You don't dogfight with an F-35. You send up your F-15-22 for the dogfight, and your F-35 to "first strike". So the dogfighters fight the air battle while the F-35 avoids the battle and takes out the ground radar and support aircraft for the other side. When you have AWACS and nobody else does, you have an advantage for your F-15s.
Of course, if they claimed they'd only be used for limited air to ground strikes of strategic importance, they'd never get funding, so they cure cancer. Anyone who isn't brain dead or a Congressman (oops, I repeat myself), knows that it's lies for funding. The "all-rounder" has one and only one function. A stealth strike bombing-like function in a fighter worst-of-all-worlds expensive and delicate aircraft. For what it'll be used for, we'd have been much better off with something else. But that wouldn't make L-M Billions.
No STOVL is VTOL? But all VTOL are STOVL? That can only be true if there are no STOVL.
The more likely explanation is that there's not a clear agreement on the definitions, so it's STOVL by all definitions, even if not VTOL by all definitions.
An injunction doesn't physically stop you. It just provides legal penalties. But if you had no ability to control the release, and the deadman was set before the injunction, you could prove innocence.
And emigration isn't hard, or leaving you in places you don't want to be. Plenty of places are better than the US. And the way US corporations work, if you contact a US company with something, they'll get a US injunction against you. Yes, if they were to file it where you are, then it'd be more effective. But the way it works, it's better/easier to file in the US only, then sue the non-US citizen for actions taken outside the US.
So your assertion is that the only way to defend a trademark is to "fight" it with takedowns for anything and everything? That would make you one of the idiots I was talking about.
I was at a large telco that has a pattern of hire-layoff cycles. One layoff cycle, it was a big one, with changes and such, and they asked for volunteers. More people volunteered than they had reductions. They let all those go who wanted. The next layoff time, anyone who asked about volunteering wasn't laid off. The idea was that anyone who wanted to leave, shouldn't be eligible for the layoff package. If you want to go, quit. If you want to stay, we'll fire you.
I got laid off a few rounds after that, not a bad thing.
Nope. The two numbers that matter for the calculations are total weight and Cg. Both can be assessed by on-plane measurements at the landing gear, or scales in/on the ground. Rotational inertia and other things would matter at the precise distribution of weight, but that has no effect on level flight (and minimal on the maneuvering), and level flight is the key thing they are trying to optimize.
As other mentioned, the reason they're seeing this issue is the trend towards smaller seats and stuffing in more passengers to fill them.
The practice has *always* been to weigh and balance the plane. I've been on 737 in the US where the crew moved the passengers, based on cargo and uneven passenger loading. They have *always* done weight calculations. It's just that the margin of error and estimates make them mostly moot. But they are calculated for every fligth (unless you are Aaliyah, or any of the many celebrities who died in a knowingly overloaded plane, though they likely did the calculations, but still flew knowing it was overloaded).
NDA is usually between groups sharing trade secrets. NDA would be a NDC, not an NDA for an employee. You wouldn't have a stand-alone Non-Disclosure Agreement, but a Non-Disclosure Clause in the Employment Agreement.
I came here to say this. I've seen people fired for less. Any "on the record" statement of any kind is a fireable offense for most places. Some explicitly, some implicitly.
I'm not asking anything of religion. Just pointing out a gap and seeing if it's as obvious to others as it seemed to me.
The Son is God. God is all knowing. The Son doesn't know when Armageddon is. I don't care if it doesn't make sense. Just making sure my understanding is correct (or if not correct, at least logical).
If the Son of God is God, how can the Son not know?
That seems to break the Trinity.
What's funny is that nearly every generation has thought theirs to be the last for millenia. The disciples thought the second-coming would be within their life times. Repeat for another 100 generations.
More recently, people thought the world would end through nukes, AI, global warming, disasters, zombies, or any of a variety of other things. But every generation hates their kids and every generation thinks they are last.
Still, not impossible. How do you know if the site you are going to has Google analytics built in? Cookies and webhosts tracking their usage with Google can reveal a lot more than the "just don't use them" crowd gives them credit for.
There is no end to the new games. What's the "end" to the village builder games? Every building? Every building at max level? Full resource stores? There are so many "ends" that a 3rd party can't easily analyze it.
And the pay to win games can be won without spending anything. So long as someone defines "win" before you start playing.
The drone wasn't close because the optic required it to survey a house, but that it's better to be closer for the hi-res pics of the people. And it couldn't have been high up, as it was hit by a shotgun, and many witnesses (not just the shooter) identify it as being close to the ground.
I've not seen any account where anyone involved indicated a threat with a shotgun when the drone owner showed up. At that point, the shot gun was elsewhere, and the homeowner had a Glock on him. It was a pistol that the homeowner (and droneowner) claim was at that confrontation.
When your facts are so easily contradicted, it doesn't speak well for the rest of your argument.
Nothing in the article indicated the shooter was "surprised" for being arrested. But the article indicates the drone operator was shocked and upset that someone took actions against his drone.
Your math is wrong. You assume Bmr is a constant. But it's a variable. Your Bmr changes with what you eat and what you do.
Some examples based in diet research:
Sitting for a full day will burn 0 calories, but 10 calories worth of walking will burn 1000 calories. Eating 10 calories of pure sugar will burn 10 calories in increased metabolism, but cause the Bmr to decrease 30 minutes later for a 2 hour period, decreasing total calorie burn by 100 calories.
The only people who simplify it to the level you have are the ones that want to blame "willpower" for a physiological problem.
Your equation doesn't work. The assumption of a Bmr is not based in science, but in assumptions and "common sense" that is applied to blame fat people for being fat.
Snowden released 3rd party materials that are true, and unbiased. This stunt was scripted propaganda released by someone who was involved in the making of it and deliberately created it themselves. That's not an independent 3rd party release, but a 1st party propaganda piece.
Are you really so personally invested in hate of groups you don't like that you can't see any difference?
Slashdot Mirror
You don't dogfight with an F-35. You send up your F-15-22 for the dogfight, and your F-35 to "first strike". So the dogfighters fight the air battle while the F-35 avoids the battle and takes out the ground radar and support aircraft for the other side. When you have AWACS and nobody else does, you have an advantage for your F-15s.
Of course, if they claimed they'd only be used for limited air to ground strikes of strategic importance, they'd never get funding, so they cure cancer. Anyone who isn't brain dead or a Congressman (oops, I repeat myself), knows that it's lies for funding. The "all-rounder" has one and only one function. A stealth strike bombing-like function in a fighter worst-of-all-worlds expensive and delicate aircraft. For what it'll be used for, we'd have been much better off with something else. But that wouldn't make L-M Billions.
You could also, you know, employ fewer people.
No STOVL is VTOL? But all VTOL are STOVL? That can only be true if there are no STOVL.
The more likely explanation is that there's not a clear agreement on the definitions, so it's STOVL by all definitions, even if not VTOL by all definitions.
An injunction doesn't physically stop you. It just provides legal penalties. But if you had no ability to control the release, and the deadman was set before the injunction, you could prove innocence.
And emigration isn't hard, or leaving you in places you don't want to be. Plenty of places are better than the US. And the way US corporations work, if you contact a US company with something, they'll get a US injunction against you. Yes, if they were to file it where you are, then it'd be more effective. But the way it works, it's better/easier to file in the US only, then sue the non-US citizen for actions taken outside the US.
So your assertion is that the only way to defend a trademark is to "fight" it with takedowns for anything and everything? That would make you one of the idiots I was talking about.
Nope. Fired would get me paid 2 weeks. Laid off got me paid 2 months.
Insider trading information can't be shared within the company, either (except to designated insiders).
That's false. I'll agree many places operate that way, to keep liability lower, but that's a corporate policy, not law.
I was at a large telco that has a pattern of hire-layoff cycles. One layoff cycle, it was a big one, with changes and such, and they asked for volunteers. More people volunteered than they had reductions. They let all those go who wanted. The next layoff time, anyone who asked about volunteering wasn't laid off. The idea was that anyone who wanted to leave, shouldn't be eligible for the layoff package. If you want to go, quit. If you want to stay, we'll fire you.
I got laid off a few rounds after that, not a bad thing.
As other mentioned, the reason they're seeing this issue is the trend towards smaller seats and stuffing in more passengers to fill them.
The practice has *always* been to weigh and balance the plane. I've been on 737 in the US where the crew moved the passengers, based on cargo and uneven passenger loading. They have *always* done weight calculations. It's just that the margin of error and estimates make them mostly moot. But they are calculated for every fligth (unless you are Aaliyah, or any of the many celebrities who died in a knowingly overloaded plane, though they likely did the calculations, but still flew knowing it was overloaded).
: infringements must be fought in order to keep trademarks intact;
Nope. That's a misconception furthered by the markholders who are idiots, as being an idiot is easier than not.
NDA is usually between groups sharing trade secrets. NDA would be a NDC, not an NDA for an employee. You wouldn't have a stand-alone Non-Disclosure Agreement, but a Non-Disclosure Clause in the Employment Agreement.
I came here to say this. I've seen people fired for less. Any "on the record" statement of any kind is a fireable offense for most places. Some explicitly, some implicitly.
I'm not asking anything of religion. Just pointing out a gap and seeing if it's as obvious to others as it seemed to me.
The Son is God. God is all knowing. The Son doesn't know when Armageddon is. I don't care if it doesn't make sense. Just making sure my understanding is correct (or if not correct, at least logical).
If the Son of God is God, how can the Son not know?
That seems to break the Trinity.
What's funny is that nearly every generation has thought theirs to be the last for millenia. The disciples thought the second-coming would be within their life times. Repeat for another 100 generations.
More recently, people thought the world would end through nukes, AI, global warming, disasters, zombies, or any of a variety of other things. But every generation hates their kids and every generation thinks they are last.
Not if we put it on their left hand.
If they are a permanent resident elsewhere, the local benefits would kick in. So cut off the payments for "unearned" SS.
Still, not impossible. How do you know if the site you are going to has Google analytics built in? Cookies and webhosts tracking their usage with Google can reveal a lot more than the "just don't use them" crowd gives them credit for.
There is no end to the new games. What's the "end" to the village builder games? Every building? Every building at max level? Full resource stores? There are so many "ends" that a 3rd party can't easily analyze it.
And the pay to win games can be won without spending anything. So long as someone defines "win" before you start playing.
The drone wasn't close because the optic required it to survey a house, but that it's better to be closer for the hi-res pics of the people. And it couldn't have been high up, as it was hit by a shotgun, and many witnesses (not just the shooter) identify it as being close to the ground.
I've not seen any account where anyone involved indicated a threat with a shotgun when the drone owner showed up. At that point, the shot gun was elsewhere, and the homeowner had a Glock on him. It was a pistol that the homeowner (and droneowner) claim was at that confrontation.
When your facts are so easily contradicted, it doesn't speak well for the rest of your argument.
Nothing in the article indicated the shooter was "surprised" for being arrested. But the article indicates the drone operator was shocked and upset that someone took actions against his drone.
Your math is wrong. You assume Bmr is a constant. But it's a variable. Your Bmr changes with what you eat and what you do. Some examples based in diet research:
Sitting for a full day will burn 0 calories, but 10 calories worth of walking will burn 1000 calories.
Eating 10 calories of pure sugar will burn 10 calories in increased metabolism, but cause the Bmr to decrease 30 minutes later for a 2 hour period, decreasing total calorie burn by 100 calories.
The only people who simplify it to the level you have are the ones that want to blame "willpower" for a physiological problem.
Your equation doesn't work. The assumption of a Bmr is not based in science, but in assumptions and "common sense" that is applied to blame fat people for being fat.
That you appeal to emotion because the facts are against you?
Snowden released 3rd party materials that are true, and unbiased. This stunt was scripted propaganda released by someone who was involved in the making of it and deliberately created it themselves. That's not an independent 3rd party release, but a 1st party propaganda piece.
Are you really so personally invested in hate of groups you don't like that you can't see any difference?
And, from the "activists" I've known, they'd have welcomed criminal charges. They'd turn it into a media campaign. They want awareness of The Truth.
The anti-abortion group comitted fraud to get to the meeting, and in the meeting, and don't want The Truth, but they want propaganda.
There's a difference.