So you're saying we should just fuck the world, and live like kings for a century or two, and hope something happens that stops climate change? Awesome logic.
"Massacre" describes how, "terrorism" describes why. Farting could be an act of terrorism if it was meant as such, and nuking a capital city could not be terrorism if it was not. Terrorism is a motive, not a deed.
There is not one single shred of evidence pointing to the theory of evolution being false. It will never be disproved, it will only be made more accurate as the years progress. So yes, evolution and the theory describing it will never be proven false. Just as if someone thousands of years ago said that "Pi is somewhere between 3 and 4" they wouldn't be wrong to this day, or ever, they just wouldn't be as accurate as our current understanding. Every piece of evidence supporting the theory is a step towards the ridiculous possibility of "disproving" it. So far, as a species, we're doing pretty well.
What? Did you expect Tux to go to Bill's house on his birthday? How else could it have worked? Of course Bill had to go to Tux to give him his cake, and of course as Tux doesn't particularly like Bill, takes his cake away from Bill. It's no slight.
But then you have to concede that we lack many of the distinctive features of all our other ancestors, meaning all our ancestors are extinct, meaning we don't exist. Or something. I'm wasted.
You don't. You rely on one ISP between your dodgy ISP and the censored site you actually want to visit. If there's a friendly ISP on the route, you'll get your traffic diverted to the desired server, and if not, you'll get the traffic you actually requested (which is unblocked by the censoring government).
Centuries ago, the Royal family signed over vast swathes of land to the British government in return for a perpetual stipend, which is dwarfed by the price of the land in question. They also bring in a crap-tonne of tourists. They generate a definite, sizeable net profit for the country.
Cameras in London? You mean the cameras which are overwhelmingly in the hands of private citizens, which are not run by the state, and from which anyone can request copies of any footage of themselves they might have captured? It's not really a valid comparison:) The "open web" is perfectly possible in all but the handful of countries which block sites.
Because Scottish people, on the whole, are not an oppressed minority. They live in a first-world country (heck, even the last Prime Minister and his 2nd-in-command, who were in power for over 10 years, were Scottish). So yeah, it is different.
I've lived in many predominantly-Muslim areas. I know how Muslims, free from external pressures, are just as normal as everyone else free from external pressures. Funnily enough, when you have a country that has been fucked with for decades, the people in said country don't particularly appreciate those who have been doing the fucking. Weird, huh?
Nothing to do with it, eh? Apart from the massive amounts of documentation that links both the CIA and British intelligence to his ousting?
And Somalia? Really? Read some fucking history. Seriously. It's embarrassing. You really should at least make the effort to appear educated when you wade into a discussion, otherwise you end up looking like you do - misguided, ignorant, and borderline dangerous.
Slashdot Mirror
So you're saying we should just fuck the world, and live like kings for a century or two, and hope something happens that stops climate change? Awesome logic.
An old laptop? Of course. I don't know why you'd want all the media-based nonsense in a server.
They are hardly servers. Not even close.
"Massacre" describes how, "terrorism" describes why. Farting could be an act of terrorism if it was meant as such, and nuking a capital city could not be terrorism if it was not. Terrorism is a motive, not a deed.
True, but USB really took off once SE came out, as it had vastly-improved USB support.
The fact you probably thought you made sense when you wrote that speaks volumes. Wow. Seriously hilarious while utterly troubling.
There is not one single shred of evidence pointing to the theory of evolution being false. It will never be disproved, it will only be made more accurate as the years progress. So yes, evolution and the theory describing it will never be proven false. Just as if someone thousands of years ago said that "Pi is somewhere between 3 and 4" they wouldn't be wrong to this day, or ever, they just wouldn't be as accurate as our current understanding. Every piece of evidence supporting the theory is a step towards the ridiculous possibility of "disproving" it. So far, as a species, we're doing pretty well.
*cough* Windows 98 SE *cough*
So, by that logic, get rid of the police too. Awesome.
What? Did you expect Tux to go to Bill's house on his birthday? How else could it have worked? Of course Bill had to go to Tux to give him his cake, and of course as Tux doesn't particularly like Bill, takes his cake away from Bill. It's no slight.
But then you have to concede that we lack many of the distinctive features of all our other ancestors, meaning all our ancestors are extinct, meaning we don't exist. Or something. I'm wasted.
You don't. You rely on one ISP between your dodgy ISP and the censored site you actually want to visit. If there's a friendly ISP on the route, you'll get your traffic diverted to the desired server, and if not, you'll get the traffic you actually requested (which is unblocked by the censoring government).
And you obviously didn't read the post I was replying to :)
Centuries ago, the Royal family signed over vast swathes of land to the British government in return for a perpetual stipend, which is dwarfed by the price of the land in question. They also bring in a crap-tonne of tourists. They generate a definite, sizeable net profit for the country.
Mod points! Mod points! My kingdom for mod points!!!
It was the government. The monarchy had nothing to do with it.
Java for ajax? Funny. Thanks for showing you don't really know what you're talking about.
Who the fuck cares? The police can look over every inch of my phone. I'm not so far up my ass to have a problem with that.
Don't commit crimes and you'll be OK.
Cameras in London? You mean the cameras which are overwhelmingly in the hands of private citizens, which are not run by the state, and from which anyone can request copies of any footage of themselves they might have captured? It's not really a valid comparison :) The "open web" is perfectly possible in all but the handful of countries which block sites.
The gravity of the tidal bulges being displaced would have some measurable effect on the moon.
Because Scottish people, on the whole, are not an oppressed minority. They live in a first-world country (heck, even the last Prime Minister and his 2nd-in-command, who were in power for over 10 years, were Scottish). So yeah, it is different.
I've lived in many predominantly-Muslim areas. I know how Muslims, free from external pressures, are just as normal as everyone else free from external pressures. Funnily enough, when you have a country that has been fucked with for decades, the people in said country don't particularly appreciate those who have been doing the fucking. Weird, huh?
Nothing to do with it, eh? Apart from the massive amounts of documentation that links both the CIA and British intelligence to his ousting?
And Somalia? Really? Read some fucking history. Seriously. It's embarrassing. You really should at least make the effort to appear educated when you wade into a discussion, otherwise you end up looking like you do - misguided, ignorant, and borderline dangerous.
You ignored everything I wrote. Thanks.