I always kind of hoped a bit from [the band] Propagandhi's liner notes would be turned into a software license:
Absolutely all shit to do with Propagandhi, Inc., its' conglomerates or subsidiaries, is absolutely anti-copyright.1993... How the fuck can you stake a claim of ownership to intangible patterns of sound?! Duplicate, imitate, replicate, eradicate, masterbate, Merciful Fate (for non-profit, non-fascistic purposes) at will, shitface. We don't give a crap. However, Mike/Fat Wreck Chords paid for this recording, and subsequently "owns" the "rights" (whatever the fuck that means) to it, so he may very well have a different point of veiw regarding this issue, and will likely reserve the right to sue the dingleberries out of your bum. Whatever. All mistakes, fuck-ups, production flaws and tuning discrepencies are on purpose and are furthermore copyright 1993 Who Gives A Fuck? Productions. Ha.
3rd party comment servers
on
Mr Anti-Google
·
· Score: 1
Sounds like what this guy is really interested in is 3rd party comment servers.
Anyone familiar with the current Google algo will recognize that Google has spurred a glut of new registrations as people jam keywords into their domain names.
If advertisers paid users for their time directly. Users could then spend that money on content. This would result in more relevant ads and better content.
(Of course, if you weren't in a valuable demographic, you wouldn't be able to get free content like you can now.)
Though destroying usability to the extent it is on Zeldman.com is pretty indefensible. It could almost be ameliorated if the site were a real visual knockout, but it's not.
Another benefit of the die shrink is that the GeForce 2 GTS consumes close to half of the power as the original GeForce, putting it at between 8 - 9W versus the 16W for the GeForce. This makes the GeForce 2 GTS closer to the position where it could be used in a mobile solution, although 8 - 9W is still far from the target mark for a mobile product.
Slashdot Mirror
Use a program like PDFmailer to send quotes and such.
I always kind of hoped a bit from [the band] Propagandhi's liner notes would be turned into a software license:
Absolutely all shit to do with Propagandhi, Inc., its' conglomerates or subsidiaries, is absolutely anti-copyright.1993... How the fuck can you stake a claim of ownership to intangible patterns of sound?! Duplicate, imitate, replicate, eradicate, masterbate, Merciful Fate (for non-profit, non-fascistic purposes) at will, shitface. We don't give a crap. However, Mike/Fat Wreck Chords paid for this recording, and subsequently "owns" the "rights" (whatever the fuck that means) to it, so he may very well have a different point of veiw regarding this issue, and will likely reserve the right to sue the dingleberries out of your bum. Whatever. All mistakes, fuck-ups, production flaws and tuning discrepencies are on purpose and are furthermore copyright 1993 Who Gives A Fuck? Productions. Ha.
Sounds like what this guy is really interested in is 3rd party comment servers.
Wasn't Douglas Adam's trying to work out something like this?
Anyone familiar with the current Google algo will recognize that Google has spurred a glut of new registrations as people jam keywords into their domain names.
Case in point:
PSC Symbol Opticon Metrologic Scannermart
Yes! Yes! Yes!
Collaborative filtering for the masses! Reputation management! Can Annotea comment servers be far behind?(!)
Build it in to Mozilla.
Will the Athlon XP make any better use of that extra bandwidth?
Microsoft's Universal Canvas
MS didn't have the balls to upgrade office with something that was revolutionary instead of evolutionary.
MS comes up with a lot of great ideas, but, as a publicly traded company, doesn't have the nuts to execute on them.
If advertisers paid users for their time directly. Users could then spend that money on content. This would result in more relevant ads and better content.
(Of course, if you weren't in a valuable demographic, you wouldn't be able to get free content like you can now.)
I guess I'd be more upset if Real Player wasn't such a stinking pile of spyware garbage.
Ads may pay for "free" television, but this cost is ultimately billed to the consumer in the form of more expensive products.
I'd vote for Katz if only because he takes more space to say something stupid.
"If you don't like a company, don't buy its product but do buy its shares."
Are you telling me only stockholders should have a say? This isn't supposed to be a plutocracy!
This is why (almost) *everything* on the web needs some form of reputation management.
Though destroying usability to the extent it is on Zeldman.com is pretty indefensible. It could almost be ameliorated if the site were a real visual knockout, but it's not.
I don't see what's wrong with benefiting from all the money MS has spent on user interface R&D.
Steal the good ideas, improve on them, and leave the cruff behind.
Wouldn't sending $15 to Metallica be like 8 times the share they see from an album sold by their label?
Good codecs from Microsoft..
Good code from Mozilla...
...and still RealPlayer sucks ass.
Motion blur is a hack. Anti-aliasing is too.
If (when) GPU's are capable of doing 1800x1200 at 150fps. I don't think anyone's going to care about this kind of visual trickery.
If I was at Nvidia, I would be laughing my head off at the crap hardware 3dfx puts out, but pitying for the consumers tricked into buying it.
The video subsystem pretty much defines a game console. MS will put in a GeForce if they know what's good for 'em.