how the hell can they not afford a radio tagger? this isn't expensive technology. label grade RFID tags are like $.15 and even if cow grade is more, what's $5 added to the cost of raising a whole friggin cow?
if that hammer is there to keep disease from spreading through our food supply. yes that is the governments business, and if you can't make a profit while being safe, you don't deserve to make a profit at all.
survive crash tests and still be recoverable? how much you wanna bet some convenient misfortune befalls developers before they can gut the current auto industry. because that is what they are on track to do.
for not too much more money you could even get the "inflation" done with a rigid foam instead of just air for people too freaked out by a car being nothing but air and composite.
considering that the GOP takes pride in attacking and undermining Highschool Science education and scorning college education as being for the "ivory tower elite" it's not unreasonable to characterize them as being under-educated. their appeal towards religious conservatives is also quite undeniable.
given that, i am not sure what's gotten your panties in a bunch. It's not like a called them unpatriotic or traitors.
if the exact font or font size being rendered (or the presence or absence of cleartype) is going to break your design, the design is already hopelessly broken.
I have never had an issue with even large variance in what font/ size is used because the design should be flexible and resilient. if everything is so interdependent and fragile you should be looking at your overall structure, not trying to work around minor quirks on different platforms.
A photographer can't publish your photo without your written consent.
yes they can. about the only time they cannot is when you are clearly the subject of the image AND it is for commercial promotion. that is to say your likeness cannot be used to endorse a product, service, or cause without your consent.
i perfectly well understand the distinction between the API and the language, however the two are entangled so any judgement must be made on the whole not just the parts.
the problem with your model is that it assumes infinite and untraceable access. the more iterations you have, the harder it is to spot a pattern of inconsistency but the higher the chance of being discovered in the act.
Safari and chrome use the same rendering engine, in addition the functioning of firefox, chrome, and safari shouldn't differ on xp, vista and OSX. also Vista comes with IE 7 not 6, and IE 7 shouldn't be different on XP and vista so your 23 tests could reasonably be trimmed down to XP with IE 6, Vista with IE 7 then firefox and safari on OSX
I just saved you a lot of time turning your 23 tests into 4 tests. if you want to you could even cut vista out of your web tests by doing IE 6 and IE 7 in XP but IE doesn't coexist with other versions of itself so you don't save much except the cost of a vista license.
if by snoop you mean connect to a program that the user willfully loaded and interact with that program in it's normal manner of operation then yes people can do that.
assuming otherwise is as silly as the "if you are a cop you are not allowed to enter this site" disclaimers that used to be all over the internet
So the issue is that a new model has been released and only people who are eligible for a new phone can get it at a discount? Apple never should have caved on the iphone price change retroactivity, now they can't improve anything without the existing users demanding free upgrades for life.
here in the US i paid verizon $100 to send a tech out to my apartment and drop a brand new phone line from the pole to my room. and nobody has ever accused verizon of being a discount rate telephone company.
considering how fanatically small database entries are defended on wikipedia, i would expect every CoS facility to be smoldering rubble in 24 hours should anything happen to Mr. Wales.
i'm pretty sure if it's 0F, 50MPH winds, and 10" snow, your cows are already dead and you don't need to drive into town.
how the hell can they not afford a radio tagger? this isn't expensive technology. label grade RFID tags are like $.15 and even if cow grade is more, what's $5 added to the cost of raising a whole friggin cow?
if that hammer is there to keep disease from spreading through our food supply. yes that is the governments business, and if you can't make a profit while being safe, you don't deserve to make a profit at all.
survive crash tests and still be recoverable? how much you wanna bet some convenient misfortune befalls developers before they can gut the current auto industry. because that is what they are on track to do. for not too much more money you could even get the "inflation" done with a rigid foam instead of just air for people too freaked out by a car being nothing but air and composite.
but crazy machine did benefit from running properly on a modern OS. it isn't as good, but it's a damned good substitute compared to nothing at all.
i find vandalizing the sandbox to be the most enjoyable way of playing a game..
considering that the GOP takes pride in attacking and undermining Highschool Science education and scorning college education as being for the "ivory tower elite" it's not unreasonable to characterize them as being under-educated. their appeal towards religious conservatives is also quite undeniable.
given that, i am not sure what's gotten your panties in a bunch. It's not like a called them unpatriotic or traitors.
if the exact font or font size being rendered (or the presence or absence of cleartype) is going to break your design, the design is already hopelessly broken.
I have never had an issue with even large variance in what font/ size is used because the design should be flexible and resilient. if everything is so interdependent and fragile you should be looking at your overall structure, not trying to work around minor quirks on different platforms.
monthy charges make sense but late fees!? it's an MMO not a utility so it's not like they can't suspend your service if you don't pay.
A photographer can't publish your photo without your written consent.
yes they can. about the only time they cannot is when you are clearly the subject of the image AND it is for commercial promotion. that is to say your likeness cannot be used to endorse a product, service, or cause without your consent.
connecting to a computer in a state you have never been in does not obligate you to follow the laws of that state, to argue otherwise is insane.
media sentry does not require a license to be a PI in their home state.
I missed the part where remote exploits were marketed by microsoft as a feature of Windows (sounds like something SOE would do)
i perfectly well understand the distinction between the API and the language, however the two are entangled so any judgement must be made on the whole not just the parts.
reflects the views of the under-educated rural religiouly conservative masses
but enough about the GOP...
the problem with your model is that it assumes infinite and untraceable access. the more iterations you have, the harder it is to spot a pattern of inconsistency but the higher the chance of being discovered in the act.
so only part of it is utter shit.
unfortunately for anyone trying to use it, the part that is shit is required to do anything useful and so it makes the whole thing shit.
Safari and chrome use the same rendering engine, in addition the functioning of firefox, chrome, and safari shouldn't differ on xp, vista and OSX. also Vista comes with IE 7 not 6, and IE 7 shouldn't be different on XP and vista so your 23 tests could reasonably be trimmed down to XP with IE 6, Vista with IE 7 then firefox and safari on OSX
I just saved you a lot of time turning your 23 tests into 4 tests. if you want to you could even cut vista out of your web tests by doing IE 6 and IE 7 in XP but IE doesn't coexist with other versions of itself so you don't save much except the cost of a vista license.
it's not private data when the user transmits it to any third party who asks.
if by snoop you mean connect to a program that the user willfully loaded and interact with that program in it's normal manner of operation then yes people can do that.
assuming otherwise is as silly as the "if you are a cop you are not allowed to enter this site" disclaimers that used to be all over the internet
So the issue is that a new model has been released and only people who are eligible for a new phone can get it at a discount? Apple never should have caved on the iphone price change retroactivity, now they can't improve anything without the existing users demanding free upgrades for life.
unless they are an insectoid race devoid of intelligence which has evolved radio and FTL senses to help it find food (us) and coordinate attacks.
what kind of extortionate horseshit is that?
here in the US i paid verizon $100 to send a tech out to my apartment and drop a brand new phone line from the pole to my room. and nobody has ever accused verizon of being a discount rate telephone company.
considering how fanatically small database entries are defended on wikipedia, i would expect every CoS facility to be smoldering rubble in 24 hours should anything happen to Mr. Wales.
wat?
they could argue that in court, but they will have a hard time getting their lawyers to do it for them, as they don't want to get fined and disbarred.