IT will also be some time before a bicycle is capable of getting most people to and from work or to the nearest store with enough groceries to come back that will last through weather and other reasons you wouldn't necessarily be wanting to peddle a bike all over the place.
They are great when you are a kid and can take an hour to get across town or happen to be shoved onto some population center so dense you cannot pass gas without someone knowing it. But for the rest of the world, a bit impractical outside of leisure for the most part.
A lot of dealerships have their own buyer financing programs separated by little more than a name. Think along the lines of a buy here pay here dressed up a bit to resemble a real bank loan.
My current car is financed that way. Due to some screw ups in my credit, I was able to get a car loan a little cheaper in interest rates that way. The finance company is owned entirely by three different dealerships but is called something different and located in another state from those dealerships. I'm not aware of any other connections those three different dealerships have other than owning a finance company that they can use to sell cars to high risk people.
Well, not really. The first mistake is in assuming that everyone attending the conference is actually a master at security verses someone who is trying to network for whatever reasons or trying to just get more information about it to see if it is a direction he wants his career to go.
So to be more accurate, your statement should read a little more like this. "But right now we're criticizing them for practicing unsafe sex without ever asking or checking if they used a condom or even finding out if they have had sex before and we've based this all on "those other people had unsafe sex here years ago" in which case the "having sex" part may be the only reason some showed up.
Yep, it is on the credenza next to the statue of MLK when it got moved.. I'm told it an old man with a bit nose and other exaggerated facial features but I have never seen it personally.
I'm not sure if you are aware of this or not, but formatting a hard drive and reinstalling the operating system doesn't remove the information any better than simply deleting it. It's a zero sum gain unless you use a program to specifically write over the deleted or formatted information. There is no difference and it can be recovered easily in both cases (actually easier with a format because the file name isn't altered like when you delete a file).
There is generally both more time and input in reinstalling verses removing most infections with the exception of some rootkits. Every toolkit you need is mostly automated.
But it doesn't matter much anyways. This was a computer she wanted to safely _throw_away, not re-purpose for another user. This might be the slight difference in our line of thinking. If it was going to another user, I would probably use something like DBAN to somewhat securely erase the disk then a reinstall without worrying about the disinfection. It gets a bit tricky in what you do when windows is stored on a hidden partition verses having a cd to use if no one wants to spring for a refurbishment version of windows. But seeing how I was already tasked with removing the information, I already have access to anything on the system before any deletes or formating or anything. It's a trust issue I guess.
I hear this and laugh because of the unimaginative thinking required to believe it. We are a long way away from any scenario in which we have a resource problem or the destruction of natural environments and pollution become a problem. Technology increases at an alarming rate, today we are feeding far more people from a lot less land, we have pollution and environmental controls in place and are actively restoring parts of the environment damaged from ages past.
In short, your problem or concerns simply do not exist. We take steps when crap happens and reduce pollution, protect the environment, and maximize the use of resources including recycling them. It's been the natural order of society since the industrial revolution and any economically developed society practices it to some degree.
First, if you know what you are doing, wiping and reinstalling windows takes more time than cleaning an infested computer. But that wasn't the take you should have received from this. But what you should have taken away should be that someone was throwing the computer away because they didn't understand or comprehend the underlying issue with it and more or less thought it was worn out like a pair of socks that start getting holes in them.
As for no reward,. Some people like the challenge of cleaning the systems and some people like keeping them running. I have a couple systems that are more trouble than they are worth that have no practical application in today's environment but have fun messing with them.
I was just given an old computer to "remove anything that needs removed to make it safe to throw away". It was about 3 years old and had so many pop ups that they just purchased a new computer. I told them I could probably fix the pop ups if everything else worked ok. She said whatever, I can have it if I could fix it.
I started diving into this system thinking it would be infested with a bunch of malware, viruses and whatnot. Outside of tracking cookies, I couldn't find anything. The pop ups were to update java, their HP software for the printer they threw away when it stopped printing after 6 months of no use, some brother software saying there was updates and a bunch of notifications from games and other software saying there was updates available. She was using an older version of internet explorer which likely allowed a lot of pop ups when surfing the web. She essentially purchased another computer because she didn't understand crap needed updated from time to time or how to update it or that other web browsers exist without all the issues some have.
It isn't a high end computer but it isn't a bottom of the barrel system either. Its free outside of updating all the software and removing the preinstalled advertising crap that originally came with it so I have nothing to complain about. Just makes you wonder about what people are thinking.
Complicit in what crime? Anyways, ever heard of sovereign immunity? That is in essence the parent to any immunity real or perceived that the judge may have.
They probably changed the root password from GOD to superman or drowssap or something. You know it is solid now- because government learns from its mistakes.
That's fine and all but it doesn't change the facts. All it does is illustrate that there is law for you and them. Just like cops who speed down the road in their personal vehicles don't get a ticket- even when they are on their way home from a shift in which they just issued you a speeding ticket.
But there are sources out there that seem to disagree with Comey's interpretation of events. I found two that closely match hillary. It seems to be a biased site and your mileage may vary.
actually, no it does not. Look up strict liability for instance.
Another instance, you could borrow someone's car who failed to renew their vehicle registration. You get a ticket for driving on expired tags, no mens rea needed as the act of driving the car with expired registration is enough.
Hypocrisy- I don't think that word means what you think it means. Well that or there is a lot more to this story than what is printed on this page.
Even if we buy into the suggestion that the GP is a "lock her up" fan (there is evidence in word or text of law of wrong doing, Comey inserted a mens rea test into the application of a law which the law in question specifically avoids in order to say no charges are warranted because Hillary didn't mean to break the law. The only people not questioning that are Hillary supporters and never trump'rs) , I still don't see the hypocrisy here- or even a connection to the new AG or some Alt Right team member- whatever that is supposed to mean anyways.
Those of us with memories also know that Hillary as secretary of state took credit for parts of the Arab Spring and was trying to take credit for the Libya uprising until it went south. This was so prominent at her time in the State Department that Putin even accused her of interfering in Russian affairs and organizing protests after a parliament election.
If Russia was involved in the US election, it was likely retaliation for that. People who remember that don't worry that their involvement was to help trump but assume it was little more than to defeat Clinton who has been accused or similar crap.
No, someone doesn't need to be convicted to be pardoned. President Nixon was never convicted (or even impeached) and he received a pardon from President Ford over the Watergate charges after he resigned.
There is an implicit admission of guilt in accepting a pardon. But my understanding is that you really have no choice in the matter as once a pardon is issued, it is valid from the perspective of the government whether you accept it or not (they will no longer attempt to prosecute or detain/punish you for the crimes you were pardoned over).
If you know it was the other guy and not you, why are you dealing with depression and second guessing yourself still? Seems to me that you would or should have moved on and recovered or something by now.
I've had jobs where I had to deal with asshats. I was unhappy and probably depressed under a clinical definition. But all that changed when I changed jobs and didn't deal with assclowns. I actually enjoyed my job and was happy until they hired new bean counters and started scrutinizing everything which I left for yet another job.. I even had one job that turned around and was great after the asshat wrecked his car and took 4 months off to recover from life threatening injuries.
If you are letting someone who has no contact with you continue to influence your life or mental state, perhaps you need professional help or something. I just don't understand how it is possible.
Your order history - only Prime-eligible items. Amazon's Choice - Amazon's Choice items are highly rated, well-priced products that are available to order immediately. Prime-eligible items - including delivery by Prime Now for eligible items.
in an attempt to find/idntify what you ordered. If a dollhouse was on the Amazon's Choice list, it would have been ordered under this policy.
You need to do a little more than that to make it believable. Break into his car and look for hair strands around the seatbelt and head rest area. Or get into his bathroom and find a brush or comb they use- the trash can in there is a gross but good place to look also. Sprinkle a few strands of hair on the corpses. You could also follow them to a hair cut but make sure you pull the hair apart to make it appear it came out in a struggle and not just cut off. You also want to rig something they use to cause it to scratch them somehow. Taking a screw loose on a desk or something. After you notice the scratch or them bitching about it, collect the removed skill cells and try to stuff them under the fingernails of the victim.
Finally, you want to do something to make the person seem like he is loosing his marbles. Pay the local gang members to carjack him, shoot him up with heroin or some other street drug until he passes out, and leave him parked at a stop sign on a side street without taking anything from the car. Let him explain his DUI charge was someone else' fault.
That is because they purchase most of their military planes and parts and generally do not build them themselves (except one- T-35 PillÃn) . The USA manufactures the bulk of them with one version from Spain (the CASA C-212) and one from Canada (the DHC-6 Twin Otter).
This is not counting the surveillance drone made in Israel (the Hermes 900 Star) or the two trainer aircraft the Embraer EMB 314 Super Tucano made in Brazil and T-35 PillÃn made in Chili. Although the Embraer EMB 314 Super Tucano is capable of a light combat role.
However, even if that wasn't the case, some names, words, or terms used in industry or trade settle on a common name widely in use even though a local language may have a term similar enough to be used in its stead. Suppose there are 20 different terms for altitude and heading, instead of a commercial pilot learning 20 different languages, they just learn what is needed specific to flying like altitude and can understand flight control anywhere in the world even if they couldn't sit next to the guy at a bar and hold a conversation with them without a translator.
While I do not agree with your first argument as twitter is a private company/service that just happens to be popular, I couldn't agree more with your second argument.
Letting these idiots speak their mind is the only way to know who they are and it allows arguments other than name calling to show the errors of their ways. This may not influence them, but it sure as hell will influence those reading or listening to them. And if it doesn't, then we know who they are and can take steps if and when they get into any positions over others and act on that racism.
Racist views should be in the sunlight for everyone to understand their idiocy. Unfortunately, even a bling squirrel finds a nut but that is a price that needs to be paid.
There are two minimum wages. One is a minimum the government sets for all employees to be paid and the other is the market minimum in which must be paid to attract and keep employees working under the conditions presented.
The government minimum is largely static outside acts of government but the market minimum is largely moveable with unemployment. The easiest and best way to raise a minimum wage is to reduce unemployment and let the market for employees demand a higher wage. This is a problem however because the economy has crapped out so badly that fast food jobs are seen as careers now instead of first jobs and stepping stones on a path to bigger and better opportunities. The worst part of this problem is that instead of looking at the situation and saying we need more and better jobs, a lot of people are content outside of wanting to raise the pay for these menial jobs.
When I got my first legal job (other than mowing yards and crap), unemployment in my area was low. I started at minimum wage but quickly progressed above it. All I had to do was basically show up on time and put a bit of effort at doing the work. My second job, which hired me away from my first employer at a raise, I went the extra mile for them and did pretty much anything they asked to the best of my ability and my pay quickly reflected it too. I was making 13 dollars an hour rolling burritos and flipping steaks on a charbroiler in the mid 1990s. $13 an hour might not seem like much but according to an inflation calculator one dollar in 1995 had about the same purchasing power as $1.56 in 2016. So in contrast, think of it as being paid almost $20 per hour in today's world and the minimum wage at then was $4.25 an hour (it went up from $3.35 when I first started working a few years prior).
If employment was there, by necessity, the minimum wage an employer could pay to keep an employee would by higher than the minimum wage. Those fast food jobs would go back to first job experiences and as stepping stones for people to show they can show up to work and follow directions enough to be hired at someplace that pays more.
Slashdot Mirror
IT will also be some time before a bicycle is capable of getting most people to and from work or to the nearest store with enough groceries to come back that will last through weather and other reasons you wouldn't necessarily be wanting to peddle a bike all over the place.
They are great when you are a kid and can take an hour to get across town or happen to be shoved onto some population center so dense you cannot pass gas without someone knowing it. But for the rest of the world, a bit impractical outside of leisure for the most part.
A lot of dealerships have their own buyer financing programs separated by little more than a name. Think along the lines of a buy here pay here dressed up a bit to resemble a real bank loan.
My current car is financed that way. Due to some screw ups in my credit, I was able to get a car loan a little cheaper in interest rates that way. The finance company is owned entirely by three different dealerships but is called something different and located in another state from those dealerships. I'm not aware of any other connections those three different dealerships have other than owning a finance company that they can use to sell cars to high risk people.
Well, not really. The first mistake is in assuming that everyone attending the conference is actually a master at security verses someone who is trying to network for whatever reasons or trying to just get more information about it to see if it is a direction he wants his career to go.
So to be more accurate, your statement should read a little more like this. "But right now we're criticizing them for practicing unsafe sex without ever asking or checking if they used a condom or even finding out if they have had sex before and we've based this all on "those other people had unsafe sex here years ago" in which case the "having sex" part may be the only reason some showed up.
Yep, it is on the credenza next to the statue of MLK when it got moved.. I'm told it an old man with a bit nose and other exaggerated facial features but I have never seen it personally.
To throw it away or give it to someone you do not trust- yes. A full wipe is needed.
But you are missing the point. It didn't need thrown away, it needed user education.
I'm not sure if you are aware of this or not, but formatting a hard drive and reinstalling the operating system doesn't remove the information any better than simply deleting it. It's a zero sum gain unless you use a program to specifically write over the deleted or formatted information. There is no difference and it can be recovered easily in both cases (actually easier with a format because the file name isn't altered like when you delete a file).
There is generally both more time and input in reinstalling verses removing most infections with the exception of some rootkits. Every toolkit you need is mostly automated.
But it doesn't matter much anyways. This was a computer she wanted to safely _throw_away, not re-purpose for another user. This might be the slight difference in our line of thinking. If it was going to another user, I would probably use something like DBAN to somewhat securely erase the disk then a reinstall without worrying about the disinfection. It gets a bit tricky in what you do when windows is stored on a hidden partition verses having a cd to use if no one wants to spring for a refurbishment version of windows. But seeing how I was already tasked with removing the information, I already have access to anything on the system before any deletes or formating or anything. It's a trust issue I guess.
Hogwash.. Utter made up thinking.
I hear this and laugh because of the unimaginative thinking required to believe it. We are a long way away from any scenario in which we have a resource problem or the destruction of natural environments and pollution become a problem. Technology increases at an alarming rate, today we are feeding far more people from a lot less land, we have pollution and environmental controls in place and are actively restoring parts of the environment damaged from ages past.
In short, your problem or concerns simply do not exist. We take steps when crap happens and reduce pollution, protect the environment, and maximize the use of resources including recycling them. It's been the natural order of society since the industrial revolution and any economically developed society practices it to some degree.
First, if you know what you are doing, wiping and reinstalling windows takes more time than cleaning an infested computer. But that wasn't the take you should have received from this. But what you should have taken away should be that someone was throwing the computer away because they didn't understand or comprehend the underlying issue with it and more or less thought it was worn out like a pair of socks that start getting holes in them.
As for no reward,. Some people like the challenge of cleaning the systems and some people like keeping them running. I have a couple systems that are more trouble than they are worth that have no practical application in today's environment but have fun messing with them.
This is somewhat insanely true.
I was just given an old computer to "remove anything that needs removed to make it safe to throw away". It was about 3 years old and had so many pop ups that they just purchased a new computer. I told them I could probably fix the pop ups if everything else worked ok. She said whatever, I can have it if I could fix it.
I started diving into this system thinking it would be infested with a bunch of malware, viruses and whatnot. Outside of tracking cookies, I couldn't find anything. The pop ups were to update java, their HP software for the printer they threw away when it stopped printing after 6 months of no use, some brother software saying there was updates and a bunch of notifications from games and other software saying there was updates available. She was using an older version of internet explorer which likely allowed a lot of pop ups when surfing the web. She essentially purchased another computer because she didn't understand crap needed updated from time to time or how to update it or that other web browsers exist without all the issues some have.
It isn't a high end computer but it isn't a bottom of the barrel system either. Its free outside of updating all the software and removing the preinstalled advertising crap that originally came with it so I have nothing to complain about. Just makes you wonder about what people are thinking.
Complicit in what crime? Anyways, ever heard of sovereign immunity? That is in essence the parent to any immunity real or perceived that the judge may have.
Or tell them you believe it is part of the Non Disclosure Agreement so you cannot tell them about it.
They probably changed the root password from GOD to superman or drowssap or something. You know it is solid now- because government learns from its mistakes.
That's fine and all but it doesn't change the facts. All it does is illustrate that there is law for you and them. Just like cops who speed down the road in their personal vehicles don't get a ticket- even when they are on their way home from a shift in which they just issued you a speeding ticket.
But there are sources out there that seem to disagree with Comey's interpretation of events. I found two that closely match hillary. It seems to be a biased site and your mileage may vary.
http://www.thepoliticalinsider...
https://www.law.cornell.edu/us...
Check out section (d)
I guess congress is dumber than you or something.. More like something I would guess.
actually, no it does not. Look up strict liability for instance.
Another instance, you could borrow someone's car who failed to renew their vehicle registration. You get a ticket for driving on expired tags, no mens rea needed as the act of driving the car with expired registration is enough.
Hypocrisy- I don't think that word means what you think it means. Well that or there is a lot more to this story than what is printed on this page.
Even if we buy into the suggestion that the GP is a "lock her up" fan (there is evidence in word or text of law of wrong doing, Comey inserted a mens rea test into the application of a law which the law in question specifically avoids in order to say no charges are warranted because Hillary didn't mean to break the law. The only people not questioning that are Hillary supporters and never trump'rs) , I still don't see the hypocrisy here- or even a connection to the new AG or some Alt Right team member- whatever that is supposed to mean anyways.
Those of us with memories also know that Hillary as secretary of state took credit for parts of the Arab Spring and was trying to take credit for the Libya uprising until it went south. This was so prominent at her time in the State Department that Putin even accused her of interfering in Russian affairs and organizing protests after a parliament election.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12...
If Russia was involved in the US election, it was likely retaliation for that. People who remember that don't worry that their involvement was to help trump but assume it was little more than to defeat Clinton who has been accused or similar crap.
No, someone doesn't need to be convicted to be pardoned. President Nixon was never convicted (or even impeached) and he received a pardon from President Ford over the Watergate charges after he resigned.
There is an implicit admission of guilt in accepting a pardon. But my understanding is that you really have no choice in the matter as once a pardon is issued, it is valid from the perspective of the government whether you accept it or not (they will no longer attempt to prosecute or detain/punish you for the crimes you were pardoned over).
If you know it was the other guy and not you, why are you dealing with depression and second guessing yourself still? Seems to me that you would or should have moved on and recovered or something by now.
I've had jobs where I had to deal with asshats. I was unhappy and probably depressed under a clinical definition. But all that changed when I changed jobs and didn't deal with assclowns. I actually enjoyed my job and was happy until they hired new bean counters and started scrutinizing everything which I left for yet another job.. I even had one job that turned around and was great after the asshat wrecked his car and took 4 months off to recover from life threatening injuries.
If you are letting someone who has no contact with you continue to influence your life or mental state, perhaps you need professional help or something. I just don't understand how it is possible.
It's more like the little girl told the echo what it wanted for Christmas or something and the news caster paraphrased.
In case he wasn't though, Amazon's own voice ordering fact page says that when you attempt to order something it searches
in an attempt to find/idntify what you ordered. If a dollhouse was on the Amazon's Choice list, it would have been ordered under this policy.
You need to do a little more than that to make it believable. Break into his car and look for hair strands around the seatbelt and head rest area. Or get into his bathroom and find a brush or comb they use- the trash can in there is a gross but good place to look also. Sprinkle a few strands of hair on the corpses. You could also follow them to a hair cut but make sure you pull the hair apart to make it appear it came out in a struggle and not just cut off. You also want to rig something they use to cause it to scratch them somehow. Taking a screw loose on a desk or something. After you notice the scratch or them bitching about it, collect the removed skill cells and try to stuff them under the fingernails of the victim.
Finally, you want to do something to make the person seem like he is loosing his marbles. Pay the local gang members to carjack him, shoot him up with heroin or some other street drug until he passes out, and leave him parked at a stop sign on a side street without taking anything from the car. Let him explain his DUI charge was someone else' fault.
That is because they purchase most of their military planes and parts and generally do not build them themselves (except one- T-35 PillÃn) . The
USA manufactures the bulk of them with one version from Spain (the CASA C-212) and one from Canada (the DHC-6 Twin Otter).
This is not counting the surveillance drone made in Israel (the Hermes 900 Star) or the two trainer aircraft the Embraer EMB 314 Super Tucano made in Brazil and T-35 PillÃn made in Chili. Although the Embraer EMB 314 Super Tucano is capable of a light combat role.
However, even if that wasn't the case, some names, words, or terms used in industry or trade settle on a common name widely in use even though a local language may have a term similar enough to be used in its stead. Suppose there are 20 different terms for altitude and heading, instead of a commercial pilot learning 20 different languages, they just learn what is needed specific to flying like altitude and can understand flight control anywhere in the world even if they couldn't sit next to the guy at a bar and hold a conversation with them without a translator.
Let me rephrase it for him. What exactly can she do for tech other than what he thinks she might do?
While I do not agree with your first argument as twitter is a private company/service that just happens to be popular, I couldn't agree more with your second argument.
Letting these idiots speak their mind is the only way to know who they are and it allows arguments other than name calling to show the errors of their ways. This may not influence them, but it sure as hell will influence those reading or listening to them. And if it doesn't, then we know who they are and can take steps if and when they get into any positions over others and act on that racism.
Racist views should be in the sunlight for everyone to understand their idiocy. Unfortunately, even a bling squirrel finds a nut but that is a price that needs to be paid.
There are two minimum wages. One is a minimum the government sets for all employees to be paid and the other is the market minimum in which must be paid to attract and keep employees working under the conditions presented.
The government minimum is largely static outside acts of government but the market minimum is largely moveable with unemployment. The easiest and best way to raise a minimum wage is to reduce unemployment and let the market for employees demand a higher wage. This is a problem however because the economy has crapped out so badly that fast food jobs are seen as careers now instead of first jobs and stepping stones on a path to bigger and better opportunities. The worst part of this problem is that instead of looking at the situation and saying we need more and better jobs, a lot of people are content outside of wanting to raise the pay for these menial jobs.
When I got my first legal job (other than mowing yards and crap), unemployment in my area was low. I started at minimum wage but quickly progressed above it. All I had to do was basically show up on time and put a bit of effort at doing the work. My second job, which hired me away from my first employer at a raise, I went the extra mile for them and did pretty much anything they asked to the best of my ability and my pay quickly reflected it too. I was making 13 dollars an hour rolling burritos and flipping steaks on a charbroiler in the mid 1990s. $13 an hour might not seem like much but according to an inflation calculator one dollar in 1995 had about the same purchasing power as $1.56 in 2016. So in contrast, think of it as being paid almost $20 per hour in today's world and the minimum wage at then was $4.25 an hour (it went up from $3.35 when I first started working a few years prior).
If employment was there, by necessity, the minimum wage an employer could pay to keep an employee would by higher than the minimum wage. Those fast food jobs would go back to first job experiences and as stepping stones for people to show they can show up to work and follow directions enough to be hired at someplace that pays more.