My clan sucks, and I'm far from maxed. TH8, still need to spend some gold maxing walls, and elixir on research, otherwise maxed, for TH8. But I'm down to 5 minute a week, just subsistence.
That was my strategy when I had lots of time to kill. A Kabam, a Super Cell, and a King game or two on rotation. 10-30 minutes each, then on to the next one, before coming back a few hours later, when there's enough energy or whatever to play for a while. Village builders and light arcade games, and you can play the free to play for free, and never run out of games to play. Though you'll never hit the leaderboards without spending cash, or in some cases (like Clash of Clans) be online 24/7.
I would also add in NippleGate, Sex tapes, Unreality crap such as the Kartrashians,
Sex sex and, well, sex.
and robbing from Paul to pay Peter.
Taxes.
Sure, they dress it all up, and try to make it look like something else, but almost every wedge issue comes back to sex or taxes, and most of the distractions are sex and violence.
So "Congress Shall Make No Law" means congress can make all the laws they want (so long as they are against the Chinese). You must be one of those Constitutional literalists.
The law restricts an American playing a recording on a US station. His ability to exercise that speech is infringed by a law requiring registration before he exercises his speech.
Having had a little more time, all the mayors named have denied it, and it died there with that, but I've still not seen a senator deny it. Why wouldn't they deny it if it isn't true?
"Congress shall make no law" has no exception for Chinese, as you assert.
And the rights under the Constitution should not be asserted as to belong to anyone other than a US citizen.
Some rights are guaranteed to citizens. Others to residents. And others to everyone (though, obviously not enforced everywhere). Read it. The people, citizens and such are worded differently in different sections with different meanings.
"Congress shall make no law [...] abridging the freedom of speech"
Even that doesn't make sense. After all, we have people pushing here all the time that corporations have no rights, but you can't stop the people who make up corporations from exercising their rights. So China has no rights, but the Chinese people have rights, as well as the Americans advocating for them.
What's funny is that the same people pushing for corporate rights are the ones most against the people advocating Chinese interests having rights.
4 US senators named so far, yet no denials or complaints by the senators in question yet. If this was fake, why wouldn't someone whose name is on it expose it as a fake?
The Tea Party was astroturf. The start was a conservative splinter of the Republicans. Then the corporations hopped on. #notyoushield was astroturfed, and that makes you a tool of the oppressors. That you don't like being a tool makes you ignore facts and cling to your personal belief that it wasn't an astroturf started to false flag sabotage the Zoe side of Gamergate.
The only reason Bush did any good at the Rangers is that daddy helped push for the new taxpayer funded stadium. Bush was brought in for political weight for the stadium, and was there for that and not much else. He did good, but not because he did anything, other than ask daddy for help.
They tried innovation in laptops, and it generally didn't work out well. They had one of the best handhelds at one point, but dropped it while it was still popular and in demand, rather than continuing development on it. The https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... is still found in some industrial settings. Cheap DOS computer, tiny and takes almost no power. If they had tried, they could have continued the miniaturization of DOS. They also abandoned the highly popular HP 48 calculator series, and mainly, but not completely left the calculator market.
They were lost. Abandoning things with strong followings (even if niche) to chase the popular things, even if not profitable.
Yeah, and a few years ago, we bought a new server and installed Windows Server on it to do nothing other than hold a RADIUS server (Windows Server included server, not a real one). I had requested a different one, but the IT manager wouldn't buy software from a company called "Funk", and then I suggested a free one, and "If it's free, it can't be good" was the response. But I think it was more of "nobody got fired for using MS."
Well, I suggest you read Anita Sarkeesian's thesis.
Why? You imply she's not worth listening to, then implore me to read her. I don't like her. I read the other link, and it doesn't support what you say. And your opinion on the works of someone you hate isn't compelling
No, I'm saying that using facts to argue with critical theorists is pointless because they reject the existence of objective facts, at least when it is convenient.
I'm saying that facts don't work against anyone with a closed mind. You are living proof of that.
I didn't bring Zoe Quinn into this discussion, you did.
You brought up Gamergate before me. And it's not about anything other than Zoe's sex life.
I don't care about her sex life.
Yeah, that's like all the Republicans impeaching Clinton saying they don't care about his sex life. That's the only subject, and the start of the whole thing. If you didn't care about Zoe's sex life, why do you care so much about what others think about it?
I'm not an MRA. I'm a gay man who doesn't like to be used by people like Anita Sarkeesian or you as your token progressive cause,
When did I use you for a progressive cause? I just piss off the MRAs by turning the discussion back to the question about Zoe's sex life, as that's the sole thing this is all about, other than your and other people's over-reaction to Zoe's ex's breakup rant.
You, however, probably would have thrived, given what a good little conformist you seem to be.
You are the one here defending the status quo so strongly. I'm just asking you to think, which is evidently making you angry.
hardened is not what you think. In most cases it means making it more robust, but only against specific things. Some shielding. Some wider paths. Slower clocks. Hardened things have the same survivability whether on or off at the time, but won't operate properly under blast conditions.
You can't harden some things. Other things you can harden on paper, but aren't hard in practice. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... are common when hardening. You gap the copper to isolate each side, and hop the gap with light. There isn't a physical connection with copper, but they are primarily used for isolation in low noise environments, not isolation in high power environment, so in EMP conditions, they'll arc and defeat the hardening.
is it possible to enclose the transformers in faraday cages?
Not while connected to the grid. The "fix" is to have all the transformers electrically isolated from the power lines. That makes them useless. So the "trick" is to make it possible, and protect it only when necessary.
Though, a single large DPRK nuke, detonated over Kansas, would fry much more than a flare would. So the flare would be damaging, but not as much. The EMP nature of the flare is lower. It's a longer, slower event. The power lines will be very succeptible, but the coils in a transformer and computer chips would be less sensitive. A DPRK nuke over Kansas would fry PC chips on both coasts. A flare would just take out the power grid, and the additional radiation could cause more bit errors in computers.
Slashdot Mirror
My clan sucks, and I'm far from maxed. TH8, still need to spend some gold maxing walls, and elixir on research, otherwise maxed, for TH8. But I'm down to 5 minute a week, just subsistence.
That was my strategy when I had lots of time to kill. A Kabam, a Super Cell, and a King game or two on rotation. 10-30 minutes each, then on to the next one, before coming back a few hours later, when there's enough energy or whatever to play for a while. Village builders and light arcade games, and you can play the free to play for free, and never run out of games to play. Though you'll never hit the leaderboards without spending cash, or in some cases (like Clash of Clans) be online 24/7.
I would also add in NippleGate, Sex tapes, Unreality crap such as the Kartrashians,
Sex sex and, well, sex.
and robbing from Paul to pay Peter.
Taxes.
Sure, they dress it all up, and try to make it look like something else, but almost every wedge issue comes back to sex or taxes, and most of the distractions are sex and violence.
One simply follows refugees, providing humanitarian aid as they travel. Exactly like a terrorist would.
can we please elect someone who can actually fix things????
Nope. Because the American People are more focused on taxes and sex than they are about the government committing murder.
So "Congress Shall Make No Law" means congress can make all the laws they want (so long as they are against the Chinese). You must be one of those Constitutional literalists.
The law restricts an American playing a recording on a US station. His ability to exercise that speech is infringed by a law requiring registration before he exercises his speech.
Having had a little more time, all the mayors named have denied it, and it died there with that, but I've still not seen a senator deny it. Why wouldn't they deny it if it isn't true?
Is it unconstitutional that WCRW needs to pay licensing fees to the federal government in order to use the public airwaves to speak?
WCRW already paid for the radio license. Separate is the licence based on content.
And the rights under the Constitution should not be asserted as to belong to anyone other than a US citizen.
Some rights are guaranteed to citizens. Others to residents. And others to everyone (though, obviously not enforced everywhere). Read it. The people, citizens and such are worded differently in different sections with different meanings.
"Congress shall make no law [...] abridging the freedom of speech"
Even that doesn't make sense. After all, we have people pushing here all the time that corporations have no rights, but you can't stop the people who make up corporations from exercising their rights. So China has no rights, but the Chinese people have rights, as well as the Americans advocating for them.
What's funny is that the same people pushing for corporate rights are the ones most against the people advocating Chinese interests having rights.
"Congress shall make no law [...] abridging the freedom of speech"
Except for all the laws abridging the freedom of speech
He did respond to them. He answered where he was born and all that on many many occasions. That may not have been the best example.
http://www.politicususa.com/20...
4 US senators named so far, yet no denials or complaints by the senators in question yet. If this was fake, why wouldn't someone whose name is on it expose it as a fake?
The Tea Party was astroturf. The start was a conservative splinter of the Republicans. Then the corporations hopped on. #notyoushield was astroturfed, and that makes you a tool of the oppressors. That you don't like being a tool makes you ignore facts and cling to your personal belief that it wasn't an astroturf started to false flag sabotage the Zoe side of Gamergate.
You really need to get over your obsession with Zoe's sex life.
That's all Gamergate is about.
The only reason Bush did any good at the Rangers is that daddy helped push for the new taxpayer funded stadium. Bush was brought in for political weight for the stadium, and was there for that and not much else. He did good, but not because he did anything, other than ask daddy for help.
They tried innovation in laptops, and it generally didn't work out well. They had one of the best handhelds at one point, but dropped it while it was still popular and in demand, rather than continuing development on it. The https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... is still found in some industrial settings. Cheap DOS computer, tiny and takes almost no power. If they had tried, they could have continued the miniaturization of DOS. They also abandoned the highly popular HP 48 calculator series, and mainly, but not completely left the calculator market.
They were lost. Abandoning things with strong followings (even if niche) to chase the popular things, even if not profitable.
What's now called HP is really Compaq/DEC.
And not even the good part of Compaq.
Yeah, and a few years ago, we bought a new server and installed Windows Server on it to do nothing other than hold a RADIUS server (Windows Server included server, not a real one). I had requested a different one, but the IT manager wouldn't buy software from a company called "Funk", and then I suggested a free one, and "If it's free, it can't be good" was the response. But I think it was more of "nobody got fired for using MS."
Well, I suggest you read Anita Sarkeesian's thesis.
Why? You imply she's not worth listening to, then implore me to read her. I don't like her. I read the other link, and it doesn't support what you say. And your opinion on the works of someone you hate isn't compelling
No, I'm saying that using facts to argue with critical theorists is pointless because they reject the existence of objective facts, at least when it is convenient.
I'm saying that facts don't work against anyone with a closed mind. You are living proof of that.
I didn't bring Zoe Quinn into this discussion, you did.
You brought up Gamergate before me. And it's not about anything other than Zoe's sex life.
I don't care about her sex life.
Yeah, that's like all the Republicans impeaching Clinton saying they don't care about his sex life. That's the only subject, and the start of the whole thing. If you didn't care about Zoe's sex life, why do you care so much about what others think about it?
I'm not an MRA. I'm a gay man who doesn't like to be used by people like Anita Sarkeesian or you as your token progressive cause,
When did I use you for a progressive cause? I just piss off the MRAs by turning the discussion back to the question about Zoe's sex life, as that's the sole thing this is all about, other than your and other people's over-reaction to Zoe's ex's breakup rant.
You, however, probably would have thrived, given what a good little conformist you seem to be.
You are the one here defending the status quo so strongly. I'm just asking you to think, which is evidently making you angry.
I don't care if you do or don't believe anything I or anyone else says. Confirm it on your own, or don't. I don't care.
Of course, socialism was "tried", and it failed, like it always does.
So the European socialism in the UK and Sweden and such has failed?
But, in any case, whether Somalia was real socialism or just real-world socialism is irrelevant;
It was never any kind of socialism. It was a dictatorship. Or do you think all dictatorships are socialist? Or none of them?
hardened is not what you think. In most cases it means making it more robust, but only against specific things. Some shielding. Some wider paths. Slower clocks. Hardened things have the same survivability whether on or off at the time, but won't operate properly under blast conditions.
You can't harden some things. Other things you can harden on paper, but aren't hard in practice. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... are common when hardening. You gap the copper to isolate each side, and hop the gap with light. There isn't a physical connection with copper, but they are primarily used for isolation in low noise environments, not isolation in high power environment, so in EMP conditions, they'll arc and defeat the hardening.
is it possible to enclose the transformers in faraday cages?
Not while connected to the grid. The "fix" is to have all the transformers electrically isolated from the power lines. That makes them useless. So the "trick" is to make it possible, and protect it only when necessary.
Though, a single large DPRK nuke, detonated over Kansas, would fry much more than a flare would. So the flare would be damaging, but not as much. The EMP nature of the flare is lower. It's a longer, slower event. The power lines will be very succeptible, but the coils in a transformer and computer chips would be less sensitive. A DPRK nuke over Kansas would fry PC chips on both coasts. A flare would just take out the power grid, and the additional radiation could cause more bit errors in computers.