Slashdot Mirror


How Do You Greet an Extraterrestrial?

The LA Times is running a story about Earth Speaks, a companion project to SETI, which focuses on how we would communicate with intelligent extraterrestrial life, should we happen to discover it. Far more effort has been devoted to searching for signals or a means to communicate than the question of what we might say once contact is established, and the folks at SETI have set up a website to gather opinions on what the best questions and statements are. "So far, the messages break down into a few distinct categories. Some people want to throw a block party to welcome the aliens to the neighborhood. Others, less trusting, would warn the aliens that we've got guns and know how to use them. Another group, possibly influenced by having seen too many movies, would have us hide under the bed until they go away. 'If we discover intelligent life beyond Earth, we should not reply — we should freeze and play dead,' wrote one contributor." What would you say first to an alien?

803 comments

  1. I know by Dolphinzilla · · Score: 5, Funny

    got any new porn we haven't seen yet ???

    1. Re:I know by ductonius · · Score: 3, Funny

      If not, at least they would bring a new meaning to the "Miss Universe" contest.

    2. Re:I know by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1, Funny

      Ah... the ZZ Top approach....

      Warning them that we've got legs, and we know how to use them!

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    3. Re:I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or do you have a sister and how much pizza comes with her.

    4. Re:I know by antifoidulus · · Score: 4, Funny

      Would help reduce several potentially embarrassing faux paus(es?), for instance, "Which hole should I put it in?"

    5. Re:I know by auric_dude · · Score: 4, Informative

      The complete protocol was detailed way back in 1988 http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0097257/ and it seemed to work then so I reckon it will work just as well today

    6. Re:I know by laejoh · · Score: 0

      Getting an answer in japanese, priceless!

    7. Re:I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nanu Nanu

    8. Re:I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and then the second thing to ask would be: can we have access to your patent database?

      that would be a huge amount of prior art there :-)

    9. Re:I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they are humanoid give them Internet access. If tentacled then there are some "interesting" Japanese series. Insectoid then certain episodes from nature documentaries might fit the bill. Oh if they DO have bills then "Howard the Duck"

    10. Re:I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You are late for dinner. Why didn't you call?"

      Seriously though, they got 60 years of our television output, they will understand almost any common greeting and social convention.

      Why do people think if aliens wanted to kill us they wouldn't deflect an asteroid?
      I mean ... flying through light-years of space and then having to put up with us and our toy guns?

    11. Re:I know by spun · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well sonny, let me tell you bout the time the wife and I met some aliens. They landed on our farm one night and introduced themselves. Nice people. We got to talkin' and of course the conversation turned to sex. Now, the wife and I are open minded, so we thought, you know, in the name of science and interspecies understanding, we should give it a try. So the lady alien and I go off the the saucer while the male alien takes my wife to the bedroom.

      Next morning, the wife and I talk about it. She says the alien had such a tiny penis, she started to laugh. Well, he says they aren't built like us. If she wants it thicker, just pull on his left ear. If she wants it longer, just pull on his right ear. So she gets it set up the way she likes and they have a great time.

      "How was it for you?" she asks.

      I say, "Pretty good, but that alien damn near pulled my ears off!"

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    12. Re:I know by nospam007 · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's called Rishathra if you do it with aliens.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rishathra

    13. Re:I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Might be more like bestiality from their perspective.

    14. Re:I know by JustOK · · Score: 1

      or coming across the galaxy

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    15. Re:I know by h4rm0ny · · Score: 2, Funny


      I'm presuming this would be Tentacle Porn, then?

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    16. Re:I know by h4rm0ny · · Score: 4, Funny


      Nah, if the aliens want to learn English, they just need to post on Slashdot. Someone will be correcting their mistakes before you can say Alpha Centauri.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    17. Re:I know by monktus · · Score: 1

      "Oh man, I can't believe I sucked your jagon."

      --
      Weaseling out of things is important to learn. It's what separates us from the animals... except the weasel."
    18. Re:I know by dryeo · · Score: 1

      No it isn't. Rishathra is doing it with other hominoids, usually intelligent.
      Possibly actually happened with Neanderthals.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    19. Re:I know by nmb3000 · · Score: 1

      The complete protocol was detailed way back in 1988

      That's one option, though I think this revised protocol is better.

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    20. Re:I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Two tentacles one cup?

    21. Re:I know by Randle_Revar · · Score: 1

      Only if both (all) parties are intelligent Hominids - that is to say, descended from the Pak (aka Homo erectus).

    22. Re:I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if it's with hominids, with an evolutionary descent linked to ours. (With chimps, for example, would be Rishathra.) Niven's Ringworld just happened to be covered with such species.

    23. Re:I know by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Faux pas.

    24. Re:I know by Tolkien · · Score: 1

      Why on Earth do you and the parent post even know that word exists?!?

    25. Re:I know by spun · · Score: 1

      Bigot. My wife and I have an open marriage, it works quite well for us, and it is in no way freakish. Enjoy your closed mind.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    26. Re:I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why on Earth do you and the parent post even know that word exists?!?

      They enjoy the second-rate science fiction novels of Larry Niven, often confused for a "hard science fiction" author despite his sloppy engineering which has had to be patched again and again with more novels, and his laughably bad biology.
        Mote in God's Eye was pretty cool, though, although it's all about Space Mexicans. (I think that's Jerry Pournelle's influence.)

    27. Re:I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This from a user named "Tolkien"!

      I just finished a marathon watching of the LOTR movies with my oldest daughter, and I couldn't tell if she was amused or horrified that I recalled the names of various things, such as Gandalf's sword, throughout the movie.

    28. Re:I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you mean the system with alpha centaurus x 2 stars? :-)

    29. Re:I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you cared about your "wife" you would feel jealousy when hearing the guy next door boning her in the next room over.

    30. Re:I know by dryeo · · Score: 1

      We've both read Ringworld, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ringworld

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    31. Re:I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      got any new porn we haven't seen yet ???

      From TFS:

      If we discover intelligent life beyond Earth, we should not reply -- we should freeze and play dead.

      And hope that, while we hide under the bed, they don't walk through the bedroom and hear one of us let go of a fart.

    32. Re:I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aliens? Humans will do all their talking with .30-06

    33. Re:I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about: "Long ride, eh? How bout a cold beer?"

    34. Re:I know by codeButcher · · Score: 1

      Seen much of the world? No, they are not the only race by a far margin. Neither should the preferences of a few freaks reflect on the whole race.

      --
      Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
    35. Re:I know by drkfdr · · Score: 1

      But what if they have more than one tentacle?

    36. Re:I know by sonicmerlin · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Actually, if you go into a "fetish" website, one of the most common fetishes in the West is "cuckoldry", where a woman cheats on her man with another extremely large specimen of a male. It's a very masochistic fetish. Since at least a tiny bit of masochism exists in everyone (except for sadistic sociopaths) In my explorations of East Asian sites, that entire fetish doesn't exist whatsoever. Personally I think this Western fetish stems from the Ancient Greeks, when male-male relationships were considered quite normal. In this day and age of anti-gay attitudes, another man sleeping with your woman is the closest closet gays can get to fulfilling their fantasies.

    37. Re:I know by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Actually, the extraterrestrials could be hostile. So instead of asking them for porn, send them the goatse picture to scare them away from earth. :-)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    38. Re:I know by Cormacus · · Score: 1

      Slashdot needs a "+1 Literature Referece" mod.

      --
      Mon chien, il n'a pas du nez. Comment scent-il? TrÃs mauvais!
    39. Re:I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, you're a real pillar of the community with that open mind of yours...

    40. Re:I know by spun · · Score: 0

      I'm not a cuck, I don't get off on the feelings of jealousy. I'm polyamorous, which means the relationships aren't primarily about sex, but emotional closeness. We have relationships with other people, not just sex. My wife and I have to actually like the person the other is dating. Merrill is our longest term friend with benefits, at a year and a half now. We haven't had a three way in months. Mostly, we have dinner together, maybe play some cards or watch TV. Merrill and I geek out about math and programming while Jenny roles her eyes and tries to bring the conversation back around to pop culture, acting, and movies.

      I work different hours than the two of them, so often he'll come over, the two of them will have sex, go run some errands, and be back in time for dinner. Sometimes, if Jenny is feeling particularly horny, she'll have sex with one of us and then the other. It's a lot more casual than you might think. I'm not jealous because, although Merrill is more physically her type (he's 6'8") Jenny and I have been partners for nine years. We're each other's best friend, confidant, cheerleader, and financial partner, as well as lovers. I take joy in her joy with Merrill.

      I like him a lot, so I'm happy that he's happy. I'm not gay (tried it, not my cup of tea) but I'd still do a guy if he was into me. Merrill isn't gay at all. But we have the kind of non-sexual intimacy that sharing a woman brings. I like it. Jenny is a little more jealous than I am, so I keep my girls on the side more casual and circumspect. I'm still hoping I find a woman that she likes as much as I like Merrill.Anyway, google 'open relationships' or 'polyamory' if you are curious. You'll find a lot more couples doing polyamory or other forms of open relationship than you will find are into cuckolding.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    41. Re:I know by spun · · Score: 1

      Thank you for noticing! I do troll libertarians for the good of the community. I make sure to keep an open mind, you know, just in case one of them starts making sense.

      The community needs to be made aware of the scourge of libertarianism. These libertarians want to do away with all regulation, which would allow them to buy and sell slaves for their sweatshops; keep people in extreme poverty so they had to accept slavery; and practice their evil brand of economic oppression unhindered.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    42. Re:I know by Ajaxamander · · Score: 1

      Seems like if they were hostile you might end up in worse trouble if they "like what they see" after you send them Goatse...

    43. Re:I know by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      These libertarians want to do away with all regulation, which would allow them to buy and sell slaves for their sweatshops; keep people in extreme poverty so they had to accept slavery; and practice their evil brand of economic oppression unhindered.

      Yes, and smoking Marijuana makes you rape nuns and kill babies. What planet are you from, anyway?

    44. Re:I know by spun · · Score: 1

      Hey, I call it like I see it. It's not my fault that people hide from their own dark and twisted motivations. People love to rationalize. Plenty of murderers think they are doing the right thing, but that doesn't make it so.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    45. Re:I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, is this still "troll tuesday" (whatever the fuck that means to your little virgin brain) or are you still trying to get the last word in like a person who hasn't seen a woman naked?

      I'm guessing the latter of the two - but please - prove me right.

    46. Re:I know by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Hey, I call it like I see it

      That's what I'm worried about. If you were just trolling I wouldn't have responded, but knowing that you probably believe that stuff ... you need help, man. Anyone who equated libertarianism with slavery is either completely ignorant, massively brainwashed, or completely irrational. It's rather like claiming that Hitler was a Rabbi.

    47. Re:I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I would certainly not say, "All your base are belong to us!"

    48. Re:I know by spun · · Score: 1

      Wait, noticed in your sig you aren't American. Sorry. In America, 'libertarian' means 'strong property rights individualist anarchist,' not 'anarchist in general.' I myself am a social anarchist of the anarcho-syndicalist variety. Most anarchists are completely anti-authoritarian, and American Libertarians claim to be. But the obvious outcome of American style libertarianism is slavery. I'm convinced most of them know this, and figure the 'man' is keeping them down, out of their natural position as Overlord.

      As we non-libertarian anarchists say here, "Libertarians want just enough government to police their slaves."

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    49. Re:I know by Agripa · · Score: 1

      . . . that is to say, descended from the Pak (aka Homo erectus).

      Pak were Homo Habilis in Niven's stories or at least that is what the various characters speculated. Only the UN/ARM and Brennan-monster had access to fossils from earth for an investigation that I remember.

    50. Re:I know by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      I know what the word means. I just don't see how in the world you could come to a conclusion like:

      the obvious outcome of American style libertarianism is slavery

      That's insane. You're arguing that an increase in individual rights will result in the taking of individuals rights. What do you do for an encore? Claim that the obvious outcome of democracy is a dictatorship? That the obvious outcome of fire is water?

      I'm convinced most of them know this, and figure the 'man' is keeping them down, out of their natural position as Overlord.

      [citation needed]

      As we non-libertarian anarchists say here, "Libertarians want just enough government to police their slaves."

      That's about as accurate as saying that anarchists just want to break things and rape and pillage. I'm sure that you probably think you're being quite clever, but you're coming across as bigoted and petulant.

    51. Re:I know by Agripa · · Score: 1

      . . . and his laughably bad biology.

      I have often wondered about this since I read Ringworld Engineers and Protector. Was Niven unaware at the time of writing how impossible it would be for Pak descended Homo Habilis to fit into earth's fossil record and evolutionary biology or did he just hand wave it as a minor contradiction with known science? He had common biology spread across Known Space because of the Slaver Empire but the hominid to Pak connection always bothered me.

    52. Re:I know by spun · · Score: 1

      Yep. An increase in individual rights will result in some people being oppressed. Because these 'rights' that are being increased require money and property to take advantage of. Getting rid of child labor, worker safety, and minimum wage laws will help people who own factories, but it will hurt the people who work in them.

      The only way to achieve liberty in a libertarian system would be to level the playing field completely before moving to such a system, but that is never going to happen. In fact, libertarians want us to move to their system with the unfairness and imbalance still in place so they can more successfully exploit those imbalances. They want to keep their unfair advantage and remove all obstacles to using that advantage to exploit others.

      Maybe that isn't the story that libertarians tell themselves, but their greedy, selfish subconscious minds understand full well what they are working towards. Most non greedy, non selfish people instinctively see this subconscious motivation, which is why so few people choose to become libertarians.

      Adam Smith described the problem succinctly: "Civil government, so far as it is instituted for the security of property, is in reality instituted for the defence of the rich against the poor, or of those who have some property against those who have none at all." Libertarians want a government that ONLY protects property, therefore, they want a government who's sole function is the oppression of the poor for the benefit of the owning class.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    53. Re:I know by spun · · Score: 1

      Oh, I didn't catch this, but your two examples are totally ironic. Aristotle describes The Kyklos, or cycle of government, where democracy inevitably leads to the majority electing a dictator who promises to give them what they want. And water is one of the primary combustion products for most types of fire. So, just as with libertarianism, by ignoring simple chains of cause and effect, you have overlooked the obvious outcomes.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    54. Re:I know by Tolkien · · Score: 1

      Haha, I read the books in high school and have used the nickname since (10 years ago).

      *clicks dryeo's link below*

      Ohhh I see.

      I've heard of Ringworld "in passing", that is - not beyond learning of the title itself, never have read the books. :)

    55. Re:I know by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Getting rid of child labor, worker safety, and minimum wage laws will help people who own factories, but it will hurt the people who work in them.

      [citation needed]

      The only way to achieve liberty in a libertarian system would be to level the playing field completely before moving to such a system

      Complete nonsense. Such an approach wouldn't create liberty but rather an artificial equality. It wouldn't matter in the long run, though, because a few decades down the road everything would be the same again. That's because we as individuals are not equal. Some people create while others destroy, some invent while others suppress. Even a single year after your forced equalization plan, you'd once again have people who are homeless and destitute.

      Your definition of "liberty" is also unclear. Personal possessions have nothing to do with liberty. I can live in the forest with nothing but the clothes on my back, and I'll still be free. Or I can live a pampered life as the personal pool-boy of the local princess, and still have no liberty. You seem to be one of those pseudo-commie dinks who associate any inequality in income as slavery - a view which is, in my opinion, is a symptom of psychosis.

      Maybe that isn't the story that libertarians tell themselves, but their greedy, selfish subconscious minds understand full well what they are working towards

      Yeah! And those fucking Jews control everything, right? White pow ... err, I mean ANARCHIST POWER! YEAH!

      You need help. It's not healthy to have so much hatred towards anyone, let alone towards a political ideology whose sole goal is to limit government interference in the lives of men.

      The difference between me and you is that, even though I know that your particular political ideal is very likely to create the kind of harm you're attributing to libertarianism, I would never ascribe such motives to you. I know that you're simply a poor, deluded fool, who wants only the best for himself and for mankind as a whole. The fact that you're completely wrong about everything is irrelevant; you're not evil, you're just a guy with some really stupid political ideas.

    56. Re:I know by spun · · Score: 1

      I don't hate anyone, I hate an ideology that has been demonstrated to lead to less liberty. I noticed you ignored the Adam Smith quote, so I'll repeat it here: "Civil government, so far as it is instituted for the security of property, is in reality instituted for the defence of the rich against the poor, or of those who have some property against those who have none at all."

      By definition, libertarianism is government dedicated to protecting the property of the rich from the poor. That is the only legitimate function of government in the eyes of a libertarian, and I find that idea reprehensible. As loss of liberty is such a simple and logical consequence of libertarian ideology, I find it hard to believe those supporting the ideology do so out of anything but selfish reasons.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    57. Re:I know by Hamoohead · · Score: 1

      Greetings, Overlords.

      --
      "If your parents never had children, chances are you wonât either." -Dick Cavett
    58. Re:I know by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      I don't hate anyone, I hate an ideology that has been demonstrated to lead to less liberty.

      Oh, you hate communism? Ok, we're on the same page there.

      I noticed you ignored the Adam Smith quote, so I'll repeat it here

      I ignore all quotes on principle; they're useless without context, and are an appeal to authority even when context is provided. People only use quotes when they lack facts.

      By definition, libertarianism is government dedicated to protecting the property of the rich from the poor.

      Wrong. Go educate yourself

    59. Re:I know by ZyBex · · Score: 1

      CONGRATULATIONS!

      You're the 100.000th race on the galaxy! Click here to get your prize!

    60. Re:I know by ZyBex · · Score: 1

      Oops, this was supposed to be a parent-post, not a reply...

    61. Re:I know by spun · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what you object to about the quote. Which part of it do you believe is untrue?

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    62. Re:I know by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      What part of "I ignore all quotes on principle" did you not understand?

      For the record, though, the quote you chose is taken out of context, and is a vast oversimplification. Smith was talking about past systems when he made that statement, and left out the obvious fact that property laws in modern society protect anyone who owns anything. Only a fool would see it as an endorsement of the abolishment of property laws. And, as I try to limit how much time I spend talking to fools, I'm out. Peace.

    63. Re:I know by Randle_Revar · · Score: 1

      I wonder why I thought it was H. erectus? Anyway, H. Habilis makes (slightly) more sense, since it is the most primitive Homo species.

  2. Squids by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We can't even communicate in any meaningful way with squids, which are genetically far more closely related to us than any possible extraterestrials. What in the world makes us think that it would be any easier to communicate with extraterrestrials?

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    1. Re:Squids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That assumption is that for communication, sharing intelligence is more important than sharing genetics.

    2. Re:Squids by timeOday · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think genetic kinship matters, instead it would hinge on the aliens' intelligence (more specifically, capacity for information processing). If the aliens are just at the level of fungus, it would be hard to discover them in the first place, moreover their existence wouldn't matter much anyways.

    3. Re:Squids by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2, Funny

      We can't even communicate in any meaningful way with squids, which are genetically far more closely related to us than any possible extraterestrials. What in the world makes us think that it would be any easier to communicate with extraterrestrials?

      Apparently you are unaware of Japanese tentacle porn. We've got that angle covered, thankyouverymuch.

      Next.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    4. Re:Squids by fatmonkeyboy · · Score: 1

      Squids can't broadcast and receive messages from outer space.

      If we meet a race of beings that are capable of broadcasting messages over huge distances, maybe we'll have more in common with them than we do with squids.

    5. Re:Squids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mathematics (especially Logic) and Physics, things that the aliens must have discovered to communicate with us, but the squids haven't yet?

    6. Re:Squids by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It would indeed be difficult, and I suspect that the "communication" that would be possible would not really look much like the common use of the word. However, there are certain reasons for optimism:

      Unless the laws of physics are a good deal weirder than we think, we already know a great deal about what math aliens would have to know to talk to us. We could also reasonably suspect some knowledge of physics, astronomy(adjusted for their location of course) and similar knowledge. It still would be far from easy; but if you are talking to somebody across interstellar space, you can make a decent number of assumptions about what they know, unlike the squid case.

      I'm not expecting any heart-to-primary circulatory nodule chats with green babes, of course.

    7. Re:Squids by Lehk228 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      unless they are an insectoid race devoid of intelligence which has evolved radio and FTL senses to help it find food (us) and coordinate attacks.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    8. Re:Squids by goombah99 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That assumption is that for communication, sharing intelligence is more important than sharing genetics.

      One thing that all these discussions presume is that we would be able to quickly reach a way to communicate. More likely it would take a decade. But misunderstandings like say a the chimp biting your hand making someone angry would occur many times before that.

      On the otherhand if an aliaen did show up on our doorstep then it would be one of two cases:

      1) it was the first visit
      2) or it was the first open visit after many many other visits.

      in the first case the ship that arrived would likely be both of a technology far beyiond our own and at the same time extremely fragile it being at the limits of it's tenuous exitence after a long space journey.

      So it might have some nasty weapons but probably nothing we should really fear or that we could not destroy.

      Basically the vistitor would be here as our guest and at our mercy.

      in the second case, it would be the visitors setting the agenda,

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    9. Re:Squids by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 1

      I think that at a certain point "intelligent" (adaptable) species just learn and develop so fast that "dumb" (complex-instinct driven) species can't keep up.

      If the insects of alien insect planet were bathed in radiation for a billion years and finally gained the ability to give birth to microwave telescopes for finding alien prey, the humans of Earth planet could spend 250 pretty normal years on a scientific revolution and end up with flight control computers and a rocket-based nuke delivery system for annihilating alien insect planet.

    10. Re:Squids by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 1

      Even if we can't really communicate with them we can observe them. Lexical analysis alone would keep scientists busy for decades.

    11. Re:Squids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      In that case, why have we as a society still failed to find common ground with Dolphins?

    12. Re:Squids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      kekeke

    13. Re:Squids by monoqlith · · Score: 2, Funny

      You bring up a good point. Monkeys and chimps share up to 90% of their DNA with humans, and yet the last time I tried to teach my capuchin sign language, I got beaned with a fecal fast-ball.

      Yeah, I think it's that 10% responsible for our neocortex that's going to make a difference here...

    14. Re:Squids by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Are you suggesting that the reason we can't communicate with squids is because scientists have been trying to make love to them all these years? Instead of sharing intelligence?

      Or did I misread something? Because that's the most disgusting thing I've ever heard. :)

    15. Re:Squids by artor3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why assume that if they find us, they must have sci-fi movie technology? Isn't it more likely, that they'd find us through their equivalent of a SETI project, or perhaps by saying "Hey, that planet over there looks like it might have some water on it. Maybe there's life there."

      In which case, we might find ourselves receiving a weak signal from them many years later, and perhaps an un-manned (un-aliened?) probe many years after that.

      No matter who finds who, it's likely that it'll take many years just to let the other know they've been found. Distances measured in light-years suck like that.

    16. Re:Squids by TropicalCoder · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well what do you expect? Maybe if we stopped eating them and showed them more respect, they might talk to us. Like, if we banned fishing them for food, and instead establish bilateral talks with them, that could be a new beginning for man-squid relations. Then perhaps we could go on to establish trade links - like - we could trade them sardines and anchovies for ink and cuttle fish bone, to begin with. From there, perhaps we could get them to represent our interests with the octopus... When you begin treating others with respect, all kinds of possibilities begin to present themselves, as Obama has demonstrated in his recent speech in Egypt.

    17. Re:Squids by Grimbleton · · Score: 2, Funny

      Common ground? Shit, dolphins like fish and swimming, humans like fish and swimming. There's common ground right there.

    18. Re:Squids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever heard of a tasty thing called sushi?

    19. Re:Squids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      that's the most disgusting thing I've ever heard. :)

      Welcome to the internet - you've got a lot to see!

    20. Re:Squids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree. You offer food. This works as an excellent means of discovering a means of safe/friendly interaction, if one is possible. With intelligent life e.g. "Googlers" or less intelligent life - dogs or even visiting relatives.

    21. Re:Squids by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      That's right, but the yardstick to measure intelligence is subjective. The Bovine-Human communication work group was just dealt a severe blow when three of it's best researchers were eaten at a barbecue...

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    22. Re:Squids by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I'd invest in bicycle locks.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    23. Re:Squids by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      Just find a kid named Ender.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    24. Re:Squids by xeoron · · Score: 1

      Correct, but they make for some good eating... mmmm finger-licking good.... So, too, may it be possible those aliens will be our next food source, or else we risk it being us! Or perhaps, food is what will bridge the language gap, after all, it often does with wildlife and foreign people.

    25. Re:Squids by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      You forgot sex.

      Well, I guess that's nothing unusual on /.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    26. Re:Squids by Albert+Sandberg · · Score: 1

      I know how you feel, but I'm sure fedex are trying their best....

    27. Re:Squids by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      There is one on /.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    28. Re:Squids by clarkkent09 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yep and George Bush is being unfairly attacked as a war monger even through he clearly said: "I believe that human beings and fish can coexist peacefully"

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    29. Re:Squids by keraneuology · · Score: 1

      Is "sharing genetics" a reference to all of the previously-mentioned pron?

      --
      If the g'vt kept the data on you that google does you'd better believe you'd be calling it "doing evil"
    30. Re:Squids by vlm · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We could also reasonably suspect some knowledge of physics, astronomy(adjusted for their location of course) and similar knowledge

      Physics gets pretty hard to discuss beyond F=ma without a common frame of technological reference and there are huge mathematical syntax issues.

      Chemistry would work the best since there are so many obvious constants. ionization constant of pure water. All the orbitals of an iron atom. A benzene ring is ubiquitous. Curie temperatures. Melting and boiling points. "shelf stable" chemical propellants are pretty much constant across the universe, for a given temperature range. Permanent magnet technology. Even an old fashioned steam pressure/temp table (or other useful engineering liquids, like some hydrocarbons, or refrigerants) would be the same.

      Now what would be fun would be figuring out the "new" stuff on each side. Just think of what has been developed here over the last couple decades... What is this 60 atom carbon molecule they find so entertaining? Why do they want us to stick this weird mostly rare earth ceramic in liquid nitrogen with wires hooked up to either side? WTF you claim you can polymerize fluorine? Then there's "helpful" advice, like don't accumulate too many atoms with a weight of 235 hydronium nuclei in one place or else!

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    31. Re:Squids by impaledsunset · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not sure, but we are capable of communicating with squids just as good as squids are communicating with each other. It would just take time until we learn how to speak to them. Communication with other animals at the same level, however, has been achieved. Or so it seems. So if the extraterrestrials can communicate with us almost as good as we communicate with each other, it wouldn't matter much to us. Probably they would be a little frustrated, as much as some people would get if they had to "talk" with a monkey. Unless our means of communication are different in a radical way. But eventually we'll learn how even then.

      However, I think that both are false. Even if they have radically different ways of communication, or they are far more intelligent and comunicating at higher level than we do, their language would still fit in some of our notions for language, so there will be means for two-way translation that will be just as good as from English to Chinese, and we'll be understand everything they can say in their language. They might have better parsing abilities, though, so it might be a difficult task. But achievable. Don't underestimate us. Nor the extraterrestrials.

    32. Re:Squids by jamstar7 · · Score: 1
      MOD PARENT UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      That's gotta be damned near the funniest comment by an AC that I've heard all hour!

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    33. Re:Squids by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      The clearly misunderestimated him!

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    34. Re:Squids by identity0 · · Score: 1

      >in the second case, it would be the visitors setting the agenda,

      brb reinstalling X-Com

    35. Re:Squids by Reziac · · Score: 1

      We've been broadcasting Rosetta Stones into the aether for a hundred years. I daresay any species with the smarts to cross interstellar distances, and who actually gives a damn about communicating, will already have a fairly good method of making sense from such broadcasts and developing a pidgin for basic communication.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    36. Re:Squids by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

      That assumption is that for communication, sharing intelligence is more important than sharing genetics.

      Yep, "assumption" is the key word here.

      We have no particular reason to believe that there's any truth to this assumption.

      How many human languages have we managed to decipher in the absence of either a Rosetta stone or native speaker? What's the current status of understanding Linear-A, a language that people have been attempting to decipher for nearly a century?

      --
      http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    37. Re:Squids by Planesdragon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What in the world makes us think that it would be any easier to communicate with extraterrestrials?

      Squids are intelligent tool-users with a high-order language capable of expressing abstract thoughts like "we shouldn't eat all those fish now; doing so will leave us more for tomorrow."?

      I doubt we'll be mating with the squids, but most intelligent minds I've met don't need to fuck someone to communicate. (Hell, fucking tends to diminish communication...)

    38. Re:Squids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If the aliens are just at the level of fungus, it would be hard to discover them in the first place, moreover their existence wouldn't matter much anyways."

      That can be an understatement after something similar to ultravirulent and fast groving Cryptococcus Neoformans kills off all lifeforms with lungs on earth.

    39. Re:Squids by vlm · · Score: 1

      What's the current status of understanding Linear-A, a language that people have been attempting to decipher for nearly a century?

      Not much intelligence to be shared in Linear B... Only a few thousand tablet (pretty low apparent info density) and its theorized to only be a hundred or so different authors. Assuming we could translate it, we could translate all known linear B into a pretty slim English paperback book.

      We can transfer a lot more bulk data now.... Just an old fashioned printed on paper encyclopedia set would be hundreds of times more data than all known linear B tablets... A small public library contains maybe millions of times more data than all of Linear B.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    40. Re:Squids by h4rm0ny · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So it might have some nasty weapons but probably nothing we should really fear or that we could not destroy.

      A little scientific knowledge doesn't occupy a lot of mass. For all we know, it might need nothing more than a captured human to extrapolate from, and then seed the planet from orbit with germ weapons.

      But it might not need to resort to direct weapons. It would, in a knowledge-based economy, be staggeringly wealthy. And humans have demonstrated themselves woefully subject to greed and credulity. It could side with one faction on Earth and have willing allies. Or it could behave as in the film "The Man Who Fell to Earth" where the alien in disguise establishes some basic patents and proceeds to build a massive business empire from there simply through its superior intellect (I really like the scene where he is watching six televisions at once). If you want non-knowledge based wealth, it presumably has mobility within our solar system and some decent analysis tools if it got here and found us. There are whole asteroids up there which are practically great lumps of valuable minerals. It could work with us to provide that wealth and the next thing you know, hyper-rich alien again and we're right back to playing the human race against itself. But the knowlede is the thing. If the alien is smarter and more knowledgable than us, that's a powerful weapon in itself if it chooses. As the main character in Use of Weapons by Iain M. Banks remarks: "everything is a weapon."

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    41. Re:Squids by geekboy642 · · Score: 1

      There's no guarantee that extraterrestrial life is carbon and water based. It's at least a fair possibility, given that it seems to work well on this planet, but assuming other life will follow our patterns closely seems like asking for more misunderstandings than would otherwise exist.

      --
      Just another "DOJ fascist authoritarian totalitarian bootlicker" -- Zeio
    42. Re:Squids by Devout_IPUite · · Score: 1

      Dolphins are the only animal observed to perform nasal sex on each other... No joke.

      http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/article1288633.ece

    43. Re:Squids by sqldr · · Score: 1

      Well, I like eating meat, they like eating meat, maybe they could.. oh uh..

      --
      I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.
    44. Re:Squids by Devout_IPUite · · Score: 1

      Math is so universal though, 1+1=2, 2+2=4, 3+3=6, 4+4=8, 5+5=10, 6+6=12... etc.

      Make a large enough code book of those and you've got a lot you can say.

    45. Re:Squids by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > We can't even communicate in any meaningful way with squids, ...What in the world
      > makes us think that it would be any easier to communicate with extraterrestrials?

      Same thing that makes us think there *are* extraterrestrials: science fiction.

      Frankly, even if there *were* extraterrestrials, which I find highly unlikely, and even if we *could* figure out how to communicate with them, which is even more unlikely, there wouldn't be any point to it. No conversation that could ever be conducted with a dozens-of-years latency could possibly be good for anything but a heap of frustration. Imagine the fifth-century Saxons trying to discuss the weather with the Ryukyuans, multiply the difficulties ten thousandfold, and you haven't even scratched the surface yet.

      Utterly futile and completely pointless. Even more worthless than SETI, which is going some.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    46. Re:Squids by blincoln · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Why assume that if they find us, they must have sci-fi movie technology?

      Because statistically speaking, it's incredibly unlikely that an alien race would have developed technology at anything close to the same time that we did. So either they will be so far behind that they won't even have radio, or many thousands (if not millions) of years more advanced than us (technology-wise).

      This is why the "warn them that we have guns and know how to use them" and "hide under the bed" options are ridiculous. Any alien race we are able to communicate with will almost certainly have the technology to easily wipe us out if they want to, as well as being able to detect the radio waves we've been throwing out into space since the early 20th century.

      Imagine the humans of 1900 trying to pose a credible threat to or hide from the humans of 2009. Now imagine the same thing, but it's the Romans or Chinese or a few thousand years ago versus the humans of 2009. Then realize that even a few thousand years is nothing on cosmological scales, so even that vast gap of technology is an eyeblink compared to the differences in technology we would be likely to encounter with an alien race.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    47. Re:Squids by ManWithIceCream · · Score: 1

      Agreed.

      Aliens* have masted space travel, squids haven't.
      I don't think it would be incorrect to assume it would be easier to communicate with an alien than to communicate with a squid. Maybe mostly because it is highly unlikely that a squid would want to communicate with us, where an alien is more likely to want to communicate with us, as they probably are, unlike squids, smart enough to have asked the Big Questions, and would be glad to see alien lifeforms.

      *who come to visit us

    48. Re:Squids by camperdave · · Score: 1

      The rosetta stone had the same message written in three different languages, one of which we already understood. So, I guess you're talking about Sesame street and similar children's shows, where they teach basic numbers and math concepts.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    49. Re:Squids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like...maybe...Bill Gates or that other fella Steve Jobs.

      I always knew there was something strange about them two

    50. Re:Squids by mahmud · · Score: 1

      What are you saying? Discovering a "mere" fungus on another celestial body would be outright revolutionary, of course provided that the fungus hasn't been brought by the investigating probe from Earth. In fact, finding an extraterrestrial bacteria or plant (or their analogues) would probably be one of the most important discoveries humanity has _ever_ made! Not to mention that it would be exciting to see what sort of biochemistry it would have, its reproductive mechanisms, etc. The jump from no-life to life is conceptually much larger than the gap between various lifeforms.

    51. Re:Squids by Grishnakh · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Of course, all this assumes that aliens would want to be hostile to us for some reason anyway. If a civilization is advanced enough to travel here, they're probably advanced enough to not have any good reason to be hostile. The only reason for hostility would be that they want something we have, and that could really only be the planet. But while this planet is basically a paradise to us (compared to the other planets out there that we can see), that's because we evolved on it, and are suited for living on it: it has temperatures/climates we like, it has food growing/living on it that we like, etc. As aliens would have evolved on another planet, this planet and the life on it probably wouldn't be something they value that much; it could even be poisonous to them. The only other reason they'd want this planet is for the mineral resources, but if they can travel to other star systems, it seems like it would be pretty trivial for them to get mineral resources from all kinds of other lifeless asteroids and planets instead of having to fight for this one.

      Honestly, I can't imagine a decent reason why any alien visitors would be hostile to us. Some of their ways might seem hostile to some, but that would only be from insufficient communication I believe (like if they treated us as lab specimens to be experimented on for the purpose of science without attempting to communicate). I think the chances of aliens coming here to wipe us all out, like in Independence Day, are pretty much nil. If any aliens go to the effort of traveling here, they probably would be interested in either simply learning about us (without sending us all into panic), or communicating.

    52. Re:Squids by thasmudyan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The only reason for hostility would be that they want something we have, and that could really only be the planet.

      Two other categories come to mind: the alien equivalent of religious fanaticism and some form of paranoia causing them to consider a pre-emptive strike against us. There may be many more reasons we can't fathom just yet. However, I don't disagree with you. We're probably of little interest to anyone out there, as we and our world are likely not compatible enough in any significant way.

    53. Re:Squids by timeOday · · Score: 1

      It is a matter of opinion, but in my opinion, sub-intelligent life forms are conceptually very similar to any other dynamical system in nature, e.g. nuclear reactions, fires, weather events like cloud formations, etc. Sure, discovering something at the level of fungus would show us some interesting new combinations of chemical processes. But it would be extremely unlikely to drastically change life on earth, much like the moon landing. That's a far cry from linking up with a civilization millions of years more advanced than our own that could simply hand over unfathomable scientific knowledge to us.

    54. Re:Squids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We can't even communicate with other Hu-Men who happen to profess a different religion.

    55. Re:Squids by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Yeah, those are two possibilities. However, I would hope that any aliens advanced enough for interstellar travel would have outgrown religious fanaticism, and also wouldn't see us as a threat in any way due to our technological immaturity. Of course, we haven't outgrown religious fanaticism (in fact it seems to be getting stronger and stronger), even though we've developed (limited) space travel, advanced mathematics, etc. Of course, it seems like the members of society that develop the advanced math, science, and technology aren't the same members that practice religious fanaticism, and I suppose it's possible the aliens might be the same way. Maybe they have some super-smart members that invent FTL drive, but the crazy religious fanatics are the ones in power.

    56. Re:Squids by mruizcamauer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In a popular sci - fi story from Argentina, "The Ethernaut", one of the guidelines used by the invading aliens was to never use a more sophisticated weapon than needed, or one that could pose a threat to themselves if we ever got a hold of it. The initial attack was a deadly snow from space, that killed 95% of people right off. The rest were to be turned into slave zombies via a control device inserted into your spine... This was a mid/70's story in the form of a comic.

    57. Re:Squids by lawpoop · · Score: 3, Funny

      If the aliens are just at the level of fungus, it would be hard to discover them in the first place, moreover their existence wouldn't matter much anyways.

      Terrence McKenna makes the claim that psilocybin mushrooms are actually an intelligent network of beings, and can communicate with humans because of the psilocybin molecule's ability to mimic human neurotransmitters. It's fairly weird stuff, but if you look at it as science fiction ( or psychedelic fiction? ), you being to understand the difficulty of communicating with an intelligence vastly different than yourself. We are just beginning to understand that dolphins understand grammar, yet we have no idea the mechanics of their communication. They can spontaneously invent sophisticated, synchronized, two-dolphin performances for a research scientist, so it's fairly obvious that they are capable of having complex conversations about aquatic acrobatics, at least.

      Anyway, here's Terrence, channeling the mycelia network: "Though I have been on earth for ages I am from the stars. My home is no one planet, for many worlds scattered through the shining disc of the galaxy have conditions which allow my spores an opportunity for life. The mushroom which you see is the part of my body given to sex thrills and sun bathing, my true body is a fine network of fibers growing through the soil. These networks may cover acres and may have far more connections that the number in a human brain. My mycelial network is nearly immortal, only the sudden toxification of a planet or the explosion of its parent star can wipe me out. By means impossible to explain because of certain misconceptions in your model of reality all my mycelial networks in the galaxy are in hyperlight communication across space and time. The mycelial body is as fragile as a spider's web but the collective hypermind and memory is a vast historical archive of the career of evolving intelligence on many worlds in our spiral star swarm. Space, you see, is a vast ocean to those hardy life forms that have the ability to reproduce from spores, for spores are covered with the hardest organic substance known. Across the aeons of time and space drift many spore-forming life-forms in suspended animation for millions of years until contact is made with a suitable environment. Few such species are minded, only myself and my recently evolved near relatives have achieved the hyper-communication mode and memory capacity that makes us leading members in the community of galactic intelligence. How the hypercommunication mode operates is a secret which will not be lightly given to man. But the means should be obvious: it is the occurrence of psilocybin and psilocin in the biosynthetic pathways of my living body that opens for me and my symbiots the vision screens to many worlds. You as an individual and man as a species are on the brink of the formation of a symbiotic relationship with my genetic material that will eventually carry humanity and earth into the galactic mainstream of the higher civilizations.

      Since it is not easy for you to recognize other varieties of intelligence around you, your most advanced theories of politics and society have advanced only as far as the notion of collectivism. But beyond the cohesion of the members of a species into a single social organism there lie richer and even more baroque evolutionary possibilities. Symbiosis is one of these. Symbiosis is a relation of mutual dependence and positive benefits for both of the species involved. Symbiotic relationships between myself and civilized forms of higher animals have been established many times and in many places throughout the long ages of my development. These relationships have been mutually useful; within my memory is the knowledge of hyperlight drive ships and how to build them. I will trade this knowledge for a free ticket to new worlds around suns younger and more stable than your own. To secure an eternal existence down the lo

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    58. Re:Squids by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Maybe he's just talking about movies that are translated into a hojillion different languages. If you can think enough like us to understand our language then you can go from the sesame street stuff you're talking about to full multifluency by consuming the worlds' DVD collections.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    59. Re:Squids by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      even here we have more than one system of mathematics, you can make some postulates and then a system follows from those. maybe other places have different maths, or a way of modeling reality without maths.

    60. Re:Squids by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      You bring up a good point. Monkeys and chimps share up to 90% of their DNA with humans, and yet the last time I tried to teach my capuchin sign language, I got beaned with a fecal fast-ball.

      Sounds like it got its message across! Score one for inter-species communication. I'm sure that's one message the aliens won't misinterpret if we used it with them.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    61. Re:Squids by xSauronx · · Score: 1

      i think its because theyre delicious and we eat them.

      god forbig aliens taste like steak or bacon. wed be relentless in turning them into cattle.

      --
      By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
    62. Re:Squids by Requiem18th · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Assuming there are no caps to technology, if you assume technology has some limits then as the parent says they are unlikely to have sci-fi movie technology.

      For instance everything seems to indicate that FTL travel an communications are really impossible, any alien visitor is likely to "leak" their presence in the form of TV broadcasting millions of years before we can actually contact them.

      Another possible cap is that civilizations inevitably destroy themselves at certain technological levels so that any alien visitor is necessarily technologically crippled in someway or otherwise they wouldn't have made it here alive, etc.

      There are also limits to the amount of energy that can be extracted from matter so it's unlikely that a single ship can take control of the entire earth (an army could but as what price?).

      Humans of 2009 would be eaten alive by the Romans without support from institutions of 2009 providing them with weapons, rations and medicines.

      In fact the more technologically advanced you are, the more dependent in your source civilization you are, an alien invasion fleet would not only be technologically advanced, but physically huge, which then forces you to consider the economics of an alien invasion, is the planet even worth the resources necessary to reach it and knock out the natives?

      --
      But... the future refused to change.
    63. Re:Squids by speilberg0 · · Score: 1

      reminds me of a movie where they killed the boss alien with 'head and shoulders'

    64. Re:Squids by Requiem18th · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Another point I forgot to mentions is what I call the "pioneer effect". We reached the moon many years having the technology to wipe out its inhabitants if there were any. It is likely any incoming alien vessel would be of the pioneer type, with just enough resources to reach the planet and maybe make it back but not much more.

      --
      But... the future refused to change.
    65. Re:Squids by Exception+Duck · · Score: 1

      They have nukes in North Korea....

      Or maybe Xenu's forefathes will be sent back to earth.

    66. Re:Squids by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      That's a good point. There's no religious fanaticism in North Korea, just plain old insanity, yet they've managed to develop nuclear weapons. A scary thought indeed.

    67. Re:Squids by IonOtter · · Score: 1

      Imagine the humans of 1900 trying to pose a credible threat to or hide from the humans of 2009. Now imagine the same thing, but it's the Romans or Chinese or a few thousand years ago versus the humans of 2009.

      You know? Some of my fellow gamers used to say similar things about kobolds? That changed when the kobolds started chucking a few dozen spears from the top of the cliff, or collapsing the cliff on their heads.

      I've also heard RL examples of this? Allegedly, the Mujaheddin in Afghanistan used to fire from the tops of cliffs upon the Russian Hinds using old muskets. The lead musket balls would splatter on the blades and the lead would stick, throwing off the balance and shaking it out of the air. Urban legend? Probably. But the lesson remains.

      Better tech does NOT equal greater tactical skill.

      --
      [End Of Line]
    68. Re:Squids by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Yep and George Bush is being unfairly attacked as a war monger even through he clearly said: "I believe that human beings and fish can coexist peacefully"

      The year is 3310 AD. The Ur-Quan are conquering all human civilized planets and strip-mining them for resources. To this day, not a single Ur-Quan being has died in this effort...

      Ur-Quan Sindaho is being unfairly attacked as a war monger even through he clearly said "I believe that Ur-Quan and human beings can coexist peacefully". Both parties involved have yet to complain.

      You've been watching the INN (intergalactic news channel). Stay tuned for our coverage of the civil war between the curly haired and strait haired minuminu-dici's on planet Opinarious.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    69. Re:Squids by zaphirplane · · Score: 1

      you are comparing communicating with a squid and space age species more advanced than we are

    70. Re:Squids by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      Well what do you expect? Maybe if we stopped eating them and showed them more respect, they might talk to us.

      Maybe the aliens want to eat us?

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    71. Re:Squids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This assumes that a technologically advanced species bothers thinking in terms of chemistry. Perhaps chemistry was forgotton eons ago, as just a set of quite obvious emergent properties of physics.

    72. Re:Squids by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Ah, what a great movie! Well, I thought it was, some others differed. :P What really made it funny for me was that until *years* after I first saw it, I thought Head and Shoulders was a fictional brand that had been made up for the movie. When I first saw Head and Shoulders in a supermarket I thought it was some kind of brand merchandising... it turned it from an exceptionally cheesy product placement into an exceptional funny. :P

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    73. Re:Squids by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Humans of 2009 would be eaten alive by the Romans without support from institutions of 2009 providing them with weapons, rations and medicines.

      It depends on the situation. If it were a small squadron of special-ops who *knew* they would be operating without backup or resupply for a long time, then they could gear accordingly, and they'd probably kick the ass of a Roman force 10 times their size through superior strategy and firepower. If it were just a bunch of marines magically transported from patrol in Iraq to the middle of a battle in Italy somewhere, then of course they'd have more success.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    74. Re:Squids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure Daniella Westbrook's boyfriend tried it, at least once

    75. Re:Squids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It could work with us to provide that wealth and the next thing you know, hyper-rich alien again and we're right back to playing the human race against itself.

      So you're talking about the Jews?

    76. Re:Squids by fractoid · · Score: 1

      60 years ago, nuclear weapons were hard to make. Now, the principles are well understood and you can pretty much learn how to build one on Wikipedia. Even if not, you wave a million dollars at any slightly self-serving nuclear physicist and he can probably build one for you. The Sum of All Fears (the book, not the movie) had a scarily plausible plot covering just this. The capability to build a small nuclear weapon, possibly even a fusion weapon, has been within reach of a wealthy industrialist or oil baron for quite some time now, let alone a small nation.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    77. Re:Squids by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that occasionally male dolphins have been known to make advances on human swimmers. I wonder if they've ever been taken up on those advances...?

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    78. Re:Squids by Lt.Hawkins · · Score: 1

      two words: Interstellar highway.

      --
      -- My Sig is a P228.
    79. Re:Squids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We can't even communicate in any meaningful way with squids, which are genetically far more closely related to us than any possible extraterestrials. What in the world makes us think that it would be any easier to communicate with extraterrestrials?

      For one view of how to screw things up, based on a fictional intelligent message received at Arecibo, see The Sparrow http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sparrow_(novel) and its sequel Children of God http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Children_of_God_(novel), by Mary Doria Russell.

    80. Re:Squids by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Yeah, regular experimentation with psilocybin mushrooms tends to lead to that sort of theory. :P

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    81. Re:Squids by LocutusMIT · · Score: 1

      two words: Interstellar highway.

      I believe the term is "Hyperspace Bypass."

    82. Re:Squids by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      If they have the tech to locate us and reach us either remotely or in person, they'll also likely have the ability to annihilate us without our being aware of their existence.
      All it would take is a very large rock, or a well directed solar flare.

      I guess we can "prepare" for all eventualities, but maybe one of the first thing we might want to do is establish that we taste very, very bad.

    83. Re:Squids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Predator...to hunt us.

      Aliens to use us as husks.

    84. Re:Squids by xtracto · · Score: 1

      Are you suggesting that the reason we can't communicate with squids is because scientists have been trying to make love to them all these years? Instead of sharing intelligence?

      Or did I misread something? Because that's the most disgusting thing I've ever heard. :)

      BLakey Rat, present you with Rule 34

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    85. Re:Squids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure aliens sent us W.

    86. Re:Squids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your post is well-reasoned, but have you considered this counter-point:

      Ag! Ag ag ag agag AG AG AG ag AG!

    87. Re:Squids by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      So first for first, apologise for the rampant stupidity expressed across all human cultures on this planer and assure them that the destructive habits of humanity will not be taken out into space. Communications are more likely to be them visiting us, either just before we manage to destroy ourselves so as to redirect our efforts in more positive directions or just before our reach starts to extend beyond our own solar system and into the rest of the galaxy.

      It of course would be likely that any species that could travel from star to star would also manage to train anthropologists and to send investigatory satellites ahead of any 'manned' expeditions and, as such would arrive fully capable of dealing with any situation that is likely to arise.

      Inter stellar warfare is in reality impossible as there is no way to defend a planet from attack from space, whether in be a toxic dust cloud in a contra orbit, a series of very high velocity dark asteroids, specifically targeted biological warfare across multiple simultaneous vectors so as to preserve the remaining ecology, let alone any high tech weaponry, if you can get out of the way, you have no defence. It brings to mind the idea that any species that threatens that type of activity when it travels out into the galaxy is likely to get weeded out well prior to them becoming an actual threat.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    88. Re:Squids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they aren't a violent race, and are shocked to even think that one being would kill another. In which case we could take them out easy. Given millions of years, the human race (if it's still around) will be mighty different.

    89. Re:Squids by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      And then they'll be very surprised that we do not look like Sesame street characters :-)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    90. Re:Squids by disputationist · · Score: 1

      extremely fragile it being at the limits of it's tenuous exitence after a long space journey.

      This is completely unjustified. Might be true in a few special cases but no reason to assume it in general.

    91. Re:Squids by Talar · · Score: 1

      If a civilization is advanced enough to travel here, they're probably advanced enough to not have any good reason to be hostile.

      And we who are the equivalent of amoebas compared to them would know that how?

      We can't just assume that advanced civilizations will be nice just because we want it to be like that, there is simply too many unknown factors for us to assume anything. They could just as well have the attitude that there's another little developing planet, blast them quickly before they too invent the Xyz rays and can start to compete with us

    92. Re:Squids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what in the world makes you think all extraterrestrials will be so different and necessarily anything like squids....

    93. Re:Squids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot one important thing:

      We humans are DELICIOUS!

    94. Re:Squids by director_mr · · Score: 1

      What you assume about aliens reveals more about yourself than it sheds useful light on an alien encounter. If you assume the aliens will not be hostile to us, you can only back that up using your human reasoning. If you assume aliens will be hostile and we must fight them, you can only back that up using your human reasoning as well. Step back and think about how human reasoning has changed over the years, and how different civilizations and cultures would have markedly different ways of communicating with an alien visitor.

      When I think of the closest things to an alien visiting a culture, I think of the Spanish Conquistadors visiting the Americas http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conquistador and David Cargill visiting the Fiji Islands http://www.heretical.com/cannibal/fiji.html . Perhaps Lewis and Clarke could be considered an analogy for an alien visitation as well. The thing is all 3 of those analogies are of a people that visited a completely new culture with very different outcomes. The Conquistadors devastated a culture, David Cargill was shocked and dismayed by the culture he visited, and Lewis and Clarke went out to gather information leaving little impact on the cultures they experienced (at least at that time).

      The point I want to make is we don't know what an alien visit would be like, and our imagination is limited by our experiences in the culture and world we are in. Aliens will not be limited by that. To assume they would be peaceful would be silly. Actually our experience would suggest that more advanced cultures always seem to destroy or conquer or change drastically the less advanced cultures without any exception I can think of. To assume they would be violent would be equally silly. We could turn a peaceful visit into a deadly one for us or for the aliens, and we could miss out on a treasure of knowledge and science.

      We may find the aliens aren't interested in us at all (Think Star Trek 3). They may not recognize humanity as being interesting or worthy of attention at all, and may decided to be fascinated by house flies or mold. Actually that would be kind of funny to have aliens come, and basically take measures to keep people from bothering them as they go about their business, and then leave.

    95. Re:Squids by AchilleTalon · · Score: 1

      Easy, if we can capture and decipher a communication (radio) signal, we can reasonably suppose they can do it as well and hence, they are capable to communicate with us as long as we are "speaking" their own language replying and using their own cipher. And I strongly suspect, even if I am not yet sure, the squids do not emit any radio signal to the galaxy.

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
    96. Re:Squids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The universe revolves around the US and the extraterestrials either speak English or they are out to destroy the planet.

    97. Re:Squids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming there are no caps to technology, if you assume technology has some limits then as the parent says they are unlikely to have sci-fi movie technology.

      Excluding the possible 'suicide cap' (like global nuclear war or so) there is still quite a way to go with most branches of science and technology. For example, even if FTL travel is actually impossible, I'd still count, say, fusion rockets as rather sci-fi, and we're pretty much certain those are possible.

    98. Re:Squids by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Yes -- and that goes way back to the earliest days of children's television... Captain Kangaroo had some sort of reading-teaching segment. Read word, point at object; doesn't take many brain cells to make the connection, even if your culture and/or brain wiring is completely different.

      Funny thought: Alien steps out of spaceship, says, "See dog run!"

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    99. Re:Squids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Honestly, I can't imagine a decent reason why any alien visitors would be hostile to us."

      Really? Must be a lack of imagination. I can think of lots of reasons, perhaps many we can't even fathom, if they are so Alien that what they value may not even occur to us (See Aztecs and Spanish gold hoarding for a good example).

      History has shown that at least with people, when two civilizations come into contact and resources are scarce, the more advanced group tends to overpower the less advanced technologically speaking. This is a basic rule of nature (At least on Earth) with survival going to the fittest. So it's not all that illogical to worry about an advanced Alien species making a visit and the fact they probably wouldn't have our best interests at heart even if they don't have widespread murder in mind. Sometimes good intentions can lead to unintended consequences like the plagues brought to the Americas (and visa-versa). I would like to think an advanced species capable of interstellar travel would think of such things, but anything is possible when two completely unrelated species interact.

    100. Re:Squids by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 1

      Better yet, Imagine the humans of (early) 1942 posing a credible threat to aliens with the equivalent of 1994 technology!

    101. Re:Squids by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You're applying human history and Earth conditions to aliens advanced enough to achieve interstellar travel.

      History has shown that at least with people, when two civilizations come into contact and resources are scarce,

      I think it's a reasonable assumption that resources are NOT scarce for aliens. If they have interstellar travel, they can go anywhere in the galaxy they want within reason to find resources. They don't need our planet for, for instance, mineral resources, since they can just harvest lifeless asteroids and planets for them. We already have ideas of doing this, except that for us we don't have the technology and the economic cost is too great to overcome simply digging things out of the ground (regardless of the environmental destruction this causes). Aliens aren't going to have the same resource constraints we have, since they're not stuck on a single planet the way we are.

      Plus, with their advanced technology, they can probably use technological means to get around resource limitations, rather than taking an expensive trip across the galaxy to steal things from someone else. For instance, they could probably fairly easily create gold using nuclear fusion.

      As for plagues, that assumes they have similar DNA-based cellular structures to us. I don't think that's a very good assumption, since they evolved on a distant planet. The diseases we have here on Earth are already extremely species-specific, and rarely cross species barriers, and that's with lifeforms (both hosts and parasites) that have all evolved here, and use DNA and RNA. The chances that the aliens, even if they're biological, could be carrying anything that would affect us are quite remote.

    102. Re:Squids by QuasiEvil · · Score: 1

      There are also limits to the amount of energy that can be extracted from matter so it's unlikely that a single ship can take control of the entire earth (an army could but as what price?).

      This assumes the goal is domination, not destruction. Domination of a resistant planet is likely very, very hard. Destruction on a planetary scale is likely pretty easy, and could be fitted into the cargo hold of a large interstellar ship with a hundred or so large fusion bombs. Or just find a few local asteroids and toss them our way - don't even carry the munitions with you.

      I really doubt that many civilizations enlightened and advanced enough to go exploring through space would be initially hostile. That doesn't mean that humanity's stupidity wouldn't provoke them, however.

    103. Re:Squids by lawpoop · · Score: 0

      OK, so what if mushrooms are trying to communicate with us through psilocybin? AFAIK, nobody is talking about a marijuana super-intelligence, or an aspirin super-intelligence. If people who have regular 'experiments' with mushrooms report contact an otherly, mushroom consciousness making these same claims, why shouldn't we investigate this? What basis do we have to disbelieve this? Other drugs don't behave similarly.

      If you were a super-evolved organism, wouldn't the best way to communicate be direct consciousness-to-consciousness links? And aren't neurotransmitters the building block of consciousness?

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    104. Re:Squids by tchdab1 · · Score: 1

      >>That assumption is that for communication, sharing intelligence is more important than sharing genetics.

      How smart is that? My daughter is laughing.

    105. Re:Squids by witekr · · Score: 1

      It's highly unlikely that the form of our proteins are compatible with anything the aliens can digest (if they eat and digest food at all, that is).

    106. Re:Squids by Any+Web+Loco · · Score: 1

      I thought that pliot sounded familiar. looks like this ripped it off

    107. Re:Squids by Devout_IPUite · · Score: 1

      Addition is such a basic fundamental aspect of reality that I'm sure an intelligent being could figure out an addition table pattern. I'm sure I could write that in a format you've never seen and the pattern would stand out. You'd look at it and puzzle at it and eventually you'd realize that it was just addition. With addition you can show someone what your symbol for equality and zero is. Then you can show multiplication to show someone what your symbol for one is. Now you can transmit pictures in black and white.

      If the aliens were intelligent, they'd have a member that could figure it out.

    108. Re:Squids by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      I would argue periodic multiplicative functions of complex numbers are the most fundamental aspect of how we perceive reality, but maybe a hive mind of blind jellyfish would have other ideas, and couldn't see your patterns.

    109. Re:Squids by Devout_IPUite · · Score: 1

      Chickens, parrots, dolphins, elephants and various primates have all been shown to count. I'm probably missing a few, but yeah... You do realize SETI is the Search for Extra-Terrestrial INTELLIGENCE?

      If it can't add, it's not intelligent.

    110. Re:Squids by chenjeru · · Score: 1

      ...unless they find us delicious

      --
      Even if you're on the right track, you'll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers
    111. Re:Squids by bogado · · Score: 1

      Also, if they show interest in contacting us in the first place, they would probably value us as a source of information, so destroying earth would be counter-productive. Think on how much money is spent on making sure that our probes would not contaminate with earth life the places that it visits.

      --
      []'s Victor Bogado da Silva Lins

      ^[:wq

  3. Obviously the first question is... by ItsJustAPseudonym · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...do you actually have any green women in bikinis?

    1. Re:Obviously the first question is... by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or 3-boobed women![NSFW!]

      Brbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbr!

    2. Re:Obviously the first question is... by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1

      I think you missed the true obvious first question: "Is that a cookbook you're holding?"

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    3. Re:Obviously the first question is... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      bikinis, trikinis ... details.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  4. Offer them a subscription? by scsirob · · Score: 3, Funny

    We should definitely show them that we are rational, well behaved lifeforms, with broad interests and predictable interaction

    For starters we can offer them a free subscription and RSS feed to /.

    Oh wait...

    --
    To Terminate, or not to Terminate, that's the question - SCSIROB
    1. Re:Offer them a subscription? by youn · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > We should definitely show them that we are rational, well behaved lifeforms, with broad interests and predictable interaction

      You think we should lie to them, right off the bat?

      --
      Never antropomorphize computers, they do not like that :p
    2. Re:Offer them a subscription? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except we're really not all that well behaved. If they're up there watching anything we're doing, don't you think they'd pay attention to things like war, or raping our planet?

    3. Re:Offer them a subscription? by DeadDecoy · · Score: 5, Funny

      It works for marriage.

    4. Re:Offer them a subscription? by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're assuming that exploiting natural resources and fighting with each other is only a human issue.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    5. Re:Offer them a subscription? by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

      We should definitely show them that we are rational, well behaved lifeforms, with broad interests and predictable interaction

      In that case we would kill the aliens immediately, and hunker down in silent mode while reverse-engineering their transport, weapons, communications, etc. To do anything else would be irrational and irresponsible. We really don't want to be in the position of "primitive" tribes encountering high tech "civilization" - we know how that works out from our own history.

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    6. Re:Offer them a subscription? by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      .... Oh, wait.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    7. Re:Offer them a subscription? by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      You're assuming that exploiting natural resources and fighting with each other is only a human issue.

      My feeling is that any species capable of crossing interstellar space probably wouldn't find Earth a very interesting place to find resources. More likely they'd tap into Jupiter or one of the other 'large' planets, or perhaps directly into the sun itself. If they were interested in Earth at all, it would likely be for scientific reasons, not commercial ones.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    8. Re:Offer them a subscription? by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1

      People don't call in the exterminator for butterflies, but stinging wasps and hornets get cleared away. Assuming we are on the level of pests to them, would you rather be liked or disliked? ;)

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    9. Re:Offer them a subscription? by AhtirTano · · Score: 3, Funny

      Half of all marriages end in divorce. On that model, half of all first contacts should result in intergalactic war.

    10. Re:Offer them a subscription? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I take it you're divorced.

    11. Re:Offer them a subscription? by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      "I didn't make a friend, but I did demonstrate my moral and intellectual superiority."

      "Yes, by completely misrepresenting who you are."

      "Do you know another way for me to prove either of those things?"

      "Point taken."

      http://basicinstructions.net/?p=1082

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    12. Re:Offer them a subscription? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      In that case we would kill the aliens immediately, and hunker down in silent mode while reverse-engineering their transport, weapons, communications, etc. To do anything else would be irrational and irresponsible.

      Well, obviously. The aliens are stupid enough land their ship. They're stupid enough to put all their crew on shore leave in an unexplored world. And no one home knows where they went. And you could reverse-engineer the whole of modern technology from, say, a cargo ship, so clearly you can do so from a spaceship. Brilliant strategy.

      We really don't want to be in the position of "primitive" tribes encountering high tech "civilization" - we know how that works out from our own history.

      Yeah. Now suppose the Aztecs had, by some miracle, managed to defeat Cortez and taken his equipment; would that had allowed them to reach technological parity with European powers? Or, for that matter, had they reached that parity, would that had given them actual power parity - miraculously making infrastructure and the larger population it supported appearing from thin air?

      When you encounter a more advanced civilization, you don't attack them. You can't win a war; an attempt to do so will only give them an excuse to kill you all. You make the case that you are more useful alive than dead, and that killing you would be immoral, and hope that they're nice.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    13. Re:Offer them a subscription? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The other half end in death, quite appropriate really...

  5. childrens books by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 1

    just like young children are taught, they could be provided with material for understanding the english language and using it to communicate with us

    as they would be more technologically advanced, it shouldnt take too long for their linguists to understand

    otherwise, long lost languages like sanskrit which virtually operate on a flowchart could be used as well

    1. Re:childrens books by v1 · · Score: 1

      otherwise, long lost languages like sanskrit which virtually operate on a flowchart could be used as well

      We can't use any long lost languages until we find them again.

      Sanscrit has long since been rediscovered.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    2. Re:childrens books by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 1

      i guess long lost was the wrong word

      more like a minority language on which plenty of educational material is available

      sanskrit is spoken by only a few thousand people on earth, but its pretty easy to learn

  6. Re:With Apologies to H.Y. by Dolphinzilla · · Score: 1

    its not he same without a rimshot

  7. Welcome! by devman · · Score: 5, Funny

    I, for one, would welcome our new alien overlords.

    1. Re:Welcome! by TeamSPAM · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is probably one of the few threads where this meme is on topic. To put this in perspective we are probably the native american indians greeting the european explorers. And we know how well that turned out for them.

      --
      Brought to you by Team SPAM! where we believe: "Information in the noise!"
    2. Re:Welcome! by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1

      I would vote for Kodos.

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    3. Re:Welcome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      To put this in perspective we are probably the native american indians greeting the european explorers. And we know how well that turned out for them.

      Woo! We get to run the intergalactic casinos!

    4. Re:Welcome! by slarrg · · Score: 1

      And, WOW, aren't those beads shiny! Let me have them.

    5. Re:Welcome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Suppose there are aliens, with a unified intelligence, in strangely wider dimensions. Suppose they 'send' us cautious messages about ethics, say every 1000 earth/sun orbits. Then - all we do is write them down wrong, worship the misunderstandings generated, and fight the societies who corrupted the last version. "Greetings, Thor?", "Hail Xenu"? Douglas Adams could have told us.

    6. Re:Welcome! by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      This is probably one of the few threads where this meme is on topic. To put this in perspective we are probably the native american indians greeting the european explorers. And we know how well that turned out for them.

      Depends upon how valuable our real estate is to them, and how strong their collective stomach is (figuratively speaking.) Yes, you're right, historically the more technologically advanced culture usually subjugates the more primitive one ... but that's assuming that our new alien friends are as fundamentally uncivilized as we still are, or think anything like we do. On the other hand, they really could be bloodthirsty BEMs Hell-bent on wiping us out (or enslaving and/or consuming us.) Personally, I'm hoping they're more like Vulcans, or even Andorians. Now, if we get hit by a Romulan or Klingon empire first (or, God help us, the Cardassians) we're well and truly screwed.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    7. Re:Welcome! by Sibko · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This is probably one of the few threads where this meme is on topic. To put this in perspective we are probably the native american indians greeting the european explorers. And we know how well that turned out for them.

      That's assuming they're more advanced than us. But if they're more advanced then us, than in all likelyhood it wouldn't be like indians meeting europeans at all! If we're exceptionally lucky it'd be like our present day society meeting the cro-magnum.

      Sir Arthur C. Clarke made a famous observation about space explorers discovering aliens. If one considers the millions of years of pre-history, and the rapid technological advancement occurring now, if you apply that to a hypothetical alien race, one can figure the probabilities of how advanced the explorers will find them. The conclusion is "we will find apes or angels, but not men."

      Why? Consider the history of Planet Earth. Let the height of the Empire State building represent the 5 billion year life of Terra. The height of a one-foot ruler perched on top would represent the million years of Man's existence. The thickness of a dime will represent the ten thousand years of Man's civilization. And the thickness of a postage stamp will represent the 300 years of Man's technological civilization. An unknown portion above represents "pre-Singularity Man", the period up to the point where mankind hits the Singularity/evolves into a higher form/turns into angels. Say another dime. Above that would be another Empire State building, representing the latter 5 billion years of Terra's lifespan.

      If you picked a millimeter of this tower at random, what would you most likely hit? One of the Empire State buildings, of course.


      http://www.projectrho.com/rocket/rocket3aa.html#apesorangels

    8. Re:Welcome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I, for one, would shoot them in the face and say: "How you like me now".

    9. Re:Welcome! by bazorg · · Score: 1

      yes, but HOW?

    10. Re:Welcome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To mix a few metaphors together an make a good 'ol racist joke...

      Q: Why are there now indians on star trek?
      A: Because they don't go to work in the future, either.

    11. Re:Welcome! by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Exploration requires one or more of the following to happen at all:

      1) a need to spread one's own culture and/or genes, and/or

      2) curiosity or acquisitiveness, both of which are fundamentally forms of aggression (poking into someone else's space, or taking what doesn't belong to you whether from desire or from need)

      Any aliens with the gumption to come this far out in bumfuck nullspace are likely to be trouble for us, even if not intentionally so. So it may be fine to be friendly, but we'd best be on our guard as well, *especially* if they =seem= totally benign.

      The notion that just because they're "more advanced" they'll automatically be our friends is like assuming that because DHS has better equipment than average folks, it's a friend to personal freedom.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    12. Re:Welcome! by mhs1973 · · Score: 1

      mind you if a Ferengi minded species would show up, it would be interesting how certain human-looking entities on earth would be working out in relations to these new business partners

    13. Re:Welcome! by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Funny

      mind you if a Ferengi minded species would show up, it would be interesting how certain human-looking entities on earth would be working out in relations to these new business partners

      They'd get along well with the RIAA, I'm sure.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    14. Re:Welcome! by ADenyer · · Score: 1

      Woo! We get to run the intergalactic casinos!

      Until the Commonwealth of Kentucky take over the domains because gambling is illegal so it's their God-given duty to protect y'all from Satan...

    15. Re:Welcome! by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      mind you if a Ferengi minded species would show up, it would be interesting how certain human-looking entities on earth would be working out in relations to these new business partners

      They'd get along well with the RIAA, I'm sure.

      Except the *AA really don't have the lobes for business. If they did, they'd figure out how to make filesharing pay.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    16. Re:Welcome! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I suspect that the greatest potential danger from aliens would lie in their deciding that Earth would be a nice tourist spot. It can't be worth coming out for resources; anyone who can get here probably doesn't have a big problem along those lines. I suppose eliminating a potential future competitor is a valid idea, though. Or a pest.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    17. Re:Welcome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until the Commonwealth of Ceres take over the domains because gambling is illegal so it's their Gort-given duty to protect y'all from Saturn...

      Fixed that for you (it's an article about extraterrestrials, after all)...

    18. Re:Welcome! by lawpoop · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sir Arthur C. Clarke made a famous observation about space explorers discovering aliens. If one considers the millions of years of pre-history, and the rapid technological advancement occurring now, if you apply that to a hypothetical alien race, one can figure the probabilities of how advanced the explorers will find them. The conclusion is "we will find apes or angels, but not men."

      This kind of thinking relies on two notions ancient to western thought: the Great Chain of Being, and linear progress.

      The Great Chain of Being is an idea that we inherited from Christian times. It describes a hierarchy of matter and life forms, with rocks at the bottom, then plants, animals, humans, and above them, angels, and finally, God at the top. Each spot is 'better' than the one below it. So we see know why Clarke posits we will only find "Apes or Angels": he's placing aliens in the Great Chain of Being. Contrast that with, say, a more Japanese notion of life forms, where robots and humans and talking animals all inhabit and live in a world, sometimes in conflict, sometimes in peace, with each having their own niche of adaptation and way of making a living. It's a world-view you may have seen in a Miyazaki film.

      The second Old Idea that Clark's prognostication rests on is linear progress. That there is a one-dimensional measure of 'goodness' or 'progress', and as time goes on, the value always goes up. In other words, things are always getting better -- we know more, we have more things, society advances. Contrast that with an idea of cycles of good and bad times, like you might see in Hindu thought, or of balance and homeostatis, like you might find in Greek or Native American thought. So, Clarke says we are either going to find Angels or Apes. Humans are right in the middle int he Great Chain of Being, and because of linear progress, we will become more 'angelic', sooner or later. Well, what about finding jellyfish? Jellyfish have been around the Earth's oceans for millions of years, and their basic body plan and way of making a living hasn't changed that much. Sounds like a fairly successful homeostasis, if you ask me. I'll bet there will be jellyfish as long as there are temperate oceans on Earth.

      So I think if you put this reasoning in light of those two ideas, it becomes apparent that even one of our greatest 'science'-fiction minds is unaware that they are rooted in very old, religious cosmologies that are culturally based. We in the west are still in the Dark Ages of imagination, living under the tyranny of ancient, jealous, despotic Gods.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    19. Re:Welcome! by ChrisMaple · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The claim that Clarke's prediction is based on mysticism is baseless. Not regarding humans as the best of creatures is foolish.

      The claim that it is based on linear progress is contrary to Clarke's prediction, which implies a very nonlinear progress: very slow until recently, fast now and at least until we progress beyond what we might reasonably recognize as human. The part up to now is history. The rest is speculation.

      Statis is not a good thing, unless you regard pain and early death as good.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    20. Re:Welcome! by sam_v1.35b · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up! Great, succinct summary of two very important points that have been lost in much of this discussion.

    21. Re:Welcome! by SetupWeasel · · Score: 1

      What the fuck is 'Terra'? I live on Earth.

      I have to say that when I see anyone using sci-fi jargon in a conversation about reality I immediately discount anything he or she has to say.

    22. Re:Welcome! by Neo+Quietus · · Score: 1

      Ummm, "Sci-Fi jargon"?
      "Terra" is from "Terra Firma", see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terra_Firma

    23. Re:Welcome! by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      What the fuck is 'Terra'? I live on Earth.

      I have to say that when I see anyone using sci-fi jargon in a conversation about reality I immediately discount anything he or she has to say.

      You may live on Earth, but a Frenchman lives on "Le Monde", yet you both live on Terra.

      Terra is latin. It's not sci-fi jargon any more than sodium chloride is, or a parsec.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    24. Re:Welcome! by Mab_Mass · · Score: 1

      Well said.

      I think that the only really safe assumption about a potential alien contact is that the aliens will be different in ways that we can't really even begin to consider. This will be the case for biology, philosophy, ethics, society (if they even have any such thing), etc. in addition to the obvious points about technology.

      Any contact would be weird.

      It would also be fabulously interesting, if we survived.

    25. Re:Welcome! by ultranova · · Score: 1

      The Great Chain of Being is an idea that we inherited from Christian times. It describes a hierarchy of matter and life forms, with rocks at the bottom, then plants, animals, humans, and above them, angels, and finally, God at the top. Each spot is 'better' than the one below it.

      So if you wanted a quick term for something humans might become as technology makes it possible to change the species, "angels" would be a pretty descriptive one. I guess that's part of being a writer: using common myths to effectively communicate ideas.

      The second Old Idea that Clark's prognostication rests on is linear progress. That there is a one-dimensional measure of 'goodness' or 'progress', and as time goes on, the value always goes up. In other words, things are always getting better -- we know more, we have more things, society advances.

      Thus far, for the whole of human history and prehistory, it has held. In fact, by all indications, it has held for the entire history of the Universe: what began as hot hydrogen gas has turned into this fine computer I'm typing this message with, which at least I find considerably more advanced. It also shows no indications of stopping.

      Contrast that with an idea of cycles of good and bad times, like you might see in Hindu thought, or of balance and homeostatis, like you might find in Greek or Native American thought.

      Both Hindus and Indians advanced, just slower than Europeans. Given enough time, the Aztec empire or it's nth successor could had reached where we are now. And the Greek, of course, were busy inventing and advancing mathematics, logic, philosophy, democracy, etc., thus disproving any notion of homeostasis.

      Well, what about finding jellyfish? Jellyfish have been around the Earth's oceans for millions of years, and their basic body plan and way of making a living hasn't changed that much. Sounds like a fairly successful homeostasis, if you ask me. I'll bet there will be jellyfish as long as there are temperate oceans on Earth.

      Yes, of course, just like it still has apes. Clarke is merely referring to the most powerful life form on the planet.

      Oh, and jellyfishes have only existed some few hundred million years. These multi-cellular newcomers - it's the bacteria that you should be referring to.

      So I think if you put this reasoning in light of those two ideas, it becomes apparent that even one of our greatest 'science'-fiction minds is unaware that they are rooted in very old, religious cosmologies that are culturally based. We in the west are still in the Dark Ages of imagination, living under the tyranny of ancient, jealous, despotic Gods.

      Nah, it's just your own mind reacting to the word "angels" and missing the point of the argument. For your benefit, here's the same thing in a less poetic form:

      Given a planet where a technological civilization occurs sometime during its existence, it is very unlikely that any random visitor would encounter the civilization in its industrial age, since that time only lasts a few hundred years after which the civilization either evolves into something else or collapses from resource exhaustion or infighting. This "something else" was what Clarke referred to as "angels", since a post-industrial civilization is powerful enough to appear divine to less powerful civilizations, such as our own.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    26. Re:Welcome! by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Resources might be a problem for someone coming from even *further* out in bumfuck nullspace, tho -- and we might be a convenient target/stopping point on their way to pillage further in.

      Tourists and tourist agencies usually want to maintain the desirability of the tourist trap in question. What might be more of a problem are sport hunters.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    27. Re:Welcome! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Tourists and tourist agencies usually want to maintain the desirability of the tourist trap in question.

      History disagrees with you in every way possible. See also: Conservation and Preservation of the Galapagos National Park

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    28. Re:Welcome! by gobbo · · Score: 1

      it'd be like our present day society meeting the cro-magnum.

      Cro-magnum? Like, this guy? Related to Flintlock Sapiens or the earlier Flintknap Sapiens, I think.

    29. Re:Welcome! by Sinical · · Score: 1

      Listen, Clark isn't making any judgements about the goodness of any of these levels of achievement: he is simply contrasting the lifespan of the planet against humanity's exponential growth in capability. Regardless of other cultures thoughts on the basic wholesomeness of progress, it is fact that the technological progress that has been made has given us amazing powers in a short period of time, and I don't think that anyone envisions that this growth in capability will be trailing off anytime soon. So when Clark says "Apes or Angels" he isn't "placing aliens in the Great Chain of Being", he is simply stating that the TECHNOLOGICAL CAPABILITIES of aliens that are at all similar to us will either be very primitive (apelike) because they are in the pre-exponential-growth phase, or in the angel phase (far up the exponential growth curve).

      The verbiage about balance or cycles or homeostatis doesn't represent humanity in any form that I understand. Yes, there are people that support the idea of statis, but that is such a tiny fraction of humanity that it's not worth worrying about right now: everybody else wants medicine and electricity and light and food and tentacle porn. The nature of most people is to strive for more and/or better, and I don't foresee that changing. Nor do I see us backsliding anytime soon -- I suppose some kind of frightful war could put a damper on things for awhile, but I'm reasonably hopeful that this won't happen. I've seen some articles that "starting over", if required, would now be impossible because the easily-accessible forms of resources are no longer available, e.g. if all the world's oil derricks were destroyed and 18th century man came along, there'd be no way to have an oil-based economy. Seems unlikely.

      Anyway, your goofy philosophical ramblings seemed so off-point that I felt I had to respond. You must've had some really shitty experience with Christians, I guess.

    30. Re:Welcome! by lawpoop · · Score: 1
      I'm glad you posted your response, it shows how foundational and subconscious the idea of linear progress and the Great Chain of Being are to western thought.

      So when Clark says "Apes or Angels" he isn't "placing aliens in the Great Chain of Being"...

      The whole reason that anybody can understand the phrase "apes and angels" is because it directly relies on the cosmology of the Great Chain of Being.

      Why would we discover an "ape" on another planet? What a silly idea -- what is this, planet of the apes? Why would we find an ape, and not, say, an octopus, or a bat? Because, if we run into a society that's younger than us, they haven't experienced as much progress, so they are lower than us on the great chain of being -- slightly more animalistic, which the next step down on the chart. Apes are 'below' man on the Great Chain of Being ( even though modern apes are as adapted to their environment as we are to ours, just like jellyfish and any other species that's not extinct ) because they are the most human-like animals.

      The next question is why would we find an 'angel' on another planet? Why not a grinning Chesire cat? Why not a colony of slugs playing ping-pong? Again, Clarke is using linear progress --- more time means more progress, never going back or in cycles -- and the Great Chain of Being here -- with more time, and thus more progress, they will have to have ascended to the next step on the great chain of being - namely, angels.

      Now it should be clear why the phrase Apes and Angels makes sense to the western mind. It's unlikely that we will run into aliens that are the exact same 'age' as we are; therefore they will be 'younger', having had less progress, and thus be a bit lower on the Great Chain of Being, and therefore, they are "apes". Or, they may be "older", having experienced more 'progress', thus being higher on the Great Chain of Being, and the stop above human is 'Angel'.

      The verbiage about balance or cycles or homeostasis doesn't represent humanity in any form that I understand.

      There were dinosaurs for millions of years. They never evolved intelligence anything like ours nor a civilization, or tools, or anything else for that matter. They had plenty of time to grow big brains -- there's nothing really special about that. Sounds like they were pretty much in homeostatis for millions of years, until a big meteor hit. And even then, the mammals that replaced them weren't that much smarter. In fact, modern humans have only been around for some 100,000-70,000 years, and civilization, only 7,000-5,000. That's a ridiculously small sample to base cosmic ideas of evolution and intelligence on. It's within the realm of possibility that the human 'phase' on the great chain of being could last millions or billions of years. Jellyfish are still around, doing pretty well, and have absolutely no brains whatsoever.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    31. Re:Welcome! by SetupWeasel · · Score: 1

      This is an English language site. The poster clearly knows English. The poster is using "Terra" to sound more intelligent. Therefore, the poster is the most pathetic of animals: the geek douchebag.

      I have lived amongst these creatures for many years, and I simply can't take it any more. Can you "grok" that?

  8. Was this sponsored by ABC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We should watch the new ABC series V for tips."

  9. Our guns vs. theirs by oneirophrenos · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So we've got guns. I wonder how intimidated a civilization that has the technology to traverse light-years through space would be of our bullets and bombs. If they wished to annihilate us, I wager they'd be able to do it without even giving us a chance to react. If an alien race should contact Earth, I think our best bet would be to at least assume that they have peaceful intentions.

    1. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can move a spaceship then lobbing a few asteroids in our direction would be easy.

    2. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >If they wished to annihilate us, I wager they'd be able to do it without even giving us a chance to react.

      It would be trivial. ET is not a signatory on any of our international laws and treaties. They could concoct a biological weapon that doesnt require any more advanced science than we already know. They could bombard the planet with these weapons, kill only humans, and keep the planet for themselves. I think the hawks need to realize how delicate human life is and the weaponry to destroy all human life has been even in our hands for the last 50 years.

    3. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by RsG · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So we've got guns. I wonder how intimidated a civilization that has the technology to traverse light-years through space would be of our bullets and bombs. If they wished to annihilate us, I wager they'd be able to do it without even giving us a chance to react. If an alien race should contact Earth, I think our best bet would be to at least assume that they have peaceful intentions.

      ^ What he said ^

      Seriously, people. Whoever it was from TFA who suggested "we've got guns and know how to use them" as a response was clueless.

      If an extraterrestrial species is remotely close to human beings technologically, then there is no way for them to reach us anymore than we can reach them. Interstellar space is a wonderfully effective buffer. If we're communicating with a neighbouring species via radio, with no chance of visitation, then we needn't worry about hostilities. Try to imagine fighting a war between North America and Australia without ships, missiles or aircraft. And that analogy vastly understates the distances involved.

      If they can reach us, and we can't reach them, then threats or hostility is a non-starter. Any spacecraft capable of crossing the gulf between stars is very likely so far ahead of us that we'd be unable to scratch the finish. And any craft able to cross that distance at a significant fraction of the speed of light is, by definition, able to render this entire planet sterile by way of a RKV. Think muskets vs. nukes here.

      --
      Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
    4. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by Quinapalus · · Score: 1

      I agree.

      The fact is that the US military today could annihilate any army on that was on the planet in World War I. A mere 90 years of technological innovation separates the two. I doubt only 90 years of technological innovation separates us from any aliens we would meet. Now imagine a few thousand years of technological innovation! We'd have about as much chance of fending of aliens as the Australian Aborigines had fending off the British.

    5. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Exactly. Lets look at the facts. We have guns. They're all on earth. We've never had a person go further from earth then lunar orbit. While we've had some success with robots going further, they're extremely slow, taking decades to plan, build, launch, and move to other planets. Most of our weapons wouldn't even work in space. This means we'd almost certainly be fighting them... on earth, or at best in earth orbit. That means no nukes, unless we're particularly stupid.

      Now compare alien technology. If we're fighting them, they're capable of pushing a spaceship from their star to ours. That means they're capable of pushing a few dozen asteroids from our asteroid belt to our major cities. Maybe we could deflect one, given a decade notice, but we'd be powerless to stop a dozen on courses chosen to end quickly, and they never even get close enough to us for us to attempt to engage them. And that's not even considering things they may have developed specifically as weapons.

    6. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      The fact is that the US military today could annihilate any army on that was on the planet in World War I.

      A modern hospital or the geeks at a LAN party have tons of modern technology at their disposal, but neither could defeat a Roman legion.

      The aliens could have very advanced technology, but only for peaceful purposes.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    7. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by Daemonax · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Also, if we allow ourselves to imagine beings with technology with allows them to create weapons that work at or close to the speed of light, we're not going to know about it until it hits us, as it'll arrive at the same time as the light from it arrives.

    8. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not everyone reads the same types of scifi.

      RKV == Relativistic kill vehicle

      In other words, A really big, really fast moving, planet killing bullet.

    9. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      "If an alien race should contact Earth, I think our best bet would be to at least assume that they have peaceful intentions."

      I'm sure that's what some of the Native American leaders thought when they first saw men with guns.

      Or the aborigines in Australia.

      So, give all of history with intelligent, alien beings with advanced technology meeting beings of equal intelligence but better technology, you surmise that the next one will act 100% different?

      The race may not always go to the swift, nor the battle to the strong.

      But that's the way to bet.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    10. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by RsG · · Score: 1

      The fact is that the US military today could annihilate any army on that was on the planet in World War I.

      A modern hospital or the geeks at a LAN party have tons of modern technology at their disposal, but neither could defeat a Roman legion.

      The aliens could have very advanced technology, but only for peaceful purposes.

      True, and if some group of would-be legionnaires decided to sack a hospital, how quickly do you think they'd garner a response from the local cops/national guard/army?

      --
      Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
    11. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by __aaxwdb6741 · · Score: 1

      TFA also suggested that the message should be from us all as a species. Saying that we have guns and know how to use them would quickly alert the ET's about our general ignorance so they could treat us accordingly.

    12. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by keraneuology · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unless interstellar travel is nothing but a single "duh" moment away - maybe we're just missing something that will make everything simple and easy to understand. Like pipes or the wonderbra.

      --
      If the g'vt kept the data on you that google does you'd better believe you'd be calling it "doing evil"
    13. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by darpo · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be so sure. If they were at least as smart as us, they could use a communications medium to con us into doing things against our best interests. Think Contact, except instead of having us build a ship, we build a bomb that they claim is a ship.

    14. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by amorsen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They could concoct a biological weapon that doesnt require any more advanced science than we already know.

      We couldn't kill all humans with a biological weapon with our current level of technology. Maybe 90%, maybe 99% because society breaks down, but there would be survivors. Nuclear is the only option right now. In the relatively near future, an asteroid or comet strike might become an option, but that's pretty much it for now.

      Well we could of course cause runaway greenhouse effect and boil the oceans, but that would be a really big project and take a long time.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    15. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by amorsen · · Score: 1

      The aliens could have very advanced technology, but only for peaceful purposes.

      It wouldn't take long for the aliens to repurpose their technology for violent purposes. If we decided to launch a strike after being visited by aliens, it would take at least decades (and more likely centuries) for us to deliver a hydrogen bomb to their home system. In that time they could certainly turn their fusion or antimatter drives into weapons...

      If you have the amount of energy needed to travel between the stars, then you also have enough energy to make life on Earth very unpleasant, should you feel like it.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    16. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by PPH · · Score: 1

      Sneeze.

      Hey, it worked in War of the Worlds.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    17. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by harry666t · · Score: 1

      Some time ago I read a book written by someone claiming to be an alien. He sounded quite credible, who knows. I think he could've been an alien. Anyway...

      So, if his claims were to be true, there are a lot of aliens who speak many human languages fluently, study our culture, and even occassionally make a contact with humans they know and trust. They watch our TV, read our books, browse our internet, listen to our music (I wonder what'd RIAA say). I think that when (if) I'd ever meet an alien, I'd just say "hi" and have a normal conversation.

      As of the risk of an attack, the guy claimed that there are races in our galaxy that'd love to see 6 bilions of humans dead, and that the only reason why we haven't been invaded yet is because a few more friendly races are somehow protecting us.

      Also, yes, we're way more likely going to get wiped off Earth rather than enslaved or whatever. Slaves are expensive, lazy, ineffective and rebellious. I can't imagine a civilization capable of interstellar warfare that wouldn't be able to assemble a damn robotic worker.

    18. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by glueball · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Perhaps the intention with saying "we have guns" is we could annihilate ourselves if we thought it was in our best interest. Game theory intergalactic style.

      Game type #1:
      So imagine you are an alien, all peaceful and loving and just wanting to love a new species. Everything would work out, right? These would be the aliens like ET or Cocoon. Sure, we'd be labeled the North Koreans on the galactic block but at least we have a new place to visit. Maybe they have an intergalactic Dr. Phil who can help establish some trust.

      Game type #2
      Now what if you were a not so peaceful alien. You want to live on earth, but wow. Those humans are bat-shit crazy enough to destroy the planet. We better treat them kindly because if we fuck with them, they'll torch the place. These would be the aliens from Predator or Transformers.

      Game type #3
      The third possibility is that they will annihilate us no matter what our response. If we can quickly convey that we are crazy and will salt the earth, at least we might have a dog in the fight. The weapons might be ineffective on the aliens but we know they'll work on earth itself. These would be the Independence Day aliens. Not everyone can place a virus into the mother ship, but there's a reason that the Independence Day aliens chose earth and not Mars.

      Being nice will leave you only +1 to the peaceful aliens. Being crazy will leave you +2 or +3.

    19. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by publiclurker · · Score: 1

      If they have the energy needed to get to our solar system, they automatically have enough technology to destroy our planet with relative safety. Simply attach whatever ship engined they have to asteroids and pelt us out of existence from a few million miles away.

    20. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by vux984 · · Score: 1

      The aliens could have very advanced technology, but only for peaceful purposes.

      They could weaponize their propulsion system pretty trivially. Even if it just means "point empty ship at city and accelerate to a significant fraction of the speed of light".

      A modern hospital or the geeks at a LAN party have tons of modern technology at their disposal, but neither could defeat a Roman legion.

      This is a deceptive analogy. You are right, they couldn't beat a roman legion if the roman legion showed up unexpectedly at the front door. But the society that produces these things can weaponize it trivially... just via the side effects and by-products of peaceful technology. We'd have to know about things like nitroglycerine, hydrochloric acid, chlorine gas, bacteria, molds, nerve toxins, anthrax, gasoline gel (napalm), etc, etc. We'd have all kinds of advanced knowledge about toxins and how they affect us, just from our manufacturing experience.

      As a society, we'd just take all of the above, and load it into those planes used to fight forest fires, and dump it on them. And in some cases, maybe follow it with a lit match (flare gun).

    21. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by jernejk · · Score: 1

      Do you remember the title by any chance?

    22. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by mhs1973 · · Score: 1

      Game theory - works always a charm on paper, but trying to transfer that to reality is like hanging a 'MISSION ACCOMPLISHED' sign on an aircraft carrier.

    23. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      We couldn't kill all humans with a biological weapon with our current level of technology. Maybe 90%, maybe 99% because society breaks down, but there would be survivors.

      I'm thinking David Gerrold made the case that if you kill off enough people, you can pretty much kill off the rest by 'natural causes'. Think about it a bit. Kill off most of the medical profession in the plagues. Now there's nobody to set bones, take out a bad apendix, and so forth. Kill off the people who tend the machines. High tech civilisation falls apart, there's nobody to repair things. About the only survivors are going to be semi-Stone Age people with the skills to survive without high tech civilisation. The 'survivalists'? Dead as soon as they run out of ammo in their compounds, and their electricity fails.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    24. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by harry666t · · Score: 1

      "Wszystko jest wibracja", in english it would be "Everything is a vibration".

      PDF download: http://www.wrzuta.pl/other/file/xICpZYE2Zv/kosmita3.pdf

      The book has been written in polish (and I'm Polish). I've mentioned it on /. before, and there was a lot of interest and I even thought of translating it. Who knows, maybe I'll do it eventually, it's a nice thing to share and I've already shared it with many polish-speaking friends. I also would have to contact the author about the translation, as not to upset him if he's really an alien (he mentioned in the book that the civilized part of the galaxy has a very strict law when it comes to quoting other people's words, as to not make them appear like they've said something they didn't.).

    25. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nuclear is not the only option. There's viruses with 100% lethality and as contagious as the flu. A few refinements to bird flu and you're set. Set lose in a coordinated fashion and the world's epidemiologists wouldn't be able to stop it in time.

    26. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by Wooky_linuxer · · Score: 1

      Ok, but you are comparing all human history. There is no way to tell if alien history worked up the same way. Perhaps all aliens civilizations as violent as ours simply nuke themselves out of existence after 2 or 3 centuries of nuclear knowledge, while discovering FTL travel requires say a millenia or more of nuclear knowledge. There is just no way to know.

      --
      Where is that guy who'd die defending what I had to say when I need him?
    27. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      It sounds interesting. You should contact the author (alien or human) and ask if they'd like it to be translated if it were a free release. If you need a proof-reader, let me know.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    28. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by Latinhypercube · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Anyone who cites Game theory for dealing with peaceful and God powerful aliens is already bat shit crazy. A very paranoid and schizophrenic way of thinking (John Nash). Any alien race advanced enough to go wandering the stars HAS ALREADY FOUND PEACE AT HOME. No domestically waring race would divert resources to traveling almost infinite distances looking for a new fight. If we were to show ANY aggression it is US that would suffer. I always find it funny that we think aliens would come to the Earth to visit humans. How about them coming to visit the Earth with it's unique climate and beautiful variety of animals, plants, insects, single cell, marine life (that we are trying our best to destroy).

    29. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by jamstar7 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      These would be the Independence Day aliens. Not everyone can place a virus into the mother ship, but there's a reason that the Independence Day aliens chose earth and not Mars.

      Yeah, it's called a plot hook. If the aliens took over Mars & the asteroid belt, it would have been a completely different (and most likely, boring as hell) movie.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    30. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by Geirzinho · · Score: 1

      I think your average scenario #2 Decepticon would be more likely to make some super greasy popcorn and watch...

    31. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You are right, they couldn't beat a roman legion if the roman legion showed up unexpectedly at the front door.

      NOBODY expects the Roman legion!

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    32. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Any alien race advanced enough to go wandering the stars HAS ALREADY FOUND PEACE AT HOME.

      True.

      > No domestically waring race would divert resources to traveling almost infinite distances looking for a new fight.

      Quite possibly false, at the same time that the earlier statement remains true. Considering the vast and expensive distances involved, the sort of government that works for a whole planet or a whole solar system is unlikely to work for a unified multi-star-system government. To suggest a human-terminology equivalent: you might be fine with your taxes supporting something on Mars because, by then, it'd be reasonable for you to take a vacation there. But would you want your taxes going towards shipping stuff to a city ten light years away? Hell no, you already paid for that colony to be founded in the first place, they should be able to support themselves by now...

      A race with footholds in ten star systems might as well be ten separate races - and each of them are their own primary competitors for new habitable systems. They may damn well have to go armed, just in case they find their own competitors got to the destination before them and are shooting at them.

      Now ask yourself: if star-travel-capable aliens visit us, are we more likely to be the first planet they visit, or the nth? Consider that none of the systems within ten or so light years of us look inhabited yet...

    33. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Historically, humans have had several bottlenecks. Not just the black death in Europe, but back before we were even developing civilizations in Mesopotamia. We've been reduced to a thousand or two, and that was back before we had advances such as water purification, medicine, and plenty of food.

    34. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. There is simply no way to know.

      So why did the GP post assume peaceful intent?

      There's another old saying that applies -

      "hope for the best;
      prepare for the worst."

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    35. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Whoever it was from TFA who suggested "we've got guns and know how to use them" as a response was American

      FTFY.

    36. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by Flere+Imsaho · · Score: 1

      You're anthropomorphising. How can we even begin to guess their motivations and behaviour?

      --
      It gripped her hand gently. 'Regret is for humans,' it said.
    37. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      I agree. If someone shows up here and doesn't immediately start attacking us, we can assume that they mean us no harm. To get here would mean that they posses a technology that is so far advanced that we could do little to nothing to stop them from wiping us all out. Excellent point.

      How about a counterpoint. If we pickup a radio message from somewhere out there in the cosmos, we can't be sure that the ones who sent it are friendly. Turkey hunters use turkey calls. If a Tom hears another turkey, he'll go to investigate it. Sometimes, he finds a hunter with a 12 guage shotgun and ends up as dinner. The hunter knew that there was a turkey somewhere out there, but not necessarily where and couldn't expend the time or energy to find it.

      Who's to say that an intergalactic radio message isn't their version of a turkey call? They know that food is out here somewhere, but they don't know exactly where. This is an unlikely scenario, but not an impossible one. We've been blasting RF into the cosmos for a little over 60 years. So far, no one has shown up to turn us into dinner. It's also possible that the hunter was 40 light years away and we only have another 20 before they show up with their space shotguns.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    38. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by gy+equals+c · · Score: 1

      If aliens show up physically, our only sane posture is one of extreme respect. They don't need to have advanced weapons, they've got the asteroid belt and we're sitting at the bottom of a gravity well thst we can barely get out of. Ceres for breakfast, anyone?

    39. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're making the assumption that they want Earth for whatever reason. It is entirely possible a "bat-shit crazy" respose will only provoke a "if those crazy bastards ever get off that rock, they'll blow up everything. Nuke them from orbit... only way to be sure."

      I still think an attempt at peace would be the best option. If we meet war-like aliens, Earth is likely doomed regardless of which side presses the big red button. If we meet anything less than war-like, why make them angry?

    40. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by fractoid · · Score: 1
      I love the quote from your link:

      Man-portable weapons of this type would have extreme issues with recoil, however; accelerating a 1 gram projectile up to a mere 1% of light speed would produce enough force to send a 100 kg (220 pound) man flying backward at 30 meters per second (98 feet per second or 67 miles per hour).

      Also interesting is the fact that:

      A 1 kg mass traveling at 99% of the speed of light would have a kinetic energy of 5.47Ã--1017 joules. In explosive terms, it would be equal to 132 megatons of TNT. That's about 32 megatons more than the theoretical max yield of the tsar bomba, the most powerful nuclear weapon ever detonated. 1 kg of mass-energy is 8.99Ã--1016 joules or about 21.5 megatons of TNT.

      So at 0.99c, that 1kg (at rest) mass is storing more energy as inertia than it is as raw energy bound into matter.

      Then again, Mapparent = Mrest / sqrt(1 - v^2 / c^2), giving that 1kg projectile an apparent mass of 50.25kg.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    41. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by fractoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No domestically waring race would divert resources to traveling almost infinite distances looking for a new fight.

      Whuh? How'd you get that? I don't see an event like the invention of a practicable hyperdrive having that sort of effect on us war-crazy buggers, why should it affect aliens that way?

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    42. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by nizo · · Score: 1

      So I think we can assume if they intend to wipe us out, they won't even bother contacting us, since doing what you mentioned wouldn't require that we even know they exist. I mean how hard would it be for them to drop biological weapons on us undetected?

    43. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by nizo · · Score: 1

      You are forgetting #4: they come in peace, wanting to see if they could make peaceful contact, but obviously we are illogical distrustful savages who shook our spears at them. Seriously, if they are sufficiently advanced and bother trying to communicate with us, that would imply to me that they don't want to wipe us out. How hard would it be for us to wipe out a primitive society on an island in the middle of the ocean without them even knowing we exist?

    44. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by h4rm0ny · · Score: 2, Funny

      Any alien race advanced enough to go wandering the stars HAS ALREADY FOUND PEACE AT HOME

      Unless of course they're being chased by the Cylons.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    45. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      OK, in the situation where the peaceful aliens are the hospital and earthlings are the Romans, who are the cops?

      Were you going for a funny mod, or do you just not understand analogies?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    46. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      Boring to some (or most, you're right), but if you want a good treatment of something like this, try 'The Kraken Wakes', by John Wyndham. The aliens head straight for our deep oceans (they like the pressure down there), but its a tense and sometimes realistically depressing book. It's more about human nature than alien technology, so it's aged quite well (it's an old book from the man who wrote Day of the Triffids).

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    47. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      You seem to be forgetting who's turning up where. The "alien expeditionary force" would only have what it brought with them. Us earthlets would have home advantage.

      Though as other people have pointed out they could use propulsion units as weapons, directly or indirectly.

      But they'd have to have the intent to fight us. What if they didn't? What if they didn't understand the concept of agression, or had supressed it for some reason?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    48. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by syousef · · Score: 1

      So we've got guns. I wonder how intimidated a civilization that has the technology to traverse light-years through space would be of our bullets and bombs.

      I wonder how intimidated Captain Cook was by the primative weapons that killed him?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Cook#Third_voyage_.281776.E2.80.9379.29_and_death

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    49. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the most sensible analysis of policy options of the North Korean government that I have read.

    50. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well we could of course cause runaway greenhouse effect and boil the oceans, but that would be a really big project and take a long time.

      Oh yeah, decades at least.

    51. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      We could just spam them to death. They probably forgot about that.

    52. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by vux984 · · Score: 1

      You seem to be forgetting who's turning up where. The "alien expeditionary force" would only have what it brought with them. Us earthlets would have home advantage.

      Beating the alien expeditionary force isn't beating the aliens. If they want a round 2. Its game over for us.

      Though as other people have pointed out they could use propulsion units as weapons, directly or indirectly.

      Other people? I pointed that out myself, in the post you replied to.

      But they'd have to have the intent to fight us. What if they didn't? What if they didn't understand the concept of agression, or had supressed it for some reason?

      Right, we're going to get invaded by the possum people? Sure, I guess we might wipe that civilization out. But that's about it.

      Although how they ever got that advanced in the first place is beyond me. Conflict drives progress and evolution.

    53. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by amorsen · · Score: 1

      Now there's nobody to set bones, take out a bad apendix, and so forth.

      Who cares. As long as a good fraction of people make it to be parents, the species will survive.

      High tech civilisation falls apart, there's nobody to repair things.

      We'll have the use of fire, and with just a tiny bit of luck basic metallurgy (plus lots of available high-grade ore, currently known as "cars"). That's better than what we had until 5000 years ago.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    54. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      In The War of the Worlds (1953) we whacked their landing cylinder hard with a shovel, knocking off a large chunk of its heat shield. Then, when the aliens peeked out that night, three guys (untrained in the methods of first contact) approached it yelling aggressively in an incomprehensible Earth language swinging a big stick in front of them with some white fabric attached to the end. Clearly it was more hostile action and the only thing to do was fire the Heat Ray at them and an EMP disabling all local electronics.

      And when more natives showed up with a lightly armored vehicle apparently immune to the EMP, it was clearly a prelude to another attack, so it had to be blasted too.

      And when the pit was surrounded by the local military and an aircraft tried to fly over and dropped flares that hurt the aliens' eyes, that was the last straw, so the aircraft had to be shot down and the whole area around the pit had to be razed to keep the natives back while they finished extracting themselves from their landing craft.

      So clearly these native peoples were not capable of peaceful coexistence with the alien colonists.

      And thus the war began.

      Still, there was a faction that thought that perhaps coexistence could be negotiated. When it was discovered two humans were still in a structure where a cylinder had landed, a surveillance probe was sent in to locate them. The male proved to be aggressive, attacking and severing the probe from the alien craft, but there was hopes that contact with the female of the species might be more conducive.

      A physical greeting was attempted. In order to show that the aliens truly meant no harm, the alien stripped nude to show it had no weapons and gently approached the female, gently touching her shoulder, and attempted tactile telepathy with her. While the attempt established a primitive connection with the female's mind, creating an empathic link, the consciousnesses of the aliens and the humans were too different. The female summoned the male to attack again, first blinding the nude ambassador, then brutally attacking him, causing serious physical injury. (The female would later be judged insane by her fellow humans for the effects the attempt had upon her, though in fact she would be sensitive to the aliens' transmissions for the rest of her life, though unable to decipher them.)

      It was then the council determined that no peace could be had with this native species. They were to be exterminated like fungus. And so the war was set resolutely on its path toward the genocide of this irredeemably xenophobic, aggressive, and hostile native population and the planet seized for the good of the survival of the alien colonists.

      Unfortunately, the first wave succumbed to a bacteria that produced a near-death paralysis in the first colonial wave. As a last effort, a mental suppression signal was engaged to whittle away the native's memory of the attack while the rest of the colonial fleet continued on its way. 35 Earth years passed until the advance forces discovered that radiation could counteract the bacteria sufficiently for revival and most of the natives had forgotten the war and rebuilt their world. But with their superior weapons seized and concealed or destroyed by the natives, the aliens found it difficult to resume the war, resorting to insurgent and terrorist tactics defeat the humans before the deadline of the colonists' arrival.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    55. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure it will go over well with them when, after we greet them nicely and say what a gentle people we are, they see how a lot of our population plays a game called "Space Invaders"...

    56. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by amorsen · · Score: 1

      Won't work. Nothing has 100% lethality, and pockets of people will survive.

      Besides, Madagascar will close their port.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    57. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by amorsen · · Score: 1

      Good point.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    58. Re:Our guns vs. theirs by RsG · · Score: 1

      No, I understood the analogy (and yes, there was an element of subtle humour in my reply). My presumption was that "peaceful" does not preclude measures of self-defence.

      To use your own analogy, the non-hostile aliens who make contact are unarmed and unversed in combat, as a hospital staff would be. But just as a hospital is part of a larger civilization, so too would the aliens making contact. It is extremely doubtful that they have no capacity whatsoever for self-defence, even if it only boils down to tools that can be re-purposed as weapons.

      So we, the would-be legionnaires, sack the peaceful aliens and suddenly find ourselves facing the non-peaceful alternative. The "cops" would be whatever elements of the alien civilization saw fit to intervene. Against a modern military, a Roman legion would lose - hell they might not even be able to take a swat team or an angry mob with guns. Would we, the legionnaires in your analogy, fair any better?

      --
      Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
  10. Roll for initiative... by The_Chicken_205 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Roll for initiative... :D

    --
    I need a new sig...
  11. With a phone? by youn · · Score: 1

    they seem to be interested in phones... "ET Phone home"

    --
    Never antropomorphize computers, they do not like that :p
  12. Well, let's face it... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...any alien that lands on planet Earth will likely be pale-skinned, dressed in strange clothing & only grunt monosyllabically at you having been sat in front of a console screen for the past 50 years - so just practice your alien communication skills on the average British teenager...

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    1. Re:Well, let's face it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes you think they'll be pale-skinned?

    2. Re:Well, let's face it... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      What makes you think they'll be pale-skinned?

      Mainly because we're all hoping it won't be Klingons.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  13. To serve aliens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a cookbook!

  14. Your Papers Please... by Dolphinzilla · · Score: 4, Funny

    Please fill out these entry visa papers or we'll have to ask you to leave...

  15. Knowing the internet... by BertieBaggio · · Score: 1

    If we're lucky, they'll ask someone from the internet who would say something like "O HAI ALIENZ".

    If we're unlucky, they'll contact one of the YouTube comment posters.

    --
    If all you have is a grenade, pretty soon every problem looks like a foxhole -- MightyYar
  16. Not Guilty! by siloko · · Score: 1

    err, dude, we were joking!

  17. Nuke 'em from orbit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... it's the only way to be sure.

  18. A notice of lawsuit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Citing that evidence suggests that they have been monitoring earth broadcasts, and that their planet is not within the distribution zone of the earth's intellectual property, and that royalties must be paid immediately for the past 50-100 years of received carrier wave based entertainment that they have received free of cost.

    Further, a gag order is hereby issued forbidding the aliens to discuss either this suit or the entertainment materials (hereto fore "content") with any other audience, known or unknown to the residents of earth, until after trial or settlement has been concluded,

    Yadda yadda yadda

    Give us all your money,

    Signed, the MPAA and RIAA industries.

    1. Re:A notice of lawsuit. by gznork26 · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, the first alien visitors we get could be some lawyers serving us with papers...

      + + +
      "Yes sir, Mr. Nagle," I told the debriefing officer, "that's what they said when they handed us the papers."

      The five of us had just returned from what was supposed to have been the first stage of a long-delayed Mars colonization project. Had everything gone as planned, we were to have stayed for five years, helping groups of volunteer colonists set up their habitats and showing them how to use all of the special equipment. Unfortunately, it didn't quite work out that way.
      + + +

      The story is called "Site License", and you can read the whole story here:
      http://klurgsheld.wordpress.com/2007/06/05/site-license/

      P. Orin Zack

    2. Re:A notice of lawsuit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, this is quite an interesting subject. Copyright or patent rights do not work between interstellar civilisations.

      Can you already see humans hirings aliens to bootleg Disney products...

  19. Obligatory qoute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All your base are belong to us?

  20. TITS or GTFO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TITS or GTFO!

  21. Nanu! Nanu! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nanu! Nanu! is the way to go!

  22. Read FootFall by RichMan · · Score: 4, Informative

    Anyone thinking about how we greet aliens should realize several things
          a) anyone in orbit is in a very powerful position. Essentially the ultimate higher attack position.
          b) anyone arriving in orbit has very advanced technology
          c) kinetic energy

    Read Footfall, it posits aliens with the barest of interstellar travel capabilities arriving
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Footfall

    1. Re:Read FootFall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You beat me to it.

      Also, playing dead seems like it could be a good idea (although we should have thought of that 50 years ago) since the galaxy might not be a friendly place.
      In The Forge of God the solution to the Fermi Paradox is that we have not observed/heard from any alien races because all the loud ones (like us) are easy prey, and killed off quickly by Von Neumann probes sent out by other races for various reasons..
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Forge_of_God

    2. Re:Read FootFall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It gets worse: read A Killing Star.

      To wit: anyone who can reach high relativistic speeds can sterilize entire solar systems trivially, with no plausible defense possible.Furthermore, at least some, possibly most of them would do it to us first.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Killing_Star

      As quoted from the book, The Killing Star assumes the following about alien behavior:
      1. THEIR SURVIVAL WILL BE MORE IMPORTANT THAN OUR SURVIVAL.
      If an alien species has to choose between them and us, they won't choose us. It is difficult to imagine a contrary case; species don't survive by being self-sacrificing.
      2. WIMPS DON'T BECOME TOP DOGS.
      No species makes it to the top by being passive. The species in charge of any given planet will be highly intelligent, alert, aggressive, and ruthless when necessary.
      3. THEY WILL ASSUME THAT THE FIRST TWO LAWS APPLY TO US.

    3. Re:Read FootFall by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As quoted from the book, The Killing Star assumes the following about alien behavior: 1. THEIR SURVIVAL WILL BE MORE IMPORTANT THAN OUR SURVIVAL. If an alien species has to choose between them and us, they won't choose us. It is difficult to imagine a contrary case; species don't survive by being self-sacrificing. 2. WIMPS DON'T BECOME TOP DOGS. No species makes it to the top by being passive. The species in charge of any given planet will be highly intelligent, alert, aggressive, and ruthless when necessary. 3. THEY WILL ASSUME THAT THE FIRST TWO LAWS APPLY TO US.

      A very Kzin take on the Universe.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    4. Re:Read FootFall by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      Except it is not that big. Sure, it is a cheap bang for the buck but a kinetic bombardment doesn't get close to what a serious nuke can deliver. Both are far from what a 1000 tons meteor can do, however, but those have a speed that doesn't come just from Earth's gravitational speed.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    5. Re:Read FootFall by AhtirTano · · Score: 1

      I loved The Moon is a Harsh Mistress by Heinlein for this exactly logic.

    6. Re:Read FootFall by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Footfall is good but it's only one possible scenario. It seems as likely that wandering aliens will be cooperative as combative (and indeed the subject of such politics is even breached in Footfall — if the Fithp had gone behind another leader then the whole thing might have gone very differently. Also, it's a science-fiction novel.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Read FootFall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No species makes it to the top by being passive. The species in charge of any given planet will be highly intelligent, alert, aggressive, and ruthless when necessary.

      These "laws" are very poorly thought out. Species do not make it to the top by virtue of anything the species does or does not do. Species don't make decisions about whether or not to be aggressive; individuals make decisions. Species don't have instincts; individuals do. This is a fairly fundamental evolutionary principle.

      You might rebut that in a civilised species there will be governing bodies that are tasked with ensuring the survival of their species. But that's just begging the question. Who, exactly, assigned this task to this hypothetical governing body? What instinct led to the creation of a body to make sure that this task gets done? The answer: there is no evolutionary pressure for any such instinct.

      It isn't to be expected that individuals will have an interest in making decisions on behalf of their species as a whole. It is to be expected that individuals will have an interest in making decisions on behalf of their own personal welfare; but that is not normally going to lead to genocide except in cases such as (a) insanity, or (b) really, really sloppy thinking like that of the authors of "The Killing Star". There is reason to fear either of these things; but there's no reason to indulge paranoid fantasies.

    8. Re:Read FootFall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While being in orbit does provide you with a good vantage point and easy access to targets anywhere, height advantage becomes a bit less significant once you hit orbit. You can't just "drop" stuff from orbit, because it'll continue moving in the same orbit you are. Dropping something requires you to either spend a whole lot of energy to cancel its energy of motion in orbit, do a whole lot of math to have its orbit slowly decay onto the spot you want, or expend a whole lot of energy to remain stationary over the spot you choose, instead of orbiting, so that you can drop stuff.

      Nothing that can't be solved with sufficiently advanced technology, but orbital combat is more than just "high ground."

    9. Re:Read FootFall by passion · · Score: 1

      c) kinetic energy ... or as Neil Stephenson put it recently in Anathem, "getting rodded".

      --
      - passion
    10. Re:Read FootFall by Agripa · · Score: 1

      if the Fithp had gone behind another leader then the whole thing might have gone very differently.

      How many encounters between colonial powers and natives were ultimately peaceful? Even without violent conflict, native cultures are assimilated in one way or another with some minor exceptions. Even if they are just missionaries, that may or may not be good for the natives.

      In the case of Footfall, the Fithp intended to conquer earth, Winterhome to them, from the start. Dawson's discussion with the Heardmaster's Adviser (who is the deposed original planet born Heardmaster) goes bad when he reveals too much to the fi about human culture, science, and technology. The Heardmaster would conquer earth for a place to live and the Heardmaster's Adviser would conquer the humans to integrate their future progress into the heard for which Dawson kills or thinks he kills him.

      In the end of course things do go differently as the Filph get a new leader in a roundabout way.

  23. Yo Mama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yo Mama's so fat, she's the reason Pluto was reclassified a dwarf planet.

    1. Re:Yo Mama by theeddie55 · · Score: 0, Troll

      it's comments like this that make me wonder why we're looking for intelligent life in space when we're still somewhat lacking in intelligent life here on earth.

  24. Freeze and play dead? by johannesg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Freeze and play dead? Someone really should have thought of that _before_ we started broadcasting radio and TV and a planet-wide basis. Those waves really don't stop when they hit the outer atmosphere you know... By now we should be fairly well-known in our galactic neighbourhood.

    As for talking about our guns, whoever shows up here has already demonstrated massively superior technology to ours (we are not showing up on _their_ doorstep are we?) so antagonizing them might not be such a great idea either.

    So yeah, by all means let's throw a party and hope it isn't us that ends up on the barbecue...

    1. Re:Freeze and play dead? by UncleWilly · · Score: 1

      I am fairly certain I read someplace that the big-science-brains determined that earth's radio & TV signals get lost in background "space static" pretty close to our solar system (1-2 light years?)

      To answer the original question, "Should we reply, and if so, what should we say?" First off, let's assume the aliens are really close, say 50 light years away. It would probably take 100-200 years to dialog with anything more than math. By then we would have learned so much more (about the aliens, and things in general) as to make our dialog obvious.

      Having said that, we should mention the tax breaks we can offer them for relocating a space hub to Mars.

    2. Re:Freeze and play dead? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      As for talking about our guns, whoever shows up here has already demonstrated massively superior technology to ours (we are not showing up on _their_ doorstep are we?) so antagonizing them might not be such a great idea either.

      I don't think that's a given. The only two things we're lacking in order to make a slow-boat colonization ship to another planet is:
      1) Hibernation technology
      2) The economic dedication required to do so

      You can easily imagine an alien race within about 10-50 light years having both of these things available to them, and coming to earth. It's quite possible they'd come here and be utterly flabbergasted at cellphones and the Internet. I've been toying with a science fiction story based around that idea, but I'm not that great a writer.

      Bonus: because of the travel time, at the time they began the trip, they probably wouldn't have been able to observe any evidence of technological civilization on the planet, so they'd be expecting to land somewhere uninhabited.

    3. Re:Freeze and play dead? by edittard · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Worldwar: in the balance" has alien lizards landing in the middle of WW2. Based on a probe they'd sent 600 years ago they were expecting to find mailed knights on horseback, with hilarious consequences.

      --
      At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
    4. Re:Freeze and play dead? by rastilin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't think that's a given. The only two things we're lacking in order to make a slow-boat colonization ship to another planet is: 1) Hibernation technology 2) The economic dedication required to do so

      Well we're also lacking the technology to build a structure that can withstand the trip and take all the stuff it needs with it. Even if we had the technology, we'd still need to design and scale up smaller models till we got to a point where we can build it. But that isn't my point, my point is that we'd be hard pressed to build a colony ship even if we dedicated the planet's whole productive and economic capacity into it. Even if we optimized it with those "keep me awake for a week" drugs and 100 hour work weeks. That means that even a low tech STL ship that comes in to Earth implies a level of mass production several orders above ours. That is a scary thing. It means that if they actually wanted to fight us, they could out produce us in terms of Armor and Planes. If they have a high level of automation, they won't even need many personnel.

      --
      How do you kill that which has no life?
    5. Re:Freeze and play dead? by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Doesn't matter: They would have to be at least equal to us in most technology, and they would have a massive tactical advantage: A ship capable of spending an indeterminate time in deep space, with full life-support. They also would have to have more experience with space tech, notably propulsion.

      All they have to do to wipe us out is retreat to the asteroid belt, and lob a couple large ones this way. All of that would be easily within their demonstrated abilities. We have no weapons capable of attacking outside of low orbit, and no way of countering (much less actually stopping) an attack of that magnitude. Such an attack would almost certainly leave the biosphere intact, but would likely destroy all real industrial capacity and political stability on Earth. (And might even manage to wipe out humanity directly.)

      The only real reason not to do such if they wanted a war would be because they wanted our tech.

      Much better to be friendly, and see how well we can bargain. A planet-based civilization can't hold out against an attacker that holds the high orbitals.

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    6. Re:Freeze and play dead? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      That means that even a low tech STL ship that comes in to Earth implies a level of mass production several orders above ours. That is a scary thing. It means that if they actually wanted to fight us, they could out produce us in terms of Armor and Planes. If they have a high level of automation, they won't even need many personnel.

      Yah, but it's a 900 year long trip. The alien race that originally launched the damned thing might already have FTL drives-- that's a really, really long time. They might have completely forgotten it was launched in the first place, and pulled down whatever receiving station was supposed to receive it's "ping" when it reached the destination. I dunno, there's hundreds of possibilities, and all of this is science fiction anyway, so there you go.

      What I do hate is the cliched science fiction concepts that:
      1) Aliens necessarily have better technology than we do
      2) Aliens with better technology than we do are all lovey-dovey hippies

      If I have to read another science fiction story in which the aliens come to earth to protect us from blowing each other up with nukes, I'll hurl into a bucket.

    7. Re:Freeze and play dead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Why would they even need hibernation technology? Maybe they are quite capable on their own of living for hundreds or even thousands of years at an entirely natural low-metabolism state.

      So all they would need is: the economic dedication.

    8. Re:Freeze and play dead? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter: They would have to be at least equal to us in most technology, and they would have a massive tactical advantage: A ship capable of spending an indeterminate time in deep space, with full life-support. They also would have to have more experience with space tech, notably propulsion.

      Nah, the ship would destroy itself in the process of landing. It's a colony ship; they wouldn't expect to be going back. The tanks which held the fuel would serve as a huge "crumble zone" and it could come down with parachutes or something. All the details aren't worked out yet, but the important point is this:

      * You're making assumptions where none are warranted.

      Secondly, we already know several methods for building space propulsion drives that can do a long-term trip, centuries or longer. We just don't use them because they're useless for what we're doing in space now. They'd have more experience with it, yah I can't argue that.

      Thirdly, the ship wouldn't have "full life support" because it's inhabitants would all be in hibernation. That was in the premise I brought up, remember? It would have "bare minimum" life support, at best. And it, also, would be designed for a one-way trip, like the ship itself. At best it would wake a couple crew members up for the last few weeks to check-out the functionality of the systems and find a landing spot.

      All they have to do to wipe us out is retreat to the asteroid belt, and lob a couple large ones this way. All of that would be easily within their demonstrated abilities.

      No, only within the abilities you pulled out of your ass. None of the ones in the original scenario.

      Much better to be friendly, and see how well we can bargain. A planet-based civilization can't hold out against an attacker that holds the high orbitals.

      But they don't, because their ship did a controlled crash-landing.

      The problem with people who read too much sci-fi is that they get the sci-fi cliches stuck in their head and literally can't think about anything else.

      Look, aliens don't have to be technologically advanced. They don't have to be friendly, *or* hostile. There's no reason an android designed to simulate a human in every way would be super-strong. Wipe every sci-fi cliche from your head and just think for awhile.

    9. Re:Freeze and play dead? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Thank you for a response that doesn't just say, "your idea is stupid because it goes against existing sci-fi cliches", like everybody else has so far.

    10. Re:Freeze and play dead? by Sibko · · Score: 1

      Freeze and play dead? Someone really should have thought of that _before_ we started broadcasting radio and TV and a planet-wide basis. Those waves really don't stop when they hit the outer atmosphere you know... By now we should be fairly well-known in our galactic neighbourhood.

      Only if you consider our galactic neighbourhood to be what's within a thousand light years. The problem with aliens detecting us based on our transmissions is that the transmissions we broadcast to the universe aren't infinitely powerful nor perfectly collimated with no divergence. In addition, as the signal gets weaker, it becomes harder and harder to understand or even detect it.

      In all likelyhood, an alien civilization as advanced as us wouldn't be able to detect us from beyond 20 lightyears or so. With 1,000 lightyears being about the theoretical maximum. [For those civilizations which are extremely advanced.]

    11. Re:Freeze and play dead? by zoips · · Score: 1

      I think there's two reasons for 2. The first is that, tying in with 1., we hope they won't come here and wipe us out. But I think the stronger reason is that most sci-fi is also a morality tale. The stories that have peaceful aliens are intended to be a reflection of what we hope we will be when we are in that position, because as it is now, most people view our species rather dimly: violent, stupid, warmongering, and very likely to go out and rape and pillage some other species.

    12. Re:Freeze and play dead? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      because as it is now, most people view our species rather dimly: violent, stupid, warmongering, and very likely to go out and rape and pillage some other species.

      Only science fiction writers.

      Most people are pretty damned optimistic, from my experience.

    13. Re:Freeze and play dead? by mhs1973 · · Score: 1

      one of the questions also could be:
      Would they even notice us and our attempts of communication?
      We could be to them what ants are to us after all.

    14. Re:Freeze and play dead? by julesh · · Score: 1

      It means that if they actually wanted to fight us, they could out produce us in terms of Armor and Planes.

      Yeah, but we'd be sitting there with the United Nations, so they'd have to offer to make peace with us.

      Wait, you mean we aren't talking about a game of Civilization?

    15. Re:Freeze and play dead? by sa1lnr · · Score: 1

      "So yeah, by all means let's throw a party and hope it isn't us that ends up on the barbecue..."

      I vote for Slim Whitman's Indian Love Call for the music.

      That'll show em we mean business.

    16. Re:Freeze and play dead? by nscott89 · · Score: 1

      Our only option now would be to nuke the planet and hide underground and make it look like we are dead...

    17. Re:Freeze and play dead? by mpe · · Score: 1

      Nah, the ship would destroy itself in the process of landing. It's a colony ship; they wouldn't expect to be going back. The tanks which held the fuel would serve as a huge "crumble zone" and it could come down with parachutes or something.

      Coating the outside with something like pykrete would provide good shielding both for interstellar flight and atmospheric entry.

      There's no reason an android designed to simulate a human in every way would be super-strong.

      If anything it would be daft, since such an android would have difficulty using things designed for humans. It might even wind up having to break down doors after applying too much force to the handle, etc...

    18. Re:Freeze and play dead? by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 1

      Why did they land anything, crash or otherwise? If you are going to send something interstellar, might as well put a couple landing-pods on it, at least for exploration. (Even if they are only one way.)

      Why land until they are sure of their ability to stay and survive? Why wake everyone up (if they are hibernating) until they were sure of their ability to stay and survive? Core crew gets woken up, evaluates the situation, and decides how to proceed. Fight, flight, or talk are their options.

      And as for the demonstrated capabilities: It's the same tech as the ship they built. They might not be able to do it efficiently, but they'd be able to do it before we could design and build something to stop them.

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    19. Re:Freeze and play dead? by mpe · · Score: 1

      In all likelyhood, an alien civilization as advanced as us wouldn't be able to detect us from beyond 20 lightyears or so.

      In which case it would be at least 40 years before they replied. Assuming they decided to at all.

    20. Re:Freeze and play dead? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Why did they land anything, crash or otherwise? If you are going to send something interstellar, might as well put a couple landing-pods on it, at least for exploration. (Even if they are only one way.)

      Because they knew from their telescopes that the planet was reasonably suitable for life, and because they knew from their engineers that they didn't have enough fuel to make major course changes once the ship was in motion.

      And, more importantly, the WHOLE PREMISE we started with is that they have technology on par with ours. They can't build a self-contained pod that is capable of landing on a planet like Earth and taking off again, since we can't do that either. And if you suggest a one-way landing-- well, say the mother ship decides to leave, now it just strands people there to die? Really nice.

      If you're colonizing a planet, why would you bring a couple of landing-pods? When you could put in additional food supplies or something much more vital with the weight? (You might have a 2001: A Space Odyssey-esque pod to repair the ship before landing, but engineering. Possibly.)

      And as for the demonstrated capabilities: It's the same tech as the ship they built. They might not be able to do it efficiently, but they'd be able to do it before we could design and build something to stop them.

      Because the ship is *designed* to make a controlled crash landing, just like so many various probes we've sent to various planets. You don't seem to get the concept here. NASA has done this a hundred times. Spirit and Opportunity got to Mars that way.

      For economy's sake, the ship has just enough fuel to get up to speed, right? You leave orbit, slingshot around a couple of planets using up all the fuel you have, and you're on course for the destination. Centuries (I'll use the 900 years figure, based on nothing, but easy to type) pass before you arrive. The ship wakes itself back up, following its programming, and wakes up a few crew members.

      There's no fuel left to do further slingshots and going on to another planet, because the course was pre-programmed before they even left orbit in the first place. Additionally, even if they wanted to go to another planet, everything on the ship including it's nuclear power and hibernation support systems is designed for a single trip of 900 years. So even if you wanted to abort at this point, you'd just be sentencing everybody to die.

      So the crew members, knowing these facts, check-out all the systems and make whatever repairs are necessary. They pick a landing spot, now that they have a much better view of the destination planet, and do the final course programming so that the ship can use it's last remaining fuel to de-orbit. At no point here does the crew have any possibility of delaying or changing their plans because of what they find on the surface of the planet: there's no fuel to stay in orbit indefinitely (since that wasn't in the original plan), there's no fuel/energy to keep life support going indefinitely (since that wasn't in the plan), etc. They *have* to land, as planned.

      Also keep in mind that since they surveyed the planet something like a thousand years ago or more, they would have absolutely no reason to expect intelligent life to be there. That wouldn't be in the plan-- and frankly if they had expected it, they probably would have just picked another destination in the first place, rather than to try to build the miracle-ship of your imagination.

      And as for the demonstrated capabilities: It's the same tech as the ship they built.

      No it's not. You're talking about a magical ship that can make this long journey and still somehow have enough fuel to drive all over the solar system and move asteroids around. You've been watching too much Star Trek.

      I'm talking about a ship built with technology close to ours that does the absolutely bare minimum required to colonize another planet, the *bare minimum*. Another reply to my original post mentioned that the economic cost of something like this would be massive, by far the largest undertaking in human history-- that right there is why it does the bare minimum.

    21. Re:Freeze and play dead? by selven · · Score: 1

      And all this is assuming the aliens live at the bottom of a gravity well like us. What if they naturally lived in microgravity from the start? Then they would have spaceships around the same time we developed water ships.

    22. Re:Freeze and play dead? by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 1

      Landing pods don't have to send down people. We explore with robots all the time. Send one down to see if there are any major problems you couldn't detect from a distance.

      And no, they don't know that there would be a habitable planet when they arrived. Not if they have our level of tech. We are just barely able to detect planets that might be in a habitable size/orbit, and still unable to detect their atmosphere, even in general trends. And that's general trends: There are at least a dozen gasses that in concentrations of a few hundredths of a PPM would be lethal to us over time, and detecting that at even zero range is hard, never mind over interstellar distance. Without significantly advanced tech over us, they'd have to hope for the best. And that's even assuming everything is as they saw it from a distance: It also wouldn't take much for a planet to become uninhabitable over the time it took to do a decent interstellar flight at sub-light speeds. (Drop a medium asteroid on us, and all higher life would be toast. Drop Ceres on us, depending on the angle, and there'd be major changes to the atmosphere and tectonic structure.)

      So if they have our level of tech, they'd have to be willing to change plans once they got here. Refuel, minimal resupply, repair, and choose a new destination would need to be an at least possible (if not desired) option. Because they are just guessing that there's someplace to land at all, with a no better than 25% chance, at best.

      And why are they out of fuel, when they've just arrived in Earth orbit? Earth in general is a fairly poor place for refueling, unless you happen to live here. Depending on your engine type, there are several much better fueling stops in the outer system. (Or even deep-space, if they've got a fusion engine.)

      And for that matter, why do they need fuel to drop an asteroid on us? Ok, it'd take a while to drop one using a solar sail, but it could be done if they wanted to. Or solar panels and an ion engine. Again, that'd take time, but we're not going anywhere and it should be within safety tolerances on even the most low-end hibernation system.

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    23. Re:Freeze and play dead? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Funny

      If anything it would be daft, since such an android would have difficulty using things designed for humans. It might even wind up having to break down doors after applying too much force to the handle, etc...

      Yeah, I know that every time I open a door, I turn the handle AS HARD AS I POSSIBLY CAN because I want to MAKE SURE THAT FUCKER TURNS.

      For my encore, I'm going to the old folks' home, and I'm going to help some old ladies across the street AS FAST AS POSSIBLE. Shake a fuckin' leg, granny.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    24. Re:Freeze and play dead? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Landing pods don't have to send down people. We explore with robots all the time. Send one down to see if there are any major problems you couldn't detect from a distance.

      Fair enough.

      And no, they don't know that there would be a habitable planet when they arrived. Not if they have our level of tech. We are just barely able to detect planets that might be in a habitable size/orbit, and still unable to detect their atmosphere, even in general trends.

      I grant them that. You're right, though.

      And why are they out of fuel, when they've just arrived in Earth orbit? Earth in general is a fairly poor place for refueling, unless you happen to live here. Depending on your engine type, there are several much better fueling stops in the outer system. (Or even deep-space, if they've got a fusion engine.)

      I swear to God you're being purposefully dense. Because it's a ONE-USE ship, designed to go from its homeworld to Earth, and nothing else. It's not a freakin' Greyhound bus you can gas-up and take anywhere. Why is this such a hard concept to get? It's the, what, third time? Fourth time? I've explained it.

      The whole POINT of the ship is to come to Earth and land. What part of that requires refueling?

      And for that matter, why do they need fuel to drop an asteroid on us?

      How else would they get to the asteroid belt? Magical faeries?

      Look, the ship is designed to go to Earth, land, and it's done. Forever.

      It's not designed to go to Earth, then say "oops look at that", then turn around go out to the asteroid belt, attach a bunch of shit to asteroids, then go back to Earth, then wait for the asteroids to hit, then potentially repeat the process depending, then land.

      Ok, it'd take a while to drop one using a solar sail, but it could be done if they wanted to. Or solar panels and an ion engine.

      Yes, but they still need to GET to the asteroid belt to attach sails and/or ion drives to them.

      Again, that'd take time, but we're not going anywhere and it should be within safety tolerances on even the most low-end hibernation system.

      It would take infinite time, because they have no fuel.

    25. Re:Freeze and play dead? by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 1

      I swear to God you're being purposefully dense. Because it's a ONE-USE ship, designed to go from its homeworld to Earth, and nothing else. It's not a freakin' Greyhound bus you can gas-up and take anywhere. Why is this such a hard concept to get? It's the, what, third time? Fourth time? I've explained it.

      The whole POINT of the ship is to come to Earth and land. What part of that requires refueling?

      I get that's what you are saying. But that's a stupid (to the level of outright suicidal) design: The colonists have a maybe 1-in-4 chance (if they are lucky, and I'm probably over-estimating) of living once they arrive in such a ship, just because you can't guarantee they will have anyplace to land. A minimal amount of extra work up front will allow them to decide if they can live where they've arrived, or go on if they can't.

      Sure, once they find a good spot to land, crash the ship: You'll want the resources onboard anyway. But only once it has been determined habitable, which can't be determined until you are in orbit. Until then, you want to be able to re-direct to another choice.

      If you are sending single-destination ships, you'll want to either send out explorers first, or have a way to ask for help from home. Either way they'd have to solve the lightspeed problem (at least in communication), and that's way beyond our level of tech.

      None of the tech for refueling and resupplying in space is beyond us. We don't use it because it's not needed at our current level of space travel, but it would not be hard to build. Put it in, and you'll immeasurably improve the odds of actually having a viable colony at the end of the trip. Mass cost would be not insignificant, but it's easily worth it.

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    26. Re:Freeze and play dead? by sanotto · · Score: 1

      We allready got all we need to keep an alien invasion out of question... atomic bombs... may be these weapons could not destroy them, but can and will destroy the entire earth, making it an inhospitable radiactive rock, not different to mars by example...that will preclude any posibility of colonization... on a side note: Humans are crazy enough to blow out their own planet to avoid been conquered... and in any case... if the alien try to exterminate us, and they are so advanced we can not stop them... well... see you in hell bastards...

    27. Re:Freeze and play dead? by Capt.+Cooley · · Score: 1

      Author's name is Harry Turtledove, for those interested.

      I greatly enjoyed what I could find of his books at my local library.

    28. Re:Freeze and Play Dead? by The+MESMERIC · · Score: 1

      Because of competition. It seems any species that ultimately ended up being the dominant one in a planet, managed so by killing, eating, enslaving or exterminating other species as part of the process. It is only our hope that technological advances means spiritual moral evolution - but that doesn't have to be necessarily so. How many times us human - supposed to be relatively advanced & civilized - still completely decimated other nations or races, or destroyed other habitats and brought other natural species to complete extinction?

    29. Re:Freeze and play dead? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      I get that's what you are saying.

      The sooner you acknowledge my position *before* arguing against it, the sooner I assume you're not an idiot who simply didn't understand my position in the first place.

      I mean, I know this is Slashdot and human interaction is hard, but come on. You wasted a lot of your (and my) time from my repeating this over and over again because I assumed you didn't get it.

      But that's a stupid (to the level of outright suicidal) design: The colonists have a maybe 1-in-4 chance (if they are lucky, and I'm probably over-estimating) of living once they arrive in such a ship, just because you can't guarantee they will have anyplace to land. A minimal amount of extra work up front will allow them to decide if they can live where they've arrived, or go on if they can't.

      I disagree that it's a minimal amount of work. Making a one-use ship compared to a ship that can be re-used over and over again?

      Besides, put yourself in the colonist's position. We've been traveling for 900 years. If we abort, it's another 900 years (at least) to get back home. Would you even *want* to go home? Keep in mind that you're the kind of super ambitious Type-A personality person who would volunteer for this mission in the first place.

      Have you seen Apollo 13? Remember the scene where, despite their malfunction, they contemplated landing on the moon anyway, even knowing it would be their death? And that was just the moon!

      If you are sending single-destination ships, you'll want to either send out explorers first, or have a way to ask for help from home. Either way they'd have to solve the lightspeed problem (at least in communication), and that's way beyond our level of tech.

      So you're saying they should delay their colonization program until they develop FTL communication, even though that might be physically impossible? What if the aliens don't think like you do? What if they think a 25% chance is worth it? (Or are willing to dedicate enough resources to build 4-5 ships instead of one?)

      Put it in, and you'll immeasurably improve the odds of actually having a viable colony at the end of the trip. Mass cost would be not insignificant, but it's easily worth it.

      It seems to me the only two options remain either land, or turn around and go home.

      Of course, another thing here... your original post mentioned going out to grab some asteroids and "nuke them from orbit, it's the only way to be sure." But why? What's the motivation? If you're trying to colonize a planet, and it turns out there's already intelligent life there, I think your odds probably just improved by leaps and bounds. I don't see that discovery as necessarily changing the mission plan at all.

    30. Re:Freeze and play dead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, the ship is designed to go to Earth, land, and it's done. Forever.

      Dude, your aliens are idiots.

      NOBODY is going to build a spaceship that would cost trillions upon trillions upon trillions of whatever exodollars they use, populate it, and then chuck it blindly at some planet that they know essentially NOTHING about except that it 'might' have a comfortable temperature range.

    31. Re:Freeze and play dead? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Eh. Maybe they're religious fanatics and their religion dictates that they should. Maybe they have a pharaoh and this is his tomb. Maybe they just have like a hundred old space stations in orbit and want to find some way of recycling the metal. Who knows? But I can think of reasons.

    32. Re:Freeze and play dead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >We have no weapons capable of attacking outside of low orbit, and no way of countering (much less actually stopping) an attack of that magnitude.

      Indeed, we cannot repel firepower of that magnitude. Best send Gold Squadron in.

    33. Re:Freeze and play dead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry about the 'idiots' comment, that was too much. I actually rather like your idea, but you keep arguing that it could actually happen, and I don't even slightly buy it.

      Don't try too hard to justify it or make it sound realistic, the idea is good enough in itself. Fiction doesn't need to be realistic or even plausible, as long as it has a point, or at least a good way of presenting a compelling idea.

    34. Re:Freeze and play dead? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Thanks, and you're right. It's basically the set up for the story... and I'm sure I care way too much about it. :)

    35. Re:Freeze and play dead? by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 1

      Besides, put yourself in the colonist's position. We've been traveling for 900 years. If we abort, it's another 900 years (at least) to get back home. Would you even *want* to go home? Keep in mind that you're the kind of super ambitious Type-A personality person who would volunteer for this mission in the first place.

      Home? Who said anything about home? You pick a likely star, with a couple of alternates hopefully nearby. If the first doesn't work, you set course for the next, hoping to find one that works before you reach the end of what you can repair in space.

      And as for the FTL: Only if they want to use your design. If we are trying to stick with realm-of-known tech, they need to be able to decide on the fly where to land. Even if that means it's not at the star they originally headed to.

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
  25. Wrong question by kylemonger · · Score: 1

    The question presupposes that talking is the correct response. If intelligent aliens visit us here in our solar system we can reasonably expect to be enslaved or slaughtered. Interstellar space travel is a stupendously expensive undertaking, and anyone attempting it will expect a return on their investment at the end. And if you believe in Vinge's technological singularity, the visitor will no doubt be from a post-singularity culture. In that case your chances of being simply engulfed courtesy of that culture's hard-takeoff are close to 100%.

    So, forget talk. Running or fighting are your choices.

    1. Re:Wrong question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There once was a time when oceanic voyagers were technologically impossible, then they were incredibly expensive, and now they're commonplace. The same thing will happen with interstellar travel.

      So we shouldn't allow our own current technological primitivity in the field of space travel to influence our opinion of what other civilizations are capable of doing in the same area.

    2. Re:Wrong question by vlm · · Score: 1

      Interstellar space travel is a stupendously expensive undertaking, and anyone attempting it will expect a return on their investment at the end.

      OK, they wanna make a profit. Really boring reason to do something that interesting, but OK.

      enslaved or slaughtered.

      Slaughtered:

      Not really profitable outside of GTA video games. Either way you've expended all that fuel for .... nothing? At best some taxidermy specimens for a museum? Seems unlikely to run a profit. The odds of a random species finding us tasty is about as likely as us finding another random species tasty (darn low, and lower the further you get genetically different). Also a rather expensive trip to the supermarket.

      Enslaved:

      The silkworm trade was not brought out of China by stealing every freaking silkworm in the kingdom... Technically you only need a sufficiently large breeding pool. Probably, not a terribly large number. Like an airliner full, maybe. At most, a small village has been proven by unintentional long term experiment to be about enough. So, why take us all, or even bother sorting out to take the "best"?

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  26. Take off and nuke the site from orbit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um, I mean, freeze and play dead.

  27. There is no way to be "Silent"... by NukeDoggie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They would be advanced enough to hear us like we hear them... We emit lots of noise without trying. We would have to face them head on and with as little fear as we can, which means each nation would try to oneup each other in favor, and then war would ensue...

  28. Find out what their motives for being here are by unlametheweak · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'd ask them if their political views are left or right wing.

    1. Re:Find out what their motives for being here are by Peet42 · · Score: 1

      Left tentacle or right tentacle, surely?

      I for one welcome our new alien overlords.

      Hmm. That sounded cooler in my head.

    2. Re:Find out what their motives for being here are by mhs1973 · · Score: 1

      they are orbs that engulf what they consume, and they communicate by fusing or changing colors and/or texture. But essentially as orbshaped beings they have no left or right side. So what now, space cadet?

  29. What would you say first to an alien? by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

    "I can haz cheeseburger?"

    --
    Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
  30. Don't play dead by Pinckney · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If we are actually noticed, the problem with the "freeze and play dead" suggestion is that it if it works, we risk convincing them that we are mostly harmless, unintelligent creatures. Earth then begins to look like a habitable, unoccupied planet ripe for colonizing.

    While a display of martial might would serve to make the earth look less available, it also risks making us appear savage and again, unintelligent. It might make them feel justified in subjugating us and colonizing earth.

    Safest is probably a policy of partial isolation. We should greet others firmly, while revealing little of our own cultures and history. Be respectful, and allow visitors to see a strictly controlled show. Given time, this can be relaxed. If they do seem interested in colonization, prepare for war. Demand commitments to peace and respect for our territory that, if broken deliberately, will give us moral high-ground in counterattacking. But if this should occur, act quickly to establish laws of war--display an aura of civility and discipline. Conversely, if they are interested in an exchange of knowledge, be open and willing--say nothing of atrocities and wars, and let the borders be opened slowly. Control their perception of us, so that we may appear to be a mixture of cultures that they could ally themselves with, rather than merely subjugate.

    1. Re:Don't play dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nuke em from orbit, thats the only way to be sure... oh wait that would be us presumably...

    2. Re:Don't play dead by petes_PoV · · Score: 1

      Earth then begins to look like a habitable, unoccupied planet ripe for colonizing

      You're making a huge number of assumptions about what they consider habitable. For all you know oxygen could be poisonous to them. Maybe their respiratory cycle excretes hydrocarbons as waste? Maybe they eat radioactive waste.

      Who can tell, but a lack of imagination could be fatal - to us or them.

      --
      politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    3. Re:Don't play dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are assuming they have an individual psychology and a personal value system at least somewhat compatible with humans.

      What if they don't have any concept of 'respect' or 'civility' and are instead all part of a distributed hive mind, where the concept of competition and individual personalities maybe doesn't exist?

    4. Re:Don't play dead by hibji · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing this is the same strategy employed by the native americans. In the end, it never really mattered, only delayed things for a bit. I think if the aliens were interested in colonization, we're pretty much screwed.

    5. Re:Don't play dead by rastilin · · Score: 1

      While a display of martial might would serve to make the earth look less available, it also risks making us appear savage and again, unintelligent. It might make them feel justified in subjugating us and colonizing earth. Safest is probably a policy of partial isolation. We should greet others firmly, while revealing little of our own cultures and history. Be respectful, and allow visitors to see a strictly controlled show. Given time, this can be relaxed. If they do seem interested in colonization, prepare for war. Demand commitments to peace and respect for our territory that, if broken deliberately, will give us moral high-ground in counterattacking. But if this should occur, act quickly to establish laws of war--display an aura of civility and discipline. Conversely, if they are interested in an exchange of knowledge, be open and willing--say nothing of atrocities and wars, and let the borders be opened slowly. Control their perception of us, so that we may appear to be a mixture of cultures that they could ally themselves with, rather than merely subjugate.

      A brilliant plan that does seem to cover all the bases. Since we can't be sure of what they will be like, a policy of limited information sharing is the best tactic to insure they won't use our information against us in some way we have not considered. But I'd go even further, I'd be firm, but not display any violent potential. The best knife is one that is hidden after all and if they harbor the desire to conquer us anyway this will give us an advantage in the initial confrontation. On the flipside if they're peaceful then they won't consider actual violence. The only downside is the edge-case where they are violent, but only towards apparent pacifists, which still gives us an advantage in battle after which they may well retreat. Assuming they have something resembling human psychology.

      Personally whenever I see those Hollywood movies with friendly aliens, I wonder if ET's mates aren't waiting in orbit around Pluto with "planet cracker" bombs in case things turn nasty.

      --
      How do you kill that which has no life?
    6. Re:Don't play dead by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 1

      Rules of engagement:

      Be nice or we'll nuke your spaceships.

      Don't colonize us or we'll nuke your spaceships.

      Try to overpower us and we'll nuke your spaceships and make the planet uninhabitable, causing you untold waste in fuel and travel time.

      Give us your (green) women or we'll nuke your spaceships.

      Etc, etc...

    7. Re:Don't play dead by SolarStorm · · Score: 1

      This is a very interesting question because we only have our own frame of reference to rely on: What if the "Alien" race is simply a nungry colony of termites in a forest of worlds? They may be intelligent, but driven by an instinct to consume. Then again, they may be peaceful bunny rabbits that will simply over bread us into extinction and their theological beliefs wont stop the breading. (think catholic here :) The possibilities are endless. I find the show of any kind of military might silly, as any race advanced enough to achieve interstellar flight will simply look at our current weapons and laugh. Remember we cant even colonize our own oceans yet! Let alone travel to another star, think of the technology that this would require? But who says interstellar flight or alien races would use technology, what if it simply were biological? or what if what we describe as communication has no meaning to them at all? perhaps telepathy or group consiousness is "their" way of communicating, a method we simply cant comprehend or perhaps even achieve. All of this is purely speculation, but I also wonder why we are trying to say hi? If "they" are remotely interested in us, wouldnt "they" use their technological advancement say hi to whom ever interests them? For all we know the wiggly worm on the sidewalk may be trying to say hi to us, and even view our foot as first contact, until it squishes them? As far as achieving a common law of war or geneava convention is concerned. They probably havent heard of Geneava if their intent is hostile. Plus the chance that their morals are even close to what are are, are probably remote. I would simply wait for them to say Hi, sit and listen. I have a strong feeling we will be the student in any form of first contact

    8. Re:Don't play dead by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Be respectful, and allow visitors to see a strictly controlled show. Given time, this can be relaxed. If they do seem interested in colonization, prepare for war.

      Well, as it happens with tried that approach with Mexico. It turned out they were interested in colonization anyway.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    9. Re:Don't play dead by l3ert · · Score: 1

      I hope that beings sufficiently advanced to be able to come visit us would be immune to such silly propaganda. And the idea that we would be able to defend ourselves in any way is laughable. The best we could do if aliens showed off today is acknowledge to them that we are relatively immature and inferior but we would like to take the opportunity to speed up our evolution so that one day we may sit as equals to them. If they are hostile, then so be it, it was a good 200,000 years, time to die.

      --
      per dolorem ad astra
    10. Re:Don't play dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With current multiculturalism policies, they would probably be paid by the various governments to settle here, entirely regardless of their dispositions. Because it is racist to assume that they would be belligerent, and it is even racist to make them into an "other."

    11. Re:Don't play dead by Rick+Genter · · Score: 1

      The best knife is one that is hidden after all and if they harbor the desire to conquer us anyway this will give us an advantage in the initial confrontation.

      That's naive. We have no advantage; in fact, we have a huge disadvantage: we're at the bottom of a gravity well. They can throw rocks at us far more easily than we can throw nukes at them.

      --
      Don't underestimate the power of The Source
    12. Re:Don't play dead by that+IT+girl · · Score: 1

      This is assuming that another race, another species, another planet would have the same sense of morality that we do. There is no telling what their perception of right and wrong may be, or if they in fact even care about such things.

      --
      10 FILL MUG WITH COFFEE
      20 DRINK COFFEE
      30 GOTO 10
    13. Re:Don't play dead by DaFallus · · Score: 1

      Safest is probably a policy of partial isolation. We should greet others firmly, while revealing little of our own cultures and history. Be respectful, and allow visitors to see a strictly controlled show. Given time, this can be relaxed. If they do seem interested in colonization, prepare for war. Demand commitments to peace and respect for our territory that, if broken deliberately, will give us moral high-ground in counterattacking. But if this should occur, act quickly to establish laws of war--display an aura of civility and discipline. Conversely, if they are interested in an exchange of knowledge, be open and willing--say nothing of atrocities and wars, and let the borders be opened slowly. Control their perception of us, so that we may appear to be a mixture of cultures that they could ally themselves with, rather than merely subjugate.

      And if that fails, we can try giving them some blankets.

      --
      No one cares what your captcha was

      Houston TX, USA
    14. Re:Don't play dead by rastilin · · Score: 1

      That's naive. We have no advantage; in fact, we have a huge disadvantage: we're at the bottom of a gravity well. They can throw rocks at us far more easily than we can throw nukes at them.

      All the same, I wouldn't want them knowing what weapons we have. Although on that note, we really should end the space-weapons ban sometime and start developing tactics for space warfare. Preparation and all that.

      --
      How do you kill that which has no life?
    15. Re:Don't play dead by vlm · · Score: 1

      say nothing of atrocities

      Good luck. What if they are horrified at genetically engineered monoculture agriculture because in their own past they genocided their 3rd world cultures using DRM-ed seeds, kind of like what we're trying to do now?

      Or in their history they successfully used concentration camps to wipe out carnivores, and our digestive tract obviously evolved to eat meat...

      Or their peculiar religion (not all that different from some of our own cults) requires ritual sacrifice of all whom use song and dance for non-religious purposes? Or all those that do or do NOT use medicinal plants in religious services?

      Or consider worldwide mainstream media culture a form of genocide against the native cultures to be dealt with appropriately? Or they just think our mainstream media sucks, so all of us suck?

      Our secret weapon is "they" probably have a small number of people to analyze the information we dump to them, but "we" have six billion theoretical exo-anthropologists to study what they give us. Regardless of the numbers, we will make far more creative discoveries than they will, in the short term.

      Probably a fair exchange would be for them to request an amount of raw data sufficient to just barely overwhelm their staff and we'll get a similar quantity from them. Probably a heck of a lot of data, like a Project Gutenberg DVD worth. How fast they process our data will tell us a lot about them. I suspect the game extends to them showing off. Put on the best poker face and "Yeah did ya know I can read 10000 words per minute, how bout you?" when in reality they have barely figured out our alphabet...

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    16. Re:Don't play dead by vlm · · Score: 1

      but not display any violent potential.

      The opinion of what is violent is a bit variable culturally. Buddhist monks and Ancient Aztecs likely disagree. No point in pretending to use a filter that does not actually work. Even worse, if you give them a Barney DVD and send them on their way, they are going to have some pretty screwed up ideas about what is what.

      Finally they have a huge advantage over us. They can give us someone elses culture, see what we think of it, and then say "just kidding" if it all works out. Even funnier, they can try to emulate star trek episodes from TV. I hope for some 7 of 9 and less of that living lava rock that lived in the tunnels. So, be prepared for some pretty goofy data from the aliens.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    17. Re:Don't play dead by mhs1973 · · Score: 1

      well, judging by what movies have gone out on the frequencies, we are either a violent lot that has a DeathStar and will annihilate anything in its way, or on the other hand are a semi-violent lot that is on 5 year missions into space where no man has gone before..., or we have both factions and they never meet...
      that spells to me out as a big warning sign:
      AVOID ALL CONTACT. THOSE GUYS ARE NUTS!!!

    18. Re:Don't play dead by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      Randall Munroe, of XKCD's fame, considers that we should not settle for interstellar communication when we could have interstellar war !

      Details here : http://blag.xkcd.com/2008/02/15/the-laser-elevator/

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    19. Re:Don't play dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>>'...If they do seem interested in colonization, prepare for war. Demand commitments to peace ...'
      WHY?
      Why such a bias towards conflict/aggression? Preparing for war is hardly a commitment to peace. The fears that color your assumptions woudl certainly color any interaction and set a similar tone.
      What if the visitors entire population needed only 1 square mile or habitat? What if the visitors consumed (and rendered harmless) vast quantities of fission by-products, CFC, mercury, Carbon monoxide, dioxin, and arsnic? What is their waste products were containerized gasonline, liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen (all separate of course)?

      Your plan is easy to rally around, yet short sighted. In the event of alien visitors, a better option than the illusion of thoughtful consideration would be actual thoughtful consideration.

    20. Re:Don't play dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > ...while revealing little of our own cultures and history.

      I think you're assuming the ETs haven't been watching all our TV shows and commercials for the past 50+ years. (Grin)

    21. Re:Don't play dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We should greet others firmly, while revealing little of our own cultures and history. Be respectful, and allow visitors to see a strictly controlled show.

      Yes, because that stops all information from leaving places like North Korea and China via the internet. Remember, we broadcast the internet just like we broadcast everything else. Anything they need to know, they'd know by the time they said anything.

    22. Re:Don't play dead by mpe · · Score: 1

      All the same, I wouldn't want them knowing what weapons we have.

      The only weapons they wouldn't know about would be "black weapons".

    23. Re:Don't play dead by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      nuke em from orbit, thats the only way to be sure... oh wait that would be us presumably...

      Hm. If we did put the nervous in aliens, I think I'd like to see some of their fiction about us. Would probably be as funny as hell.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    24. Re:Don't play dead by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      But who says interstellar flight or alien races would use technology, what if it simply were biological? or what if what we describe as communication has no meaning to them at all?

      Peter Watts wrote a book called Blindsight. The aliens involved...well, they were psychologically unlike us in profound ways. In the words of one review, "...for all their astonishing pattern recognition and processing ability, they are not conscious. They lack a sense of self or a cogito to do the ergo summing." Basically, intelligent reflexes. Very weird.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    25. Re:Don't play dead by Sabriel · · Score: 1

      We should greet others firmly, while revealing little of our own cultures and history. Be respectful, and allow visitors to see a strictly controlled show.

      Unless they're coming via Stargate instead of Starship, this strikes me as the right idea but the wrong way around: from high orbit I can see just about everything, go just about anywhere. And were you planning on shutting down every independant communications facility on the planet?

      What we'd actually need strictly controlled is *our* knowledge of the alien presence, cultures and history, until we as a species - or at least those of us who run the show - got a firm handle on no longer being alone, let alone top dog, in the universe. We have enough xenophobes already.

      (which, incidentally, is why I'd seriously like to see a giant alien starship casually park itself over the Pacific and very publicly do nothing else at all, however much of a fantasy that might actually be)

    26. Re:Don't play dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We should greet others firmly, while revealing little of our own cultures and history.

      That would be much easier if we hadn't spent the last century beaming ever-increasing amounts of our culture into outer space. An approaching alien would just have to tune in and flip on their Tivo 100 light years out. By the time they got here they would have a pretty good idea of who we are and what we've been doing to each other, especially if they pick up History Channel's satellite feeds.

  31. Typical Slashdot Reader Responses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "But does your advanced Zarnax-12 computational system run Linux?"

    "Wow, Zarnax-12 computers! Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these!"

    "Okay, I've successfully installed Ubuntu Linux on the Zarnax-12, but I still can't get dual-monitor support, and it's not recognizing the alien T'Ralfaz sound card."

    Obligatory Movie Quote (1,000 quatloos to the first person who recognizes this)

    "...if they're more advanced than us, they should be nearer to the Creator..."

  32. I would say... by PhysicsPhil · · Score: 1

    Does your spaceship run on vacuum tubes?

  33. stupid thought experiment by heptapod · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Eight forms of human language remain uncracked by modern linguists. Surely trying to speak Ventaxian and understand their communication will be nigh impossible. Heck I don't think their characters have been encoded into unicode.
    Let alone knowing how their transmissions are encoded or even if they have a concept of DRM. If we don't know their codecs then those broadcasts will simply fall into the cosmic background radiation and remain lost to us until these aliens do something as gross as landing on the White House lawn and actually share their technology via their universal translator.
    Who's to say they're even going to be interested in humanity at all. They may decide that ants have a far older and more interesting worldwide civilization which fits their xenothropic principle rather than appealing to our hubris that nigh-hairless primates are the pinnacle of culture and society upon this ball of mud.
    On the bright side this guy says it'd be easy to figure out the grammar of a living alien language but there's still the problem of idiom which would only serve the muddy the waters of communication and possibly precipitate conflict.

    1. Re:stupid thought experiment by R2.0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Eight forms of human language remain uncracked by modern linguists. Surely trying to speak Ventaxian and understand their communication will be nigh impossible. Heck I don't think their characters have been encoded into unicode."

      I would disagree. Eight forms of writing remain uncracked. Were we to have a speaker of that language magically placed in front of those linguists, they'd crack it in about a day.

      "Language" must have context in order for it to be understood properly - writing is simply the 2 dimensional representation of a many-dimensional activity.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    2. Re:stupid thought experiment by bersl2 · · Score: 4, Funny

      You managed to involve DRM in a discussion about extraterrestrial life. I am impressed by your mastery of Slashdot.

    3. Re:stupid thought experiment by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      I would disagree. Eight forms of writing remain uncracked. Were we to have a speaker of that language magically placed in front of those linguists, they'd crack it in about a day.

      There is pretty convincing evidence that dolphins have a complex, acoustic language. At the command of a trainer, a pair of dolphins can spontaneously create a completely original, complex acrobatic routine of several moves, and perform in synchronicity, without ever practicing it. Before they snap to it, they squeak at each other for a few moments.

      We can't even understand the language of a fellow mammal with a large brain, who communicates in the same medium that we do ( sound I mean, not water ). There's no way we'd ever communicate with a radically different alien, not for years or decades at best.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
  34. ..Spam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..How do THEY handle spam?

  35. Fellas, you must've missed a turn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That big rocky planet three-quarters covered with liquid water and filled with luscious plant and animal life? Yeah, our astronomers spotted that one too... it's waaaaaay over there thousands of galaxies away.

  36. What about UFO's? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Should another civilization have the tech to be able to traverse space then what if they are watching us? Us humans like to think we have dominion over wildlife and we keep the exotic ones in threat of extinction in zoos. Well knowing how violent humans can be, what about us? Perhaps a higher intelligence already saw us and how we react towards ourselves and the environment. Perhaps they refuse to contact us due to this? Earth could be our "zoo" for all we know. Given that humans are prone towards self-destruction, what if we were labeled as a endangered species or an unknown tangent. Granted guns and bombs won't do much but don't forget the STOCKPILES of nuclear weapons powered by the very mechanics behind the sun itself. We could easily destroy our world with our current tech (and in some ways we already are).

  37. Re:Racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're just as nice as us. They are probably not coming here to take over and harvest us for our organs.

    You just contradicted yourself.

  38. First... by shellster_dude · · Score: 1, Insightful

    We would need to find intelligent life on this planet before we can find it anywhere else!

    1. Re:First... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It might be too late for that. Monty Python's "The Galaxy Song" summed it up best. "And pray that there's intelligent life somewhere up in space,
      'Cause there's bugger all down here on Earth."

  39. I've seen this in the movies... by Phantom784 · · Score: 1

    They'll either already speak English for no good reason, or there will be an easily available universal translator to help out. Problem solved!!!

  40. Communicate through imagery... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simply show them LOLCATS and they will instantly become aware of the stupidity that is inherent to our species. They won't even bother enslaving us all.

  41. I can see it now by glwtta · · Score: 4, Funny

    DAVIS: We are a benign species, opposed to interplanetary conflict, and believe in equal opportunity for all beings, regardless of age, race, gender, sexual orientation or planet of origin
    STAN: That's nice. Look, let me start over, OK? I want you to tell me what the people on your planet are gonna do to make Stanley H Tweedle a happier man
    DAVIS: Is this right?
    PRINCE: Stick to the cards, Mr President. All possibilities have been anticipated. Do not deviate from the cards
    DAVIS: Congratulations on your birthday!

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  42. Or by linumax · · Score: 1

    If an alien race should contact Earth, I think our best bet would be to at least assume that they have peaceful intentions.

    Or they could just be assholes.

  43. No one seems to have mentioned this....... by allaunjsilverfox2 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What if they were to arrive in our solar system and not care about us? I mean, what if they didn't care about lifeforms? It's a huge assumption that they are looking for others like them. That's a drive that seems to be uniquely human. As far as I know, no animal on earth goes around comparing surrounding species to themselves. I use the earth animal example because we have no other species to compare in the vicinity of our solar system. But back to the point, What if they arrive and simply ignore us?

    --
    Restore the madness of youth's lechery
    1. Re:No one seems to have mentioned this....... by itamihn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I assume _any_ intelligent lifeform, given enough time, will eventually either be curious enough to study us, or will want to fight for having a house in the beach.

    2. Re:No one seems to have mentioned this....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume _any_ intelligent lifeform, given enough time, will eventually either be bored enough to study us

      There, fixed that for you.

    3. Re:No one seems to have mentioned this....... by dodobh · · Score: 1

      Where shall we have lunch?

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
    4. Re:No one seems to have mentioned this....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a huge assumption that they are looking for others like them. That's a drive that seems to be uniquely human. As far as I know, no animal on earth goes around comparing surrounding species to themselves.

      Maybe not comparing to themselves, but dolphins do show some interest in humans. And you can definitely increase that interest by showing them your interest in them back. You will get to the point when they come to greet you whenever they see you, and beyond that.

      Showing a genuine interest is the first step in making such contacts. Aliens might get interested even if they didn't care about us at first.

    5. Re:No one seems to have mentioned this....... by nscott89 · · Score: 1

      Well no other species on Earth is intelligent enough to ponder such high thoughts either, so you can't use that to support your argument.

    6. Re:No one seems to have mentioned this....... by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      Maybe not comparing to themselves, but dolphins do show some interest in humans.

      This is true.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    7. Re:No one seems to have mentioned this....... by sl0wp0is0n · · Score: 1

      I would wager that too. We are probably just an interesting "ant colony" to them, that might be worthwhile studying... or not.

      --
      My other dog is a Wienerschnitzel.
    8. Re:No one seems to have mentioned this....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, to me, life and technology are the most interesting things one might find in the universe. If they weren't interested in that, why would they travel the universe? It doesn't look like there is anything else interesting in our solar system...

    9. Re:No one seems to have mentioned this....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alien1: Anything new on our screens yet?
      Alien2: Here there's this polluted, resource-drained planet with a self-decimating species who already talks about guns although we havent yet appeared!?
      Alien1: Well, then, turn on the grill.

    10. Re:No one seems to have mentioned this....... by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      We spam em.. They can't ignore that.

  44. Papers, please by JustOK · · Score: 1

    If they don't have valid passports, there's no way in hell they'll get into the US, unless they sneak in. Plus, wouldn't they have to send a passenger manifest first before they would be allowed to land?

    --
    rewriting history since 2109
    1. Re:Papers, please by mr_walrus · · Score: 1

      not like their haven't been illegal aliens in the usa before... :)

  45. Solved by NASA ages ago by CaptainOfSpray · · Score: 4, Funny

    Didn't any of you know? You say, "Gnorts, Mr Alien". Back in the 60's, NASA realised that the Apollo might encounter aliens on the Moon, so they named the leader of the expedition appropriately (in an anagram, to demonstrate our intelligence and puzzle-setting ability).

    --
    "Cock Up Your Beaver" does not mean what you think. This sig is intended to clog filters and annoy do-gooders
  46. No pre-determined message by kheldan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I propose a dynamic approach: learn as much as possible about them first. We may decide it would be disasterous to attempt contact, and that "playing dead" is the way to go. In any case we might discover that one approach will be better received than another; first impressions may make or break the situation.
    All that being said, I don't think the human race is anywhere near the point where we SHOULD make contact with an extraterrestrial civilization AT ALL. We're still just slightly smarter animals at heart, once you strip away the thin veneer of technology and what we laughingly call "civilization". We can't even get along with OURSELVES and our own differences let alone a race that didn't evolve here. We're bigoted, racist, and sexist: We can't decide, AS A RACE, whether we owe our existence to one supernatural being or another, or did we evolve? We make war on our neighbors over resources and things that matter even less than that. We treat people differently, sometimes even ATTACKING them, because their skin is a different color. We treat our females as second-class citizens. Furthermore we mistreat and mismanage the biosphere we live in, poisoning it with our industrial wastes, destroying parts of it out of ignorance or greed, or because it suits us to do so, and damn the consequences.
    Never mind US contacting THEM! I say that if they're out there, they're AVOIDING and IGNORING us, because we're not worth knowing yet! Can't blame them if that's the case.
    Oh, and go ahead and mod me down to "-1, Troll"; I'll understand because there is no "-1, Uncomfortable Truth" button to use.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    1. Re:No pre-determined message by Xaoswolf · · Score: 1

      I would love it if the first aliens that visit us is a war like species that travels in giant oversized smoke belching space craft fueled by burning tires.

    2. Re:No pre-determined message by Jack9 · · Score: 1

      We treat people differently, sometimes even ATTACKING them, because their skin is a different color. We treat our females as second-class citizens. Furthermore we mistreat and mismanage the biosphere we live in, poisoning it with our industrial wastes, destroying parts of it out of ignorance or greed, or because it suits us to do so, and damn the consequences.

      What's the rationale for requiring world harmony before galactic-expansionism?
      The idea that equality between genders or "races" (which I can agree, is nonsense) can/should exist, is presupposition.
      The sanctity of some prehistoric environment is not a given.

      Star Trek has poisoned your mind, imo.

      --

      Often wrong but never in doubt.
      I am Jack9.
      Everyone knows me.
    3. Re:No pre-determined message by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      WAAAGH !!!

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    4. Re:No pre-determined message by Late+Adopter · · Score: 1

      Undoing mods to post this, but...

      What makes you think they're so much better?

      Technology? We have pretty good technology but that doesn't make us any less savage. No, I think when we finally get our chance at the stars we'll still have plenty of our own problems, and maybe if we're lucky, alien cultures will be similar enough to our own to recognize and empathize with that, and maybe even exchange some of their own cultural uniquenesses for our own.

      We should never play dead. Knowledge is its own reward.

    5. Re:No pre-determined message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're either a troll or you're not living in the US. I have lived in the southern US all my life (supposedly where all the sexism/racism is rooted), in both small towns and large cities and have met only one person that treats females as second-class citizens. I've heard about racism on television, and even seen a little bit of it coming from people of all ethnicities.

      The rest of what you say I agree with, but the sexism/racism comments seem like trolling to me.

    6. Re:No pre-determined message by iris-n · · Score: 1

      We make war on our neighbors over resources and things that matter even less than that.

      Try to live in a desert without water and tell me that resources aren't important.

      And ALL CAPS ARE BAD MANNERS! The <em> tag exists for a reason.

      --
      entropy happens
    7. Re:No pre-determined message by DaveGod · · Score: 1

      People would probably get on a whole lot better if they had some aliens to hate.

    8. Re:No pre-determined message by kheldan · · Score: 1

      What makes you think they're so much better?

      Didn't say they were. If they aren't, then why would WE want to know them? Remember the movie Independance Day? Want to get THEIR attention??? :p What if WE look like the aliens in Independance Day to some other alien race? What makes you think THEY would want to know US, then?

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    9. Re:No pre-determined message by kheldan · · Score: 1

      I have lived in the southern US all my life..

      Really? I say you've lived a sheltered life then, my freind, and/or you don't read the news.. or you just aren't paying attention.
      Oh and by the way, I find it ironic for someone from the Anonymous crowd accusing me of being a troll when I'm NOT posting as Anonymous. :p You don't like my opinions, then fine, but don't accuse me of being a troll just because of that.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    10. Re:No pre-determined message by kheldan · · Score: 1

      Try to live in a desert without water and tell me that resources aren't important.

      Hey, my next door neighbor has beer, and I'm too broke to buy any. I asked politely but he doesn't want to share it with me, so I'll go conk him on the head with a stick and TAKE a beer from him. Oh and by the way: I'll post in my own style, TYVM, and if you don't like it, tough; don't presume to instruct ME on what style to post in. :p

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    11. Re:No pre-determined message by kheldan · · Score: 1

      People would probably get on a whole lot better if they had some aliens to hate.

      More than likely, yes, it certainly would give them some perspective! The only problem with that idea is that, from an outsider's perspective, it might appear that we're just behaving well because we've got company over, if you take my meaning. I'd prefer that we learn to get along for our own sake first, and not just for appearances. I do agree with you though: if everyone had incontrovertable PROOF that We Are Not Alone, then they might re-prioritize their thinking.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    12. Re:No pre-determined message by kheldan · · Score: 1

      Try to live in a desert without water and tell me that resources aren't important.

      Hey, my next door neighbor has beer, and I'm too broke to buy any. I asked politely but he doesn't want to share it with me, so I'll go conk him on the head with a stick and TAKE a beer from him. So this is acceptable to you? Might always makes right? I'm not saying that it's always as simple as that, but you get politicians and diplomats involved with things, and it somehow GETS that simple.
      Oh and by the way: I'll post in my own style, TYVM, and if you don't like it, tough; don't presume to instruct ME on what style to post in. :p

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    13. Re:No pre-determined message by rastilin · · Score: 1

      Hey, my next door neighbor has beer, and I'm too broke to buy any. I asked politely but he doesn't want to share it with me, so I'll go conk him on the head with a stick and TAKE a beer from him. Oh and by the way: I'll post in my own style, TYVM, and if you don't like it, tough; don't presume to instruct ME on what style to post in. :p

      Spoken like a man who has never wanted for anything. Obviously you would never fight for beer. However if there was a famine going on and your life was on the line, I suspect you too would strongly consider violence. People fight for economic resources for similar reasons. No-one looks favorably on the idea of existing at another's whim for their entire lives.

      --
      How do you kill that which has no life?
    14. Re:No pre-determined message by rastilin · · Score: 1

      Didn't say they were. If they aren't, then why would WE want to know them? Remember the movie Independance Day? Want to get THEIR attention??? :p What if WE look like the aliens in Independance Day to some other alien race? What makes you think THEY would want to know US, then?

      We would want to know them because they are our fellow living creatures. The self-hate runs strong in you.

      By definition any creature that gets into space must have harnessed a good proportion of the resources of their home world. The only way that's happening is if they are the strongest. Whatever they are, they won't be pacifists (probably).

      --
      How do you kill that which has no life?
    15. Re:No pre-determined message by rastilin · · Score: 1

      What's the rationale for requiring world harmony before galactic-expansionism? The idea that equality between genders or "races" (which I can agree, is nonsense) can/should exist, is presupposition. The sanctity of some prehistoric environment is not a given.

      Well put, as much as I want peace and love and all that, I'm not going to go on complaining how we're so pathetic and evil and unworthy because not ALL humans practice it yet. That's too pitiful for words, however there IS one thing that bothers me...

      Star Trek has poisoned your mind, imo.

      That we might meet other alien civlizations and then inflict the "Space Hippies" on them, they will never forgive us.

      --
      How do you kill that which has no life?
    16. Re:No pre-determined message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, we are a shameful species!
      In any case, it makes sense to observe and learn for a time. If they have the ability to travel here immediately, well technologically we haven't much input and they can do as they please. So hope for the best!
      If we will be communicating via radio bursts of some sort, the extreme time frames between transmission and reception make any period of years spent researching the alien culture a tiniest of blips on the total time line...
      On a related note, as our communication technology advances, we will cease to blindly 'broadcast' our television signals into the ether, as more targeted forms of transmission take over. As such, there is a relatively brief window when our planet would even be detectable, if others were listening.
      But at this point in our history, if I were an alien race observing us, I'd put a memo in planner to check back in a thousand years to see if we had finally evolved.

    17. Re:No pre-determined message by kheldan · · Score: 1

      Oh, I'm sorry, you meant resources necessary for basic existence, like water. Notice I didn't use an example including something as basic as WATER, I used BEER on purpose: something that's nice, but you can learn to live without. Perhaps I should have used a more obvious 'resource' in my example: OIL.
      BTW: Don't make the mistake of assuming you know ANYthing about me, Mister Complete Stranger.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    18. Re:No pre-determined message by rastilin · · Score: 1

      Without OIL a western power would be unable to power basic infrastructure like transporting food from farms to market. It's quite essential if the plans of your country include feeding your people and mobilizing your army.

      --
      How do you kill that which has no life?
    19. Re:No pre-determined message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, and go ahead and mod me down to "-1, Troll"; I'll understand because there is no "-1, Uncomfortable Truth" button to use.

      Also known as reverse karma whoring, even more effective than normal karma whoring...

  47. Playing dead is not an option by gweihir · · Score: 1

    With all the incredible junk we have pumped out via radio waves, playing dead would be a certain way to send the wrong message. On the other side, it might be a good idea to keep all those currently in power and those wanting to be away from the microphone...

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  48. Hoovercraft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My hoovercraft is full of eels

  49. Math. by solios · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It'll be the one thing we have in common, no matter what. However they conceptualize it, unless our first contact is some kind of space manatee that communicates in radio waves, whatever we make contact with will have to have developed transmission/reception capability. Language would be a big puzzle to crack, and probably a really frustrating one... but 2+2=4 everywhere you go.

    1. Re:Math. by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      Language would be a big puzzle to crack, and probably a really frustrating one... but 2+2=4 everywhere you go.

      Unless, of course, it's 11.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    2. Re:Math. by TuaAmin13 · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean 100?

    3. Re:Math. by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean 100?

      No, that'd be 9 in conventional usage

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    4. Re:Math. by dbcad7 · · Score: 1

      Well .. What then ? ... you've traveled to a foreign land where you don't know the language and shown the barmaid on a napkin that you can add.

      --
      waiting for ad.doubleclick.net
    5. Re:Math. by Katatsumuri · · Score: 1

      2+2=11 in base 3.

      In binary, where 4 is written as 100, "2" is not a digit, so there's no confusion.

      Anyway, finding the common base would probably be an easy part of human-alien communications.

    6. Re:Math. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, 2+2=4 in a system with 5 or more digits. If the aliens use binary, that sentence has to be 10+10=100. A lot of funny things can happen in the translation if you don't know what the other side means. Even among humans, we had examples where people didn't use the decimal system, let alone throughout the universe.

      So you need a language, to establish the language that you are going to use

    7. Re:Math. by vlm · · Score: 1

      Well .. What then ? ... you've traveled to a foreign land where you don't know the language and shown the barmaid on a napkin that you can add.

      Ask her if she enjoys adding 42+27 ? That should be fairly universal.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    8. Re:Math. by oGMo · · Score: 1

      This is the scientist's/mathematician's/logician's fallacy. You have a field of expertise which ostensibly can explain everything it encounters: except it never encounters anything it can't explain, because its nature doesn't allow these encounters to happen. They are excluded as irrelevant or nonexistent. Unfortunately, this doesn't necessarily mean they don't exist.

      Consider, moreover, that the laws of reality may not hold everywhere. What if universal constants are local? What if pi is an even 4 in some places, and integers are irrational? We've seen a very, very, very tiny corner of a universe that's incredibly huge. Everything may be fixed, but then again, we don't have a lot of data.

      --

      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

    9. Re:Math. by imtheguru · · Score: 1

      Fibonacci numbers or the Golden ratio would make us look a bit more erudite.

      Or maybe we'd get some interesting responses by broadcasting currently unsolved mathematical problems into the ether...

      --
      Yet Socrates himself is particularly missed.
      A lovely little thinker but a bugger when he's pissed.
    10. Re:Math. by AhtirTano · · Score: 1

      Greg Bear's book "Anvil of Stars" has an alien species where non-sentient Cords come together to form aggregate, intelligent beings called Braids. Because sentience isn't available until multiple Cords have come together, and there does not appear to be a limit on the number of Cords that can aggregate, the Braids never developed a concept of "integers". One Braid (a collection of multiple Cords) can merge with another Braid to form a single Braid: 1 + 1 = 1. All math, therefore, is based on fractions, not whole numbers.

    11. Re:Math. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2+2=5

      But only for high values of 2. Thank you scientific notation.

    12. Re:Math. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mmmmmm.... space manatee

    13. Re:Math. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or does 10 gargle 10 barble 100? I can't argue that basic mathematical principles are different within our system of mathematics, but saying that 2+2=4 everywhere implies that we humans have worked out an understanding of something universal. Math isn't a universal construct, it's only a consistent one, and even then only within itself.

    14. Re:Math. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Out of all the numbers out of all the possible dimensional spaces and topologies, do you really think they'll identify that the sequence of numbers you're spattering at them are discrete integers of a single dimension?

    15. Re:Math. by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      "you've traveled to a foreign land where you don't know the language"

      I think the protocol is just to smile and offer them a vegemite sandwich.

    16. Re:Math. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but 2+2=4 everywhere you go.

      Unless you go somewhere that uses base 4, in which case 2+2=10;
      or somewhere that uses base 3, in which case 2+2=11;
      or somewhere that uses base 2 (a.k.a. binary), in which case "what's 2"?

    17. Re:Math. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds about right...

      I'd start off with some kind of binary counter:
      0000001
      0000010
      0000011... ...up to some arbitrary number and then repeat.

      Sure it would seem very simple and not all that exciting. On the surface, it even appears less ambitious than the Aricebo broadcast. But unlike some other knowledge imparted by mathematical abstracts, if you do it right - counting in binary isn't going to be mistaken for noise or natural phenomena. You might have periodical signals from pulsars and the such and anomalous signals that could be considered planetary phenomena. But if you broadcast a very obvious yet simple binary counter, somebody on the other end should figure out it's artificial. (A pulse based broadcasting system with adjacent frequencies acting as digit placeholders should be able to make a nice strong signal without wasting energy on maintaining a constant carrier signal. Engineering-wise, it should be easy enough to figure out what would be reasonable in terms of power vs. pulses per unit time vs. project cost. Someone should just make it happen already.)

      I suspect a recieving radio astronomer may see some unusual pulses and think "this is interesting." If they look at it long enough to notice that the pulses are in sync with pulses on adjacent frequencies from the same location, that might be more interesting. And if the radio astronomer were to monitor that block of frequencies and make a movie of it with each frame set to the time of the fastest repeat of the set. (Since the lowest digit will be going 1 0 1 0...) Appearance of a binary counter within that movie should be the "Bingo!" moment. (Of course this is after ruling out any native radio sources.)

      To me, seeing a binary counter show up would basically be saying, "We have the technology and the will to communicate, is anyone else out there?" It's the hailing signal that says you know enough about math and electronics to attempt a crude yet workable communcation channel.

      Leave all the details and more complicated messages to be worked out later, provided there is a recognizable response. (The most obvious of which may be another variation of the binary counter, perhaps frequency shifted or in reverse order.)

    18. Re:Math. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if they use base 3?

  50. if they are Vogon by knappe+duivel · · Score: 1

    If they are Vogon, ask them to read some poetry (and pretend to like it)

  51. Anonymous Coward. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    first thing i would say to an alien would be.....hello, my name is .........lmao

    1. Re:Anonymous Coward. by laejoh · · Score: 0

      Inigo Montoya?

  52. How much for a ticket for a galatic guide tour? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or whats the number for the local galactic travel agent?

  53. Atomic Rockets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Imagine yourself taking a stroll through Manhattan, somewhere north of 68th street, deep inside Central Park, late at night. It would be nice to meet someone friendly, but you know that the park is dangerous at night. That's when the monsters come out. There's always a strong undercurrent of drug dealings, muggings, and occasional homicides.

    It is not easy to distinguish the good guys from the bad guys. They dress alike, and the weapons are concealed. The only difference is intent, and you can't read minds.

    Stay in the dark long enough and you may hear an occasional distance shriek or blunder across a body.

    How do you survive the night? The last thing you want to do is shout, "I'm here!" The next to last thing you want to do is reply to someone who shouts, "I'm a friend!"

    What you would like to do is find a policeman, or get out of the park. But you don't want to make noise or move towards a light where you might be spotted, and it is difficult to find either a policeman or your way out without making yourself known. Your safest option is to hunker down and wait for daylight, then safely walk out.

    There are, of course, a few obvious differences between Central Park and the universe.

    There is no policeman.

    There is no way out.

    And the night never ends.

    1. Re:Atomic Rockets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      From Run To The Stars by Michael Scott Rohan (1982). The heroes have discovered the Dreadful Secret that the BC world government is hiding: explorers have discovered the first known alien species, and BC is sending a huge missile to kill all the aliens.

      "Alien," muttered Ryly, and coughed rackingly, unpleasant in the confined space. "The Colony - people, that was different, but - Bellamy, hey, hold on. Think a minute. So what you say's true - couldn't the BC still be right? I mean, these're aliens, man! Better we'd never contacted them, but now they've found us - hell, we can't trust them! We can't be sure! It's the human race at stake."

      "Ye're sayin' that genocide - worse than that, even - that ye like the idea?" demanded Kirsty.

      "Hell, no, think I'm Stalin or somethin'? Like I said - better we'd laid low, shut up, kept to ourselves, safe, Earth and the Colony both. But these things, we can't afford to take a risk with them! Better the missile cleans the mistake off the slate, things quiet down an' we're safe again. I don't like it, I hate it - but then I'm not so wild about some of the things you feel you were justified in doin' either..."

      ..."Ryly, you're no fool, but you're bloody well talking like one. That missile can be tracked, man! With the mass it'll have by the time it connects it'll leave a wake of gravitational disturbance - on interstellar radiation, for a start - pointing right back this way. That's why it's a one-shot weapon - no second chances! Safe? What's safe? As if we could somehow hide away from the rest of the universe. Not as long as we use any kind of broadcast communication, we can't Think of it! Just round here, in our own little neighborhood, three planets inhabited, two with intelligent life, two with roughly the same kind of life! There must be millions of inhabited worlds out there, whatever the experts spout. Some like us, some not. Sooner or later one of them's bound to track back our communications overspill and find us. What then? Under the bed?"

      "If that missile hits the target," said Kristy venomously, "we'll have tae hide. Shrink back into our own wee system, never make a noise, never stir outside it. What if any other race ever found out what we'd done? Then we'd never be safe. They'd never trust us. Not for an instant. There's bound to be some of them who think like you, Ryly. We'd be giving them grand evidence, wouldn't we? They'd wipe us out like plague germs and feel good about it!"

      My own imagination was striking sparks off Kirsty's and kindling an evil flame. "Unless..." I began, and actually had trouble shaping the thought. "Unless we got them first. At once, on first contact. A pre-emptive strike, before they could possibly have a chance to find out about us. Hellfire, isn't that a glorious future history for us! A race of paranoid killers, skulking in our own backwater system when we might have had the stars! Clamping down on exploration, communications, anything that might lead someone else to us and make us stain our hands again with the same old crime... Carrying that weight down the generations. What would that make of us?"

      "Predators," breathed Kirsty, "Carrion-eaters - no, worse, ghouls, vampires, killing just tae carry on our own worthless shadow-lives."

  54. This is all very optimistic by Vahokif · · Score: 1, Insightful

    What makes them think aliens even have anything in common with us? Read some Stanislav Lem for how that might not be true in the slightest.

  55. Duh! by Fuzzums · · Score: 1

    Take me to your leader!

    --
    Privacy is terrorism.
  56. Obligatory Transformers reference by Gax · · Score: 4, Funny

    ba weep gra na weep nini bon

    1. Re:Obligatory Transformers reference by moriya · · Score: 1

      I second this. Because that's the first thing that comes to mind if I wanted to greet an extraterrestrial.

    2. Re:Obligatory Transformers reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then offer them an energon snack

  57. Take us to your leader by savi · · Score: 1

    I think the best thing would be to ask to be put in touch with whatever governmental body oversees our party of the galaxy and (hopefully) will protect our rights. If there are no rights, then we're screwed either way because anyone that can travel to us will completely out-class. On the other hand, if we can reach the Shadow Proclamatino of Judoon (or the equivalent) we may be granted some form of protection. Hopefully, this protection will take the form of David Tennant.

  58. Humans by stox · · Score: 4, Funny

    A convenient snack on those long journeys across the galaxy.

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
    1. Re:Humans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  59. just to be safe: welcome to the planet MARS by petes_PoV · · Score: 3, Funny
    and so long as it still exists the next day, we can take they're friendly.

    If they turn out to be hostile, just beam them the rules of cricket - if that doesn't act as an interplanteary virus, they'll think we're all crazy and won't want to come anywhere close, in case it's catching.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
  60. All your base are belong to us by andre.david · · Score: 1

    "All your base are belong to us"

    Nothing more eloquent is belong to communication.

  61. Hi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you really from Texas?

    1. Re:Hi by CityZen · · Score: 1

      "No, we're from, uh, France."

  62. I would probably have to go with... by Xaoswolf · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Don't probe me bro"

  63. The only thing we could do by koan · · Score: 1

    Is welcome them, if they have tech that gets them to our planet then we aren't going to have any weapons to use against them, and hiding won't end it either.
    In general I think if they are high enough up the ladder (of tech) to cross the gaps between stars we have more to gain than to lose by welcoming them.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    1. Re:The only thing we could do by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Is welcome them, if they have tech that gets them to our planet then we aren't going to have any weapons to use against them, and hiding won't end it either.

      That's not necessarily true. If you're talking about a sub-light vessel that required enormous energy to be accelerated to a significant fraction of C, odds are good that they wouldn't have the power or the reaction mass to carry lots of weapons. Such a craft would likely be a major expenditure of resources for the civilization that launched it, and they'd have needed that power for more important things, such as personnel, life support, auxiliary craft. And if they have some kind of FTL drive ... well, who knows. Either way, if they're just explorers or surveyors they would probably carry defensive weapons but not necessarily of the planet-wrecking variety. I'm really not too concerned that such visitors would have items like force fields and the like (movies like Independence Day aside) but they very well might have some seriously advanced AI on their side.

      However you look at it though, we probably wouldn't want to fuck around with them too much, until we really knew the score.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:The only thing we could do by koan · · Score: 1

      If they are traveling sub light then their other techs would be highly advanced, life support, suspension of life or robotic/cloned, IMO weapons tech is the easiest to develope, you are simply looking to kill or destroy and so anyone with the economy/tech to allow sub light travel would certainly be able to deal with us on either a weapons basis or biological.
      The fact that they are that much further advanced (we can barely maintain an orbital station) would be a good indicator of their superiority.
        I think a better debate would be their motivation for such an expenditure, are they looking for a new home? Then they could be dangerous.
      Are they "exploring" for science reasons? If so then they have massive resources.

      While they may not have a monetary based system they still have to do the work of creating the ship and tech involved.

      --
      "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  64. We've seen aliens before by WhoaNotSoFast · · Score: 1

    Uh, didn't the Bush regime build some kind of fence to keep out aliens? Quick, someone call Immigration!

  65. It really all depends on resources by Colin+Smith · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If resources are plentiful then there isn't much of a problem.

     

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:It really all depends on resources by RsG · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wandering slightly offtopic...

      What would an alien civilization able to travel to earth consider a "resource"?

      For our purposes, we'd count fossil fuels, electricity, metals, arable land, industrial and commercial infrastructure, livestock, water, building materials, manufactured items, people... All things which are finite and useful.

      If a species has the tech to cross a few dozen light years, they won't need some of the above. Water, for example, is easy to come by even in our own star system. Electrical generating capacity would be far in advance of our own, given the amount of energy needed to move a spacecraft over such distances. Fossil fuels and uranium would very likely be useless to a species far ahead of us technologically.

      On the other hand, things we don't consider to be resources might be valuable to aliens. For example, we don't yet need He3 for anything, but we might want it some day as fuel. There are likely isotopes of elements we don't yet know the uses for, but an alien might.

      The point I'm getting at is that we don't know what an alien civilization considers a "resource", or what scarcity they'd have.

      However, I strongly suspect that there's no profit in travelling interstellar distances to get resources. The energy requirements for such a trip are too large; that same technology could almost certainly be put to use to acquire or synthesize resources much more easily.

      --
      Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
    2. Re:It really all depends on resources by TuaAmin13 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe they're tired of breathing canned air?

    3. Re:It really all depends on resources by e2d2 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Gathering resources and returning wouldn't be worth it unless their world(s) were truly in need. But the more obvious need would be to spread their civilization and avoid extinction. Any civilization that wants to avoid extinction must move away from the star it was "born" at eventually.

    4. Re:It really all depends on resources by vlm · · Score: 1

      What would an alien civilization able to travel to earth consider a "resource"?

      Intellectual property, religion, franchise agreements, and pr0n. All four are manifestations of pretty much the same idea.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    5. Re:It really all depends on resources by AhtirTano · · Score: 1

      Well, we ARE the only source of humans in the universe, and we have yet to figure out what we are good for. That might count as sufficiently scarce to make the trip worthwhile.

    6. Re:It really all depends on resources by Opr33Opr33 · · Score: 1

      What would an alien civilization able to travel to earth consider a "resource"?

      Dilithium Crystals of course (sigh), what do they teach the kids these days?

    7. Re:It really all depends on resources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the more obvious need would be to spread their civilization and avoid extinction. Any civilization that wants to avoid extinction must move away from the star it was "born" at eventually.

      Populations don't have a survival instinct. Individuals have a survival instinct.

    8. Re:It really all depends on resources by fractoid · · Score: 1

      What would an alien civilization able to travel to earth consider a "resource"?

      Allotropic iron? :)

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    9. Re:It really all depends on resources by Gerafix · · Score: 1

      They want to add our species to their intergalactic zoo...

    10. Re:It really all depends on resources by Kalotus · · Score: 1

      I think their only reason to look for us would be knowledge: studying a civilization at its early stages.
      But it could be that by the time they receive our message and send a "scientific mission" to look for us (potentially many thousands of years, who knows) our technology would be more powerful than theirs, or maybe they could find nothing left alive on earth.
      So I guess they would be approaching very carefully anyway (probably hiding themselves), also to prevent a potential impact on our culture before they have some knowledge about it.

    11. Re:It really all depends on resources by e2d2 · · Score: 1

      Yes but one individual can talk to another and start a thread that spreads within the population, alerting them to the danger. We see this in a lot of animal species, and also in humans. For instance the dangers of climate change is being propagated through this mechanism today.

    12. Re:It really all depends on resources by JohnBlueMO · · Score: 1
      I don't really see He3 being particularly rare or earth-specific if interstellar travel is easy for them.

      But allow me to posit something that actually is unique to us: our specific history.

      In other words, a full scan of us and extrapolation of our history and individual stories might be of entertainment value. It might be of interest or perhaps even the alien equivalent of humorous. Or it could be the inspiration of what we would anthropomorphically think of as a mini-series.

      Yep. The aliens might be bored.

      In fact, they might have already visited and are secretly collecting material.

      Smile.

  66. Aliens will be lawyers by RichMan · · Score: 1

    You are within regulation Zone 4. You are using the patents described in the attached appendix without paying the required fees.
    You are to appear in court in another solar system in 2 months or judgment will be found against you. The required fees to become current for the use of all patents are shown in the attached appendix. Failure to make a representation at a fee payment hearing will result in bench warrants for seizure of all assets.

  67. And the answer will be: zzaappp! by thedirektor · · Score: 1

    And the answer will be: zzaappp!

    Pro: Someone will finaly stand up to the MPAA/RIAA

    Con: Earth will be in ashes, well maybe it's not that much of a con ;).

  68. Do what they do and be patient by physicsphairy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If we encounter a civilization of vastly superior technology, the idea that we would possess any capacity to negotiate is more or less absurd. Hiding doesn't work either. Assuming it's them discovering us and not vice versa, the encounter cannot possibly be far from our highly-immobile civilization, and even if we immediately turned off all the power plants and went dark, it's not like there is such an abundance of life-supporting planets nearby that earth could hope to slip through the cracks. It may not even be wise to try and be all buddy-buddy with them, as who knows what sort of culture and religion they follow. ("you dare bow to us? we will surely annihilate you for the insult of that most obscene gesture!")

    The simplest and wisest thing to do is let them call all the shots. Speak when spoken to; otherwise, be silent. Look for opportunities to reciprocate any kindness. Any technology they can be convinced to offer is guaranteed to exceed the value of any riches we bring as tribute (which should have value by virtue of uniqueness even if their culture does not experience the same rarity of materials).

    If our visitors are demanding and unreasonable human being will almost certainly have to postpone any major rebellion until they are in a position to acquire some of their oppressors' technological resources.

  69. Send them the Voynich Manuscript by mbone · · Score: 1

    Send them the Voynich Manuscript.

    That should buy some time.

  70. Obvious: by ViennaLen · · Score: 1

    With the Vulcan salute, of course!

  71. Sticks and stones by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    ... preferably Rosetta ones.

  72. My greeting... by tekiegreg · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hi, Beer's in the Fridge, bathroom's over there, enjoy your stay...

    --
    ...in bed
  73. The question is can we even communicate with them by OriginalSolver · · Score: 1

    We have no idea how extraterrestrials might see the Universe. It is conceivable that we will not be able to communicate with them in any meaningful way. Even if we can actually decoding their language(s) may take decades or centuries. They may find our languages just as perplexing.

  74. How do we communicate with Aliens? by RudeIota · · Score: 1

    Through what appears to be the universal language of mathematics... what else?

    --
    Fact: Everything I say is fiction.
    1. Re:How do we communicate with Aliens? by OriginalSolver · · Score: 1

      Another similar point is the argument that if they can make a narrow band EM transmission then they must understand the concept of physics. While this may be the common ground needed to communicate I can still envision a situation in which their physics and mathematics are based on entirely different concepts to ours but still lead to the same conclusions. Would we be able to bridge the gap? Who knows.

  75. "Beyond Earth" by TheCreeep · · Score: 1

    What's all this talk about finding intelligent lifeforms "beyond Earth". Shouldn't we really make an effort to find intelligence life on Earth first?

  76. Turing test by uassholes · · Score: 1
    This is like the Turing test. The original concept was to point out that if you can't distinguish between the responses of a human and a computer, than the computer was essentially human.

    Touring was just making a point, but people have taken it too far and claim that if you can't distinguish, then the computer is intelligent.

    So, imagine a space alien arriving in his UFO and failing the Turing test because not only does it not know what baseball is, but can't even understand human language; maybe doesn't even experience sight and sound, but experiences the world in it's own way.

    You would fail it's Touring test.

  77. First Contact says say, "Thanks." Duh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haven't these SETI scienticians seen First Contact?

    When the aliens arrive and say, "Live long and prosper," you say, "Thanks."

    Geeze, why do we go to the trouble of showing people the future when they're just going to ignore it?

  78. Puny Stink Ape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have long ago moved past your primitive false left-right dichotomies.

    We now classify political views under a much more advanced 11-dimensional system where most people come out as Quantum Libertarians.

  79. Already solved by AlHunt · · Score: 1

    The Carpenters answered this decades ago and it's already beaming it's way across the cosmos:
    ---------------------
    In your mind you have capacities you know
    To telepath messages through the vast unknown
    Please close your eyes and concentrate
    With every thought you think
    Upon the recitation we're about to sing

    Calling occupants of interplanetary craft
    Calling occupants of interplanetary, most extraordinary craft

    Calling occupants of interplanetary craft
    Calling occupants of interplanetary craft
    Calling occupants of interplanetary, most extraordinary craft

    You've been observing our earth
    And we'd like to make a contact with you
    We are your friends

    Calling occupants of interplanetary craft
    Calling occupants of interplanetary ultra emissaries

    We've been observing your earth
    And one night we'll make a contact with you

    We are your friends
    Calling occupants of interplanetary quite extraordinary craft

    And please come in pace we beseech you
    (Only of love we will teach you)
    Our earth may never survive (So don't come we beg you)
    Please interstellar policemen
    Won't you give us a sign give us a sign that we've reached you

    With your mind you have ability to form
    And transmit thought energy far beyond the norm
    You close your eyes, you concentrate, together that's the way
    To send a message we declare World Contact Day

    Calling occupants of interplanetary craft
    Calling occupants of interplanetary craft
    Calling occupants of interplanetary, most extraordinary craft

    Calling occupants
    Calling occupants
    Calling occupants of interplanetary, anti-adversary craft

    We are your friends
    ---------------------

    --
    1 in 4 Maine children in struggle with hunger.
  80. Obvious Answer by BobNET · · Score: 1

    Q: How do you greet an extraterrestrial?
    A: "Hello, extraterrestrial!"

  81. Two Words by fartrader · · Score: 1

    Brock Sampson

  82. They're just here to serve Man ... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    So we've got guns. I wonder how intimidated a civilization that has the technology to traverse light-years through space would be of our bullets and bombs. If they wished to annihilate us, I wager they'd be able to do it without even giving us a chance to react. If an alien race should contact Earth, I think our best bet would be to at least assume that they have peaceful intentions.

    Well, if you see a bunch of them walking around, holding a large book which they page through occasionally while staring hungrily at people ... time to start worrying.

    Besides, we might get lucky and be able to bring down their force shields with a computer virus.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    1. Re:They're just here to serve Man ... by mhs1973 · · Score: 1

      they are the OOOD?!


      why didn't you say so in the first place?

  83. I'll get right on it by Mannerism · · Score: 1

    I figure this is right up there with planning what to do with the lottery money.

  84. Everyone knows you just say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ba weep grahna weep nini bahm!

  85. The Universal Greeting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  86. How do you greet an extraterrestrial? by flickwipe · · Score: 1

    "Hi, nice to meet you! Ignore the clangers, they're racists."

  87. Close Encounters? by dandart · · Score: 1

    D E C lowC lowG

  88. Hey aliens, got religion? by trveler · · Score: 1

    It would be (al?)mighty interesting to find out what exterrestrial conceptions of God and religion are. How many religions they have (if any), what their worship practices are... ... how much their gods like the taste of earthling flesh... you know, that kind of thing.

    --
    ... is whot bwings os tugevza tsuzay.
  89. the universal greeting... by mr_walrus · · Score: 1

    "Pull my finger..." :)

  90. Re:First Contact says say, "Thanks." Duh. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    When the aliens arrive and say, "Live long and prosper," you say, "Thanks."

    And when they arrive and say "K'oq h'U Ploq'!" (die, alien scum!), what do you say then? Think carefully, this is important.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  91. If they are hot by usman_ismail · · Score: 1

    If they are hot aliens then "How you doin' "

  92. take me with you, this planet sucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would use the age-old...
    "beam me up scotty, there's no intelligent life down here"

    and really *really* hope they take me with them when they leave...

    anything to get off this god-forsaken rock! augh!

  93. ET by kaoshin · · Score: 1

    If I meet ET I'm going to flip him the bird.

  94. With the universal greeting: by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 1
    "Bahweepgranahweepninnibon"

    Then give them an energon cube.

    --
    Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
    altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    1. Re:With the universal greeting: by Veretax · · Score: 1

      Exactly, except I think the correct word break down is: "Bah-weep-Graaaaagnah wheep ni ni bong."

    2. Re:With the universal greeting: by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 1
      Dammit! I've been doing it wrong all this time.

      I guess that explains the Fermi Paradox.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
  95. I know this one! by the_macman · · Score: 1

    Show them you know math! You can't use numbers, those are human constructs. Although maybe you could use Roman numerals. You could try to use an XY system and draw something like sin or cos, although they may not understand our coordinate system. I think I'd go with using geometric shapes to represent PI or something. Like this picture here.

  96. They can't and they won't mention it. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

    It's a huge assumption that they are looking for others like them.

    This touches on a good point.

    I've always thought some of the very basic assumptions made by the "Seeking Intelligent Life" community are rather presumptuous.

    The assumptions are so basic as to be almost invisible to those who make them, which appears to be nearly everybody. The primary one being that Intelligent Life will be as excited about finding Intelligent Life as we are. --The only considered variables being Intelligent Life's level of technology and level of benevolence.

    Being a curious person, I decided to react to the various bits of incongruous signal peeping out from all the noise. Crop circles were one such bit of signal. There are many others. For some reason, (which is not actually, "Some Reason" but rather, like every other bit of signal, upon exploring it, a very clearly understandable reason, and not a very flattering one at that), people block out the threads, try to rationalize them away, and generally force reality through the warped lens of the current popular human belief structures. But if people manage to undo this bit of social programming and honestly look at the information available without bias or a desire to destroy it in favor of the calming, socially acceptable version, then life can be clearly seen for what it really is; The jungle on the other side of the barbed electric enclosure.

    The available indicators today, (and there are many, many of them), tell us several things. . .

    1. Alien Life doesn't exist within, and more importantly, doesn't perceive physical space/time the same way we do. They're better at it. More evolved. Time is a spatial vector for them along which they can move back and forth at will.

    2. They don't consider us equals. Far from it; they consider us food. In much the same way we don't negotiate with cattle or share in cultural exchanges with stands of corn, we are naive to expect to be treated as anything other than a retarded ape species bearing a (significant) industrial resource value. There's a reason there are so many of us at the moment and that world politics are as they are.

    3. They've been here "forever" and have been manipulating us for the same length of time.

    SETI, while it is rather sweet in its child-like naivete, remains an indicator of just how fsked we really are as a race.

    Bearing all of this in mind, it is hardly any surprise that people would rather block it out and live comfortably in some pretend reality. I'm sure cows do the equivalent thing on their level. --Imagine if all the cows at once decided to use all that enormous muscle power to overwhelm the gates and trample their keepers? They could do this at any moment, but they never will.

    -FL

    1. Re:They can't and they won't mention it. by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      They don't consider us equals. Far from it; they consider us food.

      Actually it's probably worse (or better, depending on your perspective) than that. Aliens wouldn't consider us food for the simple reason that we almost certainly wouldn't agree with them. Life that has evolved in different biospheres very likely evolved using very different chemicals, and so an alien would obtain no more nutrition by eating a human than he would by eating the human's car.

      More likely, any aliens would be so different from us that they wouldn't even consider us to be life. To them, the Earth would look like a lifeless planet, although perhaps they'd notice the presence of some some sort of interesting chemical processes marring the surface.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    2. Re:They can't and they won't mention it. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

      Actually it's probably worse (or better, depending on your perspective) than that. Aliens wouldn't consider us food for the simple reason that we almost certainly wouldn't agree with them. Life that has evolved in different biospheres very likely evolved using very different chemicals, and so an alien would obtain no more nutrition by eating a human than he would by eating the human's car.

      That's more kit from the same box of linear assumptions, I'm afraid.

      Put it this way; that feeling of power one gets when bullying (or torturing) a person is not just an imaginary rush of adrenaline or somesuch.

      Our cities are huge negative energy batteries. Come rent and bill payment day, the power level spikes. Spikes even higher during tax time. Or economic downturn. Or with the sounding of war drums and airport sirens. . , altogether it produces a bonanza of life-energy transferred. Of all the cultivated bits of capital proffered up by the planet, Human Misery, Human Longing, Human Hate, Human Fear, Pain and Anxiety are collectively the most efficiently produced and reliable bumper crop.

      As one fellow who laughing commented up upon reading one of my missives on the subject, "Ah. So aliens are Emotivores, are they?" He summed it up rather neatly, while seeming to think I was being terribly inventive.

      Wish I was.

      -FL

    3. Re:They can't and they won't mention it. by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      Put it this way; that feeling of power one gets when bullying (or torturing) a person is not just an imaginary rush of adrenaline or somesuch.

      Alien bullies? Perhaps, but that has little to do with nutrition, which is what I thought you were talking about when you said 'they consider us food'.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    4. Re:They can't and they won't mention it. by rastilin · · Score: 1

      That makes no sense whatsoever. None. Emotions release a chemical process, but that has very little energy in it, it's function is to trigger receptors in the brain and adjust physical properties.

      Let me put it directly. There is no such thing as psy power, we've been looking for years and while aliens may have abilities we have not considered, they will not have abilities that contradict physics; nor will they be able to feed on non-existant energy fields.

      --
      How do you kill that which has no life?
    5. Re:They can't and they won't mention it. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

      Let me put it directly. There is no such thing as psy power, we've been looking for years and while aliens may have abilities we have not considered, they will not have abilities that contradict physics; nor will they be able to feed on non-existant energy fields.

      That is very direct indeed, and it is certainly the official popular position which has been promoted with a particularly strong level of hysteria lately, --being the last seventy years or so, when it matters most. And while strident denial and passionately reinforced disbelief does certainly play a role in how perceptions work in small, enclosed systems, it does not alter the actual workings of the universe as a whole. This, according to my own labor-intensive findings.

      I should say, your opinion is not reinforced by my explorations into the matter at all. --Which I suspect includes many of the same sources you have absorbed on the argument, as well as, naturally, a balancing of material from the other side of the same argument. It's quite impossible to form any sort of rational notions by exploring only one side of the story. Fair and Balanced, right?

      I've observed that with disheartening regularity those who are most firm in their positions against the notion of energy are typically also those who have done the least amount of honest research. The typical example is the so-called "sceptic" who has has little-to-no experience with such matters beyond having sniffed at the daily newspaper astrology section and place mats in the local Chinese restaurant. Armchair philosophy, no matter how refined, doesn't count for much when it doesn't look at anything beyond its own thinking and the cherry-picked examples which support its cause. Causes are dangerous, emotionally charged things which get in the way of real science. This is why I find it wonderfully appropriate that there happen to be two accepted spellings of the word, "Skeptic" and "Sceptic". --One of which is a noble and sensible (and rare) type of individual, while the other bears a strong relation to the idea of "sewage" and "toxic buildup in the system."

      --Particularly given that those students of philosophy who open themselves up to the barest bit of actual, earnest research promptly fall out of their arm chairs and hit the floor in shock. You don't hear much from those people, as they tend to be too ashamed to speak, though they needn't be. It's just that their social programming was never successfully purged from their very deliberately installed guilt-circuits. Pathetic, really, but somewhat forgivable given the forces stacked against them. They are right about one thing after all; the mind is easily manipulated.

      Installed at birth and through the formative years, when one is most vulnerable, most never manage to break away from the programming. --Or they do with altogether too much force, as is evidenced by the disgust some feel from discovering that they have been born into religious families, which if one is fortunate enough to escape, as from a quicksand, tends to result in an elastic sort of hurling onto one's back --from which one's view of the world is then quite skewed until they regain their feet. For some reason, however, few bother ever standing up again, preferring to remain stubbornly flat on their backs where things feel safe and solid, and where the patch of sky above is, like the world behind their television screens, comfortably far away.

      Real men walk.

      -FL

    6. Re:They can't and they won't mention it. by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      Energy as concept is truly a fractal who's multitudionous forms we glimpse at different levels throughout the ages, what was once ascribed to the work of the gods in the heavens we now label with another name and imagine that by doing so we gain some measure of control over it uncaring that another observer from a different conciousness may be but barely aware of the form we see blinded as they are by their own preferred reflection.

      A shrewd observer who is able to remove his own human psyche from the equation and stand behind the burden of his learning and culture can, with dedicated study, glimpse occasionally those other forms of that which is taken as either commonplace or inexplicable by his fellow man. I believe if you are willing to undertake the rigours of this course of investigation, and I must warn you it can be hard and few who try can hope to "succeed", as though success it's self is even a goal, you can begin to appreciate that what is inexplicable and that which is deemed explicable are but 2 ends of the same rainbow - neither can truly be said to have a definite form but all are apparent by any observer although the incautious often take the evidence of their senses, or nowadays more commonly their equipment, to believe they have discovered the definitive location of some property of the cosmos. You and I now know the source of their error.

      To turn then to the question of 'psychic' energy one first of all has to, at all costs, avoid the temptation of seeking the effect without also considering the wider spectrum of possibility in which, it can be imagined, some specific causality may be found. Yes it may -- but like a rainbow one may see the conduit through which the action occurs but not the cause or effect since these perhaps may stand outside of the particular time frame available to the mortal observer. However by considering the fractality inherent in all energetic manifestations one may easily discern the echoes of the psychic transfer elsewhere in the continuum.

    7. Re:They can't and they won't mention it. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

      And that would be an apt example of what is known as the, "Reiki Flakey" in common parlance.

      But as one great logician pointed out, "Just because all cows are animals, it is fucking retarded to assume that all animals are cows."

      --Please pardon my paraphrasing for the benefit of the logically inept, which around Slashdot is apparently an embarrassing commonality. But as somebody wiser than me once said, "Just because all logicians are nerds, it should not be assumed that all nerds are logicians. Hell, many of them needed their mittens tied to the ends of their sleeves for a few years longer than the other kids, so really, you're asking quite a lot here."

      Ad Hom? --Sure, though I prefer to call it, "Kicking one's energy in the arse".

      -FL

  97. Send them this greeting... by netglen · · Score: 1

    Send them this greeting in Intergalatic Common...

    "All your base are belong to us!"

  98. How about? by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 1

    How about "Hey, you can't park that thing here!"

  99. Answer: by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    very carefully

  100. if he is able to travel to the earth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...then no words will be necessary, he will understand.

  101. Scary Thought by fatman22 · · Score: 1

    There may be many worlds inhabited by those who fit our understanding of "intelligent". One of them has to be the oldest and/or most advanced. It may be us.

  102. If I'm in Essex, then usually with... by your+Funny+Uncle · · Score: 1

    ..."Ullo John! Gotta New Motor?"

  103. close encounters by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

    doesn't it involve hand signals and someone playing a really loud organ?

  104. Please, please don't kill me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please, please don't kill me!

  105. how to talk . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you think about it this problem has been sovled by every parent that has raised a child . It might not be the most efficient way but it works .
    We can assume that if they arrived here and did not immeadiately destroy us , that they are as interested in communicating as we are and are inteligent enough to recognise our attempts to teach them our language or learn theirs and to cooperate and help .

  106. What up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Word.

  107. vulcan labia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    get a vulcan chick to spread her legs and make the hand sign right over the labia

  108. Idiots would get us slaughtered regardless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they actually visited Earth? It wouldn't really matter, the stupid people of the world (religious fundamentalists/xenophobes/right-wing nutjobs) would provoke them and get us all slaughtered regardless.

  109. There can be different kinds of intelligence by sznupi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But this assumption, that intelligence should be enough, relies on another - that those will be similar kinds of intelligence. Which might not be true.

    Look at the example with squid. Is it intelligent? Definitely. Does it help us humans in communicating with it? Not really.

    Notice that I've said "us humans". The burden of finding a viable channel for communication will almost certainly lie on the more intelligent species - simply because its modes of reasoning are totally out of grasp for "lesser" one. In case of squidshumans we, as a "higher" species, didn't really manage to figure out ways of communication. And it works for vast majority of species on Earth, except those which are very simple or those which are very similar to us (and it's still far from great in this case). And no, domesticated animals don't count - we bred proper responses into them.

    The intelligence we might get into contact with will be almost certainly quite different from ours - not necessarilly because of different modes of operation (hive mind for example), but also because it, most probably, had a different timescale to evolve, refine itself.

    Overall, it is likely it will be more intelligent than us. And somehow I doubt it will be very close to us, diminishing even further the chance of "close enough to find common ground". At the same time we're already quite advanced, so not exactly falling into "primitive enough".

    PS. As a personal sidenote: I think that, eventually, intelligence of our type, one that is well on its way to harness power over genes, is quite short, quite transitory stage towards intelligence that is fully aware, harnesses and embraces...memes. How it would think then? Here's the point - I am unable to comprehend. But we would look to it similarly like animals look to us - totally under influence of genes, not even realising next step.

    --
    One that hath name thou can not otter
    1. Re:There can be different kinds of intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that, eventually, intelligence of our type, one that is well on its way to harness power over genes, is quite short, quite transitory stage towards intelligence that is fully aware, harnesses and embraces...memes. How it would think then?

      "Sir, we've decoded the image."
      "What is it?"
      "Y'know how our first TV broadcasts were of Hitler at the 1936 Olympics?"
      "Dear God. They said 'hello' by sending back a swastika-bedecked alien raising its right tentacle?"
      "No, worse than that. They're a memetic-based intelligence."
      "You mean?"
      "Yeah. It's hello.jpg"

    2. Re:There can be different kinds of intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at the example with squid. Is it intelligent? Definitely

      No it fucking isn't. An understanding of mathematics (and no, not just simple arithmetic) is the bare minimum for "intelligence" by any useful definition.

    3. Re:There can be different kinds of intelligence by h4rm0ny · · Score: 2, Interesting


      I can't answer your last question for sure (of course), but I have long thought it likely that any extraterrestial intelligence we encounter / have encountered will not attempt to communicate with anyone per se, but with our culture or our species. The sheep dog doesn't care for the thought processes of a single sheep, it cares about the behaviour of the whole. Why lower yourself to talking to some "president" when you can talk to a culture through the introduction of new memes?

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    4. Re:There can be different kinds of intelligence by Patch86 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Overall, it is likely it will be more intelligent than us.

      Says who?

      Not saying they wouldn't be, but what evidence makes it "likely"?

      So far, in all of humanity's history, the most intelligent and capable animal we've ever discovered has been humans. There are billions of species, and there have been billions of years of history on this planet, but so far the only evidence of anything like "advanced" intelligence has been from homo sapiens and its close relatives.

      Bearing in mind that TFA is talking about making contact with aliens by broadcast over very long distance (say, spotting signs of life on a distant planet and beaming a response their way), there is no good reason to assume that the creatures on the other end are automatically more intelligent, higher beings. They might be, but that's just guessing. And note that simply having been around longer doesn't denote higher intelligence- 21st century technology knocks Ancient Greek tech into a cocked hat, but I'm not about to claim that we're all far more intelligent than Socrates, Aristotle and Plato.

      I still don't buy the squid analogy. Squid haven't proved themselves intelligent enough to, say, build and operate an interstellar radio transmitter, nor the will to do much else other than eat fish and swim about. If we accept that the only aliens we'll ever be talking to are those that have figured out wireless communication and space telescopes, that gives us at least some common ground which they'll be sharing with us.

    5. Re:There can be different kinds of intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What to do

      With the meme of the meme?

    6. Re:There can be different kinds of intelligence by mahmud · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And note that simply having been around longer doesn't denote higher intelligence- 21st century technology knocks Ancient Greek tech into a cocked hat, but I'm not about to claim that we're all far more intelligent than Socrates, Aristotle and Plato.

      Once we get implants and augmented intelligence to play around with, the average Joe will easily outsmart Plato & Co, not to mention the potential DNA modifications that will likely be used to produce "faster" brains, with better analytical capabilities, thus making people "wiser" overall.

      If aliens have had millions of years to perfect themselves, it's not hard to imagine them leaving their early forms behind, and having merged with space itself.

      Humanity is still very young, and 8000+ years of semi-known history is but an instant.

    7. Re:There can be different kinds of intelligence by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Look at the example with squid. Is it intelligent? Definitely. Does it help us humans in communicating with it? Not really.

      You've got to be kidding. Squids are NOT intelligent. They aren't even social animals to my knowledge. They just swim around and eat fish. They might have some rudimentary intelligence which helps them do that better, but that's not "intelligence" in the context we're talking about here. In this context, "intelligence" means being intelligent enough to develop language, communicate with other beings, create technology, perform abstract reasoning, learn about and use mathematics, etc. Squids haven't done any of that. No other animal on this planet has done all of that. Some animals have proven themselves quite intelligent as far as animals go (like chimps that can learn ~50 words of sign language so they can tell humans they're cold or hungry or happy or whatever, and can fashion sticks to use as tools in getting honey from beehives), but that's still a very far cry from what humans have achieved.

      No matter how different or more advanced an alien intelligence is from us, there are certain common things we'll most certainly have between us to use for communication. The big one is mathematics. No animal on earth can understand mathematics, beyond perhaps adding two numbers 10 (I believe some chimps have done that). Any alien race advanced enough to develop technology to travel here would almost certainly have developed mathematics.

    8. Re:There can be different kinds of intelligence by sznupi · · Score: 1

      You are illustrating my point. OK, personally I would choose an example of octopuses, because their intelligence more easily impresses us, but I've gone with the example from parent poster - and Squids definitely are intelligent too - some of them, for example, communicate, cooperate during hunts.

      But it is so different, so "primitive" kind of intelligence you dismiss it completely.

      Even taking into account your criteria:

      In this context, "intelligence" means being intelligent enough to develop language, communicate with other beings, create technology, perform abstract reasoning, learn about and use mathematics, etc.

      there are animals that fit. Yes, on "lesser" level, but they fit. You even mention them later...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    9. Re:There can be different kinds of intelligence by sznupi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Then most humans don't qualify also.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    10. Re:There can be different kinds of intelligence by MozzleyOne · · Score: 1

      PS. As a personal sidenote: I think that, eventually, intelligence of our type, one that is well on its way to harness power over genes, is quite short, quite transitory stage towards intelligence that is fully aware, harnesses and embraces...memes.

      We're further than you think.

      I CAN HAZ CHEEZBURGER?!

      --
      Ayjay on Fedang
    11. Re:There can be different kinds of intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then most humans don't qualify also.

      Is that a counter-argument or a clarification? Because, honestly, I think it's quite obvious most humans don't qualify as intelligent, and anyone who disagrees with that simply falls in the same category as said majority.

    12. Re:There can be different kinds of intelligence by xx01dk · · Score: 1

      I KNEW you guys were here already...

      --
      There is simply too much glass..
    13. Re:There can be different kinds of intelligence by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Why lower yourself to talking to some "president" when you can talk to a culture through the introduction of new memes?

      So, what exactly was 4Chan's message with "Chocolate Rain" then?

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    14. Re:There can be different kinds of intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You assume that implants and augmented intelligence will actually come to fruition. Personally, I'm extremely skeptical of them.

    15. Re:There can be different kinds of intelligence by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      But it is so different, so "primitive" kind of intelligence you dismiss it completely.

      Exactly: they are so primitive that their level of intelligence can absolutely be dismissed. Some other posts here have talked about first contact between civilizations. These animals haven't developed anything even resembling civilization, even the most advanced of them. And we've already made contact with just about all of them. None of them really cared too much, or attempted to communicate in any meaningful way. That's why they're called "animals" and not "sentient, intelligent beings".

      Some aliens might see us as primitive, but they certainly can't deny that we have a civilization of sorts, that we've developed technology, and that we can communicate. If they make contact, many of us will certainly want to communicate with them, which is more than can be said for just about any animal. When they attempt to communicate with us, it's to tell us that they're hungry and want food.

    16. Re:There can be different kinds of intelligence by sznupi · · Score: 1

      And you're doing this again...

      These animals haven't developed anything even resembling civilization, even the most advanced of them. And we've already made contact with just about all of them. None of them really cared too much, or attempted to communicate in any meaningful way. That's why they're called "animals" and not "sentient, intelligent beings".

      And how are you "sure" of any of those things? Now, we know that of course...for vast majority of human evolution (and, mostly, also now) we simply viewed animals as source of food, threat or ignored them (because that would leave resources to former two categories), a case of survivor bias. Generally we didn't try to make "contact", not in a way that wouldn't be meaningful only to us. We were even perfectly capable of doing the same thing with other humans that are different enough. (observe people communicating with unknown to you language, from vastly different culture while trying to forget about common pursuits - how many of things they do seem more than instincts?) Do you even have workable definition of "sentience"? Many people would like to hear it...

      You should hope any being sufficiently more advanced from us won't have the same approach. And that we, while making such contact, won't be that anthropocentric at this point.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    17. Re:There can be different kinds of intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disclaimer: I'm not Grishnakh.

      AIUI, one of the hallmarks of sentience as it pertains to this discussion is the ability to learn (and teach) solely through non-demonstrative communication. For example, one chimp can show another chimp how to use a reed to retrieve yummy termites from a mound. However, when away from any termite mounds and reeds, the same two chimps cannot engage in the same teaching/learning activity. This is a manifestation of the capacity for abstract reasoning and communication. AFAIK, we've never observed any other species on Earth to be capable of this (and yes, there are, or were, scientists pursuing it). Given time (maybe a very long time), two humans of radically different culture and language can still accomplish such abstract communication, because all humans are inherently capable of it (ignoring mentally handicapped, and so on). You can teach a chicken to play tic-tac-toe, but not solely through communication; you have to show the chicken the patterns and reward the desired responses. Chickens have no capacity for learning solely through communication.

      - T

    18. Re:There can be different kinds of intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Squids seem eerily intelligent, but are they even close to something anyone could communicate with? Do they even communicate to each other? And I mean something more than "shark, over there!!!!!" or "MMMMM fish GOOOD!!!" Even with chimps who are 98% genetically the same as us, they aren't above the level of a 2 or 3 year old. Had many good conversations with a toddler? Even apes taught sign language, using it for a decade or two, don't express much more than "give banana".

      They don't have much in the way of actual intelligence, don't really express themselves, so there's nothing much to talk to them about. But if some much more advanced intelligence found us. I think we've crossed the line, we are individuals, we have something to say. 99% of it is dumb dumb dumb. But I think a higher intelligence could dumb it down and have some thing to say to us.

      I'm not sure what higher intelligence means anyway. People seem to think that they think radically differently than us. Maybe if we're talking about a some kind of networked mentality, maybe the individual beings are not important or do much in the way of individualized thinking. The hive mind can hardly be bothered to think about much below the level of a planet, below that its 80% instinct. Or perhaps they have some weird body type, like a huge hill-sized bulk that gets energy by sitting in the sun, doesn't have eyes or ears, lives for 9000 years, moves a yard a day. But ignoring those cases, in what ways would they be that different?

      Are they just so advanced they can do no wrong? Super-hippies, appalled at how mean we can be to each other, never steping on bugs and their technology does nothing bad to the environment? Maybe a few of them would find our evil, engaging, maybe sexy?

      Are they ultra-monks, one step below nirvana? Without any thoughts of themselves they can't relate to us at all? They couldn't understand fashion, music or good food? I think some chorizo and scallops or really good pizza might tempt them. Throw in some booze, assuming it chemically works on them like it does on us, maybe some dancing in a miami nightclub........ they might find they have a lot of things to talk to us about....

      I think highly intelligent might just mean they know a lot. They know how to raise their children so they socialize well, without being too socialized. They can nip in the bud serial killers, child molesters, corporate executives. They're too smart to get into cults, vote republican, or believe democrats. Maybe they can do calculus in their heads, and can really apply it in real life. They look at a far away building and know how many feet away it is, they can see a spectrogram and know what its made of. They know if you dump chemicals into the sea, the short-term profit isn't worth the long term consequences. They don't exploit each other or hate the ones with octagonal eye-stems. They learned from their history, its not some classroom rule they say in public but don't really believe in. They actually think! Its not knee-jerk like 99% of us. Somehow they pass worth-while knowledge to their offspring.

      If such a thing as a higher intelligence exists, lets hope they are willing to talk to us, that they might try to teach us something.

  110. Repeat after me by PPH · · Score: 1

    "Gort! Klaatu barada nikto!"

    If its name isn't Gort, we're screwed.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Repeat after me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we're screwed.

      What do you mean "we", earthling?

  111. Transformers by Goalie_Ca · · Score: 1
    I can't believe no one has said this yet

    bah weep grana weep nini bong!

    --

    ----
    Go canucks, habs, and sens!
    1. Re:Transformers by Nocturnal+Deviant · · Score: 1

      im surprised nobody has said nano nano yet..

      --
      -Noc
    2. Re:Transformers by julesh · · Score: 1

      I can't believe no one has said this yet

      That would be because it isn't true. The first bah weep grana weep nini bong post was nearly half an hour before yours.

  112. Re:Chemistry by ScottForbes · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Chemistry would work the best since there are so many obvious constants.

    Rather than spoil the ending of the classic sci-fi short story Omnilingual by H. Beam Piper, I'll just post a link - it's a short read, like the label says. (A team of explorers on Mars find a dead civilization, complete with an utterly untranslatable library of books....)

  113. We're high in protein... by jddj · · Score: 1

    ...and delightfully crunchy!

  114. The ETs are the ones who decide, not us by Roark+Meets+Dent · · Score: 1

    The ETs who are here with us on Earth are far above humans in terms of intellectual capacity and technology. So THEY are the ones who decide how any communication with a particular human will occur. The human decides nothing. For more information visit the Dr. Karla Turner memorial website at www.KarlaTurner.org

    1. Re:The ETs are the ones who decide, not us by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      What if we are the "advanced" ones? The aliens could be intelligent, maybe even more than us, but communicate or show their intelligence in ways that we could not understand or see.

      If that is the case, why we should go that far? Maybe whales, chimps, squids, and others here could fall into that definition, and our communication attemps were enclosing the lucky ones in zoos, or kill them for food, fun, resources, etc. Worse than that. There were times here that we didn't consider other humans "humans" enough, so was ok to enslave, rape, kill, mass exterminate, or even eat others.

      If we are the advanced ones, better be very afraid any alien that could be in our path. Now, where that put us when we are not the advanced ones in such encounters?

  115. Evolution works across the universe too by BrightCandle · · Score: 1

    Saying anything is a bit dangerous until we know their intentions. Evolution and the process of smarter cultivates dumber for food will continue throughout space. We could well become another cattle ranch in the universe. Its best to say nothing at all because its doggy dog out there in the universe.

  116. Easy by krunchyfrog · · Score: 1, Funny

    I would grab my towel.

    --
    printf($randomline(sigs.txt) \n "-- "$randomline(authors.txt));
    -- myself
  117. How to greet an alien in nine easy steps. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. As a marine aviator, you shoot-down one of the invading force's attack pods using a jet fighter.
    2. Crash-land your airframe in the desert a mere fifty feet from his craft.
    3. Survive, completely uninjured mind you.
    4. With no more effort than it takes to open an unlocked car door, board the craft to investigate. (Alien must have forgot to push-down the little knob).
    5. Realize that said alien is still alive and conscious.
    6. Punch alien in the head just like you're Muhammad Ali, rendering it unconscious.
    7. Exclaim to said unconscious alien, "Welcome to Earth!"
    8. Sit outside and light-up a big, fat cigar and bask in your own awesomeness.
    9. Go write a rap song at some point. Avoid cursing in it, because you're above that shit.

    Fuck yeah! America rocks!

  118. Eddie Torres by need4mospd · · Score: 1

    We have found it, it's Eddie Torres the Extra Testicle.

  119. Use Sci-fi propaganda by EdgeyEdgey · · Score: 1

    The best way to get an extraterrestrial race to become comfortable with the idea of other races would be to infiltrate their media/communication networks and plant ideas that aliens aren't that scary, and maybe they could be quite nice.
    - Start with "The day the Earth stood still" (or alien equivalent).
    - Move on to some Star Trek like series
    etc.
    Maybe set up some conspiracy theory to get the population to think for themselves. In general, gradually get the populous happy with the idea of aliens.
    Then appear and say hello.
    Kinda like what's been happening on earth since mid 20th century.

    I for one will welcome our new extraterrestrial overlords

    --
    [Intentionally left blank]
  120. We already send a THE message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We sent the most loud and descriptive message we can in the 1940's.

    The message consist of multiple detonations of atomic weapons and send the following message: "We have the technology to destroy our planet and we are not afraid to use it."

    No federation membership for us.

  121. Problem in bed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ashamed of your 15 inches?

    Come visit our little blue planet and all the ladies in the neighborhood will be yours!

  122. Tell them everything by Crookdotter · · Score: 1

    I suggest that we line up every piece of digital information that we have and send it all. They can get a half decent view of us that way, and maybe they will do the same at some point, giving us a world of information to sift through. Imagine the advancements if we can understand any of it, and imagine the generations of work if their language or thought is beyond us.

    There's really nothing to be done if they are superior and malevolent and on the way, so why not assume they want to be friends?

    1. Re:Tell them everything by Nocturnal+Deviant · · Score: 1

      a great man once said ignorance is bliss....you exemplified that...good point "if they dont like us were FZCK*D anyways!!"

      --
      -Noc
    2. Re:Tell them everything by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

      I suggest that we line up every piece of digital information that we have and send it all. They can get a half decent view of us that way, and maybe they will do the same at some point, giving us a world of information to sift through. Imagine the advancements if we can understand any of it, and imagine the generations of work if their language or thought is beyond us.

      There's really nothing to be done if they are superior and malevolent and on the way, so why not assume they want to be friends?

      Should they or we do as you say, offer a copy of everything digital, the other should consider that an act of aggression if not war. Sturgeon's Law applies: "90% of everything is crap." Digital makes it so much easier to create that the 10% is predominantly mediocre and the 90% is crappier than ever before.

      --
      "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  123. Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keep you mandibles where I see them!

  124. Um ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi?

  125. Duh by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    We've all seen enough movies to know how it should go. The greeting will be:

    "Die, you bug-faced putrid tentacle freak!"

    said by a U.S. Marine pulling the trigger of a flamethrower.

  126. Prime Numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2 3 5 7 11 13 17 19 23 29
              31 37 41 43 47 53 59 61 67 71
              73 79 83 89 97 101 103 107 109 113
            127 131 137 139 149 151 157 163 167 173
            179 181 191 193 197 199 211 223 227 229
            233 239 241 251 257 263 269 271 277 281
            283 293 307 311 313 317 331 337 347 349

  127. Re:Math.Practicall(?) systems worked on already by sznupi · · Score: 1

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lincos_(language)
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CosmicOS

    CosmicOS is even a project on sourceforge, so if anybody have skills and will to contribute...

    --
    One that hath name thou can not otter
  128. Re:With Apologies to H.Y. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  129. Mars Attacks by KneelBeforeZod · · Score: 1

    Don't use doves! It scares the martians.

  130. Prey / Doom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haven't any of you played Prey? It is the Native American Indians that will SAVE us!

    And on a sidenote, if anyone can still find them, find the original series of DOOM novels from the mid '90s. They clearly posit that aliens found our planet centuries ago, but due to the speed of intergalactic travel it was several hundred years before they returned to dominate our planet; they came back expecting to find shepherds and sheep, and instead found lasers and nuclear missiles and space stations. Didn't expect us to advance so quickly, since the same took them millenia.

    We will defeat our supposed alien oppressors, one way or another.

  131. "a companion project to..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SETI ALPHA FIVE?!

  132. Preconceived notions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Probably "you look nothing like your picture."

    For over a century of humans describing and illustrating concepts of intelligent extraterrestrial life (and longer for beasts and demons), what are the odds that they would look nothing at all like *any* of it? If history and science have proven anything about ourselves, is that our imaginations are as limited as our intelligence. Today's tech is yesterday's magic.

  133. "We've got bacteria ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and they know how to use us."

  134. What's Your Sign? by microcars · · Score: 1

    Come Here Often?

    --
    I like microcars
  135. Without a doubt... by M-RES · · Score: 1

    "Yo Momma!"

  136. Stick With Tradition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Impound their spacecraft and autopsy their bodies.

    That's worked out well before.

  137. Maybe a) read some *real* SF, or try dolphins? by whitroth · · Score: 1

    a) We can't even talk to dolphins, though they've got some of our words. How about practicing on other intelligent Earthly species?

    b) maybe y'all should turn off the movies, and tv shows, and actually *READ* some real SF (as opposed to sci-fi (pronounced skiffy, rhyming with the peanut butter, and which thinks Godzilla movies are sf....)

    There are decades of short stories and novels whose theme is first contact. I remember one from the fifties, where one of our starships meets an alien ship. The ending of the story is both groups take out *ALL* navigation equipment and info, and trade ships.

    Then there's a more significant issue: in a galaxy that's what, about 10G years old, and we're from a planet that's had life for over 3G years, *and* we've only had real technology based on science for barely 400 years, what are the odds that we'll meet an technologically-inclined alien race that's withing 200 or 300 years of *our* technology? I suggest the odds are vast that they're either far beyond us - on the order of a nuclear aircraft carrier to a merchant ship of the 1400's, , or far behind (if they're not up to Roman Empire standards, or, say, Turtledove's "The Path Not Taken"), they're more likely hunter-gatherers.

    Start thinking of what a Prime Directive *should* be (and remember Buckminster Fuller's aphorism, "we are as gods, and we might as well get good at it"), or how to convince them that we're worth a) paying attention to, and b) that they shouldn't treat us like fire ants.

              mark

  138. Co-operation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given that it is extremely unlikely that we face any physical threat due to physics, I would say we should certainly communicate, and do so through mathematics. Once we have a way to communicate using mathematics we should develop the ability to send pictures and sound and work on language. Any civilization that is developed enough to communicate likely faces similar struggles as we do, in terms of co-operation vs competition, and likely has the balance of society in the co-operation direction. This further reduces any risk and likely means that communication would be a very large net positive.

  139. Really so Advanced? by hax0r_this · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I keep seeing people posting about how much more advanced than us a species would have to be to reach earth. I simply don't see why thats true. To my knowledge we have at least general knowledge of every major technology we would need to travel between stars, and thats with NASA never having had a budget over about $34B 2007 dollars, and currently closer to half of that. If we spent less time and money on killing each other and bailing each other out, and maybe cared about something other than our own social problems, there's no reason we couldn't have people on other planets as we speak.

    Consider this:
    For about $135B 2005 dollars we effectively went from flying propeller planes to repeatedly placing men on the moon.
    Since 2001 we have spent about $865B in Iraq and Afghanistan.
    Since Fall of 2008 we have committed about $12.2 Trillion Dollars to "Economic Recovery" plans


    The barrier between us and the stars is not some insurmountable technology one, its a matter of money and willpower. The only hope I see is that private interests (including SpaceX and other companies) will pursue these technologies (considering that hundreds of companies have higher revenue than NASA) otherwise I'm afraid we may never get off this miserable rock before we kill ourselves off. You wouldn't bet the uptime of a moderately important website on a single webserver, yet we continue to bet the survival of our species on a single rock floating in space.

    1. Re:Really so Advanced? by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      yet we continue to bet the survival of our species on a single rock floating in space.

      The rock isn't floating... IT'S FALLING TOWARD THE SUN! god help us all...

    2. Re:Really so Advanced? by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      The barrier between us and the stars is not some insurmountable technology one, its a matter of money and willpower.

      Precisely, will power spent on maintaining the status quo. Excellent post!

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    3. Re:Really so Advanced? by cbhacking · · Score: 3, Interesting

      To my knowledge we have at least general knowledge of every major technology we would need to travel between stars

      No offense, but WHAT?? There are so many problems with interstellar travel... lets consider a few, from the perspectives of spacecraft and tech available today.

      Spacecraft range: The biggest single problem. Space is big. Really, really, REALLY big. The fastest spacecraft we currently posess would take centuries to reach Alpha Centauri (the next-closest star, a mere 4 light-years or so away). In theory, an ion-drive spacecraft could get up to a noticeable fraction of c, given enough fuel, but we can't currently provide that (ion drives are amazingly efficient, but they still need two resources - reaction mass and power). Ramscoops aren't currently possible, if they'll even work (we're not sure they would). Our best reactors have a lifetime of decades, but those are Earth-based installations - current long-range spacecraft are powered by radioactive thermal decay, which can't produce enough power over a long enough time - we would need to use fission, at a minimum.

      Solar sails might be usable, but they're currently pure sci-fi. Also, at least some of the things they theoretically could do - "tack" toward a star, for example - just don't work. Sailboats can tack for two reasons: air pressure sufficient to make airfoils work, and water viscosity being much greater than air viscosity. It's possible - I don't know the math - that an "airfoil" could work in solar wind, but I rather doubt it. However, the thrust vector of an airfoil is perpendicular to the wind direction. Sailboats have keels for two reasons - to keep them from flipping over, and to force them to move only forward and backward (meaning that the airfoil thrust need only be slightly forward of 90 degrees to get forward motion). Without something to "grip" like that, even a 100% efficient solar-foil could only orbit a star at constant distance.

      Warp drive... now we're out of even the realm of things we can begin to experimentally prove. There is a theoretical mathematical model that, *if* our understanding of relativity is correct, permits moving faster than light (actually, moving at any arbitrary speed, given enough power). In short form, it consists of compressing space in front of the ship, and expanding it behind - the space in the middle, where the ship is, technically doesn't move at all. Now, the problems:
      We can't really compress space. In essense, we're talking gravity control here. In theory, with enough energy (or mass, they're related after all), it's possible. We dont' know how, though.
      We do not know how to expand space. Negative energy - not the same as anti-matter, but akin to anti-gravity - has been theorized and *maybe* observed, but we can't produce it at will, certainly not over any useful distance or magnitude.
      The theoretical power output required to be useful is, at minimum, far more than our entire race can produce. It might be more than the rest energy of the entire universe.
      You can't see where you're going. Anything that hits the "bow wave" gets compressed into a burst of gamma radiation. This includes photons.
      I trust I don't need to continue? Look it up if you want - it's a cool theiretical model - but I doubt we'll even know if it's possible within my lifetime.

      Ok, how about spacecraft durability? At any kind of decent speed, a micrometeorite, even a spec of dust, could do incredible damage. Making the spacecraft more durable generally means adding mass, which decreases its acceleration and therefore max speed for a given amount of fuel. We don't currently have any kind of shield or navigational deflector that could block a rock of the size you use to skip stones - easily large enough to utterly destroy a spacecraft (if it is anything at all like what we can build today) travelling at the pitiful speed 0.01 c.

      Finally, consider longevity. This is related to range, but worth its own discussion. Power, fuel, and durability have already been co

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    4. Re:Really so Advanced? by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Yeah but the sun keeps dodging. Damn sneaky sun.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    5. Re:Really so Advanced? by kklein · · Score: 2, Interesting

      God bless you. We need to get these ridiculous 1950s ideas out of our heads. When I was a child (in the 70s), I was told, in all sincerity, that I'd probably be able to go to the moon when I grew up.

      Ain't gonna happen. Not now, not ever in my lifetime.

      The thing is that the moon missions were batshit crazy. We were locking people up into tin cans and shooting them at the moon for no reason other than to say we did it. Yeah, it worked, but it was insanely dangerous and resulted in virtually nothing.

      I am not so shortsighted as to say "never," but most of these sci-fi staples are so far off (even granting that science in science fiction is just a frame in which to tell a good human story--same as Shakespeare, who used the magical world of the royals) as not not really be worth discussing in real terms. We're probably not even going to make it to Mars in my lifetime.

      It's a lot harder than just throwing together some vague concepts from physics and the plot of a pulp novel.

    6. Re:Really so Advanced? by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

      I suspect that NASA would not even have the budget it has today, or has been granted historically, if it were not for the possibility that we could use NASA technology to kill each other.

      I don't think that there would have been so many prominent German rocket engineers in the 1940s if rockets were not such good weapons

      Perhaps aliens developed spacecraft because killing each other was even more important in their society

      --
      Nullius in verba
    7. Re:Really so Advanced? by CorporateSuit · · Score: 1

      The thing is that the moon missions were batshit crazy. We were locking people up into tin cans and shooting them at the moon for no reason other than to say we did it. Yeah, it worked, but it was insanely dangerous and resulted in virtually nothing.

      without resorting to conspiracy theories, the approach toward the moon was extremely significant for humanity. To think that a few goldfish have actually escaped this huge glass bowl we call Earth (not to mention the fact they were able to return!) tells us that we've gone from simply staring at the stars to grasping at them, and from grasping at them, to leaping at them. We've reached the first one. We've sent machines to the second (the red star, 30 million miles away) and we're privatizing the ability to reach the first within 40 years of its initial landing. Just like Moore's law is coming up with insane new ways of finding data every day, we are developing propulsion technology at a rapid rate. We are developing biological longevity better than ever before. It's silly to think that we will go to the moon in our lifetimes. It's sillier to think that we can't.

      --
      I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
  140. I'd say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Om nom nom!

  141. How to greet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kill them and eat them.

    It would be our only hope.

  142. Homo saps by Vamman · · Score: 1

    When our species encountered another intelligent sister species of near identical genetic code we obviously annihilated them off the planet. We really don't have much basis or fact to say with 100% certainty that the reason we don't co-exist with another intelligent species on Earth is because of our own doing. Humans instinctively parasitize and conquer everything in sight. If a highly intelligent species were to greet us even as friendly beings in the soul interest of simply learning about our primitive ways our ego would explode and we very likely would turn on this species like we have done to so many others extinct and living on good ole earth. The greetings may very well be friendly at first but as soon as that alien being turns his back to us - look out.

  143. They Already Know We're Here by PeeGeeDee · · Score: 1

    There wouldn't be any point in hiding. They'd know we're here. They've probably been watching us for a long time. They'd probably get here and back to their planet very quickly by physics we won't discover for yet another 1000 years. And they're so far ahead of us that they don't need our planet or us, anyway.

  144. Three letters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    B F G

  145. Dear Aliens by will_die · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dear Friends,

    I am Prince Fayad Musa H. Bolkiah, the eldest son of Prince Jefri Bolkiah, former Finance Minister of Earth, the tiny fuel-rich planet on the outer realms.

    Due to problems with a trading guild I was advised to evacuate my immediate family outside the sultanate to avoid further prosecution from them. Before I could do that I was placed under house arrest.

    Before my Incaseration, I went ahead to dispatch large sum of fuel with the assistance of friend in a galaxy far away. The fuel has now been deposited as valuables into different private security and trust company for safe keeping.

    In order to get the fuel I will need large quantities of the following chemical products, the mineral Be3Al2(SiO3)6,) and the chemical lement with atomic number of 79, details about this follow.

    For your assistance i will compensate you with 25% of the total fuel and another 5% shall be set aside to defray any expenses that may arise.

    Please I count on your absolute confidentiality, transparency and trust while looking forward to your prompt response towards a swift conclusion of this business transaction

  146. My answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would ask the most simple minded question... Do you poop?

  147. Poppycock! by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Use of relativistic missiles is idiotic unless you plan and are absolutely capable of killing off the entire universe at once without absolutely any survivors or information left over about your act.

    Xenocidal psychos are a threat to any species out there. They are also fair game. ANYTHING you do to them is fine and dandy.
    Including killing off 99% of the species and colonizing the remaining 1% on a planet with harshest possible survivable conditions for the said species and keeping them there for purposes of hunting and torture.

    The best part?
    Any evidence of use of such weapons is a good enough cause for any species to use it on you too.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Poppycock! by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Use of relativistic missiles is idiotic unless you plan and are absolutely capable of killing off the entire universe at once without absolutely any survivors or information left over about your act.

      Huh?

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:Poppycock! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope to God you're right. But I wouldn't recommend setting up penal colonies on harsh planets. Frank Herbert's Dune has some interesting speculation on what happens to groups that colonize (or are forced to colonize) hell-holes.

      Arrakis: the Fremen.
      Salusa Secundus: the Sardaukar.

      Much safer to dump them on low-tech tropical paradises. I don't think the good people of the Pitcairn Islands (300 year-plus descendants of the HMS Bounty mutineers) are gonna conquer the planet anytime soon, and that's a good thing.

    3. Re:Poppycock! by h4rm0ny · · Score: 2, Informative


      The implied logic of the GP is that if you annihilate another civilisation, you have indicated to other civilisations that you are a threat to them or their allies. You'd therefore better be certain that you can therefore get everyone in one go, because otherwise, out of sheer logical necessity, they're like to turn on you. The GP has missed another possibility which is that the annihilating civilisation is beyond being threatened themselves and doesn't need to fear reprisals. But this latter is unlikely for two reasons: Firstly, if you've reached a particular technological level it doesn't seem there's any reason why another couldn't do so. Secondly, if you're beyond being threatened, why go out of your way to wipe out others. The former is a more concrete argument than the former because we don't know our hypothetical alien's psychology, but both arguments carry weight.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    4. Re:Poppycock! by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      I don't buy it. suppose the first civilization exists millions of years before any others, or merely believes it does. then it can go about destroying other developing civilizations with impunity, just on the assumption that other civilizations might someday pose a threat. Maybe we're being observed already, and once we start making relativistic starships we get wiped out.

    5. Re:Poppycock! by denzacar · · Score: 1

      Universe is big enough that there can not be only one race capable of such or similar attack.
      So again... Asshat species A decides to bomb to oblivion species B - someone somewhere WILL find out about it.

      Asshat species A spends the rest of it short existence in its species equivalent of being buggered with AIDS infected porcupines while being forced to watch "Nanny" marathons as they are listening to German and Turkish folk remixes of Britney Spears - while they are having their root canal drilled with drill bits made out of rusty forks dipped in elephant shit.
      While being hung upside down by their balls. Over an ant mine of very nervous ants.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  148. Answer: Slowly by YITBOS · · Score: 1
    I think a very serious subset of the question "How to we greet them?" is "How do we greet them without unknowingly making a cosmic etiquette faux-pas and either triggering a war or having them quickly heading back in the direction they came, appalled by our "uncivilized" or "rude" manners?"

    We probably want want to avoid large crowds of civilians, even *if* hypothetically they were all benevolent, accepting, and welcoming towards the extraterrestrials and there were no psychos among them. Any intergalactic travelers would almost no doubt be apprehensive (assuming they have emotions like ours :P) as they land on an alien planet... so when they open their ship's door and step on to our planet for the first time, it would probably not put them at ease if it were anything resembling the red carpet outside a Hollywood award show as celebrities exit their limo and try to make it inside.

    It would probably be best to avoid attempting any types of "universal" (by our standards) hand gestures, like an open palm-arm raised upward "hi" gesture or (unless they are humanoid and have pointed ears) the Vulcan salute.

    In all probability they have a completely different physiology than ours and have no way of knowing whether or they see it as "welcoming" or are doing the equivalent of an alien "grab my crotch and spit on your shoes." We have this problem even with our close genetic relatives--*terrestrial* primates. Where regardless of the culture or upbringing, we express happiness or amusement facially by smiling, inadvertently showing our teeth... yet chimpanzees do not see a smile with exposed teeth as happiness and instead see it as an act of dominance and aggression, sometimes causing them to attack unsuspecting humans. Imagine how many ways we could screw that up with an alien physiology and culture? Think "Mars Attacks!" when someone in the crowd releases a white dove because "they come in peace!" and when the the Martians see it, they freak out, kill the dove and everyone there.

    So the answer is:

    • We greet them SLOWLY. Quietly. We *DO NOT* rush up to them to greet them.
    • We walk very calmly and slowly--with great effort made to ensure they do not approach the aliens at a faster pace than they approach them.
    • A conscious effort being made not to make any gestures, excess noise (because no, talking LOUDLY and SLOWLY at them is probably just as insulting as it is when you do it to humans speakers of foreign languages.)
    • Probably hold off on "presenting" them with any "gifts" as it's just another opportunity to unknowingly send an unintended message.
    • Preferably the people who are the ones that go to meet them are *not* politicians or anyone who cares more about being known in history as "the one who made first contact" than they do about actually *making* first contact.

    The team would probably a small group of four or five... and for the composition of the group, I'd have to say that Michael Crichton actually addresses this very same question in "Sphere" (the movie was crap; the novel is amazing) and he actually devotes quite a bit of pages to the reasoning behind the why. (I'd highly recommend the novel, actually, for it's relation to this question to those very interested in the idea)

    Basically, the "Alien First Contact Team" is made up of:

    1. A biologist or possibly an anatomical doctor or scientist for any possible insight on the alien's physiology
    2. Some type of psychologist who has done a great deal of research on recognizing and understanding body language... this person would likely be the first to notice the more subtle behaviors of the alien's as well as their reactions during interactions.
    3. Maybe a sociologist or some other individual knowledgeable on social and cultural interactions (for the same reason as the psychologist)
    4. A Mathematician because, well, they DO say that math is the universal language, and I would imagine it would most likely be the stepping stone--and be out first
  149. Re:First Contact says say, "Thanks." Duh. by Reziac · · Score: 1

    [eyeing sig]

    "No population -- no popular unrest!!"
        -- Groachi saying

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  150. Darmok by Tteddo · · Score: 1

    Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra!

  151. "What would you say first to an alien?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Hello, alien?"

  152. new age phone home by Nocturnal+Deviant · · Score: 1

    i say give him a cell phone tell him to phone home and watch the hilarity ensue as he tried to get the area code. kinda reminds me of the first time i tried calling europe..

    --
    -Noc
  153. Ahhhhhhhhh! by Evil_Medic1 · · Score: 1

    He's got a board, with a NAIL in it!

  154. Stick to well proven methods. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A/S/L?

  155. Re: by ttyX · · Score: 1

    Uh by kicking him in the nuts?

  156. Obviously... by blitz487 · · Score: 1

    "Take me to your leader."

  157. With all due respect to by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 1

    Morgan Greywolf, "Earth is full. Go home."

    --
    I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
  158. Just Chant by kevn57 · · Score: 1

    Bentora, Bentora, Space People!

  159. Why they haven't showed up already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I see you finally decided on what to wear."

  160. *FACEPUNCH* - Welcome to Earth! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think that action movies should be our template

  161. the answer is obvious.... by Schnoogs · · Score: 1

    ...All your base are belong to us

  162. Very Simply by Stan92057 · · Score: 0

    Hello, from the planet Earth.

    --
    Jack of all trades,master of none
  163. if they come to visit us by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    We are screwed no matter what we do as they are far more advanced then us.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  164. Klatu! Beratta nicto! by rdawson · · Score: 1

    Gort, can you open this jar for me...

    1. Re:Klatu! Beratta nicto! by Nekomusume · · Score: 1

      You beat me to it.

  165. its.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi Britney,

  166. What about other intelligent life on THIS planet? by Trerro · · Score: 1

    I would argue we've already taken the first step by teaching various primates sign language. This makes us perfectly capable of talking to other species - species extremely similar to humans yes, but different species nonetheless.

    Next step? Dolphins. Dolphins have a complex language, call each other by name, and have an advanced social structure. The fact that a sonar component likely alters the "words" of their language much as body language does for us makes it language like nothing a human speaks... but that's exactly the point. We'd have to learn to use a language that probably isn't possible without the aid of technology (but tech that we can most definitely build), and we'd have to deal with the added challenge of dialects and the fact that there's no way there's a single global dolphin language - they're way too spread out for that. With dolphins were looking at a species of similar intelligence, MOSTLY similar senses, and an innate understanding that each other are in fact capable of speech, even if speech isn't quite the same thing for each species. This would be a huge step forward - we'd LEARN a language rather than teaching one, and one that's very different from human ones. We'd also get used to the idea that sometimes we need tech to talk in ways that the human body simply can't - and we'd have the first functional implementation of that field of tech.

    If we can reach a point where it's possible to have a conversation with a dolphin, why not take it further? A few people have mentioned squid. We may not be able to fully "talk" to a squid, but we could probably achieve some level of communication - and as a squid's anatomy is a lot more alien to us than a dolphin's, that would be useful.

    Now of course, there's likely to be even more significant differences between us and life on other planets... but if we already have experience in speaking to other species, then we're well on the way of being able to communicate with aliens. Like all technologies, you start with simple developments that aren't all that difficult with what we already have invented, and advanced the tech (and attached science) from there.

    Of course, this all assumes that the aliens aren't so amazingly advanced that they can simply hand us tech to automatically understand what they're saying, in which case the answer to the question is "we don't do anything at all, they do." That's something we really CANT assume, especially if we're dealing with launching a signal to a destination light years away (which implies similar tech level) as opposed to them landing here (which means that at the very least, they're beyond us in vehicle development, and quite likely many other areas as well.)

  167. Don't worry about those radio/tv broadcast by aepervius · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Freeze and play dead? Someone really should have thought of that _before_ we started broadcasting radio and TV and a planet-wide basis. Those waves really don't stop when they hit the outer atmosphere you know... By now we should be fairly well-known in our galactic neighbourhood.


    TV and radio braodcast are not detectable after a few dozen AU, at msot 1 light year (nearest solar system is 4 LY and galaxy width is measured in tens of thousand of LY to give you an idea). The reason for that is that the signal are not directional, and thus the strength of the signal goes weaker as you increase the sphere from which it diffuse to. At a distance we are speaking of, it is virtually undetectable. More or less you would have to make a powerful directional and very narrow signal toward another system to be detected at a few LY distance. Which is why SETI can only detect another specy which WANT to be detected for the same reason.

    As for being well known , we would be well known only in a very very small corner of our galaxy EVEN if the signal could travel such a distance... At most 100 LY if you count the first radio broadcast (and be VERY very very generous).

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
    1. Re:Don't worry about those radio/tv broadcast by hankwang · · Score: 1

      thus the strength of the signal goes weaker as you increase the sphere from which it diffuse to.

      Moreover, you would receive the combined signals of all radio and tv transmitters that use overlapping frequencies. Even if an alien could detect the signals, they wouldn't be able to demodulate them. At most, they would notice that there is a lot of RF noise in particular frequency bands coming from that particular planet.

  168. How I would greet an et by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shotgun blast to the chest.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rkp-MI5hxVw

  169. the logical answer... by cosm · · Score: 0

    with hookers and blackjack!

    --
    'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
  170. Don't play games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whoa! You just described my dating procedure!

  171. Play a non-threatening Go opening move. by Domini · · Score: 1

    I suggest 3-4 for a good balance.

    3-3 may even be less threatening, but then they may think us too primitive.

  172. Thats easy Capt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We come in Peace - phasers on Kill !

  173. Dear mr. Alien, Please... by SiggyRadiation · · Score: 1

    Take our leaders with you!

    --
    This unique sig is intended to make this user more recognisable.
  174. Nice Cup of Tea by turgid · · Score: 1

    With a nice cup of tea, of course, and a selection of biscuits and cakes.

    Next question?

  175. every day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Good morning, sweetheart. Coffee's ready."

  176. My response by ralphclintellis · · Score: 1

    Tell them "Humans are best taken with a bit of salt. BBQ sauce might help too"

  177. Well... by rockwood · · Score: 1

    Not sure what I'd say, but I'd defintely have my towel with me for the trip.

    --
    Never try to beat a professional at his own game!
  178. Marklar by nadamucho · · Score: 1

    Well, there is a lot of room on Marklar. If Marklar here wants to bring his marklar to Marklar, that would be fine. Just take our marklar back to Marklar and bring all the marklar back with you.

  179. Tits or gtfo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think that pretty much covers it.

  180. There is ONLY ONE TRUE WAY to Greet ET by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    Homer Simpsons Shows How

    This is the ONLY ONE CORRECT WAY.

  181. Penal colonies? What PENAL colonies? by denzacar · · Score: 1

    That one planet would be a space equivalent of a death camp. Only the primary purpose would be torture.
    Torture first, extermination later.

    What?
    They would be a species that considers xenocide a valid strategy for first contacts with other civilizations.

    No penal colonies for them.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  182. Aliens might be REALLY alien by spineboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Intelligence doesn't have to be measured in physical inventions (but I likely think it would manifest that way). Maybe the squids have the most awesome philosophy, stories, poems, songs, dance whatever.

    Intelligence species don't necessarily have to care about other species - humans can't put on a good chemi-lumescent light show for beans, and maybe that makes us look F-ing retarded and boring to them - get the idea?

    Other lifeforms might be so weird and alien to us, that we may never communicate effectively with them or want to because there might never be anything interesting to either of us
    . For God sakes, the West has a tough enough time trying to communicate with the Middle East, let alone Ceti-Alpha 6 sand bug colonies.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
    1. Re:Aliens might be REALLY alien by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      Intelligence doesn't have to be measured in physical inventions (but I likely think it would manifest that way). Maybe the squids have the most awesome philosophy, stories, poems, songs, dance whatever.

      Intelligence species don't necessarily have to care about other species - humans can't put on a good chemi-lumescent light show for beans, and maybe that makes us look F-ing retarded and boring to them - get the idea?

      While all true, there is an important rider here. If we're talking to an alien, we know that they MUST be an alien capable of building large radio transmitter/receivers. That means that they'll also need some sort of civilization for which that makes sense- a civilization to which large radio arrays seem like a good idea. It also means we know that they're able to communicate in data signal form- whether their idea of "natural speech" involves bioluminescence or scent or whatever doesn't matter, because we'd only be talking to them via data messages.

      This does two things. For one, it removes any communications problems based on differing anatomies. And for two, it means that we're dealing with an intelligence of the type and inclination to build civilizations with space radios. That gives us a huge amount of common ground with the "aliens" already, seeing as that's what we have too.

      Same can't be said of squids. Even if they were of the most fantastic intelligence, the fact they've never used it in the above ways shows how different we are from squids. The same could be true of creatures on other planets, but they're not the ones we're going to be talking with, is it...?

    2. Re:Aliens might be REALLY alien by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love you spineboy, but your idiom needs work, unless you really think that cephalopods are likely to embrace legume seeds as a unit of currency. Apart from rarity in their environment, beans appear to have no obvious intrinsic value to squids, who can't even eat them safely. Being offered beans by a squid is not necessarily something you should take as an expression of praise for your chemoluminescent display any more than being offered ricin by a sheikh is something you should take as an expression of praise for your foreign policy.

      This type of unintentional anthropomorphism ("idiosyncracy") in idiom is likely to pose problems in inter-species communications, just as "For God sakes" is not the best interjection to use on an audience partially comprising brittle atheist and polytheist humans.

    3. Re:Aliens might be REALLY alien by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I seriously expect we're missing major physics about the universe. Maybe it's not intelligent to use EM radiation to communicate? Perhaps something ubiquitous is just beyond our perception/physics? Maybe it's really easy to get control over space time and matter, but we can't figure it out? I suspect our situation is like one who is blind, deaf and looks like a bug feeling around for others wondering where they are. To me this is the only believable resolution to the Fermi paradox. It's also obvious.

  183. Huh? I can do you one better... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Huh?

    ?

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  184. Re:Chemistry by aamcf · · Score: 1

    Thanks for that link! It was a great story.

  185. Bend Over by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

    The proper greeting requires one to drop trou and present one's anatomical Antarctica. What do you think all that anal probing was about? The reason they've just dropped all abductees right back off is because every time they've said 'hello', they were ignored. If we return the gesture properly we get the secrets of nuclear powered personal jet packs, flying cars, and chrome jump suits with big fins around the shoulders, just like in the pictures. Improperly, and the greeter goes FOOM. The difference is the little light bulb embedded in the tip. Good luck

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  186. Resources? by spineboy · · Score: 1

    There are lots of different kinds - human slave labor, entertainment, livable space, etc. Hell - maybe they'll use Earth as a factory to make all sorts of toxic crap, so their homeworld won't be polluted.
    Having another planet will almost never be a bad thing.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  187. Sorry: Fermi paradox revised by w0mprat · · Score: 1

    Seriously any alien species than can traverse interstellar space is not going to be interested in talking to schizophrenic monkeys. If they exist, they certainly have the capability and the reasons, to stay hidden from us. You see, TFA answers it's own question. We're not ready to greet aliens until we can present a unified front with a single message that speaks for the consensus of humanity.

    --
    After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
  188. Re:Chemistry by I'm+not+really+here · · Score: 1

    Thanks for posting that. Fascinating read, and 100% on-topic. Never thought of that being the primary method of understanding another alien culture, but it makes sense!

    --
    Before commenting on the Bible, please read it first
  189. Hello, want to probe me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Hello, want to probe my ass?"

  190. Mars needs women, slashdot too.. by ae1294 · · Score: 1

    What I find interesting and mostly overlooked about this topic is that people expect alien's to have devolved technology in the same manner and order as we have.

    One example, People always say that any race that can cover the vast 'sorta' emptiness of space would be smarter than us by default. That is assuming that they, the alien's, didn't stumble upon 'Faster Than Light' travel at the same time they where working on something that would have seemed totally unrelated. If you look at some of the greatest breakthroughs here on earth you will often times see that people stumble upon them purely by accidental while working on totally unrelated stuff.

    I would wager that, when we do meet some aliens, we will discover that we have some advanced technologies THEY don't (porn, novel ways to kill each other, Windows 7, batman, etc) just as they have some we don't. (Robotic sex slaves, FTL drives, novel ways to make popcorn, etc) I think it will, at least at first, lead to a "you show us yours and we're show you ours" type of friendliness but who knows if that will last once the (MP/RI)AA gets involved.

    Two truely smart races would combine technologies freely as the universe is so damn huge it's not like there isn't room. Here on earth we are use to fighting over resources but in space you have trillions of empty planets, moons, etc so really there is no reason to fight over much of anything unless your race has 3.2453x10^10000000000000000 members... And even then to fight risks loosing what you already have.

  191. We should talk like we play poker .. by roguegramma · · Score: 1

    Reveal as less information as possible and only proceed to reveal more valuable information once they have revealed valuable information.

    Basically, say "Hi" first and then proceed to get a good two-way conversation going.

    --
    Hey don't blame me, IANAB
  192. My biggest fear re: aliens by Tanman · · Score: 1

    My biggest fear regarding aliens is if they are not offshoots of individuals but of a colony structure, such as an ant. In that instance, we would be doomed. They would not hesitate to take over our resources and us for the good of their colony.

  193. Coke ?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    heared about sex, heared about guns. but what about drugs ? maybe they're so damn ``high'' so the signal didn't reached out. yet.

    meanwhile, bro', was that a pink elephant, yeti or e.t. ? gee...

  194. Planet of apes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    imagine that the diffrence of IQ level between humans and some kind of ET species will be the same as the diffrence between us and apes. and that these species are searching for a new home because of theyr home planet atmosphere beeing polluted from some reason, or theyr home star dying, becoming a red giant.

    now, in that case, will you have any problem in colonising a planet where the most inteligent life form are apes ? have course, this question is not for americans, they didn't had problems not even with the "red skins"...

    in this case, will you even try to comunicate ?

  195. Closest Star is 3,900 years away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The barrier between us and the stars is not some insurmountable technology one, its a matter of money and willpower.

    You sir, are confused.

    The fastest man-made item http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/spacecraft/q0109c.shtml reached 150,000 mph (41.67 mi/sec). Voyager 1, launched in 1977, is going only 38,500 mph as it leaves our solar system. The closest star to our solar system is about 4 light years away (5,800,000,000,000,000 miles away).

    That works out to about 3,941 years to travel there at 150,000 mi/hr.

    We definitely do not have the technology to accomplish or even begin that goal. We'd need a multi-generational ship, capable of growing food without sunlight. It would need to survive longer than any culture or nation has by far.

    So perhaps you understand why we aren't planning to visit other stars at all now?

    1. Re:Closest Star is 3,900 years away by MrKaos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We definitely do not have the technology to accomplish or even begin that goal. We'd need a multi-generational ship, capable of growing food without sunlight. It would need to survive longer than any culture or nation has by far.

      And how much do you think it will cost to invest in the technologies for us to get to that point.

      You have completely missed his point, which is spot on.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    2. Re:Closest Star is 3,900 years away by gknoy · · Score: 1

      Even an unmanned probe would work, though, for visiting/exploration purposes. Fit it with electrical propulsion, and/or a solar sail, and it could likely get there. The time scale would be large, but ... a thousand (or 500, or less?) years from now, we would have something THERE that we could talk to. If we do nothing now, once we finally DO decide to go looking/traveling, we will still have to launch a probe, and have a long wait.

      We may as well launch now, and read the data once it gets there. If in the meantime we develop better technology, so much the better, but at least that's a ceiling on how long until we can have something to get data from another star system with.

    3. Re:Closest Star is 3,900 years away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      speaking of cornfused. . .

      the above poster isn't confused, you are. you're speaking in terms of current tech, he was speaking in terms of investment in future tech. noone in their right mind would suggest we attempt to reach the next star via solar sail, plasma drive or chemical propulsion. that's ludicrous.

    4. Re:Closest Star is 3,900 years away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think you understand the the argument here. What hax0r_this is saying, is that we could have the technology for interstellar travel if we had put our money and effort in it, instead of in e.g. wars. With relatively little money we've put a man on the moon. Imagine where we would be if we invested the amount of money the US had put in the Iraq war, into spacecraft propulsion research.

    5. Re:Closest Star is 3,900 years away by skiman1979 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the answer to reaching the next star is not trying to cover that distance at a higher rate of speed, but lowering the effective distance between us.

      --
      Having a smoking section in a public restaurant is like having a peeing section in a public swimming pool.
    6. Re:Closest Star is 3,900 years away by CarbonShell · · Score: 1

      Not to mention who knows if they will be there when we get there.
      Plus all the things that could go wrong in between. 'Hey Bob, did we forget to Gas up at AlphaCentarui?'

      And that is only if we know where we are going.
      IIRC Sagen once compared the density in space is like if there were only two Bees over Europe.
      If you are committing to a nearly 4k year journey, you better know that someone will be home.

    7. Re:Closest Star is 3,900 years away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the fastest we have ever made a man-made object go is the fastest we can ever go? That is illogical. If you assume unlimited terrestrial resources it's easy to imagine methods of accelerating longer to faster speeds. You can't just point your ship towards the star and full burn straight at it, but you could reduce the time to prepare to a few decades or a century or two (rough guess). Then complete the trip within a person's lifetime. Assuming unlimited resources, of course.

    8. Re:Closest Star is 3,900 years away by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      WE need a multi-generational ship. WE need food.

      There is no reason to believe there isn't a space faring culture which comes from a species easily capable of near permanent sleep naturally.

      Just because we can't be easily freezedried doesn't mean all species can't easily survive.
      ---
      My solution:

      Beep. Beeep Beep. Beep Beep Beep. Beep Beep Beep Beep Beep. etc.... Establish a numerical system. Establish a mathematical system. Work your way out from mathematical constructs to nouns and grammar.

      But that's assuming they're on par with us. They probably do have fancy multi-generational space ships in which case we can just had them a laptop with wifi. Let them figure it out.

    9. Re:Closest Star is 3,900 years away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I think you may be confused. Both of these crafts were launched in the mid-70s; both the delta-Vs we're capable of producing now as well as the efficiency of long-term low-force drives (eg ion drives) are both way higher than they were then. However, producing a ship that moves that quickly doesn't make sense for most space missions today, since most missions are unmanned and have destinations within our solar system. It's much cheaper to perform an optimal Hohmann transfer and take a while longer, since that makes your launch weight much lower and your launch vehicle cheaper.

      Now, assuming we can get a ship up to some significant fraction of the speed of light (and I'll admit, it's a pretty big assumption), then you have to consider time dilation. The main points have already been considered here. Unfortunately, several of the links are dead; one included a table of distances to possible destinations within our universe on one axis and had travel speeds as fractions of c on the other axis, and then the table showed the "proper time" of the travelers. Of course, traveling even at the speed of light, it would take us poor folks on earth 8 years to find the results of a voyage to a star 4 light years away, but any explorers lucky enough to be on that ship will experience considerably less time.

    10. Re:Closest Star is 3,900 years away by witekr · · Score: 1

      That's if you never accelerate once in space. Also, there's the Bussard ramjet idea, which could point to a solution to interstellar travel in the future.

    11. Re:Closest Star is 3,900 years away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've studied propulsion theory and practice in college and professional life. I don't live in SciFi fantasy land when working engineering problems. Engineering is about reality.

      The biggest issue for faster travel is that you need lots of power and/or lots of mass to increase your speed. "Lots of power" is understating that problem. Even a full sized nuclear reactor that weighed only 1 ton couldn't work long enough to get a vehicle moving at any significant fraction of 'c'. You need this power to "throw stuff out the back." That means you need to have "stuff" that you can throw out the back for 200 years or more. Throwing really small stuff (electrons) works, but the delta-V imparted is tiny. Throwing the stuff out really fast also helps. Someone, please run some quick numbers to show how many thousands of tons of electrons would need to be shoved out the back to get the speed to 10% of 'c' for a 50 ton vehicle. I don't know the answer, but it has got to be 500,000,000,000,000 tons or more. BTW, the mass of the Earth is 5,973,700,000,000,000,000,000 metric tons

      Ok, so you're going fast. Good. Now you need to stop when you reach some destination. That means you need to double the amount of energy and mass taken with you. You can't really pick up mass as you travel - that's called a collision and will kill you and everyone aboard.

      Dream about solutions if you like, but engineering is about reality. There is no "gravity plating" in reality.

  196. It depends... by ZiggyStardust1984 · · Score: 1

    ... is him a Vulcan? A Klingon? Borgs? Capellans?

  197. Cut them open by maxume · · Score: 1

    Only after you have cut them open do you know what color their insides are.

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  198. Guns or Music? by Wingsy · · Score: 1

    What I would like to know is how would our government respond. Guns & tanks or flashing lights and an organ?

    --
    If I didn't have absolutely NOTHING to do, I wouldn't be here.
  199. Resistance is Futile by Lost+Found · · Score: 1

    Lower your shields and surrender your ships. We will add your biological and technological distinctiveness to our own. Your culture will adapt to service us. Resistance is futile.

  200. Bah weep grah nah weep ninnybahn ... by isolationism · · Score: 1

    ... Then offer them an Energon goody. Works (almost) every time.

  201. Send Chuck Norris by SlappyBastard · · Score: 1

    Send Chuck Norris. He will present the aliens with a subpoena demanding that they allow us to bug their spaceships.

    And as Chuck Norris departs the meeting, we will have Keyboard Cat on a jumbotron with really big speakers playing to send him off.

    It's only fair that we let the aliens know what they're up against.

    --
    I scream. You scream. I assume that means we're both acquainted with the problem. We proceed.
  202. I got it... by codefungus · · Score: 1

    They've been watching our tv and listening to our news for a while now...how about we greet them with, "Let me explain..."

    --
    -- A cat is no trade for integrity!
  203. An oldie but a goodie... by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 1

    This was settled in the late 60's....

    "Gnorts, Mr Alien!"

    (Read it backwards if you missed the gag...)

    --
    Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
  204. Of Squids, Intelligence, ... and Shared Genetics! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that supposed to worry me or console me?

    ["And I, for one, welcome our new squid-related overlords"]

  205. We should be more scared of "good intentions" by voss · · Score: 1

    Our best hope is that they come to our world for trade and tourism and other miscellaneous perversions.

    Were capitalists we know how to deal with traders and tourists and pervs.

    "What happens on earth...stays on earth".

  206. Social distance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Talking to an alien species would have a galactic equivalent of a "comfort zone".

    Communicating across light years has a higher sense of safety, albeit at a cost of latency. Humans at least would be more inclined to make a sensible greeting including the most logical of introductions.

    Something much closer, such as something appearing on the edge of our solar system and signaling with radio and low level lasers would get a more schizophrenic response, greetings from some, threats from others, and points in between.

    Pop up in orbit with a obvious craft of any size, and even if it DOES NOTHING ELSE, the response would be truly psychotic. The nicest greetings imaginable (by the aliens) would probably involve them simultaneously reacting gently to various actions from the humans who went over the edge. Diplomacy!

    If they're not amenable to conversation, we'd never get a reply. Genuinely hostile, and you'd never see it coming.

  207. first we take Manhattan by epine · · Score: 1

    First, you brush up on your Ferengi and check out Kraixlist on subspace ISM to see if any civilization wishes to anex a freshly vacated class M planet.

  208. When advanced human civilizations came into contac by Larry_Dillon · · Score: 1

    When advanced human civilizations came into contact with less advanced human civilization, they most always took advantage of the technological disparity (think of the Spanish conquistadors, or just about any time Europeans came into contact with "natives"). It's nice to think that technologically advanced "aliens" would also be enlightened altruists, but, in a first contact situation, we'd be better off keeping our collective heads down and letting their actions speak for them.

    --
    Competition Good, Monopoly Bad.
  209. Re:Chemistry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great story. Thanks for the introduction to H. Beam Piper.

  210. Spank Dog! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently we have been judged to be slightly less stupid/self-destructive/xenophobic/intolerant than we really are... given half a chance, I'd say, "take it".

    Worst outcome: They realize their mistake and throw us out of the party. Best outcome: We grow up, get civilized, and end up dating some hot Romulan chicks.

  211. I suppose by Allnighterking · · Score: 1

    Na Nu, Na Nu would be out of the question.

    --

    I'm sorry, I'm to tired to be witty at the moment so this message will have to do.

  212. Painful judgmental mistake by vikingpower · · Score: 1

    - Hey dude, you want a beer ?

    - Â&30xFB6745 Â$! KZZRGT

    - PSSSSSHOOOOM !! ...

    - Aww, so sorry mate for the mess it made in the vacuum you live in.

    And there we are, facing 5 more billion years until the next encounter....

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
  213. Uhm... by bruthasj · · Score: 1

    All your base?

  214. Culture Preservation Park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make earth into a culture reserve. In this way we / our government can reap benefits from alien contact while still being able to police alien visitations and limit exploitative interactions using "culture preservation" as a veil. Yes, tourists will be seen from time to time, but our culture can be made remarkably resistant to these incidents by spreading ridicule, official denial and some intimidation. This seems to have worked quite well for about 60 years now.

  215. To Serve Man? by jerrydel · · Score: 1

    So, got any books entitled "To Serve Man"?

  216. What if They Don't Consider it Hostility? by Ken+McE · · Score: 3, Insightful
    If a civilization is advanced enough to travel here, they're probably advanced enough to not have any good reason to be hostile.

    If I decide to build a vacation house in the Everglades it might get a little rough for any alligators that happen to live on "my" lot. I'm not going to care if they've been there since sometime in the Mesozoic. I'm aware that alligators have some kind of intelligence, however I'm not that interested in it. They will never understand where I came from or how I got there, or what the hell I'm doing inside that big glass box my contractor put up on their best feeding ground. Any that get in my way will be dealt with, it doesn't matter how well they plan their defense. About all they can do is hope that I'm not a predator...

    1. Re:What if They Don't Consider it Hostility? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I already addressed this. While we might consider this planet paradise (or some parts of it), aliens aren't likely to. They didn't evolve here, and probably aren't compatible with the life that's already here, or possibly even the climate and other liquids and gases common here. What if water is toxic to them (as in Signs), or salt water/seawater (as in Alien Nation)? The latter is easily solved by not going swimming, but aliens of the former type would have a really bad day if it rains. What if atmospheric nitrogen is toxic to them, or oxygen, or carbon dioxide? They'd have to always wear environmental suits, and that doesn't sound like anyone's idea of paradise.

      You're basically assuming that any aliens would have evolved on a world very much like our own, right down to the atmospheric composition. I don't think that's a very good assumption. We've already found on our own planet, with extremophiles, that DNA-based life like our own can evolve in many very different conditions, so the idea that any intelligent alien visitors/invaders would want our planet to live on because of the natural beauty (or what we perceive as beauty) here seems rather ridiculous.

    2. Re:What if They Don't Consider it Hostility? by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      So you're saying the first things the Alien Overlords will do when they arrive is immediately convert our environment into one which suits them better, one which would almost certainly be instant death to us and all the Earths current inhabitants.

      There could be billions of reasons why aliens may want to come here other than the ones you've outlined but unfortunately we can never know what they are because they may well be completely alien to our way of thinking. For example they could be fighting some sort of massive interstellar war during the course of which the destruction of Earth is some tiny footnote of a minor skirmish.

    3. Re:What if They Don't Consider it Hostility? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      So you're saying the first things the Alien Overlords will do when they arrive is immediately convert our environment into one which suits them better, one which would almost certainly be instant death to us and all the Earths current inhabitants.

      Why not convert one of the other planets instead, and use us as an outsourced manufacturing base to get the colony going?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  217. I hope we can do better than guns by fletchzip · · Score: 0

    Anyone who says "we've got guns and know how to use them" really should be prevented from speaking on behalf of humanity.

    Let's see how this appraoch might work out:

    Aliens: "Hi"
    Humans: "We've got guns and know how to use them."
    Aliens: "We are communicating with you from a vehicle in orbit around your moon. Feel free to fire your missiles at us but at some stage during the week it takes them to reach our position we will move away. We will head back out to the Kuiper belt and begin nudging asteriods into your orbit."

  218. How many times do we have to tell you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read the following:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_propagation

    Read it yet? Did you understand it? No? OK. Try reading this:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse-square_law

    Did that help? It didn't? Jesus fucking christ...

    Our radio transmissions are too weak to be received by anyone (or anything) likely or unlikely to be listening. At a distance of only a few light years they are completely lost within the Cosmic background noise.

    No, sorry, your Janeway-brand magic holodeck polarity-reversal field won't retrieve the lost signal, no matter how much or hard you pray. Tough luck, Sparky.

  219. Which language? by vstat · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't we agree on which language to greet ET in before we discuss the message? Not only will 100 different messages be confusing, but so will those messages in 100 different languages.

  220. Just use the "Universal Greeting" by BluestreakWRX · · Score: 1

    Bah weep gra na weep nini bong.

  221. I second the call for math by PotatoHead · · Score: 1

    Rather than make an expression, the simplest thing is to probably just start counting primes, round robin with the basic elements we know.

    Announce it, move an object to show it visually, perform a movement, etc...

    Like in Contact. We heard the primes and knew there was some meaning there.

    It could be our understanding is seriously misaligned with theirs for anything else.

    And we do it nice and slow. Call out one, then wait. Call out three, then wait.

    They know where the progression is, and we've opened the door for them to do something with it.

    During the waits, we are paying attention the best we know how, and see where it leads.

    An expression, like 2+2=4 is higher up the ladder than simple counting is. Probably not the best way to start.

    Unless we missed a day in school somewhere, primes are gonna be known, and a progression of them would be seen as meaningful structure.

    From there, it's a matter of their senses being able to deal with our utterances, and ours to theirs.

    I don't know about you guys, but if that were to come to pass, I think I would be scared shitless and excited at the same time. Won't happen, but it's fun to think about.

    Sometimes I work with my animals, or a very young baby and feel a bit of that. Not the scared part with the animals, but sometimes with the baby. Those first impressions last a lifetime!

    I've managed to get into modes with the cat where we are looking at one another for a minute or so. I always wonder what the cat is thinking at that moment. Usually, animals look away quickly. When they don't, and you actually get to read them a little, it's cool.

    In any case, communicating with those different from us is always fun to think about. We really are kind of lonely in that way, or we crave the learning that would come from that kind of experience. At least I can cop to both.

    1. Re:I second the call for math by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      Unless we missed a day in school somewhere, primes are gonna be known, and a progression of them would be seen as meaningful structure.

      Considering Math teachers get sued for teaching harder maths i doubt if in a decade or so, people will be able to understand Prime numbers if they receive it from aliens.
      Probably they would understand an alien only if they sent a pic like this

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    2. Re:I second the call for math by MoeDrippins · · Score: 1

      I've probably misunderstood you (and/or are misquoting you), so apologies for that, but...

      > ...the simplest thing is to probably just start counting primes, ...

      > Call out one, then wait. Call out three, then wait.

      Since when is 1 prime, and 2 not?

      --
      Before you design for reuse, make sure to design it for use.
  222. If they are hostile to us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Suppose we all smoke a joint. Ease the tensions a bit and who knows, if they want to commence a genocide, perhaps pot will poison their vastly different systems while it just gets us baked. Hey another reason to add onto the pile for the legalization effort!

  223. Obviously... by hockpatooie · · Score: 1
    Bah-weep-Graaaaagnah wheep ni ni bong! (Ref)

    Can't believe no one posted that one yet.

  224. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  225. There's only one sci-fi story you need to read... by Bytal · · Score: 1

    "His Master's Voice" by Stanislaw Lem.

    He seems to be the only classic science fiction writer throwing cold buckets onto the ridiculous idea that it would be easy to communicate with alien intelligences.

  226. Post a plague beacon by grikdog · · Score: 1

    Warn them that the Earth is infested with a plague species (Homo sapiens Linn.) which wants to take over every habitable planet in the universuum, and thank them for demonstrating their technology.

    --
    ``Tension, apprehension & dissension have begun!'' - Duffy Wyg&, in Alfred Bester's _The Demolished Man_
  227. Oblig. by Kittenman · · Score: 1

    "Hey, is that guy boring you? Why not talk to me for a while. I'm from another planet".

    --
    "The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes" - Winston Churchill
  228. Already been done by caller9 · · Score: 1

    The second we started broadcasting radio signals, we started talking to aliens. When we started having geostationary satellites we started beaming signals in a beacon that made it around a shadow of a satellite sweeping the earth's rotation and orbit. Which is not perfect coverage considering other bodies and the sun, still pretty good.

    We can only hope they weren't listening.

    Maybe the topic of the thread is how we can develop FTL travel to jam our previous signals before they reach the destination and instead explain that most of what is broadcast from our planet represents the worst of our culture.

    Assuming one of Slashdot's readers is using a satellite internet service or possibly a wireless terrestrial connection, this discussion has made it there before any light-speed communications made after discovery.

    So on behalf of our planet, please don't judge us by our average citizen, also don't visit for 500 or so years because we'll probably nuke you(which will tickle your ships..possibly recharging them via energy sink shields.) Then again if any of the show you've undoubtedly watched "X-Files" is accurate, please stop abducting stupid people and keep your genetic mutation virus to yourselves. Colonize some other planet congruous to your species that is uninhabited due to recent planetary cataclysm, please.

    BTW: Enjoy the LOLcats.

  229. No Matter How You Prepare Us - WE DON"T TASTE GOOD by Dharma's+Dad · · Score: 1

    And no amount of sauce will fix that.

    That would be near the tops on my list - you've got to consider what would drive them to seek us out and drop in to visit. Could it be there is something they need???

    Most likely we would be the intragalactic Stuckey's (Cracker Barrel, if your under 40) and that would so not be cool....

  230. Classic by horninge · · Score: 1

    All your base are belong to us!

  231. MOD UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not enough reality on this subject.

  232. Pyramids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...we'd be hard pressed to build a colony ship even if we dedicated the planet's whole productive and economic capacity into it. Even if we optimized it with those "keep me awake for a week" drugs and 100 hour work weeks....

    What is needed is the right motivation.

    Quite a while ago, Egyptians built Pyramids.

    Chinese built the Great Wall.

    Of course, it was "forced labor". Outright slavery. But they built something that still stands, awes and makes wonder how they really did it.

    It _will_ take a lot of time, no doubt. A lot of innovations, inventions and sweat. But with the "right" motivation, mankind has shown its worth.

    Now, what would possibly be the right motivation for interstellar travel? ...

  233. Get them drunk by gullevek · · Score: 1

    I would bring them to the next bar and get wasted with them. Nothing better to say hello to earth than getting wasted!

    --
    "Freiheit ist immer auch die Freiheit des Andersdenkenden" - Rosa Luxemburg, 1871 - 1919
  234. Re:Chemistry by Deanalator · · Score: 1

    It turns out it's man.

  235. Smile and say, hi! by mmwithpeanuts · · Score: 1

    If that doesn't work, then bend over and kiss your ass, goodbye!

  236. Why should we say hi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In all movies, we say hi, they look at us and answer friendly or not... but from their point of view, we re the aliens...why can we just look at them and wait for them to say HI or.. "We are here to turn you into slaves and sell your planet to the Pluthyioneans"...

  237. Re:When advanced human civilizations came into con by freedom_india · · Score: 1

    Well said.
    What we all need to read is this good book that teaches us in a precise, emotionless way of dealing with platenary defenses.

    --
    "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
  238. taliban by slashmojo · · Score: 1

    Imagine the humans of 1900 trying to pose a credible threat to or hide from the humans of 2009.

    The Taliban and their ilk do a fair job and they're firmly rooted several centuries in the past.. and just where is osama bin laden hiding? The most advanced superpower the world has known has been trying to find him for years now with no luck at all.. cunning, guerrilla tactics and fanaticism go a long way.

    And then there's Will Smith.. ;)

  239. Use universal language of prime numbers by OutputLogic · · Score: 1
  240. What I would say to an alien by Orlando · · Score: 1

    "Hello, please help me get away from this bunch of lunatics!"

    --
    -= This is a self-referential sig =-
    1. Re:What I would say to an alien by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      Considering you are one of the "lunatics", the aliens would probably haul you off first to the Cell Block #3.

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
  241. Freeze and Play Dead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What makes these people think that because a life is not like ours that they will will harm us? We can be exactly the same, we could find life and destroy it.

  242. send images and then send symbols by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interstellar bandwidth is low, possibly hundreds of baud or less (we'll have to use an obvious but inefficient encoding such as FSK so they're sure to see it), and they won't know our language.

    Start with a binary counting code, 8-bit count from 0 to 255, and maybe a "walking 1" pattern. Then send 2D images by encoding 2-color pixels. Send geometric shapes, and some obvious marker at the end of a scan line so they'll try looking at it as a 2D matrix. Make the width a power of 2 just to be sure. Once they look at the matrix, they'll see triangles and circles, and they'll know it's an image. Send the same image again but with 4 bits per pixel, to establish a gray scale image encoding for photographs.

    Then send pictures of our faces and bodies, our planet, houses, and so on. They're very likely to have sent images around on their internet, so we could probably dispense with the counting and just send raw 512x512, 4-bit gray level images with a line down the right side to mark scanlines and time-gaps between images; they'll almost certainly try viewing the data as images, unless they don't have computers yet. If they don't have computers yet, wait until they do, it will be too hard to encode anything other than "we are here, let's count to 255 again" in a way that an alien 19th century Morse code operator can understand.

    After images of us, send pictures of mathematical equations and equivalent diagrams, arranged to establish a symbolic language for describing mathematical and engineering principles. Assign binary codes for symbols, create an alphabet. This will take a lot of carefully designed images, but we can do it over months or years, though we will have to repeat it. Then start sending more detailed messages, things like mathematical theorems, proofs, and electronic circuits. Try to give them a feel for what we know about - biology, electronics, etc.

    Technology (electronics), and by implication mathematics and physics, are the _only_ things we know for sure we'll have in common with them (since they built a radio), so that's what we should talk about first, to establish a language. Then ask them if they ever got fusion working, and send some music to see if they get it. Send information about our solar system and biology, and hope they reply in kind - cheaper than sending a starship to find out, though not as much fun.

    This plan falls apart if they're blind, but I can't imagine an entirely blind race practicing astronomy and inventing radio anyway.

    It could be bad if they're hostile, but if they're hostile, and they have the technology to get here, we're screwed anyway, so it seems like we can only win by talking to them.

    -- Tristan

  243. Help by mindflow · · Score: 1

    Help

  244. Following protocol... by GrimDanFango · · Score: 1

    Approach with gun-ports open as a sign of respect... What could possibly go wrong!

  245. I'd say to them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It's time to kick ass and chew bubble gum... And I'm all outta gum!"

  246. yet another viewpoint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a member of a group who'd like to get off this rock, go to a different rock and make different mistakes than humans have made here.

    Can ya give a brother a hand?

  247. What If It Is Ideological? by JordanL · · Score: 1

    For instance: in the television series Babylon 5, the Shadow race became an incredibly advanced race through repeated chaos and trial. Because of this, they dealt with all the minor races by attempting to instill chaos and trials so that the truly strong races could become stronger, and the weaker races were eliminated.

    It was an ideological belief that chaos and destruction were the best ways to foster improvement, and they destroyed races out of an ideological, but in their minds benevolent want to improve the less advanced species around them.

    1. Re:What If It Is Ideological? by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      I think you have probably just raised the most valid (and terrifying) concern about alien contact. What if they are "benevolent" against our will?

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    2. Re:What If It Is Ideological? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      What if they are "benevolent" against our will?

      SOCIALISTS .... IN ... SPACE !!!!

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  248. I'd say... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

    "Welcome to Earth. We taste terrible, by the way."

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  249. Chemistry? by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Chemistry would work the best since there are so many obvious constants. ionization constant of pure water. All the orbitals of an iron atom. A benzene ring is ubiquitous. Curie temperatures. Melting and boiling points.

    Except for the benzene ring what you are describing is physics i.e. the physical properties of materials. It might be the physics of a 100 or so years ago but that does not make it chemistry. Besides there are plenty of other obvious constants in physics: charge of an electron, mass of an electron, proton, neutron etc. nuclear masses, atomic orbital energies, spectral lines etc. although perhaps in another 50-100 years these will have been recycled into chemistry as well?

    1. Re:Chemistry? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      Biology is really chemistry.
      Chemistry is really physics.
      Physics is really math.

      Math is really... hard.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  250. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From jayessell

    Let the "Super Intelligent Aliens" figure out English.
    There. We have communication.

    "There's nothing valuable enough or rare enough to ship between the stars".
    When you buy a DVD you're paying for a few cents worth of plastic and paper.
    The other $18.50 is for the information on it.
    Earth has had civilization of a sort for 5000 years, but in that time has accumulated
    several Exobytes of text, audio and video.
    Aliens could squeeze that into a few grams of nano-assembled crystals.
    This assumes they don't have interstellar quantum entanglement communication.

    I hope we make a good trade for it. We can only do it once.
    Energy? (We can make energy!) De-Pollution? (Well.. If we had energy...)
    The Aliens should have something we didn't know we wanted.
    (As seen in "Betelgeuse Bridge" on Archive . org (it's a radio show!))

  251. Universal Greeting by AWG · · Score: 1

    Didn't we already cover this in the original Transformers the Movie??

    "Bah-weep-Graaaaagnah wheep ni ni bong"

  252. easy..use a South Park episode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Human - (let alien sample a fishstick..everyone likes 'em) "Do you like fishsticks"
    Alien - "uuhhh yeah"
    Human - 'So you like putting fishsticks in your mouth?'
    Alien - 'yeah'
    Human - 'then you're a gay fish'

    hilarity will ensue...

  253. We're just an asylum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the ET is smart, they'll realize this planet is just one big loony bin, and put up warning signs.

    I mean half or more of the people of the planet have an imaginary friend who they believes talks to them and while completely unseen helps them out when things go wrong, and tests their faith when he ignores them.

  254. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Is that a ray gun in your pocket, or are you just happy to be here?"

  255. Surrender! by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

    All you world belong to US.

  256. How to greet ET. Duh! by GargamelSpaceman · · Score: 1

    With some Reeses Pieces.

    --
    ...
  257. WOW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After seeing World of Warcraft, they would understand that we have superior weaponry and armor.

  258. Take a cue from the English by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

    Okay so I watched the first episode of "How do you solve a problem like Maria?"...cute teen girls, folks. And at the end, Andrew Lloyd Webber himself calls up a couple of the girls that didn't make the first cut. All but one of them was very reserved and ultra polite. I thought that if that happened in America there would be so much bleeping in the audio and dog-level pitched screaming. So, if you meet an alien, take a cue from the Brits.

  259. That's easy.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck it and eat it!

  260. About those whales ... by haapi · · Score: 1

    ... well, this is awkward.

    --
    Well, apparently, you only have to fool the majority of people for a little while.
  261. V series returning to ABC by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1

    Here's one response:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQoSCEMzJYE&NR=1

    Starring Morena Baccarin. As a bad guy. Man, is that genius. I'd probably do whatever she told me to do.

    --

    --
    $tar -xvf .sig.tar
  262. "All your base are belong to us." by Ewann · · Score: 1

    "All your base are belong to us."

  263. Only one possible answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All our base are belong to you.

  264. Tommyknockers by VoiceOfDoom · · Score: 1

    I can't believe no-one's mentioned this one. An alien species, more technologically advanced but with much less depth of thought, compassion or empathy than displayed by (some) humans. Technology doesn't necessarily equate with moral values that we would recognise. Hell, geographical distribution on Earth leads to some serious disparities in ideas about "right" or "wrong".

    Time to call in the Men In Black.....

    --
    "Life is pain Highness. Anyone who says otherwise is selling something"

    Westly, The Princess Bride

  265. Diplomacy as possible by Control-Z · · Score: 1

    I think our only hope would be that a race advanced enough to make it here would be peaceful. Maybe a bad assumption, you'd have to do like Teddy Roosevelt, talk softly but carry a big stick.

    I also think it's entirely possible that we wouldn't be able to relate to the aliens in any meaningful way. Maybe they spend all their days exchanging various molecules between themselves and us talking to them face to "face" and hitting them with exhaled CO2 would be a grave insult.

  266. Too easy... by MoeDrippins · · Score: 1

    "Come Get Some"

    --
    Before you design for reuse, make sure to design it for use.
  267. Lawl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A\S\L?

  268. why should they not be remote controlled machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    light, fast, and based on wave nature of light or ordinary EM waves bundled in some advanced constructs.

    Why material beings?

    What about "energy beings" ?

    Maybe they can transfer consciousness into energy constructs that travel like EM waves through spacetime.

    If so then they could be all around and we could never measure them.

  269. damn you they're reading this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and now you spilt the secret!

    You thoughtless slashdot jerk!
    CmdrTaco is overtaken by the powers of Oog Uug

    Now Oog Uug knows about our deceit and treachery.
    Prepare for attack!

  270. stick to the cards by speedtux · · Score: 1

    My personal favorite is: "Our planet is decaying in its own filth, and is best avoided by all aliens"

    Other choices are: "We are a benign species, opposed to interplanetary conflict, and believe in equal opportunity for all beings, regardless of age, race, gender, sexual orientation or planet of origin", "Congratulations on your birthday", and "We look forward to sharing the many benefits of our combined knowledge".

  271. We're not really being all that noisy by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    Our radio emissions are effectively omni-directional, and as such, fall off like 1/r^2... so for all practical purposes, those "I Love Lucy" reruns are lost in the noise. If they had an idea what carrier frequencies we were using, and did something like FFT over a really, really long integration time, they might pick something up, but I doubt it. There's too much space and doing so would take too long.

  272. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bend over you green blooded slime balls we gonna tear ya a new one!

  273. The E.T.'s are already here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See The Disclosure Project to start.

    The SETI program is crap, has always been crap, and is a waste of time/resources...much like this article.

  274. obviously: by SourGrapes · · Score: 1

    "If you come in peace, surrender or be destroyed. If you're here to make war, we surrender."

  275. 1st Question by mwallis · · Score: 1

    Ever since I was a boy (back in the 1960's when space was exciting) I've wondered what I would say if encountering a non-terrestrial intelligence. I still go with my answer then ...

    "How do you finance your space program??"

    --
    "I gotta get off this rock!"

  276. Let them know upfront who's tasty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like Ian Punnett's idea - let the aliens know who the "tasty" ones are. He's constantly calling Canadians "Tasties" and our "Tasty friends to the North."

  277. "KLAATU BORADA NIKTO"... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We're still just slightly smarter animals at heart, once you strip away the thin veneer of technology and what we laughingly call "civilization". We can't even get along with OURSELVES and our own differences let alone a race that didn't evolve here. We're bigoted, racist, and sexist: We can't decide, AS A RACE, whether we owe our existence to one supernatural being or another, or did we evolve? We make war on our neighbors over resources and things that matter even less than that. We treat people differently, sometimes even ATTACKING them, because their skin is a different color. We treat our females as second-class citizens. Furthermore we mistreat and mismanage the biosphere we live in, poisoning it with our industrial wastes, destroying parts of it out of ignorance or greed, or because it suits us to do so, and damn the consequences." - by kheldan (1460303) on Sunday June 07, @12:36PM (#28242001)

    Agreed, 110%... because, if I were looking down @ us/observing us? I'd state "that solar system is to be banned & avoided, it is a house full of the 'viruses of the spirit'", basically.

    (And, it is SUCH an f'ing shame, but you're pointing out EXACTLY who we are, most of the time (though William Shakespeare said it best "How like a God man is in contemplation, & how like a beast in apprehension" etc. et al, we DO have our "good side" too, but it's not always apparent, or the reasons for being good are actually quite petty ones, rather than sincere ones, unfortunately))

    I.E.-> Imo, @ least? FIRST?? We need to "mature/grow up" as a species, as cliche as that sounds.

    APK

    P.S.=> I've often said that to my pals, my initial statement - that IF I were looking down & observing us? I would probably go to our governments worldwide & tell them "IF you don't learn to live with one another, peacefully & in cooperation for the good of all? YOU STAY DOWN THERE, or we blow you away... our children play out here, & we want NONE of your "space ghetto" violence & mental poison spreading to our kids. You have been warned..." , pretty much like Michael Rennie said as KLAATU, in the original "The Day the Earth Stood Still" (great flick, the original, that is - says a HELL of a lot!)... apk

  278. Open your gun ports by pugugly · · Score: 1

    It's a sign of respect.

    --
    An Invisible Entity of Vast Power whose existence must be taken on faith alone: Liberal Media
  279. No Brainer: The universal Greeting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Baw Weep.
    Bah Nah Weep.
    Niddy-grod!

  280. Don't play 'got your nose' by JoeGee · · Score: 1

    They just don't get it.

    --

    Get off my virtual lawn, you damned virtual kids!
  281. Whatever you do .... DO NOT greet them with ... by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    To avoid any hostility, do not greet them with:

    • My sis ate your unkle last year!
    • Anal probe?
    • What just does Deep Inspection mean?
    • You guys look so like Sushi!
    • Wasn't your mom featured in Roswell magazine?
    • We got guns and we're not afraid to use them!
    • Nice aparatus, looking at his sex, while pointing to his brains...
    • I smoked your unkle last night!
    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  282. Ooops - sorry about that... by grantdh · · Score: 1

    >What would you say first to an alien?

    Gesundheit, perhaps? :)

    --

    I left my body to science, but I'm afraid they've turned it down...
  283. Go home, immigrant ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (sorry, couldn't resist)

  284. Go write a scifi book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Going to the moon was emotionally significant, not really scientifically significant. Yes, we confirmed some things and learned a few other things. Mostly what was learned had to do with human nature, not hard, practical, science.

    Go write a scifi self help book. Spend your money going to Mars. Please. We may actually see humans on Mars in the next hundred years. Going to any other solar system is 100,000+ major physics breakthroughs away.

    Force = Mass x Acceleration is tough to beat. For a given acceleration, you need power and mass. Lots of power and even more mass. The amounts for each are huge to get to another star. The only hope is to find a way around that law of physics via a breakthrough or 1,000s of them.

    Moore's Law about computer performance simply doesn't work for non-computer related things. Sorry. It would be nice if it did. It doesn't.

    Humans need to become star travelers or our species **is** going to die out. We know the end is coming and there's no way out of it unless we leave our solar system. Someone else can worry about all this ... later.

  285. Some things are truly impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some things are simply impossible. They cannot be done with current knowledge. Future knowledge introduces a different set of assumptions.

    It is impossible for a pine tree to learn to speak English. Can we agree on that? It is impossible. If you alter the pine tree so it can speak, then it isn't a pine tree any longer.

    Perhaps this will help. I think that time travel of 200 lbs 5 minutes backwards in time is more likely than living humans being able to travel to another star in the next 100,000 years of technological advances.

    Getting humans to Pluto and back is trivial in comparison. We can do that today with enough money and will power. Pluto is about 3,667,000,000 miles from Earth. Traveling at 150,000 mph (instantaneously, which is bad), that trip is about 2.8 Earth years there and 2.8 years back. All power would need to be taken with us for our 6 year trip. Power for light, heat, growing food, maintenance shop, recycling waste and water, propulsion, breaking, everything. http://www.skythisweek.info/constant1g.pdf may be helpful in calculating the real trip time but assumes we wouldn't run out of power of fuel. That's a bad assumption.

    Trip to another star - currently impossible.
    Trip and landing on Mars, which could be terraformed for human living - possible.
    Trip and landing on Saturn or Jupiter or Nepture or Unanus - impossible. Humans would be crushed by gravity during landing.
    Trip and landing on Pluto - possible.

    Steps towards interstellar travel need to be taken with the goal to build multi-generational, self-sustaining, interstellar colony ships. I don't want to go, but some people might.

  286. Whoops!! Shit happens by PotatoHead · · Score: 1

    Was a quick post, what can I say?

  287. Example by kenp2002 · · Score: 1

    # ## ###
    1 2 3

    # + ## = ###

    1 + 2 = 3

    # = 1
    ## = 2
    ### = 3

    1,2,...,9,10,11,...,18,19,20,21,...,98,99,100,101,...

    That is where you start to explain the numerals we use and give examples of the symbols we use for equality, divison, subtraction etc. It shoudl convey we have a decimal system with symbols (numerals) indicating quanity and how the scale progresses.

    The for a given language (say english) you would put in a condensed:

    (Picture of an apple)

    APPLE

    (Recording of somone saying Apple)

    A is for Apple, Ape, Achivement,b is for boy, bag, bong, baby,c is for cat, can, color, ... , x,y,z

    (recording of someone saying the alphabet with an example of a word with it)

    This will help express that symbols have sounds associated with them and that stringing together letters make words.

    (red colored square)
    Red Colored Square

    (red colored triangle)
    Red colored Triangle

    With the Red example we assume they have figured out that we are A: Intelligent and B: Trying to explain things to them at this point.

    The Red Colored Square and Red Colored Triangle is telling them two basic grammar points: adjectives and nouns.

    Then we would do a:

    (Picture of a horse standing)

    Horse

    "The Horse is standing"

    (Picture of a horse running)

    "The horse is running"

    From that point they could quickly develop a noun, verb, adjective, adverb understanding of a language. Then they just have to pull a Leeloo and watch a bazillion years worth of TV to get the idea.

    --
    -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
  288. Re:First Contact says say, "Thanks." Duh. by kenp2002 · · Score: 1

    "Don't make me call Chuck Norris you green blooded cowards!"

    --
    -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
  289. Re:Chemistry by seramar · · Score: 1

    Off topic but - Wow, great story Scott! Do you have any other recommendations of good scifi on gutenberg? I really enjoyed the read :-)

    --
    australian project gutenberg is better than the original.
  290. Re:First Contact says say, "Thanks." Duh. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    "Don't make me call Chuck Norris you green blooded cowards!"

    Yep. That would do it.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  291. Symbols, symbols, symbols by nixdroid · · Score: 0

    First, I would hand them a ruler, then a protractor. In effect, "We use symbols to communicate". If I didn't have those handy, I would show them some money.

    --
    -- Consensus - 50% probability that the majority are wrong.
  292. How about... by thexile · · Score: 1

    Yo hommie!

    OR

    FUCK YOU!!!