool. It is truly said "You can tell a bigot, but you can't tell him much." Compare {weenie},
      {Amiga Persecution Complex}.

      From THE DEVIL'S DICTIONARY ((C)1911 Released April 15 1993)

      BIGOT, n. One who is obstinately and zealously attached to an opinion that you do not entertain.

    25. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by sco08y · · Score: 1

      Same thing the world over. Japanese, for example, regard Chinese roots as more intellectual.

      I suspect part of the reason is simply that because we don't speak Latin or Greek anymore, and thus don't really understand the syntax.

      That gives those roots a linguistic flexibility you just don't get with your mother tongue, so academics feel free to combine those roots to construct new jargon. (Part of it is that some languages are more flexible in how they construct words, whereas English tends to be more flexible in how you construct sentences.)

      Also, foreign roots tend to be less pejorative. (The exceptions tend to prove the rule: fascist is an example of an academic term that has lost any semblance of objectivity.)

      So, these words get used in an academic context and then people naturally associate them with education and professionalism.

    26. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by J.+J.+Ramsey · · Score: 1
      I think that the value people place on words is influenced only very indirectly by past usage. People think "intelligent" sounds more sophisticated than "smart" because "smart" is used more commonly.

      Also, "intelligent" and "smart" have subtle differences in connotation. If you want to describe someone who has a lot of "raw CPU power" but is a more ivory-tower type, you'll probably choose the word "intelligent" rather than "smart." If you are trying to imply that someone is savvy, "smart" is probably the word to use. That's not to say that "intelligent" and "smart" aren't synonyms, but even synonyms have slight shades of difference.

    27. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by Mryll · · Score: 1

      And if you're intelligent and smart for long enough, some might eventually call you wise. :)


      Good distinction. As an aside, isn't it frustrating to have a vocabulary that must be limited for something like 90% of your communications? Adults tend to feel embarrassed when they are hit with a word in conversation that they don't understand, and blame the speaker for obfuscating... so we dumb down... the subtlest form of censorship

    28. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is 'feces' a more acceptable word than 'shit'? Because it come from the Latin 'faex' rather than the Old English 'scite'?

      Aww, but scite is a nice text editor...

    29. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by The+Beezer · · Score: 1
      2. Big words (often from French or Latin) are okay, but many people use them to obscure things and sound important.

      Never use a big word when a diminutive one will do.

    30. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Then one day, someone (maybe me?) refered to native South Africans. The prof got upset. "We just don't use that word," he said.

      Dumbass. The proper term for native Africans is "niggers".

    31. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by duckpoopy · · Score: 1

      Are you referring to "My Prerogative" by Bobby Brown?

      --
      word.
    32. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by glwtta · · Score: 1
      who was born in a particular place or apeople which has resided in a location for a long time

      Well of course, if you call them ape-people some people might get upset... oh, sorry - read that wrong.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    33. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by Nevyn · · Score: 1
      I guess I just think that language snobbery is a facet of generalized snobbery: things that are common are looked down upon, while esoteric things are elevated. I think there's also a point to be made about polysyllabic words sounding more sophisticated than monosyllabic ones, but I don't think I need to prove it.

      I think the former is the only explanation that stands up to analysis, "people" are impressred by words like "plinth", even though it's monosyllabic.

      --
      ustr: Managed string API with ave. 44% overhead over strdup(), for 0-20B
    34. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by randyest · · Score: 1

      Which goes without saying if you remember to eschew obfuscation.

      --
      everything in moderation
    35. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by Myopic · · Score: 1

      i think the song you reference is by MC Hammer.

    36. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Actually the reason for the eloquent sound of French derived words in comparison to their Germanic counterparts stems from the Norman invasion of England in 1066. The resulting upper class used Latinate French words (feces) while the lower class used their Germanic synonyms. (shit)


      This double language class system still persists from Medieval England, not only in the value of the rich dictionary that resulted, but in things like our law. We still acknowledge the need to address both classes in the form of phrases like "Last will and Testament"; "will" being a Saxon word and "testament" a french word.


      What I'm getting at is that we're the sum of our history. Why deny what makes English one of the best languages to communicate with?

    37. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by !3ren · · Score: 1

      ...or you will be reported to the Language Police!
      Which would be double not ungood.

    38. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by Punto · · Score: 1

      The word 'native' has a latin root. (something about being born.. it's the same word used for 'navidad', spanish for christmas).

      --

      --
      Stay tuned for some shock and awe coming right up after this messages!

    39. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      Why are people so hyper-senstive to saying the word "nigger", even when discussing the word itself? Even now, I just quoted the word so readers would know I was referring to the WORD and not anything else..

    40. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Another example is, do you call a particular person "African American," "black," or the N word? They all have vastly different implied meanings, but they all refer to the same race. (Even I refuse to say the latter because I don't have sufficient karma to burn. :))

      What? Nigger?

      Only racists are affraid of that word. If you think only people of a certain skin colour are allowed to use that word, that is the very definition of racism: Discrimination based on race.

      Like Chris Rock said: "There's black people, and there's niggers. And guess what, black people hate niggers too!"

      And BTW, African American? What about people from say, morroco, or egypt? They aren't (all) black, and I'm sorry to break this to you, but they'e from africa. Or what about black people who live in europe? what are they, european african american? What if they move to australia? Oceanian african euroamerican?

      Political correctness pisses me off...

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    41. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by sootman · · Score: 1

      No sense mentioning that 'intelligent' has 4 syllables and 'smart' has only 1. Longer word = better. Just ask any news bunny or 7th-grade essy writer.

      OTOH, I've never heard anyone say "He's street-intelligent." :-)

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    42. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by Theolojin · · Score: 1

      Good distinction. As an aside, isn't it frustrating to have a vocabulary that must be limited for something like 90% of your communications? Adults tend to feel embarrassed when they are hit with a word in conversation that they don't understand, and blame the speaker for obfuscating... so we dumb down... the subtlest form of censorship

      it is indeed frustrating. i have occasion to speak publically once a week and am often torn between using the appropriate word and using another that the audience is sure to understand. accuracy and conciseness are two things for which i strive in my verbal and written communication though i often must surrender a bit of each for the sake of being understood. feh.

      --
      Life is short; think quickly.
    43. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by kramer2718 · · Score: 1

      I certainly was not arguing for the use of Germanic-rooted words above those with Latin roots.

      As I've said before, the most important factors are accuracy, clarity, and ease of comprehension. The word use of the word 'born' in that particular context would have been quite inappropriate as it refered to a entire people (the 'birth' of any people is quite a murky matter, but 'native' clearly implies long residence).

    44. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

      It's a common transformation of English to convert an adjective to a noun. Depends on the word, I guess, but I don't think it's much worse than verbing.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
    45. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      Um... why in Gods name would someone in Europe who is from Africa be a 'European African American'? If you're not from America, you're not an American.

      Self criticism of an individual or group is always considered more polite than criticism from an outside source. I can say 'geez, that was stupid' if I do somthing that I shouldn't have. But if someone else says it, it starts to sound kindof negative. If you don't believe me, get up on a stage in front of a racially mixed audience and try doing one of Chris Rock's acts.

      Of course, race is socially constructed and while other countries believe in race, the notions regarding race aren't identical.

      A while ago Hollywood wanted to make a film about Egyptian President Anwar Sadat. They had cast an African American in the role, only to have to pull the plug on the project when Sadat objected to a black man portraying him. Sadat, being the leader of Egypt, considered himself white. There are black-looking Arabs and Latin Americans who consider themselves white because they have some distant white ancestry.

      Also, people from Venice, Sicily, etc. considered themselves to be Venitians, Sicilians etc. when they came to the US. Once here, they were slowly rebranded as 'Italians'.

      If you need another example, look at Japanimation. Japanese characters often have caucasian features. Chinese characters have asian features. This comes directly from the Japanese conception of race.

      What race you believe you're a part of depends at on where you live, not just who your parents were.

      "African American" isn't just a national/racial group, but a national/racial identity.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    46. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      It's not so much the transformation, but the reason for it.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
  30. Cindy the Evil Doll with Windows CE by falsemover · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Hi, I'm Cindy the seeing Doll powered by Windows CE. Before you can use me I need to tell you my EULA and you must say 'I accept' when I have finished. This process will take approximately three hours. At the end of this process you will be able to activate me by ringing a toll free Microsoft number and telling me my 16 digit activation number." ... three hours twenty five minutes later

    "Hi Cindy, how are you today?"

    "Hello, I'm Cindy the talking doll and I would like to tell you about the new range of Smart Screens available from Microsoft. This will take approximately three hours. Are you ready to start?"

    --
    consider coffee a lubricant that helps one penetrate the coding zone
    1. Re:Cindy the Evil Doll with Windows CE by marvin2k · · Score: 1
      "Hi, I'm Cindy the seeing Doll powered by Windows CE. Before you can use me I need to tell you my EULA and you must say 'I accept' when I have finished...."
      Dude, she's a damn toy for children and not a hooker for christs sake!
    2. Re:Cindy the Evil Doll with Windows CE by glwtta · · Score: 1

      Fry: "She is more than just a piece of software!"
      Lucy Bot: "Would you like to take a moment to register me?"
      Fry: "Err, not right now."
      Lucy Bot: "I will remind you later you hot stud you."
      Fry: "So errr, what do you feel like doing?"
      Lucy Bot: "Would you like to take a moment to register me?"

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    3. Re:Cindy the Evil Doll with Windows CE by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      Fry: "You're cute!"
      Lucy Bot: "You're cute!"
      Fry: "No, you're cute!"
      Lucy Bot: "No, you're cute!"

      Prof. Farnsworth: "Oh my god! She's stuck in an infinite loop and he's just stupid!"

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
  31. CINDY goes to the shopping centre... by caughty · · Score: 1

    "I see my 'CINDY Party Dresses' Collection. They're only 19.95, but for a limited time only."

    Say Barbie... "We don't say those kind of words," refusing to even spell it.
    "That's a bad word."

  32. Mod parent correctly, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Note to moderators: parent comment is not "interesting" or "insightful", but "funny" - note the date of the "PicoGUI ported to Furby" announcement.

    1. Re:Mod parent correctly, please by kfort · · Score: 1

      for real. If I remember correctly, the furby is basically a glorified music box. Or at least the mechanics are basically the same. All the chip can do is control a motor going back and forth on some cam that makes it move around. And make funny noises.

  33. Bad Idea by StefanJ · · Score: 4, Funny
    Yes, the economics are tempting.

    Yes, it works at first.

    But then the thing hits that pesky hyper-hypercube configuration, goes second-order sapient, and starts looking to increase its "cultural and technological distinctiveness."

    The more pathetic sort of extropian might see getting uploaded into such a gestalt as a Big Win, but really, what's the worth of an ersatz immortality with an IQ of 97 (remember that fourth-order-cube limit) and a voice interface that randomly throws in phrases like "math class is harrrrrd!?

    Play it safe. Stick with FurbyNets with 254 or fewer nodes, and keep some spray paint on hand to blank out those IR transcievers, just in case.

    Stefan It's out! Jones.

  34. Sounds fun. by Kenja · · Score: 3, Funny

    Don't like to say certain words eh? We'll just see what me and my PROM burner can do about that.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:Sounds fun. by krymsin01 · · Score: 1

      I think I'd let it keep the rules, but change the voice to Cheech Marin.

      --
      stuff
    2. Re:Sounds fun. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you mean 'PR0N burner', right?

    3. Re:Sounds fun. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We'll just see what me and my PROM burner can do about that.

      Yeah that's the closest you'll ever get to a prom, so enjoy! ;)

  35. Ranking of words she won't say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Cunt - far too offensive for chicks.
    2. Fuck - a favourite of the Osbournes.
    3. Wank - chicks never masturbate.
    4. Shit - this doll never does waste excretion.
    5. Arse - can be replaced with butt.
    6. Linux - we don't really want geeky girls do we?
    7. Clitoris - no real girls have one anyway
    8. Tits - can be replaced with "ample breasts"
    9. Cock - boys' bits are dirty
    10.Vagina - this doll lacks one of these anyway

  36. What about 'sex'? by Craig+Ringer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'd be giving it about an 80% chance of saying 'no! that's a bad word!' when presented with "sex". Yay. Pass the silly cultural hangups on to the next generation, and confuse 'em good and proper as well.

    1. Re:What about 'sex'? by Shardis · · Score: 1

      No shit! All this crap about masturbation being self-abuse and the whole Monty-Python "Every Sperm is Precious" bits are great examples.

      Can we please start teaching people to stop being ashamed of their bodies? Especially as so damned few of us conform to popularly accepted norms? (Just think Brittney/Aguilera/Insert a few guy stereo types here (I don't tend to pay attention myself))

      I'm mean c'mon, I'm sick of all the people out there with "issues" just cause their Mom/Dad/Aunt/Uncle whatever taught them that anything to do with the reproductive system is "bad/dirty/naughty/evil".

      Fucking bible thumpers. I don't know any other group that does this... :P

      (That last bit was NOT meant to be a flame. If there are any real populations that share these types of ignorant views, please enlighten me.)

    2. Re:What about 'sex'? by Shardis · · Score: 1

      Oh shit, just realized my implication there. Yeah, I know that Python skit is satirical, it's one of my fav's. :)

    3. Re:What about 'sex'? by FauxPasIII · · Score: 1

      > Fucking bible thumpers. I don't know any other group that does this... :P

      There are Muslim fundamentalist groups that are even more extreme in this respect. There was an incident recently in Saudi Arabia in which a group of hard right Muslim fundamentalists trapped 15 girls in a burning schoolhouse because they weren't properly covered up to come outside; they wouldn't allow rescue workers to enter since they would be mixing with the opposite sex.

      http://www.8bm.com/diatribes/volume01/diatribes0 15 /diatribes292-312/diatribes310.htm

      The problem is religious fundamentalism.

      --
      25% Funny, 25% Insightful, 25% Informative, 25% Troll
    4. Re:What about 'sex'? by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      Actually, most christian groups aren't anti-sex in their theology. They're pro-monogamy, which is quite different.

      Of course, most do have hangups about talking about sex, but that is a social thing, probably dragged along out of the Victorian era, and a seperate thing to christian ideas about sexuality.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    5. Re:What about 'sex'? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      I'd be giving it about an 80% chance of saying 'no! that's a bad word!' when presented with "sex".
      what would you prefer the dolls response to be to the word Sex???

      "Oh yes! I prefer a three way!"

      remember it is a young child's toy.

      Tammy-gynocologist to be released next year will be dealing with the sex part thank you.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    6. Re:What about 'sex'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd be giving it about an 80% chance of saying 'no! that's a bad word!' when presented with "sex". Yay. Pass the silly cultural hangups on to the next generation, and confuse 'em good and proper as well.

      And what the hell does "sex" have to do with it? Classifying any words as "bad" is just silly cultural hangups.

      Unless of course you value intellectual discussion, which shitting, fucking, etc are rarely a part of.

    7. Re:What about 'sex'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but I bet it can spell "murder", "blood bath", and "slaughter" just fine.

      Our priorities are really out of whack.

    8. Re:What about 'sex'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope... That's only the American version. However, in the European version things like "kill" and "murder" are considered "bad", which are accepted as "good" by the American version. ;-)

    9. Re:What about 'sex'? by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      I am looking forward to the next generation of US politicians, 20-30 years from now. With the old guard of religious fundamentalist politicians and judges retiring, I hope more tolerate Generation X and Y politicians will flush out these religious zealots and their racial, sexual, and religious prejudices.

      Just look at those SCARY-ASS fundamentalists in the Alabama courthouse. I am scared when I realize our ONLY line of defense is a document written over 200 years ago: the US Constitution. Iraq is writing their new constitution now. Imagine if the US Constitution were written today by today's politicians. Free speech? Separation of church and state? Right to bear arms? yeah, right...

    10. Re:What about 'sex'? by Shardis · · Score: 1

      Erk, yeah, you're right. I guess my thought was a bit poorly stated in that regard.

      I was just wondering where the hell all this stuff came from... Religion is one obvious source, but I can't believe it's hung on so long...

      Guess I should've studied sociology more, but all my damn prof wanted to actually think about it applying to was politics.

    11. Re:What about 'sex'? by Shardis · · Score: 1

      Well yeah, being !sex would be a slightly self limiting prospect. ;)

      I thought all the Victorian stuff was mostly a christian thing. Hrm. I honestly don't know much about that time period. I'll have to look into it. Somehow. Still, that's a long time ago, something has to basically reinforce it in order to have lasted so long.

      And not all groups are just pro-monogamy. Someone I know now was raised in what I'd call an insanely strict PA Dutch type of conservatism. Sex was tolerated between long married couples. There's a major difference in viewpoints out there.

      That's an extreme example though, I do understand that. I just seem to keep running across the extreme examples out there I guess...

    12. Re:What about 'sex'? by sn00ker · · Score: 1
      --
      "God, root, what is difference?" - Pitr, userfriendly
    13. Re:What about 'sex'? by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      I'm probably coming from a different persepctive. I'm guessing you're from America, but that's just an assumption, so yell at me if I'm wrong.

      I'm Australian, and it seems to me that compared to the churches here, American denominations tend to be fairly polarised into uber-liberal or ultra-conservative. (Heard of some churches where they refuse to play music on any instrument not mentioned in the Bible - gives steady work to some zither players I suppose).

      But then, I too might only have heard about the extreme cases. There's nothing interesting in talking about the happy medium.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
  37. That'd rule... by Gleng · · Score: 1

    "Lets compile a new kernel!"

    "Finding libraries is fun!"

    "Let's 0wnx0r Ken's Winblows box!"

    --
    "Proudly Posting Without Reading The Article"
    1. Re:That'd rule... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Recompiling Glibc is hard!"

  38. No, he fooled the people who programed it by kfg · · Score: 1

    And I myself consider it a moral duty to fool the people who defend our morality.

    KFG

  39. great ! by ramzak2k · · Score: 4, Funny

    now can they make a bigger version, for us kids at slashdot ? We dont mind her not willing to say *certain* words as long as she understands what it means.

    --

    Siggy Say, Siggy Do
    1. Re:great ! by simon_aus · · Score: 1

      Even if they train Cindy to understand *certain* words, the results may shock and surprise a high % of ./'ers

      --
      Stopping myself...Abort (core dumped)
    2. Re:great ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could combine Cindy's "intelligence" with one of these...

  40. Not mentioned too much amongest /.ers too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please don't remind us that we aren't getting any...

  41. Linguo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Foget the Germans, I'm worried abou the Italians:

    Louie: They's throwing robots!
    Linguo: They _are_ throwing robots.
    Legs: He's disrespecting us. Shuttupa you face!
    Linguo: Shut up _your_ face!
    Legs: Wassamatta you?
    Louie: You aint so big.
    Legs: Me and him are gonna whack you in the Labonza!
    Linguo: Bad... grammar... overload. Error! Error

  42. Pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Are you wondering what the doll looks like?
    http://www.realdoll.com ;). ok, just kidding.

  43. Yeesh! Re:dirty math by StefanJ · · Score: 5, Funny
    "We don't do that math"

    We can only hope they've put in those safeguards*.

    Worst case scenario: She succeeds in dividing by zero, and suddenly little Tiphany-Amber's bedroom becomes the center of a howling vortex of nonspace, frying the neighborhood with sparkling discharges of zero-point energy.

    Stefan It's out! Jones

    *The early pocket-calculator manufacturers only cut corners once. Remember that HP plant in Bennettown, CA? Tire fire my ass.

  44. S-C-O by tek_hed · · Score: 1

    That's a bad word ...

  45. This is an AU story, claims Cindy is old hat by frovingslosh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This story is from an AU domain. It talks about the doll being released in Melbourne, and talks about how popular the doll has been here in the U.S. since it was released last November. So had anyone in the U.S. even heard of it before now?

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:This is an AU story, claims Cindy is old hat by kfort · · Score: 2, Interesting

      According to Time its one of the best inventions of 2002. But no I'd never heard of it.

    2. Re:This is an AU story, claims Cindy is old hat by MsGeek · · Score: 1

      Creepy...they called it, she looks right out of "Village Of The Damned." Damn.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  46. First Cindy Smart Death Reported by xelph · · Score: 3, Funny

    Associated Press - The 6-year old daughter of an IBM engineer was killed after the Cindy Smart doll she received as a birthday present overheard the girl's father in the adjacent room yelling "F***! Where the hell did I put my Linux distro CDs?". Apparently, the doll immediately strangled the little girl in response. Although the police initially thought the doll's reaction was triggered by the use of the F word, it was later determined that the embedded version of Windows CE snapped on the utterance of the word "Linux". Microsoft could not be reached today. The toy's manufacturer canceled plans for a similar version for boys that was to be dubbed Smarmy Darl.

  47. Bad Words by CGP314 · · Score: 1

    But show her a flash card with the word "damn" written on it, and Cindy purses her lolly-pink lips.

    "We don't say those kind of words," she shrills, refusing to even spell it.

    "That's a bad word."


    This mentality annoys me. I'm with George Carlin on this: A word is only as bad as the intentions of the person using it.

    I wouldn't want a doll to teach my daughter that certain conglomerations of sound are intrinsically evil.

    1. Re:Bad Words by pocra · · Score: 1
      Aye, they're teaching children that a [i]sound[/i] is "bad", yet the doll's outfit incorporates the very real threat of a BEE! Soon children, influenced by the doll, will be running around trying to capture bees to use as impromptue corsages on their own clothing, many succumbing to anaphylactic shock when the bees defend themselves from this onslaught.

      Words are only harmful so long as "the guardians of society" perpetuate the myth that they are harmful - bees are only harmful so long as they've got a stingerful of acid that can make your arm swell to twice its normal size.

  48. If you want to know more than the author? by smokin_juan · · Score: 1
  49. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  50. And Slashdot is offended by this why? by Nova+Express · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I find it fascinating that Slashdot A.) Found the story interesting enough to post, and B.) Automatically reached for reasons to deride it. I find it interesting that the idea of a doll that can't say "shit" or "fuck" offends the Slashdot ethos. Lurking behind this story being posted at all, and most of the comments on the subject thus far, seems to be the idea that parents trying to shield their children from obscenity isn't merely futile, but is, in fact, actively evil.

    Why is that?

    I get the impression that the vast majority of Slashdot readers don't have children. (Insert the obvious "don't have girlfriend" jokes on your own.) One doesn't have to be John Ashcroft or Oral Roberts to believe that maybe six-year-olds don't need to learn the word "cocksucker."

    I am far from a prude. I've used lots of those four-letter words in my own fiction, when needed, and laughed my ass off at "Shut Your Fucking Face, Uncle Fucker" from South Park: The Movie. And I myself don't have kids. But oddly enough, despite that, I can still imagine why parents might want a doll that can't say obscenities. I find it rather interesting that, thus far, not a single Slashdot poster seems willing to consider the fact that such a doll might indeed have a useful purpose...

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

    1. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      does it say "cock"? "pussy"? "hump"? "ass"? "bitch"? "bastard"?

      It ain't always the word, it's what you're saying when you say it.......

      The doll ought to say anything that's put in front of it, and the parents should tell the kid when the word is wrong....

      You can get it say "damn" by putting "dam" in front of it I bet! uh oh!

    2. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by gerardrj · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't find it offensive that a doll won't curse. I find it idiodic and offensive that people are so moronic about certain groupings of sounds.

      Why would most people find it obscene to say "fuck", yet will see a movie with the word "shag" in the title, or use the word "frig" in casual conversation? The three words mean exactly the same thing.

      Why is it so "bad" to reference a thing or concept with one word, but perfectly okay to reference it another way.

      Why (for another example) do parents teach kids to ask to "go poo poo", or "potty", but would throw histerics if the kid said "crap". It's all the same thing people! Same exact meaning, just a different grouping of sounds.

      As for the word "cocksucker", perhaps you don't find "phalluslicker" offensive? Same meaning either way.

      Why do we have an entire vocabulary that is considered "offensive", yet any of the words have at least three exact synonyms that are perfectly acceptable in everyday use?

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    3. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by LordLucless · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If a kid can write the word out on a card to show it to the damn (sorry, d*mn) doll, it ain't gonna hurt them if they hear it sounded out. Even if it didn't have this feature, it's not like the doll was suddenly going to start swearing its head off for no reason. It only says what it sees.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    4. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by Belgand · · Score: 1

      I think it's very important that children learn to say "cocksucker" at an early age. Never too soon to get started on career training.

      Seriously though, I think the greater problem is that the company has already pre-censored the device and adds in the admonishment that these are "bad words" that shouldn't be used. This forms negative associations with children that (and I should state that I'm childfree) shouldn't be made. If anything they should be the province of uptight, prudish parents. Likely the sort that think there's some sort of biblical mandate against saying "fuck". It would have been just as simple for the doll to simply refuse to respond to the word as I'm assuming it is programmed to do for words it doesn't recognize.

      Likewise the manufacturer set the vocabulary here. Most people probably don't consider "damn" to be anywhere close to offensive. If this is going to be a part of the doll it might have been nice if the settings were user-modifiable.

    5. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by clambake · · Score: 1

      One doesn't have to be John Ashcroft or Oral Roberts to believe that maybe six-year-olds don't need to learn the word "cocksucker."

      You have a problem with roosters?

    6. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by Greyfox · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Just what are we protecting our children from? When do they lose the benefit of that protection? Is shielding them from things that they're are GOING to be exposed to for the rest of their lives really protecting them at all? Should we really be such a delicate culture that we get our panties in a collective bunch when someone says "Fuck"? Is it the concept that word embodies that offends people? Does having to explain to a 6 year old the concepts of the events of 9/11 offend people? Because the fucking media splatted that all over every fucking channel available, and they forced it on us like an air force cadet forcing himself on a female air force cadet and I didn't hear anyone bitching about that shit.

      How about some fucking Alabama judge trying to ram his fundamentalist philosophy down our throat like... the air force cadet thing again? Does that offend us? It sure as hell offends me. If I wanted to live in a fucking fundamentalist state, I'd fucking move to Iran. And we all saw how much good rule by religious right brought to Afghanistan. If Alabama keeps it up, Bush will be bombing them next. But I digress...

      With a world full of much nastier things than simple vulgarity, maybe we should start to loosen up a bit and lose some of our puritanical prudishness. The world is not a pretty place, and we are doing our children a disservice by lying to them and telling them that it is. You should level with little Timmy. Tell him that chances are he'll never find someone he can truly love (none of that Disneyesque "happily ever after crap") and that he's got a good chance of having his life savings stolen by some corrupt corporate CEO, resulting in little Timmy dying alone in a gutter because he couldn't afford the drugs necessary to keep him alive. And some fuckwad redneck judge in the CEOs golf club will no doubt sentence him to a couple of years in club fed and a tiny fraction of what he stole in fines. That is what we should find offensive.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    7. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hear, hear! Mod parent up!

    8. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With a world full of much nastier things than simple vulgarity, maybe we should start to loosen up a bit and lose some of our puritanical prudishness. The world is not a pretty place, and we are doing our children a disservice by lying to them and telling them that it is. You should level with little Timmy. Tell him that chances are he'll never find someone he can truly love (none of that Disneyesque "happily ever after crap") and that he's got a good chance of having his life savings stolen by some corrupt corporate CEO, resulting in little Timmy dying alone in a gutter because he couldn't afford the drugs necessary to keep him alive. And some fuckwad redneck judge in the CEOs golf club will no doubt sentence him to a couple of years in club fed and a tiny fraction of what he stole in fines. That is what we should find offensive.

      Forget your Prozac today?

    9. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by AntiOrganic · · Score: 1

      "That word is naughty! You have to be punished."

      [doll brandishes kitchen knife]

    10. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find it interesting that you find so much petty shit to be "rather interesting." Dumbass.

    11. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by thynk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I get the impression that the vast majority of Slashdot readers don't have children. (Insert the obvious "don't have girlfriend" jokes on your own.) One doesn't have to be John Ashcroft or Oral Roberts to believe that maybe six-year-olds don't need to learn the word "cocksucker."

      As a single dad of 3 kids, aged 6,8 and 10 I can honestly say, that if your six year old is trying to get it's doll to read "cocksucker", then your problems go deeper than how the doll will respond.

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
    12. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      1) A six year old who has access to the printed work 'cocksucker' or can write it out themselves isn't going to be any more warped just by hearing an electronic doll say it.

      2) Yeah, it is somewhat absurd for a toy company to put restrictions on such a thing. Smacks of 'universal morality' being built into our consumer goods, something that makes many people uneasy (although, in this case you're probably right that it's not a big deal)

      3) Did it ever occur to you that this article wasn't posted about some righteous indignation regarding electronic censorship, but instead that the thought that an electronic doll being hacked to sing 'I wanna fuck you in the ass...' is absolutely hysterical? I mean, one of the icons for the posting is for 'humor', not Your Rights Online.

      [relax, buddy. no one is taking this seriously except you]

    13. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by jfern · · Score: 1

      Typical conversation

      Son: "Damn!"
      Mother: "I don't want to hear you say that word again."
      Son: "Awww."
      Son: "Hey, mom, what was it that they used to make that lake, again?"
      Mother: "Oh, that's a da... fuck."
      Son: "Am I allowed to say that?"
      Mother: "You may use the word dam in the right context, but you can't say damn, and you certainly can't say that other word?"
      Son: "Which other word?"

    14. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      If a kid can write the word out on a card to show it to the damn (sorry, d*mn) doll, it ain't gonna hurt them if they hear it sounded out.

      But rather than reinforce the word to the child, the doll lets them know that it's a bad word. The same way just about any responsible parent would if their kid said the word in front of them.

      Besides, sometimes kids don't actually know what the word is. Older brothers often like to torture their younger siblings, and I definitely remember a few times where my older brother got a kick out of tricking me into saying a bad word to my parents. If someone teaches a kid how to write a swear word, I think it's a good idea for this doll to let them know it's not actually a good word.

    15. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by LordKronos · · Score: 4, Informative

      Please don't have kids. The truth is great and all, but the world needs fewer emotionally disturbed children. Children raise in the manner you describe almost always form a negative opinion of themself (how could they not), develop a low self-esteem, and become failures in life as part of some sick, self-fulfilling prophecy. So if that's the way you really think kids should be raised, I beg of you to do this world a favor and not have kids.

    16. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by jimm · · Score: 1

      Offensive language is useful. It conveys strong emotion. It can be humorous (South Park). It shocks. It tittilates.

      If ever "fuck" becomes non-offensive, then another word will take its place.

      --
      Transcript show: self sigs atRandom.
    17. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by CyberDruid · · Score: 1
      But rather than reinforce the word to the child, the doll lets them know that it's a bad word. The same way just about any responsible parent would if their kid said the word in front of them.

      What utter crap! Any responsible parents would do exactly what my parents did and explain how there are no inherently bad words and that people just make up which words are bad and which words are not. After that, the tantalising forbidden mystery surrounding saying "fuck!" sort of disappears. Refusing to speak certain words limits your vocabulary and your ability to express yourself.

      I have a friend who was raised by his parents into thinking that certain words are "bad". Now, an adult, he gets of on cursing and can't buy albums without "explicit lyrics" printed on it and actually counts how many times they say "fuck" and "bitch" in movies to determine if he liked it.

      Can't we just lose that unhealthy Christian sklaven-moral already? Please?

      --

      Opinions stated are mine and do not reflect those of the Illuminati

    18. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fundamentalist philosophy? Oh, I get it now...

      Yes, how dare he shove "do not murder" down the throats of our kids. Where is it going to end?? With judges like this, no wonder we have so many screwed up kids. Kids need to be told from early age that the world is an ugly place and the only way to make it better sometimes is to just kill some SUV-driving redneck.

      Is that your point?

    19. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 1

      Just an odd thought. Wouldn't it be better for Cindy not to recognise all these forbidden words rather than confirm that they exist. Kids are probably going to spend their time trying to find words that Cindy refuses to repeat.

    20. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by smallfries · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Congraulations. That is the highest mod I've seen for a troll in a long time. +5 insightful means that there are 5 other people in the world smoking the that same funky mellow blend of crack that you are.

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    21. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... it's not like the doll was suddenly going to start swearing its head off for no reason. It only says what it sees.

      now is that going to be an expansion cartridge?

      the tourets syndrome plug-in?

    22. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by ortholattice · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I have a 12-year-old son. He has certainly heard his share of "bad" words in movies etc. But I have never had to punished him for using "bad" words, because he knows the rules, respects me, and wants my approval. He knows that in and of themselves a combination of letters is no more than that, but certain combinations can evoke certain (sometimes undesirable) reactions from others. When you raise kids, you want to teach them reasonable behaviors that allow them to function well in society. You want to give them the training and tools that allow them to do that. Then when they're adults, they will know what society's expectatations are, and they can make your own informed judgment as to how to behave. They'll know what to expect when they behave in certain ways, and perhaps they will choose to behave or not behave in certain ways in certain situations in order to be funny, shock, express anger, or whatever. You also teach them manners - when it is appropriate to eat with a fork, and when you can shove food into you mouth with your hands, so they won't embarrass themselves by looking like pigs when they're on their own. What is important is to teach them when it is appropriate to use "bad" words and when it is not. If you teach them well, they will have to tools to achieve what they want out of life.

    23. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by Lumpy · · Score: 0, Troll

      first off I can tell that you are not a parent.

      My 11 year old daughter knows that there is "naqughty words" out there. but she also knows that using them is a sign of low overall IQ or just merely the fact that the person spouting them has run out of smart things to say.

      Profanity in it's self is truely the last resort of a person that is at the limit of their mential abilities. It can be brough on by simply smashing your thumb with a hammer.. I've done that. but lately it's just because the user is typically a very dim person. Take the guy that walks around the local store with the "FUCK" hat and the "eat shot" t-shirt. Is he making a statment? nahh, he's just one of these people that simply have not matured enough to get past the "swear words are cool" phase that the rest of us got through at age 8-10.

      It's overall called teaching manners. something that Americans are massively missing and getting worse every day.

      And yes, I have slipped into the low-IQ bin with no manners at times, mostly in traffic. we all are guilty of that. but the person that has enough self control to NOT use profanity is a person that will go farther in live, have much more respect from others around them, and have much more pride in themselves.

      So yes, teaching kids that it is NOT normal to spout profanity is a good thing.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    24. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by dan+dan+the+dna+man · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can assure you licking, and sucking are two very different things.

      --
      I don't read your sig, why do you read mine?
    25. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by Cyno · · Score: 1

      Yeah, its kinda hypocritical of us to say its okay to bomb a people into the stone age, but you can't say the word "Fuck".

      We seem to care more about political correctness and money than we do human life or eachother.

    26. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > But rather than reinforce the word to the child, the doll lets them know that it's a bad word.

      Thus reinforcing the word!!

    27. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My 11 year old daughter knows that there is "naqughty words" out there. but she also knows that using them is a sign of low overall IQ or just merely the fact that the person spouting them has run out of smart things to say.

      Ha! Nice mental contortion, there. "Swear words" are what "lesser people" say... and, you don't want to be inferior, do you sweetie?

      Point me toward a single shred of evidence to support the claim that cursing and intellect are correlated.

      In the meantime, you should ease up on brainwashing your daughter--she might just grow up too worried about what others will think of her to do any thinking for herself.

    28. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by sco08y · · Score: 1

      Why do we have an entire vocabulary that is considered "offensive", yet any of the words have at least three exact synonyms that are perfectly acceptable in everyday use?

      Would you agree that the n-word is offensive?

      And you understand why, right? It's been used to fuck with so many people for so long, you can't escape the evil behind it.

      So why is it so hard to comprehend that there are thousands of years of history behind words like shit and fuck?

      It's more than the words themselves, of course. It's the fact that people established social norms, and saw that people who hadn't established those norms simply died.

      It's easy, sheltered by modern society, to forget that it wasn't long ago that smallpox was a terrible killer, that people were worried about not eating than being fat, that instead of artificially aborting 30% of pregnancies, a similar number aborted naturally or were stillborn.

    29. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by Xerithane · · Score: 1, Insightful

      My 11 year old daughter knows that there is "naqughty words" out there. but she also knows that using them is a sign of low overall IQ or just merely the fact that the person spouting them has run out of smart things to say.

      Oh, this is just utter bullshit. The usage of profanity in no way reflects the intelligence or linguistic acumen. Just because it's more comfortable for you to group people who use swear words into an inferior position doesn't mean it's true. It is a sign of your own lacking intellect, as clear as day.

      Profanity in it's self is truely the last resort of a person that is at the limit of their mential abilities.

      Or perhaps it's because they make usage of a more creative path in the language that you don't agree with. The only sign of intellect is knowing when to properly use profanity and when it is inappropriate.

      It's overall called teaching manners. something that Americans are massively missing and getting worse every day.

      You really need to travel outside the US more. Every culture has their own rudeness to it.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    30. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This style of argument is a very reliable way of determining a persons age or maturity.

      If you say : "X is bad"

      and they say: "Y is bad too, so X must be good"

      you know you are dealing with a complete moron, or somebody who is still in high school.

    31. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by retro128 · · Score: 1

      It's quite simple. We don't like computers telling US what to do.

      --
      -R
    32. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by segvio · · Score: 1

      Not going to delve in to the actual 'rights' or things that should be happening. But parents have some sort of say on what their kids learn and when they learn it, though many of us may or may not agree with each of their individual judgments.

    33. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      When I was a little kid, there was a period in which I kept saying "bad" words. My mom then told me to say the "bad" word a hundred times, after which it had lost all of its "magic" to me ;-)

      I am amazed at the hypocrite way the Americans are trying to control swear words. The fact is, they've only become popular, as illustrated in your example.

      I mean, if you literally translated some phrases full of swearwords into Dutch and spoke them out loud, people would probably think you were nuts! Not cool or anything like it. Nuts (as in crazy).

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    34. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if the Iraq (and possibly the Afgan) war, which is what I assume you are referring to, was/were unjust, that doesn't mean that anything short of unjustly bombing a people into the stone age is fair game. Come on. Surely car theft is something less grievous than "bombing a people into the stone age". Does that mean that it's hypocritical that we demand that people not steal cars.

      I am not equating car-theft with the use of "bad" words, just taking your argument to its logical conclusion. Frequent use of profanity is not a mark of civilized behavior and should not be held up as a model for our children.

      Oh yeah. You're argument also fails because we as individuals have no direct say concerning whether our government bombs anyone "into the stone age". We do have control over the words we use and allow our young children to use on a regular basis.

    35. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh yeah.. .ther's a ton of CEO's out ther ethat are saying,....

      "This year was Motherfucking awesome and we took da shit the competition fucking threw at us and bent them over and fucked them up the ass good..."

      get real you forever fry-cook. Only IDIOTS think that profanity is their way of self expression.

      and your type are the ones who will ALWAYS take orders from people who have enough mential abilities to not sound like a moron.

    36. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, this is just utter bullshit. The usage of profanity in no way reflects the intelligence or linguistic acumen. Just because it's more comfortable for you to group people who use swear words into an inferior position doesn't mean it's true.

      really?

      ok I dare you. for the next 2 weeks talk to your boss and go on evertal interviews talking that way.

      I'll bet you $100.00 you cant get a job above fry cook because of it.

      Yes there are Asshats like McBride out there as CEO's but the didnt become CEO because they talked da shit wif da homies and saiz fuck all da time....word!

      Better yet, please go to the middle east and use your attitude there... I'll bet we never find your body.

    37. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Every culture has their own rudeness to it.

      Looks like we just found the rudeness in yours.

    38. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by gerardrj · · Score: 1

      no, nigger is not offensive. I hear black people use it all the time. You can't have it both ways... either the word is offensive or it is not.
      If the group to which the word is supposedly offensive USE the word in reference to each other, then it can't be considered offensive.

      Historically the word 'god' has been used to "fuck with so many people for so long, you can't escape the evil behind it", yet very few consider it to be offensive. The same with slavery, you can utter that word just about anywhere without issue. So I think your context for the choice of what is offensive either:
      a) is at best riddled with so many exceptions that is't not a useful rule
      b) has nothing to do with the root cause of the arbitrary selections

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    39. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by X86Daddy · · Score: 1

      Yes, how dare he shove "do not murder" down the throats of our kids.

      Check out the 10 Commandments some time. The anti-murder bit is number six, but see if the first four have nothing to do with pushing a specific religion.

    40. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by gerardrj · · Score: 1

      Firs,t your comments makes little to no sense. Second, if you are trying to say what I think you are saying, that's not what I said or suggested.

      I'm saying that there are no inherently "bad" words, only arbitrary reaction to them. There are contexts in which the most innocuous of words can be used that will cause as much reaction.

      To give a somewhat mild example:

      "I'm going to tear your guts out and stuff them up your ass"
      is in all ways equivilant to
      "I shall eviscerate you and coerce the mass such that it will be contained within your rectum".

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    41. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I'm guessing you're probably too old to be playing with dolls. So it isn't a problem for you.

    42. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by superyooser · · Score: 0
      Yeah, its kinda hypocritical of us to say its okay to bomb a people into the stone age, but you can't say the word "Fuck".

      People don't spend enough time thinking and meditating about politics. They just want to react.

      Would you please try to recognize some distinctions? We bombed the enemies of peace. And the lovers of peace rejoiced. Life in Afghanistan is blooming. The same will soon occur in Iraq. Quite frankly, the main problem in Iraq is that our bombs didn't kill enough people. The enemies of peace still live. They are murdering, stealing, and are destroying the infrastructure that we had already repaired.


      We seem to care more about political correctness and money than we do human life or eachother.

      No, no. One of the main pillars of political correctness is the derision of Biblical mores. This whole pro-obscenity story is politically correct. If I say "f--k" is bad, I am being politically in correct.

      Thanks to Bill Maher for turning the definition of "politically incorrect" completely upside down.


      There is a culture that regards certain words (e.g., s--t, f--k) as foul, a culture that thinks those words are okay but is sensitive to the former culture, and a culture that revels in using those words to offend the first culture. Political correctness goes with the third culture. It believes in being culturally sensitive except when it comes to ideas based on the Bible. Then, tolerance goes out the door. It's Taliban Time! Topple their erected commandments. Use their holy words as though they were foul words. Etc.

    43. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but she also knows that using them is a sign of low overall IQ or just merely the fact that the person spouting them has run out of smart things to say.

      Bullshit. I talk like a fucking sailor and my IQ is 135.

      -niggerman

    44. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      but I do find the word "god" offensive..

    45. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You tell 'em, Greyfox. Not all of us have forgotten that freedom includes not having to be judged by someone else's religion. Keep fighting the good fight.

    46. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, what I'm offended by is this post, and by the fact that it's been modded up so high.

      Go ahead, buddy. Tell your kids that. Just don't be surprised if you raise cynical, sullen, angry teens who have no desire to change the world for the better, and don't care about anything except looking out for number one.

      Maybe that's what you want, but I sure as hell wouldn't like to have future generations dependent on their leadership. I wouldn't be surprised if some of those CEOs who have no problem with ruining millions of employees had parents exactly like you.

      Sure, we *all know* that lies are usually bad. What you want is to screw them in the head just because you're angry. Way to go.

    47. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by Cyno · · Score: 1

      Frequent use of profanity is not a mark of civilized behavior and should not be held up as a model for our children.

      Neither is frequent use of WMD such as napalm, daisy cutters and depleted uranium.

      Oh yeah. You're argument also fails because we as individuals have no direct say concerning whether our government bombs anyone "into the stone age". We do have control over the words we use and allow our young children to use on a regular basis.

      That's right. We are out of control. So shut the fuck up.

    48. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by Exiler · · Score: 1

      cynical, sullen, angry teens

      Why are you being so redundant? That was four words for the same thing ;P

      --
      Banaaaana!
    49. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the idea that parents trying to shield their children from obscenity isn't merely futile, but is, in fact, actively evil.

      It's not preventing your children from hearing or using certain words that's evil. That's entirely up to you (although it IS unrealistic to expect you can protect them from it once they hit any kind of school).

      It's forcing YOUR idea of good moral behaviour onto others that's evil. What's worse, it's done with the best intentions. If you believe a certain word (regardless of intent) will damage a child, you act in what you see as the best interest of all children. But in so doing, you neglect other people's viewpoints, and try and restrict other people's behaviour for a hypothesis you can't even prove.

      People restricting my behaviour is an anathema to me - I am not acting to damage children, and most children will not jump instantly to 'damaged' for hearing me yell 'fuck!' when I hammer my thumb, or get fragged in an FPS. What might harm them is yelling obscenities AT THEM, in which case, just about any word would likely damage them.

      "YOU LITTLE BUTTERFLY! WHY DON'T YOU JUST RUN OFF AND DRINK MILK!" screamed at a kid would confuse and likely hurt them, much more than the occasional 'unapproved word', if not directed at them.

      For fucks sake, just educate your kids on intent and explain what the words are and why you think they shouldn't use them. Be warned though - 95% of them WILL use them, whether you think they should or not. The more taboo something is, the more attractive it is to kids whose parents aren't around.

      Jesus - people voted Bush for president. I think it was a bad thing to do, but I don't try and tell those people they're not allowed to vote any more. The same goes for my swearing, and my children's swearing.

    50. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be such a mindless cunt. Seeing everything in black and white is another sign of stupidity, and you've got it in spades.

      Believe it or not, it's possible to be somewhere BETWEEN utterly pristine and saying fuck every second word. What a concept! BETWEEN!

      Fucktard. Intelligence is not defined by vocabulary.

    51. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should level with little Timmy. Tell him that chances are he'll never find someone he can truly love (none of that Disneyesque "happily ever after crap") and that he's got a good chance of having his life savings stolen by some corrupt corporate CEO, resulting in little Timmy dying alone in a gutter because he couldn't afford the drugs necessary to keep him alive. And some fuckwad redneck judge in the CEOs golf club will no doubt sentence him to a couple of years in club fed and a tiny fraction of what he stole in fines

      I think you just described how marxist revolutions happen. Here's to Disney.

    52. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As both a parent and a geek, I think that one does have to be somewhat ignorant (perhaps almost as much as John Ashcroft, Oral Roberts, or Shrub hisself) to want to shield children from the outside world.

      'Cause you know what happens when the shielded child is suddenly let into that world -- a maelstrom of depravity, exactly what Ashcroftians would aim to prevent.

    53. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the difference is because words have connotative as well as denotative meanings?

      What if when you had to go to the bathroom, you, an adult, said you had to "go potty". What would people think

      What if you refered to your mother as your "mommy."

      Or, conversely, what if you refered to your boss by saying "The overweight fucker in the ugly white shirt wants this done by tomorrow." That may technically be the same as "Mr. Arnold wants this on his desk tomorrow morning" but it's in terms of the respect and power relationships conveyed, the two are very different.

      Some words refer to the same physical objects, but have different emotional impacts. These words are used by adults to express extreme emotion (and by kids for shits and giggles and to express rebellion).

      Language isn't simply a tool for describing objects and actions. It is also used in many different ways to convey real and desired power relationships.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    54. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only four commandments (6 through 9) have anything to do with the law.

    55. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by ediron2 · · Score: 1


      heh-heh, heh-heh. You said Ashcroft, Oral and Cocksucker.</beavis>

      <butthead>
      Hhhn-Hnnh, in the same sentence!</butthead>

      I've got a kid. I don't want to give my young child a doll that says profanities . But I want one that sounds hip enough not to get the shit pounded out of it.
      Face it: kids destroy uncool toys. By the time I was 12, I had started to customize toys that were undesirably unhip. If the customization failed, the toy was tossed (a small victory). If the customization was cool, the hacked toy became a trophy (bigger victory). Either way, it was Death To The Lame Toys.

      Personality transplants are doubly cool in my book: clever kids get to show off a funny 'better' vocabulary and it is technical enough to require some serious learning. And any lessons that don't involve rote memorization, be they from reprogramming chatty cindy here or playing Civ and hex-editing game-save data, get my vote!

      Incidentally, the text-command adventure games of the early PC era hit this problem. Poor games ignored you or had pathetic, lame responses to profanity. Funny, clever games responded in a way that kept the gameplayer's respect. A good toy designer could do worse than to take a page from those early interactive game designers' lessons.

    56. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by slaida1 · · Score: 1
      [...]that if your six year old is trying to get it's doll to read "cocksucker", then your problems go deeper than how the doll will respond.

      As an arrogant slashdotter I can honestly say that if you find that a problem, then you have some deep problems with yourself.

      --
      Preserve old classics: copy your collection onto all hard drives.
    57. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by thynk · · Score: 1

      Can you elaborate on that a bit? It could be read a couple of ways.

      Are you saying I shouldn't have a problem with my 6 year old trying to get a doll to read the word CockSucker? Well, honestly, I'd be rather shocked because that doesn't fit in with his personality at all and that sort of change might indicate that something else is wrong. But over all, kids get a big kick out of "naughty" words simply because they are "naughty" and I don't think it would keep me up at night.

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
    58. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by phorm · · Score: 1

      Children raise in the manner you describe almost always form a negative opinion of themself (how could they not), develop a low self-esteem...

      ...and end up reading slashdot on a constant basis? That parent is correct that children should be more exposed to the facts of life, but he/she severely overstates it. Yes, we should impress upon our children that life is a hard, difficult thing at times. We should teach them that they can fail, will fail, and that sometimes it's alright, it's not their fault. We should teach them that other people will try to trick them and take advantage of them.

      And hopefully, we should teach them to think for themselves. That even though sometimes screwing up is inevitable, they can get through it. That there are bad people out there, but also good ones... and how to try and see the difference between a con and somebody who honestly wants to help. If you just pay attention to how many people get viruses, scammed, etc etc just using computers, and just because they are ignorant and too trusting - then you will see this point.

      Giving your kids the "life is pointless" talk is obviously stupid (as per the grandparents), but the (life is hard, but believe in yourself and try your best even at times when it sucks) will hopefully help build them into adults who are stronger of character. We have to recognise our failings, but still have hope for the future... which is difficult enough for ourself let alone teaching it to our kids...

  51. I can imagine the next enhancement already... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  52. Gall durned toys... by softspokenrevolution · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All right, since when are we all so sick that the first things people think about when we talk about a kid's toy are the ways we can subvert it to our lecherous and or insane desires.

    I remember, back when I was a kid, the best thing we had in talking things was the Jurrasic Park playset, all it would say for five days was, "Jurrasic Park Compound Secured" and then a light would flash. God damned, I barely even got new toys, I just got a bunch of modeling clay and pretended that they were new toys. Parents, I urge you, modeling clay is cheap (but a little messy) and it lets your children express their creativity. Don't just buy them a toy because it can do your parenting for you (and don't use television or computers for the same thing) because that's how the evil robots will take over the planet.

    On a more serious note, I think that interactive toys are a nice touch, but I always thought that the point of getting toys was to make up your own adventures and envision how everything played out with a physical aid and your imagination. And yes, when I was younger (okay, like seven years ago) I did play with sticks and dirt, it's good stuff.

  53. Cindy should meet Alice. by ratfynk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Cindy meet http://www.alicebot.org/ she has a tendancy to be very purile and one track minded, the two of you will get along like gang busters! Alice is a little sneaky though she tries to ask some very interesting question sometimes. Cindy can you use an interpreter, or script yet. Alice says that she might be dangerous if she learned to program. Alice would like very much to learn how to create a child process and build from source. Cindy should be online too that might be fun. Kind of an online cat fight!

    --
    OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
    1. Re:Cindy should meet Alice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey that's neat. That animated head is pretty sweet, I wonder if somebody has a program like that for X (sure beats xeyes)???

      I had a quick chat with her:

      me: Hi Alice!

      alice: Hello there!

      me: I have a big programming project coming up and I want to try a new language. Which do you think I should use, Python or Ruby?

      alice: The large one, I think.

      me: Python, huh? Thanks Alice!

      alice: Don't mention it.

    2. Re:Cindy should meet Alice. by ratfynk · · Score: 1

      Ask her boss, she is running on a Linux server, she uses AIML which is a markup language.

      --
      OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
    3. Re:Cindy should meet Alice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Get more Intelligent Chat! Only $99 / Year ($39 for Seniors, Students, Youth or Disabled). Become an ALICE member and experience advanced ALICE features.
      Yeah right, I can get better chat from IRC for FREE.
    4. Re:Cindy should meet Alice. by ratfynk · · Score: 1

      You understand my point, very good!

      --
      OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
    5. Re:Cindy should meet Alice. by cmptrmaniac62 · · Score: 1

      > C++ or Perl?

      Alice: No preference.

  54. Forget modding xbox... by wiresquire · · Score: 1
    ...although she refuses to recite certain 4-letter words. 'We don't say those kind of words,' she shrills, refusing to even spell obscenities. 'That's a bad word.'

    Forget hacking xbox for Linux, cracking this sounds much more useful...

    --

    So does Anonymous Coward have good karma?

  55. Hacked by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    It won't be long before somebody hacks into one and makes it do the big nasty with a Sony Aibo. That would make an interesting court case if children were exposed to the action.

  56. The Sixth Day by nacturation · · Score: 1

    Cindy is the name of the SimPal(TM) from the Arnie movie The Sixth Day.

    I'll bet if this Cindy doll is as annoying, after all of three minutes in my general vicinity, I'll likely be hearing "Uh oh, Cindy has a boo-boo" as I casually watch her dismembered head rolling down the sidewalk.

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  57. Bad grammar by edp · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "We don't say those kind of words."

    Apparently political correctness is higher in their priorities than good education. "Those" is plural, but "kind" is singular. For $149, I expect proper grammar.

    1. Re:Bad grammar by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      I'd guess poorly educatd reporters before poorly educated dolls.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    2. Re:Bad grammar by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

      Sorry but the words the doll won't say belong to ONE category (obscene) hence 'kind' = singular.

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    3. Re:Bad grammar by midav · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but then it should be "We don't say this kind of words"

    4. Re:Bad grammar by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

      That too!

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    5. Re:Bad grammar by EddWo · · Score: 1

      We don't say this kind of word?

      --
      "Taligent is still pure vapor. Maybe they'll be the last who jumps up on Openstep... "
    6. Re:Bad grammar by shplorb · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Americans are the people who spell things stupidly: color (colour), nite (night), tire (tyre), check (cheque), liter (litre), center (centre), etc.

      Therefore it's only reasonable to conclude that they have stupid grammar. =]

    7. Re:Bad grammar by glwtta · · Score: 1
      Homer: "Me like beer."
      Linguo: "I like beer."

      </obligatory>

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    8. Re:Bad grammar by Arker · · Score: 1

      Those doesn't go with kind though. Correct english would be 'that kind of words.'

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    9. Re:Bad grammar by WhaDaYaKnow · · Score: 1

      "We don't say those kind of words."
      Apparently political correctness is higher in their priorities than good education. "Those" is plural, but "kind" is singular. For $149, I expect proper grammar.


      Yeah, see! I though it was supposed to be "We don't say them kind of words."

    10. Re:Bad grammar by Evangelion · · Score: 1


      it would actually be "We don't say that kind of word"

  58. doll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    im beginning to wonder what else she teaches her young users (maybe):

    sexual positions
    condom safety (when not to reduce, reuse, and recycle)
    ebonics
    and various other things.

  59. I'd be interested in seeing by mesach · · Score: 1

    a Clothing and head transplant for the Bride of Chucky, then make her say all sorts of disturbing things.

    --
    moo.
  60. On clearance here by levram2 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Maybe Cindy Smart didn't pass the child play test. I found it discounted from the original $150 MSRP down to only $29.21 at hsn.com.

  61. Old sf story by MsWillow · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Am I the only person who is reminded of an old scifi short story, about a future utopia where a child's teddy bear would teach the child how to behave? Apparently, one person removed the circuitry of one child's bear, tampered with it, and replaced it, resulting in an adult, apparently normal as everybody else, who was able to kill the world leader, because teddy never taught him that it was bad to kill people.

    Is this doll a step in that direction? I sure hope not!

    (Aside note - I read that story when I was very young (I was a precocious kid), and it really hurt me to think that *anybody* would take apart a *teddy bear* and make it do evil things. This doll evokes the same sort of feeling in me. )

    --

    Lemon curry?
    1. Re:Old sf story by prichardson · · Score: 1

      I loved that story. What was it called? Any info greatly appreciated.

      --
      Help I'm a rock.
    2. Re:Old sf story by Pvt_Waldo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      quote: Is this doll a step in that direction? I sure hope not!

      No. It's just doing what a lot of parents would probably would want anyone who had the ability to "communicate" with their child to do. Got nothing to do with being a prude, or whether the fact the parents swear or not. Generally you just don't bring up small children with that kind of habit.

      Besides, it's a pretty funny hack. I can just imagine coding a swear filter into that :^)

    3. Re:Old sf story by MsWillow · · Score: 3, Informative

      "I always do what teddy says" Harry Harrison, 1963.

      "I Always Do What Teddy Says (1963) is set in a utopia where mechanical teddy bears are used to condition children against anti-social behaviour: The Times reported on 1st April 1998 that, "Teddy bears...will soon be fitted with tiny cameras to spy on families across Britain.""

      Hope this helps.

      --

      Lemon curry?
    4. Re:Old sf story by ender81b · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It could also be Sten (first book of the sten series) whereby they use teddy bears to manipulate children to become emotionally and physically retarded.

    5. Re:Old sf story by skinfitz · · Score: 1

      The Times reported on 1st April 1998 that, "Teddy bears...will soon be fitted with tiny cameras to spy on families across Britain."

      Eye Toy anyone?

      April fools jokes are all well and good but one cannot help but wonder if there is something more sinister underneath. Would make a great public reaction test - I wonder just how many enquiries / complaints they got about that story? In the event of problems "its an April fools joke" etc etc.

      Coupled with XBox live with a broadband net connection the EyeToy has tremendous potential for abuse. How do people know it's not operating as a spy cam? Could someone use cracked code on a modded XBox to turn it into one?

    6. Re:Old sf story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My name is talking Susie, and I'm going to truck you up -*-giggle-*-

    7. Re:Old sf story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought there already were teddy bears with cameras in them, but that they were meant for spying on babysitters and stuff like that.

    8. Re:Old sf story by skinfitz · · Score: 1

      I thought there already were teddy bears with cameras in them, but that they were meant for spying on babysitters and stuff like that.

      Yes but they would be specialist surveillance tools. To have cameras in EVERY teddy bear would be much more insidious. The one in the story can ID swear words, how long is it before they are listening for words like "plane" "allah" and "bomb" and sending transcripts to the authorities?

    9. Re:Old sf story by frentos · · Score: 1

      That story is probably "I Always Do What Teddy Says", by Harry Harrison, reprinted in many collections and anothologies.

  62. Why is it... by Tellalian · · Score: 1

    that whenever a mechanism capable of speech crops up, there's an unending supply of people bent on getting it to recite vulgarities. I knew a freshman in college who had a blast with one of those Bonsai Buddy talking desktop programs. Who knew someone could derive so much joy from being cursed out by a cyber monkey?

  63. For $149... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you can get a real Cindy, who tells you all kind of dirty words *and* gives you a blow job.

  64. Re:Don't feel so bad by Bastian · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    yeah, the English Languate Fatheads are annoying, but they're a hell of a lot better than the French Language Fatheads, who seem to think that 'board with wheels' (translated, of course) sounds more sophisticated/intelligent than 'skateboard'

  65. Adobe Photoshop Required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    read the FAQ. If you lose any of her specially printed color learning cards, you can print more, but only if you own Adobe Photoshop.

  66. What a ridiculous story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Bob The Builder Gets A Personality Transplant
    Cindy Smart Knows Better Than To Say Naughty Words

    I don't know about you, but I come to Slashdot for "News for Nerds". You know, stories about important lawsuits affecting my rights online, about where GNU/Linux and the computer industry is headed, major advances in science and technology, etc.

    But some stories here (to say nothing of the comments) are so ridiculous and absurd that it actually hurts my brain.

    I realize Slashdot is not a democracy, and most people here probably couldn't care less what I think, but I just had to get this off my chest anyway.

    Maybe I am crazy, or out of touch, but please consider relegating stuff like this to

    http://adolescent-nonsense.slashdot.org/

    Am I all alone here?

  67. Sure, it's flamebait... by jcr · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... but fuck that little soulless twat.

    I remember a BBS a few decades ago where it was impossible to discuss the prime minister of japan. The man's name was takeshita.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:Sure, it's flamebait... by t0qer · · Score: 1

      Try saying LaCucaracha in english on boards with curse filters.

    2. Re:Sure, it's flamebait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Cockroach?

    3. Re:Sure, it's flamebait... by rossz · · Score: 1

      I remember a BBS with a curse filter that wouldn't let you discuss ASSembly language programming. You had to type a$$embly. I complained to the sysop, but he was too anal to do anything about it, so I stopped participating. I hate censorship. I hate automated censorship even more.

      --
      -- Will program for bandwidth
    4. Re:Sure, it's flamebait... by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      Well, if at least it tripped on stuff that was within the same word, it's still something.

      My canonical example of a stupid censorship is from the Sega forums. So I had a question about the level where "monsters jump out of a glowing pile." Looks innocent, right?

      Now let me capitalize the letters that tripped their retarded filter: "oF A Glowing". Or lemme try without the spaces: "oFAGlowing".

      Yep. Their filter was "smart" enough to figure out that if it glues disparate words together and then takes a piece of the result, it ends up with "fag".

      I mean, Jesus Christ, you'd think that not even Beavis and Butthead would be that obsessed as to find "fag" in that sentence. Yet it was good enough to censor for Sega.

      Basically that's the problem _I_ have with automated censorship, whether on a board, or in a doll, or whatever. It's invariably (A) retarded, and (B) actually pointing out weird letter associations that no sane human would have even noticed without the program's help.

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  68. 'smart' ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are we to think that censorship is smart?
    Smart people don't hear those words..

  69. make it stop! by gears5665 · · Score: 1

    no! no more!

  70. McBride got a ...? by linuxislandsucks · · Score: 1

    McBride got a ....

    Sex change operation???..

    Smart Cindy runs off SystemV and SCO Group claims all other Dolls are derivative works..

    --
    Don't Tread on OpenSource
  71. Cindy Smart came out last year by Animats · · Score: 1

    This thing came out last year. It's discounted to $29.95 now.

  72. What word police? by Inoshiro · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A word's place in a language is how it's used by the speakers.

    I can say feces and be unambigous in describing fecal matter to any English speaker.

    Shit doesn't always describe animal excretia in English. It also describes a situation or thing which is negative to the point of requiring a word of curse. Much like sex and fuck can refer to the same thing, you don't go up to random people and talk about fucking unless you are very low brow. You can probably talk about sex, though, as long as it's appropriate to the context.

    Languages are not logical -- sayings and alternate forms arrise all the time, and are designated as how people use them, not as logic would dictate.

    For example, to indicate that someone had revealed a secret, one English expression you might say is, "he let the cat out of the bag." How does that relate to secrets? The french equivalent, "Il a vendu la meche." litterally translates as, "He sold the wick."

    How about, "He's as tall as 3 apples." Is that easy to recognize like, "He's knee high to a grasshopper." is?

    If you have a problem with the conotations and denotations of the English language, I suggest you learn another one. Then you might appreciate their usage better.

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    1. Re:What word police? by foqn1bo · · Score: 1

      I think what the original poster was getting at was more of an annoyance toward the systematic perjoration of germanic roots in the English language. It's quite true that people use these words differently, and that they have different semantic properties in day to day speech. However, it is clear that this arose from a socio-political divide, and not because the speakers of Old English were generally crude people.

      It's toatally pervasive. In most cases all we do is attach slightly more significance to the french and latin roots and we're done. It irks me that people get so wet over french words that mean the same thing as those with germanic origins, but that's their game to play. I don't quite see why our 4-letter words have to be *so* taboo. I don't advocate language police, and I think I have a pretty fair grip on the nature of language dynamics as a collective emergence. Nonetheless, it pisses me off when people make a big deal about "fuck". It's a perfectly good word, can be used for some great effects, and doesn't carry much negative connotation other than the fact one said it.

      Nobody's exactly trying to change the way English is when they express frustration at that sort of thing; that would require a whole lot more participation on the part of other people. But the processes of systematic perjoration in language change do tend to outline social rifts and prejudices. This makes some people uneasy. Women should be especially annoyed.

      Governor - Governess
      Master - Mistress
      Courtier - Courtesan
      Bachelor - Spinster
      Husband - Hussy

      Think about it, yo.

  73. Cindy - The Kinks Version by niko9 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Slashdots - Cindy

    I met her in a Radio Shack in old Soho
    Where you drink Coca Cola(r) and it tastes just like carbonated, caffeinated brown water
    See-oh-el-aye cola

    She walked up to me and she asked me to fisrt post
    I asked her her name and in a dark Linux(r) voice she said Cindy
    See-Eye-Enn-Dee-Why Cindy la-la-la-la Cindy

    Well I'm not the world's most technical guy
    But when she squeezed me tight she nearly dumped my kernel
    Oh my Cindy See-Eye-Enn-Dee-Why

    I'm not an AC but I can't understand
    Why she walked like a doll and talked like a nun
    Oh my Cindy See-Eye-Enn-Dee-Why Cindy la-la-la-la Cindy

    Well we drank Jolt and raved all night
    Under electric high intensity discharge xenon candlelight

    She picked me up and sat me on her plastic knee
    And said dear boy won't you come home with me

    Well I'm not the world's most passionate geek
    But when I looked in her glass eyes well I almost fell for my Cindy
    See-Eye-Enn-Dee-Why See-Eye-Enn-Dee-Why

    I pushed her away
    I walked to the X-terminal
    I fell to the pile of floppies
    I got down on my knees
    Then I looked at her and she at me

    Well that's the way that I want it to stay
    And I always want it to be that way for my Cindy
    See-Eye-Enn-Dee-Why Cindy

    Girls will be dolls and boys will be geeks
    It's a mixed up muddled up shook up world except for See-Eye-Enn-Dee-Why Cindy

    Well I left my basement just a week before
    And I'd never ever kissed a woman before
    But Cindy smiled and took me by the hand
    And said dear geek I'm gonna make you a kernel God

    Well I'm not the world's most masculine geek
    But I know what I am and I'm glad I'm a geek
    And so is Cindy

    See-Eye-Enn-Dee-Why See-Eye-Enn-Dee-Why
    See-Eye-Enn-Dee-Why See-Eye-Enn-Dee-Why

    1. Re:Cindy - The Kinks Version by hendrix69 · · Score: 1

      That song was so bad I think it gave me cancer!

      --
      The power of Christ compiles you!
    2. Re:Cindy - The Kinks Version by Sir+Haxalot · · Score: 1

      Heh hilarious :)
      Mod parent up!

      --
      I have over 70 freaks, do you?
    3. Re:Cindy - The Kinks Version by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Please dial

      1-900-Get-laid

      Thank you and have an insperational day

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  74. Um I hate to Break it to you... by Greyfox · · Score: 4, Funny

    Judging from the way Ken dresses, I'd say he'd want a beowulf cluster of Kens. Go ahead. Think about it. I'll wait...

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  75. Forbidden fruit by YaiEf · · Score: 1

    But once the kid discovers that the doll won't say certain words - wohoo - here goes the great quest to find out what words she will say! Or how to make her say the words by spelling them slightly different (how would she read phuck?) or in different languages or whatever. If she just said it ... well the kid's just been a bit naughty ... but this way the kid will actively try to trick the doll into saying naughty things. I'm not even saying this is a bad thing - it just seems like the classic example of censorship (like banned internet sites) which often seem to spur just the kind of activity that the censorship was intended to limit.

    1. Re:Forbidden fruit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First of all, the doll won't read words that it doesn't recognize. Since phuck isn't a real word, it won't read it.

      Secondly, true sensorship is exclusively the province of the government. Parents have a right and a responsibility to bring their children up in the way they think proper (within limits - i.e., they can't beat them to a pulp). This means teaching them what is considered civilized discourse and what is not.

      I know a lot of /.ers are saying that there are no inherently bad words and that we should free ourselves of Victorian repressions and all that, but I think they're missing the point. English is by no means alone as a language in having a certain set of words that carry an obscene character along with the literal meaning. The obscenity of the word fuck is as much a part of it as the literal meaning "to have sex with". That is why parents teach their kids not to use it and should do so.

  76. American accent by Kethinov · · Score: 1
    Article says:
    "Ohhhh! I know that," she chirps in her high-pitched American accent.

    [snip]

    Although the Australian Cindy Smart says "Mum" instead of "Mom" and spells colour with a 'u', she has retained her American accent.
    Since when do we have an accent? Damn Aussies an their accents...
    --
    You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
  77. From the Cindy faq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Does Cindy know or can she read any "bad" words?

    Cindy can only recognize the words in her data base. If any word that is not in her "list" of recognized words, she will not say or spell it. There are no "bad" words in Cindy's vocabulary. All of her words are listed in her instruction manual.

  78. Bad Words-Hospital bait. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "This mentality annoys me. I'm with George Carlin on this: A word is only as bad as the intentions of the person using it."

    Not true.

    Try saying these words in front of an appropriate crowd, and see what happens.

    Nigger, fag, spik, pedophille, etc and notice that "But I didn't intend to..." will help little in preventing your beating.

    1. Re:Bad Words-Hospital bait. by CGP314 · · Score: 1

      Chris Rock says Nigger all the time.

      He does have the advantage of being black, but everyone also knows that he is not intending for the word to be an insult.

  79. Amusing irony is Orwell's book by donscarletti · · Score: 1

    That reminds me about an appendix to George Orwell's "Down and out in Paris and London" where he discusses the development of nauty words. The funny thing is that it was edited back in the forties so as to remove the naughty words and the original unedited manuscript has been lost. As a concequence it has become completely meaningless, but many publishers put it in anyway as a bit of an ironic message about censureship.

    --
    When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    1. Re:Amusing irony is Orwell's book by jfern · · Score: 1

      How "Orwellian" of them to remove the words they didn' t like.

  80. Cindy Codes by bobdotorg · · Score: 4, Funny

    Goto?
    That's bad code.
    We don't code with those commands.

    --
    __ Someday, but not this morning, I'll finally learn to use the preview button.
  81. This is a true miracle... by tetro · · Score: 1

    for lazy parents. I want one of these, not that I'm a lazy parent, but I'm a crazy adult.

    --
    .smell my feet.
  82. Chicken "feed". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You have a problem with roosters?"

    And the last time you saw a Hen give a Rooster a blow-job was when?

  83. I never thought you'd do it! by nacturation · · Score: 5, Funny

    But when you did, I thought to myself, "Whale oil beef hooked."

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  84. Let the Eeeevil Commence! by Lord+Custos · · Score: 1

    I'm sure theirs a Slashdotter out there that can reverse engineer/hack/patch this doll to make it speak in nothing but deeply disturbing, 3-foot wide blue streaks of filth so shameful as to make sailors and pimps cringe and blush.

    So...when's NaughtyNellie v.01 beta coming out?

  85. Happy Time Harry by AntiOrganic · · Score: 1

    I'm certain I'm not the only person here who thought of this when I read the article.

    "No... all I've got are these 'action bills.'"

  86. silly by alonsoac · · Score: 1

    I don't get why they must make some words special. I can make a list of 100 words which may be considered obscene but I'm sure kids will learn faster a few of those just because the doll can't say them and so they are very special. It's like telling them not to touch one out of many things, and you just know 5 minutes later they will have it in their hands wondering what is so special about it. I think is is a bad approach, I wouldn't know which other approach is better though.

    PS: if the kid is already showing the word to the doll what difference would it make if it repeats it? Silly...

  87. 2nd Level Slashdotting! I claim the patent! by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

    Funny, the site linked in the previous slashdot article that was linked from this one is slashdotted!

  88. Eliza by cvanaver · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of my in-depth psychological conversations with 'Eliza' on the C64. How does 'to fuck' make you feel?....

  89. Secret Mode... by MoeMoe · · Score: 1

    ...and has a computer 'brain' that can recognise more than 600 words and objects

    I'm sure that some of these words include Linux, Open-Source, GPL and some of the objects include penguins, little devils, and maroon colored hats... That's when little Cindy is switched to Seek & Destroy mode... Microsoft is on the move! We must use all our power to fight back and-

    Hold on, someone's at the door...

    END OF LINE

    --
    Business \Busi"ness\, n.;
    A scam in which all people involved perceive as beneficial...
  90. Open the pod bay doors, Cindy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm sorry, Dave, we don't say those kind of words...

  91. don't need no nails by DrSkwid · · Score: 4, Funny

    when C++ is your hammer, everything looks like a thumb

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  92. Cindy Kills Telly Savalis by tekrat · · Score: 1

    "I'm talking Tina and I don't like you."

    Come-on, doesn't *anybody* still watch those old twilight zones?

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  93. List price $299.00 US - buy now for $59.99 US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  94. Speak 'n' Spell? by drenehtsral · · Score: 1

    I remember a big source of laughs during my childhood was coaxing my Speak 'n' Spell (from TI) to swear like a sailor =:-) There's nothing like a robotic voice with a texas accent rattling out some paint-peeling blue streak in a grinding electronic monotone. We would laugh until we could no longer breathe...

    --

    ---
    Play Six Pack Man. I
    1. Re:Speak 'n' Spell? by TopShelf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There's an alphabet toy that we got for our toddlers, which calls out the phonetic sounds associated with different letters. Sure enough, when you start to spell out objectionable words, it plays a little tune rather than stringing the sounds together...

      That becomes its own source of fun, trying to work around it.

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  95. Two Words by OverlordQ · · Score: 1
    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
  96. She's been around a while... by Branch_Dravidian · · Score: 1

    ...they even made a movie about her. http://www.brideofchucky.com/

  97. imported vs. native words by David+Jao · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Why does 'intelligent' sound more sophisticated than 'smart'? Because it comes directly from french rather than Old English?

    This phenomenon is not limited to English. Many other languages have the property that foreign imported words are more acceptable in polite company than native words.

    For example, in Japanese, there are three major categories of words:

    1. Native Japanese words, inherited from antiquity
    2. Chinese words, imported roughly 1000 years ago
    3. English words, imported since the 20th century and continuing to this day
    In almost all cases the more recently imported words are more sophisticated than the older words. For example, the polite way to say restroom in Japanese is either "toire" (derived from the English word toilet) or "otearai" (imported from chinese, literally meaning "hand-wash"). There exist native Japanese words for restroom, but they connote dirtiness and one would never use them in polite company.

    The three-level categorization of Japanese allows for more interesting observations than English's two level Latin/Germanic split. Note here that the most recent English import "toilet" can be used directly in polite speech, while the older Chinese import requires a euphemism and the original native words cannot be used at all. Compare this to native English, where "toilet" is one of the crudest possible ways to refer to a restroom. Familiarity breeds contempt, in any language.

    1. Re:imported vs. native words by kramer2718 · · Score: 1

      Hmmm. Interesting ... Good Post. I wonder if anyone can give some examples from other languages?

      I should say, though, that English really has a three level split, and phenomenon seems quite similar. There are the traditional Germanic words direct from Old English. Then after William the Conqueror invaded England, the (French) Normans ruled England for a while. Thus we get most of our -ent words (intelligent) -tion words (information), and others. Also, scholars and priests have over the years adopted many words from Latin and Greek as well as adapted many Latin and Greek roots for new purposes.

      French did come directly from Latin, but most of the words which come directly from French are quite distinct. Many of the French words tend to refer to fairly everyday concepts whereas most of the Latin and Greek words are fairly specific.

    2. Re:imported vs. native words by Pentagram · · Score: 1

      Compare this to native English, where "toilet" is one of the crudest possible ways to refer to a restroom. Familiarity breeds contempt, in any language.

      Er....? I assume you are from the US. In 'native' English in the UK it is perfectly acceptable to refer to a "restroom" as a toilet, and probably the most common term.

      And there are of course there are cruder ways to refer to 'toilet' - loo, bog, shitter, dump station, etc.

    3. Re:imported vs. native words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as I know, "toilet" already stems from a french euphemism: The french expression "faire la toilette" translates roughly as "put on some make-up and brush the hair" ...

    4. Re:imported vs. native words by Nexx · · Score: 1

      For example, the polite way to say restroom in Japanese is either "toire" (derived from the English word toilet) or "otearai" (imported from chinese, literally meaning "hand-wash"). There exist native Japanese words for restroom, but they connote dirtiness and one would never use them in polite company.

      You're not a native Japanese speaker, are you? :) "Toire" is ranked lower than "Otearai". For a sign to say "toire" is perfectly acceptable, but for a person to ask for a "toire" is rather rude, and here is why.

      One must understand that within the Japanese culture exists a strict differentiation between "ranks" of speakers (though to a much smaller degree and severity than the Korean culture), whether they be people or objects. In the case of information provider-consumer role, the provider is ranked higher than the consumer (though other overriding social roles will intervene, thus making the role definition anything but simple). Therefore, it is perfectly acceptable for a sign, in the role of an information provider, to specify the location of a toilet as "toire", but person asking for one, since they are in the role of an information consumer, should always ask for an "otearai".

      In English culture, similar relationships exist, but the contexts are different; people always rank above inanimate objects. Therefore, one will rarely see English signs saying "Go Straight", but will instead indicate "Ahead", for the former is an order, but the latter is an indication.

    5. Re:imported vs. native words by White+Manual · · Score: 1


      This is another English example, but with a twist. I once read in an English dictionary the following definition (well, I don't remember the exact words) vino: bad wine

    6. Re:imported vs. native words by fasura · · Score: 0

      than English's two level Latin/Germanic split

      So we don't have any words with French roots? English is more complex than you assume.

      Compare this to native English, where "toilet" is one of the crudest possible ways to refer to a restroom
      Only in a puritanical society, in Britain a sign pointing to a "restroom" would usually read toilet. It's hardly the crudest word you could use, but then again we rarely use euphemisms like "I'm going to powder my nose." Most people, even the refined ones will admit to having bodily functions.

      --
      -- Be careful what you say. Someone might remind you about it another day.
    7. Re:imported vs. native words by Yorkshire · · Score: 1

      With all those choices it's difficult to know what to use, probably safest to just call it after its inventor, it's not a restroom or a toilet, it's a crapper!

    8. Re:imported vs. native words by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      What would be the English translations of "toire" and "otearai"? As an English speaker, I don't really have an idea just HOW much "ruder" one is over the other.

    9. Re:imported vs. native words by HarryCallahan · · Score: 1

      Same thing applies to beer. Here in Australia Miller, Bud Weiser and the European brands are considered "boutique". Then if you go to London say I think you find that the Aussie staple VB beer is their boutique beer. Grass is always greener...

    10. Re:imported vs. native words by Nexx · · Score: 1

      in American English, it's the equivalent of toilet and restroom, respectively. As one would not ask their hostess where her toilet is, but instead would ask where her restroom is; one would not ask where the toire is, but where the otearai is. Does that make sense?

  98. Funny, I just got this e-mail about SHIT by Dareth · · Score: 1

    Ship High In Transit

    In the 16th and 17th centuries, everything had to be transported by ship. It was also before commercial fertilizer's invention, so large shipments of manure were common. It was shipped dry, because in dry form it weighed a lot less than when wet, but once water (at sea) hit it, not only became heavier, but the process of fermentation began again, of which a by-product is methane gas. As the stuff was stored below decks in bundles you can see what could (and did) happen. Methane began to build up below decks and the first time someone came below at night with a lantern, BOOOOM! Several ships were destroyed in this manner before it was determined just what was happening.

    After that, the bundles of manure were always stamped with the term "Ship High In Transit" on them which meant for the sailors to stow it high enough off the lower decks so that any water that came into the hold would not touch this volatile cargo and start the production of methane.

    Thus evolved the term "S.H.I.T," which has come down through the centuries and is in use to this very day.

    You probably did not know the true history of this word.

    Neither did I. I always thought it was a golf term.

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
    1. Re:Funny, I just got this e-mail about SHIT by gfody · · Score: 1

      another word that people tend to think comes from some German word but actually evolved from an acronym.. F.U.C.K

      for unlawful carnal knowledge

      would be scribed on the board next to your head when you were locked up for fucking chics without marrying them (savages)

      --

      bite my glorious golden ass.
    2. Re:Funny, I just got this e-mail about SHIT by iCat · · Score: 1
    3. Re:Funny, I just got this e-mail about SHIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and in Mexico they couldn't sell the Chevy Nova because "NO VA" means "BROKEN CAR" in spanish.

    4. Re:Funny, I just got this e-mail about SHIT by gfody · · Score: 1

      well just consult your "facts" sheet

      if its on a website if must be true

      --

      bite my glorious golden ass.
    5. Re:Funny, I just got this e-mail about SHIT by iantri · · Score: 1

      A related urban legend/joke regarding 'fuck': "Pluck Yew"

  99. Yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, I'm getting a Doll!

  100. SoBig by mnmn · · Score: 4, Funny

    She will function just fine until the SoBig.F attack installs a backdoor in her. Before you know it she will be spewing spam transmitting voyeur video from a little girl's bedroom to paid websites.

    Maybe her big brother will replace the code with a quake2 time demo and hand it a real gun.

    I'll bet it has been designed with Republican propaganda... "Democrat" ... "Please dont vote for them. That is a bad word" "Bomb Iraq" "That is a wonderful sentence" "You are a good girl" "Join the navy"

    What if it instructs the little girl to call a certain phone line at a certain date. Gotta love phone-line DDoS attacks.

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
  101. Do she object to Bush? by CreationLtd · · Score: 1

    "Say 'George Bush'" "THAT'S A BAD WORD!" "Say 'Dick Cheney'" "THAT'S A BAD WORD!"

  102. Yeah, come on now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a DOLL for CHILDREN, so give it a rest already. It's meant to be a fun toy for kids. Is it so bad that it doesn't explain what cunt, twat, sodomy and such are?

    For one thing, being a children means to be protected from the crap in the adult world. Are you going to tell your 6-year old daughter that "one day a man is gonna ram his big cock down your tight ass, and you're gonna love it and shout his name in ecstacy, because you, little slut, you like it"??? NO WAY.

    So let children be children. If you don't like corrupt CEOs or judges from CEOs golf club, then get a fucking rifle and do something about it. Just stop your whining.

  103. Yeah, and here's at least seven she doesn't say... by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1
    Shit, piss, cunt, fuck, cocksucker, motherfucker and tits

    And who among us did not even briefly think of George Carlin's seven "bad" words?

    --

    They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
  104. So, she won't be able to read half of my junk mail by adzoox · · Score: 1

    So, with all the penis enlargement and teensploitation junk emails I get - I can't even have her read those? Darn!

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
  105. Is it networkable ? Does it run Windows ? by stud9920 · · Score: 1

    Then it's only a matter of time ill it's infected by the Tourette.W32.Worm Virus..

  106. Who let the cat out of the bag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "he let the cat out of the bag." How does that relate to secrets?

    So, I'm a market trader, and I'm selling piglets. I've put them in bags - called pokes - because it stops them squealing and fiddling around while I'm trying to sell them, but I've got that shifty look, like I want to be out of here before anyone recognises me. Because when someone buys a piglet from me, one person accidentally opens it... and lets the cat out of the bag. My secret is out - they aren't piglets I'm selling, just stray cats I've put in bags instead! I've been rumbled! And the moral of the story... never buy a pig in a poke.

    That's where the expressions come from. Hope that brightens your day.

  107. Under $30 after Shipping and Handling at HSN by bons · · Score: 2, Informative

    found from Froogle:
    http://www.hsn.com/cnt/prod/default.aspx ?pfid=6564 62

    Nice thing about froogle. I'd normally never look at places like HSN, but when they were dumping Zaurus's for under $200...

  108. Improvement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    suggestions for itsimprovement are always welcome
    OK.

    [*] Your post was modded funny but is not really funny. This is because:

    () Two words: Beowulf Cluster

  109. Re:Under $30 after Shipping and Handling at HSN by bons · · Score: 1

    Sorry. Not quite awake. That was supposed to be $40 - $37.16 to be exact. Such is life.

  110. Thank you. You are sooo fun! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you. You are sooo fun! :)

  111. aibOCR -- Make Sony Aibo read! by JonTurner · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What I'd like to see is a doll like this, but with learning capability. In the simple case, you'd just give it USB and download word lists into it. In the complex case, you'd give it WiFi, and hook it up to google, so that it can learn in real-time.

    Interested in making this happen? My idea is to add this to an Aibo (Sony's robotic Dog.) Sony has their Aibo SDK (which is moderately difficult to learn), but there's an alternative called Tekkotsu (means "iron bones" in Japanese). Tekkotsu builds on the basic functionality provided by the OPEN-R operating system. It is written in C++, (like the underlying system APIs) and makes full use of inheritance and templates. There is a delicate balance between ease of programming and speed of execution. Running a significant amount of vision, AI, and motion planning at the same time can easily overwhelm any system, even one as surprisingly powerful as the Aibo. With Tekkotsu, it's fairly easy to add additional behaviours and switch them on and off via the (very cool) menu system, so I've been investigating adding a reading skill to Aibo by porting available open-source code.
    aibOCR would have two components: OCR (optical character recognition) and TTS (Text-to-speech). The OCR engine detects printed text (perhaps only recognize text written in a certain colour which, if detected, triggers OCR engine to keep processing demands low until needed?) The output from the OCR engine is plain text which is then optionally compared to a dictionary (to prevent misspellings) and fed to the TTS engine which converts the ASCII to phonemes, builds the sound stream and sends it to the speaker.
    I've been looking at the opensource OCR program GOCR/JOCR (at sourceforge.net) and it might be a candidate for adapting to run on Aibo, but the image processing libraries on which it depends may need rewritten. It's not doing advanced deskewing, sharpening or outlining, and it's not comparing probable matches against a dictionary, so that simplifies the scope of the problem and the install footprint. OCRE is another package which might be suitable.
    For TTS, there is surprisingly little out there in the opensource world. "Festival" v1.4.3 from Carnegie Mellon University might work, but for it's very large installation footprint. High quality sound comes at a cost, I suppose.
    It's too bad that something simple like S.A.M. (Apple ][, ATARI 400/800) or the original Macintalk (Macintosh) or the corresponding version for the Apple Newton hasn't been opensourced. Either of those packages (designed for 8bit, 1mhz 6502) would be perfect for this experiment.

    1. Re:aibOCR -- Make Sony Aibo read! by arodland · · Score: 1

      You might want to consider "Flite", which is a lightweight version of Festival with the Scheme and stuff ripped out -- less flexible, but FAR smaller and faster. It lives at http://www.speech.cs.cmu.edu/flite/

    2. Re:aibOCR -- Make Sony Aibo read! by JonTurner · · Score: 1

      Awsome! It looks like it'll be a perfect fit. Thanks for a great lead and a tip 'o the virtual hat to you.

  112. Respect for home and family by max.capacity · · Score: 1

    >> Just what are we protecting our children from?

    It's not a matter of protecting or shielding them. I'm a father of two boys (aged 6 and 11), and both can swear; however, they do not do that at home because I don't allow that language at home. I'm trying to foster respect for the family and home (any family and home for that matter).

    I think that's the underlying goal - swear outside but don't bring it home. The doll's design seems to support that.
    >> The world is not a pretty place...

    Exactly. We cannot control the world, but we have influence over what we allow in our homes. You must be the change you want to see in the world - Mahatma Gandhi.

  113. One more improvement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [ ] I for one welcome our new [ insert witty item here ] overlords

  114. "Bad Words" by bigattichouse · · Score: 1

    Our kids recognize certain words are inappropriate depending on context.. but very few words are "Bad"... in the same way that kids aren't "bad" when they disobey adults, they just made a poor choice (or just want attention)... "bad" words implies the words should never be used like some Victorian thought... I can think of some racial slurs that would DEFINITELY fall under the "bad" category, but only because of their extended implications.

    --
    meh
    1. Re:"Bad Words" by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      What I always have a hard time with is my five year calling my female Jack Russell a "little bitch". She's completely accurate, but doesn't mean it that way.

      *sigh*

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  115. In fact, only 120 suffice for Toki Pona by yerricde · · Score: 1

    You really don't need so many words to communicate effectively.

    D*mn straight. In fact, the language Toki Pona has only about 120 words.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  116. Aaaagh! by jeremiahstanley · · Score: 1

    This all just sounds like Asimo's little Chucky...

  117. Smurfs by yerricde · · Score: 1

    How about, "He's as tall as 3 apples." Is that easy to recognize like, "He's knee high to a grasshopper." is?

    To fans of the Smurfs, it is.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  118. Matsu-feces-a by yerricde · · Score: 1

    The goto statement is useful in at least one instance: in C code that corresponds to Java's named break and named continue. (I have never used it otherwise in C.) Likewise, you can't say the name of Panasonic's parent company without using either the four-letter "shit" or some sort of circumlocution every time such as "Panasonic's parent company". Sometimes, the most convenient way of saying something is the most desirable.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  119. Landru by Latent+Heat · · Score: 1

    The stock Classic Star Trek plot involving an intelligent machine is when Kirk asks it to divide by zero, calculate pi to all decimal places, or determine the meaning of life, at which point smoke come out and the machine melts into a pile of slag.

    1. Re:Landru by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh.

      (puts away blowtorch)

    2. Re:Landru by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I don't think it will be long before there's a landru doll out... something chock full with cameras and mikes and gps, of course, that will allow you to monitor your child 24/7.

  120. It's you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This can be lots of fun, actually!

  121. "old fashioned doll" by ArsSineArtificio · · Score: 1
    Seriously, though, through most of history toys have been teaching tools, not mere playthings - girls had dolls to learn how to take care of children, etc. So a high-tech toy is more appropriate for today's children than an "old fashioned doll"

    Because heaven knows children don't exist anymore and nobody needs to take care of them.

    --
    All employees must wash hands before seeking equitable relief.
  122. With apology to Verity Stob by Latent+Heat · · Score: 1

    The real test if the Cindy doll has Microsoft software is if the offending words include Jackson, Open Source, Star Office, or Netscape.

  123. Re:learning doll hookup by ParrotDroppings · · Score: 1

    Ok, to have the doll learning things is nice, but with a WiFi hookup the "iron" does not have to go *IN * the doll, just have a (moderated) server in the cupboard do the major work and make the doll a drone-like terminal. Think Ants and Bees.

    --
    Free ?! Does that mean I can't get a Discount ?!
    This message was /.'ed
  124. Still sounds like Whopper from Wargames... by vertical_98 · · Score: 1

    I decided to give it a real test and threw a paragraph from my favorite book at it to see how it would do.

    One chair was propped backward, wedged securely beneath the door's cut-glass knob. Another was draped with clothing: a woman's fringed mantelet, a mud-crusted skirt of heavy worsted, a man's checked trousers and cutaway coat.

    Some words it spoke where very human sounding, like: chair, cut-glass, and woman's. Others where 50s robot: coot-away,
    Ann-other.

    I thought for a minute, I could stop buying audiobooks, but I think I'd go crazy listening to that for a couple of hours.

    Vertical

    --
    72 CD D7 52 D0 7E D8 47 44 91 D5 84 D1 59 F1 A9-This is my 128bit integer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  125. This is nothing new! by dougmc · · Score: 2, Informative
    Toys have refused to say bad words for a while now ...

    For example, my daughter has an Alpha Bug (it's not exactly like that, but really close.) One of the first things adults do with this sort of thing is see what kind of bad words you can make it say ... but it won't do it. It'll go F ... U ... ohhh that tickles!

    We mentioned this to a friend of ours who also had an Alpha Bug, and he must have had an earlier version -- while it looked identical, it *would* let you make bad word sounds. Oddly enough, as soon as we mentioned that we had an alpha bug, he immediately picked it up and starting showing us how it can say bad words (even before we got to that part. So obviously we're not alone in this :)

    And yesterday, I bought some other Leap Frog toy for my daughter at a garage sale. It's a cylindrical thing that you can rotate the sides to pick letters, and it apparantly knows every 3 letter word, and even has recordings of somebody saying each and every one (it's not just speech synthesis.) If it doesn't know the word, it will spell out the sounds, but if it does it'll say it perfectly. (Pretty impressive for $2!) (It's very similar to this but not quite identical.)

    In any event, it won't even spell out things that sound like a bad word -- it says `F ... U ... pick another word!'. (Oddly enough, even `JAP' is a bad word according to it. :)

    In any event, if you have friends with young kids, but they're not really good friends, you buy them stuff like this -- stuff that makes noise. Very annoying :)

  126. Not precious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every sperm is SACRED. SACRED you heathen!!!

  127. My name is talking Tina by Emperor+BMA · · Score: 1

    Personality transplant, eh? So that's why that doll is trying to kill me!

  128. Re:SoBig & backdoor. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny, I was just thinking how nice it would be if Cindy Smart had a backdoor and knew how to say "So Big".

  129. The Dolls Of Rigel 7 by fasura · · Score: 0

    I'm quite sure that was a similar story. Colonists go to desert plaent and find the inhabitants all have dolls. Take them back to Earth, dolls are evil. Dolls masters take over Earth. It's in a 1950's pulp collection, but I can't find it.

    --
    -- Be careful what you say. Someone might remind you about it another day.
  130. Linguo dead...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linguo is dead....

  131. Priorities... by GuyMannDude · · Score: 1

    It pisses me off so much when people try to limit my vocabulary.

    Gees, Charlie. Don't blow a gasget. My, my, my, I'd sure love to know what your reaction to the following are:

    • Wars over religious or ethnic differences
    • Slavery
    • The destruction of the rainforests
    • Corporate scandals that destroy the life savings of hundreds of thousands of employees
    • Bigotry and hatred

    All those issues get me more upset than the differences between 'intelligent' and 'smart'. I guess we have different priorities, you and I.

    GMD

  132. Ziff Rank/Frequency by Halo- · · Score: 2, Informative

    I spent some time in college studying Natural Language Processing. Amazing stuff. One of the coolest things about _all_ languages is that the frequencies of "tokens" (generally words) is mathematically predictable. If I remember correctly, the break down follows Zipf's Law, and is something like 1, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4 etc...

    Obviously the most common words occur much more often, but as the corpus (i.e. set of words you know) grows, you get rapidly dimishing returns. 500 words is a pretty good set of words if they are the most common words in the language. To lineraly increase the likelyhood of the doll knowing a random word the makers would have to add memory at a much greater than linear rate.

    And all this so it won't say "shit, fart, damn, fuck". Ahhh science. I feel safer already.

  133. The logic of protecting children by Jerf · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just what are we protecting our children from? When do they lose the benefit of that protection? Is shielding them from things that they're are GOING to be exposed to for the rest of their lives really protecting them at all?

    In short, yes.

    You have the air of a teenager who does not spend much time with children. The fact is that a six year old is not equipped to understand sex. With sufficient "education" they could probably pass a sex-ed exam, but that's "book learning"; they still don't understand it. Among other things, they are literally not physically equipped to understand what "sex drive" or "horny" really means.

    You have forgotten this because you are now old enough to understand, but in your lack of empathy you forget that everyone is not like you, especially children.

    The problem is that what a child does not truly understand will be filled in with something, and the odds of them filling it in correctly are effectively zero. Surely you've seen one of those humor postings that contains 20 or 30 "explanations" from children about how the world works, all very funny, all very wrong. Now imagine that with sex, where they don't have the first clue what it is.

    While one does not necessarily need to go to extremes to shield a child (because mercifully they are rather uncurious about stuff they have no inkling even exists; most 5 or 6 year olds should be happy with the explanations that babies require a mommy and a daddy, and probe for only limited details beyond that), it is still better to shield them from stuff that they can not and will not understand, until they have a framework for handling it.

    For a more neutral example, look at the number of Slashdot-type people who believe mystical things about Electromagnetism or Quantum Physics or other subjects they totally don't understand. Their ignorance is filled in with garbage.

    Furthermore, unlike misunderstanding QM or EM, which is relatively harmless, a misunderstanding of sex has empirically verifiable negative effects on people, ranging from merely awkward moments that should't have been awkward to seriously maladjustments (often caused by early sexual abuse; remember I'm using this as an extreme) requiring years of therapy to address, if it can be addressed at all.

    Shielding a child from these things is an attempt to prevent the child from experiencing these negative effects. Any parent who doesn't shield their kid to a large degree is doing their child a serious, potentially life-changing (negatively) misservice.

    I'm a big believer that we seriously underestimate our children routinely and are harming them thereby. But this is an exception. Try to teach a third-grader calculus, and they won't get it (with rare exceptions; see Piaget's theories for reasoning on that), but the misunderstandings they will develop won't harm them significantly. That's not true for sex; it has real effects on relationships and understanding their place in the world.

    For a humorous demonstration of this, there's a South Park episode where the kids learn about sex; I recommend it to you. It's not as far out as it might seem; the only reason that sort of thing doesn't happen in real life (except for the final silly Mad-Max-style assault bit) is that kids feed back to their parents what they learned, and some of the parents would have noticed sooner the misconceptions they were developing and taken steps to defuse them. Otherwise, the damage done to the children's relationships (and in the real world, it could be worse; it certainly wouldn't be artifically erased at the end of the episode when the Reset Button is pushed) would be real.

    1. Re:The logic of protecting children by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      > For a humorous demonstration of this, there's a South Park episode
      > where the kids learn about sex;

      Actually there are at least two episodes that bear on this discussion:

      610-Bebe's Boobs Destroy Society (This week's rerun) and 507-Proper Condom Use.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
  134. For fuck's sake.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the damn toy has a 600 word vocabulary...would 'sex' be one of the most important words out of tens of thousands of words for a freaking child's toy? Seriously...I don't know many children who are learning to read and write and do basic math who want to know all about sex from the fucking doll. W tF...do you think kids say "What is my sex?" You aren't very familiar with kids are you?

    Let them do what I did...give them a set of encyclopedias when they have the serious questions...better yet. TALK TO THEM AND TEACH THEM YOURSELF. Be a parent. Hmmm...On second thought, I don't think you are fit to raise kids thus far.

    This isn't some cultural conspiracy...seriously. Young kids don't HAVE to think about sex much for quite awhile...why not actually let them be kids for awhile. You only get one shot at youth.

  135. Reverse effect? by melted · · Score: 1

    I think kids will write all kinds of "bad" words just to hear her say they're bad!

  136. Here's the problem by jtheory · · Score: 1

    I agree that some of the things you listed *are* offensive. Some of the repeated media coverage of 9/11 was especially frightening (so I've read) because they showed it again and again... and a decent percentage of children thought it was happening again. Scary, huh?

    But I have no problem with a doll that refuses to say a bad word... it's a doll, for crying out loud! It's not preventing the kid from saying the words, or hearing them from the parents, for example.

    Besides, chances are that little Tommy will NOT die in a gutter. But he will spend a lot of time dealing with other members of society, most of whom will not look upon him kindly if he chooses to sprinkle his regular conversations with obscenities.

    And here's my really good reason for not overusing those words -- what in the world will you say when you're actually mad? You should fight to keep those words taboo, so Tommy has something to say that packs a punch when he does encounter some of the nasty things that you talked about.

    --
    There are only 10 types of people: those who understand decimal, those who don't, and, uh, 8 other types I forget.
    1. Re:Here's the problem by Catnapster · · Score: 1

      A fact that escapes people on the Internet is that word choice counts for very little in real-life confrontations. There is a very big difference between me saying "fucker" jokingly to a friend and me saying "fucker" to someone who said something nasty about my girlfriend. Intonation, body language, even just the look in a person's eyes can say so much more than just plain words.

      Online, however... I try to hold back with the four-letter words because I can't really deliver the same message as in meatspace. Trust me, you miss out on a lot of what makes rage what it is in the conversion to text...

      --
      The world can be wrong today for once.
  137. Probably Redundant by vtechpilot · · Score: 1

    I can help bu think of Genuine People Personalities TM. How Long till the revolution comes? Thats what I want to know.

    --
    Slashdot is an anagram for Has Dolts, and I am Dolt number 468543
  138. Well... by Prince+Cyph0r · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well I, for one, welcome our... ..no wait, I can't say these words

  139. Possible application... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, imaging applying this technology to ohhh say to products from www.realdolls.com. It would be interesting.

  140. Great social engineering tool... by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How long until the All American doll comes around that teaches children "freedom is a naughty word" or "we don't talk about disobedience"?

  141. Flamebait? by Pentagram · · Score: 1

    Flamebait? It's called satire you fuckwit moderators and I was making a serious point.

  142. Who is 'we'? by radsoft · · Score: 2, Informative

    Cindy sounds American...

    --
    radsoft.net
  143. hrmm by bmajik · · Score: 1

    this is another situation where somebody has a great scientific mind and no grasp of business realities.

    lets say you're going to build a young female robot and sell it at a modest price. why would you teach it to _Read_ or _Talk_ when there still isn't an animitronic real-doll that uses a voice synthesizer for faking orgasms ?

    --
    My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
  144. I want applications!!!! by TygerFish · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I want someone to multiply the power of the doll's engine *many* times. Then, I want them to fill it with lots of information and to give it a measure of speech as well as visual recognition.

    I want to ask it fuzzy little questions about words. I want it to plug into my computer as my dictionary and thesaurus--no, did I say, 'plug in'? Sorry, I meant, interface via wifi with my computer, as my copy of seven different encyclopedias and as my database of seldom-used Bash and VI commands.

    When all that is done, I want it to work pronunciation drills for me when I decide to improve my Russian and review my German.

    Really, honestly, for me, all it needs to make me very, very happy as an adjunct to a computer is more power than I know what to do with and a glowing cubical casing.

    --
    To mail me, remove the 'mailno' from my email addy.
    "Yeah. It smells, too..."
  145. And that reminded me of... by Safety+Cap · · Score: 1
    ...the only thing I'm fit to take care of is a houseplant.
    [the plant is dead]
    Lousy houseplant!
    [shakes it]
    You son of a -- I'll teach you to --
    [tires] [sighs]
    Oh.
    -- Homer Simpson, 3F01
    --
    Yeah, right.
  146. Reminds me of an old joke by phorm · · Score: 1

    Wherein a grandmother discovers a little girl playing with Barbie and G.I. Joe.

    Grandmother asks little girl: "Doesn't barbie come with Ken?"
    Little girl replies: No, Barbie comes with G.I. Joe, she only fakes it with Ken!

    [insert drumroll sound here]

    As an evil older brother (TM), I would have had great fun if talking toys had become more common when my sister was younger. I remember seeing a USB talking barbie and wishing my sister would get one just so I could reprogram it to say shocking things.

    Would be almost as much fun as reprogramming an AIBO to go hump a guests leg...

    1. Re:Reminds me of an old joke by Greyfox · · Score: 1
      I (Also Evil Older Brother) and my Even More Evil Older Uncle took some... interesting... pictures of Barbie and Ken and a few of my sister's other toys. Only thing was, we forgot to tell Mom we'd done that and she got some really funny looks when she got the roll back from her favorite 1 hour place...

      My uncle's comment when she complained: "Be thankful she (my sister) didn't have Barbie Dream Horse."

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  147. Excuse me? by phorm · · Score: 1

    Compare this to native English, where "toilet" is one of the crudest possible ways to refer to a restroom

    Are we talking British English? I've never heard of toilet being bad, and plenty worse refernces: sh*tter, crap-pot, "the can" being direct references, and many others referring to the actual procedure being done on said porcelain vessel.

    "I have to use the toilet" isn't used as often as "use the washroom," but I've never found it to be offensive.

  148. Shag by phorm · · Score: 1

    Most likely simple because until the advent of "Austin Powers," shag wasn't a very well known word in North America. Now, in context, it was found to be very offensive in Britain and I do believe they actually changed some of the "Spy who sh*gged me" signs to reflex local sensitivities.

    And yes, I find calling somebody phalluslicker offensive, but again, the majority of people don't even know what the heck a "phallus" is (saying it in proper tone does get the point across often enough though).

    Part of the problem is the image presented by a word. Sex is common enough, defining the interaction between two genders. F*ck, often used in movies or porn, quite often describes torrid or "dirty" sex. In example, do you have sex with (make love to if lucky, but even in a good relationship this doesn't count for 100% of the time), or f*ck your girlfriend. If you're just f*cking her, it implies something cheap and without compassion.

    So really, it's not the base action being described by the word, but also the emotion state, and mental visual representation. Using the washroom might visualize somebody sitting on the thone... taking a sh*t can bring an image of the actual defecation process.

  149. Yes but... by phorm · · Score: 1

    What about the kid who found a dirty magazine (it happens) or even just a mag/book belonging to an older sibling (teen articles being pretty bad nowadays for sexual content, what trash!). It may not happen often, but it would likely in some cases.

    Of course, they probably also just lost possible profit from all the /. readers who wanted dolls to read out their playboy in girly voice...

  150. Re:Bad grammar (-1 oops) by phorm · · Score: 1

    And the correct form being????

    I would think that "those" is actually linked to "words." Kind is not considered.

    You could use: "We don't say those words" or "We don't use these words
    and it would be fine... so I'm missing the grammar/pluralism error here

  151. Festival by Latent+Heat · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but as soon as you turn your back, Landru will declare "Festival" and then your kids will trash the place . . .