Slashdot Mirror


HP Is Now Two Companies. How Did It Get Here? (cio.com)

New submitter joshroberts3388 writes: If Hollywood wanted a script about the inexorable decline of a corporate icon, it might look to Hewlett-Packard for inspiration. Once one of Silicon Valley's most respected companies, HP officially split itself in two on Sunday, betting that the smaller parts will be nimbler and more able to reverse four years of declining sales. HP fell victim to huge shifts in the computer industry that also forced Dell to go private and have knocked IBM on its heels. Pressure from investors compelled it to act. But there are dramatic twists in HP's story, including scandals, a revolving door for CEOs and one of the most ill-fated mergers in tech history, that make HP more than a victim of changing times.

198 comments

  1. Failing upwards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And after buggering up HP so bad as to cause this split, that CEO is now running for president.

    1. Re:Failing upwards by steak · · Score: 2

      fiorina hasn't been ceo of hp for 10 years

    2. Re:Failing upwards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, it worked for Jefferson Davis. Why not Carly Fiorina?

      Then again, if Donald Trump is right about "who would vote for that?," maybe Jefferson Davis was a bit more attractive...

    3. Re:Failing upwards by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      fiorina hasn't been ceo of hp for 10 years

      And notably, during that time zero other companies offered her the CEO position.

      It's not impossible for a single disastrous CEO to bring a company down for a decade.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    4. Re:Failing upwards by interval1066 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      She did leave HP a mess. She was the one to cause a lot of their top engineering talent to walk, she tried to shift HP to a products company with the Compaq acquisition which was a huge boondoggle in the end, and hp's stock price fell 55% under her watch. You don't get fired for doing a good job.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    5. Re:Failing upwards by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      And after buggering up HP so bad as to cause this split, that CEO is now running for president.

      Who knows, maybe she'll do the same for the US when she's El Presidenta after overseeing a disastrous loss of market share to China PLC. You could make the split roughly north/south, say along the Mason-Dixon line.

    6. Re:Failing upwards by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

      It appears to me sometimes, that a lot of CEOs spend their entire tenure as CEO . . . as NOT being the CEO. Instead, they spend all of their time doing interviews on CNBC and conference calls with with Wall Street analysts.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    7. Re:Failing upwards by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 3, Interesting

      She also helped destroy the high quality instruments division before spinning it off as Agilent. That was the group whose technology quality helped keep HP's quality high, because the robust designs and high quality for HP instruments were a touchstone for quality in the the company's other departments. Since her advent, I've repeatedly shown partners and clients that they can buy more hardware, of better overall quality, for less money, than by insisting on HP. It does require some research, but when you're buying 100 servers you _do not care_ how many firewire ports it has, the graphical chipset, or how robust the decorative faceplate is. You care about CPU's, amount and quality of memory, and being able to afford dual power supplies _and_ dual UPS's and switches to plug them into.

    8. Re:Failing upwards by msauve · · Score: 2

      Yep. The current HP is a name only. The real HP legacy is Keysight Technologies (via Agilent). What's now called HP is really Compaq/DEC.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    9. Re: Failing upwards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keysight's (and formerly Agilent T&M) has suffered from almost a decade of declining sales and massive layoffs in a test and measurement market that's being taken over by relative newcomers. If a company still has the HP Way, I think it's still Agilent because their medical instrumentation business is strong and they still invest in R&D.

    10. Re:Failing upwards by Bender0x7D1 · · Score: 1

      It appears to me sometimes, that a lot of CEOs spend their entire tenure as CEO . . . as NOT being the CEO. Instead, they spend all of their time doing interviews on CNBC and conference calls with with Wall Street analysts.

      That's what CEOs are supposed to do. If they are publicly traded, they need to manage Wall Street since those funds are generally the majority stakeholders in the company. Also, you do interviews to get your corporate message out there, and get a little free publicity.

      --
      Reading code is like reading the dictionary - you have to read half of it before you can go back and understand it.
    11. Re:Failing upwards by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
      Fiorina will do to America what she did to HP.

      She will buy Canada at inflated price and lay off half of America.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    12. Re:Failing upwards by khallow · · Score: 2

      She also helped destroy the high quality instruments division before spinning it off as Agilent.

      Most of that was done before she came to power. She merely oversaw the final phase of the spin off of Agilent and had little to do with the spin off. The huge decline in the combined PC/server market share of HP/Compaq is her baby though.

    13. Re: Failing upwards by nullchar · · Score: 1

      Yup, the Chief Executive Officer is a cheerleader, while the Chief Operating Officer does the day to day. Still, the CEO is at the top and needs to build a strong team to implement the corporate message, thus they are ultimately responsible.

    14. Re:Failing upwards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The CEO is supposed to manage the business well and plan for the future. A CEO does not have to kiss Wall Street's stupid ass if he is competent and doing a good job.

      I have to keep bringing him up but Steve Jobs is a good example of this. In his second term as CEO, he pretty much told Wall Street to pound sand and sent his lackey, Tim Cook, to do the quarterly conferences.

      The effective CEO will likely not want to waste his time with the stupid analysts that the Wall Street firms use to cover the company. The CEO is better off paying attention to running the company well and outsourcing dealing with Wall Street to a spin doctor.

    15. Re:Failing upwards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would actually be a good thing because, by acquiring Canada and its vast natural resources, the U.S. could recover rather quickly from practically any other stupid action Fiorina takes. Employment would likely eventually recover and the U.S. would recover, too, unlike HP which will never recover unless it can find its own Steve Jobs.

      Most likely, Fiorina would sell off most of the U.S. for a few hundred billion dollars to use that to balance the budget for a year or two and then tout her managerial prowess.

    16. Re:Failing upwards by TWX · · Score: 1

      She did leave HP a mess. She was the one to cause a lot of their top engineering talent to walk, she tried to shift HP to a products company with the Compaq acquisition which was a huge boondoggle in the end, and hp's stock price fell 55% under her watch. You don't get fired for doing a good job.

      I think that a big part of the problem was not that HP got Compaq's customers and market share, but that it got Compaq's quality and the hamstrung business practices that made it available for takeover in the first place.

      I can see a real reason for a professional-services and professional-hardware company to purchase a commodity-hardware company; commodity hardware can sell like crazy and for a long time Compaq did a half-decent job using their consumer-grade products as test-platforms before integrating the technology into their commercial computing platforms. They had two lines of laptop. They had several lines of desktop. They had servers. Tech didn't usually make it into the workstation-grade laptops and desktops immediately, the kinks were worked out in the consumer lines first. Their servers might have not been high end, but they were workable on a budget.

      I don't know what the actual problem is, but I wonder if the negatives of Compaq were somehow seen as positives from a financial perspective, and those negatives were rolled into HP to break it.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    17. Re:Failing upwards by Thunderf00t · · Score: 1

      Well, at least Carly can say that she wasn't Leo.

      --
      We will never be the change to the weather and the sea
    18. Re:Failing upwards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      La Presidente.

    19. Re:Failing upwards by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Maybe, but HP really should never have gotten into a commodity PC business. It's not really a high tech sort of thing except for some small parts here and there. No need for a design team, no need for innovation, with clones all you have to do is copy and put on some makeup.

    20. Re:Failing upwards by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      What's now called HP is really Compaq/DEC.

      And not even the good part of Compaq.

    21. Re:Failing upwards by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      They tried innovation in laptops, and it generally didn't work out well. They had one of the best handhelds at one point, but dropped it while it was still popular and in demand, rather than continuing development on it. The https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... is still found in some industrial settings. Cheap DOS computer, tiny and takes almost no power. If they had tried, they could have continued the miniaturization of DOS. They also abandoned the highly popular HP 48 calculator series, and mainly, but not completely left the calculator market.

      They were lost. Abandoning things with strong followings (even if niche) to chase the popular things, even if not profitable.

    22. Re:Failing upwards by KGIII · · Score: 2

      And sure as hell not the good parts of Digital.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    23. Re: Failing upwards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bollocks. gates, ellison, jobs, packard, piech, morita were much more than cheerleaders. they knew their shit and did beancounting and talking as a side job.

      mbas focus on these actvities, though.

    24. Re: Failing upwards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bingo. great products, good understanding of customers drive results. finance results follow this.

      hp was completely hollowed out in terms of true innovation at the end of platt' s reign.

    25. Re:Failing upwards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get you guys. The only reason to hate on Obama is because he's just as bad as the guy before him.

    26. Re:Failing upwards by markhb · · Score: 1

      You left off the other major product line they got from Compaq: Tandem. It even survived HP trying to move the line to Itanium!

      --
      Save Maine's economy: write stuff down. All comments are exclusively my own, not my employer.
    27. Re:Failing upwards by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but the current President has already driven America into the dumpsters. Remember when he said that 9 Trillion dollars was "unpatriotic"? I do. But perhaps he wasn't lying and meant it should be 20 Trillion, like it is today. That is MORE than doubled in 7 years, which is something no other two term president has been able to manage. But hey, Blame Bush for that.

      And since we are talking "she" I wonder if your view of Clinton's disastrous years as Secretary of State is going to play into your voting. My guess is that it isn't. Her admitted lying to the American People leading up to the last Presidential Election should be enough to keep her out of office, but in Democrat Primaries that is considered a leading skill and job qualification.

      Fiorina, at least, has something she has accomplished, other than Monica Lewinsky's ExBoyfriend's wife.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    28. Re:Failing upwards by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      Canada's not exactly a good Compaq analog. To carry the analogy properly, you'd have to posit that Fiorina would merge the US with Greece, Syria, or Ukraine. And then fire half of the US and base the entire country's remaining economy on printer ink made in Mexico.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    29. Re:Failing upwards by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      And after buggering up HP so bad as to cause this split, that CEO is now running for president.

      My problem with HP consumer stuff, was the abismal quality. A desktop failure was expected about 6 months to one year after the warantee expired. And also, replacement part (power supply or mother board), were non-standard, meaning that one had to visit HP for a replacement. Even their wireless mouse failed within a year.

      If a company skimps on quality, the customer flees that brand and also recommends other brands. I have a pile of failed HP desktops.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    30. Re:Failing upwards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Lew Platt put the Agilent split in motion. Fiorina had little if anything to do with it.

    31. Re:Failing upwards by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

      And the DEC part (the operating system part of the DEC part, I mean) has been spun off, too.

      --
      There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
  2. Let's Not Forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... one Carly Fiorina.

    1. Re:Let's Not Forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, it is almost like that was forgotten in the article LINKED ABOVE. Except there it was at the very top of the article. Worst of all you still could not get first post.

    2. Re: Let's Not Forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having done business with the HP's amputated left arm, I can tell you that it's not just the former CEO. The horrible attitude goes all the way down the food chain in that company. I will never buy anything from HP again. Never.

  3. Some parallels with USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Especially with Carly as "CEO".

    Sometimes, things just get too big.

  4. What's the other company? by oneiros27 · · Score: 1

    Palm?
    3Com?
    Compaq?
    Ericsson?
    Apollo Computer?
    Snapfish?
    Mercury Interactive?
    EDS?

    I'm guessing they won't call it Autonomy.

    maybe they won't recycle a merger name, and go with "Agilent II"?

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
    1. Re:What's the other company? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Keysight

    2. Re:What's the other company? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      HP is splitting as "HP Inc." and "Hewlett-Packard Enterprise", which is quite boring. It would have been more fun to split as "Hewlett" and "Packard".

    3. Re:What's the other company? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Worse: "HP Inc." (HP) and "Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co" (HPE).

      This was announced in October, 2014, by the way.

    4. Re:What's the other company? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No hyphen!

    5. Re:What's the other company? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

      HP is splitting as "HP Inc." and "Hewlett-Packard Enterprise".

      Each shareholder gets one share of HP Inc and one share of HPE for each original share, but to maintain his investment each shareholder is required to buy one additional HPE share each month at current market, or his whole investment becomes worthless.

    6. Re:What's the other company? by RabidReindeer · · Score: 4, Funny

      ... or his whole investment becomes worthless.

      Or was that "and"?

    7. Re:What's the other company? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thought it was Digital, Compaq and then HP

    8. Re:What's the other company? by GungaDan · · Score: 1

      Oh fuck that - I've bought HP ink before. What a ripoff!

      --
      Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
  5. "How did it get there . . . ?" by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That's not the important question. The interesting question is, "Where is it going . . . ?" I don't think HP's senior management can answer that question.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:"How did it get there . . . ?" by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 2

      The interesting question is, "Where is it going . . . ?"

      Unless they turn things around, they're going down the shitter. It's really a shame too. There was a time when I wouldn't hesitate to purchase their products. For a very long time, I wouldn't think of purchasing a printer from another company. But that time is long past.

    2. Re:"How did it get there . . . ?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same boat as you. At this point, I don't know what I would do even with a free HP server. I've struggled for years with their awful ILO management tool and it just never gets any better.

    3. Re:"How did it get there . . . ?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's what happens when you lose/fire all those pesky engineers you built up over the years. You know, the ones who were loyal, passionate and knowledgeable, and actually made your product. Lose them and all you have is a management husk, a marketing team, and a bit of residual goodwill to burn.

      One day I hope that the various management fads will recognise that you can't just pick these people up on contract whenever it is convenient, or find them by outsourcing to India via 10 layers of indirection. They *are* your company.

    4. Re:"How did it get there . . . ?" by triffid_98 · · Score: 1

      For a very long time, I wouldn't think of purchasing a printer from another company. But that time is long past.

      Indeed. My HP 4M+ (circa 1994) is still giving my IBM Model M (circa 1984) and my Tektronix 465B (circa 1980) a run for their money...unfortunately that ship has long since sailed.

    5. Re:"How did it get there . . . ?" by swb · · Score: 1

      Their corporate x86 server support was really good in the 1990s.

      I can remember a problematic Netserver LX Pro which had some strange problem that we knew ultimately had to be hardware based because we had 5 of them running identical Netware installs, and only one of them had this problem.

      We had 4 hour support and had a field engineer on site with a trolley full of spare parts on a Sunday night who was able to diagnose and replace the parts pretty quickly.

      Getting that kind of support now out of anyone else would be impossible. You'd end up with some 23 year old gamer with no clue on how to diagnose the problem, only after hours of telephone troubleshooting designed to be a "How can we not replace parts?" obstacle course.

      The good news is that hardware is better and infrastructure virtualization lets you route around problems, but the support is nowhere near as good.

    6. Re:"How did it get there . . . ?" by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      "Where is it going . . . ?" I don't think HP's senior management can answer that question.

      Sadly, I have mostly concluded that an alarming amount of large corporations have senior management who mostly don't have a clue.

      Especially in companies who have grown through acquisition, there seems to be a lot of gaps between what the CEO thinks exists, and what actually exists. They just end up mismanaging a bunch of units which at one point were pretty good, but have been pretty much wrecked by lousy management.

      I've maintained for years mergers and acquisitions really only make short term profits, but in the long-term destroys good technologies and organizations by screwing up what was good about them in the first place.

      That, and the fact that the sales people take the commission money and run like hell, and nobody ever checks if the the lies they sold don't cause a mess in the long run ... how many of us have seen stuff which the sales weasels pitched, and which cost 3-4x to deliver and support? Often companies don't seem to know just how bad the disconnect is between sales and reality. The same goes for 'executive compensation', it's not tied to any long-term results, just the stock price this quarter.

      The bigger the corporation, often the less clue management actually has.

      I'm betting years of bad decisions has left HP (and other companies) with so many pieces and parts they haven't got the slightest idea of how to run it all.

      Then all you end up with is a bunch of demoralized people who have been so badly mismanaged there's simply no way to fix it. And that isn't the fault of those divisions, it's the fault of terrible management in the first place.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    7. Re:"How did it get there . . . ?" by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      Their corporate x86 server support was really good in the 1990s.

      Indeed it was. And the hardware from that period was solid as well. In fact I retired one of their servers from the mid nineties a year or two ago that I re-purposed for a firewall. While it was low power compared to a modern system, it took up too much space and was power hungry compared to a firewall in a box.Even so, I had 12 years up-time on it at one point. The only reason I powered it down was to replace a fan with a loud bearing. I also cleaned the inch or so of dust that had accumulated on all of the horizontal surfaces too.

    8. Re:"How did it get there . . . ?" by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      HP 4M+ is a great printer. Unfortunately isn't very manageable with its JAVA interface. The fact that they need to be firewalled should say enough.

      You might want to update your windows 98 To something more modern while you're at it. ;)

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    9. Re:"How did it get there . . . ?" by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      I have mostly concluded that an alarming amount of large corporations have senior management who mostly don't have a clue.

      They aren't supposed to have a clue about actually running a business. They are supposed to have a clue about having a personality and able to raise funds and schmooze other CEO types.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    10. Re:"How did it get there . . . ?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a very long time, I wouldn't think of purchasing a printer from another company. But that time is long past.

      Indeed. My HP 4M+ (circa 1994) is still giving my IBM Model M (circa 1984) and my Tektronix 465B (circa 1980) a run for their money...unfortunately that ship has long since sailed.

      The biggest problem I ever had with the 4's was the stupid output roller, with age it'd start 'accordion feeding' the pages and jam. Usually you could just clean up the rollers though and it'd be fine - 10 minutes and a phillips screwdriver, and even if you wound up replacing the roller assembly it was about the same 10 mins. The II/III and 'p' series of the same were fairly easy too, and the same as the Laserwriters of the day from Apple, so easy to keep a few parts on hand (fuser, rollers, etc). I still have a 4M here at home that got 'tossed' because they didn't want to pay for a fuser, runs like a champ ~20yrs later.

    11. Re:"How did it get there . . . ?" by triffid_98 · · Score: 1

      You might want to update your windows 98 To something more modern while you're at it. ;)

      Windows 98? DOS 1.x FTW. Fortunately you can still get parallel and PS/2 ports on modern PC's. I don't know for how much longer though.

      (I still have one of those Compaq 'Portables' I pull out every so often just for grins)

  6. Ericsson? by sirwired · · Score: 1

    HP doesn't own Ericsson, nor do they have any relationship with them other than an IT outsourcing contract. Maybe you are thinking of Sony, which merged their handset business with Ericssons?

  7. changing times my ass by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 5, Interesting

    By all accounts things only started to go south when Bill and Dave left and were replaced by a series of bean counters with no sense for what gives a tech company positive buzz and positive sales growth. Carly being example 1. Meg being example 2.

    1. Re:changing times my ass by LordRPI · · Score: 1

      And they keep saying women have a tough time in tech

    2. Re:changing times my ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Carly is despised in Corvallis Oregon(a town of Democrats) for what she did to HP. This isn't a partisan issue moron.

    3. Re:changing times my ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't agree. Meg is doing a very good job.

      HP is simply a place where the upper managers are idiots pretending to be passionate. Everyone from line managers and upward, are rewarded for the wrong things. Everyone is told that they need to be inspiring... and the customer is completely forgotten about.

    4. Re:changing times my ass by sconeu · · Score: 1

      And for what she did to Lucent.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    5. Re:changing times my ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not true. John Young was an electrical engineer and Lew Platt was a mechanical engineer, and both rose through the ranks. They carried on the HP Way when each was CEO. If anything, Platt was considered too caring by investors. This is the primary reason the board went outside the company for his successor, they wanted somebody who could be aggressive and change the company culture to be more responsive to the markets.

      After Platt, all the HP CEOs have been bean counters, with educations in business and careers in sales or finance.

    6. Re:changing times my ass by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Growth without focus.

      HP allowed Woz to sell the Apple computer. Some think that HP should be kicking themselves, they were in the opportunity to lead the home PC revolution. However the consumer market wasn't HP focus. If they were to go with the personal computer chances are they would have failed at it, because that wasn't their market. They wouldn't have been able to sell small quantities like they did with the Apple I, as well offer the right amount of personal marking touch that only Jobs can do.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    7. Re:changing times my ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Exactly how? By judging them on the same criteria as other CEOs?

      Welcome to equality. These are the standards men have been judged by, and it's high time women got a taste.

    8. Re:changing times my ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "HP is simply a place where the upper managers are idiots pretending to be passionate. Everyone from line managers and upward, are rewarded for the wrong things. Everyone is told that they need to be inspiring... and the customer is completely forgotten about."

      About a year ago I quit HP because I lost faith and respect in the account management responsible for data center operations for a large client. (The dregs of an old EDS account). The account team nurtured a culture of systemic bureaucracy and lost customer focus. Although HP was contracted to migrate and manage thousands of systems, sometimes the situation was the client was dictating technical decisions, although they had no clue. A sad state of affairs.

    9. Re:changing times my ass by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      your first line contradicts your second line.

      who comes up with the reward schemes.. heck, basically that is the only job the ceo has now in a big enough company. thats how the steering is done.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    10. Re:changing times my ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The CEO is responsible for defining the culture of a company, so judging by your observation of that culture, no, she isn't doing a good job.

    11. Re:changing times my ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are an idiot. Instead of parroting inane slogans, try to actually think.

    12. Re:changing times my ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Platt was a *mechanical* engineer and I doubt he EVER did real engineering. At least not of the type relevant at HP: designing circuits, debugging complex code, getting a manufacturing process running, building custom systems for large corporations and the like.

      He was a clueless MBA carrer-o-crat and a beancounter. H and P drank the MBA cool aid and forgot to train their proper replacements.

    13. Re:changing times my ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly by "Bill and Dave left" is actually "when Bill and Dave died". I was at HP still when Dave's death was announced and within a year or two things started to change. Bill died in 2001 and that's when the rape and pillage of the company began in earnest.

  8. Agilent is original HP by evanh · · Score: 1

    And there is also the Avago spin-off. How many other splits has HP gone through?

    1. Re:Agilent is original HP by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      The spinoff from Agilent, Keysight is the current test and measurement business.

  9. You mean 3 companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    HP sold off the original HP as Agilent.

    1. Re:You mean 3 companies by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      I count 4

      HP Inc.
      HP Enterprise
      Agilent
      Keysight

      I'm sure there are others I'm not aware of.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    2. Re:You mean 3 companies by c4757p · · Score: 1

      Yup, Avago as well.

    3. Re:You mean 3 companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So they're another SCO then.

  10. Simple.... by BenJeremy · · Score: 1

    It got here because Meg wanted to spin EDS back off.

    Or course, this brilliant move is from the idiots who kept calling the original HP garage a "two car garage" every couple of days, while featuring a picture of that garage, which was clearly only big enough for one car.

    1. Re:Simple.... by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 1

      If they let enough people go from HP and outsource everything else to India because of the merger, sooner or later HP head offices will be able to fit in that two-door garage again.

      --
      READY.
      PRINT ""+-0
  11. It's three companies, or did we forget Agilent? by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1
    Agilent was the core of HP's technology prowess back in the day. The part of HP that became Agilent was the part of HP that was the original and great HP.

    .
    Once Agilent was split off, HP started its downward spiral.

    1. Re:It's three companies, or did we forget Agilent? by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      Agilent splt from hp in 99 and was its own company nothing to do with HP, Agilent then split off all its electronic test equipment to form keysight, yet another separate company, while Agilent pretty much does nothing as what they do provide is a decade out of date and a decade ahead on price

  12. HP sucks, will fold by 2020 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I called this a long time ago.
    Carly Fiorina ruined HP.

    1. Re:HP sucks, will fold by 2020 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You shouldn't have posted Anonymously, I would've given you points. The last HP PC I bought in 1998 had multiple video crashes daily, everyone that bought that model had the same problem. HP help forums said try the memory IC upgrade ($90), reinstall the OS, use an HP monitor ($385) do this, do that, it still was a pile of shit. Never bought another. Switched to ShuttlePC with Linux and have been using those for decades.

    2. Re:HP sucks, will fold by 2020 by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Meg Whitman!

  13. But what about HP-UX? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm less interested in the past. I'm far more interested in the future.

    What does this mean for HP-UX? That's what I am interested in knowing!

    Will we see a future open source release of HP-UX, perhaps? Will we see HP-UX return to the former glory it once had?

    1. Re:But what about HP-UX? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      What does this mean for HP-UX?

      I want to know what it means for my TI-83.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:But what about HP-UX? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What glory?

    3. Re: But what about HP-UX? by DaMattster · · Score: 1

      I don't think HP-UX will be open sourced. HP Enterprise will want to sell support services for it.

    4. Re:But what about HP-UX? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does this mean for HP-UX?

      I want to know what it means for my TI-83.

      Did HP buy Texas Instruments?

    5. Re:But what about HP-UX? by spauldo · · Score: 1

      Will we see a future open source release of HP-UX, perhaps?

      Doubtful. It'd take a team of software experts and lawyers a lot of time to verify HP's ownership of any source code that was released.

      Sure, Sun did it with Solaris, but Sun has always been a lot friendlier with open source than HP and already had some large open source products out there (Java, for instance, and OpenOffice).

      I haven't done a lot of work with HP-UX - just some support stuff. Is there anything there that's worth bothering with?

      --
      Those who can't do, teach. Those who can't teach either, do tech support.
    6. Re: But what about HP-UX? by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 1

      HP still sells HPUX and doesn't promote Linux.

      HP is a Microsoft shop internally, and in the enterprise they'll recommend HPUX before they recommend Linux.
      Also, there are many paranoid customers who "don't want free software because it is crap"

      Also there are a lot of big businesses still running HPUX on it's specific hardware, and all that is going to need support going forward.
      HPUX is still alive and kicking due to HP putting it in there and is now entrenched in customer businesses and hideously costly to remove.
      HP will support Linux if they can get paid for it, but I imagine the margins on entrenching HPUX in places instead of Linux wins them lots of money supporting it and the proprietary hardware that it runs on.

      --
      READY.
      PRINT ""+-0
    7. Re: But what about HP-UX? by nullchar · · Score: 1

      I haven't used HP-UX in years, but in the late 90s it was super stable, including X11 and all programs I used. It had an alternate compiler to gcc which was great for learning C.

      The included gnu tools were always behind those in Linux distros (like grep color, tar options, etc), and the same might happen today. But there are dedicated users of every OS, similar to declining spoken languages, so some people must enjoy certain features of HP-UX and would like it to live and even grow.

    8. Re: But what about HP-UX? by Dog-Cow · · Score: 0

      Also, there are many paranoid customers who "don't want free software because it is crap"

      The 1990s called, and they want their stupidity back.

      Seriously, man. Every serious organization from Ford Motor to the NSA and NASA have been using Linux for a decade or more. Get out of you mother's fucking basement.

    9. Re: But what about HP-UX? by TWX · · Score: 1

      That's because they weren't actually GNU tools. They were the UNIX tools on which the GNU tools were based.

      Upside of HPUX, it's stable and its development is very tightly controlled.

      Downside of HPUX, it is very slow to adopt new technologies or even basic improvements, and the hardware that it runs on is extremely limited.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    10. Re: But what about HP-UX? by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 1

      Hard to believe, but yes, there are muppets out there who don't want to run "free software"

      --
      READY.
      PRINT ""+-0
    11. Re: But what about HP-UX? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, there are many paranoid customers who "don't want free software because it is crap"

      The 1990s called, and they want their stupidity back.

      Seriously, man. Every serious organization from Ford Motor to the NSA and NASA have been using Linux for a decade or more. Get out of you mother's fucking basement.

      Hmm.. you could use that same argument for a LOT of things. Windows, Solaris, AIX, whatever, and it does't mean that software is particularly _wanted_, or isn't crap for that matter.

      I want any datacenter OS as much as I want car insurance, for one thing. Free software is like that in-law that offers to help too much, which is GREAT until something goes wrong and everything gets awkward because you can't just pay them to step their game up, and you really can't ask for more. You just wish they'd told you to go to a professional in the first place so you wouldn't have to hurt anyone's feelings.

    12. Re: But what about HP-UX? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and a few years ago, we bought a new server and installed Windows Server on it to do nothing other than hold a RADIUS server (Windows Server included server, not a real one). I had requested a different one, but the IT manager wouldn't buy software from a company called "Funk", and then I suggested a free one, and "If it's free, it can't be good" was the response. But I think it was more of "nobody got fired for using MS."

    13. Re: But what about HP-UX? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Actually, you *can* pay them to step-up their game... Companies pay all the time. Hell, they pay their own employees to work on the kernel. It's not even all that uncommon. I've had companies approach me to write custom plug-ins for a forum software that I use - and I'm quite happily retired. If you want something, pay for it indeed and you can pay for support for open source content. The best part is that it is open source - you can pay anyone you damned well please.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    14. Re: But what about HP-UX? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It was the preferred platform for enterprisey stuff like SAP and Oracle back then.

      Now you can get them for Linux is there any compelling reason to stay with it?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    15. Re: But what about HP-UX? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean hp48gx? Or the 50g? The 50g has been cancelled

    16. Re:But what about HP-UX? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does this mean for HP-UX?

      I want to know what it means for my TI-83.

      Basically, you'll get HP for your TI and UX for your 83.

      Which means that the hyphens in both names are no longer necessary; that's where the cost savings come in with this split.

    17. Re: But what about HP-UX? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      meanwhile google builds an empire on free software...
      whateva peeps are stupid..

    18. Re: But what about HP-UX? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the scripting and coding and little bits of glue it took 30 years of your IT departments handiwork to get a workable, if not 100% stable system?

      That's the only reason any of these ancient monoliths are still around at all. Addiction by any other name...

    19. Re: But what about HP-UX? by quetwo · · Score: 1

      But where is "Free or Open Source" software on the magic quadrant? For some odd reason C-level people love those charts and believe everything Forrester feeds them.

    20. Re: But what about HP-UX? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's still super stable and rarely if ever crashes.

      That's why places that run HP-UX still run it. So that the phone never rings on nights and weekends.

    21. Re: But what about HP-UX? by Agripa · · Score: 1

      The 50g has been cancelled

      It has? They are still selling them. Maybe I need to buy a spare while I can.

    22. Re: But what about HP-UX? by Last+Warrior · · Score: 1

      HPE is not a Microsoft shop. Perhaps in some other division.
      Source: I am an HP Employee. (HP Enterprise)

    23. Re: But what about HP-UX? by nikkipolya · · Score: 1

      Personally I found Solaris to be more stable than HP-UX. Solaris too came along with its own tools, like their forte compilers. Anyways, now all of that is history.
      Smart phones and tablets are replacing desktop computers and cloud is replacing servers. HP is almost non-existent in those 2 markets.

  14. Didn't Agilent split up, too? by Ihlosi · · Score: 1

    Keysight Technologies?

    1. Re:Didn't Agilent split up, too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Verigy, though I can't recall what happened to that one.

  15. That would be 3 by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

    Seeing as they spun off the test instrument business (The part of HP many people really liked) as Agilent in 99

    Maybe the should sell/spinoff the calculator division to Agilent and re-name it HP-Classic.

  16. of course it is two companies by steak · · Score: 1

    H and P

  17. The name HP doesn't mean what you think it means. by leftover · · Score: 1

    This, exactly. Silly Valley and the business press blundered along with the charade that the sad dregs left after Agilent split off were in any way related to the real HP.

    Yes Carly made things even worse (and of course she would be disastrous as POTUS) but all she had left to work with was bullshit and hubris.

    --
    Bent, folded, spindled, and mutilated.
  18. the usual way by NostalgiaForInfinity · · Score: 1

    Mitosis.

  19. Take some risks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not solve some problems that no one else has been able to solve?
    -Keyboard/mouse interface alternatives for wearable computing
    -Something something artificial intelligence
    -Something something quantum computing

    They should go back to thinking about things from a "DARPA Hard"/"Moonshot thinking" perspective instead of being another "me too" corporation chasing wearables/"mobile"/tablets/cloud services/3d printers(-WTF were they thinking BTW? Talk about late to your own party!)/etc.

    These fads are all obviously saturated and a company of HPs size can't survive as a "me too". They either distinguish themselves in a new market or decline. This is why Amazon/Google/Apple are so determined to be the "first to market" on everything Media Retail 2.0. The "Desktop Publishing" fad has come and gone leaving HP overly invested in an out of fashion Ink cartel.

    Google and Microsoft(to some extent Apple and Amazon) are already in the race on artificial intelligence... is HP? Why not?

    Maybe HP just needs to give up on consumer products in general and focus on biomedical/impantables. If they "disrupted" the prosthetics/human augmentation/trans-humanism scene that could be their competitive edge.

    Instead: their risk-adverse CEO(s) will continue to lead the company in aimless directions with no convictions as they continue to lose talent until they get bought up by TI or some similar company looking to expand in to servers(for god knows what reason).

    Of all tech companies: I think NVIDIA is the one demonstrating the most "vision" right now.

    1. Re:Take some risks? by nikkipolya · · Score: 1

      That CEO fired HP's R&D department during the 2001 recession because she thought that the R&D department was non-profitable!! And so HP had no choice but to become a "me too" organization.

  20. HP - Aglient - Keysight by labnet · · Score: 1

    Remember that HP (The real HP that made electronic test equipment) was spun off into Agilent which was recently spun off again into Keysight Technoogies.

    (2009)
    HP -> HP (Computers, Printers etc)
    -> Agilent (Life Sciences, Electronic Test)

    (2014)
    Agilent -> Agilent (Life Sciences etc)
    -> Keysight Technologies (Electronic Test)

    So when you talk to engineers about HP, we think Agilent and now Keysight as having the original DNA of HP

    --
    46137
    1. Re:HP - Aglient - Keysight by klui · · Score: 1

      Agilent was spun off in 1999.

  21. The names? by XB-70 · · Score: 1

    HP is now H ... and ... P ??

    --
    *** Don't be dull.***
  22. Worst CEOs ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HPs list of CEOs since 2000 looks like a clown parade compared to other companies.

    Although Fiorina started the downward spiral, and Meg sealed the fate, Apotheker made the biggest blunder of them all. Marks sexual harassment should of course not go unnoticed either.

    1. Re:Worst CEOs ever by Thunderf00t · · Score: 1

      Agreed about Leo.

      I still use the Touchpad that I got when HP had their fire sale. The sad thing is, it's still pretty good, and could have been a unique and compelling entry in the tablet market before they decided to kill it. Granted, I don't know what HP's costs were, but, at the time it was released, the Touchpad, along with HP's phone, was well-regarded, and, I think, could have gone on to be a strong player. Just seems like a wasted opportunity and premature write-off... one of Leo's many blunders that not even Carly can approach.

      --
      We will never be the change to the weather and the sea
  23. Carly Fiorina managed to suck $100M out of HP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a zombie company, run by people who want to drain its lifeblood for their own personal gain.

    Not one person who ran HP in recent years gave a shit about HPs long term future.

    1. Re:Carly Fiorina managed to suck $100M out of HP by hambone142 · · Score: 1

      Loot and scoot CEOs.

      If they paid as much effort inventing products as they did with acquisitions and "splits" it would be a successful company.

      It's only the name of a once great company now.

      Its soul has been removed.

      Such a sad thing to witness. I keep hoping the ghosts of Hewlett and Packard will return to smite the assholes that have filed through it's corporate doors whilst stuffing their pockets full.

    2. Re:Carly Fiorina managed to suck $100M out of HP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Loot and scoot CEOs.

      If you don't want that kind of CEO, don't give them that kind of contract, then. If you want long-term success, tie the bonuses to long-term success. Not short-term! Perhaps you won't get the same people that way - but that is actually a good thing.

  24. Worst CEOs ever by stseathser · · Score: 1

    HP's list of CEOs since 2000 looks like a clown parade compared to other companies. Although Fiorina started the downward spiral, and Meg sealed the fate, Apotheker made the biggest blunder of them all. Marks sexual harassment should of course not go unnoticed either.

  25. Carly... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Why the long face?

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  26. No, it's now FOUR companies by 14erCleaner · · Score: 1

    HP, the upcoming new one, Agilent, and Keysight.

    --
    Have you read my blog lately?
  27. Don't worry - it'll survive... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Afaik, it's the ONLY Operating System that has "verified design" status (could be wrong, mind's a junkyard of trivia in computing) & not many, IF ANY OTHERS, have that status.

    * It's thus MORE than worthy intellectual property so they'd more than likely always have a buyer for it IF necessary... imo @ least.

    Personally, I think this 'downturn' in PC sales is not only due to the economy sagging, but also the fact MANY FOLKS are aware of how to pop together computers & their constituent component parts - so more folks do what bikers do, & "build their own harley from the ground up" - it's a different generation out there now who for @ least 25++ yrs. or so have grown up around these things & are not 'scared they will break them' anymore OR get electrocuted etc. is why!

    APK

    P.S.=> - feel free to correct me where & if I am incorrect... apk

    1. Re:Don't worry - it'll survive... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lick some more balls apk

    2. Re: Don't worry - it'll survive... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a pretty bizzare suggestion...

      That the downturn is even partly caused by more people building their own computers.

      If anything that market is shrinking, and there are relatively fewer people building their own rigs than there used to be.

      Why? Because unless you're part of the tiny (relative to the overall market) group of people who gladly invest thousands of dollars in "their rig", there aren't really any reasons to build your own desktop computer.

      People used to build for mainly two reasons: Price and performance.

      1: Price.
      In today's market (where laptops are the majority) the margins are so thin for manufacturers, that consumers won't save much by building their own system.

      Unless the machine they're looking to build is in the bottom or top 10% in terms of performance/price, they're probably likely to LOSE money by building it themselves.

      2: Performance.
      This was the other reason why people put together their own desktops. 15-20 years ago or so, mainstream computers were so starved for performance, that anything extra you were able to squeeze out of the hardware was well worth it. Every 60 or 100 MHz improvement made a tangible difference. By choosing the right motherboard, cooler and CPU enthusiasts could put together a 1200 MHz computer for the price of a 1000 MHz Dell. And those extra 200 MHz could really be felt.

      Today? We're long past the point where computers are more than fast enough for everyday use. The only people who really need more performance are gamers and professionals, and even for them performance improvements have mostly plateaued.

      For everybody else, especially for the vast majority who only use their computers for websurfing, watching a movie now and then, and office work/email, even a low end Atom/Braswell CPU is plenty fast enough.

      Even IF you'd be able to extract an extra 10-20% percent performance by building a desktop yourself, which isn't realistic, considering how performance have plateaued, what's the point? A file opening a tenth of a second faster? That's beyond the limits of human perception anyways.

      Which is why people don't bother building their own desktop systems anymore. There's no point and only little money to save. (Unless you're the kind of gamer who'll happily invest 2-3000$ in a system that can run games at 4K resolution.)

    3. Re:Don't worry - it'll survive... apk by KGIII · · Score: 1

      It looks like several have been 'verified' (assuming this is what you mean) since 2011.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      I've only seen PikeOS in the wild - that I know of. I may well have interfaced with others but not known it. Contrary to popular belief, I do not, in fact, dig into the guts of everything. It is possible that I have not noticed any encounters.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    4. Re: Don't worry - it'll survive... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he means in the context of Evaluation Assurance Levels under Common Criteria. However, the EAL system is laregely done away with in favor of the more practical Protection Profile system. Hardly any vendor ever got evaluated above an EAL 4 under the old system, which was "methodically designed, tested and reviewed." Formal design review and testing are at EAL7. If HP-UX had done that in the past, good for them, but that was for a specific version for a period of two years anyway.

      Point being, the NSA has poured enough reaources into Linux development over the years to show that an EAL7 on an old version of HP-UX isn't going to save it from the rubbish heap with the only type of organization who cares about an EAL7. That and the fact that the IAD runs NIAP, which is the US CC validation scheme and therefor is part of getting away from EAL also.

  28. I tried to give them money 3 times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No wonder they are in decline. I tried three times the other day to buy a computer from them. The first time when I submitted my order, the website told me it couldn't process my purchase, please try back later. When I tried again, it froze up with an infinitely spinning gif saying it was processing, but after several minutes of waiting it became clear that it wasn't still processing. I thought the third time was a charm because they processed my order, reserved the funds on my credit card with a pending charge, and emailed me a confirmation. Then the next day I received an email telling me that they had declined my order (no reason given), and informed me that I would not be charged, but the pending charge would remain on my card until the bank cleared it in several days. I called to find out why they cancelled the order, and of course talked to someone who had a really thick foreign accent. Apparently the automatic system couldn't process it, but if I still wanted the computer they could try to process it manually. Two days later I have received no confirmation of my call, no confirmation that they were going to process the order manually, nor any notice of them cancelling it again. I may or may not have a computer being charged to my credit card and may or may not have a computer being shipped to me. I'm guessing probably not, but don't want to order from somewhere else and get surprised by an extra computer that I didn't think was coming.

    1. Re:I tried to give them money 3 times by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Companies are really missing the true hidden cost of offshoring labor. It appears in the near term to be cheaper, but they ignore all of the hidden costs like customer loyalty, customer experience, service quality, build quality, etc. It actually costs MORE to offshore when you factor in all of these costs.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    2. Re:I tried to give them money 3 times by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Yes, 10 years down the line the company goes to shit. Carly, Hurd, Apotheker, Dunn, Meg... they don't care, they got the business to not crash and burn on their watch so they're "successful" and got the bonuses when they left.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  29. Jew summary. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Hollywood wanted a script about the inexorable decline of a corporate icon, it might look to Hewlett-Packard for inspiration.

    Ok so Hollywood inspiration.

    that make HP more than a victim of changing times.

    The victims.

    https://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=HPQ
    https://www.sec.gov/answers/qadded.htm

    They have been not-the-best-choice for a long time already. They are kind of like corn flakes. Money trap investment at best, selling electronic basics for whatever margins they can get off of chinese imports. Also, knowing that Windows is looking permanently stupid right now, trying something different is sink or swim.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HP-UX
    ^looking very weak now. Linux is already the norm in cyberspace.

    https://www.vox.com/2015/9/19/9356637/carly-fiorina-iran-hp-printers
    Whatever about Carly blahblah blah that was a long time ago. Obviously zero chance of being Commander in Chief of the world's foremost military superpower in the history of Earth.

    I agree with this AC http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=8260393&cid=50844043

  30. The Good Parts of HP have been gone for years. by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The good parts of HP have been gone for a long time.

    The Corvalis Group was pretty much just dismantled.

    The Instruments group became Agilent.

    The part that is left is a bunch of ink grifters in the printing division and a bunch of shitty clone sellers in the computer division.

    It's not at all the same company that it was. And it has nothing to do with Carly, she only became CEO years after the decline. The Cold War killed HP. They couldn't continue to sell instruments and equipment to the Military at sky-high prices, the business they were doing in the 60's became comodified. The back labs at HP filled up with boomers who though they could ride the gravy train to retirement but it wasn't going to happen.

    1. Re:The Good Parts of HP have been gone for years. by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 3, Informative

      > They couldn't continue to sell instruments and equipment to the Military at sky-high prices, the business they were doing in the 60's became comodified

      They also sold to coporate customers, who discovered that instead of paying thousands for an oscilloscope, they could pay hundreds for a plug-in digital board with far less precision and frequency range, but they _did not care_. HP disdained to enter the low-end instrument market, and couldn't maintain the formerly very high revenue stream as modern A/D converters improved. They could have continued in a much more modest way: few modern technicians understand that _the oscilloscope probe _matters_ and needs to be taken into account very differently at different fruquency ranges in your measurements, and the old HP instruments took their tuning for accuracy _seriously_ to preserve precision. Now? Good luck finding that switching power supply harmonic creeping its way into your motherboard and causing errors because some cheap vendor discarded the small, extra ceramic capacitors to save price and board space on their latest design.

    2. Re: The Good Parts of HP have been gone for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      35 years in electronics.
      My preferences:
      Instruments HP-Agilent-Keysight
      Scopes Tektronix
      DMM Fluke

      Anyone else?

    3. Re:The Good Parts of HP have been gone for years. by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 2

      I'll just fire up my Tek 7603 'scope with the differential comparator plugin to find that harmonic. I don't have a matched set of probes so won't get 100 dB of common mode rejection, but it'll do the job.

      I never really liked the old HP analog scopes. I thought Tek made a far batter line.

    4. Re: The Good Parts of HP have been gone for years. by serbanp · · Score: 1

      Nope, that pretty much seals it. The new Tek scopes are crappy, though

    5. Re:The Good Parts of HP have been gone for years. by Agripa · · Score: 1

      As much as I like the 7A13 and 7603, a 7L5 or 7L14 with a 7613 and home made sniffer probe would probably be a better choice.

    6. Re: The Good Parts of HP have been gone for years. by Agripa · · Score: 1

      I would settle for one of their lower end MSO/DPO/MDO oscilloscopes but forget the high end like the MSO/DPO5000 which runs Windows 7. At least when I evaluated it, it had all kind of problems.

    7. Re: The Good Parts of HP have been gone for years. by serbanp · · Score: 1

      yeah, some of their more recent scopes are damn weird: the DPO5000 series has a counter-intuitive interface (crappy touch screen, many functions are accessible only by mouse), while a MSO4000 we bought does not accept standard "smart" probes (which the TDS4000 models support), a downright sleazy move as nowhere was this "small" detail mentioned beforehand.

      The older stuff is more intuitive, compatible across series and very reliable.

    8. Re: The Good Parts of HP have been gone for years. by Agripa · · Score: 1

      That *is* odd.

      One of the problems I had with the MSO5000 is that when the instrument is tilted back allowing easier access to the controls and placement of the keyboard and mouse, torque on the larger probe bodies causes them to separate from the probe interface causing all kinds of problems including crashes. That might work if the retention mechanism of the probe interface was better but with all of that plastic, it is not mechanically sound.

  31. They should call one of them Compaq! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would be a great name for a PC company...

  32. A quck guide by plopez · · Score: 2

    HP Inc. - printer, consumer electronics and low end servers. Basically unraveling the Compaq deal.
    HP Ent - disk arrays, high end servers, Open VMS (and therefore a lineage to DEC), Open Stack, Saas, and services. Services was once EDS and management is slowly and quietly putting a knife to it, thereby unraveling another deal made by Carly and the clowns.
    Agilent - split into Avago and Keysight.

    As far as services goes, other companies are having problems with a dying service part of the business. Probably due to the cloud convincing people they do not need IT services. That includes Oracle and IBM.

    So when you discuss HP please specify.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    1. Re:A quck guide by plopez · · Score: 1

      oops said that wrong Agilent split but is still around.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    2. Re:A quck guide by tibit · · Score: 1

      Who gets to keep their switches product lines? I kinda like them, and they are an excellent value on the used market.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    3. Re:A quck guide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IBM and HP services are just so stupid expensive for what they offer...

    4. Re:A quck guide by plopez · · Score: 1

      Enterprise.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  33. Decline of a corporate icon by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    Even worst example of decline of a corporate icon: Digital. Once suppier of leading technologies such as the Alpha CPU, it was bought by a PC maker, Compaq. And Compaq merged with HP. Oh, wait...

  34. Three companies? by seven+of+five · · Score: 1

    They spun off Agilent in 2002.

  35. Missed Opportunities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HP's had some great stuff in their day, but for all the able management they used to have, they also had their share of myopia, missing out on the birth of the consumer PC and other developments. Reminds me a lot of Ken Olsen's DEC in that regard. HP may be destined to be a takeover target/subsidiary of Apple or some other sugar daddy, have the marrow of its IP sucked out and tossed aside like so many other former greats.

  36. Don't you mean... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Very similar to our current president.

    Don't you mean our previous president? Oh, wait, Cheney didn't actually let Bush control things until he and his cronies had f*cked things beyond recognition. Say what you want about Obama, he's fresh air and sunshine compared to Cheney/Bush. Before W., no deficit, great economy, no Iraq war. After W., record deficit, tax-payer bank bailouts, job losses, total Iraq quagmire. And one other thing, like Fiorina, Bush was a business failure (excepting only as managing general partner of a baseball team) before the GOP came calling. With Fiorina, the GOP is following the exact same playbook.

    1. Re:Don't you mean... by hackwrench · · Score: 2

      I have a hypothesis that goes for any president and "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" backs me up.

    2. Re:Don't you mean... by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      I have a hypothesis that goes for any president and "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" backs me up.

      And I agree with it. Basically, the less that the president, or congress is able to get done, the better it is for all of us citizens.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    3. Re:Don't you mean... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The only reason Bush did any good at the Rangers is that daddy helped push for the new taxpayer funded stadium. Bush was brought in for political weight for the stadium, and was there for that and not much else. He did good, but not because he did anything, other than ask daddy for help.

    4. Re:Don't you mean... by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      Actually, if I recall correctly, the point Adams made was that anyone who is the sort of person capable of getting himself elected to office should, under no circumstances, be trusted or allowed to do the job.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    5. Re:Don't you mean... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a hypothesis that goes for any president and "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" backs me up.

      And I agree with it. Basically, the less that the president, or congress is able to get done, the better it is for all of us citizens.

      No, I think your own opinion wrt government may have altered your perception of what was being said.

      The HHGG has this quote wrt President:

      “Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job.”

      but it also says

      The President is always a controversial choice, always an infuriating but fascinating character. His job is not to wield power but to draw attention away from it.

      which seems more likely to be the hypothesis mentioned above, given the context.

      Either way, I think we can all agree that the HHGG gets pretty much everything right.

      I gave up panicking years ago - just because it didn't seem to help.

  37. Umm, not exactly by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "HP fell victim to huge shifts in the computer industry...."

    No, not really.

    What they fell victim to was Carly Fiorina, who skillfully drove a once-vibrant company into the ground and then walked away with millions, laughing at the suckers who got laid off as a result of her ham-handed management.

    It's no secret what ruined HP, and the thing that ruined HP is now running for president of the country. Fortunately she has ZERO chance of ever sitting in the White House, but it's an insult to everyone that this greedy, viscous bitch would dare to present herself as a viable candidate for the most powerful office in the land.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    1. Re:Umm, not exactly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      viscous misandristic bitch..

      There, FTFY.

    2. Re:Umm, not exactly by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      insult to everyone that this greedy, viscous bitch would dare to present herself as a viable candidate for the most powerful office in the land.

      You talking about Carly or Hillary? Seriously I can't tell the difference.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    3. Re:Umm, not exactly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      greedy, thick, sticky consistency bitch?

      Perhaps you meant vicious?

    4. Re:Umm, not exactly by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      You talking about Carly or Hillary? Seriously I can't tell the difference.

      In a practical sense, there is virtually no difference. There just wear different brands, but underneath they're nearly identical in ideology and sense of purpose. Hillary is a Republican in virtually every way, indistinguishable except for which side of the aisle she sits on.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    5. Re:Umm, not exactly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She is running for VP and there is a good chance she'll get it to attract women voters.

    6. Re:Umm, not exactly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both think being a girl qualifies for a leader's job. They are power hungry and use the fitting communist ideology in order to satisfy their hunger.

  38. The title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It could be called "Bungled"

  39. Carly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And some people want Carly for president?

    1. Re:Carly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same people who voted for Sarah Palin.

  40. Oh look by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like Pavlov ringing his bell, a bunch of Hillary lovers saw the headline and went straight to bashing Carly Fiorina. Hello, Hillary lovers.

  41. HPs failure summarized by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 4, Insightful

    HP went to hell in a basket because the board of directors keeps hiring McKinsey style business idiots to run the company. As a result, they by or merge with company after company and with the exception of their 20 year forey into the memristor which even today has yet to happen, they have absolutely no concept of innovation or market leadership. They for lack of a better term are a huge beige box vendor which tries to beige box everything they touch.

    I think the biggest and most impressive effort they've made in a really long time to be part of something bigger was the Itanium processor project with Intel. But sadly, whether it was them, Intel or both, Itanium failed because developers couldn't afford to get one.

    If you look closely at the list of CEOs that HP has had over the past 15 years, every one of them is someone that loves the word "synergize" and was hired by the board of directors to increase the value of their shares with absolutely no respect for the company itself. They probably all hang out on yachts filled with hookers talking about how great HP is without having the first clue as to what HP actually makes.

  42. No product by countach · · Score: 1

    HP hasn't had interesting product in living memory. The closest they came was buying WebOS and making a tablet, but they couldn't even follow through on that one. I'm not sure there was a future in that anyway, but at least if they'd followed through it would be something to move forward with.

    1. Re:No product by Thumper_SVX · · Score: 3, Interesting

      HP hasn't had interesting product in living memory. The closest they came was buying WebOS and making a tablet, but they couldn't even follow through on that one. I'm not sure there was a future in that anyway, but at least if they'd followed through it would be something to move forward with.

      True on the consumer side, but on the enterprise/datacenter side they were producing some pretty interesting products in the last few years that were horribly marketed and/or sold. My personal favourite was the HP Moonshot which was a hyper-converged blade architecture and potentially one of the most interesting things in large-scale computing in years. However, it was hobbled by terrible marketing, and requiring you to have the solution architected (at your cost, mind) by HP's techs rather than allowing you to just buy the chassis and blades. I went through that process and it was such a pain in the ass that we ended up buying Cisco UCS (which was its own set of pains in the ass I won't get into).

      I think they did ease up that requirement for architecture, but I know myself and a lot of other people were really put off by the sales technique; like they were saying we were too dumb to know our own workload requirements and therefore they wanted to charge us for their service folks times to come architect it for us. They were acting like they had no competitor... and in that sort of density they sort of didn't when it was first unveiled. But tech moves quickly, and at the time it was felt that the kind of density Moonshot was offering was a nice to have and not a necessity, so most savvy IT managers and admins went with UCS or Dell's M1000e, and later started looking at platforms like Nutanix and Simplivity for the same workloads.

  43. Not easy by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Face it, it's not easy to run a tech company. Things always change in unpredictable ways. If it were easy, everybody would do it. Apple is one of the few strong survivors of time, and they've had lean times also.

    Apple's success is a narrow focus, being cutting edge, and making hardware relatively simple to use.

    I've used both iPhone and Android, and iPhone overall has a more polished, intuitive and integrated user interface for most every-day tasks. It ain't perfect, but does more things cleaner, at least for the bread-and-butter tools.

  44. Not confined to HP unfortunately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes well it seems to be happening (or happened) to many a good engieering company.

    I still like their servers.

  45. HP, no surprise by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 1

    HP = Has Problem HP = Hardly Perfect HP = Horrendous Products HP = Horse Puckey

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
  46. Screw HP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When HP refused to upgrade its driver for one of its printers so that it would work on my new version of Windows, I said screw you, HP, I'll never again buy one of your products. So I bought a Canon printer and yelled "SCREW YOU, HP" in the general direction of HP's grave.

  47. Yes, that's exactly what I meant... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: I haven't paid attention to these types of things in many years because they change so fast & so much.

    Another one I used to pay a bit of attention to was Orange Book ratings (C2, etc.) & that iirc, has also been replaced.

    * Once they get "replaced", I pretty much stop paying attention... what's the point then, you know?

    (Then the "new hotness" will be replaced by "another new hotness" & another, ad infinitum...)

    APK

    P.S.=> When standardized ratings get replaced by "new standardized ratings" there's no consistency & it's been YEARS since I looked into it - & what do I see (much as with the orange book ratings?): Yet another rating system - "will wonders NEVER cease"... apk

  48. Two words Carly. Fiorina. by WOOFYGOOFY · · Score: 1

    "HP Is Now Two Companies. How Did It Get Here?"

    Two words: Carly Fiorina.

    I know people throw around the term psychopath in connection with CEO character a lot but in this case, she absolutely ticks off the boxes, including :

    PATHOLOGICAL LYING

    Carly Fiorina Makes a Lot of Stuff Up About Everything

    http://www.motherjones.com/pol...

    CONNING AND MANIPULATIVENESS

    "..the thing that comes through clearest is this almost, if we werenâ(TM)t on TV, Iâ(TM)d say almost psychopathic denial of reality. As you saw, even the creators of that hoax Planned Parenthood video, that even they say that this is not the footage that she says it isâ¦when she was national finance chairman for McCain, she was jousting with him, what his positions are on contraceptives, trying to contradict him in real time. It was very bizarre.

    Or saying that he is not equipped to be the CEO of a corporation, but he could be the commander in chief while sheâ(TM)s helping to run his campaign, and then denying she said it when it was on tapes everywhere.

    This is like, she stomps her feet and demands that black is white, hot is cold, and rich is poor and wins are losses.â

    âoeâ¦Many great leaders failed. but their resilience came from exoneration or contrition. She just stomps her feet and demands redemption. You have to earn redemption.â

    http://www.mediaite.com/tv/is-...

    LACK OF REMORSE OR GUILT

    Wallace: âoeWhat about the 30,000 American jobs that you laid off?â

    Fiorina: âoeYou know, every family and every business in California knows what it means to go through tough times. And every family is cutting back, and every business is laying off right now. I donâ(TM)t say that with delight. I say that with sorrow. But yes, it is true that jobs are being taken out of California. By the way, China fights harder for our jobs than we do.

    http://www.mediaite.com/tv/is-...

    SHALLOW AFFECT / CALLOUSNESS / LACK OF EMPATHY

    As CEO of Hewlett-Packard, Carly Fiorina laid off 18,000 workers. When reflecting on her tenure, she admitted she wished she had "done them all faster."
    Fiorina Fired At Least 18,000 HP Employees

    POOR BEHAVIORAL CONTROLS / IMPULSIVITY

    According to those who work with her, she has a barely stifled impulsivity towards make deeply personal and alienating remarks to others, and for no real reason :

    She once ridiculed the music interests and appearance of a dissenting board member Walter Hewitt, son of HPâ(TM)s co-founderâ"as well as the allegedly dowdy look of rival Senate candidate Barbara Boxer.

    Read more: http://www.politico.com/magazi...

    a trait she *barely* has under control as evidenced by this live mic "accident" .

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    IRRESPONSIBILITY

    "....She makes irresponsible decisions. At HP, Fiorina abruptly pivoted from a strategy of chasing IT services to a splashier, but less sound strategy of ramping up in device manufacturing.

    While her predecessor, revered HP CEO Lew Platt, traveled coach in commercial planes, she demanded the company buy her a Gulfstream IV. More recently, her service on the Taiwan Semiconductor board indicates continued irresponsibility. Financial disclosures at the time Fiorina left the board in 2009 show that she attended just 17 percent of the companyâ(TM)s board meetings."

  49. Why the Compaq bashing? by stereoroid · · Score: 1

    The acquisition might have been a problem financially, but it brought a lot of good people in to HP, including many DEC veterans from Compaq's takeover of them. In the past I've seen HP staffers confuse bad corporate policy with bad people or bad technology.

    HP's Server business was a joke before they acquired the Proliant line, and their Storage business model was to resell Hitachi. If HP is an Enterprise player at all today, it;s thanks to Compaq (and, by extension, DEC).

    --
    (this is not a .sig)
  50. Calculator metaphor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the 1990s every engineering student bought an HP 48. Finance students owned an HP 12.
    Ten years later, you couldn't find an HP calculator on campus.

    Somewhere in between is the second story of HP. Just as stellar as the first story of HP.

  51. "IBM Envy" by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Wanted to be the largest PC hardware company just as the mobile wave was hitting. IBM sould their PC hardware to Lenevo in time.

    Wanted to be a services company, buying up DEC and EDS. I havent heard how that half is faring. They get the brunt of layoffs.

  52. Private Dell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it's less about shifts in the industry and more that publicly-traded companies are forced into certain behaviors. Publicly-traded companies have to please a mob of investors. Some people use bad news (and possibly help spread it) to short a stock. Others are always chasing the hype train.

    I think a lot of investors are leeches. They wouldn't know a good idea if it hit them like a freight train. (If anyone gives you a line about investors being logical, just look up any time the words "stock market" and "panic" appear.)

    Going private may allow Dell to focus on its core competencies and not act like a crazy person.

  53. Two companies? by plcurechax · · Score: 1

    I think you mean four companies.

    Hewlett-Packard -- whatever they are spinning off into -- maybe computers and printers/ink
    Agilent Technology (life science)
    Keysight (electronics test equipment)

  54. NOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Certainly HPUX has never been validated at EAL7. Because that would imply mathematical correctness proofs of EVERYTHING. This is already hard to do for a few thousands line of code. L4 might qualify for this, but just the kernel !

    HPUX is a buggy crappile like Linux and Windows and MacOS. HPUX Ping of Death for starters.

    But if you do not connect it to the internet, it is quite ok and stable... Like all the other major crappiles we call operating systems.

    Wanna know the essentials ? youtube for the NSA technical director who spills the beans.

  55. Indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fat, middle aged, bald, white, male engineer knew his shit and designed electronics in an honest way. Then came the progressive folks who wanted GIRL AT ALL COST.

    Now, we have Girly HP tech, while all the evil white guys are now at places like Google and run circles around the communist girls who hijacked HP.

  56. Booohooo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "we are discriminated when we fuck up a wonderful corporation which was invented by these evil, evil, white men !!!!" Boooohhooo.

    FUCK THAT. Become Kindergardeners and do not fuck up our activities. Thank you very much, commies and commie-femi-Nazis.

  57. BULL-MBA-EXCREMENT ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Real entrepreneuers like Ellison, Hewlett and the Google Boys KNOW THEIR TECHNOLOGY SHIT. Yeah, I am shouting, because it is important. They are not beancounters, they invest in things which they understand and care about. Something which they think about for hours and days in lots of dimensions, only one of which is $$$. Compare that to the MBA, who can think in one dimension mostly.

  58. Who's going to make the Prime? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which division gets the Prime? Wish Agilent (now Keysight) had gotten the rights. Maybe they'd keep it up to day.

  59. It's what I said (Orange Book 'verified design') by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Class A1: Verified design: Systems in class A1 are functionally equivalent to those in class B3 in that no additional architectural features or policy requirements are added. The distinguishing feature of systems in this class is the analysis derived from formal design specification and verification techniques and the resulting high degree of assurance that the TCB is correctly implemented. This assurance is developmental in nature, starting with a formal model of the security policy and a formal top-level specification (FTLS) of the design. In keeping with the extensive design and development analysis of the TCB required of systems in class A1, more stringent configuration management is required and procedures are established for securely distributing the system to sites. A system security administrator is supported."

    FROM -> http://book.soundonair.ru/hall...

    It's older "Orange Book" ratings as I mention in the next link below, since I know that Windows NT received C2 ratings from that very source!

    So, like I said in the next link - these 'ratings' change & I haven't paid attention to them for these reasons in ages -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... & thus, ORIGINALLY, I WAS RIGHT ON THE SOURCE "Orange Book" earlier

    (... Too much 'trivia' in my brain is all... personally, I largely think they're bullshit cuz there's SO many diff. ones now, I could care less - especially 'outta the box' MINUS hand-done security hardening yourself...)

    APK

    P.S.=> There's a LOT more backing it too if you wish to see it, here -> http://www.bing.com/search?q=%... ... apk

  60. Dunno..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've had two HP PCs, both of outstanding quality, no problems whatsoever. I've given them away when they've gotten old, and they still work perfectly for their new owners, after all these years. Great stuff.

    I certainly hope that HP survives.

    PS. I've never owned Compaq. Only HP Pavillions.