Some people, you know, just like complicated ancient technologies, like "drag and drop" and "sync" using some free tools (like amarok on Linux, or Mediamonkey on Windows). It makes you wonder if their dicks are as big as yours. Non-confirmist hippies and their refusal to sell their soul. They just don't know the pleasure of bondage, like you and me!
I call bullshit on you, because they listened to us (the users) on "Anyone remember being able to have multiple queues on your (shared) account with someone? Thrown out, in the name of "efficiency" to much booing.". Go spread your MS hatred somewhere else.
We are talking about Netflix. Yes, they are a company looking for making profit, but they are also one of the few companies who have a solid record of listening to their customers. I have nothing but positive experience with Netflix. Give them a chance - let's see how they will react to this.
If the artists are represented by RIAA, movies by MPAA and writers by Author's Guild, I have no moral problem with piracy. But at the same time, all the files I have on my computers are from legal source - CDs (older) and amazon.com (newer).
I believe its good news because TPB prosecution stinks of corporate thuggery. And at the same time, RIAA and their ilk are going after innocent people with countless cases filed every year. They do not deserve anything out of this.
But From TFA: "What has been shown in court today is that the prosecutor cannot prove that the.torrent files he is using as evidence actually used The Pirate Bay's tracker. Many of the screenshots being used clearly state there is no connection to the tracker. Additionally, prosecutor HÃ¥kan Roswall didn't adequately explain the function of DHT which allows for so called "trackerless" torrents."
So, it is only matter of time they are back later with stronger evidences?
Summary: "The conclusion being that relational databases and key value stores aren't really mutually exclusive and instead are different tools for different requirements."
The term 'pornography' when used in relation to an offence is not defined in any statutes in India but the term 'obscenity' has been effectively explained in two statutes in India, and these legislations prescribe that 'obscenity' in certain circumstances constitutes an offence. These legislations are (i) The Indian Penal Code, 1860 ('IPC') and (ii) The Information Technology Act, 2000 ('IT Act').
Although neither the IPC nor the IT Act defines what 'obscenity' is, section 292 of the IPC and section 67 of the IT Act, (which corresponds to section 292 of the IPC) explain 'obscenity' to mean anything which is lascivious or appeals to the prurient interest or if its effect is to deprave and corrupt persons. Therefore according to the law in India, anything that is lascivious or appeals to the prurient interest or if its effect is to deprave and corrupt persons would be considered to be 'obscene'.
Obscenity as an offence under the Indian Penal Code.
Section 292 of the IPC comprehensively sets out the circumstances in which 'obscenity' and / or any 'obscene' material is an offence.
All these efforts, for what? Copy-paste? It gives me immense satisfaction to know that people are getting dumber day by day for buying a smartphone which is not really that smart. Enough of iphone / apple bullshit.
Of course, you can't fault Apple in this case, but it should never have come to this. I salute all iphone users for falling for the hype.
Okay, here come macboys with their modpoints... 3... 2.... 1....
It's good to see that somebody in academics is appreciating the importance and usefulness of Wikipedia, instead of ranting about inaccuracies and trolls.
Now let's resume our program of bashing Wikipedia.
Slashdot Mirror
Some people, you know, just like complicated ancient technologies, like "drag and drop" and "sync" using some free tools (like amarok on Linux, or Mediamonkey on Windows). It makes you wonder if their dicks are as big as yours. Non-confirmist hippies and their refusal to sell their soul. They just don't know the pleasure of bondage, like you and me!
A wild guess - from the money they will get from the customers?
>>IBM clone users
WTF? A perfect troll/flamebait in other discussion, but an informative post when it comes to defending Apple/Mac.
Bravo!
>>how many people would be willing to buy the equivalent product that has little or no image / cool factor attached to it?
All those who are not suffering from inferiority complex?
Any article mentioning twitter is nothing but fart-sniffing.
/. in last 12 hours which has something to do with twitter. They all have been equally pointless.
This is third article here on
Here is a beginning.
http://current.com/items/89891774/supernews_twouble_with_twitters.htm
Too hip? May be I am too 'dumb' to use it?
In any case, I think this video summarizes it very well. http://current.com/items/89891774/supernews_twouble_with_twitters.htm
And, of course, everybody knows that only Apple users love their products. All others are, you know, just shills.
"+" sign is part of RFC, ffs.
Apparently, you.
I call bullshit on you, because they listened to us (the users) on "Anyone remember being able to have multiple queues on your (shared) account with someone? Thrown out, in the name of "efficiency" to much booing.". Go spread your MS hatred somewhere else.
We are talking about Netflix. Yes, they are a company looking for making profit, but they are also one of the few companies who have a solid record of listening to their customers. I have nothing but positive experience with Netflix. Give them a chance - let's see how they will react to this.
Great post!! Flamebait? No. Apple fanbois with mod points? Yes.
If the artists are represented by RIAA, movies by MPAA and writers by Author's Guild, I have no moral problem with piracy. But at the same time, all the files I have on my computers are from legal source - CDs (older) and amazon.com (newer).
I believe its good news because TPB prosecution stinks of corporate thuggery. And at the same time, RIAA and their ilk are going after innocent people with countless cases filed every year. They do not deserve anything out of this.
Good to hear this news.
.torrent files he is using as evidence actually used The Pirate Bay's tracker. Many of the screenshots being used clearly state there is no connection to the tracker. Additionally, prosecutor HÃ¥kan Roswall didn't adequately explain the function of DHT which allows for so called "trackerless" torrents."
But From TFA: "What has been shown in court today is that the prosecutor cannot prove that the
So, it is only matter of time they are back later with stronger evidences?
Headline: Is the Relational Database Doomed?
Summary: "The conclusion being that relational databases and key value stores aren't really mutually exclusive and instead are different tools for different requirements."
WTF?
"productizing their OSes"
"project-wide priorities"
"go different directions"
"bring coherence"
"end-user-oriented goals"
Okay. Now I will have to go and puke.
First, make a sucky product, and then remove some of the suckiness from it, and ALL HAIL STEVE JOBS!! Only from a fanboi.
DRM free music (even from major labels) has been in market for at least a year.
http://www.apiap.org/opinions/legal/opinion-the-law-on-pornography-in-india-and-implication-on-cyber-cafe-operators
The term 'pornography' when used in relation to an offence is not defined in any statutes in India but the term 'obscenity' has been effectively explained in two statutes in India, and these legislations prescribe that 'obscenity' in certain circumstances constitutes an offence. These legislations are (i) The Indian Penal Code, 1860 ('IPC') and (ii) The Information Technology Act, 2000 ('IT Act').
Although neither the IPC nor the IT Act defines what 'obscenity' is, section 292 of the IPC and section 67 of the IT Act, (which corresponds to section 292 of the IPC) explain 'obscenity' to mean anything which is lascivious or appeals to the prurient interest or if its effect is to deprave and corrupt persons. Therefore according to the law in India, anything that is lascivious or appeals to the prurient interest or if its effect is to deprave and corrupt persons would be considered to be 'obscene'.
Obscenity as an offence under the Indian Penal Code.
Section 292 of the IPC comprehensively sets out the circumstances in which 'obscenity' and / or any 'obscene' material is an offence.
>> appears to be the question of how to implement it best in the UI
umm... by just giving copy/paste options in the menu somewhere, just like every other freaking smartphone in world?
All these efforts, for what? Copy-paste? It gives me immense satisfaction to know that people are getting dumber day by day for buying a smartphone which is not really that smart. Enough of iphone / apple bullshit.
... 3... 2.... 1....
Of course, you can't fault Apple in this case, but it should never have come to this. I salute all iphone users for falling for the hype.
Okay, here come macboys with their modpoints
It's good to see that somebody in academics is appreciating the importance and usefulness of Wikipedia, instead of ranting about inaccuracies and trolls.
Now let's resume our program of bashing Wikipedia.
Huh...
Do you have problem with "huh" too?
I agree.
Umm... I thought that's what I said.