Now I can run SUSE's broken, outdated software on another platform! Yaay!
SUSE is technically nice an' all, but god damn its packages are always so outdated, and its userbase is too small to be regularly catered for in documentation.
You realise your account is factually inaccurate, right? No of course you don't. Why should people listen to you when your account of 9/11 doesn't even mention the planes?
You seem incapable of actually having a discussion with someone. If someone points out some unfortunate truth from "your" side, you simply point out something unfortunate on the "other" side, as if that achieves absolutely anything. Seriously. This is getting pathetic. Learn to actually discuss things, not just play a game of "internet nuh-uh!"
It still is a republic, as the leader is not dynastic. It's close, but there are still elections. I think the word you meant was "democracy", as that is the only part which really matters - the people able to have their say, even if it's for which end of the shit sandwich they want to start at.
Seeing as you appear to be confused by the terminology, so much that you think misusing it is some sort of sleight or attack on its veracity, let me help you:
1. Global warming = The increase in energy in the Earth's atmosphere 2. Climate change = the changes in climate due to #1
Easy, right? Now you can use these terms without sounding like a scientifically-illiterate fucktard.
It's actually something I would have assumed the stereotypical Republican would like: "Put up or shut up". The scientists have their evidence, and those who don't like the findings should put up their evidence and not just anonymously post some nonsensical rebuttal devoid of evidence. So yeah, if you are trying to fight scientific findings with your opinion, you are a fucking idiot muppet.
Then read the IPCC reports, and your ignorance will be cured. You seem to be acting like no-one's bothered to figure this stuff out, when it appears it's just you being massively ignorant of an entire field of study, then using your ignorance as evidence of why it should be trashed. Brilliant stuff.
Thanks for sharing just how little you know of this subject. It really helps those who are trying to have a decent discussion when you out yourself as not only not understanding the findings, but completely disinterested in doing so. Good jerb!
As has been pointed out you are confusing science with the USDA, which speaks more of your ability to understand what you learn than of science in general. Ouch.
Seeing as you just described "model", I don't think they have to do shit. Maybe you should learn more about the terminology in play instead? No-one is getting throat-jumped for simply holding a differing opinion, but for categorically ignoring the science and substituting their own conjecture.
When the science behind them is bad, they get ripped apart by climatologists (which you misspelled as "alarmists"). You not knowing that speaks more of your understanding of this than anyone else, and it doesn't say kind things.
I hope you were being sarcastic, otherwise you just demonstrated the exact attitude which is driving people to try to strike back against people who think it's perfectly acceptable to use childish attacks in lieu of a coherent argument.
"Triggered" types who see the normalization of assaults upon various minorities as being dangerous to society? Oh noes! I guess Rosa Parks was a "triggered" type too.
I think you meant to say "I take the cries of my strawman, pulled-out-my-ass PC crowd to be largely hypocritical", as everything you said was a complete guess. You don't seem to know what "politically correct" means, but that sure as shit ain't gonna stop you railing on it!
So you assume there is absolutely nothing of value in examining Hyperloop? Comparing it to telepathy is strange, as telepathy requires a complete rewriting of the sciences in order to exist, whereas Hyperloop is not doing anything particularly novel, it's a combination of well-tested techniques and technologies.
Slashdot Mirror
Now I can run SUSE's broken, outdated software on another platform! Yaay!
SUSE is technically nice an' all, but god damn its packages are always so outdated, and its userbase is too small to be regularly catered for in documentation.
Countries which have setups just as you describe have far more competition in their ISPs, lower prices, and better service.
No difference? This drone can be piloted without being able to see it, the RC helicopter you mention couldn't, hence the difference.
You realise your account is factually inaccurate, right? No of course you don't. Why should people listen to you when your account of 9/11 doesn't even mention the planes?
You seem incapable of actually having a discussion with someone. If someone points out some unfortunate truth from "your" side, you simply point out something unfortunate on the "other" side, as if that achieves absolutely anything. Seriously. This is getting pathetic. Learn to actually discuss things, not just play a game of "internet nuh-uh!"
It still is a republic, as the leader is not dynastic. It's close, but there are still elections. I think the word you meant was "democracy", as that is the only part which really matters - the people able to have their say, even if it's for which end of the shit sandwich they want to start at.
"Vista is a fine example of if you fuck up the release and fix it later, some people will never consider it fixed."
Plenty of people consider it fixed. Vista was fine after SP1.
Windows 10 will support a Linuxesque package manager. You can read more here albeit a bit out of date, but good information none the less.
Seeing as you appear to be confused by the terminology, so much that you think misusing it is some sort of sleight or attack on its veracity, let me help you:
1. Global warming = The increase in energy in the Earth's atmosphere
2. Climate change = the changes in climate due to #1
Easy, right? Now you can use these terms without sounding like a scientifically-illiterate fucktard.
So you defend the right by assaulting the left with straw men. Brilliant. You are really good at this.
It's actually something I would have assumed the stereotypical Republican would like: "Put up or shut up". The scientists have their evidence, and those who don't like the findings should put up their evidence and not just anonymously post some nonsensical rebuttal devoid of evidence. So yeah, if you are trying to fight scientific findings with your opinion, you are a fucking idiot muppet.
Then read the IPCC reports, and your ignorance will be cured. You seem to be acting like no-one's bothered to figure this stuff out, when it appears it's just you being massively ignorant of an entire field of study, then using your ignorance as evidence of why it should be trashed. Brilliant stuff.
The models aren't failing, though. Thanks for playing.
Thanks for sharing just how little you know of this subject. It really helps those who are trying to have a decent discussion when you out yourself as not only not understanding the findings, but completely disinterested in doing so. Good jerb!
As has been pointed out you are confusing science with the USDA, which speaks more of your ability to understand what you learn than of science in general. Ouch.
So you haven't read the IPCC reports. Thanks for letting everyone know you are making stuff up.
Seeing as you just described "model", I don't think they have to do shit. Maybe you should learn more about the terminology in play instead? No-one is getting throat-jumped for simply holding a differing opinion, but for categorically ignoring the science and substituting their own conjecture.
When the science behind them is bad, they get ripped apart by climatologists (which you misspelled as "alarmists"). You not knowing that speaks more of your understanding of this than anyone else, and it doesn't say kind things.
I hope you were being sarcastic, otherwise you just demonstrated the exact attitude which is driving people to try to strike back against people who think it's perfectly acceptable to use childish attacks in lieu of a coherent argument.
"Triggered" types who see the normalization of assaults upon various minorities as being dangerous to society? Oh noes! I guess Rosa Parks was a "triggered" type too.
Hint: There is more to the world than the internet.
I think you meant to say "I take the cries of my strawman, pulled-out-my-ass PC crowd to be largely hypocritical", as everything you said was a complete guess. You don't seem to know what "politically correct" means, but that sure as shit ain't gonna stop you railing on it!
Surely that should be "citation" and not "cite"...
Hence them being called something different to just "star", meaning they were assumed to be different from stars.
So you assume there is absolutely nothing of value in examining Hyperloop? Comparing it to telepathy is strange, as telepathy requires a complete rewriting of the sciences in order to exist, whereas Hyperloop is not doing anything particularly novel, it's a combination of well-tested techniques and technologies.
You don't sound very rational.