What combined work of 5000 scientists? IPCC is complied works by half a dozen people, not all of which are scientists. The works are cherry picked and later found to be full of errors.
Most studies out there arent about the effects of CO2 on global temperatures (some are) but most are about the potential effects if such warming occured. Or dirivative works on different subjects with GW splashed in for funding.
This constant claim that 5000 scientists are working in unison and all agree on the same exact data and subject is ludicrous and a lie.
Nobody with more than 1 brain cell doesnt understand that both parties ALREADY PAY FOR THE USE OF THE NETWORK.
What the hell are they supposed to be paying more for? Its like a bully charging to get into the courtyard. But the thing is, he has no legal right to charge you for that.
Well, the telcos want to charge you to pass into the public courtyard (PUBLIC), and they are pushing politicians to make it LEGAL.
Stop trying to start flame wars, when you damn well know what the hell it is we are talking about.
The "likely" changes are nothing of the sort. They are speculations at most, with no actual proof to back them up.
The changes might just be for the better, with some slight annoyances. The reports of meter high sea level rises are to say the least exaggerated and unfounded.
And saying we MAY not be able to support the number of humans on the planet... people have been saying that for hundreds of years. There has never been any basis to that, EVER.
The world produces more food than all 6 billion of us require. The problem we have is distribution, not production or sustainability. If all the money being wasted on fear mongering was spent on finding good solutions to those distribution problems, then thing would get better instantly.
We are good on fresh water. Its getting warmer, remember ? The glaciers will melt and supply us with fresh water. The air is fine and getting better every decade. Indeed we where polutting the crap out of our metropolitain areas, but there has been a SHARP increase in air quality in the last 20-30 years.
We definitely still need to find cleaner energy sources, ways to pollute less, etc...
What we dont need to idiotic policies like carbon trading. Which is the only reason the UN has been throwing money at this AGW fear mongering.
So it gets dry here, wet there, hot here and cold there.
Things change. Its the nature of time.
No one has demonstrated without a doubt that it means the end of civilization.
We will adapt, migrate and flourish, because that is human nature.
Expecting to maintain the status quo because this is what we "currently" know as being comfortable and "optimum" is short sighted and frankly ridiculous.
And with all that aside. No one has demonstrated either that there will be DRASTIC changes yet. Its all speculation, based on unreliable computer models, unproven theories based on far fetched assumptions with no basis (I'm talking to you, runway climate change).
Honestly, all I see is allot of alarmism and not very much actual science.
Because of their brainwashing from a really young age, or weak mindedness making them susceptible to believing in fairy tales, anything that is impressive or surprising they will attribute to god.
Wake up fuzzy, between dreaming and real life, and any shit you see or feel can be attributed to god or something holy if you are a religiously inclined brainwashed person.
Have a problem you can solve, even after months and months of throwing ideas at it.. then all of a sudden out of nowhere you have a EUREKA moment... HOLY SHIITE, it must be god who gave you the answer. Its a GOD experience, I FEEL CLOSE TO THE LORD!!!
The sooner most people (because never will we be rid of this vile problem) get over this god bullshit, the sooner we will be able to go forward as a society.
Google can decide to make their service slow as molasses for BT or TalkTalk customers.
Still available, but almost unusable.
Then offer to bring it back up to speed for the same amount BT is asking to "speed" up their service for Google.
If Facebook, Ebay etc... all decide to do the same thing with all ISP's asking for money to "speed" things up for them, they will soon realize that the futility of this new "service".
Now the question is... will Google fight them, or do they WANT this to happen...?
The results are there for all to see. The research is NOT. There is a BIG difference.
Also, people constantly find fault with the science. They are ignored, called names and passed over by the buddy system (I mean "peer review").
There are so many things wrong with your highlighted sentence with a link that its not even funny. There are DEFINITELY published scientific papers that conclude that AGW is not happening. You blindly follow the "enlightened", exactly like religious nuts follow their priests.
Now about the prosecutor... I would have liked to see the information, however I do think he is a power hungry idiot.
That is such an alarmist view of things, you should be put into a straight jacket before your fear mongering starts harming those of us that live in a free society.
Hold on to your horses there buddy.
Chemicals...oOOoo scary word.
WATER is a chemical.
EVERYTHING is made up of chemicals, EVERYTHING.
What combined work of 5000 scientists?
IPCC is complied works by half a dozen people, not all of which are scientists. The works are cherry picked and later found to be full of errors.
Most studies out there arent about the effects of CO2 on global temperatures (some are) but most are about the potential effects if such warming occured. Or dirivative works on different subjects with GW splashed in for funding.
This constant claim that 5000 scientists are working in unison and all agree on the same exact data and subject is ludicrous and a lie.
Citation please.
Its my understanding it froze over enough in early December (on cue) so that the polar bears could go roaming around and eat some tasty baby seals.
Your BS claims from the site you quoted is dated 4 weeks ago. And their observations on Dec. 6th where based on November data.
The Hudson Bay froze the same week that article was posted, ON CUE. Meaning, thats about the time it freezes over every year.
What are you? Some kind of shit disturber?
Nobody with more than 1 brain cell doesnt understand that both parties ALREADY PAY FOR THE USE OF THE NETWORK.
What the hell are they supposed to be paying more for? Its like a bully charging to get into the courtyard. But the thing is, he has no legal right to charge you for that.
Well, the telcos want to charge you to pass into the public courtyard (PUBLIC), and they are pushing politicians to make it LEGAL.
Stop trying to start flame wars, when you damn well know what the hell it is we are talking about.
I dont think so.
We will see this sort of thing only if its politically inconvenient to use standard warfare.
Because quick and easy, means cheap. Which means, the military industrial complex isn't making profit.
We wont be seeing this replacing standard warfare anytime soon.
But then I guess I'm just an alarmist.
Indeed.
The "likely" changes are nothing of the sort. They are speculations at most, with no actual proof to back them up.
The changes might just be for the better, with some slight annoyances. The reports of meter high sea level rises are to say the least exaggerated and unfounded.
And saying we MAY not be able to support the number of humans on the planet... people have been saying that for hundreds of years. There has never been any basis to that, EVER.
The world produces more food than all 6 billion of us require. The problem we have is distribution, not production or sustainability. If all the money being wasted on fear mongering was spent on finding good solutions to those distribution problems, then thing would get better instantly.
We are good on fresh water. Its getting warmer, remember ? The glaciers will melt and supply us with fresh water. The air is fine and getting better every decade. Indeed we where polutting the crap out of our metropolitain areas, but there has been a SHARP increase in air quality in the last 20-30 years.
We definitely still need to find cleaner energy sources, ways to pollute less, etc...
What we dont need to idiotic policies like carbon trading. Which is the only reason the UN has been throwing money at this AGW fear mongering.
Now now, no need for fear mongering.
Trying to appeal to the general populations fears does not an argument make.
There is no evidence to back up any of the numbers you just threw up there, not even for a 20% probability.
Come back when you have something to say other than, "What IF its the end of the world? Shouldnt we just jump off the bridge??".
"We will adapt, migrate and flourish, because that is human nature."
Ah, yes, the most important species on the planet! Screw all other living beings! They can just go extinct! All that matters are humans.
More important than the Anonymous Coward species thats for sure.
So it gets dry here, wet there, hot here and cold there.
Things change. Its the nature of time.
No one has demonstrated without a doubt that it means the end of civilization.
We will adapt, migrate and flourish, because that is human nature.
Expecting to maintain the status quo because this is what we "currently" know as being comfortable and "optimum" is short sighted and frankly ridiculous.
And with all that aside. No one has demonstrated either that there will be DRASTIC changes yet. Its all speculation, based on unreliable computer models, unproven theories based on far fetched assumptions with no basis (I'm talking to you, runway climate change).
Honestly, all I see is allot of alarmism and not very much actual science.
The one who doesnt beleive in fairies?
A lazy bum should get a job. It is a known fact that manny of them are there by choice.
They are imbeciles.
Because of their brainwashing from a really young age, or weak mindedness making them susceptible to believing in fairy tales, anything that is impressive or surprising they will attribute to god.
Wake up fuzzy, between dreaming and real life, and any shit you see or feel can be attributed to god or something holy if you are a religiously inclined brainwashed person.
Have a problem you can solve, even after months and months of throwing ideas at it.. then all of a sudden out of nowhere you have a EUREKA moment... HOLY SHIITE, it must be god who gave you the answer. Its a GOD experience, I FEEL CLOSE TO THE LORD!!!
The sooner most people (because never will we be rid of this vile problem) get over this god bullshit, the sooner we will be able to go forward as a society.
Google can decide to make their service slow as molasses for BT or TalkTalk customers.
Still available, but almost unusable.
Then offer to bring it back up to speed for the same amount BT is asking to "speed" up their service for Google.
If Facebook, Ebay etc... all decide to do the same thing with all ISP's asking for money to "speed" things up for them, they will soon realize that the futility of this new "service".
Now the question is... will Google fight them, or do they WANT this to happen...?
Zionism is a nationalistic political movement. It does not = JEW.
Many jews around the world are AGAINST Zionism.
Putting whole country (Iran) into the same boat as a religious extremist group like Al-Qaeda, is beyond idiotic.
Leaders of a country the size of Iran have much more at stake and much more to consider than the single minded goals of a few nutjob imams.
Comparing Iran with poor, repressed and backwater afghani people is ignorant.
The level of education in Teheran and other Iran cities is quite high.
You basically know absolutely nothing about what you are commenting on.
You come off as an ignorant, hate mongering idiot.
Though I'm not surprised you where voted +5 insightful I am ashamed that Slashdot has such ignorants amongst its ranks.
I see no more of a threat from Iran than from Egypt for example. Only bullshit propaganda from Israel and the US on behalf of Israel.
You are wrong. They are Persian and speak Farsi predominantly. Arabic is a second language.
60 % of the Iran population is Persian, the rest is a mix.
Educate yourself.
Hmm, I thought it was illegal to pass on the right in most US states.
I guess I was wrong.
Here in Canada, it definitely is.
In Quebec for example on any roads above 70km/h it is illegal to pass a car on the right.
No.
The results are there for all to see. The research is NOT.
There is a BIG difference.
Also, people constantly find fault with the science. They are ignored, called names and passed over by the buddy system (I mean "peer review").
There are so many things wrong with your highlighted sentence with a link that its not even funny. There are DEFINITELY published scientific papers that conclude that AGW is not happening. You blindly follow the "enlightened", exactly like religious nuts follow their priests.
Now about the prosecutor... I would have liked to see the information, however I do think he is a power hungry idiot.
Those are fantasy guestimates, NOT estimates.
Trumped up numbers with no basis in imperial data whatsoever.
Perhaps you dont do anything unless you have actual proof?
That is such an alarmist view of things, you should be put into a straight jacket before your fear mongering starts harming those of us that live in a free society.
Come across as anti-scientists?
WTF for, because they dont agree with fuzzy conclusions, based on faulty computer models.
Or because the dont agree with the tampered data?
What is anti-science about ASKING FOR THE RESEARCH AND NOT THE RESULTS.
Get your head out of your behind and smell the arrogance.
Yes.
It has not been proven to be the cause of any warming outside of a greenhouse.
Simple isnt it?
There is no such correlation.
I dont know what you have been modded insightful, your just an ignorant hack trying to sound important.
You are EXACTLY the same as those you are trying to insult.
So I'll take public grant money.
Pretend to work for 2-4 years.
Produced a trumped up paper.
And deny all access to the "research".
That seems logical to you?
WTF are they serving in schools now a days? Sheep feed?
Your ramblings really have no basis in fact.
Its alarmism 101.
"WE CANT DO ANYTHING TO STOP IT.
So lets to the most stoopid batshit crazy EXTREME thing we can, and we JUST MIGHT SLOW IT..."
Go back under your rock and wait for the next bandwagon. There are enough people on this one we dont need the batshit idiots too.
copy paste much?