Making a tool to check most programs for errors sounds extremely complicated, but wouldn't it be possible to make a more simple tool that checks the security of a PHP/MySQL website?
If this would be a thread about car safety, you would be saying something along the lines of "It's nice that cars are safe and all, but can I have an apple?"
Your are correct actually, in my little joke I should have added the 6.0 after 'Visual Basic'. I code.NET also (although c#) and indeed, both the languages are a pleasure. I can't wait for the whole managed directx 10 hive to start.
in the hope that customers who try it will eventually migrate to the more powerful ESX server
It's not only more powerful, it's fundamentally different. It's requires a different sort of administration. Also, the usage is different. gsx wil rarely be actively used in high uptime required production environments, esx will. esx also enables functionalities such als vmotion (if you have a san that is) and will be used more often in blade server configs.
I really wonder if people will view esx as an 'upgrade' to gsx.
But how would that translate into practical use? Here (at my work) we use asp.net for server side coding. Using ajax ment nothing more then implementing an interface in the page (the ICallBackEventHandler), after which you wrote some code for the callback and some javascript to 'catch' the callback and set the innerHTML for some div.
Both FF and IE reacted the same to this, it all worked fine. I never had to do any difficult ActiveX instantiation or something. Am I misunderstanding you?
From the FA:
IE 7 also includes a number of new features for Web developers, including support for up-and-coming Web-programming technologies known collectively as AJAX.
How would they go about supporting this? Would it have a javascript extension for it or something? Really the only thing a browser needs to do for ajax is support the xml http request object, which IE does since 5.0 (I believe). The rest is up to the server side code. or not?
I heard recently about three hackers which were charged but microsoft later dropped all charges and decided not sue. I believe their names were Whitman Price and Haddad.
Reminds me of this episode of voyager where tom paris was sentenced by some race to re-live the last moments of his victim. He was later proven innocent by Tuvok.
I wonder if some sort of brainscan of a victim can ever deliver this sort of detail in the future.
Slashdot Mirror
Britain it is!
No seriously, you must be new here ...
Making a tool to check most programs for errors sounds extremely complicated, but wouldn't it be possible to make a more simple tool that checks the security of a PHP/MySQL website?
If this would be a thread about car safety, you would be saying something along the lines of "It's nice that cars are safe and all, but can I have an apple?"
Reverted edits by Anonymous Coward (talk) to last version by Dr. Good, reason; vandalism.
I don't believe that can happ...[hey who deleted my file?]
You must be new here.It's "I don't believe that can happ...[NO CARRIER]"
No, no, NO! You don't understand!
Here's how it's done:
"Fr1st ps0t !!1!11!!one!!1!"
... both times recently with a really comprehensive blob of text explaining myself.
...
Rejected both times. I guess I should rename myself to beatle-beatle or something
So the crackhead son in this example actually build a $12bn fighter? He must have some good shit.
Too bad you are being modded a troll anonymous coward. Playing WoW extensively I can say you're comment is most insightful.
So 99% of the people at your company are very, very stupid.
I must say you have the odds against you.
Your are correct actually, in my little joke I should have added the 6.0 after 'Visual Basic'. I code .NET also (although c#) and indeed, both the languages are a pleasure. I can't wait for the whole managed directx 10 hive to start.
What's up next?
Enhancing gui user experience with Oracle Forms
HowTo: Brute Force numbercrunching in Visual Basic
or
Windows 98 Security 101
"I see soon-to-be dead people"
Relatively speaking everybody does.
found in sharks that give them their 'sixth sense'
The shark turns out in the end to be dead all along.
in the hope that customers who try it will eventually migrate to the more powerful ESX server
It's not only more powerful, it's fundamentally different. It's requires a different sort of administration. Also, the usage is different. gsx wil rarely be actively used in high uptime required production environments, esx will. esx also enables functionalities such als vmotion (if you have a san that is) and will be used more often in blade server configs.
I really wonder if people will view esx as an 'upgrade' to gsx.
But how would that translate into practical use? Here (at my work) we use asp.net for server side coding. Using ajax ment nothing more then implementing an interface in the page (the ICallBackEventHandler), after which you wrote some code for the callback and some javascript to 'catch' the callback and set the innerHTML for some div.
Both FF and IE reacted the same to this, it all worked fine. I never had to do any difficult ActiveX instantiation or something. Am I misunderstanding you?
From the FA: IE 7 also includes a number of new features for Web developers, including support for up-and-coming Web-programming technologies known collectively as AJAX. How would they go about supporting this? Would it have a javascript extension for it or something? Really the only thing a browser needs to do for ajax is support the xml http request object, which IE does since 5.0 (I believe). The rest is up to the server side code. or not?
I heard recently about three hackers which were charged but microsoft later dropped all charges and decided not sue. I believe their names were Whitman Price and Haddad.
I learned in high school once that an explosion is nothing more then something burning really fast. So I agree with you.
I had the same experience reading his post. I think he was trying to explain but I didn't understand a word he said.
They will be ported to Vista.
You gotta love the "Read the rest of this comment..." at the bottom of the post. hmmm, I indeed wonder what he will write next.
Reminds me of this episode of voyager where tom paris was sentenced by some race to re-live the last moments of his victim. He was later proven innocent by Tuvok.
I wonder if some sort of brainscan of a victim can ever deliver this sort of detail in the future.
Peter Ashdown, is hoping to leverage his knowledge of the internet
seriously, is it so hard to just 'leverage' the word 'use' instead. I run into leverage freakin' everywhere whenever something has to sound important.
mirror
no, a lens! RTFA!