There is no genetic source to racism. There's a genetic source to preferring the familiar, but racism isn't genetic. Having traveled around the world, I've noticed that racism is different in different places. It's all bigotry, but some places it's much more nationalistic (England) or religious (southern Western Europe), and in the US it's racism. But they are all bigotry, and not always what is labeled "racism" based on race. It's the genetic "familiar good, different bad" instinct that's bread into us. "Familiar is defined by our family and friends, not genetics. Racism isn't genetic.
When everyone counts "infant mortality" different, then the numbers aren't comparable. They are all true, but all measuring different things. You also (stupidly) presume only governments can officiate/sanction something. So when you figure out what "official" and "comparable" are, feel free to try again. And try to respond to what I write, not what you (mistakenly) think I mean.
So international law has settled a corporation-state attacking a small country? I thought the rules were all based on country vs country, not company vs country. If Sony can take and hold North Korea, who's to say they can't? If a tin pot dictator does it, it's an internal matter that international law doesn't mess with.
"One less problem" is correct, as idioms can violate grammar rules and still be correct. You must really hate the song "I got one less problem without you."
South Korea is a rich country. They can afford their own defense, but its convenient for them for Uncle Sam to pick up the tab. I have stood on the North side of the DMZ and it is clear that the US is just a thorn in the situation making everybody tense.
Part of the point is that North Korea can't "invade" South Korea, but could destroy it. The US is there to enforce MAD. If NK attacks SK, SK will lose, but so will NK. That is the point. It's like a nuclear deterrent.
My facts are correct. The AC said that the cops need to kill more Black people to even up the numbers. Looking at them a slightly different way, the Black people need to kill more cops.to even the numbers. If everyone stopped killing, then the numbers would be even as well, but that doesn't work for stats of previous periods of time.
The solution is to go to the UK model. No cops killing anyone (or was there one in Scotland, I can't tell from the sources I saw).
Could it just POSSIBLY be that blacks are far more likely than whites to be engaged in street activities that are begging to attract police attention?
Nope. Every study I've seen done on it indicates that two people with a clean background check, one white and one black are both equally likely to offend, and that applies across all types of offending (violent, felony, non-violent). The issue is that Black people are more likely to be harshly punished for any act, leading to higher recividism. But I've never seen a study that shows a black person with no record is more likely to offend than a white person of the same SES level. If you've seen one, I'd love to see it.
The studies indicate that recividism is higher in Blacks because they perceive unfair treatment, and the studies detect unfair treatment.
And that, once confronted, just maybe they might be far more threatening - as in, likely to whip out a handgun or rush the officer?
Unrelated to the number of beatings/killings of unarmed people, who, by definition couldn't have pulled a gun on the cops.
On the other hand, every single one of the issues presented remains absolutely topical to this day. You take the afros and 60s cars out of that episode and it could have been made yesterday.
My experience is that this exists because the whites assert there is no racism, especially against those lazy, worthless Niggers. The system does hold down the Black man, and the system calls all Black people liars for thinking it does. When we admit our racism and embrace it (in an MLK way, not a Hitler way), then we'll be closer to moving away from being suck in the '60s race riots for another 200 years.
I know multiple people who claim to not be racist, but insist they wouldn't hire anyone who wasn't white. That kind of disconnect, insisting everything is right, while doing the opposite, is what causes frustration. If every Black person born tomorrow actually had all the same opportunities as white people, we wouldn't have any racism in a generation. But I know plenty of people who were pulled over for DWB. Even had it happen to me once, for driving a "bad" car in a nice neighborhood at night. Driving home from volunteering at a non-profit as a poor college student. "Your inspection sticker looked to be out of date". But it wasn't. And where he was, I don't think he could have even seen the sticker at all, let alone have any idea whether it was valid. The new Caddy in front didn't get pulled over, and the new Mazda behind me didn't get pulled over, and had the same exact sticker (I know because Mom owned the non-profit I was volunteering at, and was following me home). This was in a small town that has been sued for racism (rounding up brown people at bus stops and arresting them for loitering). I have no doubt he thought I didn't belong, and waved me on when he stopped me and established I was white and did look like everyone else. Young enough to be allowed a used car, and old enough to have a license. Move along, white boy, you are valid. But if I'd been black or otherwise didn't look as fit-in as he liked, I'm sure I'd have had harassed me more.
Fd @ 55 mph, or other set speed. The nice thing about Cd is that it's given as a constant (despite the fact it isn't). So one car will be 0.3 and the other will be 0.28. And you'll presume (usually correctly) that 0.28 will be better than 0.3 in all cases. The speed-based differences for roughly similar shapes is small enough that they can be discarded for most purposes. So Cd has a value. Two family sedans with similar size and shape are directly comparable through Cd, but a mini may have a worse Cd than a Prius, but may have less drag. Because if the cars aren't comparable in size, Cd is useless. Fd/v^2 would be ok, but confusing, so Fd@[speed] seems to be the most useful.
Reality, people say "looks fast" or "looks smooth".
Pause for just one second and it becomes clear that the mother's survival after childbirth is pretty damn important. Somebody has to care for the baby, feed the baby, teach the baby, protect the baby. Humans are not sharks, born fully-formed knowing everything they need and ready to fend for themselves.
So every time a baby is born, everyone else in the village dies?
Even your own theory is self-contradictory - if all that matters is childbirth, why would lactation reduce fertility?
Because getting the baby to self-sufficiency (or at least solid food) is necessary, and the calories for that decrease gestational efficiency. The single largest killer of women until the early 1900s was childbirth. Are you asserting that 100% of babies born to mothers that died out died? Because that would contradict your contradiction. Birth is more important than anything else, including the mother's life. Though a 1:1 reproduction rate with the mother dying every time wouldn't work for long.
You'd shit all over someone for such know-nothing pontification on a computer topic, so why do you indulge in it for a human biology topic?
Just because you know nothing of biology and tribal culture doesn't mean I can't know something on the topic.
Or because black people know that they are twice as likely to be shot than a white person, they shoot back. The unarmed dead blacks are because the cops shoot first many of the times.
That and when a cop is shot, the suspect is always black, until proven otherwise. Also, with only 46 cops shot dead, your numbers work out to 133 Black people killed by cops, and 19 cops killed by black people. So black people need to kill another 115 cops to cover the difference.
Realistically, if the car has been driving on auto with the passangers not paying constant attention (in which case, why do you have the auto controls? and people are really bad at paying constant attention to something that they can't control), do you really think that having someone grab for the wheel in an emergancy is going to do more good than harm? the big red panic button to stop the car is about all that is meanignful in any case.
The situation they require manual controls for is when you drive into a blizzard/flood, and the car drives until it's unsafe to stop and unsafe to continue. When you give the computer the choice between two bad things, something bad will happen. The regulators would rather that bad choice be in the hands of a human, when the "fix" is to work out as many "unsafe to continue, unsafe to stop" conditions, and improve stopping before them. It's not about the instant hand-over, but the impossible situation.
Cd isn't a useful measure. If you reduce the cross section, you lower drag. So you need to measure the total. The little squarer cars have a worse Cd, but better overall aerodynamics.
Because form follows function. It's more efficient to have the smallest car that meets the inside requirements (and all regulations). Why have a hood and a trunk if they aren't needed? So the Luddites feel more comfortable? Yes, you buy your cars based on how they make you feel, rather than how they work.
We've never measured life expectancy as a measure of life expectancy of a 5-year old. That would be a better measure. The reason the USA is now trailing in life expectancy is the high infant mortality rate. The life expectancy works if you are looking at population growth and birth rates, but doesn't work as a predictor of longevity.
That, and you gave no infant mortality rates, I don't think they are significantly different than 200 years ago, for which we had more reasonable records. But that childhood and such were so much more dangerous.
More blacks are killed in car crashes than murder. Why do you support execution by car crash, but not execution by blacks?
Your complaints are a non sequitur. So long as car crashes exist, one may not complain about the number of murdered blacks. Nope, I don't play by your twisted logic.
#1, ask hawkinspeter. He asserted it was the US. #2. The obvious motive, given the timing, is in response to the hack of Sony. Why would the US have done it, if not for Sony? #3 Attacking a soverign nation is war. Sony/Japan is irrelevant to that point.
There are more white people than black people in the USA. So there could be strong racism and your statement still be true. Also, how many were unarmed and under 20? That seems to be the sweet spot for killing black men.
So when does the US go to war to defend a Japanese company? The US won't defend Americans in the USA (how many unarmed black men were killed by cops this year? How many black men were lynched this year?), but will happily start a war to defend the Right of Japan to make profit in the USA.
Sharing ideas without inhibition is the reason that the napkins are used. It's only those who choose to inhibit themselves who need any chemical removal of inhibitions. If we actually brainstormed well, alcohol would be purely a detriment.
Slashdot Mirror
And I'm gonna need that guy's eye.
There is no genetic source to racism. There's a genetic source to preferring the familiar, but racism isn't genetic. Having traveled around the world, I've noticed that racism is different in different places. It's all bigotry, but some places it's much more nationalistic (England) or religious (southern Western Europe), and in the US it's racism. But they are all bigotry, and not always what is labeled "racism" based on race. It's the genetic "familiar good, different bad" instinct that's bread into us. "Familiar is defined by our family and friends, not genetics. Racism isn't genetic.
When everyone counts "infant mortality" different, then the numbers aren't comparable. They are all true, but all measuring different things. You also (stupidly) presume only governments can officiate/sanction something. So when you figure out what "official" and "comparable" are, feel free to try again. And try to respond to what I write, not what you (mistakenly) think I mean.
So international law has settled a corporation-state attacking a small country? I thought the rules were all based on country vs country, not company vs country. If Sony can take and hold North Korea, who's to say they can't? If a tin pot dictator does it, it's an internal matter that international law doesn't mess with.
DD-WRT is a router OS, so DD-OS is the desktop version, right?
"One less problem" is correct, as idioms can violate grammar rules and still be correct. You must really hate the song "I got one less problem without you."
South Korea is a rich country. They can afford their own defense, but its convenient for them for Uncle Sam to pick up the tab. I have stood on the North side of the DMZ and it is clear that the US is just a thorn in the situation making everybody tense.
Part of the point is that North Korea can't "invade" South Korea, but could destroy it. The US is there to enforce MAD. If NK attacks SK, SK will lose, but so will NK. That is the point. It's like a nuclear deterrent.
My facts are correct. The AC said that the cops need to kill more Black people to even up the numbers. Looking at them a slightly different way, the Black people need to kill more cops.to even the numbers. If everyone stopped killing, then the numbers would be even as well, but that doesn't work for stats of previous periods of time.
The solution is to go to the UK model. No cops killing anyone (or was there one in Scotland, I can't tell from the sources I saw).
Those are not official and aren't used to compare life expectancy between populations.
Could it just POSSIBLY be that blacks are far more likely than whites to be engaged in street activities that are begging to attract police attention?
Nope. Every study I've seen done on it indicates that two people with a clean background check, one white and one black are both equally likely to offend, and that applies across all types of offending (violent, felony, non-violent). The issue is that Black people are more likely to be harshly punished for any act, leading to higher recividism. But I've never seen a study that shows a black person with no record is more likely to offend than a white person of the same SES level. If you've seen one, I'd love to see it.
The studies indicate that recividism is higher in Blacks because they perceive unfair treatment, and the studies detect unfair treatment.
And that, once confronted, just maybe they might be far more threatening - as in, likely to whip out a handgun or rush the officer?
Unrelated to the number of beatings/killings of unarmed people, who, by definition couldn't have pulled a gun on the cops.
On the other hand, every single one of the issues presented remains absolutely topical to this day. You take the afros and 60s cars out of that episode and it could have been made yesterday.
My experience is that this exists because the whites assert there is no racism, especially against those lazy, worthless Niggers. The system does hold down the Black man, and the system calls all Black people liars for thinking it does. When we admit our racism and embrace it (in an MLK way, not a Hitler way), then we'll be closer to moving away from being suck in the '60s race riots for another 200 years.
I know multiple people who claim to not be racist, but insist they wouldn't hire anyone who wasn't white. That kind of disconnect, insisting everything is right, while doing the opposite, is what causes frustration. If every Black person born tomorrow actually had all the same opportunities as white people, we wouldn't have any racism in a generation. But I know plenty of people who were pulled over for DWB. Even had it happen to me once, for driving a "bad" car in a nice neighborhood at night. Driving home from volunteering at a non-profit as a poor college student. "Your inspection sticker looked to be out of date". But it wasn't. And where he was, I don't think he could have even seen the sticker at all, let alone have any idea whether it was valid. The new Caddy in front didn't get pulled over, and the new Mazda behind me didn't get pulled over, and had the same exact sticker (I know because Mom owned the non-profit I was volunteering at, and was following me home). This was in a small town that has been sued for racism (rounding up brown people at bus stops and arresting them for loitering). I have no doubt he thought I didn't belong, and waved me on when he stopped me and established I was white and did look like everyone else. Young enough to be allowed a used car, and old enough to have a license. Move along, white boy, you are valid. But if I'd been black or otherwise didn't look as fit-in as he liked, I'm sure I'd have had harassed me more.
Fd @ 55 mph, or other set speed. The nice thing about Cd is that it's given as a constant (despite the fact it isn't). So one car will be 0.3 and the other will be 0.28. And you'll presume (usually correctly) that 0.28 will be better than 0.3 in all cases. The speed-based differences for roughly similar shapes is small enough that they can be discarded for most purposes. So Cd has a value. Two family sedans with similar size and shape are directly comparable through Cd, but a mini may have a worse Cd than a Prius, but may have less drag. Because if the cars aren't comparable in size, Cd is useless. Fd/v^2 would be ok, but confusing, so Fd@[speed] seems to be the most useful.
Reality, people say "looks fast" or "looks smooth".
Pause for just one second and it becomes clear that the mother's survival after childbirth is pretty damn important. Somebody has to care for the baby, feed the baby, teach the baby, protect the baby. Humans are not sharks, born fully-formed knowing everything they need and ready to fend for themselves.
So every time a baby is born, everyone else in the village dies?
Even your own theory is self-contradictory - if all that matters is childbirth, why would lactation reduce fertility?
Because getting the baby to self-sufficiency (or at least solid food) is necessary, and the calories for that decrease gestational efficiency. The single largest killer of women until the early 1900s was childbirth. Are you asserting that 100% of babies born to mothers that died out died? Because that would contradict your contradiction. Birth is more important than anything else, including the mother's life. Though a 1:1 reproduction rate with the mother dying every time wouldn't work for long.
You'd shit all over someone for such know-nothing pontification on a computer topic, so why do you indulge in it for a human biology topic?
Just because you know nothing of biology and tribal culture doesn't mean I can't know something on the topic.
Or because black people know that they are twice as likely to be shot than a white person, they shoot back. The unarmed dead blacks are because the cops shoot first many of the times.
That and when a cop is shot, the suspect is always black, until proven otherwise. Also, with only 46 cops shot dead, your numbers work out to 133 Black people killed by cops, and 19 cops killed by black people. So black people need to kill another 115 cops to cover the difference.
Realistically, if the car has been driving on auto with the passangers not paying constant attention (in which case, why do you have the auto controls? and people are really bad at paying constant attention to something that they can't control), do you really think that having someone grab for the wheel in an emergancy is going to do more good than harm? the big red panic button to stop the car is about all that is meanignful in any case.
The situation they require manual controls for is when you drive into a blizzard/flood, and the car drives until it's unsafe to stop and unsafe to continue. When you give the computer the choice between two bad things, something bad will happen. The regulators would rather that bad choice be in the hands of a human, when the "fix" is to work out as many "unsafe to continue, unsafe to stop" conditions, and improve stopping before them. It's not about the instant hand-over, but the impossible situation.
They are "solved" better than a human. I don't know how good that is, as humans solving that problem fail rather regularly.
Cd isn't a useful measure. If you reduce the cross section, you lower drag. So you need to measure the total. The little squarer cars have a worse Cd, but better overall aerodynamics.
Because form follows function. It's more efficient to have the smallest car that meets the inside requirements (and all regulations). Why have a hood and a trunk if they aren't needed? So the Luddites feel more comfortable? Yes, you buy your cars based on how they make you feel, rather than how they work.
We've never measured life expectancy as a measure of life expectancy of a 5-year old. That would be a better measure. The reason the USA is now trailing in life expectancy is the high infant mortality rate. The life expectancy works if you are looking at population growth and birth rates, but doesn't work as a predictor of longevity.
That, and you gave no infant mortality rates, I don't think they are significantly different than 200 years ago, for which we had more reasonable records. But that childhood and such were so much more dangerous.
More blacks are killed in car crashes than murder. Why do you support execution by car crash, but not execution by blacks?
Your complaints are a non sequitur. So long as car crashes exist, one may not complain about the number of murdered blacks. Nope, I don't play by your twisted logic.
#1, ask hawkinspeter. He asserted it was the US.
#2. The obvious motive, given the timing, is in response to the hack of Sony. Why would the US have done it, if not for Sony?
#3 Attacking a soverign nation is war. Sony/Japan is irrelevant to that point.
There are more white people than black people in the USA. So there could be strong racism and your statement still be true. Also, how many were unarmed and under 20? That seems to be the sweet spot for killing black men.
So when does the US go to war to defend a Japanese company? The US won't defend Americans in the USA (how many unarmed black men were killed by cops this year? How many black men were lynched this year?), but will happily start a war to defend the Right of Japan to make profit in the USA.
Do not cross Caesar.
North Korea did it. Aren't they blamed for everything? They typo'd their own botnet, and accidentally DDoS'd their CnC, rather than their Sony target.
Sharing ideas without inhibition is the reason that the napkins are used. It's only those who choose to inhibit themselves who need any chemical removal of inhibitions. If we actually brainstormed well, alcohol would be purely a detriment.