hmm... since a virus scanner really does sometimes have to interrupt the user, perhapse something combining the firefox focus timer to prevent ninja-clicks (window pops with button under your mouse as you click) and some sort of system to prevent accidental unwanted keyboard input, perhaps something that must be traced out with the mouse similar to the Castlevania DS seals, except made hard to screw up but impossible to accidentally complete while doing something else and not paying attention to the screen
for just that reason i have gaim text replacement to auto-star out my credit card number and various passwords, if someone has user level access with full credentials in order to read my NTFS encrypted %user%\.gaim\ directory i am pretty much pwned anyways, and i have almost entered sensative info into a chat, which is what caused me to implement this in the first place
it uses only one source, in between the two counters, just the source is closer to one than the other, and a neutron absorbing sphere around the system could protect against outside emmisions and reflections (does neutron radiation reflect?)
no need to use multiple entropy sources, radioactive decay is completely unpredictable on the atom scale, and counters detect individual decays.
two geiger counters, one wired to every tick advance the position of the system pointer by one, the other is set to flip the bit at the sytem counter, the radioactive source is closer to the flip bit counter in order to ensure an oppurtunity for many flips and reduce the odds of a suden burst in advances resulting in a long string of nulls.
your idea would slam into the million monkeys problem, the number of quasars and datarate emitted would result in enough pads to make the message say anything
in some cases running a program from a compressed volume can be faster than running uncompressed (cpu relatively fast compared to disk access rate and data the program uses is not stored in a compressed form)
was it the emachines 98se->ME upgrade? i am convinced that thing leaves the system slightly different than a regular ME install, worked quite well and was never worse than win98 se
Re:409 scams still work so why not phishing?
on
Why Phishing Works
·
· Score: 1
rule 1: people are stupid
rule 2: the oppurtunity for riches makes people far more stupid
see: lottery, casino, hostage takers, bank robbers, 419 victems
would never happen, SCO could do what they did because they have nothing to lose. if microsoft went nuts with lawsuits they have a lot to lose, and IBM would be more than happy to pick their bones clean.
have you considered setting up a secured CVS server, i have heard of people using them for documents and stuff, the advantage is you keep every version you ever saved
you are mistaken. Security by obscurity refers to using a secret method of protection which, once discovered will become a threat to all using that method of security.
for example public key cryptography is not security by obscurity, but Flash DRM media stream is. there is theoretically nothing standing between the potential attacker and the target, merely a bit of debugging and/or traffic sniffing.
that test fails to account for the fact that people get better at a task over time. it's results will be to show what the designers wanted to prove, that people are better at sorting old and bad vs young and good, but the results will be meaningless because it is a junk study
Slashdot Mirror
the fact that it incorrectly singles out republicans, both republicans and democrats want corporate and personal dependance on government.
you are correct that offtopic was incorrect, a 50/50 split on troll and flamebait would fit your post just nicely
unfortunately southern baptists do not take such an enlightened view on personal freedom and sin.
not if you get in through the politics door
i dont mind screwing with poular entertainment for the sake of emergancy communication.
at least it's not goin the other way shafting first responders to line some fatcat's pockets
the register is in on the april 1 antics
look at his URL, it's a .au address
hmm... since a virus scanner really does sometimes have to interrupt the user, perhapse something combining the firefox focus timer to prevent ninja-clicks (window pops with button under your mouse as you click) and some sort of system to prevent accidental unwanted keyboard input, perhaps something that must be traced out with the mouse similar to the Castlevania DS seals, except made hard to screw up but impossible to accidentally complete while doing something else and not paying attention to the screen
for just that reason i have gaim text replacement to auto-star out my credit card number and various passwords, if someone has user level access with full credentials in order to read my NTFS encrypted %user%\.gaim\ directory i am pretty much pwned anyways, and i have almost entered sensative info into a chat, which is what caused me to implement this in the first place
try foxit reader, it's much better than acrobat i have been using it for months with no problems at all and much faster loading of PDFs
it also doesn't try to register as a browser plugin leaving you with two sets of toolbars and a notecard's worth of space to read your PDF.
it uses only one source, in between the two counters, just the source is closer to one than the other, and a neutron absorbing sphere around the system could protect against outside emmisions and reflections (does neutron radiation reflect?)
no need to use multiple entropy sources, radioactive decay is completely unpredictable on the atom scale, and counters detect individual decays.
it falls apart because if you are going to transmit quasar locations you may as well send a moderately beefy symmetric key.
two geiger counters, one wired to every tick advance the position of the system pointer by one, the other is set to flip the bit at the sytem counter, the radioactive source is closer to the flip bit counter in order to ensure an oppurtunity for many flips and reduce the odds of a suden burst in advances resulting in a long string of nulls.
your idea would slam into the million monkeys problem, the number of quasars and datarate emitted would result in enough pads to make the message say anything
the PSP is ahead in every single technical aspect: computational power, graphic capabilites, etc.
especially load times, the PSP's loading times are FAR higher than the DS, why did nintendo have to suck so bad?
the $300 computer monitor gives a better "eperiance" because it does not come with violent sodomy.
in some cases running a program from a compressed volume can be faster than running uncompressed (cpu relatively fast compared to disk access rate and data the program uses is not stored in a compressed form)
was it the emachines 98se->ME upgrade?
i am convinced that thing leaves the system slightly different than a regular ME install, worked quite well and was never worse than win98 se
rule 1: people are stupid
rule 2: the oppurtunity for riches makes people far more stupid
see: lottery, casino, hostage takers, bank robbers, 419 victems
I would support a law legalizing 419 scams.
would never happen, SCO could do what they did because they have nothing to lose. if microsoft went nuts with lawsuits they have a lot to lose, and IBM would be more than happy to pick their bones clean.
have you considered setting up a secured CVS server, i have heard of people using them for documents and stuff, the advantage is you keep every version you ever saved
speed is a function of acceleration over time, therefore i must assume you dropped your brain at the moment you posted.
you fail to understand, that line is an acknowledgement of our kneeling before the almighty dollar.
you are mistaken. Security by obscurity refers to using a secret method of protection which, once discovered will become a threat to all using that method of security.
for example public key cryptography is not security by obscurity, but Flash DRM media stream is. there is theoretically nothing standing between the potential attacker and the target, merely a bit of debugging and/or traffic sniffing.
that test fails to account for the fact that people get better at a task over time. it's results will be to show what the designers wanted to prove, that people are better at sorting old and bad vs young and good, but the results will be meaningless because it is a junk study