Slashdot Mirror


Updating Quickbooks Forces Online Membership?

garyebickford asks: "I've been using Quickbooks 2001 for a long time, sending out invoices via email. A couple of months ago it asked if I wanted to do an online update - these occurred occasionally and I agreed. There was no information regarding what the update would do, although IIRC there was some mention of 'new features' and 'improvements'. Since that time, it is now impossible to either fax or email an invoice without signing up for Quickbook's 'Online Business Member' program since it appears to use their own mail server. Membership is free for now, but the required click-agreement forces me to agree in advance to any future fees! I have no interest in letting Intuit know about my invoices and other financial information. As a result, this software is essentially useless and I must find a new accounting package. I've looked at various OSS packages but haven't found one that has developed far enough to use in this way. But there are many out there and I haven't kept up to date, so maybe someone else out there can suggest something. I'd prefer using it on Linux, of course. I'd also be interested if this loss of functionality would be sufficient to consider a class action suit to recover costs of conversion." The issue at hand is that commercial software has started to force consumers to fall into such schemes to maintain features that they already had. Today it is Quickbooks, but what about tomorrow?

441 comments

  1. Easy... by AmigaAvenger · · Score: 1, Informative

    Uninstall, reinstall, patch up to the level that caused the problem, and be happy with it.

    1. Re:Easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Good luck finding the patches. Once they fall to a forced use scenario, it's common practice to only allow previous patches to include the forced use option.

    2. Re:Easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, that sounds all well... but Quickbooks itself, also updates all of the Tax Forms, along with all other State / Federal tax filing information.

      You have to keep that information updated.

    3. Re:Easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the american government wants the names and descriptions of your first born children. Be sure to keep that updated, or you might e branded a terrorist.

    4. Re:Easy... by Alsee · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Uninstall, reinstall, patch up to the level that caused the problem

      The article says the patches are "autoupdate". No option to patch at all except to the latest version.

      Assuming the raw unpatched version is completely unacceptable (quite likely) then your only options are to accept everything they want to shove down your throat, or dump the program entirely.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    5. Re:Easy... by Thu+Anon+Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      this needs modding down since obviously it's been repudiated

      --



      I'm good with numbers - .45, 7.62, 9.....
    6. Re:Easy... by AntiNorm · · Score: 4, Funny

      Uninstall, reinstall, patch up to the level that caused the problem, and be happy with it.

      You mean like what you do with Windows?

      --

      I pledge allegiance to the flag...
      of the Corporate States of America...
    7. Re:Easy... by isorox · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, I lost my Dos 5.0 disks though :(

    8. Re:Easy... by DivideX0 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Are you using Windows XP? If so, then check an see if the Quicking Update was caught by the System Restore feature under Start | Programs | Accessories | System Tools. If so, then roll back your system to before the Quicken Update and you should be all set.

      Of course back up all your Quicken files, blah, blah, blah.

      --
      My next Slashdot post will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
    9. Re:Easy... by ErikTheRed · · Score: 3, Informative

      Oh no, it's much, much worse. I'm in the exact same boat as the sumitter with my business. My experience with Quicken / Quickbooks updates in the past has been that the software tags the data files (and may make other changes, but I haven't bothered trying to hack them) with the version / patch number currently in use. If you reinstall Quickbooks, it will refuse to use the data file until the software has been patched up the level that the data files were last used at.

      I've also been looking for a good OSS solution, but have come up short (I'll post separately on that subject).

      --

      Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
    10. Re:Easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, better keep your list of first born children updated, in case another child is born bbefore your first one. (extra b supplied for your message)

    11. Re:Easy... by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      Right. That is exactly how ALL accounting programs get you. QuickBooks is fairly cheap here, althouhg I've heard PeachTree is cheaper. If someboody makes a free one that will update you tax tables forever, please let me know?

      Let's see:

      QuickBook's Pro:
      write checks
      pay 35 employees varing rates
      4 compaines
      cost 30min. and $200 + per year

      By Hand:
      cost 48hrs. and $0

      Winner:
      draw you own conclusion!

  2. In Soviet Russia... by jimius · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You charge Quickbooks srry, I couldn;t resist, I love the soviet russia jokes :)

    1. Re:In Soviet Russia... by jimius · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      it seems my lay-out and signature are a bit @#$-up srry for any misundersdtandings

    2. Re:In Soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      In Soviet Russia Quickbooks installs you!

    3. Re:In Soviet Russia... by kaxman · · Score: 1

      It's alright for those of us intelligent enough to use "Prefix everyone's signature with "--" to make it blazingly obvious where comment ends and sig begins".

      --
      Everyone on slashdot has a journal.
  3. Common sense by are_bee · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Assuming all updates are optional, why not just reinstall the program and ignore the update requests?

    1. Re:Common sense by Tteddo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because when you update the program, it updates your data file to the new version, and you can't go back. I still use QB99 for this reason.

    2. Re:Common sense by WickedLittleSlaveBoy · · Score: 1

      if it updated his qb database during the update, it may be that the he can't open it without updating... very nasty little updates. in the multiuser version, if one client updates, all the others have to in order to read the db.

    3. Re:Common sense by Tteddo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I have had customers be forced to update also, because their accountant had a newer version. It's quite the trap they have there!

    4. Re:Common sense by WickedLittleSlaveBoy · · Score: 1

      well, it was only mildly annoying until this, now if the accountant pays, so will you. should have seen this one coming...

      I actually have no problem with the software subscription idea, but I'd like to know that's what I'm getting into upfront.

    5. Re:Common sense by are_bee · · Score: 1

      Backups?

    6. Re:Common sense by Traicovn · · Score: 1

      Backups would be great, except I am sure that if anything new had been done (which, when using financial software is very likely) then the backups would probably be pretty useless, as either they would be incredibly old (and not containing all the data needed), or unaccessible (because they had been made after the upgrade had happened)

      Dead tree backups are a btch as well, and might take days/months/years depending on the amount of data one has to backup.

      --

      [Something witty and intelligent should have appeared here.]
      {Traicovn}
    7. Re:Common sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      can't do incremental updates on the application, it always updates to current version. so, unless you have backups of the application and registry, as well, or you've never updated QB, it's going to be harder than that seems... up till now, updating hasn't been an issue, so most people update(I think it's enabled in the default install) or have to update if they're doing payroll.

    8. Re:Common sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      on second thought, I doubt an update does much to the registry.

    9. Re:Common sense by sourcehunter · · Score: 2
      One problem with that - once you update you can never go back - not even through reinstalling. Quickbooks automatically "updates" its company data file with the new version - even incremental patches. Once it has done that, the file can never be used on a previous version.

      Quickbooks is a very evil program. I still use it only because I have little choice. It is cheap and we don't have time to develop our own.

      --

      quis custodiet ipsos custodes - Juvenal
  4. I use 'FirstEdge' for OS X... by otis+wildflower · · Score: 4, Informative

    .. Largely because it's good enough for what I need, and it runs in OS X. There's annoying bugs (print to PDF, then attach to email, since they haven't kept up with Jaguar's Mail api), but I don't have to go sign up for no dumbass thing to use it.

    Also, TimeSlice for OS X is very nice, it itemizes your billing time (if you bill per hr) and exports it into CSV..

    There's also AccountEdge for OS X, but it's overkill and overpriced for my simple needs.

    Is there anything comparable for Xwindows? Good Q..

    1. Re:I use 'FirstEdge' for OS X... by Getzen · · Score: 1
      By the way, the Windows version of the AccountEdge software mentioned above is called MYOB Plus:

      MTOB Plus

      Interestingly, it is file-compatible with the Mac version, AccountEdge.

  5. Workaround by yesman · · Score: 3, Informative

    Use a program like PDFmailer to send quotes and such.

    1. Re:Workaround by 1u3hr · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Another workaround:
      Can you force it to use your SMTP server of choice? Look in the exe and its other files for a string that looks like a mail server, (say smtp.quickbooks.com). If you find that, go to your hosts file and make a line
      smtp.quickbooks.com aa.bb.cc.dd
      where aa.bb.cc.dd is the IP of the mailserver you want to use (eg on your ISP). No guarantee but worth a try. If it really is SMTP, then the commands to send should be universal.

      Otherwise, as the above poster, create a PDF and email it yourself -- there are free ways. It's not difficult to work out automated methods if you have any volume.

  6. I've noticed this myself... by kaxman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...and I'm not even a "business" customer. I like to hunt up old versions of programs, especially older shareware stuff that I might use a couple times a year, simply because it isn't as 'crippled' as today's version, or because nowadays the company making it requires that you give them a valid email and a reason for being interested in the software. And I'm not talking about finding old programs because they're easier to find cracks for; I actually do pay and have paid for many programs I find useful, and send money along fairly frequently for the free programs that deserve it. But for stuff that just strives to annoy, I'm having none of it.

    --
    Everyone on slashdot has a journal.
  7. Easy by unterderbrucke · · Score: 3, Funny
    1. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So we should reward Quicken and be forced to upgrade. Even the paid version we had is fully functional.

      I cannot agree with you.

  8. TurboTax for 2002 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Has a similar scheme. I find I'm forced to spend a lot of time explaining this all to clients; they sure are pissed. Open Source tax/acctng sware would be very useful. And an AOL client...

    1. Re:TurboTax for 2002 by swv3752 · · Score: 2

      you mean like PengAOL

      Yeah, it is not official. The official one is Gamera, but lots of luck finding it now.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
  9. scary side effect by phr2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Having the invoices from millions of small businesses all go through the same server in the same format makes that server a VERY juicy source for the Office of Total Information Awareness. This kind of centralization has to be resisted.

    1. Re:scary side effect by pongo000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Think of the millions who use on-line bill payment services! Talk about juicy: A company could build quite a marketable portfolio about you based upon your bill-paying habits.

      Unfortunately, the masses are sucked in by the slick marketing, and never give a thought as to the middleman through which they're routing all their personal financial information.

      Can you imagine posting all of your income tax information on the web? Apparently someone is willing to do this!

    2. Re:scary side effect by meatpopcicle · · Score: 1

      How is this any of their business? Why does it need to go throught their servers. This IS scary and anyone using this software should stop. Imagine if you will the day someone hacks this mail server.

      It probably already has for that matter.

      I tried AccountEdge for Mac and its pretty pitiful. Lots of bugs, and unwieldy at times. It has a steep learning curve too.

      Since Intuit bought MYOB in Canada they have discontinued support for MYOB. Now we are stuck with a buggy application and no tax table updates!

      --
      "You're on my side and the dark side, like Lando Calrissian?" --Gimpy, Undergrads
    3. Re:scary side effect by ethanms · · Score: 1

      If you're emailing an invoice then I would hope that the most sensitive information it contains is your mutual physical mailing address'.

      I think it's understood by even the least savvy users (except my mom) that email is considered unsecure and should never be used to send 'privilaged' information like credit card or checking account information.

      But I do agree that it's BS to be forced to use their servers to do anything besides download updates, unless at the very least they're allowing you to open some sort of a secure tunnel or use SSL.

    4. Re:scary side effect by Black+Copter+Control · · Score: 2
      Imagine if you will the day someone hacks this mail server.

      You don't even have to hack directly into the server... Just hack one of the routers leading into them..... redirect a copy of the flow and pick your data out of that (carnivore style).
      (and I'm betting that the data isn't encrypted...)

      --
      OS Software is like love: The best way to make it grow is to give it away.
    5. Re:scary side effect by motardo · · Score: 2

      they can track your habits even without doing on-line bill payment services. I don't see how this is any different.

    6. Re:scary side effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Imagine if your attorney decides to stop representing you because you have violated privilege, or if you lose a court case because you violated privilege (sending transactions through a third party without the other party's consent).

    7. Re:scary side effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeah, I wouldn't want to allow a company to make records of the things I've bought (mastercard, visa, american express) or to keep records of my financial dealings (my banks) or to have a combined overhead view of my entire financial history (trw, experian, etc).

      Face facts, your privacy is gone. As long as we don't have privacy, we might as well get some slick services.

    8. Re:scary side effect by vanyel · · Score: 2

      Unless you pay by cash, online bill payment adds nothing on top of the federal reserve system through which all checks are processed already. And automatic payment is the only way my bills get paid on time ;-)

    9. Re:scary side effect by nahdude812 · · Score: 2
      Unless you pay by cash, online bill payment adds nothing on top of the federal reserve system through which all checks are processed already


      But the FRS isn't a commercial entity who could (and would) sell marketing information about you. It's also a terribly ominous system to try to hack, it would take a lot more balls than most hackers have to try to do that, versus a corporate network. Also, it represents a duplication of information at the FRS, and at the software vendor, representing two independant points of failure for the same information.

  10. Long live spreadsheets... by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 5, Informative
    I own a small business (yeah, me, can you believe it?) doing productivity consulting and stuffs. Although it takes me longer than it would if things were automatic, I use SPREADSHEETS for everything financial. I own it, it's mine, and I can do what I want.

    I looked at QuickBooks, MS Money, etc and for complete control, nothing can match using spreadsheets for all the tracking, etc. One master spreadsheet for accounting gets numbers from all the other spreadsheets (sales, expenses, etc). Will I need something stronger a year or two from now? Yeah, and I'll be reading the posts right here for an idea on what I will do then. But for anyone who is a one-h@x0r shop up to a couple of employees, spreadsheets fit the bill just fine. Oh, and of course online banking (Citibank is pretty sweet and reasonable fees for corporate account).

    Good luck!

    1. Re:Long live spreadsheets... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you!

      I suppose that they killed 5,000,000 Iraqi children too?

    2. Re:Long live spreadsheets... by gmhowell · · Score: 3, Funny

      How much software do you actually need to order some buckets of shit and hire some Mexican kids to fling it around?

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    3. Re:Long live spreadsheets... by scumdamn · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Just in case any of you moderators get confused, this is both on topic and not a troll. The original poster's nick was "Eric Cartman South P" and in the most recent episode of South Park, Cartman had a business where he really hired some hispanic kids to fling poo onto the walls of parents who fucked with their kids. Just in case you missed it and wanted to banish the above comment to oblivion, please don't. It deserves a +1 funny if anything.

    4. Re:Long live spreadsheets... by stephanruby · · Score: 1, Redundant

      I guess I'm the only one who got the South Park reference. Everyone else thought this post was serious. : )

    5. Re:Long live spreadsheets... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, no they weren't just flinging it around. IIRC, they were matching it to the decor.... (posted anonymously because too many moderators have no sense of humor).

    6. Re:Long live spreadsheets... by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Nope. I beat you by making the joke a little more obvious by two hours right here.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    7. Re:Long live spreadsheets... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I use SPREADSHEETS for everything financial.

      In my experience, that's how accountants do it as well. There are always information systems (think RPG + AS/400), but the information often finds its way into a spreadsheet for analysis.

      Forms, transaction processing, invoices, checks and billing, stuff like that is done with computers, but the various ledger balances are usually done with a spreadsheet.

    8. Re:Long live spreadsheets... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you need an inventory of all the shits, so you need to know how much nut and crunch brown you have, and how much baby green you've got.... it requires very high-tech computers, as you would know if you'd ever been to Mr. Cartman's office.

    9. Re:Long live spreadsheets... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I am not defending the existing retail-boxed accounting software. However, there is a reason it costs so much. It is very versatile, it holds your hand and it is correct.


      Rolling your own accouting software is a like doing brain surgeory on yourself. You may know how to do it, but with one false move you can mess up a lot of things. Maybe your books are not that complicated, maybe you are an excellent programmer who rarely makes mistakes and knows tax codes and accounting rules inside-out. Maybe you keep meticulous backups and don't have loads of accounting work to do in between adding new features to your accounting system to keep it easy-to-use and correct for every feature that you want.


      For the rest of us schmucks who twist our own arms just to sit down and keep up the books, it's a nightmare to roll your own.

    10. Re:Long live spreadsheets... by gmhowell · · Score: 1
      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    11. Re:Long live spreadsheets... by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      It looks like even the original poster thought he was being serious.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    12. Re:Long live spreadsheets... by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      Somebody has never seen how much shelf space is needed for a set of US/state/county/city tax tables. Find the sales and payroll taxes for a random city in Ohio or Pennsylvania.

    13. Re:Long live spreadsheets... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw no embelishing in their post, you silly little troll.

  11. Quickbooks disabled? noooooo...... by Thu+Anon+Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    We had the same thing happen a few years ago to us. We were using it at the start of the new year wrapping up previous years finance stuff, a message came up saying that since they didn't want us to get in trouble, they were going to disable the tax tables in 30 days time so we couldn't use them. We would have to purchase new tax table info from Intuit, EVEN IF THE DAMN TAX TABLES HADN'T CHANGED!

    No tax tables makes Quickbooks about as useless as tits on a boar hog. Our CPA switched us over to Netledger at Netledger.com

    --



    I'm good with numbers - .45, 7.62, 9.....
    1. Re:Quickbooks disabled? noooooo...... by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 5, Funny
      "No tax tables makes Quickbooks about as useless as tits on a boar hog."

      Clearly, you have never owned a boar hog ;-)

    2. Re:Quickbooks disabled? noooooo...... by MeanMF · · Score: 1

      If they allow you to go on using the old rate tables, they could be found liable for providing incorrect tax advice. You need to have the latest rates.

    3. Re:Quickbooks disabled? noooooo...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you didn't notice the part about forced payment even if there were no changes to the tables.

    4. Re:Quickbooks disabled? noooooo...... by kuroth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      NetLedger Small Business Suite: $1200 per year

      Upgrades Required To Use Quickbooks Tax Tables:
      - Do-It-YourSelf Payroll: $169 per year
      - Upgrade To Current Quickbooks Version: $100 one-time

      Great CPA you have there.

    5. Re:Quickbooks disabled? noooooo...... by Thu+Anon+Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      there were a few other issues that demanded a move. but as for Netledger, we don't pay for it since he gets a special deal him being a licensed re-seller and all. and before you say anything else, Yes, I have seen my monthly CPA bills. they aren't more than they were before. one of the other problems was that QB data files were getting a bit too unwieldy to carry around or send via the Internet since we both work on the data files from different aspects. that and keeping them properly updated since we had to constantly work with them while he needed them for a few days each time. Netledger made a whole lot more sense, even if the interface can be a PITA to deal with

      --



      I'm good with numbers - .45, 7.62, 9.....
    6. Re:Quickbooks disabled? noooooo...... by Thu+Anon+Coward · · Score: 1

      couldn't if I wanted to you know. I do believe our neighborhood covenant restrictions prevent any sort of non-domesticated animal from being housed in or near the property. (not that that prevents the backyard neighbor from feeding the goddamn raccoons who then come over and swim in our swimming pool so they can wash up afterwards. I'd like to kick his mother#$%^%^#@$ ass)

      --



      I'm good with numbers - .45, 7.62, 9.....
    7. Re:Quickbooks disabled? noooooo...... by forii · · Score: 1

      Farm animals such as hogs, sheep, cattle, chickens, etc. are "domesticated" animals. Sure, they're not "pets", but they are considered domesticated.

    8. Re:Quickbooks disabled? noooooo...... by zvar · · Score: 1

      NetLedger Small Business Suite: $1200 per year

      Upgrades Required To Use Quickbooks Tax Tables:
      - Do-It-YourSelf Payroll: $169 per year
      - Upgrade To Current Quickbooks Version: $100 one-time

      - Piece of mind knowing you're not getting screwed next year: Priceless


      Z' Var

    9. Re:Quickbooks disabled? noooooo...... by steve_l · · Score: 4, Interesting

      When people complain about MS business practices, I think these people have never used quicken. I wanted to get (UK) quicken 95 to be y2k compliant, all they would offer me was a (small) discount on a current version. Instead I acquired a friend's copy, only to discover that it was chock-a-block with 'value added services' that were essentially trying to generate sales bounties for intuit.

      I would never touch any of their products again.

    10. Re:Quickbooks disabled? noooooo...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I guess it's official now...

      Piracy definitely hurts bussinesses by providing try-before-buy kind of an access to products, thus giving all potential buyers a realistic picture of the crap that is offered.

    11. Re:Quickbooks disabled? noooooo...... by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Would you like to hear my rant about how TurboTax 2001 forcibly installed IE5.5 and fubar'd my system but good? I'd really like to bill Intuit for all the time that wasted (it broke DUN, wouldn't uninstall cleanly, and even IEradicating IE5.5 didn't completely undo all the damage it did -- for the first time *ever* I am probably going to have to reinstall Windows.. used to be this system ran for several weeks before needing a restart; since TurboTax, the max is about 3 days.)

      To add insult to injury, I couldn't find ANY way to contact Intuit other than the basic support email (which garnered NO response). What I *really* wanted was to call their sales dept. and give 'em an earful about why NEXT year, I'll be buying some *other* tax package. I've already inquired about the tax software from H&R Block, and guess what -- no forced IE.

      The upshot is -- Intuit lost a good customer that day. I will NEVER buy any of their products again. EVER. Period.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    12. Re:Quickbooks disabled? noooooo...... by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "not that that prevents the backyard neighbor from feeding the goddamn raccoons who then come over and swim in our swimming pool so they can wash up afterwards"

      That's what owning a slingshot is for ;-) You can get some fairly high powered models at sporting stores.

  12. we need kash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why dosent kde release 'kash' or something.

    1. Re:we need kash by Kingsly · · Score: 1

      There is Kapital... but it's commercial...

  13. What about tomrrow? by nurb432 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Tomorrow all commercial software will pull this sort of stunt. To get to full 'pay per use' models.

    They will have to, once the unwashed masses become technically educated enough that they realize what is going on with this constant upgrade cycle and stops buying new products since what they have 'works well enough for me'.

    The entire market is based on this deceit. and will suddenly implode..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:What about tomrrow? by WTF+Wazzat · · Score: 1

      It would be a wonderous event if the deceit-driven market would implode. But that what I thought about the '90s hype-driven market,and look what... Hey!

      Personally, I have been using a very old version of Quicken after Intuit pasted on that awful HTML front end and entered the vertical integration business. A real shame what was done to a promising product. Let's hear it for GNUCash!

      Fortunately for me, this is right in line with my project to dump MS and everything that requires MS in favor of Linux. I hesitate to say this in public, but I would be willing to pay for some of those free programs that installed themselves with Red Hat Linux. I have lots of 'druthers for GNUCash, but I am surely glad it exists!

    2. Re:What about tomrrow? by Dunkirk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No... They're going to get most everyone moved over before people realize they've been had. Probably 3/4th's of my friends and family have computers, and there are only a handful that would even *know* the difference between owning a piece of software and "renting" it over the wire, let alone *care*. It's hopeless. Just like spam, if companies can continue to make money from practices that are - to people like Slashdot readers - basically bait-and-switch tactics, they're going to do it. All the more reason to move to OSS ASAP. Spend your money there and do without paid software. I tell you, I used to think Stallman was a certifiable nut, but the further the copyright holders take their position in today's electronic society, the more I think that his view is the only one that will stem the tide. Just say no to closed source.

      --
      Acts 17:28, "For in Him we live, and move, and have our being."
  14. Caught in the headlights of a major trend ... by LL · · Score: 3, Informative

    ... where access to the customer is being treated and fungible (and thus marketable). I can point to a whole string of court cases starting with CompuServe v Cyber Promotions, Ebay v Bidder's Advantage, Intel v Hamadi, etc which have basically ruled that companies who "own" the infrastrcuture for communications effectively are private networks (think cable) and courts are relunctant to impose common-carrier, anti-competition or even anti-competition rules on them. Companies are not stupid, if they can't get lock in one way, they'll try another legit mechanism and in effect, vertically coordinate their services (software, middleware, skinware = GUI/web layout, tangleware = EULA + legal entanglements) to capture business.

    Is it legal? ... yes
    Is it proper? ... debateable
    Is it worthwhile? ... depends on the customer whether they cna get satisfaction for service

    Perhaps you should write a little letter to your fair-trading rep or competition commissioner requesting investigation into unfair trading practices based on their market power to exclude future competitors (say ASPs).

    LL

    1. Re:Caught in the headlights of a major trend ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Actually, considering that the product he bought did NOT required this online component, considering that he is forced to agree to any and all future fee schedules to receive a patch that may very well be needed for new taxing information as a small business owner...no, it is not legal. This is bait and switch. This is forced obselescence. This is possibly the unfair exertion of monopoly power as Quicken owns the lion's share of this type of software business.

  15. Try GNUcash... by chupar · · Score: 5, Informative

    I used Quickbooks a *long* time ago to help out with my father's small business. For myself, I've been using GNUcash for about a year, and I'm fairly pleased. Some of the reporting options could use some work, but it keeps track of all my data, and that's the important part. Quick look at their website indicates a new stable version is on the way, with some things that might help you, although the faxing/emailing features don't seem to be on the radar...

    - Small Business Accounting Features:
    GnuCash now can be used for Customer and Vendor tracking, Invoicing and Bill Payment,
    and using different Tax and Billing Terms in a small business.
    - OFX Import:
    GnuCash is the first free software application to support the Open Financial Exchange
    protocol that many banks and financial services are moving to use. The development of
    OFX and HBCI support has also resulted in an improved transaction matching system that
    more accurately picks duplicate transactions.

    1. Re:Try GNUcash... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GNUcash is foul. It reeks. It would be a bad piece of software even in the windows world.

      No sound card ? Expect to have trouble, as gnucash needs libaudio. Why does an accounting program link against an audio library ? Who knows ? Dig up Joe Barr's old article on "dependancy hell" and the associated slashdot article for more bad news.

      sql-ledger and gnu-ledger are your only hope.

    2. Re:Try GNUcash... by lobsterGun · · Score: 1

      Notice to potential adopters: before you look into GNUCash you should know that it is Linux only.

    3. Re:Try GNUcash... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you expect? The people who write GNUcash don't have any money to begin with, so what the hell would they know about this? They might as well put a tetris game or something of the like because that's about all it's good for.

    4. Re:Try GNUcash... by adminispheroid · · Score: 2
      Notice to potential adopters: before you look into GNUCash you should know that it is Linux only.

      Nearly but not quite true. gnucash.org has binary distros for Solaris and Irix. Gnucash requires Gnome 2, so you'd have a shot at getting it going anyplace Gnome 2 has been ported.

    5. Re:Try GNUcash... by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      A windows alternative, although not at all free is Peachtree. If you look hard enough at staples you are likely to get a significant discount like free after rebate. I have no idea about gimmicks like this, but would guess that since their trailing Quicken they might have a better value proposition.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    6. Re:Try GNUcash... by adminispheroid · · Score: 2

      Oops, I'm an idiot. Gnucash requires Gnome 1.4, not Gnome 2.

    7. Re:Try GNUcash... by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1
      Heh, some lady called at this place I used to work wanting to talk to "the boss". He wasn't there, so we gave her the Director of Technical Services. The first question she asked was something like "What accounting package do you use?". He, of course, answered "Well, we have Peachtree but it's a piece of crap." She responded with "Um, I am peachtree...."

      laughed my ass off over that one. :)

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    8. Re:Try GNUcash... by noshellswill · · Score: 0

      It's no prize. I had a look -- for my small business which is currently run pencil & paper. Works OKey even the taxes. Anyrate, the GNU-babbling started quick ... YOU MUST LEARN THESE 9 OBSCURE RECURSIVE CONVOLUTION-BASED CONCEPTS ... or suchlike ... WTF I didn't want babble and learning is a COST not a BENEFIT !! I wanted a couple columns to chuck monthly incomes and outgoes with a bit of auto-projection. Good luck --- No excuse me good fscking luck, but what should I have expected from a weinerized proggie?

    9. Re:Try GNUcash... by Blackknight · · Score: 1

      No it isn't.

      GnuCash has been in the ports tree for some time. All you have to do is build and install it.

    10. Re:Try GNUcash... by sparkler · · Score: 1
      Notice to potential adopters: before you look into GNUCash you should know that it is Linux only.

      Also note that this is a feature, not a bug!

    11. Re:Try GNUcash... by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 2

      I used Quickbooks a *long* time ago to help out with my father's small business. For myself, I've been using GNUcash

      I last looked at Gnucash about three years ago, and at the time I found it:

      - Tricky to install, with lots of dependencies
      - Pretty rough user inteface

      but, and this is the important thing, under active development. Just now I did apt-get install gnucash, and two minutes later I'm in the tutorial. Wow, big difference. The interface is GTK, which in my experience tends to imply slower project progress on the gui front, but leaves you with much shorter startup times and snappier response, compared to the same thing in QT/KDE, and runs fine under KDE, which suits me just fine.

      The new user manual is a work in progress, but the parts that are done are really nice to look at, loaded with screen shots just like a commercial product. But of course, not loaded with nags and advertisements, unlike a commercial product.

      I didn't go deeper than taking a quick look at the docs, but my impression from what I've heard people say about it is, it's usable. That's good enough for me. Once any OSS project gets to "usable", you know it's just going to keep getting better from there. Plus, this is the kind of code I like to build from source and do a little hacking on. I suppose that if somebody hasn't already done it by the time I need it, making a nice interface for printing cheques would be fun. What I'd be thinking in terms of is:

      One-time setup:

      - Scan in the blank cheques so they can be usedas wallpaper for a print preview

      - Switch to a forms view of the cheque table with the scanned cheques as the wallpaper.

      - Drag the amount field etc into proper position against the wallpaper

      Now, to do a print a cheque run:

      - First, get the whole cheque run into a table view, so you can see all the cheques and the
      effects on account balances

      - Now flip to the forms view with the cheque wallpaper. You should be able to page up/down
      to see each cheque that's going to be printed

      - Load the cheques in the printer and go

      - In case of something mis-printed, you need to be able to cancel the obliterated cheques in
      the database as "spoiled" and issue new ones, with new numbers but otherwise identical. This
      happens all the time, so it has to be efficient to get back on track here. Of course, the accounts
      have to be seen to be correct after all this!

      So, the idea it's all wysiwyg, which is just the space I like to be in when I'm doing something as dull as accounting. I.e., I'd rather spend a week coding up a drool-mindless easy interface, once, than waste a minute or two fiddling around with a crude interface every time, especially the first time, trying to get the fields in the right places.

      Anyway, crude cheque printing or not, this package looks like it's ready for real work.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    12. Re:Try GNUcash... by HiThere · · Score: 2

      Is this really true? Not currently, but in a more permanent way?

      The reason that I ask is that CygWin nearly has KDE up on my Win98 system. (I assume that it would actually be up if I had Win2000 or some such.) And this seems to run many Linux applications already. If KDE were running, I doubt that gtklib wouldn't work. etc.

      Mind you, I think that using it on Linux is a superior idea...

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    13. Re:Try GNUcash... by lobsterGun · · Score: 1
      I looked all through the GnuCash web site and located the following
      The majority of the GnuCash 1.6.0 dependencies are satisfied by Gnome 1.4. The only ones on top of a standard Gnome 1.4 installation are Guppi, Guile, slib and G-Wrap. You can get RedHat rpms for Gnome 1.4 from the Gnome Packaging Project.

      Presumably this means that if you are running Gnome 1.4 and have the additional packages the you should be able to run GnuCash regardless of your OS. As mentioned by another poster, Solaris may be a possibility.

    14. Re:Try GNUcash... by benoitg · · Score: 1

      It doesn't. Gnucash doesn't directly link to libaudio or libesd. It is a gnome dependency we pick up because we use gnome services. Perhaps if you asked the GnuCash developpers about it instead of bitching on Slashdot, you would have gotten usefull information, we are surprisingly helpfull you know... As for the "problem" caused by this, every sound daemon I know can generate null output when you have no soundcard.

    15. Re:Try GNUcash... by benoitg · · Score: 1

      Nope, I know for sure it also runs on Solaris, MacOS X and BSD

  16. Re:Workaround -- Uh, why pay to generate a pdf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Use a free pdf print driver and print the quote from quickbooks to pdf, then send to client. I agree this quickbooks change sucks, but while you're looking for a replacement this should work fine, it has for me.

  17. Forcing updates by RuXc · · Score: 5, Informative

    I am switching Quickbooks after I send out W2's this year for very similar reasons. Quickbooks will stop allowing you to do payroll if the TaxTables get too out of date. This normally wouldn't bother me, but they offer absolutely no way (that I know of) to manually enter the tax data, the payroll functionality get killed.

    To get the new TaxTables, they have really upped their subscription price to more than I think is reasonable. Also, they periodically force an update to the Quickbooks software to be able to use the new TaxTables format. So, for me to keep using Quickbooks, I would have to pay for a new (higher) TaxTable subscription and also update to a new version, which I can't justify.

    I have looked at PeachTree, and it seems very usable. It's Tax Table like subscription is about the same as Intuits (around $150), but they do allow you to manually enter details if you need to.

    I hate to see Inuit stoop to this, I really like their product. I used Quickbooks at version 5, and liked it. (I don't need any features now that version 5 didn't have). I just can't justify them doing these kind of things to customers, though.

    1. Re:Forcing updates by matt_fk · · Score: 1

      Sue. Seriously. If for nothing else, then the lawyer expenses and the cost of moving to (and learning!) a new accounting system. You will win if you find a good lawyer who can argue this hassle that you are forced to deal with.

    2. Re:Forcing updates by FzBravozF · · Score: 1

      If your getting bombarded with screens asking you to update you TT subscription you can make it stop.

      If your on QB 2001 or 2002, go to Employees at the top of the screen then to Set up payrol service. In the first step it'll ask you if you want to sign up for Basic or Deluxe payroll. Near the bottom their should be an option for more information or tax table information. Inside that page you should see an option to "Manualy calculate tax tables" after you click that QB will no longer ask you to update your Tax tables. Of course when you go to pay your employees, none of the taxes will come up but you can enter it in manually.

      Just Fyi
      Bravo

      --
      "Blah"
    3. Re:Forcing updates by RuXc · · Score: 1

      Thanks, That might be just what I need to get me by for the beginning of the next year. I am running Quickbooks 99 (it does all I need and more) and don't see the option directly, but will search around.

    4. Re:Forcing updates by fishbowl · · Score: 2

      I can think of several reasons why an accountant would want to
      calculate payroll based on prior-year tax tables! I would go as far as to say it should be a REQUIRED capability!

      I certainly want the ability to recalculate my personal tax returns for prior years. If a business can't use the software to validate past data, that's a bug, plain and simple.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    5. Re:Forcing updates by drafalski · · Score: 1
      I hate to see Inuit stoop to this, I really like their product.
      A shame to see the fish/shrimp/seal fur trade sullied by such shady business practices...
    6. Re:Forcing updates by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      >>I have looked at PeachTree, and it seems very usable. It's Tax Table like subscription is about the same as Intuits (around $150), but they do allow you to manually enter details if you need to.

      OK.

      I'm still lost in manually entering the Data. Wouldn't that cost me at least $150 to do that in house? Correct me if I'm wrong, but this seems viable if only you don't have too many employees. If you are the only one maybe a spreadsheet would be better. I want the open source alternative?

  18. Try Compiere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Read lots of good stuff about this, but as yet haven't had time to try it out. Looks like it could do what you need it to:

    http://www.compiere.org

    1. Re:Try Compiere by rindeee · · Score: 1

      And hey, since Compiere requires Oracle, you won't have any money to worry about keeping track of!

    2. Re:Try Compiere by valisk · · Score: 1

      Lets be fair to the guys at Compiere, they are working on a PostgreSQL version, and Postgres is probably one of the very best pieces of free software out there. I know from using the Open ACS project that it is, (at least for low to medium volume use) as stable and reliable as Oracle. Also the .org database is now held on Postgres. Just think how much of a hammering that gets.

      --

      Economic Left/Right: -0.62
      Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.69
    3. Re:Try Compiere by rindeee · · Score: 1

      I absolutely agree. I was not intending to cast aspersions at PostgreSQL, just making a little funny. I am waiting with bated breath for the ported version to be released as I am dying to use Compiere but can't spend the bucks on Oracle. ER

    4. Re:Try Compiere by Narcissus · · Score: 1
      I just went to the Compiere site and noticed that they have currently placed porting "on hold", sort of, basically asking people to put their money where their mouths are with regards to this port.

      Although I don't use it, I think it would be fantastic to see it using an OS database, and so am considering making a donation. If you want this port to come, maybe you would like to hand over a few dollars.

      Looking at the current donations, I think it's been a pretty piss poor effort: I don't know how much they've advertised this, but I think it's a real shame that people that are using it at least haven't shown some cash. I'm not sure of the costs associated with Oracle, but I'm sure there'd have to be at least an annual support fee. Surely it would be worth it for most of those users to take a year's worth of support fees and put it towards developing an OS port? Anyway, if you're interested in making a donation, go to http://www.compiere.org/technology/independence.ht ml

  19. Bad by notlameness · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Bad intuit, bad No market share for you oh wait, a reletively useful app that most people will usebecause it is a useful service that may or may not cost money later

  20. AppGen MyBooks by goldid · · Score: 5, Informative

    I haven't had time to fully use this yet, but I am considering purchasing: AppGen MyBooks (www.appgen.com) which has a Windows/OS X/Linux accounting program. Looks nice to me.

    1. Re:AppGen MyBooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Appgen is Very good! You can also customize it using their supplied SDK. You can import Quickbooks, and for oddball formats they'll do it for you for a one-time charge of a couple of hundred bucks.

      The backend db is proprietary written with 4GL, and there is ODBC support. For the network version we run the server in Linux and the client is Java, so it's identical on whatever platform we use (Windows now, switching to Linux over time).

      One of the nicest features is that you don't have a limit on how many years you can have online, i.e., you never have to purge old data in order to open up a new year. Also you can have unlimited companies open so you can cut and paste data from one to another.

      Very very good.

    2. Re:AppGen MyBooks by KmArT · · Score: 1

      You should be aware that AppGen essentially pulled a fast one with support of their home accounting software, Moneydance. Moneydance was a Java accounting program, written by Sean Reilly. Originally it was shareware (something like $25.00) but it wasn't crippled in any way if you didn't register. Later, Sean sold the rights to AppGen. Initially, they had a number of developers working on it, including Sean, but then a mysterious silence descended on the project. Later, it turns out, AppGen basically let go of all their people working on the Moneydance side of things but still had a shell of a website for it (I can't get to it currently). However, they were still taking orders for the product. Recently, someone hinted of big news on the moneydance mailing list that was to be forthcoming in the next few weeks but I don't know what that is and it hasn't been announced yet.

      So buyer beware. Appgen handled the whole process rather poorly, IMHO, and info was not very timely or even available after Sean was left go. Bottom line - I don't think very highly of them as a company.

      Moneydance is not, unfortunately, open source. It is fairly feature complete and stable though, considering it hasn't been updated in over a year. Still works good for me - if it ain't broke (too bad), don't fix it.

      Kevin

  21. Here's an idea... by tmark · · Score: 5, Insightful

    it is now impossible to either fax or email an invoice ...since it appears to use their own mail server.

    Couldn't you just do something like print the invoices to a PDF then email that through the mailer of your choice ? Sure beats having to move your operation and data to a new system, and with the convenient plus that if you want, as some do, you can always have a copy of the invoice exactly as it was printed.

    1. Re:Here's an idea... by vondo · · Score: 2

      Good idea. In fact, combine GNUCash as mentioned above with kprinter (the KDE printing panel) and you can directly mail PDF files as a "printer" device.

    2. Re:Here's an idea... by dossen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How about adding an entry to your host file, pointing the intuit mailserver to some other mailserver? That is if you are sure you want to stay with Quicken, rather than follow the advice (and good advice it is) of my fellow /.'ers and change to an oss solution.

    3. Re:Here's an idea... by terraformer · · Score: 1

      This is what I do but it is the principle of the whole thing. I stopped using their email function when I realized it was going into their servers (and I would eventually be charged). Despite that, I continue to get "reminders" that there is an open invoice that needs to be collected. I received payment on it months ago (but never re-connected to their service) so clearly they are retaining and tracking my invoices. They are scum and I have almost finished a scathing letter to their CS/execs but I doubt it will do any good.

      --
      Who are you? The new #2 Who is #1? You are #617565. I am not a number, I am a free man! Muhahaha.
    4. Re:Here's an idea... by adrew · · Score: 1

      The easy was is to use one of those "printer driver" fax programs. Just go to File -> Print, pull the customer's fax number out of the address book and fire the invoices away.

      They work great, save paper, and the text is more readable.

    5. Re:Here's an idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make sure you send a copy to jerry pournelle (www.jerrypournelle.com)

    6. Re:Here's an idea... by condour75 · · Score: 1

      I do this and it works great for invoices. I still use quickbooks 99 but I will definitely be scouring this thread to try some alternates.

      Most important features to me are:

      1. invoicing
      2. being able to generate an accountant's copy (that he can read)

      If I can find a linux replacement that does those two (and basic bookkeeping) I'll never look back. The switch from outlook to evolution / spam assassin / fetchmail has been a HUGE benefit to my productivity.

      Now if only they'd make flash mx, photoshop, and dreamweaver for linux I'd be down to a single machine. unfortunately i'll be running a winders machine for a while yet. Linux can't produce one of these quite yet.

  22. It's true by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The issue at hand is that commercial software has started to force consumers to fall into such schemes to maintain features that they already had. Today it is Quickbooks, but what about tomorrow?

    It's true actually... when I started my job back in September I was using Windows XP, and as there didn't seem to be any chance to switch to Linux coming soon I settled back into life as a Windows user, at work at least. Despite not really needing much software, I found I needed a truckload of commercial utilities to get anything done. We have a slightly dodgy connection, so a download manager that supported resuming (as neither mozilla nor IE appear to support this) was a must. On goes Download Accelerator. We need WinZip of course. Hmm, WindowBlinds FX looks nice (and it is nice). The BBC only streams in RealAudio so to save myself going insane I put on RealPlayer so I can listen to the radio while working.

    After a month or so, I realised if I could get the Adobe SVG plugin in IE working under Linux I could switch over to it, and so I got CrossOver (patched Wine to fix some bugs [sigh]) and was very happy.

    A week or so ago I rebooted into Windows, and was assaulted by raw commercialism. WindowBlinds had come to the end of its trial and popped up a window on every boot asking me to buy it. RealOne insisted on popping up adverts for its new features and offers, while cleverly not appearing to be running. WinZip of course has a nag screen whenever you run it. Download Accelerator inserts a blinking lightbulb into the system tray. It was almost physically unpleasant battering my way through all this garbage to get to what I wanted. I had become desensitised to it as I started using Windows again, then going back to it after so long was a real shock.

    After a while, you realise that seemingly every Windows app comes with some extra code whos only purpose is to try and make you spend money, or sell your eyeballs for a bit. It has nothing to do with enhancing the app, and this is true even for basic must have utilities like decompression programs and audio decoders. I wish I could suggest an alternative to Quickbooks but I don't really use programs like that. Except I know support was recently added to Wine for it.

    1. Re:It's true by MeanMF · · Score: 1, Troll

      Try either paying for the software or uninstalling it. Either way, it'll clear up those pesky registration screens.

    2. Re:It's true by Repugnant_Shit · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can use LeechFTP for FTP resuming. I think it supports HTTP downloads too.

      There are *lots* of free zip utilities. (Personally I think WinRAR is much better and worth the money).

      For an alternative to RealPlayer...hmmm. You got me there :)

      WindowBlinds makes it clear that it is a demo, so complaints about it expiring are just lame. The LiteStep devs are working on skinning, and I think I saw a WindowBlinds FX clone recently (try Shell Extension city).

      Its possible to find lots of freeware for Windows, you just have to look harder. Look at GNUWin II for some open source apps.

      And make sure to download Ad-Aware to hunt down those evil spy programs.

    3. Re:It's true by yasth · · Score: 4, Funny

      RealOne Enterprise Desktop is a nice alternative to RealPlayer.

      --
      I'd do something interesting, but my server can't handle a slashdotting.
    4. Re:It's true by koko775 · · Score: 1

      and you needed winzip for an OS that has integrated zip support...why?

      Also, just get a hacked uxtheme.dll -- no ads, no trialware, just a hacked dll which lets you use custom themes.

      A wget port from linux to windows/dos is all i need to download -- it resumes flawlessly and works perfectly, with the same simple command line.

    5. Re:It's true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>and you needed winzip for an OS that has integrated zip support...why?

      because the built-in support is slow, and especially shitty on larger zip files. that's why.

    6. Re:It's true by cicho · · Score: 1

      There are freeware (no source code, but no $$$ either) alternatives to nearly all the pieces of software you mention, except WindowBlinds I suppose. If you insist on installing trial versions of shareware packages, don't be surprised by the pop-ups and nags. Pay for it, or replace it with freeware. As for RealOne, the installer shits all over your system, but it's not a big deal to delete all the shortcuts and bookmarks, and to stop the app from automatically launching on startup. (There's freeware that will protect you from that, look for "StartupCPL" or "Startup Manager" and "Startup Monitor", all fully functional at $0 cost.)

      As with a Linux system, your Windows machine must be maintained, so maintain it.

      --
      "Only the small secrets need to be protected. The big ones are kept secret by public incredulity." - Marshall McLuhan
    7. Re:It's true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Find the Realplayer 8.0 version (not RealOne). It takes some effort to find as it's very well hidden (someone must have the URL for the Windows version), but it doesn't have any the fucked up pop-ups that RealOne has. And, IMHO, it functions better.

    8. Re:It's true by pVoid · · Score: 3, Interesting
      What are you complaining about?

      You downloaded each and everyone of those applications you call 'necessities'. *You* are the one who made the choice.

      I personally installed RealPlayer a long time ago, and then said "no thanks", and have never used it since. Same for netscape mind you. But also, until Quicktime fixed it's horrendous interface and constant nagging, I didn't use it either.

      When I setup a new Win box, I get a fixed list of administration tools for FREE (as in beer) from sysinternals.com, I get Winrar/Winzip for free with a proper nag screen that doesn't hog memory, just gently reminds you that you have been using it for the 400th consecutive day without paying. And a few open source things like wget and netcat and the like from google.

      I have yet to get nags on my screen.

      All I have to say is be careful what you complain about as a user, because what you want you just might get...

      (Stupid) People complained about "DLL Hell" for the longest time, and now we are ALL cursed with Windows File Protection - a hybrid 'security' scheme set up so that even administrators couldn't replace/delete critical files (why? because all the stupid people ran as admin).

      Complain about nagware, and who knows, maybe free stuff like Winzip and winamp will disapear too, and enter the world of Web Services.

    9. Re:It's true by kaxman · · Score: 1

      Even for windows I can generally find a free app for most uses. Or something with a bare minimum of nagging that works so well it's worth paying for anyway. But generally, you're right.

      --
      Everyone on slashdot has a journal.
    10. Re:It's true by timeOday · · Score: 2
      Oh really? I paid for Windows and it still came plastered with ads for online services and such.

      My company paid for Acrobat Reader, but it still nags me "Acrobat isn't just a reader! Buy the whole suite!"

      The whole topic of this slashdot story is a guy who paid for quickbooks, but now it demands the inside scoop on all his business doings.

      I'll bet slashdotters can think of lots of commercial apps that are similarly obnoxious.

    11. Re:It's true by ErikTheRed · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Try using QuickBooks. They p1mp so many (grossly overpriced) services in their software it's sick. Doing my accounting is about as annoying as browsing pr0n sites with IE. This with software I shelled out ~$200 for, plus the tax table subscription.

      --

      Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
    12. Re:It's true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. As if there aren't tons of freeware alternatives to each and every one of the programs you mention. Also, WindowBlinds is hardly a member program of a productivity suite now, it is?

      WebAttack.com is a great place to find freeware utilities like zip managers, media players, etc. Stop your damn whining and do a little searching. You're starting to sound like a Windoze user...

    13. Re:It's true by ikkis · · Score: 1

      You know what's funny about your story. You have such a bad connection yet you still feel the need to waste what little bandwidth you have to listen to the radio over it.

      Buy a radio and you won't need Real Player. And maybe improve your connection a little.

    14. Re:It's true by RKBA · · Score: 1

      The easiest way I've found to bypass Windows File Protection is simply to have a second, minimal install of WinNT on a separate partition. I boot into that to do maintenance on my primary WinNT installation.

    15. Re:It's true by Kiwi · · Score: 1
      We have a slightly dodgy connection, so a download manager that supported resuming (as neither mozilla nor IE appear to support this) was a must

      Wget supports this; is free and available for Linux and Windows.

      We need WinZip of course

      Unzip is free and is available for both Windows and Linux.

      WindowBlinds FX looks nice

      Every single modern window manager and desktop environment for Linux is fully themeable.

      The BBC only streams in RealAudio

      Real Networks does make a plug-in for Linux.

      - Sam

      --

      The secret to enjoying Slashdot is to realize that it should not be taken too seriously.

    16. Re:It's true by samdu · · Score: 2

      Instead of Download Accelerator, try LeechGet. Instead of WinZip, try UltimaetZip. Both are as good or better than their counterparts, yet never resort to these shenanigans.

    17. Re:It's true by marauder404 · · Score: 2

      What are you complaining about? Using Windows doesn't resign yourself to using commercial software. You can find an open source or free version of just about every utility that you require. I use Windows every day but I use tons of open source software: Emacs, Cygwin, gcc, random utilities, etc. Sometimes it's not as well developed as their Linux/Unix counterparts, but most of the time, they work just as well. Finding precompiled binaries is convenient, but they're hard to find sometimes. The market for Windows machines running open source software is even smaller than open source software running on an open source OS.

      Regarding the "commercialism," of COURSE it's filled with commercialism -- you haven't paid for the software. They're trying to get you to pay them for it, as you probably agreed to in the license agreement. You can pay for it make it go away or you can discontinue the trial. If you don't like the model or the software, find an alternative -- a packaged piece of commercial software or a free version.

    18. Re:It's true by valisk · · Score: 1

      Forget GoZilla, Leach get etc etc. Use Wget, a truly excellent command line unix/linux program, it has so many options for resuming downloads and mirroring sites etc. that it really does put just about every other download manager to shame for being crap. Like you I use Windows for business purposes, having recently started my own business after working in a windows only shop. However I infected my computer with cygwin :) learned about all the real power tools and now I am in the process of switching over to Linux permanantly.

      --

      Economic Left/Right: -0.62
      Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.69
    19. Re:It's true by 5KVGhost · · Score: 2

      Each of the examples you note is a well known shareware application. The intent of the nag screens is to get you to pay for the app after the trial period has expired. If you buy them, the nag screens go away. If you don't want to buy them and are offended by nag screens then use freeware alternatives instead. (Or, in the case of WinZip, just use the basic functionality built into XP.) Don't install shareware and then get upset because it's shareware.

  23. Lie to them by Qrlx · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why don't you call Intuit support and come up with some reason as to why their new software won't work for you. Like your small office has only one phone line and there's no ISP in your area, or your ISP went out of business or something.

    Or maybe that you live on a boat, and you can easily send mail via USPS but to use the Internet requires a trip to the local cybercafe, since you can't get internet access on your cell phone?

    1. Re:Lie to them by ameoba · · Score: 2

      Not to mention that many ISPs don't allow you to connect to SMTP servers other than their own, as a method of trimming back on spam. MSN, for example, is one of the major ISPs that block SMTP.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    2. Re:Lie to them by penguinboy · · Score: 2

      It would be fairly trivial for QB to get around port 25 blocking, by using an alternate port and/or encapsulating the data between QB and the Intuit server.

    3. Re:Lie to them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From what I recall from reading about this issue on Infoworld, Intuit claims that Quickbooks has *always* sent invoices through their servers, they just now require authentication.

    4. Re:Lie to them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, so they were lying to their customers the whole time.

      This almost makes lying back to them feel ethical. Almost.

    5. Re:Lie to them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'll cost you. $50 connection fee to get connected to a support rep, and like $100 for every 15 minutes you talk to the rep, even if you're on hold with them while they consult with their associates. The $50 fee is there just in case you become disgruntled, then the support rep will give you the admin office phone number to get rid of you. After you call and stay on hold with them a bit the person will say they only have authority to waive the $50 connect fee but not the time spent with the rep. You can either take the $50 waived connect fee right then as settlement, or submit your request in writing but chance not getting anything at all waived. I took the $50.

    6. Re:Lie to them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see how they were lying to their customers. Alway remember that, with proprietary software, everything is in the fine print.

      http://www.infoworld.com/articles/op/xml/02/07/2 9/ 020729opgripe.xml

  24. My bad experience with Inuit products by systemapex · · Score: 5, Informative

    I purchased Quicken Deluxe about this time last year. It came with a free downloadable version of QuickTax. I decided to download and install QuickTax around January so I could get a headstart on my taxes. Around this time, I upgraded my computer and had to re-install Windows. I re-installed Quicken Deluxe no problem but when it came time to re-install QuickTax I was notified that I could not do it. A version of the software had already been installed on a different computer! I was told to call their tech support line if this was not the case. So I did. I called their non-toll-free number long distance and was notified that their office was closed and would be until Monday (this was late Friday afternoon). So, I could not do my taxes that weekend. I waited until Monday and phoned their tech support line. I had to answer some questions to verify my identity and was told that if there ever was a next time, I would have to fax them with appropriate documentation verifying my identity! So, 3 days and 2 long-distance charges later I was left with a program that would only last until my next reformat. No thanks. I will never buy another Intuit product because of stories like my own and this one. Moreover, experiences like this helped push me to going 100% Linux/OSS - I've been doing so since late August with much less problems than I expected I would have.

    1. Re:My bad experience with Inuit products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What linux accounting programs have you looked into ?

    2. Re:My bad experience with Inuit products by systemapex · · Score: 2

      GNUcash so far. It took me a few tries to get my Quicken data imported but once it was, I found GNUcash far more intuitive from an accounting perspective - I have some high school-level accounting experience under my belt.

    3. Re:My bad experience with Inuit products by lpret · · Score: 2

      Dude, I had the same problem with OfficeXP. Microsoft's just as bad if not worse.

      --
      This is my digital signature. 10011011001
    4. Re:My bad experience with Inuit products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that any version of QuickTax is good for only the year in which it is rectified with the tax code, right? Tax prep software is made obsolete by the yearly changes to the tax code.

      What good would a 13 month old tax program do you, regardless of whether or not you could install it?

    5. Re:My bad experience with Inuit products by Dirtside · · Score: 5, Funny

      Look, just because the Inuit live in a relatively primitive society doesn't mean you have to denigrate them. I mean, come on, have you ever even tried seal blubber soup?

      Wait... did you mean Intuit? Oh, well, that's different then.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    6. Re:My bad experience with Inuit products by systemapex · · Score: 2

      But that's precisely why this whole episode was ridiculous. Tax software is typically used only once or twice by individuals. The one time I went to use the software,I had to jump through hoops to prove I had a legitimate license. Moreover, if I support this type of activation, I might find it cropping up all over the place. What is a nuisance now could become a major hassle if it became popular amongst software publishers.

      I realize my case is a special one because I reformatted, but there was no prior warning of this product activation behaviour. I would never have installed it the first time around if I had known it had this. At least MS gives warning and a toll-free, easy method of contacting them for activation.

    7. Re:My bad experience with Inuit products by mriker · · Score: 1
      I went through the exact same process when I had to re-install QuickTax. What a friggin' pain in the ass that was. As a result, I'll NEVER purchase another Intuit product as long as I live and will encourage everyone I know to do the same.

      Apparently there's a decent and much more customer-friendly program called TaxWiz (which seems to be for Canadians only); I'll be checking that out come next time to do taxes.

    8. Re:My bad experience with Inuit products by acceleriter · · Score: 2, Funny
      . . . I have some high school-level accounting experience under my belt.

      Not me. I learned my accounting on the street.

      --

      CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.

    9. Re:My bad experience with Inuit products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      TaxWiz's web page says
      Print or NETFILE up to 6 returns on one computer
      so I'm a little concerned that it might be pulling the same authorization limitations that Intuit are. I would be interested in your feedback in whether that's the case.
  25. Appgen by protek · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'd suggest checking out Appgen's MyBooks,

    http://www.appgen.com/products/mybooks.html

    It works on Windows, Linux, and Mac, will import your Quickbooks data, and you can try it free for 30 days. I've downloaded it, but haven't played with it much. Maybe other Slashdoters can attest to its usefulness.

    Regards,

    Chris

    1. Re:Appgen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought MyBooks to run on OS X. it will not run because of the OSX 10.1 to 10.2 problem that affects many OS X programs. OK, so I downloaded their update. It runs. But there is no way to back up the data. No kidding.

      I have to rescue data for my customers regularly, so it is one of the first things I look for.

      In spite of the $100us I spent on it, it nags you to register within 30 days. So I figured the backup modules were disabled until regisration.
      I called and got a code which I typed in directly.

      Now it still would not backup. So I asked the guy on the phone about it and he said that maybe someone in the back had made a program that would do a backup.

      While I was explaining to him that only a fool would commit finantial data to something with no backup mechanism I realized that the registration code had disappeared. So I asked him to read it back to me. He refused saying he said he could only read it once.

      THe windows version does have a backup option off the File/ menu.

      The Linux version never survived install on Redhat 8.0, Mandrake 7.2 or Debian 2.2.3.

      For added entretainment, Microcenter has a no refund policy on opened software.

      Clearly, I don't recommend MyBooks

      George Orr
      gorr@hal-pc.org

    2. Re:Appgen by acceleriter · · Score: 2
      For added entretainment, Microcenter has a no refund policy on opened software.

      Did you pay with a credit card? It may not get you your money back, but it would at least cost Micro Center some if you disputed the charge.

      If you live within 50 miles of Micro Center, purchased a product with which you have a problem, and made a good faith attempt to solve your problem with them, the Fair Credit Billing Act is on your side.

      --

      CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.

  26. No AOL Client Needed. by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

    And an AOL client...

    NO!!! If AOL refuses to follow industry standards, then they should pay the price. If enough AOL users get tired of things not working, perhaps an end can be put to the AOL juggernaut.

    1. Re:No AOL Client Needed. by zapfie · · Score: 1

      What industry standards has AOL refused to follow? Just curious.

      --
      slashdot!=valid HTML
    2. Re:No AOL Client Needed. by fmaxwell · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What industry standards has AOL refused to follow? Just curious.

      POP3, SMTP, and even basic system logons, to name a few. If they followed industry standards, you would not need to use their proprietary CD to gain access to AOL, would you? You could simply configure the phone number, name, and password like you do with any normal ISP.

      The above list is not intended to complete, but is just some examples.

    3. Re:No AOL Client Needed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't even start us.

      how many times have i seen attachments from outside (general internet) go into the AOL system only to get butchered.

      how many times have AOLers sent me attachments...and they come through as nonsense.

      AOL is a piece of proprietary shit.

      don't even HINT that you are defending it.

    4. Re:No AOL Client Needed. by zapfie · · Score: 1

      Uh.. ever hear of an honest question? Maybe you should look at fmaxwell's post for the proper way to respond.

      --
      slashdot!=valid HTML
    5. Re:No AOL Client Needed. by DrXym · · Score: 2
      But you do have access to your mail through IMAP, not to mention via webmail.


      The reason AOL software configures your dialup is pretty obvious when you look at who it's intended for and the hundred and one ways they could fuck things up. I guess AOL would rather do it for you than have their telephone support centres double in size.

    6. Re:No AOL Client Needed. by SEWilco · · Score: 1
      What industry standards has AOL refused to follow? Just curious.

      Even without chapter and verse, you know that there is something wrong when it is necessary to say "AOL client".

    7. Re:No AOL Client Needed. by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      The reason AOL software configures your dialup is pretty obvious...

      That's the point: They don't just configure your dial-up, which would be fine. Instead, they put an entire set of proprietary tools in place, some of which, at least in the past, have made it impossible for neophyte users who were using AOL on a trial basis to connect with other ISPs. If you try to remove the AOL software with an uninstall, countless droppings remain on your disc, desktop, and menus.

  27. change in software paradigm? by ryochiji · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder if tying in of software with (potentially non-free) online services is a transition phase in changes in the software paradigm. It seems like M$ (and others) are starting to look at software as services, potentially bringing it all online at some point. By tying in stand alone software with online services, I wonder if vendors are trying to blur the line between stand alone software packages and online services.

    1. Re:change in software paradigm? by kaxman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If they treat it that way I swear to all that is good I'll write my own. Software should not, with few exceptions perhaps, be a service. That's awful. I can see it now, pay-per-page Word usage. I still use Windows, entirely for games, but every day I get closer to dual-booting.

      I pay for the software, just like I pay for...I don't know...a stereo. I can open up the stereo and tinker with it, but it is already illegal for me to do that with software. I don't even own software that I buy nowadays.

      Boy, the free-software ideal seems more and more attractive with every day that passes.

      --
      Everyone on slashdot has a journal.
    2. Re:change in software paradigm? by leonbrooks · · Score: 2
      If they treat it that way I swear to all that is good I'll write my own.

      Please do.

      Boy, the free-software ideal seems more and more attractive with every day that passes.

      It will also help existing suck^H^H^H^Hcustomers if you let Intuit know you're doing that, and why ('You made me do it; if you'd treated your customers decently there would be no free QuickBooks clone'). And call your OSS package something like `QuackBooks' to drive the point home. (-:

      --
      Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    3. Re:change in software paradigm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It bothers me a lot that a seach on this thread for "GAAP" brings up nothing.

      A general-purpose business accounting program is not something that will be easy to turn out. Most companies of any size have purpose-built accounting software. I suggest you collect the requirements for your project from a CPA, and have them validated by experienced accountants in various industries.

      Yes, business is all addition and subtraction, but that simplicity might deceive you. What works for personal finance, that might work for a small family business or even a 2-partner law firm, will not work for a construction company, a factory, a gas well completion contractor, a hospital, or a casino.

      Note, that few of these people would be able to use Quickbooks!

      I wish someone would turn out a rock-solid personal finance system before they get the idea that they're going to revolutionize the accounting biz with their OSS project.

    4. Re:change in software paradigm? by Malc · · Score: 2

      It's also a logical way of combanting software piracy, if you're a commercial software company. Quicken products are some of the most copied that I've seen. Up there with Windows and Office. I could only install Quick Tax last year on one computer. This was very annoying as I wanted to use it on different ones, not just the one at home. By tying the product to online services, people can copy the software as much as they like. This means people have to use hacked software, which probably decreaes the number of people using it illegally - even if it's a small amount, it results in more revenues for Intuit.

    5. Re:change in software paradigm? by dubl-u · · Score: 2

      Software should not, with few exceptions perhaps, be a service.

      That's a reasonable thing to say. Of course, it's also reasonable to want your software to be kept current. And it's also reasonable to say that if it turns out you don't need a product, it sucks to have paid a lot of money for it. Alas, these notions, individually reasonable, don't go together.

      Personally, I'm pretty fed up with the way a lot of companies, especially Microsoft, try to keep people on the upgrade treadmill. And I never know what to do for expensive programs that I know I'll use rarely: if I could pay $5/day for Photoshop the two times a year I really need it, I would. And I'm sick to death with the marketing bullshit used to trick people into laying out a lot of money for what turns out to be crappy software.

      Usage-based pricing and subscription pricing can better align the interests of companies and of programmers. It's not a panacea, and it doesn't suit everybody, but you shouldn't dismiss it out of hand.

    6. Re:change in software paradigm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I could only install Quick Tax last year on one computer. This was very annoying as I wanted to use it on different ones, not just the one at home.

      Yep and they're doing it again this year. And if your hard drive should fail and you need to reinstall, then it's time to call tech support. If it happens when you're audited four years later what will you do? We haven't figured out what we'll be doing this year (my mother and sister used to share the software to file their tax returns), but it won't be QuickTax. Unfortunately they bought out a couple of their Canadian competitors a few years back and the one or two that are left are also doing the single machine thing. I guess there were a few people passing the software around at some places I have worked at but, as often happens with such copy protection schemes, Intuit are alienating their customer base. If somebody else puts out a tax package with the same terms as quicktax used to have (3-6 returns total on multiple computers) I'll buy it.

      In the meantime? Well, most of the web tax services expect you to trust your income data to their servers, and I'm a little concerned about their security (talk about a payday for anybody who wants to perform some identity theft), so maybe it'll be back to paper and pen for a while until Intuit smartens up.
    7. Re:change in software paradigm? by mpe · · Score: 2

      Yes, business is all addition and subtraction, but that simplicity might deceive you. What works for personal finance, that might work for a small family business or even a 2-partner law firm, will not work for a construction company, a factory, a gas well completion contractor, a hospital, or a casino.

      There is also the issue that accounting and taxation laws are specific to geography. With things getting especially complex where a transnational plays games to avoid taxation.

    8. Re:change in software paradigm? by Coppit · · Score: 2
      I wonder if tying in of software with (potentially non-free) online services is a transition phase in changes in the software paradigm. It seems like M$ (and others) are starting to look at software as services, potentially bringing it all online at some point. By tying in stand alone software with online services, I wonder if vendors are trying to blur the line between stand alone software packages and online services.
      Actually, MS wants software to be a utility that you pay for each month. Pay your electric bill... Pay your software bill...
    9. Re:change in software paradigm? by HiThere · · Score: 2

      That's what they're trying. But in the process they appear to be testing just how much value for the end user they can remove. I'm glad I've already switched to Linux for active work, or I'd be feeling rather paranoid right now.

      (Actually, the switch was because I read the license a couple of years ago, and decided that I didn't want to agree with that. Then I compared what it said, with earlier versions, and decided that I didn't like the direction things were headed. So I got out while the getting was good. After the first year, I've never regretted it.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    10. Re:change in software paradigm? by WNight · · Score: 2

      The problem with payment options for software is that people don't really understand that it's not at all like a physical product and they keep trying to price it like one.

      If you rent a car for a day, nobody else can use it. If you didn't really need it and just let it sit by the curb you'd still be depriving the company of a car. It makes sense to charge you full price (except perhaps wear and tear) because you represent a missed opportunity to rent to someone else.

      Software isn't like this. If I pay for a one-day use of Photoshop and don't use it, all I cost was some bits in a billing spreadsheet, or the up-front cost of sending the package. My not using it means they don't need to do anything and thus they don't have any real costs. But you know the pricing model isn't going to reflect this.

      It's similar to the piracy loons who claim that every copy of Photoshop selling for $1 in Asia is ($799) on the books of Adobe, as if someone who wasn't going to pay anyway costs them a sale.

      Back to the "Of these three, pick any two" topic... It's not unreasonable to expect a product to stay current, to have a return policy, and to be your property.

      It's how shareware works. You get to try the product, often in a very full-featured way, you usually get any updates they release in the near future, so you don't get stuck with an old version, there's a subscription (cheaper purchase for owners of old versions) to allow you to keep current, and it's yours, they can't take it away and don't try.

      In fact, the ideal shareware model seems to be to only lightly cripple, or perhaps just nag past low usage limit / day. This lets a person use it fully and actually become dependent on it so that they really want to buy it.

      I expect companies won't ever realize this. Commercial software tends to get more painful to use as time goes on, as if they don't even realize that it's the lowly despicable users who in the end, are their source of revenue.

  28. Have you considered... by endquotedotcom · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...sending your rant to them, instead of /.? I'm sure a quick search would come up with OSS alternatives, but I'm sure you'd prefer to stick with what you're used to. If you emailed them, and then followed up with a phone call to voice your concerns, I'm sure you wouldn't be the only one. If they become aware that some users actually do read their click-throughs, changing their ways would set a precedent for other companies.

    1. Re:Have you considered... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hehe ya like Intuit gives a shit. It's been like this in the Canadian verison for a year now and they don't care. There were even peopel looking into class action suits.

    2. Re:Have you considered... by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

      Yep, i was wondering that, too. Except I wouldn't start off with a rant. :) Maybe give them a link here...

      I agree this sort of game is offensive and damaging. They should try to make good for your reasonable understanding that you weren't sacrificing functionality in exchange for the upgraded features.

      But customer service does occasionally ... serve. Good luck, and next time take your dollers elsewhere to a more ethical company ... that is, until they pull the same stunt ... but you won't be suckered twice, will you?

      I avoid upgrades for as long as possible on the Luddite theory "if it ain't broke, don't fix it."

    3. Re:Have you considered... by Cerberus9 · · Score: 1
      changing their ways would set a precedent for other companies.

      A precedent such as going out of business. Measures like these are signs that the company is getting desperate for sources of recurring revenue, without which the business cannot survive. I don't support the practice, but I recognise it for what it is: the beginning of a financial death wail.
    4. Re:Have you considered... by rw2 · · Score: 2

      .sending your rant to them, instead of /.?

      I have. Several times.

      They don't give a shit.

    5. Re:Have you considered... by Reziac · · Score: 2

      I *did* send MY rant (covered above in brief) to Intuit, or at least to the only contact email I could locate (nominally for tech support). No response.

      I wasn't going to call to complain at MY expense, and AFAICT they have no 800 contact number.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    6. Re:Have you considered... by dlur · · Score: 2

      Not to try to side with Intuit, but this is clearly a false statement above. I was able to find the page with their toll free phone support numbers in approximately 1.2 seconds. It's right here on this page.

      Just because it says that the phone line is only for installation help, upgrade assistance, and product defects (this update system is surely a defect in my eyes), doesn't mean you can't call them up, ask to talk to a manager and start explaining how much money you've spent on their software, and how you're never going to spend another dime on it again because of this feature. If enough folks were to do that, not just not buy the software, but call the company and let them know why they _might_ actually rethink their strategy. Doubtfull, but you don't know unless you try. So everyone who owns Quickbooks, please call (888) 320-7276 and let them know how you feel. Or even if you were thinking of purchasing quickbooks, but after reading this were inclined not to purchase it, give them a call and let them know why.

      --
      Duris MUD - The best pkill MUD. Ever.
    7. Re:Have you considered... by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Thanks for the info ... it didn't occur to me to look on quickbooks.com for a Turbotax problem!! I went to the main Intuit site and dug around for some time without finding a phone number. (Or at least an 800 #, I don't remember by now. I wasn't about to complain on MY nickel.) No idea how much their site's been redone since then, either.

      But since 8 mnths later I'm STILL not done being mad about it (because every time I really work this system, I get reminded how much better it performed before) .. so they're gonna hear from me.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  29. Does this remind anyone of .mac ? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2

    I am also very skeptical of Microsoft's rental scheme and the "one big application" motto which the Win32 world is heading where each application is an additional component with a monthly access fee.

    These schemes sound like the rent-to-own scams that were popular a decade ago where customers paid 4x times the worth of various products through rental schemes. If you rented a couch for example through rent=to-own and refused to pay anymore, you would lose the couch and pay a fine for breaking the contract and all the money you invested already in it is gone. Most customers just paid through the roof so they would not lose there invested money and still retain good credit. However with proprietary file formats you lose all your data if you decide to not use the application anymore. In other words your screwed.

    1. Re:Does this remind anyone of .mac ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "rent-to-own scams" .mac was too good to be true in the first place.
      20megs of space and an email address for free?
      No

    2. Re:Does this remind anyone of .mac ? by terraformer · · Score: 1
      However with proprietary file formats you lose all your data if you decide to not use the application anymore. In other words your screwed.

      At least with XML based formats in greater fashion these days your data is only a Perl script away...

      --
      Who are you? The new #2 Who is #1? You are #617565. I am not a number, I am a free man! Muhahaha.
    3. Re:Does this remind anyone of .mac ? by bfree · · Score: 2








      Just because a file format is XML does not mean it is in the slighest bit useful! Now if the file format is an open specification of XML you should be fine. The above example is silly, but isn't .doc now XML and it hasn't imrpoved things in the slightest for bodies looking to write .doc compatible programs.

      --

      Never underestimate the dark side of the Source

    4. Re:Does this remind anyone of .mac ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, IBM has only been doing software rental for 50 years, so it's obviously doomed to failure.

  30. No free Mail for quickbooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am in the same boat.. I have been using fineprint PDF factory to create the invoice and mailing it right from ther same PDF creation screen.. it works but I would rather just be able to specify MY own SMTP server from within quickbooks. also I just found a product called invoy for quikbooks... It is a invoice mailer http://www.invoy.com/default.htm for quickbooks... but looks like it would be usefull for a high volume invoice mailer... I don't bill out that often to use it... and it seems to have an issue using exchange as an SMTP server..

    1. Re:No free Mail for quickbooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hrmm...sniff the traffic.

      Setup your own DNS server and then kindly resolve the quickbooks smtp server to be your own :)

      Easy way to hack it

      (I dont give a crap if you think it violates the DMCA either! It originated from my network I will do with it as i please Thank you! BOFH)

  31. Whoa, here... by NineNine · · Score: 2, Redundant

    You're talking about using their servers for a service. If course you're gonna have to pay. Just because you didn't pay in the past doesn't mean that you won't have to later. You're not entitled to use their servers for free. I use Quickbooks daily, and I can press print and drop a PO or an invoice on a fax machine just fine. I can also export and email 'em if I really, really want to. You're paying for the convenience of using their service. Nobody said you *had* to use their service at all.

    1. Re:Whoa, here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hehe sure. Wait until you get nailed with your payroll feature locked down unless you pay for tax tables from them. THey did this in the Canadian version - no pay, then no payroll feature, it becomes disabled and no way to manually use it or manually update your tax rates.

    2. Re:Whoa, here... by rollingcalf · · Score: 2, Informative

      The problem is that they *are* trying to force you to use their service, by gradually removing features that previously would run on your standalone PC.

      --
      ---------
      There is inferior bacteria on the interior of your posterior.
    3. Re:Whoa, here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      parent has stated the obvious and has missed the entire point.

      please mod down to -1 uninsightful

  32. Intuit is no longer a Good company. by bluephone · · Score: 4, Informative

    I helped a customer migrate from an ancient version of ACCPAC for DOS (Computer Associates product) to Quickbooks 99, and the upgrade to 2000. During the upgrade to 2000, we notices a much stricter set of rules for use, registration (which has always been over the top), and even simple networking of multiple systems. And the updates process was a nightmare, with more hoops to jump through than a Sigfreid and Roy show. When the customer bought 2001, and brought me back in to upgrade, the noose tightened further. Despite having several hundred dollars invested in QB over the years, I recommended heavily that they find another product to move to, because I could see how harshly Intuit was trying to keep it's small business accounting marketshare. Despite the cost and commplexity of Peachtree, I did recommend that over QB again, or moving off of a Windows based platform altogether. I still recomend this to all small businesses. Intuit is no longer the good Quicken company they were...

    --
    jX [ Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler. - Einstein ]
  33. In KGB's Soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Bear or Wulf clusterfucks YOU!. What a coun-try!

  34. Watch out for Quickbooks advocates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are heaps of folks on the NGs that defend this practice - notably Mike Block of http://www.blocktax.com/

  35. Intuit installing spyware? by Hollins · · Score: 5, Informative

    This message was recently posted to alt.comp.financial.quicken. It appears Turbotax 2002 may be installing and starting a spyware service without any notice. I just checked my machine, where I installed Turbotax last week, and indeed, this service is running:

    --
    Recently I found a running Service named C-DillaCdaC11BA on my Windows XP Pro system. Being an individual interested with Internet Security (viruses, etc), I naturally became concerned that my system may have become compromised. Starting my investigation revealed the associated file (called "CDAC11BA.EXE") located in the Windows\System32\Drivers directory. In addition, I found a hidden directories under the C drive. This first directory was named C_DILLA" and below it was a directory named "SafeCast Product Licenses". Contained within this directory was a single file called "BD6FD000.DAT".

    I traced the dates/times the files and directories were created to the same date/time I had installed this years version of Intuit's TurboTax. This is interesting because last year's version of TurboTax did not install this application and nowhere in this year's installation did it make mention of installing it, a third-party application that attempts to hide itself and runs as an additional service! A search of Google for C-DILLA revealed the following article, entitled "C-Dilla! "Copy Protection or Spyware?". It's located at http://www.tswn.com/modules/news/article.php?item_ id=45

    Nowhere on Intuit's website does it offer a description of this service or appropriate removal instructions. Is it really copyright protection or is Intuit utilizing spyware with their latest version of TurboTax?

    1. Re:Intuit installing spyware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Well.. cdilla is the licensing system used by AutoCAD, so yeah, it's a real system.

      (AutoDesk are seemingly much more upfront about its presence though - it's documented in the help and what not - and there are various ways of using AutoCAD that may or may not use cdilla.)

    2. Re:Intuit installing spyware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      C-Dilla is a software-lock copy protection scheme. It's like a software based dongle. 3ds max has been using C-Dilla since version 4.

      It isn't spyware and no spyware finding software (that I am aware of) will report it as installed spyware.

      Without the C-Dilla service running any program that authenticates through it will fail to start.

    3. Re:Intuit installing spyware? by Fable · · Score: 5, Informative

      SafeCast is a copy protection scheme. A company I recently worked for used SafeCast to regulate the usage of pre-release software - we made video games, and when we sent a pre-release version of our game to a member of the press (for a preview), SafeCast would require that the user register with our license server in order to preview the game. That way, we could see exactly who was playing what, and where. If the disc ended up in someone elses hands (this was a no-no), we could trace it back to the original user. If the user did not register, they could not use the software.

      So, does intuit track your usage? probably. That is exactly what we used it for.

    4. Re:Intuit installing spyware? by gilroy · · Score: 2
      Blockquoth the poster:

      SafeCast is a copy protection scheme.

      and

      So, does intuit track your usage? probably. That is exactly what we used it for.

      Um, that makes it spyware -- and that makes your company a dealer in spyware. It's particularly irksome because (a) they started running a service (which can costs cycles, for example) and (b) they didn't tell anyone. That makes it wrong... The company should be up-front about whatever resources they intend to consume. I know that I'm less likely to buy something that installs a spyware module, even if it's "only" to track legitimate usage.
    5. Re:Intuit installing spyware? by Reziac · · Score: 2

      I don't know about this C-DILLA, but I can tell you for a fact that the version of IE5.5 that TurboTax 2001 forcibly installed IS ET-ware. When I finally got DUN working again and went online, the VERY FIRST ding on my firewall, not ten seconds later, was FROM a M$ IP address, which I recognised as being within their block, and *verified* with whois. I already knew that FP98 goes around ZoneAlarm, so it wasn't really any surprise that IE5.5 apparently had as well (unless you've got a better explanation for why a M$-owned server instantly began trying to peek into some port they have no business going near).

      This part wasn't exactly Intuit's fault, but if TurboTax hadn't forcibly installed IE5.5 (and there was no advance hint that it would do so, nor could the install be interrupted) it could not have happend in the first place.

      More ranting in my post above, re all the time and aggravation TTax cost me. And after that, no way in hell will I *ever* buy another Intuit product.

      So, all you companies who are hellbent on forcing us into the subscription model and telling us which features we can or can't install and/or use, not to mention doing so on the sly -- don't be surprised when after a couple rounds of this horseshit, your market share begins to shrink. Even ordinary users can recognise when they've been bent over a barrel once too often.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  36. Business plan... by LucidityZero · · Score: 3, Funny

    1. Create popular software program
    2. Sell popular software program
    3. Force fees on users after the fact
    4. ????
    5. Profit!!!

    Actually, I guess in this cause you can skip number 4 entirely. :)

    --
    Sig.i>
    1. Re:Business plan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has been confirmed that the "????" step does indeed equal "Force fees on users after the fact
      " ... ...

      Therefore:

      1. Steal Underwear
      2. Force fees on users after the fact
      3. Profit

    2. Re:Business plan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4. Force user's accounting data through your servers and raise your prices to take 10% of their profits (...and you know their profits).

  37. quickbooks sucks... yes sucks by jmd! · · Score: 2

    We use quickbooks at work, at I was excited when they went to an online version... great, I don't need Windows to run the client anymore. Wrong.

    The new web version requires Windows. Yes, Windows. Not even Mac users can use it. It uses ActiveX for no apperent reason. All of the functionality could have easily been done in HTML with a tiny bit of JS. But they made ActiveX a requirement.

    If it's so obviously unnecessary, why would they limit their available customers and produce a seperate Mac version? Here's why.

    Quickbooks want's to be an ASP. It's in fashion. They start to design a web version. Microsoft threatens them (because it's in fashion), as there are millions of computers that payed $300 for Windows just so they can run Quickbooks on top of it. Quickbooks ensures Windows will still be required, by an ActiveX dependency.

    Microsoft maintains monopoly. User gets screwed.

    1. Re:quickbooks sucks... yes sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course this could probably change once ActiveX gets implemented into mozilla =) (me hopes and prays)

    2. Re:quickbooks sucks... yes sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It isn't just that Win is required, it mandates the use of IE with relaxed security.


      Keep in mind QB is no longer a program, just ActiveheX scripts that run in IE.

    3. Re:quickbooks sucks... yes sucks by kennylives · · Score: 2

      Yes, but it's still Mozilla on WINDOWS

      --

      Where the value of X-Mailer: is the true measure of a man...

  38. From the company bringing you product activation.. by emarkp · · Score: 2

    In other Intuit news, I've been a TurboTax user for about 4-5 years (both federal and state). Since they're putting in 'Product Activation' this year, now I have to figure out which competitor to use.

    You'd think they'd learn that this crap is losing customers.

  39. Dear slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am wondering if some OSS package exists. Please do my research for me as I am either too busy or, more likely, too lazy.

    Thank you,
    Some Fat-Ass Loser

  40. Quickbooks try Peachtree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I don't know of a single professional CPA who recommends Quickbooks...

    When I took accounting at college they recommeded Peachtree Accounting, and this seems to be what most accountants prefer. In fact, the university I went to now requires that you use Peachtree.

    1. Re:Quickbooks try Peachtree by T5 · · Score: 2

      My CPA does, and they're fairly reputable. They don't recommend that you upgrade QB or QB Pro; they haven't upgraded theirs since 2000. Convenient, though. Just drop your DB onto media, hand it and a check over, and all your financial worries disappear!

      Guess it's time to stir the pot with my accountant and see what they recommend next.

    2. Re:Quickbooks try Peachtree by forii · · Score: 1

      The problem with peachtree is that it doesn't import files from Quickbooks 2002.

    3. Re:Quickbooks try Peachtree by ChaoticLimbs · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well, most accountants I've dealt with are morons who will fudge the data all up with journal entries without adequate references or explanations. They simply adjust the balances of your expense accounts without leaving a comment behind to tell you why. Don't even get me started on "bookkeepers". Half of them don't know what a debit and credit are. I worked tech support for Intuit and dealt with people's messed up 13 meg data file (that they haven't backed up in 3 years).

  41. I been foolin wit these jokers for a while now... by dnoyeb · · Score: 2

    I have had my taste of intuit for a while now. I use plain old Quicken. They mislead you with 'extreme prejudice' into thinking you need the online junk. Its part of the install. You never click cancel during the install right? But you gotta know when the install is over and the garbage begins...

    In any event, you can usually get the updates from their website if you are 'Sherlock' enough. Thus, you don't have to use the auto- weputyourfinancialinfointoourbagoftricks update junk.

    Of course this is with Quicken and YMMV.

    I just can't believe you have to do _anything_ online to use your non-online software.

    Perhaps they subverted you into using an online version? I think intuit has online versions of all their money packages and sometimes the offline versions turn themselves into web-forwarders to the online versions if you are not careful.

    Why in the living HELL would I wan't to _PUT_ my money online????? I mean my whole portfolio? I simply can't imagine why.

  42. Want people to embrace using OSS apps? Then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...start writing OSS apps that are 1) equal, or 2) better than the commercial version. Anything less will be unacceptable. Don't bitch because people aren't using OSS, bitch because there is no OSS apps for people to use.

    Oh, don't expect gratitude. You're the one who clamored for OSS usage.

    1. Re:Want people to embrace using OSS apps? Then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...start writing OSS apps that are 1) equal, or 2) better than the commercial version. "

      Actually, it still surprises me just how little there is, commercial or otherwise, to fill the needs of people who want computerized solutions for personal or small or large business accounting software. I have worked in companies small and large, and the only accounting "systems" that I've seen that worked, were only partially computerized.

      Also, I am old enough to have gotten some experience BEFORE everything was expected to be computerized, and certainly before "computerized" meant "runs on a desktop PC."

      I have to say, we had better accounting systems in the manual/paper days than we do today.

  43. This is nothing... by Locky · · Score: 5, Informative

    After losing information crucial to QuickBooks operation (ex-wife) I reinstalled QB99 on a new machine and called Intuit for my serial keys only to find out they don't support calls related to any product over 2 years old. They refused to give me my keys (which they had on file) and essentially forced me to fork out $400 for a new version of QuickBooks. Somwhere along the line they also threathened to take me to court after I demanded they give me what I legally own. Needless to say I will never buy an Intuit product again and encourage others to do the same.

  44. If you had read Ed Foster's column in InfoWorld... by mbstone · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...you'd have known all about Intuit's anti-consumer practices months ago:

    Twist in Intuit's crippleware techniques doubles the cost of its tax-table service (4/27/01)

    Intuit is up to its old tricks: Adding taxing burdens on its QuickBooks clients (3/17/00)

    There is another column by Foster -- the #1 and only consumer IT columnist of whom I am aware -- on the practice of making QuickBooks users transmit invoices using Intuit's servers but you'll have to find it yourself.

  45. fix your hosts file by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    adjust your hosts file accordingly and use your own mail server. Or if the address/IP is hardcoded in you may have a big hex editing job.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  46. *** YOU LIE!! *** by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THE ONLY REASON you don't like the new "feature" (albiet it kinda sucks) is that YOU DIDN'T LEGALLY PAY FOR THE SOFTWARE IN THE FIRST PLACE!!!

    Seeing as you are a regular reader of Slashdot, it is safe to assume that you never pay for software.

    Boo Hoo!

  47. Peachtree Accounting by Deathlizard · · Score: 2

    I'd have to recommend Peachtree over many other accounting apps out there. Although it has a slight learing curve it's very powerful and reliable.

    It is unfortunate that Intuit is alienating its customers to the point of them turning to other accounting apps. When that happens most companies tend to migrate to the most visable Platform out there, which is usually Microsoft. It wouldn't suprise me if in two years Intuit Sues Microsoft for being a accounting software monopoly instead of Intuit listening to their own customers and giving them what they want.

    1. Re:Peachtree Accounting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Peachtree isn't bad, I used to use it myself, but I've moved my firm over to the completely integrated CCH ProSystemFX solution - while it is a little more pricy, I've found it completely worth it. It also has a slight learning curve, but CCH has customer support for any questions that is better than anything I've ever experienced in life - i.e., no wait times, no dumbass flunkies who can't answer your questions/solve your problem - you actually get a programmer on the other end.

  48. Re:How helpful. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Incompatible with what?
    GPL?

  49. zerg by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 3, Funny
    I have no interest in letting Intuit know about my invoices and other financial information.
    Only a terrorist would not be willing to share their personal financial data with a good, honest, patriotic company like Intuit. You're not a terrorist... are you?
    --
    [o]_O
    1. Re:zerg by maexio · · Score: 0, Troll

      Great move there buddy, call on the standard ko line of all imbeciles. Call the person a terrorist, and it immediately makes you righteous, right? Perhaps you should more closely read the constitution of the United States, or the principles the country was founded upon, instead of resorting to tagging people as terrorists. I personally, would argue that what Intuit is doing is a removal of property, since they are removing usable access from a program that is one's property. After all, property is protected by the constitution. Also, the argument that there is a disclaimer has already been previously denied in court. So without proper packaging, or advertising the product simply as a service, i don't see how they are not removing property. But, don't resort to calling people terrorists, simply becuase they don't want to give away their personal information to a company. Besides stating that a company is honest simply states that you don't follow the news, or the recent ENRON, scandal INCLUDING their TAX COMPANY. (Accounting, but whatever). So why should you be forced to TRUST a company.

    2. Re:zerg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Uhhh . . . Beavith, I think that wath tharcathm.

      ~~~

    3. Re:zerg by el_chicano · · Score: 1
      Call the person a terrorist, and it immediately makes you righteous, right?
      I think Lord Omlette is making a comment that there should be a corollary to Godwin's Law, except you get called a "terrorist" instead of "nazi".
      I personally, would argue that what Intuit is doing is a removal of property, since they are removing usable access from a program that is one's property.
      You should read your EULAs more closely, most commercial software you only lease and you don't own the program, the software company does.
      So why should you be forced to TRUST a company.
      Because then you are not a good consumer. Or in the case of the government, a patriotic citizen.
      --
      A man who wants nothing is invincible
    4. Re:zerg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a retard.

  50. Always have a fallback plan. by Spudley · · Score: 2

    This story highlights one thing I've always said: When it comes to a 'mission-critical' system, you should always always always have a fallback plan in case the current system lets you down.
    That goes as much for home accounting as it does for the space shuttle's life support.
    There is a difference between using a computer system and relying on one. As soon as you rely on it, you open yourself up to disaster if it stops being reliable.
    In most cases, you don't have to actually buy the alternative solution straight up; the important thing is being prepared for a situation where you might need it.

    --
    (Spudley Strikes Again!)
  51. EULA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so i take it u DIDN'T read the EULA. my guess is that it stated that they would screw you in that and you agreed....

  52. Why upgrade? by pla · · Score: 5, Informative

    I really do not understand people's "need" to always have the newest version of a program.

    I upgrade *ONLY* when I encounter either a major bug (meaning "uncircumventable") in what I already have, or what I have simply cannot do what I need it to.

    For my web-surfing machine, I run W2K. I will *not*, *ever*, upgrade to XP simply because it doesn't do anything "new". Perhaps I will need to upgrade to the next version of Windows someday, but considering Microsoft's (and most companys') release habits, I doubt I'll need to for at least a few more versions. Hell, I only upgraded from NT4 because it had poor PNP and high-end multimedia support (which I don't really consider a "good" reason, technologically speaking, but when I couldn't run 90% of modern games or get any new hardware, I didn't have much choice). Before NT4, I used DOS (the entire Win95 line quite simply sucked, and amazingly, seemed to get progressively *worse*, not better).

    For email, I use Calypso (well, mostly, I use Elm, but for my junkmail account I find it easier to get it via POP and just let the nice filters strip out 99% of the spam). Calypso, for those who don't know it, still uses a text-only interface (basic support for HTML/RTF, but the only email I get in HTML consists of spam, so I don't really care 'bout that).

    For compiling under windows, I still use Borland C++ 5. I suspect I'll have to upgrade when 64-bit chips hit the mainstream in a year or two, but at the moment, that 6-year-old compiler does the job just as well as anything I could go out and buy today.

    The "solution" here seems obvious. "If it ain't broke, don't fix it".

    Don't get me wrong, I have no strong love for "retro" computing (except classic console video game emulation ). But of the programs I regularly use, not a single one has made any real improvement in half a decade.

    And now, we see companies moving toward *decreased* functionality in their programs, along with non-permanant licenses to use them. Explain how that benefits me?

    1. Re:Why upgrade? by BradleyUffner · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I upgrade *ONLY* when I encounter either a major bug (meaning "uncircumventable") in what I already have, or what I have simply cannot do what I need it to.
      That's all well and good until you start dealing with programs like accounting packages. These programs using tax tables and rules that need to be up to date to even function. If you don't update them then the program dies. The problem then comes if the "update" removed functionality that already existed in the old version.
    2. Re:Why upgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last time I checked, web browsers didn't use tax tables. Don't post on subjects you know nothing about, dumbass.

    3. Re:Why upgrade? by Yosho · · Score: 1

      For my web-surfing machine, I run W2K. I will *not*, *ever*, upgrade to XP simply because it doesn't do anything "new".

      Yes it does. Among the features I use regularly include fast user switching, which lets multiple users be logged into a computer at once locally (I know, Linux already does this), and a remote desktop connection that supports more than 8-bit colors (of course, this only works with servers that also support this, which at the moment is limited to other WinXP boxes, but the upcoming .NET Server should).

      I also find the ability to lock the taskbar's position and selectively hide icons in the system tray very useful. I usually have around a dozen programs at a time running in the background that insist on having icons down there, but there are only three or four at any given time that I want to actually see; the rest just take up space. XP also has better hardware support, meaning that if I take a random piece of hardware and plug it in, it's more likely to automatically detect and install it so I don't have to go hunting drivers down. There are more I don't use, but I can't recall the details at the moment, so I won't elaborate.

      Your decision to keep using Win2k is fine with me, but let's at least not lie to ourselves.

      For email, I use Calypso

      Actually, I used to also use Calypso, and I think it's still a great client. Why don't I anymore? for one, I discovered that there's no way to export all of your current mail into another format, and it stores everything in its own proprietary format. You may feel differently, but a lot of the e-mail I receive is important correspondance that I don't want to lose; Calypso's way of handling things meant that ever switching to another client would be fairly painful, and while I didn't want to, it's possible that someday I would have to for unforeseen reasons.

      On top of that, the company that made Calypso pretends that it doesn't exist anymore. If you encounter any problems, you won't get any technical support from them, and if your hardware is damaged and you somehow lose the program, you won't be able to find it for download anymore. Not to mention that you won't be able to read any of your old mail because of how Calypso stores it.

      With that said, I now mostly use Mozilla; it was a bit awkward getting used to the different interface at first, and there are a few things I miss, but I've discovered other features I like that Calypso didn't have. And being a free, open source project, it's not likely to vanish any time soon.

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
    4. Re:Why upgrade? by Yosho · · Score: 1

      Actually, I take part of that back. The company that developed Calypso, MCS Dallas, no longer supports it, but out of curiousity I did a bit of searching around, and it looks like Rose City Software does now. Their page looks a little... unprofessional, however.

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
  53. updates are not optional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
    If you don't install the updates, you can't use the updated tax tables you purchased, which means you can't issue your own payroll checks, which makes the program useless in a matter of 45 days, along with 10 years of historical data. Besides, Intuit almost demands you use its very expensive payroll services, instead. It costs as much as another headcount, a big hit for an org employing less than 10 people.


    Ever price QuickBooks checks? 4 times as expensive as generic Quill. Fun, eh?


    There is *NO* substitute for QuickBooks. We can't get the Linux based developers off their KDE vs Gnome kick, so we are stuck. Has any Linux developer ever finished any project?

    1. Re:updates are not optional by mkoenecke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sure there's a substitute for Quickbooks. I'm still quite happily using Peachtree Accounting version 7, which still lets you update your own tax tables. Later versions wipe this out, which is the only reason I have refused to "ugrade."

      Someday all these chickens will come home to roost, as more and more people realize that "upgrading" means being required to buy into a glorified leasing program to keep functionality. More and more people will stick with what they have in lieu of surrendering ones autonomy to ones software provider.

      --
      TANSTAAFL
    2. Re:updates are not optional by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      Peachtree is good. I own about a dozen copies of it. Mostly 2002, a few 2003. I havent a clue what to do with them, but they are free so I just keep em around.

  54. I went through exactly the same thing by kfg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And if you want to take the time and trouble you can hack spreadsheets to be just as automatic as Quicken in any modern Office Suite, like, say-Open Office. Frankly, since I understand the math involved, I'm not sure why anyone would bother with propriatary accounting systems.

    Roll your own. If you don't understand the math it will force you to learn it. In my opinion you *should* understand the math of handling your money, especially if it's a business.

    What's more, commnand line spreadsheets are readily available ( Visicalc itself is now available for download) so even people, businesses or nonprofits with little or no capital can run a spreadsheet on free antique hardware that Quicken would choke on.

    I highly recommend the book "Elements of Spreadsheet Style" by John Nevison. Out of print but available used through Amazon for under ten bucks.

    An older Edition of the classic book "Small Time Operator" known as the "Computer Edition" includes complete Visicalc code for all of your bookeeping needs. This is also available used through Amazon but will set you back twentysix bucks. Cheap price for avoiding the propriatary rat race and a hell of a book for anyone just getting started in their first business.

    KFG

    1. Re:I went through exactly the same thing by ergo98 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Frankly, since I understand the math involved, I'm not sure why anyone would bother with propriatary accounting systems.

      And I understand how to make hash tables and red-black trees, so I don't understand why anyone would bother with RDMBS when all they need is a C compiler and the gumption to "roll their own".

      Of course that is absolutely, positively ridiculous. A complex program like Quickbooks isn't simply a couple of spreadsheets rolled together to give you a total, but is complete business management system.

    2. Re:I went through exactly the same thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not enough just to understand the math,
      as there are any number of generally accepted accounting principles that are counterintuitive.

    3. Re:I went through exactly the same thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If databases didn't let you export your data, I would get the fucking C compiler out.

    4. Re:I went through exactly the same thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Frankly, since I understand the math involved, I'm not sure why anyone would bother with propriatary accounting systems.

      So let me get this straight: I'm supposed to tell my father, who flunked a simple PDP-8 programming class back when the PDP-8 was cutting edge and ended up starting his own small non-IT business, to waste hours of time (and thus loads of money) writing his own spreadsheets to do his accounting instead of using QuickBooks? And then waste hours of my time (and thus loads of my money) fixing them for him? No thanks, I'd rather have him buy something pre-packaged that he can blame if any of the math goes wrong (preferably not QuickBooks, which I will urge him to jump off at the earliest opportunity.)

    5. Re:I went through exactly the same thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ditto. Mod this person up, as common sense has arrived. I made the mistake of moving off spreadsheets ONE time. QuickBooks, et al, are a load of shite.

      There are a load of apps with check, etc, templates. The IRS makes a CD-ROM they sell for about $15. They update it every year, and it has all the forms, instructions, etc.

      Why the hell use anything else, and give up complete control.

      I am Mike Nomad

    6. Re:I went through exactly the same thing by mpe · · Score: 2

      So let me get this straight: I'm supposed to tell my father, who flunked a simple PDP-8 programming class back when the PDP-8 was cutting edge and ended up starting his own small non-IT business, to waste hours of time (and thus loads of money) writing his own spreadsheets to do his accounting instead of using QuickBooks? And then waste hours of my time (and thus loads of my money) fixing them for him? No thanks, I'd rather have him buy something pre-packaged that he can blame if any of the math goes wrong (preferably not QuickBooks, which I will urge him to jump off at the earliest opportunity.)

      If he gets accused of fraud or tax evasion blaming some piece of proprietary software is unlikely to do much good anyway.

    7. Re:I went through exactly the same thing by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      >>What's more, commnand line spreadsheets are readily available ( Visicalc itself is now available for download) so even people, businesses or nonprofits with little or no capital can run a spreadsheet on free antique hardware that Quicken would choke on.

      How do you get it to print checks? How do you get it to print 1099's and W2's, etc.??

    8. Re:I went through exactly the same thing by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > A complex program like Quickbooks
      > but is complete business management system

      Yeah, that's like saying pico is a complete word processor. Quickbooks is fine for small businesses, but thinking that it is a "complete" Business system is laughable. For COMPLETE business management, a company needs something like MAS/90 -- a REAL accounting program.

    9. Re:I went through exactly the same thing by HiThere · · Score: 2

      I have no knowledge of QuickBooks, so I may be overrating them, but I believe that in addition to accounting they provide many reports, and help one stay within the bounds of some very peculiar and unexpetedly unreasonable laws. (And I can't tell you what they are, because I don't know them.)

      Just consider, however, the intricacies of ADA when you are building a web page, and then realize that the same people who wrote that have been writing laws to govern businesses since the country started.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    10. Re:I went through exactly the same thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you don't even know my dad, fscktard. He'd never be charged with tax evasion.

    11. Re:I went through exactly the same thing by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      Oh, no way man, compared to Sage, MAS 90 is laughable garbage. No, wait, compared to Great Plains Enterprise edition, calling Sage complete is laughable.

      Quickbooks is a complete business management system for small businesses, and obviously was never intended to be recommended for medium or complex multi-warehouse style businesses.

  55. a request? by vvikram · · Score: 1


    hey , not to be a pita but can the editors just
    stop the crappy two line comments at
    the end of each post. it just makes them
    and us [the readers] look stupid. thanks but we also can read the stuff you know?

    [actually if the comments made sense i would have never posted this but for quite a while it looks like its a ragtag set of folks passing yodaesque comments on the world and how it should run sitting from their basement]

    no offence please.

    vv

    1. Re:a request? by el_chicano · · Score: 1

      If you don't want to see the sigs, you can turn them off in user preferences.

      As far as the comments making sense, your on your own!

      --
      A man who wants nothing is invincible
    2. Re:a request? by theLime · · Score: 1

      Maybe I read his comment wrong, but I think he meant the Slashdot editors' post-article comments. In this article it would be:
      "The issue at hand is that commercial software has started to force consumers to fall into such schemes to maintain features that they already had. Today it is Quickbooks, but what about tomorrow?"
      added by Cliff.

      In this case, it's not so bad, but I've seen some pretty dumb ones before.

    3. Re:a request? by el_chicano · · Score: 1
      Maybe I read his comment wrong, but I think he meant the Slashdot editors' post-article comments.
      On second reading, I think you are right. I don't know about you but I enjoy them -- it is what gives slashdot some personality.

      Regular news sites never admit to being biased even if they are. At least slashdot is upfront about its bias...
      --
      A man who wants nothing is invincible
  56. Renewing QB tax tables by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Don't let Intuit know about it, but... if you install QB on a different computer, the software update forces an update to the current tax tables!

    I found this out when I move QB6 to my laptop, two years after the tax tables expired. A few weeks ago, when I put QB6 onto my new XP box for the office, it again updated my obsolete tables, which I could then copy to any computer that previously had QB6 installed.

    Of course, that doesn't fix the problem of giving in to Intuit's propaganda about "improving" the product, UPGRADE NOW!!!, and losing access to previous features because they're "properly implemented" now...

    Last night, I talked someone out of Quicken when I told them about how Intuit's products constantly badger you to buy some service or product that is GUARANTEED to make your financial life blissful. She just wanted to balance her checkbook!

  57. hard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
    You never have posession of the patches. They are a download through IE (only, Netscape will not work) and auto installed. Obviously, you've never used Koday image editing software for the cameras.


    Quickbooks is not a real app, it is a collection of scripts that runs in an IE window. Using 98lite to uninstall IE ruins your QB install.


    Now get off your ass and help write a Linux equivalent. +3 my dying backside, you're a nitwit.

    1. Re:hard by Narcissus · · Score: 2

      Just because a program uses IE does not make it "not a real app... a collection of scripts".

      Come on, a little more credit, please! It has embedded HTML, yes, and requires IE to display them, yes, but it doesn't just have IE show the pages and be it.

      Quickbooks has special tags in the HTML that it then hooks into to add features to the HTML. And if it's anything like Quicken you'll even find links to the actual application through HTTP (eg. http://qw.exe/ ). You can't deny the fact that most of the work is done within the application itself, and only some of the data is represented in HTML. To start with, I'd compare the features presented in HTML (and the work required to present those features!) with those done within the "old-school" application itself.

      And besides: who cares, even if it is a collection of scripts? I can't find a better product, so I use it. And if you would deny using the best product simply for the fact that it's a script, then you obviously would prefer to use your computer as a form of self-congratulating toy than a tool to get the job done. Not that there's anything wrong with that, but you do seem to infer that there's something wrong with any other alternative.

      And I love the trolling "get off your ass and help write a Linux equivalent". Is that a "help me write" or "help write me" a Linux equivalent?

      If it's the former, why post AC: how are we going to help you if we don't know who you are? And if it's the latter, you can just get stuffed.

  58. I may have solved this problem... by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 2

    My Quickbooks started bugging me about updating...it said I couldn't do any payroll functions until I updated. Unfortunately the update it download bombed every time. I was stuck. Turns out the .inf file had a 'check payroll update' line that I could change manually, and it stopped bugging me after that. I don't use the tax tables, but there might be a similar solution for your problem.

    --


    Evil is the money of root.
  59. Re:How helpful. by SN74S181 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Incompatible with anything but a single sourced computer that runs a closed-source GUI.

  60. replacement for Quicken on OS X by austad · · Score: 2

    Does anyone know of a good replacement for quicken on mac OS X? I bought Quicken 2003, and I'm fairly unhappy with it, especially since it crashes for no reason. I'd like something which has some scripting capabilities to pull down data from my bank, or remove duplicates in .qif files (like a .qif from a bill pay service, and the corresponding check on the bank .qif).

    I would assume it's possible to make GNUCash work, but last time I tried to compile that beast under linux and make all the deps work, it was nearly impossible. Probably would take a couple days or more under OSX.

    Preferably I could find something not chocked full of ads or something that does not contact it's maker for any reason. Why can't companies make good solid software anymore without trying to screw their clients into upgrading or buying services?

    --
    Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
    1. Re:replacement for Quicken on OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could try Liquid Ledger.

    2. Re:replacement for Quicken on OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Well, I guess so. It kinda seems that way. Anyhow, looking at the Apple website, under the "Store" tab, is a "productivity" software section. Several seem to be listed there. Anybody tried out "Checkmark" or "MYOB"?

    3. Re:replacement for Quicken on OS X by mad.frog · · Score: 1

      Oh God yes! I upgraded to Q2003 (Mac) in order to download my credit card transactions directly from my bank, as promised on the package. What the package didn't say was that very few banks (including mine) support downloading to the Mac version, only the Windows version. (My bank didn't point this out on their web site, either. Only by calling THEIR tech support did I eventually find this out.)

      But wait, the plot thickens... the weird part is that this isn't some wacky thing that would be hard to do in a cross-platform way; both Mac and Windows versions apparently just download transaction info in ".QFX" format, which is apparently some Quicken-specific, vaguely XML-like text file format, that they have somehow, deliberately, made platform-senstivie.

      This baffled and dumbfounded me... for one, I can't imagine why they would want to. (It's not like parsing a text file is hard to make cross-platform...)

      I don't suppose anyone out there knows the format of this file, so I can manually edit mine to be Mac-compliant? :-)

    4. Re:replacement for Quicken on OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I admit compiling GNUcash from scratch is really a pain, but Fink has made the problem pretty much go away. In the beginning, even Fink had a lot of problems getting it right, but I think you'll find it pretty painless under Mac OS 10.1.X now.

      If you're already at 10.2.X, then you'll have to wait until the entire Fink tree is recompiled with GCC 3.X and re-released, of course.

  61. QuickBook Registration Requirements by Scitt · · Score: 1

    I've seen more and more businesses require a credit card number that they will use automatically when subscriptions need renewing, etc. What I've done is used ShopSafe, a feature of Mastercard. I make a new number, with only enough money in it for the initial necessary payment, and with an expiration date in the not-too-distant future. When the automatic renewals come, the business will have to come back to me to get a new credit card number. Therefore, I am in complete control!

    1. Re:QuickBook Registration Requirements by base3 · · Score: 2

      American Express has a similar service, called Private Payments. The number's no good after the first billing--I absolutely love it. The ability to limit the amount charged on a per number basis sounds even better, though--I'll have to look into that.

      --
      One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
  62. HAHA I HEARD ANOTHER FUNNY ONE TOO by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 1, Troll

    it goes ALL YOUR BASES ARE BELONGING TO US!!!

    Hahahahahahahahahahahaha!!! SO funny!!!!

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  63. Re:From the company bringing you product activatio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's so bad about product activation? It just registers your product electronically to make sure that you're not pirating the software. You did buy TurboTax, right?

  64. Re:Here's an idea...won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    QB emails out in a proprietary format that only they understand. You'll be sending gibberish.


    And if you crack it, bet that Intuit will use the DMCA to get you.

  65. Maybe one reason... by StarTux · · Score: 2

    Why they never will make a Linux port, because they worry about the reputation Linux has for being Open Source, and also because we're percieved at being a minute userbase, especially on the Desktop.

    Hopefully this makes sense...never good to post on Slashdot... ...When tired that is :).

  66. Article on Linux Accounting Pkgs by gatch · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's about 6 months old, but here is an article you may find useful on Linux Accounting systems. I am in the process of completing part 2 which should be available soon: http://l4sb.com/portalarticle_search

    1. Re:Article on Linux Accounting Pkgs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why compiere is not included?

      http://www.compiere.org/index.html

    2. Re:Article on Linux Accounting Pkgs by gatch · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the tip. I will include it in part 2. Looks good.

  67. Quicken backdoors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Approximately 3 years ago a friend had a meeting with someone from Intuit who claimed they could monitor our website using end-user copies of Quicken.

    He said they had "one million" in the field which could be used as monitors.

    We never considered their solution, but we were shocked to hear of the backdoor. Or maybe it wasn't a backdoor. Maybe they were just going to re-direct a percentage of users to our website and then have us re-direct them back.. We've always wondered..

    I don't use windows, so I wasn't able to monitor the network traffic.

    1. Re:Quicken backdoors by Mendax+Veritas · · Score: 2

      Starting with Quicken 97, and continuing at least through Quicken 99 (don't know about anything newer than that), Quicken included software by Inverse Network Technology (later purchased by Visual Networks, NASDAQ:VNWK) for QOS reportage on dial-up and website connections. This product was originally called AccessWizard, then AccessRamp, and is still being marketed by Visual Networks today as Visual IP InSight. This is what the Intuit guy was talking about.

  68. Re:*** YOU LIE!! *** NO! YOU DIE, INTUIT TROLL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Die you intuit trolling basstid. DIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  69. Intuit screwed me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    and I didn't even buy their products. My company was a faithful user of MYOB accounting for the macintosh (Canada). Then MYOB went dot-bomb and in canada sold their asses to Intuit, who then took it over.

    Intuit, with their lame-ass "PAY US ALL THE TIME" model then started charging me $25 a month for their tax table update plan. You can see what's coming... there were NO TAX TABLE UPDATES. In fact, the only thing I ever got from them was a note saying that intuit were DISCONTINUING MYOB and that I was now FUCKED FOR ACCOUNTING IN CANADA.

    Fuck you, Intuit!

  70. The question poser's PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's using a Windows-only product, but would prefer a Linux solution. Doesn't sound like an "OS-X only" solution would work terribly well for him. Imagine suggesting Windows-only software for the myriad questions of "I want a Linux app that...." How would that get moderated? +5 interesting?

  71. Intuit is only the worst offender by drdanny_orig · · Score: 1

    I've never cared for Intuit's crass commercialism. Even after you pay them for their crapware, they insist on begging you to spend more. I'm still using Quicken-2000 (Basic), but never allow it to "upgrade" itself, and as soon as I can get it to export my data correctly, I'll use gnucash. (So far I get no joy....) What I actually worry about more is that every day it seems that someone is trying to get into my pocket without my permission, and it makes me very angry. Is this because I'm old and just a curmudgeon, or is it really getting worse?

    --
    .nosig
    1. Re:Intuit is only the worst offender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not just that you are old, it is getting worse. Hi-tech is no longer laying gold eggs, so the companies are attempting ANYTHING to continue bringing in the bucks. The have no real interest in the customer, only the stockholder.

    2. Re:Intuit is only the worst offender by Palarran · · Score: 1

      For exporting data, you might investigate Datablox.

  72. Re:From the company bringing you product activatio by kent_eh · · Score: 1

    What's so bad about product activation? It just registers your product electronically to make sure that you're not pirating the software.

    It also ensures that you have to call them and grovel if you upgrade your system between tax years.

    In order to bring 2001 tax info forward into the 2002 software, you have to have both versions of the program installed. Except that the previous version is already installed on a "different computer"(same HD, different MB)

    And don't get me started about them requiring Internet Despoiler to be installed as well.

    --

    ---
    "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
  73. Write your own or pay up. by MikeFM · · Score: 2

    If you don't like it then write your own. If your just bitching cus they don't have enough money then try coughing up a donation to pay for the work they've done. If you use an opensource program or think you might in the future then get off your arse and send them a payment. Donating $5 per program you'd have to pay for otherwise would be a good start.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    1. Re:Write your own or pay up. by stephanruby · · Score: 4, Interesting
      If you don't like it then write your own. If your just bitching cus they don't have enough money then try coughing up a donation to pay for the work they've done. If you use an opensource program or think you might in the future then get off your arse and send them a payment. Donating $5 per program you'd have to pay for otherwise would be a good start.

      I am an open souce developer and working on a project that happens to be open source doesn't give me the right not to have my work criticized.

      As a software user, if I'm going to try out new software, I'd like to know everyone's opinion on it, good or bad, before I install it. It doesn't matter if the software is free and it doesn't matter if the software is open -- I don't want to create myself the hassle and the frustration of installing a software that won't work on my machine. I, for one, am glad he told us about the sound card issue (my FreeBSD machine doesn't have a sound card either) and now I can use the time he saved me to evaluate the remaining options.

      Stephan
      PS: As noble as your intentions may be, simply donating money may not be the most practical option for every user out there.

    2. Re:Write your own or pay up. by MikeFM · · Score: 2

      I'm a developer also and I didn't mean not to criticize. I mean not to bitch. There is a big difference.

      It certainly is useful to list the real pros and cons of using a given program. It is not useful to bash the programmers because you think they are not well enough funded.

      Requiring a sound card to run an accounting program seems an odd decision to me. My first question is if that is an option that can be disabled when configuring for compilation. I'd assume it would be. That's the way I'd do it at least if I was the developer.

      Besides donating money to projects that you use, which is very useful, I'd suggest getting a LinuxFund credit card as that allows you to donate to projects without having to make any significant effort. It may not be practical to donate to every project you use but it certainly wouldn't hurt to donate to one or two. If you don't have the money then donate you skills. If your a coder donate code, if your an artist donate art, if you can read and write then donate documentation. If nothing else go down and donate your help to your local food kitchen. It doesn't donate directly to opensource but at least your giving something back.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  74. Quickbooks sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Get Simply Accounting, simple and less crap esp. if you live in Canada.

  75. Quicken 2003 is now subscription based! by SparkyMartin · · Score: 1

    They were gonna take YOU to court simply because you were asking for your keys? A while ago I would have said BS!, but you know, in this day and age I don't doubt it.

    I just found out today that Quicken 2003 forces you to subsribe in order to use their product, at least here in Canada it does. The flier says that you can upgrade to Quicken 2003 XG for $59.99 and that lets you use Quicken 2003 XG for 12 months. After 12 months "customers must renew or upgrade in order to continue to use Quicken" Some bargain-the full version used to cost the same amount and you could use it for years! I'll keep using my current version until transaction downloads no longer work (or probably sooner), then dump quicken and go back to a spreadsheet.

    Intuit used to a good company but its turned into garbage. I would recommend to avoid their products as well.

    1. Re:Quicken 2003 is now subscription based! by steve_l · · Score: 2

      If they dropped the annual price to say, $30, then the subscription would make sense. But instead they are saying 'you must buy a new copy of our app every year'. I am so glad these people dont make cars, they'd just crash a year after purchase in order to make you buy a new one. Oh, wait a minute, didnt ford explorers do that...

    2. Re:Quicken 2003 is now subscription based! by el_chicano · · Score: 1
      I am so glad these people dont make cars, they'd just crash a year after purchase in order to make you buy a new one. Oh, wait a minute, didnt ford explorers do that...
      Don't forget the old Ford Pinto, also known as the Firebomb!
      --
      A man who wants nothing is invincible
  76. Richard Stallman told you this would happen. by paynter · · Score: 5, Funny

    And everyone called him a radical.

    1. Re:Richard Stallman told you this would happen. by Picklesnow · · Score: 1
      This whole thread is showing why the open source community is growing, and yes will eventually replace the commercial software for most business applications. While commercial programs are building bigger much over featured programs, with all kinds of "anti-theft devices that make them a real pain to use" and are adding more means to separate us from our money weather or not we are wanting to upgrade or not, the open source software system is quietly and quickly improving its software, to the point that it is quite usable and getting better much faster than commercial software. In 1999 I was unable to make the switch to Linux because I could not find the drivers and usable programs now in the end to 2002 I am about shut down my last Windows system for the last time and now find no problem in that.

      Consider that Microsoft is soon to release a new version of MS Office that apparently will not work under W95/98 & ME that has some changes that according to rumors will make its files a problem for the present version of MS Office. Can you say forced upgrade of Windows as well as new versions of MS office. Some more Windows users will switch over this and will after the first period of readjustment will say, Hey, this is easy and it works. They will tell their friends and the next time some commercial software giant decides to f**k over their users in favor of the short term bottom line more will switch, and so on.

      Add to this the fact some end user computers are selling Linux boxes, and they are selling them. The message to all box manufactures is that you no longer must have Windows to sell your machine. by next Christmas more companies will be offering more Linux boxes that will be running a much improved OS, which will be competing against the same XP. Sure XP will still have the loins share of the market but its share will have slipped ever so slightly. The next year the process will continue until Many manufactures are willing to go sans-windows.

    2. Re:Richard Stallman told you this would happen. by Our+Man+In+Redmond · · Score: 2

      Well, that's because he is a radical. But, radicals are occasionally right.

      --
      Someone you trust is one of us.
    3. Re:Richard Stallman told you this would happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tirades like this come from people that seem to think that buisness is a one way street and that when they "go too far" there is no going back. But the fact is is Intuit goes too far and pisses off too many customers they can easily back off. Buisness is a dynamic machine that will settle on the mid point between giving away too much free and charging or restricting too much freedom, and that point is decided on by it's customers.

      In short, you hypothesis that "this" is why OSS will take over is complete and utter crap.

  77. A lot more to come by attobyte · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think software companies are going this way because it secures income. I think you will see this a lot more then we have been.

    I guess Opensource software has to win to fight this problem.

    Atto

    --
    I didn't use the preview button, so get over it!!!!

    Mike

  78. quickbooks by syrinx · · Score: 1

    I've never actually used Quickbooks, but around 5 or 6 years ago I think, Intuit offered free demos of it. They mailed it to you. On seven 3.5" floppies.

    My friend ordered some absurd amount of demos. None of us went without disks ever again.

    Even now, on the occasion I need a floppy disk, all mine are still Quickbooks disks. Some are still in their original plastic wrapping. Not only that, but never once has a QB disk failed me, whereas many other disks (old AOL disks, even some I actually bought) have lost their data.

    So anyway, they probably lost so much money on disks that they now need to make up for it by screwing their customers. ;)

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
  79. Re:From the company bringing you product activatio by emarkp · · Score: 2
    When did you stop beating your wife? (Common example of similar logical fallacy.)

    Yes, I have purchased TurboTax each year. I'm also too lazy to send in the rebates. What happens in 2 years when Intuit goes belly-up and I need to check some of the calculations? Oops, they're not around to let me use the product I purchased, and the IRS doesn't care.

    When a company starts treating all its customers as potential theives first and customers second, it will lose customers. Just as Intuit lost this one.

    Additionally, if I were to use TurboTax and then sell it used in the same tax year, this would be a problem. (Note: I have never done this, but AFAICT it is totally within my legal rights.)

  80. Packet mangling! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One could always mangle the packets so Quickbooks thinks it's talking to their server.

    1. Re:Packet mangling! by FauxPasIII · · Score: 2


      firewall# iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -p tcp --dport 25 -d ${INTUIT_SMTP_SERV} -j DNAT ${FRIENDLY_SMTP_SERV}

      --
      25% Funny, 25% Insightful, 25% Informative, 25% Troll
    2. Re:Packet mangling! by FauxPasIII · · Score: 4, Informative

      Dammit. Make that:

      firewall# iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -p tcp --dport 25 -d ${INTUIT_SMTP_SERV} -j DNAT --to ${FRIENDLY_SMTP_SERV}

      --
      25% Funny, 25% Insightful, 25% Informative, 25% Troll
  81. source for Real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    go to www.wlsam.com, it's a radio station. On the left, click on the listen button. The listen page will give you instructions on how to get player8.

  82. Re:From the company bringing you product activatio by emarkp · · Score: 2
    In order to bring 2001 tax info forward into the 2002 software, you have to have both versions of the program installed.
    Are you sure of this? That hasn't been the case in the past.
  83. Time to quit. by SloWave · · Score: 2

    OK You guys convinced me. I guess it's time for me to break my 12 year Quicken habit.

  84. easy switch to a real accounting package by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    Quickbooks is and always has been a joke in the accounting world. Thereare many MANY real accounting systems out ther that most businesses use. Check with some of them. If you want to run linux and can get your hands on the program that allows yourto run Xenix software in linux try Excalibur. It's 10,000 times better than anything quickbooks can even try to accomplish, allows POS terminals to be cheap text terminals, and like other real accounting packages, allow you to update your tax and other tables by hand. I strongly suggest that you learn how to do all that by hand and get a full grasp instead of relying on some program to do it all magically for you... The IRS is not going to take an excuse that quickbooks mis-calculated it..

    finally there are at least 30 dos based systems that are far better than any windows accounting systems. (you want speed and accuracy instead of pretty icons right?)

    I have helped at least 20 businesses switch away from quickbooks.. and they now have a better grasp of their companies financial picture because they now understand every aspect of it instead of the dumbed-down picture that quickbooks paints.

    Switch away.. you will be much happier in the long run... and more profitable!

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:easy switch to a real accounting package by RazorJ_2000 · · Score: 1

      What are some good DOS-based (or other) accounting packages?

      --
      pi=sigma{n:0-infinity}[(1/16)^n][(4/(8n+1))-(2/(8n +4))-(1/ (8n+5))-(1/(8n+6))]
    2. Re:easy switch to a real accounting package by TheDigitalOne · · Score: 1

      Ok, I use QB 2002 to manage the books on two retail businesses that I own. What DOS programs/packages do you recommend that I try using to replace QB with? Any Linux solutions? Anything out there that can import the data from QB for me?

      We are currently running about $1.2M/yr per store (no, I don't need a full-time account to manage my books using QB) can any of these other solutions provide me with the same functionality?

      I would move to a non-MSFT or Quicken solution in a heatbeat, but not if I have to hire a $75,000.00 a year accountent to replace a $200.00 software package.

      -TDO

    3. Re:easy switch to a real accounting package by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      It's not to hard to find. I typed dos accounting package into google and found this

      the one I have seen that is the best of the lot is Champion controller. for intel/windows and it looks like they made a windows client for their software package. Remember you do NEED to actually start learning and understanding your business accounting to use the aoftware packages that are more powerful. you do need to understand the basics and a little bit of the advanced accounting (taxes lie squarely in the advanced, but are not too difficult if you take your time and learn a bit of the accounting... I do my 1040 long every year, and I did moy 1040 long form when I had my business.)

      you don't need a $75,000.00 a year accountant, not even Fortune 500 companies hire that expensive of an accountant. you really DO need one during tax time no matter what software you use.

      Linux based accounting.... it does exist....

      this is a non-open-source accounting package. I have not used it. I personally absolutely loved the package for Sco Xenix called Excalibur Premiere. it was a $1000.00 per module package that allowed you to create any form possible plus used a real SQL backend, but I do not know if it exists anymore.... they may have made a dos/windows version of it now.

      Basically, I have seen that almost every company that is serious about their accounting package they do NOT use any of the windows based products. many of the larger businesses still use thier Unix accounting systems they bought in the early 80's.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  85. SQL Ledger and Nola by nurb432 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Both solid, and useable, although still in process of development so they arent perfect..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:SQL Ledger and Nola by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      anyone checked out NetLedger (www.netledger.com)? It's an ASP, so your files reside with a hosted app. However, you can upload your quickbooks files & get running fast. There's a bunch of other stuff besides accounting that the system does, but I'm sure they have a pay-for-what-you-use kind of deal. Anyway, maybe worth a look.

  86. how strange so rox NOT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first, and last, time i used quickbooks was in 1999. A customer requested it so i stopped by the local shop and pick a copy up off the shelf. After installing the software and setting up their books it told me that i had 60 days to register the software or it would no longer work! I couldn't believe my eyes. Shareware in a box? WTF! I called the tech support number and the poor guy told me that i had to register it and they would give me a key to unlock it for continued use. I couldn't help but explode on the guy. Actually i felt really bad about it. But anywho, the registered name for the software is: I cant believe i have to register this #&$*^#$ %$#! after i purchased it off the shelf. If the customer wasn't so heavly addicted to slothware i would have writen a db front end for him. it would have cost him the same amount.

  87. Who do they think they are? by AyaJulia · · Score: 1

    Wow. Updates that force information to be sent to the company's servers, for a possible future fee. Who does Intuit think they are, Microsoft?

  88. Solution: by iCEBaLM · · Score: 2

    Uninstall it and reinstall it, when asked if you want to do any updates in the future click "No".

    -- iCEBaLM

  89. more luck needed. by twitter · · Score: 2

    He'll never get that far. You don't think the unistall will work, do you? It will leave some kind of register doo-doo behind, if not in the data itslelf.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  90. Re:From the company bringing you product activatio by kent_eh · · Score: 1

    That's what I remember it said on the QT2002* box that I read, then put back on the shelf.

    *Canadian retail version

    --

    ---
    "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
  91. Its not just Tax Companies (Obviously by maexio · · Score: 1

    I had a similar problem occur with Pro Engineer Pro/ Flythrough by PTC. (I think that was the package portion). This software costs thousands of dollars a year to keep 'maintained' these fees are a percentage of total purchase price, which varies depending upon when you buy it. Also, if you have licenses that are like 10 years old, and extremely expensive (as there has been several price drops since) you pay the upgrad price on the initial purchase price, even if you would be paying less for being a less loyal consumer and having bought it more recently. Further, within the last year, they have unilaterally decided to replace operation of some components of some licenses. This is software they are replacing, that i am paying to keep using, but they are discarding it and requiring me to purchase new stuff. It will still run after the discard date, but not if i use any of the new software i'm paying thousands of dollars a year to maintain. What a scam. I have basically paid them thousands of dollars a year for NOTHING. I would move to OSS in a heartbeat if it wouldn't destroy my company's production abilities so massively, as there is not a oss competitor.

  92. Well, what about Mcaffee? by lkeyes · · Score: 1

    I just received a $40.00 subscription charge from Mcaffee for their on-line "tune-up" product. This was something I bought a year ago for a client...and we've long since moved on to another product. I had no idea the charge was coming and there is no way to get it removed, that I can see, by going to their web site.

    They must be learning from Intuit. I also had the problem with QB 2002... .have sworn by the QuickBooks product for years, and recommended it to many. No more. They are driving my accountant batty; she has to have a copy of every version from '95 - 2003 to service all of her clients.

  93. BINGO! by crm114 · · Score: 1

    That is precisely what ms is up to. '.net services' etc. Ms is betting the farm on moving to a services hosting model.

  94. This is only the beginning by D.+Book · · Score: 3, Informative

    Intuit's sister program, Quicken, is headed down the same course. Here's the situation with the Australian version of Quicken 2002, which is produced by the local distributor Reckon:

    1) Forced registration and machine-specific activation, or the program stops running after X times.
    2) Forced collection of personal details during registration. In fact, if you just tell it your phone number, their automated system will tell you your address (unless you have an unlisted number).
    3) Forced telephone reactivation upon reinstallation. You can't reactivate over the Internet (this only works for the first installation).
    4) No right to sell your legitimate, boxed copy of the software to someone else if you no longer wish to use it (Kapital is the same in this regard, despite the company's claims).

    If you give them a fake name and address, you'd better remember them, otherwise you won't be able to reactivate. And, for your information, there is no QUICKEN.INI workaround in the Australian version, and no "cracks" available.

    Don't be surprised if us Aussies are a test market for this, and the rest of the world is next. I switched to GnuCash, but as far as I can tell, most other users have been perfectly willing to take it up the arse.

  95. Good bye Intuit by mtm_king · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Good bye Intuit,

    I loved you for years. I used to use you to see how to write a great UI for a GUI back when I was going from programing for DOS to Window$. I also thought the world of you cause back in the 80's you were very well done, lean and mean, and you were a cheap date, and NOT married to Micro$oft - even though the Feds had to stop the marriage.

    We have been together for years - you sent out many thousands of dollars of invoices for me and kept the old check book under control. Quicken, Quickbooks, and TurboTax have been on every PC I have had over these many years.

    But when I upgraded from some 90's version of yourself to Quicken 2003 Premier Home and Business things did not feel like they used to. I did not need Quickbooks anymore, and I felt like your were not a part of my life as much as you were after my money (now you wanted to know my total net worth.)

    AND YOU REJECTED MY MAIL IN REBATE.

    Good bye Intuit

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  96. Forget GNUcash... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GNU has an ok C compiler, and some useful cli utilities, but I avoid anything GNU for the desktop like the plague. I haven't even tried GNUCash, but after struggling with the Gimp, I can imagine how usable it would be. I bet it even has little pain-in-the-ass pop-up windows. What the OSS world needs is a real accounting package written by real programmers who have a clue what businesses need. A bunch of 1337 h4x0r coders in high school and college really don't know what the hell they're doing in a business setting. The best accounting software for Linux is Peachtree on Solaris.

  97. What about Simply Accounting 9 in Canada? by RazorJ_2000 · · Score: 1

    What about Simply Accounting 9 (Canadian Ed)? I've been using v8.5 for a while and found it to be pretty good. I'm fairly comprehensive and a much more true accounting system than QuickXXX ever has been.

    --
    pi=sigma{n:0-infinity}[(1/16)^n][(4/(8n+1))-(2/(8n +4))-(1/ (8n+5))-(1/(8n+6))]
  98. I used to work for Intuit by ChaoticLimbs · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I used to do tech support for the Quickbooks and Quickbooks Pro line back in version 4+5. At that time they were a very fun, if low-paying job to have. They moved their entire operations to Tucson, AZ. They closed down the center in Rio Rancho, NM. They catered a big luncheon in a tent and sent all the temps home. The rest of us had to work 90 days more to get our severance pay. I always thought it was an odd way to announce a closure. Other than that, though, I always thought it was a great company. My supervisor, Travis Wheeler, even shaved his head on site after losing a bet. (kinda a dumb stunt, but he's at least honest when he loses a bet he shouldn't have made). He also got us some Nerf Crossbows so we could entertain ourselves by foam-fragging each other in the middle of important calls. I never saw them use this kind of method before. I don't approve. I will say, though, that QB is a great product, but Peachtree has really progressed since 1997 and should probably be checked out as a result of this new tactic. Sorry, Intuit. It was great while it lasted, but only Microsoft could get away with this kind of noncompetitive crap.

  99. Web Based Accounting Software by el_chicano · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you are willing to move your accounting over to a webapp, check out NOLA. It uses PHP and MySQL and is free and GPLed. I looked at it a few months ago and it seemed promising, I need to grab the current code and see how it looks now...

    --
    A man who wants nothing is invincible
  100. Ouicken is already Online! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for $20 a month now, Quicken will let you keep your books on the web so that you can share them with your accountant...at least this is what my accountant tells me. He's been trying to get me to do this QuickBooks online thing, which seems like a pay to beta service...the "advantage" is that your data is housed and stored elsewhere and you install no software, the disadvantage is that it is windows explorer only (? dont ask me why--something to do with the way the browser works) and that it has limited functionality at the mo. So cough up those $ to help intuit get their product right! It seems that this is going to be the way the product is going to go--I'll put money down that one of the next five versions will be migrating your data to a web based application....

  101. AS400/iseries Re:Long live spreadsheets... by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

    use IBM AS400! If you can program all those spreadsheet cells, you can set up an IBM iseries database. Old Style RPG is good enough and you can access it thru all your excell sheets. They are very pricy though. But you own all the software with no CAL fees. (they do use artifical CUP limits though, but it's not the same as MS by a mile)

  102. Same boat man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We had the same thing happen with QB 2001 and ended up converting to Peachtree about a year ago. We're a small IT consulting firm with 9 employees. We actually purchased QB 2002 too, after a support call costing $300 said QB 2001 had a bug (er, I think he called it an "undocumented feature") in e-mail invoicing that only QB 2002 provided, if we really needed that functionality we had to upgrade. Just two months after that purchase we got "downgraded" on an upgrade that came in from Intuit automagically. In our case we were on their Basic subscription and had to upgrade to the Deluxe subscription at around $50 per month if we wanted to keep using the features we had just paid for in the upgrade. We have since dropped all Intuit products and will never purchase anything from that company again! It's hard to do since they're such a juggernaut, but it had to be done.

    We switched over to Peachtree with an acceptable level of pain, and have been very happy with it so far. The sales rep at Peachtree said at the time they were receiving record numbers of people switching from QB to their product for exactly this reason.

    We did review some Linux and open source packages at the time of the switch, but none were full-fledged enough to meet our needs. Plus, you don't want to mess with your accountant's software, he/she can make life miserable if the tools aren't perfect.

  103. Invalid argument by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're the weenies claiming you want world domination. Put up or shut up. I gladly pay for working software. Pre-beta MP3 crap from kiddies doesn't get a nickel. And no, I'm not going to donate in the hope that some day the kiddies will grow up and write something useful. I pay a real programmer to write what I need if I can't buy it from a real software vendor. Quite frankly, I've seen little of value from the open source folks. There are a few gems, and I do donate to them, but they're few and far between, and run in the server room on a "real" unix.

    1. Re:Invalid argument by MikeFM · · Score: 2

      Most of the weenies wanting world domination aren't the ones actually doing the coding. It's mostly some weird geek groupie cult. Paying a real programmer to write software is just as valid a way of donating money as throwing out nickles if you have the number of nickles to afford to custom write software. If you're not giving away non-unique software you've funded then your missing out on the chance to greatly reduce your costs and to get your software tested a lot better than one or two guys in house could do.

      I won't deny there is a lot of poorly written opensource software but I'd argue that it's certainly not a higher percentage than that of closed source software. If you get a chance look at the source to any commercial program you want. It's almost all crap.

      Most of those "real" Unix's I've seen have been either pretty expensive or pretty sucky and if something goes to hell with them or the company that makes them dies you'll be stuck with no way to fix problems or add new features as you don't have the source code.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  104. Why not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use a dns redirect to make it think your local mail server is it's own.

    That should put a stop to it, and setting up a hosts file on linux / windows is piss easy.

  105. CheckBook Tracker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could try CheckBook Tracker -
    http://tony.maro.net
    I've never used it, but I've heard good things.

  106. Registration bypass key by onyxruby · · Score: 5, Informative
    The following tells quicken it's registered. Just copy and past into a text file, rename as a .reg and merge with registry. Walaa, Quicken thinks it's registered. Did I just break the DMCA?


    For other than XP:


    [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Intuit\QAgent\Guide \C :|Program Files|QUICKENW|INET|COMMON|QCHANNEL.DAT]
    "AppID"= "1"
    "AppName"="Quicken for Windows"
    "AppVer"="11.0.0.0"
    "Enable"="Yes"
    "Mo de"="Idle"
    "SubAppID"="2"


    For Windows XP"


    [HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\TypeLib\{4E2B30D0-E0A2-11D2-9 E1 1-00105A26F05D}]
    [HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\TypeLib\{4E2B 30D0-E0A2-11D2-9E1 1-00105A26F05D}\1.0]
    @="Quicken 1.0 Type Library"
    [HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\TypeLib\{4E2B30D0-E0A 2-11D2-9E1 1-00105A26F05D}\1.0\0]
    [HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\TypeLib \{4E2B30D0-E0A2-11D2-9E1 1-00105A26F05D}\1.0\0\win32]
    @="C:\\PROGRA~1\\Qui cken\\QWAPP.DLL"
    [HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\TypeLib\{4E2B 30D0-E0A2-11D2-9E1 1-00105A26F05D}\1.0\FLAGS]
    @="1"
    [HKEY_CLASSES_R OOT\TypeLib\{4E2B30D0-E0A2-11D2-9E1 1-00105A26F05D}\1.0\HELPDIR]
    @="C:\\PROGRA~1\\Qui cken\\"

    1. Re:Registration bypass key by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's "voila", jackass.

    2. Re:Registration bypass key by mattr · · Score: 2

      no jack, ass.

      nice circumvention.

  107. AppGen MyBooks Not Yet Ready for Prime Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The chairman of our local LUG tried AppGen's MyBooks at a small trucking company he works for, and reported only marginal success due to software bugs and instability, lots of crashes, and functionality that wasn't completely implemented but the UI leads the user to beliece that it is. In other words, AppGen has probably another year's worth of development and debugging before MyBooks is really ready for prime time. Unfortunately they had to go back to Quickbooks after the failed experiment.

  108. This proves Stallman's point by intnsred · · Score: 1
    I know that for some quoting RMS is some kind of blasphemy. But in this recent BBC article Stallman said, "Proprietary software is not designed to serve you but it is designed to control you" and later added, "A whole generation has grown up with the idea that it is normal for them to have no freedom."

    This proves his point in a major way. The question remains, how long are people going to put up with such abuse?

  109. Related topic: by smittyoneeach · · Score: 2

    Are there any open source tax preparation packages? I hear about this or that checkbook program, but the thought of doing my taxes warms me as much as a binary Repository for system configuration.
    If we can balance our own books through Open Source software, maybe we can pressure the government to balance its own. Uncle Sam's accounting 'quirks' make MCI's vanish into--and I've heared this used in real conversations around DC-- 'decimal dust'.

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  110. Bob the angry flower.. apostrophe usage by ctxspy · · Score: 1

    http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif

  111. Peachtree by smelroy · · Score: 1

    Peachtree is awful! I must get junk mail from them at least once a week and spam from them once a month. This is all a result of me registering as required to use their software. The interface is equally awful. When you find a better solution then Quickbooks or Peachtree let me know too!

    --
    Switching to Linux can be an adventure!
  112. OT: Re:No AOL Client Needed. by ComputerSlicer23 · · Score: 2
    You could simply configure the phone number, name, and password like you do with any normal ISP.

    AOL doesn't want to be another normal ISP. They don't want to provide you with straight dialup. That's not their business plan. They don't follow the standards, because they don't want to be a commodity service. They want a differentiated service. A lot of people use AOL specifically because once you get the CD, it's easy to install, and it has a good user experience. It's much simpiler then configuring the various pieces of software that you might want. It gives them something to compete on besides just price. If all you want is lowcost dialup, go someplace else, AOL isn't what you are looking for.

    They want to make accessing their service, easy, simple, fun, and unique. Anybody can do straight dialup, what AOL provides is much harder to do. Not that I want it, but it is harder.

    I've never had AOL, I never want AOL. However, I know people who have it, and they love it. If you don't like AOL, send the CD's to those crazy people who are going to dump them on AOL's front lawn.

    Kirby

    1. Re:OT: Re:No AOL Client Needed. by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      No argument with anything you said and it was not news to me.

      But I happen to feel that standards are a good thing and I do not want to encourage those who would deviate from them. If AOL's non-standard interface to the Internet breaks things, that's great as far as I am concerned. I want people who choose AOL to regret their choice and transition over to a standards-based service. After all, the Internet is successful because of standards.

      AOL has millions of users. If I sell a POP3-based e-mail spam filtering product, that's millions people who can't use it. It's countless tech support calls from AOL users that don't understand why it won't work. It's hassles from stores that sell the product because AOL users keep returning it. No thanks. I'd rather have standards. If AOL wants to differentiate themselves, they can provide client-side software that does that without breaking everything at the network level.

    2. Re:OT: Re:No AOL Client Needed. by mentin · · Score: 2
      AOL has millions of users. If I sell a POP3-based e-mail spam filtering product, that's millions people who can't use it. It's countless tech support calls from AOL users ...

      Absolutely wrong. AOL users are people who don't want to buy/install/manage spam filtering software. Instead they pay AOL for internet access and filtering their e-mails. Of course, they don't have a choice of filtering software - only AOL's own, but AOL's users don't care. They want to access internet, they don't want to be system/mail administrators.

      It is like conferencing capability of your home phone line - some people prefer to buy their own conferencing hardware, but most would pay their phone provider. Only businesses pay for their own conferencing hardware. Of course, businesses don't buy AOL.

      --
      MSDOS: 20+ years without remote hole in the default install
    3. Re:OT: Re:No AOL Client Needed. by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      Absolutely wrong. AOL users are people who don't want to buy/install/manage spam filtering software.

      It was just an example. I could have just as easily mentioned some other kind of software -- like financial management software.

      You need to stop taking examples so literally.

    4. Re:OT: Re:No AOL Client Needed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't take it too literally, fscktard. Learn how to communicate.

  113. This is the sort of crap that lead me to Linux by ONOIML8 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    First they suckered you into "upgrades", then they force you into them.

    I started with Quicken. That was such a wonderful program thru about V3.0. The next couple of "upgrades" had lots of bells and whistles that seemed nice, but I got lost in the toys and wasn't paying attention to the actual accounting. Ouch.

    Then there was the matter of the "upgraded" programs crashing all the time. Sometimes I lost data, sometimes not. In any case it was a pain in the arse.

    A few years later, after I had become a *nix convert, I went to work for a small company. When I started they had zilch for an accounting system. Scraps of paper. That's no joke. So the owner hires a wiz bang accountant who promptly insists on Quickbooks.

    I yelled, screamed, jumped up and down.

    We purchased and installed Quickbooks. The accountant punched in the data and we were off and running. No sooner did we get things running and, wouldn't you know it, the network portion quits on us.

    You guessed it.....gotta buy a network license upgrade.

    So the owner takes a loan from her mom, gets the upgrade and we're back in bidness. Until tax time.

    Manditory tax "upgrade". Isn't that like a tax tax?

    So she shells out more of the green, gets the tax upgrade and everything is fine for a few more months. Or so I thought.........

    The boss calls me in and wants to know why my department is only doing 57% of goal. I look at her numbers, from Quickbooks, and they don't match my invoices. Not trusting Quickbooks I tracked my own department in spreadsheets too (StarOffice 5.2). Sure it was double the "paperwork" but it proved worth it.

    I never did find out the whole reason that Quickbooks was losing transactions. Didn't care. That's Intuit's problem, right? Not according to them it aint.

    All that money you pay them and if "nobody else is having this problem" then you get zilch, zip, nada for tech support.

    Don't get me wrong, I'm not picking on Intuit here. IMHE they are just par for the course in the windows world.

    But didn't they start out as a Mac product?

    --
    . Quit playing Monopoly with Bill. Switch to one of many non-Microsoft products today.
  114. Illegal practice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've noticed that no one has brought this up yet...

    How is it that this (Disabling feature of a program after its sale, then force user to pay money to get it re-enabled) legal?

    Surely this breaks consumer protection laws in the form of bait and switch, at the very least. Thought I would be more inclined to call in extortion.

  115. Re:Workaround -- Uh, why pay to generate a pdf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I currently do this with my business and it works well. Just make sure to include a link to download the appropriate pdf reader.

  116. you know... by nkkdprgrmmr · · Score: 1

    you know, I am pretty sure that the canadian version of quickbooks does not do this. Of course, maybe it is still to come.

    --
    I see Windows, I see Mac. I see Linux on the rack.
  117. new business plans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I think it is a trend in business plans to move away from selling software products toward selling services around those products. MS is doing it gradually with XP, others like QB are also doing it. It is not an easy transition.

    I spent about a year of my time (after work and weekends over a few years) writing my own product. Professional marketers told me that I would not make money from sales, and they were correct.

    Nobody wants to buy software anymore; the old model of 'sell, install and forget' is uncool now. Maybe this is from bad support, expensive and mandatory upgrades. Maybe they are afraid that there is an open-source equivalent they have missed and will appear foolish if they pay for it.

    So the lesson for me is; give the software away and try to sell services around it, just like QB and MS are doing.

  118. Re:AS400/iseries Re:Long live spreadsheets... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    use IBM AS400! ... But you own all the software with no CAL fees.

    Yeah, but get used to paying 20% "Maintenance" for the rest of your life. And the client-access software damn well has seat fees.

    It costs $300 to buy a EDIT.COM-quality text editor from IBM for OS/400. This is not a cheap platform to own.

  119. also-- by nkkdprgrmmr · · Score: 1

    this goes right along with a conversation i had with someone just yesterday morning. EVERYTHING is moving to be web based. in the future, people won't buy compters, they will buy terminals that connect to the internet. If you want to use M$ Word, you will have to pay a monthly subscription. same with everything that we use. all data will be stored online, and pirating software will be kind of a moot point, since nobody will have their own hard drive anymore.

    it is a step to take the user out of the equation for fuckups. it makes it easier for the developer and for the businesses to keep all their ducks in line, but it makes things hell on the user when, for example, they are forced to upgrade to a new version that takes out or changes some of the features that they were most comfortable with, or liked the most.

    kind of an ominous, extreme future, but that is what it looks like now. i could write a book, and call it "2029". it will take place in a war torn era, about a man who lives in Victory Estates, and is part of the working middle class.

    Big Brother is watching!

    --
    I see Windows, I see Mac. I see Linux on the rack.
  120. Too bad GNUcash isn't up to speed yet. by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 2

    I think someday GNUcash might be a pretty good alternative. We're using QBPro 99 and I've often thought about upgrading but they charge an arm and a leg so I haven't.

    I tried using GNUcash on a personal level but it was missing some vital features so I'll wait until it's got some more functionality.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  121. So you are saying... by cnelzie · · Score: 2, Insightful


    That you are using out of date tax code for your city/state? That's not a very wise thing to do, unless there is some method of manually updating that information and you perfectly update the tax codes and tax forms in your Quickbooks 99 software.

    If you were looking to do business as an account for my company and I found out that you weren't using the updates to keep your tax code information up to date, you wouldn't be my accountant.

    --
    If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
  122. They did the same thing with online backups by ppetrakis · · Score: 1

    Before I could backup to my account status to their online thingee for
    free. Now all of a sudden they want to charge for the service. I can't
    really blame them. They are in business to make money... That was with
    the home and small business package. I was thinking of switching to "MY OB Firstedge" since I jsut bought a Mac. Anyone have any experiences regarding that software, good or bad?

    Peter

    --
    www.alphalinux.org
  123. Re:Sure... by gmhowell · · Score: 1

    I don't get it. You do IT? Did the other business dry up after you did the service for Butters?

    May I suggest that when you pick a handle, you be prepared for folks who are more conversant in the source material than yourself? Specifically, check information on episode 616. Removing your head from your ass, finding information that is readily available, and apologizing for being a dipshit will go a long way towards helping you in life. Do you speak without thinking with your clients?

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  124. Has anyone thought of complaining directly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ...to Intuit? If enough people complain, indicate their interest in finding alternatives they may get the drift. It's a competitive world & it's to Intuit's advantage to keep customers happy, but they won't move on this unless the faceless hoards squeek loudly enough.

    It's not enough to complain amongst ourselves about this -- we need to tell the vendor we're p**ed off at them to their face.

  125. Re:OT: Re:No AOL Client Needed.-Greed is good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " AOL doesn't want to be another normal ISP. They don't want to provide you with straight dialup. That's not their business plan. They don't follow the standards, because they don't want to be a commodity service. They want a differentiated service. A lot of people use AOL specifically because once you get the CD, it's easy to install, and it has a good user experience. It's much simpiler then configuring the various pieces of software that you might want. It gives them something to compete on besides just price. If all you want is lowcost dialup, go someplace else, AOL isn't what you are looking for.

    They want to make accessing their service, easy, simple, fun, and unique. Anybody can do straight dialup, what AOL provides is much harder to do. Not that I want it, but it is harder. "

    Well speaking as a former AOLer. None of those qualities are unique to AOL (MSN), and standards could give all that " easy, simple, fun, and unique."[1] and more. It's all in the pre-setup work that an ISP/Content provider does. Just like the difference betwee OEM computers, and ones you build yourself. The ONLY purpose of not following the standards is lock-in. Just like in the AOL, and OEM computer example.

    [1] Content for exclusive customers is nothing new to AOL. Compuserve, Prodigy, etc did this as well as modern day MSN. There are even ISP's that provide services that's only accessable to their customers.i.e Game servers,File repositories.Chat rooms. The latter even do it using standards.

  126. There isn't a "real" OSS solution for accounting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    As the CTO of a mid-sized accounting firm, I can let you know there really is no open source solution - and most of the commercial solutions are pretty lacking themselves. The main question you really need to ask yourself is what specific needs do you have, how important to you are they, and how much value they will provide.

    What specifically are you looking for? If its a time and billing solution there are some choices that I'm sure others have opinions about that might be suitable. But if your looking for a more advanced system - one that handles tax processing and time and billing and does this for multiple clients (i.e. handling the T&B for several individual seperate buisnesses and all of their tax liabilities), your pretty much SOL if you want an OSS. The main reason for this isn't the creation of a database and then publishing it as open source, the problem is maintaining it with respect to changes in tax law. Changes that happen continually at the international, federal, state, and local levels. If you've got a client base spread accross 8 countries and 44 states, this becomes a significant problem in that you just cannot write the code once and plug and chug from there, the code itself has to continually be changed to fit the current legal environment.

    I myself experiemented with the idea of producing our own system in-house to solve this problem, and began searching for possible open source solutions. It is an impossibility. Realistically, a truely robust accounting system requires that you have 1) a group dedicated to doing nothing but keeping up with the constantly changing tax laws of basically EVERYWHERE, be it a change in the Fed, a change in tax law in the state of Mississippi, or a change in the tax law of any local city that your clients may be located within. Now that you've got a group (or realistically, a person) doing this, they then have to pass on all changes that need to be made to a programmer - yes, you have to keep a programmer on staff at all times just to continually update the system with the law, and then if you really have any common sense, you have to then send through quality control. Open source just cannot accomplish this for you, and anyone who would do this continually open source is either a fool with no money or someone paid by a government. I have yet to encounter either.

    When you run the numbers its actually just more cost effective to outsource the solution. We spend ~$10k US annually to have a complete system provided for us that updates as often as a few times a week, a whole lot more cost effective than maintaining the staff necessary to do this otherwise.

  127. Not Intuits only problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The QuickTax software for Canada has a serious bug in calculating one of the forms and you can't correct it and still "netfile" it.

    (For people wondering what the error is, it has something to do with getting the wrong figures for moving expense deductions.)

    So naturally when my parents get audited, they now owe an additional 800+ dollars because the software messed up.

  128. Quickbooks try MYOB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MYOB has some nice accounting software, with a few different versions for different requirements. It runs on Windows and Mac, and has localised versions depending on country.

    http://www.myob.com/

  129. Re:Sure... by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    Haven't watched the episode yet. So whatever the reference, it is lost on me. All I saw was a lame and racist post. Maybe after watching the latest SP epp, your post will make sence.

    I was busy earning some of that money that gets put in my spreadsheet. When you are out of highschool and mom cuts off your allowance, you'll understand about "work". Until then, catch episodes as they air Wed night at 10:00pm sharp and type up little reviews just for me.

  130. Oddly enough... by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 2

    I work for a large software company and we had a similar discussion about removal of functionality. Given the discussion we had, I think that you might very well have grounds for a class action suit, regardless of the EULAs you agreed to. I'd look INTU IT (ha ha), if I were you.

    --
    That is all.
  131. Re:Sure... by gmhowell · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    High school? Whatever. I've got grown up responsibilities that would make you wake up screaming you thin skinned pissant.

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  132. Two items. by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1. Have you contacted Intuit about this? What was their response? Certainly you're not the only one who has noticed this change...what's the buzz in the QB community?

    2. Change. Use Peachtree (I've had it for years, works great) Like Linux? Use VMware.

  133. Snail mail... by samdu · · Score: 2

    You could always use snail mail to send out your invoices. Incidentally, I use QB 2002 to run my business and have not seen a message such as you described. The only time anything remotely similar has come up is when accidentally clicking on premium features (like do a credit check or bank online).

    1. Re:Snail mail... by Leon+Yendor · · Score: 1

      Thank $deity somebody got it!

      Why do you have to use their services to send out a PDF invoice or fax?

      I use PDFfactory (from www.fineprint.com) to get PDFs and if you can't have a virtual fax printer in similar fashion then print the bloody thing and fax it from the paper.

      All this angst for the lack of thinking across the square? Bah! Humbug! It's the season...

  134. Re:Sure... by gmhowell · · Score: 1

    Your familiarity with the methods to torture adolescents make me question if you aren't the one still in High School. I was hoping that you could have at least come up with a reasonable burn or changed tactics to deal with someone of legal drinking age or higher. But you haven't. You bore me. Go away.

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  135. MYOB by GravySkin · · Score: 0

    MYOB is great accounting software and runs on Windows or Mac

    http://www.myob.com/us/

    --
    "never met a Microsoft zealot"
  136. Re:Sure... by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    Fact is, SOMETHING in your life is so bad, it would, as you said, make me wake up at night screaming.

    Talk with us. Share with us. Did a spam e-mail not deliver on a promise to increase the size of your little "member"? Did the photo of me and your girlfriend, in her locker, tear at a tender heart? Did the fact that you went to school on a short yellow bus confuse your simple mind? Don't fear. Tell me how I, a total stranger - nay - mere words on a chat room page, can "Go away." and you shall triumph over your fears. Everyone marvels at your strength! How brave and brazen of you to scold the great Eric_Cartman_South_P. The girls will scream your name! Your parents will finally love you! All is well in the little bubble of the nexus you call your world! I cowar and hide and pray - oh pray - that my humble firewall protects me from your wrath.

    :)

  137. Sorry Cartman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're the only one here who looks pathetic and stupid.

    If you had only had the grace to respond to respond like an adult to the correction gmhowell made after your original stupid flame, you could have come out smelling like a rose. As it is, you're just another (apparently adolescent) loser.

    I hope you get modded down into the depths of hell so that you'll give up posting with a reference that you insult people for knowing about.

    (Posting AC since I have no desire to know if/how you respond to this or to be part of your next flame war)

  138. Re:There isn't a "real" OSS solution for accountin by hackus · · Score: 2

    I am not so sure.

    There is a revolution going on. Mostof it has to do with aspects of OSS. But not in exactly the same way. OSS (Open Source Software) in context of a company and a busines process, internal to that companies operations and business goals.

    With the kinds of things Java can do, in the development process, alot of companies are outsourcing the development of key systems, paying more for them upfront for development, but even though the pricetag is much higher in the long run it is cheaper:

    1) The company, in your case, builds its own accounting system.

    YOU own the accounting system.

    2) IDE tools such as Idea's Intellij, provide means to build Java code at a very fast pace. Java in and of itself, isn't what makes things go fast, it is the tools and the technology (OOD) that allows the software to be built rather quickly.

    Couple this with computers that keep getting enourmously more powerful year after year, companies are putting together even more toolsets for programmers to boost thier individuals capabilities and manage the "Holy Grail" of Software Engineering at the moment. ReUse and Patterns...undoubtedly, the next generation IDE's will be able to address those issues even more and put computer hardware advances in speed to even better use.

    3) YOU control when the software needs more features.

    That is, you upgrade and put the money into the software when someone in accounting says: "What if we combined payroll with the taxes section, perhaps we could build a credit system with a bank and Eletronically forward the funds ourselves...instead of having XXXX Payroll outsource company do it?

    4) YOU control when the expenditures should be put into your budget for next year, for more features.

    How much capability is also an important question when you want to figure out how much

    5) YOU own something your competitors can't buy, because this software investment is part of your business process. For example, anyone can go buy Quicken, and try and get it to fit your business.

    Your competitors WILL in fact do that, but YOU have something that fits your business EXACTLY and can change as your busiones changes as fast as your business ROI that YOU determine is acceptable.

    I think this is becomming more common than most people think. I know, because my company is an expert at analyzing huge software systems, such as SAP, PeopleSoft and other Enterprise Resource Planning packages, and determinng, what would be better?

    Spending $80 dollars an hour for 4 programmers and one project manager, or spending 20 MILLION on a software package and consultants to customize it at $180-$250 an hour?

    In a great many cases, it isn't worth spending that much money on these large ERP systems, when technology, specifically Java development environments can produce a custom package for your company at half the cost of rolling your own. (i.e. 20 Million for SAP or 10 Million for your own package....)

    I think this is the biggest threat to Shrink wrap software. Programming environments are becomming so powerful, because ever more powerful machine hardware is providing the programmer with productivity gains and toolsets (IDE's source debuggers Refactoring tools, access to code library systems such as cvs) that allow him to do the work of 5 programmers.

    Compare that even 5 years ago when such things were not inetgrated as they are today.

    -Hack

    --
    Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
  139. Re:Sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dude, you're fucking named after a south park character. if you're so busy working, buy a fucking tivo and watch south park in 20 minutes, and don't be surprised when people make south park references to a total douchebag named Eric Cartman.

  140. Try to tell software you do not have internet ?!? by holle2 · · Score: 1

    I know from some other software package (cannot remember which) that asked if there was an internet connection during installation. If it was told there was not, it would not even ask for online registration.

    I suggest you try the same for quickbooks. Try downloading your updates as files or let them send you an update CD. Simply claim you do not have internet connectivity.

    The only drawback I can think of is, that you have to send email using another program instead of sending it from quickbooks directly.

  141. Anybody Using Nola? by htgrp · · Score: 1

    Next weekend I am going to get it up and running for a business I am planning on starting the first of the year. I was just wondering about any firsthand experince? Thanks!

  142. Tell them what you think: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://quickbooks.intuit.com/qbcom/jhtml/feedback. jhtml?priorityCode=0273400000&cr=1

  143. Re:If you had read Ed Foster's column in InfoWorld by valisk · · Score: 1

    I'll be honest this shit about Intuit worries me. I started a new business earlier this year and bought QB 2002 having heard a lot of good things about it, and not knowing of any really good OSS replacements that didn't require an Oracle license(hurry up and support Postgres, Compiere!).
    Now the more I read the more convinced I am that I have made a bad decision.
    Still, I have only had 18 customers so far so it won't be such a massive hassle to switch over to something else :)
    In the mean time Intuit, along with Microsoft are helping me to see the wisdom in Richard Stallman's message.

    --

    Economic Left/Right: -0.62
    Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.69
  144. Class action suit? by Oestergaard · · Score: 2

    What the fsck is wrong with people?

    So this guy uses a piece of software for free. Good for him. Some day the publisher decides that they want to require payment for the service in the future - and they make him aware of this fact in advance.

    And the first thing that pops up in this guys head is a lawsuit ?!!?

    How about Intuit suing him for stupidity?

    I mean, it's not like they ever promised him that they would make their services available to him for free, in all eternity...

    Especially I find it amusing, that he wants a free software alternative - and would be willing to accept one that had basically so poor functionality that he could sue Intuit because of the conversion costs (from migrating from their free-as-in-beer services to some under-developed free-as-in-speech tool).

    Like, "an alternative that is so crippled that I can't do business is ok, because I'll just move my business to lawsuits instead of doing productive work then".

    And people wonder why the economy is going to hell... Sheesh...

  145. More Intuit BS by joabj · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If my experience is any indication, the company has been pulling such sleazy "forced upgrade" tactics for awhile. A few years back I bought Quicken 97 to balance my checking account. It worked fine up until earlier this year, when I wiped the hard drive and reinstalled the OS and had tor install the Quicken as well.

    For the installation, I had to (re)register the product electronically. Trouble is, Intuit had long since cut off its end of the registration process for the '97, and , as a way of user support in the FAQ, mentioned only that users should upgrade (i.e. buy the new version).


    Bloody hell. I spent $80 for the damn software, I have no use for the additional bells and whistles and it really pisses me off I can longer use this software that I purchased! I went back to using plain spreadsheets and I can gaurantee that under no circumstances will I ever purchase some product by this company. Greedy fucks.

  146. Sending invoices via email? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    Without encrypting the invoices? I'm glad you lost the functionality fuck face.

  147. Re:OT: Re:No AOL Client Needed.-Greed is good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    There are even ISP's that provide services that's only accessable to their customers.i.e Game servers,File repositories.Chat rooms. The latter even do it using standards.

    That reminds me of a slightly off-topic situation. What the heck happened to Counter-Strike and Half-Life updates?? It seems like the only place they want to let you get them is through that awful fileplanet.com service which is ALWAYS backlogged for hours unless you pay their monthly fees to get on their member servers. What happened to good old mirrors? The pain in downloading the latest updates is what has stopped me from finally playing Counter-Strike the last few months.

  148. A simple workaround by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a simple workaround for this:

    Print your invoices to a file (PS - not sure if it supports PDF, otherwise use ps2pdf) and email/fax it to your customers.

    Yup it's a pain, but it works. Thats what I do.

    J

  149. Relational Database by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 2
    Skip spreadsheets. Whip up some tables in your relational database of choice (MySQL, SQLite, Postgres, et al) and slap a web interface on the front using your serverside scripting language of choice (TCL,PHP,PERL, et all).

    I am actually in the process of writing a self-contained webserver based on the TclHttpd using the SQLite embedded database. The plan is to run the server on the individuals computer, and have them open a browser connection to localhost.

    The TCL Web server can also load specialized modules for printing forms, and also access the local file system to syncronize data, poke through the registry etc. Charts and graphics could be handled by rendering GIF files.

    The really nice part about this setup is that a small office can all access the books. With a forms-based accounting system, you SO will be up and running in no time flat.

    Anyone in?

    --
    "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
    --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    1. Re:Relational Database by SpaceJunkie · · Score: 1

      So why not whip up a ready to roll MySQL/Php system and GPL it. Then its easily customized but comes a complete system...
      Nice.
      For my MySQL projects I make sure I use a reasonably unique database name, and use a makefile to launch create scripts and pipe the outputs to logs.

      --
      OrionRobots.co.uk - Robots From sol
  150. Explain? by arafel · · Score: 1

    > GNUcash is foul. It reeks. It would be a bad piece
    > of software even in the windows world.

    Thanks for the informative comments. Would you like to post something more useful than "it stinks"?

    1. Re:Explain? by SirTwitchALot · · Score: 1
      While the post does sound a lot like flamebait... he did bring up something more useful immediately after your cuttoff.

      No sound card ? Expect to have trouble, as gnucash needs libaudio. Why does an accounting program link against an audio library ? Who knows ? Dig up Joe Barr's old article on "dependancy hell" and the associated slashdot article for more bad news.


      I feel this is a valid concern, and it's one I was unaware of.
      --
      Go away, or I will replace you with a very small shell script.
    2. Re:Explain? by arafel · · Score: 1

      True, that was something useful. However, I don't really regard one crumb of information like that as being full justification for saying "it reeks" and so on. I expect more reasons for my money, dammit. :-)

  151. Re:Sure... by Profane+Motherfucker · · Score: 1

    You are a dumb motherfucker. To wit, extremely fucking gauche assclown. Not only do you piss an moan, you get upset like a little bitch. What kind of stupid cocksucker picks a South Park name, and can't handle any reference to South Park: apparently, you.

  152. Re:Sure... by SpaceJunkie · · Score: 1

    Amusing as you little exchange was... hehe.. Surely he has a point when using Eric cartman as a nick, you should at least not flame him in regards to your ignorance on the subject. Granted, missing Southpark is neither life threatening nor makes you inferior, but at least be careful before throwing around remarks about someone being racist, and then continuing to wind them up. I can see how much fun you are having - but let it go. You are just making yourself look silly... Saying that, where would my dreary monday afternoon be without some comedian on slashdot....

    --
    OrionRobots.co.uk - Robots From sol
  153. Spyware too by Coppit · · Score: 2

    What I haven't seen people mention is that Quickbooks is a spyware piece of crap. Install a software firewall that blocks outbound access and you'll see what I mean. It's harder to stop it from calling home using deeply buried options than it is to stop Real Player. (And that's saying something!)

  154. Re:From the company bringing you product activatio by SEWilco · · Score: 1

    Write your reps in Congress.
    Request flat taxes. Chop the tax code down from a library to one page.

  155. Re:Sure... by FortKnox · · Score: 1

    Read his journal, then understand that if you were in his shoes, you'd piss your pants, and ask to stop the earth, cause you'd want to get off.

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
  156. Simply Accounting by gatch · · Score: 1

    This appears to be a Windows-only package.

  157. Re:Here's an idea...A completely useless site. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This just might go up on the lynx hall of shame as it comes up totally blank.
    Learn how to use HTML.
    PLease.

  158. Linux Accounting Choices by SEWilco · · Score: 2

    Commercial and Free:
    L4SB July 2002 table

  159. and there's more... by thegoldenear · · Score: 1

    my pragmatic collection of free (and non-free, but getting away from it as much as possible) software for Windows: http://www.thegoldenear.connectfree.co.uk/gg/toolb ox/win32/the-software.htm

  160. It's not just Quickbooks... by deisher · · Score: 1

    Intuit is becoming harder and harder to deal with. They recently changed to a license authentication scheme with TurboTax that attempts of enforce one non-transferrable license per machine. They'll sell you TurboTax now but if you upgrade your PC at Christmas time and re-install, you must pay full price for another license before they will authenticate you on the new machine. Perhaps anticipating the wave of customer complaints, Intuit has stopped answering their phones with humans. You now get a recording directing you to their web site. As soon as I find a viable alternative, I'm dumping Quicken and TurboTax. It's not worth the hassle.

  161. Re:Registry by tomhudson · · Score: 2
    Quickbooks does put keys in the registry.

    Here's how to find/crack them for any app: works well to get rid of the nag screen asking you to register before your 25 uses are up...

    1. Copy your two registry files to a linux partition
    2. Install the application
    3. Copy the new registry files to a linux partition
    4. Do a diff on the two sets of registry files
    5. Run the app once, copy the new registry files to a linux partition
    6. Write a small Windows app that sets the keys to the value they were after one run, then launches the real app.
    You'll never have to register, which is great if you don't want to give them access to your box.

    I did this for a friend of mine, copied the whole Windows partition (dd if=/dev/hda1 of=/xfer/part1_image_xyz) to linux just to make sure there were no other files hanging around.

    Should work for games, etc, as well

    Now, before I get flamed for this, he owned a legit copy (original CD, manuals, etc.) but didn't like the idea of sharing his stuff w. Intuit.

    In hindsight, looks like he was right

  162. Re:Snail mail...windows only???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry.
    yahoo pdf rpm linux
    search
    profit!!!!!

  163. Re:Snail mail...windows only???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yahoo
    make pdf linux
    search
    profit!!!

    basically it comes down to saving the document as a PS file and then converting that PS file using ps2pdf into a pdf.
    No more iNtuit crap.

  164. Reinstall by molywi · · Score: 1

    Why dont you just uninstall the version you have right now, delete all the files, (keep your data files of course)... and then just re-install from the original cd? This way you get back to the way you had it before the update. Then simply just dont update the software again, as it sounded like you were only updating because you knew you could, not because something was not functioning properly.....

  165. ALL VERSIONS USE INTUIT'S SERVER by asscroft · · Score: 1

    This is nothing new. All versions of QuickBooks that can send statements use Intuit's Servers. The only difference is that before it connected anonymously and now it connects as you. However, there isn't any record of what you send kept by Intuit. They simply use thier email servers rather than your own so that they can offer the deluxe features such as delivery notification and automatic payment reminders. Lighten up. If you want to send through your own server just use the SDK, create your own XSL style sheet, update this manually every time you change your template, maintain all the code yourself and quit yer bitchin'.

    --
    because I have been enjoined by this Holy Office to abandon the false opinion which maintains that the Sun is the centre
  166. Man in line at the supermarket. . . by kfg · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Ok, let me just run home and fire up the computer to print this check and I'll be right back."

    An outfit so small and so poor that it *needs* to run free Visicalc on an old 8088 doesn't print checks, it writes them just like most of the world does. It doesn't have very many to write either. Maybe a half dozen a month if it's unlucky.

    In my last retail business (3000 square foot store) I wrote three checks a month. That's all. At that "volume" hand writing them is quicker, easier and cheaper.

    Honestly, you realize hundreds of billions of dollars have been transacted perfectly well with no more "technology" then pen and ink don't you? I have a physical handicap that makes writing a difficulty and it's *still* easier to hand write small volumes of checks than print them.

    When an person/outfit gets big enough that the printing volume gets large enough that there is *benifit* to printing checks and forms then they use their office suite to print them, as I already suggested. Document processors are just that, not just overbloated $400 post-it note writers. If it comes to that I first started printing checks and forms on an 8088 running Microsoft Works 1.0.

    It seems easy to forget that just because new ways of doing things come up that the old ways still work just fine, and in certain situations, for certain people, are even *better* than the new ways.

    The right tool for the right job, and the size of the job helps determine the right tool.

    Honestly, relying on a program like Quickbooks to write a half dozen checks a month, one W2 * a year* and keep a daily transaction ledger is just plain doofey.

    To equate a spreadsheet with programing and IT as some above have done is even doofier. Spreadsheets are an office app, just like a WP. Spreadsheets have been traditionally hated by the IT deparment because they were the app that took computing *OUT* of the IP department and put it on a PC on every businessman's own desk.

    Accounting apps are there to save time and money. If they do neither they are less than worthless. They are NOT supposed to replace understanding of what's going on with your money. If you *can't* balance a checkbook because * you don't understand* the process perhaps business is not the best place for you.

    If you *do* understand the process whipping up a checkbook balancer in a spreadsheet is barely the work of minutes. A simple, single entry, bookkeeping system is hardly the work of more minutes, even if you've never used a spreadsheet before. Double entry will take a bit longer, but then I've refered the reader to a work that lays it all out for them. All they have to do is type it in.

    An office suite, ( which, again, isn't IT, it's a collection of apps for *office workers*) does everything Quickbooks does, and more (without phoning home). That's why MS was late to the "Financial management package" party. It never occured to them that anyone would want such a thing because * they had already provided one,* complete with instructions on how to use it as such.

    It's called MS Office.

    KOffice works just as well. Open Office works even better.

    What the hell do you think is really going on behind the scenes in Quickbooks, behind all the pretty graphics and doofey interface? It's just a *crippled* office suite.

    Cripple your own.

    KFG

    1. Re:Man in line at the supermarket. . . by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      >>Honestly, relying on a program like Quickbooks to write a half dozen checks a month, one W2 * a year* and keep a daily transaction ledger is just plain doofey.

      Try half a dozen in a day, 3 or 4 companies. It's worth it. I agree that they are getting greedy with the the tax table updates. Yes, you probably can do it with a spreadsheet. Then you have to do your own debuging, train three people, and on and on. If there is an open source alternative that doesn't require hours of training and maintaining for the secretary, please someone let me know?

      I would like to know?

      If there is an add-in for open office that will do all of this, let me know?

  167. SQL-Ledger by Danyel · · Score: 1

    I have been meaning to set this up and try it for some time now. It's a complete ledger system with PDF printing and runs from a web server. I belive it's PHP based. Check it out at
    http://www.sql-ledger.com/

  168. You could do that, of course by kfg · · Score: 2

    But that would rely on programing. The spreadsheet solution requires no programing knowledge ( despite what some of the trollier replys to my post have implied. A spreadsheet is a businessman's app, not a programing enviroment. If you can't figure out what a spreadsheet is and how to work one within a few minutes you have no business in business).

    Under certain circumstances, for certain people, your solution is superiour.

    With this caveat I suppose. *I* would never do it quite that way. In any business of mine no accounting data ever goes on the net. Ever. The accounting dept. is stand alone. The idea that in my small office all can access the books gives me the willies. *I* can access the books. My *bookeeper* ( should I even have one at the time) can access the books. That's it. A few times a year an accountant will be given temporary access.

    It can be inconvienient at times, but nowhere near so inconvienient as having the SEC digging through your computers caches and coming up with all sorts of juicey little tidbits. God forbid that any internal finacial data should ever be transmited across the Internet. Then they don't even have to dig around in *your* caches.

    In the old days of paper and pencil the bookeeper was the first employee to get their own office. The office contained a safe. Not for the money. for the *books.*

    Grandma knew something about sucking eggs that the "chillen's" haven't figured out yet.

    KFG

  169. Re:Sure... by gmhowell · · Score: 1

    I've written about it several times. Again, a little research would do wonders. Things are a bit better today (this having been written ~six months ago).

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  170. You are overrating them by kfg · · Score: 2

    In the sense you mean they only deal with high level tax issues, and as has already been noted elsewhere the IRS itself will provide you with all the relevant computer data and programing you need.

    What's more, the laws change every time a legislative body goes into session.

    Quickbooks is no replacement for a good accountant and lawyer.

    It is the businessman's responsibility to know and understand all laws applicable to his business. Relying on software to *understand* it for you is folly that can only lead to eventual disaster. That people do so I actually find shocking. Don't end up being like the girl refered to in a post a couple of days ago who insisted her physics paper claiming that electrons go 6 times the speed of light was correct because it was the answer her computer gave her. The IRS won't buy that line any more than the physics professor did.

    You are right. The laws can be so arcane that *noone* understands them, not even the people who wrote them.

    That includes the people who wrote Quickbooks. Garbage in, Garbage out.

    Do your own homework. Know your own business. It's cheaper - and safer. It takes more time. If you went into business to have more time - boy did you make a mistake! As I like to say to people, the greatest thing about being in business for yourself is that you get to chose your working hours - all 100 a week of them.

    As well as handling your own finacial and legal matters at a low level other matters you should be prepared to take care of personally as the new CEO of your own startup firm include:

    Cleaning and unclogging toilets, shoveling walks, taking out garbage, chasing racoons out of the vents and wall spaces ( Yes, I've actually had to do this), washing floors, cleaning carpets, being the LAST person in the business with a nice desk and the last person in the firm to *make any money.*

    If you aren't fully prepared to be personally responsible for all of the above, even if you have millions in start up capital from somewhere, get an hourly job. You'll be happier.

    KFG

  171. Re:Sure... by DaytonCIM · · Score: 2

    I was busy earning some of that money that gets put in my spreadsheet. When you are out of high school and mom cuts off your allowance, you'll understand about "work".

    Straight up, you're an idiot. You're an idiot for having a Cartman UID and accusing someone of being a racist for making a South Park joke. If you're that sensitive, maybe you should stick to the Powerpuff Girls.

    You're an idiot for making the assumption that GMHowell is in high school and he doesn't know "work." Try thinking (and maybe reading) before you type a response, you f$#%ing moron.

    And thank you for the "tip" on spreadsheets. Wow. Can you get me a good deal on Quattro Pro? Do you think AOL is a good ISP for a small business? 'Cause that would just be "da bomb."

    Man, you know all the c00l, l33t, h@x@rs lingo! You're my new h@x@r h3r0!

    At $1,200 per diem fee and a booked calander, it's a fun way to be a geek. Using things I learn on slashdot is good money making FUN.

    By the way, the correct spelling is: c-a-l-e-n-d-a-r and Slashdot is capitalized. Thanks for playing...

  172. Re:Sure... by Xerithane · · Score: 2

    Fact is, SOMETHING in your life is so bad, it would, as you said, make me wake up at night screaming.
    No, it would probably make you kill your own damn self. You don't have the strength to persevere through what he deals with. Your little life has desperation caused from unemployement? I hope your mother/father/sister/daughter/son dies so you can understand anguish.

    If you had on iota of a clue, you'd realize when you are wrong and gracefully back away. It must suck to realize you have no ground to stand on, yet flap your arms to try from falling.

    Here's a little piece of advice: Learn and grow old, admit defeat and idiocy in the same apology, and avoid such situations in the past.

    I have more respect for gmhowells shit than your brains.

    --
    Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
  173. Re:Sure... by DaytonCIM · · Score: 1

    I think it should be abundantly clear by now that you're an idiot and flat out wrong.

    The only thing you should be typing is an apology to GMHowell.

  174. Re:Sure... by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 2
    Yes, that situation is quite unfortunate. Trully sorry to hear it, and sorry if my little flames "hit home" so to speak. Didn't mean them too.

    However, SURELY you must understand that a little flame war, over a topic of misunderstanding (I missed that SP episode) held on a message board, at 2:00am, is *nothing* personal. Just plain fun, albeit at the cost of Karma, which thankfully keeps most flames (such as ours) tucked away.

    :)

  175. Re:Sure... by gmhowell · · Score: 1

    I can let bygones be bygones. What's the point in Karma: Excellent if you can't flush some down the toilet once in a while? I reserve my foes list for PWP'ers and crapflooder's anyway;)

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  176. Some info from a former Intuit employee by DigitalCrackPipe · · Score: 1

    I did tech support for Intuit back in college, but the last version that I supported was 2k. This may not apply to 2001, but here's what I'd do: make sure you have a backup(you should have several anyway) or copy of your data and have install keys written down (not just the ones you entered from the package, but the registration key as well). Then uninstall the program and remove the remaining stuff since it stores the updates that have been done. Reinstall and update up to the last version you had (last I saw of it, they had standalone EXE updates for the patches but they tried not to let you know. They could be found on the web site with a lot of searching, but the techs wouldn't tell you unless you couldn't update any other way. This is probably the only way to get the previous update). Then restore your data file. (if the latest version updated your data file, restore the backup you made before updating your data file). You should hopefully be able to get tax table updates manually as well so you can do payroll without auto-updating. Again, this is based on my knowledge of the previous year's product, so who knows if they've made things more complicated.

    Other than that, maybe if you make a case to a tech that you can't legally use their servers (or something) they'll be able to tell you if there's really a way around the mandatory membership. If you're nice but insistent sometimes the techs can help you out more, but I know I was less responsive to people who were screaming at me for things I wasn't responsible for. (and of course it depends on who you get... but call soon before tax rush = 2 hour hold time)

    As a last note, I'm not sure if it's leagal to agree to future undisclosed fees. More likely, you have the option to go without the ability to email invoices when they start charging. Still lame.

  177. Moron alert. by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

    I didn't take it too literally, fscktard. Learn how to communicate.

    I communicate perfectly clearly (and am a published author). That you are too stupid to be able to extrapolate from an example is not my fault.

    But since you insist on making an ass of yourself (and because you pissed me off), I'll lend a hand. You wrote:

    "Absolutely wrong. AOL users are people who don't want to buy/install/manage spam filtering software."

    That's utter bullshit and here's proof:

    From http://www.emailspamblocker.com/: "Email Spam Blocker for America Online AOL(TM) 7.0 - 8.0"

    Go to http://www.antispam-software.net/products.htm and you will see SPAM INSPECTOR for America Online 7.0

    From the Mailwasher homepage: "AOL support coming later."

    Happy now, asshole?

    If you really are as stupid as you seem, I can see why you post anonymously.

  178. Re:Here's an idea...A completely useless site. by condour75 · · Score: 1

    thank you for pointing this out. I placed a disclaimer on the page sending people to get flash, so lynx folks will understand why they're not seeing much.

    Meanwhile, Wacky Neighbor looks just fine in lynx, by design. And I am perfectly capable of using html.

    You might get farther in life with a different personality.

  179. In this particular instance. . . by kfg · · Score: 1

    I was talking to the case at hand, the small outfit running old hardware and software from financial distress.

    Having outgrown that phase I thought I was through with all that, but divorce has proven me wrong and it looks like I'll have to go through it again. :)

    Ok, I'm exagerating. I got left with my personally assembled Athlon 900. As far as computing goes I'm good to go with a start over from scratch one man operation.

    No, there is no such available add-in that I'm aware of. Most of the pieces are out there, but you'll have to track them down and assemble them yourself, and of course take the time to debug. Frankly right now it's probably quicker to do it from scratch than find the templates on the web.

    Personally I've never let a seceratary near a spreadsheet, or write checks. My bookeepers need no training in them. Invoices are handled through the word processor, which I've never had anyone kick up a fuss over either. For a while I used StarOffice 5.2 on Linux and people in the office didn't even know they weren't using a Windows theme. That was the one great thing about the otherwise stupid desktop interface. Maybe I've just had better luck with employees.

    Or maybe it's because they've actually seen me take off my tie and unstop and clean a clogged toilet myself when they were doing more valuable work that makes them more willing to go with the flow. I don't know. When I tell *my* employees they're going to train in new software they generally respond, " Cool, that makes me more marketable at your expense." Some employers might rail at this. I love it. As the boss I've never figured out why I should balk at training my people in getting things done the way *I* think is right. I consider it time and money very well spent and I prefer sharp people working for me, even if it *isn't* always to my advantage. I'm smart. Dull people bore me. I don't like my working enviroment to bore me. Want a job with me? Come to the interview with copy of Brave New World under one arm and Euripides - in Greek, under the other. Then be prepared to work as hard as I pay you, and I won't expect you to work any harder.

    I make money to buy things I want. Period. I want my business the way I want it. I spend money on it. I rarely do so foolishly.

    Except I did buy Quickbooks. That was foolish. I already had MS Office and Star Office. I already knew accounting. My bookeepers already knew accounting. My Front Office people already knew word processing. Piece of cake. I've never been big enough that *I* wasn't the "personel dept." and I never want to be.

    Look, there is no "perfect" solution. Quickbooks is just more imperfect that any homegrown solution I've found and with homegrown, Open Source, I'm beholden to nobody. Every penny you spend training your people with Open Office goes into *your people's* skill set. Not Microsoft's or Intuit's coffers. With that comes having to take the time and responsiblility to develop it personally. If I shied from personal responsibility I wouldn't be in business in first place and the bloody janitor would unclog the toilet, it wouldn't be my job.

    Maybe I should take on the task of writing up some generic "Quickbooks" Office Suite based workalike and release it open source. I don't know if I'm the right man for the job though. It always comes down to something like " How the hell do *I* know what you want your invoices to look like? *YOU* know. You have the tools, use them."

    Just the way I'm made up I guess. I guess that's why I'm in business. I like to do things for myself.

    KFG

    1. Re:In this particular instance. . . by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      Cool! Makes sense to me. As far as the invoices, most people will go along if it works has company logo, etc. QuickBooks sells checks too. (very high)

      Trying to go open source where possible. We just have the occasional application that will only run in Windows. I think we could switch to Open Office or Star Office and no one would know the difference. Switch the CAD and accounting software that everyone is used to would be the stumbling block.

  180. Quickbooks is the AOL of the accounting world by jayntguru · · Score: 1

    (My wife is an accountant, thus I do a lot of side job tech support stuff for accountants.) I have learned: Quicken sucks. Accountants hate it, it's the #1 choice of idiots and morons worldwide. Just like: AOL + idiot, Quickbooks = idiot. I have never met or supported any accounting firms that use any quicken products other than to convert data to a peachtree readable format. (or some other format) Quickbooks is a personal finance package that tried to turn itself into a professional solution. Peachtree is a more useable package. It's not "good" but is definitely better than quickbooks. Peachtree was designed as a professional package.

    --
    -Jay
  181. Ed Foster covers this too in The Gripe Line by Wilk4 · · Score: 1

    Ed Foster covers this too, a bit. I think he mentioned it more than once in his column, The Gripe Line on InfoWorld. Here is the one I found: Cost of 'free' service. Poke back through the archives for more...

  182. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  183. Re:There isn't a "real" OSS solution for accountin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd like to respond to your comment point by point:

    1)By creating the system, you own it.

    Yes, this is true. And when your clients get audited and there is an error in the code that calculated something wrong because you haven't done proper QA, well you are at fault. Whereas if you use an outsourced solution that the IRS itself says is the best, well then, if a coding problem occurs, YOU AREN'T LIABALE - the company that provided the solution is. Its all about covering your ass.

    I'm skipping point 2 as I have no comment and jumping straight to:

    3)You control when the software needs new features.

    Guess what? I still do. I'm not buying an off-the-shelf solution to my problem, because my specific problem is not off the shelf. As such, if I have a need, the specific outsource I have will customize to my needs at my schedule. I've never had a feature request take longer than 1 week to get implemented - can you say the same for in house solutions?

    I think I've addressed #4 with the previous.

    5)Well, all of my competitors are using equal solutions. If they were to do it in-house they would have to incur the related erroneous expense needlessly. I don't feel any worry about them spending more to do the same thing in-house.

    The problem is that this is code that must be re-written on a daily basis in peak times and the open source community just doesn't have any real interest in tax law.

  184. Re:Sure... by subgeek · · Score: 1

    first - i agree with your assessment of this tool.

    second - i do like the power puff girls. if people like this guy are watching it, i'm sure they're not getting most of the jokes.

    --
    you probably shouldn't have read this.
  185. if you mess with one of us... by subgeek · · Score: 1

    ...you mess with all of us. next time you should check the friend/foe list to see what you're getting into.

    --
    you probably shouldn't have read this.
    1. Re:if you mess with one of us... by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 2
      Hehehe. "..all of us." "...what you're getting into."

      Thanks for the laugh.

    2. Re:if you mess with one of us... by Xaoswolf · · Score: 2
      Yes, we are much like the Musketeers, and if you saw the movie, The Musketeer, then I can see why you are laughing.

      Perhaps we should be more like the Boy Scouts or something...

  186. I used OpenOffice.org. Also Quickbooks called me by garyebickford · · Score: 1

    Here's just a short update.
    1. I solved the problem by using an old OpenOffice form letter I built a while back, that includes a short spreadsheet that does the job. I copied the data into it and saved it in Word format (the client only uses MS). Problem solved, for now.
    2. I went to Quickbooks.com and used their feedback form to send them a major flame. I mentioned the terms "Class Action", if you get my drift. Interestingly enough, while I was out today I got a call from an actual QB employee, to discuss the problem. He said he'd try again later but hasn't so far.

    --
    It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
  187. Zing by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 2
    Score that one +1 for insightful, and my original post -1 for dumbassed.

    I think there is a reason the wife doesn't let me balance the checkbook.

    I tend to forget that can does not imply ought.

    --
    "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
    --Dr.W.Edwards Deming